versus Lessons for Joint Ventures in China : A Happy Marriage but Painful Divorce by Sacha Milchten & Antoine Ryckebusch Company Presentation Founded in 1987 Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co. Limited owned by the government of Hangzhou's Shangcheng District. Founded in 1973 from the merger of Boussois-SouchonNeuvesel and Gervais Danone 1979 – 1985 : acquisition of Amora, Maille, La Pie Qui Chante, Carambar… Zong Qinghou : Chairman and managing director In 1995, Peregrine Investments Holdings introduced Zong to Danone, and discussions about joint ventures began. CEO : Franck Riboud Who are the customers? More than 1,500 first-level dealers 12,000 second-level dealers 35 provincial sales offices 2,500 sales team employees 2 million sales outlets across China Suppliers Important role of the water bottle Kind of water Exclusive deals with suppliers Supplier relations Who are the competitors? Coca-Cola Co. PepsiCo, Inc Taiwan-founded companies Uni-President Enterprise Corp. and Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp. Success of Future Cola Not worry too much about domestic competition Imitations What are the Key Success Factors of this business? Being good and tasty Being a trustmark Product quality Find the good chinese partner Innovation Culture differences and Relations To what extent are these KSF mastered by the company ✔ Product quality ✗✔Culture differences Innovation ✔✔ Find the good chinese partner and Relations good and tasty ✔Being Being a trustmark The Case : Danone versus Wahaha: Lessons for Joint Ventures in China A Happy Marriage but Painful Divorce Video Background : Formation of the joint venture Established first JV in 1996 Danone owned 51%(invest $170 million) and Wahaha owned 49% of the shares. Wahaha Group becomes a private company… But the trademark belongs to the state ! Management of the JV and the creation of competing non-JV companies Management of the JV from one of the richest men in China : Zong The conflict : Creation of a series of companies that sold the same products as the JV and used the Wahaha trademark Arbitration and Lawsuits One of the arguments of Zong’s : The JV agreement of 1996 was unfair. Danone had intention to control China’s beverage market. Foreign mergers and acquisitions should go through the anti-monopoly check. ( China should promulgate AntiMonopoly Law as soon as possible.) Dispute on the Wahaha Brand Lessons to be learned Don’t use technical legal techniques to assert or gain control in a JV Do not expect a 51% ownership interest in a JV will provide effective control Do not proceed with a JV formed on a weak legal basis : the brand name. The foreign party must actively supervise or participate in the day-to-day management of the JV Danone today in China Danone breaks up with Wahaha Group . With the end of the JV, Danone focus on other markets. Danone has continued to pursue this strategy, and has joint ventures with companies. The Chinese beverage company's expansion is no laughing matter « Thank you Danone ! » From milk to Future Cola A"patriotic" brand soon international ? Sources Wahaha : l'empire contre attaque ! www.aujourdhuilachine.com Steven M. Dickinson on the lessons to be learned from the tensions within China’s largest beverage joint venture www.chinaeconomicreview.com/cer/2007_09/Danone_v_Wahaha. html L'implantation de Danone sur le marché chinois http://danone-en- chine.wikeo.be/a.html The Chinese beverage company's expansion by Paula M. Miller www.chinabusinessreview.com/public/0409/company_profile.html Thank you ! Q&A…