2025 NCAA TOURNAMENT GUIDE
2025 NCAA
TOURNAMENT GUIDE
Comments and questions can be sent to @Matteise
@Matteise
TUESDAY
1
WEDNESDAY
16 Alabama State
11 San Diego State
16 St. Francis
11 North Carolina
FIRST FOUR
Texas 11
American 16
Xavier 11
Mount St. Mary's 16
Duke
Auburn
16 Alabama St / St. Francis
Lexington - T/S
Raleigh - F/S
8 Louisville
1
American / Mt. St. Mary's 16
Mississippi State
8
9 Creighton
Baylor
9
5 Michigan
Oregon
5
12 UC San Diego
Denver - T/S
Seattle - F/S
4 Texas A&M
Arizona
13 Yale
6 Ole Miss
11 SDSU / UNC
South
East
Atlanta
Fri/Sun
Newark
Thu/Sat
Milwaukee - F/S
BYU
Denver - T/S
Wisconsin
3
Montana 14
7 Marquette
Saint Mary's
Cleveland - F/S
Cleveland - F/S
2 Michigan State
7
Vanderbilt 10
Alabama
15 Bryant
1
6
VCU 11
14 Lipscomb
2
Robert Morris 15
Florida
16 Norfolk State
4
Akron 13
3 Iowa State
10 New Mexico
Liberty 12
Houston
Raleigh - F/S
Wichita - T/S
1
SIUE 16
8
UConn
Gonzaga
8
9
Oklahoma
Georgia
9
5
Memphis
Clemson
5
12 Colorado State
4
CORRECT PICKS
Seattle -F/S
13 Grand Canyon
6
Missouri
11 Drake
3
out of 32
West
Second Round:
out of 16
Midwest
San Francisco
Thu/Sat
Sweet Sixteen:
out of 8
Indianapolis
Fri/Sun
Wichita - T/S
Texas Tech
Providence - T/S
First Round:
Maryland
Purdue 4
High Point 13
Illinois 6
Milwaukee - F/S
Elite Eight:
out of 4
Final Four:
out of 2
7
2
Troy 14
Kansas
Providence - T/S
National Champion:
out of 1
Total:
out of 63
St. John's
15 Omaha
Texas / Xavier 11
Kentucky 3
14 UNC Wilmington
10 Arkansas
McNeese 12
UCLA 7
Lexington - T/S
Utah State 10
Tennessee 2
Wofford 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2025 Tournament
5
First Round Schedule
7
Daily Survivor Schedule
Statistics and Trends
9
Advanced Ranking Metric Systems
NCAA Tournament Team rankings across predictive and results-based metric systems
10
S-Curve Positioning
Finding over and under seeded teams by comparing “expected” and actual S-curve positioning
11
Individual and Team Stat Leaders
Statistical leaders amongst NCAA Tournament participants
17
NCAA Tournament By The Numbers
Examining NCAA Tournament trends by seed matchup, conference, and round
44
Seeding vs. Analytics
Examining NCAA Tournament 1st Round games with worse seed having better KenPom ranking
49
NCAA Tournament Coaches Performance Against Seed Expectations
Examining NCAA Tournament performance of coaches
52
A Comparison of Points Spreads - First Round 2009-024
A look at how the better seed fares under different betting conditions
55
Betting Trends: 2024-2025 Betting Data for NCAA Tournament Teams
Against the Spread and Over/Under data for all tournament teams
56
Road “Woe”rriors
Points scored and points allowed data comparing home and road performance
Teams and Regions
60
South Region - #1 Seed: Auburn
103
East Region - #1 Seed: Duke
143
Midwest Region - #1 Seed: Houston
183
West Region - #1 Seed: Florida
Misc.
223
Conference Standings
232
NCAA Tournament History Year-Year
[Note: TOC Based on digital version - Cover Page = Pg. 1]
2025 NCAA Tournament: First Round
Thursday, March 20
Lexington - Brian Anderson, Jim Jackson, Allie La Force
Team
Time
Line
M/L
Total
-2.5
-125
+105
145.5
9:15 AM
CBS
8
9
Louisville
Creighton
11:50 AM
CBS
1
16
Auburn
Bama St / St. Francis
3:50 PM
TNT
2
15
Tennesse
Wofford
-18.5
-3200
+1400
132.5
6:25 PM
TNT
7
10
UCLA
Utah State
-5.5
-235
+195
144.5
First Half
Result
Line
Providence - Andrew Cataon, Steve Lappas, Evan Washburn
Team
Time
Line
M/L
Total
9:40 AM
truTV
4
13
Purdue
High Point
-8.5
-475
+360
153.5
12:15 PM
truTV
5
12
Clemson
McNeese
-7.5
-350
+275
134.5
4:10 PM
CBS
7
10
Kansas
Arkansas
-4.5
-220
+180
145.5
6:45 PM
CBS
2
15
St. John's
Omaha
-18.5
-1650
+950
147.5
Team
Line
M/L
Total
10:30 AM
TNT
3
14
Wisconsin
Montana
-16.5
-2000
+950
149.5
1:5 PM
TNT
6
11
BYU
VCU
-2.5
-155
+130
145.5
4:25 PM
TBS
4
13
Texas A&M
Yale
-7.5
-300
+250
141.5
7:00 PM
TBS
5
12
Michigan
UC San Diego
-2.5
-165
+140
142.5
Result
Line
Team
Line
M/L
Total
11:00 AM
TBS
1
16
Houston
SIU Edwardsville
1:35 PM
TBS
8
9
Gonzaga
Georgia
-6.5
-220
+180
151.5
4:35 PM
truTV
6
11
Missouri
Drake
-6.5
-285
+230
133.5
7:10 PM
truTV
3
14
Texas Tech
UNC Wilmington
-15.5
-1600
+900
143.5
Total
Result
First Half
Result
Line
Wichita - om McCarthy, Deb Antonelli, Steve Smith, AJ Ross
Time
Result
First Half
Denver - Brad Nessler, Brendan Haywood, Dana Jacobson
Time
Total
Total
Result
First Half
Result
Spreads as of: Monday, 9:45 AM PT
Line
Total
Result
2025 NCAA Tournament: First Round
Friday, March 21
Raleigh - Ian Eagle, Bill Raftery, Grant Hill, Tracy Wolfson
Team
Time
Line
M/L
Total
+1.5
+105
-125
146.5
9:15 AM
CBS
8
9
Mississippi State
Baylor
11:50 AM
CBS
1
16
Duke
Amer. / Mt. St. Mary's
3:50 PM
TNT
1
16
Florida
Norfolk State
-26.5
6:25 PM
TNT
8
9
UConn
Oklahoma
-4.5
First Half
Result
Line
-205
+170
147.5
Team
Line
M/L
Total
9:40 AM
truTV
2
15
Alabama
Robert Morris
-22.5
-4000
+1600
165.5
12:15 PM
truTV
7
10
Saint Mary's
Vanderbilt
-4.5
-220
+180
135.5
4:25 PM
TBS
7
10
Marquette
New Mexico
-3.5
-175
+145
151.5
7:00 PM
TBS
2
15
Michigan State
Bryant
-18.5
-3000
+1200
150.5
First Half
Result
Line
Milwaukee - Kevin Harlan, Dan Bonner, Stan Van Gundy, Lauren Shehadi
Team
Time
10:30 AM
TNT
3
14
Iowa State
Lipscomb
1:5 PM
TNT
6
11
Ole Miss
SDSU / UNC
4:10 PM
CBS
3
14
Kentucky
Troy
6:45 PM
CBS
6
11
Illinois
Texas / Xavier
Line
M/L
Total
-13.5
-800
+550
143.5
-10.5
-500
+380
152.5
Result
Team
Line
M/L
Total
11:00 AM
TBS
5
12
Memphis
Colorado State
+2.5
+130
-155
147.5
1:35 PM
TBS
4
13
Maryland
Grand Canyon
-11.5
-575
+425
150.5
4:35 PM
truTV
4
13
Arizona
Akron
-15.5
-1200
+750
166.5
7:10 PM
truTV
5
12
Oregon
Liberty
-4.5
-220
+185
139.5
Total
Result
First Half
Line
Seattle - Lisa Byington, Robbie Hummel, Jalen Rose, Andy Katz
Time
Result
153.5
Cleveland - Spero Dedes, Jim Spanarkel, Jon Rothstein
Time
Total
Total
Result
First Half
Result
Spreads as of: Monday, 9:45 AM PT
Line
Total
Result
NCAA TOURNAMENT - DAILY SURVIVOR SCHEDULE
South - Atlanta
East - Newark
1st & 2nd Round
Sweet 16 & Elite 8
Sweet 16 & Elite 8
1st & 2nd Round
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
1) Duke
2) Michigan State
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
2) Alabama
3) Iowa St.
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
3) Wisconsin
4) Texas A&M
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
4) Arizona
5) Michigan
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
5) Oregon
6) Ole Miss
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
6) BYU
7) Marquette
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
7) Saint Mary's
8) Louisville
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
8) Mississippi State
9) Creighton
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
9) Baylor
10) New Mexico
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
10) Vanderbilt
11) SDSU
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
11) VCU
11) UNC
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
12) Liberty
12) UC San Diego
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
13) Akron
13) Yale
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
14) Montana
14) Lipscomb
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
15) Robert Morris
15) Bryant
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
16) American
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
16) Mt. St. Mary's
1) Auburn
16) Ala St. / St. Fran
West - San Francisco
Midwest - Indianapolis
1st & 2nd Round
Sweet 16 & Elite 8
Sweet 16 & Elite 8
1st & 2nd Round
1) Florida
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
1) Houston
2) St. John's
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
2) Tennessee
3) Texas Tech
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
3) Kentucky
4) Maryland
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
4) Purdue
5) Memphis
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
5) Clemson
6) Missouri
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
6) Illinois
7) Kansas
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
7) UCLA
8) UConn
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
8) Gonzaga
9) Oklahoma
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
9) Georgia
10) Arkansas
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
10) Utah State
11) Drake
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
11) Texas
12) Colorado State
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
11) Xavier
13) Grand Canyon
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
12) McNeese
14) UNC Wilmington
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
13) High Point
15) Omaha
Thursday - Saturday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Friday - Sunday
14) Troy
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
15) Wofford
Friday - Sunday
Thursday - Saturday
16) SIUE
16) Norfolk State
Statistics and Trends
• Advanced Ranking Metric Systems
NCAA Tournament Team rankings across predictive and results-based metric systems
• S-Curve Positioning
Finding over and under seeded teams by comparing “expected” and actual S-curve positioning
• Individual and Team Stat Leaders
Statistical leaders amongst NCAA Tournament participants
• NCAA Tournament By The Numbers
Examining NCAA Tournament trends by seed matchup, conference, and round
• Seeding vs. Analytics
A look at first round matchups when the better seed has a worse Torvik ranking than opponent.
• NCAA Tournament Coaches Performance Against Seed Expectations
Examining NCAA Tournament performance of coaches
• A Comparison of Points Spreads - First Round 2009-2024
A look at how the better seed fares under different betting conditions
• Betting Trends: 2024-2025 Betting Data for NCAA Tournament Teams
Against the Spread and Over/Under data for all tournament teams
• Road “Woe”rriors
Points scored and points allowed data comparing home and road performance
Advanced Ranking Metric Systems
Team
AVG
BPI
EM
KPI
NET
TR
WAB
AVG
BPI
EM
KPI
NET
POM SOR
TR
WAB
Auburn
2.3
3
4
1
2
4
1
3
1
Baylor
32.0
19
27
52
30
29
40
27
39
Duke
2.5
1
1
6
1
1
4
2
6
Oklahoma
41.3
43
47
42
43
38
36
46
32
Houston
2.3
2
2
5
3
3
2
1
2
Arkansas
41.3
42
38
43
40
40
45
43
40
Florida
3.3
4
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
New Mexico
37.7
49
36
32
42
41
33
40
34
Tennessee
5.2
5
6
4
5
5
5
6
5
Vanderbilt
46.5
56
52
47
48
49
41
42
37
Alabama
5.3
6
5
2
6
6
6
5
4
Utah St.
42.7
44
54
34
37
51
37
49
38
Michigan St.
9.3
11
11
7
11
8
8
13
7
Texas
45.5
34
43
58
39
44
53
48
46
St. John's
10.3
12
7
10
13
12
7
15
8
Xavier
42.5
39
34
60
45
43
42
37
49
Texas Tech
9.5
8
10
21
7
7
10
7
15
San Diego St.
49.3
54
53
39
52
46
47
54
44
Iowa St.
11.0
7
8
23
9
10
13
8
18
Drake
49.2
73
49
33
56
58
32
58
41
Kentucky
14.3
17
30
9
15
16
12
17
9
VCU
34.5
33
17
36
31
30
48
29
51
Wisconsin
12.5
18
13
15
14
11
9
12
10
UNC
35.8
25
29
54
36
33
38
36
43
Texas A&M
18.2
22
23
13
18
17
17
22
11
UCSD
42.2
57
42
40
35
36
46
44
45
Purdue
19.5
21
20
12
19
19
27
18
20
Colorado St.
44.7
53
39
44
47
42
49
38
47
Maryland
13.8
13
12
17
10
13
18
10
19
McNeese
62.0
66
61
77
58
59
64
63
59
Arizona
14.2
9
14
25
12
14
20
9
16
Liberty
61.3
85
68
49
60
62
62
56
60
Michigan
22.3
29
31
8
25
26
16
26
12
Yale
73.2
67
58
74
72
74
75
79
77
Clemson
19.5
15
22
19
22
18
15
21
22
High Point
76.0
81
73
69
82
84
67
85
66
Oregon
28.0
36
37
11
29
31
21
39
14
Akron
86.7
112
98
63
91
99
66
101
65
Memphis
37.5
46
40
14
50
52
14
61
23
GCU
84.7
87
65
94
92
93
78
83
75
BYU
21.3
24
16
31
24
24
19
14
21
Lipscomb
98.7
106
104
104
84
83
115
102
92
Illinois
23.5
23
28
22
17
20
30
23
25
Troy
101.0
109
93
107
99
98
102
103
97
Missouri
23.2
31
25
29
16
15
29
16
24
UNC Wilm
97.3
111
96
88
102
105
84
109
83
Mississippi
25.5
32
33
18
28
25
22
28
13
Montana
134.7
173
160
125
143
157
90
133
79
UCLA
27.2
27
26
28
27
27
28
25
28
Rob Morris
129.3
168
137
110
139
139
101
150
95
Marquette
26.7
20
24
30
26
28
23
31
29
Wofford
142.5
139
115
133
131
120
187
145
187
Saint Mary's
23.2
30
19
20
21
22
25
24
27
Omaha
152.8
211
157
156
160
156
149
126
139
Kansas
21.0
14
15
24
20
21
26
20
26
Bryant
142.8
131
119
164
141
149
143
153
140
Louisville
19.3
28
18
16
23
23
11
19
17
Norfolk St.
164.0
171
161
167
183
180
122
195
114
Gonzaga
16.7
10
9
26
8
9
39
11
35
SIUE
213.7
240
221
225
216
217
185
218
153
Connecticut
31.7
16
21
46
32
35
31
35
36
American
214.0
227
217
214
226
237
163
244
163
Miss St.
32.8
35
35
27
34
32
34
32
30
Mt St. Mary's 221.0
239
249
184
236
250
168
263
160
Creighton
32.7
26
32
37
38
37
24
33
31
Alabama St.
265.3
276
263
256
274
273
252
274
203
Georgia
35.2
38
41
38
33
34
35
30
33
Saint Francis
298.2
307
300
273
297
311
330
301
236
AVG
BPI
EM
KPI
NET
POM SOR
TR
WAB
Team
AVG
BPI
EM
KPI
NET
POM SOR
TR
WAB
Team
AVG.:
BPI:
NET:
TR:
POM SOR
Team
KEY
Average of rankings EXCLUDING maximum and minimum value
ESPN BPI Rankings
EM:
Evan Miya Rankings
NCAA NET Rankings
POM: Ken Pomeroy Rankings
T-Rank Bart Torvik
WAB: Wins Above Bubble Rank
KPI:
SOR:
Kevin Pauga - KPI Sports
Strength of Record Rankings
@ Matteise
S-Curve Positioning
Finding Over and Under Seeded Teams
TEAM
S-DIFF
EXP
ACT
TEAM
S-DIFF
EXP
ACT
Akron
-1
54
53
Michigan St.
0
7
7
Alabama
0
6
6
Mississippi
-2
26
24
Alabama St.
0
67
67
Miss St.
-1
33
32
American
0
65
65
Missouri
0
23
23
Arizona
3
13
16
Montana
-1
59
58
Arkansas
-2
39
37
Mt St Mary's
0
66
66
Auburn
0
1
1
New Mexico
0
38
38
Baylor
4
31
35
Norfolk St.
0
63
63
ERROR
S-CURVE
TEAM
EXPECTED
S-CURVE
ACTUAL
S-CURVE
Bryant
1
61
62
UNC
10
36
46
Memphis
-17
37
20
BYU
0
21
21
Oklahoma
-3
39
36
Oregon
-10
29
19
Clemson
0
18
18
Omaha
-1
62
61
Vanderbilt
-7
46
39
Colorado St.
4
44
48
Oregon
-10
29
19
Michigan
-5
22
17
Connecticut
1
30
31
Purdue
-4
18
14
SDSU
-5
48
43
Creighton
1
32
33
Rob Morris
1
58
59
Purdue
-4
18
14
Drake
-3
47
44
Saint Francis
0
68
68
Texas
-4
45
41
Duke
-1
3
2
Saint Mary's
4
23
27
Kentucky
-3
14
11
Florida
0
4
4
SDSU
-5
48
43
Georgia
-1
35
34
SIUE
0
64
64
Gonzaga
15
15
30
St. John's
-1
9
8
GCU
1
53
54
Tennessee
0
5
5
High Point
0
52
52
Texas
-4
45
41
ERROR
S-CURVE
TEAM
EXPECTED
S-CURVE
ACTUAL
S-CURVE
Houston
2
1
3
Texas A&M
-3
16
13
Gonzaga
15
15
30
Illinois
-3
25
22
Texas Tech
1
8
9
Louisville
12
17
29
Iowa St.
0
10
10
Troy
-1
57
56
VCU
11
34
45
Kansas
8
20
28
UCSD
6
41
47
UNC
10
36
46
Kentucky
-3
14
11
UCLA
-3
28
25
Kansas
8
20
28
Liberty
1
49
50
UNC Wilm.
2
55
57
UCSD
6
41
47
Lipscomb
-1
56
55
Utah St.
-3
43
40
Colorado St.
4
44
48
Louisville
12
17
29
Vanderbilt
-7
46
39
Baylor
4
31
35
Marquette
-1
27
26
VCU
11
34
45
Maryland
3
12
15
Wisconsin
1
11
12
McNeese
-1
50
49
Wofford
0
60
60
Memphis
-17
37
20
Xavier
0
42
42
Michigan
-5
22
17
Yale
0
51
51
S-Difference is equal to the actual S-Curve ranking minus the expected S-Curve ranking.
Expected S-Curve ranking is equal to average ranking excluding the MINIMUM and
MAXIMUM ranking amongst the six computer ranking systems.
Teams with a positive S-Diff were placed on the S-Curve below in a worse than expected place,
while teams with a negative S-Diff were placed in a better than expected S-Curve position.
SEEDED ABOVE METRIC AVERAGE
SEEDED BELOW METRIC AVERAGE
@ Matteise
INDIVIDUAL STAT LEADERS
[Tournament Players Only]
Minutes Per Game
Points Per Game
Field-Goal Percentage
Min: Play 75% of School G
GP
MPG
Min: Play 75% of School G
PPG
Usage
Min 5 FG/G + 75% of G
FgM/G
%
B. Stirtz
Drake
33
39.3
P. Haggerty
Memphis
21.8
28.5
R. Kalkbrenner
Creig
7.8
65.5%
M. Mascari
Drake
33
38.5
D. Dent
N. Mex.
20.6
27.8
V. Goldin
Mich
6.1
62.3%
B. Smith
Purdue
33
36.8
TKR
Purdue
20.2
32.3
D. Dainja
Memphis
5.9
61.5%
P. Haggerty
Memphis
34
36.6
J. Ognacevic
Lips
20.1
26.2
TKR
Purdue
8.2
59.9%
L. Barrett
SMC
33
36.5
T. Johnson
Tex.
19.8
29.2
G. Ike
Gonzaga
6.5
59.6%
E. Timberlake
Bryant
32
36.0
A. Tait-Jones
UCSD
19.5
29.6
Z. Ejiofor
St. John's
5.0
57.8%
K. Woods
Rob. Mo
29
36.0
K. Jones
Marq.
19.3
29.1
K. Filewich
Wofford
5.4
57.6%
S. Ashworth
Creig
33
35.8
R. Taylor
SIUE
19.3
30.2
A. Tait-Jones
UCSD
6.3
57.6%
A. Karaban
UConn
31
35.8
J. Poulakidas
Yale
19.2
26.7
J. Ognacevic
Lipscomb
6.9
57.3%
J. Zackery
Clemson
33
35.3
J. Tonje
Wisc
19.2
28.0
N. Omier
Baylor
5.9
56.7%
Min: Play 75% of School G
APG
A/TO
Three-Point Percentage
Min 2.5 3PM/G + 75% of G
Free-Throw Percentage
3PM/G
%
Min 2.5 FTM/G + 75% of G
Assists
FTM/G
%
C. Pacheco
Mt. St. M.
2.6
46.4%
T. Bates
Missouri
2.5
94.3%
R. Nembhard
Gonzaga
9.8
4.3
D. Richards
McNeese
2.6
45.0%
K. Battle
Gonzaga
3.5
92.9%
B. Smith
Purdue
8.7
3.0
K. Brea
Kentucky
2.6
43.9%
S. Ashworth
Creighton
3.4
92.6%
Z. Zeigler
Tenn
7.3
2.4
S. Ball
UConn
2.9
42.2%
D. Jones
Auburn
2.5
92.0%
S. Ashworth
Creighton
6.8
1.9
L. Cryer
Houston
2.9
42.2%
K. Knueppel
Duke
2.8
91.4%
D. Dent
N. Mex.
6.4
2.2
R. Conwell
Xavier
3
41.8%
J. Tonje
Wisconsin
5.9
90.8%
A. Marciulionis
SMC
6.1
2.9
Z. Mayo
Kansas
2.6
41.3%
CBM
Auburn
3.3
89.4%
E. Cadeau
UNC
6.0
1.9
M. Mascari
Drake
2.6
41.0%
D. Newby
NC Wilm
4.1
89.1%
K. Jones
Marq
5.9
3.3
J. Poulakidas
Yale
3.2
40.9%
T. Johnson
Texas
3.6
89.1%
C. Hepburn
L'Ville
5.8
1.9
C. Grill
Missori
2.8
40.5%
J. Poulakidas
Yale
2.8
89.0%
H. Diarra
UConn
5.8
2.6
Steals
Rebounds
Blocked Shots
Min: Play 75% of School G
Stl/G
PF/G
Min: Play 75% of School G
3.4
H. Gray
UCSD
3.2
1.7
R. Kalkbrenner
10.9
4.0
C. Matthews
Miss St.
2.5
2.7
Auburn
10.6
3.5
C. Hepburn
L'Ville
2.5
H. Dickinson
Kansas
10.0
2.7
M. Falslev
Utah St.
D. Wolf
Michigan
9.8
2.1
S. Mitchell
N. Clifford
Colo St.
9.7
1.4
I. Schieffelin
Clemson
9.4
K. Filewich
Wofford
D. Brennan
J. Toppin
Min: Play 75% of School G
RPG
OReb
N. Junior Joseph
N. Mex
11.2
N. Omier
Baylor
J. Broome
@ Matteise
Blk/G
PF/G
Creig.
2.7
1.4
M. Gwath
SDSU
2.6
1.9
2.7
A. Dickerson
Rob Mo.
2.4
3.2
2.3
2.2
J. Broome
Auburn
2.3
2.0
Marq.
2.3
2.4
N. Bittle
Oregon
2.2
2.6
J. Anderson
Lipsc.
2.3
1.1
L. Bamgboye
VCU
2.2
2.0
3.1
B. Smith
Purdue
2.2
1.7
J. Tugler
Houston
2.1
3.2
9.4
3.6
B. Stirtz
Drake
2.2
1.4
Z. Ivisic
Arkansas
2.0
1.9
GCU
9.2
3.3
C. Howell
UCSD
2.1
2.9
E. Timberlake
BRYNT
1.8
2.8
TexTech
9.2
3.2
M. Byrd
SDSU
2.1
2.2
A. Sakenis
SIUE
1.8
1.4
TEAM STAT LEADERS [OFFENSE]
Tempo
NCAA Average: 67.2
Team
POS/G
1)
Alabama
74.6 (1)
2)
New Mexico
3)
Points Per Game
NCAA Average: 73.8
Adjusted Offensive Efficiency
NCAA Avg: 106.4
Team
PPG
Team
Eff.
1)
Alabama
91.1 (1)
1)
Auburn
129.0 (1)
73.1 (4)
2)
Gonzaga
86.6 (2)
2)
Duke
128.5 (2)
Bryant
72.3 (7)
3)
Florida
85.4 (3)
3)
Florida
127.7 (3)
4)
Grand Canyon
71.5 (15)
4)
Kentucky
85.3 (4)
4)
Alabama
127.6 (4)
5)
Illinois
71.3 (17)
5)
Akron
84.6 (8)
5)
Missouri
127.0 (5)
6)
Akron
71.2 (19)
6)
Missouri
84.5 (9)
6)
Texas Tech
126.0 (6)
7)
Kentucky
70.9 (22)
7)
Auburn
83.8 (10)
7)
BYU
125.4 (7)
8)
Memphis
70.7 (30)
8)
Illinois
83.8 (11)
8)
Purdue
125.0 (8)
61)
Clemson
64.3 (328)
61)
St. Mary's (CA)
73.5 (193)
61)
Norfolk State
106.2 (178)
62)
Wofford
63.9 (335)
62)
Alabama State
73.4 (194)
62)
Robert Morris
105.9 (185)
63)
Tennessee
63.8 (336)
63)
SIU-Edwardsville
72.6 (216)
63)
Bryant
105.8 (190)
64)
UConn
63.8 (340)
64)
St. Francis (PA)
71.1 (257)
64)
SIU-Edwardsville
101.3 (265)
65)
American
63.4 (349)
65)
San Diego State
70.9 (261)
65)
American
101.2 (268)
66)
St. Mary's (CA)
61.8 (359)
66)
Mount St. Mary's
70.4 (271)
66)
Alabama State
100.5 (282)
67)
Houston
61.4 (360)
67)
Drake
70.1 (279)
67)
St. Francis (PA)
99.9 (294)
68)
Drake
58.6 (364)
68)
American
68.6 (310)
68)
Mount St. Mary's
99.4 (298)
2PT FG%
NCAA Avg: 51.0%
3PT FG%
NCAA Avg: 33.7%
Team
2PT FG%
1)
Creighton
60.5 (2)
2)
Alabama
3)
FT%
NCAA Avg: 71.7%
Team
3PT FG%
Team
FT%
1)
Houston
39.8 (2)
1)
Wisconsin
85.5 (1)
59.7 (4)
2)
Liberty
39.5 (5)
2)
Michigan State
81.3 (3)
BYU
58.6 (6)
3)
Xavier
38.8 (6)
3)
Oklahoma
80.3 (5)
4)
Duke
58.0 (8)
4)
Purdue
38.5 (9)
4)
Gonzaga
80.3 (6)
5)
Gonzaga
57.8 (10)
5)
Yale
38.5 (9)
5)
Colorado State
78.5 (14)
6)
Michigan
57.7 (11)
6)
Memphis
38.0 (17)
6)
Xavier
78.5 (17)
7)
Utah State
57.7 (11)
7)
Texas Tech
37.9 (19)
7)
Texas Tech
78.2 (21)
8)
Liberty
57.7 (11)
8)
Duke
37.7 (20)
8)
UConn
78.2 (22)
61)
Ole Miss
51.0 (178)
61)
Grand Canyon
31.6 (285)
61)
New Mexico
68.9 (270)
62)
Robert Morris
50.7 (187)
62)
Mississippi State
31.4 (295)
62)
BYU
68.1 (286)
63)
New Mexico
50.6 (194)
63)
Norfolk State
31.3 (299)
63)
Texas A&M
67.9 (291)
64)
Mount St. Mary's
50.1 (216)
64)
Texas A&M
31.1 (316)
64)
Alabama State
67.8 (296)
65)
Houston
49.0 (267)
65)
Illinois
31.1 (316)
65)
San Diego State
67.3 (309)
66)
Texas A&M
48.0 (290)
66)
Michigan State
30.8 (325)
66)
Liberty
65.3 (338)
67)
SIU-Edwardsville
47.8 (295)
67)
St. John's
30.4 (337)
67)
SIU-Edwardsville
65.0 (340)
68)
Alabama State
45.4 (341)
68)
Troy
30.3 (339)
68)
Wofford
64.2 (351)
@ Matteise
TEAM STAT LEADERS [OFFENSE]
3PA Rate%
NCAA Avg: 39%
FTA Rate%
NCAA Avg: 33.1%
Team
3PA Rate
1)
UC San Diego
49.6 (8)
2)
Creighton
3)
Turnover Rate
NCAA Avg: 17.3%
Team
FTA Rate
Team
TO Rate
1)
Missouri
46.8 (2)
1)
Ole Miss
12.8 (3)
49.0 (10)
2)
Grand Canyon
43.9 (7)
2)
Gonzaga
13.2 (4)
BYU
48.3 (15)
3)
Drake
43.0 (11)
3)
Alabama State
13.2 (4)
4)
Wisconsin
48.1 (18)
4)
Texas A&M
41.7 (16)
4)
Auburn
13.4 (6)
5)
Louisville
48.1 (18)
5)
Alabama
40.1 (25)
5)
UC San Diego
13.4 (6)
6)
Liberty
47.7 (22)
6)
Georgia
39.8 (27)
6)
Marquette
13.5 (8)
7)
Wofford
47.7 (22)
7)
Oklahoma
39.6 (29)
7)
Wisconsin
14.1 (17)
8)
VCU
47.4 (25)
8)
Memphis
39.4 (30)
8)
Texas
14.3 (18)
61)
Gonzaga
33.5 (313)
61)
American
29.5 (289)
61)
Robert Morris
18.5 (272)
62)
St. Mary's (CA)
33.4 (315)
62)
Creighton
28.5 (313)
62)
Drake
18.6 (277)
63)
Memphis
33.1 (322)
63)
Houston
28.2 (315)
63)
Georgia
18.8 (289)
64)
Michigan State
32.7 (329)
64)
Clemson
28.2 (315)
64)
Memphis
19.2 (304)
65)
New Mexico
32.2 (333)
65)
Akron
26.8 (332)
65)
St. Francis (PA)
19.6 (321)
66)
Yale
32.0 (336)
66)
Marquette
26.1 (341)
66)
Michigan
19.8 (328)
67)
St. John's
30.3 (346)
67)
Kansas
24.3 (355)
67)
Troy
19.9 (330)
68)
Norfolk State
27.7 (360)
68)
St. Francis (PA)
23.8 (357)
68)
Mount St. Mary's
21.7 (358)
Off-Rebound Rate
NCAA Avg: 29.7%
% Of Total Pts - 2nd Chance Pts
NCAA Avg: 14.6%
Team
OR%
Team
% Of Pts
1)
Texas A&M
42.0 (1)
1)
Texas A&M
22.9% (1)
2)
St. Mary's (CA)
40.5 (2)
2)
St. John's
19.7% (5)
3)
Troy
38.6 (6)
3)
St. Mary's (CA)
19.2% (9)
4)
Florida
38.1 (8)
4)
Troy
18.1% (24)
5)
St. John's
37.3 (9)
5)
Florida
17.9% (30)
6)
VCU
36.7 (11)
6)
Bryant
17.8% (32)
7)
Houston
36.1 (15)
7)
Georgia
17.7% (34)
8)
Georgia
36.1 (15)
8)
Mississippi State
17.6% (37)
61)
UC San Diego
25.6 (307)
61)
Creighton
12.0% (310)
62)
Ole Miss
25.4 (311)
62)
American
11.9% (312)
63)
St. Francis (PA)
25.4 (311)
63)
Colorado State
11.7% (321)
64)
Xavier
25.2 (316)
64)
St. Francis (PA)
11.6% (323)
65)
Lipscomb
24.0 (330)
65)
Xavier
11.5% (327)
66)
American
23.8 (335)
66)
UC San Diego
10.1% (348)
67)
Montana
22.6 (345)
67)
Montana
9.7% (354)
68)
Liberty
18.9 (361)
68)
Liberty
8.5% (363)
@ Matteise
TEAM STAT LEADERS [OFFENSE]
% Of Total Pts - Fastbreak Pts
NCAA Avg: 12.8%
Team
% Of Pts
1)
Michigan State
20.7% (2)
2)
New Mexico
3)
% Of Total Pts - Paint Pts
NCAA Avg: 43.0%
Team
% Of Pts
1)
Norfolk State
50.3% (14)
19.7% (4)
2)
Gonzaga
50.0% (16)
Xavier
19.5% (5)
3)
New Mexico
49.3% (22)
4)
Florida
19.5% (6)
4)
Bryant
48.8% (25)
5)
Norfolk State
18.6% (10)
5)
St. Mary's (CA)
48.6% (28)
6)
Alabama State
17.9% (17)
6)
Kansas
48.5% (32)
7)
Memphis
17.6% (23)
7)
St. John's
48.4% (33)
8)
Arizona
17.2% (28)
8)
Arizona
47.9% (37)
61)
Lipscomb
10.1% (290)
61)
Ole Miss
39.7% (296)
62)
Clemson
9.4% (316)
62)
Lipscomb
39.4% (304)
63)
Wisconsin
9.3% (318)
63)
UCLA
39.4% (307)
64)
St. Mary's (CA)
8.8% (330)
64)
Texas
39.2% (310)
65)
Illinois
8.6% (335)
65)
Texas Tech
38.9% (319)
66)
Liberty
8.5% (338)
66)
Wisconsin
38.8% (321)
67)
Louisville
8.5% (341)
67)
UC San Diego
38.3% (329)
68)
Drake
8.4% (343)
68)
Alabama State
38.0% (334)
% Of Total Pts - Pts off TO
NCAA Avg: 18.2%
Team
% Of Pts
1)
UC San Diego
25.5% (3)
2)
UCLA
3)
Bench Points Per Game
NCAA Avg: 26.8%
Team
% Of Pts
1)
Michigan State
43.6% (4)
24.7% (5)
2)
Missouri
42.7% (7)
Iowa State
24.5% (6)
3)
Akron
40.6% (11)
4)
Marquette
23.3% (13)
4)
BYU
38.0% (24)
5)
Vanderbilt
23.0% (17)
5)
Alabama
37.5% (27)
6)
Houston
22.9% (18)
6)
Mississippi State
37.3% (28)
7)
St. John's
22.7% (22)
7)
Vanderbilt
36.4% (32)
8)
Drake
22.6% (23)
8)
Arizona
36.4% (33)
61)
Kentucky
15.9% (300)
61)
Bryant
19.7% (321)
62)
Wofford
15.8% (304)
62)
Marquette
19.2% (327)
63)
Omaha
15.2% (327)
63)
Robert Morris
19.1% (329)
64)
Lipscomb
14.9% (328)
64)
St. John's
19.1% (330)
65)
Wisconsin
14.6% (332)
65)
UC San Diego
18.5% (335)
66)
Alabama
13.6% (352)
66)
Creighton
18.2% (338)
67)
Creighton
12.4% (361)
67)
Lipscomb
15.7% (355)
68)
Illinois
12.3% (362)
68)
Maryland
15.4% (358)
@ Matteise
TEAM STAT LEADERS [DEFENSE]
Points Per Game Allowed
NCAA Avg: 72.1
Team
PPG
1)
Drake
58.4 (1)
2)
Houston
3)
Adjusted Defensive Efficiency
NCAA Avg: 106.4
Team
Eff.
1)
Houston
88.0 (1)
58.5 (2)
2)
St. John's
89.1 (2)
St. Mary's (CA)
60.7 (5)
3)
Tennessee
91.1 (3)
4)
UC San Diego
61.6 (6)
4)
Duke
91.3 (4)
5)
Duke
61.9 (7)
5)
Michigan State
91.8 (5)
6)
VCU
62.4 (8)
6)
Maryland
92.0 (6)
7)
Liberty
62.9 (10)
7)
Iowa State
92.3 (8)
8)
Tennessee
63.0 (11)
8)
St. Mary's (CA)
92.8 (9)
61)
Akron
74.5 (254)
61)
Mount St. Mary's
107.5 (199)
62)
Illinois
74.6 (259)
62)
High Point
108.1 (213)
63)
Oklahoma
74.8 (264)
63)
Omaha
108.4 (221)
64)
Vanderbilt
74.8 (267)
64)
Montana
109.0 (235)
65)
North Carolina
75.0 (272)
65)
Norfolk State
109.0 (237)
66)
Omaha
75.0 (273)
66)
Alabama State
109.6 (246)
67)
Kentucky
77.9 (324)
67)
Wofford
109.7 (248)
68)
Alabama
81.4 (356)
68)
St. Francis (PA)
112.0 (289)
2PT FG%
NCAA Avg: 51.0%
3PT FG%
NCAA Avg: 33.8%
Team
2PT FG%
Team
3PT FG%
1)
Duke
43.4 (3)
1)
Tennessee
27.8 (1)
2)
VCU
43.6 (4)
2)
Michigan State
27.9 (2)
3)
Houston
43.9 (5)
3)
Liberty
28.0 (3)
4)
San Diego State
45.0 (8)
4)
Auburn
29.2 (5)
5)
St. John's
45.8 (11)
5)
Florida
29.6 (7)
6)
St. Mary's (CA)
45.8 (11)
6)
Gonzaga
30.2 (15)
7)
Creighton
45.8 (11)
7)
San Diego State
30.4 (19)
8)
Florida
45.9 (14)
8)
Oklahoma
30.5 (20)
61)
Montana
53.1 (268)
61)
UNC Wilmington
34.4 (214)
62)
American
53.1 (268)
62)
Wofford
34.5 (223)
63)
St. Francis (PA)
53.4 (278)
63)
BYU
34.8 (242)
64)
Omaha
53.5 (283)
64)
UConn
35.1 (257)
65)
Kentucky
53.7 (289)
65)
Omaha
35.1 (257)
66)
Drake
54.3 (303)
66)
Baylor
35.4 (275)
67)
Oklahoma
54.9 (322)
67)
Mississippi State
36.1 (313)
68)
Purdue
56.4 (348)
68)
Vanderbilt
36.9 (337)
@ Matteise
TEAM STAT LEADERS [DEFENSE]
Opponent 3PA Rate%
NCAA Avg: 39.1%
Team
3PA Rate
1)
Illinois
30.4 (3)
2)
St. Mary's (CA)
3)
Opponent FTA Rate%
NCAA Avg: 33.2%
Team
FTA Rate
1)
Creighton
16.9 (1)
31.3 (6)
2)
Lipscomb
22.3 (8)
Texas Tech
34.1 (29)
3)
St. Mary's (CA)
25.0 (18)
4)
UConn
34.2 (35)
4)
Duke
25.4 (21)
5)
Liberty
34.4 (41)
5)
Maryland
25.9 (26)
6)
Grand Canyon
34.4 (41)
6)
Liberty
26.3 (30)
7)
Auburn
34.8 (50)
7)
Mount St. Mary's
26.7 (34)
8)
Montana
35.0 (54)
8)
Louisville
26.8 (36)
61)
Mount St. Mary's
44.5 (333)
61)
San Diego State
37.2 (289)
62)
UCLA
44.8 (337)
62)
Omaha
37.7 (296)
63)
Tennessee
45.1 (340)
63)
Alabama State
38.7 (308)
64)
Wofford
45.8 (344)
64)
Vanderbilt
39.0 (310)
65)
McNeese
46.6 (351)
65)
Auburn
39.2 (312)
66)
Texas A&M
47.0 (352)
66)
Texas
39.3 (319)
67)
San Diego State
47.3 (354)
67)
Ole Miss
39.5 (321)
68)
Yale
48.0 (359)
68)
UConn
40.0 (332)
Forced Turnover Rate
NCAA Avg: 17.3%
Team
TO Rate
1)
UC San Diego
23.3 (2)
2)
UCLA
3)
Opponent Off-Rebound Rate
NCAA Avg: 29.9%
Team
OR%
1)
Michigan State
24.6 (8)
22.8 (5)
2)
St. Mary's (CA)
24.9 (9)
Drake
22.1 (10)
3)
Xavier
25.2 (14)
4)
St. John's
21.9 (12)
4)
Colorado State
25.3 (16)
5)
Iowa State
21.8 (14)
5)
Omaha
25.4 (18)
6)
Houston
21.7 (17)
6)
New Mexico
25.6 (20)
7)
McNeese
21.6 (18)
7)
Drake
25.8 (22)
8)
Marquette
21.5 (19)
8)
Yale
25.8 (22)
61)
North Carolina
15.2 (306)
61)
Baylor
31.2 (250)
62)
Omaha
14.9 (319)
62)
McNeese
31.3 (257)
63)
Wofford
14.9 (319)
63)
Oklahoma
31.7 (275)
64)
Wisconsin
14.5 (331)
64)
Georgia
31.8 (278)
65)
Kentucky
14.0 (340)
65)
Troy
32.0 (287)
66)
Alabama
13.5 (348)
66)
Missouri
32.2 (296)
67)
Illinois
12.7 (359)
67)
Memphis
32.3 (302)
68)
Creighton
11.7 (361)
68)
Norfolk State
33.8 (335)
@ Matteise
NCAA TOURNAMENT TRENDS: 2009-2024
Better Seed Performance By Round
Straight-Up and Against the Spread
Straight-Up
Against The Spread
-Round of 64-
-Second Round-
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
0%
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2022
0%
2024
2009
2011
2013
-Sweet 16100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2022
2024
2019
2022
2024
-Elite 8-
100%
0%
2015
2017
2019
2022
0%
2024
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
Better Seed Performance: Straight-Up
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
Last 10 Tournaments
Last 15 Tournaments
1) Round of 64
20-12
21-10
22-10
25-7
21-11
228-91 (71.5%)
341-138 (71.2%)
2) Second Round
15-1
10-6
10-6
11-5
14-2
117-43 (73.1%)
178-62 (74.2%)
3) Sweet 16
5-3
6-2
4-4
4-4
3-5
51-29 (63.8%)
77-43 (64.2%)
4) Elite 8
1-3
3-1
4-0
1-3
3-1
22-18 (55.0%)
30-30 (50.0%)
Total
41-19
40-19
40-20
41-19
41-19
418-181 (69.8%)
626-273 (69.6%)
Better Seed Performance: Against The Spread
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
Last 10 Tournaments
Last 15 Tournaments
1) Round of 64
11-21-0
14-17-0
15-17-0
19-13-0
19-13-0
149-165-5 (47.5%)
225-245-9 (47.9%)
2) Second Round
10-6-0
9-7-0
5-11-0
8-8-0
10-6-0
81-79-0 (50.6%)
127-113-0 (52.9%)
3) Sweet 16
3-5-0
5-3-0
3-5-0
4-4-0
3-5-0
41-36-3 (53.2%)
58-58-4 (50.0%)
4) Elite 8
1-3-0
2-2-0
4-0-0
0-4-0
3-1-0
16-22-2 (42.1%)
23-35-2 (39.7%)
Total
25-35-0
30-29-0
27-33-0
31-29-0
35-25-0
287-302-10 (48.7%)
433-451-15 (49.0%)
@ Matteise
% Calculated as W/(W+L)
1 Seed vs. 16 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
4-0
1-3-0
0-4-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-23.2
-24.4
-23.4
2021
4-0
2-2-0
1-3-0
Game Over/Under:
142.2
144.0
141.2
2022
4-0
2-2-0
1-2-1
Total Points Scored
143.4
142.7
142.1
2023
3-1
1-3-0
2-2-0
2024
4-0
4-0-0
2-2-0
1 Seed - Points Scored
83.8
83.7
82.8
Last 10
38-2
20-20-0
18-19-3
16 Seed - Points Scored
59.6
59.0
59.4
'09-'24
58-2
31-29-0
25-32-3
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
1 Seed
4.1
16 Seed
218.8
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
3.7
4.5
119.1
(11)
119.9
(9)
119.9
(10)
91
(11)
90.8
(12)
91.2
(15)
9.3
(3)
9.1
(3)
9.4
(3)
209.9
208.1
101.5
(212)
101.9
(195)
101.8
(201)
105.6
(210)
105.7
(222)
105.5
(210)
-7.6
(166)
-7.1
(164)
-7.6
(169)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When favored by 20 or more points the #1 Seed is 24-25 ATS (2 G by no more than +/- 1 pt of spread, #1 Seed 0-2), O/U is 21-25 in these G.
- and the O/U is no more than 140 points, the #1 Seed is 10-14 ATS, O/U 11-12.
- and the #16 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 200 of worse, #1 Seed is 16-7 ATS, with 7 covers by 10 or more points.
- since 2015, the #1 Seed has led by 15+ points at HT in 10 of 17 G. [2022-2024: 15+ HT lead 1 time in 6 G, LY UConn/Stetson]
- and the #16 has a Bart Torvik ranking of 199 or better, #1 Seed is 8-18 ATS, w/ 4 ATS L's by no more than 3 points.
- When favored by no more than 19.5 points, the #1 Seed is 7-4 ATS -- from 2019-2024 only 1 G.
- When the O/U is set at 145 or higher, #1 Seed is 13-12 ATS and the O/U is 10-13.
- When the O/U is set at 140 or lower, #1 Seed is 13-16 ATS and the O/U is 13-15.
- When the O/U result is OVER, the #1 Seed is 12-13 ATS -- when the O/U goes UNDER, the #1 Seed is 18-14 ATS.
- In G that have gone OVER, avg score: 87.8-64.3, HT: 43.1-28.4, Better Seed OE Rank: 17.8, DE: 13.4, Worse Seed OE Rank: 217.4, DE: 189.8
- In G that have gone UNDER, avg score: 77.4-54, HT: 36.5-25.7, Better Seed OE Rank: 7.5, DE: 14.6, Worse Seed OE Rank: 193.4, DE: 193.1
- Over last 60 G, when the #1 Seed scores 85 or fewer points, the #1 Seed is 14-22 ATS --- 10-19 ATS since 2012.
- Over last 60 G, when the #16 scores 70 or fewer points, the #1 Seed is 29-22 ATS, O/U is 17-31.
- Over last 60 G, the average halftime score is #1 Seed: 39.5 points to #16 Seed 26.8 points.
- At the half, when the #1 Seed trails or leads by 8 or fewer points, #1 Seed is 3-19 ATS.
- At the half, when the #1 Seed leads by 10 or more points, the #1 Seed is 27-10 ATS --- by 15 or more points, the #1 Seed is 23-7 ATS.
- When #1 Seed comes from a conference outside of Tier 1, #1 Seed is 3-4 ATS.
- When #1 Seed comes for a Tier 1 conference and the #16 Seed from a tier 1 through 4 conference, #1 Seed is 9-0 S/U, 4-5 ATS.
- When #1 Seed comes for a Tier 1 conference and the #16 Seed from a tier 5 or 6 conference the #1 Seed is 24-20 ATS...and has a Torvik
ranking of 200 or worse, #1 Seed is 20-1 S/U and 13-8 ATS. ['23, Purdue/FDU].
- When #1 Seed has an adj. def-eff ranking of 10 or better, the O/U is 15-13 avg #16 PPG: 58.6, when ranking is 25 or worse: O/U 4-6, 60 PPG.
- When #16 Seed has an offensive efficiency ranking of 150 or better (17 G), the #16 Seed averages 59.8 PPG (60 or more 9 times) — when
ranking is 225 or worse (20 G) the #16 Seed averages 56.1 PPG (60 or more 6 times).
- When #16 Seed has a defensive efficiency ranking of 150 or better (19 G), the #1 Seed averages 79.6 points per game (#1 Seed avg. OE rank:
9.3) — when ranking is 225 or worse (22 G) the #1 Seed averages 87.6 points per game (#1 Seed avg. OE rank: 8.4).
- When #16 Seed has an offensive turnover rate ranking of 200 or worse, #1 Seed is 18-9 ATS, O/U 13-13, when 100 or better: 8-13, 10-10.
- When #16 Seed has an opponent off-reb rate ranking of 225 or worse, #1 Seed is 14-9 ATS, O/U 7-14, when 100 or better: 8-8, 7-8-1.
- When #16 Seed shoots 35% or better on its 3PA for season, #1 Seed is 11-15 ATS -- when below 33%, #1 Seed is 10-7 ATS.
- When #16 Seed has an eFG% ranking of 100 or better, #1 Seed is 9-9 ATS, O/U 4-11, when 200 or worse: ATS 14-10, O/U 15-9.
- When both teams have an adj. tempo ranking of 150 or better, the average total points scored is 155.8 points, O/U is 10-7. When both teams
have an adj. tempo rank of 151 or worse, the average total points scored is 132.2, O/U is 11-15.
- When #1 Seed has top 30 ranking in both adj. off. efficiency AND 3PT FG%, #1 Seed is 14-8 ATS -- 2009-17: 9-3 ATS, since 5-5, 2-2 in 2024.
@ Matteise
1 Seed vs. 16 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
Spread
(O/U)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
126.8
(1)
94.1
(13)
(2) Connecticut
BE - Tier 1
91
*
-27.5
(145.5)
52
Stetson (230)
ASun - Tier 5
108.4
(117)
114.1
(346)
117.8
(21)
93.3
(7)
(8) North Carolina
ACC - Tier 1
90
*
-24.5
(133.5)
62
Wagner (300)
NEC - Tier 6
95.2
(335)
105.4
(179)
118.5
(18)
85.3
(1)
(1) Houston
B12 - Tier 1
86
*
-24.5
(129.5)
46
Longwood (170)
BSth - Tier 4
103.6
(205)
104.2
(149)
126.1
(2)
94.3
(15)
(3) Purdue
B10 - Tier 1
78
*
-26.5
(138.5)
50
Grambling St. (282)
SWAC - Tier 6
97.4
(310)
106.3
(197)
118.5
(8)
92.6
(16)
(6) Purdue
B10 - Tier 1
58
-23.5
*
(146.5)
63
Fairleigh Dickinson (307)
NEC - Tier 6
104.6
(149)
117
(361)
117.1
(12)
88
(3)
(1) Houston
Amer - Tier 2
63
*
-19.5
(121.5)
52
Northern Kentucky (173)
Horz - Tier 4
101.1
(225)
101.1
(130)
115.4
(16)
88.3
(5)
(2) Alabama
SEC - Tier 1
96
*
-24.5
(153.5)
75
Texas A&M Corpus Chris
(191)
Slnd - Tier 6
104.4
(155)
106.2
(241)
112.9
(29)
91.5
(11)
(13) Kansas
B12 - Tier 1
96
*
-21.5
(146.5)
68
Howard (231)
MEAC - Tier 5
100.9
(229)
105.7
(228)
117.5
(8)
90.7
(14)
(3) Baylor
B12 - Tier 1
85
*
-20.5
(138.5)
49
Norfolk St. (196)
MEAC - Tier 6
99.9
(217)
102
(179)
120.2
(5)
92.9
(24)
(4) Kansas
B12 - Tier 1
83
*
-22
(146)
56
Texas Southern (191)
SWAC - Tier 6
96.9
(273)
98.6
(112)
118
(7)
92.4
(21)
(5) Arizona
P12 - Tier 1
87
*
-21.5
(157)
70
Wright St. (202)
Horz - Tier 5
104.2
(130)
106.9
(273)
120.9
(3)
88.5
(7)
(1) Gonzaga
WCC - Tier 2
93
*
-22.5
(149.5)
72
Georgia St. (152)
SB - Tier 4
100.8
(198)
99.4
(125)
117.7
(8)
90.8
(15)
(4) Michigan
B10 - Tier 1
82
*
-25
(141)
66
Texas Southern (216)
SWAC - Tier 6
97.9
(235)
103.2
(209)
117.4
(9)
90.8
(16)
(5) Illinois
B10 - Tier 1
78
*
-22.5
(143)
49
Drexel (130)
CAA - Tier 4
106.2
(92)
103.6
(218)
123.3
(3)
93.5
(37)
(3) Baylor
B12 - Tier 1
79
*
-25.5
(138.5)
55
Hartford (190)
AE - Tier 5
96.7
(260)
99.2
(125)
125.3
(1)
89.6
(10)
(1) Gonzaga
WCC - Tier 2
98
*
-33
(154)
55
Norfolk St. (211)
MEAC - Tier 6
99
(216)
103.9
(227)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
1 Seed vs. 16 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
--
--
--
9-0 (4-5)
25-1 (15-11)
17-1 (9-9)
51-2 (28-25)
82.7-59.4
2
--
--
--
2-0 (0-2)
--
3-0 (2-1)
5-0 (2-3)
81-57.2
3
--
--
--
2-0 (1-1)
--
--
2-0 (1-1)
65-41.5
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
--
--
--
13-0 (5-8)
25-1 (15-11)
20-1 (11-10)
58-2 (31-29)
82.0-58.6
Avg. Score
--
--
--
77.2-56.6
83.4-59.8
83.1-58.4
82-58.6
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
2 Seed vs. 15 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
4-0
2-2-0
3-1-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-16.1
-16.5
-16.8
2021
3-1
1-3-0
2-2-0
Game Over/Under:
143.3
142.1
141.6
2022
3-1
2-2-0
3-1-0
Total Points Scored
141.9
140.8
141.6
2023
3-1
3-1-0
1-3-0
2024
4-0
4-0-0
2-2-0
2 Seed - Points Scored
79.5
78.7
79.3
Last 10
36-4
22-17-1
18-22-0
15 Seed - Points Scored
62.4
62.2
62.3
'09-'24
53-7
31-26-3
29-31-0
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
2 Seed
7.7
15 Seed
147.3
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
7.4
7.7
117.1
(17)
117.7
(15)
118.1
(14)
92.3
(20)
92.2
(24)
92.4
(23)
7.0
(7)
7.2
(7)
7.6
(7)
146.7
148.3
104.5
(161)
104.1
(158)
104.1
(159)
102.4
(156)
102
(156)
102.3
(155)
-5.4
(129)
-4.8
(123)
-4.9
(121)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When favored by 20 or more points, the #2 Seed is 5-5-1 ATS (2 G by no more than +/- 1 point of spread, #2 Seed 1-0-1).
- When favored by 14 or fewer points, the #2 Seed is 8-5 ATS and the O/U has gone under in 10 of 13 games.
- In G's w/ an O/U total of 143 or higher, the #2 Seed is 10-13-1 ATS and the O/U is 6-18.
- In G's w/ an O/U total of 140 or less, the #2 Seed is 19-11-2 ATS & the O/U is 21-11. The #2 Seed has led at HT in 29 of 32 G, by 10+ pts 19x.
- When the #2 Seed wins and covers, the O/U is 11-20, 12 games within +/-3 points of game total.
- In games where #2 Seed wins by 15 or more points, the #2 Seed is 31-6-3 ATS (6 G by no more than +/- 1 point of spread), O/U is 17-23.
- In games won by the #15 Seed...
- The #15 Seed has been leading or tied at the half in 5 of 7 games, largest HT deficit of 2 points.
- The #15 Seed has had a Bart Torvik ranking of 130 or better 5 times - excluding 2012 Norfolk St. (190), avg. BT rank of #15: 120.7.
- #2 Seed from Tier 1 Conf vs. #15 Seed from a Tier 1-4 Conference, #2 Seed is: 22-3 S/U, 14-11 ATS, O/U 11-14 -- avg. score: 77.8-61.4
- #2 Seed from Tier 1 Conf vs. #15 Seed from a Tier 5 or 6 Conference, #2 Seed is: 27-4 S/U, 15-13-3 ATS, O/U 15-16 -- avg. score: 79.3-63.0.
- When #15 Seed has a WAB Rank of 100 or better, the #2 Seed is 16-5 S/U, 8-12-1 ATS -- average score: 79.3-65.4.
- When #15 Seed has a WAB rank of 125 or worse, the #2 Seed is 20-2 S/U, 15-7 ATS -- average score: 79.1-61.1.
- When #2 Seed scores under 80 points, the O/U is 12-21, O/U is 3-16 when #2 Seed scores 75 or fewer points.
- When #15 Seed scores 70 or more points, the #2 Seed is 10-6 S/U, 1-14-1 ATS, O/U is 12-4, less than 70: S/U 43-1, ATS 30-12-2, O/U 17-27.
- At H/T, #2 Seed leading by 10 or more points: 33-0 S/U, 22-8-3 ATS, O/U 17-16.
- At H/T, #2 Seed when trailing OR leading by less than 10 points: 20-7 S/U, 9-18 ATS, and the O/U is 12-15.
- #2 Seed with a top 20 adjusted offensive AND defensive efficiency ranking is 19-0 S/U and 14-4-1 ATS. Since 2015, 9-4 ATS.
- #2 Seed with a top 50 3PT FG rate ranking is 5-2 ATS, 1-6 O/U, when rate ranking is 300 or worse 5-5-1 ATS, 9-2 O/U.
- When the #15 Seed's 3PT FG ranking is...
- 50 or better the O/U is 1-7.
- 250 or worse, #2 Seed is 13-5-1 ATS.
- #2 Seed with defensive efficiency ranking...
- of 30 or worse: 15-5 S/U, 7-13 ATS, O/U: 6-14.
- of 50 or worse: 5-3 S/U, 1-7 ATS, 2-6 O/U.
- When the #15 Seed had a defensive efficiency ranking of...
- of 125 or better, #2 Seed is 15-4 S/U, 9-10 ATS, O/U is 8-11. Average Score: 76.7-62.0.
- of 200 or worse, #2 Seed is 14-1 S/U, 9-6 ATS, O/U is 5-10. Average Score: 81.3-64.3.
- #2 Seed with an adj. tempo rank of 200 or slower AND an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 50 or better is 16-2 S/U and 13-4-1 ATS.
- When the #15 Seed has an adjusted defensive efficiency total of 103 or higher (1.03+ PPP), #2 Seed is 20-1 (13-8), and O/U is 8-13.
- When the #15 Seed has an adjusted defensive efficiency total of 100 or better (<=1 PPP), #2 Seed is 16-5 (8-12-1), and O/U is 12-9.
@ Matteise
2 Seed vs. 15 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
Spread
(O/U)
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
113.4
(55)
87.5
(2)
(6) Iowa St.
B12 - Tier 1
82
*
-15.5
(135.5)
65
South Dakota St. (139)
Sum - Tier 5
107.7
(132)
105.2
(176)
121.6
(7)
93.3
(8)
(5) Arizona
P12 - Tier 1
85
*
-19.5
(163.5)
65
Long Beach St. (196)
BW - Tier 4
105.2
(180)
107.9
(228)
118.7
(16)
94.3
(16)
(9) Marquette
BE - Tier 1
87
*
-14.5
(156.5)
69
Western Kentucky (133)
CUSA - Tier 4
104.5
(195)
101.3
(99)
115.4
(33)
91.1
(3)
(7) Tennessee
SEC - Tier 1
83
*
-21.5
(130.5)
49
St. Peter's (209)
MAAC - Tier 5
97.2
(313)
100.7
(90)
119
(4)
96
(47)
(11) Marquette
BE - Tier 1
78
*
-10.5
(141.5)
61
Vermont (103)
AE - Tier 5
107.9
(94)
101.2
(133)
114.6
(20)
91.6
(12)
(9) Texas
B12 - Tier 1
81
*
-13.5
(149.5)
61
Colgate (113)
Pat - Tier 6
111.7
(40)
105.8
(231)
119.7
(3)
95.4
(41)
(7) Arizona
P12 - Tier 1
55
-14.5
*
(153.5)
59
Princeton (106)
Ivy - Tier 3
107.6
(97)
101.6
(142)
113.2
(26)
87.4
(2)
(3) UCLA
P12 - Tier 1
86
-17.5
(136.5)
53
UNC Asheville (187)
BSth - Tier 5
101.2
(219)
102.4
(153)
119.1
(6)
93.9
(33)
(8) Kentucky
SEC - Tier 1
79
85
St. Peter's (127)
MAAC - Tier 4
97.6
(261)
94.1
(36)
112.7
(23)
89.6
(10)
(11) Auburn
SEC - Tier 1
80
*
-14.5
(140)
61
Jackonsville St. (140)
ASun - Tier 5
104
(136)
101.7
(168)
117.1
(9)
93
(26)
(10) Villanova
BE - Tier 1
80
*
-15
(135.5)
60
Delaware (132)
CAA - Tier 4
106.8
(84)
103.2
(209)
120.4
(4)
94.4
(39)
(6) Duke
ACC - Tier 1
78
*
-18.5
(145)
61
Cal St. Fullerton (182)
BW - Tier 4
102
(175)
103.2
(208)
110.7
(39)
88.6
(4)
(11) Alabama
SEC - Tier 1
68
*
-17
(147)
55
Iona (143)
MAAC - Tier 5
100.7
(180)
98.8
(116)
119
(5)
89.4
(8)
(2) Houston
Amer - Tier 2
87
*
-20.5
(134.5)
56
Cleveland St. (176)
Horz - Tier 4
99.2
(214)
99.7
(135)
121.4
(4)
97.1
(88)
(10) Ohio St.
B10 - Tier 1
72
75
Oral Roberts (156)
Sum - Tier 5
107.5
(72)
106.7
(275)
123.7
(2)
96.5
(78)
(6) Iowa
B10 - Tier 1
86
74
Grand Canyon (91)
WAC - Tier 5
103.6
(131)
95.5
(65)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
*
-18
(132)
-15.5
(156)
*
*
*
-13.4
(144.5)
2 Seed vs. 15 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
--
--
3-1 (3-1)
19-2 (11-10)
17-3 (9-9)
10-1 (6-4)
49-7 (29-24)
78.6-62.3
2
--
--
--
4-0 (2-2)
--
--
4-0 (2-2)
80.5-63.8
3
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
--
--
3-1 (3-1)
23-2 (13-12)
17-3 (9-9)
10-1 (6-4)
53-7 (31-26)
78.75-62.4
Avg. Score
--
--
72.0-58.0
79.2-62.4
79.8-64.7
78.4-60.1
78.8-62.4
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
3 Seed vs. 14 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
4-0
3-1-0
0-4-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-12.8
-11.9
-12.0
2021
3-1
2-2-0
2-2-0
Game Over/Under:
143.6
143.6
143.0
2022
4-0
3-1-0
2-2-0
Total Points Scored
144.4
142.5
142.8
2023
4-0
2-2-0
1-3-0
2024
3-1
3-1-0
2-2-0
3 Seed - Points Scored
80.4
78.8
77.6
Last 10
34-6
21-19-0
18-22-0
14 Seed - Points Scored
64.0
63.7
65.2
'09-'24
52-8
32-27-1
25-35-0
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
3 Seed
15.5
14 Seed
133.3
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
16
15.4
117.8
(19)
116.3
(22)
116.8
(21)
96.1
(60)
94.6
(47)
94.5
(42)
5.6
(11)
5.5
(12)
6.0
(12)
119.3
116.8
105.4
(142)
105.5
(133)
105.9
(128)
102.1
(150)
100.6
(129)
100.9
(128)
-3.6
(98)
-2.7
(87)
-2.9
(90)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When #3 Seed is favored by 12.5 points or more, #3 Seed is 22-4 S/U and 15-11 ATS.
- When #3 Seed is favored by 9.5 points or less, #3 Seed is 16-3 S/U, 9-9-1 ATS, and the O/U is 6-13.
- When the O/U total is...
- 145 points or higher, the #3 Seed is 20-3 S/U, 9-14 ATS, and the O/U is 11-2. Average score: 80.9-70.3.
- 140 points or less, the #3 Seed is 26-5 S/U, 19-12 ATS, and the O/U is 14-17. Average score: 72.9-60.2.
- 135 or less: 17-2 S/U, 13-6 ATS, and the O/U is 8-11. Average score: 72.6-56.7
- When the #14 Seed comes from a conference with a conference tier ranking of...
- Tier 3: #3 Seed is 10-0 S/U, 6-4 ATS, 6-4 O/U. Average score: 78.5-64.8 ----- average Torvik rank of #14: 108.3
- Tier 4: #3 Seed is 18-4 S/U, 13-8-1 ATS, 7-15 O/U. Average score: 74.1-63.2 ----- average Torvik rank of #14: 109.6
- Tier 5 or 6: #3 Seed is 23-4 S/U, 13-14 ATS, 12-15 O/U. Average score: 77.2-63.9 ----- average Torvik rank of #14: 111.9
- When #3 Seed scores 75 or more points, #3 Seed is 32-2 S/U, 23-11 ATS, and the O/U is 23-11.
- When #3 Seed scores 70 or fewer points, #3 Seed is 20-6 S/U, 9-16-1 ATS, and the O/U is 2-24.
- When #14 Seed scores 65 or more points, #3 Seed is 25-5 S/U, 13-17 ATS, and the O/U is 21-9.
- When #14 Seed scores 60 or fewer points, #3 Seed is 25-3 S/U, 18-9-1 ATS, and the O/U is 3-25.
- In the 8 wins by the #14 Seed, the #14 Seed has led at halftime in 5 of 8 games and trailed by no more than 5 points in the other 3 games.
- When #14 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 125 or worse, #3 Seed is 20-2 S/U, 14-8 ATS.
- When the Bart Torvik ranking difference is at least 100 spots, the #3 Seed is 25-3 S/U, 16-12 ATS, and the O/U is 14-14.
- #3 Seed with a top 100 ranking in both offensive rebound rate AND turnover rate is 17-1 S/U and 13-5 ATS.
- #3 Seed with a turnover rate ranking of 200 or worse is 8-3 S/U, 5-6 ATS. 3 S/U wins by 4 or fewer points.
- #3 Seed with an adjusted offensive efficiency ranking of 20 or better is 26-6 S/U, 13-18-1 ATS, and the O/U is 10-22. Average score: 74.7-64.7.
- When #3 Seed does not cover, the O/U is 5-13.
- #3 Seed with an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 30 or better is 28-4 S/U, 21-11 ATS, and the O/U is 15-17. Average pts allowed: 62.2
- #3 Seed with an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 60 or worse is 12-2 S/U, 4-10 ATS, and the O/U is 3-11. Average pts allowed: 66.1
- #3 Seed w/ BOTH an adj. offensive and defensive eff. ranking of 35 or better is 18-3 S/U, 14-7 ATS, and 11-10 O/U.
- When #14 Seed has an adjusted def-efficiency ranking of 100 or better, the #3 Seed is 13-2 S/U, 11-4 ATS, O/U is 5-10. Avg #3 Seed pts: 70.9
- When #14 Seed has an adjusted def-efficiency ranking of 150 or worse, the #3 Seed is 18-2 S/U, 8-11-1 ATS, O/U is 9-11. Avg #3 Seed pts: 79
- Oakland (170) last year was first 150+ defense win since Harvard (161) in 2013, both had top 100 eFG% and WAB ranks.
- At the half, when the #3 Seed is trailing or tied, the #3 Seed is 11-5 S/U and 2-14 ATS.
- At the half, when the #3 Seed is leading, the #3 Seed is 41-3 S/U and 30-13-1 ATS.
- At the half, when the #3 Seed is leading by 6 or more points, the #3 Seed is 29-0 S/U and 24-4-1 ATS.
- #3 Seed with a WAB ranking of 10 or better is 22-2 S/U, 13-10 ATS ---- with a WAB ranking of 15 or worse: 11-3 S/U, 7-7 ATS.
@ Matteise
3 Seed vs. 14 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
Spread
(O/U)
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
124.3
(4)
100.7
(92)
(13) Illinois
B10 - Tier 1
85
*
-10.5
(145.5)
69
Morehead St. (132)
OVC - Tier 6
106.7
(149)
103.4
(138)
122.2
(6)
100.5
(86)
(18) Baylor
B12 - Tier 1
92
*
-14.5
(137.5)
67
Colgate (163)
Pat - Tier 6
102.3
(230)
102.5
(126)
122.5
(5)
101.9
(113)
(22) Kentucky
SEC - Tier 1
76
-13.5
*
(159.5)
80
Oakland (134)
Horz - Tier 4
108.2
(120)
105.1
(170)
120.4
(11)
96.3
(24)
(10) Creighton
BE - Tier 1
77
*
-11.5
(143.5)
60
Akron (128)
MAC - Tier 5
105.7
(169)
101.9
(111)
110.3
(59)
93.1
(21)
(24) Kansas St.
B12 - Tier 1
77
*
-7.5
(139.5)
65
Montana St. (97)
BSky - Tier 4
104.1
(158)
97
(62)
118.6
(7)
98.4
(81)
(17) Xavier
BE - Tier 1
72
*
-11.5
(152.5)
67
Kennesaw St. (119)
ASun - Tier 4
105
(139)
100.5
(113)
120.9
(2)
99.5
(94)
(15) Baylor
B12 - Tier 1
74
*
-10.5
(141.5)
56
UC Santa Barbara (121)
BW - Tier 4
108.7
(76)
104
(193)
122.6
(1)
98.6
(83)
(10) Gonzaga
WCC - Tier 2
82
*
-15.5
(153.5)
70
Grand Canyon (117)
WAC - Tier 3
109.8
(65)
104.5
(202)
122.6
(1)
97.5
(85)
(12) Purdue
B10 - Tier 1
78
*
-17
(144.5)
56
Yale (153)
Ivy - Tier 4
99.8
(226)
98.4
(106)
110.1
(38)
93.8
(32)
(29) Wisconsin
B10 - Tier 1
67
*
-7.5
(139.5)
60
Colgate (136)
Pat - Tier 6
106.4
(93)
103.6
(217)
110.1
(39)
86.9
(3)
(9) Tennessee
SEC - Tier 1
88
*
-18
(133.5)
56
Longwood (155)
BSth - Tier 5
104.7
(117)
103.5
(215)
109.1
(57)
85.5
(1)
(7) Texas Tech
B12 - Tier 1
97
*
-15.5
(132.5)
62
Montana St. (144)
BSky - Tier 5
103
(156)
100.8
(146)
113.5
(20)
92.8
(30)
(17) Texas
B12 - Tier 1
52
53
Ab. Christian (89)
Slnd - Tier 6
100.9
(176)
92.6
(28)
115
(12)
94.9
(58)
(22) West Virginia
B12 - Tier 1
84
*
-13
(136)
67
Morehead St. (139)
OVC - Tier 5
98.1
(233)
96.1
(73)
110
(44)
91.3
(18)
(24) Arkansas
SEC - Tier 1
85
*
-8.5
(161)
68
Colgate (55)
Pat - Tier 5
112.4
(26)
98
(104)
108.7
(59)
90.2
(11)
(25) Kansas
B12 - Tier 1
93
*
-10.5
(146)
84
Eastern Washington (93)
BSky - Tier 5
107.9
(65)
99.7
(134)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
-8.5
(139)
*
3 Seed vs. 14 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
1-0 (0-1)
--
9-0 (6-3)
17-4 (12-8)
15-2 (8-9)
7-2 (4-5)
49-8 (30-26)
75.8-64.1
2
--
--
1-0 (0-1)
1-0 (1-0)
--
1-0 (1-0)
3-0 (2-1)
81.7-57.3
3
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
1-0 (0-1)
--
10-0 (6-4)
18-4 (13-8)
15-2 (8-9)
8-2 (5-5)
52-8 (32-27)
76.1-63.8
Avg. Score
66-63
--
78.5-64.8
74.1-63.2
79.0-64.7
74.1-62.5
76.1-63.8
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
4 Seed vs. 13 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
3-1
2-2-0
2-2-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-8.4
-8.2
-9.2
2021
2-2
1-3-0
1-3-0
Game Over/Under:
141.3
137.6
140.9
2022
4-0
1-3-0
1-3-0
Total Points Scored
138.9
135.9
140.9
2023
3-1
2-2-0
2-2-0
2024
3-1
2-2-0
3-1-0
4 Seed - Points Scored
73.1
71.5
73.7
Last 10
32-8
15-24-1
18-22-0
13 Seed - Points Scored
65.8
64.4
67.1
'09-'24
47-13
26-33-1
26-34-0
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
4 Seed
17.0
13 Seed
91.1
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
17.9
17.3
115.3
(27)
114.2
(31)
115.3
(28)
93.8
(30)
93.2
(28)
93.7
(33)
4.2
(17)
4.6
(16)
4.8
(16)
91.3
92.7
109.6
(78)
108.2
(91)
107.8
(98)
100.8
(127)
99.8
(117)
99.8
(112)
-1.0
(68)
-1.4
(73)
-1.4
(72)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When #4 Seed is favored by 8.5 or more points, the #4 Seed is 32-4 S/U, 15-20-1 ATS, and the O/U is 14-22. Since 2019: 8-1 S/U, 4-5 ATS.
- S/U L's: 2011 Morehead St/L'Ville (1 pt), 2018 Buffalo/Arizona (21 pts), 2018 Marshall/Wichita St (6 pts), 2024 Yale/Auburn (2 pts).
- When #4 Seed is favored by no more than -6 points, the #4 Seed is 8-6 S/U, 6-8 ATS. Since 2019: 3-2 S/U, L's: Furman/UVA, UCI/K-State
- When the O/U is 142.5 or more points, the #4 Seed is 19-2 S/U, 12-8-1 ATS, and the O/U is 9-12. Average Score: 81.7-71.5
- When the O/U is 135 or fewer points, the #4 Seed is 17-7 S/U, 8-16 ATS, and the O/U is 11-3. When 130 or less points 10-5 S/U, 5-10 ATS.
- When #4 Seed scored 75 or more points, the #4 Seed is 22-2 S/U, 14-9-1 ATS, and the O/U is 16-8. When 80 or more 15-0 S/U, 10-4-1 ATS.
- When #4 Seed scores fewer than 70 points, the #4 Seed is 17-11 S/U, 6-22 ATS, and the O/U is 6-22. 2009-2018: 9-7 (2-14), Since: 8-4 (4-8).
- When the #13 Seed scores...
- 65 or more points, the #4 Seed is 16-10 S/U, 7-18-1 ATS, and the O/U is 19-7. 12 of 26 games decided by 6 points or less.
- 70 or more points, the #4 Seed is 11-7 S/U, 5-12-1 ATS, and the O/U is 16-2. Since 2017 5-5 S/U and 2-8 ATS.
- 60 or fewer points, the #4 Seed is 23-0 S/U, 15-8 ATS, and the O/U is 3-20. Average off-eff ranking of #14 Seed: 106.5.
- When the #4 Seed leads at halftime, the #4 Seed is 38-4 S/U, 23-18-1 ATS, and the O/U is 17-25.
- When leading by 6 or more points, the #4 Seed is 28-1 S/U and 17-11-1 ATS. L LY, Auburn led Yale 41-34 at halftime.
- When the #13 Seed leads at halftime, the #4 Seed is 7-7 S/U and 3-11 ATS. When trailing by 4+, #4 Seed is 1-6 S/U ('22 - Ill (1) vs. C'Nooga)
- When #4 Seed has BOTH a Bart Torvik & WAB ranking of 15 or better, the #4 Seed is 19-1 S/U (Aub/Yale) and 10-9-1 ATS.
- When #4 Seed has BOTH a Bart Torvik & WAB ranking of 16 or worse, the #4 Seed is 11-7 S/U and 8-10 ATS. Since 2018: 4-5 S/U.
- When the #13 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of...
- 90 or better, the #4 Seed is 24-10 S/U, 12-22 ATS, and the O/U is 17-17.
- 115 or worse, the #4 Seed is 8-1 S/U (2018 Marshall BT: 122 beat Wichita State BT: 26) and 4-4-1 ATS.
- When the Torvik ranking differential is 70 or fewer, the #4 Seed is 18-10 S/U, 11-17 ATS. When no more than 45, the #4 Seed is 5-5 S/U.
- When the Torvik ranking differential is 85 or more spots, the #4 Seed is 18-2 S/U and 11-8-1 ATS.
- When #13 Seed comes from a Tier 1-3 conference, the #4 Seed is 14-7 S/U, 7-14 ATS. Average score: 69.8-66.1, avg #13 BT Rank: 82.2
- When #13 Seed comes from a Tier 4-6 conference, the #4 Seed is 33-6 S/U, 19-19-1 ATS. Average score: 74.1-64.5, avg #13 BT Rank: 93.3
- When #13 Seed has a WAB TOTAL of 0 or higher, the #4 Seed is 9-5 S/U, when the #13's WAB TOTAL is below -2.5, the #4 Seed is 12-3 S/U.
- When the #4 Seed has an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of....
- 25 or better, the #4 Seed is 26-5 S/U, 11-20 ATS, and the O/U is 16-15. Average points scored by #14 Seed: 63.8.
- and an offensive efficiency ranking of 25 or better, the #4 Seed is 12-1 S/U, only loss Yale vs. Auburn.
- 40 or worse, the #4 Seed is 13-6 S/U, 10-9 ATS, and the O/U is 6-13. Average points scored by #14 Seed: 68.9.
- When the #13 Seed has an adjusted offensive efficiency of...
- 110 or more points (1.10 PPP), the #13 Seed averages 70.1 points (16 games).
- 105 or fewer points (1.05 PPP), the #13 Seed averages 58.4 points (16 games).
- When #4 Seed has a defensive eFG% rank of 75 or worse, the #4 Seed is 13-7 S/U, 10-10 ATS. When favored by no more than 8: 4-5 S/U.
@ Matteise
4 Seed vs. 13 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
Spread
(O/U)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
120.5
(10)
92.1
(6)
(4) Auburn
SEC - Tier 1
76
-13.5
*
(140.5)
78
Yale (88)
Ivy - Tier 3
109.7
(96)
100.4
(85)
125.6
(3)
101.4
(100)
(12) Alabama
SEC - Tier 1
109 *
-8.5
(172.5)
96
Charleston (103)
CAA - Tier 4
112.9
(58)
105.5
(180)
120.7
(8)
96.9
(26)
(11) Duke
ACC - Tier 1
64
*
-12.5
(133.5)
47
Vermont (114)
AE - Tier 5
105.4
(175)
99.8
(73)
113.9
(47)
93.3
(9)
(17) Kansas
B12 - Tier 1
93
*
-7.5
(152.5)
89
Samford (87)
SC - Tier 3
112.2
(64)
102.6
(129)
111.1
(48)
86.2
(1)
(4) Tennessee
SEC - Tier 1
58
*
-11.5
(135.5)
55
Louisiana (91)
SB - Tier 3
110.8
(51)
102.3
(151)
112.5
(31)
95.8
(43)
(32) Indiana
B10 - Tier 1
71
*
-3.5
(138.5)
60
Kent St. (75)
MAC - Tier 4
106.1
(124)
95.1
(40)
110.4
(57)
93.5
(27)
(27) Virginia
ACC - Tier 2
67
-5.5
*
(129.5)
68
Furman (95)
SC - Tier 4
111.9
(37)
104.1
(194)
118.9
(6)
92.5
(15)
(5) Connecticut
BE - Tier 1
87
*
-9.5
(140.5)
63
Iona (69)
MAAC - Tier 5
108.8
(73)
97
(63)
115.1
(15)
91.6
(16)
(13) UCLA
P12 - Tier 1
57
*
-13.5
(128)
53
Akron (145)
MAC - Tier 5
104.8
(116)
102.7
(191)
111.6
(28)
96.9
(76)
(42) Providence
BE - Tier 1
66
*
-3
(148.5)
57
South Dakota St. (75)
Sum - Tier 5
115
(16)
104
(225)
113.6
(20)
93.1
(27)
(16) Illinois
B10 - Tier 1
54
*
-8
(136.5)
53
Chattanooga (79)
SC - Tier 3
108.4
(64)
98.5
(109)
109.4
(52)
92
(18)
(21) Arkansas
SEC - Tier 1
75
*
-4.5
(139.5)
71
Vermont (72)
AE - Tier 6
108.6
(63)
97.4
(83)
117.2
(10)
93.7
(39)
(9) Florida St.
ACC - Tier 1
64
*
-11
(143.5)
54
UNC Greensboro (118)
SC - Tier 3
101.6
(159)
97.4
(95)
109.1
(55)
92.3
(27)
(33) Oklahoma St.
B12 - Tier 1
69
*
-7
(138.5)
60
Liberty (94)
ASun - Tier 5
109.1
(53)
100.8
(164)
111.5
(32)
93
(33)
(27) Purdue
B10 - Tier 1
69
-7.5
*
(124.5)
78
North Texas (82)
CUSA - Tier 3
103.7
(129)
94
(43)
114.9
(14)
93.9
(41)
(18) Virginia
ACC - Tier 1
58
-7
(130)
62
Ohio (79)
MAC - Tier 3
111.8
(30)
101
(168)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
*
4 Seed vs. 13 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
1-0 (1-0)
2-1 (1-2)
10-6 (4-12)
10-1 (4-6)
15-3 (11-7)
4-0 (3-1)
42-11 (24-28)
72.8-65.2
2
--
--
1-0 (1-0)
0-2 (0-2)
1-0 (0-1)
--
2-2 (1-3)
69.8-65.5
3
--
--
--
3-0 (1-2)
--
--
3-0 (1-2)
74-62.3
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
1-0 (1-0)
2-1 (1-2)
11-6 (5-12)
13-3 (5-10)
16-3 (11-8)
4-0 (3-1)
47-13 (26-33)
72.6-65.1
Avg. Score
71.0-58.0
81.0-75.0
67.8-65.1
76.1-70.1
71.6-62.2
78.5-52.8
72.6-65.1
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
5 Seed vs. 12 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
1-3
0-4-0
3-1-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-5.8
-5.8
-5.8
2021
3-1
2-2-0
1-3-0
Game Over/Under:
138.7
138.1
137.8
2022
2-2
2-2-0
3-1-0
Total Points Scored
132.1
136.3
140.3
2023
4-0
4-0-0
0-4-0
2024
2-2
1-3-0
2-2-0
5 Seed - Points Scored
69.6
69.8
72.2
Last 10
26-14
16-21-3
24-16-0
12 Seed - Points Scored
62.5
66.5
68.1
'09-'24
36-24
23-34-3
33-26-1
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
5 Seed
18.2
12 Seed
73.5
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
18.3
19.6
114.9
(31)
114.6
(29)
114.4
(35)
94.2
(38)
93.9
(38)
93.9
(35)
3.7
(21)
3.9
(20)
4.1
(20)
69.9
69.4
109.5
(76)
109
(75)
109.6
(74)
98.6
(90)
97.9
(84)
98.5
(89)
0.3
(51)
0.3
(51)
0.4
(50)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When #5 Seed is favored by...
- 7.5 or more points, the #5 Seed is 11-3 S/U, 4-9-1 ATS, and the O/U is 7-7.
- 4.5 or fewer points, the #5 Seed is 12-12 S/U, 11-12-1 ATS, and the O/U is 12-11.
- When #5 Seed wins, the average score is 75.0 to 64.1 (139.1). When the #12 Seeds wins the average score is 72.0 to 64.1 (136.1).
- When the O/U is 140 or more points, the #5 Seed is 15-4 S/U, 10-8-1 ATS, and the O/U is 9-10. The average points scored is 142.8 points.
- When the O/U is 130 or fewer points, the #5 Seed is 9-9 S/U, 8-10 ATS, and the O/U is 10-8. The average point scored is 130.7 points.
- When the O/U has gone OVER, the #5 Seed is 21-12 S/U, 15-16-2 ATS. When the G has gone UNDER, the #5 Seed is 15-11 S/U, 8-17-1 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed scores 74 or fewer points, the #5 Seed is 16-19 S/U, 9-25-1 ATS. Since 2021: 7-5 S/U and 5-7 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed scores 65 or fewer points, the #5 Seed is 8-14 S/U, 3-18-1 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed scores 77 or more points, the #5 Seed is 18-1 S/U, 13-4-2 ATS, and the O/U is 18-1.
- When the #12 scores under 70 points, the #5 Seed is 24-9 S/U, 17-15-1 ATS, and the O/U is 9-23.
- When the #12 scores 70 or more points, the #5 Seed is 12-15 S/U, 6-19-2 ATS, and the O/U is 24-3. Since 2019: 2-7 S/U, 1-8 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed leads at halftime by 5 or more points, the #5 Seed is 22-1 S/U, 16-6-1 ATS.
- When tied or trailing at halftime, the #5 Seed is 6-18, 3-19-2. Since 2018, only #5 Seed to overcome halftime deficit is '23 Miami vs. Drake.
- When the #5 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking...
- of 25 or worse, the #5 Seed is 7-10 S/U, 3-13-1 ATS. Average Bart Torvik rankings, #5: 31.1, #12: 60.8.
- of 15 or better, the #5 Seed is 13-6 S/U, 8-9-2 ATS. Average Bart Torvik rankings, #5: 10.7, #12: 63.7.
- that is at least 60 spots better than the #12 Seed, the #5 Seed is 12-4 S/U and 7-9 ATS. Average score: 70.4-64.4, 6 S/U W's by 10+.
- that is at most 30 spots better than the #12 Seed, the #5 Seed is 9-10 S/U and 9-10 ATS. Average score: 69.2-68.1.
- When the #5 Seed has a WAB ranking of 25 or worse, the #5 Seed is 6-9 S/U and 4-10-1 ATS.
- When the #12 Seed has a WAB ranking of 60 or worse, the #5 Seed is 9-3 S/U and 5-7 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed wins outright...(a 5+ favorite in 24 of 36 games)
- Offensive efficiency (rank): #5 Seed - 113.9 (32.8), #12 Seed - 109.2 (72.6)
- Defensive efficiency (rank): #5 Seed - 93.1 (31.4), #12 Seed - 97.6 (87.6)
- When the #12 Seed wins outright...
- Offensive efficiency (rank): #5 Seed - 111.8 (49.7), #12 Seed - 109.3 (70.5)
- Defensive efficiency (rank): #5 Seed - 92.6 (32.1), #12 Seed - 97.1 (80.6)
- When the #5 Seed has an adjusted offensive AND defensive efficiency ranking of 35 or better, the #5 Seed is 11-2 S/U and 8-3-2 ATS.
- When the #5 Seed has a FTA rate ranking of 250 or worse, the #5 Seed is 7-6 S/U and 4-9 ATS.
- When the #12 Seed has an adjusted offensive AND defensive efficiency ranking of 100 or better, the #5 Seed is 16-12 S/U and 13-15 ATS.
- When the #12 Seed has an adjusted offensive efficiency ranking of 101 or worse, #5 Seed is 7-4 S/U and 5-6 ATS.
- When the #12 Seed has an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 101 or worse, #5 Seed is 14-8 S/U and 6-13-3 ATS.
@ Matteise
5 Seed vs. 12 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Spread
(O/U)
111.8
(72)
94.4
(17)
(30) San Diego St.
MWC - Tier 1
69
115.1
(37)
93.4
(10)
(14) Saint Mary's
WCC - Tier 3
120
(13)
99
(59)
120.6
(9)
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
-6.5
(140.5)
65
UAB (115)
Amer - Tier 2
112.4
(62)
106.9
(206)
66
-5.5
*
(131.5)
75
Grand Canyon (67)
WAC - Tier 4
111.5
(77)
99.9
(74)
(21) Wisconsin
B10 - Tier 1
61
-4.5
*
(143.5)
72
James Madison (70)
SB - Tier 4
112
(68)
100.7
(93)
98.3
(43)
(15) Gonzaga
WCC - Tier 3
86
*
-6.5
(148.5)
65
McNeese (83)
Slnd - Tier 6
111.7
(73)
101.7
(108)
111.9
(38)
93.1
(23)
(21) Duke
ACC - Tier 2
74
*
-5.5
(145.5)
51
Oral Roberts (78)
Sum - Tier 5
111.9
(36)
101.2
(132)
117.3
(11)
101.4
(136)
(40) Miami FL
ACC - Tier 2
63
*
-2.5
(145.5)
56
Drake (67)
MVC - Tier 4
107.9
(96)
96.1
(49)
111.3
(45)
90.1
(8)
(12) San Diego St.
MWC - Tier 1
63
*
-5.5
(142.5)
57
Charleston (74)
CAA - Tier 5
109.2
(69)
97.7
(72)
111.7
(39)
89.1
(6)
(8) Saint Mary's
WCC - Tier 2
63
*
-4.5
(123.5)
51
VCU (73)
A10 - Tier 3
104.2
(156)
93.1
(22)
107.8
(74)
90.1
(11)
(19) Saint Mary's
WCC - Tier 2
82
*
-2.5
(124)
53
Indiana (20)
B10 - Tier 1
108
(68)
90.5
(13)
121
(2)
97.8
(91)
(14) Iowa
B10 - Tier 1
63
-10
*
(150.5)
67
Richmond (91)
A10 - Tier 2
107.7
(75)
99.4
(129)
117.1
(10)
88.9
(9)
(2) Houston
Amer - Tier 2
82
-9
(137.5)
68
UAB (59)
CUSA - Tier 3
111.1
(32)
98.1
(98)
112.6
(24)
94.8
(42)
(22) Connecticut
BE - Tier 1
63
-6.5
*
(131.5)
70
New Mexico St. (85)
WAC - Tier 4
106
(98)
97.5
(84)
115.4
(11)
91.7
(22)
(7) Colorado
P12 - Tier 1
96
-6
(136.5)
73
Georgetown (56)
BE - Tier 1
107.2
(79)
93.7
(40)
108.5
(60)
88.2
(3)
(16) Tennessee
SEC - Tier 1
56
-8.5
*
(130.5)
70
Oregon St. (78)
P12 - Tier 1
109.1
(54)
98.4
(113)
118.5
(7)
97.2
(89)
(20) Villanova
BE - Tier 1
73
*
-6
(144.5)
63
Winthrop (87)
BSth - Tier 5
104.8
(112)
96
(72)
114.2
(16)
94.1
(44)
(21) Creighton
BE - Tier 1
63
*
-7.5
(138)
62
UC Santa Barbara (66)
BW - Tier 4
108.1
(62)
96.2
(77)
*
*
*
5 Seed vs. 12 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
3-6 (2-6)
2-3 (0-5)
11-3 (6-7)
5-7 (2-10)
4-1 (3-2)
1-1 (0-1)
26-21 (13-31)
70.0-69.2
2
1-0 (1-0)
--
2-1 (2-1)
2-0 (2-0)
2-1 (2-1)
--
7-2 (7-2)
72.3-58.8
3
--
1-0 (1-0)
1-0 (1-0)
0-1 (0-1)
--
1-0 (1-0)
3-1 (3-1)
75-63.3
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
4-6 (3-6)
3-3 (1-5)
14-4 (9-8)
7-8 (4-11)
6-2 (5-3)
2-1 (1-1)
36-24 (23-34)
70.7-67.3
Avg. Score
69.1-68.7
64.3-65.8
71.7-66.0
73.3-70.1
69.4-65.1
72.7-64.0
70.7-67.3
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
6 Seed vs. 11 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
3-1
2-2-0
2-2-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-2.9
-3.6
-3.0
2021
2-2
2-2-0
1-3-0
Game Over/Under:
140.5
140.3
138.4
2022
1-3
1-3-0
2-2-0
Total Points Scored
134.7
134.9
133.1
2023
3-1
2-2-0
0-4-0
2024
1-3
1-3-0
2-2-0
6 Seed - Points Scored
66.0
67.2
66.3
Last 10
18-22
14-26-0
13-27-0
11 Seed - Points Scored
68.7
67.7
66.9
'09-'24
29-31
22-38-0
20-39-1
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
6 Seed
27.3
11 Seed
48.0
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
24.8
25.8
113.5
(38)
113.4
(33)
113.6
(35)
95.5
(49)
94.6
(43)
94.9
(44)
2.6
(27)
3.1
(25)
3.3
(25)
48.1
46.8
111.5
(59)
111.3
(54)
111.3
(55)
97
(64)
96.9
(70)
96.6
(62)
0.8
(45)
0.8
(45)
0.7
(46)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
-
-
When the #6 Seed is favored by 5 or more points, the #6 Seed is 8-7 S/U, 6-9 ATS, and the O/U is 2-13.
When the #6 Seed is favored by 3 or fewer points, the #6 Seed is 6-10 S/U, 6-10 ATS, and the O/U is 5-10.
When the #11 Seed is favored, the #6 Seed is 2-7 S/U, 2-7 ATS, and the O/U is 6-3 -- all 7 wins by 10+ pts, LY: #11 Oregon 87, #6 S. Car 73
When the O/U is set at...
- No more than 130 points, the #6 Seed is 9-6 S/U, 8-7 ATS, and the O/U is 5-10.
- No less than 140 points, the #6 Seed is 16-10 S/U, 11-15 ATS, and the O/U is 7-18. Since 2019: 6-4, 4-6-0, 3-7.
When the #6 Seed leads at halftime by 5 or more points, the #6 Seed is 17-3 S/U, 13-7 ATS, and the O/U is 6-13.
When tied or trailing at halftime, the #6 Seed is 7-25 S/U and 5-27 ATS. Since 2020 when trailing at half, #6 is 2-8 S/U
When the #6 Seed scores...
- 65 or fewer points, the #6 Seed is 11-23 S/U, 8-26 ATS, and the O/U is 5-29.
- 70 or more points, the #6 Seed is 15-5 S/U, 12-8 ATS, & the O/U is 12-7. Since '19: 7-1 S/U (L So. Car vs. Oregon LY, ORE favored)
- 75 or more points, the #6 Seed is 10-1 S/U, 8-3 ATS, and the O/U is 7-3. Last S/U L: 2010 #6 Marquette L by 2 vs. Washington
When the #11 Seed scores more than 65 points, the #6 Seed is 5-22 S/U, 2-25 ATS, and the O/U is 16-11.
When the #11 Seed scores 65 or fewer points, the #6 Seed is 24-9 S/U, 20-13 ATS, and the O/U is 4-28. Since '19: 6-3 S/U, 6-3 ATS, 0-9 O/U.
When the #6 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 20 or better, the #6 Seed is 11-9 S/U and 8-12 ATS.
When the #6 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 35 or worse, the #6 Seed is 5-9 S/U and 4-10 ATS.
When the #6 Seed has a worse Bart Tovik ranking than the #11 Seed, the #6 Seed is 6-9 S/U and 6-9 ATS. When also an underdog: 0-9, 0-9.
When the #6 Seed has an adjusted offensive AND defensive efficiency ranking of 40 or better, the #6 Seed is 12-6 S/U and 9-9 ATS.
When the #11 Seed has an adjusted offensive efficiency ranking of 35 or better, the #6 Seed is 14-11 S/U and 12-13 ATS.
When the #11 Seed has an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 35 or better, the #6 Seed is 6-10 S/U and 4-12 ATS. Avg. #6 Pts: 63.1
#6 Seed NOT from AAC, ACC, B10, B12, BE, P10, P12, SEC vs. #11 Seed from one of those conferences, #6 Seed is 2-7 S/U and 2-7 ATS.
#6 Seed from AAC, ACC, B10, B12, BE, P10, P12, SEC vs. #11 Seed from one of these conferences, #6 Seed is 12-12 S/U and 10-14 ATS.
21 of 60 games decided by 5 points or less, #6 Seed is 9-12 SU and 2-19 ATS.
31 of 61 games decided by 10 or more points, #6 Seed is 13-18 S/U and 13-18 ATS.
#6 Seed with a turnover rate ranking of 200 or worse is 4-8 S/U and 3-9 ATS.
#6 Seed w/ a top 150 ranking in 3PT FG% AND offensive rebound rate AND turnover rate is 11-6 S/U and 8-9 ATS. 3 of 6 S/U L's since '19.
@ Matteise
6 Seed vs. 11 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
Spread
(O/U)
120.2
(12)
98.5
(48)
(16) BYU
B12 - Tier 1
67
117.2
(25)
99.2
(63)
(32) Clemson
ACC - Tier 1
77
117.2
(26)
99.1
(61)
(31) Texas Tech
B12 - Tier 1
114.4
(43)
99.2
(62)
114.7
(19)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
-8.5
*
(142.5)
71
Duquesne (82)
A10 - Tier 2
106.9
(143)
97.2
(30)
1.5
(152.5)
56
New Mexico (25)
MWC - Tier 1
114.6
(39)
95.5
(21)
67
-4.5
*
(146.5)
80
North Carolina St. (62)
ACC - Tier 1
113.6
(52)
100.7
(91)
(48) South Carolina
SEC - Tier 1
73
2.5
*
(135.5)
87
Oregon (59)
P12 - Tier 1
113.6
(51)
100
(76)
97.8
(75)
(33) Kentucky
SEC - Tier 1
61
-4.5
(142.5)
53
Providence (48)
BE - Tier 1
114.9
(18)
100.4
(109)
108.2
(87)
90
(7)
(20) Iowa St.
B12 - Tier 1
41
-4.5
*
(131.5)
59
Pitt (77)
ACC - Tier 2
112.5
(32)
101.5
(139)
113.8
(23)
92.8
(18)
(14) Creighton
BE - Tier 1
72
*
-5.5
(148.5)
63
North Carolina St. (41)
ACC - Tier 2
113
(27)
97.8
(74)
110.4
(58)
93.4
(26)
(26) TCU
B12 - Tier 1
72
*
-4.5
(142.5)
70
Arizona St. (62)
P12 - Tier 1
105.8
(129)
93.8
(29)
111.5
(29)
90.5
(12)
(15) Texas
B12 - Tier 1
81
*
-1.5
(125)
73
Virginia Tech (17)
ACC - Tier 1
114.7
(17)
94.9
(43)
105.8
(100)
88.1
(5)
(18) LSU
SEC - Tier 1
54
-3.5
(129)
*
59
Iowa St. (35)
B12 - Tier 1
103.1
(154)
88.7
(8)
112.5
(25)
98.7
(114)
(50) Colorado St.
MWC - Tier 1
63
2
(137)
*
75
Michigan (27)
B10 - Tier 1
113.9
(19)
96.7
(73)
115.9
(13)
98.1
(99)
(25) Alabama
SEC - Tier 1
64
-4
*
(153.5)
78
Notre Dame (41)
ACC - Tier 1
111.9
(27)
97.1
(79)
111.5
(31)
92.6
(29)
(26) BYU
WCC - Tier 2
62
-3.5
*
(138.5)
73
UCLA (30)
P12 - Tier 1
114.2
(15)
96.2
(76)
111.3
(36)
89.3
(6)
(12) San Diego St.
