Nasser Group 3 Claire, Carlee, Keelan, Cara, Cabagayle Nasser in Power Nasser’s goals for Egypt were to create independence, social justice and a better standard of living for the middle class. When Nasser came to power, he wanted to make Egypt independent of external control and provide total government control over the economy. His ability to maintain power depended on the success of his actions and how he was viewed by society like many other single party leaders. Nasser had anti-imperialist policies and connected with the concept of ‘positive neutralism.’ (Pearson 227-33) Nasser on the cover of Time Foreign Policy Nasser believed in non-alignment and embraced “positive neutralism” Attended the Non-Alignment Conference in 1961 Nasser was friends with Kermit Roosevelt, son of Franklin Roosevelt and the CIA’s Middle Eastern specialist, but a formal alliance was never made with USA Nasser was hesitant to form alliances, saying they were “too colonial” (Pearson 230) Foreign Policy Nasser formed a relationship with the USSR when they agreed to provide arms to Egypt from Czechoslovakia This relationship was not as close as the USSR would have liked Tensions in this relationship emerged because Nasser refused to embrace communism This tension prevented generous aid from being given to Egypt Nasser and Khruschev of the USSR (Pearson 230) Suez Crisis 1948: Egypt takes over Gaza after the war 1955: Relations between Israel and Egypt worsen after 39 Palestines and Egyptians are killed in a border raid Aug. 4, 1956: Nasser announces the nationalization of Suez Canal 1956: Israel, Britain, and France plot to take control of the canal by invading Egypt, but failed due to poor planning Because of this incident, Nasser appeared as a hero and became highly popular in Egypt (Pearson 231) Soldiers during the Suez Crisis Domestic Policies: Nasser After Suez Political Change June 1956: New constitution for Egyptian Republic. Stated Islam as national religion and that Egypt was part of “Arab Nation” Structure of government changed as well, now led by President with 6 year office term and supplemented by a council of ministers and a National assembly. Liberation Rally replaced in 1957 by National Union-intended to replace all political parties. Note: Nasser feared that this political freedom would result in rise of Muslim Brotherhood and communists. July 1957 National Assembly Elections, in which women voted for the first time. The Assembly was intended to have a majority of lower classes representatives, but the elections resulted in an Assembly of primarily middle-class professionals. (This may be due to the fact that there was a £50 deposit from all candidates to stand for election). (Pearson 232-33) Domestic Policies: Nasser After Suez Political Change The National Assembly was closed down in March 1958- replaced by the UAR. It was still however, able to accomplish significant changes, including: ban of employment of children under 12, measures to improve working conditions, healthcare, food distribution. Islamic Nationalism- a domestic policy under Nasser that aimed to take Egypt into a new future. Secularized religious courts, advanced women’s rights (both of which were criticized by Muslim Brotherhood) and made primary education mandatory. National Assembly 1957 (Pearson 232-33) Domestic Policies: Nasser After Suez Economic Change -Confiscation of foreign owned businesses was a result of the nationalization of the Suez Canal. -In 1957 Nasser began the “Egyptionization” of all foreign companies and agencies to reduce the dependence on foreign investment. A National Planning Committee and the Economic Organization were set up to organize this. -Five Year Plan in 1958 was set in motion to increase growth of industrial output. -Being a public and private investment plan, it wasn’t as successful as Nasser had hoped, pushing him to further nationalize after 1960. -Corruption was present in the system. Directed officials used grants towards family and friends and in exchange for bribes. -Nasser was disappointed that land reform has achieved so little. Production levels rose, but not by much. (Pearson 232-33)