MWC - Tier 3
62
-3
(138)
78
Syracuse (49)
ACC - Tier 1
112.2
(27)
97.3
(91)
111.5
(33)
91.4
(20)
(19) Texas Tech
B12 - Tier 1
65
*
-4
(128.5)
53
Utah St. (40)
MWC - Tier 3
104.4
(120)
89
(5)
113.3
(21)
90.2
(12)
(8) USC
P12 - Tier 1
72
*
-8
(134)
56
Drake (68)
MVC - Tier 3
112.2
(28)
100.2
(146)
*
*
*
6 Seed vs. 11 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
12-11 (9-14)
2-4 (2-4)
5-9 (4-10)
1-0 (0-1)
2-0 (1-1)
--
22-24 (16-30)
65.7-66.6
2
2-5 (2-5)
1-0 (0-1)
--
1-0 (1-0)
--
--
4-5 (3-6)
65.6-64.7
3
0-2 (0-2)
2-0 (2-0)
--
--
--
--
2-2 (2-2)
65.5-67.5
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
1-0 (1-0)
--
--
--
--
1-0 (1-0)
58.0-41.0
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
14-18 (11-21)
6-4 (5-5)
5-9 (4-10)
2-0 (1-1)
2-0 (1-1)
--
29-31 (22-38)
65.5-65.9
Avg. Score
65.9-67.1
64.2-62.8
63.4-65.7
66.5-60.0
80.0-70.5
--
65.5-65.9
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
7 Seed vs. 10 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Tournaments:
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
2019
1-3
1-3-0
3-1-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-0.5
-1.1
-1.3
2021
1-2
1-2-0
1-2-0
Game Over/Under:
140.1
138.2
139.6
2022
3-1
3-1-0
2-2-0
Total Points Scored
138.3
138.6
142.4
2023
3-1
3-1-0
1-3-0
2024
3-1
3-1-0
1-3-0
7 Seed - Points Scored
71.1
70.1
72.4
Last 10
25-14
23-16-0
21-18-0
10 Seed - Points Scored
67.2
68.5
70.1
'09-'24
35-24
31-27-1
30-29-0
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
7 Seed
35.9
10 Seed
39.7
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
32.9
32.5
113.6
(37)
112.9
(38)
112.9
(43)
97.2
(66)
95.9
(54)
95.6
(48)
2.6
(28)
2.8
(28)
2.7
(29)
41.7
40.2
113.3
(38)
112
(45)
112.9
(46)
97.5
(68)
96.7
(63)
96.9
(64)
2.0
(33)
1.7
(36)
1.5
(39)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When the #7 Seed is favored by....
- 5 or more points, the #7 Seed is 6-0 S/U, 3-3 ATS, and the O/U is 5-1. All games have been decided by 8 points or less.
- 3 or fewer points, the #7 Seed is 16-10 S/U, 13-12-1 ATS, and the O/U is 13-13. 11 games decided by 5 or less, 9 games by 10+ points.
- And the #7 Seed has a BT ranking of 40 or better AND the #10 Seed has a BT ranking of 35 or worse, the #7 Seed is 10-2 S/U,
8-3-1 ATS. When the #7 has a BT ranking of 45 or worse, the #7 Seed is 1-4 S/U and 1-4 ATS.
- When the #10 Seed is favored, the #7 Seed is 9-9 S/U and 11-7 ATS.
- By 1.5 points or less, the #7 Seed is 9-3 S/U and 9-3 ATS. Since 2021, 5-1 S/U, only loss '24 UF vs. Colorado.
- By 2 or more points, the #7 Seed is 0-6 S/U and 0-6 ATS. Average margin of victory for #10 Seed is 9.2 points.
- When the O/U is set at...
- No more than 135 points, the #7 Seed is 15-5 S/U, 14-5-1 ATS, and the O/U is 10-10. Average score: 66.6-61.4
- No less than 145 points, the #7 Seed is 8-2 S/U, 6-4 ATS, and the O/U is 5-5. Average score: 83.4-76.0.
- When the total goes OVER, the #7 Seed is 21-9 S/U, 17-12-1 ATS. Since 2017 the #7 Seed is 11-3 S/U and 10-4 ATS.
- Since 2017, when the total goes UNDER, the #7 Seed is 6-4 S/U and 6-4 ATS. 7 of 10 G have gone under by 10+ points.
- When the #7 Seed scores...
- Under 70 points, the #7 Seed is 9-17 S/U, 8-17-1 ATS, and the O/U is 4-22. Average def-efficiency rank of #10 Seed: 49.7.
- 75 or more points, the #7 Seed is 19-3 S/U, 16-6 ATS, and the O/U is 18-4. Average def-efficiency rank of #10 Seed: 67.1.
- When the #10 Seed scores...
- 65 or fewer points, the #7 Seed is 17-7 S/U, 16-7-1 ATS, and the O/U is 4-20. Average off-efficiency rank of #10 Seed: 57.8.
- 75 or more points, the #7 Seed is 10-11 S/U, 8-13 ATS, and the O/U is 18-3. Average off-efficiency rank of #10 Seed: 40.6.
- When the #7 Seed is leading at halftime, the #7 Seed is 23-8 S/U and 21-9-1 ATS.
- By 5 or more points, the #7 Seed is 14-2 S/U and 13-3 ATS.
- When trailing or tied at halftime, the #7 Seed is 12-16 S/U and 10-18 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed has a better Bart Torvik ranking than the #10 Seed and the #7 Seed's Bart Torvik ranking is...
- 20 or better, the #7 Seed is 10-2 S/U and 6-6 ATS. When 25 or better, the #7 Seed is 14-6 S/U and 10-10 ATS.
- 35 or worse, the #7 Seed is 7-2 S/U and 5-3-1 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed has a worse Bart Torvik ranking than the #10 Seed, the #7 Seed is 8-13 S/U and 10-11 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed is favored, the #7 Seed is 3-7 S/U and 3-7 ATS.
- When the #10 Seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 45 or worse, the #7 Seed is 13-6 S/U and 9-9-1 ATS.
- 13 games decided by 3 or less, 26 games decided by 5 or less, 19 games decided by 10 or more points.
- When the #7 Seed has a 2PT FG% AND 3PT FG% ranking of 100 or better, the #7 Seed is 15-4 S/U and 14-5 ATS. Since '19: 6-0, 6-0.
- When the #10 Seed has an eFG% ranking of 125 or worse AND a turnover rate ranking of 85 or worse, the #7 Seed is 11-4 S/U and 10-5 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed has BOTH an offensive and defensive efficiency ranking of 50 or better, the #7 Seed is 13-6 S/U and 10-9 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed has an offensive efficiency ranking of 30 or better, the #7 Seed is 17-11 S/U and 13-15 ATS.
- When the #7 Seed has a defensive efficiency ranking of 30 or better, the #7 Seed is 14-7 S/U and 10-10-1 ATS.
@ Matteise
7 Seed vs. 10 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Spread
(O/U)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
112.6
(61)
97
(29)
(43) Washington St.
P12 - Tier 1
66
*
1.5
(138.5)
61
Drake (53)
MVC - Tier 3
114.6
(40)
100.2
(79)
117.8
(22)
100.7
(89)
(35) Dayton
A10 - Tier 2
63
*
1.5
(136.5)
60
Nevada (40)
MWC - Tier 1
114.3
(44)
98.1
(39)
119.3
(14)
99.4
(64)
(23) Florida
SEC - Tier 1
100
1.5
* 102
(157.5)
Colorado (27)
P12 - Tier 1
117.4
(24)
98.2
(42)
118.1
(20)
98.4
(46)
(24) Texas
B12 - Tier 1
56
*
-2.5
(143.5)
44
Colorado St. (44)
MWC - Tier 1
114.5
(41)
98.7
(52)
111.6
(41)
95
(38)
(30) Michigan St.
B10 - Tier 1
72
*
-2.5
(136.5)
62
USC (44)
P12 - Tier 1
110.8
(52)
96.4
(53)
113.2
(25)
94.8
(36)
(22) Texas A&M
SEC - Tier 1
59
-2.5
*
(135.5)
76
Penn St. (42)
B10 - Tier 1
115.4
(17)
99.9
(104)
117.5
(10)
103.8
(187)
(59) Missouri
SEC - Tier 1
76
*
1.5
(155.5)
65
Utah St. (28)
MWC - Tier 1
115.5
(14)
98
(78)
106.6
(108)
91.7
(13)
(36) Northwestern
B10 - Tier 1
75
*
-1.5
(127.5)
67
Boise St. (35)
MWC - Tier 1
108.2
(86)
92.9
(19)
109.6
(46)
95
(44)
(39) Murray St.
OVC - Tier 5
92
*
-2
(137)
87
San Francisco (23)
WCC - Tier 2
109.4
(51)
92.2
(19)
109.3
(55)
96
(61)
(53) USC
P12 - Tier 1
66
-2
*
(139.5)
68
Miami FL (55)
ACC - Tier 1
114.3
(18)
100.6
(138)
116.3
(11)
99.5
(131)
(31) Ohio St.
B10 - Tier 1
54
*
-0.5
(133.5)
41
Loyola Chicago (37)
MVC - Tier 2
109.1
(58)
93.9
(34)
110.9
(33)
95.5
(51)
(36) Michigan St.
B10 - Tier 1
74
*
1
(140.5)
73
Davidson (48)
A10 - Tier 2
115.7
(14)
101.4
(160)
113.9
(18)
92.3
(26)
(14) Connecticut
BE - Tier 1
54
-4
(130)
*
63
Maryland (41)
B10 - Tier 1
110.1
(43)
94.2
(46)
105.2
(110)
90.5
(14)
(44) Clemson
ACC - Tier 1
56
2.5
(125)
*
60
Rutgers (47)
B10 - Tier 1
106.6
(87)
91.9
(25)
110.4
(41)
93.4
(35)
(32) Florida
SEC - Tier 1
75
1.5
(135)
70
Virginia Tech (51)
ACC - Tier 1
108.8
(58)
94.5
(52)
112.9
(27)
92.7
(17)
(18) Louisville
ACC - Tier 1
76
-4.5
*
(137.5)
86
Minnesota (49)
B10 - Tier 1
109.5
(57)
96.6
(56)
*
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
7 Seed vs. 10 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
20-15 (16-19)
4-1 (4-1)
1-0 (1-0)
--
--
--
25-16 (21-20)
70.6-68.3
2
3-4 (4-3)
--
0-1 (0-1)
--
--
--
3-5 (4-4)
67.0-71.0
3
5-2 (3-3)
--
1-1 (2-0)
--
--
--
6-3 (5-3)
73.8-69.2
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
1-0 (1-0)
--
--
--
--
1-0 (1-0)
92.0-87.0
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
28-21 (23-25)
5-1 (5-1)
2-2 (3-1)
--
--
--
35-24 (31-27)
70.9-69.1
Avg. Score
70.4-69.4
76.2-66.0
70.0-70.5
--
--
--
70.9-69.1
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
8 Seed vs. 9 Seed
Statistical Averages of Matchup
Better Seed S/U
Better Seed ATS
O/U
Last 3 Yrs.
Last 5 Yrs.
Last 10 Yrs.
2019
0-4
0-4-0
4-0-0
Better Seed Favored By:
-0.1
-0.8
-0.6
2021
3-1
3-1-0
3-1-0
Game Over/Under:
140.8
138.4
137.9
2022
1-3
1-3-0
2-2-0
Total Points Scored
140.6
141.3
141.2
2023
2-2
2-2-0
1-3-0
2024
1-3
1-3-0
2-2-0
8 Seed - Points Scored
68.8
68.4
69.2
Last 10
19-21
18-22-0
24-16-0
9 Seed - Points Scored
71.8
73.0
72.0
'09-'24
31-29
29-31-0
33-26-1
Torvik
Average
Rankings
Bart Torvik Ranking
BT Offensive Eff. (Rank)
BT Defensive Eff. (Rank)
Last 3
Last 5
8 Seed
33.5
9 Seed
36.2
WAB (Rank)
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10
32.9
34.4
111.9
(55)
111.4
(56)
111.8
(53)
95.5
(50)
94.7
(48)
95.2
(48)
2.1
(33)
1.9
(35)
2.0
(34)
35.2
36.6
111.5
(54)
111
(53)
111.3
(54)
95.3
(38)
94.7
(37)
95.2
(41)
1.4
(41)
1.7
(38)
1.6
(39)
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
- When the #8 Seed is favored, the #8 Seed is 15-18 S/U and 12-21 ATS.
- By 4 or more points, the #8 Seed is 7-3 S/U and 7-3 ATS. Only favored by 4 or more points 2 times in last six NCAA tournaments.
- When the #9 Seed is favored, the #8 Seed is 15-11 S/U and 16-10 ATS.
- When the #8 Seed scores...
- Under 70 points, the #8 Seed is 9-22 S/U and 7-24 ATS. Since 2021: 1-7 S/U and 1-7 ATS. Avg. def-eff ranking of #9 Seed: 34.7.
- 75 or more points, the #8 Seed is 17-4 S/U, 17-4 ATS, and the O/U is 17-4. Average def-efficiency ranking of #9 Seed: 49.8.
- When the #9 Seed scores...
- Under 70 points, the #8 Seed is 20-8 S/U and 17-11 ATS. Average defensive efficiency ranking of #8 Seed: 55.4.
- 75 or more points, the #8 Seed is 4-13 S/U and 4-13 ATS. Average defensive efficiency ranking of #8 Seed: 57.2.
- When leading at halftime, the #8 Seed is 24-9 S/U and 25-8 ATS.
- By 5 or more points, the #8 Seed is 17-3 S/U and 17-3 ATS.
- When tied or trailing at halftime, the #8 Seed is 7-20 S/U and 4-23 ATS.
- By 5 or more points, the #8 Seed is 3-17 S/U and 1-19 ATS. Last #8 to win after 5+ HT deficit: 2015 NC State vs. LSU, won by 1.
- When the #8 Seed has a worse Bart Torvik ranking than the #9 Seed, the #8 Seed is 15-13 S/U and 13-15 ATS.
- When #8 Seed is from a Tier 1 conference, the #8 Seed is 9-11 S/U and 9-11 ATS. Since 2021: 4-5 S/U and 4-5 ATS.
- When the #8 Seed has a WAB ranking of 40 or worse, the #8 Seed is 5-9 S/U and 5-9 ATS.
- 15 games decided by 3 points or less, 23 by 6 points or less, and 28 games decided by 10 points or more.
- When the #8 Seed has an offensive efficiency of 110 or worse (1.1 PPP), the #8 Seed is 5-10 S/U and 4-11 ATS.
- When the #8 Seed has a defensive eff. ranking of 30 or better, the #8 Seed is 7-14 S/U, 6-15 ATS. When an underdog, #8 Seed is 1-5 S/U.
@ Matteise
8 Seed vs. 9 Seed Matchups - Past Four NCAA Tournaments (Most Recent On Top)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
(Ken Pom) Better Seed
Spread
(O/U)
Worse Seed (Ken Pom)
Adj. Off-Eff.
(Rank)
Adj. Def-Eff.
(Rank)
117.6
(23)
102.5
(125)
(49) Florida Atlantic
Amer - Tier 2
65
-3.5
*
(142.5)
77
Northwestern (38)
B10 - Tier 1
116.3
(28)
99.7
(69)
112.3
(63)
94.7
(20)
(28) Mississippi St.
SEC - Tier 1
51
1.5
*
(131.5)
69
Michigan St. (19)
B10 - Tier 1
113.6
(50)
93.5
(11)
115.9
(30)
96.9
(28)
(26) Nebraska
B10 - Tier 1
83
1.5
*
(148.5)
98
Texas A&M (46)
SEC - Tier 1
115.1
(36)
99.7
(68)
114.1
(46)
100.3
(81)
(58) Utah St.
MWC - Tier 1
88
3.5
(149.5)
72
TCU (37)
B12 - Tier 1
114.3
(45)
97.9
(35)
113.9
(22)
94.2
(32)
(16) Memphis
Amer - Tier 2
65
-1.5
*
(151.5)
66
Florida Atlantic (25)
CUSA - Tier 3
112.2
(33)
94.8
(35)
118.9
(5)
102.7
(162)
(37) Iowa
B10 - Tier 1
75
1.5
*
(151.5)
83
Auburn (23)
SEC - Tier 1
110.9
(49)
93.2
(24)
111.5
(43)
95
(37)
(31) Maryland
B10 - Tier 1
67
*
2.5
(136.5)
65
West Virginia (18)
B12 - Tier 1
116.1
(13)
96.4
(54)
110.7
(53)
92
(14)
(19) Arkansas
SEC - Tier 1
73
*
-2.5
(143.5)
63
Illinois (43)
B10 - Tier 1
109
(72)
94.4
(34)
112.8
(22)
95.9
(57)
(28) North Carolina
ACC - Tier 1
95
*
-4
(153)
63
Marquette (60)
BE - Tier 1
107.9
(70)
95.4
(50)
101.4
(189)
86.4
(2)
(30) San Diego St.
MWC - Tier 1
69
-2.5
(120)
*
72
Creighton (63)
BE - Tier 1
104.2
(132)
92.3
(20)
106.8
(85)
93.3
(30)
(47) Seton Hall
BE - Tier 1
42
-1.5
*
(128.5)
69
TCU (38)
B12 - Tier 1
107.4
(78)
92.9
(25)
106.9
(83)
91.9
(17)
(33) Boise St.
MWC - Tier 1
53
3.5
*
(133.5)
64
Memphis (24)
Amer - Tier 2
110.4
(37)
93.2
(29)
118.9
(6)
99.8
(138)
(29) LSU
SEC - Tier 1
76
*
-2
(143.5)
61
St. Bonaventure (28)
A10 - Tier 2
110.1
(42)
91.9
(23)
109
(57)
88.2
(2)
(13) Loyola Chicago
MVC - Tier 3
71
*
-6
(124.5)
60
Georgia Tech (35)
ACC - Tier 1
112.7
(24)
95.6
(66)
107.9
(66)
91.9
(24)
(36) North Carolina
ACC - Tier 1
62
-2
*
(136.5)
85
Wisconsin (15)
B10 - Tier 1
111.5
(34)
90.3
(13)
111.1
(37)
94.7
(54)
(39) Oklahoma
B12 - Tier 1
72
1.5
(139)
68
Missouri (37)
SEC - Tier 1
110.7
(38)
94.3
(49)
*
*
8 Seed vs. 9 Seed - Conference Tier Results (2009-2024)
Conf Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
All
Avg. Score
1
17-19 (17-19)
3-4 (3-4)
1-0 (1-0)
0-1 (0-1)
--
--
21-24 (21-24)
70.0-71.8
2
5-2 (3-4)
--
0-1 (0-1)
--
--
--
5-3 (3-5)
68.5-67.6
3
4-0 (4-0)
0-2 (0-2)
1-0 (1-0)
--
--
--
5-2 (5-2)
64.9-64.3
4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
All
26-21 (24-23)
3-6 (3-6)
2-1 (2-1)
0-1 (0-1)
--
--
31-29 (29-31)
69.2-70.4
Avg. Score
69.9-70.7
66.1-70.0
66.7-65.0
72.0-74.0
--
--
69.2-70.4
Better Seed Conference Tier on Left, Worse Seed Conference Tier on Top -- Read left to right (Better Seed Tier is W-L (ATS) vs. Worse Seed Tier
Conference Rankings - Efficiency
The average adjusted efficiency margin of all teams that finish in the 25th-75th percentile within the conference.
Example: Pac-12 has 12 teams, take the average adjusted efficiency margin of teams of w/ an adj.EM of 3rd through 9th in the conference.
Rounding up to nearest whole number for "better team" and down for "worse team", ie: 10-team league takes average of 3rd through 7th.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
Average
2025
AAC
11.11
5.17
9.69
7.4
7.2
8.5
9.1
7.7
7.4
4.7
7.8
0.9
ACC
13.9
13.8
16.7
18.5
16.3
17.0
15.9
9.3
8.4
12.0
14.2
9.2
America East
-9.9
-5.3
-9.4
-4.6
-5.8
-6.4
-4.7
-8.2
-8.2
-5.1
-6.8
-9.4
Atlantic Sun
-8.0
-7.5
-7.0
-5.9
-8.9
-3.6
-8.3
-4.9
-2.7
-5.9
-6.3
-6.0
Atlantic 10
10.5
7.3
6.2
4.7
1.0
1.3
10.1
5.5
0.2
5.4
5.2
3.5
Big 10
16.6
13.9
14.8
14.0
13.6
17.3
21.6
14.0
15.6
15.2
15.7
18.6
Big 12
17.3
20.3
19.5
20.6
17.4
18.0
20.9
18.2
18.8
18.2
18.9
17.5
Big East
14.1
15.7
14.4
15.9
15.6
11.3
15.5
12.7
13.4
15.7
14.4
13.7
Big Sky
-6.4
-6.9
-6.6
-6.4
-1.4
-8.2
-4.6
-7.1
-2.3
-3.7
-5.4
-5.1
Big South
-7.6
-5.0
-5.6
-7.4
-4.6
-2.3
-7.8
-6.2
-4.5
-3.5
-5.4
-4.1
Big West
0.1
3.7
1.2
-8.4
-0.4
-4.7
-2.0
-2.2
-0.8
-2.7
-1.6
-1.5
C-USA
-1.1
-0.7
-3.3
-3.4
-0.2
0.5
4.0
1.1
2.2
-1.6
-0.2
2.8
CAA
-0.7
-2.6
5.2
1.6
-2.4
-4.8
-2.0
-0.2
-8.5
-2.3
-1.7
-3.9
Horizon
0.7
0.4
0.4
-2.7
-5.7
-3.6
-3.2
-6.9
-4.1
-3.5
-2.8
-4.1
Ivy
1.5
1.2
0.0
-1.8
-3.7
1.1
-2.0
-1.7
2.0
1.2
-0.2
-2.5
MAAC
-1.7
-2.4
-3.5
-2.3
-2.7
-9.4
-7.0
-3.9
-6.6
-5.3
-4.5
-9.1
MAC
1.1
4.4
1.1
0.7
-1.5
4.2
5.2
-4.0
-2.4
-5.4
0.4
-5.9
MEAC
-14.1
-14.0
-15.1
-17.5
-17.5
-15.3
-14.0
-10.2
-8.0
-10.5
-13.6
-11.6
Missouri Valley
1.7
2.1
2.7
2.2
3.1
-0.0
4.4
5.9
-0.2
4.1
2.6
0.9
Mountain West
6.4
4.8
4.1
4.6
7.4
2.5
4.8
10.2
10.2
10.2
6.5
9.0
Northeast
-6.7
-6.3
-11.7
-8.8
-8.7
-9.6
-8.0
-10.5
-15.4
-13.0
-9.9
-15.1
Ohio Valley
-7.7
-3.7
-3.7
-4.0
-5.1
-5.6
-4.3
-5.6
-8.9
-11.0
-5.9
-11.2
Pac 12
13.9
10.1
14.6
11.6
10.7
7.9
14.2
9.9
13.0
11.5
11.7
Patriot
-1.9
-4.3
-7.3
-4.8
-7.9
-4.7
-5.0
-10.0
-8.7
-11.3
-6.6
-10.1
SEC
9.6
13.5
11.6
13.0
15.1
15.5
16.7
15.6
15.0
15.1
14.1
22.3
SOCON
-10.3
-6.4
-2.1
2.5
-2.8
2.1
4.4
0.6
-2.7
0.6
-1.4
0.4
Southland
-10.5
-9.0
-13.0
-7.8
-6.8
-9.5
-12.3
-10.3
-11.2
-10.1
-10.0
-4.5
Summit
0.6
-3.8
0.2
-0.8
0.2
-5.0
-4.2
-4.1
-6.2
-6.4
-3.0
-3.4
Sun Belt
-3.3
-4.0
-1.6
-0.3
-2.0
-0.0
-4.0
-0.3
1.8
-2.4
-1.6
-4.2
SWAC
-14.6
-14.1
-13.0
-16.6
-16.7
-14.5
-14.5
-11.4
-11.4
-12.6
-13.9
-13.4
WAC
-5.9
-9.9
-4.0
-2.4
-0.7
0.5
-6.4
-0.3
1.9
-1.1
-2.8
-3.7
WCC
6.1
6.5
0.8
2.3
2.5
6.1
9.2
8.3
7.3
0.5
5.0
3.9
Conference Tiers
Using the adjusted efficiency margin established for each conference an average value was established. After which, six conference tiers were established for
each season using methodology that compares the conference's metrics against an adjusted average using the standard deviation found from the yearly numbers.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
Average
Tier
AAC
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1.8
3
ACC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1.1
1
America East
6
5
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5.3
5
Atlantic Sun
5
5
5
5
6
4
5
5
4
5
4.9
5
Atlantic 10
1
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2.3
3
Big 10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
1
Big 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
1
Big East
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
1
Big Sky
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
4
4.7
4
Big South
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
4.8
4
Big West
4
3
3
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
4.0
4
C-USA
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3.6
3
CAA
4
4
2
3
4
5
4
4
5
4
3.9
4
Horizon
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4.1
4
Ivy
3
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
3.5
4
MAAC
4
4
4
4
4
6
5
4
5
5
4.5
5
MAC
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
5
4
5
3.6
5
MEAC
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
5.9
6
Missouri Valley
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
2
4
3
3.1
3
Mountain West
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
1
1
1
2.2
1
Northeast
5
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
5.7
6
Ohio Valley
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
4.9
6
Pac 12
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1.1
Patriot
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
5.2
5
SEC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
1
SOCON
6
5
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3.8
3
Southland
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
5.8
4
Summit
3
4
4
4
3
5
5
5
5
5
4.3
4
Sun Belt
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
4.1
4
SWAC
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6.0
6
WAC
5
6
4
4
4
3
5
4
3
4
4.2
4
WCC
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2.4
2
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
TIER 6
First Round Conference Trends — Power Conferences (2009-2024)
SEED
When
Favored
When
Underdog
Overall
1-3
4-6
7-8
9+
Straight-Up
61-29
28-3
16-5
3-10
14-11
56-5
5-24
ATS
36-52-2
12-18-1
8-13-0
2-11-0
14-10-1
25-43-1
11-9-1
ACC
Notes
• When favored by 3 points or less as the better seed, ACC teams are 3-7 S/U and 2-8 ATS.
• As a 4-8 Seed vs. a tier 1 or 2 opponent, ACC teams are 8-11 S/U, 5-14 ATS. vs. Tier 3+: 11-4 S/U, 5-10 ATS.
• Since 2015 when seeded 1-8, ACC teams w/ a Torvik ranking of 20 or better are 25-3 S/U, 30+: 4-4 S/U.
• As a 1-8 Seed vs. a team with Bart Torvik ranking of 50 or better, ACC teams are 5-9 S/U and 3-11 ATS.
• Average Torvik rank as a 9+ Seed: 41.8 -- when having a better BT ranking than 1-8 Seed: 5-2 S/U, 5-2 ATS.
• Since 2021, seeded 1 or 2: 2x, seeded 5-8: 4-2 S/U -- as 5-8 vs. power-conf opp: 1-2, L #7 Clem, #8 UNC.
• As a 3-8 Seed with an offensive efficiency ranking of 50 or worse, ACC teams are 4-7 S/U and 1-10 ATS.
• Since 2021, as an 11 or 12 Seed, ACC teams are 4-2 S/U. Average Torvik ranking of ACC teams: 47.8
Straight-Up
73-27
25-3
17-11
14-3
17-10
63-4
10-23
ATS
54-42-4
16-11-1
8-18-2
12-5-0
18-8-1
35-33-3
19-9-1
Big 10
Notes
• Michigan State as a 1-4 Seed: 6-1 (2-3-2), as 5-8 Seed: 4-0 (3-1), as 9+ Seed: 2-1 (2-1).
• As a 1-2 Seed, favored by 18 or more points: 9-1 S/U, 5-5 ATS -- favored by 15 or less: 6-0 S/U, 4-1-1 ATS.
• As a 4-6 Seed playing against a Tier 1 or 2 opponent: 0-5 S/U, 0-5 ATS -- vs. Tiers 3+: 17-6 S/U, 8-13-2 ATS.
• As a 4-8 Seed, when scoring at least 70 points, B10 teams are 22-6 S/U, 15-11-2 ATS, and the O/U is 21-7.
• As a 5-8 Seed, when trailing at halftime, B10 teams are 2-7 S/U and 1-8 ATS.
• As a 9 or 10 Seed, B10 teams are 13-6 S/U and 14-4-1 ATS.
• As a 9+ Seed with a better Bart Torvik ranking than opponent, B10 teams are 9-4 S/U and 9-4 ATS. Since 2021
4-0 and 4-0.
Straight-Up
64-33
34-5
15-11
7-4
8-13
60-6
4-26
ATS
49-47-1
23-15-1
11-15-0
6-5-0
9-12-0
38-39-1
11-7-0
Big 12
Notes
• Since 2021 as a 1-4 Seed, B12 teams are 15-1 S/U and 12-4 ATS.
• Since 2021 as a 5-7 Seed, B12 teams are 4-3 S/U and 3-4 ATS. Since 2009, 10-13 ATS.
• As a 4-8 Seed vs. a team from a tier 1 conference, B12 teams are 9-8 (7-10) -- vs. Tier 3+: 12-4 (9-7).
• As a favored 9+ Seed, B12 teams are 1-5 S/U and 1-5 ATS. S/U W: #10 Iowa St. vs ND in 2013.
• As a 9+ Seed and an underdog of 2.5 or less points, B12 teams are 5-3 S/U and 6-2 ATS.
• As a 4-8 Seed with an off. efficiency ranking of 50 or worse, B12 teams 6-5 S/U and 4-7 ATS. Avg PPG: 66.3.
• As a 4-8 Seed with an off. efficiency ranking of 40 or better, B12 teams 13-9 S/U, 11-11 ATS. Avg PPG: 73.5.
• Since 2021 as a 1-3 Seed, B12 teams have led at HT in 9 of 10 G; 6 HT leads by 10+, 5 by 15+.
Straight-Up
56-34
32-2
16-11
1-6
7-15
52-8
4-25
ATS
43-47-0
21-13-0
14-13-0
1-6-0
7-15-0
37-35-0
6-11-0
Big East
Notes
• Since 2014 (realignment), as 1-8 Seed: 25-8 (20-13) -- as 9+ Seed: 5-9 (5-9).
• Since 2014: BE teams seeded 4-8 are 11-8 (10-9), when seeded 1-3, BE teams are 14-0 (10-4).
• Since 2014 as 1-8 Seed, BE teams are 6-6 (6-6) vs. a team from a tier 1-3 conference (avg score: 63.7-65.0).
• Since 2014 as 1-8 Seed, BE teams are 19-2 (14-7) vs. a team from a tier 4-6 conf (78.7-63.4).
• Since 2014 as a 9+ Seed with a better Bart Torvik ranking than the 1-8 Seed, BE teams are 3-1 S/U and 3-1
ATS. Lone loss 2017 Marquette vs. #7 South Carolina, game was played in Greenville, SC.
• Since 2014 As a favorite of 12 or more points, BE teams are 11-0 S/U and 8-3 ATS.
• Since 2014 As a 1-8 Seed favored by 5 or fewer points, BE teams are 4-5 S/U, 4-5 ATS, and the O/U is 1-8.
Straight-Up
48-28
18-2
14-8
10-6
6-12
41-10
6-18
ATS
36-40-0
10-10-0
7-15-0
10-6-0
9-9-0
26-31-0
9-9-0
SEC
Notes
@ Matteise
• As a 1-3 Seed SEC teams are 18-2 S/U, 10-10 ATS, and the O/U is 12-8. Have led at HT by 15+ 9x.
• As a 4-7 Seed favored by no more than 5 points, SEC teams 6-5 S/U, 4-7 ATS -- since 2019, 2-3 (1-4).
• As a 5-8 Seed vs. tier 1 opp, SEC teams are 10-10 (9-11) -- vs. Tier 2+: 7-2 (5-4).
• As a 9+ Seed who is an underdog, SEC teams are 3-7 S/U and 6-4 ATS.
• Rick Barnes at Tennessee as a 1-3 Seed, Tennessee has allowed: 49, 56, 70 (#2 Seed vs. Colgate), 47 points.
• As a 1-8 Seed with a top 20 offensive efficiency ranking, SEC teams 14-6 (7-13), avg. PPG: 78.9.
• As a 1-8 Seed when trailing at halftime, SEC teams are 3-11 S/U and 2-12 ATS.
First Round Conference Trends (2009-2024)
Avg. Seed
14.7
America East
As Worse Seed
--
1-14
--
8-6-1
27.8
11-7
3-3
7-11-0
5-1-0
45.9
10-10
12-12
10-8-2
13-11-0
125.2
--
2-12
--
8-6-0
127.1
--
0-14
--
3-10-1
155.3
--
1-13
--
5-9-0
• Average Torvik differential 147.5 -- when <=135, BSth teams: 1-3, (2-2) 74.3-68.0, when 150+: 0-7 (2-5) 82.1-54.9.
• As a #15 or #16 Seed, BSth teams are 4-6 ATS, avg MOD: 24.2 -- as #12-#14: 1-3 ATS, 3 L's by: 32, 10, 12.
• Since 2018, O/U is 5-2 -- since 2009, when O/U is set at <=139, O/U is 7-2 --- when 140+ 0-5.
14.3
Big West
As Better Seed
• As a #15 + Seed, Big Sky teams have average margin of defeat: 16.4 PPG (5G) --- as #13 or #14: 19.3 PPG (9G).
• Big Sky teams with a Torvik ranking of 100 or better, avg. MOD: 14.8 PPG (4G) --- w/ BT 125+, avg. MOD: 20.1 (8G).
• As Tier 4 conf: 1-3 ATS, avg. MOD: 12.3 PPG (4G) --- as Tier 5+: 2-7-1 ATS, avg. MOD: 20.7 PPG (10 G).
14.9
Big South
As Worse Seed
• As #16 Seed, ASun teams are 2-2 ATS, average score: 86.5-63.0 --- as #13 or #14 Seed: 3-3 ATS, 74.0-67.0.
• Trailed by no more 5 points or led at halftime in 6 G.
• ASun teams with a Bart Torvik ranking of 125 or better are 5-3 ATS --- since 2021 are 2-0 S/U: Liberty & Kennesaw St.
14.1
Big Sky
As Better Seed
• Since 2015, no A-10 team has been better than a 7 Seed. Over this period as #7 or #8 Seed, A-10 3-4 S/U, 5-2 ATS.
• Since 2015, as 9+ Seed, A10 teams are 5-8 S/U, 5-8 ATS. Since 2019: 2-4, 2-4.
• As 9+ Seed w/ A10 as Tier 1 or 2 Conf: 9-6 S/U, 10-5 ATS --- as tier 3+: 3-6 S/U and 3-6 ATS.
14.7
Atlantic Sun
AGAINST THE SPREAD
• As 1-8 Seed w/ a top 25 Torvik ranking, AAC teams are 9-3 S/U and 6-6 ATS --- since 2019: 4-2 S/U, 3-3 ATS
• When better seed and favored by 6 or more points, AAC teams are 6-2 S/U and 4-4 ATS --- no more than 3: 1-2 S/U.
• As 1-8 Seed since 2019, 4 of 5 S/U wins were by Houston.
8.7
Atlantic 10
136.7
OVERALL
• AE teams w/ a top 100 WAB rank: 3-3-1 ATS, avg score: 76.4-62.3 --- w/o top 100 WAB: 3-5 ATS, 72.4-59.1.
• When Torvik differential less than 100 spots, AE teams 2-3 ATS, 78.8-65.6 --- when 125 or more: 6-2-1 ATS, 72.9-59.3.
• When underdog of 20 or more points, AE teams are 5-0-1 ATS
6.4
American Athletic
(AAC)
Avg. Torvik
Ranking
126.9
--
2-13
--
7-8-0
• As a #15+ Seed, BW teams are 3-6 ATS, average MOD: 23.7 PPG, 3 games +/- 1.5 pts of spread. Trailed at halftime in
each game, by an average of 14.3 PPG.
• In games BW teams won ATS, BW teams average def-eff rank: 89.1, in games did not win ATS, avg. def-eff: 151.`
12.5
CAA
@ Matteise
9-6-1
73.9
2-1
6-8
1-2-0
7-7-0
114.4
2-0
2-12
2-0-0
6-8-0
84.4
--
6-8
--
10-4-0
• As Tier 3 conf (Torvik: 73.2) 3-3 (5-1) 68.8-67.8 (S/U W's last 2), as Tier 4+ conf (Trove: 92.9), 3-5 (5-3) 69.1-64.4.
• With a BT ranking of 101 or worse (avg: 117) 2-3 (2-3) - top 100 (66.3) 4-5 (8-1), average spread as top 100 team -7.4.
• Underdog of 10 or more points: 3-5 S/U, 5-3 ATS, and O/U 2-6 --- when no more than 9.5: 3-3 (5-1), O/U 3-3.
13.9
MAAC
1-0-0
• Butler was better seeded team in 2010, 2011 (2-0, 2-0)
• Since 2012, avg seed: 14.6 -- as 15 or 16 Seed: 3-3 ATS (58.5-75.7), as 14 Seed or better: 2-4 ATS (73.8-60.8).
• Since 2014, Horizon teams have led or trailed by no more than 5 points at halftime in 5 of 10 games.
13.3
Ivy League
3-13
• Since 2014 NCAAT (Houston, Memphis, SMU, UCF left before '14 season), CUSA 6-4 (6-4) in 1st Rd, all as 9+ Seed
• Since 2014, vs. better seed w/ Torvik ranking of 20 or better: 3-4 (3-4) -- vs. KenPom of 25 or worse: 3-0 (3-0).
• Since 2014, CUSA teams have led or trailed by no more than 5 points at halftime in 8 of 10 games.
13.1
Horizon League
1-0
• Since 2013 (VCU left after 2012), 0-11 (5-5-1), better seed is 5-0 ATS last 5 NCAAT's. Avg. BT rank CAA team: 107.
• CAA teams have trailed at halftime by 10+ in 4 of last 5 games.
• Since 2013 as Tier 2-4 Conf: 5-3-1 ATS, avg. 69.3 PPG -- as Tier 5+ conference: 0-2 ATS, avg. 55 PPG.
11.3
Conference USA
92.6
123.4
--
2-12
--
5-9-0
• Against a #3+ Seed, as an underdog of 19.5 or less points, MAAC teams are 1-6 S/U (Siena '09) and 2-5 ATS.
• As a #15 or #16 Seed, MAAC teams have given up 78+ points in 6 of last 7 games, avg: 82.9.
• When game total is 144 or fewer points, the game has gone over 6 times in 8 games.
Avg. Seed
12.9
MAC
@ Matteise
1-10
--
2-9-0
46
6-1
6-7
4-3-0
7-6-0
37.8
13-15
0-12
9-19-0
2-10-0
206
--
1-8
--
4-4-1
106.7
2-0
3-9
2-0-0
7-5-0
130
--
1-14
--
7-8-0
100.8
1-0
1-13
1-0-0
9-5-0
113.2
--
3-9
--
6-5-1
113.4
--
2-13
--
7-6-2
122
--
4-9
--
9-4-0
227.9
--
0-8
--
4-4-0
76.9
--
2-14
--
9-7-0
• When a WAC team seeded 9+ scores 70 or more points, WAC teams are 2-4 S/U, 5-1 ATS, and O/U is 5-1.
• GCU last two years --- 2023: 82-70 L vs. Gonzaga (3/14), 75-66 W vs. SMC (5/12).
6.3
WCC
--
• Last 6 games, have trailed at HT by average of 18.8 pts: 9, 28, 18, 12, 25 --- avg. points allowed: 45.2 points.
• Average spread: +23.9, +25 or more in 4 games, less than 20 once (+19.5).
12.9
WAC
203.7
• With a top 100 WAB ranking, SB teams: 4-4 (6-2) avg. Torvik: 101 --- w/ WAB of 125+: 0-4 (3-1), avg. Torvik: 168.5
• When underdog of 12 or fewer points, SB teams are 5-0 ATS --- when underdog of 12 or more SB has 4 L's by 20+.
15.9
SWAC
9-5-0
• When underdog of 8 or fewer points: 1-4 (1-2-2), when underdog of more than 10 points: 1-6 (5-2).
• When Torvik difference is no more than 60, Summit Lg: 1-5 (2-2-2) Seed: 12.5 -- 80+: 1-5 (4-3) Seed: 14.9.
14.2
Sun Belt
1-0-0
• When underdog of 10 or fewer points, 3-3 (3-2-1), when underdog of more than 10 points: 0-6 (3-3).
• W/ Torvik of 100 or better (avg. seed: 13.1, BT: 80.9) 3-4 (4-2-1), w/o T-100 KP (Seed: 15, BT: 158.4) 0-5 (2-3).
13.7
Summit League
4-10
• As 9+ Seed SC team w/ top 100 Torvik ranking are 7-2 ATS --- 6 of 9 games decided by 4 points or less.
• As 9+ Seed when SC Conf Tier is 1-4, SC teams are: 5-2 ATS --- when SC tier 5 or 6, SC teams are 4-3 ATS, O/U 1-6.
• As 9+ Seed w/ a WAB ranking of 75 or better, SC teams are 6-3 ATS --- when 90+, SC teams are 2-2 ATS.
13.9
Southland
1-0
• With top 100 Bart Torvik ranking: 1-4 (2-3), 3 of 4 L's by 10+ --- w/o top 100 BT: 0-10 (5-5), avg. MOD: 21.2
• Points allowed when PL team has def-efficiency ranking of 100 or better (4 G): 77.5, when outside top 100 (11 G): 82.5.
• Points scored when PL team has off-efficiency ranking of 100 or better (8 G): 65.3, when outside top 100 (7 G): 60.7.
12.9
Southern Conference
As Worse Seed
• Wins as better seed: '12 #6 Murray State vs. Colorado St, 58-41& '22 #7 Murray State vs. San Francisco, 92-87
• As 14-16 Seed: 0-6 (3-3), avg. BT: 164, all L's by 10+, 2 by 20+ -- as 9-13 Seed: 3-3 (4-2), BT:
14.4
Patriot League
As Better Seed
• 2023 FDU vs. Purdue - FDU first NEC team in Round of 64 since 2019.
• Excluding Purdue (58 points), in 8 other R64 games since 2009, NEC teams allowing 84.9 PPG -- avg def-eff rank: 195.
12.5
Ohio Valley
As Worse Seed
• As better seed & worse Torvik ranking, MWC teams are 3-6 (3-6) --- w/ better Torvik + favored by 5+, MWC: 7-2 (3-6).
• As better seed & favored by 3 points or less, MWC teams are 1-6 (1-6).
• As 9+ Seed, 8 of 12 L's by 10 or more points --- 3 L's by 3 or fewer points. Average MWC Torvik of 9+ Seed: 56.7.
15.7
Northeast
As Better Seed
• As better seed & favored by 5 or more MVC teams are 4-1 (3-2) -- as worse seed & favored MVC teams are 2-1 S/U.
• As 9+ Seed & underdog of 5 or more pts, MVC teams are 0-4 (2-2) --- MVC 3-0 when worse seed + better Torvik rank.
• As 9+ & w/ a Torvik differential of <=40, MVC teams are 6-3 (5-4) --- when differential 55+, MVC teams: 0-4 (2-2).
7.6
Mountain West
AGAINST THE SPREAD
• Play-in G L's in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2024 -- last 3 NCAAT: 0-3 (0-3), average score: 93-57, average Torvik margin: 207.
• As 16 Seed (7 G), average 26.1 1H pts & avg. HT deficit: 17.1.
9.3
Missouri Valley
99.3
OVERALL
• As the worse seed and an underdog of no more than 8 points, MAC teams are 2-3 ATS, O/U is 0-5. 10+ pts: 6-2 ATS.
• As the worse seed & w/ a def-eff rank of <=110, MAC teams are 2-5 S/U, 4-3 ATS (allow 73.7 PPG) -- 125+: 5-1 ATS.
15.5
MEAC
Avg. Torvik
Ranking
20.3
16-3
3-5
9-10-0
3-5-0
• Gonzaga as top 2 seed: 6-0 (2-4), 82.3-59.3 -- 3-8 Seed: (Avg Seed: 5.6) 7-0 (4-3), 77.4-64.9.
• As 9+ Seed WCC 2 of 3 S/U wins have been in Denver (Gonzaga vs. Big East) -- other W in Providence (SMC vs. Rich)
• As #4-#8 Seed, WCC teams are 9-3 S/U and 7-5 ATS --- when favored: 6-3 (4-5)...by at least 4 points 5-1 (3-3).
NCAA TOURNAMENT — SECOND ROUND
Last 3
Last 5
Last 15
Last 15
Last 5
Last 3
#1 Seed S/U
2-2
4-3
24-7
24-3
12-0
7-0
#1 Seed S/U
Average Spread
-7.3
-8.0
-8.8
-9.4
-9.9
-9.1
Average Spread
#1 Seed ATS
2-2-0
4-3-0
16-15-0
14-13-0
6-6-0
3-4-0
0-0-0
#1 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
2-0-0
3-0-0
8-7-0
7-8-0
3-4-0
1-3-0
#1 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
vs.
#1 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
0-2-0
1-3-0
8-8-0
7-5-0
3-2-0
2-1-0
#1 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
vs.
8
Seed
O/U Record
2-2-0
4-3-0
17-13-1
17-10-0
9-3-0
6-1-0
O/U Record
Average O/U
146.4
146.0
142.5
140.5
141.0
141.1
Average O/U
9
Seed
#1 - Points Scored
84.0
81.0
77.6
77.7
80.6
83.9
#1 - Points Scored
#8 - Points Scored
70.8
71.9
66.9
66.5
69.7
73.7
#9 - Points Scored
1
Seed
1
Seed
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
-
Average Bart Torvik Ranking Differential: #1 vs. #8: 28.5 (4.6 and 33.1) — #1 vs. #9: 33.0 (3.7 and 36.6).
When Torvik differential is 25 or less, #1 Seed is 15-5, (10-10) --- when differential is 35 or more, #1 Seed is 21-2, (11-11).
In #1 vs. #8 matchup, when favored by 10 or more, #1 Seed is 11-0, (6-5), when favored by 8 or less, #1 Seed is 9-6, (7-8).
In #1 vs. #8 matchup, when #8 Seed from a tier 1 conference, #1 Seed: 16-5, (10-11), 78.8-69.0 --- vs. non-tier 1: 8-2, (6-4) 75.3-62.4.
In #1 vs. #9 matchup, when #9 Seed from a tier 1 conference, #1 Seed: 19-1, (13-7), 79.2-65.7 --- vs non-tier 1: 5-2, (1-6) 73.4-68.9.
In #1 vs. #9 matchup, when favored by 10 or more, #1 Seed is 12-1, (6-7) --- when favored by 8 or less, #1 Seed is 8-2, (7-3).
In #1/#8, #1 Seed has led at half in 24 of 31 matchups, by 5 or more 20 times, 10 or more 11 times.
In #1/#9, #1 Seed has led at half in 21 of 27 matchups, by 5 or more 16 times, 10 or more 6 times.
#1 Seed vs. a #8 Seed w/o a top 40 offensive efficiency ranking is 8-2, (5-5) --- vs. a #9 Seed w/o a top 40 off-eff ranking is 13-2 (9-6).
#1 Seed w/o a top 20 off-eff ranking is 8-2, (6-4) --- w/o a top 20 def-eff ranking, #1 Seed is 13-3, (6-10).
Last 3
Last 5
Last 15
Last 15
Last 5
Last 3
#2 Seed S/U
6-1
7-2
21-10
18-4
12-0
7-0
#2 Seed S/U
Average Spread
-6.2
-5.9
-5.8
-6.5
-9.9
-9.1
Average Spread
#2 Seed ATS
4-3-0
5-4-0
15-16-0
10-12-0
6-6-0
3-4-0
#2 Seed ATS
#2 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
3-2-0
3-2-0
8-8-0
5-6-0
3-4-0
1-3-0
#2 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
vs.
#2 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
1-1-0
2-2-0
7-8-0
5-6-0
3-2-0
2-1-0
#2 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
vs.
7
Seed
O/U Record
2-5-0
3-6-0
16-14-1
10-12-0
9-3-0
6-1-0
O/U Record
Average O/U
137.8
139.4
140.1
140.3
141.0
141.1
Average O/U
10
Seed
#2 - Points Scored
70.1
70.3
72.6
72.3
80.6
83.9
#2 - Points Scored
#7 - Points Scored
64.4
66.9
68.8
67.1
69.7
73.7
#10 - Points Scored
2
Seed
2
Seed
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
-
#2 Seed vs. #7 Seed w/ Bart Torvik ranking of 35 or worse: 10-2, (8-4), 74.3-66.3 --- vs. #7 Seed w/ top 20 ranking: 6-3, (5-4), 74.1-68.0.
#2 Seed vs. #10 Seed w/ Bart Torvik ranking of 35 or worse: 8-4, (5-7), 72.2-86.6 --- vs. #10 Seed w/ top 20 ranking: 4-0, (2-2), 70.5-63.0.
When the Torvik ranking differential is 20 or less, #2 Seed is 16-6, (10-12). When 30 or more, #2 Seed is 14-6, (10-10), since '21: 7-1 (5-3)
#2 Seed favored by 5 or fewer points 10-8, (6-12), when favored by 7 or more points: 14-3 (6-11) --- 8-0 S/U vs. #10 Seed.
#2 Seed vs. a #7 Seed from tier 1 conference: 14-8, (9-13) --- vs. non tier 1 conference: 7-2 (6-3).
#2 Seed vs. a #10 Seed from tier 1 conference: 16-3, (10-9) --- non tier 1 conference: 2-1, (0-3).
In #2/#7, #2 Seed has led at half in 21 of 31 matchups, by 5 or more 15 times, 10 or more 8 times.
In #2/#10, #2 Seed has led at half in 17 of 22 matchups, by 5 or more 8 times, 10 or more 5 times.
#2 Seed vs. #7 Seed w/ defensive efficiency ranking of 30 or better: 8-5, (6-7) --- vs. #10 Seed w/ def-eff. ranking of 30 or better: 9-1, (5-5).
#7/#10 Seed vs #15 Seed, #7/#10 is 3-4, (3-4), #15 W's: '13 FGCU (SDSU), '21 ORU (UF), '22 St. Peter's (Murr. St), '23 Princeton (Arizona)
When total has gone OVER, #2 Seed is 21-5, (12-14) --- when game has gone UNDER, #2 Seed is 17-9, (12-14).
@ Matteise
Last 3
Last 5
Last 15
Last 15
Last 5
Last 3
#3 Seed S/U
3-2
7-3
19-6
15-12
12-0
7-0
#3 Seed S/U
Average Spread
-1.5
-1.5
-2.5
-5.2
-9.9
-9.1
Average Spread
#3 Seed ATS
2-3-0
5-5-0
15-10-0
11-16-0
6-6-0
3-4-0
#3 Seed ATS
#3 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
1-2-0
3-3-0
10-7-0
5-8-0
3-4-0
1-3-0
#3 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
vs.
#3 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
1-1-0
2-2-0
5-3-0
6-8-0
3-2-0
2-1-0
#3 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
vs.
6
Seed
O/U Record
4-1-0
5-4-1
12-12-1
16-11-0
9-3-0
6-1-0
O/U Record
Average O/U
143.9
143.3
140.9
137.0
141.0
141.1
Average O/U
11
Seed
#3 - Points Scored
76.0
73.3
72.0
70.7
80.6
83.9
#3 - Points Scored
#6 - Points Scored
75.6
71.5
68.9
68.4
69.7
73.7
#11 - Points Scored
3
Seed
3
Seed
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
-
In #3/#6 matchup, 9 of 25 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 10 by 5 five points or loss -- 10 by 10 more points, last year: 8.
In #3/#11 matchup, 6 of 27 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 10 by 5 five points or loss -- 12 by 10 more points, last year: 13, 26.
When scoring 70 or more points, #3 Seed is 24-3, (20-7) --- when scoring less than 70: 10-15, (6-19).
#3 Seed favored by 4 or more pts is 19-11, (13-17) [vs. #11: 12-10 (8-14)], when favored by 3 or less: 9-2 (8-3), as underdog: 3-4, (3-4).
#3 Seed w/ a Bart Torvik ranking of 20 or worse is 7-7, (6-8), w/ a Torvik of 10 or better: 8-4, (6-6).
#3 Seed w/ a Bart Torvik ranking that is at least 40 spots better than #11 Seed is 8-4, (6-6) -- #3 has worse Torvik than opp: 4-5, (4-5).
#3 Seed vs. a team from tier 2 or worse conference: 15-5, (12-8), when favored by 4 or more #3 Seed is 11-2, (9-4).
When trailing at the half vs. #11 Seed, #3 Seed is 2-10, (0-12).
#14 Seed is 0-8, (2-6), trailed at HT each G avg. score: 37.9-29.0 --- avg #14 Seed Torvik in R32: 103.1, Tier 4: 4x, Tier 5: 2x, Tier 6: 2x
Last 3
Last 5
Last 15
Last 15
Last 5
Last 3
#4 Seed S/U
3-3
4-4
17-11
16-3
12-0
7-0
#4 Seed S/U
Average Spread
0.3
0.4
-1.3
-5.9
-9.9
-9.1
Average Spread
#4 Seed ATS
3-3-0
4-4-0
17-11-0
10-9-0
6-6-0
3-4-0
#4 Seed ATS
#4 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
2-1-0
3-1-0
11-6-0
4-6-0
3-4-0
1-3-0
#4 Seed ATS: Favored By
Avg. ATS Or More
vs.
#4 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
1-2-0
1-3-0
6-5-0
6-3-0
3-2-0
2-1-0
#4 Seed ATS: Favored By
Less Than Avg. ATS
vs.
5
Seed
O/U Record
3-3-0
4-4-0
12-15-1
7-12-0
9-3-0
6-1-0
O/U Record
Average O/U
135.3
137.6
137.9
138.3
141.0
141.1
Average O/U
12
Seed
#4 - Points Scored
66.2
67.9
69.6
71.8
80.6
83.9
#4 - Points Scored
#5 - Points Scored
67.5
68.4
67.4
62.8
69.7
73.7
#12 - Points Scored
4
Seed
4
Seed
(Notes Going Back To 2009 NCAA Tournament)
-
In #4/#5 matchup, when #4 Seed favored by 3.5 or more points: 7-2, (7-2), when underdog #4 is 4-5 (4-5), 0-3 when underdog of 3 or more.
In #4/#12 matchup, when #4 Seed favored by 5.5 or more points: 11-1, (5-7) --- 5 G +/- 3 pts from spread.
#4 Seed from tier 1 conf. is 11-9, (10-10) vs. tier 1 opp --- vs. non tier 1 opp, #4 Seed from tier 1 conf. is 18-4, (14-8) [12-1, (8-5) vs. #12 Sd]
#4 Seed from a non tier 1 conference is 4-1, (3-2) --- last happened in 2018 #4 Gonzaga vs. #5 Ohio State, only time since 2015.
When #5 Seed has a better Bart Torvik ranking, #4 Seed is 3-6, (3-6) --- when when #5 Seed is favored, #4 Seed is 0-5, (0-5).
When both #4 and #5 Seed have a Bart Torvik ranking of 20 or better, #4 Seed is 11-6, (11-6).
Top 20 #4 Seed vs. #5 Seed w/ a Bart Torvik ranking of 21 or worse, #4 Seed is 6-2, (6-2).
In #5/#13 matchup, #5 Seed is 8-0 (7-1). In 7 of 8 G the margin of victory has been by 13 or more points, 5 times by 20+ points.
In #12 vs. #13 matchup, #12 Seed is 3-2, (3-2). #13 S/U wins came when #13 had the better Torvik ranking (49 vs. 54 and 64 vs. 65).
In #12 vs. #13 matchup, when #13 Seed comes from a tier 4+ conference, the #12 Seed is 2-0, (2-0).
@ Matteise
NCAA TOURNAMENT 2009-2024 — SWEET SIXTEEN
2024
Loses-Wins
Seed
1
1
--
4
17-8
5
11-6
8
--
9
--
12
5-0
13
1-0
16
--
TOTAL
34-14
4
8-17
--
--
3-3
0-2
--
--
--
11-22
5
6-11
--
--
--
1-1
--
--
--
7-12
8
--
3-3
--
--
--
0-1
--
--
3-4
WinsLoses
1/5
Connecticut
82
San Diego St.
52
1/4
UNC
87
Alabama
89
1/4
Houston
51
Duke
54
1/5
Purdue
80
Gonzaga
68
2023
4/9
Tennessee
55
FAU
62
1/5
Houston
75
Miami FL
89
1/5
Alabama
64
San Diego St.
71
4/8
Connecticut
88
Arkansas
65
2022
9
--
2-0
1-1
--
--
--
1-0
--
4-1
12
0-5
--
--
1-0
--
--
--
--
1-5
13
0-1
--
--
--
0-1
--
--
--
0-2
16
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
14-34
22-11
12-7
4-3
1-4
5-1
2-0
--
4/8
UCLA
66
UNC
73
1/4
Kansas
66
Providence
61
1/5
Arizona
60
Houston
72
1/4
Gonzaga
68
Arkansas
74
2021
1/4
Michigan
76
Florida St.
58
8/12
Loy-Chicago
58
Oregon St.
65
1/5
Baylor
62
Villanova
51
1/5
Gonzaga
83
Creighton
65
- The better seed is 39-21 S/U and 29-29-2 ATS --- From 2019-2024: 10-10 S/U and 7-13 ATS.
- #1 Seeds are 34-14 S/U and 25-22-1 ATS --- From 2019-2024: 9-7 S/U and 6-10 ATS.
- When favored by five or fewer points: 9-5, (6-7-1) --- vs. top 10 Torvik opp: 4-3 S/U, vs. non-top 10 BT: 5-2.
- When favored by eight or more points: 12-2, (9-5) --- S/U L's: '22 #1 Gonzaga/#4 Arkansas & '11 #1 Duke/#5 Arizona in Anaheim.
- 6-2, (6-2) vs. #4/#5 Seeds (77.8-65.1), #1 Seed vs. #12/#13 Seed 6-0, (3-3), 74.2-58.2.
- #1 Seed vs. a team w/ a Torvik ranking of 21 or worse: 15-3, (8-10), vs. team w/ Torvik ranking of 20 or better: 19-11, (17-12-1), vs. a
-
-
-
-
team w/ a top 10 Torvik ranking: 8-5 (7-5-1).
- When both are from a tier 1 conf. & worse seed has a Torvik ranking of 25 or worse, #1 Seed is 7-0 S/U, avg. score: 82.4-61.1.
- When both are from a tier 1 conf. & worse seed has a Torvik ranking of 20 or better, #1 Seed is 15-10 S/U, avg. score: 74.2-70.0.
#1 Seed...
- From a tier 1 conference vs. opponent from tier 1 conference: 23-10, (19-14), HT margin <=5: 16x, <=3 9x, >=10 8x.
- From a tier 1 conference vs. opponent from a tier 2 or worse conference: 8-2, (4-6), HT margin <=5 pts 2x, >=10 pts 4x.
- In a game with a Bart Torvik ranking margin of 10 or less is: 13-9, (11-10-1).
- In a game with a Bart Torvik ranking margin of 25 or more is: 9-1, (5-5) --- S/U L: 2023, Miami (BT: 40) beat Houston (BT: 1).
When #1 Seed scores 70 or more points: 26-5, (21-10), when scoring under 70 points: 8-9 (4-12-1)
At halftime, #1 Seed...
- Has led 14 times vs. #4 Seed (<=5 pts 4x, >=10 pts 4x), trailed 9 times (4-5 S/U, 2-7 ATS), and the score was tied twice.
- Has led 11 times vs. #5 Seed (<=5 pts 5x, >=10 pts 4x), trailed 6 times (1-5 S/U, 1-5 ATS).
- Has not trailed at the half vs. a #12 or #13 Seed. In 5 G vs. #12 Seed, have led by 14+ four times. Avg HT margin: 15.6.
In #1/#4 matchup, #1 Seed is 9-3, (5-6-1) vs. a #4 Seed w/ a top 20 def-efficiency ranking, 6-2, (5-3) when def-efficiency outside top 40.
In #1/#5 matchup, 2010 Syracuse 59 vs. Butler 63: Syracuse -11 turnovers, 2011 Duke 77 vs. Arizona 93: Duke led by 6 at the half, the
Derrick Williams game, 2019 UNC 80 vs. Auburn 97: Auburn 17-of-37 3PT, 65% on 2PA.
Pac-10/12 trend for either side of Sweet Sixteen bracket: as worse seed in Sweet 16 Regions outside of "WEST REGION" (excluding
2021 "West Region" Gams in Indy), Pac-10/Pac-12 teams are 2-10 (4-8) [Wins: 2021 Oregon State & UCLA in Indy bubble]. When
Pac-10/12 team is better seed AND playing in West Region [Does NOT include USC vs. Oregon 2021 in West Region played in Indy]
they are 4-2 S/U and 1-5 ATS.
When better seed comes from a non-tier 1 conference, that seed has gone 4-4 S/U and 3-4-1 ATS.
When the #4 or #5 Seed is the better seed, they are 4-6 S/U and 3-6-1 ATS.
- When the game has gone OVER, the #4/#5 Seeds are 3-1 S/U and 2-1-1 ATS.
- When playing an opponent with a top 60 offensive AND defensive efficiency ranking, the #4/#5 Seeds are 2-4 (1-4-1).
@ Matteise
2024
Loses-Wins
Seed
2
3
2
--
9-12
3
12-9
--
6
5-2
--
7
--
4-4
10
--
2-0
11
8-3
--
14
--
--
15
--
2-1
TOTAL
25-14
2/3
Iowa St.
69
Illinois
72
2/6
Arizona
72
Clemson
77
2/11
Marquette
58
NC State
67
2/3
Tennessee
82
Creighton
75
17-17
6
2-5
--
--
2-0
--
--
--
1-0
5-5
7
--
4-4
0-2
--
--
0-1
--
--
4-7
WinsLoses
2023
3/7
Kansas St.
98
Michigan St.
93
2/3
Texas
83
Xavier
71
6/15
Creighton
86
Princeton
75
2/3
UCLA
76
Gonzaga
79
2022
10
--
0-2
--
--
--
2-2
--
--
2-4
11
3-8
--
--
1-0
2-2
--
--
--
6-10
14
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
15
--
1-2
0-1
--
--
--
--
--
1-3
Total
14-25
17-17
5-5
7-4
4-2
10-6
--
3-1
3/15
Purdue
64
St. Peter's
67
10/11
Miami FL
70
Iowa St.
56
2/11
Villanova
63
Michigan
55
2/3
Duke
78
Texas Tech
73
2021
2/11
Alabama
78
UCLA
88
2/11
Houston
62
Syracuse
46
3/15
Arkansas
72
Oral Roberts
70
6/7
USC
82
Oregon
68
- The better seed is 38-22 S/U and 29-29-2 ATS --- Since 2019: 12-8 (11-9).
- #2 Seeds are 25-14 ATS and the O/U is 19-19.
- When favored by no more than 5 points: 17-9 S/U and 14-10-2 ATS.
- 10-8, (10-8) vs. #3 Seed --- 7-1, (4-2-2) vs. non-#3 Seed.
- When favored by eight or more points: 4-0 S/U, 1-3 ATS.
- #2 Seed vs. a team w/ a Torvik ranking of 21 or worse: 12-6, (8-9-1), vs. team w/ Torvik ranking of 20 or better: 13-8, (11-9-1), vs. a
team w/ a top 10 Torvik ranking: 2-4, (2-4).
- #2 Seed...
- From a tier 1 conference vs. opponent from tier 1 conference: 20-12, (15-16-1), O/U: 16-15.
- From a tier 1 conference vs. opponent from a tier 2 or worse conference: 3-1, (2-1-1) [2023 UCLA/Gonzaga].
- In a game with a Bart Torvik ranking margin of 10 or less is: 11-8, (10-8-1).
- In a game with a Bart Torvik ranking margin of 25 or more is: 7-3, (5-5) [2024: 0-2, NC State/Marqette, Clemson/Arizona].
- vs. an opponent w/ a WAB ranking of 15 or better is 12-7, (12-7).
- vs. an opponent w/ a WAB ranking of 25 or worse is 11-3, (6-6-2).
- When #2 Seed scores 70 or more points: 16-7, (13-8-2), O/U: 15-7, when scoring under 70 points: 9-7, (6-10), O/U: 4-12.
- At halftime, #2 Seed...
- Has led 9 times vs. #3 Seed, trailed 11 times, and the score was tied once.
- Has led 3 times vs. #6 Seed, trailed 3 times, and the score was tied once -- #2 Seed has led by 10 or more points, 2 times.
- In #2/#3 matchup, 2 of last 21 G has been decided by <=3 points, 6 by <=5 points, 12 games by >=10 points, & 2 games by 20+ poitns.
- As the better seed, the #3 Seed...
- When favored by 5 or more points is 4-1, (1-4). 2022 Purdue L vs. Saint Peter's.
- When favored by 3 or fewer points is 2-2, (2-2).
- As underdog is 2-1, (2-1).
- In a game where its Bart Torvik ranking is at least 15 spots better than the worse seed is 4-2, (1-5).
- In a game where its Bart Torvik ranking is no more than 10 spots better than the worse seed is 3-3, (3-3).
- Is 3-4, (3-4) vs. a worse seed that has an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 40 or better.
- Is 5-1, (2-4) vs. a worse seed that has an adjusted defensive efficiency ranking of 50 or worse.
- When better seed is playing a double-digit seed with a WAB ranking of 50 or worse, the better seed is 7-3, (2-7-1).
- When better seed has a top 25 offensive and defensive efficiency ranking, the better seed is 16-7, (10-12-1).
- When better seed has an offensive efficiency ranking of 26 or worse, the better seed is 9-10, (8-11).
- When better seed has a defensive efficiency ranking of 26 or worse, the better seed is 16-6, (14-7-1).
@ Matteise
NCAA TOURNAMENT 2009-2024 — ELITE EIGHT
L-W
W-L
2024
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
15
ALL
1
--
7-8
8-3
--
--
2-0
--
--
--
1-1
2-2
--
--
20-14
2
8-7
--
--
1-1
1-3
--
--
0-2
0-1
--
--
1-0
--
11-14
3
3-8
--
--
0-3
1-0
--
--
--
1-1
--
--
--
--
5-12
4
--
1-1
3-0
--
--
1-0
1-3
--
--
--
0-1
--
--
6-5
5
--
3-1
0-1
--
--
2-0
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5-2
6
0-2
--
--
0-1
0-2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0-5
7
--
--
--
3-1
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
3-1
8
--
2-0
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1-0
3-0
9
--
1-0
1-1
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0-1
--
2-2
10
1-1
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1-1
11
2-2
--
--
1-0
--
--
--
--
1-0
--
--
--
--
4-2
12
--
0-1
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0-1
15
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0-1
--
--
--
--
--
0-1
14-20
14-11
12-5
5-6
2-5
5-0
1-3
0-3
2-2
1-1
2-4
1-0
1-0
1/3
Connecticut
77
Illinois
52
4/6
Alabama
89
Clemson
82
4/11
Duke
64
NC State
76
1/2
Purdue
72
Tennessee
66
2023
3/9
Kansas St.
76
FAU
79
2/5
Texas
81
Miami FL
88
5/6
SDSU
57
Creighton
56
3/4
Gonzaga
54
Connecticut
82
2022
8/15
UNC
69
St. Peter's
49
1/10
Kansas
76
Miami FL
50
2/5
Villanova
50
Houston
44
2/4
Duke
78
Arkansas
69
2021
1/11
Michigan
49
UCLA
51
2/12
Houston
67
Oregon St.
61
1/3
Baylor
81
Arkansas
72
1/6
Gonzaga
85
USC
66
- The better seed is 30-20 S/U and 23-35-2 ATS -- 2015-2014: 21-15, (16-19-1), 2019-2024: 12-8, (10-10).
- When the better seed is...
- Favored by six or more points, the better seed is 14-6, (11-8-1).
- Favored by four or fewer points, the better seed is 9-13, (6-15-1).
- An underdog, the better seed is 4-7, (4-7).
- In games where the better seed has a worse Bart Torvik ranking than the worse seed, the better seed is 4-6, (3-6-1).
- In games where the the Bart Torvik difference is 5 or fewer ranking spots, the better seed is 8-12, (5-14-1).
- In games where the the Bart Torvik difference is 15 or fewer ranking spots, the better seed is 20-19, (16-22-1).
- In games where the the Bart Torvik difference is 25 or more ranking spots, the better seed is 6-8, (4-9-1).
- In games where the worse seed has a Bart Torvik ranking of 9 or better, the better seed is 8-11, (7-11-1).
- 12 of past 60 games have been decided by 3 points or less, 18 of past 60 by 5 points or less.
- 22 of past 60 games have been decided by 10 or more points, 10 of past 60 by 15 or more points.
- In games where O/U has gone OVER (28 G), the better seed is 12-16, (12-16).
- In games where O/U has gone UNDER (32 G), the better seed is 18-14, (11-19-2).
- In #1 vs. #2 matchup...
- The halftime margin has been 3 points or less in 9 of 15 G, no more than 5 points in 12 games.
- the #1 Seed has led 6 times, the #2 Seed 7 times, and the game has been tied at the half twice.
- #1 Seed is 2-4, (2-4) when O/U line is set at no more than 140 points.
- Better seed from Tier 1 conference vs. a non-tier 1 conference is 3-7 S/U and 3-7 ATS.
- When the better seed is a #4+ Seed, they are 5-5, (4-6) --- 2022-2024: 3-1 (2-2).
- When the better seed has an off-eff ranking of 21 or worse, the better seed is 6-9, (4-11).
- When the better seed has a def-eff ranking of 21 or worse, the better seed is 14-11, (12-12-1).
@ Matteise
SEEDING VS. ANALYTICS
When The Better Seed Does Not Have The Better Bart Torvik Ranking
When Better Seed Comes From "Big Six" Conference
Round of 64: Better Seed/Worse Bart Torvik
Year
Better Seed SU
Better Seed ATS
Favored Team ATS
2024
2-2
2-2-0
1-3-0
2023
3-1
3-1-0
2-2-0
2022
1-3
1-3-0
3-1-0
2021
2-1
2-1-0
1-2-0
2019
1-2
1-2-0
1-2-0
2018
2-1
2-1-0
2-0-0
2017
2-2
3-1-0
0-4-0
2016
3-6
3-6-0
6-3-0
2015
3-1
3-1-0
0-4-0
2014
1-2
1-2-0
2-1-0
2013
2-1
2-1-0
2-1-0
2012
2-4
1-5-0
1-5-0
2011
3-3
3-3-0
1-5-0
2010
3-5
3-5-0
3-5-0
2009
1-2
1-2-0
2-1-0
Since 2009
31-36
31-36-0
27-39-0
-Better Seed S/U Overall (1st Round)
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From Big Six Conf
10-15
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From NON-Big Six Conf
8-6
-Better Seed ATS (1st Round)
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From Big Six Conf
10-15-0
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From NON-Big Six Conf
8-6-0
When Better Seed Comes From NON-"Big Six" Conference
-Better Seed S/U Overall (1st Round)
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From Big Six Conf
10-10
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From NON-Big Six Conf
3-5
-Better Seed ATS (1st Round)
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From Big Six Conf
9-11-0
If Better Bart Torvik Team
Comes From NON-Big Six Conf
4-4-0
For this page, the "Big Six Conferences" are the ACC, B10, B12, BE,
P12, SEC.
Round of 64 Game Log: Better Seed/Worse Bart Torvik Ranking: 2009-2024
Year
Seed
Torvik
Team
Spread
Seed
Torvik
Team
Torvik Difference:
Score
2024
8
49
Florida Atlantic
-3.5
9
38
Northwestern
11
Northwestern, 77-65
2024
6
32
Clemson
1.5
11
25
New Mexico
7
Clemson, 77-56
2024
8
28
Mississippi St.
1.5
9
19
Michigan St.
9
Michigan St., 69-51
2024
8
58
Utah St.
3.5
9
37
TCU
21
Utah St., 88-72
2023
8
37
Iowa
1.5
9
23
Auburn
14
Auburn, 83-75
2023
7
59
Missouri
1.5
10
28
Utah St.
31
Missouri, 76-65
2023
8
31
Maryland
2.5
9
18
West Virginia
13
Maryland, 67-65
2023
7
36
Northwestern
-1.5
10
35
Boise St.
1
Northwestern, 75-67
2022
7
39
Murray St.
-2
10
23
San Francisco
16
San Francisco, 87-92
2022
6
50
Colorado St.
2
11
27
Michigan
23
Michigan, 75-63
2022
8
47
Seton Hall
-1.5
9
38
TCU
9
TCU, 69-42
2022
8
33
Boise St.
3.5
9
24
Memphis
9
Memphis, 64-53
2021
8
29
LSU
-2
9
28
St. Bonaventure
1
LSU, 76-61
2021
8
36
North Carolina
-2
9
15
Wisconsin
21
Wisconsin, 85-62
2021
8
39
Oklahoma
1.5
9
37
Missouri
2
Oklahoma, 72-68
2019
6
38
Villanova
-3.5
11
33
Saint Mary's
5
Villanova, 61-57
2019
8
36
Ole Miss
-1
9
32
Oklahoma
4
Oklahoma, 95-72
2019
7
31
Nevada
-3
10
22
Florida
9
Florida, 70-61
2018
7
36
Arkansas
2
10
18
Butler
18
Butler, 79-62
2018
7
50
Rhode Island
-1.5
10
35
Oklahoma
15
Rhode Island, 83-78
Game Won By Better Seed
Game Won By Worse Seed
Year
Seed
Torvik
Team
Spread
Seed
Torvik
Team
Torvik Difference:
Score
2018
7
39
Nevada
0
10
32
Texas
7
Nevada, 87-83
2017
7
32
South Carolina
1
10
30
Marquette
2
South Carolina, 93-73
2017
7
49
Dayton
6.5
10
12
Wichita St.
37
Wichita St., 64-58
2017
6
40
Maryland
-2
11
35
Xavier
5
Xavier, 76-65
2017
8
36
Northwestern
2
9
33
Vanderbilt
3
Northwestern, 68-66
2016
6
47
Notre Dame
-3
11
45
Michigan
2
Notre Dame, 70-63
2016
7
43
Wisconsin
1
10
34
Pitt
9
Wisconsin, 47-43
2016
6
26
Seton Hall
2
11
22
Gonzaga
4
Gonzaga, 68-52
2016
7
41
Dayton
1
10
35
Syracuse
6
Syracuse, 70-51
2016
8
50
Texas Tech
3.5
9
28
Butler
22
Butler, 71-61
2016
6
20
Arizona
-1
11
14
Wichita St.
6
Wichita St., 65-55
2016
8
56
Colorado
3.5
9
32
Connecticut
24
Connecticut, 74-67
2016
7
63
Oregon St.
4
10
29
VCU
34
VCU, 75-67
2016
8
38
St. Joseph's
3.5
9
33
Cincinnati
5
St. Joseph's, 78-76
2015
6
22
Butler
2.5
11
21
Texas
1
Butler, 56-48
2015
8
42
Cincinnati
-1.5
9
35
Purdue
7
Cincinnati, 66-65
2015
7
38
VCU
3.5
10
18
Ohio St.
20
Ohio St., 75-72
2015
8
53
Oregon
1
9
40
Oklahoma St.
13
Oregon, 79-73
2014
6
50
Massachusetts
6
11
11
Tennessee
39
Tennessee, 86-67
2014
8
58
Colorado
6
9
12
Pitt
46
Pitt, 77-48
2014
8
20
Gonzaga
4
9
18
Oklahoma St.
2
Gonzaga, 85-77
Game Won By Better Seed
Game Won By Worse Seed
Year
Seed
Torvik
Team
Spread
Seed
Torvik
Team
Torvik Difference:
Score
2013
6
33
Memphis
-1.5
11
24
Saint Mary's
9
Memphis, 54-52
2013
8
31
Colorado St.
2.5
9
28
Missouri
3
Missouri, 72-84
2013
6
40
UCLA
3
11
17
Minnesota
23
Minnesota, 83-63
2012
6
67
San Diego St.
3
11
40
North Carolina St.
27
North Carolina St.,
79-65
2012
7
41
Saint Mary's
-2
10
30
Purdue
11
Purdue, 72-69
2012
8
35
Creighton
-1.5
9
24
Alabama
11
Creighton, 58-57
2012
7
57
Notre Dame
-2
10
55
Xavier
2
Xavier, 67-63
2012
8
34
Iowa St.
2
9
32
Connecticut
2
Connecticut, 64-77
2012
8
16
Memphis
-3
9
10
Saint Louis
6
Saint Louis, 61-54
2011
6
45
Xavier
-1
11
30
Marquette
15
Marquette, 66-55
2011
8
36
George Mason
2
9
25
Villanova
11
George Mason, 61-57
2011
5
24
Kansas St.
-2
12
21
Utah St.
3
Utah St., 68-73
2011
7
50
UCLA
1.5
10
43
Michigan St.
7
UCLA, 78-76
2011
7
56
Texas A&M
-1
10
41
Florida St.
15
Florida St., 57-50
2011
8
19
UNLV
-2
9
12
Illinois
7
Illinois, 73-62
2010
7
18
Clemson
-2
10
17
Missouri
1
Missouri, 86-78
2010
7
29
Oklahoma St.
-2
10
28
Georgia Tech
1
Georgia Tech, 64-59
2010
8
40
UNLV
1
9
32
Northern Iowa
8
Northern Iowa, 69-66
2010
5
23
Texas A&M
-3
12
22
Utah St.
1
Texas A&M, 69-53
2010
6
39
Notre Dame
-2.5
11
35
Old Dominion
4
Old Dominion, 51-50
2010
7
51
Richmond
-1.5
10
42
Saint Mary's
9
Saint Mary's, 80-71
Game Won By Better Seed
Game Won By Worse Seed
Year
Seed
Torvik
Team
Spread
Seed
Torvik
Team
Torvik Difference:
Score
2010
6
25
Xavier
-1.5
11
20
Minnesota
5
Xavier, 65-54
2010
8
43
Gonzaga
1
9
26
Florida St.
17
Gonzaga, 67-60
2009
5
46
Florida St.
-2.5
12
31
Wisconsin
15
Wisconsin, 61-59
2009
7
61
Boston College
2
10
27
USC
34
USC, 72-55
2009
8
45
LSU
-1.5
9
43
Butler
2
LSU, 75-71
Game Won By Better Seed
Game Won By Worse Seed
NCAA Tournament Coaches 2025
Performance Against Seed Expectations (PASE)
Performance Against Seed Expectations (PASE) is a statistical measure of wins a team achieves compared to the average
number of wins each seed achieves over a period of time. The following chart shows the average number of wins each seed has
totaled over the last 20 NCAA Tournaments.
4
Tournament Wins 2004-2024
3.23
3
Wins
2.25
1.93
2
1.60
1.16
1
0
0.81
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.99
0.74 0.64
7
8
9
0.83
0.53
10
0.51
11
12
0.25
0.13 0.15 0.03
13
14
15
16
Seed
Seed
Wins
Seed
Wins
1
258
9
51
2
180
10
42
3
154
11
66
4
128
12
41
5
93
13
20
6
65
14
10
7
79
15
12
8
59
16
2
Top 15 PASE Coaches in 2025 NCAA Tournament: 2004-2024 — Min. 3 Appearances
Coach
Team
NCAA
App.
Avg.
Seed
Record
+/-Wins
PASE
OP > .5
UP > -.5
Chris Beard
Mississippi
5
6.00
11-5
5.01
1.003
0
2
Dan Hurley
Connecticut
6
5.83
14-4
5.21
0.869
2
2
John Calipari
Arkansas
15
3.13
43-14
10.98
0.732
2
8
Tom Izzo
Michigan St.
19
5.42
37-19
10.89
0.573
6
8
Dana Altman
Oregon
10
8.10
16-10
5.24
0.524
2
4
Michael White
Georgia
4
6.75
6-4
2.08
0.519
0
1
Brian Dutcher
San Diego St.
5
7.00
7-5
2.3
0.460
3
2
John Groce
Akron
5
12.20
4-5
2.26
0.453
0
2
Rick Pitino
St. John's
14
5.57
27-13
5.43
0.388
5
5
James Jones
Yale
4
13.25
2-4
0.99
0.247
0
1
Sean Miller
Xavier
12
4.92
21-12
2.68
0.223
2
4
Rodney Terry
Texas
3
7.67
4-3
0.64
0.213
0
1
Nate Oats
Alabama
7
6.57
10-7
0.93
0.132
2
2
Brad Brownell
Clemson
6
8.83
5-6
0.76
0.127
3
2
Bruce Pearl
Auburn
12
5.75
17-12
1.49
0.124
6
4
+/- Wins: Number of Wins or Loses Over Coaches Tournament History Compared To Expected Total
PASE: +/- Wins Divided By NCAA Appearances
OP >.5 - Number Of Times Team Has Outperformed Seed Expectation By At Least .5 Wins
UP >-.5 - Number Of Times Team Has Underperformed Seed Expectation By At Least .5 Wins
Top 15 PASE Coaches in 2024 NCAA Tournament: Last 5 NCAA Tournaments
Last 5 NCAA Tournaments (Since 2019)
Since 2004
Coach
Team
NCAA
App.
OP >.5
UP >.5
PASE
Avg. Seed
Tournament
Record
PASE
Hubert Davis
North Carolina
2
1
1
1.519
4.5
7-2
1.519
Dusty May
Michigan
2
1
1
1.313
8.5
4-2
1.313
Porter Moser
Oklahoma
1
1
0
1.263
9.5
6-2
2.219
Dan Hurley
Connecticut
4
2
2
1.256
5.8
14-4
0.869
Chris Beard
Mississippi
3
1
0
1.150
6.0
11-5
1.003
Dana Altman
Oregon
3
2
0
0.892
8.1
16-10
0.524
Greg McDermott
Creighton
4
2
0
0.866
7.5
11-12
-0.018
Tom Izzo
Michigan St.
4
2
0
0.784
5.4
37-19
0.573
Brian Dutcher
San Diego St.
4
2
2
0.781
7.0
7-5
0.460
Jon Scheyer
Duke
2
1
0
0.619
4.5
4-2
0.619
Brad Brownell
Clemson
2
1
1
0.600
8.8
5-6
0.127
Mick Cronin
UCLA
4
1
1
0.584
7.3
14-14
-0.004
Mark Byington
Vanderbilt
1
0
0
0.488
12.0
1-1
0.488
Mark Few
Gonzaga
5
3
1
0.448
4.7
38-20
0.081
Rodney Terry
Texas
2
1
0
0.381
7.7
4-3
0.213
Bottom 10 PASE Coaches in 2024 NCAA Tournament: Last 5 NCAA Tournaments
Last 5 NCAA Tournaments (Since 2019)
Since 2004
Coach
Team
NCAA
App.
OP >.5
UP >.5
PASE
Avg. Seed
Tournament
Record
PASE
Tommy Lloyd
Arizona
3
0
2
-1.242
1.7
4-3
-1.242
Brad Underwood
Illinois
3
0
3
-1.154
8.9
4-7
-0.448
John Calipari
Arkansas
2
0
1
-1.031
3.1
43-14
0.732
Shaka Smart
Marquette
4
0
3
-1.016
6.6
9-11
-0.368
Mark Pope
Kentucky
2
0
2
-0.813
6.0
0-2
-0.813
Todd Golden
Florida
2
0
2
-0.756
8.5
0-2
-0.756
Greg Gard
Wisconsin
4
0
3
-0.722
6.2
6-6
-0.102
Niko Medved
Colorado St.
2
0
2
-0.669
8.0
0-2
-0.669
Randy Bennett
Saint Mary's
4
0
2
-0.578
8.1
5-10
-0.369
Ryan Odom
VCU
1
0
1
-0.525
13.0
1-2
0.225
@ Matteise
NCAA Tournament Appearances - 2004-2024 (Excludes Play-in L)
Sweet 16 Appearances
20 - Bill Self (Kansas)
3 - Ritchie McKay (Liberty)
11 - B. Self
20 - Mark Few (Gonzaga)
3 - Rodney Terry (Texas)
11 - M. Few
19 - Tom Izzo (Michigan St.)
3 - Tommy Lloyd (Arizona)
11 - J. Calipari
17 - Rick Barnes (Tennessee)
2 - Anfernee Hardaway (Memphis)
10 - T. Izzo
16 - Matt Painter (Purdue)
2 - Dennis Gates (Missouri)
8 - S. Miller
15 - John Calipari (Arkansas)
2 - Dusty May (Michigan)
7 - R. Pitino
14 - Mick Cronin (UCLA)
2 - Grant McCasland (Texas Tech)
7 - M. Painter
14 - Rick Pitino (St. John's)
2 - Hubert Davis (North Carolina)
6 - R. Barnes
12 - Bruce Pearl (Auburn)
2 - Jon Scheyer (Duke)
5 - B. Pearl
12 - Greg McDermott (Creighton)
2 - Mark Pope (Kentucky)
5 - K. Sampson
12 - Scott Drew (Baylor)
2 - Niko Medved (Colorado St.)
5 - D. Altman
12 - Sean Miller (Xavier)
2 - Porter Moser (Oklahoma)
5 - S. Drew
11 - Shaka Smart (Marquette)
2 - Robert Jones (Norfolk St.)
10 - Buzz Williams (Texas A&M)
2 - Ryan Odom (VCU)
10 - Dana Altman (Oregon)
2 - Todd Golden (Florida)
9 - B. Self
10 - Kelvin Sampson (Houston)
2 - Travis DeCuire (Montana)
9 - J. Calipari
10 - Randy Bennett (Saint Mary's)
1 - Andrew Toole (Robert Morris)
6 - T. Izzo
7 - Brad Underwood (Illinois)
1 - Mark Byington (Vanderbilt)
6 - R. Pitino
7 - Nate Oats (Alabama)
1 - Scott Cross (Troy)
5 - M. Few
6 - Brad Brownell (Clemson)
0 - Alan Huss (High Point)
4 - S. Miller
6 - Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon)
0 - Ben McCollum (Drake)
6 - Dan Hurley (Connecticut)
0 - Brian Barone (SIU Edwardsville)
Final Four Appearances
6 - Greg Gard (Wisconsin)
0 - Chris Crutchfield (Omaha)
5 - T. Izzo
6 - Kevin Willard (Maryland)
0 - Donny Lind (Mount St. Mary's)
5 - J. Calipari
6 - Will Wade (McNeese)
0 - Duane Simpkins (American)
4 - B. Self
5 - Brian Dutcher (San Diego St.)
0 - Dwight Perry (Wofford)
3 - R. Pitino
5 - Chris Beard (Mississippi)
0 - Eric Olen (UC-San Diego)
2 - M. Few
5 - John Groce (Akron)
0 - Jerrod Calhoun (Utah St.)
2 - D. Hurley
5 - T.J. Otzelberger (Iowa St.)
0 - Kevin Young (BYU)
4 - Chris Jans (Mississippi St.)
0 - Lennie Acuff (Lipscomb)
2 - B. Self
4 - James Jones (Yale)
0 - Phil Martelli Jr. (Bryant)
2 - D. Hurley
4 - Michael White (Georgia)
0 - Rob Krimmel (St. Francis PA)
1 - R. Pitino
4 - Pat Kelsey (Louisville)
0 - Takayo Siddle (UNC Wilmington)
1 - S. Drew
3 - Richard Pitino (New Mexico)
0 - Tony Madlock (Alabama St.)
1 - J. Calipari
@ Matteise
Elite 8 Appearances
Championships Won
BETTER SEED RECORD BY SPREAD - FIRST ROUND, LAST 15 NCAA TOURNAMENTS (2009-2024)
Better Seed As Underdog
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
26-28
48.1%
1-1
2-1
4-0
2-1
1-2
1-2
2-1
2-6
2-3
0-2
0-1
2-1
1-2
2-1
4-4
ATS
29-25-0
53.7%
1-1-0
2-1-0
4-0-0
2-1-0
1-2-0
1-2-0
3-0-0
3-5-0
3-2-0
0-2-0
0-1-0
2-1-0
1-2-0
2-1-0
4-4-0
Better Seed As 0-3 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
39-43
47.6%
2-5
3-7
4-5
2-3
4-1
2-2
4-1
1-2
2-2
3-3
1-5
1-2
5-3
4-2
1-0
ATS
32-48-2
40.0%
2-5-0
3-7-0
3-5-1
1-4-0
4-1-0
0-3-1
2-3-0
1-2-0
1-3-0
3-3-0
1-5-0
1-2-0
5-3-0
4-2-0
1-0-0
Better Seed As 3.5-6 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
59-32
64.8%
4-2
3-1
3-1
8-3
4-5
6-1
4-1
0-2
5-0
5-1
4-5
4-2
2-2
7-2
0-4
ATS
46-45-0
50.5%
3-3-0
2-2-0
1-3-0
8-3-0
3-6-0
5-2-0
3-2-0
0-2-0
4-1-0
4-2-0
2-7-0
4-2-0
1-3-0
6-3-0
0-4-0
Better Seed As 6.5-12 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
75-21
78.1%
4-2
5-0
3-1
4-2
4-1
3-2
9-1
6-2
6-1
6-1
4-1
6-4
3-2
6-0
6-1
ATS
40-53-3
43.0%
2-4-0
2-3-0
1-3-0
2-3-1
4-1-0
2-3-0
3-6-1
3-5-0
4-3-0
3-3-1
2-3-0
3-7-0
1-4-0
4-2-0
4-3-0
Better Seed As 12.5-20 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
88-11
88.9%
6-0
7-1
8-0
5-0
4-1
11-1
3-1
6-1
7-0
5-1
7-0
3-1
7-1
4-1
5-2
ATS
50-46-3
52.1%
2-3-1
4-4-0
5-3-0
4-1-0
4-1-0
5-6-1
0-4-0
4-3-0
2-4-1
2-4-0
5-2-0
1-3-0
5-3-0
2-3-0
5-2-0
Better Seed As 20.5+ Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
S/U
54-3
94.7%
5-0
2-0
3-0
1-1
5-0
1-0
5-0
4-0
4-0
4-1
4-0
5-0
4-0
2-1
5-0
ATS
28-28-1
50.0%
2-2-1
1-1-0
2-1-0
0-2-0
1-4-0
0-1-0
2-3-0
3-1-0
2-2-0
3-2-0
1-3-0
3-2-0
2-2-0
1-2-0
5-0-0
BETTER SEED (S/U) RECORD BY SPREAD, LAST 15 NCAA TOURNAMENTS (2009-2024)
Better Seed As Underdog
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
7-9
43.8%
0-0
1-1
0-0
1-0
0-0
0-0
1-2
1-1
0-0
0-0
0-1
1-1
0-1
2-1
0-1
S16
4-2
66.7%
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-1
1-1
1-0
2-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
E8
4-7
36.4%
0-0
1-0
0-1
1-2
0-1
0-1
1-1
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
1-0
0-1
0-0
Better Seed As 0-3 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
19-10
65.5%
5-1
0-2
1-0
1-2
1-0
1-0
0-1
1-0
4-1
1-1
2-0
1-0
1-0
0-2
0-0
S16
18-15
54.5%
2-1
1-0
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-0
2-0
2-1
1-2
1-2
2-0
1-2
1-1
0-1
E8
4-7
36.4%
0-1
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
1-0
0-2
1-1
1-1
0-1
0-0
0-0
1-1
0-0
Better Seed As 3.5-6 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
68-24
73.9%
1-0
4-2
7-3
4-1
3-2
4-3
6-1
5-2
5-1
5-2
5-0
5-3
3-2
6-1
5-1
S16
24-15
61.5%
0-1
3-1
1-3
0-1
2-2
2-1
2-0
4-0
1-0
2-2
1-1
0-0
2-0
2-1
2-2
E8
11-10
52.4%
1-0
1-2
1-1
0-0
1-2
0-2
0-0
0-0
0-0
2-0
1-2
0-0
2-0
0-1
2-0
Better Seed As 6.5-9.5 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
52-17
75.4%
5-0
5-0
1-2
5-0
5-2
5-2
1-1
5-0
1-2
1-2
3-0
2-2
4-3
2-1
7-0
S16
20-9
69.0%
4-0
2-1
0-1
4-0
0-0
1-0
1-0
1-0
1-1
0-0
3-0
2-2
1-0
0-2
0-2
E8
9-5
64.3%
1-1
0-0
0-0
1-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
1-1
1-1
0-0
0-0
3-1
1-0
0-0
1-1
Better Seed As 10+ Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
32-2
94.1%
4-0
0-1
2-0
2-0
3-0
1-0
3-0
1-0
2-0
3-1
5-0
1-0
2-0
1-0
2-0
S16
11-2
84.6%
0-0
0-0
1-0
1-0
2-0
0-0
2-0
0-0
0-0
1-0
0-0
2-0
0-2
1-0
1-0
E8
2-1
66.7%
0-0
0-0
0-1
0-0
0-0
1-0
1-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
0-0
BETTER SEED (ATS) RECORD BY SPREAD, LAST 15 NCAA TOURNAMENTS (2009-2024)
Better Seed As Underdog
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
7-9-0
43.8%
0-0-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-2-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-1-0
1-1-0
0-1-0
2-1-0
0-1-0
S16
5-1-0
83.3%
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
1-1-0
1-0-0
2-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
E8
4-7-0
36.4%
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-1-0
1-2-0
0-1-0
0-1-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-1-0
0-0-0
Better Seed As 0-3 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
17-12-0
58.6%
5-1-0
0-2-0
1-0-0
1-2-0
1-0-0
1-0-0
0-1-0
0-1-0
4-1-0
1-1-0
1-1-0
1-0-0
1-0-0
0-2-0
0-0-0
S16
14-16-3
46.7%
2-1-0
1-0-0
1-1-0
0-2-0
1-1-0
0-2-1
1-0-0
2-0-0
0-1-2
1-2-0
1-2-0
2-0-0
1-2-0
1-1-0
0-1-0
E8
2-8-1
20.0%
0-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-2-0
0-1-1
1-1-0
0-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-2-0
0-0-0
Better Seed As 3.5-6 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
55-37-0
59.8%
1-0-0
3-3-0
6-4-0
3-2-0
3-2-0
4-3-0
5-2-0
4-3-0
2-4-0
2-5-0
5-0-0
5-3-0
3-2-0
5-2-0
4-2-0
S16
21-17-1
55.3%
0-1-0
2-1-1
1-3-0
0-1-0
1-3-0
2-1-0
2-0-0
4-0-0
1-0-0
1-3-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
2-0-0
2-1-0
2-2-0
E8
9-12-0
42.9%
1-0-0
1-2-0
0-2-0
0-0-0
1-2-0
0-2-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-1-0
1-2-0
0-0-0
2-0-0
0-1-0
2-0-0
Better Seed As 6.5-9.5 Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
30-39-0
43.5%
3-2-0
5-0-0
1-2-0
2-3-0
2-5-0
4-3-0
1-1-0
2-3-0
1-2-0
1-2-0
1-2-0
1-3-0
1-6-0
1-2-0
4-3-0
S16
13-16-0
44.8%
3-1-0
2-1-0
0-1-0
2-2-0
0-0-0
0-1-0
1-0-0
1-0-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
1-2-0
2-2-0
0-1-0
0-2-0
0-2-0
E8
8-6-0
57.1%
1-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-1-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
2-2-0
1-0-0
0-0-0
1-1-0
Better Seed As 10+ Point Favorite
Total
Win %
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
R32
18-16-0
52.9%
2-2-0
0-1-0
1-1-0
2-0-0
2-1-0
1-0-0
1-2-0
1-0-0
0-2-0
2-2-0
3-2-0
1-0-0
0-2-0
0-1-0
2-0-0
S16
5-8-0
38.5%
0-0-0
0-0-0
1-0-0
0-1-0
0-2-0
0-0-0
1-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-1-0
0-0-0
1-1-0
0-2-0
1-0-0
1-0-0
E8
0-2-1
0.0%
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-1
0-1-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
0-0-0
2024-2025 Against The Spread & Over/Under Team Results
Team
ATS
Over/Under
Team
ATS
Over/Under
Akron
14 - 15 - 0
18 - 11 - 0
Michigan St.
21 - 9 - 1
10 - 21 - 0
Alabama
18 - 13 - 0
16 - 14 - 1
Mississippi St.
14 - 17 - 0
19 - 12 - 0
Alabama St.
11 - 16 - 2
11 - 17 - 1
Missouri
17 - 14 - 0
19 - 12 - 0
American
15 - 13 - 1
15 - 14 - 0
Montana
14 - 11 - 3
18 - 10 - 0
Arizona
16 - 15 - 0
17 - 14 - 0
Mount St. Mary's
17 - 11 - 1
12 - 15 - 2
Arkansas
13 - 16 - 1
12 - 18 - 0
New Mexico
15 - 15 - 0
14 - 15 - 1
Auburn
18 - 13 - 0
20 - 11 - 0
Norfolk St.
17 - 11 - 0
14 - 14 - 0
Baylor
9 - 18 - 3
16 - 14 - 0
North Carolina
12 - 19 - 1
16 - 15 - 1
Bryant
12 - 16 - 0
14 - 13 - 1
Oklahoma
15 - 15 - 0
17 - 12 - 1
BYU
18 - 12 - 1
18 - 12 - 1
Ole Miss
15 - 15 - 1
16 - 15 - 0
Clemson
20 - 11 - 0
16 - 15 - 0
Omaha
20 - 9 - 0
16 - 13 - 0
Colorado St.
18 - 13 - 0
17 - 13 - 1
Oregon
14 - 16 - 1
16 - 15 - 0
UConn
14 - 17 - 0
15 - 15 - 1
Purdue
17 - 13 - 0
17 - 12 - 1
Creighton
18 - 11 - 2
14 - 17 - 0
Robert Morris
23 - 6 - 0
16 - 13 - 0
Drake
15 - 13 - 0
12 - 16 - 0
St. Francis
14 - 12 - 0
17 - 9 - 0
Duke
20 - 10 - 0
16 - 14 - 0
Saint Mary's
14 - 15 - 0
11 - 17 - 1
Florida
23 - 8 - 0
14 - 16 - 1
San Diego St.
12 - 16 - 0
14 - 13 - 1
Georgia
17 - 14 - 0
12 - 18 - 1
SIUE
15 - 11 - 1
13 - 14 - 0
Gonzaga
13 - 18 - 0
18 - 13 - 0
St. John's
19 - 11 - 1
14 - 16 - 1
Grand Canyon
10 - 19 - 0
14 - 15 - 0
Tennessee
15 - 15 - 1
13 - 18 - 0
High Point
15 - 14 - 0
14 - 15 - 0
Texas
14 - 15 - 1
18 - 11 - 1
Houston
16 - 14 - 1
14 - 17 - 0
Texas A&M
16 - 13 - 2
12 - 19 - 0
Illinois
14 - 15 - 1
18 - 12 - 0
Texas Tech
16 - 14 - 0
16 - 13 - 1
Iowa St.
17 - 14 - 0
13 - 18 - 0
Troy
17 - 11 - 0
11 - 17 - 0
Kansas
14 - 16 - 0
9 - 21 - 0
UC San Diego
23 - 6 - 0
13 - 15 - 1
Kentucky
16 - 14 - 1
17 - 13 - 1
UCLA
18 - 12 - 1
13 - 18 - 0
Liberty
18 - 9 - 1
13 - 15 - 0
UNC Wilmington
19 - 10 - 0
15 - 12 - 2
Lipscomb
15 - 9 - 4
11 - 17 - 0
Utah St.
15 - 15 - 0
15 - 13 - 2
Louisville
19 - 12 - 0
10 - 21 - 0
Vanderbilt
18 - 13 - 0
15 - 15 - 1
Marquette
14 - 17 - 0
13 - 18 - 0
VCU
19 - 8 - 2
16 - 13 - 0
Maryland
17 - 14 - 0
17 - 13 - 1
Wisconsin
19 - 11 - 1
18 - 13 - 0
McNeese
13 - 15 - 0
12 - 14 - 2
Wofford
13 - 15 - 0
14 - 14 - 0
Memphis
15 - 16 - 0
16 - 15 - 0
Xavier
17 - 14 - 0
14 - 16 - 1
Michigan
13 - 17 - 0
16 - 14 - 0
Yale
16 - 9 - 0
13 - 12 - 0
@ Matteise
via covers.com
ROAD “WOE”-RRIORS: POINTS SCORED
On average, teams in 2025 NCAAT had a Torvik Off-Efficiency that was 0.65 points higher at home than on the road.
Point Scored
Team
Point Scored
Team
Home
Road +/-
Home
Road +/-
Akron
119.1
10.5
Michigan St.
117.7
1.5
Alabama
122.8
-7.7
Mississippi St.
119.1
1
Alabama St.
103.2
2.7
Missouri
124.9
-2.3
American
101.1
-0.9
Montana
109.4
-2.8
Arizona
127.0
6.3
Mount St. Mary's
99.3
0.2
Arkansas
111.9
0.9
New Mexico
113.6
2.6
Auburn
125.1
-8
Norfolk St.
106.7
0.1
Baylor
121.2
0.8
North Carolina
118.2
-0.3
Bryant
103.8
-3.6
Oklahoma
117.6
-0.7
BYU
126.4
3.8
Ole Miss
114.4
-5
Clemson
119.9
3.7
Omaha
110.6
-0.7
Colorado St.
118.6
6.2
Oregon
114.4
-1.7
UConn
121.9
-0.6
Purdue
131.1
12.6
Creighton
119.8
5.7
Robert Morris
101.3
-6.9
Drake
110.8
-2.7
St. Francis
103.7
6.3
Duke
128.9
2.6
Saint Mary's
115.7
1.2
Florida
127.0
0
San Diego St.
107.7
-2.3
Georgia
118.3
6
SIUE
100.4
-1
Gonzaga
124.2
1.4
St. John's
112.2
-1.2
Grand Canyon
109.9
3.3
Tennessee
119.2
0.7
HIgh Point
116.1
-2.5
Texas
117.9
2.4
Houston
126.9
4.3
Texas A&M
119.1
6.6
Illinois
118.6
-5.9
Texas Tech
122.8
-5.9
Iowa St.
119.6
0.2
Troy
110.7
7.2
Kansas
123.1
14.1
UC San Diego
113.0
0.4
Kentucky
127.6
7.3
UCLA
121.4
8.6
Liberty
105.7
-10.6
UNC Wilmington
113.1
2.4
Lipscomb
112.6
4.5
Utah St.
127.2
10.4
Louisville
113.2
-9.4
Vanderbilt
118.0
-0.4
Marquette
114.3
-5.3
VCU
116.4
1.9
Maryland
115.1
-6
Wisconsin
121.5
-1.5
McNeese
112.0
-1.9
Wofford
107.5
-5.6
Memphis
110.3
-3.5
Xavier
114.9
-1.4
Michigan
117.2
1.9
Yale
114.2
0.4
ROAD “WOE”-RRIORS: POINTS ALLOWED
On average, teams in 2025 NCAAT had a Torvik Def-Efficiency that was 1.2 higher on the road than home.
Team
Point Allowed
Home
Road +/-
Akron
110.0
4.8
Alabama
92.3
Alabama St.
Team
Point Allowed
Home
Road +/-
Michigan St.
93.2
-8.3
-7.2
Mississippi St.
100.3
98
117.1
6.4
Missouri
99.6
97.3
American
104.8
-7.7
Montana
107.0
108.5
Arizona
96.3
1
Mount St. Mary's
111.7
115
Arkansas
94.0
-2.3
New Mexico
97.3
97.8
Auburn
89.5
0.1
Norfolk St.
111.7
108.4
Baylor
94.2
-8.3
North Carolina
98.8
97.1
Bryant
101.8
-7.7
Oklahoma
102.5
99.2
BYU
94.2
4.1
Ole Miss
95.9
100.6
Clemson
96.5
3.7
Omaha
109.1
101.5
Colorado St.
98.0
0.4
Oregon
96.5
103.5
UConn
102.5
6
Purdue
98.4
99.5
Creighton
98.4
4.7
Robert Morris
102.0
107.9
Drake
100.0
2.1
St. Francis
114.2
108.3
Duke
90.6
-5.7
Saint Mary's
97.1
98.3
Florida
91.0
5.3
San Diego St.
92.2
97.3
Georgia
96.6
-0.8
SIUE
106.2
107.7
Gonzaga
97.9
3.3
St. John's
93.5
100.5
Grand Canyon
99.1
-3.7
Tennessee
90.7
95.7
High Point
103.4
1.9
Texas
102.3
94.2
Houston
85.5
-5.3
Texas A&M
93.2
96.9
Illinois
92.1
-3.9
Texas Tech
94.3
91.8
Iowa St.
88.6
-7.6
Troy
105.5
106.2
Kansas
94.2
-0.8
UC San Diego
99.0
100.6
Kentucky
97.6
1.2
UCLA
93.1
90
Liberty
95.6
-10.4
UNC Wilmington
108.1
106.4
Lipscomb
105.9
-1.9
Utah St.
105.6
99.9
Louisville
95.1
-4.3
Vanderbilt
99.7
102
Marquette
93.5
-9.6
VCU
94.3
90.8
Maryland
89.8
-3.8
Wisconsin
97.4
98.6
McNeese
98.7
-4.3
Wofford
109.6
114.6
Memphis
98.9
-4.3
Xavier
97.1
99.3
Michigan
95.4
-6.8
Yale
99.7
102.2
Regions and Teams
South Region
1
Auburn
16
Alabama State / Saint Francis
2
Michigan State
15
Bryant
3
Iowa State
14
Lipscomb
4
Texas A&M
13
Yale
5
Michigan
12
UC San Diego
6
Ole Miss
11
San Diego State / North Carolina
7
Marquette
10
New Mexico
8
Louisvvile
9
Creighton
East Region
1
Duke
16
American / Mt. St. Mary's
2
Alabama
15
Robert Morris
3
Wisconsin
14
Montana
4
Arizona
13
Akron
5
Oregon
12
Liberty
6
BYU
11
VCU
7
Saint Mary's
10
Vanderbilt
8
Mississippi State
9
Baylor
Midwest Region
1
Houston
16
SIUE
2
Tennessee
15
Wofford
3
Kentucky
14
Troy
4
Purdue
13
High Point
5
Clemson
12
McNeese
6
Illinois
11
Texas / Xavier
7
UCLA
10
Utah State
8
Gonzaga
9
Georgia
West Region
1
Florida
16
Norfolk State
2
St. John's
15
Omaha
3
Texas Tech
14
UNC Wilmington
4
Maryland
13
Grand Canyon
5
Memphis
12
Colorado State
6
Missouri
11
Drake
7
Kansas
10
Arkansas
8
UConn
9
Oklahoma
1.
SCHEDULE
Ranking comes from sorting
teams average rank
excluding min/max of BPI,
Evan Miya, KenPom, NET,
KPI, SOR, Torvik and
WAB.
1
2
2. Record in games by
location using the ranking
laid out above.
3. Efficiency and stats via
Bart Torvik
4. Statistical output by game
result and location
3
5. PPP & PPP Allowed by
location and game result via
Torvik
4
6. Player statistical data for
team's top four scorers by
LAST 5 GAMES PLAYED
BY THE PLAYER (NOT
JUST LAST 5 GAMES BY
TEAM!!!), location, and
result.
7. Roster and statistics
8. Percentage of points and
scored and allowed by
situations and percentile
rank. Stats via CBB
Analytics
5
6
7
8
South Region
1.15
NCAA
Average
1.10
ADJUSTED PPP ALLOWED
Saint Francis
PPP & PPPA
1.06
Alabama St.
Bryant
1.05
Yale
Lipscomb
North Carolina
1.00
Creighton
Mississippi
UC San Diego
0.95
New Mexico
San Diego St.
Louisville
Auburn
Iowa St.
Michigan St.
0.90
0.85
Marquette
Michigan
Texas A&M
0.85
0.90
0.95
Lexington
1
Auburn
Thu
16
Bama St / SFU
11:50
8
Louisville
Thu
9
Creighton
9:15
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
ADJUSTED PPP
Denver
5
Michigan
Thu
12
UC San Diego
7:00
4
Texas A&M
Thu
13
Yale
4:25
Milwaukee
6
Ole Miss
Fri
11
SDSU / UNC
1:05
3
Iowa St.
Fri
14
Lipscomb
10:30
Atlanta
Friday / Sunday
Cleveland
7
Marquette
Fri
10
New Mexico
4:25
2
Michigan St.
Fri
15
Bryant
7:00
Game Times Are PT
1.30
Alabama St / St. Francis
Louisville
Creighton
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Auburn
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Saint Francis
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Alabama State
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
189
W, 94-43
Vermont
1
W, 74-69
^^Houston
123
W, 79-56
Kent St.
122
W, 102-69
North Alabama
Record
28-5 (15-3)
10
W, 83-81
^^Iowa St.
Home
13-2
36
W, 85-72
^^North Carolina
Road
37
W, 90-76
^^Memphis
3
L, 84-78
*Duke
232
W, 98-54
Richmond
45
W, 91-53
^^Ohio St.
255
W, 100-59
Georgia St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^Purdue
67.8
129.1
93.7
13.4
17.4
34.3
30.3
143rd
1st
12th
6th
155th
51st
211th
55.7
74.0
56.1
36.8
33.5
40.6
25th
eFG%
113th
FT%
30th
2PT%
39th
3PT%
166th
FTA/FGA %
138th
3PA/FGA %
46.0
73.5
47.2
29.2
39.2
34.8
11th
259th
41st
5th
312th
50th
18
W, 87-69
#1 Auburn Tigers - SEC
BPI: 3
BT: 3
EM: 4
KPI: 1
NET: 2
W, 87-58
Monmouth
23
W, 84-68
Missouri
45
W, 87-82
*Texas
86
W, 66-63
*South Carolina
33
W, 88-66
Miss St.
35
W, 70-68
*Georgia
SOR: 1
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
83.8
69.6
1-25
2-2
3-1
2-2
15-3
Win
85.0
67.0
26-50
5-0
4-0
4-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
77.4
84.0
51-100
0-0
0-0
2-0
Non-Conf.
93.7
Home
87.3
65.5
101-200
3-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
31.2
Road
80.9
73.0
201+
3-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +12.5 (1st)
261
POM: 4
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 53-51
Tennessee
83
W, 87-74
*LSU
Win
74.8%
57.1%
45.8%
36.9%
27.8%
9.3
5.4
1.9
6.7
2.4
-0.5
26
W, 92-82
*Ole Miss
Loss
68.5%
51.0%
55.6%
36.2%
35.5%
8.4
8.6
-2.0
-5.6
1.0
-6.0
39
W, 98-70
Oklahoma
Home
74.4%
59.1%
44.9%
35.3%
26.4%
8.9
5.7
2.3
7.9
3.1
1.5
4
L, 90-81
Florida
Road
73.6%
53.5%
49.0%
38.0%
31.9%
9.4
5.9
0.4
2.3
1.4
-3.7
47
W, 80-68
*Vanderbilt
6
W, 94-85
*Alabama
140
39
W, 67-60
Arkansas
125
125
35
W, 82-70
Georgia
26
W, 106-76
Ole Miss
110
110
W, 94-78
*Kentucky
16
L, 83-72
*Texas A&M
95
95
80
6
!L, 93-91
Alabama
26
W, 62-57
^^Ole Miss
65
L, 70-65
In Paint 42%
42
Fast Break 12%
42
84
2nd Chance 17%
57
Off TO 19%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Tennessee
Home
2nd Chance 18% 2
Game #
Loss
Road
Johni Broome
43
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
30
In Paint 45%
80
5
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
14
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
5
85
Off TO 16%
Chad Baker-Mazara
Miles Kelly
Tahaad Pettiford
--W vs. Houston, Aub 71% 2PT FG,
Pettiford 21 off bench (5-8 3PT)
--W vs. ISU, trailed by 16 at HT
--L vs. Duke, Duke +15 FTA
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.4
8.6
37-64
2-9
12.0
2.0
13-28
6-15
15.4
2.8
9-17
16-39
12.8
3.0
8-19
12-31
W 18.5 10.9 166-294
19-65
12.9
3.4
67-121
43-113
11.0
3.8
38-80
63-160 10.4
2.0
52-103
46-129
D. Jones DNP L @ Tx A&M
L
20.6
9.0
41-76
3-11
10.8
2.2
11-25
7-15
14.8
3.0
11-21
13-33
14.4
2.4
8-24
16-36
H
18.9
9.5
94-161
10-33
13.1
2.9
34-58
24-65
11.0
4.7
21-48
33-83
8.7
1.8
21-48
22-73
R
18.8 11.5 113-209
12-43
12.2
3.4
44-88
26-63
12.0
2.8
28-53
43-110
12.9
2.3
39-79
40-92
Pettiford SEC Tourney L: 0-8 FG
Miles Kelly 9-14 3PT @ UK, since:
7-25 last 4G
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Baker-Mazara, J. Broome, D. Cardwell, D. Jones, M. Kelly (23 G: 19-4)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Johni Broome
6'10"
Sr
2
30.1
18.9
10.6
3.1
1.4
0.9
2.3
55.9%
207-370
28.9%
22-76
60.7%
105-173
10 Chad Baker-Mazara
6'7"
Sr
--
25.5
12.6
3.2
2.7
1.4
1.2
0.6
53.4%
78-146
39.1%
50-128
89.4%
110-123
13 Miles Kelly
6'6"
Sr
--
28.1
11.6
3.7
1.1
0.9
1.1
0.4
48.5%
49-101
39.4%
76-193
91.7%
55-60
0
Tahaad Pettiford
6'1"
Fr
--
22.2
11.0
2.1
2.9
1.5
0.9
0.2
47.2%
60-127
37.6%
62-165
79.5%
58-73
2
Denver Jones
6'4"
Sr
1
27.4
10.7
2.0
2.5
1.4
0.6
0.2
47.4%
46-97
41.6%
57-137
92.0%
80-87
31 Chaney Johnson
6'7"
Sr
--
23.2
9.3
4.8
1.4
1.0
0.8
0.9
63.7%
109-171
31.9%
15-47
70.5%
43-61
44 Dylan Cardwell
6'11"
Sr
--
20.1
5.1
4.8
1.6
0.6
0.8
1.5
69.5%
73-105
50.0%
1-2
33.3%
18-54
3
Jahki Howard
6'6"
Fr
14
9.9
4.7
1.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
61.8%
21-34
40.9%
9-22
66.7%
20-30
8
Ja'Heim Hudson
6'7"
Jr
7
6.0
1.5
1.0
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
60.0%
15-25
15.4%
2-13
75.0%
3-4
4
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
#1 Auburn Tigers - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
Vermont
--
297
136
56% 36-64 26% 15-58 46% 16-35 22%
5-23
6-11
8-11
7
9
9
15
1
W
74-69
^^Houston
(2)
9
1
53% 27-51 41% 24-58 30%
7-23
39%
5-13
13-19 16-22
9
10
11
10
123 W
79-56
Kent St.
(3)
195
93
49% 28-57 33% 20-61 25%
6-24
24%
5-21
17-22
11-15
10
10
6
7
122 W
102-69
North Alabama
(4)
81
180
62% 39-63 42% 27-64 44% 12-27 33%
5-15
12-17
10-11
7
4
11
10
10 W
83-81
^^Iowa St.
(6)
20
8
48% 28-59 47% 25-53 33%
39%
7-18
18-22 24-29
7
5
12
8
36 W
85-72
^^North Carolina
(0)
21
65
44% 30-69 44% 27-62 37% 11-30 38%
6-16
14-17 12-19
11
7
7
10
37 W
90-76
^^Memphis
(0)
88
47
57% 34-60 50% 28-56 33%
67%
6-9
14-17 14-19
11
8
9
11
9-27
8-24
Opp
Off. Reb
94-43
L
For
3PT
189 W
3
Opponent
Opp Eff.
78-84
*Duke
(6)
2
4
45% 29-64 50% 29-58 40% 10-25 41%
9-22
10-12 17-27
12
12
8
4
232 W
98-54
Richmond
(3)
223
218
48% 33-69 27% 16-59 43% 13-30 20%
6-30
19-27 16-19
14
7
7
14
45 W
91-53
^^Ohio St.
(5)
38
61
46% 33-72 35% 18-51 43% 13-30 38%
6-16
12-14
11-19
14
2
5
7
255 W
100-59
Georgia St.
(2)
153
318
57% 35-61 34% 21-62 36%
18%
4-22
21-26 13-20
8
14
11
18
18 W
87-69
^^Purdue
(3)
8
68
55% 36-66 39% 23-59 39% 10-26 35%
8-23
5-9
15-23
11
10
9
10
261 W
87-58
Monmouth
(8)
219
282
44% 29-66 37% 19-52 27%
39%
5-13
21-28 15-19
15
4
7
11
23 W
84-68
Missouri
(4)
5
75
57% 28-49 38% 21-55 48% 10-21 30%
7-23
18-24 19-26
6
10
16
16
45 W
87-82
*Texas
(2)
39
69
48% 29-61 46% 26-56 38%
8-21
36%
5-14
21-25 25-30
9
9
9
11
86 W
66-63
*South Carolina
(3)
110
59
46% 26-57 41% 25-61 38%
8-21
25%
4-16
6-12
9
13
6
7
33 W
88-66
Miss St.
(2)
26
50
55% 33-60 35% 22-63 42% 10-24 13%
3-24
12-15 19-27
7
15
9
16
35 W
70-68
*Georgia
(3)
46
23
39% 24-61 46% 26-57 44% 10-23 35%
7-20
12-20
9-20
13
10
9
12
5
W
53-51
Tennessee
(6)
19
3
31% 18-59 32% 17-54 15%
3-20
18%
4-22
14-19 13-16
15
8
9
10
83 W
87-74
*LSU
(3)
128
62
40% 32-80 47% 24-51 32%
8-25
36%
8-22
15-21 18-26
24
10
9
20
26 W
92-82
*Ole Miss
(2)
31
34
48% 30-62 46% 26-56 50% 14-28 32%
6-19
18-23 24-35
11
8
12
9
98-70
Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
53% 32-61 33% 18-54 31%
8-26
30%
7-23
26-33 27-29
7
6
7
13
81-90
Florida
(3)
3
13
43% 30-70 48% 31-64 32%
7-22
39% 13-33 14-23 15-18
15
9
8
11
47 W
80-68
*Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
52% 30-58 42% 26-62 38%
9-24
18%
3-17
11-15 13-14
7
14
8
11
6
39 W
4
L
9-25
8-30
9-16
W
94-85
*Alabama
(3)
4
28
46% 30-65 39% 27-70 40% 12-30 19%
5-26
22-32 26-35
6
10
4
6
39 W
67-60
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
40% 25-62 46% 25-55 17%
4-24
16%
3-19
13-17
7-14
11
3
12
10
35 W
82-70
Georgia
(2)
46
23
43% 27-63 39% 22-57 27%
6-22
32%
7-22
22-28 19-25
16
10
8
12
26 W
106-76
Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
60% 34-57 47% 24-51 52% 11-21 36%
5-14
27-33 23-31
8
3
8
8
14 W
94-78
*Kentucky
(2)
11
49
52% 29-56 46% 23-50 46% 12-26 24%
4-17
24-31 28-38
4
9
8
18
16
L
72-83
*Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
50% 25-50 43% 28-65 41%
36%
9-25
13-15 18-25
8
22
11
9
6
L
91-93 #
Alabama
(3)
4
28
48% 35-73 52% 35-67 39% 10-26 32%
7-22
11-17 16-24
8
8
9
13
62-57
^^Ole Miss
(5)
31
34
45% 23-51 38% 20-53 29%
6-21
17%
4-23
10-15 13-17
8
5
14
9
65-70
^^Tennessee
(0)
19
3
42% 23-55 43% 20-47 29%
6-21
26%
5-19
13-22 25-27
8
10
6
10
26 W
5
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-22
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
125.1
9th
133.1
1st
133.7
1st
128.7
4th
129.9
5th
Def-Efficiency
89.5
4th
96.3
26th
92.3
15th
94.4
17th
96.4
27th
WAB
+3.2
6th
+9.3
1st
+4.2
1st
+7.9
2nd
+4.3
7th
FG% 50% or better
12-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
21-3
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-2
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
9-3
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-2
17-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-3
11-2
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
18-2
More FTA than Opp.
11-1
13-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
0-1
More OReb than Opp.
17-1
15-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
28-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
20-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
19-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
6-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
6-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
4-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
15-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-0
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
12-0
97
L, 93-79
*UNLV
83
L, 74-61
*LSU
W, 115-64
Virginia-Lynchburg
154
W, 85-67
^^Omaha
Record
19-15 (12-6)
175
W, 77-75
^^Lamar
Home
8-3
85
L, 97-78
*Akron
Road
54
L, 77-59
*Cincinnati
52
L, 101-72
*SMU
309
L, 81-64
*Southern Miss.
299
!W, 103-93
UT Martin
163
L, 71-54
^^Norfolk St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^Delaware St.
67.6
100.5
109.6
13.2
18.6
28.3
31.1
154th
282nd
246th
4th
90th
228th
246th
294
L, 83-80
#16 Alabama St. Hornets - SWAC
BPI: 276
BT: 274
EM: 263
KPI: 256
NET: 274
L, 82-65
*Missouri
364
W, 84-55
Miss Valley St.
363
W, 93-91
Ark. PB
256
L, 77-70
*Jackson St.
321
L, 67-65
*Alcorn St.
355
W, 69-65
*Alabama A&M
SOR: 252
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
73.4
72.2
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
11-12
Win
78.0
66.3
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.7
79.8
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-5
Non-Conf.
176.4
Home
81.9
71.4
101-200
0-0
2-1
0-0
Conf.
317.1
Road
69.4
72.7
201+
7-3
3-1
6-4
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -10.2 (200th)
23
POM: 273
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 11-4
Opp. O-Reb%
47.1
69.8
45.4
32.9
29.9
42.9
325th
eFG%
269th
FT%
341st
2PT%
219th
3PT%
274th
FTA/FGA %
84th
3PA/FGA %
50.3
69.9
50.4
33.4
38.7
39.5
145th
60th
154th
154th
308th
203rd
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 66-63
Prairie View A&M
282
L, 80-69
Texas Southern
Win
70.5%
48.4%
46.1%
35.6%
29.9%
9.4
6.9
1.1
1.5
4.4
1.1
278
L, 67-64
*Beth-Cook
Loss
67.1%
43.2%
55.5%
29.9%
37.4%
8.4
8.0
0.0
-9.5
2.5
-6.5
296
W, 67-66
*Florida A&M
Home
69.8%
52.1%
50.5%
33.9%
30.7%
9.0
6.3
1.3
-1.2
6.4
-1.6
329
L, 77-67
Grambling St.
Road
68.8%
43.0%
50.1%
32.6%
34.1%
9.0
7.9
0.3
-4.4
2.3
-2.6
218
W, 82-81
Southern
363
W, 75-63
*Ark. PB
140
364
W, 79-56
*Miss Valley St.
125
125
296
W, 60-59
Florida A&M
278
L, 70-68
Beth-Cook
110
110
W, 94-52
Alabama A&M
218
W, 66-65
*Southern
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 38% 8
95
Fast Break 18%
95
95
80
30
2nd Chance 13%
91
Off TO 22%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
75
In Paint 41%
329
W, 59-47
*Grambling St.
80
282
W, 84-79
^^Texas Southern
65
329
W, 64-62
^^Grambling St.
256
W, 60-56
^^Jackson St.
HT vs. Missouri: L 42-24
HT vs. Cincy: L 46-33
HT vs. SMU, L 49-39
Fast Break 15% 18
65
Game #
Home
2nd Chance 16% 10
Game #
Loss
Road
CJ Hines
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
355
Off-Efficiency
Amarr Knox
93
Off TO 15%
Antonio "TJ" Madlock
Offensive Pct.l
361
Micah Simpson
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 13.6
2.2
18-40
10-22
8.8
1.6
9-39
4-14
14.2
9.8
18-49
4-10
4.2
1.6
3-9
4-14
CJ Hines vs. KenPom A+B
opponents: 2PT: 31%, 3PT 24%
W 15.3
3.2
65-131
40-93
14.6
2.2
74-170
20-66
13.0
8.1
61-129
13-41
8.3
1.7
19-36
34-86
L
13.3
2.8
40-95
28-82
14.0
1.8
60-144
17-53
12.1
5.9
49-112
8-30
4.6
1.5
8-29
14-62
Madlock vs. A+B: 2PT 34%
H
16.0
3.3
38-74
25-64
16.3
2.3
54-110
9-38
13.4
7.7
40-70
5-21
7.7
1.5
11-17
20-53
NCAAT SWAC: '24 L28, '22 L27
R
13.6
2.9
67-152
43-111
13.4
1.9
80-204
28-81
12.3
6.9
70-171
16-50
6.1
1.7
16-48
28-95
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Sr
1
29.3
14.4
3.0
2.5
1.3
1.1
0.1
46.5%
105-226
38.9%
68-175
72.9%
62-85
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Hines, A. Knox, T. Madlock, M. Octave, J. Walker (13 G: 11-2)
NAME
3
CJ Hines
6'2"
1
Amarr Knox
2PT
3PT
FT
6'3"
Jr
--
28.6
14.3
2.0
2.5
1.4
1.7
0.0
42.7%
134-314
31.1%
37-119
77.7%
108-139
20 Antonio "TJ" Madlock
6'3"
Sr
2
30.0
12.6
7.2
2.6
1.6
1.1
0.3
45.6%
110-241
29.6%
21-71
70.8%
121-171
2
Micah Simpson
6'2"
Jr
--
17.5
6.7
1.7
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.1
41.5%
27-65
32.4%
48-148
80.0%
28-35
25 Jasteven Walker
6'10"
Jr
--
18.5
5.3
3.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8
51.0%
49-96
28.8%
21-73
58.8%
20-34
11 Micah Octave
6'5"
Sr
7
25.7
5.2
5.4
0.7
0.6
1.5
0.3
50.8%
30-59
25.6%
23-90
37.9%
11-29
5
Tyler Mack
6'5"
Jr
5
14.0
4.8
1.6
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
46.2%
6-13
38.5%
42-109
66.7%
2-3
0
D'Ante Bass
6'6"
Jr
--
13.1
4.6
3.0
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
52.7%
29-55
32.5%
26-80
61.3%
19-31
10 Jalen Keago
6'2"
Jr
15
11.8
4.2
1.8
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.1
57.1%
12-21
30.3%
10-33
73.5%
25-34
#16 Alabama St. Hornets - SWAC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
DBG
Off
Def
79-93
UNLV
--
162
55
44% 27-61 57% 33-58 41%
9-22
45%
9-20
16-20 18-28
10
12
12
9
83
L
61-74
LSU
(5)
128
62
33% 20-60 45% 21-47
1-20
35%
7-20
20-26 25-34
13
4
14
14
W
115-64
Virginia-Lynchburg
(7)
--
--
52% 45-86 37% 23-63 36% 13-36 20%
4-20
12-23 14-20
20
6
7
19
154 W
85-67
Nebraska Omaha
(3)
78
221
47% 26-55 35% 22-63 40% 12-30 22%
6-27
21-29 17-26
6
12
9
10
8-21
17-24 21-28
1
10
9
11
8-15
18-23
7
15
10
9
32% 10-31 12-14
5-12
7
14
7
9
For Opp For Opp
77-75
Lamar
(0)
269
94
49% 26-53 43% 23-54 38%
L
78-97
Akron
(0)
62
185
41% 27-66 46% 32-69 49% 16-33 43% 15-35
54
L
59-77
Cincinnati
(2)
90
21
30% 20-66 45% 31-69 23%
52
L
72-101
SMU
(5)
36
70
35% 24-69 48% 33-69 32% 13-41 35% 10-29
11-16
25-34
9
15
8
8
309
L
64-81
Southern Miss
(1)
336
226
32% 23-71 50% 30-60 31%
9-12
12-17
8
8
6
11
7-30
9-29
38%
Opp
85
299 W
8-21
For
Turnovers
L
5%
Opp
Off. Reb
97
175 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
36%
9-25
103-93 #
Tennessee Martin
(5)
249
304
50% 36-72 47% 30-64 47% 17-36 36% 12-33 14-22 21-30
8
14
4
14
163
L
54-71
Norfolk St.
(7)
178
237
31% 18-58 46% 23-50 12%
30%
3-10
15-22 22-28
10
9
11
13
294
L
80-83
Delaware St.
(0)
272
320
48% 31-64 56% 31-55 34% 11-32 50%
9-18
7-11
12-19
7
4
11
9
23
L
65-82
(9)
5
75
39% 25-65 50% 29-58 40%
8-20
31%
9-29
7-10
15-18
9
8
12
12
(4)
364
364
50% 28-56 35% 20-57 44%
8-18
13%
2-16
20-26 13-15
12
8
8
15
(1)
347
361
54% 31-57 57% 30-53 41% 12-29 48% 14-29 19-30 17-22
5
6
8
13
(4)
288
200
43% 28-65 46% 24-52 28%
18-27
12
9
10
13
256
L
70-77
Missouri
Mississippi Valley
St.
Arkansas Pine
Bluff
Jackson St.
321
L
364 W
84-55
363 W
93-91
3-26
7-25
50% 11-22
7-15
65-67
Alcorn St.
(1)
331
267
36% 22-61 43% 19-44 31% 11-35 31%
5-16
10-17 24-29
12
6
9
11
355 W
69-65
(4)
360
328
34% 23-67 34% 21-62 24%
6-25
27%
9-33
17-25 14-20
16
13
7
13
361 W
66-63
(6)
339
353
42% 23-55 37% 22-59 21%
4-19
23%
5-22
16-21 14-21
7
6
11
7
8-30
282
L
69-80
Alabama A&M
Prairie View
A&M
Texas Southern
(1)
341
138
33% 25-77 51% 26-51 27%
47%
8-17
11-20 20-24
18
6
5
15
278
L
64-67
Bethune Cookman
(4)
329
223
37% 21-57 45% 24-53 37% 10-27 11%
2-18
12-21 17-35
3
9
10
12
67-66
Florida A&M
(1)
255
344
37% 23-62 37% 22-60 26%
7-27
38% 13-34 14-18
9-11
10
10
5
11
67-77
Grambling St.
(4)
346
228
41% 25-61 48% 26-54 33%
8-24
42%
8-19
9-13
17-21
7
11
10
14
218 W
82-81
(1)
313
99
45% 29-65 37% 26-70 39% 10-26 23%
5-22
14-20 24-33
6
17
8
7
363 W
75-63
(4)
347
361
36% 24-66 38% 23-61 31%
5-10
15
7
10
17
364 W
79-56
(1)
364
364
45% 29-65 38% 24-63 44% 14-32 32%
7-22
7-9
1-3
9
4
8
12
60-59
Southern
Arkansas Pine
Bluff
Mississippi Valley
St.
Florida A&M
(4)
255
344
31% 20-64 45% 22-49
9%
2-22
21%
4-19
18-23 11-18
14
6
5
15
68-70
Bethune Cookman
(1)
329
223
39% 25-64 51% 24-47 19%
5-27
42%
5-12
13-17 17-23
5
7
5
19
355 W
94-52
Alabama A&M
(4)
360
328
56% 33-59 37% 19-52 48% 12-25 13%
2-16
16-17 12-25
8
9
10
13
218 W
66-65
Southern
(4)
313
99
43% 23-54 42% 23-55 46% 10-22 15%
3-20
10-14 16-27
6
12
14
8
329 W
59-47
Grambling St.
(1)
346
228
35% 22-63 33% 16-49 22%
5-14
10-11 10-12
12
6
8
13
282 W
84-79
Texas Southern
(4)
341
138
42% 27-65 53% 30-57 48% 14-29 46% 10-22 16-28
9-19
12
9
10
18
329 W
64-62
Grambling St.
(0)
346
228
36% 23-64 36% 20-55 28%
7-25
23%
5-22
11-14 17-18
14
6
8
9
256 W
60-56
Jackson St.
(0)
288
200
34% 22-65 37% 20-54 31%
9-29
29%
5-17
7-11
10
10
6
14
296 W
329
L
296 W
278
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-29
5-23
41% 12-29 18-28
36%
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
11-15
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
103.2
250th
100.5
272nd
105.8
164th
98.8
310th
99.3
298th
Def-Efficiency
117.1
344th
107.7
196th
112.8
318th
110.1
235th
105.4
139th
WAB
-2.8
169th
-7.4
231st
-5.1
279th
-5.2
178th
-2.3
133rd
FG% 50% or better
5-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-9
More FTM than Opp.
11-1
FG% 45% or better
7-1
3PT% < 35%
8-11
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
12-6
More FTA than Opp.
10-1
FG% below 45%
12-14
Make >= 10 3PA
9-5
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
5-4
More OReb than Opp.
10-7
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-6
Make < 10 3PA
10-10
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
14-11
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
16-9
Opp. FG% 45% or better
3-12
3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-9
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-7
More Turnovers than Opp.
3-3
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
3-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-6
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-0
@ Matteise
63
L, 87-57
*Dayton
18
L, 88-62
*Clemson
236
W, 65-64
*Campbell
71
L, 92-62
*Penn St.
Record
16-17 (8-8)
223
L, 66-58
*Mt. St. Mary's
Home
10-4
W, 96-57
Penn St.-Schuylkill
Road
#16 Saint Francis Red Flash - NEC
BPI: 307
BT: 301
EM: 300
KPI: 273
NET: 297
POM: 311
SOR: 330
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
71.1
71.6
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-2
6-13
Win
79.4
64.7
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
63.4
78.1
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-3
89
L, 82-65
*Georgetown
287
W, 88-78
Lehigh
Non-Conf.
178.4
Home
79.0
66.4
101-200
0-2
0-0
1-2
159
L, 79-70
Radford
Conf.
310.9
Road
65.3
75.5
201+
7-2
0-0
5-6
W, 107-55
Penn St.-Shenango
L, 69-66
*Niagara
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Maryland
67.1
99.9
112.0
19.6
16.4
25.4
30.0
181st
294th
289th
321st
228th
311th
192nd
320
12
L, 111-57
W, 104-47
Franciscan
128
L, 90-77
*Robert Morris
162
L, 74-59
Central Conn.
315
L, 64-60
Stonehill
331
W, 73-59
Merychurst
306
W, 75-71
*FDU
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -12.2 (240th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-6
Opp. O-Reb%
51.6
72.5
52.6
33.4
23.8
41.9
129th
eFG%
169th
FT%
115th
2PT%
194th
3PT%
357th
FTA/FGA %
106th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
51.3
74.5
53.4
32.3
28.7
43.2
203rd
300th
278th
88th
70th
311th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
288
L, 64-51
*LIU Brooklyn
334
!L, 70-68
*Wagner
Win
74.0%
61.6%
50.1%
36.1%
25.1%
8.9
6.4
-0.5
5.6
-1.0
0.0
288
W, 74-64
LIU Brooklyn
Loss
71.2%
48.6%
54.8%
31.7%
36.4%
7.6
9.3
-2.2
-6.3
-2.0
-4.8
334
L, 68-66
Wagner
Home
75.1%
60.3%
50.0%
35.6%
28.5%
8.9
7.5
0.2
6.0
-0.6
1.3
331
L, 62-58
*Merychurst
Road
70.6%
50.9%
54.3%
32.5%
32.7%
7.7
8.2
-2.6
-5.4
-2.2
-5.3
349
W, 86-78
Le Moyne
362
W, 81-69
*Chicago St.
140
315
L, 79-74
*Stonehill
125
125
162
L, 83-67
*Central Conn.
349
!W, 81-76
*Le Moyne
110
110
FDU
362
!W, 80-71
Chicago St.
Fast Break 10% 22
95
95
80
334
W, 58-55
Wagner
288
W, 71-68
*LIU Brooklyn
65
W, 46-43
2nd Chance 12% 11
45
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
*Central Conn.
Home
HT margin vs. Clemson, Penn St,
G'Town, MD: -21, -7, -1, -26
Last 6 G: 3 OT + 3 3-pt W's
V. Pinedo 4.5 fouls per 40
DNP L's vs. Radford or Niagara
2nd Chance 16% 22
Game #
Loss
Road
Riley Parker
52
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
Ace Talbert
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
70
In Paint 42%
80
162
50
In Paint 43%
Defensive Pct.l
!W, 85-80
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
306
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 21% 14
Valentino Pinedo
Juan Crawford Jr.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.0
3.4
17-29
12-28
10.2
2.8
6-19
11-29
8.8
6.6
19-39
0-0
13.4
4.6
15-28
10-31
W 16.0
3.4
55-87
36-82
18.0
4.0
1-4
4-6
10.2
6.3
55-92
0-1
11.1
4.7
36-62
26-74
L
10.9
3.6
44-92
27-76
8.3
2.5
5-15
7-23
9.9
6.7
58-104
0-2
8.9
3.5
27-53
27-66
H
17.4
3.7
56-89
31-80
-
-
-
-
10.6
7.3
42-80
0-0
10.5
4.8
28-50
23-64
R
10.4
3.3
43-90
32-78
10.2
2.8
6-19
11-29
9.7
6.1
71-116
0-3
9.6
3.6
35-65
30-76
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Cranford, D. Kelly, C. Moncrief, R. Parker, V. Pinedo (10 G: 8-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
11 Riley Parker
6'2"
Jr
--
31.8
13.4
3.5
3.4
2.5
0.8
0.1
55.3%
2
3PT
FT
99-179
39.9%
63-158
85.9%
55-64
Ace Talbert
6'0"
So
28
28.0
10.2
2.8
1.8
2.2
0.6
0.2
31.6%
6-19
37.9%
11-29
50.0%
6-12
31 Valentino Pinedo
6'8"
So
5
27.8
10.0
6.5
1.3
1.6
0.8
0.7
57.7%
113-196
0.0%
0-3
61.1%
55-90
4
Juan Crawford Jr.
6'3"
Fr
--
27.5
10.0
4.1
1.9
1.3
1.0
0.0
54.8%
63-115
37.9%
53-140
89.8%
44-49
14 Bobby Rosenberger
6'5"
So
--
22.2
8.5
3.7
1.4
1.2
0.5
0.3
50.9%
81-159
23.7%
27-114
75.5%
37-49
5
Daemar Kelly
6'5"
So
--
29.9
8.2
3.3
1.7
1.7
0.8
0.5
53.7%
66-123
31.0%
36-116
78.9%
30-38
7
Jeremy Clayville
6'0"
Fr
2
19.5
7.7
1.4
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.0
46.3%
25-54
39.0%
60-154
69.2%
9-13
0
Chris Moncrief
6'6"
Jr
2
17.4
6.1
2.7
1.2
1.0
0.7
0.2
56.8%
67-118
33.3%
8-24
60.4%
32-53
20 Brendan Scanlon
5'8"
Sr
32
10.5
6.0
--
3.0
--
1.0
--
100.0%
3-3
0.0%
0-1
--
--
#16 Saint Francis Red Flash - NEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
57-87
*Dayton
--
57
129
38% 22-58 46% 31-68 29%
6-21
25%
18
L
62-88
*Clemson
(3)
24
17
39% 22-56 59% 33-56 40%
223
Opp
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
7-11
17-25
4
15
12
7
8-20
44% 12-27 10-14 10-17
6
7
16
16
8-32
65-64
*Campbell
(1)
266
167
50% 25-50 44% 21-48 33%
6-18
21%
5-24
9-11
17-21
5
4
18
18
62-92
*Penn St.
(1)
63
79
37% 22-59 49% 34-69 29%
9-31
33%
9-27
9-17
15-20
10
11
21
15
L
58-66
*Mt. St. Mary's
(3)
298
199
36% 22-61 41% 23-56 20%
6-30
22%
5-23
8-9
15-20
10
10
12
14
96-57
Penn St.-Schuylkill
(3)
--
--
56% 39-70 39% 22-56 30% 11-37 14%
2-14
7-10
11-19
12
3
15
17
65-82
*Georgetown
(2)
157
67
39% 22-56 44% 30-69 35% 10-29 33%
9-27
11-15
13-19
13
13
19
8
88-78
Lehigh
(2)
296
276
55% 34-62 48% 30-63 36%
9-28
11-14
9-12
10
8
10
10
70-79
Radford
(4)
109
240
39% 24-62 50% 24-48 38% 11-29 42% 11-26
11-13
20-25
7
5
5
8
L
287 W
159
For
Off. Reb
L
W
89
Opp
FT
L
71
For
3PT
63
236 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
L
W
9-25
32%
107-55
Penn St.-Shenango
(2)
--
--
55% 43-78 34% 23-68 35% 10-29 17%
5-29
11-13
4-4
9
3
5
10
320
L
66-69
*Niagara
(9)
280
335
47% 27-58 44% 25-57 40% 10-25 43% 13-30
2-4
6-7
5
6
7
10
12
L
57-111
*Maryland
(2)
28
6
41% 24-59 62% 42-68 30%
2-3
12-17
2
11
13
5
W
7-23
58% 15-26
104-47
Franciscan
(1)
--
--
66% 41-62 27% 17-64 52% 13-25 18%
6-34
9-13
7-13
7
12
5
7
128
L
77-90
*Robert Morris
(1)
185
144
51% 27-53 53% 31-58 57% 12-21 30%
6-20
11-15
22-32
4
10
19
13
162
L
59-74
Central Conn.
(12)
306
87
42% 24-57 48% 28-59 27%
6-22
31%
8-26
5-7
10-11
8
6
12
8
315
L
60-64
Stonehill
(1)
292
330
37% 21-57 39% 24-61 29%
6-21
31% 11-36
12-14
5-8
11
11
10
12
331 W
73-59
Merychurst
(4)
291
340
56% 28-50 36% 21-58 38%
8-21
32%
8-25
9-13
9-12
7
10
12
6
306 W
75-71
*FDU
(1)
323
249
52% 29-56 32% 21-65 43%
9-21
20%
6-30
8-11
23-32
5
14
16
5
10
16
288
L
51-64
*LIU Brooklyn
(5)
349
122
35% 17-48 45% 21-47 19%
5-26
40%
8-20
12-17 14-16
4
9
334
L
68-70 #
*Wagner
(1)
359
238
37% 23-63 37% 22-60 30%
7-23
36%
8-22
15-17 18-25
6
10
9
10
74-64
LIU Brooklyn
(3)
349
122
48% 25-52 37% 26-70 38%
8-21
19%
4-21
16-20
8-13
5
14
11
7
288 W
334
L
66-68
Wagner
(1)
359
238
48% 23-48 48% 25-52 37%
7-19
48% 11-23 13-17
7-9
10
8
14
13
331
L
58-62
*Merychurst
(3)
291
340
39% 21-54 39% 22-57 25%
7-28
21%
5-24
9-17
13-17
8
6
13
8
86-78
Le Moyne
(6)
239
362
54% 27-50 48% 28-58 42% 11-26 24%
5-21
21-30 17-24
7
9
18
13
7-30
349 W
362 W
81-69
*Chicago St.
(1)
361
343
55% 30-55 45% 25-56 52% 11-21 23%
10-12 12-14
5
3
14
10
315
L
74-79
*Stonehill
(4)
292
330
54% 31-57 40% 24-60 29%
4-14
41% 12-29
8-13
19-23
8
12
7
6
162
L
8-25
44%
67-83
*Central Conn.
(1)
306
87
48% 29-61 53% 32-60 32%
1-2
12-13
3
7
10
6
349 W
81-76 #
*Le Moyne
(4)
239
362
45% 29-64 52% 29-56 32% 10-31 34% 11-32 13-17
7-10
15
6
16
17
306 W
85-80 #
FDU
(1)
323
249
50% 34-68 38% 27-72 33%
9-27
31% 11-36
15-19
11
9
12
5
362 W
80-71 #
Chicago St.
(6)
361
343
47% 29-62 48% 29-60 29%
6-21
44% 11-25 16-24
2-2
10
2
10
17
334 W
58-55
Wagner
(3)
359
238
43% 22-51 35% 20-57 36%
9-25
13%
3-24
5-6
12-17
4
15
13
10
288 W
71-68
*LIU Brooklyn
(2)
349
122
49% 23-47 42% 23-55 37%
7-19
33%
7-21
18-23 15-22
4
12
11
11
162 W
46-43
*Central Conn.
(2)
306
87
32% 19-60 30% 17-56 19%
5-26
18%
3-17
3-7
9
9
9
16
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
7-16
8-11
6-8
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
103.7
239th
97.4
328th
100.0
268th
101.2
279th
101.6
263rd
Def-Efficiency
114.2
314th
110.7
264th
112.0
305th
115.0
321st
112.7
283rd
WAB
-3.7
212th
-8.5
269th
-5.3
284th
-7.2
243rd
-1.4
97th
FG% 50% or better
10-2
3PT% >= 35%
9-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
1-9
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
8-2
14-5
3PT% < 35%
2-12
Make >= 10 3PA
7-12
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
6-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-8
More FTA than Opp.
8-3
3-7
More OReb than Opp.
1-5
Make < 10 3PA
10-13
8-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
13-10
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
6-6
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
4-9
3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-8
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-11
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-10
1-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
5-4
@ Matteise
315
W, 93-45
Morehead St.
5
L, 77-55
Tennessee
346
W, 100-68
Bellarmine
150
W, 76-61
Winthrop
Record
27-7 (18-2)
51
W, 89-61
^^Indiana
Home
14-3
48
!W, 79-70
^^West Virginia
Road
39
L, 69-64
^^Oklahoma
26
L, 86-63
Ole Miss
3
L, 76-65
Duke
161
W, 77-74
UTEP
14
L, 93-85
*Kentucky
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Florida St.
68.8
118.4
94.7
16.5
18.6
32.2
27.2
92nd
25th
16th
132nd
90th
107th
55th
53.4
74.4
57.0
33.0
34.5
48.1
71st
eFG%
103rd
FT%
19th
2PT%
212th
3PT%
133rd
FTA/FGA %
18th
3PA/FGA %
49.2
71.4
48.3
33.7
26.8
39.7
96th
139th
74th
172nd
36th
208th
91
W, 90-76
#8 Louisville Cardinals - ACC
BPI: 28
BT: 19
EM: 18
KPI: 16
NET: 23
W, 78-76
Eastern Kent.
36
W, 83-70
North Carolina
103
W, 70-50
*Virginia
18
W, 74-64
Clemson
70
W, 82-78
*Pittsburgh
120
W, 85-61
*Syracuse
SOR: 11
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.6
68.9
1-25
1-2
1-1
0-1
13-4
Win
81.8
66.4
26-50
1-1
1-1
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.3
78.7
51-100
4-0
2-0
3-1
Non-Conf.
102.4
Home
78.0
68.6
101-200
5-0
0-0
6-0
Conf.
90.3
Road
79.2
69.2
201+
3-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.5 (13th)
183
POM: 23
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-1
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
103
W, 81-67
Virginia
52
W, 98-73
*SMU
Win
75.9%
58.9%
45.8%
34.4%
32.2%
9.5
7.6
0.3
5.3
2.1
5.4
61
W, 72-59
Wake Forest
Loss
67.5%
48.5%
58.5%
28.4%
39.9%
9.0
9.0
5.1
2.3
-1.9
-1.6
99
L, 77-70
*Georgia Tech
Home
75.5%
57.3%
49.5%
30.0%
31.4%
8.8
7.5
0.8
3.7
1.9
8.4
182
W, 84-58
*B.C.
Road
72.8%
56.6%
46.9%
36.2%
36.1%
10.1
8.2
1.8
5.7
0.7
-0.4
210
W, 88-78
Miami (FL)
132
W, 91-66
*N.C. State
140
107
W, 75-60
*Notre Dame
125
125
91
W, 89-81
Florida St.
155
W, 71-66
*Virginia Tech
110
110
Pittsburgh
125
W, 85-68
California
44
In Paint 42%
Fast Break 8% 6
95
95
80
43
2nd Chance 14%
58
Off TO 19%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
60
In Paint 42%
80
W, 68-48
Stanford
80
80
W, 75-73
^^Stanford
65
18
W, 76-73
^^Clemson
3
L, 73-62
^^Duke
Home
A. Traore DNP Bellarmine - @FSU
Game #
Loss
Road
Terrence Edwards Jr.
96
Fast Break 9%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Chucky Hepburn
2nd Chance 14%
56
Off TO 17%
60
Reyne Smith
Defensive Pct.l
W, 79-68
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
70
Off-Efficiency
J'Vonne Hadley
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
R. Smith DNP last 4G, expected back
L5 25.2
4.6
28-51
16-45
15.6
4.6
18-35
7-34
8.0
1.4
2-2
10-37
11.4
7.4
15-27
4-10
N. Waterman DNP L @ GTech
W 16.5
4.5 108-191 47-150 16.6
3.3
77-139
46-136 14.3
2.7
12-25
92-227 12.9
7.4
99-176
27-61
T. Edwards first 8G: 10.8 PPG
--13 G Feb-March: 21.6 PPG
L
17.0
2.4
25-64
17-44
14.9
4.3
19-38
15-48
9.7
3.3
5-10
14-50
9.4
6.7
19-32
5-22
H
16.6
3.6
65-120
32-99
15.6
3.7
37-73
24-81
12.5
3.2
6-12
50-145 12.3
7.7
60-106
14-38
J. Hadley 46% 3PT in ACC
R
16.5
4.5
68-135
32-95
16.8
3.4
59-104
37-103 14.4
2.4
11-23
56-132 12.0
6.9
58-102
18-45
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Edwards, J. Hadley, C. Hepburn, J. Scott, N. Waterman (11 G: 10-1)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
6'6"
Sr
--
32.6
16.6
4.1
2.6
2.2
0.7
0.2
52.2%
133-255
33.0%
24 Chucky Hepburn
6'2"
Sr
1
34.7
16.2
3.5
5.8
3.0
2.5
0.1
54.2%
96-177
6
Reyne Smith
6'2"
Sr
4
30.8
13.4
2.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.1
48.6%
17-35
1
J'Vonne Hadley
6'6"
Sr
--
33.0
12.2
7.3
1.9
1.6
0.7
0.2
56.7%
7
Kasean Pryor
6'10"
Sr
27
23.3
12.0
6.1
2.1
2.1
1.6
1.1
0
James Scott
6'11"
So
--
23.9
7.3
6.2
1.4
1.0
0.6
93 Noah Waterman
6'11"
Sr
4
20.3
6.1
3.6
0.4
0.8
25 Aboubacar Traore
6'5"
Sr
10
13.7
4.7
4.4
0.6
1.2
9
6'8"
Fr
--
13.3
3.3
3.0
0.3
0.6
5
NAME
Terrence Edwards Jr.
Khani Rooths
2PT
3PT
FT
64-194
77.9%
106-136
33.2%
61-184
84.2%
160-190
38.3%
106-277
94.2%
49-52
118-208
38.6%
32-83
77.1%
81-105
57.1%
20-35
15.2%
5-33
87.9%
29-33
0.9
78.1%
107-137
16.7%
1-6
43.5%
30-69
0.2
0.4
54.7%
29-53
28.9%
37-128
41.9%
13-31
0.5
0.5
55.1%
43-78
16.7%
1-6
67.6%
23-34
0.4
0.3
54.7%
29-53
23.5%
12-51
55.9%
19-34
#8 Louisville Cardinals - ACC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
--
321
281
45% 32-71 23% 12-52 31% 11-36 14%
55-77
Tennessee
(4)
19
3
27% 16-60 57% 30-53 26% 10-39 53% 10-19 13-13
346 W
100-68
Bellarmine
(9)
224
359
55% 35-64 45% 24-53 34% 12-35 36%
9-25
150 W
76-61
Winthrop
(2)
152
217
48% 26-54 31% 22-70 27%
21%
6-29
51 W
89-61
^^Indiana
(4)
74
39
57% 37-65 33% 21-63 37% 10-27 35%
48 W
79-70 #
^^West Virginia
(0)
103
7
42% 24-57 44% 26-59 25%
7-28
35%
L
Opp
For
FT
Morehead St.
5
For
3PT
93-45
315 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
7-26
Opp
3-21
For
Off. Reb
Opp
18-28 18-27
Turnovers
For Opp For Opp
14
11
5
20
7-11
12
11
13
20
18-24
11-17
10
4
8
14
17-26
11-22
10
17
20
18
7-20
5-7
12-17
8
15
15
23
9-26
24-33
9-12
12
5
13
14
39
L
64-69
^^Oklahoma
(0)
30
77
38% 24-63 48% 21-44 22%
7-32
47%
8-17
9-16
19-25
20
3
14
10
26
L
63-86
Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
33% 19-57 57% 34-60 17%
5-30
40%
8-20
20-30 10-13
15
4
12
7
3
L
65-76
Duke
(4)
2
4
37% 19-51 45% 28-62 36% 11-31 27%
8-30
16-21 12-14
8
9
14
5
77-74
UTEP
(2)
189
124
40% 23-58 51% 29-57 18%
9-20
25-34
7-11
16
5
11
15
85-93
*Kentucky
(2)
11
49
44% 31-70 58% 32-55 36% 14-39 52% 11-21
9-14
18-28
10
7
7
11
91 W
90-76
*Florida St.
(6)
142
72
51% 28-55 53% 29-55 52% 15-29 40%
19-23 10-14
3
2
6
9
183 W
78-76
Eastern Kent.
(6)
113
266
38% 24-64 45% 30-67 31% 11-36 40% 10-25 19-24
6-7
18
9
14
10
36 W
83-70
North Carolina
(3)
21
65
45% 26-58 40% 24-60 23%
6-26
25%
4-16
25-39 18-23
8
6
7
10
103 W
70-50
*Virginia
(2)
89
134
44% 25-57 37% 20-54 37%
7-19
19%
5-26
13-14
5-6
11
6
8
9
18 W
74-64
Clemson
(2)
24
17
46% 25-55 40% 26-65 30%
8-27
33%
8-24
16-20
4-5
9
14
11
13
70 W
82-78
*Pittsburgh
(3)
60
105
46% 31-68 44% 24-55 37% 13-35 48% 10-21
7-15
20-22
14
5
11
9
120 W
85-61
*Syracuse
(2)
95
147
50% 31-62 40% 24-60 43% 12-28 32%
8-25
11-11
5-9
8
7
10
14
103 W
81-67
Virginia
(3)
89
134
43% 26-60 47% 24-51 26%
38%
8-21
23-27 11-19
8
4
7
14
52 W
98-73
*SMU
(2)
36
70
46% 31-67 40% 23-57 45% 19-42 33%
6-18
17-19 21-24
12
9
7
10
61 W
72-59
Wake Forest
(6)
137
36
39% 23-59 41% 23-56 31% 11-36 38%
8-21
15-21
5-8
9
9
8
15
161 W
14
L
99
6-23
45%
8-20
70-77
*Georgia Tech
(3)
151
66
46% 25-55 48% 30-63 36%
9-25
33%
8-24
11-19
9-17
7
5
13
9
182 W
84-58
*B.C.
(3)
199
173
50% 34-68 38% 23-60 39%
9-23
30%
6-20
7-11
6-11
10
7
11
14
210 W
88-78
Miami (FL)
(2)
72
324
49% 33-67 51% 33-65 36% 11-31 29%
6-21
11-12
6-12
10
8
8
10
132 W
91-66
*N.C. State
(3)
145
102
64% 35-55 36% 22-61 58% 11-19 33% 11-33 10-11 11-17
6
14
17
12
107 W
75-60
*Notre Dame
(3)
99
115
49% 26-53 36% 20-55 33% 11-33 27%
6-22
12-17 14-16
5
8
10
9
91 W
89-81
Florida St.
(5)
142
72
50% 26-52 54% 32-59 33%
7-21
24%
4-17
30-34 13-17
9
7
13
14
155 W
71-66
*Virginia Tech
(2)
164
137
45% 28-62 43% 25-58 26%
6-23
42% 11-26
9-11
5-6
5
9
12
21
70 W
79-68
Pittsburgh
(3)
60
105
51% 23-45 37% 23-63 52% 11-21 27% 10-37 22-31 12-17
2
11
11
11
125 W
85-68
California
(3)
104
162
53% 27-51 30% 21-71 48% 11-23 28%
9-32
20-26 17-22
5
19
14
10
80 W
68-48
Stanford
(2)
75
88
44% 27-61 30% 17-56 23%
5-22
27%
7-26
9-10
7-13
9
10
9
11
80 W
75-73
^^Stanford
(4)
75
88
51% 28-55 46% 26-56 35%
8-23
42% 11-26 11-18 10-12
8
6
11
8
18 W
76-73
^^Clemson
(0)
24
17
44% 24-55 39% 27-69 27%
6-22
31%
22-27 14-17
9
12
13
9
62-73
^^Duke
(0)
2
4
39% 25-64 44% 22-50 27%
7-26
37% 10-27
5-10
11
8
11
9
3
L
6-34
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
5-16
19-24
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
113.2
77th
122.6
11th
110.9
90th
121.5
17th
117.4
43rd
Def-Efficiency
95.1
28th
95.3
17th
99.2
75th
93.0
10th
94.4
14th
WAB
+1.4
31st
+4.1
13th
-0.3
68th
+4.9
11th
+2.4
19th
FG% 50% or better
10-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-5
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
21-4
18-1
3PT% < 35%
9-6
Make >= 10 3PA
16-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
14-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-2
More FTA than Opp.
20-4
6-3
More OReb than Opp.
4-3
Make < 10 3PA
13-4
16-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
21-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
20-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
21-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
8-5
3-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
245
W, 99-86
UTRGV
306
W, 96-70
FDU
291
W, 78-43
Hou. Christian
240
W, 79-56
UMKC
Record
24-10 (15-5)
55
L, 74-63
Nebraska
Home
15-2
50
L, 71-53
^^San Diego St.
Road
#9 Creighton Bluejays - Big East
BPI: 26
BT: 33
EM: 32
KPI: 37
NET: 38
POM: 37
SOR: 24
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
75.2
69.5
1-25
2-0
0-2
0-2
9-8
Win
79.2
66.0
26-50
2-1
1-1
1-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
65.8
77.9
51-100
4-1
0-0
2-1
16
L, 77-73
^^Texas A&M
107
W, 80-76
^^Notre Dame
20
W, 76-63
Kansas
97
W, 83-65
UNLV
6
L, 83-75
*Alabama
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Georgetown
67.1
117.3
98.3
18.1
11.7
26.9
27.2
187th
32nd
42nd
242nd
361st
266th
55th
55.8
73.3
60.5
33.9
28.5
49.0
23rd
eFG%
135th
FT%
2nd
2PT%
175th
3PT%
313th
FTA/FGA %
10th
3PA/FGA %
47.0
71.4
45.8
32.7
16.9
35.2
25th
140th
11th
110th
1st
60th
89
L, 81-57
Non-Conf.
110.5
Home
79.5
66.6
101-200
2-0
2-0
2-0
Conf.
77.5
Road
71.0
72.5
201+
5-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.1 (29th)
56
W, 86-79
Villanova
9
W, 57-56
St. John's
27
L, 79-71
*Marquette
86
W, 80-76
*Butler
110
W, 84-64
Providence
30
W, 68-63
*UConn
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 73-49
*DePaul
220
W, 79-54
Seton Hall
Win
76.2%
63.1%
43.9%
36.8%
32.0%
9.8
7.6
-1.4
7.3
-3.7
5.8
42
W, 86-77
Xavier
Loss
66.5%
53.7%
50.3%
27.9%
34.4%
8.5
7.4
-2.6
-5.3
-4.9
-0.4
56
W, 62-60
*Villanova
Home
74.3%
63.7%
43.3%
37.0%
31.1%
10.6
7.5
-1.7
7.7
-4.7
5.1
110
W, 80-69
*Providence
Road
72.1%
57.6%
48.3%
30.6%
34.4%
8.2
7.6
-1.8
-0.5
-3.4
2.8
27
W, 77-67
Marquette
30
L, 70-66
UConn
140
9
L, 79-73
*St. John's
125
125
89
W, 80-69
Georgetown
116
W, 75-65
DePaul
110
110
42
L, 83-61
*Xavier
95
95
220
W, 79-61
*Seton Hall
80
W, 87-74
Butler
116
!W, 85-81
^^DePaul
65
30
W, 71-62
^^UConn
9
L, 82-66
^^St. John's
Def-Efficiency
140
2-7 when eFG% <50%
2PT FG% <60%: 7-10
3PT FG% <30%: 4-8
Fast Break 12%
45
Off TO 12% 1
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 45% 23
83
Fast Break 11%
Home
2nd Chance 16% 24
Game #
Loss
Road
Ryan Kalkbrenner
50
2nd Chance 12% 15
65
Game #
In Paint 43%
Defensive Pct.l
86
80
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
116
Off TO 20% 24
Steven Ashworth
Jamiya Neal
Jackson McAndrew
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 21.2
8.8
46-62
2-12
13.8
4.4
6-24
16-45
11.0
6.0
12-28
7-20
10.6
6.0
5-8
13-33
Ashworth DNP L vs. SDSU
P. Isaacs OUT - last G: vs. KU
W 22.1
8.9 190-252
16-45
16.5
4.6
45-97
78-189
11.8
6.2
74-140
34-96
6.3
4.4
17-34
35-113
L
13.1
8.6
49-85
3-12
15.8
2.8
13-38
25-90
10.7
5.8
34-63
10-48
10.7
4.7
9-12
27-67
R. Kalkbrenner 4x BE Def-POY
H
20.6
9.1 133-170
9-23
17.5
4.2
26-62
62-145 10.5
6.1
47-84
23-67
6.0
4.4
12-22
22-80
J. McAndrew 37% 3PT in BE
R
18.1
8.4 106-167
10-34
15.0
4.0
32-73
41-134 12.5
6.1
61-119
21-77
9.2
4.6
14-24
40-100
Starting Lineup Last G: S. Ashworth, J. Green, R. Kalkbrenner, J. McAndrew, J. Neal (22 G: 17-5)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
11 Ryan Kalkbrenner
7'1"
Sr
1
34.2
19.4
8.8
1.5
1.4
0.6
2.7
70.9%
239-337
33.3%
19-57
68.2%
105-154
1
Steven Ashworth
6'0"
Sr
1
35.8
16.3
4.1
6.8
3.5
0.7
0.1
43.0%
58-135
36.9%
103-279
92.6%
113-122
2
Pop Isaacs
6'2"
Jr
26
31.7
16.3
4.8
3.9
2.9
0.5
0.1
45.0%
18-40
38.3%
23-60
86.2%
25-29
5
Jamiya Neal
6'5"
Sr
--
34.0
11.5
6.1
4.4
2.4
0.9
0.6
53.2%
108-203
30.6%
44-144
58.9%
43-73
23 Jackson McAndrew
6'10"
Fr
--
21.3
7.6
4.5
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.1
56.5%
26-46
34.4%
62-180
65.6%
21-32
0
Jasen Green
6'8"
So
--
20.0
4.8
3.1
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.5
73.5%
50-68
28.6%
12-42
66.7%
28-42
41 Isaac Traudt
6'10"
So
--
16.3
4.8
2.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
60.7%
17-28
38.8%
38-98
94.1%
16-17
7
Fedor Žugić
6'6"
N/A
14
11.4
4.3
1.7
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.2
63.6%
14-22
35.1%
13-37
76.0%
19-25
4
Sterling Knox
6'4"
Fr
30
6.0
3.0
1.5
--
1.0
--
--
60.0%
6-10
--
--
--
--
#9 Creighton Bluejays - Big East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
DBG
Off
Def
245 W
99-86
UTRGV
--
211
254
60% 33-55 43% 33-77 30%
306 W
96-70
FDU
(3)
323
249
48% 33-69 36% 24-67 30% 10-33 38%
291 W
78-43
Hou. Christian
(2)
286
225
56% 29-52 25% 18-71 33%
240 W
79-56
UMKC
(2)
284
155
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
40% 14-35 26-29
6-10
7
15
15
10
9-24
20-25 13-14
15
8
14
14
14%
5-35
13-20
2-3
4
13
10
9
48% 30-63 29% 22-75 32% 11-34 24%
8-33
8-8
4-4
9
12
14
6
7-23
7-21
Opp
Off. Reb
55
L
63-74
Nebraska
(5)
85
56
33% 17-52 42% 24-57 29% 12-42 25%
4-16
17-23 22-30
7
7
16
7
50
L
53-71
^^San Diego St.
(3)
122
14
34% 21-62 48% 30-62 19%
47%
8-17
5-13
3-7
10
4
9
7
16
L
73-77
^^Texas A&M
(0)
49
11
38% 23-60 39% 28-71 35% 13-37 22%
5-23
14-16 16-23
9
17
13
10
107 W
80-76
^^Notre Dame
(2)
99
115
49% 28-57 43% 28-65 46% 11-24 39%
9-23
13-15
11-15
5
10
12
7
20 W
76-63
Kansas
(3)
43
10
47% 25-53 36% 25-70 41% 12-29 35%
8-23
14-17
5-8
6
9
14
4
97 W
6-31
83-65
UNLV
(2)
162
55
63% 31-49 42% 27-64 50% 10-20 33%
7-21
11-12
4-7
3
6
12
6
6
L
75-83
*Alabama
(6)
4
28
45% 27-60 43% 30-70 30%
6-30
13-16 17-22
4
15
13
10
89
L
57-81
*Georgetown
(3)
157
67
40% 21-53 55% 33-60 36% 12-33 63% 10-16
3-9
5-7
5
8
16
13
56 W
86-79
Villanova
(2)
23
95
55% 31-56 50% 32-64 56% 14-25 40%
8-20
10-14
7-9
7
8
7
1
9
57-56
St. John's
(9)
71
2
42% 22-53 37% 25-68 35%
9-26
22%
2-9
4-7
4-6
9
10
17
9
W
27
L
8-27
20%
71-79
*Marquette
(2)
40
31
40% 24-60 41% 29-70 23%
7-31
32% 11-34
16-22
10-11
10
10
12
7
86 W
80-76
*Butler
(7)
44
150
51% 33-65 48% 30-63 33%
8-24
32%
8-25
6-9
8-12
7
5
6
7
110 W
84-64
Providence
(2)
92
143
52% 32-62 38% 26-68 44% 14-32 20%
4-20
6-12
8-9
5
12
10
12
30 W
68-63
*UConn
(3)
16
92
48% 23-48 45% 26-58 35%
8-23
32%
6-19
14-15
5-5
7
6
9
6
116 W
73-49
*DePaul
(2)
115
126
52% 25-48 30% 19-63 32%
6-19
13%
3-23
17-22
8-13
6
7
14
9
220 W
79-54
Seton Hall
(3)
325
89
58% 28-48 43% 23-54 42% 11-26 33%
3-9
12-17
5-6
4
4
12
10
42 W
86-77
Xavier
(3)
41
38
53% 30-57 42% 28-66 44% 11-25 38%
9-24
15-19 12-17
9
12
12
8
56 W
62-60
*Villanova
(2)
23
95
47% 24-51 40% 23-58 23%
6-26
18%
3-17
8-14
11-12
7
0
17
5
110 W
80-69
*Providence
(3)
92
143
42% 27-65 41% 27-66 26%
8-31
42% 11-26 18-21
4-6
6
7
5
10
27 W
77-67
Marquette
(2)
40
31
53% 27-51 36% 26-72 39% 11-28 31% 11-36 12-14
4-4
5
17
8
5
30
L
66-70
UConn
(2)
16
92
40% 19-47 39% 26-66 29%
7-24
23%
6-26
21-30 12-15
5
11
10
6
9
L
73-79
*St. John's
(4)
71
2
42% 27-65 38% 28-73 27%
8-30
33%
6-18
11-15 17-29
9
18
14
5
89 W
80-69
Georgetown
(6)
157
67
42% 28-67 39% 25-65 27% 10-37 36% 12-33 14-21
7-14
11
6
8
7
116 W
75-65
DePaul
(2)
115
126
52% 29-56 45% 25-56 33%
9-27
36%
8-22
8-15
7-11
12
2
12
5
61-83
*Xavier
(2)
41
38
45% 26-58 55% 33-60 25%
6-24
52% 11-21
3-7
6-8
6
2
12
5
220 W
79-61
*Seton Hall
(2)
325
89
63% 27-43 36% 24-67 52% 11-21 29%
6-21
14-16
7-9
3
14
12
8
86 W
87-74
Butler
(3)
44
150
52% 34-65 44% 30-68 43% 16-37 41%
9-22
3-5
5-6
13
8
9
1
116 W
85-81 #
^^DePaul
(4)
115
126
43% 31-72 46% 32-70 29% 10-34 40% 12-30 13-18
5-10
14
9
12
13
30 W
71-62
^^UConn
(0)
16
92
52% 26-50 43% 26-61 35%
6-17
38%
8-21
13-18
2-4
4
11
3
3
66-82
^^St. John's
(0)
71
2
43% 26-60 52% 34-65 23%
6-26
50%
7-14
8-16
7-11
11
10
13
9
42
9
L
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.8
24th
114.1
53rd
113.5
58th
118.0
35th
118.7
34th
Def-Efficiency
98.4
59th
98.0
42nd
96.7
43rd
98.4
44th
100.0
61st
WAB
+2
18th
+1.1
39th
-0.6
80th
+3.2
20th
+1.5
28th
FG% 50% or better
14-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
20-1
3PT% < 35%
4-9
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
19-4
13-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
14-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
13-6
More FTA than Opp.
21-5
5-3
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
10-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
8-3
19-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
4-0
3-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
21-10
21-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
1-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
6-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
18-10
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-6
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-2
@ Matteise
UC San Diego
Texas A&M
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Michigan
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Yale
167
W, 101-53
Cleveland St.
61
L, 72-70
^^Wake Forest
75
W, 76-64
TCU
133
W, 94-67
Miami (OH)
Record
25-9 (14-6)
289
W, 72-49
Tarleton St.
Home
13-3
155
W, 75-63
^^Virginia Tech
Road
42
W, 78-53
^^Xavier
11
W, 67-64
*Wisconsin
64
W, 85-83
Iowa
39
L, 89-87
^^Arkansas
39
L, 87-86
^^Oklahoma
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Fort Wayne
69.4
115.2
94.5
19.8
16.0
33.2
29.8
65th
53rd
15th
328th
259th
79th
181st
54.5
72.5
57.7
33.4
35.0
42.5
51st
eFG%
165th
FT%
11th
2PT%
194th
3PT%
120th
FTA/FGA %
91st
3PA/FGA %
46.3
72.5
45.9
31.3
28.5
38.9
17th
210th
14th
46th
65th
182nd
164
W, 89-58
#5 Michigan Wolverines - Big 10
BPI: 29
BT: 26
EM: 31
KPI: 8
NET: 25
W, 112-64
Western Ky.
67
W, 85-74
*USC
28
W, 94-75
*UCLA
109
W, 91-75
Washington
88
!L, 84-81
*Minnesota
57
W, 80-76
Northwestern
SOR: 16
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.3
71.2
1-25
1-3
3-0
1-2
12-6
Win
80.4
67.2
26-50
1-0
1-2
2-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
72.2
82.3
51-100
5-0
0-1
4-1
Non-Conf.
99.5
Home
82.2
70.7
101-200
5-0
1-0
0-0
Conf.
45.6
Road
74.8
71.7
201+
1-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +6.2 (9th)
166
POM: 26
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 12-4
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
18
L, 91-64
*Purdue
71
W, 76-72
Penn St.
Win
72.8%
58.1%
43.5%
35.5%
29.0%
8.9
7.0
0.0
7.7
-2.4
2.4
77
W, 66-63
*Rutgers
Loss
72.8%
56.8%
52.7%
27.2%
37.6%
6.4
9.6
-1.3
-1.1
-4.8
-0.1
29
W, 80-76
Oregon
Home
69.7%
60.5%
45.1%
35.8%
32.8%
8.7
8.0
-0.2
6.9
-2.6
3.9
51
W, 70-67
*Indiana
Road
75.9%
55.2%
46.6%
31.3%
30.0%
7.9
7.3
-0.4
4.0
-3.4
-0.2
18
W, 75-73
Purdue
45
W, 86-83
*Ohio St.
140
7
L, 75-62
Michigan St.
125
125
55
W, 49-46
*Nebraska
77
W, 84-82
Rutgers
110
110
Illinois
12
L, 71-65
Maryland
95
95
80
7
L, 79-62
*Michigan St.
18
W, 86-68
^^Purdue
65
W, 81-80
^^Maryland
11
W, 59-53
^^Wisconsin
D. Wolf in Nov: 4 G <10 pts, DecMarch: 5x
3-8 when opp finishes w/ eFG >50%
4-6 when opp finishes w/ OR >33%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 40%
85
Fast Break 11%
80
31
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Vladislav Goldin
26
Off TO 16%
65
Game #
64
2nd Chance 15%
Home
(ALL PRIOR TO B10 TITLE G)
V. Goldin in Nov: 9.1 PPG -- has
scored 10+ in all but 2 G since 12/1
44
Fast Break 12%
80
12
79
In Paint 46%
Defensive Pct.l
L, 93-73
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
25
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 21% 10
Danny Wolf
Tre Donaldson
Nimari Burnett
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 20.0
8.8
33-61
2-6
17.0 10.8
26-44
6-18
9.6
2.8
9-20
8-24
7.6
4.2
6-9
8-22
W 15.7
6.4 133-206
1-8
13.1 10.7 95-168
8-29
12.5
3.6
64-122
13-36
10.2
3.6
33-49
10-36
L
19.4
8.0
64-98
10-22
13.1
7.3
37-60
27-75
9.1
3.1
17-40
46-119
8.3
3.2
16-26
53-119
H
15.5
6.6
85-124
6-15
11.3
9.9
56-107
13-40
12.1
3.3
45-86
25-64
11.4
3.5
28-37
37-80
R
17.8
7.0 112-180
5-15
14.7
9.8
76-121
22-64
11.2
3.7
36-76
34-91
8.2
3.5
21-38
26-75
Starting Lineup Last G: N. Burnett, T. Donaldson, V. Goldin, R. Jones, D. Wolf (9 G: 7-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
50 Vladislav Goldin
7'1"
Sr
--
27.3
16.7
6.8
1.1
2.3
0.5
1.4
64.8%
197-304
36.7%
11-30
72.7%
141-194
1
Danny Wolf
7'0"
Jr
--
30.2
13.1
9.8
3.7
3.3
0.7
1.3
57.9%
132-228
33.7%
35-104
61.6%
77-125
3
Tre Donaldson
6'2"
Jr
--
31.3
11.6
3.5
4.2
2.2
1.1
0.1
50.0%
81-162
38.1%
59-155
70.5%
55-78
4
Nimari Burnett
6'4"
Sr
--
26.8
9.7
3.5
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.2
65.3%
49-75
40.7%
63-155
77.2%
44-57
11 Roddy Gayle Jr.
6'5"
Jr
1
26.2
9.4
3.5
2.3
1.9
0.8
0.2
52.3%
91-174
19.7%
14-71
78.2%
86-110
42 Will Tschetter
6'8"
Sr
--
16.1
6.6
2.5
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.1
65.3%
47-72
35.9%
33-92
86.1%
31-36
24 Sam Walters
6'10"
So
11
12.7
5.0
1.6
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.2
68.8%
11-16
36.6%
26-71
73.7%
14-19
2
L.J. Cason
6'2"
Fr
7
11.6
4.0
1.3
0.9
1.0
0.4
0.0
50.0%
23-46
23.6%
13-55
85.2%
23-27
15 Rubin Jones
6'5"
Sr
4
20.9
3.4
2.4
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.2
48.7%
18-37
25.0%
18-72
70.6%
12-17
#5 Michigan Wolverines - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
167 W
61
L
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
101-53
Cleveland St.
--
241
114
68% 39-57 30% 21-70 56% 10-18 11%
2-19
13-22
9-11
6
18
16
20
70-72
^^Wake Forest
(5)
137
36
42% 24-57 46% 26-56 30% 10-33 30%
6-20
12-15 14-19
9
10
15
13
5-19
75 W
76-64
TCU
(4)
174
27
50% 26-52 34% 22-64 38%
15-23 15-22
11
12
21
11
133 W
94-67
Miami (OH)
(2)
142
177
58% 35-60 40% 26-65 48% 14-29 34% 11-32
10-15
4-8
8
6
18
13
289 W
72-49
Tarleton St.
(2)
358
98
45% 25-56 42% 17-41 27%
50%
6-12
16-23
9-10
10
4
10
19
155 W
75-63
^^Virginia Tech
(3)
164
137
40% 25-62 35% 20-58 29% 10-34 24%
4-17
15-20 19-24
11
13
14
17
42 W
78-53
^^Xavier
(1)
41
38
49% 30-61 35% 20-58 50% 11-22 35%
8-23
7-14
5-9
7
7
9
18
11 W
67-64
*Wisconsin
(5)
14
26
39% 23-59 34% 22-64 24%
6-25
22%
6-27
15-21 14-19
10
11
12
10
64 W
85-83
Iowa
(3)
18
178
55% 32-58 42% 32-77 20%
4-20
33%
9-27
17-22 10-17
10
13
16
4
9-23
11-18
9-24
6-22
26%
39
L
87-89
^^Arkansas
(2)
83
22
58% 34-59 50% 33-66 44%
8-18
39%
14-22
5
8
17
13
39
L
86-87
^^Oklahoma
(7)
30
77
47% 30-64 47% 27-57 14%
4-28
48% 12-25 22-26 21-24
14
9
10
11
164 W
89-58
Fort Wayne
(3)
149
231
63% 37-59 32% 21-65 48% 10-21 21%
8-38
5-6
8-9
8
2
18
6
166 W
112-64
Western Ky.
(6)
232
106
52% 33-64 36% 24-66 48% 19-40 20%
5-25
27-35
11-19
14
5
17
14
67 W
85-74
*USC
(5)
36
105
53% 29-55 44% 27-62 42% 10-24 33%
6-18
17-21 14-22
7
9
13
12
28 W
94-75
*UCLA
(2)
27
20
62% 32-52 42% 25-60 54% 15-28 10%
2-20
15-21 23-34
4
9
16
6
109 W
91-75
Washington
(4)
116
133
53% 29-55 41% 26-63 38% 11-29 43%
9-21
22-32 14-18
7
11
11
11
81-84 #
*Minnesota
(3)
106
86
45% 28-62 45% 33-73 50% 11-22 31%
9-29
14-20
9-13
10
11
13
5
80-76
Northwestern
(2)
66
41
36% 22-61 40% 23-58 26%
7-27
32%
7-22
29-37 23-31
12
10
11
12
64-91
*Purdue
(4)
8
68
37% 20-54 55% 34-62 21%
6-29
38%
9-24
18-21 14-21
12
8
22
6
71 W
76-72
Penn St.
(2)
63
78
48% 30-62 49% 25-51 43% 12-28 47%
9-19
4-9
13-16
7
5
9
18
77 W
66-63
*Rutgers
(4)
48
119
48% 22-46 33% 22-67 35%
7-20
28% 10-36 15-21
9-13
5
12
17
11
29 W
80-76
Oregon
(3)
53
37
43% 27-63 43% 29-67 33%
9-27
33%
9-27
17-21
9-11
11
10
15
12
51 W
70-67
*Indiana
(2)
74
39
44% 24-54 42% 25-60 24%
5-21
32%
6-19
17-20 11-15
6
6
11
7
18 W
75-73
Purdue
(2)
8
68
45% 25-56 44% 30-69 30%
7-23
35%
7-20
18-26
6-8
12
9
11
11
86-83
*Ohio St.
(4)
38
61
49% 33-68 46% 28-61 33%
7-21
36%
9-25
13-17 18-27
17
9
12
9
62-75
Michigan St.
(4)
37
5
46% 23-50 46% 28-61 24%
5-21
41%
9-22
11-18 10-15
6
12
13
10
55 W
49-46
*Nebraska
(2)
85
57
30% 18-61 26% 16-62 19%
5-27
21%
6-28
8-13
8-12
8
8
14
10
77 W
84-82
Rutgers
(2)
48
119
54% 29-54 45% 30-67 24%
5-21
36%
9-25
21-32 13-18
8
8
14
7
18
11
9
88
L
57 W
18
L
45 W
7
L
25
L
73-93
Illinois
(2)
15
45
46% 28-61 47% 34-73 22%
4-18
38% 14-37 13-19 11-15
10
12
L
65-71
Maryland
(2)
28
6
44% 27-62 38% 24-63 35%
7-20
36%
9-25
4-7
14-19
9
9
16
8
7
L
62-79
*Michigan St.
(3)
37
5
37% 19-52 45% 25-56 13%
3-24
38%
9-24
21-29 20-24
8
10
15
14
18 W
86-68
^^Purdue
(4)
8
68
52% 30-58 34% 22-65 31%
8-26
32%
7-22
18-22 17-22
9
14
6
5
12 W
81-80
^^Maryland
(0)
28
6
47% 31-66 44% 27-61 39%
7-18
33%
7-21
12-13 19-23
14
3
16
6
11 W
59-53
^^Wisconsin
(0)
14
26
32% 19-59 22% 15-68 27%
9-33
18%
7-39
12-13 16-18
5
12
8
6
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
117.2
42nd
115.3
45th
120.5
14th
113.5
71st
111.7
102nd
Def-Efficiency
95.4
30th
93.6
9th
92.5
16th
96.7
29th
93.0
9th
WAB
+1.5
29th
+4.8
10th
-0.3
70th
+4.4
14th
+4.2
8th
FG% 50% or better
11-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-7
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
16-5
3PT% < 35%
9-4
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
0-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
16-6
13-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
19-2
More FTA than Opp.
16-5
2-2
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
15-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
10-2
23-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
6-1
2-7
3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-5
23-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
4-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
8-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
17-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
10-5
@ Matteise
50
L, 63-58
*San Diego St.
238
W, 94-76
Pepperdine
344
W, 64-54
Sacramento St.
173
L, 84-71
Seattle
Record
30-4 (18-2)
216
W, 72-67
^^La Salle
Home
13-2
152
W, 73-67
^^James Madison
Road
213
#12 UC San Diego Tritons - Big West
BPI: 57
BT: 44
EM: 42
KPI: 40
NET: 35
POM: 36
SOR: 46
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.8
61.6
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
17-2
Win
81.7
60.1
26-50
0-0
0-0
1-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
65.5
73.0
51-100
0-1
1-0
1-0
W, 80-45
^^Toledo
W, 109-33
La Verne
Non-Conf.
181.7
Home
84.0
59.7
101-200
4-1
2-0
3-1
153
W, 84-76
*UCSB
Conf.
207.6
Road
76.4
63.1
201+
7-0
2-0
7-0
252
W, 81-60
CS. Bakersfield
275
W, 80-56
*Idaho
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Utah St.
65.8
113.5
97.0
13.4
23.3
25.6
28.4
263rd
64th
35th
6th
2nd
307th
102nd
55.4
74.6
56.1
36.5
33.8
49.6
31st
eFG%
93rd
FT%
30th
2PT%
53rd
3PT%
153rd
FTA/FGA %
8th
3PA/FGA %
47.7
75.4
46.2
33.1
29.8
44.3
42nd
330th
20th
127th
93rd
328th
43
323
W, 75-73
W, 77-71
*San Diego
W, 109-51
Occidental
344
W, 90-51
*CS. Fullerton
188
W, 95-68
Cal Poly
66
L, 60-52
UC Irvine
325
W, 80-54
*Long Beach St.
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +1.2 (44th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
L, 85-81
*UC Riverside
153
W, 77-63
UCSB
Win
74.3%
58.1%
43.7%
37.9%
32.2%
11.4
7.6
0.3
1.3
7.5
3.2
114
W, 79-54
CS. Northridge
Loss
76.8%
47.8%
53.3%
25.7%
38.9%
6.8
8.8
-0.5
-8.3
4.8
-1.0
220
W, 74-63
*Hawaii
Home
75.8%
57.7%
43.4%
37.0%
32.4%
11.9
7.3
2.0
1.5
8.6
2.2
137
W, 91-71
UC Riverside
Road
73.7%
55.8%
46.0%
36.3%
33.3%
9.9
8.1
-1.2
-1.0
6.1
3.1
66
W, 85-67
*UC Irvine
252
W, 73-54
*CS. Bakersfield
140
242
W, 85-60
UC Davis
125
125
188
W, 81-67
*Cal Poly
220
W, 83-44
Hawaii
110
110
W, 77-71
*CS. Northridge
344
W, 100-55
CS. Fullerton
95
95
80
W, 70-63
Long Beach St.
242
W, 68-57
*UC Davis
65
^^UCSB
66
W, 75-61
^^UC Irvine
H. Gray leads nation in steal rate, 30
G w/ 2+ steals, 15 G w/ 4+ steals
A. Tait-Jones top 10 fouls drawn per
40 & FT rate; 8+ FTA in 19G
C. Howell top 50 steals rate
L vs. SDSU, led 48-42 w/ 9:09 left,
shot 10-35 on 2PA
82
2nd Chance 10% 4
99
Off TO 25%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
95
In Paint 37%
325
W, 69-51
In Paint 38% 9
Fast Break 16%
80
153
Def-Efficiency
140
65
Game #
Home
90
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Aniwaniwa Tait-Jones
77
Fast Break 11%
99
Off TO 14%
Tyler McGhie
Hayden Gray
Defensive Pct.l
114
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
137
Nordin Kapic
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 18.0
6.4
28-47
1-7
15.0
4.2
2-16
17-50
11.2
3.0
8-14
13-28
11.2
5.6
10-17
8-24
W 19.4
5.6 173-271
15-42
17.1
4.0
64-135 108-271 11.8
3.3
76-137
57-127 10.7
5.1
50-96
47-147
L
20.5
4.8
25-51
0-6
10.8
3.5
11-20
6-24
6.5
2.3
5-14
5-18
9.5
5.3
9-19
5-22
H
20.2
4.5
91-142
9-22
15.5
4.2
28-56
49-125 10.5
2.9
34-64
25-68
11.2
5.1
26-53
29-82
R
18.9
6.2 107-180
6-26
17.1
3.7
47-99
65-170
3.4
47-87
37-77
10.1
5.2
33-62
23-87
11.7
Starting Lineup Last G: H. Gray, C. Howell, N. Kapic, T. McGhie, A. Tait-Jones (32 G: 28-4)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
12 Aniwaniwa Tait-Jones
6'6"
Sr
--
29.9
19.5
5.5
3.7
2.0
1.3
0.4
61.5%
198-322
31.3%
15-48
75.8%
222-293
13 Tyler McGhie
6'5"
Sr
--
30.4
16.4
3.9
1.7
0.7
0.9
0.2
48.4%
75-155
38.6%
114-295
85.5%
65-76
3
Hayden Gray
6'4"
Sr
--
32.0
11.2
3.2
3.3
1.4
3.2
0.2
53.6%
81-151
42.8%
62-145
68.8%
33-48
24 Nordin Kapic
6'8"
Jr
1
24.7
10.6
5.2
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.4
51.3%
59-115
30.8%
52-169
73.5%
75-102
5
Justin Rochelin
6'4"
So
--
19.2
6.7
3.5
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.3
64.5%
49-76
34.0%
36-106
68.8%
22-32
8
Chris Howell
6'6"
Jr
--
28.8
5.7
3.7
3.1
1.0
2.1
0.3
53.2%
41-77
32.8%
21-64
75.0%
48-64
20 Aidan Burke
6'3"
So
--
13.2
4.2
1.3
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.0
68.4%
13-19
39.2%
38-97
57.1%
4-7
31 Milos Vicentic
6'7"
Sr
33
19.6
3.0
5.0
--
1.0
--
--
0.0%
0-5
100.0%
1-1
--
--
4
6'10"
Jr
14
5.4
2.7
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
45.5%
5-11
45.2%
14-31
100.0%
2-2
Cade Pendleton
2PT
3PT
FT
#12 UC San Diego Tritons - Big West
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
122
14
33% 20-61 44% 22-50 39% 10-26 36%
8-22
8-13
11-15
8
5
8
14
94-76
Pepperdine
(2)
174
244
49% 32-65 52% 24-46 42% 16-38 43%
9-21
14-20 19-27
12
4
9
18
64-54
Sacramento St.
(2)
343
315
35% 19-54 40% 19-47 29%
8-28
28%
8-29
18-26
8-16
7
8
9
17
71-84
Seattle
(3)
235
80
50% 26-52 56% 27-48 31%
5-16
50% 10-20 14-19 20-27
3
6
8
12
216 W
72-67
^^La Salle
(4)
227
192
36% 22-62 38% 21-55 34% 11-32 29%
17-28 18-31
12
11
8
14
152 W
73-67
^^James Madison
(0)
105
253
50% 24-48 43% 24-56 39%
18-26
8-8
3
6
5
9
213 W
80-45
^^Toledo
(0)
96
355
56% 32-57 30% 16-53 37% 11-30 24%
6-25
5-7
7-10
4
7
10
16
8-27
14-19
3-6
14
5
6
25
48% 14-29 20-24 12-15
12
6
7
17
344 W
173
L
7-18
Opp
Turnovers
*San Diego St.
238 W
For
Off. Reb
58-63
L
Opp
FT
Result
50
For
3PT
7-24
41% 11-27
W
109-33
La Verne
(6)
--
--
53% 40-76 21% 11-53 40% 15-38 30%
153 W
84-76
*UCSB
(4)
124
193
44% 28-64 51% 25-49 26%
252 W
81-60
CS. Bakersfield
(1)
197
306
47% 26-55 46% 22-48 43% 15-35 56%
14-19
11-12
5
4
12
19
275 W
80-56
*Idaho
(7)
139
334
47% 27-58 39% 20-51 33% 10-30 43% 12-28 16-23
4-9
9
5
10
16
43 W
75-73
*Utah St.
(1)
13
148
47% 22-47 40% 24-60 30%
8-27
29%
23-27 17-24
3
8
15
13
323 W
77-71
*San Diego
(3)
290
269
46% 24-52 51% 27-53 40%
8-20
40% 10-25 21-27
7-10
6
7
12
23
W
109-51
Occidental
(6)
--
--
46% 40-87 34% 19-56 36% 21-58 32%
6-19
8-11
7-10
18
3
3
17
344 W
90-51
*CS. Fullerton
(6)
362
284
53% 31-59 33% 16-49 37% 11-30 23%
3-13
17-20 16-17
6
9
7
20
188 W
95-68
Cal Poly
(4)
120
260
55% 32-58 41% 23-56 33%
8-24
39% 16-41 23-25
6-8
8
5
9
15
52-60
UC Irvine
(1)
169
33
31% 19-61 38% 21-55 17%
6-35
33%
7-21
8-9
11-16
8
9
7
11
80-54
*Long Beach St.
(4)
277
317
58% 30-52 43% 19-44 47%
9-19
27%
4-15
11-16 12-17
6
3
10
14
81-85
*UC Riverside
(1)
107
235
40% 26-65 51% 30-59 21%
6-28
37% 10-27 23-28 15-22
10
11
9
14
153 W
77-63
UCSB
(4)
124
193
47% 26-55 36% 20-55 36%
9-25
22%
5-23
16-23 18-19
5
10
8
15
114 W
79-54
CS. Northridge
(1)
144
130
45% 27-60 33% 20-61 37% 11-30 14%
2-14
14-17 12-18
7
11
9
17
220 W
74-63
*Hawaii
(5)
248
195
48% 24-50 48% 20-42 42%
137 W
91-71
UC Riverside
(5)
107
235
49% 34-70 44% 28-64 41% 12-29 38% 12-32 11-12
66 W
85-67
*UC Irvine
(1)
169
33
54% 29-54 39% 19-49 52% 16-31 30%
6-20
252 W
73-54
*CS. Bakersfield
(4)
197
306
50% 25-50 36% 22-61 50% 16-32 13%
2-15
7-12
242 W
85-60
UC Davis
(1)
328
108
52% 31-60 44% 23-52 43% 12-28 24%
4-17
188 W
81-67
*Cal Poly
(4)
120
260
48% 30-63 41% 25-61 22%
220 W
83-44
Hawaii
(1)
248
195
51% 29-57 27% 15-56 48% 13-27 22%
5-23
12-17
114 W
77-71
*CS. Northridge
(4)
144
130
42% 26-62 46% 25-55 41% 13-32 30%
7-23
344 W
100-55
CS. Fullerton
(1)
362
284
53% 37-70 37% 19-51 45% 18-40 30%
325 W
70-63
Long Beach St.
(4)
277
317
39% 22-56 37% 18-49 30% 10-33 30%
242 W
68-57
*UC Davis
(1)
328
108
153 W
69-51
^^UCSB
(5)
124
193
66 W
75-61
^^UC Irvine
(0)
169
33
66
L
325 W
137
L
via Torvik
Home Games
8-31
8-28
4
2
9
17
3-5
12
6
8
12
11-14 23-28
3
9
11
17
8-9
2
16
5
10
11-18 10-10
10
3
8
14
4-4
9
6
4
17
9-13
7
9
6
12
12-20 14-17
7
5
9
16
6-20
8-9
11-16
5
6
3
17
7-23
16-21 20-22
9
11
5
18
41% 21-51 35% 19-55 40% 10-25 41%
9-22
16-19 10-15
7
12
11
12
44% 22-50 27% 16-60 27%
17%
6-35
18-25 13-17
4
10
2
8
49% 27-55 35% 20-57 41% 12-29 28%
8-29
9-13
5
4
12
12
Road & Neutral Games
8-19
5-9
8-36
7-26
46% 10-22 18-23 13-18
38% 13-34 13-19
Non-Conference Games
13-13
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
113.0
79th
112.6
65th
106.4
157th
116.0
51st
118.1
38th
Def-Efficiency
99.0
68th
96.5
29th
98.8
69th
97.3
32nd
95.8
24th
WAB
-1.1
93rd
+2.2
28th
-0.1
59th
+0.7
46th
+1.9
21st
FG% 50% or better
11-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
23-1
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-3
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
24-2
21-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-3
More FTM than Opp.
19-1
9-3
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
19-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
19-1
More FTA than Opp.
21-1
8-2
More OReb than Opp.
11-3
15-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
28-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
26-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
22-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
1-0
0-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-0
@ Matteise
69
L, 64-61
*UCF
342
W, 87-55
East Texas A&M
175
W, 97-71
Lamar
45
W, 78-64
Ohio St.
Record
22-10 (11-7)
218
W, 71-54
Southern
Home
13-3
29
L, 80-70
^^Oregon
Road
32
W, 77-73
^^Creighton
77
W, 81-77
^^Rutgers
Non-Conf.
61
W, 57-44
Wake Forest
Conf.
8
W, 72-67
^^Texas Tech
18
W, 70-66
^^Purdue
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Hou. Christian
66.1
115.7
93.2
18.2
19.7
42.0
27.8
240th
49th
11th
249th
54th
1st
76th
291
W, 77-45
228
W, 92-54
Ab. Christian
45
W, 80-60
Texas
39
W, 80-78
*Oklahoma
6
L, 94-88
Alabama
14
L, 81-69
*Kentucky
83
W, 68-57
LSU
#4 Texas A&M Aggies - SEC
BPI: 22
BT: 22
EM: 23
KPI: 13
NET: 18
POM: 17
SOR: 17
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
74.3
67.9
1-25
1-2
2-0
1-2
9-7
Win
75.2
62.2
26-50
5-1
1-2
2-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
72.3
80.5
51-100
2-0
1-0
2-1
112.9
Home
77.8
63.4
101-200
1-0
0-0
0-0
36.6
Road
70.9
72.4
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.2 (17th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 8-4
47.5
69.5
48.0
31.1
41.7
37.6
315th
eFG%
274th
FT%
290th
2PT%
316th
3PT%
16th
FTA/FGA %
205th
3PA/FGA %
48.2
76.8
46.5
33.4
35.3
47.0
58th
353rd
26th
154th
238th
352nd
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 63-62
*Ole Miss
45
L, 70-69
*Texas
Win
70.3%
50.9%
45.9%
31.1%
31.4%
6.6
8.0
6.0
10.7
1.8
5.1
39
W, 75-68
Oklahoma
Loss
67.8%
41.7%
47.6%
31.0%
37.6%
7.8
10.0
5.5
4.9
-3.0
-3.4
86
W, 76-72
*South Carolina
Home
70.2%
52.0%
43.6%
28.8%
31.4%
6.3
7.7
6.1
11.7
1.5
4.3
23
W, 67-64
*Missouri
Road
68.7%
43.8%
49.4%
33.2%
35.2%
7.8
9.6
5.5
6.1
-0.9
0.6
35
W, 69-53
Georgia
39
W, 69-61
Arkansas
140
33
L, 70-54
*Miss St.
125
125
5
L, 77-69
Tennessee
47
L, 86-84
Vanderbilt
110
110
L, 89-70
*Florida
1
W, 83-72
Auburn
Def-Efficiency
140
57
In Paint 44%
36
Fast Break 11%
95
95
80
100
2nd Chance 23%
82
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
99
In Paint 34%
83
W, 66-52
*LSU
80
45
!L, 94-89
^^Texas
65
65
Game #
Home
Z. Phelps DNP L @ UCF
Taylor DNP @ OU, vs. Bama, @ UK
75
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Wade Taylor IV
40
Fast Break 13%
Off TO 20% 18
Zhuric Phelps
Pharrel Payne
Defensive Pct.l
4
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
26
Henry Coleman III
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 18.8
4.2
10-33
11-34
12.6
3.4
14-40
6-26
12.2
5.6
22-42
0-0
7.4
7.8
15-29
0-0
W 15.4
2.9
43-100
50-143 13.6
4.5
84-195
21-79
8.4
4.6
68-101
0-0
8.7
5.6
73-123
0-0
L
16.6
3.9
13-44
19-66
15.3
6.0
36-95
13-51
11.7
5.6
40-72
0-0
5.8
5.6
24-47
0-1
A&M eFG% < 45%: 6-9
A&M opponent finishes w/ a TO%
below 17%: 2-8
H
14.9
2.9
26-59
29-94
14.5
5.9
72-153
13-56
9.1
5.4
52-78
0-0
9.3
4.8
57-94
0-0
R
16.5
3.4
30-85
40-115
13.7
4.0
48-137
21-74
9.8
4.4
56-95
0-0
6.3
6.4
40-76
0-1
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
4
Wade Taylor IV
6'0"
Sr
4
30.7
15.7
3.2
4.3
2.6
1.3
0.1
38.9%
56-144
33.0%
69-209
88.3%
121-137
1
P. Payne top 100 off-reb% & blk%
H. Coleman top 60 off-reb%
Starting Lineup Last G: H. Coleman, A. Garcia, H. Hefner, M. Obaseki, W. Taylor (3 G: 2-1)
2PT
3PT
FT
Zhuric Phelps
6'4"
Sr
1
28.1
14.1
5.0
2.2
3.0
1.7
0.1
41.4%
120-290
26.2%
34-130
69.9%
95-136
21 Pharrel Payne
6'9"
Jr
--
19.8
9.4
4.9
0.4
1.2
0.3
1.1
62.4%
108-173
--
--
56.7%
85-150
15 Henry Coleman III
6'8"
Sr
--
21.9
7.8
5.6
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.1
57.1%
97-170
0.0%
0-1
69.1%
56-81
35 Manny Obaseki
6'4"
Sr
--
16.2
6.5
1.7
1.2
1.1
0.3
0.3
36.4%
55-151
35.0%
14-40
73.3%
55-75
11 Andersson Garcia
6'7"
Sr
--
24.2
5.9
6.2
1.6
1.2
1.0
0.7
57.7%
41-71
38.3%
18-47
72.6%
53-73
9
Solomon Washington
6'7"
Jr
2
22.5
4.7
5.2
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.2
45.1%
37-82
19.6%
10-51
67.9%
38-56
2
Hayden Hefner
6'6"
Sr
2
15.2
4.6
1.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.3
53.2%
25-47
29.9%
23-77
73.1%
19-26
6'5"
Sr
--
10.5
4.4
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
50.0%
4-8
41.8%
41-98
83.3%
10-12
10 C.J. Wilcher
#4 Texas A&M Aggies - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
51
113
37% 23-63 34% 17-50 30%
7-23
31%
8-26
8-14
22-31
15
5
11
10
342 W
87-55
East Texas A&M
(3)
337
273
56% 34-61 39% 20-52 33%
5-15
29%
7-24
14-24
8-11
14
5
10
18
175 W
97-71
Lamar
(2)
269
94
55% 32-58 38% 24-64 46% 12-26 33%
6-18
21-32 17-25
15
13
14
9
45 W
78-64
Ohio St.
(3)
38
61
39% 19-49 34% 20-59 38%
8-21
27%
8-30
32-40 16-22
11
12
11
9
71-54
Southern
(4)
313
99
38% 26-69 39% 21-54 19%
5-26
24%
6-25
14-26
6-11
23
7
10
18
70-80
^^Oregon
(5)
54
37
32% 22-68 46% 25-55 31% 11-35 28%
7-25
15-20 23-31
17
6
12
8
32 W
77-73
^^Creighton
(0)
32
42
39% 28-71 38% 23-60 22%
5-23
35% 13-37 16-23 14-16
17
9
10
13
77 W
81-77
^^Rutgers
(2)
48
119
43% 24-56 41% 28-68 13%
2-15
23%
6-26
31-42 15-17
8
11
12
16
61 W
57-44
Wake Forest
(2)
137
36
39% 19-49 28% 17-60 23%
5-22
21%
6-28
14-17
4-7
11
14
18
14
8
L
Opp
Turnovers
--
29
For
Off. Reb
DBG
218 W
Opp
FT
*UCF
L
For
3PT
61-64
69
Opponent
Opp Eff.
W
72-67
^^Texas Tech
(4)
6
32
37% 25-67 45% 23-51 38%
9-24
39% 12-31 13-18
9-12
14
6
9
17
18 W
70-66
^^Purdue
(5)
8
68
44% 22-50 45% 24-53 41%
9-22
35%
9-26
17-24
9-10
11
5
16
16
291 W
77-45
Hou. Christian
(5)
286
225
47% 32-68 31% 15-49 41%
7-17
10%
2-20
6-10
13-20
15
7
9
11
228 W
92-54
Ab. Christian
(7)
319
81
59% 31-53 37% 19-52 40%
8-20
36%
5-14
22-30
11-13
16
9
18
20
45 W
80-60
Texas
(6)
39
69
47% 27-57 35% 18-52 11%
2-19
27%
7-26
24-32 17-20
10
5
7
11
39 W
80-78
*Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
44% 27-61 54% 25-46 39%
9-23
58% 14-24 17-22 14-17
15
8
7
18
6
L
88-94
Alabama
(2)
4
28
39% 28-72 40% 27-68 22%
4-18
35% 13-37 28-48 27-40
19
18
8
12
14
L
69-81
*Kentucky
(2)
11
49
39% 23-59 46% 24-52 23%
7-30
33%
9-27
16-25 24-31
8
7
11
14
83 W
68-57
LSU
(3)
128
62
43% 26-61 36% 17-47 32%
7-22
24%
7-29
9-21
16-18
11
6
9
15
26 W
63-62
*Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
39% 24-62 37% 24-65 29%
8-28
31% 11-35
7-9
3-4
10
5
20
10
3-8
45
69-70
*Texas
(2)
39
69
42% 27-64 46% 24-52 52% 12-23 40%
14-17
12
5
11
6
39 W
L
75-68
Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
38% 21-56 48% 21-44 17%
46% 10-22 29-35 16-22
20
2
13
10
86 W
76-72
*South Carolina
(3)
110
59
45% 22-49 45% 25-56 48% 11-23 39% 12-31 21-30 10-12
8
7
10
10
23 W
67-64
*Missouri
(6)
5
75
45% 24-53 40% 21-53 26%
5-19
24%
5-21
14-23 17-20
9
10
13
12
35 W
69-53
Georgia
(2)
46
23
41% 26-64 33% 16-49 30%
6-20
28%
7-25
11-16 14-18
16
7
11
13
39 W
4-24
8-20
69-61
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
42% 24-57 42% 20-48 30%
6-20
33%
7-21
15-21 14-19
8
7
9
16
33
L
54-70
*Miss St.
(2)
26
50
36% 19-53 43% 22-51 35%
8-23
36%
9-25
8-13
9
5
19
9
5
L
69-77
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
39% 23-59 43% 23-54 17%
5-30
48% 13-27 18-20 18-20
11
8
11
7
47
L
84-86
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
37% 23-62 41% 24-58 32%
7-22
42% 10-24 31-39 28-36
14
10
12
9
4
L
70-89
*Florida
(2)
3
13
39% 23-59 48% 32-67 29%
5-17
42% 14-33 19-28 11-16
15
10
13
10
W
83-72
Auburn
(2)
1
12
43% 28-65 50% 25-50 36%
9-25
41%
9-22
18-25 13-15
22
8
9
11
83 W
66-52
*LSU
(3)
128
62
42% 22-52 30% 15-50 27%
4-15
27%
7-26
18-25 15-20
14
4
12
10
89-94 #
^^Texas
(4)
39
69
35% 25-72 43% 31-72 39% 12-31 41%
9-22
27-40 23-31
18
9
13
6
1
45
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
17-20
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.1
28th
112.5
66th
114.6
47th
116.4
49th
117.2
45th
Def-Efficiency
93.2
16th
92.8
8th
90.7
7th
94.0
12th
94.3
13th
WAB
+2.1
17th
+3.1
19th
+2.3
8th
+3.4
18th
+1.5
29th
FG% 50% or better
3-0
3PT% >= 35%
9-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-7
More FTM than Opp.
18-4
FG% 45% or better
6-0
3PT% < 35%
13-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-3
More FTA than Opp.
20-4
FG% below 45%
16-10
Make >= 10 3PA
2-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
6-4
More OReb than Opp.
18-10
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-0
Make < 10 3PA
20-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
5-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-8
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-8
Opp. FG% below 45%
17-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
7-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-1
@ Matteise
190
W, 88-62
Quinnipiac
165
L, 91-79
*UIC
18
L, 92-84
*Purdue
W, 100-46
Emerson
Record
22-7 (13-1)
88
L, 59-56
*Minnesota
Home
11-0
333
W, 86-64
*Stony Brook
Road
322
W, 91-66
^^Fairfield
229
L, 100-94
^^Delaware
Non-Conf.
148
L, 84-78
*Rhode Island
Conf.
189
W, 65-50
Vermont
85
W, 74-58
^^Akron
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*UTEP
67.2
113.9
103.7
14.4
16.1
33.2
25.8
179th
61st
116th
19th
249th
79th
22nd
54.8
73.6
53.4
38.5
32.0
32.0
40th
eFG%
126th
FT%
89th
2PT%
9th
3PT%
205th
FTA/FGA %
336th
3PA/FGA %
48.8
76.6
47.3
33.7
28.7
48.0
82nd
352nd
44th
172nd
70th
359th
161
L, 75-74
304
W, 93-65
Howard
185
W, 79-58
Brown
257
W, 92-88
*Columbia
198
W, 83-67
Dartmouth
235
W, 84-55
Harvard
146
W, 77-70
*Princeton
#13 Yale Bulldogs - Ivy
BPI: 67
BT: 79
EM: 58
KPI: 74
NET: 72
POM: 74
SOR: 75
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
81.7
69.7
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
11-7
Win
83.4
65.8
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
76.3
82.1
51-100
0-0
1-0
0-1
191.4
Home
84.5
62.1
101-200
6-0
2-0
4-3
221.1
Road
79.9
74.4
201+
4-0
1-1
3-1
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -2.7 (74th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
280
W, 90-61
*Penn
121
W, 103-88
*Cornell
Win
74.0%
55.2%
46.7%
39.8%
30.8%
7.8
8.9
1.5
8.6
1.7
3.5
280
W, 72-71
Penn
Loss
70.7%
49.8%
49.8%
35.5%
41.0%
7.0
10.4
1.3
1.1
-1.3
-5.3
146
W, 84-57
Princeton
Home
74.5%
55.8%
47.6%
36.8%
27.4%
7.8
7.5
3.1
10.0
3.3
3.4
121
W, 92-88
Cornell
Road
72.4%
52.7%
47.4%
40.2%
36.2%
7.5
10.4
0.4
4.8
-0.4
0.2
257
W, 90-64
Columbia
198
W, 72-67
*Dartmouth
140
235
L, 74-69
*Harvard
125
125
185
W, 70-61
*Brown
146
W, 59-57
^^Princeton
110
110
121
W, 90-84
^^Cornell
95
95
80
80
Def-Efficiency
140
86
In Paint 47%
39
Fast Break 12%
74
2nd Chance 16%
Off TO 16% 23
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Fast Break 16% 9
65
Game #
Home
Road
John Poulakidas
L Purdue, largest deficit 13, Purdue
11-23 from 3PT, Yale 64% 2PT FG
vs. Minnesota, led 25-11, Yale -11
turnover margin, -14 FTA
4 back who played 10+ min R64 LY
KenPom OE Rk LY: 91, DE: 93
74
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
92
Off TO 15%
Nick Townsend
Bez Mbeng
Defensive Pct.l
99
In Paint 35%
65
Offensive Pct.l
Off-Efficiency
Casey Simmons
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 18.0
2.8
18-36
16-41
15.2
7.8
24-54
4-6
16.2
8.2
22-47
5-17
9.2
4.6
15-29
3-9
W 19.0
3.3
67-128
17-53
16.2
7.5 108-200
1-7
13.4
5.8
62-127
7-23
9.0
5.4
65-118
3-6
L
20.2
3.5
22-48
66-150 13.0
6.6
32-61
25-46
13.3
4.7
25-57
32-82
7.7
2.1
21-29
11-30
H
15.2
3.9
31-65
25-73
15.0
6.9
42-85
15-28
13.2
5.0
31-55
15-43
10.6
5.6
38-68
6-14
R
21.8
2.9
58-111
58-130 15.7
7.4
98-176
11-25
13.5
5.8
56-129
24-62
7.7
4.0
48-79
8-22
Starting Lineup Last G: S. Aletan, B. Mbeng, J. Poulakidas, C. Simmons, N. Townsend (16 G: 14-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
4
John Poulakidas
6'5"
Sr
3
31.4
19.2
3.3
1.3
0.8
0.6
0.1
50.6%
89-176
40.9%
42 Nick Townsend
6'7"
Jr
--
30.2
15.4
7.2
3.6
1.5
0.7
0.2
53.6%
140-261
2
Bez Mbeng
6'4"
Sr
1
32.6
13.4
5.5
5.6
2.9
1.9
0.4
47.3%
87-184
14 Casey Simmons
6'6"
Jr
1
24.7
8.7
4.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.6
58.5%
10 Samson Aletan
6'10"
So
--
20.8
7.7
3.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
1.6
8
Isaac Celiscar
6'6"
Fr
--
20.6
7.0
5.1
1.5
0.7
0.5
24 Yassine Gharram
6'3"
Sr
21
23.5
6.4
6.0
2.5
2.5
9
Riley Fox
6'6"
Fr
6
9.3
3.4
1.3
0.2
0.1
11 Trevor Mullin
6'0"
So
--
11.6
3.2
1.1
0.8
0.5
FT
83-203
89.0%
73-82
49.1%
26-53
76.3%
90-118
37.1%
39-105
70.6%
84-119
86-147
38.9%
14-36
69.8%
30-43
60.0%
87-145
0.0%
0-1
63.2%
48-76
0.2
56.8%
67-118
28.0%
7-25
75.8%
47-62
0.5
0.3
60.0%
12-20
47.1%
8-17
37.5%
3-8
0.2
0.0
50.0%
15-30
41.0%
16-39
--
--
0.3
0.0
54.1%
20-37
32.6%
14-43
83.3%
10-12
#13 Yale Bulldogs - Ivy
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
165
18
Opp
For
FT
Off
Def
256
166
46% 30-65 32% 19-60 35%
21-27 17-18
18
7
15
13
L
79-91
*UIC
(3)
195
207
45% 25-56 46% 31-68 46% 11-24 38% 12-32 18-25 17-23
5
7
16
8
L
84-92
*Purdue
(2)
8
68
51% 33-65 54% 28-52 31%
48% 11-23
10-19 25-32
11
5
10
10
100-46
Emerson
(1)
--
--
60% 41-68 35% 19-54 46% 11-24
9%
2-22
7-13
6-13
11
7
12
16
8-26
22%
7-32
For
Opp
Turnovers
--
7-20
Opp
Off. Reb
DBG
L
For
3PT
Quinnipiac
W
88
FG
88-62
190 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For Opp For Opp
56-59
*Minnesota
(2)
106
86
44% 20-45 36% 20-55 50%
7-14
18%
3-17
9-12
16-26
8
12
12
2
333 W
86-64
*Stony Brook
(3)
263
351
51% 35-69 42% 22-53 45%
9-20
50%
9-18
7-16
11-16
11
4
6
16
322 W
91-66
^^Fairfield
(2)
330
310
60% 33-55 40% 20-50 44%
7-16
32%
7-22
18-20 19-25
6
8
5
7
229
L
94-100
^^Delaware
(0)
122
325
48% 32-67 53% 29-55 28%
5-18
47% 16-34 25-30 26-30
6
6
6
11
148
L
78-84
*Rhode Island
(7)
148
204
42% 27-65 39% 23-59 22%
4-18
33% 11-33
7
11
8
12
189 W
65-50
Vermont
(4)
297
136
44% 23-52 35% 19-55 40%
8-20
26%
7-27
11-13
5-9
7
7
12
10
85 W
74-58
^^Akron
(12)
62
186
48% 27-56 31% 18-58 27%
4-15
33%
9-27
16-21 13-17
13
6
18
13
74-75
*UTEP
(0)
189
124
44% 27-62 48% 25-52 46% 10-22 65% 11-17
10-17 14-21
13
4
15
13
304 W
93-65
Howard
(10)
233
336
54% 33-61 46% 26-57 50% 14-28 27%
6-22
13-17
7-9
10
7
8
14
185 W
79-58
Brown
(9)
244
159
45% 30-67 42% 22-53 25%
7-22
14-16
7-12
12
6
4
14
257 W
92-88
*Columbia
(6)
213
345
47% 29-62 44% 30-69 44% 10-23 32% 11-34
24-31 17-21
11
7
15
5
198 W
83-67
Dartmouth
(1)
283
90
44% 32-73 40% 22-55 28%
5-18
22%
5-23
14-17 18-26
9
7
11
14
235 W
84-55
Harvard
(4)
253
205
43% 27-63 37% 22-60 40%
8-20
28%
8-29
22-29
3-5
17
4
8
12
146 W
77-70
*Princeton
(5)
229
191
57% 31-54 35% 24-69 56%
9-16
33% 14-42
6-8
8-9
9
17
15
9
280 W
90-61
*Penn
(0)
234
337
57% 32-56 35% 23-66 53%
8-15
32% 10-31 18-22
5-11
5
8
11
8
121 W
103-88
*Cornell
(6)
56
265
63% 40-64 47% 32-68 48% 10-21 41% 15-37 13-19
9-12
7
9
10
11
280 W
72-71
Penn
(5)
234
337
48% 30-63 46% 28-61 19%
3-16
37% 11-30
9-14
4-5
8
10
3
10
146 W
84-57
Princeton
(0)
229
191
57% 32-56 27% 15-56 45%
9-20
23%
11-15 19-24
6
10
8
9
121 W
92-88
Cornell
(5)
56
265
49% 30-61 41% 28-68 38% 11-29 39% 15-39 21-30 17-21
8
14
9
9
257 W
90-64
Columbia
(0)
213
345
54% 38-71 40% 23-58 26%
5-19
33%
6-18
9-13
12
5
8
13
72-67
*Dartmouth
(5)
283
90
42% 27-65 38% 26-69 31%
5-16
26%
9-35
13-17
6-10
9
9
6
4
69-74
*Harvard
(0)
253
205
43% 29-67 47% 27-58 25%
4-16
41%
9-22
7-11
11-11
12
8
8
10
185 W
70-61
*Brown
(6)
244
159
43% 23-53 34% 20-59 44%
8-18
30%
9-30
16-22 12-16
5
14
6
14
146 W
59-57
^^Princeton
(6)
229
191
45% 22-49 39% 22-57 20%
3-15
29% 10-35 12-18
3-3
7
5
8
7
121 W
90-84
^^Cornell
(0)
56
265
50% 31-62 56% 29-52 57% 13-23 41% 11-27 15-21 15-16
5
3
3
10
161
L
198 W
235
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
5-20
32%
Non-Conference Games
8-35
20-26 27-30
Conference Games
12-16
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
114.2
66th
113.8
56th
113.5
56th
114.1
63rd
113.6
76th
Def-Efficiency
99.7
75th
106.0
164th
103.9
149th
103.5
116th
104.7
128th
WAB
+0.5
51st
-3.2
106th
-3.5
207th
+0.5
52nd
+0.4
48th
FG% 50% or better
10-1
3PT% >= 35%
15-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-5
More FTM than Opp.
15-1
15-2
3PT% < 35%
7-5
Make >= 10 3PA
7-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
6-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-2
More FTA than Opp.
15-1
8-5
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
16-5
12-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
14-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
18-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
19-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
8-3
15-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-2
@ Matteise
San Diego St / North Carolina
Iowa State
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Ole Miss
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Lipscomb
North Carolina
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
San Diego State
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
288
W, 90-60
LIU Brooklyn
329
W, 66-64
Grambling St.
129
W, 64-54
Southern Ala.
44
W, 84-69
^^Colorado St.
Record
22-11 (10-8)
328
W, 100-68
Oral Roberts
Home
13-3
21
!W, 96-85
^^BYU
Road
18
L, 80-78
^^Purdue
17
W, 86-63
*Louisville
Non-Conf.
326
W, 86-53
Lindenwood
Conf.
309
W, 77-46
^^Southern Miss.
218
W, 74-61
Southern
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Queens
68.0
117.4
97.0
12.8
20.5
25.4
30.8
132nd
31st
34th
3rd
33rd
311th
230th
194
W, 80-62
37
L, 87-70
*Memphis
35
W, 63-51
Georgia
39
W, 73-66
*Arkansas
83
W, 77-65
LSU
6
W, 74-64
*Alabama
33
!L, 84-81
*Miss St.
#6 Ole Miss Rebels - SEC
BPI: 32
BT: 28
EM: 33
KPI: 18
NET: 28
POM: 25
SOR: 22
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.2
71.7
1-25
2-2
1-2
2-3
9-8
Win
79.6
66.5
26-50
3-1
2-0
1-3
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
72.3
82.3
51-100
1-0
0-0
2-0
151
Home
78.1
67.9
101-200
2-0
0-0
0-0
32.9
Road
76.3
75.3
201+
5-0
1-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.8 (20th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-5
Opp. O-Reb%
51.1
73.8
51.0
34.1
35.6
40.2
152nd
eFG%
119th
FT%
178th
2PT%
156th
3PT%
104th
FTA/FGA %
146th
3PA/FGA %
50.5
70.5
51.6
32.7
39.5
44.0
157th
97th
209th
110th
321st
322nd
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
16
L, 63-62
Texas A&M
23
L, 83-75
*Missouri
Win
73.7%
52.3%
49.9%
35.6%
30.1%
8.3
7.2
0.1
0.1
5.8
2.2
45
W, 72-69
Texas
Loss
74.0%
48.3%
54.8%
31.4%
37.6%
8.1
9.5
-4.3
-12.0
3.6
-3.5
1
L, 92-82
Auburn
Home
73.2%
52.6%
48.4%
33.5%
33.0%
8.4
8.1
-0.3
-1.1
5.4
3.1
14
W, 98-84
Kentucky
Road
74.4%
49.6%
54.6%
34.8%
32.5%
8.1
7.9
-2.5
-6.7
4.7
-2.4
83
W, 72-70
*LSU
86
W, 72-68
*South Carolina
140
33
L, 81-71
Miss St.
125
125
47
L, 77-72
*Vanderbilt
1
L, 106-76
*Auburn
110
110
Oklahoma
5
W, 78-76
Tennessee
95
95
80
4
L, 90-71
*Florida
39
W, 83-80
^^Arkansas
65
L, 62-57
62
Fast Break 14%
80
1
In Paint 40% 18
^^Auburn
M. Dia top 60 def-reb%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
Jaemyn Brakefield
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 38%
91
Fast Break 10%
88
33
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Sean Pedulla
86
Off TO 21%
65
Game #
27
2nd Chance 13%
99
Off TO 14%
Matthew Murrell
Defensive Pct.l
W, 87-84
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
39
Off-Efficiency
Malik Dia
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 15.4
3.2
17-33
11-32
10.8
2.2
19-23
1-8
8.6
3.2
13-22
3-19
12.2
6.4
14-30
5-10
W 14.2
3.5
51-119
51-128 10.7
4.4
63-108
15-44
11.6
3.7
50-90
22-72
10.4
6.0
67-131
18-52
When opponent finished w/ an offreb rate of 30% or better, Ole Miss
was: 8-11, undefeated <30%
L
16.3
3.5
36-60
27-73
11.1
4.3
37-65
7-23
9.0
3.0
18-39
15-49
11.1
5.2
34-66
8-26
H
15.8
3.8
43-85
40-109 12.6
4.3
58-101
12-36
11.5
3.8
34-59
17-57
9.0
5.5
38-82
13-38
R
14.1
3.2
44-94
38-92
4.4
42-72
10-31
9.9
3.1
34-70
20-64
12.1
5.9
63-115
13-40
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
S. Pedulla 41% 3PT in SEC
J. Murray down to 32% in SEC
M. Murrell 40% 3PT LY
9.2
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Davis, M. Dia, J. Murray, M. Murrell, S. Pedulla (21 G: 12-9)
NAME
2PT
3PT
3
Sean Pedulla
6'1"
Sr
--
32.8
14.9
3.5
3.6
2.0
1.8
0.2
48.6%
87-179
38.8%
4
FT
78-201
82.2%
83-101
Jaemyn Brakefield
6'8"
Sr
--
22.9
10.9
4.4
1.8
1.2
0.8
0.3
57.8%
100-173
32.8%
22-67
72.4%
92-127
11 Matthew Murrell
6'4"
Sr
4
29.9
10.6
3.4
1.9
0.7
1.8
0.2
52.7%
68-129
30.6%
37-121
80.3%
61-76
0
Malik Dia
6'9"
Jr
--
20.6
10.6
5.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.9
51.3%
101-197
33.3%
26-78
64.8%
70-108
5
Jaylen Murray
5'11"
Sr
--
30.6
10.6
2.2
3.5
1.3
1.5
0.2
44.4%
64-144
37.5%
57-152
83.3%
50-60
14 Dre Davis
6'6"
Sr
2
26.0
10.4
4.7
1.3
1.2
1.0
1.0
50.8%
94-185
31.4%
22-70
68.4%
67-98
7
Davon Barnes
6'4"
Sr
--
20.5
5.2
3.2
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.3
50.6%
45-89
21.2%
14-66
73.6%
39-53
1
Mikeal Brown-Jones
6'8"
Sr
5
10.1
4.1
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.5
53.3%
32-60
18.2%
2-11
75.9%
44-58
8
Eduardo Klafke
6'5"
Fr
--
10.3
1.6
1.0
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
33.3%
3-9
50.0%
13-26
54.5%
6-11
#6 Ole Miss Rebels - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
For
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
LIU Brooklyn
--
349
122
49% 28-57 35% 20-58 41%
9-22
33%
5-15
25-32 15-24
9
8
14
15
329 W
66-64
Grambling St.
(3)
346
228
35% 23-65 47% 21-45 23%
6-26
47%
9-19
14-18 13-20
9
4
6
21
129 W
64-54
Southern Ala.
(3)
179
112
33% 21-64 39% 20-52 34% 13-38 28%
7-25
9-14
7-11
11
5
9
13
44 W
84-69
^^Colorado St.
(3)
34
46
51% 28-55 48% 24-50 47%
35%
9-26
19-26
10-11
6
5
4
14
328 W
100-68
Oral Roberts
(4)
220
339
54% 37-69 43% 23-54 39% 10-26 31%
9-29
16-22 13-18
14
4
8
21
21 W
96-85 #
^^BYU
(6)
7
53
48% 31-64 41% 26-64 29%
32% 12-38 29-36 21-26
7
10
9
15
78-80
^^Purdue
(0)
8
68
43% 26-61 54% 26-48 42% 15-36 46% 10-22
11-13
18-26
7
9
6
10
5-17
For
Opp
Turnovers
90-60
9-19
Opp
Off. Reb
Result
L
Opp
FT
288 W
18
For
3PT
For Opp For Opp
17 W
86-63
*Louisville
(3)
25
16
57% 34-60 33% 19-57 40%
8-20
17%
5-30
10-13 20-30
4
15
7
12
326 W
86-53
Lindenwood
(3)
352
201
52% 31-60 35% 18-51 35%
8-23
29%
6-21
16-22
11-19
8
8
7
14
309 W
77-46
^^Southern Miss.
(6)
336
226
45% 26-58 33% 16-49 41% 13-32 17%
4-23
12-20 10-15
12
7
9
16
218 W
74-61
Southern
(2)
313
99
42% 22-53 38% 22-58 40% 10-25 30%
7-23
20-29 10-18
7
10
17
18
194 W
80-62
Queens
(3)
184
222
48% 31-65 45% 23-51 26%
7-27
36% 11-31
11-14
5-11
8
5
7
20
37
70-87
*Memphis
(6)
88
47
36% 24-66 48% 29-61 25%
7-28
37%
7-19
15-21 22-31
9
11
9
13
35 W
63-51
Georgia
(6)
46
23
41% 21-51 29% 17-58 38%
6-16
11%
2-18
15-21 15-17
9
14
13
13
39 W
73-66
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
46% 23-50 37% 22-59 39%
9-23
22%
5-23
18-28 17-24
6
8
4
6
83 W
77-65
LSU
(2)
128
62
49% 27-55 41% 24-59 36%
9-25
23%
7-31
14-19 10-10
5
10
13
16
6-21
6
L
W
74-64
*Alabama
(2)
4
28
39% 27-70 43% 20-47 29%
25%
5-20
14-16 19-26
8
4
7
21
33
L
81-84 #
*Miss St.
(3)
26
50
46% 30-66 45% 29-65 37% 13-35 33%
9-27
8-14
17-28
8
17
10
13
16
L
62-63
Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
37% 24-65 39% 24-62 31% 11-35 29%
8-28
3-4
7-9
5
10
10
20
23
L
75-83
*Missouri
(2)
5
75
48% 28-58 45% 22-49 30%
6-20
44% 11-25 13-18 28-39
3
11
13
16
72-69
Texas
(3)
39
69
40% 23-58 40% 25-63 33%
7-21
23%
19-25 12-14
5
13
4
11
6-19
45 W
1
L
5-22
82-92
Auburn
(2)
1
12
46% 26-56 48% 30-62 32%
50% 14-28 24-35 18-23
8
11
9
12
14 W
98-84
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
55% 35-64 50% 29-58 43% 13-30 48% 10-21 15-21 16-22
2
3
1
5
83 W
72-70
*LSU
(3)
128
62
38% 23-61 45% 25-56 26%
6-23
33%
8-24
20-29 12-25
10
8
5
9
86 W
72-68
*South Carolina
(3)
110
59
46% 25-55 44% 22-50 62%
8-13
29%
4-14
14-17 20-32
4
7
7
8
33
L
71-81
Miss St.
(2)
26
50
38% 23-60 43% 28-65 25%
6-24
26%
7-27
19-26 18-27
5
12
11
12
47
L
72-77
*Vanderbilt
(6)
22
84
42% 25-60 46% 24-52 32%
9-28
35%
8-23
13-15 21-29
8
8
11
13
1
L
76-106
*Auburn
(3)
1
12
47% 24-51 60% 34-57 36%
5-14
52% 11-21 23-31 27-33
3
8
8
8
87-84
Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
51% 28-55 53% 27-51 33%
8-24
46% 10-22 23-31 20-22
6
3
9
12
78-76
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
46% 31-68 46% 25-54 26%
5-19
39% 12-31 11-14 14-17
11
6
5
7
71-90
*Florida
(2)
3
13
33% 22-66 49% 31-63 33%
7-21
37% 14-38 20-25 14-21
12
15
9
14
83-80
^^Arkansas
(4)
83
22
47% 30-64 46% 26-56 33%
8-24
32%
7-22
15-20 21-32
8
11
10
15
57-62
^^Auburn
(0)
1
12
38% 20-53 45% 23-51 17%
4-23
29%
6-21
13-17 10-15
5
8
9
14
39 W
5
W
4
L
39 W
1
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
114.4
64th
119.4
20th
116.3
35th
118.0
36th
122.1
20th
Def-Efficiency
95.9
33rd
96.9
32nd
96.0
38th
97.4
35th
101.9
82nd
WAB
+1.6
25th
+3.2
18th
+1.7
16th
+2.8
25th
+1.6
27th
FG% 50% or better
6-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
15-4
14-4
3PT% < 35%
8-7
Make >= 10 3PA
11-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-5
More FTA than Opp.
15-3
5-5
More OReb than Opp.
2-2
Make < 10 3PA
17-8
11-0
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
17-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
21-10
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-7
3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-4
3PA / FGA < 35%
9-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-9
More Turnovers than Opp.
0-0
7-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-0
@ Matteise
41
W, 63-58
UC San Diego
W, 100-49
Occidental
15
L, 80-67
Gonzaga
32
W, 71-53
^^Creighton
Record
21-9 (14-6)
29
L, 78-68
^^Oregon
Home
12-3
1
!W, 73-70
^^Houston
Road
274
W, 84-62
*Fresno St.
323
W, 74-57
San Diego
Non-Conf.
176
W, 81-75
Cal Baptist
Conf.
125
W, 71-50
^^California
43
L, 67-66
Utah St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Boise St.
65.8
108.9
94.4
16.8
19.7
29.4
30.9
260th
122nd
14th
155th
54th
200th
235th
53
W, 76-68
#11 San Diego St. Aztecs - MWC
BPI: 54
314
W, 67-38
Air Force
38
L, 62-48
*New Mexico
44
W, 75-60
Colorado St.
97
L, 76-68
UNLV
314
!W, 77-76
*Air Force
95
W, 69-50
*Nevada
BT: 54
EM: 53
KPI: 39
NET: 52
POM: 46
SOR: 47
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
70.9
63.6
1-25
0-1
1-0
0-0
9-6
Win
74.1
60.1
26-50
3-1
1-1
0-3
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
63.3
71.8
51-100
2-1
0-1
2-1
82.9
Home
73.0
61.5
101-200
3-0
1-0
2-0
124.2
Road
68.7
65.8
201+
3-0
0-0
2-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +0.9 (46th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-2
Opp. O-Reb%
50.6
66.7
51.6
32.8
32.1
39.4
184th
eFG%
334th
FT%
153rd
2PT%
225th
3PT%
201st
FTA/FGA %
167th
3PA/FGA %
45.3
70.0
45.0
30.4
37.2
47.3
6th
66th
8th
19th
289th
354th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
179
W, 71-68
San Jose St.
200
W, 63-61
Wyoming
Win
67.1%
53.0%
42.5%
34.7%
29.0%
7.9
7.6
0.2
3.5
3.1
-0.4
44
L, 68-63
*Colorado St.
Loss
65.4%
47.9%
48.9%
30.7%
33.3%
7.3
8.4
-3.3
-6.7
-0.1
-6.0
179
W, 69-66
*San Jose St.
Home
70.6%
53.0%
45.2%
34.9%
29.9%
8.1
7.5
1.3
3.2
2.4
-0.6
53
W, 64-47
Boise St.
Road
62.9%
50.3%
43.7%
32.1%
30.6%
7.3
8.2
-3.0
-2.3
1.9
-3.6
274
W, 83-60
Fresno St.
43
L, 79-71
*Utah St.
140
38
W, 73-65
New Mexico
125
125
200
W, 72-69
*Wyoming
97
L, 74-67
*UNLV
110
110
Nevada
53
L, 62-52
^^Boise St.
74
In Paint 45%
51
Fast Break 13%
95
95
80
80
65
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 37%
97
Fast Break 8%
99
2nd Chance 16% 20
Game #
Loss
Road
Nick Boyd
88
Off TO 21%
65
Game #
66
2nd Chance 16%
89
Off TO 16%
Miles Byrd
BJ Davis
Defensive Pct.l
W, 80-61
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
95
Off-Efficiency
Magoon Gwath
Gwath DNP final 5 G + played 2
minutes in L @ Utah State -- finished
top 10 blocked shote rate
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.2
3.6
14-32
13-26
11.8
6.4
11-19
8-30
10.0
2.8
5-11
10-26
8.8
5.4
17-25
3-6
Boyd 29% 3PT in MWC
W 12.6
3.7
56-119
33-99
13.5
4.7
50-98
38-108
8.7
3.3
35-69
27-70
10.2
5.7
53-91
16-38
L
15.2
4.1
24-53
17-41
10.4
4.1
14-35
15-64
9.8
2.2
16-36
15-44
4.1
4.0
14-28
0-5
H
15.5
4.2
48-81
28-70
13.0
4.5
29-59
29-76
7.8
2.5
24-42
18-51
8.5
4.5
32-63
10-27
R
11.3
3.5
32-91
22-70
12.1
4.5
35-74
24-96
10.2
3.5
27-63
24-63
8.5
6.0
35-56
6-16
Byrd top 50 steals rate
L vs. Oregon: Ore + 18 FTA, 16 OR
67-66 L v. USU, led by 7 w/ 1:56 left
Starting Lineup Last G: N. Boyd, M. Byrd, J. Coleman-Jones, B. Davis, M. Heide (5 G: 3-2)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Nick Boyd
6'3"
Sr
--
29.9
13.4
3.8
4.0
1.8
1.0
--
46.5%
80-172
35.7%
50-140
74.8%
92-123
21 Miles Byrd
6'7"
So
1
30.3
12.6
4.5
2.8
1.5
2.1
1.1
48.1%
64-133
30.8%
53-172
82.8%
77-93
10 BJ Davis
6'2"
So
--
23.9
9.0
3.0
1.2
1.0
1.5
0.1
48.6%
51-105
36.8%
42-114
77.8%
42-54
0
Magoon Gwath
7'0"
So
5
24.9
8.5
5.2
0.7
1.5
0.4
2.6
56.3%
67-119
37.2%
16-43
65.2%
30-46
31 Jared Coleman-Jones
6'10"
Sr
2
25.6
7.3
5.1
1.0
1.1
0.6
0.7
48.0%
60-125
34.0%
17-50
59.6%
34-57
3
Wayne McKinney III
6'0"
Sr
--
18.5
6.2
1.5
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.2
42.9%
48-112
30.9%
21-68
62.8%
27-43
5
Pharaoh Compton
2
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
6'8"
Fr
1
13.4
5.4
2.5
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.5
65.1%
69-106
--
--
36.7%
18-49
24 Taj DeGourville
6'5"
Fr
--
19.0
5.3
2.9
1.9
1.2
0.6
0.3
44.0%
33-75
30.9%
21-68
71.4%
30-42
40 Miles Heide
6'10"
So
1
16.5
4.0
3.6
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.3
76.8%
53-69
20.0%
1-5
29.6%
8-27
#11 San Diego St. Aztecs - MWC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
63-58
UC San Diego
--
64
35
44% 22-50 33% 20-61 36%
W
100-49
Occidental
(5)
--
--
49% 37-76 29% 17-58 45% 18-40 26%
67-80
Gonzaga
(5)
12
29
38% 23-61 42% 24-57 32%
8-25
71-53
^^Creighton
(7)
32
42
48% 30-62 34% 21-62 47%
8-17
68-78
^^Oregon
(0)
54
37
51% 29-57 45% 25-56 32%
6-19
73-70 #
^^Houston
(2)
9
1
40% 23-57 37% 23-62 36%
9-25
274 W
84-62
*Fresno St.
(3)
275
216
49% 33-68 27% 18-67 30%
323 W
74-57
San Diego
(2)
290
269
176 W
81-75
Cal Baptist
(3)
204
135
71-50
^^California
(9)
104
66-67
Utah St.
(6)
13
76-68
*Boise St.
(6)
67-38
Air Force
48-62
*New Mexico
75-60
Colorado St.
68-76
UNLV
314 W
77-76 #
95 W
69-50
179 W
Turnovers
Opp
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
11-15
8-13
5
8
14
8
6-23
8-13
9-13
15
10
4
19
25%
5-20
13-18 27-31
8
11
10
8
19%
6-31
3-7
5-13
4
10
7
9
46% 10-22
4-8
18-26
4
9
12
14
46% 11-24
18-27 13-17
10
15
6
12
7-23
19%
5-27
11-17
21-30
13
13
14
10
44% 29-66 31% 17-55 29%
5-17
19%
6-32
11-15
17-23
10
7
10
15
55% 28-51 45% 29-64 53%
9-17
36% 12-33 16-20
5-5
6
14
7
11
162
37% 25-67 26% 14-55 35%
9-26
21%
5-24
12-15 17-21
16
12
13
18
148
39% 20-52 44% 22-50 25%
6-24
29%
8-28
20-22 15-21
8
4
14
15
52
54
44% 27-61 38% 20-53 41%
7-17
23%
7-30
15-24 21-25
12
6
11
12
(3)
311
239
36% 25-69 31% 11-36 23%
6-26
25%
5-20
11-19
11-22
23
1
9
17
(2)
87
18
35% 17-48 36% 24-67 31%
5-16
21%
6-28
9-17
8-20
1
13
14
8
(2)
34
46
45% 25-56 43% 20-47 36%
9-25
32%
9-28
16-26
11-15
9
6
9
19
(3)
162
55
40% 24-60 44% 24-55 32%
9-28
30%
6-20
11-16
22-27
7
7
13
12
*Air Force
(3)
311
239
42% 27-65 43% 19-44 22%
6-27
40%
8-20
17-27 30-44
13
9
6
14
*Nevada
(2)
79
120
48% 27-56 29% 15-51 36%
9-25
19%
5-26
6-8
15-22
8
15
9
10
71-68
San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
51% 27-53 41% 21-51 37%
7-19
48% 15-31
8-11
11-17
5
2
14
11
63-61
Wyoming
(3)
230
149
37% 18-49 37% 19-52 23%
5-22
31%
8-26
22-28 15-22
8
6
10
10
63-68
*Colorado St.
(6)
34
46
38% 22-58 42% 22-53 35%
8-23
37%
7-19
11-21 17-24
11
15
7
11
179 W
69-66
*San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
41% 24-59 41% 26-64 17%
4-23
33% 11-33 17-22
3-10
15
15
15
13
53 W
64-47
Boise St.
(3)
52
54
54% 26-48 33% 18-54 42%
5-12
17%
3-18
7-11
6-11
5
11
13
11
274 W
83-60
Fresno St.
(2)
275
216
54% 34-63 44% 24-55 31%
8-26
26%
5-19
7-8
7-8
9
3
9
14
71-79
*Utah St.
(3)
13
148
44% 23-52 41% 21-51 33% 10-30 41% 11-27 15-22 26-32
4
9
7
7
73-65
New Mexico
(2)
87
18
48% 25-52 34% 22-64 43%
9-21
32%
9-28
14-22 12-16
5
13
13
12
72-69
*Wyoming
(3)
230
149
50% 24-48 45% 25-56 37%
7-19
30%
8-27
17-30 11-16
4
14
5
16
67-74
*UNLV
(2)
162
55
40% 24-60 51% 25-49 24%
7-29
50% 12-24 12-20 12-20
8
3
9
13
80-61
Nevada
(3)
79
120
55% 30-55 40% 19-47 39% 10-26 22%
10-18 18-25
5
5
8
11
52-62
^^Boise St.
(4)
52
54
38% 18-47 34% 19-56 33%
9-15
3
13
12
9
L
29
1
L
W
125 W
43
L
53 W
314 W
38
L
44 W
97
L
200 W
44
L
43
L
38 W
200 W
97
L
95 W
53
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
For
Off. Reb
39% 10-26
32 W
Opp
FT
41 W
15
For
3PT
8-22
7-21
5-23
28% 11-40
Non-Conference Games
13-17
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
107.7
166th
110.0
101st
112.8
66th
108.1
149th
110.2
134th
Def-Efficiency
92.2
10th
95.5
20th
93.9
26th
94.3
16th
95.4
23rd
WAB
+0.1
61st
+0.8
47th
+1.3
21st
+0.1
54th
-0.3
65th
FG% 50% or better
6-1
3PT% >= 35%
13-0
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-4
More FTM than Opp.
9-2
FG% 45% or better
11-1
3PT% < 35%
8-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
16-5
More FTA than Opp.
8-1
FG% below 45%
10-8
Make >= 10 3PA
2-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
5-4
More OReb than Opp.
10-2
Opp. FG% 50% or better
0-1
Make < 10 3PA
19-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
14-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
1-1
3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
6-4
Opp. FG% below 45%
20-8
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-0
@ Matteise
206
W, 90-76
Elon
20
L, 92-89
*Kansas
216
W, 107-55
American
220
W, 87-69
*Hawaii
Record
22-13 (13-7)
63
W, 92-90
^^Dayton
Home
12-3
1
L, 85-72
^^Auburn
Road
7
!L, 94-91
^^Michigan St.
6
L, 94-79
Alabama
99
W, 68-65
Georgia Tech
216
W, 93-67
La Salle
4
L, 90-84
^^Florida
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
^^UCLA
70.5
118.8
99.8
15.1
15.2
29.2
27.1
34th
21st
65th
39th
306th
204th
54th
54.2
73.7
54.9
35.3
34.8
37.0
52nd
eFG%
124th
FT%
48th
2PT%
91st
3PT%
125th
FTA/FGA %
227th
3PA/FGA %
28
W, 76-74
#11 North Carolina Tar Heels - ACC
BPI: 25
BT: 36
EM: 29
KPI: 54
NET: 36
W, 97-81
Campbell
17
L, 83-70
*Louisville
107
W, 74-73
*Notre Dame
52
W, 82-67
SMU
132
W, 63-61
*N.C. State
125
W, 79-53
California
SOR: 38
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
80.8
75.0
1-25
0-2
0-4
0-4
10-10
Win
84.8
70.3
26-50
0-0
1-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
74.0
82.9
51-100
3-1
2-0
1-2
Non-Conf.
96.9
Home
84.9
72.4
101-200
4-0
1-0
4-0
Conf.
85.8
Road
77.7
76.9
201+
5-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +1.5 (42nd)
236
POM: 33
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-5
49.6
74.8
49.2
33.5
30.0
37.9
115th
308th
108th
161st
100th
142nd
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
L, 72-71
Stanford
61
L, 67-66
*Wake Forest
Win
73.8%
56.5%
44.9%
39.7%
33.2%
8.9
7.7
-0.3
5.7
-0.6
4.5
182
!W, 102-96
B.C.
Loss
73.7%
52.4%
56.5%
27.9%
33.9%
6.2
8.0
-1.2
-4.0
-0.2
-3.2
70
L, 73-65
*Pittsburgh
Home
75.0%
55.5%
47.1%
36.3%
34.1%
8.0
8.5
0.6
5.6
1.1
4.9
3
L, 87-70
*Duke
Road
72.8%
54.3%
50.7%
34.7%
32.9%
7.8
7.3
-1.6
-0.5
-1.6
-0.8
70
W, 67-66
Pittsburgh
18
L, 85-65
*Clemson
140
120
W, 88-82
*Syracuse
125
125
132
W, 97-73
N.C. State
103
W, 81-66
Virginia
110
110
W, 96-85
*Florida St.
210
W, 92-73
Miami (FL)
Def-Efficiency
140
95
95
80
In Paint 46%
84
Fast Break 16%
85
31
2nd Chance 13%
25
Off TO 16%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
74
In Paint 41%
155
W, 91-59
*Virginia Tech
80
3
L, 82-69
Duke
65
107
W, 76-56
^^Notre Dame
61
W, 68-59
^^Wake Forest
3
L, 74-71
^^Duke
Cadeau 10+ pts in all 7 Nov G's, 3x
since Feb. 1
V. Lubin since Feb 1: 12.5 PPG, 3rd
in ACC play in 2PT FG%
Ian Jackson of bench final 11G, PPG
during stretch: 9.5 PPG
Home
63
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
RJ Davis
91
Fast Break 10%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
76
Off TO 17%
Ian Jackson
Defensive Pct.l
91
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
80
Seth Trimble
Elliot Cadeau
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 15.8
2.8
9-19
15-28
6.8
1.4
5-13
7-19
9.8
3.6
10-24
2-12
7.0
2.6
8-21
5-9
W 17.2
3.7
60-132
52-139 13.8
2.9
60-113
42-93
11.9
5.4
58-108
17-53
9.1
2.6
60-107
14-45
L
16.7
3.2
52-107
26-87
10.1
2.7
31-62
15-51
11.2
4.5
37-84
8-36
10.2
3.4
34-82
13-36
H
17.7
3.8
49-109
34-107 13.1
3.1
44-82
22-55
11.4
5.6
38-79
13-35
9.3
3.3
42-80
9-29
R
16.6
3.3
63-130
44-119
2.6
47-93
35-89
11.7
4.7
57-113
12-54
9.7
2.6
52-109
18-52
11.8
Starting Lineup Last G: E. Cadeau, R. Davis, V. Lubin, D. Powell, J. Withers (8 G: 7-1)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
RJ Davis
6'0"
Sr
--
34.4
17.0
3.5
3.7
1.6
1.1
0.1
46.9%
112-239
34.5%
78-226
88.5%
11 Ian Jackson
6'4"
Fr
1
24.4
12.4
2.8
0.9
1.2
0.6
0.2
52.0%
91-175
39.6%
57-144
72.8%
67-92
7
Seth Trimble
6'3"
Jr
3
28.8
11.6
5.1
1.4
1.1
1.4
0.3
49.5%
95-192
28.1%
25-89
80.9%
106-131
3
Elliot Cadeau
6'1"
So
--
27.6
9.5
2.9
6.0
3.1
1.0
0.3
49.7%
94-189
33.3%
27-81
67.4%
64-95
22 Ven-Allen Lubin
6'8"
Jr
--
19.6
8.5
5.6
0.3
0.8
0.4
0.9
68.9%
126-183
0.0%
0-3
66.7%
44-66
9
6'6"
Fr
--
25.4
7.5
3.3
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
59.8%
64-107
37.1%
33-89
65.4%
34-52
24 Jae'Lyn Withers
6'9"
Sr
--
17.3
6.4
4.4
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.4
54.8%
40-73
43.9%
36-82
70.6%
36-51
13 Jalen Washington
6'10"
Jr
1
15.8
5.8
4.1
0.5
1.1
0.3
0.9
63.2%
72-114
27.8%
5-18
63.8%
37-58
5
6'7"
Jr
6
8.1
2.8
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
65.2%
15-23
30.4%
14-46
56.3%
9-16
4
NAME
Drake Powell
Cade Tyson
2PT
3PT
FT
138-156
#11 North Carolina Tar Heels - ACC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
Turnovers
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
182
277
40% 32-80 43% 26-61 41% 13-32 45% 13-29 13-16
11-14
15
9
6
15
89-92
*Kansas
(3)
43
10
43% 27-63 49% 37-76 30%
7-23
29%
6-21
28-31 12-17
9
9
9
4
216 W
107-55
American
(6)
268
198
59% 36-61 31% 19-61 32%
7-22
23%
7-31
28-34
10-11
8
6
9
12
220 W
87-69
*Hawaii
(7)
248
195
52% 28-54 39% 22-57 33%
5-15
35%
8-23
26-34 17-24
3
13
5
13
63 W
For
Off. Reb
DBG
L
Opp
FT
Elon
20
For
3PT
90-76
206 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
92-90
^^Dayton
(1)
57
129
52% 28-54 43% 32-74 39%
9-23
44% 14-32 27-34 12-15
8
8
15
9
1
L
72-85
^^Auburn
(0)
1
12
44% 27-62 44% 30-69 38%
6-16
37% 11-30
12-19 14-17
7
11
10
7
7
L
91-94 #
^^Michigan St.
(0)
37
5
50% 32-64 54% 33-61 48% 11-23 25%
16-21 24-31
5
7
11
10
6
L
79-94
Alabama
(6)
4
28
41% 32-78 49% 35-71 18%
5-28
36% 12-33 10-16 12-13
10
8
13
13
68-65
Georgia Tech
(2)
151
66
39% 23-59 31% 20-64 21%
5-24
30%
17-21 17-24
9
9
18
14
93-67
La Salle
(6)
227
192
54% 36-67 36% 26-73 32% 10-31 35% 10-29
11-23
5-11
12
11
10
12
84-90
^^Florida
(2)
3
13
46% 33-72 46% 30-65 18%
5-28
34% 11-32
13-19 19-27
8
14
10
17
76-74
^^UCLA
(3)
27
20
47% 22-47 49% 26-53 35%
8-23
50%
24-35 13-22
6
7
18
12
97-81
Campbell
(7)
266
167
57% 36-63 44% 28-63 36% 10-28 40% 10-25 15-20 15-20
8
8
6
7
70-83
*Louisville
(2)
25
16
40% 24-60 45% 26-58 25%
4-16
23%
6-26
18-23 25-39
6
8
10
7
107 W
74-73
*Notre Dame
(2)
99
115
53% 27-51 44% 25-57 29%
6-21
30%
7-23
14-18 16-21
4
8
13
12
52 W
82-67
SMU
(2)
36
70
47% 27-57 33% 23-69 50% 11-22 22%
4-18
17-24 17-21
4
12
14
10
132 W
63-61
*N.C. State
(3)
145
102
43% 26-60 37% 24-65 37%
7-19
16%
3-19
4-8
10-12
11
16
12
9
125 W
79-53
California
(3)
104
162
48% 31-65 35% 24-69 36%
5-14
12%
3-25
12-13
2-5
9
11
10
13
88
43% 23-54 43% 26-60 28%
5-18
32%
7-22
20-24 13-14
4
6
4
8
2-15
6-10
99 W
216 W
4
L
28 W
236 W
17
L
80
L
71-72
Stanford
(2)
75
61
L
66-67
*Wake Forest
182 W
4-16
8-27
9-18
(2)
137
36
40% 26-65 40% 22-55 25%
8-32
13%
21-27
5
9
12
14
102-96 # B.C.
(3)
199
173
56% 35-63 55% 36-66 38%
6-16
58% 14-24 26-33 10-14
11
5
8
8
70
L
65-73
*Pittsburgh
(2)
60
105
44% 26-59 44% 24-55 29%
7-24
35%
16-20
9
5
13
6
3
L
70-87
*Duke
(3)
2
4
47% 26-55 53% 28-53 37%
7-19
50% 10-20 11-14 21-25
12
7
14
8
67-66
Pittsburgh
(6)
60
105
48% 26-54 42% 22-52 47%
7-15
47%
4
5
6
6
4-19
48% 12-25
70 W
18
L
9-26
8-17
6-9
8-15
14-18
5-11
65-85
*Clemson
(1)
24
17
45% 28-62 50% 32-64 21%
9-12
8
13
13
13
120 W
88-82
*Syracuse
(4)
95
147
49% 30-61 44% 29-66 46% 13-28 31%
4-13
15-23 20-22
12
12
9
10
132 W
97-73
N.C. State
(3)
145
102
57% 35-61 46% 27-59 40%
8-20
33%
8-24
19-24 11-16
8
7
11
8
103 W
81-66
Virginia
(2)
89
134
48% 27-56 45% 24-53 56%
9-16
27%
6-22
18-22 12-13
10
3
10
8
91 W
96-85
*Florida St.
(1)
142
72
55% 32-58 54% 27-50 39% 10-26 50% 10-20 22-31 21-28
8
4
8
7
210 W
92-73
Miami (FL)
(4)
72
324
59% 33-56 43% 29-68 56% 10-18 30%
9-30
16-24
6-7
8
10
11
10
155 W
91-59
*Virginia Tech
(2)
164
137
59% 33-56 38% 22-58 54% 15-28 33%
7-21
10-12
8-15
6
7
13
12
3
69-82
Duke
(3)
2
4
39% 25-64 56% 31-55 33%
47%
9-19
10-11 11-13
4
5
6
14
107 W
76-56
^^Notre Dame
(3)
99
115
48% 28-58 32% 20-62 46% 13-28 30%
6-20
7-12
10-17
7
7
8
4
61 W
68-59
^^Wake Forest
(0)
137
36
34% 19-56 34% 21-62 36%
8-22
9%
2-22
22-27 15-20
8
8
12
9
71-74
^^Duke
(0)
2
4
47% 26-55 49% 27-55 18%
3-17
23%
5-22
16-24 15-22
9
9
12
13
3
L
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-27
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
118.2
33rd
118.5
26th
120.0
16th
118.3
32nd
123.5
14th
Def-Efficiency
98.8
66th
100.6
70th
102.7
116th
100.2
67th
100.5
67th
WAB
+0.3
55th
+1.2
37th
+0.3
46th
+0.7
48th
+1.7
25th
FG% 50% or better
11-1
3PT% >= 35%
16-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-5
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
14-3
18-5
3PT% < 35%
4-8
Make >= 10 3PA
6-10
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-8
More FTA than Opp.
15-5
6-5
More OReb than Opp.
2-4
Make < 10 3PA
13-12
7-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
7-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
5-8
3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-5
3PA / FGA < 35%
11-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
13-6
8-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
6-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
364
W, 83-44
Miss Valley St.
240
W, 82-56
UMKC
327
W, 87-52
IUPUI
1
L, 83-81
^^Auburn
Record
24-9 (13-7)
63
W, 89-84
^^Dayton
Home
15-2
84
W, 99-71
^^Colorado
Road
#3 Iowa St. Cyclones - Big 12
BPI: 7
BT: 8
EM: 8
KPI: 23
NET: 9
POM: 10
SOR: 13
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
80.4
68.1
1-25
2-1
0-2
1-3
9-7
Win
84.3
64.1
26-50
2-0
0-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.0
78.7
51-100
5-1
3-0
5-1
27
W, 81-70
Marquette
256
W, 100-58
Jackson St.
64
W, 89-80
*Iowa
154
W, 83-51
Omaha
330
W, 99-72
Morgan St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Colorado
68.5
118.9
92.4
16.9
21.8
32.2
28.4
106th
20th
8th
159th
14th
107th
102nd
54.6
75.7
55.1
35.8
38.5
36.9
44th
eFG%
61st
FT%
44th
2PT%
67th
3PT%
40th
FTA/FGA %
230th
3PA/FGA %
48.4
75.0
47.5
33.2
28.9
40.7
63rd
315th
50th
130th
74th
246th
84
W, 79-69
Non-Conf.
149.5
Home
83.8
63.5
101-200
1-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
44.7
Road
76.7
72.9
201+
5-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.4 (14th)
31
W, 74-55
Baylor
74
W, 82-59
Utah
8
!W, 85-84
*Texas Tech
20
W, 74-57
Kansas
48
L, 64-57
*West Virginia
69
W, 108-83
UCF
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 76-61
*Arizona St.
13
!L, 86-75
*Arizona
Win
75.8%
57.2%
46.5%
37.7%
30.3%
7.9
6.8
0.8
6.9
3.7
6.8
68
L, 80-61
Kansas St.
Loss
75.6%
49.1%
50.3%
31.0%
40.2%
7.0
10.2
-0.6
-3.2
1.6
-1.7
20
L, 69-52
*Kansas
Home
75.5%
55.3%
44.4%
38.7%
30.6%
8.1
6.9
0.2
5.4
4.4
6.9
75
W, 82-52
TCU
Road
76.0%
54.8%
51.0%
32.9%
35.8%
7.2
8.6
0.7
2.9
1.8
1.9
69
W, 77-65
*UCF
54
W, 81-70
Cincinnati
140
84
W, 79-65
Colorado
125
125
1
L, 68-59
*Houston
91
L, 74-68
*Oklahoma St.
110
110
W, 84-67
Arizona
21
!L, 88-85
BYU
95
95
80
68
W, 73-57
*Kansas St.
54
W, 76-56
^^Cincinnati
65
L, 96-92
In Paint 46%
79
Fast Break 15%
73
44
2nd Chance 14%
99
Off TO 25%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
79
In Paint 40%
80
21
Def-Efficiency
140
^^BYU
Home
38
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Curtis Jones
58
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
45
Off TO 18%
Keshon Gilbert
Defensive Pct.l
13
Off-Efficiency
Joshua Jefferson
Offensive Pct.l
78
Milan Momcilovic
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 18.2
3.0
11-27
15-38
7.0
2.4
4-17
6-14
14.8
5.2
22-38
3-7
14.6
3.0
11-21
14-32
W 17.9
4.2
76-154
67-166 13.2
3.6
85-154
20-57
13.2
8.0 101-170
11-34
10.6
3.0
30-66
46-106
D. Jackson top 5 B12 off-reb%
Lipsey top 75 steals%
L
14.9
4.9
21-49
16-57
14.2
3.0
27-53
6-21
12.4
5.8
32-66
7-20
14.8
3.8
13-24
12-37
H
16.3
4.1
52-107
43-107 12.8
3.8
61-116
16-48
13.1
7.8
69-122
9-20
12.0
3.5
18-35
36-81
L vs. Auburn, led 49-33 to start 2H
R
18.1
4.6
45-96
40-116
3.0
51-91
10-30
12.8
6.9
64-114
9-34
10.7
2.8
25-55
22-62
C. Jones DNP L @ Houston
K. Gilbert OUT for NCAA T
--DNP L's @ Hou, @ OkSt,
Gilbert + Lipsey DNP B12 Tourney L
Momcilovic DNP vs. KU - @ KU
14.2
Starting Lineup Last G: N. Heise, D. Jackson, J. Jefferson, C. Jones, M. Momcilovic (1 G: 0-1)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Curtis Jones
6'4"
Sr
1
30.6
17.1
4.3
2.3
1.3
1.2
0.2
47.8%
10 Keshon Gilbert
6'4"
Sr
4
31.6
13.4
3.5
4.1
3.2
1.7
0.1
2
Joshua Jefferson
6'8"
Jr
--
29.3
13.0
7.4
3.0
2.3
2.1
0.7
22 Milan Momcilovic
6'8"
So
7
27.2
11.4
3.2
0.9
0.9
0.4
3
Tamin Lipsey
6'1"
Jr
1
31.2
10.8
2.6
3.2
1.6
1
Dishon Jackson
6'11"
Sr
--
18.9
8.6
5.1
0.7
0
Nate Heise
5
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
97-203
37.2%
83-223
84.0%
105-125
54.1%
112-207
33.3%
26-78
72.9%
86-118
56.4%
133-236
33.3%
18-54
77.7%
108-139
0.3
47.8%
43-90
40.6%
58-143
83.7%
36-43
2.1
0.2
61.2%
79-129
33.6%
39-116
76.1%
70-92
1.1
0.5
1.1
57.9%
95-164
0.0%
0-1
72.3%
94-130
6'5"
Sr
--
21.2
4.8
3.2
1.0
0.8
1.3
0.1
62.7%
37-59
37.1%
23-62
60.9%
14-23
33 Brandton Chatfield
6'10"
Sr
--
14.5
3.9
3.0
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
63.9%
53-83
0.0%
0-1
70.6%
24-34
15 Nojus Indrusaitis
6'5"
Fr
19
6.0
2.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.1
--
50.0%
8-16
14.3%
2-14
52.9%
9-17
#3 Iowa St. Cyclones - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
Miss Valley St.
--
364
364
48% 28-59 37% 19-51 24%
8%
1-12
22-29
5-11
11
5
12
23
240 W
82-56
UMKC
(6)
284
155
48% 30-62 33% 18-54 40% 10-25 26%
8-31
12-19 12-13
11
8
7
12
87-52
IUPUI
(6)
119
363
50% 31-62 35% 18-52 28%
7-25
32%
9-28
18-24
7-9
11
5
9
19
81-83
^^Auburn
(6)
1
12
47% 25-53 48% 28-59 39%
7-18
33%
9-27
24-29 18-22
5
7
8
12
63 W
89-84
^^Dayton
(0)
57
129
52% 30-58 58% 29-50 24%
4-17
39%
7-18
25-29 19-26
5
6
6
11
84 W
99-71
^^Colorado
(0)
129
51
60% 35-58 42% 23-55 44% 11-25 42%
8-19
18-23 17-18
6
6
9
17
27 W
81-70
Marquette
(6)
40
31
51% 30-59 39% 27-70 40%
15-21
5-10
8
11
12
10
256 W
100-58
Jackson St.
(3)
288
200
51% 34-67 37% 20-54 39% 11-28 32%
21-29
11-13
14
6
7
23
64 W
89-80
*Iowa
(3)
18
178
44% 31-70 44% 28-63 39% 11-28 39% 11-28
16-22 13-15
17
5
9
9
154 W
83-51
Omaha
(2)
78
221
53% 32-60 36% 20-56 30%
6-20
26%
6-23
13-18
5-9
10
7
12
18
330 W
99-72
Morgan St.
(6)
285
350
61% 36-59 46% 29-63 35%
7-20
44%
4-9
20-26 10-15
8
9
11
13
84 W
79-69
*Colorado
(7)
129
51
43% 29-68 49% 28-57 22%
4-18
32%
7-22
17-22
14
7
9
19
31 W
74-55
Baylor
(4)
17
58
49% 24-49 30% 19-64 48% 10-21 24%
7-29
16-24 10-14
7
12
12
7
74 W
82-59
Utah
(2)
73
71
44% 27-61 36% 22-61 27%
6-22
24%
7-29
22-29
8-13
11
12
8
17
8
85-84 #
*Texas Tech
(3)
6
32
53% 31-59 42% 28-66 35%
6-17
45%
9-20
17-24 19-24
8
14
14
14
74-57
Kansas
(3)
43
10
41% 24-59 41% 24-59 62%
8-13
31%
5-16
18-25
4-11
9
8
13
17
9-27
6-7
W
20 W
48
L
Opp
Turnovers
83-44
L
For
Off. Reb
Result
1
Opp
FT
364 W
327 W
For
3PT
5-21
6-15
36% 11-31
7-22
6-8
57-64
*West Virginia
(2)
103
7
44% 25-57 39% 22-56
6%
1-17
33%
11-14
8
5
14
9
69 W
108-83
UCF
(2)
51
113
56% 40-71 43% 27-63 41%
9-22
46% 11-24 19-25 18-23
13
11
10
19
78 W
76-61
*Arizona St.
(3)
67
76
46% 22-48 45% 21-47 42%
8-19
33%
3
3
12
17
8-24
24-30 11-18
13
L
75-86 #
*Arizona
(1)
10
30
43% 28-65 44% 29-66 29%
7-24
35% 10-29 12-18 18-22
11
10
17
15
68
L
61-80
Kansas St.
(4)
108
24
37% 19-52 45% 26-58 44%
8-18
50% 10-20 15-19 18-21
10
12
18
15
20
L
52-69
*Kansas
(1)
43
10
31% 19-62 47% 26-55 14%
3-21
50%
9-18
11-20
8-11
14
9
5
12
75 W
82-52
TCU
(4)
173
27
60% 31-52 36% 19-53 47%
9-19
14%
2-14
11-14 12-20
6
11
14
15
69 W
77-65
*UCF
(2)
51
113
46% 27-59 42% 27-65 25%
7-28
23%
6-26
16-21
5-10
10
9
9
8
54 W
81-70
Cincinnati
(3)
90
21
49% 24-49 46% 25-54 39%
7-18
41% 11-27 26-30
9-11
12
4
18
14
84 W
79-65
Colorado
(2)
129
51
51% 24-47 45% 24-53 48% 10-21 24%
21-31 13-22
5
8
14
13
4-17
1
L
59-68
*Houston
(3)
9
1
39% 18-46 53% 25-47 40%
8-20
59% 10-17 15-17
8-10
4
6
12
14
91
L
68-74
*Oklahoma St.
(2)
140
63
41% 24-58 42% 25-59 30%
8-27
26%
6-23
12-20 18-22
11
9
18
11
84-67
Arizona
(3)
10
30
50% 27-54 33% 19-57 52% 11-21 18%
4-22
19-23 25-27
6
10
15
14
85-88 #
BYU
(2)
7
53
39% 25-64 44% 26-59 29%
8-28
34% 11-32 27-31 25-31
5
14
10
27
73-57
*Kansas St.
(3)
108
24
47% 24-51 38% 20-53 35%
7-20
10%
2-21
18-22 15-22
2
9
11
17
76-56
^^Cincinnati
(3)
90
21
54% 29-54 33% 19-58 48% 10-21 30%
9-30
8-10
9-11
9
10
16
11
92-96
^^BYU
(0)
7
53
56% 37-66 52% 30-58 43% 13-30 50% 18-36
5-7
18-21
8
9
9
10
13 W
21
L
68 W
54 W
21
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.6
25th
119.4
19th
124.2
3rd
115.8
53rd
118.0
40th
Def-Efficiency
88.6
2nd
96.0
23rd
95.5
35th
90.5
4th
93.5
11th
WAB
+2.5
11th
+2.9
22nd
+1.7
15th
+3.5
17th
+0.8
41st
FG% 50% or better
13-1
3PT% >= 35%
17-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
19-4
20-2
3PT% < 35%
4-7
Make >= 10 3PA
7-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
8-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
16-5
More FTA than Opp.
19-3
4-5
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
16-8
11-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
5-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
19-5
3PA / FGA < 35%
8-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-4
8-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-3
@ Matteise
156
W, 77-72
*Duquesne
39
L, 76-60
*Arkansas
142
W, 78-69
Wofford
125
L, 80-79
Belmont
Record
25-9 (14-4)
166
L, 66-61
*Western Ky.
Home
15-3
14
L, 97-68
*Kentucky
Road
256
W, 77-53
Jackson St.
355
W, 82-44
*Alabama A&M
Non-Conf.
106
W, 80-62
*Chattanooga
Conf.
203
W, 78-60
SEMO
W, 99-67
Truett-McConnell
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Middle Tenn.
66.1
110.7
104.1
14.4
15.9
24.0
26.5
242nd
97th
125th
19th
269th
330th
36th
113
L, 67-65
#14 Lipscomb Bisons - ASun
BPI: 106
BT: 102
EM: 104
KPI: 104
NET: 84
Asbury
180
W, 70-65
*Jacksonville
263
W, 96-64
*North Florida
194
L, 75-73
Queens
350
W, 86-67
West Ga.
346
W, 87-53
*Bellarmine
SOR: 115
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.3
67.3
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
10-6
Win
84.0
64.3
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.4
75.7
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-0
167.1
Home
83.2
66.8
101-200
5-3
0-0
4-4
253.7
Road
75.0
67.9
201+
8-0
0-0
6-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -4.1 (90th)
W, 112-54
POM: 83
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-4
55.9
79.6
56.7
36.7
31.4
47.4
22nd
eFG%
7th
FT%
20th
2PT%
43rd
3PT%
224th
FTA/FGA %
25th
3PA/FGA %
48.6
67.1
49.9
31.0
22.3
37.2
74th
5th
133rd
37th
8th
118th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
277
W, 88-60
Austin Peay
122
L, 74-64
*North Alabama
Win
78.7%
60.2%
47.5%
39.2%
29.6%
10.9
6.7
-0.5
6.4
1.6
7.0
340
W, 68-55
*Central Ark.
Loss
82.4%
50.8%
53.4%
26.3%
34.1%
7.0
8.0
-5.3
-10.6
1.1
1.1
183
L, 80-71
Eastern Kent.
Home
78.8%
57.9%
47.5%
37.3%
30.9%
10.6
7.4
-0.6
4.6
2.5
7.2
346
W, 87-80
Bellarmine
Road
80.2%
57.1%
51.0%
34.2%
30.7%
9.1
6.7
-3.1
-1.1
0.3
3.6
350
W, 76-67
*West Ga.
194
W, 94-81
*Queens
140
353
W, 93-60
Stetson
125
125
177
W, 82-68
FGCU
183
L, 66-57
*Eastern Kent.
110
110
122
W, 75-63
North Alabama
95
95
277
W, 95-78
*Austin Peay
80
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 39% 16
Offensive Pct.l
Off-Efficiency
Fast Break 10% 21
W, 78-60
Central Ark.
340
W, 84-66
Central Ark.
65
194
!W, 81-75
Queens
122
W, 76-65
North Alabama
J. Ognacevic vs. Ark & UK: 16.5
PPG, 10-16 2PT, 2-10 3PT -- in conf
play shot 49% from 3 (27-55)
Off TO 15% 10
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 48% 7
99
Fast Break 8%
65
Game #
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
Road
Jacob Ognacevic
50
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
91
Off TO 15%
Will Pruitt
Joe Anderson
Defensive Pct.l
340
80
2nd Chance 12% 18
Gyasi Powell
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 20.6
8.8
25-43
7-15
15.0
7.2
11-25
11-27
22.0
3.2
9-14
24-42
10.0
2.6
6-11
11-30
J. Anderson first 13 G: 7.9 PPG,
since 15.3 PPG - top 50 steals rate
W 20.4
8.5 142-212
33-74
14.7
6.2
80-135
42-104 13.4
3.4
53-93
64-146
11.8
4.1
42-78
59-154
L
19.3
7.1
46-81
14-43
9.2
4.9
23-53
7-36
10.0
4.0
22-36
13-44
10.9
2.2
16-41
16-47
12 G's vs. teams w/ a def eFG% rank
of 300+ -- 4 vs. top 100, 1-3 in this
games
H
21.4
8.7 109-158
22-59
13.4
5.6
51-100
28-74
13.1
3.2
35-66
46-110
11.7
3.9
29-53
42-109
R
18.6
7.6
25-58
13.0
6.2
52-88
21-66
11.8
3.9
40-63
31-80
11.5
3.3
29-66
33-92
79-135
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Anderson, J. Ognacevic, G. Powell, W. Pruitt, C. Williams (16 G: 13-3)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
41 Jacob Ognacevic
6'7"
Sr
--
33.6
20.1
8.2
1.4
1.8
0.3
0.4
64.2%
188-293
40.2%
47-117
79.8%
166-208
2
Will Pruitt
6'3"
Sr
--
32.2
13.2
5.9
2.6
1.2
0.9
0.3
54.8%
103-188
35.0%
49-140
80.8%
97-120
22 Joe Anderson
6'0"
Sr
--
32.1
12.5
3.5
3.9
1.6
2.3
0.2
58.1%
75-129
40.5%
77-190
82.7%
43-52
10 Gyasi Powell
6'2"
Sr
--
31.3
11.6
3.6
1.5
0.9
1.0
0.1
48.7%
58-119
37.3%
75-201
93.0%
53-57
15 Dylan Faulkner
6'9"
So
19
17.5
10.5
5.3
2.0
1.4
0.5
1.7
66.0%
62-94
0.0%
0-8
70.2%
33-47
6
6'10"
Jr
--
16.2
5.6
2.0
1.6
0.8
0.4
0.5
60.0%
42-70
33.7%
32-95
84.6%
11-13
35 Grant Asman
6'10"
Jr
6
14.6
3.4
2.3
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.5
62.5%
25-40
22.5%
9-40
57.6%
19-33
5
Miles White
6'3"
Jr
--
13.6
2.9
2.2
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.3
42.9%
9-21
32.4%
23-71
72.2%
13-18
30 Ross Candelino
6'5"
Jr
14
5.4
2.4
1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
66.7%
8-12
34.6%
9-26
100.0%
4-4
Charlie Williams
#14 Lipscomb Bisons - ASun
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
156 W
39
L
142 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
77-72
*Duquesne
--
166
103
52% 25-48 45% 28-62 43%
9-21
30%
6-20
18-26 10-19
For Opp For Opp
2
8
16
14
60-76
*Arkansas
(1)
83
22
38% 22-58 54% 34-63 33%
9-27
21%
4-19
7-9
4-7
4
6
18
12
7-21
39% 12-31 15-18
78-69
Wofford
(2)
91
248
48% 28-58 45% 26-58 33%
5-10
11
11
6
10
125
L
79-80
Belmont
(2)
84
224
47% 31-66 52% 33-64 38% 11-29 39% 11-28
6-8
3-6
7
12
7
14
166
L
61-66
*Western Ky.
(4)
232
106
35% 23-66 38% 24-63 16%
5-31
23%
5-22
10-11
13-18
6
7
13
13
14
L
68-97
*Kentucky
(1)
11
49
39% 26-67 55% 34-62 17%
5-29
48% 12-25
11-12
17-21
5
9
6
8
256 W
77-53
Jackson St.
(4)
288
200
40% 29-73 37% 23-63 28%
9-32
29%
6-21
10-15
1-5
13
12
5
16
355 W
82-44
*Alabama A&M
(5)
360
328
46% 28-61 25% 16-64 40% 14-35 24%
5-21
12-15
7-11
8
9
18
15
106 W
80-62
*Chattanooga
(2)
59
270
58% 33-57 45% 25-56 47%
32%
6-19
6-6
6-9
5
2
12
8
203 W
78-60
SEMO
(1)
264
133
48% 29-60 42% 25-60 40% 10-25 36%
5-14
10-16
5-8
8
7
11
15
W
99-67
Truett-McConnell
(10)
--
--
49% 37-76 43% 27-63 31%
9-29
30%
6-20
16-21
7-11
16
8
10
22
65-67
*Middle Tenn.
(2)
130
121
46% 24-52 38% 24-63 22%
4-18
29%
6-21
13-17 13-22
3
18
8
11
W
112-54
Asbury
(9)
--
--
48% 44-91 27% 21-79 24% 11-46 28% 11-40
13-17
1-2
21
12
2
11
180 W
70-65
*Jacksonville
(3)
267
111
56% 22-39 49% 25-51 47%
7-15
40%
6-15
19-26
9-13
6
9
16
15
96-64
*North Florida
(1)
136
349
54% 33-61 36% 23-64 40%
8-20
23%
7-31
22-29
11-18
7
10
9
14
73-75
Queens
(4)
184
222
47% 26-55 44% 27-62 38%
8-21
40% 10-25 13-16
11-17
6
14
9
8
350 W
86-67
West Ga.
(1)
332
323
50% 26-52 40% 26-65 45% 13-29 21%
4-19
21-31 11-18
9
10
10
6
346 W
87-53
*Bellarmine
(4)
224
359
53% 33-62 33% 18-54 43% 15-35 27%
7-26
6-10
10-13
11
5
9
10
277 W
88-60
Austin Peay
(1)
250
294
60% 30-50 35% 22-63 52% 12-23 30% 10-33 16-20
6-9
6
6
12
7
64-74
*North Alabama
(4)
81
180
42% 23-55 48% 28-59 25%
7-28
36%
8-22
11-14 10-14
6
15
7
9
68-55
*Central Ark.
(1)
326
346
41% 23-56 40% 21-53 18%
6-34
25%
7-28
16-21
6-14
6
10
9
13
9-28
36% 10-28 14-18 16-21
113
L
263 W
194
L
122
L
340 W
183
L
8-17
71-80
Eastern Kent.
(4)
113
266
39% 24-62 43% 27-63 32%
9
10
7
5
346 W
87-80
Bellarmine
(1)
224
359
54% 25-46 59% 33-56 41% 11-27 30%
6-20
26-33
8-9
3
2
9
12
350 W
76-67
*West Ga.
(3)
332
323
48% 29-60 45% 28-62 41% 11-27 24%
5-21
7-10
6-7
6
6
10
10
194 W
94-81
*Queens
(2)
184
222
54% 32-59 53% 28-53 47% 14-30 47%
8-17
16-17 17-25
3
3
6
7
353 W
93-60
Stetson
(4)
302
357
55% 35-64 38% 24-63 47% 17-36 22%
5-23
6-8
7-9
6
5
5
6
82-68
FGCU
(1)
150
211
49% 26-53 45% 29-65 33%
7-21
33%
8-24
23-29
2-7
4
8
1
8
57-66
*Eastern Kent.
(2)
113
266
28% 17-60 45% 27-60 17%
5-29
29%
6-21
18-20
6-10
8
11
7
12
122 W
75-63
North Alabama
(1)
81
180
50% 28-56 42% 22-52 41% 11-27 39%
5-13
8-10
14-17
5
5
8
9
277 W
95-78
*Austin Peay
(3)
250
294
60% 29-48 50% 30-60 64% 18-28 43%
9-21
19-20
9-12
4
11
5
3
340 W
78-60
Central Ark.
(1)
326
346
45% 26-58 43% 23-53 39% 13-33 20%
4-20
13-15 10-14
6
3
10
12
340 W
84-66
Central Ark.
(4)
326
346
51% 31-61 40% 23-57 36% 13-36 27%
8-30
9-11
12-12
7
5
9
10
194 W
81-75 #
Queens
(2)
184
222
49% 23-47 40% 29-72 36%
33%
8-24
27-29
9-12
6
16
11
8
122 W
76-65
North Alabama
(2)
81
180
40% 19-47 34% 23-67 44% 12-27 24%
4-17
26-30 15-24
5
13
8
6
177 W
183
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-22
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
112.6
86th
108.1
127th
106.1
161st
112.6
82nd
114.8
66th
Def-Efficiency
105.9
177th
100.0
64th
94.9
30th
107.4
186th
109.2
218th
WAB
-2
128th
-2.1
82nd
-2
140th
-2.3
96th
0
60th
FG% 50% or better
13-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
21-3
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
4-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-3
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-4
19-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-5
More FTM than Opp.
19-5
6-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
19-4
More FTA than Opp.
19-3
3-4
More OReb than Opp.
10-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
10-0
22-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
19-7
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
13-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-1
@ Matteise
New Mexico
Michigan State
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Marquette
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Bryant
333
W, 102-62
Stony Brook
62
W, 82-63
George Mason
227
W, 70-62
Central Mich.
12
W, 78-74
*Maryland
Record
23-10 (13-7)
18
W, 76-58
Purdue
Home
14-3
35
W, 80-69
^^Georgia
Road
315
W, 94-59
Stonehill
338
W, 94-62
Western Carolina
10
L, 81-70
*Iowa St.
11
W, 88-74
Wisconsin
63
L, 71-63
*Dayton
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Butler
67.7
116.7
96.6
13.5
21.5
30.1
31.0
146th
40th
31st
8th
19th
174th
241st
52.0
72.3
54.9
32.5
26.1
46.3
114th
eFG%
176th
FT%
48th
2PT%
238th
3PT%
341st
FTA/FGA %
40th
3PA/FGA %
86
W, 80-70
#7 Marquette Golden Eagles - Big East
BPI: 20
BT: 31
EM: 24
KPI: 30
NET: 26
W, 72-70
*Xavier
110
W, 78-50
*Providence
32
W, 79-71
Creighton
89
W, 74-66
Georgetown
116
!W, 85-83
*DePaul
42
L, 59-57
Xavier
SOR: 23
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.9
68.5
1-25
2-1
0-1
1-2
9-7
Win
81.2
65.6
26-50
1-2
2-0
1-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.9
75.3
51-100
4-0
0-0
2-2
Non-Conf.
115.4
Home
80.4
65.2
101-200
2-0
0-0
2-0
Conf.
77.7
Road
73.2
72.1
201+
5-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.6 (26th)
42
POM: 28
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-2
Opp. O-Reb%
49.9
72.8
51.3
31.8
30.2
39.8
127th
227th
196th
64th
108th
215th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 76-59
*Seton Hall
56
W, 87-74
Villanova
Win
75.1%
57.5%
51.2%
33.7%
30.6%
9.9
7.2
1.5
0.9
6.3
1.4
86
W, 78-69
*Butler
Loss
64.3%
49.0%
51.5%
29.4%
34.8%
8.3
7.0
-1.3
-5.8
0.7
-5.3
30
L, 77-69
UConn
Home
73.4%
55.9%
50.4%
32.1%
29.9%
9.5
6.9
2.5
1.5
5.5
1.9
9
L, 70-64
*St. John's
Road
70.9%
53.8%
52.3%
32.9%
33.9%
9.3
7.3
-1.3
-3.9
3.6
-3.3
32
L, 77-67
*Creighton
116
W, 68-58
DePaul
140
220
W, 80-56
Seton Hall
125
125
56
L, 81-66
*Villanova
110
W, 82-52
Providence
110
110
W, 76-61
*Georgetown
30
L, 72-66
*UConn
95
95
80
9
!L, 86-84
St. John's
42
W, 89-87
^^Xavier
65
L, 79-63
In Paint 46%
83
Fast Break 16%
89
33
2nd Chance 14%
97
Off TO 23%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^St. John's
Home
K. Jones 26.4% 3PT in BE, since
Feb. 1: 29.2%, 26-of-89
28
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Kam Jones
59
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
40
In Paint 44%
80
9
Def-Efficiency
140
99
Off TO 13%
David Joplin
Stevie Mitchell
Defensive Pct.l
89
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
220
Chase Ross
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
38-63
12-45
L5 23.6
5.4
16.8
7.0
18-26
11-29
10.4
4.2
12-27
5-14
10.6
3.4
14-21
6-17
Joplin 3PT as SO: 40%, LY: 36%
S. Mitchell 3PT in BE: 31.5%, 4-of-9
vs. Prov, excl that: 7-28 since 2/1
W 19.3
4.3 135-220 45-133 14.1
5.7
64-108
47-154 12.7
4.3
82-132
22-53
11.1
3.9
54-100
27-68
L
19.4
4.7
13.1
5.1
27-58
20-62
6.8
3.5
16-52
7-27
9.7
3.8
24-44
10-33
W vs. Purdue, forced 15 TO, Purdue
.85 PPP
H
19.9
4.9 104-170 34-102 13.1
5.8
47-82
29-105
11.6
4.4
51-96
16-40
11.5
4.1
40-74
23-50
R
18.8
3.9
5.1
44-84
38-111
10.1
3.8
47-88
13-40
9.8
3.6
38-70
14-51
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Kam Jones
6'4"
Sr
--
33.6
19.3
4.5
5.9
1.8
1.4
0.2
58.8%
197-335
31.2%
63-202
64.0%
23 David Joplin
6'7"
Sr
--
31.7
13.8
5.5
1.3
1.9
1.1
0.9
54.8%
91-166
31.0%
67-216
81.8%
72-88
4
Stevie Mitchell
6'2"
Sr
--
27.2
10.9
4.1
1.5
0.8
2.3
0.1
53.3%
98-184
36.3%
29-80
73.3%
77-105
2
Chase Ross
6'4"
Jr
--
30.1
10.7
3.9
2.1
1.4
1.8
0.7
54.2%
78-144
36.6%
37-101
75.4%
86-114
12 Ben Gold
6'11"
Jr
--
25.4
7.3
4.2
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.8
61.1%
33-54
37.0%
50-135
75.8%
25-33
13 Royce Parham
6'8"
Fr
--
14.7
5.2
2.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.4
58.2%
39-67
28.6%
26-91
64.0%
16-25
7
62-115
93-165
18-69
29-100 14.5
Starting Lineup Last G: B. Gold, K. Jones, D. Joplin, S. Mitchell, C. Ross (33 G: 23-10)
1
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
55-86
Zaide Lowery
6'5"
So
3
15.8
4.1
3.0
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.1
56.8%
25-44
38.2%
21-55
71.4%
10-14
10 Damarius Owens
6'7"
Fr
4
9.8
2.7
1.2
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.2
34.2%
13-38
35.5%
11-31
90.9%
20-22
5
6'4"
So
--
9.1
1.9
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.1
50.0%
16-32
18.8%
6-32
50.0%
13-26
Tre Norman
#7 Marquette Golden Eagles - Big East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
263
351
59% 40-68 37% 22-60 29%
28%
7-25
13-17
11-15
10
10
7
13
62 W
82-63
George Mason
(3)
191
19
39% 26-67 38% 22-58 31% 11-35 33%
8-24
19-26
11-15
11
9
9
18
227 W
70-62
Central Mich.
(2)
210
241
36% 20-55 40% 21-52 28% 10-36 24%
6-25
20-25 14-21
4
7
11
24
12 W
78-74
*Maryland
(3)
28
6
45% 26-58 53% 29-55 35%
8-23
37%
7-19
18-24
9-14
9
7
6
12
18 W
76-58
Purdue
(3)
8
68
45% 27-60 40% 20-50 32%
8-25
33%
6-18
14-15 12-18
6
4
6
13
35 W
80-69
^^Georgia
(3)
46
23
50% 29-58 44% 24-54 41% 11-27 32%
8-25
11-15
13-19
8
6
13
17
315 W
94-59
Stonehill
(3)
292
330
61% 37-61 44% 24-54 48% 10-21 25%
6-24
10-17
5-7
12
3
10
14
94-62
Western Carolina
(2)
342
297
51% 37-72 38% 23-60 35% 14-40 30%
8-27
6-10
8-12
8
5
13
18
70-81
*Iowa St.
(3)
20
8
39% 27-70 51% 30-59 36% 11-31 40%
6-15
5-10
15-21
11
8
10
12
88-74
Wisconsin
(2)
14
26
50% 31-62 46% 24-52 31%
8-26
39% 10-26 18-21 16-18
10
11
5
14
63-71
*Dayton
(6)
57
129
41% 22-54 48% 29-61 31%
9-29
21%
4-19
10-15
9-16
9
15
13
7
86 W
80-70
Butler
(3)
44
150
43% 32-75 51% 24-47 20%
6-30
41%
9-22
10-12 13-15
18
3
2
14
7-19
63
L
9-31
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
11 W
For
Off. Reb
Stony Brook
L
Opp
FT
102-62
10
For
3PT
333 W
338 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
42 W
72-70
*Xavier
(2)
41
38
49% 29-59 46% 24-52 37%
32%
6-19
7-11
16-20
4
4
10
13
110 W
78-50
*Providence
(9)
92
143
44% 29-66 34% 17-50 31% 11-36 29%
8-28
9-11
8-14
13
14
5
20
32 W
79-71
Creighton
(2)
32
42
41% 29-70 40% 24-60 32% 11-34 23%
7-31
10-11
16-22
10
10
7
12
89 W
74-66
Georgetown
(3)
157
67
36% 21-59 44% 24-55 38%
8-19
23-27 10-12
9
9
13
18
85-83 #
*DePaul
(6)
115
126
43% 29-68 52% 33-64 35% 13-37 38% 12-32 14-24
5-8
7
10
6
15
57-59
Xavier
(3)
41
38
37% 23-62 40% 23-57 28%
8-29
12%
2-17
3-7
11-16
10
8
12
9
220 W
76-59
*Seton Hall
(2)
325
89
41% 24-58 49% 21-43 37% 10-27
9%
1-11
18-25 16-20
11
6
13
23
56 W
87-74
Villanova
(2)
23
95
47% 28-60 42% 25-59 30%
9-30
35% 10-29 22-27 14-19
9
11
6
12
86 W
78-69
*Butler
(3)
44
150
51% 31-61 41% 24-59 36%
8-22
27%
15-18
5
10
5
10
116 W
42
L
9-24
42%
6-22
8-11
30
L
69-77
UConn
(3)
16
92
40% 25-63 60% 25-42 32%
7-22
63% 12-19 12-22 15-19
13
6
8
21
9
L
64-70
*St. John's
(2)
71
2
41% 22-54 42% 25-60 32%
8-25
19%
12-18 17-31
2
18
10
13
32
L
67-77
*Creighton
(3)
32
42
36% 26-72 53% 27-51 31% 11-36 39% 11-28
4-4
12-14
17
5
5
8
116 W
68-58
DePaul
(2)
115
126
37% 25-67 42% 25-60 16%
17%
4-24
14-20
4-9
16
7
12
13
220 W
80-56
Seton Hall
(6)
325
89
53% 30-57 37% 21-57 41% 11-27 25%
4-16
9-13
10-14
12
7
12
9
56
L
4-25
3-16
66-81
*Villanova
(2)
23
95
42% 24-57 45% 24-53 33% 10-30 58% 15-26
8-8
18-20
8
7
7
7
110 W
82-52
Providence
(3)
92
143
44% 27-61 34% 19-56 42% 17-41 23%
6-26
11-16
8-11
8
9
10
16
89 W
76-61
*Georgetown
(3)
157
67
56% 32-57 35% 19-55 33%
8-24
29%
7-24
4-7
16-25
6
11
12
13
3-22
30
L
66-72
*UConn
(3)
16
92
44% 25-57 40% 26-65 14%
35%
7-20
13-16 13-14
7
14
5
8
9
L
84-86 #
St. John's
(2)
71
2
44% 31-71 45% 33-74 35% 10-29 22%
5-23
12-22 15-21
12
17
12
11
89-87
^^Xavier
(4)
41
38
49% 32-66 53% 30-57 42% 14-33 48% 11-23 11-13 16-19
4
3
3
10
63-79
^^St. John's
(0)
71
2
39% 23-59 42% 28-67 21%
6
10
17
10
42 W
9
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
6-29
28%
Non-Conference Games
5-18
11-18 18-25
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
114.3
65th
119.6
18th
119.4
19th
115.9
52nd
116.5
51st
Def-Efficiency
93.5
18th
98.6
45th
94.2
27th
96.4
27th
99.3
56th
WAB
+1.3
33rd
+2.3
27th
+2.2
9th
+1.1
37th
-1.2
86th
FG% 50% or better
8-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-5
More FTM than Opp.
14-1
12-3
FG% 45% or better
12-0
3PT% < 35%
12-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
17-5
More FTA than Opp.
FG% below 45%
11-10
Make >= 10 3PA
12-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
4-3
More OReb than Opp.
11-5
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-3
Make < 10 3PA
11-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
22-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
1-4
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-5
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-7
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-1
@ Matteise
169
W, 91-84
Nicholls St.
28
W, 72-64
^^UCLA
174
W, 100-81
A&M CorChristi
9
L, 85-71
*St. John's
Record
26-7 (17-3)
329
W, 80-58
Grambling St.
Home
16-1
282
W, 99-68
Texas Southern
Road
78
L, 85-82
^^Arizona St.
67
W, 83-73
^^USC
179
W, 83-77
San Jose St.
149
!L, 89-83
New Mexico St.
W, 122-70
West. New Mexico
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
VCU
73.0
111.8
94.9
15.6
20.5
31.5
25.6
4th
87th
18th
66th
33rd
127th
20th
34
W, 78-71
#10 New Mexico Lobos - MWC
44
W, 76-68
*Colorado St.
274
W, 103-89
*Fresno St.
95
!W, 82-81
Nevada
200
W, 61-53
*Wyoming
50
W, 62-48
San Diego St.
179
L, 71-70
*San Jose St.
BPI: 49
BT: 40
EM: 36
KPI: 32
NET: 42
POM: 41
SOR: 33
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
81.2
70.8
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
10-6
Win
83.2
68.2
26-50
4-0
1-0
2-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
74.0
80.1
51-100
3-0
1-2
2-1
Non-Conf.
118.4
Home
86.6
71.1
101-200
4-1
1-0
1-1
Conf.
125.6
Road
75.6
70.4
201+
4-0
0-0
2-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.8 (32nd)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
50.8
68.4
50.6
34.1
37.8
32.2
172nd
eFG%
308th
FT%
194th
2PT%
156th
3PT%
47th
FTA/FGA %
333rd
3PA/FGA %
49.2
66.7
48.2
33.8
35.0
38.3
96th
2nd
69th
178th
232nd
157th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 84-65
Boise St.
274
W, 95-67
Fresno St.
Win
68.5%
53.5%
47.1%
35.0%
32.5%
7.1
7.1
2.5
5.5
3.4
4.0
97
W, 75-73
*UNLV
Loss
69.7%
43.0%
53.3%
33.8%
38.9%
7.0
9.0
3.1
-2.3
2.9
-1.9
43
W, 82-63
*Utah St.
Home
67.6%
52.8%
47.9%
35.3%
35.8%
7.6
8.0
3.8
6.3
5.0
5.5
44
W, 87-65
Colorado St.
Road
70.1%
49.3%
49.0%
34.0%
31.8%
6.6
7.0
1.4
1.3
1.4
-0.1
314
W, 88-53
*Air Force
200
W, 71-67
Wyoming
140
43
W, 82-79
Utah St.
125
125
53
L, 86-78
*Boise St.
50
L, 73-65
*San Diego St.
110
110
W, 92-71
Air Force
95
W, 71-67
*Nevada
95
95
80
97
W, 81-67
UNLV
179
W, 63-52
^^San Jose St.
65
L, 72-69
In Paint 49%
94
Fast Break 20%
99
50
2nd Chance 15%
88
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Boise St.
Home
79
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Donovan Dent
32
Fast Break 14%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
49
In Paint 43%
80
53
Def-Efficiency
140
95
Off TO 15%
Nelly Joseph
Mustapha Amzil
Defensive Pct.l
314
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
53
Tru Washington
D. Dent 3PT in MWC: 33%
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
M. Amzil DNP L @ Boise St
L5 24.8
1.4
36-67
7-12
16.4 14.0
36-61
0-1
9.0
5.2
11-28
5-21
11.4
4.2
15-28
4-20
T. Washington top 50 steals rate
W 20.8
L vs. SJSU: 3-15 3PT, SJSU 10-22
2PT FG% < 45%, 3-5
2.4 173-324
21-52
14.0 11.7 136-244
0-4
10.9
5.4
61-118
26-96
12.5
4.0
74-147
38-98
L
20.0
2.0
41-96
6-13
13.9
40-68
0-2
12.7
5.2
10-36
13-40
6.6
3.7
13-37
4-21
H
19.8
2.2 108-207
10-29
14.2 10.8 90-163
0-3
11.6
6.6
44-86
17-72
14.2
4.1
50-99
30-62
R
21.5
2.4 106-213
17-36
13.7 11.7 86-149
0-3
10.9
4.0
27-68
22-64
8.3
3.8
37-85
12-57
9.4
Starting Lineup Last G: M. Amzil, F. Borvicanin, D. Dent, N. Joseph, T. Washington (22 G: 18-4)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Donovan Dent
6'2"
Jr
--
35.1
20.6
2.3
6.4
2.9
1.5
0.8
51.0%
214-420
23 Nelly Joseph
6'9"
Sr
--
31.3
14.0
11.2
1.2
2.3
1.3
1.5
56.4%
176-312
22 Mustapha Amzil
6'9"
Sr
3
28.4
11.3
5.4
1.4
1.3
0.8
0.7
46.1%
71-154
3
Tru Washington
6'4"
So
1
27.8
11.2
3.9
2.0
1.3
2.1
0.3
47.3%
87-184
0
CJ Noland
6'4"
Sr
1
20.8
8.0
2.5
1.2
0.8
1.1
0.3
50.4%
8
Filip Borovicanin
6'9"
Jr
--
22.4
5.9
4.5
1.2
1.0
0.7
0.2
24 Jovan Milicevic
6'10"
Fr
1
12.1
4.0
2.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
1
Braden Appelhans
6'7"
So
4
10.5
3.5
0.8
0.5
0.2
0.3
4
Kayde Dotson
6'2"
Fr
2
6.9
2.4
0.4
0.8
0.5
0.4
2
NAME
2PT
3PT
41.5%
FT
27-65
78.1%
171-219
0.0%
0-6
64.5%
109-169
28.7%
39-136
70.5%
79-112
35.3%
42-119
62.8%
59-94
58-115
30.2%
32-106
74.1%
43-58
51.6%
47-91
30.3%
23-76
65.2%
30-46
0.2
52.8%
19-36
45.6%
26-57
57.9%
11-19
0.2
26.7%
4-15
43.8%
28-64
76.9%
10-13
0.1
41.7%
10-24
41.7%
15-36
62.5%
10-16
#10 New Mexico Lobos - MWC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
194
170
38% 31-81 42% 30-72 19%
7-36
41% 15-37 22-32
9-16
16
11
8
16
28 W
72-64
^^UCLA
(3)
27
20
51% 25-49 36% 20-55 40%
6-15
22%
5-23
16-23 19-27
6
13
22
21
100-81
A&M CorChristi
(3)
187
141
53% 33-62 53% 29-55 39%
9-23
31%
5-16
25-39 18-35
10
6
13
22
71-85
*St. John's
(4)
71
2
44% 28-64 50% 34-68 44%
8-18
22%
4-18
7-18
13-20
13
19
11
15
329 W
80-58
Grambling St.
(3)
346
228
47% 28-60 36% 22-62 39%
7-18
37%
7-19
17-26
7-15
8
7
15
21
282 W
99-68
Texas Southern
(2)
341
138
51% 38-75 39% 23-59 41% 11-27 50%
9-18
12-21 13-17
13
6
7
18
82-85
^^Arizona St.
(3)
67
76
38% 24-63 47% 26-55 38%
6-16
47%
9-19
28-32 24-32
10
7
11
9
67 W
83-73
^^USC
(1)
35
104
52% 30-58 49% 27-55 33%
7-21
41%
7-17
16-24 12-18
9
6
14
15
179 W
83-77
San Jose St.
(3)
161
168
43% 28-65 45% 25-56 41%
7-17
48% 10-21 20-30 17-21
11
6
8
10
L
149
L
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
78
For
Off. Reb
Nicholls St.
L
Opp
FT
91-84
9
For
3PT
169 W
174 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
83-89 #
New Mexico St.
(2)
208
52
36% 30-84 52% 32-62 31% 10-32 45% 14-31 13-22
11-17
20
7
6
16
W
122-70
West New Mexico
(6)
--
--
60% 47-78 48% 28-59 50% 14-28 35%
7-12
12
6
11
24
34 W
78-71
VCU
(3)
42
25
42% 27-64 42% 24-57 27%
3-11
32% 10-31 21-30 13-24
13
4
11
10
7-20
14-17
44 W
76-68
*Colorado St.
(9)
34
46
49% 31-63 45% 27-60 47%
7-15
26%
8-8
9
12
12
17
274 W
103-89
*Fresno St.
(2)
275
216
59% 41-70 43% 29-67 39%
9-23
46% 10-22 12-15 21-31
5
8
16
14
95 W
82-81 #
Nevada
(2)
79
120
47% 23-49 42% 25-59 28%
5-18
42%
8-19
31-41 23-35
5
9
14
9
200 W
61-53
*Wyoming
(3)
230
149
33% 19-57 32% 19-59 24%
5-21
26%
5-19
18-22 10-17
7
5
10
8
62-48
San Diego St.
(3)
122
14
36% 24-67 35% 17-48 21%
6-28
31%
5-16
8-20
9-17
13
1
8
14
70-71
*San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
41% 27-66 43% 28-65 20%
3-15
46% 10-22 13-19
5-8
10
8
8
13
53 W
84-65
Boise St.
(2)
52
54
54% 31-57 44% 25-57 47%
7-15
21%
5-24
15-15 10-13
1
6
10
15
274 W
95-67
Fresno St.
(2)
275
216
49% 38-78 36% 25-69 43% 13-30 20%
5-25
6-11
12-15
11
6
13
13
97 W
75-73
*UNLV
(4)
162
55
48% 28-59 43% 23-54 23%
3-13
38%
8-21
16-24 19-29
12
11
9
11
43 W
82-63
*Utah St.
(6)
13
148
48% 28-58 38% 24-64 32%
7-22
16%
5-31
19-27 10-23
8
4
15
9
44 W
87-65
Colorado St.
(3)
34
46
54% 30-56 35% 20-58 64%
9-14
22%
5-23
18-24 20-24
8
12
7
11
314 W
88-53
*Air Force
(2)
311
239
47% 33-70 32% 17-54 35%
8-23
29%
7-24
14-22 12-19
12
4
7
17
200 W
71-67
Wyoming
(3)
230
149
42% 23-55 54% 28-52 35%
7-20
54%
7-13
18-34
4-14
11
5
13
18
43 W
82-79
Utah St.
(3)
13
148
46% 24-52 48% 28-59 35%
7-20
39% 10-26 27-34 13-16
12
11
13
13
50 W
179
L
6-23
7-9
53
L
78-86
*Boise St.
(2)
52
54
51% 29-57 48% 25-52 39%
7-18
42% 10-24 13-17 26-32
5
6
15
13
50
L
65-73
*San Diego St.
(5)
122
14
34% 22-64 48% 25-52 32%
9-28
43%
9-21
12-16 14-22
13
5
12
13
314 W
92-71
Air Force
(3)
311
239
53% 34-64 45% 25-56 22%
4-18
38%
8-21
20-25 13-19
7
6
11
18
95 W
71-67
*Nevada
(2)
79
120
40% 23-57 45% 25-56 33%
9-27
21%
4-19
16-22 13-20
5
3
9
10
97 W
81-67
UNLV
(2)
162
55
53% 31-58 45% 25-56 30%
3-10
30%
6-20
16-27 11-16
8
6
8
13
63-52
^^San Jose St.
(5)
161
168
38% 24-64 36% 20-56 31%
5-16
27%
6-22
10-20
6-8
13
6
10
15
69-72
^^Boise St.
(0)
52
54
40% 25-63 44% 23-52 33%
6-18
26%
7-27
13-18 19-23
13
10
6
10
179 W
53
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
113.6
71st
111.0
87th
115.1
45th
111.6
93rd
110.4
123rd
Def-Efficiency
97.3
45th
93.7
10th
98.7
68th
94.4
18th
94.7
15th
WAB
+1.8
19th
+1
40th
+0.1
51st
+3
21st
+1
38th
FG% 50% or better
10-1
3PT% >= 35%
13-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
12-5
18-1
3PT% < 35%
8-6
Make >= 10 3PA
2-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
20-2
More FTM than Opp.
18-3
13-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
3-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-2
More FTA than Opp.
21-2
5-3
More OReb than Opp.
23-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-5
21-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
13-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
6-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-1
@ Matteise
261
W, 81-57
Monmouth
320
W, 96-60
Niagara
20
L, 77-69
^^Kansas
286
W, 86-72
Bowling Green
Record
27-6 (17-3)
112
W, 83-75
Samford
Home
15-1
84
W, 72-56
^^Colorado
Road
37
L, 71-63
^^Memphis
36
!W, 94-91
^^North Carolina
88
W, 90-72
*Minnesota
55
W, 89-52
Nebraska
192
W, 77-58
^^Oakland
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Florida Atlantic
67.8
116.8
91.9
16.6
16.4
35.3
24.6
139th
37th
5th
137th
228th
31st
8th
51.2
78.1
53.6
30.8
37.8
32.7
147th
eFG%
20th
FT%
85th
2PT%
325th
3PT%
47th
FTA/FGA %
329th
3PA/FGA %
119
W, 86-69
#2 Michigan St. Spartans - Big 10
BPI: 11
BT: 13
EM: 11
KPI: 7
NET: 11
W, 80-62
Western Mich.
45
W, 69-62
*Ohio St.
109
W, 88-54
Washington
57
W, 78-68
*Northwestern
71
W, 90-85
Penn St.
25
W, 80-78
Illinois
SOR: 8
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.2
67.2
1-25
4-0
0-2
3-0
12-5
Win
80.8
66.3
26-50
1-0
2-1
1-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.3
71.5
51-100
3-1
1-0
4-1
Non-Conf.
140.9
Home
81.9
65.6
101-200
3-0
1-0
0-0
Conf.
48
Road
74.6
68.8
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +7.9 (8th)
293
POM: 8
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-3
46.1
72.2
49.1
27.9
33.1
41.4
12th
186th
106th
2nd
182nd
273rd
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 81-74
*Rutgers
88
W, 73-51
Minnesota
Win
78.5%
54.9%
48.8%
32.1%
27.6%
6.1
6.7
2.6
9.6
0.9
4.6
67
L, 70-64
*USC
Loss
76.4%
46.8%
50.2%
25.2%
29.5%
5.2
6.5
2.7
4.7
-3.8
-0.2
28
L, 63-61
*UCLA
Home
81.7%
56.1%
49.8%
30.8%
26.8%
6.3
6.3
3.8
11.3
1.3
5.7
29
W, 86-74
Oregon
Road
74.5%
51.2%
48.4%
30.8%
28.9%
5.6
7.1
1.5
6.4
-1.2
1.8
51
L, 71-67
Indiana
25
W, 79-65
*Illinois
140
18
W, 75-66
Purdue
125
125
22
W, 75-62
*Michigan
12
W, 58-55
*Maryland
110
110
W, 71-62
Wisconsin
64
W, 91-84
*Iowa
95
95
80
100
82
2nd Chance 17%
44
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
W, 79-62
Michigan
29
W, 74-64
^^Oregon
65
^^Wisconsin
Home
Jase R as starter last 11 G: 30 MPG,
16.4 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 22-52 3PT
3PT%: Nov-Jan: 28.9% Since: 33.7%
92
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Jaden Akins
34
Fast Break 14%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
57
In Paint 43%
22
L, 77-74
85
In Paint 47%
Fast Break 21%
80
11
Def-Efficiency
140
47
Off TO 18%
Jase Richardson
Defensive Pct.l
11
Off-Efficiency
Tre Holloman
Offensive Pct.l
77
Jaxon Kohler
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 12.6
3.8
11-32
12-35
17.8
4.8
12-26
14-29
10.2
2.2
12-22
7-24
9.2
8.0
15-25
3-6
W 13.3
3.7
88-187
41-134 12.0
3.2
78-128
30-75
9.6
2.0
52-112
38-108
8.3
7.6
72-123
13-39
All L's came w/ eFG% <50%
L
10.0
3.0
16-33
9-35
12.0
3.3
10-25
10-22
6.2
2.0
8-23
4-22
6.8
7.8
14-29
3-8
Kohler top 30 off & def reb rate
H
14.9
4.6
60-112
29-89
11.3
3.1
45-69
18-45
9.6
2.1
29-58
24-76
8.1
8.1
42-77
7-24
Booker since 2/1: 8.3 MPG, 1 DNP
R
10.6
2.6
44-108
21-80
12.8
3.3
43-84
22-52
8.5
1.9
31-77
18-54
7.9
7.2
44-75
9-23
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Jaden Akins
6'4"
Sr
--
26.9
12.7
3.6
1.5
1.1
0.8
0.3
47.3%
104-220
29.6%
11 Jase Richardson
6'3"
Fr
1
24.7
12.0
3.2
1.9
0.9
0.8
0.3
57.5%
88-153
5
Tre Holloman
6'2"
Jr
--
22.9
9.0
2.0
3.8
1.6
0.8
0.2
44.4%
60-135
0
Jaxon Kohler
6'9"
Jr
--
20.8
8.0
7.6
1.3
1.3
0.4
0.8
56.6%
55 Coen Carr
6'6"
So
--
20.2
7.7
3.4
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.7
1
Jeremy Fears Jr.
6'2"
So
1
23.2
7.4
2.0
5.5
2.0
1.1
8
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Akins, J. Fears, J. Kohler, J. Richardson, S. Zapala (10 G: 8-2)
3
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
50-169
78.2%
61-78
41.2%
40-97
84.0%
89-106
32.3%
42-130
85.0%
51-60
86-152
34.0%
16-47
81.5%
44-54
64.1%
93-145
30.8%
4-13
66.7%
56-84
0.2
42.3%
55-130
37.5%
12-32
75.0%
90-120
Frankie Fidler
6'7"
Sr
--
16.3
7.0
3.3
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.2
46.7%
57-122
19.7%
12-61
87.9%
80-91
15 Carson Cooper
6'11"
Jr
--
17.2
5.1
5.0
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.7
60.6%
57-94
0.0%
0-1
74.0%
54-73
34 Xavier Booker
6'11"
So
1
13.1
4.8
2.3
0.3
0.9
0.1
0.7
62.1%
41-66
23.3%
17-73
78.6%
22-28
#2 Michigan St. Spartans - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
81-57
Monmouth
--
219
282
49% 30-61 28% 17-61 17%
3-18
30%
8-27
18-27 15-16
12
7
13
14
320 W
96-60
Niagara
(2)
280
335
52% 35-67 38% 20-53 33%
6-18
35%
9-26
20-25
11-18
15
5
9
15
L
For
3PT
261 W
20
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For Opp For Opp
69-77
^^Kansas
(4)
43
10
35% 24-69 41% 28-69 13%
3-24
29%
5-17
18-21 16-22
10
9
10
10
286 W
86-72
Bowling Green
(3)
299
227
46% 27-59 44% 27-62 20%
4-20
19%
5-26
28-32 13-14
13
5
11
12
112 W
83-75
Samford
(2)
101
209
51% 28-55 49% 28-57 29%
7-24
35%
9-26
20-23 10-14
8
11
14
19
84 W
72-56
^^Colorado
(5)
129
51
49% 30-61 37% 20-54 10%
2-21
21%
4-19
10-13 12-20
9
5
11
12
63-71
^^Memphis
(0)
88
47
42% 22-52 47% 26-55 35%
7-20
35%
8-23
12-19
11-14
8
6
13
8
36 W
94-91 #
^^North Carolina
(0)
21
65
54% 33-61 50% 32-64 25%
4-16
48% 11-23
24-31 16-21
7
5
10
11
88 W
90-72
*Minnesota
(6)
106
86
53% 29-55 44% 26-59 50% 11-22 32%
9-28
21-26
9
8
9
7
4-22
37
L
11-17
55 W
89-52
Nebraska
(2)
85
56
52% 29-56 33% 18-54 39%
9-23
18%
22-23 12-18
11
4
14
11
192 W
77-58
^^Oakland
(9)
177
234
43% 26-60 30% 19-63 35%
6-17
36% 11-31
19-23
9-17
15
15
12
8
119 W
86-69
Florida Atlantic
(3)
77
186
45% 31-69 40% 27-68 38%
8-21
18%
4-22
16-20
11-14
14
9
9
9
293 W
80-62
Western Mich.
(8)
259
283
50% 27-54 41% 24-58 30%
6-20
30%
7-23
20-22
7-17
8
8
16
15
45 W
69-62
*Ohio St.
(3)
38
61
44% 24-55 37% 22-60 17%
3-18
26%
7-27
18-22
11-16
11
13
16
12
109 W
88-54
Washington
(5)
116
132
53% 32-61 33% 18-55 33%
7-21
19%
3-16
17-18 15-23
7
6
11
15
57 W
78-68
*Northwestern
(2)
66
41
50% 27-54 36% 21-59 50%
4-8
20%
5-25
20-27 21-27
8
13
9
11
71 W
90-85
Penn St.
(2)
63
79
47% 32-68 53% 28-53 26%
6-23
42% 10-24 20-24 19-25
12
6
9
14
25 W
80-78
Illinois
(3)
15
44
43% 28-65 42% 28-66 30%
3-10
21%
5-24
21-27 17-27
11
13
8
10
77 W
81-74
*Rutgers
(5)
48
119
48% 27-56 34% 23-68 26%
5-19
30%
9-30
22-26 19-25
10
13
15
5
88 W
73-51
Minnesota
(2)
106
86
45% 25-56 41% 21-51 32%
8-25
35%
6-17
15-20
3-5
13
4
9
9
67
L
64-70
*USC
(3)
35
104
42% 24-57 42% 24-57 33%
5-15
32%
7-22
11-19 15-19
9
10
12
9
28
L
61-63
*UCLA
(2)
27
20
38% 20-53 35% 21-60 23%
5-22
25%
7-28
16-19 14-19
12
6
15
3
86-74
Oregon
(3)
54
37
50% 27-54 39% 24-61 44%
8-18
37% 10-27 24-27 16-23
10
8
11
7
67-71
Indiana
(2)
74
39
38% 21-55 48% 24-50 17%
4-23
23%
3-13
21-25 20-28
12
7
11
8
25 W
79-65
*Illinois
(3)
15
44
49% 33-68 38% 24-63 42%
5-12
21%
7-33
8-13
10-13
13
11
7
11
18 W
75-66
Purdue
(2)
8
68
58% 28-48 51% 24-47 31%
4-13
38%
9-24
15-21
9-11
5
5
6
12
22 W
75-62
*Michigan
(2)
53
15
46% 28-61 46% 23-50 41%
9-22
24%
5-21
10-15 11-18
12
6
10
13
12 W
58-55
*Maryland
(4)
28
6
34% 22-65 31% 15-48 27%
4-15
20%
4-20
10-12 21-26
12
3
10
11
11 W
71-62
Wisconsin
(3)
14
26
39% 28-71 34% 22-65 33%
9-27
16%
5-32
6-13
11
6
9
9
64 W
91-84
*Iowa
(3)
18
178
51% 31-61 48% 30-63 33%
9-27
39%
9-23
20-30 15-18
7
10
6
10
22 W
79-62
Michigan
(2)
53
15
45% 25-56 37% 19-52 38%
9-24
13%
3-24
20-24 21-29
10
8
14
15
74-64
^^Oregon
(4)
54
37
46% 25-54 47% 25-53 47%
7-15
21%
4-19
17-29 10-14
9
5
11
15
74-77
^^Wisconsin
(0)
14
26
41% 24-59 43% 23-54 37%
7-19
31%
9-29
19-24 22-28
8
5
7
7
29 W
51
L
29 W
11
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
13-16
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
117.7
39th
116.2
39th
111.0
85th
119.6
27th
116.0
57th
Def-Efficiency
93.2
15th
91.8
7th
97.1
48th
90.4
3rd
90.7
3rd
WAB
+3
8th
+4.8
9th
+0.4
40th
+7.1
3rd
+3.8
9th
FG% 50% or better
11-0
3PT% >= 35%
10-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-0
More FTM than Opp.
20-4
19-0
3PT% < 35%
8-6
Make >= 10 3PA
17-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
1-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
20-6
More FTA than Opp.
17-1
4-0
More OReb than Opp.
3-0
Make < 10 3PA
26-6
18-5
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
23-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
17-0
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
20-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-4
18-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-1
@ Matteise
W, 105-63
Dean
266
!L, 90-88
Siena
337
W, 87-64
*Buffalo
229
W, 85-84
*Delaware
Record
23-11 (14-2)
315
L, 67-66
*Stonehill
Home
12-3
94
L, 85-70
*St. Bonaventure
Road
254
W, 97-85
^^Tenn. St.
106
L, 84-76
*Chattanooga
187
W, 78-73
*Drexel
185
L, 76-75
Brown
W, 122-63
VTSU-Johnson
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*St. John's
72.3
105.8
105.4
16.5
16.4
34.2
28.8
7th
190th
152nd
132nd
228th
54th
126th
9
L, 99-77
#15 Bryant Bulldogs - America East
BPI: 131
BT: 153
EM: 119
KPI: 164
NET: 141
L, 86-84
^^Fordham
138
L, 70-65
*Towson
82
L, 112-66
*Grand Canyon
212
W, 81-55
Maine
189
W, 73-53
Vermont
259
W, 89-79
*Albany
SOR: 143
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
82.4
73.9
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
11-8
Win
87.6
70.2
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.4
81.5
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-2
Non-Conf.
208.3
Home
85.9
67.4
101-200
1-1
0-0
1-3
Conf.
293.8
Road
79.5
78.9
201+
9-2
1-1
9-1
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -7.1 (140th)
233
POM: 149
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-7
Opp. O-Reb%
51.0
71.8
51.5
33.4
30.4
34.8
162nd
eFG%
200th
FT%
154th
2PT%
194th
3PT%
260th
FTA/FGA %
283rd
3PA/FGA %
47.7
72.0
47.3
32.2
30.0
36.0
42nd
175th
44th
83rd
100th
87th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 85-62
UMass Lowell
354
W, 95-76
*New Hampshire
Win
73.0%
55.8%
44.6%
34.7%
32.2%
8.6
7.3
5.4
11.2
1.1
1.2
309
W, 83-69
Binghamton
Loss
69.4%
45.8%
50.3%
30.9%
32.7%
6.3
7.4
-0.2
-2.6
-2.6
-0.3
295
W, 92-86
*UMBC
Home
70.5%
56.8%
43.8%
33.9%
31.9%
8.0
6.7
6.3
12.7
0.7
1.9
356
W, 92-70
*NJIT
Road
72.4%
49.4%
48.7%
33.5%
32.7%
7.7
7.7
1.5
2.1
-0.7
-0.2
259
L, 68-63
Albany
309
W, 78-71
*Binghamton
140
356
W, 88-66
NJIT
125
125
295
W, 81-79
UMBC
189
L, 59-55
*Vermont
110
110
W, 79-78
*UMass Lowell
212
W, 80-72
*Maine
95
95
80
W, 90-56
New Hampshire
295
W, 85-74
UMBC
65
Albany
212
W, 79-59
Maine
66
91
2nd Chance 18%
34
Off TO 17%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
E. Timberlake AE POY
DNP L @ St. John's
60
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Rafael Pinzon
32
Fast Break 14%
65
Game #
71
Off TO 17%
Earl Timberlake
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
39
In Paint 44%
354
W, 91-78
94
In Paint 49%
Fast Break 14%
80
259
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
240
Off-Efficiency
Barry Evans
Offensive Pct.l
240
Connor Withers
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.2
3.2
20-42
15-51
15.8
5.2
35-57
0-0
15.6
6.2
26-47
5-11
10.2
7.4
6-17
9-36
W 19.7
3.1
93-190
16-38
15.3
8.7 127-233
3-10
14.0
6.7
90-163
13-39
12.5
6.3
37-67
22-66
Siena L, Siena's Shoats 31 off bench
K Cramer DNP Stonehill L
L
15.3
2.6
27-77
66-175 16.0
7.1
55-122
6-15
12.5
7.3
38-81
28-71
8.8
4.1
6-17
57-172
H
17.8
3.1
58-114
35-103 15.4
8.9
85-155
5-9
14.7
6.8
71-120
17-47
12.7
4.9
22-41
42-118
Timberlake 16 G w/ 2+ blocks
R
19.1
2.9
62-153
47-110
7.7
97-200
4-16
12.4
6.9
57-124
24-63
10.3
6.2
21-43
37-120
K. Mitchell 4-21 3PT in conf play,
3-7 in AE Tourney -- top 50 OReb%
15.6
Starting Lineup Last G: B. Evans, K. Mitchell, R. Pinzon, E. Timberlake, C. Withers (22 G: 16-6)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
24 Rafael Pinzon
6'6"
Sr
4
33.6
18.5
3.0
2.2
2.4
1.0
0.1
44.9%
120-267
38.5%
0
Earl Timberlake
6'6"
Sr
2
36.0
15.5
8.2
4.7
2.4
1.0
1.8
51.3%
182-355
5
Barry Evans
6'8"
Jr
2
32.7
13.5
6.9
2.7
2.1
1.4
0.6
52.5%
128-244
7
Connor Withers
6'7"
Sr
--
34.3
11.3
5.6
3.4
2.0
1.6
1.4
51.2%
22 Keyshawn Mitchell
6'11"
So
--
20.2
8.6
6.9
0.6
1.1
0.4
0.8
1
Kvonn Cramer
6'6"
Sr
1
17.6
7.9
4.5
0.6
0.8
0.6
4
Devean Williams
FT
82-213
88.5%
69-78
36.0%
9-25
71.9%
105-146
37.3%
41-110
65.8%
52-79
43-84
33.2%
79-238
82.7%
62-75
60.5%
98-162
32.1%
18-56
57.5%
42-73
1.0
61.7%
95-154
33.3%
5-15
62.8%
54-86
6'3"
Jr
33
15.8
6.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
75.0%
3-4
--
--
0.0%
0-2
13 Jakai Robinson
6'5"
Jr
2
20.8
5.9
3.5
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.2
54.5%
60-110
17.4%
4-23
71.6%
58-81
21 Aaron Davis
6'7"
So
22
9.6
5.3
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
61.5%
16-26
24.3%
9-37
83.3%
5-6
#15 Bryant Bulldogs - America East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
--
--
--
56% 40-72 34% 24-70 30%
7-23
44%
88-90 #
Siena
(3)
252
263
45% 26-58 40% 28-70 41%
9-22
39% 11-28
337 W
87-64
*Buffalo
(5)
344
308
39% 31-79 36% 19-53 37% 10-27 22%
229 W
85-84
*Delaware
(3)
121
325
51% 33-65 43% 29-68 42% 10-24 35%
L
Opp
For
FT
Dean
266
For
3PT
105-63
W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
18-23
8-9
15
4
13
14
27-37 23-27
14
14
23
18
6-27
15-20 20-30
15
3
8
16
7-20
9-15
7
8
17
10
7-16
19-21
315
L
66-67
*Stonehill
(2)
292
330
37% 22-60 36% 24-66 32%
6-19
23%
5-22
16-21 14-21
8
14
8
9
94
L
70-85
*St. Bonaventure
(2)
165
57
41% 26-63 56% 32-57 37%
7-19
57%
8-14
11-14
13-16
13
6
12
12
97-85
^^Tenn. St.
(1)
238
214
52% 35-67 43% 31-73 54% 14-26 21%
4-19
13-18 19-26
16
8
20
10
76-84
*Chattanooga
(0)
59
270
37% 24-65 49% 28-57 33%
8-24
37% 11-30
20-25 17-22
15
7
10
11
78-73
*Drexel
(4)
222
158
44% 27-61 40% 27-68 24%
4-17
39% 11-28
20-31
10
10
6
11
75-76
Brown
(3)
244
160
51% 29-57 49% 29-59 36%
5-14
40%
6-15
12-20 12-17
6
5
11
11
122-63
VTSU-Johnson
(1)
--
--
58% 49-85 39% 27-69 40% 18-45 27%
4-15
6-12
5-11
20
11
6
13
20
19
11
254 W
106
L
187 W
185
L
W
8-14
9
L
77-99
*St. John's
(2)
71
2
49% 28-57 50% 39-78 35%
6-17
31%
8-26
15-24 13-19
9
233
L
84-86
^^Fordham
(2)
172
268
44% 27-61 44% 30-69 33%
6-18
30%
7-23
24-31 19-22
11
9
16
14
138
L
65-70
*Towson
(7)
181
183
40% 24-60 41% 26-64 36%
8-22
21%
5-24
9-11
6
12
10
11
82
L
4-28
13-17
66-112
*Grand Canyon
(7)
126
60
34% 23-67 41% 34-83 14%
32%
9-28
16-27 35-44
11
19
22
7
212 W
81-55
Maine
(4)
307
127
50% 31-62 34% 18-53 39% 10-26 29%
5-17
9-14
14-20
15
3
18
14
189 W
73-53
Vermont
(6)
297
136
45% 29-65 43% 22-51 41% 11-27 30%
7-23
4-6
2-6
10
8
6
17
259 W
89-79
*Albany
(4)
236
302
51% 33-65 44% 30-68 32%
7-22
38%
8-21
16-19 11-13
10
10
9
9
240 W
85-62
UMass Lowell
(1)
158
338
45% 34-75 29% 20-68 29%
8-28
23%
6-26
9-12
16-25
16
12
12
11
354 W
95-76
*New Hampshire
(4)
355
332
49% 36-73 40% 26-65 39% 11-28 33%
8-24
12-12 16-18
11
12
6
12
309 W
83-69
Binghamton
(1)
310
292
46% 30-66 42% 24-57 35%
9-26
32%
9-28
14-19 12-13
11
5
3
12
295 W
92-86
*UMBC
(4)
206
358
49% 37-76 52% 30-58 30%
9-30
32%
8-25
9-15
18-29
15
5
9
11
356 W
92-70
*NJIT
(1)
354
314
45% 29-64 34% 23-67 41% 11-27 39% 14-36 23-26 10-13
10
6
6
8
63-68
Albany
(4)
236
302
37% 23-62 42% 26-62 32%
6-19
25%
5-20
11-17 11-17
17
8
17
15
309 W
78-71
*Binghamton
(1)
310
292
42% 27-64 38% 24-64 33%
6-18
36%
9-25
18-24 14-20
11
8
5
4
356 W
88-66
NJIT
(4)
354
314
54% 37-69 36% 25-70 29%
6-21
28%
7-25
8-17
9-10
11
7
8
14
81-79
UMBC
(1)
206
358
48% 31-64 53% 33-62 25%
6-24
38%
9-24
13-16
4-8
14
4
14
12
55-59
*Vermont
(4)
297
136
36% 20-56 41% 24-58 19%
4-21
33%
6-18
11-21
5-9
9
7
8
8
240 W
79-78
*UMass Lowell
(6)
158
338
42% 28-67 47% 30-64 33%
9-27
33%
8-24
14-19 10-13
8
7
11
15
212 W
80-72
*Maine
(1)
307
127
48% 28-59 43% 24-56 27%
6-22
33%
5-15
18-26 19-25
13
8
9
8
354 W
90-56
New Hampshire
(2)
355
332
45% 33-73 34% 22-65 30%
8-27
16%
4-25
16-22
8-17
17
9
13
13
295 W
85-74
UMBC
(3)
206
358
46% 32-69 42% 28-66 33%
7-21
46% 10-22 14-19
8-14
15
3
10
9
259 W
91-78
Albany
(2)
236
302
52% 34-65 43% 27-63 36%
5-14
39% 10-26 18-22 14-25
11
11
13
11
212 W
79-59
Maine
(3)
307
127
51% 32-63 39% 22-57 29%
5-17
14%
11
5
18
12
259
L
295 W
189
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
1-7
10-12 14-20
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
103.8
237th
107.4
139th
104.7
184th
106.8
180th
103.9
227th
Def-Efficiency
101.8
102nd
108.1
206th
107.3
213th
105.2
138th
104.6
126th
WAB
-2.6
159th
-4.5
139th
-6.1
323rd
-1.1
73rd
-1.3
94th
FG% 50% or better
9-1
3PT% >= 35%
9-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
13-6
18-2
3PT% < 35%
5-9
Make >= 10 3PA
14-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
8-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-7
More FTA than Opp.
13-6
4-2
More OReb than Opp.
2-2
Make < 10 3PA
15-11
18-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-9
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
11-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
3-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
20-7
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-5
9-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
9-8
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-5
@ Matteise
East Region
1.15
NCAA
Average
PPP & PPPA
1.06
1.10
ADJUSTED PPP ALLOWED
Mount St. Mary's
Montana
American
Akron
1.05
Robert Morris
Vanderbilt
1.00
Liberty
0.95
BYU
Baylor
Mississippi St.
Arizona
Oregon
Alabama
Wisconsin
VCU
Saint Mary's
Duke
0.90
0.85
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
ADJUSTED PPP
Raleigh
1
Duke
Fri
16
AU / MSM
11:50
8
Miss St.
Fri
9
Baylor
9:15
5
Oregon
Fri
12
Liberty
7:10
4
Arizona
Fri
13
Akron
4:35
6
BYU
Thu
11
VCU
1:05
3
Wisconsin
Thu
14
Montana
10:30
7
Saint Mary's
FRI
10
Vanderbilt
12:15
2
Alabama
FRI
15
Robert Morris
9:40
Seattle
Newark
Thursday / Saturday
Denver
Cleveland
Game Times Are PT
American / Mount St. Mary's
Mississippi State
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Duke
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Baylor
Mount St. Mary's
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
American
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
212
W, 96-62
Maine
292
W, 100-58
Army
14
L, 77-72
^^Kentucky
142
W, 86-35
Wofford
Record
31-3 (19-1)
13
W, 69-55
*Arizona
Home
17-0
20
L, 75-72
^^Kansas
Road
173
W, 70-48
Seattle
1
W, 84-78
Auburn
17
W, 76-65
*Louisville
252
W, 72-46
Incarnate Word
62
W, 68-47
George Mason
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Georgia Tech
65.7
128.5
91.3
14.4
17.7
35.2
26.5
267th
2nd
4th
19th
134th
35th
36th
57.4
78.4
58.0
37.7
32.1
45.4
5th
eFG%
17th
FT%
8th
2PT%
20th
3PT%
201st
FTA/FGA %
51st
3PA/FGA %
44.5
71.5
43.4
30.9
25.4
37.9
3rd
144th
3rd
33rd
21st
142nd
99
W, 82-56
#1 Duke Blue Devils - ACC
BPI: 1
155
W, 88-65
Virginia Tech
52
W, 89-62
*SMU
70
W, 76-47
Pittsburgh
107
W, 86-78
Notre Dame
210
W, 89-54
Miami (FL)
182
W, 88-63
*B.C.
BT: 2
EM: 1
KPI: 6
NET: 1
POM: 1
SOR: 4
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
82.7
61.9
1-25
1-0
2-2
2-1
14-3
Win
83.8
60.5
26-50
1-0
1-0
1-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.7
76.3
51-100
5-0
1-0
3-0
Non-Conf.
97.2
Home
85.5
59.1
101-200
6-0
0-0
3-0
Conf.
92.7
Road
79.9
64.8
201+
4-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +9.6 (5th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 1-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
61
W, 63-56
*Wake Forest
132
W, 74-64
N.C. State
Win
78.9%
58.9%
42.5%
37.8%
30.0%
10.2
6.7
2.5
9.8
1.6
5.0
36
W, 87-70
North Carolina
Loss
73.5%
49.0%
51.3%
36.5%
42.3%
9.0
7.3
-1.0
-0.7
1.0
-1.7
120
W, 83-54
*Syracuse
Home
79.9%
57.8%
39.1%
38.5%
32.0%
10.9
7.1
3.2
11.2
2.1
6.3
18
L, 77-71
*Clemson
Road
76.7%
58.2%
47.6%
36.8%
29.7%
9.3
6.5
1.2
6.7
1.1
2.5
125
W, 78-57
California
80
W, 106-70
Stanford
140
103
W, 80-62
*Virginia
125
125
25
W, 110-67
^^Illinois
210
W, 97-60
*Miami (FL)
110
110
Def-Efficiency
140
31
In Paint 41%
65
Fast Break 14%
W, 100-65
Florida St.
61
W, 93-60
Wake Forest
95
95
80
36
W, 82-69
*North Carolina
99
W, 78-70
^^Georgia Tech
65
W, 74-71
^^North Carolina
17
W, 73-62
^^Louisville
I. Evans: DNP L’s vs. UK & KU.
--Last 9G: 11.3 PPG
M. Gillis: DNP W @ Cuse, L @
Clemson
CF + KK 3PT ACC: 83-193, 43%
Flagg DNP QF or Final
61
Off TO 19%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
82
In Paint 40%
80
36
55
2nd Chance 15%
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Cooper Flagg
94
Fast Break 9%
65
Game #
Kon Knueppel
Defensive Pct.l
91
Offensive Pct.l
Off-Efficiency
2nd Chance 13%
79
Off TO 16%
84
Tyrese Proctor
Sion James
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 15.4
6.2
23-41
5-15
19.4
4.8
20-30
10-26
12.8
3.0
14-23
9-34
12.2
4.8
13-22
7-15
W 18.9
7.5 147-270 38-105 14.5
4.0
76-127
69-167
11.5
3.1
58-118
62-171
8.8
4.4
68-115
25-61
L
19.0
7.0
15-33
5-12
13.0
3.7
9-21
5-22
16.7
3.7
7-11
11-20
7.3
2.3
5-9
2-3
H
19.8
7.6
82-150
26-69
13.7
3.6
38-63
37-88
11.3
3.2
26-58
35-86
8.9
4.5
36-61
15-35
R
17.8
7.3
80-153
17-48
15.0
4.4
47-85
37-101 12.6
3.1
39-71
38-105
8.5
3.8
37-63
12-29
Starting Lineup Last G: I. Evans, S. James, K. Knueppel, K. Maluach, T. Proctor (2 G: 2-0)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
2
Cooper Flagg
6'9"
Fr
2
30.5
18.9
7.5
4.1
2.2
1.5
1.3
53.5%
162-303
36.8%
43-117
83.0%
151-182
7
Kon Knueppel
6'7"
Fr
--
30.4
14.4
4.0
2.7
1.4
1.0
0.2
57.4%
85-148
39.2%
74-189
91.4%
96-105
5
Tyrese Proctor
6'6"
Jr
1
29.5
12.0
3.2
2.2
1.1
0.8
0.1
50.4%
65-129
38.2%
73-191
69.7%
46-66
14 Sion James
6'6"
Jr
--
25.4
8.7
4.2
3.1
1.2
0.9
0.3
58.9%
73-124
42.2%
27-64
82.1%
69-84
9
Khaman Maluach
7'2"
Fr
--
21.0
8.3
6.8
0.5
0.8
0.2
1.2
74.2%
112-151
20.0%
3-15
74.6%
50-67
3
Isaiah Evans
6'6"
Fr
3
14.7
7.7
1.2
0.6
0.5
0.2
0.1
48.3%
14-29
43.9%
61-139
81.3%
26-32
1
Caleb Foster
6'5"
So
1
14.1
5.0
1.7
1.4
0.9
0.6
0.1
46.5%
40-86
31.3%
21-67
65.6%
21-32
18 Mason Gillis
6'6"
Sr
2
15.1
4.3
2.6
0.8
0.4
0.5
--
69.6%
16-23
34.1%
30-88
81.0%
17-21
21 Patrick Ngongba
6'11"
Fr
9
10.4
3.6
2.7
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.4
71.7%
38-53
0.0%
0-1
70.0%
14-20
#1 Duke Blue Devils - ACC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
--
307
127
56% 35-63 37% 21-57 38% 11-29 21%
3-14
15-20 17-18
10
6
12
13
292 W
100-58
Army
(3)
289
312
49% 35-71 33% 21-64 45% 17-38 28%
8-29
13-18
8-9
14
8
8
12
72-77
^^Kentucky
(3)
11
49
39% 28-71 40% 25-63 17%
40% 10-25 12-17 17-24
86-35
Wofford
(3)
91
248
48% 30-62 25% 14-57 42% 16-38 15%
5-33
69-55
*Arizona
(5)
10
30
43% 26-61 40% 21-53 36%
26%
6-23
72-75
^^Kansas
(3)
43
10
50% 24-48 49% 28-57 42% 11-26 47%
8-17
173 W
70-48
Seattle
(2)
235
80
40% 23-58 21% 10-47 28% 10-36 21%
4-19
1
20
L
4-24
9-25
Opp
For
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
13 W
For
Off. Reb
Maine
L
Opp
FT
96-62
14
For
3PT
212 W
142 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For Opp For Opp
10
8
7
10
2-3
14
10
10
15
8-13
7-11
10
6
13
15
13-18
11-12
3
7
16
15
14-19 24-31
10
7
13
15
10-11
W
84-78
Auburn
(4)
1
12
50% 29-58 45% 29-64 41%
9-22
40% 10-25 17-27 10-12
12
12
4
8
17 W
76-65
*Louisville
(3)
25
16
45% 28-62 37% 19-51 27%
8-30
36% 11-31
12-14 16-21
9
8
5
14
252 W
72-46
Incarnate Word
(1)
200
287
44% 24-55 32% 17-53 32%
8-25
22%
5-23
16-21
7-12
14
8
12
7
62 W
68-47
George Mason
(6)
191
19
38% 21-56 29% 20-68 33%
9-27
12%
2-17
17-21
5-6
11
16
10
12
99 W
82-56
*Georgia Tech
(3)
151
66
56% 31-55 36% 21-58 40% 10-25 35%
6-17
10-15
8-10
8
5
10
9
155 W
88-65
Virginia Tech
(9)
164
137
53% 31-58 46% 23-50 38% 11-29 38%
8-21
15-15
11-15
9
4
9
12
52 W
89-62
*SMU
(3)
36
70
53% 33-62 34% 23-67 41% 11-27 24%
5-21
12-16
11-25
9
14
7
6
6-20
13-18
5-8
7
8
13
10
58% 14-24 30-35 10-16
7
4
8
7
70 W
76-47
Pittsburgh
(2)
60
105
50% 26-52 31% 18-58 55% 11-20 30%
107 W
86-78
Notre Dame
(3)
99
115
53% 24-45 47% 27-57 33%
210 W
89-54
Miami (FL)
(2)
72
324
55% 34-62 39% 23-59 53% 17-32 30%
6-20
4-7
2-2
12
4
9
7
182 W
88-63
*B.C.
(3)
199
173
53% 30-57 45% 22-49 33%
8-24
33%
5-15
20-25 14-26
8
3
8
7
61 W
63-56
*Wake Forest
(6)
137
36
37% 21-57 37% 19-51 28%
9-32
17%
3-18
12-17 15-23
12
2
16
10
132 W
74-64
N.C. State
(1)
145
102
39% 23-59 41% 24-59 20%
4-20
46% 10-22 24-28
6-7
11
4
7
11
36 W
87-70
North Carolina
(4)
21
65
53% 28-53 47% 26-55 50% 10-20 37%
7-19
21-25 11-14
7
12
8
14
83-54
*Syracuse
(3)
95
147
57% 30-53 38% 23-60 39%
26%
6-23
14-19
2-4
7
11
6
13
71-77
*Clemson
(2)
24
17
44% 24-55 59% 30-51 50% 12-24 40%
4-10
11-14 13-22
8
9
9
10
125 W
78-57
California
(3)
104
162
47% 27-58 35% 20-57 36%
7-23
15-19 10-15
11
8
10
8
120 W
18
L
8-24
9-23
9-25
30%
80 W
106-70
Stanford
(2)
75
88
63% 40-64 38% 24-63 48% 14-29 41% 12-29 12-13 10-13
8
11
5
10
103 W
80-62
*Virginia
(1)
89
134
53% 31-59 39% 20-52 39%
9-23
36%
8-22
9-11
14-17
10
3
5
5
25 W
110-67
^^Illinois
(4)
15
44
56% 40-72 38% 23-61 52% 12-23
8%
2-26
18-24 19-28
12
10
6
9
210 W
97-60
*Miami (FL)
(2)
72
324
56% 32-57 39% 25-64 60% 15-25 20%
5-25
18-20
5-5
7
8
10
16
91 W
100-65
Florida St.
(3)
142
72
44% 32-73 39% 22-57 27%
33%
7-21
28-34 14-17
18
6
4
14
61 W
93-60
Wake Forest
(1)
137
36
47% 34-72 33% 19-58 36% 14-39 38%
6-16
11-13 16-20
18
10
10
12
36 W
82-69
*North Carolina
(4)
21
65
56% 31-55 39% 25-64 47%
9-19
33%
9-27
11-13 10-11
5
4
14
6
99 W
78-70
^^Georgia Tech
(4)
151
66
44% 27-62 43% 26-61 23%
7-30
44% 12-27 17-19
6-8
10
7
7
11
36 W
74-71
^^North Carolina
(0)
21
65
49% 27-55 47% 26-55 23%
5-22
18%
3-17
15-22 16-24
9
9
13
12
17 W
73-62
^^Louisville
(0)
25
16
44% 22-50 39% 25-64 37% 10-27 27%
7-26
19-24
8
11
9
11
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-30
Non-Conference Games
5-10
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
128.9
2nd
126.3
6th
122.6
7th
130.7
1st
134.7
1st
Def-Efficiency
90.6
6th
90.8
6th
83.8
1st
93.4
11th
93.3
10th
WAB
+3.2
5th
+6.4
5th
+2.2
10th
+5.9
7th
+4.8
6th
FG% 50% or better
16-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
22-1
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
9-2
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
0-1
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
5-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
26-1
20-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-3
More FTM than Opp.
23-1
11-1
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
20-0
More FTA than Opp.
20-1
6-1
More OReb than Opp.
16-1
21-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
25-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
19-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
24-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-0
More Turnovers than Opp.
11-1
3-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
10-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-1
@ Matteise
216
L, 65-52
*La Salle
235
W, 67-55
Harvard
266
L, 74-66
*Siena
36
L, 107-55
*North Carolina
Record
22-12 (13-5)
76
L, 80-73
*High Point
Home
14-2
240
W, 64-60
^^UMKC
Road
W, 73-56
^^P.R.-Bayamon
W, 81-77
^^Albany
W, 97-52
Notre Dame (MD)
115
!W, 81-71
George Washington
79
L, 84-57
*Saint Joseph's
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Virginia
63.4
101.3
107.5
16.8
17.6
23.8
27.4
349th
268th
198th
155th
139th
335th
62nd
259
103
L, 63-58
#16 American Eagles - Patriot
BPI: 227
295
!L, 96-93
UMBC
283
L, 81-58
*Navy
317
W, 75-64
Holy Cross
284
L, 60-54
*Boston U.
219
W, 68-58
Bucknell
313
W, 73-54
*Loyola (MD)
BT: 244
EM: 217
KPI: 214
NET: 226
POM: 237
SOR: 163
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
68.6
67.3
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
8-10
Win
72.3
61.9
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
62.0
77.1
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-2
Non-Conf.
200.5
Home
72.4
63.3
101-200
1-0
0-0
0-1
Conf.
292.8
Road
65.3
70.8
201+
12-2
2-0
5-6
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -8.3 (164th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 9-2
Opp. O-Reb%
51.8
75.9
51.1
35.1
29.5
44.8
119th
eFG%
56th
FT%
170th
2PT%
103rd
3PT%
289th
FTA/FGA %
57th
3PA/FGA %
52.1
69.2
53.1
33.6
34.1
35.7
243rd
29th
268th
168th
211th
77th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
317
W, 74-65
*Holy Cross
287
W, 68-67
Lehigh
Win
78.0%
53.9%
48.7%
37.5%
30.0%
8.6
6.0
-1.3
1.0
1.7
3.4
258
W, 81-77
Colgate
Loss
69.5%
48.7%
57.8%
30.3%
39.2%
8.1
6.3
0.1
-7.5
0.0
-7.3
290
W, 75-68
*Lafayette
Home
75.2%
53.3%
49.5%
37.0%
30.4%
8.8
6.1
-1.7
-0.4
2.0
3.0
292
W, 71-68
Army
Road
76.1%
51.0%
54.4%
32.7%
35.4%
8.1
6.1
-0.1
-3.4
0.3
-3.4
219
L, 71-49
*Bucknell
287
!W, 78-75
*Lehigh
140
290
W, 60-58
Lafayette
125
125
313
W, 72-51
Loyola (MD)
292
L, 76-69
*Army
110
110
Boston U.
283
L, 68-60
Navy
95
95
80
258
W, 67-59
*Colgate
290
W, 71-69
Lafayette
65
W, 72-62
Colgate
283
W, 74-52
Navy
55
Fast Break 13%
80
258
In Paint 40% 21
2nd Chance 12% 14
1H vs. UNC: -9, 2H vs. UNC: --43
M. Rogers vs UNC: 15 pts, 5-11 FG
top 50eFG%, 45.5% 3PT in conf play
G. Jones 3PT in conf play: 22-43,
DNP L @ Bucknell
3 G's vs. teams w/ eFG% D that
ranked in top 100
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 48% 7
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Matt Rogers
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
65
Game #
79
Off TO 20%
Fast Break 10%
88
2nd Chance 13%
82
29
Off TO 19%
Elijah Stephens
Defensive Pct.l
W, 48-44
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
284
Off-Efficiency
Greg Jones
Colin Smalls
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.4
5.0
23-32
8-21
8.4
2.0
12-27
4-15
11.0
4.4
9-20
9-14
8.6
2.4
7-16
8-19
W 16.7
5.9 100-148
39-94
10.9
2.9
60-133
18-51
11.3
4.1
42-80
30-63
10.5
1.9
37-68
29-74
L
17.6
5.2
63-103
20-54
9.8
2.3
24-50
9-29
8.5
3.5
18-29
11-28
8.6
1.5
21-47
12-52
H
18.1
6.4
81-116
30-68
8.3
2.3
35-93
10-39
11.0
4.3
33-63
21-45
9.9
2.1
28-53
23-60
R
16.1
4.9
82-135
29-80
13.2
3.2
49-90
17-41
9.7
3.6
27-46
20-46
9.6
1.4
30-62
18-66
Starting Lineup Last G: L. Ball, G. Jones, M. Rogers, C. Smalls, E. Stephens (13 G: 11-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
15 Matt Rogers
6'9"
Sr
--
27.1
17.0
5.6
1.3
2.0
0.7
0.4
64.9%
163-251
39.9%
59-148
74.5%
1
Elijah Stephens
2PT
3PT
FT
76-102
5'9"
Sr
4
30.4
10.6
2.7
3.7
2.3
1.6
0.1
45.9%
84-183
33.8%
27-80
84.1%
69-82
23 Greg Jones
6'6"
So
2
26.9
10.3
3.9
1.0
1.4
0.9
0.1
55.0%
60-109
45.1%
41-91
85.4%
88-103
3
Colin Smalls
6'2"
Sr
2
26.6
9.8
1.7
1.3
0.6
0.8
0.0
50.4%
58-115
32.5%
41-126
81.3%
74-91
33 Matt Mayock
6'7"
So
--
24.5
7.2
2.3
1.3
0.9
0.4
0.4
49.4%
39-79
34.2%
41-120
84.6%
44-52
12 Geoff Sprouse
6'0"
Jr
15
22.9
6.3
2.2
1.6
1.1
0.6
--
26.3%
5-19
35.0%
36-103
50.0%
2-4
4
Lincoln Ball
6'6"
Sr
--
25.9
3.9
5.8
1.9
0.7
0.8
0.3
47.9%
46-96
19.4%
6-31
50.0%
23-46
25 Eric Michaels
6'9"
Fr
6
11.0
3.2
2.4
0.3
0.6
0.1
0.5
49.4%
38-77
--
--
46.7%
14-30
7
6'4"
Fr
--
12.5
3.2
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.6
--
41.9%
18-43
27.1%
19-70
66.7%
14-21
Wyatt Nausadis
#16 American Eagles - Patriot
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
216
L
235 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
FT
For
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
52-65
La Salle
--
227
192
36% 20-55 42% 23-55 29%
9-31
31%
5-16
3-8
14-18
8
9
9
5
67-55
Harvard
(5)
253
205
44% 22-50 39% 20-52 38%
9-24
24%
5-21
14-17 10-15
3
6
9
11
266
L
66-74
Siena
(1)
252
263
44% 24-55 55% 26-47 50%
9-18
44%
4-9
9-12
18-25
7
10
8
10
36
L
55-107
North Carolina
(2)
21
65
31% 19-61 59% 36-61 23%
7-31
32%
7-22
10-11
28-34
6
8
12
9
76
L
6-14
8-12
73-80
High Point
(2)
29
213
56% 29-52 57% 29-51 32%
7-22
43%
16-21
12
9
9
7
240 W
64-60
UMKC
(3)
284
155
42% 18-43 35% 17-49 15%
3-20
42% 10-24 25-27 16-19
8
7
16
14
W
73-56
P.R.-Bayamon
(0)
--
--
44% 26-59 33% 17-51 21%
6-28
10%
1-10
15-22 21-26
8
8
14
20
259 W
81-77
Albany
(0)
236
302
64% 29-45 45% 27-60 56%
9-16
31%
4-13
14-24 19-26
4
8
16
10
W
97-52
Notre Dame (MD)
(6)
--
--
54% 32-59 35% 19-55 37% 10-27 17%
2-12
23-30 12-18
12
9
15
20
115 W
81-71 #
George Washington
(2)
147
101
40% 25-62 42% 28-66 41% 13-32 15%
2-13
18-24 13-27
11
12
16
13
79
L
57-84
Saint Joseph's
(13)
98
83
36% 20-56 60% 29-48 29%
50%
8-16
10-15 18-21
11
5
12
15
103
L
58-63
Virginia
(3)
89
134
38% 19-50 46% 23-50 36% 11-31 42%
8-19
9-9
9-14
2
6
6
6
295
L
93-96 #
UMBC
(6)
206
358
48% 37-77 53% 38-72 36% 11-31 35%
7-20
8-16
13-18
11
6
10
9
283
L
58-81
Navy
(3)
271
279
38% 21-56 55% 30-55 27%
36%
5-14
7-11
16-23
7
7
9
6
75-64
Holy Cross
(2)
279
342
50% 24-48 42% 24-57 50% 12-24 36%
9-25
15-17
7-10
3
10
7
9
54-60
Boston University
(2)
317
278
36% 18-50 43% 20-47 29%
6-21
29%
6-21
12-13 14-21
5
7
8
9
219 W
68-58
Bucknell
(2)
226
202
47% 23-49 37% 20-54 33%
6-18
11%
2-19
16-21 16-21
5
13
14
14
313 W
73-54
Loyola MD
(1)
295
305
50% 28-56 44% 20-45 44% 10-23 31%
4-13
7-10
10-18
5
5
8
12
317 W
74-65
Holy Cross
(4)
279
342
47% 25-53 51% 26-51 44% 10-23 40%
8-20
14-16
5-11
8
3
9
11
287 W
68-67
Lehigh
(3)
296
276
46% 21-46 51% 24-47 35%
7-20
56%
9-16
19-24 10-17
5
4
9
13
258 W
81-77
Colgate
(2)
217
307
46% 23-50 48% 27-56 45%
9-20
42%
8-19
26-32 15-22
8
11
8
12
290 W
75-68
Lafayette
(3)
324
229
41% 24-59 45% 27-60 39% 11-28 38%
8-21
16-17
6-12
6
9
6
8
292 W
71-68
Army
(2)
289
312
49% 26-53 43% 26-61 36%
9-25
23%
6-26
10-16 10-14
13
12
14
7
49-71
Bucknell
(3)
226
202
35% 16-46 60% 27-45 24%
5-21
46%
6-13
12-17 11-16
3
3
10
11
287 W
78-75 #
Lehigh
(2)
296
276
42% 25-59 43% 23-54 24%
5-21
17%
4-23
23-27 25-37
8
7
10
11
290 W
60-58
Lafayette
(1)
324
229
45% 23-51 40% 20-50 25%
5-20
32%
8-25
9-11
10-18
2
7
7
11
72-51
Loyola MD
(4)
295
305
52% 27-52 38% 18-48 57% 13-23 15%
3-20
5-7
12-20
7
7
12
11
69-76
Army
(3)
289
312
43% 26-61 48% 25-52 35%
9-26
47%
8-17
8-13
18-20
8
6
6
8
48-44
Boston University
(2)
317
278
32% 18-56 35% 17-49 10%
2-21
38%
8-21
10-12
2-4
9
8
7
19
7-31
317 W
284
L
219
L
313 W
292
L
284 W
283
L
7-24
9-33
60-68
Navy
(3)
271
279
38% 21-56 47% 21-45 23%
46%
6-13
11-17 20-30
7
10
9
13
258 W
67-59
Colgate
(2)
217
307
49% 25-51 45% 23-51 46% 12-26 31%
8-26
5-8
5-8
2
2
12
14
290 W
71-69
Lafayette
(4)
324
229
46% 25-54 51% 27-53 44% 10-23 42% 11-26 11-16
4-5
5
4
9
12
258 W
72-62
Colgate
(2)
217
307
50% 27-54 44% 25-57 41%
30%
7-23
11-13
5-7
6
8
11
11
283 W
74-52
Navy
(2)
271
279
52% 27-52 35% 20-57 44% 11-25 20%
4-20
9-13
8-10
3
10
8
12
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
7-17
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
101.1
275th
102.0
234th
102.8
222nd
100.5
294th
98.3
316th
Def-Efficiency
104.8
154th
110.7
263rd
108.5
235th
108.2
199th
104.6
127th
WAB
-1.5
111th
-6.8
212th
-4.4
252nd
-4
135th
-2.4
138th
FG% 50% or better
7-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
15-2
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-10
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-7
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-10
Opp. FG% below 45%
15-2
16-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-9
More FTM than Opp.
13-1
6-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-3
More FTA than Opp.
13-1
2-0
More OReb than Opp.
12-10
8-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-12
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
16-11
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-5
1-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-9
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-0
@ Matteise
63
L, 87-57
*Dayton
18
L, 88-62
*Clemson
236
W, 65-64
*Campbell
71
L, 92-62
*Penn St.
Record
16-17 (8-8)
223
L, 66-58
*Mt. St. Mary's
Home
10-4
W, 96-57
Penn St.-Schuylkill
Road
#16 Saint Francis Red Flash - NEC
BPI: 307
BT: 301
EM: 300
KPI: 273
NET: 297
POM: 311
SOR: 330
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
71.1
71.6
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-2
6-13
Win
79.4
64.7
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
63.4
78.1
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-3
89
L, 82-65
*Georgetown
287
W, 88-78
Lehigh
Non-Conf.
178.4
Home
79.0
66.4
101-200
0-2
0-0
1-2
159
L, 79-70
Radford
Conf.
310.9
Road
65.3
75.5
201+
7-2
0-0
5-6
W, 107-55
Penn St.-Shenango
L, 69-66
*Niagara
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Maryland
67.1
99.9
112.0
19.6
16.4
25.4
30.0
181st
294th
289th
321st
228th
311th
192nd
320
12
L, 111-57
W, 104-47
Franciscan
128
L, 90-77
*Robert Morris
162
L, 74-59
Central Conn.
315
L, 64-60
Stonehill
331
W, 73-59
Merychurst
306
W, 75-71
*FDU
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -12.2 (240th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-6
Opp. O-Reb%
51.6
72.5
52.6
33.4
23.8
41.9
129th
eFG%
169th
FT%
115th
2PT%
194th
3PT%
357th
FTA/FGA %
106th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
51.3
74.5
53.4
32.3
28.7
43.2
203rd
300th
278th
88th
70th
311th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
288
L, 64-51
*LIU Brooklyn
334
!L, 70-68
*Wagner
Win
74.0%
61.6%
50.1%
36.1%
25.1%
8.9
6.4
-0.5
5.6
-1.0
0.0
288
W, 74-64
LIU Brooklyn
Loss
71.2%
48.6%
54.8%
31.7%
36.4%
7.6
9.3
-2.2
-6.3
-2.0
-4.8
334
L, 68-66
Wagner
Home
75.1%
60.3%
50.0%
35.6%
28.5%
8.9
7.5
0.2
6.0
-0.6
1.3
331
L, 62-58
*Merychurst
Road
70.6%
50.9%
54.3%
32.5%
32.7%
7.7
8.2
-2.6
-5.4
-2.2
-5.3
349
W, 86-78
Le Moyne
362
W, 81-69
*Chicago St.
140
315
L, 79-74
*Stonehill
125
125
162
L, 83-67
*Central Conn.
349
!W, 81-76
*Le Moyne
110
110
FDU
362
!W, 80-71
Chicago St.
Fast Break 10% 22
95
95
80
334
W, 58-55
Wagner
288
W, 71-68
*LIU Brooklyn
65
W, 46-43
2nd Chance 12% 11
45
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
*Central Conn.
Home
HT margin vs. Clemson, Penn St,
G'Town, MD: -21, -7, -1, -26
Last 6 G: 3 OT + 3 3-pt W's
V. Pinedo 4.5 fouls per 40
DNP L's vs. Radford or Niagara
2nd Chance 16% 22
Game #
Loss
Road
Riley Parker
52
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
Ace Talbert
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
70
In Paint 42%
80
162
50
In Paint 43%
Defensive Pct.l
!W, 85-80
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
306
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 21% 14
Valentino Pinedo
Juan Crawford Jr.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.0
3.4
17-29
12-28
10.2
2.8
6-19
11-29
8.8
6.6
19-39
0-0
13.4
4.6
15-28
10-31
W 16.0
3.4
55-87
36-82
18.0
4.0
1-4
4-6
10.2
6.3
55-92
0-1
11.1
4.7
36-62
26-74
L
10.9
3.6
44-92
27-76
8.3
2.5
5-15
7-23
9.9
6.7
58-104
0-2
8.9
3.5
27-53
27-66
H
17.4
3.7
56-89
31-80
-
-
-
-
10.6
7.3
42-80
0-0
10.5
4.8
28-50
23-64
R
10.4
3.3
43-90
32-78
10.2
2.8
6-19
11-29
9.7
6.1
71-116
0-3
9.6
3.6
35-65
30-76
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Cranford, D. Kelly, C. Moncrief, R. Parker, V. Pinedo (10 G: 8-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
11 Riley Parker
6'2"
Jr
--
31.8
13.4
3.5
3.4
2.5
0.8
0.1
55.3%
2
3PT
FT
99-179
39.9%
63-158
85.9%
55-64
Ace Talbert
6'0"
So
28
28.0
10.2
2.8
1.8
2.2
0.6
0.2
31.6%
6-19
37.9%
11-29
50.0%
6-12
31 Valentino Pinedo
6'8"
So
5
27.8
10.0
6.5
1.3
1.6
0.8
0.7
57.7%
113-196
0.0%
0-3
61.1%
55-90
4
Juan Crawford Jr.
6'3"
Fr
--
27.5
10.0
4.1
1.9
1.3
1.0
0.0
54.8%
63-115
37.9%
53-140
89.8%
44-49
14 Bobby Rosenberger
6'5"
So
--
22.2
8.5
3.7
1.4
1.2
0.5
0.3
50.9%
81-159
23.7%
27-114
75.5%
37-49
5
Daemar Kelly
6'5"
So
--
29.9
8.2
3.3
1.7
1.7
0.8
0.5
53.7%
66-123
31.0%
36-116
78.9%
30-38
7
Jeremy Clayville
6'0"
Fr
2
19.5
7.7
1.4
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.0
46.3%
25-54
39.0%
60-154
69.2%
9-13
0
Chris Moncrief
6'6"
Jr
2
17.4
6.1
2.7
1.2
1.0
0.7
0.2
56.8%
67-118
33.3%
8-24
60.4%
32-53
20 Brendan Scanlon
5'8"
Sr
32
10.5
6.0
--
3.0
--
1.0
--
100.0%
3-3
0.0%
0-1
--
--
#16 Saint Francis Red Flash - NEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
57-87
*Dayton
--
57
129
38% 22-58 46% 31-68 29%
6-21
25%
18
L
62-88
*Clemson
(3)
24
17
39% 22-56 59% 33-56 40%
223
Opp
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
7-11
17-25
4
15
12
7
8-20
44% 12-27 10-14 10-17
6
7
16
16
8-32
65-64
*Campbell
(1)
266
167
50% 25-50 44% 21-48 33%
6-18
21%
5-24
9-11
17-21
5
4
18
18
62-92
*Penn St.
(1)
63
79
37% 22-59 49% 34-69 29%
9-31
33%
9-27
9-17
15-20
10
11
21
15
L
58-66
*Mt. St. Mary's
(3)
298
199
36% 22-61 41% 23-56 20%
6-30
22%
5-23
8-9
15-20
10
10
12
14
96-57
Penn St.-Schuylkill
(3)
--
--
56% 39-70 39% 22-56 30% 11-37 14%
2-14
7-10
11-19
12
3
15
17
65-82
*Georgetown
(2)
157
67
39% 22-56 44% 30-69 35% 10-29 33%
9-27
11-15
13-19
13
13
19
8
88-78
Lehigh
(2)
296
276
55% 34-62 48% 30-63 36%
9-28
11-14
9-12
10
8
10
10
70-79
Radford
(4)
109
240
39% 24-62 50% 24-48 38% 11-29 42% 11-26
11-13
20-25
7
5
5
8
L
287 W
159
For
Off. Reb
L
W
89
Opp
FT
L
71
For
3PT
63
236 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
L
W
9-25
32%
107-55
Penn St.-Shenango
(2)
--
--
55% 43-78 34% 23-68 35% 10-29 17%
5-29
11-13
4-4
9
3
5
10
320
L
66-69
*Niagara
(9)
280
335
47% 27-58 44% 25-57 40% 10-25 43% 13-30
2-4
6-7
5
6
7
10
12
L
57-111
*Maryland
(2)
28
6
41% 24-59 62% 42-68 30%
2-3
12-17
2
11
13
5
W
7-23
58% 15-26
104-47
Franciscan
(1)
--
--
66% 41-62 27% 17-64 52% 13-25 18%
6-34
9-13
7-13
7
12
5
7
128
L
77-90
*Robert Morris
(1)
185
144
51% 27-53 53% 31-58 57% 12-21 30%
6-20
11-15
22-32
4
10
19
13
162
L
59-74
Central Conn.
(12)
306
87
42% 24-57 48% 28-59 27%
6-22
31%
8-26
5-7
10-11
8
6
12
8
315
L
60-64
Stonehill
(1)
292
330
37% 21-57 39% 24-61 29%
6-21
31% 11-36
12-14
5-8
11
11
10
12
331 W
73-59
Merychurst
(4)
291
340
56% 28-50 36% 21-58 38%
8-21
32%
8-25
9-13
9-12
7
10
12
6
306 W
75-71
*FDU
(1)
323
249
52% 29-56 32% 21-65 43%
9-21
20%
6-30
8-11
23-32
5
14
16
5
10
16
288
L
51-64
*LIU Brooklyn
(5)
349
122
35% 17-48 45% 21-47 19%
5-26
40%
8-20
12-17 14-16
4
9
334
L
68-70 #
*Wagner
(1)
359
238
37% 23-63 37% 22-60 30%
7-23
36%
8-22
15-17 18-25
6
10
9
10
74-64
LIU Brooklyn
(3)
349
122
48% 25-52 37% 26-70 38%
8-21
19%
4-21
16-20
8-13
5
14
11
7
288 W
334
L
66-68
Wagner
(1)
359
238
48% 23-48 48% 25-52 37%
7-19
48% 11-23 13-17
7-9
10
8
14
13
331
L
58-62
*Merychurst
(3)
291
340
39% 21-54 39% 22-57 25%
7-28
21%
5-24
9-17
13-17
8
6
13
8
86-78
Le Moyne
(6)
239
362
54% 27-50 48% 28-58 42% 11-26 24%
5-21
21-30 17-24
7
9
18
13
7-30
349 W
362 W
81-69
*Chicago St.
(1)
361
343
55% 30-55 45% 25-56 52% 11-21 23%
10-12 12-14
5
3
14
10
315
L
74-79
*Stonehill
(4)
292
330
54% 31-57 40% 24-60 29%
4-14
41% 12-29
8-13
19-23
8
12
7
6
162
L
8-25
44%
67-83
*Central Conn.
(1)
306
87
48% 29-61 53% 32-60 32%
1-2
12-13
3
7
10
6
349 W
81-76 #
*Le Moyne
(4)
239
362
45% 29-64 52% 29-56 32% 10-31 34% 11-32 13-17
7-10
15
6
16
17
306 W
85-80 #
FDU
(1)
323
249
50% 34-68 38% 27-72 33%
9-27
31% 11-36
15-19
11
9
12
5
362 W
80-71 #
Chicago St.
(6)
361
343
47% 29-62 48% 29-60 29%
6-21
44% 11-25 16-24
2-2
10
2
10
17
334 W
58-55
Wagner
(3)
359
238
43% 22-51 35% 20-57 36%
9-25
13%
3-24
5-6
12-17
4
15
13
10
288 W
71-68
*LIU Brooklyn
(2)
349
122
49% 23-47 42% 23-55 37%
7-19
33%
7-21
18-23 15-22
4
12
11
11
162 W
46-43
*Central Conn.
(2)
306
87
32% 19-60 30% 17-56 19%
5-26
18%
3-17
3-7
9
9
9
16
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
7-16
8-11
6-8
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
103.7
239th
97.4
328th
100.0
268th
101.2
279th
101.6
263rd
Def-Efficiency
114.2
314th
110.7
264th
112.0
305th
115.0
321st
112.7
283rd
WAB
-3.7
212th
-8.5
269th
-5.3
284th
-7.2
243rd
-1.4
97th
FG% 50% or better
10-2
3PT% >= 35%
9-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
1-9
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
8-2
14-5
3PT% < 35%
2-12
Make >= 10 3PA
7-12
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
6-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-8
More FTA than Opp.
8-3
3-7
More OReb than Opp.
1-5
Make < 10 3PA
10-13
8-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
13-10
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
6-6
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
4-9
3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-8
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-11
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-10
1-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
5-4
@ Matteise
350
W, 95-60
West Ga.
255
W, 101-66
Georgia St.
207
W, 80-59
SE Louisiana
74
W, 78-73
^^Utah
Record
21-12 (8-10)
52
W, 84-79
*SMU
Home
10-5
97
W, 80-58
^^UNLV
Road
86
L, 87-77
^^Butler
70
W, 90-57
Pittsburgh
361
W, 91-84
Prairie View A&M
59
W, 66-63
^^McNeese St.
227
W, 83-59
^^Central Mich.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Memphis
67.9
118.3
98.8
15.1
19.0
34.1
29.5
133rd
26th
50th
39th
73rd
55th
166th
37
W, 79-66
#8 Mississippi St. Bulldogs - SEC
278
W, 87-73
Beth-Cook
86
W, 85-50
South Carolina
47
W, 76-64
*Vanderbilt
14
L, 95-90
Kentucky
1
L, 88-66
*Auburn
26
!W, 84-81
Ole Miss
BPI: 35
BT: 32
EM: 35
KPI: 27
NET: 34
POM: 32
SOR: 34
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.8
74.2
1-25
1-4
0-1
0-3
11-7
Win
82.0
65.9
26-50
1-1
0-0
4-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
75.8
88.7
51-100
3-0
4-1
2-0
Non-Conf.
149.9
Home
83.3
72.8
101-200
0-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
32.2
Road
76.8
75.3
201+
5-0
1-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.0 (31st)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-4
Opp. O-Reb%
51.7
70.0
55.2
31.4
31.6
42.3
122nd
eFG%
261st
FT%
42nd
2PT%
295th
3PT%
211th
FTA/FGA %
93rd
3PA/FGA %
Defense
51.9
69.5
50.1
36.1
35.4
44.2
236th
42nd
145th
313th
240th
326th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
5
L, 68-56
*Tennessee
86
!W, 65-60
*South Carolina
Win
67.6%
58.1%
46.3%
34.1%
30.3%
8.7
7.2
2.5
5.9
3.3
-0.3
6
L, 88-84
Alabama
Loss
74.0%
50.1%
57.3%
27.1%
44.5%
7.9
12.8
2.8
-3.2
1.2
0.1
23
L, 88-61
Missouri
Home
70.0%
61.4%
48.3%
32.8%
37.0%
8.7
9.6
1.2
4.3
2.6
2.3
35
W, 76-75
*Georgia
Road
70.0%
50.4%
51.7%
30.2%
35.3%
8.2
8.9
3.8
1.2
2.5
-2.2
4
L, 81-68
Florida
26
W, 81-71
*Ole Miss
140
16
W, 70-54
Texas A&M
125
125
39
L, 93-87
*Oklahoma
6
L, 111-73
*Alabama
110
110
LSU
45
!L, 87-82
Texas
95
95
80
39
L, 93-92
*Arkansas
83
W, 91-62
^^LSU
65
L, 85-73
Fast Break 16%
88
2nd Chance 18%
91
70
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
98
In Paint 36%
80
23
81
In Paint 46%
65
Game #
^^Missouri
Home
L vs. Butler, Butler 12-22 3PT
When opponent finished w/ an eFG%
of 55% or better: 3-11
Not same D as last 2 years - prev 2
years 3PT% D rank: 36 & 8
L @ Ark: Trailed 70-54 (No Thiero)
OT L vs. Texas: Trailed 54-42
KeShawn Murphy
47
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Josh Hubbard
66
Fast Break 12%
82
Off TO 16%
Claudell Harris Jr.
Defensive Pct.l
W, 81-69
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
83
Off-Efficiency
Riley Kugel
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 22.6
2.0
18-35
15-52
12.4
6.4
25-42
0-3
6.6
2.0
5-7
7-26
9.4
4.0
8-16
7-20
W 17.6
2.3
57-117
62-168 10.7
7.2
91-148
4-20
10.8
3.2
30-58
49-130
9.6
3.0
51-83
24-69
L
20.5
2.0
30-65
42-135 13.7
7.9
68-114
0-6
7.1
2.2
11-20
17-64
8.5
3.2
18-50
13-46
H
21.0
2.3
48-89
51-130
11.7
7.0
78-113
0-11
10.5
2.9
21-30
33-91
8.4
2.9
31-52
15-48
R
16.7
2.1
39-93
53-173
11.8
7.8
81-149
4-15
8.6
2.8
20-48
33-103
9.9
3.2
38-81
22-67
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Hubbard, R. Kugel, C. Matthews, R. Melendez, M. Nwoko (11 G: 6-5)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
12 Josh Hubbard
5'11"
So
--
32.9
18.7
2.2
3.2
1.2
0.9
0.1
47.8%
87-182
34.3%
3
KeShawn Murphy
6'10"
Jr
--
24.1
11.8
7.5
1.6
1.5
0.9
1.2
60.7%
159-262
0
Claudell Harris Jr.
6'4"
Sr
--
22.7
9.5
2.8
1.2
0.7
0.8
0.1
52.6%
41-78
2
Riley Kugel
6'5"
Jr
1
22.4
9.2
3.0
1.6
1.4
1.1
0.2
51.9%
22 RJ Melendez
6'7"
Sr
--
22.4
8.9
4.4
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.7
4
Cameron Matthews
6'7"
Sr
--
29.3
7.2
6.6
3.6
2.4
2.5
1
FT
104-303
87.8%
130-148
15.4%
4-26
61.1%
58-95
34.0%
66-194
76.2%
32-42
69-133
32.2%
37-115
75.4%
46-61
59.8%
70-117
28.1%
32-114
75.3%
58-77
0.7
55.8%
86-154
24.0%
6-25
49.5%
49-99
Kanye Clary
5'11"
Jr
26
19.0
6.3
1.3
2.6
0.7
1.1
--
42.9%
12-28
20.0%
2-10
70.0%
14-20
23 Michael Nwoko
6'10"
So
--
15.4
6.3
4.6
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.8
55.0%
82-149
14.3%
1-7
60.6%
40-66
5
6'5"
Jr
--
19.4
4.9
2.6
0.9
0.3
0.9
0.6
57.1%
40-70
30.0%
18-60
75.7%
28-37
Shawn Jones Jr.
#8 Mississippi St. Bulldogs - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
95-60
West Ga.
--
332
323
55% 36-65 39% 21-54 47% 14-30 21%
4-19
9-16
14-20
7
6
8
19
255 W
101-66
Georgia St.
(3)
153
318
58% 42-72 34% 22-64 36% 10-28 28%
5-18
7-10
17-25
11
17
10
16
207 W
80-59
SE Louisiana
(3)
216
212
44% 27-62 35% 19-54 25%
7-28
36%
9-25
19-26 12-17
10
8
10
16
74 W
78-73
^^Utah
(4)
73
71
36% 24-67 45% 28-62 24%
6-25
32%
9-28
24-33
8-14
17
9
7
12
52 W
84-79
*SMU
(4)
36
70
41% 28-68 51% 24-47 35%
9-26
35%
8-23
19-25 23-34
12
4
7
13
97 W
80-58
^^UNLV
(5)
162
55
43% 29-67 44% 21-48 38% 12-32 40%
8-20
10-18
8-15
16
4
10
15
77-87
^^Butler
(0)
44
150
38% 26-69 53% 28-53 26%
7-27
55% 12-22 18-21 19-27
11
7
6
13
7-21
31%
L
For
3PT
350 W
86
Opponent
Opp Eff.
70 W
90-57
Pittsburgh
(4)
60
105
58% 37-64 31% 20-64 33%
9-13
16
12
14
11
361 W
91-84
Prairie View A&M
(3)
339
353
56% 30-54 56% 31-55 42% 11-26 53% 10-19 20-31 12-20
12
5
11
9
8-26
9-13
59 W
66-63
^^McNeese St.
(5)
65
74
37% 19-52 42% 22-53 28%
41%
9-22
23-33 10-17
9
11
7
14
227 W
83-59
^^Central Mich.
(2)
210
241
49% 35-71 35% 20-58 38% 11-29 31%
8-26
2-7
11-12
14
8
5
11
37 W
79-66
*Memphis
(3)
88
47
44% 31-70 36% 19-53 37% 10-27 30%
8-27
7-10
20-26
18
10
14
18
278 W
87-73
Beth-Cook
(8)
329
223
51% 31-61 50% 26-52 32%
8-25
33%
5-15
17-24 16-24
12
8
9
16
86 W
85-50
South Carolina
(4)
110
59
57% 35-62 29% 16-55 32%
8-25
11%
2-19
7-9
8
7
10
14
6-16
19%
5-26
16-19 15-20
47 W
5-18
76-64
*Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
47% 27-57 36% 22-62 38%
14
L
90-95
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
45% 32-71 56% 34-61 30% 12-40 50% 16-32 14-18
1
L
66-88
*Auburn
(2)
1
12
35% 22-63 55% 33-60 13%
84-81 #
Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
45% 29-65 46% 30-66 33%
56-68
*Tennessee
(2)
19
3
34% 19-56 42% 23-55 30% 10-33 36% 10-28
8-12
26 W
5
L
86 W
16-23
7
9
10
12
11-19
11
8
6
13
3-24
42% 10-24 19-27 12-15
15
7
16
9
9-27
37% 13-35 17-28
8-14
17
8
13
10
12-13
8
10
10
10
65-60 #
*South Carolina
(3)
110
59
42% 23-55 29% 17-58 23%
6-26
20%
13-18 22-29
7
18
16
17
6
L
84-88
Alabama
(3)
4
28
50% 33-66 49% 31-63 32%
8-25
48% 15-31 10-16 11-20
11
17
9
14
23
L
61-88
Missouri
(2)
5
75
36% 20-55 55% 33-60 31%
8-26
47% 15-32 13-20
7-10
10
8
11
11
76-75
*Georgia
(6)
46
23
55% 32-58 46% 25-54 30%
6-20
38%
17-22
9
7
9
9
68-81
Florida
(2)
3
13
41% 24-58 46% 28-61 26%
7-27
39% 14-36 13-19 11-17
10
6
15
8
26 W
81-71
*Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
43% 28-65 38% 23-60 26%
7-27
25%
6-24
18-27 19-26
12
5
12
11
16 W
70-54
Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
43% 22-51 36% 19-53 36%
9-25
35%
8-23
17-20
8-13
5
9
9
19
35 W
4
L
4-20
8-21
6-18
39
L
87-93
*Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
40% 29-73 53% 29-55 32% 10-31 42% 11-26 19-22 24-34
19
7
12
9
6
L
73-111
*Alabama
(2)
4
28
38% 28-73 52% 37-71 20%
6-30
49% 22-45 11-15 15-18
16
12
14
11
81-69
LSU
(3)
128
62
57% 29-51 39% 25-64 33%
7-21
25%
8
11
11
8
6-25
48% 11-23 22-28 14-23
83 W
9-36
45
L
82-87 #
Texas
(2)
39
69
40% 27-68 48% 31-64 24%
39
L
92-93
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
44% 32-73 55% 31-56 38% 12-32 43%
9-21
91-62
^^LSU
(3)
128
62
52% 35-67 39% 22-56 44% 15-34 19%
73-85
^^Missouri
(0)
5
75
36% 24-66 49% 27-55 20%
83 W
23
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
6-30
33%
Non-Conference Games
16-22 10-14
11
11
12
13
16-21 22-27
10
8
2
10
5-26
6-10
13-26
10
8
13
15
8-24
19-27 23-28
9
7
8
14
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.1
29th
118.1
31st
118.5
23rd
118.6
30th
118.4
36th
Def-Efficiency
100.3
84th
97.3
36th
99.3
76th
99.1
53rd
101.1
75th
WAB
-0.3
71st
+3.3
15th
+2.1
12th
+0.9
45th
+0
57th
FG% 50% or better
9-1
3PT% >= 35%
9-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-11
More FTM than Opp.
10-5
FG% 45% or better
11-2
3PT% < 35%
12-11
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-1
More FTA than Opp.
9-4
FG% below 45%
10-10
Make >= 10 3PA
7-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
2-10
More OReb than Opp.
15-9
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-7
Make < 10 3PA
14-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-6
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-11
3PA / FGA >= 40%
13-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-10
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-4
Opp. FG% below 45%
15-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
4-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-2
@ Matteise
15
L, 101-63
*Gonzaga
39
W, 72-67
^^Arkansas
191
W, 104-67
Sam Houston St.
289
W, 104-41
Tarleton St.
Record
19-14 (10-10)
9
!W, 99-98
^^St. John's
Home
13-3
5
L, 77-62
^^Tennessee
Road
352
W, 91-60
New Orleans
30
L, 76-72
*UConn
228
W, 88-57
Ab. Christian
163
W, 94-69
Norfolk St.
W, 107-53
Arlington Baptist
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Utah
64.6
120.5
99.3
16.1
18.8
35.6
31.2
314th
17th
58th
103rd
81st
23rd
250th
74
W, 81-56
#9 Baylor Bears - Big 12
BPI: 19
BT: 27
EM: 27
KPI: 52
NET: 30
L, 74-55
*Iowa St.
54
W, 68-48
Cincinnati
78
!W, 72-66
*Arizona St.
13
L, 81-70
*Arizona
75
L, 74-71
TCU
68
W, 70-62
Kansas St.
SOR: 40
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.5
69.2
1-25
1-2
1-2
0-6
6-11
Win
82.8
63.0
26-50
1-0
1-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.8
77.5
51-100
5-1
1-0
3-2
Non-Conf.
113.3
Home
82.7
62.8
101-200
2-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
41.7
Road
70.6
75.2
201+
3-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.0 (39th)
10
POM: 29
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-7
Opp. O-Reb%
51.5
74.6
51.2
34.7
31.0
40.2
135th
eFG%
94th
FT%
168th
2PT%
126th
3PT%
240th
FTA/FGA %
146th
3PA/FGA %
51.2
69.9
49.8
35.4
33.5
40.8
196th
58th
128th
275th
196th
250th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 76-61
*Utah
21
!L, 93-89
*BYU
Win
74.8%
54.1%
45.4%
36.9%
30.7%
9.4
6.8
3.2
7.5
3.3
3.3
20
W, 81-70
Kansas
Loss
73.9%
47.3%
54.4%
32.5%
40.5%
7.3
9.4
0.5
-3.2
0.1
-2.3
8
L, 73-59
*Texas Tech
Home
75.5%
54.5%
46.0%
35.5%
32.0%
9.3
6.8
3.6
6.9
4.4
4.4
69
W, 91-76
UCF
Road
73.2%
48.2%
52.0%
34.7%
37.5%
7.7
9.0
0.6
-0.8
-0.4
-2.4
1
L, 76-65
*Houston
48
!W, 74-71
West Virginia
140
13
L, 74-67
Arizona
125
125
84
L, 76-74
*Colorado
54
L, 69-67
*Cincinnati
110
110
W, 71-61
Oklahoma St.
75
W, 61-58
*TCU
95
95
80
1
L, 65-61
Houston
68
W, 70-56
^^Kansas St.
65
L, 76-74
In Paint 44%
56
Fast Break 13%
54
89
2nd Chance 17%
79
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
77
In Paint 41%
80
8
Def-Efficiency
140
^^Texas Tech
Home
W vs. St. John's: Celestine + Wright
8-of-10 3PT off bench
J. Roach DNP K-St - KU, 3-1
28
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Norchad Omier
P
42
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
64
Off TO 17%
V.J. Edgecombe
Defensive Pct.l
91
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
74
Robert Wright
Jeremy Roach
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.6 14.0
29-47
3-8
15.8
7.8
19-38
6-24
8.2
1.2
12-34
2-10
9.2
1.8
11-28
6-19
W 15.7 11.8
96-155
12-32
14.7
5.8
67-128
29-86
12.2
2.2
61-129
19-47
11.2
2.0
40-83
21-66
N. Omier top 50 off & def reb %
L
16.1
79-123
7-32
15.5
5.3
41-91
20-56
10.1
1.9
43-108
11-37
9.2
1.8
23-72
18-47
Edgecombe 39% 3PT in B12 pla
---DNP L's vs. UConn or @ Tex Tech
H
14.7 11.8 76-121
8-23
15.6
5.3
61-105
19-65
11.1
2.5
51-112
14-40
10.2
1.8
29-67
19-59
R
17.0 10.1 99-157
11-41
14.3
5.9
47-114
30-77
11.5
1.6
53-125
16-44
10.3
2.0
34-88
20-54
#
9.6
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Celestine, V. Edgecombe, J. Nunn, N. Omier, R. Wright (1 G: 0-1)
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
15 Norchad Omier
6'7"
Sr
--
31.4
15.9
10.9
1.5
2.5
1.2
1.0
62.9%
175-278
29.7%
19-64
75.0%
117-156
7
V.J. Edgecombe
6'5"
Fr
2
32.6
15.0
5.6
3.3
2.0
2.1
0.6
49.3%
108-219
34.5%
49-142
77.9%
102-131
1
Robert Wright
6'1"
Fr
--
29.4
11.3
2.1
4.3
2.0
1.0
0.1
43.9%
104-237
35.7%
30-84
78.1%
75-96
3
Jeremy Roach
6'2"
Sr
6
29.2
10.3
1.9
2.7
1.4
0.8
0.1
40.6%
63-155
34.5%
39-113
69.4%
34-49
2
Jayden Nunn
6'4"
Sr
1
28.8
9.0
2.8
1.6
0.8
0.9
0.2
40.0%
38-95
41.1%
62-151
64.1%
25-39
13 Langston Love
6'5"
Jr
15
25.7
8.4
2.7
1.2
1.1
0.7
0.2
43.4%
23-53
32.4%
24-74
89.2%
33-37
17 Josh Ojianwuna
6'10"
Jr
10
24.7
7.4
6.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.8
78.3%
65-83
0.0%
0-1
64.5%
40-62
32 Jalen Celestine
6'7"
Sr
4
24.9
7.2
3.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.2
47.7%
21-44
35.5%
49-138
80.8%
21-26
5
6'9"
Fr
10
6.5
1.7
1.5
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
42.1%
8-19
25.0%
6-24
50.0%
4-8
Jason Asemota
2PT
3PT
FT
#9 Baylor Bears - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
12
29
37% 23-62 56% 40-71 14%
3-21
42% 13-31 14-20
8-13
13
15
11
11
39 W
72-67
^^Arkansas
(4)
83
22
47% 27-58 41% 24-58 29%
7-24
25%
14-17
9
10
8
11
191 W
104-67
Sam Houston St.
(2)
102
252
59% 41-70 44% 26-59 44% 14-32 36% 10-28
8-11
5-9
16
6
15
16
289 W
104-41
Tarleton St.
(4)
358
98
52% 31-60 39% 15-39 47% 15-32 36%
27-36
6-11
18
2
12
27
99-98 #
^^St. John's
(3)
71
2
42% 35-83 55% 34-62 52% 15-29 58% 14-24 14-23 16-28
62-77
^^Tennessee
(0)
19
3
42% 25-59 52% 24-46 27%
91-60
New Orleans
(4)
309
354
49% 35-72 39% 20-52 41% 15-37 41%
W
L
352 W
30
L
6-22
Opp
Turnovers
--
5
For
Off. Reb
DBG
9
Opp
FT
*Gonzaga
L
For
3PT
63-101
15
Opponent
Opp Eff.
5-20
5-14
11-17
13
5
15
18
6-8
17-22
14
8
12
12
9-22
6-7
11-18
14
11
6
16
44% 12-27
72-76
*UConn
(6)
16
92
49% 27-55 46% 21-46 35%
6-17
32%
8-25
12-19 26-33
11
8
8
7
228 W
88-57
Ab. Christian
(4)
319
81
59% 35-59 35% 19-55 44%
8-18
14%
2-14
10-16 17-23
9
9
9
10
163 W
94-69
Norfolk St.
(1)
178
237
55% 36-65 49% 23-47 35%
9-26
56% 10-18 13-19 13-21
11
5
8
20
W
107-53
Arlington Baptist
(15)
--
--
51% 41-81 28% 19-68 48% 13-27 22%
5-23
12-17 10-16
22
9
19
19
74 W
81-56
Utah
(3)
73
71
41% 28-69 32% 21-66 28%
9-32
23%
7-30
16-18
7-13
13
10
11
17
55-74
*Iowa St.
(3)
20
8
30% 19-64 49% 24-49 24%
7-29
48% 10-21 10-14 16-24
12
7
7
12
68-48
Cincinnati
(2)
90
21
50% 27-54 35% 17-49 36%
5-14
35%
8-23
9-11
6-12
8
10
8
13
10
L
54 W
78 W
72-66 #
*Arizona St.
(3)
67
76
43% 25-58 37% 22-60 38%
8-21
29%
7-24
14-21 15-22
10
8
13
11
13
L
70-81
*Arizona
(2)
10
30
48% 27-56 54% 29-54 30%
6-20
50%
7-14
10-13 16-25
7
9
12
10
75
L
9-25
71-74
TCU
(4)
173
27
40% 25-63 51% 27-53 36%
39%
7-18
12-18 13-17
5
10
5
16
68 W
70-62
Kansas St.
(2)
108
24
38% 21-56 44% 24-55 38% 11-29 38%
9-24
17-21
5-9
13
10
4
9
74 W
76-61
*Utah
(2)
73
71
44% 25-57 40% 22-55 38%
22%
5-23
17-20 12-20
12
13
11
10
89-93 #
*BYU
(2)
7
53
50% 30-60 55% 32-58 46% 13-28 38%
8-21
16-24 21-26
13
9
12
10
81-70
Kansas
(3)
43
10
43% 25-58 46% 26-57 30%
6-20
27%
6-22
25-28 12-19
10
5
15
14
59-73
*Texas Tech
(2)
6
32
34% 19-56 40% 27-68 28%
5-18
38% 11-29 16-20
8-10
10
14
12
7
91-76
UCF
(3)
51
113
53% 32-60 44% 26-59 32%
8-25
40%
19-22 16-18
10
11
9
12
65-76
*Houston
(1)
9
1
58% 22-38 51% 27-53 60%
9-15
42% 10-24 12-16 12-16
4
8
15
7
21
L
20 W
8
L
69 W
1
L
48 W
9-24
8-20
74-71 #
West Virginia
(4)
103
7
39% 21-54 40% 26-65 23%
5-22
26%
8-31
27-32 11-17
7
9
10
10
13
L
67-74
Arizona
(1)
10
30
40% 22-55 48% 28-58 23%
5-22
22%
4-18
18-25 14-18
8
8
11
13
84
L
74-76
*Colorado
(4)
129
51
36% 25-69 49% 23-47 33%
9-27
41%
9-22
15-17 21-25
12
3
6
11
54
L
67-69
*Cincinnati
(2)
90
21
47% 26-55 46% 25-54 44% 11-25 44% 10-23
4-5
9-14
7
8
12
6
71-61
Oklahoma St.
(3)
140
63
37% 22-59 39% 19-49 27%
8-30
14%
2-14
19-34 21-29
11
6
15
17
61-58
*TCU
(2)
173
27
44% 22-50 35% 20-58 30%
6-20
29%
6-21
11-14 12-18
9
17
12
11
61-65
Houston
(3)
9
1
34% 20-59 44% 22-50 31%
9-29
42%
8-19
12-16 13-18
12
9
9
8
70-56
^^Kansas St.
(3)
108
24
46% 28-61 37% 21-57 33%
7-21
12%
3-25
7-10
11-13
10
9
4
6
74-76
^^Texas Tech
(0)
6
32
45% 27-60 39% 25-64 25%
4-16
44% 15-34 16-19 11-16
11
16
4
7
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
91 W
75 W
1
L
68 W
8
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Off-Efficency
121.2
21st
120.4
16th
125.1
2nd
118.2
33rd
119.3
31st
Def-Efficiency
94.2
20th
103.5
111th
103.4
132nd
97.7
37th
98.8
52nd
WAB
+1.2
34th
+0.7
49th
+0.8
29th
+1
43rd
+0.5
47th
FG% 50% or better
7-2
3PT% >= 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-12
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
10-6
3PT% < 35%
9-8
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-6
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
9-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
12-2
More FTA than Opp.
9-5
6-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
3-7
More OReb than Opp.
12-6
Make < 10 3PA
13-12
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-5
3-11
3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-9
More Turnovers than Opp.
4-7
16-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
5-1
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
10-4
Liberty
Arizona
Akron
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Oregon
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
137
W, 91-76
UC Riverside
135
W, 79-48
Montana
279
!W, 80-70
Portland
101
W, 82-61
Troy
Record
24-9 (12-8)
93
W, 78-75
*Oregon St.
Home
12-4
16
W, 80-70
^^Texas A&M
Road
50
W, 78-68
^^San Diego St.
6
W, 83-81
^^Alabama
67
W, 68-60
*USC
28
L, 73-71
UCLA
276
W, 79-61
Stephen F. Austin
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^Stanford
67.6
115.1
97.3
16.2
17.6
30.6
29.2
151st
54th
37th
108th
139th
159th
149th
52.2
76.3
53.0
34.0
33.4
38.6
105th
eFG%
49th
FT%
107th
2PT%
164th
3PT%
169th
FTA/FGA %
176th
3PA/FGA %
80
W, 76-61
311
W, 89-49
Weber St.
25
L, 109-77
Illinois
12
W, 83-79
Maryland
45
W, 73-71
*Ohio St.
71
W, 82-81
*Penn St.
18
L, 65-58
Purdue
#5 Oregon Ducks - Big 10
BPI: 36
BT: 39
EM: 37
KPI: 11
NET: 29
POM: 31
SOR: 21
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.2
70.9
1-25
1-2
2-1
1-2
12-5
Win
79.3
67.6
26-50
0-1
1-0
1-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
68.0
79.9
51-100
4-1
2-0
4-1
Non-Conf.
117.7
Home
78.3
68.5
101-200
4-0
0-0
1-0
Conf.
50.1
Road
74.2
73.2
201+
3-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.3 (16th)
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-2
Opp. O-Reb%
49.1
72.1
50.0
31.7
27.7
37.4
93rd
178th
139th
61st
49th
123rd
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
109
W, 82-71
Washington
88
L, 77-69
*Minnesota
Win
76.5%
53.8%
48.8%
35.5%
28.8%
8.0
6.7
-0.7
3.2
2.0
5.0
28
L, 78-52
*UCLA
Loss
75.8%
51.0%
53.0%
29.9%
40.3%
6.8
8.3
-1.8
-5.1
-1.4
-2.6
55
L, 77-71
Nebraska
Home
79.3%
53.8%
50.8%
34.6%
29.6%
7.9
6.8
0.1
3.6
1.6
4.6
22
L, 80-76
*Michigan
Road
73.6%
52.3%
49.2%
33.4%
33.8%
7.5
7.5
-1.9
-1.6
0.5
1.4
7
L, 86-74
*Michigan St.
57
W, 81-75
Northwestern
140
77
W, 75-57
Rutgers
125
125
64
W, 80-78
*Iowa
11
!W, 77-73
*Wisconsin
110
110
USC
51
W, 73-64
Indiana
95
95
80
2nd Chance 13% 24
83
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
!W, 80-73
*Washington
51
W, 72-59
^^Indiana
65
^^Michigan St.
Home
40
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Nate Bittle
84
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
36
In Paint 44%
109
L, 74-64
81
Fast Break 16%
80
7
33
In Paint 41%
62
Off TO 17%
Jackson Shelstad
Defensive Pct.l
W, 82-61
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
67
Off-Efficiency
TJ Bamba
Keeshawn Barthelemy
L vs. UCLA - Andrews 3 at buzzer
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
Bamba 7 of 24 3PM in 2G, 37% LY
Angel 27% in B10, 48% LY in P12
L5 18.8
9.0
27-47
6-16
13.2
2.2
18-32
7-29
11.6
3.6
18-34
3-12
11.2
2.0
11-17
10-25
W 14.6
8.2 108-183
21-69
13.5
2.9
72-140
43-118
10.7
3.2
63-148
21-76
11.0
2.6
44-92
48-99
Shelstad 44% 3PT in B10 play
L
12.9
5.3
30-52
13-33
12.7
2.9
23-50
17-46
9.6
4.3
27-53
3-18
7.7
1.8
13-40
12-45
Have not lost in R64 under Altman
H
13.4
7.2
61-109
16-49
13.3
3.3
45-95
32-76
9.5
3.2
41-84
11-43
9.0
2.4
28-62
24-65
R
14.8
7.6
77-126
18-53
13.2
2.6
50-95
28-88
11.2
3.8
49-117
13-51
11.1
2.3
29-70
36-79
Starting Lineup Last G: B. Angel, T. Bamba, K. Barthelemy, N. Bittle, J. Shelstad (12 G: 8-4)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
32 Nate Bittle
7'0"
Sr
--
27.7
14.1
7.4
1.9
1.5
0.8
2.2
58.7%
138-235
33.3%
34-102
82.2%
3
Jackson Shelstad
6'0"
So
--
33.0
13.2
2.9
2.7
1.5
1.0
0.0
50.0%
95-190
36.6%
60-164
84.8%
67-79
5
TJ Bamba
6'5"
Sr
--
28.0
10.4
3.5
2.9
1.5
1.7
0.2
44.8%
90-201
25.5%
24-94
74.6%
91-122
9
Keeshawn Barthelemy
6'1"
Sr
--
27.7
10.1
2.4
2.6
0.9
1.1
0.2
43.2%
57-132
41.7%
60-144
88.4%
38-43
21 Brandon Angel
6'8"
Sr
--
23.3
8.5
3.9
1.1
1.4
0.5
0.3
63.1%
77-122
35.9%
23-64
82.6%
57-69
2
Jadrian Tracey
6'5"
Sr
--
21.5
7.0
2.8
1.7
1.2
0.9
0.2
64.3%
54-84
34.4%
31-90
69.0%
29-42
10 Kwame Evans Jr.
6'9"
So
--
16.1
6.1
4.4
0.7
1.1
0.4
0.6
58.5%
48-82
28.0%
14-50
73.6%
64-87
7
Supreme Cook
6'9"
Sr
3
11.1
4.7
2.6
0.2
0.7
0.3
0.1
53.6%
52-97
--
--
58.7%
37-63
0
Ra'Heim Moss
6'4"
Sr
5
10.6
1.6
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.0
42.9%
12-28
12.5%
2-16
66.7%
14-21
88-107
#5 Oregon Ducks - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
For
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
91-76
UC Riverside
--
107
235
50% 33-66 45% 29-65 32%
6-19
35% 12-34 19-25
6-12
13
7
8
8
135 W
79-48
Montana
(3)
82
236
45% 27-60 34% 17-50 36%
9-25
16%
3-19
16-23
11-17
11
6
7
12
279 W
80-70 #
Portland
(3)
175
313
41% 28-69 38% 24-64 23%
7-31
36% 11-31
17-23
11-16
9
7
10
15
101 W
82-61
Troy
(4)
163
73
52% 29-56 37% 25-67 32%
7-22
12%
3-25
17-19
8-10
9
12
16
17
93 W
78-75
*Oregon St.
(3)
45
210
49% 30-61 40% 25-62 41%
9-22
40%
8-20
9-12
16 W
80-70
^^Texas A&M
(4)
49
11
46% 25-55 32% 22-68 28%
7-25
31% 11-35
50 W
78-68
^^San Diego St.
(0)
122
14
45% 25-56 51% 29-57 46% 10-22 32%
6
W
83-81
^^Alabama
(2)
4
28
44% 29-66 42% 27-64 29%
5-17
67 W
68-60
*USC
(3)
35
104
38% 21-55 35% 19-55 35%
8-23
L
Opp
FT
137 W
28
For
3PT
17-23
5
14
6
9
23-31 15-20
6
17
8
12
18-26
9
4
14
12
32% 12-38 20-25 15-20
9
12
8
15
15%
11
9
14
13
6-19
2-13
4-8
18-24 20-26
71-73
UCLA
(3)
27
20
47% 26-55 45% 28-62 43%
9-21
52% 12-23 10-14
5-7
9
6
12
8
276 W
79-61
Stephen F. Austin
(6)
345
146
51% 25-49 40% 25-63 37%
7-19
15%
3-20
22-32
8-11
10
18
18
20
80 W
76-61
^^Stanford
(5)
75
88
44% 24-55 37% 23-62 27%
6-22
27%
8-30
22-29
7-13
9
8
8
9
89-49
Weber St.
(7)
273
285
55% 33-60 33% 17-51 41%
9-22
14%
3-22
14-17 12-21
77-109
Illinois
(3)
15
44
44% 30-69 58% 42-73 33%
5-15
55% 16-29 12-17
12 W
83-79
Maryland
(2)
28
6
52% 29-56 48% 28-59 43% 12-28 43%
45 W
73-71
*Ohio St.
(3)
38
61
42% 24-57 42% 24-57 36%
9-25
39%
82-81
*Penn St.
(2)
63
79
54% 31-57 46% 31-68 36%
8-22
58-65
Purdue
(5)
8
68
36% 18-50 34% 19-56 24%
7-29
82-71
Washington
(2)
116
132
51% 31-61 46% 26-56 33%
311 W
25
L
71 W
18
L
109 W
8
8
11
17
9-11
7
9
10
10
9-21
13-15 14-19
6
9
8
10
7-18
16-22 16-19
8
9
12
14
37%
7-19
12-19 12-14
6
12
10
9
17%
2-12
15-17 25-30
2
9
16
11
6-18
19%
4-21
14-18 15-17
9
4
9
9
6-16
88
L
69-77
*Minnesota
(3)
106
86
46% 22-48 53% 30-57 35%
8-23
38%
17-21 11-18
1
8
11
8
28
L
52-78
*UCLA
(4)
27
20
41% 21-51 56% 30-54 17%
4-23
48% 11-23
6-10
7
6
13
7
55
L
71-77
Nebraska
(2)
85
56
40% 24-60 51% 26-51 25%
5-20
17%
4-23
18-22 21-29
9
6
9
11
22
L
76-80
*Michigan
(2)
53
15
43% 29-67 43% 27-63 33%
9-27
33%
9-27
9-11
17-21
10
11
12
15
7
L
74-86
*Michigan St.
(2)
37
5
39% 24-61 50% 27-54 37% 10-27 44%
8-18
16-23 24-27
8
10
7
11
57 W
81-75
Northwestern
(2)
66
41
47% 24-51 52% 31-60 38%
42%
8-19
25-28
5-10
7
7
8
11
77 W
75-57
Rutgers
(4)
48
119
47% 28-60 46% 24-52 59% 13-22 21%
4-19
6-8
5-7
9
6
7
11
64 W
80-78
*Iowa
(2)
18
178
48% 30-63 49% 28-57 41%
9-22
41%
9-22
11-13 13-17
11
7
7
7
11 W
77-73 #
*Wisconsin
(2)
14
26
42% 30-72 46% 30-65 35%
8-23
25%
7-28
9-12
6-6
7
5
8
17
67 W
82-61
USC
(6)
35
104
48% 32-67 34% 21-61 37% 10-27 23%
5-22
8-10
14-18
13
15
12
16
51 W
73-64
Indiana
(2)
74
39
39% 24-61 40% 26-65 24%
6-25
36%
9-25
19-21
3-7
12
13
8
9
109 W
80-73 #
*Washington
(4)
116
132
49% 27-55 41% 25-61 29%
6-21
26%
5-19
20-30 18-24
11
7
13
7
72-59
^^Indiana
(3)
74
39
49% 26-53 36% 25-69 40%
8-20
25%
4-16
12-15
5-10
4
12
12
11
64-74
^^Michigan St.
(0)
37
5
47% 25-53 46% 25-54 21%
4-19
47%
7-15
10-14 17-29
5
9
15
11
51 W
7
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-21
Non-Conference Games
7-12
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
114.4
63rd
116.1
40th
116.9
30th
115.3
59th
116.9
48th
Def-Efficiency
96.5
38th
97.4
37th
92.3
14th
100.0
65th
97.0
32nd
WAB
+0.2
58th
+5.1
7th
+3.1
3rd
+2
30th
+1.9
23rd
FG% 50% or better
7-0
3PT% >= 35%
13-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
16-3
16-3
3PT% < 35%
8-6
Make >= 10 3PA
11-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
4-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-3
More FTA than Opp.
18-3
4-3
More OReb than Opp.
2-5
Make < 10 3PA
20-8
11-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
16-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
8-7
3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-5
5-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
9-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-2
@ Matteise
225
W, 83-63
^^Valparaiso
173
W, 66-64
*Seattle
W, 81-45
CarolinaU
119
!L, 77-74
^^Florida Atlantic
Record
28-6 (13-5)
124
W, 68-47
*Charleston
Home
12-3
301
W, 89-69
^^La. Lafayette
Road
68
W, 67-65
^^Kansas St.
59
W, 62-58
^^McNeese St.
Non-Conf.
W, 93-36
Central Penn
Conf.
364
W, 89-52
Miss Valley St.
335
W, 83-74
NC A&T
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
St. Andrews
65.3
112.8
98.3
15.3
16.9
18.9
28.0
281st
68th
43rd
48th
188th
361st
82nd
58.4
65.4
57.7
39.5
30.9
47.7
2nd
eFG%
347th
FT%
11th
2PT%
5th
3PT%
245th
FTA/FGA %
22nd
3PA/FGA %
45.9
73.6
48.0
28.0
26.3
34.4
9th
266th
61st
3rd
30th
41st
W, 124-50
#12 Liberty Flames - CUSA
BPI: 85
BT: 56
EM: 68
KPI: 49
NET: 60
W, 79-56
UT Arlington
166
L, 71-70
Western Ky.
113
W, 73-63
Middle Tenn.
191
W, 76-68
*Sam Houston St.
130
L, 79-74
*La. Tech
161
L, 72-70
UTEP
SOR: 62
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.6
62.9
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
16-3
Win
77.6
60.1
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.5
76.0
51-100
0-0
2-0
0-0
184.2
Home
77.9
58.5
101-200
5-3
3-1
8-2
148.7
Road
75.5
66.3
201+
4-0
2-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -0.3 (56th)
237
POM: 62
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-5
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
149
W, 68-60
New Mexico St.
272
W, 82-59
*FIU
Win
66.5%
60.1%
45.0%
40.6%
26.8%
10.9
5.5
-2.6
0.1
2.0
0.4
145
W, 76-68
*Kennesaw St.
Loss
64.4%
55.3%
53.6%
32.0%
35.3%
9.2
7.0
-1.0
-5.3
2.0
0.0
131
L, 72-61
*J'Ville St.
Home
68.6%
59.2%
43.8%
37.5%
27.5%
10.8
5.9
-1.3
1.5
3.6
3.1
130
W, 77-53
La. Tech
Road
64.1%
59.3%
48.7%
40.3%
28.9%
10.4
5.7
-3.2
-2.7
0.8
-1.8
191
W, 64-61
Sam Houston St.
149
W, 64-54
*New Mexico St.
140
161
W, 76-69
*UTEP
125
125
272
W, 58-45
FIU
131
W, 59-55
J'Ville St.
110
110
Kennesaw St.
113
W, 86-81
*Middle Tenn.
Fast Break 8% 7
95
95
80
166
W, 90-61
*Western Ky.
80
161
W, 81-60
^^UTEP
65
145
W, 81-79
^^Kennesaw St.
131
W, 79-67
^^J'Ville St.
44
In Paint 42%
2nd Chance 8% 1
W vs. McNeese: McNeese 1-12 3PT
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 48% 6
90
Fast Break 10%
Home
2nd Chance 16% 22
Game #
Loss
Road
Taelon Peter
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
65
Game #
65
Off TO 19%
Defensive Pct.l
L, 85-80
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
145
Off-Efficiency
89
Off TO 15%
Kaden Metheny
Zach Cleveland
Isaiah Ihnen
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
T. Peter CUSA 6th Man of Year
L5 19.8
5.6
18-22
16-25
15.0
3.0
6-13
19-44
14.0
4.8
30-45
0-2
6.2
4.0
12-17
0-4
I. Ihnen last G: vs. NC A&T
W 13.0
3.8
75-101
21-42
13.7
3.0
46-86
15-47
10.8
6.0
99-195
1-7
8.3
5.4
89-143
1-3
K. Metheny 32% 3PT in CUSA, LY
39.4%
L
18.0
5.7
14-16
54-121 12.2
2.3
6-14
84-207 12.0
7.5
29-56
2-9
11.0
6.3
24-38
4-17
H
12.4
4.1
40-51
26-67
14.9
3.2
26-43
45-111
10.3
7.2
44-98
1-7
8.4
5.8
48-85
2-10
T. Peter top 20 eFG% in country
R
15.0
4.2
49-66
49-96
12.4
2.6
26-57
54-143
11.4
5.7
84-153
2-9
9.1
5.4
65-96
3-10
Starting Lineup Last G: O. Aquino, Z. Cleveland, J. Maughmer, K. Metheny, C. Porter (29 G: 23-6)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
0.1
76.1%
2
Taelon Peter
6'4"
Sr
--
22.7
13.9
4.2
1.1
0.6
0.9
3
2PT
3PT
FT
89-117
46.0%
75-163
77.3%
68-88
Kaden Metheny
5'11"
Jr
1
32.0
13.5
2.9
2.0
1.4
0.8
--
52.0%
52-100
39.0%
99-254
78.2%
43-55
25 Zach Cleveland
6'7"
Jr
3
32.0
11.0
6.3
5.1
2.5
0.7
1.0
51.0%
128-251
18.8%
3-16
53.5%
76-142
7
Isaiah Ihnen
6'9"
Jr
23
18.0
10.4
4.3
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.3
69.8%
30-43
38.9%
14-36
66.7%
12-18
0
Colin Porter
5'10"
Jr
--
31.8
9.3
2.2
4.3
1.5
1.6
0.0
57.7%
56-97
44.3%
54-122
74.1%
43-58
8
Owen Aquino
6'8"
Jr
--
24.7
8.8
5.6
2.1
1.5
0.7
1.1
62.4%
113-181
25.0%
5-20
64.4%
58-90
32 Jayvon Maughmer
6'6"
Sr
--
28.9
8.8
4.4
1.5
1.1
1.0
0.4
63.7%
72-113
32.8%
44-134
55.0%
22-40
4
6'3"
Fr
8
6.7
4.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
--
0.0
47.8%
11-23
42.9%
21-49
91.7%
22-24
6'8"
Jr
3
8.0
3.2
1.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.0
60.0%
6-10
41.2%
28-68
37.5%
3-8
Brett Decker Jr.
11 Zander Yates
#12 Liberty Flames - CUSA
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
201
250
54% 32-59 35% 22-63 42% 10-24 13%
2-15
9-13
17-21
4
8
5
8
173 W
66-64
Seattle
(4)
235
80
48% 24-50 52% 24-46 36%
36%
5-14
10-19
11-24
7
6
14
12
81-45
CarolinaU
(2)
--
--
41% 28-69 33% 15-46 29% 13-45 43%
9-21
12-17
6-6
9
4
3
21
74-77 #
Florida Atlantic
(3)
77
186
43% 26-61 51% 30-59 29% 10-34 38%
8-21
12-21
9-12
10
2
12
13
124 W
68-47
Charleston
(0)
198
151
52% 26-50 31% 16-52 44%
8-18
31%
4-13
8-15
11-14
4
7
13
15
301 W
89-69
Louisiana
(4)
327
247
67% 33-49 45% 25-56 50%
9-18
33%
8-24
14-23
11-13
9
3
14
6
68 W
67-65
Kansas St.
(1)
108
24
45% 24-53 45% 27-60 45%
9-20
29%
7-24
10-14
4-5
9
10
12
12
59 W
62-58
McNeese St.
(0)
65
74
42% 20-48 45% 21-47 36% 11-31
8%
1-12
11-14
15-18
5
8
11
13
W
93-36
(3)
--
--
54% 38-71 28% 16-57 31% 11-35 19%
4-21
6-8
0-2
13
6
7
14
364 W
89-52
(7)
364
364
56% 29-52 42% 20-48 49% 16-33 18%
2-11
15-20 10-15
5
5
10
17
335 W
83-74
(6)
335
303
50% 33-66 40% 27-67 35%
9-22
9-15
11-12
8
8
6
9
W
124-50
Central Penn
Mississippi Valley
St.
North Carolina
A&T
St. Andrews
(2)
--
--
62% 48-77 28% 19-67 46% 18-39 29% 10-34 10-12
2-4
13
5
13
19
79-56
UT Arlington
(3)
171
301
53% 27-51 31% 22-70 47% 15-32 10%
2-20
10-14 10-12
4
13
12
8
70-71
Western Kentucky
(11)
232
106
44% 27-62 45% 28-62 30%
29%
5-17
8-16
10-19
7
8
8
14
113 W
73-63
Middle Tennessee
(1)
130
121
44% 28-64 38% 25-66 39% 10-26 26%
6-23
7-10
7-11
8
15
10
9
191 W
76-68
Sam Houston St.
(4)
102
252
46% 26-57 42% 24-57 41% 11-27 40%
8-20
13-22 12-15
6
6
9
12
166
L
8-22
8-23
8-27
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
237 W
For
Off. Reb
Valparaiso
L
Opp
FT
83-63
W
For
3PT
225 W
119
Opponent
Opp Eff.
41%
130
L
74-79
Louisiana Tech
(1)
146
142
43% 26-60 46% 25-55 28%
33%
7-21
15-21 22-25
2
7
4
13
161
L
70-72
UTEP
(4)
189
124
46% 24-52 43% 26-60 39% 11-28 40%
8-20
11-17 12-15
3
6
12
8
149 W
68-60
New Mexico St.
(1)
208
52
46% 24-52 36% 22-61 21%
4-22
17-26 12-16
5
9
8
11
272 W
82-59
FIU
(6)
338
123
60% 31-52 39% 21-54 46% 11-24 13%
1-8
9-14
16-21
1
12
9
16
145 W
76-68
Kennesaw St.
(4)
155
109
50% 28-56 39% 27-69 42% 11-26 19%
6-32
9-12
8-13
2
18
8
12
131
L
7-25
3-14
18%
61-72
Jacksonville St.
(1)
135
145
41% 24-59 49% 28-57 29% 10-34 27%
3-11
3-7
13-14
5
6
8
7
130 W
77-53
Louisiana Tech
(4)
146
142
50% 29-58 39% 20-51 52% 12-23 23%
6-26
7-12
7-9
3
4
4
14
191 W
64-61
Sam Houston St.
(1)
102
252
44% 21-48 40% 21-53 32%
9-28
26%
5-19
13-16 14-19
4
8
13
14
149 W
64-54
New Mexico St.
(4)
208
52
44% 20-45 35% 20-58 27%
6-22
20%
4-20
18-30 10-14
4
9
8
10
161 W
76-69
UTEP
(1)
189
124
47% 27-57 43% 26-61 48% 14-29 35%
9-26
8-15
8-9
6
4
11
5
272 W
58-45
FIU
(6)
338
123
43% 20-47 37% 20-54 39% 12-31
8%
1-12
6-9
4-5
4
7
16
16
131 W
59-55
Jacksonville St.
(4)
135
145
43% 21-49 37% 21-57 29%
7-24
26%
6-23
10-17
7-9
6
10
9
10
80-85
Kennesaw St.
(2)
155
109
46% 22-48 51% 32-63 38%
9-24
38% 11-29 27-36 10-13
2
6
9
10
113 W
86-81
Middle Tennessee
(3)
130
121
55% 30-55 44% 28-64 33%
8-24
25%
7-28
18-20 18-26
3
13
11
12
166 W
90-61
Western Kentucky
(1)
232
106
53% 32-61 34% 23-68 47% 16-34 29%
8-28
10-16
7-14
6
11
7
6
161 W
81-60
UTEP
(3)
189
124
58% 32-55 36% 21-58 48% 12-25 32%
7-22
5-7
11-13
6
10
10
11
145 W
81-79
Kennesaw St.
(1)
155
109
51% 28-55 48% 26-54 44% 14-32 40%
8-20
11-20 19-23
6
7
7
8
131 W
79-67
Jacksonville St.
(0)
135
145
60% 30-50 44% 24-55 60% 12-20 33%
6-18
7-9
1
9
8
5
145
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
13-25
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
105.7
198th
116.3
36th
111.0
86th
110.4
109th
114.6
67th
Def-Efficiency
95.6
32nd
99.7
59th
97.0
47th
96.6
28th
98.8
53rd
WAB
-2
127th
+1.7
32nd
+0.8
31st
-1.6
83rd
+0.5
45th
FG% 50% or better
16-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
21-2
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-4
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
3-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
25-1
20-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-3
More FTM than Opp.
13-2
8-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
18-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
23-3
More FTA than Opp.
17-3
1-1
More OReb than Opp.
10-3
6-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
27-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
19-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
22-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-2
2-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
12-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-0
@ Matteise
358
W, 93-64
Canisius
281
W, 102-44
Old Dominion
11
L, 103-88
*Wisconsin
3
L, 69-55
Duke
Record
22-12 (14-6)
151
W, 104-71
^^Davidson
Home
13-3
39
L, 82-77
^^Oklahoma
Road
#4 Arizona Wildcats - Big 12
BPI: 9
BT: 9
EM: 14
KPI: 25
NET: 12
POM: 14
SOR: 20
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
81.7
72.4
1-25
2-3
2-1
1-4
9-9
Win
88.4
69.5
26-50
1-0
0-3
2-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
69.5
77.8
51-100
5-0
0-0
3-1
48
!L, 83-76
^^West Virginia
300
W, 102-66
Southern Utah
28
L, 57-54
^^UCLA
112
W, 96-64
Samford
227
W, 94-41
Central Mich.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
TCU
69.8
124.0
96.5
16.2
16.6
35.9
28.5
52nd
10th
30th
108th
212th
19th
108th
52.9
78.4
55.1
32.4
36.6
34.6
83rd
eFG%
18th
FT%
44th
2PT%
247th
3PT%
71st
FTA/FGA %
291st
3PA/FGA %
48.6
71.4
47.2
33.6
29.2
41.9
74th
137th
41st
168th
80th
284th
75
W, 90-81
Non-Conf.
115.7
Home
87.3
69.6
101-200
1-0
1-0
0-0
Conf.
38.9
Road
76.8
74.9
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.4 (15th)
54
W, 72-67
*Cincinnati
48
W, 75-56
*West Virginia
69
W, 88-80
UCF
31
W, 81-70
Baylor
8
L, 70-54
*Texas Tech
91
W, 92-78
*Oklahoma St.
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 1-5
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 78-63
Colorado
10
!W, 86-75
Iowa St.
Win
77.8%
57.4%
44.9%
36.6%
32.7%
7.9
8.7
1.7
9.3
1.4
6.6
78
W, 81-72
*Arizona St.
Loss
79.8%
50.7%
51.4%
24.3%
35.4%
4.9
8.6
1.5
4.0
-3.1
1.0
21
W, 85-74
*BYU
Home
76.5%
58.5%
45.4%
34.4%
34.0%
7.8
8.4
2.2
9.3
1.4
7.8
8
W, 82-73
Texas Tech
Road
80.4%
52.3%
49.0%
30.3%
33.3%
5.9
8.8
1.1
5.8
-1.6
1.9
68
L, 73-70
*Kansas St.
1
L, 62-58
Houston
140
31
W, 74-67
*Baylor
125
125
21
L, 96-95
BYU
74
W, 83-66
Utah
110
110
L, 84-67
78
W, 113-100 Arizona St.
*Iowa St.
Def-Efficiency
140
95
95
80
In Paint 48%
90
Fast Break 17%
92
79
2nd Chance 16%
44
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
90
In Paint 39%
20
L, 83-76
*Kansas
80
20
W, 88-77
^^Kansas
65
8
W, 86-80
^^Texas Tech
1
L, 72-64
^^Houston
Home
First 9G - OE Rk: 61, DE: 35
3PT FG% Rk: Ari: 289, Opp: 217
(34.2%)
Krivas OUT (foot) last G: So. Utah
Townsend DNP L @ K-State
H. Veesaar since Feb. 1: 12.2 PPG,
finished w/ 70% 2PT FG% in B12,
2nd best
66
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Caleb Love
59
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
50
Off TO 18%
Jaden Bradley
Defensive Pct.l
10
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
84
KJ Lewis
Henri Veesaar
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 18.8
3.8
17-36
14-32
12.8
3.2
18-35
3-6
13.8
4.2
21-43
2-10
12.8
5.6
22-31
4-10
W 18.1
4.2
66-140
66-171 10.6
3.2
65-136
15-41
11.5
4.6
78-140
6-35
11.6
5.6
83-117
15-35
L
13.8
4.2
37-84
20-95
13.9
3.7
54-98
5-28
9.9
4.3
33-74
5-28
5.6
3.9
22-38
1-11
H
17.9
3.9
46-96
46-131
9.8
3.4
51-101
9-35
12.3
4.1
61-101
4-29
10.9
5.3
52-74
12-27
R
15.4
4.4
57-128
40-135 13.5
3.3
68-133
11-34
9.7
4.9
50-113
7-34
8.2
4.8
53-81
4-19
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Awaka, J. Bradley, A. Dell'Orso, C. Love, T. Townsend (18 G: 15-3)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
Sr
--
34.1
16.6
4.2
3.5
2.0
1.2
0.3
46.0%
103-224
32.3%
86-266
88.5%
100-113
1
Caleb Love
6'4"
0
Jaden Bradley
6'3"
Jr
--
34.1
11.8
3.4
3.7
1.9
1.8
0.1
50.9%
119-234
29.0%
20-69
82.9%
102-123
5
KJ Lewis
6'4"
So
--
25.9
10.9
4.5
2.9
2.1
1.4
0.8
51.9%
111-214
17.5%
11-63
81.3%
117-144
13 Henri Veesaar
7'0"
Jr
--
20.7
9.5
5.0
1.3
1.1
0.7
1.1
67.7%
105-155
34.8%
16-46
70.3%
64-91
4
6'6"
Sr
2
21.4
8.3
3.9
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.2
53.7%
87-162
31.8%
14-44
81.7%
49-60
30 Tobe Awaka
6'8"
So
--
19.6
8.2
7.8
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.5
64.2%
106-165
40.0%
2-5
68.2%
60-88
14 Motiejus Krivas
7'2"
So
26
15.7
7.9
4.5
1.1
0.8
0.4
0.8
55.3%
21-38
--
--
70.0%
21-30
3
Anthony Dell'Orso
6'6"
Jr
--
18.1
7.1
1.4
1.3
0.7
0.6
0.1
51.4%
38-74
40.4%
44-109
88.9%
32-36
9
Carter Bryant
6'8"
Fr
--
18.9
6.4
4.1
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0
63.9%
39-61
36.6%
34-93
67.3%
37-55
Trey Townsend
#4 Arizona Wildcats - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
DBG
Off
Def
93-64
Canisius
--
303
360
49% 33-68 43% 22-51 29%
8-28
39% 10-26 19-27 10-13
15
4
9
19
281 W
102-44
Old Dominion
(4)
300
262
51% 38-75 32% 18-57 36%
8-22
13%
6-17
23
6
8
18
18-29
Opp
Turnovers
358 W
2-16
For
Off. Reb
For Opp For Opp
11
L
88-103
*Wisconsin
(5)
14
26
38% 28-74 48% 25-52 17%
4-23
44% 12-27 28-40 41-47
17
1
13
9
3
L
55-69
Duke
(6)
2
4
40% 21-53 43% 26-61 26%
6-23
36%
9-25
7-11
8-13
6
10
15
13
15-20
151 W
104-71
^^Davidson
(4)
114
196
57% 39-69 38% 27-71 50% 11-22 32% 11-34
6-8
12
8
14
11
39
L
77-82
^^Oklahoma
(0)
30
77
43% 28-65 43% 25-58 26%
5-19
41% 12-29 16-19 20-21
14
13
9
15
48
L
76-83 #
^^West Virginia
(0)
103
7
45% 29-64 40% 27-68 33%
7-21
35% 12-34
11-13
17-22
9
11
14
7
102-66
Southern Utah
(7)
340
242
50% 34-68 38% 24-64 38%
6-16
36% 10-28 28-36
8-15
12
9
9
17
54-57
^^UCLA
(6)
27
20
45% 19-42 45% 23-51 13%
2-16
19%
14-19
7-16
8
5
22
14
112 W
96-64
Samford
(3)
101
209
58% 32-55 37% 22-60 32%
7-22
34% 12-35 25-31
8-15
10
7
14
12
227 W
94-41
Central Mich.
(2)
210
241
55% 36-66 26% 14-54 35% 10-29 19%
3-16
12-13 10-18
12
9
10
15
75 W
90-81
TCU
(8)
173
27
57% 33-58 46% 29-63 32%
7-22
39%
9-23
17-21 14-18
7
11
7
8
54 W
72-67
*Cincinnati
(4)
90
21
43% 23-53 39% 25-64 36%
5-14
20%
5-25
21-27 12-23
6
14
11
11
48 W
75-56
*West Virginia
(2)
103
7
51% 31-61 36% 21-58 35%
7-20
28%
8-29
6-10
6-8
9
6
8
10
69 W
88-80
UCF
(3)
51
113
47% 28-60 39% 30-78 39%
9-23
23%
8-35
23-29 12-17
10
19
13
9
31 W
81-70
Baylor
(2)
17
58
54% 29-54 48% 27-56 50%
7-14
30%
6-20
16-25 10-13
9
7
10
12
3-18
26%
6-23
300 W
28
L
8
L
4-21
54-70
*Texas Tech
(3)
6
32
31% 18-58 36% 24-66 17%
15-19 16-18
8
13
7
8
91 W
92-78
*Oklahoma St.
(2)
140
63
56% 32-57 46% 25-54 40% 10-25 44% 10-23 18-23 18-24
8
7
8
12
84 W
78-63
Colorado
(3)
129
51
47% 30-64 43% 24-56 33%
47%
9-19
9-11
6-8
11
7
10
14
10 W
86-75 #
Iowa St.
(1)
20
8
44% 29-66 43% 28-65 35% 10-29 29%
7-24
18-22 12-18
10
11
15
17
78 W
81-72
*Arizona St.
(4)
67
76
37% 26-70 37% 25-68 33%
8-24
35% 12-34 21-22 10-14
15
8
13
11
21 W
85-74
*BYU
(2)
7
53
49% 31-63 42% 28-67 38%
8-21
29% 10-34 15-17
8-14
11
9
12
10
8
82-73
Texas Tech
(3)
6
32
52% 30-58 37% 26-70 31%
4-13
36% 12-33 18-23
9-10
9
11
14
9
108
24
41% 26-63 45% 28-62
9%
2-22
5%
1-19
16-19 16-26
10
6
17
9
W
9-27
68
L
70-73
*Kansas St.
(2)
1
L
58-62
Houston
(3)
9
1
37% 20-54 43% 25-58 22%
5-23
29%
5-17
13-17
7-9
6
3
10
6
74-67
*Baylor
(1)
17
58
48% 28-58 40% 22-55 22%
4-18
23%
5-22
14-18 18-25
8
8
13
11
95-96
BYU
(4)
7
53
54% 32-59 55% 36-65 46% 10-22 45% 14-31 21-25 10-14
13
8
14
9
83-66
Utah
(3)
73
71
41% 26-63 34% 21-62 33%
9-27
27%
22-29 17-22
15
13
7
12
67-84
*Iowa St.
(2)
20
8
33% 19-57 50% 27-54 18%
4-22
52% 11-21 25-27 19-23
10
6
14
15
113-100
Arizona St.
(2)
67
76
59% 36-61 46% 31-67 44% 10-23 52% 12-23 31-39 26-31
12
10
5
2
76-83
*Kansas
(3)
43
10
47% 26-55 49% 33-67 38%
6-16
38%
18-21
9-14
6
11
8
4
20 W
88-77
^^Kansas
(4)
43
10
53% 31-58 42% 27-64 44%
8-18
45% 14-31 18-21
9-13
7
10
10
13
8
86-80
^^Texas Tech
(0)
6
32
51% 31-61 43% 26-61 50%
8-16
32%
9-28
16-21 19-30
12
12
9
7
64-72
^^Houston
(0)
9
1
44% 25-57 43% 26-61 28%
5-18
39%
9-23
9-12
7
9
11
8
31 W
21
L
74 W
10
L
78 W
20
1
L
W
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
7-26
8-21
11-12
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
127.0
5th
120.7
15th
115.5
42nd
125.2
11th
126.5
9th
Def-Efficiency
96.3
35th
96.3
27th
93.1
20th
97.5
36th
98.1
45th
WAB
+2.4
13th
+3
20th
-1.3
99th
+5.3
9th
+3.3
13th
FG% 50% or better
13-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-8
More FTM than Opp.
18-5
18-4
3PT% < 35%
4-8
Make >= 10 3PA
10-10
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
13-4
More FTA than Opp.
18-6
10-5
More OReb than Opp.
0-2
Make < 10 3PA
17-11
14-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
12-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
12-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
18-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
7-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-9
12-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-3
@ Matteise
90
!L, 80-75
*Ark. St.
W, 88-57
Ohio Wesleyan
23
L, 87-68
*Saint Mary's
175
W, 79-72
Lamar
Record
28-6 (17-1)
154
W, 92-84
Omaha
Home
16-0
264
W, 97-78
Alabama St.
Road
222
#13 Akron Zips - MAC
BPI: 112
BT: 101
EM: 98
KPI: 63
NET: 91
POM: 99
SOR: 66
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
84.6
74.5
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
12-6
Win
87.6
72.6
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.7
83.5
51-100
0-0
0-1
0-1
W, 86-73
Northern Kent.
W, 101-48
SUNY Brockport
141
L, 100-81
^^Milwaukee
73
L, 74-58
^^Yale
256
W, 68-50
^^Jackson St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Princeton
71.2
113.7
106.8
16.6
17.2
33.3
29.0
19th
62nd
185th
137th
174th
76th
135th
55.4
74.9
55.8
36.6
26.8
45.4
31st
eFG%
86th
FT%
34th
2PT%
47th
3PT%
332nd
FTA/FGA %
51st
3PA/FGA %
146
L, 76-75
Non-Conf.
175.6
Home
88.3
72.1
101-200
6-0
1-1
1-2
Conf.
248.8
Road
81.3
76.7
201+
8-0
3-0
7-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -1.8 (65th)
286
W, 71-68
*Bowling Green
227
W, 87-71
Central Mich.
270
W, 105-81
*Eastern Mich.
213
W, 85-78
Toledo
181
W, 92-80
Ohio
337
W, 90-58
*Buffalo
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-2
Opp. O-Reb%
49.5
73.0
50.6
31.9
33.7
38.0
109th
235th
163rd
70th
201st
149th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
133
W, 102-75
Miami (OH)
351
W, 80-70
*Northern Ill.
Win
75.9%
60.2%
47.9%
36.8%
31.0%
11.4
7.4
2.3
8.2
0.7
-1.7
123
W, 85-71
*Kent St.
Loss
71.3%
43.0%
58.0%
34.0%
33.3%
8.5
7.2
-2.2
-9.0
0.0
-2.8
268
W, 81-73
Ball St.
Home
73.7%
60.5%
49.0%
36.9%
30.4%
12.0
7.3
2.6
7.8
1.9
-2.8
129
W, 80-67
Southern Ala.
Road
76.6%
53.4%
50.7%
35.9%
32.4%
9.8
7.5
0.6
2.8
-0.6
-1.1
293
W, 105-92
Western Mich.
227
W, 85-82
*Central Mich.
140
351
W, 73-63
Northern Ill.
125
125
181
L, 84-67
*Ohio
268
W, 87-82
*Ball St.
110
110
Kent St.
213
W, 96-87
*Toledo
29
In Paint 41%
81
Fast Break 15%
95
95
80
44
2nd Chance 14%
64
Off TO 19%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
50
In Paint 43%
337
W, 88-70
Buffalo
80
286
W, 96-67
^^Bowling Green
65
213
W, 100-90
^^Toledo
133
W, 76-74
^^Miami (OH)
LY #14 Seed, 17 pt L vs. Creighton
LY O-Eff Rk: 164, D-Eff Rk: 98
N. Johnson MAC POY & Def-POY
Home
2nd Chance 16% 12
Game #
Loss
Road
Nate Johnson
29
Fast Break 14%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
W, 77-72
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
123
Off-Efficiency
83
Off TO 16%
Tavari Johnson
Isaiah Gray
Shammah Scott
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.6
4.6
19-41
7-19
13.0
1.6
14-28
11-23
11.6
3.0
21-29
3-7
12.8
2.4
11-21
7-16
W 14.8
5.5
111-201 34-105 13.1
2.1
88-162
48-120 10.5
4.5
79-127
28-71
9.7
3.6
46-84
40-107
J. Okonkwo top 30 off & def reb rate
L
10.5
3.0
20-54
3-16
12.7
1.2
23-57
8-23
5.7
5.3
10-27
3-13
8.0
3.0
13-25
6-17
5 G vs. teams w/ top 100 2PT FG%
defense, 12 vs. 275+
H
14.8
5.2
64-110
21-60
12.6
2.1
45-86
28-70
10.2
4.1
46-80
15-40
8.3
3.7
22-41
21-61
R
13.3
4.9
67-145
16-61
13.3
1.7
66-133
28-73
9.1
5.2
43-74
16-44
10.3
3.3
37-68
25-63
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
34 Nate Johnson
6'3"
Sr
--
30.0
14.0
5.0
3.5
1.8
1.8
0.5
51.4%
131-255
30.6%
37-121
79.2%
103-130
5
Starting Lineup Last G: I. Gray, N. Johnson, T. Johnson, J. Okonkwo, S. Wilson (20 G: 19-1)
NAME
Tavari Johnson
2PT
3PT
FT
5'11"
Jr
--
24.7
13.0
1.9
3.9
2.1
0.8
0.3
50.7%
111-219
39.2%
56-143
91.2%
52-57
13 Isaiah Gray
6'3"
Sr
--
24.3
9.6
4.7
2.5
1.8
1.1
0.1
57.8%
89-154
36.9%
31-84
77.8%
56-72
1
6'2"
Sr
1
24.3
9.4
3.5
2.8
1.0
0.8
0.4
54.1%
59-109
37.1%
46-124
79.1%
53-67
22 Josiah Harris
6'7"
Jr
28
23.6
8.7
5.2
2.0
0.2
0.8
0.7
14.3%
2-14
33.3%
11-33
83.3%
15-18
0
Amani Lyles
6'7"
Jr
1
18.0
7.7
5.3
1.5
1.2
0.6
1.2
70.3%
83-118
32.2%
19-59
62.0%
31-50
3
Shammah Scott
Sharron Young
6'0"
Fr
--
16.0
7.6
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.0
--
55.3%
47-85
40.5%
45-111
80.6%
29-36
32 James Okonkwo
6'8"
Sr
--
18.2
7.0
7.3
0.5
1.3
0.6
0.9
59.9%
85-142
--
--
67.3%
68-101
15 Bowen Hardman
6'3"
Jr
--
15.5
6.7
1.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
85.7%
12-14
39.6%
65-164
62.5%
10-16
#13 Akron Zips - MAC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
90
L
W
23
L
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
75-80 #
Arkansas St.
--
112
97
35% 28-79 47% 34-73 29% 10-34 30%
9-30
9-13
3-6
16
11
14
13
88-57
Ohio Wesleyan
(3)
--
--
55% 35-64 39% 21-54 43% 15-35 35% 10-29
3-3
5-8
8
4
10
16
68-87
Saint Mary's
(3)
55
9
37% 24-65 50% 35-70 46% 13-28 26%
5-19
7-8
12-18
7
18
10
11
175 W
79-72
Lamar
(9)
269
94
37% 26-70 42% 22-52 18%
24%
4-17
21-31 24-33
17
7
9
17
154 W
92-84
Nebraska Omaha
(0)
78
221
53% 35-66 52% 29-56 46% 18-39 32%
6-19
4-9
20-22
10
11
8
12
264 W
97-78
Alabama St.
(0)
282
246
46% 32-69 41% 27-66 43% 15-35 49% 16-33 18-23
8-15
15
7
9
10
222 W
86-73
Northern Kentucky
(8)
241
243
53% 26-49 45% 24-53 44% 11-25 33%
8-24
23-28 17-28
8
9
16
11
W
6-33
101-48
SUNY Brockport
(3)
--
--
46% 37-81 28% 20-71 28% 13-47 13%
3-23
14-17
5-12
19
7
8
13
141
L
81-100
Milwaukee
(7)
183
174
47% 34-72 58% 37-64 40%
8-20
58% 11-19
5-11
15-20
5
11
17
22
73
L
58-74
Yale
(4)
61
116
31% 18-58 48% 27-56 33%
9-27
27%
4-15
13-17 16-21
6
13
13
18
68-50
Jackson St.
(0)
288
200
35% 23-66 29% 17-59 23%
9-39
29%
6-21
13-19 10-17
22
10
21
15
75-76
Princeton
(8)
229
191
42% 27-64 49% 29-59 30%
7-23
35%
7-20
14-17
11-18
9
5
12
11
286 W
71-68
Bowling Green
(3)
299
227
39% 26-67 35% 23-66 29% 12-42 32%
8-25
7-9
14-21
8
13
12
14
227 W
87-71
Central Michigan
(3)
210
241
46% 30-65 43% 26-60 44% 18-41 38%
8-21
9-10
11-11
10
5
8
9
270 W
105-81
Eastern Michigan
(3)
213
309
61% 37-61 44% 28-63 43%
9-21
32%
9-28
22-26 16-22
11
8
14
15
213 W
85-78
Toledo
(2)
96
355
47% 35-75 38% 24-64 31%
9-29
28%
5-18
6-9
25-31
12
11
9
8
181 W
92-80
Ohio
(2)
168
219
52% 35-68 34% 22-64 39% 10-26 25%
6-24
12-15 30-33
7
11
9
12
337 W
90-58
Buffalo
(3)
344
308
57% 35-61 30% 21-69 52% 13-25 25%
9-36
7-9
7-13
5
7
19
10
133 W
102-75
Miami OH
(3)
141
177
55% 36-65 47% 28-60 44% 15-34 32%
8-25
15-19 11-15
9
6
13
15
351 W
80-70
Northern Illinois
(2)
353
291
43% 27-63 39% 22-56 30% 10-33 30%
7-23
16-21 19-29
10
1
15
12
123 W
85-71
Kent St.
(2)
195
93
48% 29-61 35% 22-63 41% 11-27 24%
6-25
16-22 21-25
11
7
12
6
268 W
81-73
Ball St.
(3)
225
300
54% 35-65 55% 28-51 25%
29%
5-17
4-8
12-20
7
4
8
9
129 W
80-67
South Alabama
(3)
179
112
46% 28-61 45% 24-53 42% 19-45 26%
6-23
5-7
13-20
9
5
10
13
293 W
105-92
Western Michigan
(2)
259
283
62% 39-63 43% 32-75 50% 14-28 36% 11-31 13-19 17-24
8
20
15
11
227 W
85-82
Central Michigan
(3)
210
241
53% 31-59 42% 27-65 28%
5-18
29%
7-24
18-23 21-24
7
11
14
16
351 W
73-63
Northern Illinois
(2)
353
291
43% 24-56 35% 21-60 24%
5-21
26%
9-35
20-26 12-18
5
2
10
8
7-26
9-14
256 W
146
L
181
L
7-28
67-84
Ohio
(3)
168
219
44% 27-61 47% 30-64 22%
4-18
27%
17-23
9
7
14
5
268 W
87-82
Ball St.
(2)
225
300
51% 34-67 46% 28-61 30%
9-30
46% 10-22 10-13 16-21
10
5
7
8
123 W
77-72
Kent St.
(2)
195
93
43% 28-65 47% 29-62 27%
7-26
25%
4-16
14-19 10-16
13
11
11
13
213 W
96-87
Toledo
(3)
96
355
57% 32-56 52% 33-63 54% 13-24 31%
5-16
19-22 16-25
8
12
17
10
337 W
88-70
Buffalo
7-27
12-19 17-19
15
11
6
12
#N/ W
A W
286
#N/A
#N/A
5-21
12-15 12-17
10
8
9
21
96-67
Bowling Green
(2) 344 308 47% 33-70 38% 23-61 36% 10-28 26%
#N/ #N/A #N/A 49% 34-69 42% 25-60 41% 16-39 24%
A
(0) 299 227 56% 32-57 49% 29-59 56% 10-18 29%
5-17
26-33 27-32
9
10
6
7
213 W
100-90
Toledo
(0)
11
6
9
10
via Torvik
Home Games
96
355
46% 27-59 49% 28-57 33%
Road & Neutral Games
9-27
50% 15-30 13-16
Non-Conference Games
3-5
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.1
27th
108.6
123rd
109.3
112th
114.0
64th
115.1
64th
Def-Efficiency
110.0
249th
103.9
119th
104.3
157th
106.7
165th
111.4
262nd
WAB
+0.8
38th
-2.7
90th
-2.7
172nd
+0.6
50th
+0.2
53rd
FG% 50% or better
13-0
3PT% >= 35%
16-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
22-1
3PT% < 35%
6-5
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
12-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
23-4
More FTA than Opp.
9-1
18-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
5-1
More OReb than Opp.
19-3
Make < 10 3PA
10-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
23-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
19-3
10-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
22-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-3
18-0
3PA / FGA < 35%
3-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
8-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
6-1
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
10-2
VCU
Wisconsin
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
BYU
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Montana
340
W, 88-50
Central Ark.
137
W, 86-80
UC Riverside
194
W, 99-55
Queens
275
W, 95-71
Idaho
Record
24-9 (14-6)
364
W, 87-43
Miss Valley St.
Home
15-2
26
!L, 96-85
^^Ole Miss
Road
132
W, 72-61
^^N.C. State
110
L, 83-64
*Providence
Non-Conf.
274
W, 95-67
Fresno St.
Conf.
200
W, 68-49
^^Wyoming
296
W, 103-57
Florida A&M
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Arizona St.
67.2
125.4
99.1
17.6
17.2
33.3
26.1
180th
7th
53rd
207th
174th
76th
30th
57.2
70.5
58.6
37.1
30.2
48.3
7th
eFG%
241st
FT%
6th
2PT%
32nd
3PT%
269th
FTA/FGA %
15th
3PA/FGA %
78
W, 76-56
#6 BYU Cougars - Big 12
BPI: 24
BT: 14
EM: 16
KPI: 31
NET: 24
L, 86-55
*Houston
8
L, 72-67
Texas Tech
75
L, 71-67
*TCU
91
W, 85-69
Oklahoma St.
74
!L, 73-72
*Utah
84
W, 83-67
*Colorado
SOR: 19
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
81.0
70.9
1-25
1-2
1-1
2-1
9-7
Win
86.2
67.3
26-50
2-0
0-1
1-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.1
80.4
51-100
5-0
0-0
3-3
179.9
Home
85.9
64.6
101-200
2-0
2-0
0-1
43.6
Road
75.7
77.6
201+
5-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.8 (21st)
1
POM: 24
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
50.6
70.6
49.3
34.8
29.5
44.4
164th
104th
114th
242nd
89th
329th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
54
W, 80-52
Cincinnati
31
!W, 93-89
Baylor
Win
71.0%
62.3%
47.3%
39.9%
33.0%
11.6
8.8
2.0
8.8
0.5
2.5
69
W, 81-75
*UCF
Loss
69.2%
49.1%
54.5%
29.4%
40.0%
8.3
9.6
1.1
-1.9
-1.8
-4.6
13
L, 85-74
Arizona
Home
68.9%
63.9%
45.4%
36.5%
32.4%
10.5
8.8
2.0
8.7
2.4
4.1
54
L, 84-66
*Cincinnati
Road
72.5%
52.6%
53.4%
37.7%
37.6%
10.9
9.1
1.4
2.9
-2.8
-3.1
48
W, 73-69
*West Virginia
68
W, 80-65
Kansas St.
140
20
W, 91-57
Kansas
125
125
13
W, 96-95
*Arizona
78
W, 91-81
*Arizona St.
110
110
West Virginia
10
!W, 88-85
*Iowa St.
95
95
80
74
W, 85-74
Utah
10
W, 96-92
^^Iowa St.
65
L, 74-54
Fast Break 12%
48
2nd Chance 14%
44
50
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
96
In Paint 37%
80
1
31
In Paint 41%
65
Game #
^^Houston
Home
K. Catchings DNP last 4 G, started
first 15G, bench minutes since
97
2nd Chance 12%
Game #
Loss
Road
Richie Saunders
59
Fast Break 12%
Off TO 21% 8
Egor Demin
Trevin Knell
Fousseyni Traore
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.6
4.2
15-29
8-23
9.2
5.0
9-21
6-22
5.2
1.4
3-5
6-19
9.0
4.2
19-30
0-0
W 17.3
4.4
81-136
59-125 10.6
4.1
52-87
28-81
10.2
2.8
24-37
54-119
8.8
5.5
84-124
1-4
L
12.9
4.2
22-41
15-46
9.8
3.0
23-51
8-52
5.9
1.2
4-8
13-36
8.0
5.0
28-53
0-0
PPP of <1.1: BYU 2-9
D. Hall 22 @ ISU, 22 in 4 of other
last 5 games
H
15.5
4.9
55-92
35-83
12.3
4.0
41-72
25-69
9.1
3.0
22-33
29-81
9.7
6.9
65-96
1-3
R
16.6
3.9
48-85
39-88
8.3
3.6
34-66
11-64
8.9
1.8
6-12
38-74
7.4
3.7
47-81
0-1
#
M. Mag started final 18 G
R. Saunders led B12 in 3PT%
Defensive Pct.l
W, 77-56
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
48
Off-Efficiency
Starting Lineup Last G: E. Demin, K. Keita, T. Knell, M. Mag, R. Saunders (18 G: 14-4)
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
15 Richie Saunders
6'5"
Jr
1
29.3
16.0
4.4
1.6
1.3
1.2
0.4
58.2%
103-177
43.3%
74-171
81.7%
85-104
3
Egor Demin
6'9"
Fr
3
27.5
10.3
3.8
5.4
3.0
1.2
0.4
54.3%
75-138
27.1%
36-133
67.5%
52-77
21 Trevin Knell
6'5"
Sr
--
20.3
9.0
2.4
1.2
0.8
0.9
0.1
62.2%
28-45
43.2%
67-155
73.2%
41-56
45 Fousseyni Traore
6'6"
Sr
--
17.5
8.6
5.3
1.4
1.2
0.3
0.4
63.3%
112-177
25.0%
1-4
81.4%
57-70
6
6'9"
Fr
4
18.2
7.6
2.3
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.4
52.5%
32-61
35.5%
43-121
58.7%
27-46
25 Dawson Baker
6'3"
Jr
--
16.9
7.6
1.9
1.3
0.9
0.5
--
52.6%
51-97
38.8%
40-103
73.7%
28-38
30 Dallin Hall
6'3"
Jr
4
25.1
7.1
2.2
4.2
1.7
0.8
0.1
51.7%
30-58
36.7%
36-98
67.2%
39-58
13 Keba Keita
6'8"
Jr
1
20.7
7.1
7.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.0
66.7%
102-153
--
--
40.0%
24-60
0
6'7"
Sr
2
18.5
5.8
2.0
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.2
62.5%
35-56
38.8%
26-67
78.0%
32-41
Kanon Catchings
Mawot Mag
#6 BYU Cougars - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
Central Ark.
--
326
346
46% 33-72 34% 19-56 34% 15-44 23%
137 W
86-80
UC Riverside
(2)
107
235
53% 33-62 43% 25-58 27%
194 W
99-55
Queens
(4)
184
222
51% 40-78 35% 20-58 43% 15-35 37% 11-30
275 W
95-71
Idaho
(2)
139
334
87-43
Miss Valley St.
(6)
364
364
53% 31-58 38% 17-45 34% 11-32 20%
2-10
14-19
85-96 #
^^Ole Miss
(4)
31
34
41% 26-64 48% 31-64 32% 12-38 29%
5-17
72-61
^^N.C. State
(0)
145
102
42% 25-59 37% 21-57 39% 10-26 39%
9-23
L
132 W
110
L
Opp
For
FT
88-50
26
For
3PT
340 W
364 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
7-11
5-13
17
8
10
17
14-26 19-23
10
3
10
12
4-8
4-10
18
2
12
15
56% 33-59 50% 26-52 39% 10-26 57% 12-21 19-30
7-11
6
3
6
17
7-10
11
4
9
16
21-26 29-36
10
7
15
9
12-16 10-14
14
8
13
9
6-22
7-25
Opp
Off. Reb
7-31
39% 11-28
64-83
*Providence
(3)
92
143
33% 23-69 60% 25-42 28%
55% 12-22
11-17
21-26
20
2
4
8
274 W
95-67
Fresno St.
(7)
275
216
55% 38-69 35% 24-69 41% 14-34 32% 12-37
5-6
7-10
10
8
17
10
200 W
68-49
^^Wyoming
(2)
230
149
52% 24-46 42% 20-48 45%
11-14
3-8
5
5
10
12
296 W
103-57
Florida A&M
(5)
255
344
54% 34-63 33% 18-55 44% 15-34 29% 10-34 20-26
11-12
9
2
11
18
78 W
76-56
Arizona St.
(10)
67
76
48% 28-58 37% 21-57 31% 10-32 21%
11
10
14
13
9-20
25%
6-24
6-29
10-14
8-10
11-15
1
L
55-86
*Houston
(3)
9
1
38% 18-48 49% 29-59 33%
8-24
47% 16-34
12-16
4
14
14
11
8
L
67-72
Texas Tech
(2)
6
32
44% 25-57 45% 26-58 22%
5-23
36% 10-28 12-21 10-16
11
10
8
9
75
L
67-71
*TCU
(3)
173
27
48% 22-46 42% 25-59 38%
9-24
38%
9-24
14-19 12-19
4
5
15
5
85-69
Oklahoma St.
(2)
140
63
52% 27-52 41% 23-56 43% 12-28 38%
8-21
19-27 15-23
7
7
12
13
91 W
74
72-73 #
*Utah
(3)
73
71
39% 30-78 45% 25-56 27%
26%
6-23
4-10
17-32
13
6
8
9
84 W
L
83-67
*Colorado
(2)
129
51
59% 31-53 46% 21-46 46% 11-24 37%
8-30
7-19
10-15 18-27
8
7
14
16
54 W
80-52
Cincinnati
(3)
90
21
57% 28-49 38% 23-61 63% 15-24 18%
5-28
9-11
1-4
5
11
14
9
31 W
93-89 #
Baylor
(2)
17
58
55% 32-58 50% 30-60 38%
46% 13-28 21-26 16-24
9
13
10
12
69 W
81-75
*UCF
(3)
51
113
48% 28-58 37% 23-62 44% 14-32 31%
8-26
11-19 21-25
5
6
17
10
8-21
13
L
74-85
Arizona
(2)
10
30
42% 28-67 49% 31-63 29% 10-34 38%
8-21
8-14
15-17
9
11
10
12
54
L
66-84
*Cincinnati
(3)
90
21
47% 24-51 59% 34-58 35% 10-29 50% 10-20
8-11
6-9
2
7
10
10
48 W
73-69
*West Virginia
(2)
103
7
46% 25-55 47% 27-58 36% 10-28 33%
9-27
13-16
6-7
7
5
10
7
68 W
80-65
Kansas St.
(3)
108
24
49% 27-55 41% 25-61 26%
29%
6-21
20-26
9-17
13
11
10
11
20 W
91-57
Kansas
(2)
43
10
52% 34-66 37% 23-63 39% 14-36 28%
9-32
9-12
2-5
9
6
10
15
13 W
96-95
*Arizona
(3)
10
30
55% 36-65 54% 32-59 45% 14-31 46% 10-22 10-14 21-25
8
13
9
14
78 W
91-81
*Arizona St.
(3)
67
76
55% 34-62 47% 27-57 50% 17-34 35%
8-23
6-15
19-26
3
4
11
9
48 W
77-56
West Virginia
(2)
103
7
53% 29-55 33% 21-63 33%
30%
8-27
14-22
6-10
6
7
6
4
10 W
88-85 #
*Iowa St.
(2)
20
8
44% 26-59 39% 25-64 34% 11-32 29%
8-28
25-31 27-31
14
5
27
10
74 W
85-74
Utah
(3)
73
71
48% 29-61 35% 25-72 29%
32% 12-37 19-26 12-19
8
19
9
16
96-92
^^Iowa St.
(4)
20
8
52% 30-58 56% 37-66 50% 18-36 43% 13-30 18-21
54-74
^^Houston
(0)
9
1
32% 19-60 42% 23-55 21%
10 W
1
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
6-23
5-15
8-28
6-28
5-7
9
8
10
9
39% 10-26 10-10 18-23
10
11
13
8
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Non-Conference Games
Off-Efficency
126.4
8th
122.6
12th
116.7
33rd
126.8
8th
128.7
8th
Def-Efficiency
94.2
21st
103.1
103rd
97.4
53rd
98.3
42nd
99.9
59th
WAB
+2.3
14th
+2.5
25th
-0.4
72nd
+4.5
13th
+4.9
4th
FG% 50% or better
16-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
22-2
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
2-7
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
17-4
16-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-7
More FTM than Opp.
16-3
8-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
18-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-2
More FTA than Opp.
16-2
9-5
More OReb than Opp.
6-6
15-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
15-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
14-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
21-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
20-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-4
1-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-2
@ Matteise
346
W, 84-65
Bellarmine
182
W, 80-55
^^B.C.
184
W, 63-42
Merrimack
313
W, 83-57
Loyola (MD)
Record
28-6 (15-3)
220
!L, 69-66
^^Seton Hall
Home
15-1
95
L, 64-61
^^Nevada
Road
210
#11 VCU Rams - Atlantic 10
BPI: 33
BT: 29
EM: 17
KPI: 36
NET: 31
POM: 30
SOR: 48
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.1
62.4
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
13-5
Win
78.7
59.9
26-50
0-0
1-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
69.7
74.2
51-100
2-1
3-1
3-1
W, 77-70
^^Miami (FL)
W, 103-58
Elizabeth City St.
243
W, 89-54
Ga. Southern
280
W, 66-47
Penn
44
W, 76-68
^^Colorado St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*New Mexico
66.1
116.3
96.0
16.8
20.6
36.7
30.0
238th
42nd
25th
155th
27th
11th
192nd
52.4
74.5
54.2
33.5
32.2
47.4
98th
eFG%
98th
FT%
65th
2PT%
188th
3PT%
197th
FTA/FGA %
25th
3PA/FGA %
44.4
72.0
43.6
30.6
36.1
35.3
1st
172nd
4th
23rd
262nd
64th
38
L, 78-71
Non-Conf.
174.6
Home
81.0
58.3
101-200
3-0
1-0
3-1
Conf.
135.1
Road
73.7
66.1
201+
9-0
1-1
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +1.1 (45th)
226
W, 90-70
William & Mary
94
L, 77-75
*St. Bonaventure
100
W, 84-65
*Loyola Chicago
233
W, 73-61
Fordham
105
W, 78-62
Saint Louis
79
W, 78-69
*Saint Joseph's
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-4
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
148
W, 81-57
*Rhode Island
94
W, 75-61
St. Bonaventure
Win
74.5%
54.8%
42.1%
35.2%
28.7%
9.7
5.7
3.5
7.9
2.3
1.1
105
L, 78-69
*Saint Louis
Loss
73.8%
54.6%
48.3%
26.2%
40.2%
8.3
6.2
1.7
-1.3
1.2
-3.3
232
W, 90-49
Richmond
Home
74.8%
56.4%
42.7%
34.4%
28.1%
9.9
5.4
4.9
9.3
3.2
1.9
216
W, 96-66
La Salle
Road
74.1%
53.1%
43.8%
32.5%
32.4%
9.1
6.2
1.7
3.7
1.2
-1.2
63
W, 73-68
115
W, 80-72
*Dayton
*George
Washington
140
202
W, 80-51
UMass
125
125
62
W, 70-54
George Mason
232
W, 78-60
*Richmond
110
110
Davidson
156
W, 71-62
*Duquesne
95
95
80
In Paint 40% 23
Fast Break 16%
87
2nd Chance 17%
87
87
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
52
In Paint 43%
63
L, 79-76
Dayton
80
94
W, 76-59
^^St. Bonaventure
65
100
W, 62-55
^^Loyola Chicago
62
W, 68-63
^^George Mason
Home
P. Russell DNP L vs. Dayton
42
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Joseph Bamisile
74
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
35
Off TO 19%
Max Shulga
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
W, 80-56
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
151
Off-Efficiency
Phillip Russell
Zeb Jackson
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
M. Shulga A10 POY
L5 14.4
6.6
10-17
8-35
13.6
3.8
24-43
4-18
6.6
1.4
2-10
9-24
12.6
8.0
12-17
8-24
J. Clark Nov-Dec: 6.7 PPG, 35% FG
Clark Jan-March: 11.6 PPG, 55% FG
W 14.9
6.2
62-130
8-37
15.5
4.9 117-189
11-41
10.3
1.6
31-68
10-26
10.4
7.0
58-85
3-30
L
16.3
4.8
19-36
60-139 13.2
6.0
20-41
49-153 12.0
2.0
10-15
58-161
6.0
6.2
9-16
44-108
L. Bamgboye top 5 block shot rate,
12 games w/ 3+ blocks
H
15.6
5.8
37-71
37-81
16.3
5.0
75-113
27-90
10.3
1.7
13-33
33-98
10.4
6.5
37-55
24-54
R
14.7
6.1
44-95
31-95
14.0
5.1
62-117
33-104 10.8
1.7
28-50
35-89
8.9
7.2
30-46
23-84
Starting Lineup Last G: L. Bamgboye, J. Bamisile, J. Clark, P. Russell, M. Shulga (22 G: 20-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
22 Joseph Bamisile
6'4"
Sr
--
26.6
15.1
5.1
1.9
2.5
1.1
0.7
59.6%
137-230
30.9%
60-194
64.4%
58-90
11 Max Shulga
6'4"
Sr
--
32.8
15.1
5.9
4.0
1.6
1.8
0.1
48.8%
81-166
38.6%
68-176
78.7%
148-188
1
Phillip Russell
5'10"
Sr
1
23.3
10.6
1.7
2.2
1.5
1.1
0.0
49.4%
41-83
36.4%
68-187
80.8%
63-78
2
Zeb Jackson
6'5"
Sr
5
22.4
10.4
3.7
2.0
1.4
1.1
0.1
45.7%
48-105
31.0%
40-129
88.7%
86-97
4
Jack Clark
6'8"
Sr
--
28.6
9.6
6.9
1.9
1.1
1.0
0.4
66.3%
67-101
34.1%
47-138
78.5%
51-65
21 Christian Fermin
6'10"
Jr
1
19.8
4.7
3.2
0.6
0.7
0.3
1.4
55.7%
68-122
0.0%
0-1
54.3%
19-35
9
Luke Bamgboye
6'10"
Fr
--
16.6
3.8
3.3
0.5
0.7
0.5
2.2
59.8%
55-92
0.0%
0-1
48.7%
18-37
6
Terrence Hill Jr.
6'3"
Fr
12
6.5
3.5
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.0
56.5%
13-23
34.4%
11-32
100.0%
17-17
5
Alphonzo Billups III
6'7"
So
12
7.3
3.0
1.0
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.0
62.5%
10-16
30.6%
15-49
100.0%
2-2
#11 VCU Rams - Atlantic 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
346 W
84-65
Bellarmine
--
224
359
53% 29-55 46% 26-56 52% 15-29 31%
4-13
11-17
9-13
11
9
16
13
182 W
80-55
^^B.C.
(3)
199
172
43% 26-60 29% 17-58 30%
8-27
18%
2-11
20-29 19-29
10
13
12
17
184 W
63-42
Merrimack
(4)
315
85
38% 19-50 28% 12-43 21%
5-24
5%
1-19
20-27 17-24
8
5
17
21
313 W
83-57
Loyola (MD)
(2)
295
305
49% 30-61 33% 19-57 31%
8-26
37%
7-19
15-22 12-19
12
9
10
16
9-37
220
L
66-69 #
^^Seton Hall
(4)
325
89
37% 22-60 42% 23-55 24%
58%
7-12
13-18 16-25
7
8
14
16
95
L
61-64
^^Nevada
(0)
79
120
39% 20-51 48% 21-44 32% 10-31 54%
7-13
11-14
15-26
9
5
11
11
210 W
77-70
^^Miami (FL)
(1)
71
324
51% 28-55 40% 24-60 36% 10-28 26%
6-23
11-15
16-19
9
10
11
8
W
103-58
Elizabeth City St.
(4)
--
--
50% 34-68 31% 19-61 30% 11-37 20%
3-15
24-33 17-26
18
12
14
17
243 W
89-54
Ga. Southern
(4)
237
245
46% 25-54 30% 18-60 38% 12-32 29%
6-21
27-34 12-17
12
12
12
14
280 W
66-47
Penn
(4)
234
337
39% 26-67 36% 18-50 24%
19%
5-27
8-11
6-7
15
4
10
15
44 W
76-68
^^Colorado St.
(4)
34
46
44% 25-57 51% 26-51 37% 11-30 33%
5-15
15-25
11-13
12
5
8
14
71-78
*New Mexico
(3)
87
18
42% 24-57 42% 27-64 32% 10-31 27%
3-11
13-24 21-30
4
13
10
11
90-70
William & Mary
(3)
167
272
47% 35-74 47% 27-58 25%
6-11
15
8
7
16
75-77
*St. Bonaventure
(8)
165
56
48% 28-58 50% 29-58 36% 11-31 33%
5-15
8-9
14-19
11
11
11
6
100 W
84-65
*Loyola Chicago
(3)
143
82
49% 30-61 38% 21-55 38%
9-24
33%
8-24
15-20 15-23
16
9
10
12
233 W
73-61
Fordham
(3)
172
268
42% 27-65 37% 21-57 19%
5-26
33%
7-21
14-22 12-14
19
9
13
13
105 W
78-62
Saint Louis
(5)
123
110
42% 30-72 46% 17-37 30% 10-33 39%
9-23
8-10
19-23
18
3
9
19
79 W
78-69
*Saint Joseph's
(2)
98
83
42% 24-57 33% 24-72 46% 10-22 22%
8-36
20-27 13-18
9
12
9
6
148 W
81-57
*Rhode Island
(3)
148
204
43% 29-68 39% 19-49 30%
35%
8-23
15-21 11-21
14
7
14
26
75-61
St. Bonaventure
(2)
165
56
45% 26-58 44% 25-57 46% 11-24 21%
4-19
12-16
7-10
6
8
6
15
69-78
*Saint Louis
(3)
123
110
33% 22-67 49% 21-43 16%
33%
6-18
20-26 30-39
13
4
8
16
232 W
90-49
Richmond
(3)
223
219
65% 33-51 33% 15-46 55% 16-29 31%
5-16
8-8
14-16
5
7
9
13
216 W
96-66
La Salle
(2)
228
192
52% 37-71 39% 22-57 44% 15-34 33%
5-15
7-8
17-20
17
7
10
6
63 W
73-68
(2)
57
129
36% 25-69 37% 19-51 21%
37%
7-19
17-19 23-25
21
11
14
17
115 W
80-72
(4)
147
101
51% 26-51 42% 22-52 50% 14-28 41%
9-22
14-16 19-27
12
7
16
10
202 W
80-51
*Dayton
*George
Washington
UMass
(6)
262
163
46% 28-61 32% 20-62 48% 14-29
0%
0-10
10-14 11-18
11
11
8
8
62 W
70-54
George Mason
(2)
191
19
39% 21-54 35% 17-48 30% 10-33 26%
5-19
18-24 15-24
11
7
9
13
232 W
78-60
*Richmond
(2)
223
219
56% 28-50 44% 24-54 46% 11-24 40%
8-20
11-13
4-7
7
3
10
6
151 W
80-56
Davidson
(2)
114
195
49% 30-61 37% 19-52 39%
9-23
27%
6-22
11-14 12-17
12
8
9
10
71-62
*Duquesne
(3)
166
103
42% 23-55 41% 21-51 36%
8-22
25%
4-16
17-21 16-24
12
11
14
15
76-79
Dayton
(2)
57
129
38% 23-61 47% 28-60 17%
5-30
39%
9-23
25-31 14-16
18
11
7
8
94 W
76-59
^^St. Bonaventure
(6)
165
56
43% 29-68 36% 20-55 28%
9-32
21%
4-19
9-10
15-20
13
11
7
13
100 W
62-55
^^Loyola Chicago
(0)
143
82
43% 22-51 29% 20-68 25%
6-24
20%
5-25
12-21 10-16
8
18
10
10
62 W
68-63
^^George Mason
(0)
191
19
40% 19-47 34% 19-56 32%
8-25
43%
9-21
22-27 16-19
9
8
15
11
38
L
226 W
94
L
94 W
105
L
156 W
63
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
6-25
7-28
8-27
5-31
6-28
42% 10-24 13-18
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
116.4
44th
114.5
50th
107.1
143rd
119.8
23rd
122.4
17th
Def-Efficiency
94.3
24th
97.1
33rd
92.5
17th
98.4
43rd
97.1
33rd
WAB
+0.3
54th
+0.8
45th
-1
90th
+1.2
34th
+1.9
22nd
FG% 50% or better
7-0
3PT% >= 35%
14-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
13-1
3PT% < 35%
15-5
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-1
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
18-1
14-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
14-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
21-3
More FTA than Opp.
14-1
1-0
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
14-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-3
27-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-4
4-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
22-6
24-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
0-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-0
@ Matteise
317
W, 85-61
Holy Cross
196
W, 79-67
Montana St.
171
W, 87-56
App. St.
13
W, 103-88
Arizona
Record
26-9 (13-7)
245
W, 87-84
UTRGV
Home
14-3
69
W, 86-70
^^UCF
Road
#3 Wisconsin Badgers - Big 10
BPI: 18
BT: 12
EM: 13
KPI: 15
NET: 14
POM: 11
SOR: 9
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.7
70.4
1-25
2-1
1-1
1-3
12-6
Win
83.0
68.1
26-50
1-1
1-0
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.2
77.2
51-100
4-1
4-0
5-0
70
W, 81-75
^^Pittsburgh
362
W, 74-53
Chicago St.
Non-Conf.
133.2
Home
83.0
68.2
101-200
3-0
0-0
0-0
22
L, 67-64
Michigan
Conf.
50.1
Road
76.6
72.6
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
27
L, 88-74
*Marquette
25
L, 86-80
*Illinois
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
^^Butler
67.4
122.5
96.1
14.1
14.5
28.0
26.6
163rd
14th
26th
17th
331st
237th
41st
53.6
82.8
54.7
34.9
33.8
48.1
63rd
eFG%
1st
FT%
50th
2PT%
117th
3PT%
153rd
FTA/FGA %
18th
3PA/FGA %
86
W, 83-74
339
W, 76-53
Detroit
64
W, 116-85
Iowa
77
W, 75-63
*Rutgers
88
W, 80-59
Minnesota
45
W, 70-68
Ohio St.
67
W, 84-69
*USC
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.9 (10th)
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-3
47.9
72.3
46.8
33.0
28.1
39.1
50th
195th
32nd
123rd
55th
189th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
28
L, 85-83
*UCLA
55
W, 83-55
Nebraska
Win
83.3%
57.5%
46.0%
37.0%
32.4%
10.3
7.5
-1.2
3.1
1.1
5.8
12
L, 76-68
*Maryland
Loss
80.9%
47.0%
49.4%
29.4%
34.5%
8.8
8.8
-0.3
-2.3
-1.8
-0.6
57
W, 75-69
*Northwestern
Home
84.7%
53.9%
46.4%
36.7%
33.9%
10.4
7.9
0.6
4.4
2.2
7.4
51
W, 76-64
Indiana
Road
80.9%
55.5%
47.3%
33.3%
32.2%
9.5
7.7
-2.4
-0.9
-1.4
1.2
64
W, 74-63
*Iowa
18
W, 94-84
*Purdue
140
25
W, 95-74
Illinois
125
125
29
!L, 77-73
Oregon
109
W, 88-62
Washington
110
110
7
L, 71-62
*Michigan St.
95
95
88
W, 74-67
*Minnesota
80
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 39% 12
Offensive Pct.l
Off-Efficiency
Fast Break 9% 13
32
2nd Chance 13%
Off TO 15% 9
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
71
L, 86-75
Penn St.
57
W, 70-63
^^Northwestern
65
28
W, 86-70
^^UCLA
7
W, 77-74
^^Michigan St.
Home
Crowl 4 pts in B10 Champ G, 5 in SF
W -- final 6 G prior B10T: 13.8 PPG
M. Klesmit DNP L @ MSU or PSU
Game #
Loss
Road
John Tonje
L,Zona 4-23 3PT,
^^Michigan
22Zona,
vs.
28-40 FT,
Wisc. Tonje shot 22 FT (team 47)
65
Game #
Fast Break 12%
64
2nd Chance 14%
61
97
Off TO 14%
John Blackwell
Steven Crowl
Defensive Pct.l
86
In Paint 39%
80
Nolan Winter
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.6
7.4
13-33
14-33
15.4
4.4
14-32
11-32
9.6
5.2
10-25
8-15
7.6
5.4
7-10
4-10
W 20.2
5.3
90-149
22-62
15.7
5.1
99-186
10-41
9.9
5.3
75-125
6-23
9.7
6.0
66-89
9-30
L
16.4
5.6
22-61
58-144 15.0
5.2
36-68
45-129
8.8
5.4
25-47
22-46
8.8
5.6
21-34
24-61
H
19.3
4.8
50-94
37-95
15.2
5.9
60-124
30-82
10.9
5.1
60-93
10-28
9.3
6.1
44-62
15-36
R
19.1
5.8
62-116
43-111
15.8
4.4
75-130
25-88
8.4
5.7
40-79
18-41
9.7
5.7
43-61
18-55
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Blackwell, S. Crowl, M. Klesmit, J. Tonje, N. Winter (31 G: 24-7)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
John Tonje
6'5"
Sr
--
31.0
19.2
5.3
1.8
1.9
0.7
0.2
53.3%
112-210
38.8%
80-206
90.8%
208-229
25 John Blackwell
6'4"
So
--
30.9
15.5
5.1
2.1
2.1
0.9
0.1
53.2%
135-254
32.4%
55-170
81.2%
108-133
22 Steven Crowl
7'0"
Sr
--
25.4
9.6
5.4
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
58.1%
100-172
40.6%
28-69
81.5%
53-65
31 Nolan Winter
6'11"
So
--
21.2
9.5
5.9
1.1
0.7
0.4
0.4
70.7%
87-123
36.3%
33-91
78.7%
59-75
11 Max Klesmit
6'3"
Sr
4
27.8
9.4
2.4
2.7
1.1
0.8
0.1
48.2%
39-81
28.2%
49-174
84.6%
66-78
4
Kamari McGee
6'0"
Sr
--
22.1
6.7
2.6
1.9
0.6
0.9
0.1
46.2%
43-93
47.6%
39-82
80.5%
33-41
7
Carter Gilmore
9
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
6'7"
Sr
--
18.9
3.9
2.5
1.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
62.2%
28-45
35.1%
20-57
76.0%
19-25
13 Xavier Amos
6'8"
Jr
--
9.6
3.4
1.8
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.3
44.9%
22-49
30.7%
19-62
70.4%
19-27
33 Jack Janicki
6'5"
Fr
--
11.7
2.0
1.4
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.3
63.6%
14-22
27.7%
13-47
42.9%
3-7
#3 Wisconsin Badgers - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
85-61
Holy Cross
--
279
342
49% 29-59 43% 23-53 36% 11-31 38%
16-16
6-7
7
3
11
12
196 W
79-67
Montana St.
(2)
207
182
45% 24-53 44% 24-54 50% 11-22 46% 12-26 20-21
7-10
6
4
11
13
171 W
87-56
App. St.
(2)
281
79
47% 33-70 38% 21-56 29%
29%
7-24
13-16
7-13
13
9
6
18
13 W
103-88
Arizona
(4)
10
30
48% 25-52 38% 28-74 44% 12-27 17%
4-23
41-47 28-40
1
17
9
13
245 W
87-84
UTRGV
(2)
211
254
49% 26-53 49% 31-63 40%
9-11
8
7
9
8
69 W
86-70
^^UCF
(3)
51
113
49% 32-66 34% 21-62 32% 10-31 12%
2-17
12-16 26-37
8
11
13
10
70 W
81-75
^^Pittsburgh
(1)
60
104
48% 29-60 50% 30-60 25%
22%
5-23
18-22 10-13
7
5
6
8
8-28
8-20
5-20
Opp
Off. Reb
317 W
362 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
9-24
39% 13-33 27-32
74-53
Chicago St.
(5)
361
343
39% 23-59 34% 20-59 33% 10-30 25%
6-24
18-21
7-7
9
7
8
10
22
L
64-67
Michigan
(2)
54
15
34% 22-64 39% 23-59 22%
24%
6-25
14-19 15-21
11
10
10
12
27
L
74-88
*Marquette
(3)
40
31
46% 24-52 50% 31-62 39% 10-26 31%
8-26
16-18 18-21
11
10
14
5
25
L
80-86
*Illinois
(2)
15
45
44% 28-63 42% 27-64 35% 10-29 30% 10-33 14-21 22-25
9
15
11
13
86 W
83-74
^^Butler
(3)
44
150
45% 26-58 43% 22-51 24%
6-25
32%
3
6
339 W
76-53
Detroit
(7)
351
296
41% 26-64 33% 22-66 20%
7-35
64 W
116-85
Iowa
(11)
18
178
77 W
75-63
*Rutgers
(2)
48
119
54% 31-57 34% 25-73 32%
27%
88 W
80-59
Minnesota
(3)
106
86
44% 25-57 39% 22-57 39% 11-28 37%
45 W
70-68
Ohio St.
(3)
38
61
42% 20-48 42% 25-59 23%
5-22
67 W
84-69
*USC
(3)
36
105
56% 31-55 49% 26-53 32%
9-28
83-85
*UCLA
(2)
27
83-55
Nebraska
(4)
68-76
*Maryland
(2)
57 W
75-69
*Northwestern
51 W
76-64
Indiana
64 W
74-63
18 W
25 W
6-27
8-25
25-27 22-32
4
4
50%
4-8
17-19
5-6
13
7
9
8
65% 40-62 49% 32-66 68% 21-31 38%
9-24
15-17 12-18
7
6
12
9
7-26
6-6
6-13
6
13
16
8
7-19
19-24
8-13
9
10
7
15
29%
5-17
25-28 13-15
6
9
12
11
40%
6-15
13-15 11-17
4
6
11
15
20
51% 25-49 51% 29-57 50% 15-30 32%
6-19
18-21 21-28
4
10
13
6
85
57
48% 30-63 34% 21-62 46% 17-37 33% 10-30
6-8
3-8
3
6
8
11
28
6
37% 22-59 40% 24-60 33%
50% 12-24 15-21 16-21
9
9
9
7
(2)
66
41
42% 22-53 42% 25-59 41% 13-32 39% 11-28 18-21
8-9
6
6
8
5
(2)
74
39
43% 26-60 40% 23-57 41% 12-29 26%
7-27
12-17 11-15
7
9
6
11
*Iowa
(3)
18
178
39% 24-61 38% 24-63 34% 12-35 32%
8-25
14-17
10
10
9
9
94-84
*Purdue
(6)
8
68
62% 32-52 52% 29-56 40% 12-30 46% 10-22 18-24 16-21
2
3
3
4
95-74
Illinois
(2)
15
45
52% 34-65 43% 26-60 42% 10-24 33% 10-30 17-22 12-14
12
9
10
14
73-77 #
Oregon
(3)
53
37
46% 30-65 42% 30-72 25%
35%
8-23
6-6
9-12
5
7
17
8
88-62
Washington
(2)
116
133
52% 33-64 45% 26-58 33% 10-30 32%
7-22
12-16
3-8
12
6
5
10
62-71
*Michigan St.
(4)
37
5
34% 22-65 39% 28-71 16%
5-32
33%
9-27
13-16
6-13
6
11
9
9
74-67
*Minnesota
(2)
106
86
44% 24-55 41% 26-63 23%
5-22
35%
7-20
21-24
8-15
6
11
11
6
75-86
Penn St.
(2)
63
78
36% 25-69 56% 31-55 32% 10-31 58% 11-19 15-17 13-19
10
3
8
13
57 W
70-63
^^Northwestern
(4)
66
41
42% 22-53 37% 20-54 32%
25%
5-20
18-23 18-22
8
11
10
12
28 W
86-70
^^UCLA
(0)
27
20
52% 30-58 32% 22-68 59% 19-32 30%
9-30
7-13
17-26
7
19
9
5
7
77-74
^^Michigan St.
(0)
37
5
43% 23-54 41% 24-59 31%
9-29
37%
7-19
22-28 19-24
5
8
7
7
53-59
^^Michigan
(0)
54
15
22% 15-68 32% 19-59 18%
7-39
27%
9-33
16-18 12-13
12
5
6
8
28
L
55 W
12
L
29
L
109 W
7
L
88 W
71
L
W
22
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Off-Efficency
121.5
19th
Def-Efficiency
97.4
WAB
+1
Road & Neutral Games
7-22
9-27
7-28
8-25
Non-Conference Games
7-9
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
123.3
122.9
16th
123.0
8th
120.6
13th
49th
96.4
28th
102.9
121st
95.5
21st
94.8
17th
36th
+4.9
8th
+1.6
17th
+2.8
23rd
+3.3
12th
FG% 50% or better
7-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
15-3
3PT% < 35%
11-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
14th
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-2
More FTM than Opp.
22-3
14-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-7
More FTA than Opp.
19-2
6-3
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
11-5
10-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-4
5-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
21-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
22-9
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-4
1-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
8-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-1
@ Matteise
W, 92-61
Hawaii Hilo
L, 79-48
*Oregon
W, 94-44
Northwest Indian
5
L, 92-57
*Tennessee
Record
25-9 (15-3)
43
L, 95-83
*Utah St.
Home
15-1
308
W, 83-73
Denver
Road
324
W, 69-66
Utah Tech
114
W, 83-75
CS. Northridge
Non-Conf.
139
W, 71-67
South Dakota St.
Conf.
127
L, 88-81
*St. Thomas
W, 89-60
Montana Tech
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Northern Iowa
67.0
112.0
109.0
16.2
15.5
22.6
29.0
198th
82nd
236th
108th
288th
345th
135th
56.4
74.6
57.3
36.5
36.2
36.8
12th
eFG%
96th
FT%
16th
2PT%
53rd
3PT%
84th
FTA/FGA %
235th
3PA/FGA %
29
108
L, 104-76
#14 Montana Grizzlies - Big Sky
60
L, 71-67
*San Francisco
302
W, 92-81
*Eastern Wash.
275
W, 73-71
*Idaho
250
W, 81-76
Northern Ariz.
117
L, 81-57
Northern Col.
311
W, 63-59
*Weber St.
BPI: 173
BT: 133
EM: 160
KPI: 125
NET: 143
POM: 157
SOR: 90
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.9
72.9
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
10-8
Win
80.3
68.2
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.3
86.1
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-1
140.5
Home
79.8
67.2
101-200
3-1
1-0
2-2
234.3
Road
74.3
78.1
201+
9-0
2-0
5-2
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -3.1 (77th)
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 8-2
Opp. O-Reb%
52.2
74.0
53.1
33.7
31.9
35.0
246th
277th
268th
172nd
149th
54th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
224
L, 86-61
*Idaho St.
275
W, 72-67
Idaho
Win
75.3%
60.6%
50.7%
38.9%
28.8%
7.7
5.9
-1.7
1.5
1.0
3.6
196
W, 77-70
Montana St.
Loss
68.3%
52.8%
56.5%
28.6%
44.1%
6.2
8.8
-2.0
-7.7
-2.6
-5.1
210
W, 92-78
Portland St.
Home
72.8%
59.5%
50.5%
36.0%
26.6%
7.7
5.1
-0.9
1.8
0.9
2.9
344
W, 87-59
Sacramento St.
Road
74.2%
57.6%
53.9%
36.0%
37.6%
7.0
8.1
-2.6
-3.3
-0.7
-0.2
117
W, 86-78
*Northern Col.
250
W, 83-80
*Northern Ariz.
140
224
W, 81-68
Idaho St.
125
125
311
W, 65-58
Weber St.
196
W, 89-85
*Montana St.
110
110
344
W, 60-54
*Sacramento St.
95
95
210
!L, 79-76
*Portland St.
80
Eastern Wash.
250
W, 74-65
^^Northern Ariz.
65
117
W, 91-83
^^Northern Col.
Big Sky KenPom rank in NCAAT
last 3 years: 223, 113, 138
36
2nd Chance 10% 3
Off TO 16% 21
97
Fast Break 9%
Home
89
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Money Williams
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 47% 10
65
Game #
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
75
Off TO 17%
Malik Moore
Joe Pridgen
Defensive Pct.l
W, 83-72
^^Idaho
78
In Paint 46%
Offensive Pct.l
302
W, 78-55
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 11%
80
275
Off-Efficiency
Kai Johnson
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.0
3.0
22-38
6-26
9.8
2.8
6-16
9-22
10.0
7.2
20-32
0-1
9.8
3.2
11-22
6-14
L vs. Oregon: trailed 44-20 at HT
vs. Tennessee: trailed 40-31 at HT
Montana PPP in those G: .74, .83
W 11.8
3.7
62-138
34-99
12.7
3.5
47-94
49-112
12.4
6.9 127-186
4-13
12.4
3.2
86-131
24-57
L
17.7
3.1
26-59
22-62
13.5
2.2
19-36
11-34
9.0
6.8
36-58
1-7
7.2
2.9
21-48
2-24
3 G vs. teams w/ top 100 D
6 G vs. teams w/ 2PT% D in top 200
H
11.0
3.2
36-85
21-60
12.6
3.3
29-60
31-76
12.2
7.5
77-117
4-11
12.2
3.3
58-88
13-36
R
15.4
3.9
52-112
35-101 13.1
3.1
37-70
29-70
10.9
6.3
86-127
1-9
10.1
2.9
49-91
13-45
Starting Lineup Last G: K. Johnson, M. Moore, J. Pridgen, T. Sawyer, B. Whitney (14 G: 13-1)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
0
Money Williams
6'4"
So
--
27.2
13.3
3.6
3.1
2.5
1.1
0.3
44.7%
3
3PT
FT
88-197
34.8%
56-161
79.6%
109-137
Malik Moore
6'5"
So
5
30.7
12.8
3.2
2.4
1.2
0.8
0.1
50.8%
66-130
41.1%
60-146
82.2%
60-73
11 Joe Pridgen
6'5"
Sr
--
27.7
11.5
6.9
1.3
1.4
0.9
0.7
66.8%
163-244
25.0%
5-20
57.5%
50-87
1
Kai Johnson
6'4"
Jr
--
24.3
11.1
3.1
1.8
1.5
1.3
0.6
59.8%
107-179
32.1%
26-81
69.4%
84-121
12 Brandon Whitney
6'1"
Sr
--
29.8
9.5
2.2
2.7
0.8
0.7
0.0
61.0%
97-159
38.3%
18-47
84.1%
74-88
32 Te'Jon Sawyer
6'8"
Sr
1
23.7
9.2
3.9
1.3
1.4
0.5
0.6
64.6%
95-147
41.7%
20-48
72.6%
53-73
20 Austin Patterson
6'3"
Jr
--
19.6
5.7
2.3
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.4
77.1%
27-35
39.6%
38-96
80.6%
25-31
50 Jensen Bradtke
6'10"
Fr
10
10.6
3.4
1.5
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
52.0%
13-25
30.6%
15-49
91.7%
11-12
8
6'4"
Jr
22
5.6
2.6
0.7
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.1
50.0%
5-10
35.3%
6-17
33.3%
3-9
Jeremiah Dargan
#14 Montana Grizzlies - Big Sky
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
W
29
L
W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
92-61
Hawaii Hilo
--
--
--
57% 38-67 37% 23-63 18%
4-22
28%
5-18
12-23 10-13
For Opp For Opp
13
8
7
16
48-79
*Oregon
(3)
54
37
34% 17-50 45% 27-60 16%
3-19
36%
9-25
11-17
16-23
6
11
12
7
94-44
Northwest Indian
(1)
--
--
51% 35-69 33% 20-60 36%
9-25
15%
3-20
15-22
1-2
15
3
10
17
5
L
57-92
*Tennessee
(2)
19
3
35% 18-52 61% 31-51 28%
7-25
43%
9-21
14-19 21-25
3
5
11
12
43
L
83-95
*Utah St.
(4)
13
148
52% 32-62 50% 29-58 33%
8-24
45%
9-20
11-20
28-36
12
10
18
12
308 W
83-73
Denver
(5)
293
220
49% 30-61 39% 25-64 28%
7-25
11%
2-19
16-19 21-24
6
13
12
13
324 W
69-66
Utah Tech
(0)
260
316
43% 24-56 44% 28-64 20%
3-15
21%
4-19
18-24
6-8
12
7
13
6
114 W
83-75
CS. Northridge
(1)
144
130
42% 22-53 39% 30-78 36% 10-28 24%
6-25
29-37
9-14
9
15
16
11
139 W
71-67
South Dakota St.
(6)
111
175
45% 26-58 41% 26-64 31%
17%
4-23
11-16
11-12
4
9
11
15
81-88
*St. Thomas
(2)
58
230
53% 31-59 50% 29-58 50% 12-24 41%
9-22
7-9
21-25
4
5
11
9
89-60
Montana Tech
(2)
--
--
57% 35-61 40% 24-60 38% 11-29 25%
5-20
8-11
7-11
7
4
14
11
(5)
125
117
55% 29-53 69% 40-58 23%
5-22
58% 11-19
13-17 13-18
4
4
12
7
127
L
W
108
L
76-104
*Northern Iowa
60
L
8-26
67-71
*San Francisco
(4)
94
40
46% 25-55 44% 21-48 24%
4-17
39% 10-26 13-16 19-31
4
5
9
6
302 W
92-81
*Eastern Wash.
(11)
258
274
56% 31-55 46% 29-63 42%
8-19
33%
8-24
22-24 15-17
3
12
6
15
275 W
73-71
*Idaho
(1)
139
334
54% 28-52 42% 27-64 39%
7-18
30%
8-27
10-16
9-10
4
11
12
12
250 W
81-76
Northern Ariz.
(4)
221
256
52% 31-60 42% 29-69 45%
9-20
39%
7-18
10-13
11-16
3
11
10
9
57-81
Northern Col.
(1)
86
187
35% 20-58 57% 34-60 19%
4-21
44%
7-16
13-22
6-10
5
9
11
13
63-59
*Weber St.
(4)
273
285
40% 21-52 43% 22-51 31%
5-16
39%
7-18
16-22
8-12
10
7
8
11
61-86
*Idaho St.
(1)
186
251
39% 22-56 56% 33-59 42%
8-19
44%
7-16
9-18
13-16
9
10
11
10
275 W
72-67
Idaho
(1)
139
334
49% 25-51 40% 22-55 44% 12-27 42% 10-24 10-15 13-20
5
8
11
11
196 W
77-70
Montana St.
(4)
209
182
52% 30-58 53% 24-45 29%
33%
4-12
13-15 18-20
5
4
5
13
210 W
92-78
Portland St.
(4)
274
100
64% 35-55 55% 31-56 67% 10-15 31%
5-16
12-14 11-16
4
6
9
8
344 W
87-59
Sacramento St.
(1)
343
315
56% 32-57 37% 20-54 46% 12-26 22%
5-23
11-11 14-19
6
9
8
8
117 W
86-78
*Northern Col.
(4)
86
187
62% 31-50 48% 29-61 63% 10-16 48% 13-27 14-20
7-9
4
2
12
9
250 W
83-80
*Northern Ariz.
(1)
221
256
61% 30-49 50% 29-58 50% 10-20 40% 10-25 13-18 12-16
2
10
7
11
224 W
81-68
Idaho St.
(4)
186
251
56% 32-57 35% 23-66 46%
6-13
23%
5-22
11-16 17-21
9
14
12
9
311 W
65-58
Weber St.
(1)
273
285
50% 26-52 49% 23-47 36%
8-22
36%
5-14
5-7
7-8
3
3
9
12
196 W
89-85
*Montana St.
(6)
209
182
55% 30-55 54% 30-56 42%
8-19
36%
5-14
21-26 20-33
5
7
5
9
344 W
60-54
*Sacramento St.
(4)
343
315
50% 19-38 38% 21-56 20%
2-10
17%
4-23
20-24
8-13
2
7
13
8
117
L
311 W
224
L
210
L
4-14
76-79 #
*Portland St.
(1)
274
100
42% 25-60 40% 25-63 20%
5-25
57%
8-14
21-26 21-35
6
12
13
9
302 W
83-72
Eastern Wash.
(1)
258
274
55% 27-49 56% 30-54 43%
6-14
27%
4-15
23-33
8-11
7
4
10
11
250 W
74-65
^^Northern Ariz.
(5)
221
256
55% 24-44 39% 24-62 30%
3-10
28%
7-25
23-34 10-18
2
7
13
10
275 W
78-55
^^Idaho
(1)
139
334
46% 28-61 31% 17-55 39% 14-36 19%
5-26
8-10
16-20
4
9
5
11
117 W
91-83
^^Northern Col.
(0)
86
187
65% 30-46 59% 30-51 64%
6-14
24-28 17-20
5
2
10
8
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
7-11
43%
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
109.4
133rd
112.2
72nd
106.8
147th
112.6
80th
116.6
50th
Def-Efficiency
107.0
191st
110.8
266th
108.9
237th
110.8
248th
107.5
191st
WAB
-0.2
68th
-2.8
96th
-2.3
149th
-1.1
74th
+0.4
49th
FG% 50% or better
18-3
3PT% >= 35%
17-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-9
21-4
3PT% < 35%
4-5
Make >= 10 3PA
6-6
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
9-7
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-2
More FTM than Opp.
16-1
8-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
8-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-0
More FTA than Opp.
14-2
3-2
More OReb than Opp.
17-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
9-1
22-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
12-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-4
3PA / FGA < 35%
15-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
8-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
14-5
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-1
@ Matteise
Vanderbilt
Alabama
Robert Morris
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Saint Mary's
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
138
W, 76-69
Towson
106
W, 86-74
Chattanooga
85
W, 87-68
Akron
55
W, 77-74
^^Nebraska
Record
28-5 (17-1)
W, 78-38
Stanislaus St.
Home
16-1
188
W, 80-66
Cal Poly
Road
67
W, 71-36
^^USC
78
L, 68-64
^^Arizona St.
209
!W, 82-74
UTSA
74
W, 72-63
*Utah
53
!L, 67-65
^^Boise St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Merrimack
61.7
115.0
92.8
15.1
16.6
40.5
24.9
359th
55th
9th
39th
212th
2nd
9th
184
W, 73-68
#7 Saint Mary's Gaels - WCC
BPI: 30
BT: 24
EM: 19
KPI: 20
NET: 21
L, 75-68
Utah St.
298
W, 70-60
Pacific
238
W, 71-41
Pepperdine
279
W, 81-58
*Portland
159
W, 81-56
LMU
323
W, 103-56
*San Diego
SOR: 25
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
73.5
60.7
1-25
1-0
0-1
1-0
12-4
Win
75.5
59.6
26-50
0-1
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
62.4
66.6
51-100
4-0
2-2
3-1
Non-Conf.
108.8
Home
75.8
61.6
101-200
6-0
0-0
2-0
Conf.
133.6
Road
71.1
59.6
201+
4-0
1-0
3-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.2 (24th)
43
POM: 22
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
50.9
69.5
51.8
32.6
31.4
33.4
167th
eFG%
273rd
FT%
145th
2PT%
232nd
3PT%
224th
FTA/FGA %
315th
3PA/FGA %
46.2
74.7
45.8
31.2
25.0
31.3
14th
307th
11th
43rd
18th
6th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 74-50
*Pepperdine
60
W, 71-51
San Francisco
Win
70.4%
52.9%
43.7%
33.2%
31.6%
6.6
5.5
6.1
12.3
1.6
3.4
111
W, 80-75
*Washington St.
Loss
62.8%
48.4%
53.7%
27.3%
26.3%
5.4
4.2
2.4
2.4
-1.0
-0.6
64
W, 67-54
*Santa Clara
Home
70.1%
53.6%
45.0%
31.1%
32.8%
6.4
6.2
6.9
12.2
1.4
5.1
15
W, 62-58
Gonzaga
Road
68.5%
50.8%
45.7%
33.8%
28.3%
6.5
4.4
4.1
9.3
1.0
0.3
60
L, 65-64
*San Francisco
93
W, 63-49
*Oregon St.
140
64
W, 73-64
Santa Clara
125
125
111
W, 77-56
Washington St.
279
W, 79-66
Portland
110
110
W, 74-67
*Gonzaga
159
W, 58-55
*LMU
95
95
80
93
W, 74-64
Oregon St.
238
W, 74-59
^^Pepperdine
65
L, 58-51
91
In Paint 49%
Fast Break 9% 9
80
15
Def-Efficiency
140
^^Gonzaga
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 46% 16
68
Fast Break 12%
Home
96
2nd Chance 12%
Game #
Loss
Road
Augustas Marciulionis
40
Off TO 17%
65
Game #
98
2nd Chance 19%
88
Off TO 16%
Paulius Murauskas
Mitchell Saxen
Defensive Pct.l
15
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
238
Luke Barrett
A. Marciulionis 39.5% 3PT in WCC
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
M. Saxen B2B yrs top 20 off-reb rate
L5 14.0
4.4
19-36
5-18
9.6
6.4
13-29
3-12
12.2
8.4
26-45
0-1
10.8
8.2
16-24
6-20
P. Murauskas in WCC Title G: 0 pts,
0-7 FG, 4 fouls in 14 minutes
W 14.2
3.1
95-193
43-108 13.5
8.6 107-197
30-91
10.1
8.1 116-210
0-1
10.2
6.6
83-131
29-109
L
14.8
2.4
24-41
5-30
6.8
4.8
11-24
2-14
13.4
7.2
26-51
0-0
7.8
7.4
8-17
6-16
L. Barrett 3PT in WCC: 23.5%
H
15.3
2.6
56-113
31-74
13.8
9.2
71-132
14-51
10.1
8.1
69-122
0-0
10.7
7.5
53-82
17-66
L vs. BSU led by 2 w/ 23 seconds left
R
13.3
3.4
63-121
17-64
11.1
6.8
47-89
18-54
11.2
7.8
73-139
0-1
8.9
5.9
38-66
18-59
Starting Lineup Last G: L. Barrett, A. Marciulionis, P. Murauskas, J. Ross, M. Saxen (33 G: 28-5)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
6'4"
Sr
--
34.9
14.3
3.0
6.1
2.1
1.4
0.1
50.9%
23 Paulius Murauskas
6'8"
So
--
27.3
12.5
8.0
1.4
1.3
0.7
0.4
11 Mitchell Saxen
6'10"
Sr
--
29.5
10.6
7.9
1.8
1.4
1.3
1.3
33 Luke Barrett
6'6"
Sr
--
36.5
9.8
6.7
1.4
0.9
0.7
0
Mikey Lewis
6'3"
Fr
--
16.2
8.5
1.7
0.6
0.8
2
Jordan Ross
6'3"
So
--
26.3
8.1
3.0
2.6
1
3
NAME
Augustas Marciulionis
2PT
3PT
FT
119-234
34.8%
48-138
79.6%
90-113
53.4%
118-221
30.5%
32-105
74.8%
80-107
54.4%
142-261
0.0%
0-1
51.9%
67-129
0.4
61.5%
91-148
28.0%
35-125
69.8%
37-53
0.7
0.2
45.4%
44-97
38.8%
57-147
72.4%
21-29
0.8
0.8
0.3
42.0%
73-174
28.9%
22-76
69.1%
56-81
Harry Wessels
7'1"
Jr
1
12.6
5.2
3.3
0.3
1.1
0.2
0.9
56.1%
55-98
--
--
83.3%
55-66
45 Andrew McKeever
7'1"
So
14
6.0
2.5
2.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
64.7%
22-34
--
--
30.8%
4-13
9
6'8"
So
2
10.0
2.3
1.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
45.5%
10-22
31.0%
13-42
91.7%
11-12
Ashton Hardaway
#7 Saint Mary's Gaels - WCC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
138 W
76-69
Towson
--
181
183
46% 25-54 42% 27-64 25%
4-16
31%
4-13
22-29
11-19
12
11
9
7
106 W
86-74
Chattanooga
(2)
59
270
52% 27-52 51% 27-53 36%
8-22
40%
8-20
24-32 12-17
8
2
9
9
85 W
87-68
Akron
(4)
62
185
50% 35-70 37% 24-65 26%
5-19
46% 13-28 12-18
7-8
18
7
11
10
55 W
77-74
^^Nebraska
(4)
85
56
43% 26-61 45% 22-49 48% 11-23 29%
5-17
14-25 25-29
14
11
9
15
W
78-38
Stanislaus St.
(2)
--
--
49% 31-63 27% 16-59 24%
6-25
18%
3-17
10-15
3-7
13
5
13
14
188 W
80-66
Cal Poly
(2)
120
260
46% 32-69 40% 23-58 30%
8-27
32%
8-25
8-16
12-13
20
9
14
17
67 W
71-36
^^USC
(4)
35
104
51% 30-59 26% 13-50 21%
3-14
0%
0-12
8-12
10-12
9
4
10
10
64-68
^^Arizona St.
(0)
67
76
42% 25-60 46% 28-61 47%
8-17
28%
5-18
6-12
7-12
11
6
13
10
82-74 #
UTSA
(3)
159
233
41% 24-59 36% 25-70 14%
3-21
32%
9-28
31-43 15-19
17
18
13
17
72-63
*Utah
(3)
73
71
44% 25-57 38% 24-64 38%
8-21
28%
5-18
14-23 10-17
8
14
12
10
65-67 #
^^Boise St.
(6)
52
54
38% 23-61 41% 21-51 33%
6-18
29%
4-14
13-16 21-27
9
9
7
11
73-68
Merrimack
(4)
315
85
46% 26-57 50% 25-50 42%
5-12
57% 12-21 16-19
14
3
11
10
78
L
209 W
74 W
53
L
184 W
43
L
6-6
68-75
Utah St.
(2)
13
148
44% 24-54 59% 30-51 40% 10-25 35%
6-17
10-19
9-11
9
4
12
13
298 W
70-60
Pacific
(5)
278
257
38% 26-68 41% 23-56 30%
7-23
25%
3-12
11-20
11-15
20
7
6
8
238 W
71-41
Pepperdine
(4)
174
244
41% 28-68 32% 17-54 21%
6-29
13%
2-16
9-11
5-11
17
7
8
12
279 W
81-58
*Portland
(1)
175
313
44% 30-68 37% 20-54 38%
8-21
35%
7-20
13-19
11-14
17
9
7
18
159 W
81-56
LMU
(2)
214
107
42% 24-57 40% 21-53 44%
8-18
46%
5-11
25-28
9-13
15
7
7
11
323 W
103-56
*San Diego
(3)
290
269
53% 37-70 44% 24-54 52% 15-29 33%
5-15
14-16
3-3
17
7
6
13
238 W
74-50
*Pepperdine
(6)
174
244
47% 30-64 34% 19-56 37%
7-8
9-14
12
7
6
5
7-19
25%
3-12
60 W
71-51
San Francisco
(4)
94
40
62% 32-52 27% 14-52 20%
1-5
22%
6-27
6-14
17-20
4
5
7
7
111 W
80-75
*Washington St.
(1)
69
181
58% 30-52 57% 28-49 41%
7-17
43%
6-14
13-14 13-13
8
2
11
12
64 W
67-54
*Santa Clara
(3)
47
64
40% 25-62 35% 18-51 31%
8-26
36%
8-22
9-12
10-11
16
6
9
11
15 W
62-58
Gonzaga
(2)
12
29
38% 21-55 44% 24-55 36%
9-25
18%
3-17
11-22
7-13
13
8
11
9
64-65
*San Francisco
(4)
94
40
43% 26-60 44% 25-57 13%
3-23
31%
5-16
9-16
10-16
8
8
5
9
93 W
63-49
*Oregon St.
(1)
45
210
53% 26-49 37% 19-52 38%
6-16
29%
4-14
5-9
7-8
4
5
7
9
64 W
73-64
Santa Clara
(2)
47
64
53% 25-47 40% 23-57 43%
6-14
38%
9-24
17-24
9-11
6
7
12
11
111 W
77-56
Washington St.
(3)
69
181
46% 29-63 41% 22-54 21%
5-24
40%
6-15
14-17
6-9
13
6
5
15
279 W
79-66
Portland
(3)
175
313
47% 32-68 48% 26-54 38%
9-24
29%
5-17
6-8
9-15
15
4
9
11
15 W
74-67
*Gonzaga
(2)
12
29
44% 27-61 48% 27-56 40%
8-20
29%
4-14
12-15
9-12
11
7
8
7
159 W
58-55
*LMU
(4)
214
107
38% 21-56 39% 21-54 27%
4-15
33%
4-12
12-18
9-12
9
2
7
3
93 W
74-64
Oregon St.
(1)
45
210
40% 23-57 48% 22-46 41%
9-22
25%
3-12
19-23 17-21
19
6
7
6
74-59
^^Pepperdine
(8)
174
244
50% 29-58 39% 22-56 15%
2-13
28%
5-18
14-24 10-15
12
5
6
7
51-58
^^Gonzaga
(0)
12
29
39% 20-52 41% 26-63
0-16
7%
1-15
11-15
8
6
15
4
60
L
238 W
15
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
0%
Non-Conference Games
5-7
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
115.7
51st
114.5
51st
113.6
54th
117.6
38th
113.1
83rd
Def-Efficiency
97.1
41st
90.0
3rd
97.0
45th
91.6
6th
90.9
5th
WAB
+1.7
22nd
+2.5
24th
+0.1
50th
+4.2
15th
+2.2
20th
FG% 50% or better
9-0
3PT% >= 35%
15-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-1
16-0
3PT% < 35%
12-5
Make >= 10 3PA
3-1
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
22-3
More FTM than Opp.
18-2
13-3
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
2-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
19-4
More FTA than Opp.
22-2
2-0
More OReb than Opp.
26-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
23-3
26-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
5-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
15-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-0
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
19-5
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-1
@ Matteise
357
W, 102-63
MD Eastern Shore
203
W, 85-76
SEMO
125
W, 85-69
California
256
W, 94-81
Jackson St.
Record
20-12 (8-10)
95
W, 73-71
^^Nevada
Home
14-3
220
W, 76-60
^^Seton Hall
Road
#10 Vanderbilt Commodores - SEC
BPI: 56
BT: 42
EM: 52
KPI: 47
NET: 48
POM: 49
SOR: 41
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.6
74.8
1-25
3-1
0-0
1-5
6-9
Win
84.9
69.2
26-50
2-2
0-2
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.9
84.1
51-100
1-0
2-0
1-0
49
L, 81-70
^^Drake
307
W, 87-56
Tenn. Tech
155
W, 80-64
*Virginia Tech
75
W, 83-74
^^TCU
360
W, 105-53
The Citadel
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Austin Peay
69.5
118.6
101.2
14.7
20.0
32.2
29.7
60th
22nd
84th
28th
43rd
107th
175th
51.7
74.7
53.6
32.5
34.0
40.2
122nd
eFG%
90th
FT%
85th
2PT%
238th
3PT%
149th
FTA/FGA %
146th
3PA/FGA %
277
W, 85-55
Non-Conf.
203.3
Home
84.0
70.9
101-200
1-0
0-0
1-0
Conf.
27.7
Road
74.7
79.2
201+
7-0
1-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +1.5 (40th)
352
W, 100-56
New Orleans
83
W, 80-72
*LSU
33
L, 76-64
Miss St.
23
L, 75-66
*Missouri
86
W, 66-63
South Carolina
5
W, 76-75
Tennessee
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-1
Opp. O-Reb%
52.9
72.0
51.5
36.9
39.0
37.5
275th
171st
205th
337th
310th
125th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
L, 103-87
*Alabama
14
W, 74-69
Kentucky
Win
74.6%
57.1%
46.1%
34.0%
35.2%
8.9
7.4
1.4
2.7
5.6
2.0
39
L, 97-67
*Oklahoma
Loss
75.1%
48.0%
60.6%
29.7%
39.9%
6.8
8.3
1.9
-4.8
0.7
-3.3
4
L, 86-75
*Florida
Home
75.5%
55.9%
47.6%
32.7%
35.3%
8.6
7.5
2.5
3.3
4.7
1.7
45
W, 86-78
Texas
Road
73.8%
50.9%
56.0%
32.4%
38.9%
7.5
7.9
0.6
-4.1
2.7
-1.9
1
L, 80-68
Auburn
5
L, 81-76
*Tennessee
140
14
L, 82-61
*Kentucky
125
125
26
W, 77-72
Ole Miss
16
W, 86-84
*Texas A&M
110
110
!W, 97-93
Missouri
39
L, 90-77
Arkansas
Def-Efficiency
140
95
95
80
In Paint 46%
75
Fast Break 15%
71
78
2nd Chance 16%
96
Off TO 23%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
36
In Paint 44%
35
L, 79-68
*Georgia
80
45
L, 79-72
^^Texas
65
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Jason Edwards
79
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Tyler Nickel
Defensive Pct.l
23
Off-Efficiency
2nd Chance 14%
58
Off TO 17%
64
Devin McGlockton
Offensive Pct.l
6
A.J. Hoggard
J. Edwards draws 6.2 fouls / 40 min.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
Hoggard 3PT LY: 35%, 39% in B10
L5 15.6
1.4
14-34
8-26
13.8
2.2
5-12
17-34
8.0
7.8
15-23
3-14
9.2
3.0
12-28
2-17
D. McGlockton 3PT last 10 G: 7-29
W 17.2
1.9
61-116
43-113
12.2
2.3
21-40
57-130 10.9
8.2
75-100
13-39
10.3
2.6
46-109
19-59
L
16.8
1.8
45-98
20-62
7.7
2.5
8-22
21-62
9.6
7.4
35-61
12-35
9.1
2.8
33-89
7-36
H
15.1
1.9
48-100
34-99
11.7
2.4
16-29
45-107
11.6
8.4
65-89
13-37
11.6
3.1
45-101
16-53
R
19.2
1.9
58-114
29-76
9.1
2.3
13-33
33-85
9.1
7.3
45-72
12-37
7.9
2.3
34-97
10-42
T. Nickel 3PT conf G: 45%, 5th best
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Edwards, A. Hoggard, C. Manon, D. McGlockton, T. Nickel (16 G: 7-9)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
1
Jason Edwards
6'0"
Jr
--
25.0
17.0
1.9
1.3
1.6
0.9
--
49.5%
5
3PT
FT
106-214
36.0%
63-175
83.1%
143-172
Tyler Nickel
6'7"
Jr
--
24.7
10.5
2.4
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.5
46.8%
29-62
40.6%
78-192
84.3%
43-51
99 Devin McGlockton
6'7"
Jr
--
24.9
10.4
7.9
1.0
0.8
0.8
1.1
68.3%
110-161
33.8%
25-74
66.7%
38-57
11 A.J. Hoggard
6'4"
Sr
1
26.1
9.8
2.7
4.6
2.3
1.2
0.3
39.9%
79-198
27.4%
26-95
74.7%
68-91
22 Jaylen Carey
6'8"
So
--
20.4
8.2
5.8
0.8
1.5
0.6
0.7
54.3%
94-173
24.3%
9-37
56.8%
46-81
2
MJ Collins
6'4"
Jr
1
20.9
7.7
2.4
0.5
1.0
0.6
--
52.8%
57-108
29.3%
27-92
72.9%
43-59
30 Chris Manon
6'5"
Sr
--
17.8
6.5
3.6
1.3
0.9
1.7
1.0
63.5%
61-96
24.2%
8-33
77.8%
63-81
3
Tyler Tanner
6'0"
Fr
--
20.6
5.8
2.3
1.9
0.4
1.7
0.2
60.0%
57-95
25.4%
16-63
75.0%
24-32
4
Grant Huffman
6'3"
Sr
4
18.1
3.4
1.9
1.8
0.8
1.1
0.2
51.7%
30-58
22.7%
5-22
70.0%
21-30
#10 Vanderbilt Commodores - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opp Eff.
FG
For
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
MD Eastern Shore
--
348
356
50% 36-72 44% 23-52 24%
8-34
33%
203 W
85-76
SEMO
(5)
264
133
39% 25-65 44% 28-63 12%
3-25
48% 12-25 32-41
125 W
85-69
California
(2)
104
162
52% 35-68 44% 24-55 28%
7-25
36%
5-14
8-15
256 W
94-81
Jackson St.
(2)
288
200
52% 33-63 40% 25-63 42% 16-38 37%
7-19
95 W
73-71
^^Nevada
(4)
79
120
48% 28-59 54% 29-54 40%
40%
6-15
11-18
7-10
220 W
76-60
^^Seton Hall
(0)
325
89
52% 28-54 37% 23-63 37% 10-27 33%
7-21
10-12
7-11
70-81
^^Drake
(1)
70
45
44% 24-54 54% 29-54 19%
33%
5-15
307 W
87-56
Tenn. Tech
(4)
270
288
47% 33-71 31% 20-64 36% 11-31 35%
155 W
80-64
*Virginia Tech
(4)
164
137
53% 29-55 38% 23-60 33%
9-27
28%
6-22
59% 10-17 27-33 14-26
6-15
4-21
Opp
7-21
For
Off. Reb
102-63
L
Opp
FT
357 W
49
For
3PT
Opp
22-33 10-19
Turnovers
For Opp For Opp
14
4
1
15
8-13
20
3
9
8
16-21
7
8
8
20
12-17 24-30
7
15
9
12
10
8
12
16
5
15
11
13
18-24 18-20
6
10
15
17
8-23
10-12
8-10
13
7
9
15
8-29
13-18 10-13
3
12
8
14
75 W
83-74
^^TCU
(3)
173
27
42% 25-59 49% 25-51 27%
8
6
11
18
360 W
105-53
The Citadel
(9)
356
352
56% 38-68 41% 19-46 52% 12-23 27%
7-26
17-21
8-17
15
8
3
19
277 W
85-55
Austin Peay
(2)
250
294
60% 29-48 32% 19-60 44%
11%
2-19
19-27 15-22
6
9
17
13
352 W
100-56
New Orleans
(8)
309
354
47% 36-76 35% 19-55 41% 14-34 24%
4-17
14-15 14-23
12
10
9
21
83 W
80-72
*LSU
(4)
128
62
44% 28-64 50% 24-48 31%
8-26
28%
5-18
16-24 19-23
14
4
8
14
6-16
8-18
33
L
64-76
Miss St.
(2)
26
50
36% 22-62 47% 27-57 19%
5-26
38%
15-20 16-19
9
7
12
10
23
L
66-75
*Missouri
(3)
5
75
40% 21-52 49% 24-49 44%
8-18
42% 10-24 16-20 17-25
9
9
11
14
86 W
66-63
South Carolina
(3)
110
59
41% 23-56 42% 19-45 19%
4-21
44%
16-21 18-23
8
9
12
24
5
76-75
Tennessee
(2)
19
3
46% 26-56 48% 24-50 38%
8-21
48% 10-21 16-19 17-21
8
7
9
9
87-103
*Alabama
(2)
4
28
39% 31-80 56% 36-64 42% 11-26 36%
8-22
14-18 23-34
14
8
10
11
9-23
4-11
W
6
L
14 W
7-16
74-69
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
44% 29-66 48% 26-54 36% 12-33 39%
8-13
7
10
5
17
39
L
67-97
*Oklahoma
(6)
30
77
39% 24-62 63% 36-57 27%
7-26
55% 11-20 12-14 14-22
7
7
14
16
4
L
75-86
*Florida
(2)
3
13
51% 31-61 57% 31-54 32%
6-19
48% 10-21
7-12
14-23
7
9
9
10
86-78
Texas
(3)
39
69
42% 30-71 42% 25-60 33%
9-27
36%
9-25
17-22 19-27
15
13
5
9
12
42% 26-62 52% 30-58 18%
3-17
38%
9-24
13-14 11-15
14
7
11
8
9-21
45 W
1
L
68-80
Auburn
(2)
1
5
L
76-81
*Tennessee
(3)
19
3
46% 27-59 56% 29-52 44% 12-27 43%
10-14 14-22
6
2
5
5
14
L
61-82
*Kentucky
(3)
11
49
40% 25-63 57% 29-51 20%
5-25
41% 11-27
6-11
11
2
10
12
26 W
77-72
Ole Miss
(2)
31
34
46% 24-52 42% 25-60 35%
8-23
32%
9-28
21-29 13-15
8
8
13
11
16 W
86-84
*Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
41% 24-58 37% 23-62 42% 10-24 32%
7-22
28-36 31-39
10
14
9
12
23 W
97-93 #
Missouri
(2)
5
75
50% 34-68 49% 28-57 31%
41%
9-22
21-24 28-35
17
9
14
13
8-26
13-13
39
L
77-90
Arkansas
(2)
83
22
38% 23-60 51% 33-65 40% 10-25 33%
8-24
21-27 16-22
6
10
14
15
35
L
68-79
*Georgia
(3)
46
23
39% 22-57 45% 22-49 30%
8-27
44%
8-18
16-21 27-37
12
9
11
13
45
L
72-79
^^Texas
(3)
39
69
41% 24-58 46% 25-54 16%
3-19
25%
4-16
21-30 25-34
8
6
9
8
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
118.0
35th
118.4
27th
116.2
36th
120.1
20th
121.5
22nd
Def-Efficiency
99.7
76th
102.0
85th
99.3
78th
101.6
84th
103.9
115th
WAB
+1.7
21st
-0.2
55th
+0.7
32nd
+1.3
32nd
-0.3
61st
FG% 50% or better
8-1
3PT% >= 35%
10-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-9
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
10-2
13-2
3PT% < 35%
7-10
Make >= 10 3PA
10-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
7-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
10-3
More FTA than Opp.
11-3
3-4
More OReb than Opp.
2-8
Make < 10 3PA
13-9
11-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
17-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-8
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
6-11
3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
4-3
2-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-1
@ Matteise
178
W, 110-54
UNC Asheville
90
W, 88-79
Ark. St.
59
W, 72-64
McNeese St.
18
L, 87-78
*Purdue
Record
25-8 (13-5)
25
W, 100-87
^^Illinois
Home
12-3
1
!W, 85-80
^^Houston
Road
77
W, 95-90
^^Rutgers
29
L, 83-81
^^Oregon
36
W, 94-79
*North Carolina
32
W, 83-75
Creighton
273
W, 97-90
*North Dakota
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Kent St.
74.6
127.7
96.4
16.7
13.5
34.7
29.2
1st
4th
28th
149th
348th
39th
149th
56.3
71.6
59.7
35.0
40.1
46.2
14th
eFG%
210th
FT%
4th
2PT%
107th
3PT%
25th
FTA/FGA %
41st
3PA/FGA %
47.9
70.4
48.8
30.8
33.9
35.1
50th
89th
92nd
29th
206th
56th
123
W, 81-54
#2 Alabama Crimson Tide - SEC
BPI: 6
BT: 5
EM: 5
KPI: 2
NET: 6
W, 105-82
South Dakota St.
39
W, 107-79
Oklahoma
86
W, 88-68
*South Carolina
16
W, 94-88
*Texas A&M
26
L, 74-64
Ole Miss
14
W, 102-97
*Kentucky
SOR: 6
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
91.1
81.4
1-25
1-2
3-1
3-3
13-5
Win
94.0
78.3
26-50
5-1
0-1
4-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
82.3
91.3
51-100
3-0
1-0
1-0
Non-Conf.
74.6
Home
91.3
75.9
101-200
3-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
30.5
Road
91.0
86.0
201+
0-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +9.8 (4th)
139
POM: 6
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
47
W, 103-87
Vanderbilt
83
W, 80-73
LSU
Win
71.6%
61.5%
47.6%
35.9%
28.7%
10.8
7.0
0.8
8.4
-1.4
4.0
33
W, 88-84
*Miss St.
Loss
71.7%
53.9%
52.5%
32.0%
37.9%
9.1
8.6
0.1
0.3
-4.1
-3.0
35
W, 90-69
Georgia
Home
71.5%
61.6%
46.9%
32.4%
27.2%
9.7
6.9
0.5
8.2
-1.5
6.1
39
W, 85-81
*Arkansas
Road
71.7%
58.1%
50.3%
37.1%
34.2%
11.0
7.7
0.7
4.9
-2.6
-0.9
45
W, 103-80
*Texas
1
L, 94-85
Auburn
140
23
L, 110-98
*Missouri
125
125
14
W, 96-83
Kentucky
33
W, 111-73
Miss St.
110
110
5
L, 79-76
*Tennessee
95
95
4
L, 99-94
Florida
80
79
55
2nd Chance 15%
Off TO 14% 3
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
*Auburn
14
W, 99-70
^^Kentucky
65
49
^^Florida
Home
C. Youngblood DNP 9G, became
starter game vs. LSU
Wrightsell last G: vs. Oregon - OUT
2nd Chance 16% 21
Game #
Loss
Road
Mark Sears
65
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
!W, 93-91
Offensive Pct.l
51
In Paint 43%
In Paint 43%
1
L, 104-82
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 15%
80
4
Off-Efficiency
92
Off TO 15%
Grant Nelson
Aden Holloway
Labaron Philon
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.0
3.2
20-41
8-35
11.2
6.4
15-29
5-14
8.2
1.6
4-12
10-25
14.2
3.6
19-37
7-21
W 18.5
3.0
69-150
62-165 12.7
7.7
91-137
21-72
12.0
2.0
41-72
62-143 10.7
3.1
77-134
22-87
Nelson injured in SEC Tourney L - ??
L
19.1
3.3
30-58
16-66
9.3
7.5
27-46
2-12
9.6
1.9
11-20
16-44
11.6
3.8
23-46
12-26
Sears 36% 3PT in SEC
H
19.3
3.4
43-91
35-101 10.5
7.6
50-79
8-26
12.2
2.3
24-40
37-93
10.5
2.9
44-77
12-52
R
18.1
2.7
56-117
43-130 12.9
7.7
68-104
15-58
10.8
1.7
28-52
41-94
11.3
3.6
56-103
22-61
Starting Lineup Last G: G. Nelson, C. Omoruyi, L. Philon, M. Sears, C. Youngblood (8 G: 4-4)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
--
32.5
18.7
3.0
4.9
2.6
0.9
0.1
47.6%
99-208
33.8%
78-231
84.8%
184-217
1
Mark Sears
6'1"
Sr
4
Grant Nelson
6'11"
Sr
--
25.7
11.9
7.6
1.6
1.8
0.5
1.2
64.5%
118-183
27.4%
23-84
66.7%
86-129
3
Latrell Wrightsell Jr.
6'3"
Sr
25
25.7
11.5
1.8
2.0
1.3
0.5
0.1
81.8%
9-11
42.2%
19-45
85.0%
17-20
2
Aden Holloway
6'1"
So
--
21.1
11.4
2.0
1.9
1.2
0.6
0.0
56.5%
52-92
41.7%
78-187
78.0%
39-50
0
Labaron Philon
6'4"
Fr
--
24.5
10.9
3.3
3.6
1.8
1.3
0.3
55.6%
100-180
30.1%
34-113
75.6%
59-78
8
Chris Youngblood
6'4"
Sr
9
25.0
10.0
2.2
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.3
56.4%
31-55
38.6%
49-127
76.9%
30-39
11 Clifford Omoruyi
6'11"
Sr
--
19.0
7.6
6.6
0.8
0.8
0.2
1.0
74.0%
97-131
0.0%
0-1
70.4%
57-81
10 Mouhamed Dioubate
6'7"
So
--
15.9
7.1
5.9
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.7
65.0%
78-120
38.1%
8-21
60.9%
53-87
35 Derrion Reid
6'8"
Fr
13
15.1
6.4
3.0
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.3
52.2%
35-67
25.7%
9-35
56.6%
30-53
#2 Alabama Crimson Tide - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
156
295
63% 38-60 27% 20-73 44%
8-18
23%
6-26
26-37
8-14
14
13
10
8
90 W
88-79
Arkansas St.
(3)
112
97
41% 27-66 40% 25-62 19%
6-31
21%
6-28
28-44 23-36
12
6
10
10
72-64
McNeese St.
(2)
65
74
44% 22-50 39% 24-61 32% 11-34 29%
7-24
17-24
9-11
9
8
13
12
78-87
Purdue
(3)
8
68
44% 28-63 49% 31-63 31%
9-16
13-15 16-25
10
10
8
3
25 W
100-87
Illinois
(4)
15
44
52% 39-75 45% 32-71 32% 11-34 33% 10-30
11-13
13-24
5
13
7
12
1
85-80 #
Houston
(5)
9
1
37% 22-60 37% 24-65 37% 11-30 32%
6-19
30-41 26-33
17
9
14
12
95-90
Rutgers
(0)
48
119
52% 30-58 45% 29-65 40% 10-25 15%
2-13
25-36 30-35
13
7
19
9
77 W
29
L
9-29
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
W
For
Off. Reb
UNC Asheville
L
Opp
FT
110-54
18
For
3PT
178 W
59 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
56%
81-83
Oregon
(2)
54
37
42% 27-64 44% 29-66 32% 12-38 29%
5-17
15-20 20-25
12
9
15
8
36 W
94-79
North Carolina
(3)
21
65
49% 35-71 41% 32-78 36% 12-33 18%
5-28
12-13 10-16
8
10
13
13
8-27
17-22 13-16
32 W
83-75
Creighton
(9)
32
42
43% 30-70 45% 27-60 20%
273 W
97-90
North Dakota
(3)
138
321
52% 33-63 43% 33-76 32% 11-34 42% 17-41 20-30
123 W
81-54
Kent St.
(3)
195
93
45% 27-60 28% 21-75 26%
139 W
105-82
South Dakota St.
(6)
111
175
39 W
107-79
Oklahoma
(5)
30
77
86 W
88-68
South Carolina
(3)
110
16 W
94-88
Texas A&M
(2)
49
26
L
6-30
30%
15
4
10
13
7-8
14
14
14
11
18-35 10-13
17
15
17
11
47% 37-78 42% 30-71 35% 19-55 42% 11-26
12-16
11-13
14
11
6
14
50% 38-76 48% 32-67 31%
9-29
26%
5-19
22-30 10-16
20
7
8
11
59
55% 35-64 43% 23-54 42%
8-19
21%
3-14
10-20 19-25
9
6
11
15
11
40% 27-68 39% 28-72 35% 13-37 22%
4-18
27-40 28-48
18
19
12
8
6-21
9-35
5-20
7%
64-74
Mississippi
(2)
31
34
43% 20-47 39% 27-70 25%
19-26 14-16
4
8
21
7
14 W
102-97
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
45% 30-67 48% 35-73 38% 13-34 41% 11-27 29-34 16-20
11
11
9
8
47 W
103-87
Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
56% 36-64 39% 31-80 36%
8-22
42% 11-26 23-34 14-18
8
14
11
10
83 W
80-73
LSU
(3)
128
62
44% 27-61 39% 28-71 30%
7-23
13%
3-23
19-24 14-19
8
14
14
14
33 W
88-84
Mississippi St.
(3)
26
50
49% 31-63 50% 33-66 48% 15-31 32%
8-25
11-20 10-16
17
11
14
9
35 W
90-69
Georgia
(2)
46
23
53% 30-57 36% 27-76 42% 11-26 17%
4-23
19-23 11-23
8
13
19
6
39 W
85-81
Arkansas
(6)
83
22
55% 34-62 43% 28-65 26%
35%
7-20
12-18 18-21
9
12
14
10
45 W
103-80
Texas
(2)
39
69
62% 34-55 42% 29-69 59% 17-29 36%
8-22
18-20 14-19
8
12
16
8
40% 12-30 26-35 22-32
10
6
6
4
9
8
14
8
5-19
29%
2-27
1
L
85-94
Auburn
(3)
1
12
39% 27-70 46% 30-65 19%
23
L
98-110
Missouri
(3)
5
75
54% 35-65 60% 35-58 42% 13-31 39%
9-23
15-21 31-47
14 W
96-83
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
53% 32-61 43% 29-68 36% 11-31 35%
9-26
21-25 16-22
7
10
15
12
33 W
111-73
Mississippi St.
(2)
26
50
52% 37-71 38% 28-73 49% 22-45 20%
6-30
15-18 11-15
12
16
11
14
L
76-79
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
42% 25-60 43% 26-61 38%
9-24
38%
8-21
17-26 19-26
10
5
10
11
L
94-99
Florida
(3)
3
13
47% 34-72 49% 35-72 36%
9-25
30%
8-27
17-25 21-29
9
14
6
9
93-91 #
Auburn
(2)
1
12
52% 35-67 48% 35-73 32%
7-22
39% 10-26 16-24 11-17
8
8
13
9
99-70
Kentucky
(5)
11
49
51% 36-71 38% 21-56 38% 11-29 26%
16-21 23-35
7
5
10
16
82-104
Florida
(0)
3
13
42% 28-67 51% 37-72 31% 11-35 44% 12-27 15-23 18-28
10
13
10
7
5
4
1
W
14 W
4
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
5-26
Non-Conference Games
5-19
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
122.8
14th
130.5
2nd
122.7
6th
130.5
2nd
130.8
4th
Def-Efficiency
92.3
12th
99.5
55th
95.4
32nd
97.4
34th
96.6
28th
WAB
+2.5
12th
+7.3
4th
+3.2
2nd
+6
5th
+3.4
11th
FG% 50% or better
14-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
18-2
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-3
14-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-5
More FTM than Opp.
19-2
11-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
18-3
More FTA than Opp.
18-2
6-2
More OReb than Opp.
10-5
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
12-4
19-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
7-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
5-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
15-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
5-2
@ Matteise
48
L, 87-59
*West Virginia
229
L, 81-77
*Delaware
W, 79-51
Chatham
315
W, 63-51
Stonehill
Record
26-8 (15-5)
326
W, 67-53
Lindenwood
Home
16-2
352
W, 73-62
New Orleans
Road
121
W, 86-76
*Cornell
358
W, 72-64
Canisius
Non-Conf.
181
L, 84-68
*Ohio
Conf.
185
L, 72-58
Youngstown St.
164
L, 82-77
*Fort Wayne
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Towson
67.9
105.9
105.1
18.5
18.8
35.3
28.3
136th
185th
144th
272nd
81st
31st
96th
138
W, 68-67
#15 Robert Morris Colonials - Horizon
BPI: 168
297
W, 90-77
St. Francis (PA)
222
!W, 97-93
Northern Kent.
339
!L, 78-76
*Detroit
192
W, 79-71
*Oakland
167
L, 80-69
Cleveland St.
230
W, 75-72
Wright St.
BT: 150
EM: 137
KPI: 110
NET: 139
POM: 139
SOR: 101
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.9
70.4
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
10-6
Win
79.4
67.9
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
68.5
78.8
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-0
232.8
Home
77.0
66.5
101-200
4-2
2-0
5-2
237.7
Road
76.7
74.9
201+
11-0
0-0
3-3
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -4.3 (93rd)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 8-4
51.3
72.0
50.7
34.9
38.4
36.8
142nd
eFG%
193rd
FT%
187th
2PT%
117th
3PT%
41st
FTA/FGA %
235th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
50.3
72.6
49.8
34.2
30.0
35.6
145th
218th
128th
204th
100th
74th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 89-67
*Green Bay
141
W, 81-79
*Milwaukee
Win
72.5%
53.0%
48.4%
36.8%
32.7%
8.0
7.0
2.9
7.0
0.7
5.5
185
W, 72-70
*Youngstown St.
Loss
71.3%
44.7%
52.5%
29.1%
36.9%
6.3
6.9
3.6
1.5
-0.9
-1.4
192
W, 73-71
Oakland
Home
70.6%
53.7%
46.3%
34.0%
32.0%
7.3
6.6
2.4
6.4
0.4
5.4
327
W, 106-53
IUPUI
Road
74.3%
47.9%
53.0%
36.1%
35.3%
7.9
7.4
3.7
4.8
0.3
2.3
230
L, 66-64
*Wright St.
339
W, 71-56
Detroit
140
222
W, 81-76
*Northern Kent.
125
125
167
W, 68-59
*Cleveland St.
164
W, 76-69
Fort Wayne
110
110
W, 94-85
Green Bay
141
W, 72-59
Milwaukee
Def-Efficiency
140
95
95
80
In Paint 45%
67
Fast Break 14%
64
80
2nd Chance 17%
75
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
27
In Paint 45%
327
W, 82-68
*IUPUI
80
230
W, 83-62
Wright St.
65
192
!W, 79-76
^^Oakland
185
W, 89-78
^^Youngstown St.
Home
Alvaro Folgueiras
48
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Kam Woods
41
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
343
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
343
Off TO 20% 19
Amarion Dickerson
Josh Omojafo
A. Folgueiras G's w/ 2+ 3PM
Nov-Jan: 6x, Feb-March: 7x
In conf playy, top 10 in stl% & blk%
HL POY
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.0
6.4
25-47
9-31
13.8
7.2
16-28
9-20
9.2
3.8
15-25
3-11
16.2
6.8
15-31
8-14
W 14.9
4.6
79-182
32-107 15.9
9.4
111-170
37-82
13.6
5.7 114-182
14-48
11.9
4.0
62-126
24-58
A. Dickerson HL Def-POY, top 50
nationally block shot rate, 2+ in 23G.
L
15.9
4.6
36-86
10-39
8.4
7.9
15-35
7-22
10.8
6.3
24-46
6-20
9.8
3.1
20-50
4-15
H
13.1
4.3
50-116
15-68
14.5 10.5 76-119
20-55
13.6
6.3
82-127
8-34
11.3
3.4
44-87
14-35
R
17.0
4.9
65-152
27-78
13.7
24-49
12.2
5.3
56-101
12-34
11.4
4.3
38-89
14-38
J. Omojafo top 50 FT rate, in HL
Tourney shot 26 FT in 3G.
7.4
50-86
Starting Lineup Last G: A. Dickerson, A. Folgueiras, J. Omojafo, D. Smith, K. Woods (21 G: 17-4)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
8
Kam Woods
6'1"
Sr
5
36.0
15.1
4.6
5.1
3.0
1.7
0.1
42.9%
115-268
28.8%
42-146
60.6%
7
Alvaro Folgueiras
6'9"
So
--
29.1
14.1
9.1
3.1
2.3
1.4
1.2
61.5%
126-205
42.3%
44-104
78.0%
96-123
3
Amarion Dickerson
6'7"
Jr
--
28.9
12.9
5.9
1.4
1.4
1.0
2.4
60.5%
138-228
29.4%
20-68
69.3%
104-150
4
Josh Omojafo
6'5"
Jr
1
30.0
11.4
3.8
1.4
1.5
0.5
0.3
46.6%
82-176
38.4%
28-73
81.4%
127-156
11 D.J. Smith
6'0"
Jr
--
28.2
9.0
2.2
3.1
2.1
0.6
0.0
41.5%
44-106
39.0%
55-141
79.4%
54-68
2
6'5"
So
--
23.9
8.3
3.0
1.0
0.8
0.3
0.1
50.6%
45-89
40.2%
53-132
78.6%
33-42
Ryan Prather Jr.
83-137
45 Ismael Plet
6'7"
Sr
1
16.4
4.8
3.8
0.6
0.7
0.2
0.3
51.6%
63-122
0.0%
0-2
55.2%
32-58
13 Antallah Sandlin'El
6'8"
So
25
8.7
4.4
2.0
--
0.6
0.2
0.1
63.2%
12-19
23.1%
3-13
77.8%
7-9
10 Dilen Miller
6'4"
Fr
9
12.0
2.5
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.8
--
31.8%
7-22
21.2%
11-52
94.1%
16-17
#15 Robert Morris Colonials - Horizon
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Off. Reb
Turnovers
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
Opp
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
48
L
59-87
*West Virginia
--
103
7
32% 22-68 55% 33-60 25%
6-24
41% 14-34
9-12
7-12
15
6
13
11
229
L
77-81
*Delaware
(2)
121
325
39% 27-69 47% 25-53 39%
9-23
33%
5-15
14-22 26-32
14
4
11
14
W
79-51
Chatham
(2)
--
--
50% 28-56 30% 21-70 39%
7-18
19%
5-27
16-20
4-10
12
11
14
11
315 W
63-51
Stonehill
(3)
292
330
37% 16-43 32% 17-54 20%
2-10
32%
8-25
29-39
9-16
8
5
15
11
326 W
67-53
Lindenwood
(0)
352
201
43% 26-61 35% 19-54 36% 10-28 27%
4-15
5-5
11-18
10
8
10
10
352 W
73-62
New Orleans
(1)
309
354
42% 22-52 40% 20-50 32%
9-28
23%
3-13
20-28 19-26
11
2
17
12
121 W
86-76
*Cornell
(3)
56
265
45% 29-65 47% 27-58 25%
5-20
32%
9-28
23-31 13-15
14
4
11
13
358 W
72-64
Canisius
(5)
303
360
41% 23-56 42% 26-62 30%
7-23
27%
7-26
19-23
5-7
12
5
13
9
181
L
68-84
*Ohio
(2)
168
219
41% 22-54 52% 29-56 37%
7-19
44%
7-16
17-20 19-22
6
7
13
12
185
L
58-72
Youngstown St.
(3)
247
176
35% 20-58 46% 28-61 14%
3-22
26%
6-23
15-22 10-13
12
6
16
13
164
L
77-82
*Fort Wayne
(3)
149
231
40% 29-72 46% 26-56 28%
7-25
25%
4-16
12-15 26-30
12
4
14
13
138 W
68-67
Towson
(8)
181
183
49% 23-47 54% 25-46 39%
7-18
46%
5-11
15-21 12-15
7
6
13
15
297 W
90-77
St. Francis (PA)
(3)
294
289
53% 31-58 51% 27-53 30%
6-20
57% 12-21 22-32
11-15
10
4
13
19
222 W
97-93 #
Northern Kent.
(7)
241
243
39% 35-91 41% 33-81 21%
7-33
36%
8-22
20-32 19-30
19
16
12
21
76-78 #
*Detroit
(3)
351
296
36% 24-66 46% 31-67 17%
4-23
25%
3-12
24-30 13-15
13
10
10
10
79-71
*Oakland
(1)
177
234
46% 25-55 39% 27-69 47%
7-15
24%
8-33
22-26
9-13
14
20
10
9
339
L
192 W
167
69-80
Cleveland St.
(3)
240
114
47% 24-51 48% 30-63 37%
7-19
47%
8-17
14-23 12-18
10
13
18
14
230 W
L
75-72
Wright St.
(3)
127
310
46% 25-55 42% 26-62 32%
6-19
47%
7-15
19-27 13-21
7
10
11
13
343 W
89-67
*Green Bay
(4)
287
341
54% 29-54 49% 22-45 52% 12-23 44%
8-18
19-27 15-21
6
1
10
16
141 W
81-79
*Milwaukee
(1)
183
174
44% 27-61 51% 29-57 44% 10-23 40%
6-15
17-23 15-21
13
11
14
19
185 W
72-70
*Youngstown St.
(2)
247
176
43% 27-63 49% 27-55 35%
8-26
12-17
14
8
11
15
192 W
73-71
Oakland
(2)
177
234
50% 24-48 40% 23-57 50% 10-20 43% 12-28 15-24 13-18
9
10
13
8
327 W
106-53
IUPUI
(4)
119
363
52% 37-71 35% 19-55 55% 12-22 14%
3-22
20-25 12-21
19
7
8
13
64-66
*Wright St.
(2)
127
310
46% 24-52 40% 23-57 41%
7-17
50%
8-16
9-16
12-17
9
12
13
14
339 W
71-56
Detroit
(2)
351
296
51% 25-49 39% 20-52 36%
9-25
31%
5-16
12-16 11-16
6
10
12
18
222 W
81-76
*Northern Kent.
(2)
241
243
54% 28-52 53% 32-61 35%
7-20
56%
9-16
18-25
3-7
7
8
13
11
167 W
68-59
*Cleveland St.
(3)
240
114
39% 24-62 44% 25-57 31%
8-26
13%
2-16
12-14
7-11
12
7
10
11
164 W
76-69
Fort Wayne
(2)
149
231
55% 29-53 45% 26-58 35%
6-17
30%
7-23
12-20 10-12
6
7
16
16
343 W
94-85
Green Bay
(5)
287
341
54% 35-65 46% 27-59 28%
5-18
35%
7-20
19-28 24-30
7
10
6
10
141 W
72-59
Milwaukee
(1)
183
174
46% 26-56 35% 22-63 50%
8-16
27%
7-26
12-16
8-12
12
13
16
10
327 W
82-68
*IUPUI
(3)
119
363
57% 31-54 40% 24-60 37% 10-27 38%
9-24
10-14 11-14
10
7
9
2
230 W
83-62
Wright St.
(6)
127
310
47% 27-57 48% 27-56 35% 10-29 23%
5-22
19-28
3-3
13
3
9
16
192 W
79-76 #
^^Oakland
(3)
177
234
44% 28-64 46% 25-54 40% 10-25 35%
8-23
13-18 18-27
11
9
14
13
185 W
89-78
^^Youngstown St.
(0)
247
176
47% 29-62 43% 27-63 50% 11-22 38% 11-29 20-28 13-17
14
7
8
5
230
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
6-17
31%
Non-Conference Games
8-9
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
101.3
271st
108.2
125th
98.4
300th
106.1
187th
109.5
142nd
Def-Efficiency
102.0
108th
108.5
216th
103.8
145th
105.3
139th
105.5
144th
WAB
-1.3
101st
-3
100th
-1.5
111th
-3.1
119th
+0
59th
FG% 50% or better
10-0
3PT% >= 35%
16-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-4
More FTM than Opp.
22-4
16-2
3PT% < 35%
10-6
Make >= 10 3PA
10-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-4
More FTA than Opp.
21-3
3-1
More OReb than Opp.
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-2
Make < 10 3PA
17-8
18-5
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
23-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
10-7
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-1
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
9-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
11-5
11-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
10-6
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-2
@ Matteise
Midwest Region
1.15
NCAA
Average
PPP & PPPA
1.06
1.10
ADJUSTED PPP ALLOWED
Wofford
High Point
SIU Edwardsville
Utah St.
1.05
Saint Peter's
McNeese
1.00
Texas
Troy
Purdue
Kentucky
Illinois
Xavier
Georgia
0.95
Gonzaga
UCLA
Clemson
Tennessee
0.90
Houston
0.85
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
ADJUSTED PPP
Wichita
1
Houston
Thu
16
SIUE
11:00
8
Gonzaga
Thu
9
Georgia
1:35
5
Clemson
Thu
12
McNeese
12:15
4
Purdue
Thu
13
High Point
9:40
Providence
Indianapolis
Friday / Sunday
Milwaukee
6
Illinois
Fri
11
Texas / Xavier
6:45
3
Kentucky
Fri
14
Troy
4:10
7
UCLA
Thu
10
Utah State
6:25
2
Tennessee
Thu
15
Wofford
3:50
Lexington
Game Times Are PT
SIU Edwardsville
Gonzaga
Georgia
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Houston
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
256
W, 97-40
Jackson St.
1
L, 74-69
^^Auburn
301
W, 91-45
La. Lafayette
231
W, 80-44
Hofstra
Record
30-4 (19-1)
6
!L, 85-80
^^Alabama
Home
16-1
107
W, 65-54
^^Notre Dame
Road
50
!L, 73-70
^^San Diego St.
86
W, 79-51
Butler
Non-Conf.
101
W, 62-42
Troy
Conf.
213
W, 78-49
Toledo
174
W, 87-51
A&M CorChristi
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Oklahoma St.
61.4
124.8
88.0
14.6
21.7
36.1
29.3
360th
9th
1st
25th
17th
15th
157th
91
W, 60-47
#1 Houston Cougars - Big 12
BPI: 2
BT: 1
EM: 2
KPI: 5
NET: 3
W, 86-55
BYU
75
W, 65-46
TCU
68
W, 87-57
*Kansas St.
48
W, 70-54
West Virginia
69
W, 69-68
*UCF
74
W, 70-36
Utah
SOR: 2
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
74.2
58.5
1-25
3-1
2-2
3-0
14-3
Win
74.1
55.8
26-50
2-0
0-1
2-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
75.0
78.5
51-100
5-0
1-0
5-0
116.6
Home
76.5
53.2
101-200
2-0
1-0
0-0
42
Road
71.9
63.7
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +11.6 (2nd)
21
POM: 3
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-4
Opp. O-Reb%
52.7
74.1
49.0
39.8
28.2
34.5
88th
eFG%
112th
FT%
267th
2PT%
2nd
3PT%
315th
FTA/FGA %
296th
3PA/FGA %
44.9
70.9
43.9
30.9
34.1
43.1
4th
115th
5th
33rd
211th
306th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
!W, 92-86
*Kansas
48
W, 63-49
*West Virginia
Win
74.1%
50.3%
43.2%
39.9%
30.0%
8.2
6.4
3.7
7.2
4.6
0.2
8
!L, 82-81
Texas Tech
Loss
73.7%
40.8%
49.1%
38.6%
36.1%
6.8
9.8
0.8
-2.3
-0.5
-3.0
91
W, 72-63
Oklahoma St.
Home
74.1%
50.6%
41.4%
42.0%
31.8%
9.0
6.5
5.5
9.5
5.8
0.8
84
W, 69-59
*Colorado
Road
74.0%
47.5%
46.1%
37.2%
30.1%
7.1
7.1
1.2
2.7
2.3
-1.1
31
W, 76-65
Baylor
13
W, 62-58
*Arizona
140
78
W, 80-65
*Arizona St.
125
125
10
W, 68-59
Iowa St.
8
W, 69-61
*Texas Tech
110
110
W, 73-64
Cincinnati
20
W, 65-59
Kansas
95
95
80
W, 65-61
*Baylor
84
W, 77-68
^^Colorado
65
^^BYU
13
W, 72-64
^^Arizona
31
88
2nd Chance 17%
95
Off TO 23%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
93
In Paint 37%
31
W, 74-54
In Paint 40% 22
Fast Break 11%
80
21
Def-Efficiency
140
Home
L vs. Auburn, Aub 71% 2PT FG,
Pettiford 21 pts off bench
46
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
LJ Cryer
73
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
74
Off TO 17%
Emanuel Sharp
Defensive Pct.l
54
Off-Efficiency
Milos Uzan
J'Wan Roberts
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.6
2.4
10-28
17-36
17.0
4.6
11-27
14-31
15.0
2.2
16-34
10-22
8.6
6.2
15-42
0-0
W 14.4
2.3
54-137
89-206 12.5
3.1
37-74
65-152
11.9
3.2
86-175
48-112
10.8
6.3 122-238
0-0
L
21.5
1.5
17-38
11-31
13.5
3.3
3-16
9-21
8.8
1.5
11-26
4-10
11.3
6.8
17-39
0-0
M. Uzan Nov-Jan: 9.5 PPG, 44.4%
FG, 38% 3PT ---- Feb-March: 14
PPG, 48% FG, 48% 3PT
H
15.7
2.1
33-75
58-115
12.5
2.6
19-35
36-76
10.2
3.0
42-83
24-65
9.5
5.8
64-126
0-0
R
14.7
2.4
38-100
42-122 12.8
3.6
21-55
38-97
12.8
3.1
55-118
28-57
12.3
6.9
75-151
0-0
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
LJ Cryer
6'1"
Sr
--
32.3
15.2
2.2
1.8
1.1
0.9
0.1
40.6%
21 Emanuel Sharp
6'3"
Jr
3
26.9
12.6
3.1
0.9
0.8
1.4
--
7
Milos Uzan
6'4"
Jr
--
31.3
11.5
3.0
4.3
1.4
1.0
0.1
13 J'Wan Roberts
6'8"
Sr
3
30.5
10.8
6.3
1.7
1.7
1.0
23 Terrance Arceneaux
6'6"
Jr
--
21.4
7.1
2.9
0.9
0.7
8
Mylik Wilson
6'3"
Sr
--
17.5
6.0
3.9
1.4
11 Joseph Tugler
6'8"
So
--
22.0
5.6
5.7
5
Ja'Vier Francis
6'8"
Sr
2
15.4
4.9
4.3
25 Mercy Miller
6'4"
Fr
14
8.7
2.9
1.9
Cryer 3PT L Aub/Ala: 3-12
J. Roberts DNP B12 Semi or Final
Offensive Pct.l
20
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Arceneaux, L. Cryer, E. Sharp, J. Tugler, M. Uzan (3 G: 3-0)
4
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
71-175
42.2%
100-237
91.5%
75-82
44.4%
40-90
42.8%
74-173
89.0%
89-100
48.3%
97-201
42.6%
52-122
75.9%
41-54
0.7
50.2%
139-277
--
--
63.7%
58-91
1.0
0.4
52.4%
66-126
33.3%
25-75
73.9%
34-46
0.8
1.3
0.2
47.1%
73-155
38.7%
12-31
72.4%
21-29
0.9
1.0
0.9
2.1
55.2%
74-134
27.3%
3-11
54.1%
33-61
0.2
1.0
0.4
0.9
59.8%
58-97
0.0%
0-1
70.7%
41-58
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.1
34.4%
11-32
20.0%
5-25
70.0%
21-30
#1 Houston Cougars - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
288
200
58% 39-67 28% 13-47 60% 12-20 17%
4-23
7-7
10-15
11
7
9
20
69-74
^^Auburn
(4)
1
12
41% 24-58 53% 27-51 39%
30%
7-23
16-22 13-19
10
9
10
11
301 W
91-45
La. Lafayette
(3)
327
247
46% 31-68 33% 15-46 44% 10-23 29%
6-21
19-27
9-12
18
3
9
22
231 W
80-44
Hofstra
(8)
322
96
47% 29-62 31% 16-52 50% 12-24 32%
8-25
10-16
4-5
10
4
4
14
80-85 #
^^Alabama
(3)
4
28
37% 24-65 37% 22-60 32%
6-19
37% 11-30
26-33 30-41
9
17
12
14
65-54
^^Notre Dame
(1)
99
115
45% 27-60 39% 19-49 26%
6-23
33%
7-21
5-9
9-14
6
6
5
10
70-73 #
^^San Diego St.
(1)
122
14
37% 23-62 40% 23-57 46% 11-24 36%
9-25
13-17 18-27
15
10
12
6
6
L
50
L
5-13
Opp
Turnovers
--
107 W
For
Off. Reb
DBG
L
Opp
FT
Jackson St.
1
For
3PT
97-40
256 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
86 W
79-51
Butler
(6)
44
150
53% 32-60 28% 13-46 50%
9-18
32%
9-28
6-6
16-22
12
7
11
12
101 W
62-42
Troy
(2)
163
73
43% 22-51 24% 12-50 47%
9-19
11%
2-18
9-14
16-22
10
11
8
9
213 W
78-49
Toledo
(7)
96
355
45% 30-67 30% 16-54 17%
4-24
28%
5-18
14-19 12-18
14
4
11
14
174 W
87-51
A&M CorChristi
(2)
187
141
49% 26-53 32% 18-56 48% 14-29 26%
5-19
21-25 10-16
11
13
8
12
91 W
60-47
*Oklahoma St.
(8)
140
63
42% 24-57 26% 14-54 30%
21%
4-19
6-6
15-18
5
7
11
12
21 W
86-55
BYU
(4)
7
53
49% 29-59 38% 18-48 47% 16-34 33%
8-24
12-16
11-15
14
4
11
14
75 W
65-46
TCU
(1)
173
27
48% 26-54 43% 20-47 42%
8-19
17%
3-18
5-9
3-7
11
6
9
14
68 W
87-57
*Kansas St.
(4)
108
24
49% 34-69 40% 19-47 43%
6-14
40% 10-25 13-20
48 W
70-54
West Virginia
(3)
103
7
49% 25-51 44% 19-43 42% 11-26 41%
9-22
69 W
69-68
*UCF
(2)
51
113
42% 29-69 40% 25-62 19%
3-16
30%
74 W
70-36
Utah
(3)
73
71
43% 26-60 30% 13-43 28%
5-18
29%
20 W
92-86 #
*Kansas
(2)
43
10
48% 35-73 46% 30-66 32%
8-25
63-49
*West Virginia
(3)
103
7
48% 25-52 47% 20-43 39%
81-82 #
Texas Tech
(2)
6
32
45% 29-64 43% 23-54 36%
91 W
72-63
Oklahoma St.
(2)
140
63
84 W
69-59
*Colorado
(3)
129
51
31 W
76-65
Baylor
(1)
17
13 W
62-58
*Arizona
(4)
78 W
80-65
*Arizona St.
(2)
10 W
68-59
Iowa St.
(3)
8
W
69-61
*Texas Tech
(1)
54 W
73-64
Cincinnati
20 W
65-59
31 W
65-61
84 W
21 W
13 W
48 W
8
L
6-20
9-14
16
2
4
13
9-12
7-11
9
3
6
11
7-23
8-11
11-17
16
13
8
13
5-17
13-19
5-12
14
9
5
24
36%
9-25
14-25 17-30
11
10
5
10
7-18
22%
4-18
6-6
5-11
11
3
13
11
5-14
40% 12-30 18-27 24-34
14
9
11
12
42% 26-62 51% 25-49 38%
8-21
37%
7-19
12-14
6-12
16
4
10
11
48% 27-56 41% 19-46 40%
6-15
39%
9-23
9-15
12-16
13
5
8
10
58
51% 27-53 58% 22-38 42% 10-24 60%
9-15
12-16 12-16
8
4
7
15
10
30
43% 25-58 37% 20-54 29%
22%
5-23
7-9
13-17
3
6
6
10
67
76
48% 26-54 43% 19-44 48% 11-23 36%
8-22
17-20 19-26
10
5
9
12
20
8
53% 25-47 39% 18-46 59% 10-17 40%
8-20
8-10
15-17
6
4
14
12
6
32
45% 22-49 30% 17-57 50%
6-12
20%
6-30
19-23 21-26
5
15
9
9
(4)
90
21
54% 30-56 44% 26-59 21%
3-14
30%
6-20
10-12
6-8
4
8
9
10
Kansas
(1)
43
10
35% 24-68 45% 19-42 35%
7-20
42%
5-12
10-14 16-19
15
4
6
20
*Baylor
(4)
17
58
44% 22-50 34% 20-59 42%
8-19
31%
9-29
13-18 12-16
9
12
8
9
77-68
^^Colorado
(4)
129
51
49% 24-49 40% 23-57 44%
8-18
25%
5-20
21-31 17-20
8
9
12
13
74-54
^^BYU
(0)
7
53
42% 23-55 32% 19-60 39% 10-26 21%
6-28
18-23 10-10
11
10
8
13
72-64
^^Arizona
(0)
10
30
43% 26-61 44% 25-57 39%
5-18
11-12
9
7
8
11
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
5-17
9-23
28%
Non-Conference Games
9-12
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
126.9
7th
122.6
10th
122.6
8th
125.8
10th
124.7
12th
Def-Efficiency
85.5
1st
89.4
2nd
86.6
3rd
88.6
2nd
90.9
4th
WAB
+3.9
2nd
+7.7
3rd
+0
53rd
+9.8
1st
+7.1
1st
FG% 50% or better
5-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
18-1
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
12-3
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-1
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
5-1
Opp. FG% below 45%
25-3
22-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-3
More FTM than Opp.
16-1
8-1
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
21-1
More FTA than Opp.
14-1
1-2
More OReb than Opp.
20-3
21-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
29-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
27-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
2-1
14-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-0
@ Matteise
W, 95-42
Westminster (MO)
51
L, 80-61
*Indiana
25
L, 90-58
*Illinois
208
W, 77-72
*Indiana St.
Record
22-11 (13-7)
293
W, 79-60
*Western Mich.
Home
12-3
358
W, 76-58
^^Canisius
Road
343
#16 SIU Edwardsville Cougars - OVC
BPI: 240
BT: 218
EM: 221
KPI: 225
NET: 216
POM: 217
SOR: 185
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
72.6
66.1
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
10-8
Win
76.1
60.0
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
65.5
78.3
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-1
L, 82-57
*Green Bay
W, 83-49
St. Ambrose
Non-Conf.
221.6
Home
76.3
61.9
101-200
0-0
0-0
0-0
263
L, 78-73
North Florida
Conf.
289.4
Road
69.6
69.6
201+
9-3
3-0
7-6
268
W, 82-69
Ball St.
W, 100-52
Eureka
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Little Rock
65.8
101.3
105.7
17.1
17.3
31.8
29.1
257th
265th
164th
174th
167th
122nd
143rd
244
L, 60-56
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -7.8 (155th)
203
L, 80-64
*SEMO
340
W, 77-66
Western Ill.
326
W, 58-47
Lindenwood
318
W, 60-57
*Eastern Ill.
307
W, 67-59
Tenn. Tech
254
!W, 87-80
*Tenn. St.
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-5
Opp. O-Reb%
48.9
67.9
47.8
34.0
33.1
36.3
270th
eFG%
316th
FT%
295th
2PT%
164th
3PT%
173rd
FTA/FGA %
246th
3PA/FGA %
47.5
70.3
46.3
33.0
33.2
38.6
37th
86th
22nd
123rd
184th
170th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
299
L, 85-82
*UT Martin
335
W, 82-76
Southern Ind.
Win
68.6%
51.3%
41.9%
37.1%
29.1%
7.8
6.1
1.8
6.6
2.3
1.5
315
W, 65-54
Morehead St.
Loss
65.4%
43.3%
51.5%
28.8%
38.8%
6.8
9.6
1.7
-3.8
-0.9
-2.3
326
L, 65-63
*Lindenwood
Home
67.2%
50.4%
40.8%
34.6%
33.7%
7.7
7.7
2.4
5.5
3.4
3.1
340
W, 69-65
*Western Ill.
Road
67.9%
47.2%
48.4%
33.7%
31.8%
7.3
6.9
1.3
1.1
-0.6
-2.2
318
W, 66-41
Eastern Ill.
307
W, 75-58
*Tenn. Tech
140
299
L, 76-71
UT Martin
125
125
254
W, 84-72
Tenn. St.
315
W, 80-62
*Morehead St.
110
110
*Southern Ind.
203
L, 83-68
SEMO
95
95
80
244
W, 73-65
Little Rock
254
W, 71-69
^^Tenn. St.
65
W, 69-48
Fast Break 15%
76
2nd Chance 16%
72
39
Off TO 17%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
87
In Paint 39%
80
203
49
In Paint 43%
65
Game #
^^SEMO
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Ray'Sean Taylor
Fast Break 12%
69
2nd Chance 14%
63
52
Off TO 18%
Brian Taylor
Defensive Pct.l
L, 82-68
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
335
Off-Efficiency
Ring Malith
Jo Valrie
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 20.6
4.8
21-35
9-27
8.4
4.0
13-28
2-10
13.2
7.2
11-30
9-23
8.0
6.7
11-19
0-4
W 20.8
4.8
67-136
72-182
11.6
4.0
70-127
20-47
11.8
7.4
62-118
27-74
9.0
2.0
4-8
0-1
Taylor led OVC in fouls drawn per
40, top 5 in steals rate (top 200
nationally)
L
16.5
4.0
36-70
19-81
12.7
4.3
32-80
20-38
10.8
6.6
24-73
14-57
7.5
9.0
7-11
0-3
H
18.2
5.0
54-100
37-113
12.0
3.9
43-83
17-37
13.0
8.2
44-88
20-61
9.0
2.0
4-8
0-1
R
20.3
4.2
49-106
54-150
11.9
4.2
59-124
23-48
10.2
6.3
42-103
21-70
7.5
9.0
7-11
0-3
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
3
Ray'Sean Taylor
6'1"
Sr
--
32.3
19.3
4.6
3.8
2.6
2.0
0.1
50.0%
103-206
34.6%
11 Brian Taylor
6'4"
Jr
--
31.4
12.0
4.1
2.9
2.1
0.8
0.2
49.3%
102-207
0
6'9"
Jr
--
31.0
11.5
7.2
1.4
1.5
0.8
0.7
45.0%
86-191
33 Jo Valrie
6'5"
Sr
30
17.9
8.0
6.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
57.9%
2
Desmond Polk
6'4"
Sr
--
29.8
6.2
3.3
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.3
24 Kyle Thomas
6'10"
So
10
14.5
6.0
3.3
0.7
0.9
0.2
4
L vs. IU, tied at 27 4:32 1H
---1st ten min 2H: 16-16, -7 final 10
R. Taylor vs. IU + ILL: 11-37 FG,
5-19 3PT, 31 pts
Starting Lineup Last G: R. Malith, D. Polk, B. Taylor, R. Taylor, K. Thomas (16 G: 11-5)
Ring Malith
2PT
3PT
FT
91-263
84.6%
159-188
47.1%
40-85
72.4%
71-98
31.3%
41-131
76.1%
83-109
11-19
0.0%
0-4
28.6%
2-7
45.0%
49-109
28.1%
32-114
44.4%
12-27
1.0
57.6%
57-99
12.5%
1-8
62.9%
22-35
Darrion Baker
6'8"
Fr
23
15.1
5.9
4.3
0.7
1.1
0.4
0.5
62.5%
20-32
22.2%
2-9
59.1%
13-22
21 Myles Thompson
6'7"
Jr
--
18.4
5.7
4.0
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.4
45.9%
78-170
44.4%
4-9
27.1%
19-70
34 Arnas Sakenis
6'11"
Jr
8
16.4
4.5
3.9
0.7
0.6
0.3
1.8
54.2%
45-83
--
--
52.3%
23-44
#16 SIU Edwardsville Cougars - OVC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
--
--
48% 39-82 30% 15-50 27%
6-22
47%
9-19
11-18
3-4
17
3
10
32
74
39
35% 25-71 53% 30-57 19%
5-26
38%
6-16
6-13
14-17
14
8
12
16
61-80
*Indiana
(1)
25
L
Opp
Turnovers
Westminster (MO)
L
For
Off. Reb
95-42
51
Opp
FT
Result
W
For
3PT
58-90
*Illinois
(1)
15
44
30% 22-73 44% 28-63 25%
6-24
40% 15-38
8-17
19-28
14
13
7
5
208 W
77-72
*Indiana St.
(3)
133
290
50% 30-60 41% 24-59 30%
8-27
37% 15-41
9-12
9-15
10
10
15
16
293 W
79-60
*Western Mich.
(2)
259
283
49% 30-61 30% 16-54 45% 14-31 15%
2-13
5-8
26-37
10
10
13
9
358 W
76-58
^^Canisius
(0)
303
360
50% 29-58 40% 22-55 46% 10-22 29%
6-21
8-10
8-11
9
6
13
13
57-82
*Green Bay
(2)
287
341
34% 20-59 47% 24-51 23%
7-31
37% 10-27 10-18 24-29
9
4
13
10
83-49
St. Ambrose
(3)
--
--
42% 31-74 30% 17-57 25%
7-28
19%
11-13
20
5
9
16
73-78
North Florida
(5)
136
349
39% 28-72 42% 27-65 30%
7-23
38% 14-37 10-16 10-22
16
12
12
10
268 W
82-69
Ball St.
(8)
225
300
49% 28-57 43% 27-63 46% 11-24 35%
8-23
15-21
7-10
12
8
9
8
W
100-52
Eureka
(6)
--
--
55% 36-65 31% 18-59 47% 17-36 27%
8-30
11-18
8-10
6
6
8
17
(3)
320
139
32% 19-59 39% 23-59 29%
8-28
42%
8-19
10-15
6-11
11
9
13
12
7-19
12-17 13-15
0
8
5
6
9-14
8-9
8
12
10
9
343
L
W
263
L
244
L
56-60
*Little Rock
203
L
4-21
14-20
64-80
*SEMO
(1)
264
133
43% 23-54 48% 30-62 27%
6-22
37%
340 W
77-66
Western Ill.
(11)
304
348
60% 30-50 44% 24-55 62%
8-13
44% 10-23
326 W
58-47
Lindenwood
(1)
352
201
35% 23-66 32% 17-53 27%
6-22
18%
3-17
6-12
10-16
10
10
12
20
318 W
60-57
*Eastern Ill.
(2)
357
165
41% 20-49 37% 20-54 25%
3-12
28%
5-18
17-29 12-15
13
8
14
10
307 W
67-59
Tenn. Tech
(3)
270
288
44% 27-61 32% 18-56 29%
5-17
22%
6-27
8-13
17-21
7
7
9
10
254 W
87-80 #
*Tenn. St.
(4)
238
214
43% 28-65 45% 27-60 50% 10-20 32%
6-19
21-29 20-33
8
10
13
18
82-85
*UT Martin
(1)
249
304
54% 23-43 55% 28-51 52% 12-23 43% 12-28 24-29 17-24
5
5
13
9
335 W
82-76
Southern Ind.
(4)
312
327
48% 28-59 48% 27-56 40%
6-15
41%
7-17
20-27 15-19
6
6
5
12
315 W
65-54
Morehead St.
(1)
321
281
36% 17-47 33% 17-51 17%
3-18
24%
4-17
28-39 16-23
5
6
8
10
299
L
326
63-65
*Lindenwood
(4)
352
201
35% 22-63 39% 20-52 26%
5-19
27%
6-22
14-18 19-30
11
12
15
17
340 W
L
69-65
*Western Ill.
(1)
304
348
40% 25-62 38% 24-64 41%
7-17
30%
6-20
12-17 11-14
13
11
6
8
318 W
66-41
Eastern Ill.
(2)
357
165
42% 26-62 27% 14-52 31%
9-29
21%
3-14
5-12
10-17
11
5
8
8
75-58
*Tenn. Tech
(1)
270
288
52% 33-63 41% 22-54 30%
7-23
16%
3-19
2-5
11-16
5
4
10
10
71-76
UT Martin
(6)
249
304
41% 25-61 41% 24-58 36% 10-28 42% 11-26 11-20 17-21
12
11
10
12
254 W
84-72
Tenn. St.
(1)
238
214
49% 26-53 40% 25-62 40%
8-20
41% 11-27 24-30 11-17
5
13
11
19
315 W
80-62
*Morehead St.
(4)
321
281
52% 26-50 42% 25-60 50%
8-16
21%
4-19
20-24
8-17
6
8
8
4
7-15
17-27 19-23
11
9
10
10
307 W
299
L
335
L
68-82
*Southern Ind.
(1)
312
327
38% 23-60 47% 28-60 26%
5-19
47%
203
L
68-83
SEMO
(4)
264
133
41% 24-58 53% 34-64 24%
4-17
39% 10-26 16-21
244 W
73-65
Little Rock
(1)
320
139
44% 23-52 38% 23-60 40%
8-20
41%
7-17
254 W
71-69
^^Tenn. St.
(5)
238
214
45% 26-58 46% 24-52 38%
8-21
27%
203 W
69-48
^^SEMO
(0)
264
133
44% 24-54 28% 17-60 27%
3-11
13%
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
5-7
13
6
14
7
19-27 12-21
11
13
17
13
4-15
11-14 17-21
11
9
8
9
3-24
18-28 11-13
11
4
12
7
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
100.4
282nd
101.4
251st
99.7
275th
100.7
287th
103.8
228th
Def-Efficiency
106.2
181st
105.3
147th
103.9
150th
107.1
172nd
106.0
154th
WAB
-2.6
161st
-5.2
158th
-2.2
145th
-5.8
191st
-2.4
136th
FG% 50% or better
6-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-10
More FTM than Opp.
14-3
FG% 45% or better
11-1
3PT% < 35%
10-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
16-1
More FTA than Opp.
13-5
FG% below 45%
11-10
Make >= 10 3PA
5-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
3-6
More OReb than Opp.
10-8
Opp. FG% 50% or better
0-3
Make < 10 3PA
17-9
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
12-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
3-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
5-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
6-7
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-5
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-1
@ Matteise
31
W, 101-63
Baylor
78
W, 88-80
Arizona St.
240
W, 113-54
UMass Lowell
50
W, 80-67
*San Diego St.
Record
25-8 (14-4)
325
W, 84-41
Long Beach St.
Home
13-2
48
!L, 86-78
^^West Virginia
Road
#8 Gonzaga Bulldogs - WCC
BPI: 10
BT: 11
EM: 9
KPI: 26
NET: 8
POM: 9
SOR: 39
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
86.6
69.6
1-25
0-1
1-1
0-1
12-6
Win
89.8
65.8
26-50
1-0
0-3
1-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
76.6
81.8
51-100
3-1
2-0
2-1
51
W, 89-73
^^Indiana
151
W, 90-65
^^Davidson
Non-Conf.
99.4
Home
91.2
66.8
101-200
3-0
1-0
2-0
14
!L, 90-89
^^Kentucky
Conf.
135.1
Road
82.8
72.0
201+
6-0
0-0
3-0
30
L, 77-71
^^UConn
169
W, 102-72
Nicholls St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Bucknell
70.1
123.3
96.5
13.2
18.2
32.7
26.4
47th
12th
29th
4th
103rd
95th
34th
55.7
80.1
57.8
34.4
30.9
33.5
25th
eFG%
5th
FT%
10th
2PT%
145th
3PT%
245th
FTA/FGA %
313th
3PA/FGA %
219
W, 86-65
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.7 (33rd)
28
L, 65-62
^^UCLA
238
W, 89-82
*Pepperdine
279
W, 81-50
Portland
159
W, 96-68
*LMU
323
W, 93-80
San Diego
111
W, 88-75
Washington St.
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 0-4
47.5
72.8
49.1
30.2
28.6
40.6
37th
224th
106th
15th
67th
242nd
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
!L, 97-89
*Oregon St.
64
L, 103-99
Santa Clara
Win
81.7%
59.0%
48.3%
35.8%
27.8%
7.6
6.7
2.2
8.8
3.6
5.2
279
W, 105-62
*Portland
Loss
74.7%
53.5%
51.6%
30.2%
37.1%
6.5
9.5
-0.3
-2.6
-0.3
-3.1
93
W, 98-60
Oregon St.
Home
78.3%
59.2%
48.2%
37.8%
29.1%
8.8
7.5
2.2
8.5
3.3
5.3
23
L, 62-58
*Saint Mary's
Road
81.7%
56.6%
49.8%
31.1%
31.2%
6.1
7.3
1.1
3.9
2.2
1.4
159
W, 73-53
LMU
298
W, 78-61
*Pacific
140
60
W, 88-77
San Francisco
125
125
238
W, 107-55
Pepperdine
111
W, 84-63
*Washington St.
110
110
L, 74-67
Saint Mary's
64
W, 95-76
*Santa Clara
95
95
80
60
W, 95-75
*San Francisco
60
W, 85-76
^^San Francisco
65
W, 58-51
96
Fast Break 17%
92
47
2nd Chance 15%
50
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Graham Ike
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
67
89
Fast Break 10%
65
Game #
^^Saint Mary's
B. Gregg 3PT LY: 38%, 103 3PA
—in WCC this year: 37% (35 3PA)
—Nov-Dec: 6-of-31
In Paint 50%
In Paint 42%
80
23
Def-Efficiency
140
Khalif Battle
2nd Chance 12%
96
Off TO 15%
95
Nolan Hickman
Defensive Pct.l
23
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
93
Braden Huff
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.2
7.0
36-54
1-2
15.6
3.4
20-35
8-22
10.8
1.4
13-22
6-21
8.0
2.0
16-27
2-6
L vs. WVU: led by 5, 0:25 left
L vs. UK: led by 18, early 2H
L vs. UCLA: led by 4, 4:49 left,
L vs. OreSt: led by 5, 5:33 left
W 16.6
7.9 150-241
7-19
14.2
3.7
63-119
42-120
11.3
2.5
47-91
55-117
11.7
3.4 125-195
4-19
L
18.8
6.3
53-88
4-11
10.0
2.6
19-33
9-33
10.1
2.4
15-26
17-48
8.1
2.6
27-54
3-11
H
15.7
7.7
81-139
6-16
13.5
3.5
28-56
29-77
12.9
2.9
31-49
42-87
12.8
3.8
82-123
1-9
Stromer since 2/1: 10 MPG, 1 DNP
R
18.3
7.3 122-190
5-14
12.9
3.4
54-96
22-76
9.5
2.2
31-68
30-78
9.2
2.7
70-126
6-21
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
13 Graham Ike
6'9"
Sr
--
22.5
17.1
7.5
1.4
1.6
0.7
0.6
61.7%
203-329
36.7%
11-30
79.7%
126-158
99 Khalif Battle
6'5"
Sr
--
26.4
13.2
3.5
1.5
1.4
1.2
0.1
53.9%
82-152
33.3%
51-153
92.9%
117-126
11 Nolan Hickman
6'2"
Sr
--
30.1
11.0
2.5
2.3
0.9
1.0
0.3
53.0%
62-117
43.6%
72-165
92.3%
24-26
34 Braden Huff
6'10"
So
--
16.0
10.8
3.2
0.9
0.4
0.3
0.6
61.0%
152-249
23.3%
7-30
74.4%
32-43
0
6'0"
Sr
--
35.0
10.8
3.1
9.8
2.3
1.7
0.1
46.7%
93-199
39.3%
35-89
76.5%
65-85
33 Ben Gregg
6'10"
Sr
--
20.6
9.4
5.2
1.3
0.6
0.7
0.5
73.2%
93-127
27.5%
19-69
78.6%
66-84
1
Michael Ajayi
6'7"
Sr
1
19.4
6.7
5.5
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.3
54.0%
68-126
18.6%
8-43
68.8%
55-80
4
Dusty Stromer
6'6"
So
1
18.2
4.6
2.2
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.2
51.1%
23-45
34.6%
27-78
79.2%
19-24
24 Ismaila Diagne
7'0"
Fr
24
6.6
3.6
1.8
--
0.7
0.6
0.4
84.6%
11-13
--
--
83.3%
10-12
Starting Lineup Last G: K. Battle, N. Hickman, B. Huff, G. Ike, R. Nembhard (1 G: 1-0)
NAME
Ryan Nembhard
2PT
3PT
FT
#8 Gonzaga Bulldogs - WCC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
17
58
56% 40-71 37% 23-62 42% 13-31 14%
3-21
8-13
14-20
15
13
11
11
78 W
88-80
Arizona St.
(5)
67
76
50% 31-62 48% 30-63 33%
31%
9-29
18-22
11-12
8
4
8
10
240 W
113-54
UMass Lowell
(4)
158
338
54% 41-76 36% 18-50 46% 10-22 19%
3-16
21-27 15-20
11
2
9
24
50 W
80-67
*San Diego St.
(2)
122
14
42% 24-57 38% 23-61 25%
5-20
32%
8-25
27-31 13-18
11
8
8
10
84-41
Long Beach St.
(1)
277
317
46% 29-63 32% 17-54 33%
9-27
10%
2-20
17-24
5-11
11
9
4
12
78-86 #
^^West Virginia
(6)
103
7
40% 26-65 41% 26-63 33%
7-21
31% 11-35
19-22 23-26
8
8
12
11
89-73
^^Indiana
(0)
74
39
48% 31-64 46% 27-59 30%
6-20
22%
4-18
21-22 15-22
9
3
13
12
151 W
8-24
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
51 W
For
Off. Reb
Baylor
L
Opp
FT
101-63
48
For
3PT
31 W
325 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
90-65
^^Davidson
(0)
114
196
55% 35-64 43% 24-56 38%
6-16
25%
6-24
14-15
11-16
8
1
9
10
14
L
89-90 #
^^Kentucky
(7)
11
49
47% 33-71 45% 34-75 22%
6-27
28%
7-25
17-24 15-18
13
15
5
7
30
L
5-24
15-19 18-21
71-77
^^UConn
(6)
16
92
44% 25-57 46% 27-59 38%
6-16
21%
169 W
102-72
Nicholls St.
(3)
194
170
65% 35-54 36% 27-75 47%
8-17
30% 10-33 24-27
219 W
86-65
Bucknell
(2)
226
202
48% 34-71 41% 24-59 34% 12-35 32% 10-31
28
L
6
7
10
7
8-11
4
7
14
10
6-9
7-10
10
4
12
17
62-65
^^UCLA
(6)
27
20
46% 25-55 36% 20-55 29%
7-24
50% 12-24
5-8
13-18
8
11
15
11
238 W
89-82
*Pepperdine
(1)
174
244
55% 36-66 47% 32-68 13%
2-15
31%
9-29
15-19
9-10
10
10
13
14
279 W
81-50
Portland
(2)
175
313
43% 29-68 33% 21-63 46% 11-24 16%
4-25
12-16
4-6
14
8
7
15
159 W
96-68
*LMU
(1)
214
107
53% 38-72 38% 21-55 44%
8-24
13-14 18-25
10
7
6
14
323 W
93-80
San Diego
(3)
290
269
45% 28-62 42% 28-67 32% 10-31 33% 11-33 27-33 13-16
11
8
11
9
111 W
88-75
Washington St.
(2)
69
181
56% 34-61 53% 32-60 48% 10-21 38%
8-21
10-13
3-8
10
10
13
15
45
210
42% 30-72 59% 31-53 36%
6-14
20-25 29-37
17
2
10
8
7-16
33%
93
L
89-97 #
*Oregon St.
(4)
64
L
99-103
Santa Clara
(1)
47
64
55% 36-66 54% 36-67 36% 10-28 47% 18-38 17-23 13-19
7
9
10
13
105-62
*Portland
(6)
175
313
63% 42-67 35% 20-58 55% 12-22 29%
7-24
9-13
15-19
8
7
7
14
98-60
Oregon St.
(2)
45
210
55% 33-60 38% 21-55 53%
9-17
26%
6-23
23-27 12-19
9
13
6
13
58-62
*Saint Mary's
(3)
55
9
44% 24-55 38% 21-55 18%
3-17
36%
9-25
7-13
11-22
8
13
9
11
159 W
73-53
LMU
(4)
214
107
43% 25-58 35% 19-55 11%
2-18
18%
4-22
21-23 11-16
10
7
6
8
298 W
78-61
*Pacific
(1)
278
257
43% 25-58 40% 22-55 23%
5-22
25%
5-20
23-26 12-20
8
10
9
13
60 W
88-77
San Francisco
(4)
94
40
52% 34-65 43% 26-60 29%
4-14
33%
9-27
16-23 16-19
12
7
9
7
238 W
107-55
Pepperdine
(1)
174
244
57% 45-79 29% 19-65 46% 12-26 27%
7-26
5-7
10-14
11
5
6
10
111 W
84-63
*Washington St.
(3)
69
181
52% 29-56 41% 24-59 47%
7-15
36%
9-25
19-20
6-8
7
8
10
14
67-74
Saint Mary's
(2)
55
9
48% 27-56 44% 27-61 29%
4-14
40%
8-20
9-12
12-15
7
11
7
8
64 W
95-76
*Santa Clara
(2)
47
64
58% 37-64 40% 22-55 27%
6-22
44% 11-25 15-20 21-28
5
4
13
16
60 W
95-75
*San Francisco
(3)
94
40
58% 34-59 46% 31-67 46% 11-24 17%
8
12
9
8
60 W
85-76
^^San Francisco
(8)
94
40
44% 28-63 45% 28-62 24%
4-17
44% 11-25 25-32
9-14
6
3
7
13
23 W
58-51
^^Saint Mary's
(0)
55
9
41% 26-63 39% 20-52
1-15
0%
11-15
6
8
4
15
279 W
93 W
23
L
23
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
7%
9-25
43%
Non-Conference Games
3-18
0-16
16-19 10-14
5-7
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
124.2
11th
122.8
9th
123.0
5th
124.8
12th
121.4
23rd
Def-Efficiency
97.9
53rd
95.7
22nd
94.5
28th
99.3
55th
94.1
12th
WAB
+0.6
50th
+2.2
30th
+0.6
36th
+1.1
42nd
+2.4
18th
FG% 50% or better
15-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
4-5
More FTM than Opp.
17-2
19-4
3PT% < 35%
6-4
Make >= 10 3PA
13-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
21-3
More FTA than Opp.
16-2
5-3
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
16-7
17-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
19-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-4
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-4
16-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-1
@ Matteise
307
W, 83-78
Tenn. Tech
282
W, 92-64
Texas Southern
263
W, 90-77
North Florida
99
W, 77-69
*Georgia Tech
Record
20-12 (8-10)
355
W, 93-45
Alabama A&M
Home
15-3
27
L, 80-69
^^Marquette
Road
#9 Georgia Bulldogs - SEC
BPI: 38
BT: 30
EM: 41
KPI: 38
NET: 33
POM: 34
SOR: 35
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
75.6
69.3
1-25
2-2
1-0
0-5
5-9
Win
81.7
64.5
26-50
2-1
0-2
1-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
65.3
77.4
51-100
2-0
1-0
2-0
9
W, 66-63
^^St. John's
180
W, 102-56
Jacksonville
Non-Conf.
185.1
Home
82.2
66.2
101-200
3-0
0-0
0-0
107
W, 69-48
Notre Dame
Conf.
30.8
Road
67.1
73.4
201+
6-0
0-0
0-0
82
W, 73-68
^^Grand Canyon
337
W, 100-49
Buffalo
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Charleston So.
66.4
115.9
95.8
18.8
18.0
36.1
31.8
223rd
46th
23rd
289th
116th
15th
278th
52.5
71.7
53.8
33.5
39.8
36.8
95th
eFG%
204th
FT%
78th
2PT%
188th
3PT%
27th
FTA/FGA %
235th
3PA/FGA %
47.2
73.7
47.8
30.9
30.4
40.6
29th
268th
57th
33rd
112th
242nd
303
W, 81-65
193
W, 79-72
S. Carolina St.
26
L, 63-51
*Ole Miss
14
W, 82-69
Kentucky
39
W, 72-62
Oklahoma
5
L, 74-56
*Tennessee
1
L, 70-68
Auburn
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.1 (38th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
39
L, 68-65
*Arkansas
4
L, 89-59
*Florida
Win
72.9%
57.8%
44.8%
36.3%
29.0%
7.5
7.1
1.8
9.9
0.1
5.6
86
W, 71-60
South Carolina
Loss
69.0%
47.2%
52.5%
29.0%
34.2%
6.2
8.1
-2.5
-5.1
-1.8
-1.7
6
L, 90-69
*Alabama
Home
71.1%
57.4%
47.3%
37.2%
30.0%
7.9
7.4
1.5
8.7
0.2
6.4
83
W, 81-62
LSU
Road
72.7%
49.3%
48.4%
28.4%
32.1%
5.7
7.5
-1.6
-1.4
-1.6
-1.8
33
L, 76-75
Miss St.
16
L, 69-53
*Texas A&M
140
23
L, 87-74
Missouri
125
125
1
L, 82-70
*Auburn
4
W, 88-83
Florida
110
110
*Texas
86
W, 73-64
*South Carolina
95
95
80
W, 79-68
Vanderbilt
39
L, 81-75
^^Oklahoma
65
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
69
Fast Break 15% 21
65
Game #
2nd Chance 16% 13
Game #
Loss
Road
Asa Newell
T. Lawrence DNP L @ A&M, vs.
Missouri, @ Auburn
59
Off TO 19%
Home
A. Newell top 75 off-reb rate
91
2nd Chance 18%
In Paint 42%
47
Demery in January (UGA 3-5), 9.5
PPG, 29% FG; since: 17.5 PPG
60
Fast Break 14%
80
W vs. Florida, UGA led 39-19 12
min. in; UGA 10-18 3PT, UF 11-32
76
In Paint 46%
Defensive Pct.l
W, 83-67
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
45
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 21% 13
Silas Demary Jr.
Blue Cain
Dakota Leffew
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 14.4
7.4
17-30
6-19
20.4
4.0
17-29
16-35
12.4
5.8
14-23
7-18
7.8
3.0
9-18
4-15
W 15.5
6.2 105-161
15-48
13.7
4.5
48-98
32-77
8.7
4.6
32-59
23-72
12.0
2.3
41-71
41-104
L
14.9
8.0
54-94
11-39
13.1
3.1
23-67
24-72
11.3
3.7
28-60
21-58
5.1
1.7
12-28
9-42
H
16.4
6.8 100-152
15-43
13.2
3.9
38-85
30-75
8.5
4.0
33-59
19-65
12.1
2.0
36-55
40-95
R
13.9
6.9
11-44
13.7
4.1
33-80
26-74
11.1
4.5
27-60
25-65
6.1
2.2
17-44
10-51
59-103
Starting Lineup Last G: B. Cain, S. Demary, R. Godfrey, D. James, A. Newell (7 G: 4-3)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
14 Asa Newell
6'11"
Fr
--
28.9
15.3
6.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
62.4%
159-255
29.9%
26-87
74.4%
93-125
5
Silas Demary Jr.
6'5"
So
--
31.3
13.4
4.0
3.1
2.3
1.7
0.2
43.0%
71-165
37.6%
56-149
80.5%
120-149
0
Blue Cain
6'5"
So
--
27.0
9.6
4.2
1.5
1.3
1.3
0.1
50.4%
60-119
33.8%
44-130
86.2%
56-65
1
Dakota Leffew
6'4"
Sr
1
25.5
9.6
2.1
1.6
1.3
0.7
0.4
53.5%
53-99
34.2%
50-146
80.0%
40-50
7
Tyrin Lawrence
6'4"
Sr
3
25.4
8.5
3.2
2.4
1.9
1.1
0.2
49.5%
54-109
32.5%
25-77
77.1%
64-83
2
De'Shayne Montgomery
6'5"
So
16
16.1
6.8
2.2
0.8
1.8
1.1
0.2
47.6%
30-63
25.9%
7-27
71.1%
27-38
10 RJ Godfrey
6'8"
Jr
--
19.6
6.5
3.9
0.9
1.5
0.6
0.6
57.7%
82-142
0.0%
0-10
61.1%
44-72
6
Somto Cyril
6'11"
Fr
--
13.9
4.5
3.8
0.5
1.1
0.2
1.6
63.1%
53-84
0.0%
0-1
47.4%
37-78
13 Dylan James
6'9"
So
1
13.6
3.3
2.2
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.5
50.0%
29-58
43.5%
10-23
52.0%
13-25
#9 Georgia Bulldogs - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
83-78
Tenn. Tech
--
270
288
52% 34-66 49% 30-61 22%
282 W
92-64
Texas Southern
(5)
341
138
263 W
90-77
North Florida
(1)
136
99 W
77-69
*Georgia Tech
(2)
151
93-45
Alabama A&M
(3)
69-80
^^Marquette
(3)
W
66-63
^^St. John's
180 W
102-56
107 W
69-48
27
9
L
For
3PT
307 W
355 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
Opp
For
FT
Off. Reb
Turnovers
Opp
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
39% 11-28
11-18
7-11
14
4
12
13
42% 25-59 37% 24-65 35% 12-34
5%
30-39 15-19
13
3
14
4
349
53% 31-59 43% 30-70 40%
6-15
32% 12-37 22-28
5-6
13
11
10
9
66
46% 26-56 37% 23-63 17%
3-18
26%
6-23
22-31 17-22
9
8
12
11
360
328
53% 28-53 30% 16-54 36%
9-25
29%
6-21
28-41
7-12
15
6
16
21
40
31
44% 24-54 50% 29-58 32%
8-25
41% 11-27
13-19
11-15
6
8
17
13
(0)
71
2
49% 24-49 31% 19-61 42%
5-12
11%
2-19
13-16 23-28
12
17
23
14
Jacksonville
(5)
267
111
67% 36-54 35% 20-57 58% 14-24 28%
7-25
16-21
9-13
4
8
12
15
Notre Dame
(2)
99
115
44% 28-63 37% 19-52 23%
6-26
21%
4-19
7-9
6-9
13
6
5
10
5-15
4-18
1-19
82 W
73-68
^^Grand Canyon
(10)
126
60
51% 27-53 37% 23-63 33%
26%
7-27
14-17 15-17
7
12
18
13
337 W
100-49
Buffalo
(4)
344
308
54% 37-69 34% 18-53 41% 14-34 21%
4-19
12-19
9-12
14
5
5
18
303 W
81-65
Charleston So.
(2)
308
280
51% 32-63 40% 23-57 50%
9-18
35%
8-23
8-14
11-16
10
7
10
14
79-72
S. Carolina St.
(6)
242
131
54% 27-50 40% 23-57 31%
5-16
35%
7-20
20-31 19-24
6
8
14
15
51-63
*Ole Miss
(5)
31
34
29% 17-58 41% 21-51 11%
2-18
38%
6-16
15-17 15-21
14
9
13
13
14 W
82-69
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
42% 23-55 38% 24-64 29%
7-24
24%
6-25
29-38 15-19
11
11
13
13
39 W
72-62
Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
43% 21-49 38% 24-63 18%
3-17
26%
7-27
27-37
11
8
13
11
8-27
193 W
26
L
7-9
5
L
56-74
*Tennessee
(3)
19
3
38% 20-53 42% 28-66 29%
6-21
30%
10-12 10-10
7
18
17
9
1
L
68-70
Auburn
(2)
1
12
46% 26-57 39% 24-61 35%
7-20
44% 10-23
9-20
12-20
10
13
12
9
39
L
65-68
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
44% 20-46 31% 18-58 36%
5-14
13%
3-23
20-29 29-34
7
14
13
10
4
L
59-89
*Florida
(2)
3
13
36% 21-59 53% 34-64 24%
5-21
35%
9-26
12-15 12-15
13
14
17
14
71-60
South Carolina
(2)
110
59
51% 26-51 41% 21-51 47%
7-15
24%
4-17
12-15 14-18
5
8
11
17
69-90
*Alabama
(3)
4
28
36% 27-76 53% 30-57 17%
4-23
42% 11-26 11-23 19-23
13
8
6
19
81-62
LSU
(3)
128
62
49% 32-65 36% 21-58 38%
9-24
36% 12-33
8-13
8-13
13
6
11
10
50
46% 25-54 55% 32-58 38%
8-21
30%
6-20
17-22
6-18
7
9
9
9
86 W
6
L
83 W
33
L
75-76
Miss St.
(2)
26
16
L
53-69
*Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
33% 16-49 41% 26-64 28%
7-25
30%
6-20
14-18 11-16
7
16
13
11
23
L
74-87
Missouri
(3)
5
75
53% 31-59 47% 33-70 29%
5-17
31%
9-29
7-10
12-14
10
16
9
1
L
7-22
27%
6-22
1
70-82
*Auburn
(6)
1
12
39% 22-57 43% 27-63 32%
19-25 22-28
10
16
12
8
W
88-83
Florida
(2)
3
13
54% 28-52 41% 27-66 56% 10-18 34% 11-32 22-27 18-29
4
14
17
9
45 W
83-67
*Texas
(3)
39
69
52% 29-56 44% 23-52 36%
8-22
35%
17-24 13-20
8
6
10
13
86 W
73-64
*South Carolina
(2)
110
59
48% 26-54 37% 19-51 28%
5-18
44% 10-23 16-20 16-21
7
3
6
5
47 W
79-68
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
45% 22-49 39% 22-57 44%
8-18
30%
27-37 16-21
9
12
13
11
75-81
^^Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
44% 28-63 48% 26-54 36% 10-28 48% 12-25
9-16
14
7
11
12
4
39
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
8-23
8-27
17-25
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
118.3
32nd
112.3
71st
115.4
44th
115.4
58th
120.6
24th
Def-Efficiency
96.6
39th
95.0
15th
97.9
60th
94.1
13th
97.2
35th
WAB
+1.6
23rd
+0.4
53rd
+1.5
19th
+1.1
38th
+0.5
44th
FG% 50% or better
11-1
3PT% >= 35%
12-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
4-5
More FTM than Opp.
14-3
15-3
3PT% < 35%
5-9
Make >= 10 3PA
8-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
4-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
16-7
More FTA than Opp.
12-4
5-4
More OReb than Opp.
0-4
Make < 10 3PA
16-11
12-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
15-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
9-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
1-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-8
11-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-3
@ Matteise
McNeese
Purdue
High Point
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Clemson
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
303
W, 91-64
Charleston So.
297
W, 88-62
St. Francis (PA)
183
W, 75-62
Eastern Kent.
53
L, 84-71
*Boise St.
Record
27-6 (18-2)
159
W, 79-51
Radford
Home
15-2
60
W, 70-55
^^San Francisco
Road
#5 Clemson Tigers - ACC
BPI: 15
BT: 21
EM: 22
KPI: 19
NET: 22
POM: 18
SOR: 15
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.3
65.7
1-25
2-0
0-1
0-1
12-4
Win
76.1
61.7
26-50
1-1
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
77.3
83.5
51-100
3-1
3-0
4-2
71
W, 75-67
^^Penn St.
296
W, 86-58
Florida A&M
14
W, 70-66
Kentucky
210
W, 65-55
*Miami (FL)
37
!L, 87-82
Memphis
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*South Carolina
64.2
118.4
94.9
15.7
20.1
33.7
29.9
328th
24th
17th
75th
41st
66th
185th
53.6
76.6
52.3
37.2
28.2
38.4
63rd
eFG%
41st
FT%
129th
2PT%
28th
3PT%
315th
FTA/FGA %
182nd
3PA/FGA %
48.9
69.5
49.3
32.2
27.6
38.3
89th
37th
114th
83rd
46th
157th
86
!L, 91-88
61
W, 73-62
Wake Forest
80
W, 85-71
Stanford
125
W, 80-68
California
17
L, 74-64
*Louisville
91
W, 77-57
Florida St.
99
W, 70-59
*Georgia Tech
Non-Conf.
127.7
Home
80.5
65.9
101-200
6-0
0-0
4-0
Conf.
93.5
Road
71.9
65.4
201+
3-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.9 (18th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-4
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
70
!W, 78-75
*Pittsburgh
120
W, 86-72
Syracuse
Win
75.2%
54.2%
47.9%
38.4%
32.0%
8.5
6.7
1.0
4.4
2.6
3.7
155
W, 72-57
*Virginia Tech
Loss
82.8%
45.3%
55.2%
32.5%
32.9%
8.3
7.8
0.0
-4.2
1.3
-5.3
132
W, 68-58
*N.C. State
Home
75.4%
54.6%
49.0%
38.3%
34.2%
9.2
7.4
1.6
4.7
3.1
4.2
99
!L, 89-86
Georgia Tech
Road
78.0%
50.0%
49.6%
35.8%
30.0%
7.7
6.4
-0.1
0.9
1.5
-0.3
3
W, 77-71
Duke
36
W, 85-65
North Carolina
140
91
W, 72-46
*Florida St.
125
125
52
W, 79-69
*SMU
107
W, 83-68
Notre Dame
110
110
*Virginia
182
W, 78-69
*B.C.
155
W, 65-47
Virginia Tech
52
W, 57-54
^^SMU
17
L, 76-73
Fast Break 9% 13
95
95
80
80
52
2nd Chance 15%
80
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Louisville
Home
29
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Chase Hunter
100
Fast Break 8%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
51
In Paint 43%
65
Schieffelin this year vs. last year
eFG%: 54.8% /// 61.1%
Def-Reb%: 22.7% (T100) /// 26.5%
56
In Paint 44%
68
Off TO 17%
Ian Schieffelin
Viktor Lakhin
Defensive Pct.l
W, 71-58
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
103
Off-Efficiency
Jaeden Zackery
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 14.4
3.2
19-38
7-23
12.4
9.4
23-40
1-9
12.4
7.4
22-39
2-7
13.4
3.2
19-37
5-15
Since 2/1, C. Hunter: 4 G w/ 20+ pts,
4 G w/ <10 pts
W 14.8
2.9
77-143
54-137 12.1
9.3 100-184
23-69
11.7
6.3 105-180
20-52
11.8
3.2
84-156
31-89
L
23.3
3.3
30-62
21-45
15.8 10.0
28-46
6-14
11.0
6.3
19-48
4-12
9.2
3.7
11-30
6-17
L vs. GT: led 64-59 w/ 59 sec left
W vs. Duke, 21-6 run 2H, down 8, up
7 -- Flagg, 6-17 FG
H
16.5
3.4
56-97
39-95
12.0
59-112
15-43
12.9
6.2
71-125
16-39
11.0
3.2
55-99
14-51
R
16.3
2.6
51-108
36-87
13.6 10.4 69-118
14-40
10.1
6.3
53-103
8-25
11.6
3.4
40-87
23-55
8.5
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Hunter, V. Lakhin, I. Schieffelin, C. Wiggins, J. Zackery (23 G: 17-6)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
6'3"
Sr
--
33.4
16.4
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.4
0.5
52.2%
107-205
41.2%
75-182
86.3%
101-117
1
Chase Hunter
4
Ian Schieffelin
6'8"
Sr
--
33.4
12.8
9.4
2.7
1.6
0.8
0.8
55.7%
128-230
34.9%
29-83
74.5%
79-106
0
Viktor Lakhin
6'11"
Sr
--
23.6
11.6
6.3
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.5
54.4%
124-228
37.5%
24-64
69.7%
62-89
11 Jaeden Zackery
6'2"
Sr
--
35.3
11.3
3.3
3.2
1.5
2.1
0.1
51.1%
95-186
34.9%
37-106
81.8%
72-88
7
Chauncey Wiggins
6'10"
Jr
--
23.4
8.3
3.0
0.7
1.1
0.3
0.2
51.6%
63-122
37.0%
40-108
79.4%
27-34
2
Dillon Hunter
6'4"
Jr
3
22.6
5.4
2.5
1.9
0.5
0.9
0.1
51.6%
33-64
31.2%
24-77
61.5%
24-39
3
Jake Heidbreder
6'5"
Jr
2
13.9
4.2
1.1
0.8
0.5
0.5
--
47.1%
16-34
38.6%
27-70
100.0%
16-16
10 Del Jones
6'2"
Fr
2
11.8
3.9
1.5
1.0
0.7
0.2
0.1
45.2%
33-73
31.8%
14-44
76.5%
13-17
6
6'7"
Sr
6
6.0
2.3
1.5
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.2
55.9%
19-34
57.1%
4-7
54.2%
13-24
Myles Foster
#5 Clemson Tigers - ACC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
Charleston So.
--
308
280
49% 32-65 40% 20-50 52% 11-21 44% 11-25
16-24 13-27
11
10
7
17
297 W
88-62
St. Francis (PA)
(3)
294
289
59% 33-56 39% 22-56 44% 12-27 40%
8-20
10-17 10-14
7
6
16
16
75-62
Eastern Kent.
(3)
113
266
46% 28-61 43% 26-61 29%
7-24
25%
6-24
12-19
4-5
17
11
13
15
71-84
*Boise St.
(4)
52
54
37% 25-68 46% 25-55 24%
6-25
29%
7-24
15-20 27-30
11
11
8
9
159 W
79-51
Radford
(3)
109
240
51% 25-49 31% 17-55 48% 11-23 20%
4-20
18-22 13-19
6
9
11
11
60 W
70-55
^^San Francisco
(3)
94
40
48% 28-58 39% 20-51 41%
7-17
33%
8-24
7-10
7-7
13
5
12
13
71 W
75-67
^^Penn St.
(0)
63
79
44% 25-57 46% 26-56 47%
9-19
22%
4-18
16-20
11-15
9
6
13
16
296 W
86-58
Florida A&M
(2)
255
344
50% 30-60 42% 23-55 36%
9-25
42% 11-26
17-20
1-6
12
7
9
14
14 W
70-66
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
37% 24-65 38% 24-63 32%
8-25
26%
7-27
14-19
11-18
14
10
7
12
9-27
16%
4-25
10-12
210 W
Opp
For
Opp
Turnovers
91-64
L
For
Off. Reb
Result
53
Opp
FT
303 W
183 W
For
3PT
For Opp For Opp
65-55
*Miami (FL)
(3)
72
324
40% 23-58 41% 23-56 33%
5-6
10
11
7
11
37
L
82-87 #
Memphis
(6)
88
47
45% 30-67 52% 31-60 32% 10-31 48% 12-25 12-15 13-17
10
10
13
14
86
L
88-91 #
*South Carolina
(2)
110
59
47% 30-64 52% 30-58 43%
41%
7-17
19-21 24-34
8
10
10
11
61 W
73-62
Wake Forest
(3)
137
36
39% 24-61 50% 25-50 32% 10-31 23%
3-13
15-16
9-12
7
4
12
18
80 W
85-71
Stanford
(10)
75
88
48% 28-58 44% 27-61 42%
8-19
30%
6-20
21-24
11-12
8
10
10
17
80-68
California
(2)
104
162
62% 31-50 46% 26-57 44%
8-18
35%
6-17
10-12 10-16
7
7
12
6
64-74
*Louisville
(2)
25
16
40% 26-65 46% 25-55 33%
8-24
30%
8-27
4-5
16-20
14
9
13
11
91 W
77-57
Florida St.
(3)
142
72
48% 28-58 43% 21-49 46% 13-28 25%
4-16
8-10
11-15
7
7
10
9
99 W
70-59
*Georgia Tech
(2)
151
66
44% 23-52 35% 19-54 35%
7-20
16-20 14-19
4
9
9
13
70 W
78-75 #
*Pittsburgh
(3)
60
105
51% 27-53 45% 28-62 52% 14-27 32% 11-34 10-14
8
12
10
9
120 W
86-72
Syracuse
(3)
95
147
56% 31-55 54% 28-52 45%
9-20
52% 11-21 15-21
5-6
8
5
7
11
155 W
72-57
*Virginia Tech
(2)
164
137
48% 28-58 38% 19-50 33%
7-21
37%
7-19
9-13
12-21
11
9
5
8
68-58
*N.C. State
(6)
145
102
48% 26-54 38% 23-60 35%
6-17
41%
9-22
10-12
3-6
3
11
5
10
86-89 #
Georgia Tech
(2)
151
66
36% 28-77 42% 35-83 32% 12-37 25%
7-28
18-21 12-25
14
20
12
15
W
77-71
Duke
(3)
2
4
59% 30-51 44% 24-55 40%
50% 12-24 13-22 11-14
9
8
10
9
36 W
85-65
North Carolina
(1)
21
65
50% 32-64 45% 28-62 48% 12-25 21%
4-19
9-12
5-11
13
8
13
13
91 W
72-46
*Florida St.
(4)
142
72
48% 29-61 34% 18-53 30%
13%
2-15
6-9
8-19
10
12
11
14
52 W
79-69
*SMU
(6)
36
70
49% 28-57 44% 25-57 48% 14-29 32%
8-25
9-11
11-14
8
16
9
15
107 W
83-68
Notre Dame
(3)
99
115
48% 30-63 45% 22-49 39%
9-23
31%
5-16
14-18 19-21
8
6
3
10
103 W
71-58
*Virginia
(2)
89
134
47% 26-55 42% 22-52 10%
1-10
42%
8-19
18-23
6-10
7
4
7
9
182 W
78-69
*B.C.
(3)
199
173
50% 29-58 42% 25-60 40%
8-20
33%
6-18
12-16 13-18
12
7
13
7
155 W
65-47
Virginia Tech
(2)
164
137
44% 27-61 41% 19-46 15%
3-20
32%
8-25
8-13
1-4
14
7
9
20
57-54
^^SMU
(4)
36
70
38% 18-47 40% 22-55 19%
4-21
7%
1-14
17-23
9-13
7
7
15
11
73-76
^^Louisville
(0)
25
16
39% 27-69 44% 24-55 31%
5-16
27%
6-22
14-17 22-27
12
9
9
13
125 W
17
L
132 W
99
3
L
52 W
17
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-21
8-23
4-10
8-27
35%
Non-Conference Games
8-10
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.9
23rd
116.2
38th
114.5
48th
121.2
18th
118.1
39th
Def-Efficiency
96.5
37th
94.6
14th
97.8
59th
95.5
20th
91.6
7th
WAB
+1.6
26th
+3.3
16th
-0
57th
+4.7
12th
+2.8
14th
FG% 50% or better
9-0
3PT% >= 35%
17-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
18-1
20-1
3PT% < 35%
7-5
Make >= 10 3PA
10-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
8-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-4
More FTA than Opp.
19-0
5-1
More OReb than Opp.
2-2
Make < 10 3PA
19-4
16-2
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
6-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
21-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
11-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
6-1
9-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
10-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-0
@ Matteise
139
L, 80-73
^^South Dakota St.
W, 111-57
Biblical Stud. (TX)
6
L, 72-64
*Alabama
72
W, 68-61
North Texas
Record
27-6 (19-1)
136
W, 76-68
^^Illinois St.
Home
13-1
201
W, 84-69
^^Longwood
Road
58
L, 62-58
^^Liberty
64
L, 74-67
Santa Clara
Non-Conf.
W, 103-69
LeTourneau
Conf.
33
L, 66-63
^^Miss St.
301
W, 64-56
*La. Lafayette
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
New Orleans
65.2
113.4
100.8
16.2
21.6
34.7
31.3
286th
65th
74th
108th
18th
39th
257th
53.3
70.7
53.2
35.6
35.7
36.7
73rd
eFG%
235th
FT%
95th
2PT%
77th
3PT%
101st
FTA/FGA %
240th
3PA/FGA %
47.5
70.9
46.9
32.2
31.4
46.6
37th
117th
35th
83rd
136th
351st
352
W, 86-61
#12 McNeese Cowboys - Southland
BPI: 66
BT: 63
EM: 61
KPI: 77
NET: 58
W, 79-51
SE Louisiana
342
W, 75-56
*East Texas A&M
246
W, 92-69
*N'Western St.
169
W, 80-71
Nicholls St.
291
W, 75-59
*Hou. Christian
175
W, 75-64
Lamar
SOR: 64
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.2
64.0
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
14-5
Win
80.0
62.5
26-50
0-0
0-1
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
64.7
70.8
51-100
1-1
0-1
0-0
128.5
Home
80.0
61.1
101-200
3-0
2-1
2-1
238.5
Road
75.2
66.2
201+
7-0
2-0
8-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -0.9 (58th)
207
POM: 59
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
276
W, 79-59
Stephen F. Austin
245
W, 93-63
*UTRGV
Win
70.7%
55.7%
46.4%
38.1%
31.2%
8.1
7.6
1.5
5.1
3.9
3.6
174
W, 74-73
*A&M CorChristi
Loss
72.7%
51.5%
51.4%
25.6%
35.5%
5.3
10.0
0.7
-1.7
-0.2
-2.2
169
L, 71-63
*Nicholls St.
Home
71.2%
55.7%
48.2%
35.6%
30.2%
7.9
6.8
3.2
6.1
4.6
3.6
252
W, 67-65
Incarnate Word
Road
70.8%
54.4%
46.3%
36.1%
33.2%
7.5
9.0
-0.1
2.2
2.1
1.8
246
W, 65-50
N'Western St.
342
W, 67-51
East Texas A&M
140
352
W, 78-64
*New Orleans
125
125
207
W, 88-82
*SE Louisiana
174
W, 73-57
A&M CorChristi
110
110
UTRGV
175
W, 68-66
*Lamar
95
95
80
77
2nd Chance 16%
93
Off TO 22%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
97
In Paint 37%
276
W, 95-64
*Stephen F. Austin
246
W, 83-64
^^N'Western St.
65
W, 63-54
57
Fast Break 13%
80
175
73
In Paint 45%
65
Game #
^^Lamar
Home
L vs. Miss St: led 50-43, 11:32 left
Better OE & DE this year than LY, do
not shoot the 3PT as well
Q. Copeland top 20 assist rate
J. Garcia SLand POY, Shumate conf
Def-POY
-------------Breed played 1st & 3rd G
2nd Chance 17% 4
Game #
Loss
Road
Javohn Garcia
71
Fast Break 12%
Sincere Parker
87
Off TO 16%
Christian Shumate
Defensive Pct.l
W, 100-65
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
245
Off-Efficiency
DJ Richards
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 12.0
4.4
17-38
3-11
14.8
2.4
18-36
6-14
11.8
5.6
25-34
1-5
12.4
3.4
3-4
15-21
W 13.6
3.7
90-178
31-94
12.3
2.5
87-167
27-88
10.6
6.3 108-150
12-35
11.4
2.4
13-25
79-165
L
9.7
2.7
13-33
5-14
11.2
2.2
19-36
6-25
10.0
6.3
19-28
4-18
4.5
1.3
3-8
6-24
H
13.9
2.9
42-84
18-55
10.3
2.5
41-85
8-35
11.4
7.2
54-76
9-25
11.7
2.6
5-11
42-96
R
12.2
3.9
61-127
18-53
13.3
2.5
65-118
25-78
9.8
5.6
73-102
7-28
8.9
1.9
11-22
43-93
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Charles, Q. Copeland, J. Garcia, D. Richards, C. Shumate (20 G: 19-1)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
7
Alyn Breed
6'3"
Sr
31
29.9
17.5
3.0
1.5
4.0
1.5
--
52.6%
6
3PT
FT
10-19
50.0%
2-4
100.0%
9-9
Javohn Garcia
6'3"
Sr
--
28.9
12.9
3.5
1.9
0.9
1.6
0.5
48.8%
103-211
33.3%
36-108
81.0%
111-137
21 Sincere Parker
6'3"
Jr
1
19.7
12.1
2.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.3
52.2%
106-203
29.2%
33-113
83.3%
75-90
24 Christian Shumate
6'6"
Sr
--
27.3
10.5
6.3
0.8
1.3
0.7
1.3
71.3%
127-178
30.2%
16-53
43.1%
44-102
2
DJ Richards
6'4"
Jr
--
22.8
10.1
2.2
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.0
48.5%
16-33
45.0%
85-189
88.7%
47-53
11 Quadir Copeland
6'6"
Jr
--
21.7
9.0
3.3
4.5
2.6
1.3
0.2
51.7%
106-205
14.3%
3-21
70.8%
75-106
5
Joe Charles
6'7"
Sr
2
29.0
8.7
7.1
0.9
0.6
1.3
0.7
55.0%
44-80
36.6%
49-134
80.0%
36-45
23 Brandon Murray
6'5"
Sr
5
24.8
7.1
3.1
2.1
1.4
0.9
0.3
56.1%
60-107
34.9%
15-43
70.8%
34-48
0
5'11"
So
12
13.7
4.3
1.1
1.8
1.4
1.0
0.2
41.4%
24-58
35.0%
7-20
68.8%
22-32
T'Johnn Brown
#12 McNeese Cowboys - Southland
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
139
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
^^South Dakota St.
--
111
175
39% 23-59 46% 28-61 27%
111-57
Biblical Stud. (TX)
(2)
--
--
60% 42-70 36% 22-61 33% 10-30 14%
L
Opp
For
FT
73-80
W
For
3PT
Result
L
6
Opp Eff.
7-26
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
34% 12-35 20-27 12-16
3-21
Turnovers
For Opp For Opp
8
11
11
15
7
12
20
17-26
10-11
13
64-72
*Alabama
(3)
4
28
39% 24-61 44% 22-50 29%
7-24
32% 11-34
9-11
17-24
8
9
12
13
72 W
68-61
North Texas
(6)
118
48
44% 19-43 32% 17-54 24%
4-17
36%
8-22
26-39 19-23
9
13
11
14
136 W
76-68
^^Illinois St.
(3)
80
232
44% 24-54 44% 22-50 40%
8-20
42% 11-26
20-26 13-21
10
5
5
7
201 W
84-69
^^Longwood
(1)
203
258
62% 34-55 43% 21-49 29%
4-14
35%
12-17 20-27
8
11
14
19
L
58-62
^^Liberty
(0)
68
43
45% 21-47 42% 20-48
8%
1-12
36% 11-31
15-18
11-14
8
5
13
11
L
67-74
Santa Clara
(7)
47
64
39% 24-61 41% 23-56 28%
8-29
35% 10-29
11-17
18-19
12
12
7
12
103-69
LeTourneau
(3)
--
--
70% 41-59 50% 28-56 48% 10-21 45%
9-20
11-11
4-5
9
6
12
15
58
64
W
33
L
7-20
63-66
^^Miss St.
(6)
26
50
42% 22-53 37% 19-52 41%
9-22
28%
5-18
10-17 23-33
11
9
14
7
301 W
64-56
*La. Lafayette
(7)
327
247
42% 25-60 41% 22-54
1-16
33%
8-24
13-17
4-6
10
4
7
11
352 W
86-61
New Orleans
(5)
309
354
49% 32-66 41% 24-58 36% 11-31 25%
6-24
11-13
7-15
12
15
6
14
207 W
79-51
SE Louisiana
(1)
216
212
49% 27-55 40% 19-48 39%
7-18
23%
5-22
18-22
8-16
10
9
12
22
342 W
75-56
*East Texas A&M
(4)
337
273
51% 28-55 31% 20-64 33%
6-18
28% 10-36 13-20
6-8
9
12
13
16
246 W
92-69
*N'Western St.
(1)
251
189
54% 31-57 41% 21-51 57% 16-28 32%
8-25
14-18 19-22
8
7
7
10
169 W
80-71
Nicholls St.
(4)
194
170
38% 24-64 37% 22-59 20%
3-15
22%
4-18
29-39 23-26
21
13
13
15
291 W
75-59
*Hou. Christian
(1)
286
225
48% 29-60 40% 20-50 33%
7-21
26%
7-27
10-19 12-20
9
6
9
17
175 W
75-64
Lamar
(4)
269
94
43% 25-58 48% 22-46 33%
9-27
37%
7-19
16-28 13-20
12
8
7
15
276 W
79-59
SFA
(1)
345
146
47% 27-57 35% 16-46 31%
9-29
35%
7-20
16-21 20-32
14
13
13
18
245 W
93-63
*UTRGV
(4)
211
254
54% 33-61 37% 23-62 43% 12-28 21%
7-33
15-18 10-14
15
11
13
12
174 W
74-73
*A&M CorChristi
(1)
187
141
48% 27-56 42% 25-60 52% 12-23 42%
8-19
8-14
5
13
12
10
169
L
6%
15-23
63-71
*Nicholls St.
(4)
194
170
48% 24-50 48% 24-50
0%
0-12
50% 11-22 15-20 12-14
7
4
15
13
252 W
67-65
Incarnate Word
(1)
200
287
49% 29-59 46% 26-57 15%
2-13
25%
6-24
7-14
7-12
11
11
6
5
246 W
65-50
N'Western St.
(4)
251
189
38% 19-50 43% 17-40 46% 10-22 32%
6-19
17-21 10-17
10
5
14
18
342 W
67-51
East Texas A&M
(1)
337
273
45% 26-58 35% 17-49 45%
36% 11-31
6-10
6-7
13
4
7
12
352 W
78-64
*New Orleans
(4)
309
354
44% 32-72 45% 25-56 34% 11-32 48% 10-21
3-9
4-9
14
9
6
19
207 W
88-82
*SE Louisiana
(1)
216
212
57% 30-53 44% 27-61 52% 11-21 37% 13-35 17-26 15-18
11
11
12
8
174 W
73-57
A&M CorChristi
(4)
187
141
48% 28-59 44% 22-50 43%
25%
4-16
11-17
9-15
18
9
11
7
245 W
100-65
UTRGV
(1)
211
254
53% 38-72 42% 26-62 52% 12-23 30%
9-30
12-14
4-6
11
5
13
22
175 W
68-66
*Lamar
(4)
269
94
43% 23-54 36% 22-61 20%
33%
9-27
19-32 13-15
11
11
7
11
276 W
95-64
*SFA
(1)
345
146
51% 33-65 34% 23-68 52% 13-25 27%
9-33
16-20
9-12
10
10
6
10
246 W
83-64
^^N'Western St.
(7)
251
189
54% 27-50 41% 23-56 58% 11-19 35%
9-26
18-21
9-11
4
7
8
11
175 W
63-54
^^Lamar
(0)
269
94
42% 20-48 31% 20-65 18%
5-23
20-27
9-17
5
17
7
10
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-20
6-14
3-15
3-17
22%
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
112.0
90th
113.9
54th
107.9
130th
115.4
57th
112.7
90th
Def-Efficiency
98.7
64th
101.2
73rd
98.2
61st
101.5
83rd
103.3
101st
WAB
+0.1
62nd
-0.9
63rd
-2
136th
+0.9
44th
+0.2
52nd
FG% 50% or better
10-0
3PT% >= 35%
14-1
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-2
More FTM than Opp.
19-3
17-1
3PT% < 35%
10-5
Make >= 10 3PA
13-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
12-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-4
More FTA than Opp.
20-3
5-5
More OReb than Opp.
1-0
Make < 10 3PA
15-6
16-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-1
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
22-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
3-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
24-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
9-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
20-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-3
10-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-1
@ Matteise
174
W, 90-73
A&M CorChristi
222
W, 72-50
Northern Kent.
73
W, 92-84
Yale
6
W, 87-78
Alabama
Record
22-11 (13-7)
27
L, 76-58
*Marquette
Home
14-2
170
W, 80-45
Marshall
Road
132
W, 71-61
^^N.C. State
26
W, 80-78
^^Ole Miss
Non-Conf.
71
L, 81-70
*Penn St.
Conf.
12
W, 83-78
Maryland
16
L, 70-66
^^Texas A&M
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^Auburn
65.0
125.1
100.0
15.6
17.8
31.0
29.9
294th
8th
68th
66th
126th
146th
185th
56.3
73.0
55.5
38.5
34.6
38.1
14th
eFG%
150th
FT%
37th
2PT%
9th
3PT%
130th
FTA/FGA %
191st
3PA/FGA %
1
L, 87-69
#4 Purdue Boiler Makers - Big 10
BPI: 21
BT: 18
EM: 20
KPI: 12
NET: 19
W, 83-64
Toledo
88
W, 81-61
*Minnesota
57
W, 79-61
Northwestern
77
W, 68-50
*Rutgers
55
W, 104-68
Nebraska
109
W, 69-58
*Washington
SOR: 27
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.9
71.1
1-25
3-1
0-3
0-3
8-9
Win
82.2
66.7
26-50
1-1
1-0
1-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
69.3
79.8
51-100
6-0
1-0
3-2
91.6
Home
85.1
69.8
101-200
2-0
1-0
1-0
48.5
Road
71.1
72.3
201+
2-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.3 (23rd)
213
POM: 19
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-3
Opp. O-Reb%
52.0
72.6
56.4
30.7
31.0
42.7
240th
217th
348th
25th
125th
299th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 65-58
*Oregon
45
L, 73-70
Ohio St.
Win
72.3%
58.4%
53.5%
39.5%
28.4%
8.8
6.9
-0.6
3.2
3.4
4.6
22
W, 91-64
Michigan
Loss
75.0%
49.9%
62.7%
36.1%
35.7%
7.2
8.3
-0.5
-3.2
-1.7
-4.2
51
W, 81-76
Indiana
Home
72.5%
59.4%
56.2%
41.7%
28.4%
9.4
6.9
-1.3
2.1
3.7
3.1
64
W, 90-81
*Iowa
Road
73.5%
51.7%
56.7%
35.1%
33.0%
7.2
7.8
0.2
0.1
-0.2
0.3
67
W, 90-72
USC
22
L, 75-73
*Michigan
140
11
L, 94-84
Wisconsin
125
125
7
L, 75-66
*Michigan St.
51
L, 73-58
*Indiana
110
110
W, 76-66
UCLA
77
W, 100-71
Rutgers
95
95
80
25
L, 88-80
*Illinois
67
W, 76-71
^^USC
65
L, 86-68
In Paint 0.41
30
Fast Break 0.11
24
55
2nd Chance 0.15
68
Off TO 0.19
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Michigan
Home
50
2nd Chance 0.15
Game #
Loss
Road
Trey Kaufman-Renn
79
Fast Break 0.11
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
50
In Paint 0.43
80
22
Def-Efficiency
140
80
Off TO 0.16
Braden Smith
Defensive Pct.l
28
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
29
Fletcher Loyer
C.J. Cox
W vs. Bama, trailed 65-59, 10:59 left
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
Defensive stats since 2/1:
efG%: 56.7%, TO: 13%, 2PT D: 63%
L5 25.6
6.8
53-92
0-0
17.6
4.8
13-33
18-46
13.4
1.2
6-12
13-29
3.8
2.6
6-13
1-7
W 20.2
2-9 when opp finished w/ FT rate of
37% or greater - only L's < 37%:
Auburn & Marquette
6.5 177-286
2-6
17.9
4.6
84-159
55-136 14.2
2.2
41-88
60-116
5.3
3.0
21-35
17-45
L
20.1
5.7
90-158
1-1
12.5
4.6
29-77
23-67
13.0
2.2
32-64
10-35
7.3
2.6
13-29
13-33
H
20.3
5.8 133-199
2-6
16.9
4.6
59-120
38-99
15.1
2.2
34-70
44-82
7.7
3.4
25-37
17-39
R
20.1
6.6 134-245
1-1
15.2
4.6
54-116
40-104 12.6
2.2
39-82
26-69
4.3
2.4
9-27
13-39
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Cox, C. Furst, T. Kaufman-Renn, F. Loyer, B. Smith (20 G: 13-7)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
4
Trey Kaufman-Renn
6'9"
Jr
--
30.4
20.2
6.2
2.2
2.3
0.7
0.3
60.1%
267-444
42.9%
3-7
64.7%
123-190
3
Braden Smith
6'0"
Jr
--
36.8
16.1
4.6
8.7
2.9
2.2
0.2
47.9%
113-236
38.4%
78-203
83.3%
70-84
2
Fletcher Loyer
6'4"
Jr
--
30.7
13.8
2.2
1.7
1.2
0.5
0.0
48.0%
73-152
46.4%
70-151
85.5%
100-117
12 Daniel Jacobsen
7'4"
Fr
31
12.9
6.5
3.5
--
0.5
--
1.5
80.0%
4-5
0.0%
0-1
71.4%
5-7
0
C.J. Cox
6'3"
Fr
--
18.6
5.9
2.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.0
53.1%
34-64
38.5%
30-78
76.0%
38-50
5
Myles Colvin
6'5"
So
--
17.4
5.3
2.6
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.2
51.0%
25-49
32.5%
38-117
63.2%
12-19
1
Caleb Furst
6'10"
Sr
--
19.0
4.3
3.6
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.2
55.4%
46-83
--
--
64.6%
51-79
23 Camden Heide
6'7"
So
--
19.3
4.3
3.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
71.4%
20-28
36.8%
25-68
82.4%
28-34
24 Gicarri Harris
6'3"
Fr
--
15.3
4.0
1.6
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.2
60.5%
23-38
30.3%
20-66
92.6%
25-27
#4 Purdue Boiler Makers - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
A&M CorChristi
--
187
141
56% 31-55 45% 30-67 42% 11-26 32%
6-19
17-27
7-7
8
6
16
9
222 W
72-50
Northern Kent.
(3)
241
243
53% 27-51 30% 17-57 41%
22%
5-23
9-14
11-14
8
14
13
12
73 W
92-84
Yale
(2)
61
116
54% 28-52 51% 33-65 48% 11-23 31%
8-26
25-32 10-19
5
11
10
10
6
87-78
Alabama
(3)
4
28
49% 31-63 44% 28-63 56%
9-16
31%
9-29
16-25 13-15
10
10
3
8
9-22
Opp
Turnovers
90-73
L
For
Off. Reb
Result
27
Opp
FT
174 W
W
For
3PT
58-76
*Marquette
(3)
40
31
40% 20-50 45% 27-60 33%
6-18
32%
8-25
12-18 14-15
4
6
13
6
170 W
80-45
Marshall
(3)
192
179
50% 24-48 30% 16-53 38%
6-16
13%
4-32
26-33
9-17
6
14
13
19
132 W
71-61
^^N.C. State
(4)
145
102
43% 23-54 43% 23-53 31%
5-16
24%
4-17
20-26
11-15
11
7
6
7
80-78
^^Ole Miss
(0)
31
34
54% 26-48 43% 26-61 46% 10-22 42% 15-36 18-26
70-81
*Penn St.
(5)
63
79
51% 24-47 49% 23-47 38%
8-21
39%
26 W
71
L
12 W
7-18
11-13
9
7
10
6
14-19 28-32
4
7
22
16
83-78
Maryland
(2)
28
6
49% 32-66 46% 30-66 35%
9-26
42% 11-26
10-13
7-9
9
10
8
10
16
L
66-70
^^Texas A&M
(5)
49
11
45% 24-53 44% 22-50 35%
9-26
41%
9-10
17-24
5
11
16
16
1
L
69-87
^^Auburn
(6)
1
12
39% 23-59 55% 36-66 35%
8-23
39% 10-26 15-23
5-9
10
11
10
9
213 W
83-64
Toledo
(7)
96
355
49% 31-63 41% 26-64 36% 10-28 14%
2-14
11-15
10-16
10
17
6
13
88 W
81-61
*Minnesota
(3)
106
86
50% 29-58 48% 25-52 44% 11-25 24%
4-17
12-16
7-16
9
9
2
7
57 W
79-61
Northwestern
(2)
66
41
51% 28-55 38% 23-60 40%
8-20
28%
7-25
15-18
8-12
8
10
11
13
77 W
68-50
*Rutgers
(3)
48
119
50% 28-56 33% 17-52 17%
4-24
30%
7-23
8-16
9-11
8
10
8
15
55 W
104-68
Nebraska
(2)
85
56
63% 41-65 48% 26-54 58% 19-33 22%
6-27
3-6
10-11
7
4
10
17
109 W
69-58
*Washington
(2)
116
132
50% 25-50 43% 20-47 23%
3-13
41%
9-22
16-22
9-14
6
6
10
17
29 W
65-58
*Oregon
(2)
54
37
34% 19-56 36% 18-50 17%
2-12
24%
7-29
25-30 15-17
9
2
11
16
45
L
9-22
70-73
Ohio St.
(2)
38
61
48% 26-54 53% 24-45 33%
3-9
48% 11-23 15-20 14-17
9
5
10
18
22 W
91-64
Michigan
(2)
53
15
55% 34-62 37% 20-54 38%
9-24
21%
6-29
14-21 18-21
8
12
6
22
51 W
81-76
Indiana
(6)
74
39
53% 29-55 57% 30-53 15%
2-13
37%
7-19
21-28
9-16
10
11
10
20
64 W
90-81
*Iowa
(3)
18
178
53% 30-57 52% 30-58 48% 12-25 37% 11-30 18-23 10-16
10
6
11
11
67 W
90-72
USC
(2)
35
104
50% 33-66 41% 26-63 23%
6-26
15%
4-26
18-26 16-29
15
11
10
10
7-20
30%
7-23
6-8
22
L
73-75
*Michigan
(3)
53
15
44% 30-69 45% 25-56 35%
18-26
9
12
11
11
11
L
84-94
Wisconsin
(3)
14
26
52% 29-56 62% 32-52 46% 10-22 40% 12-30 16-21 18-24
3
2
4
3
7
L
66-75
*Michigan St.
(2)
37
5
51% 24-47 58% 28-48 38%
9-24
31%
4-13
9-11
15-21
5
5
12
6
51
L
58-73
*Indiana
(4)
74
39
43% 20-47 52% 28-54 44%
7-16
21%
4-19
11-15 13-20
5
5
15
7
76-66
UCLA
(4)
27
20
52% 27-52 48% 24-50 50% 11-22 28%
5-18
11-16 13-16
6
12
9
14
100-71
Rutgers
(3)
48
119
56% 37-66 44% 25-57 50% 18-36 32%
8-25
8-9
13-21
14
8
9
9
80-88
*Illinois
(2)
15
44
51% 32-63 49% 28-57 28%
5-18
37% 11-30 11-13 21-25
4
4
7
8
76-71
^^USC
(5)
35
104
47% 26-55 44% 27-62 39%
9-23
29%
7-24
15-23 10-14
12
14
9
10
68-86
^^Michigan
(0)
53
15
34% 22-65 52% 30-58 32%
7-22
31%
8-26
17-22 18-22
14
9
5
6
28 W
77 W
25
L
67 W
22
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
131.1
1st
118.5
25th
120.4
15th
126.8
7th
128.7
7th
Def-Efficiency
98.4
60th
100.5
68th
99.0
72nd
98.5
45th
106.0
153rd
WAB
+3.1
7th
+1.1
38th
+1.2
22nd
+3
22nd
+0.2
54th
FG% 50% or better
16-4
3PT% >= 35%
15-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
16-2
20-6
3PT% < 35%
2-5
Make >= 10 3PA
7-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-5
More FTA than Opp.
14-3
3-4
More OReb than Opp.
3-6
Make < 10 3PA
13-10
8-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-9
3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
12-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-7
More Turnovers than Opp.
3-6
6-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-3
@ Matteise
359
W, 93-51
Coppin St.
256
W, 80-71
Jackson St.
319
W, 76-60
NC Central
102
W, 68-65
UAB
Record
29-5 (14-2)
216
W, 80-73
American
Home
16-1
264
L, 71-61
^^Missouri St.
Road
281
W, 73-67
^^Old Dominion
215
W, 76-73
^^Hampton
W, 81-50
Pfeiffer
144
L, 72-68
*UNC Greensboro
72
W, 76-71
North Texas
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^App. St.
66.4
117.7
108.2
15.3
16.5
34.0
29.9
218th
29th
213th
48th
222nd
58th
185th
56.4
76.4
57.4
36.6
37.6
39.0
12th
eFG%
45th
FT%
15th
2PT%
47th
3PT%
52nd
FTA/FGA %
172nd
3PA/FGA %
49.1
70.5
48.9
32.9
36.3
36.0
93rd
94th
97th
115th
269th
87th
171
W, 65-59
#13 High Point Panthers - Big South
BPI: 81
W, 99-31
CarolinaU
197
W, 94-81
*Southern Ill.
163
L, 77-74
Norfolk St.
159
W, 76-58
Radford
178
L, 103-99
*UNC Asheville
303
W, 93-79
*Charleston So.
BT: 85
EM: 73
KPI: 69
NET: 82
POM: 84
SOR: 67
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
82.2
68.8
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
13-4
Win
83.2
66.7
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
76.4
81.0
51-100
1-0
0-0
0-0
Non-Conf.
209.9
Home
83.4
64.0
101-200
4-1
3-0
3-2
Conf.
243.1
Road
81.0
73.5
201+
9-0
3-1
4-1
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -1.8 (64th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-4
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
270
W, 96-55
Gardner Webb
201
L, 82-80
*Longwood
Win
75.7%
58.5%
46.7%
37.6%
32.3%
8.2
6.6
1.5
7.1
1.5
2.6
251
W, 77-66
Presbyterian
Loss
79.5%
52.3%
55.4%
30.6%
35.4%
8.2
6.8
1.4
-0.6
-0.4
2.0
346
W, 86-77
*USC Upstate
Home
73.5%
58.7%
45.0%
36.7%
32.5%
8.8
6.4
4.0
10.9
1.4
3.7
150
W, 84-62
Winthrop
Road
79.2%
56.7%
51.2%
36.0%
32.9%
7.6
6.9
-1.0
1.1
1.0
1.3
251
W, 84-72
*Presbyterian
159
W, 78-75
*Radford
Longwood
150
W, 88-66
*Winthrop
W, 83-60
Charleston So.
270
W, 90-67
*Gardner Webb
125
125
110
110
95
95
80
346
W, 88-66
USC Upstate
270
W, 85-64
^^Gardner Webb
65
W, 76-73
^^Radford
150
W, 81-69
^^Winthrop
B. Pettiford - FR & SO at KU, this
year top 100 Off-Rating & ast rate
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
67
Road
D'Maurian Williams
50
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
51
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Kezza Giffa
J. Bodo Bodo - B2B yrs top 10 offreb rate, top 15 def-red %, top 100
block shot % - Conf. Def POY
30
Off TO 17%
Home
G's vs. opp w/ T-100 KenPom OE: 1
vs. top 100 KenPom Def-Eff: 2, vs.
vs. opp w/ top 100 def eFG%: 3
77
2nd Chance 16%
In Paint 43%
80
159
62
Defensive Pct.l
303
72
In Paint 45%
Offensive Pct.l
W, 83-72
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 14%
178 !W, 104-100 UNC Asheville
201
Off-Efficiency
140
79
Off TO 16%
Kimani Hamilton
Bobby Pettiford
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 15.8
2.0
17-36
7-24
8.6
1.8
10-19
5-12
12.2
4.2
20-35
5-11
10.4
3.8
21-39
1-2
W 15.1
2.5
96-182
34-103 13.8
3.4
80-153
39-90
13.4
4.5 115-188
25-73
8.8
2.5
79-135
6-11
L
13.2
2.4
11-25
5-22
11.8
3.2
15-33
4-18
13.4
6.0
15-29
3-12
9.2
2.4
17-22
2-8
H
13.3
2.3
48-96
17-63
14.4
3.5
49-95
25-64
15.4
5.5
76-114
17-47
8.6
1.8
38-59
3-7
R
16.4
2.7
59-111
22-62
12.7
3.2
46-91
18-44
11.5
3.9
54-103
11-38
9.1
2.9
58-98
5-12
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Bodo Bodo, K. Giffa, K. Hamilton, C. Johnston, D. Williams (29 G: 24-5)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
1
28.2
14.9
2.5
2.5
1.7
0.4
0.0
51.7%
1
Kezza Giffa
6'2"
Sr
4
D'Maurian Williams
6'3"
Sr
3
26.8
13.5
3.4
2.3
1.3
0.8
0.1
5
Kimani Hamilton
6'8"
Jr
--
24.5
13.4
4.7
2.3
1.9
1.0
0.4
55 Bobby Pettiford
6'0"
Sr
5
21.4
8.9
2.5
3.4
1.3
1.0
2
Chase Johnston
6'3"
Sr
--
22.0
7.0
1.8
0.9
0.6
11 Abdoulaye Thiam
6'4"
Sr
--
14.0
6.0
1.3
0.4
10 Simon Hildebrandt
6'9"
Jr
10
13.6
5.6
3.1
21 Juslin Bodo Bodo
7'0"
So
--
21.4
5.3
8.4
0
6'6"
Sr
9
13.3
4.6
2.9
Terry Anderson
2PT
3PT
FT
107-207
31.2%
39-125
85.9%
159-185
51.1%
95-186
39.8%
43-108
82.0%
100-122
59.9%
130-217
32.9%
28-85
72.3%
112-155
0.0
61.1%
96-157
42.1%
8-19
87.5%
42-48
1.1
--
43.3%
13-30
43.5%
70-161
50.0%
2-4
0.6
0.3
0.0
64.6%
53-82
33.3%
24-72
81.3%
26-32
0.4
1.0
0.2
0.2
63.0%
29-46
33.3%
18-54
74.2%
23-31
0.1
0.7
0.6
1.4
63.6%
70-110
--
--
54.2%
39-72
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.1
59.4%
38-64
33.3%
6-18
58.3%
21-36
#13 High Point Panthers - Big South
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
363
299
56% 31-55 31% 20-64 50% 14-28 23%
5-22
17-25
6-13
8
6
12
12
256 W
80-71
Jackson St.
(2)
288
200
55% 23-42 43% 23-54 42% 10-24 35%
7-20
24-29 18-26
4
4
18
12
319 W
76-60
NC Central
(2)
243
347
51% 27-53 43% 23-54 40%
6-15
40%
6-15
16-19
8-10
7
5
7
10
102 W
68-65
UAB
(2)
33
255
38% 24-64 35% 19-55 25%
6-24
39%
7-18
14-19 20-28
11
14
8
14
80-73
American
(2)
268
198
57% 29-51 56% 29-52 43%
6-14
32%
7-22
16-21
8-12
9
12
7
9
61-71
^^Missouri St.
(5)
261
161
44% 20-46 39% 23-59 18%
3-17
44%
8-18
18-24 17-21
4
14
13
13
281 W
73-67
^^Old Dominion
(0)
300
262
53% 25-47 42% 27-64 38%
6-16
29%
7-24
17-23
7
13
8
7
215 W
76-73
^^Hampton
(0)
228
190
49% 24-49 42% 25-59 56% 10-18 33%
8-24
18-23 15-21
6
10
11
2
W
81-50
Pfeiffer
(3)
--
--
44% 29-66 38% 18-48 32%
8-25
36%
5-14
15-19
9-16
16
4
9
16
L
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
144
For
Off. Reb
Coppin St.
L
Opp
FT
93-51
264
For
3PT
359 W
216 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
6-11
68-72
*UNC Greensboro
(2)
196
171
44% 26-59 50% 29-58 33%
7-21
29%
6-21
9-9
8-13
9
11
6
8
72 W
76-71
North Texas
(2)
118
48
44% 20-45 42% 21-50 32%
8-25
50%
7-14
28-37 22-27
10
6
16
13
171 W
65-59
^^App. St.
(7)
281
78
36% 22-61 35% 20-57 21%
6-29
36%
5-14
15-18 14-18
9
10
13
16
W
99-31
CarolinaU
(2)
--
--
59% 38-65 27% 13-49 33%
8-24
22%
4-18
15-21
1-2
18
1
13
20
197 W
94-81
*Southern Ill.
(3)
180
203
58% 33-57 46% 23-50 35%
7-20
29%
5-17
21-32 30-37
6
9
7
14
74-77
Norfolk St.
(7)
178
237
35% 19-55 54% 28-52 42% 15-36 33%
5-15
21-33 16-23
20
5
10
8
76-58
Radford
(3)
109
240
47% 28-60 40% 21-53 42% 13-31 38%
6-16
7-10
10-13
13
13
8
13
6-21
163
L
159 W
178
99-103
*UNC Asheville
(1)
156
295
49% 32-65 51% 35-69 26%
8-31
29%
27-30 27-37
10
8
10
2
303 W
L
93-79
*Charleston So.
(3)
308
280
53% 34-64 43% 23-54 55%
6-11
42% 10-24 19-21 23-31
9
9
6
10
270 W
96-55
Gardner Webb
(2)
245
264
47% 33-71 36% 22-62 41% 13-32 20%
4-20
17-19
7-14
12
13
6
16
201
80-82
*Longwood
(4)
203
258
39% 25-64 51% 27-53 28%
8-29
43%
9-21
22-26 19-34
11
9
4
10
251 W
L
77-66
Presbyterian
(1)
231
261
54% 28-52 39% 22-56 35%
7-20
32%
9-28
14-19 13-18
8
6
12
6
346 W
86-77
*USC Upstate
(3)
305
329
53% 30-57 53% 32-61 45% 14-31 32%
8-25
12-15
5-6
8
5
11
10
150 W
84-62
Winthrop
(2)
152
217
55% 30-55 36% 19-53 43%
9-21
29%
7-24
15-25 17-26
11
5
14
9
251 W
84-72
*Presbyterian
(6)
231
261
60% 29-48 39% 24-62 58%
7-12
36%
9-25
19-25 15-18
9
15
10
6
159 W
78-75
*Radford
(3)
109
240
57% 26-46 47% 24-51 63% 10-16 43%
9-21
16-18 18-23
4
5
13
9
178 W
104-100 # UNC Asheville
(2)
156
295
51% 37-72 46% 33-72 23%
3-13
44% 12-27 27-33 22-29
14
13
12
11
201 W
83-72
Longwood
(4)
203
258
47% 34-72 54% 29-54 23%
7-31
10%
1-10
8-13
13-20
19
5
12
11
150 W
88-66
*Winthrop
(1)
152
217
46% 31-67 40% 23-58 36%
9-25
10%
2-21
17-20 18-28
8
10
6
13
303 W
83-60
Charleston So.
(3)
308
280
58% 34-59 43% 23-54 33%
6-18
25%
5-20
9-12
4
5
8
15
270 W
90-67
*Gardner Webb
(2)
245
264
51% 31-61 41% 21-51 35%
7-20
38%
6-16
21-28 19-28
7
8
3
10
346 W
88-66
USC Upstate
(3)
305
329
52% 34-65 33% 22-66 39% 11-28 38% 11-29
9-16
11-18
11
10
17
17
270 W
85-64
^^Gardner Webb
(8)
245
264
50% 30-60 40% 21-52 29%
7-24
32%
6-19
18-27 16-20
13
7
10
14
159 W
76-73
^^Radford
(0)
109
240
54% 28-52 57% 28-49 47%
7-15
33%
6-18
13-19 11-14
11
7
9
9
150 W
81-69
^^Winthrop
(0)
152
217
45% 33-73 42% 28-66 31%
8-26
26%
7-27
7-7
11
9
7
11
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
9-14
6-11
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
116.1
49th
118.6
23rd
113.8
52nd
120.3
19th
118.9
32nd
Def-Efficiency
103.4
132nd
112.9
300th
110.5
269th
107.3
184th
106.8
173rd
WAB
-0.1
65th
-1.8
72nd
-1.6
117th
-0.5
62nd
+1.2
35th
FG% 50% or better
19-0
3PT% >= 35%
19-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
13-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
19-4
25-1
3PT% < 35%
4-4
Make >= 10 3PA
10-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
8-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
16-3
More FTA than Opp.
16-2
3-0
More OReb than Opp.
4-4
Make < 10 3PA
21-4
14-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
26-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
22-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-0
More Turnovers than Opp.
11-2
10-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
Texas / Xavier
Kentucky
Troy
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Illinois
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Xavier
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Texas
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
318
W, 112-67
Eastern Ill.
214
W, 90-58
SIUE
192
W, 66-54
Oakland
6
L, 100-87
^^Alabama
Record
21-12 (12-8)
357
W, 87-40
MD Eastern Shore
Home
13-4
244
W, 92-34
Little Rock
Road
39
W, 90-77
^^Arkansas
57
!L, 70-66
*Northwestern
11
W, 86-80
Wisconsin
5
L, 66-64
Tennessee
23
W, 80-77
^^Missouri
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
Chicago St.
71.3
122.2
98.5
15.8
12.7
36.0
26.3
17th
15th
45th
83rd
359th
17th
33rd
52.3
75.9
57.3
31.1
34.6
46.9
103rd
eFG%
55th
FT%
16th
2PT%
316th
3PT%
130th
FTA/FGA %
30th
3PA/FGA %
47.3
71.2
46.1
33.3
26.8
30.4
32nd
131st
18th
141st
36th
3rd
362
W, 117-64
#6 Illinois Fighting Illini - Big 10
BPI: 23
BT: 23
EM: 28
KPI: 22
NET: 17
W, 109-77
*Oregon
109
W, 81-77
*Washington
71
W, 91-52
Penn St.
67
L, 82-72
USC
51
W, 94-69
*Indiana
7
L, 80-78
*Michigan St.
SOR: 30
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
83.8
74.6
1-25
2-3
1-3
1-2
8-8
Win
91.0
68.5
26-50
2-0
1-0
1-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.3
85.3
51-100
3-1
1-0
2-3
Non-Conf.
142.2
Home
84.4
67.0
101-200
1-0
0-0
1-0
Conf.
44.7
Road
83.3
82.7
201+
5-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.4 (27th)
29
POM: 20
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
12
L, 91-70
Maryland
57
W, 83-74
Northwestern
Win
77.8%
60.0%
43.5%
35.7%
32.5%
10.8
6.6
4.6
14.1
-0.7
7.0
55
!L, 80-74
*Nebraska
Loss
72.3%
52.5%
50.1%
23.0%
34.8%
6.8
6.8
0.8
1.3
-5.8
-0.4
45
W, 87-79
Ohio St.
Home
77.3%
59.1%
42.8%
30.5%
31.8%
9.5
6.3
3.4
10.9
-1.4
8.9
77
L, 82-73
*Rutgers
Road
74.1%
55.6%
49.5%
31.9%
34.8%
9.3
7.0
3.0
7.9
-3.9
-0.6
88
W, 95-74
*Minnesota
28
W, 83-78
UCLA
140
7
L, 79-65
Michigan St.
125
125
11
L, 95-74
*Wisconsin
3
L, 110-67
^^Duke
110
110
64
W, 81-61
Iowa
95
95
22
W, 93-73
*Michigan
80
87
2nd Chance 17%
Off TO 12% 1
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Purdue
64
W, 106-94
^^Iowa
65
65
Game #
^^Maryland
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Kasparas Jakucionis
Will Riley
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
33
Fast Break 12%
71
2nd Chance 14%
70
Off TO 17%
65
Tomislav Ivisic
Defensive Pct.l
W, 88-80
K. Jakucionis DNP L vs. USC
T. Ivisic DNP L vs. MD, L @ Neb
T. White DNP L @ Rutg, vs. Mich St
Offensive Pct.l
42
In Paint 42%
In Paint 45%
18
L, 88-65
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 9% 7
80
12
Off-Efficiency
Kylan Boswell
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 12.2
5.8
9-25
8-24
17.2
5.4
28-45
6-23
17.0
4.6
27-36
6-26
17.2
5.4
28-45
6-23
Jakucionis 3PT last 8G: 9-38, 23.7%
Turnovers in L: 4.6 per game
W 15.4
5.4
58-94
36-99
12.8
4.0
69-124
27-83
13.1
4.3
56-103
3-47
12.8
4.0
69-124
17-54
L
14.4
6.0
32-66
15-56
12.2
4.4
33-79
17-54
9.8
5.8
41-71
27-87
12.2
4.4
33-79
27-83
W. Riley since 2/1: 16.3 PPG
H
14.5
5.9
42-68
22-76
12.6
4.0
47-94
24-71
10.5
4.6
36-62
14-65
12.6
4.0
47-94
24-71
R
15.5
5.4
48-92
29-79
12.4
4.3
55-109
20-66
13.3
5.2
61-112
16-69
12.4
4.3
55-109
20-66
Starting Lineup Last G: K. Boswell, T. Ivisic, K. Jakucionis, W. Riley, T. White (5 G: 4-1)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
32 Kasparas Jakucionis
6'6"
Fr
2
31.5
15.0
5.6
4.6
3.6
0.9
0.3
56.3%
90-160
32.9%
51-155
84.1%
132-157
7
Will Riley
6'8"
Fr
--
25.5
12.6
4.1
2.3
1.1
0.3
0.2
50.2%
102-203
32.1%
44-137
71.6%
78-109
13 Tomislav Ivisic
7'1"
So
3
26.5
12.5
7.7
2.3
1.6
0.6
1.1
63.0%
97-154
34.6%
46-133
74.6%
44-59
4
6'2"
Jr
--
30.5
11.9
4.9
3.4
2.1
1.2
0.3
55.7%
97-174
22.4%
30-134
79.4%
108-136
22 Tre White
6'7"
Jr
3
22.9
10.7
5.4
0.8
1.0
0.4
0.4
57.8%
85-147
34.4%
22-64
82.4%
84-102
3
Ben Humrichous
6'9"
Sr
--
26.5
8.0
3.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.7
48.3%
28-58
35.0%
62-177
68.8%
22-32
21 Morez Johnson Jr.
6'9"
Fr
5
17.8
7.1
6.7
0.3
0.8
0.4
1.2
64.0%
73-114
--
--
61.9%
52-84
2
6'1"
So
--
15.6
6.3
1.7
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.1
68.4%
52-76
25.5%
25-98
80.6%
29-36
6'6"
So
2
9.7
3.1
1.5
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.2
61.9%
13-21
34.4%
22-64
50.0%
3-6
Kylan Boswell
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn
15 Jake Davis
#6 Illinois Fighting Illini - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
357
165
48% 31-64 38% 26-68 38% 16-42 33%
4-12
34-46
11-25
14
3
13
7
214 W
90-58
SIUE
(3)
265
164
44% 28-63 30% 22-73 40% 15-38 25%
6-24
19-28
8-17
13
14
5
7
66-54
Oakland
(4)
177
234
42% 23-55 38% 20-53 28%
4-25
13-17
10-11
10
6
16
15
87-100
^^Alabama
(6)
4
28
45% 32-71 52% 39-75 33% 10-30 32% 11-34
13-24
11-13
13
5
12
7
357 W
87-40
MD Eastern Shore
(2)
348
356
45% 33-74 22% 15-68 25% 10-40 25%
5-20
11-18
5-8
19
10
9
15
244 W
92-34
Little Rock
(1)
320
139
44% 30-68 24% 13-55 32% 10-31 21%
3-14
22-26
5-12
14
6
8
14
39 W
90-77
^^Arkansas
(2)
83
22
53% 30-57 48% 28-58 48% 15-31 29%
5-17
15-22 16-27
5
8
10
11
66-70 #
*Northwestern
(7)
66
41
37% 25-67 39% 28-72 27%
4-21
7-11
10-17
6
7
9
4
86-80
Wisconsin
(3)
14
26
42% 27-64 44% 28-63 30% 10-33 35% 10-29 22-25 14-21
15
9
13
11
L
11 W
5
L
7-25
9-34
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
57
For
Off. Reb
Eastern Ill.
L
Opp
FT
112-67
6
For
3PT
318 W
192 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
16%
19%
64-66
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
29% 15-51 32% 20-62 17%
4-23
25%
6-24
30-36 20-28
10
16
11
4
23 W
80-77
^^Missouri
(7)
5
75
44% 25-57 40% 23-58 31%
8-26
23%
3-13
22-23 28-37
11
9
16
8
362 W
117-64
Chicago St.
(6)
361
343
62% 41-66 37% 25-67 46% 15-33 32% 10-31 20-28
4-4
10
4
10
14
29 W
109-77
*Oregon
(3)
54
37
58% 42-73 44% 30-69 55% 16-29 33%
9-11
12-17
9
7
10
10
109 W
81-77
*Washington
(2)
116
132
47% 31-66 43% 28-65 19%
39% 10-26 14-19
11-14
12
7
13
10
91-52
Penn St.
(2)
63
79
44% 34-77 31% 20-65 32% 10-31 17%
2-12
13-16 10-14
17
5
14
13
72-82
USC
(2)
35
104
37% 23-62 52% 34-65 22%
36%
5-14
19-21
9-11
10
7
15
14
71 W
67
L
51 W
5-26
7-32
5-15
94-69
*Indiana
(2)
74
39
40% 30-75 39% 25-65 34% 11-32 22%
4-18
23-26 15-18
16
7
6
11
7
L
78-80
*Michigan St.
(4)
37
5
42% 28-66 43% 28-65 21%
5-24
30%
3-10
17-27 21-27
13
11
10
8
12
L
70-91
Maryland
(3)
28
6
38% 23-61 50% 36-72 21%
6-28
25%
3-12
18-24 16-23
8
11
16
7
83-74
Northwestern
(2)
66
41
45% 29-65 44% 30-68 28%
9-32
40% 10-25 16-24
74-80 #
*Nebraska
(3)
85
56
36% 26-73 40% 31-78 24% 10-42 25%
87-79
Ohio St.
(2)
38
61
52% 30-58 37% 27-73 20%
73-82
*Rutgers
(2)
48
119
42% 27-65 41% 24-59 21%
95-74
*Minnesota
(2)
106
86
63% 36-57 41% 27-66 56%
57 W
55
L
45 W
77
L
88 W
28 W
4-6
17
8
12
5
12-18 13-18
18
9
17
6
4-20
48% 11-23 23-31 14-15
10
13
11
5
6-28
38%
6-16
13-19 28-34
15
15
13
8
9-16
40%
8-20
14-16 12-14
9
8
6
2
5-20
83-78
UCLA
(2)
27
20
51% 27-53 48% 28-58 39% 11-28 52% 12-23 18-20 10-15
9
4
14
7
7
L
65-79
Michigan St.
(3)
37
5
38% 24-63 49% 33-68 21%
11
13
11
7
11
L
74-95
*Wisconsin
(2)
14
26
43% 26-60 52% 34-65 33% 10-30 42% 10-24 12-14 17-22
9
12
14
10
3
L
67-110
^^Duke
(3)
2
4
38% 23-61 56% 40-72
8%
2-26
52% 12-23 19-28 18-24
10
12
9
6
64 W
81-61
Iowa
(2)
18
178
51% 32-63 42% 24-57 31%
9-29
33%
6-18
7-9
7
8
5
16
22 W
93-73
*Michigan
(4)
53
15
47% 34-73 46% 28-61 38% 14-37 22%
4-18
11-15 13-19
18
10
9
11
18 W
88-80
Purdue
(4)
8
68
49% 28-57 51% 32-63 37% 11-30 28%
5-18
21-25 11-13
4
4
8
7
106-94
^^Iowa
(5)
18
178
54% 35-65 55% 39-71 46% 12-26 46% 11-24 24-30
65-88
^^Maryland
(0)
28
6
37% 23-63 42% 30-71 22%
64 W
12
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
7-33
6-27
42%
5-12
10-13
8-12
8-13
5-10
14
7
10
4
48% 11-23 13-18 17-24
13
9
17
3
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Non-Conference Games
Off-Efficency
118.6
31st
124.5
7th
118.0
25th
123.3
15th
126.2
10th
Def-Efficiency
92.1
9th
101.5
81st
93.6
25th
96.9
30th
106.1
155th
WAB
+1.2
35th
+2.2
29th
+0.8
30th
+2.5
26th
+1.8
24th
FG% 50% or better
8-0
3PT% >= 35%
10-0
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
12-1
3PT% < 35%
9-11
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
17-6
11-12
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
14-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-6
More FTA than Opp.
17-5
7-4
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
7-9
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-5
14-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
8-0
5-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-11
16-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
4-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
12-12
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
15-9
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-4
@ Matteise
45
L, 80-72
^^Ohio St.
291
W, 90-59
Hou. Christian
362
W, 105-58
Chicago St.
364
W, 89-43
Miss Valley St.
Record
19-15 (6-12)
120
W, 70-66
^^Syracuse
Home
11-7
79
W, 67-58
^^Saint Joseph's
Road
294
W, 90-68
Delaware St.
132
W, 63-59
*N.C. State
30
L, 76-65
UConn
149
W, 91-67
New Mexico St.
363
W, 121-57
Ark. PB
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
New Orleans
67.3
116.7
100.2
14.3
16.6
29.8
29.7
177th
39th
69th
18th
212th
189th
175th
52.5
74.9
51.8
36.0
36.6
35.4
95th
eFG%
85th
FT%
145th
2PT%
63rd
3PT%
71st
FTA/FGA %
272nd
3PA/FGA %
48.4
70.1
47.5
33.3
39.3
36.2
63rd
70th
50th
141st
319th
91st
352
W, 98-62
#11 Texas Longhorns - SEC
BPI: 34
246
W, 77-53
N'Western St.
16
L, 80-60
*Texas A&M
1
L, 87-82
Auburn
5
L, 74-70
Tennessee
39
W, 77-73
*Oklahoma
4
L, 84-60
*Florida
BT: 48
EM: 43
KPI: 58
NET: 39
POM: 44
SOR: 53
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.4
72.2
1-25
3-3
1-1
0-2
8-8
Win
84.2
64.4
26-50
0-4
1-1
2-3
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.1
82.1
51-100
0-0
1-0
1-1
Non-Conf.
174.9
Home
82.2
69.1
101-200
1-0
1-0
1-0
Conf.
31.4
Road
74.2
75.8
201+
7-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +0.0 (53rd)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-5
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
23
W, 61-53
Missouri
16
W, 70-69
Texas A&M
Win
73.7%
56.7%
44.4%
39.6%
28.5%
8.2
5.8
-0.6
5.0
3.5
3.0
26
L, 72-69
*Ole Miss
Loss
76.4%
45.5%
51.7%
31.4%
39.0%
6.7
8.5
0.9
-3.5
-0.9
-3.3
83
W, 89-58
*LSU
Home
74.7%
54.6%
45.5%
38.0%
34.9%
8.1
7.4
0.6
2.9
3.0
2.8
39
L, 78-70
Arkansas
Road
75.1%
48.7%
49.6%
33.5%
31.4%
6.9
6.6
-0.5
-0.7
-0.1
-2.8
47
L, 86-78
*Vanderbilt
6
L, 103-80
Alabama
140
14
W, 82-78
Kentucky
125
125
86
L, 84-69
*South Carolina
39
!L, 86-81
*Arkansas
110
110
Georgia
33
!W, 87-82
*Miss St.
In Paint 39% 15
71
Fast Break 15%
95
95
80
30
2nd Chance 13%
58
Off TO 19%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
74
In Paint 41%
39
L, 76-72
Oklahoma
80
47
W, 79-72
^^Vanderbilt
65
16
!W, 94-89
^^Texas A&M
5
L, 83-72
^^Tennessee
T. Mark DNP 1st 4G + L @ Vandy, L
vs. Georgia
A. Kaluma 30.8% 3PT in SEC
J. Pope 31.5% 3PT in SEC
K. Shedrick top 100 block shot rate
T. Johnson 2PT in SEC: 43%, 3PT:
36.4% - 2+ TO's in each of last 11G
Home
29
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Tre Johnson
82
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
96
Off TO 15%
Arthur Kaluma
Jordan Pope
Defensive Pct.l
L, 83-67
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
35
Off-Efficiency
Tramon Mark
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.0
2.8
11-43
14-35
10.4
6.2
17-33
2-10
14.2
3.8
15-23
8-18
15.6
4.0
20-38
7-21
W 19.6
3.0
70-150
48-119
12.6
8.2
62-116
16-41
12.4
2.1
48-78
36-93
12.8
3.7
43-83
26-64
L
20.1
3.1
63-144
37-98
12.2
6.9
44-92
17-50
9.7
1.9
26-63
23-70
7.3
3.6
22-66
8-34
H
19.8
3.6
67-132
40-107 13.9
8.0
55-99
24-51
12.7
1.4
43-78
37-95
9.3
3.9
29-68
15-47
R
19.9
2.4
66-162
45-110
7.2
51-109
9-40
9.6
2.6
31-63
22-68
11.5
3.4
36-81
19-51
10.9
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Johnson, A. Kaluma, T. Mark, J. Pope, K. Shedrick (18 G: 8-10)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
20 Tre Johnson
6'6"
Fr
2
34.6
19.8
3.0
2.8
1.8
1.0
0.3
45.2%
133-294
39.2%
6
Arthur Kaluma
6'7"
Sr
2
29.4
12.4
7.6
1.8
1.6
0.9
0.9
51.0%
106-208
0
Jordan Pope
6'2"
Jr
--
25.8
11.2
2.0
1.7
0.9
1.0
--
52.5%
74-141
12 Tramon Mark
6'5"
Sr
6
26.6
10.4
3.6
1.6
0.8
0.9
0.5
43.6%
5
Kadin Shedrick
6'11"
Sr
--
26.4
8.7
6.1
0.6
0.9
0.7
1.7
2
Chendall Weaver
6'3"
Jr
15
20.3
6.3
5.0
1.3
0.8
0.6
25 Jayson Kent
6'8"
Sr
8
17.3
5.5
3.3
0.5
1.0
1
Julian Larry
6'3"
Sr
--
20.4
4.7
1.5
3.0
1.6
22 Devon Pryor
6'7"
So
11
12.1
3.2
2.0
0.5
0.3
FT
85-217
89.1%
114-128
36.3%
33-91
78.4%
87-111
36.2%
59-163
87.5%
56-64
65-149
34.7%
34-98
74.7%
59-79
58.5%
93-159
31.6%
6-19
67.2%
92-137
0.3
53.0%
35-66
40.0%
8-20
60.5%
26-43
0.5
0.3
62.3%
43-69
27.0%
10-37
52.8%
28-53
0.7
0.1
48.7%
37-76
34.9%
15-43
79.2%
42-53
0.3
0.1
65.0%
26-40
18.8%
3-16
81.3%
13-16
#11 Texas Longhorns - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
DBG
Off
Def
--
38
61
37% 25-68 45% 27-60 26%
291 W
90-59
Hou. Christian
(3)
286
225
58% 36-62 35% 18-51 48% 10-21 33% 10-30
8-13
362 W
105-58
Chicago St.
(3)
361
343
57% 36-63 30% 19-64 50%
9-18
31%
364 W
89-43
Miss Valley St.
(3)
364
364
64% 29-45 33% 17-51 36%
5-14
9%
120 W
70-66
^^Syracuse
(4)
95
147
47% 27-58 46% 26-57 27%
4-15
79 W
67-58
^^Saint Joseph's
(0)
98
83
44% 24-55 32% 21-66 39%
7-18
294 W
90-68
Delaware St.
(6)
272
320
52% 32-62 35% 23-65 30%
63-59
*N.C. State
(4)
145
102
65-76
UConn
(3)
16
92
149 W
91-67
New Mexico St.
(3)
208
363 W
121-57
Ark. PB
(2)
347
352 W
98-62
New Orleans
(3)
309
132 W
30
L
246 W
Opp
FT
^^Ohio St.
L
For
3PT
72-80
45
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For
7-27
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
50% 14-28 15-20 12-14
Turnovers
For Opp For Opp
11
8
9
14
13-17
9
4
6
15
8-26
24-33 12-19
7
7
9
12
1-11
26-36
8-13
7
5
7
12
24%
5-21
12-14
9-18
6
7
9
11
30%
7-23
12-17
9-17
7
17
11
12
8-27
46%
6-13
18-24 16-21
6
14
8
13
45% 24-53 44% 24-54 47%
8-17
36%
5-14
7-14
6-14
12
9
12
7
42% 21-50 52% 28-54 47%
8-17
45%
9-20
15-24
11-16
6
11
9
12
52
59% 34-58 45% 25-56 35%
6-17
33%
6-18
17-23
11-13
7
7
10
15
361
63% 44-70 42% 22-53 57% 17-30 14%
3-21
16-20 10-17
11
4
7
22
354
55% 34-62 35% 23-66 52% 13-25 35%
7-20
17-24
9-21
10
13
6
8
77-53
N'Western St.
(9)
251
189
50% 27-54 38% 21-55 44% 11-25 18%
3-17
12-15
8-17
12
7
10
5
16
L
60-80
*Texas A&M
(5)
49
11
35% 18-52 47% 27-57 27%
7-26
11%
2-19
17-20 24-32
5
10
11
7
1
L
82-87
Auburn
(2)
1
12
46% 26-56 48% 29-61 36%
5-14
38%
8-21
25-30 21-25
9
9
11
9
5
L
70-74
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
42% 26-62 45% 25-56 28%
7-25
44% 10-23
11-14
14-20
12
14
5
12
77-73
*Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
48% 28-58 51% 25-49 32%
7-22
31%
5-16
14-18 18-26
4
6
14
18
60-84
*Florida
(2)
3
13
36% 20-55 49% 33-67 25%
4-16
40%
8-20
16-19 10-15
8
11
14
8
61-53
Missouri
(2)
5
75
34% 17-50 31% 15-48 20%
4-20
18%
4-22
23-30 19-27
13
7
9
10
70-69
Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
46% 24-52 42% 27-64 40%
8-20
52% 12-23 14-17
3-8
5
12
6
11
69-72
*Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
40% 25-63 40% 23-58 23%
5-22
33%
7-21
12-14 19-25
13
5
11
4
39 W
4
L
23 W
16 W
26
L
83 W
89-58
*LSU
(2)
128
62
56% 36-64 45% 23-51 48% 10-21 13%
2-15
7-9
10-15
9
4
6
15
39
L
70-78
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
34% 22-64 44% 22-50 27%
6-22
41%
7-17
20-27 27-35
10
3
10
9
47
L
78-86
*Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
42% 25-60 42% 30-71 36%
9-25
33%
9-27
19-27 17-22
13
15
9
5
6
L
80-103
Alabama
(2)
4
28
42% 29-69 62% 34-55 36%
8-22
59% 17-29 14-19 18-20
12
8
8
16
82-78
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
45% 29-64 42% 26-62 22%
5-23
25%
6-24
19-23 20-28
14
17
12
15
14 W
86
L
69-84
*South Carolina
(6)
110
59
40% 23-57 43% 22-51 31%
5-16
33%
6-18
18-27 34-45
9
4
10
8
39
L
81-86 #
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
42% 30-71 47% 27-58 35%
9-26
53%
9-17
12-13 23-31
10
4
10
12
35
L
67-83
Georgia
(2)
46
23
44% 23-52 52% 29-56 35%
8-23
36%
8-22
13-20 17-24
6
8
13
10
87-82 #
*Miss St.
(2)
26
50
48% 31-64 40% 27-68 48% 11-23 24%
6-25
14-23 22-28
11
11
13
12
72-76
Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
39% 23-59 40% 23-58 38%
8-21
33%
8-24
18-23 22-28
11
7
11
5
47 W
79-72
^^Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
46% 25-54 41% 24-58 25%
4-16
16%
3-19
25-34 21-30
6
8
8
9
16 W
94-89 #
^^Texas A&M
(0)
49
11
43% 31-72 35% 25-72 41%
9-22
39% 12-31 23-31 27-40
9
18
6
13
72-83
^^Tennessee
(0)
19
3
46% 25-54 50% 27-54 25%
4-16
25%
9
13
11
7
33 W
39
5
L
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
5-20
18-21 24-35
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
117.9
37th
115.5
44th
115.4
43rd
115.6
56th
117.8
41st
Def-Efficiency
102.3
111th
97.6
39th
97.5
55th
100.8
76th
103.6
108th
WAB
-1.3
104th
+1.4
35th
+0.1
52nd
-1
69th
-0.7
73rd
FG% 50% or better
9-0
3PT% >= 35%
13-5
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-9
16-2
3PT% < 35%
3-13
Make >= 10 3PA
1-4
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
3-9
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-6
More FTM than Opp.
13-5
6-10
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
6-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-6
More FTA than Opp.
9-5
3-3
More OReb than Opp.
13-15
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
7-7
16-12
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
16-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
5-4
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
4-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
3-10
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-0
@ Matteise
282
W, 78-69
Texas Southern
327
W, 94-80
IUPUI
256
W, 94-57
Jackson St.
61
W, 75-60
Wake Forest
Record
21-11 (13-7)
266
W, 80-55
Siena
Home
15-2
86
W, 75-66
^^South Carolina
Road
#11 Xavier Musketeers - Big East
BPI: 39
BT: 37
EM: 34
KPI: 60
NET: 45
POM: 43
SOR: 42
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.0
70.9
1-25
0-1
0-1
0-1
6-9
Win
81.4
66.4
26-50
2-1
0-1
1-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.5
79.4
51-100
4-0
1-0
1-4
22
L, 78-53
^^Michigan
193
W, 71-68
S. Carolina St.
75
L, 76-72
*TCU
330
W, 119-58
Morgan St.
54
L, 68-65
*Cincinnati
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*UConn
69.0
116.3
97.8
16.0
17.6
25.2
25.2
78th
41st
38th
95th
139th
316th
14th
53.9
79.4
51.3
38.8
37.2
37.4
55th
eFG%
8th
FT%
164th
2PT%
6th
3PT%
60th
FTA/FGA %
213th
3PA/FGA %
30
!L, 94-89
Non-Conf.
164.1
Home
81.5
66.9
101-200
3-0
0-0
2-0
Conf.
77.1
Road
74.1
75.4
201+
6-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +0.4 (49th)
27
L, 72-70
Marquette
220
W, 94-72
Seton Hall
89
L, 69-63
*Georgetown
9
L, 82-72
St. John's
116
W, 77-63
*DePaul
56
W, 69-63
Villanova
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-5
50.6
71.8
50.5
33.9
28.1
37.2
164th
158th
159th
187th
55th
118th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 59-57
*Marquette
9
!L, 79-71
*St. John's
Win
79.1%
54.0%
49.1%
39.9%
33.3%
8.4
7.3
-0.4
3.1
3.2
7.5
30
W, 76-72
UConn
Loss
80.2%
46.4%
52.8%
36.9%
35.1%
7.9
7.4
-2.8
-4.1
-3.4
0.2
32
L, 86-77
*Creighton
Home
80.1%
53.6%
48.3%
40.3%
33.1%
8.5
6.9
-1.7
0.9
3.0
8.0
89
W, 74-69
Georgetown
Road
78.5%
48.8%
53.0%
37.2%
34.6%
8.0
7.9
-0.8
0.3
-1.3
1.6
56
L, 80-68
*Villanova
110
W, 91-82
*Providence
140
116
W, 85-68
DePaul
125
125
86
W, 76-63
Butler
220
W, 73-66
*Seton Hall
110
110
W, 83-61
Creighton
86
W, 91-78
*Butler
Def-Efficiency
140
95
95
80
110
W, 76-68
Providence
27
L, 89-87
^^Marquette
65
2nd Chance 11% 10
D. McKnight 3PT conf play: 27.6%,
last year 42% in Big East play
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 46% 21
48
Fast Break 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Zach Freemantle
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
65
Game #
56
Off TO 18%
Home
M. Foster 17 PPG LY w/ Furman
99
Fast Break 19%
80
Freemantle DNP @UConn - vs. SH
(1-2)
34
In Paint 42%
Ryan Conwell
Defensive Pct.l
32
Off-Efficiency
2nd Chance 14%
70
Off TO 17%
71
Dailyn Swain
Offensive Pct.l
27
Dayvion McKnight
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.6
7.2
39-52
5-16
24.4
2.4
13-21
24-41
10.2
6.6
18-43
0-5
7.6
3.6
9-22
2-6
W 17.7
7.6 115-184
19-57
16.8
2.6
44-83
62-146 10.9
5.7
83-141
1-17
9.9
2.6
50-117
16-37
L
16.6
6.2
51-94
9-34
16.9
3.3
28-59
35-86
9.7
4.9
32-63
3-5
9.2
2.5
34-75
3-17
H
17.8
6.7
84-138
14-44
15.9
2.4
34-65
49-116
10.9
5.9
66-113
2-14
10.7
2.0
45-97
14-33
R
16.8
7.6
82-140
14-47
17.9
3.3
38-77
48-116
9.9
4.9
49-91
2-8
8.4
3.2
39-95
5-21
Starting Lineup Last G: R. Conwell, M. Foster, Z. Freemantle, D. McKnight, D. Swain (26 G: 19-7)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
32 Zach Freemantle
6'9"
Sr
3
31.1
17.3
7.1
2.1
1.8
1.0
0.8
59.7%
7
Ryan Conwell
6'3"
Jr
--
32.9
16.8
2.8
2.5
1.7
1.3
0.2
3
Dailyn Swain
6'7"
So
--
28.4
10.5
5.4
2.6
1.7
1.5
0.6
20 Dayvion McKnight
6'0"
Sr
--
32.5
9.6
2.6
4.3
1.6
1.4
1
Marcus Foster
6'5"
Sr
--
27.1
7.6
4.8
2.0
1.0
21 Dante Maddox Jr.
6'2"
Sr
--
18.9
7.2
2.4
1.5
2
Jerome Hunter
6'8"
Sr
--
19.1
5.7
3.3
0
Trey Green
6'0"
So
23
10.9
5.0
0.9
4
John Hugley IV
6'11"
Sr
--
9.6
3.0
2.0
3PT
FT
166-278
30.8%
28-91
76.1%
86-113
50.7%
72-142
41.8%
97-232
82.5%
104-126
56.4%
115-204
18.2%
4-22
83.0%
93-112
0.2
43.8%
84-192
35.2%
19-54
80.6%
83-103
1.0
0.2
40.2%
41-102
38.1%
40-105
75.9%
41-54
0.8
0.8
0.2
40.7%
24-59
40.0%
42-105
84.8%
56-66
0.9
1.2
0.5
0.5
50.5%
51-101
50.0%
13-26
76.9%
40-52
1.0
0.9
0.3
--
45.5%
5-11
37.5%
9-24
100.0%
8-8
0.7
0.8
0.0
0.1
50.0%
22-44
56.3%
9-16
60.0%
24-40
#11 Xavier Musketeers - Big East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
282 W
78-69
Texas Southern
--
341
138
37% 19-51 41% 24-58 26%
327 W
94-80
IUPUI
(3)
119
256 W
94-57
Jackson St.
(3)
61 W
75-60
Wake Forest
(3)
266 W
80-55
Siena
86 W
75-66
^^South Carolina
53-78
22
L
193 W
75
L
330 W
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
44% 10-23 34-41
11-13
4
6
9
17
363
56% 33-59 47% 28-60 56% 10-18 50% 14-28 18-22 10-12
8
5
8
9
288
200
54% 33-61 29% 19-66 52% 16-31 25%
5-20
12-15 14-20
5
10
10
10
137
36
40% 23-57 47% 22-47 39% 10-26 33%
5-15
19-22
11-15
8
6
10
18
(3)
252
263
51% 33-65 42% 20-48 46% 11-24 33%
6-18
3-4
9-20
5
7
9
15
(4)
110
59
44% 28-63 43% 23-54 22%
4-18
24%
4-17
15-21 16-20
10
3
10
11
^^Michigan
(1)
53
15
35% 20-58 49% 30-61 35%
8-23
50% 11-22
5-9
7-14
7
7
18
9
71-68
S. Carolina St.
(3)
242
131
46% 20-44 43% 23-54 28%
5-18
33%
7-21
26-36 15-22
2
7
15
17
72-76
*TCU
(3)
173
27
48% 28-58 47% 28-60 32%
9-28
33%
6-18
7-9
14-18
8
10
15
7
6-23
Opp
Off. Reb
119-58
Morgan St.
(4)
285
350
60% 41-68 36% 22-61 67% 12-18 20%
2-10
25-34 12-22
15
4
6
10
54
L
65-68
*Cincinnati
(3)
90
21
38% 22-58 38% 22-58 32%
25%
5-20
15-17 19-26
7
10
13
9
30
L
89-94 #
*UConn
(3)
16
92
50% 29-58 48% 33-69 54% 13-24 33%
8-24
18-21 20-21
3
12
9
7
27
L
70-72
Marquette
(2)
40
31
46% 24-52 49% 29-59 32%
37%
7-19
16-20
7-11
4
4
13
10
94-72
Seton Hall
(9)
325
89
57% 27-47 38% 23-61 48% 10-21 46%
6-13
30-40 20-24
7
11
10
12
220 W
6-19
6-19
89
L
63-69
*Georgetown
(2)
157
67
35% 20-57 45% 25-56 26%
5-19
22%
4-18
18-25 15-25
7
11
11
12
9
L
72-82
St. John's
(3)
71
2
37% 22-60 42% 34-81 22%
4-18
13%
2-16
24-25 12-13
6
18
11
7
116 W
77-63
*DePaul
(3)
115
126
48% 26-54 40% 21-53 45%
9-20
32% 10-31 16-20 11-15
6
5
11
12
56 W
69-63
Villanova
(2)
23
95
41% 20-49 43% 22-51 40% 10-25 38%
8-21
19-26 11-14
4
7
11
11
27 W
59-57
*Marquette
(3)
40
31
40% 23-57 37% 23-62 12%
2-17
28%
8-29
11-16
3-7
8
10
9
12
71-79 #
*St. John's
(3)
71
2
40% 24-60 47% 28-60 40%
8-20
8%
1-12
15-18 22-27
6
9
13
13
76-72
UConn
(2)
16
92
47% 26-55 47% 26-55 41%
7-17
27%
7-26
17-24 13-17
5
9
9
12
77-86
*Creighton
(3)
32
42
42% 28-66 53% 30-57 38%
9-24
44% 11-25 12-17 15-19
12
9
8
12
74-69
Georgetown
(5)
157
67
51% 25-49 49% 27-55 39%
7-18
30%
7-23
17-19
8-13
4
3
14
12
68-80
*Villanova
(4)
23
95
49% 26-53 51% 29-57 42%
8-19
50% 12-24
8-12
10-10
6
6
13
8
110 W
91-82
*Providence
(2)
92
143
44% 26-59 54% 36-67 48% 13-27 32%
8-25
26-29
2-10
8
10
10
11
116 W
85-68
DePaul
(2)
115
126
59% 30-51 44% 26-59 27%
4-15
24%
7-29
21-24
9-12
2
9
9
12
86 W
76-63
Butler
(2)
44
150
43% 29-68 44% 24-55 32%
8-25
26%
6-23
10-11
9-14
4
4
9
20
220 W
73-66
*Seton Hall
(4)
325
89
49% 20-41 42% 23-55 36%
8-22
27%
4-15
25-33 16-18
4
5
16
14
32 W
83-61
Creighton
(5)
32
42
55% 33-60 45% 26-58 52% 11-21 25%
6-24
6-8
2
6
5
12
86 W
91-78
*Butler
(3)
44
150
52% 34-65 47% 24-51 35%
7-20
43% 12-28 16-18 18-22
7
3
5
11
110 W
76-68
Providence
(2)
92
143
45% 26-58 48% 26-54 35%
7-20
50% 12-24 17-21
4-11
10
7
11
16
87-89
^^Marquette
(4)
40
31
53% 30-57 49% 32-66 48% 11-23 42% 14-33 16-19 11-13
3
4
10
3
9
L
30 W
32
L
89 W
56
27
L
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
3-7
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
114.9
59th
116.3
37th
110.7
93rd
116.9
44th
120.3
25th
Def-Efficiency
97.1
44th
99.4
54th
99.4
80th
97.1
31st
97.2
36th
WAB
+1.3
32nd
-1
66th
-0.5
73rd
+1.2
33rd
+1.3
32nd
FG% 50% or better
9-2
3PT% >= 35%
15-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-5
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
17-4
13-5
3PT% < 35%
8-6
Make >= 10 3PA
6-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-6
More FTA than Opp.
17-4
5-4
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
12-9
8-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
17-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-8
3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
8-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
2-8
8-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
6-7
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-2
@ Matteise
230
W, 103-62
Wright St.
219
W, 100-72
Bucknell
3
W, 77-72
^^Duke
98
W, 97-68
Lipscomb
Record
22-11 (10-8)
256
W, 108-59
Jackson St.
Home
15-3
166
W, 87-68
Western Ky.
Road
255
W, 105-76
Georgia St.
18
L, 70-66
*Clemson
Non-Conf.
15
!W, 90-89
^^Gonzaga
Conf.
258
W, 78-67
Colgate
17
W, 93-85
Louisville
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
^^Ohio St.
70.8
123.9
98.8
15.2
14.0
28.7
25.9
22nd
11th
49th
44th
340th
221st
25th
56.0
73.8
55.9
37.4
35.9
41.7
19th
eFG%
120th
FT%
33rd
2PT%
25th
3PT%
93rd
FTA/FGA %
113th
3PA/FGA %
45
L, 85-65
#3 Kentucky Wildcats - SEC
BPI: 17
BT: 17
EM: 30
KPI: 9
NET: 15
W, 88-54
4
W, 106-100 Florida
35
L, 82-69
*Georgia
33
W, 95-90
*Miss St.
16
W, 81-69
Texas A&M
6
L, 102-97
Alabama
SOR: 12
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
85.3
77.9
1-25
4-2
2-1
2-2
7-8
Win
89.9
72.7
26-50
1-1
1-1
2-4
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
76.2
88.3
51-100
3-0
0-0
0-0
121.1
Home
90.7
72.8
101-200
2-0
0-0
0-0
29.9
Road
78.9
83.9
201+
5-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.6 (12th)
185
POM: 16
Brown
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-4
50.4
72.0
53.7
30.8
31.0
43.5
151st
173rd
289th
29th
125th
316th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
47
L, 74-69
*Vanderbilt
5
W, 78-73
*Tennessee
Win
75.2%
59.6%
52.0%
39.7%
27.9%
10.7
7.8
-0.6
3.8
0.9
4.0
39
L, 89-79
Arkansas
Loss
71.3%
49.2%
57.0%
31.9%
37.1%
7.4
9.9
1.7
0.8
-4.0
-1.4
26
L, 98-84
*Ole Miss
Home
75.5%
60.8%
50.8%
38.9%
30.1%
10.6
8.1
0.5
5.1
1.3
2.9
86
W, 80-57
South Carolina
Road
72.0%
50.3%
57.0%
35.3%
31.7%
8.5
8.9
-0.1
0.1
-3.1
1.3
5
W, 75-64
Tennessee
45
L, 82-78
*Texas
140
47
W, 82-61
Vanderbilt
125
125
6
L, 96-83
*Alabama
39
W, 83-82
*Oklahoma
110
110
1
L, 94-78
Auburn
95
95
83
W, 95-64
LSU
80
91
29
2nd Chance 13%
Off TO 16% 17
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
*Missouri
39
W, 85-84
^^Oklahoma
65
72
^^Alabama
Fast Break 15% 19
65
Game #
Home
L. Butler: DNP L's: vs. Ark, @ Ole
Miss, @ Tex, @ Bama, SEC Tourney
L vs. Bama - reaggravated in SEC-T
A. Carr DNP L @ Vandy
J Robinson OUT, DNP in last 5G +
last 4 L's
W vs. Tennessee, Vols 11-45 3PT, L.
Butler DNP
90
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Otega Oweh
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
W, 91-83
Offensive Pct.l
57
In Paint 44%
In Paint 41%
23
L, 99-70
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 17%
80
6
Off-Efficiency
82
Off TO 16%
Jaxson Robinson
Lamont Butler
Koby Brea
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.0
3.6
21-44
4-7
13.6
2.8
7-18
16-35
7.4
2.6
10-22
1-6
14.8
3.6
11-16
15-33
W 17.1
4.3 112-197
21-48
13.3
3.8
40-70
42-118
10.9
2.7
51-87
15-38
12.7
3.3
32-54
65-131
L
14.5
5.2
47-109
5-24
12.4
2.7
9-22
20-47
13.0
3.0
21-44
6-20
8.9
2.9
13-31
21-65
H
15.4
3.6
88-146
15-36
13.4
4.1
32-54
35-99
12.9
3.1
50-85
14-37
13.0
2.9
25-44
57-111
R
17.3
5.8
71-160
11-36
12.6
2.6
17-38
27-66
9.1
2.3
22-46
7-21
9.6
3.5
20-41
29-85
Starting Lineup Last G: K. Brea, A. Carr, O. Oweh, T. Perry, A. Williams (3 G: 1-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
0
Otega Oweh
6'4"
Jr
--
28.1
16.2
4.6
1.6
1.5
1.6
0.5
52.0%
2
Jaxson Robinson
6'6"
Sr
9
28.1
13.0
3.5
1.7
0.9
0.6
0.5
1
Lamont Butler
6'2"
Sr
9
25.4
11.5
2.8
4.3
2.0
1.6
0.2
4
Koby Brea
6'7"
Sr
--
27.5
11.5
3.2
1.3
0.5
0.5
22 Amari Williams
7'0"
Sr
--
22.5
11.0
8.5
3.1
2.3
7
Andrew Carr
6'11"
Sr
1
23.7
10.5
4.8
1.7
10 Brandon Garrison
6'10"
So
1
17.4
5.8
3.9
15 Ansley Almonor
6'7"
Sr
--
14.7
5.6
1.7
77 Kerr Kriisa
6'3"
Sr
24
17.4
4.4
2.4
3PT
FT
159-306
36.1%
26-72
78.2%
140-179
53.3%
49-92
37.6%
62-165
76.3%
29-38
55.0%
72-131
36.2%
21-58
73.1%
68-93
0.3
52.9%
45-85
43.9%
86-196
90.9%
30-33
0.5
1.2
58.4%
125-214
25.0%
1-4
64.2%
111-173
0.9
0.7
0.7
65.1%
97-149
32.8%
21-64
75.7%
78-103
1.9
1.2
0.8
0.6
57.4%
66-115
31.4%
11-35
52.8%
19-36
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.1
78.6%
22-28
43.7%
38-87
90.0%
27-30
3.8
1.0
0.4
0.2
40.0%
2-5
26.3%
10-38
85.7%
6-7
#3 Kentucky Wildcats - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
230 W
103-62
Wright St.
--
127
310
60% 39-65 35% 24-68 46% 11-24 19%
5-27
14-19
9-12
7
10
7
12
219 W
100-72
Bucknell
(4)
226
202
48% 38-79 40% 29-73 36% 13-36 36% 12-33
11-16
2-6
20
9
15
13
3
W
77-72
^^Duke
(2)
2
4
40% 25-63 39% 28-71 40% 10-25 17%
4-24
17-24 12-17
8
10
10
7
98 W
97-68
Lipscomb
(6)
97
125
55% 34-62 39% 26-67 48% 12-25 17%
5-29
17-21
11-12
9
5
8
6
256 W
108-59
Jackson St.
(2)
288
200
58% 41-71 33% 23-69 44% 17-39 19%
4-21
9-10
9-18
4
10
10
16
166 W
87-68
Western Ky.
(3)
232
106
40% 25-62 32% 21-66 28%
8-29
15%
4-26
29-42 22-29
13
12
10
11
255 W
105-76
Georgia St.
(2)
153
318
60% 40-67 46% 26-56 27%
7-26
52% 11-21
18-22 13-20
7
4
9
17
18
66-70
*Clemson
(3)
24
17
38% 24-63 37% 24-65 26%
7-27
32%
8-25
11-18
14-19
10
14
12
7
15 W
L
90-89 #
^^Gonzaga
(3)
12
29
45% 34-75 47% 33-71 28%
7-25
22%
6-27
15-18 17-24
15
13
7
5
258 W
78-67
Colgate
(3)
217
307
43% 30-70 41% 27-66 32% 10-31 33% 11-33
8-13
2-3
13
7
5
8
17 W
93-85
Louisville
(2)
25
16
58% 32-55 44% 31-70 52% 11-21 36% 14-39 18-28
9-14
7
10
11
7
65-85
^^Ohio St.
(6)
38
61
30% 17-57 57% 30-53 18%
29%
4-14
27-32 21-27
11
6
9
7
185 W
88-54
Brown
(9)
244
160
50% 30-60 41% 20-49 36% 10-28 24%
5-21
18-23
9-12
9
7
5
23
4
106-100
Florida
(3)
3
13
58% 37-64 55% 33-60 48% 14-29 36% 12-33 18-24 22-35
8
12
5
8
69-82
*Georgia
(2)
46
23
38% 24-64 42% 23-55 24%
15-19 29-38
11
11
13
13
95-90
*Miss St.
(3)
26
50
56% 34-61 45% 32-71 50% 16-32 30% 12-40
11-19
8
11
13
6
45
L
W
35
L
33 W
16 W
4-22
6-25
Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
46% 24-52 39% 23-59 33%
24-31 16-25
7
8
14
11
6
97-102
Alabama
(3)
4
28
48% 35-73 45% 30-67 41% 11-27 38% 13-34 16-20 29-34
11
11
8
9
47
L
69-74
*Vanderbilt
(6)
22
84
48% 26-54 44% 29-66 39%
4-11
10
7
17
5
W
7-30
14-18
81-69
9-23
23%
7-24
L
5
9-27
29%
36% 12-33
8-13
78-73
*Tennessee
(2)
19
3
50% 25-50 35% 25-72 50% 12-24 24% 11-45 16-24 12-17
7
12
11
5
39
L
79-89
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
48% 30-62 55% 32-58 44% 10-23 52% 13-25
12-16
8
3
13
7
26
L
9-18
84-98
*Ole Miss
(2)
31
34
50% 29-58 55% 35-64 48% 10-21 43% 13-30 16-22 15-21
3
2
5
1
86 W
80-57
South Carolina
(3)
110
59
48% 30-62 33% 19-58 35%
18%
4-22
12-13 15-23
6
8
9
7
5
75-64
Tennessee
(2)
19
3
50% 26-52 43% 23-54 50% 12-24 17%
3-18
11-14 15-19
3
7
8
9
78-82
*Texas
(3)
39
69
42% 26-62 45% 29-64 25%
22%
5-23
20-28 19-23
17
14
15
12
82-61
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
57% 29-51 40% 25-63 41% 11-27 20%
5-25
13-13
6-11
2
11
12
10
83-96
*Alabama
(2)
4
28
43% 29-68 53% 32-61 35%
9-26
36% 11-31 16-22 21-25
10
7
12
15
83-82
*Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
50% 29-58 53% 30-57 30%
7-23
40% 10-25 18-24 12-17
7
7
13
15
78-94
Auburn
(2)
1
12
46% 23-50 52% 29-56 24%
4-17
46% 12-26 28-38 24-31
9
4
18
8
83 W
95-64
LSU
(2)
128
62
51% 36-71 45% 26-58 38% 12-32 27%
6-10
7
3
8
16
23 W
91-83
*Missouri
(3)
5
75
48% 27-56 44% 29-66 55% 11-20 39% 11-28 26-33 14-21
8
12
9
9
85-84
^^Oklahoma
(4)
30
77
52% 31-60 48% 30-62 33%
8-24
36%
15-22 15-18
5
4
10
8
70-99
^^Alabama
(0)
4
28
38% 21-56 51% 36-71 26%
5-19
38% 11-29 23-35 16-21
5
7
16
10
W
45
L
47 W
6
L
39 W
1
L
39 W
6
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-23
6-24
Non-Conference Games
6-22
9-25
11-11
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
127.6
3rd
120.3
17th
121.7
11th
127.1
6th
122.2
18th
Def-Efficiency
97.6
51st
100.0
63rd
96.1
40th
100.5
73rd
98.9
54th
WAB
+2.6
10th
+2.9
23rd
+2
14th
+3.2
19th
+1.6
26th
FG% 50% or better
14-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
19-5
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
3-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-6
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-7
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-4
14-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-7
More FTM than Opp.
15-6
8-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-4
More FTA than Opp.
17-7
9-7
More OReb than Opp.
7-8
9-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
13-4
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
10-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
14-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-8
More Turnovers than Opp.
11-8
1-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-4
@ Matteise
213
W, 84-74
Toledo
352
W, 78-61
*New Orleans
39
L, 65-49
*Arkansas
29
L, 82-61
*Oregon
Record
23-10 (13-5)
350
W, 84-65
*West Ga.
Home
11-4
209
W, 86-72
UTSA
Road
184
L, 72-68
Merrimack
183
W, 84-74
Eastern Kent.
1
L, 62-42
*Houston
W, 87-53
Middle Ga. St.
W, 105-60
LaGrange
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Georgia St.
66.1
106.7
100.7
19.9
19.8
38.6
32.0
237th
163rd
73rd
330th
50th
6th
287th
255
W, 77-57
171
W, 69-61
*App. St.
170
W, 58-57
*Marshall
205
L, 74-73
Texas St.
90
L, 84-78
Ark. St.
346
W, 77-58
*La. Monroe
129
L, 64-63
*Southern Ala.
#14 Troy Trojans - Sun Belt
BPI: 109
BT: 103
EM: 93
KPI: 107
NET: 99
POM: 98
SOR: 102
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
73.9
65.4
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
12-6
Win
78.8
63.1
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
62.6
70.8
51-100
0-1
1-0
1-0
Non-Conf.
175.2
Home
79.8
66.5
101-200
2-1
1-0
2-3
Conf.
228.3
Road
68.9
64.5
201+
7-2
1-0
6-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -4.5 (98th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-5
Opp. O-Reb%
50.1
72.6
53.9
30.3
37.8
44.8
215th
eFG%
163rd
FT%
72nd
2PT%
339th
3PT%
47th
FTA/FGA %
57th
3PA/FGA %
47.2
72.2
46.2
32.6
29.3
38.1
29th
188th
20th
102nd
82nd
153rd
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
129
W, 65-55
Southern Ala.
309
W, 70-61
Southern Miss.
Win
73.2%
58.0%
44.0%
31.5%
28.3%
8.5
6.0
1.9
7.2
1.2
5.1
243
W, 81-74
Ga. Southern
Loss
68.7%
48.8%
48.6%
25.6%
41.0%
5.8
8.9
4.1
2.9
-1.7
0.5
346
W, 87-50
La. Monroe
Home
70.1%
59.9%
46.0%
32.9%
33.1%
8.7
6.8
3.2
7.3
1.0
3.9
152
L, 64-61
*James Madison
Road
73.8%
51.3%
44.5%
27.3%
31.5%
6.8
7.0
2.1
4.7
-0.3
3.5
133
L, 69-62
*Miami (OH)
301
W, 74-56
*La. Lafayette
140
90
W, 71-70
*Ark. St.
125
125
301
L, 72-69
La. Lafayette
332
W, 83-66
Coastal Carolina
110
110
*Texas St.
309
W, 70-58
*Southern Miss.
95
95
80
281
W, 75-59
^^Old Dominion
152
W, 79-60
^^James Madison
65
W, 94-81
Fast Break 17%
91
2nd Chance 18%
93
88
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Ark. St.
Fast Break 15% 18
65
Game #
Home
2nd Chance 18% 3
Game #
Loss
Road
Tayton Conerway
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
67
In Paint 42%
80
90
69
In Paint 45%
Defensive Pct.l
W, 74-69
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
205
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 22% 7
Myles Rigsby
Thomas Dowd
Jackson Fields
T. Conerway SB POY
---vs. Ark, Ore, Hou: 18 pts, 7-33 FG
---3PT since 2/1 (12G) 9-44, 20.5%
---Top 5 steals rate, top 25 assist rate
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.2
4.8
30-62
5-19
16.4
4.0
17-32
3-11
12.2
9.2
15-19
5-24
9.0
3.6
8-16
8-15
W 13.8
4.2
96-167
26-92
13.8
4.4
68-116
19-60
10.5
7.1
43-69
35-116
8.4
4.7
48-81
18-47
T. Dowd 15 G w/ 3+ off-rebounds
L
15.5
5.6
48-84
10-38
8.2
3.2
25-59
1-14
8.2
6.1
17-26
11-36
6.7
4.6
23-44
1-10
0 games vs. teams w/ top 100 offrebound allowed rate
H
14.2
4.3
68-102
14-56
13.0
4.3
44-79
13-39
9.0
6.5
21-39
24-62
7.4
3.9
37-54
5-23
R
14.4
4.8
76-149
22-74
11.2
3.8
49-96
7-35
10.4
7.1
39-56
22-90
8.3
5.3
34-71
14-34
#
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Conerway, T. Dowd, J. Fields, M. Rigsby, M. Rigsby (27 G: 21-6)
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
12 Tayton Conerway
6'3"
Sr
--
30.4
14.3
4.6
4.8
2.7
2.9
0.4
57.4%
144-251
27.7%
4
Myles Rigsby
6'6"
So
1
28.1
12.0
4.0
1.4
2.3
1.5
0.6
53.1%
93-175
1
Thomas Dowd
6'8"
So
--
25.2
9.8
6.8
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.5
63.2%
60-95
15 Jackson Fields
6'8"
Jr
--
21.7
7.9
4.7
0.6
1.1
0.6
0.8
56.8%
2
6'3"
Jr
--
21.5
6.9
2.8
1.7
1.8
0.7
0.4
33 Theo Seng
6'9"
Sr
4
14.5
5.3
3.2
0.5
0.6
0.4
3
Marcus Rigsby Jr.
Cooper Campbell
2PT
3PT
FT
36-130
66.7%
76-114
27.0%
20-74
79.9%
139-174
30.3%
46-152
73.0%
65-89
71-125
33.3%
19-57
72.6%
61-84
52.2%
36-69
29.2%
42-144
66.0%
31-47
0.4
65.1%
28-43
30.4%
24-79
77.1%
27-35
6'2"
Fr
--
16.4
5.2
1.6
1.2
0.6
0.6
--
48.1%
26-54
36.4%
32-88
75.0%
24-32
10 Jerrell Bellamy
6'9"
Jr
2
10.2
4.6
2.2
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.7
54.9%
50-91
37.5%
3-8
68.8%
33-48
11 Victor Valdes
6'7"
So
--
16.8
4.4
2.2
1.9
1.2
0.9
0.3
38.2%
21-55
30.1%
22-73
75.5%
37-49
#14 Troy Trojans - Sun Belt
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
213 W
84-74
Toledo
--
96
355
52% 35-67 41% 28-69 30%
7-23
18%
3-17
7-13
15-17
11
11
11
11
352 W
78-61
*New Orleans
(4)
309
354
43% 27-63 37% 24-65 30%
7-23
20%
4-20
17-23
9-20
17
10
21
15
39
L
49-65
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
38% 21-55 43% 24-56 16%
3-19
44% 10-23
4-7
7-14
10
8
24
14
29
L
61-82
*Oregon
(3)
54
37
37% 25-67 52% 29-56 12%
3-25
32%
7-22
8-10
17-19
12
9
17
16
350 W
84-65
*West Ga.
(1)
332
323
51% 25-49 46% 28-61 40% 10-25 31%
4-13
24-27
5-6
10
12
10
14
209 W
86-72
UTSA
(5)
159
233
55% 28-51 44% 24-55 55% 11-20 46% 13-28 19-25
11-13
7
10
15
20
68-72
Merrimack
(3)
315
85
46% 22-48 55% 27-49 26%
5-19
56% 14-25 19-30
4-6
11
3
13
14
84-74
Eastern Kent.
(1)
113
266
58% 29-50 47% 29-62 47%
8-17
18%
4-22
18-20 12-16
8
8
15
10
42-62
*Houston
(8)
9
1
24% 12-50 43% 22-51 11%
2-18
47%
9-19
16-22
9-14
11
10
9
8
W
87-53
Middle Ga. St.
(3)
--
--
49% 31-63 31% 20-64 14%
4-28
7%
1-14
21-34 12-21
16
13
19
20
W
105-60
LaGrange
(2)
--
--
53% 36-68 30% 17-57 35% 10-29 37%
7-19
23-33 19-28
21
15
15
20
255 W
77-57
Georgia St.
(3)
153
318
43% 26-60 41% 22-54 29%
25%
6-24
18-25
7-15
14
8
11
13
171 W
69-61
*App. St.
(11)
281
78
44% 25-57 38% 21-56 34% 12-35 31%
8-26
7-10
11-16
9
7
12
8
170 W
58-57
*Marshall
(1)
192
179
37% 19-51 39% 22-56 23%
7-31
19%
3-16
13-17 10-17
10
12
14
13
5-17
184
L
183 W
1
L
7-24
205
L
73-74
Texas St.
(4)
134
298
48% 22-46 42% 25-59 29%
43%
6-14
24-31 18-21
10
12
15
13
90
L
78-84
Ark. St.
(1)
112
97
46% 24-52 50% 26-52 40% 10-25 39%
9-23
20-28 23-27
9
6
11
8
77-58
*La. Monroe
(3)
334
322
48% 31-64 32% 21-66 36% 11-31 30%
8-27
4-8
8-11
17
14
13
9
63-64
*Southern Ala.
(2)
179
112
35% 20-57 40% 23-57 29%
41% 11-27 14-22
7-9
15
8
13
14
129 W
65-55
Southern Ala.
(6)
179
112
36% 23-64 39% 20-51 30% 12-40 27%
6-22
7-10
9-15
17
10
12
14
309 W
70-61
Southern Miss.
(1)
336
226
40% 22-55 40% 23-58 36%
9-25
32%
6-19
17-24
9-15
11
5
17
16
243 W
81-74
Ga. Southern
(2)
237
245
50% 26-52 43% 27-63 24%
7-29
35% 10-29 22-34 10-12
9
15
7
13
346 W
129
L
346 W
9-31
87-50
La. Monroe
(1)
334
322
48% 30-63 37% 18-49 36% 14-39 20%
3-15
13-16 11-15
13
5
5
12
152
L
61-64
*James Madison
(3)
105
253
42% 24-57 44% 21-48 27%
6-22
36%
8-22
7-11
14-19
14
10
12
11
133
L
62-69
*Miami (OH)
(2)
141
177
39% 22-56 44% 25-57 26%
6-23
35% 10-29 12-18
9-14
10
8
15
17
301 W
74-56
*La. Lafayette
(3)
327
247
46% 26-56 41% 20-49 32%
8-25
25%
3-12
14-21 13-18
16
5
15
14
90 W
71-70
*Ark. St.
(2)
112
97
39% 22-57 39% 25-65 29%
8-28
31%
8-26
19-27 12-18
11
18
9
12
9-28
301
69-72
La. Lafayette
(4)
327
247
39% 25-65 43% 23-53 32%
39%
5-13
10-16 21-23
18
5
15
12
332 W
L
83-66
Coastal Carolina
(1)
276
331
53% 29-55 41% 23-56 38% 12-32 38%
9-24
13-19 11-15
10
11
9
9
205 W
74-69
*Texas St.
(2)
134
298
38% 22-58 41% 20-49 20%
5-25
27%
3-11
25-34 26-33
18
8
11
13
309 W
70-58
*Southern Miss.
(2)
336
226
33% 21-63 35% 20-58 27%
7-26
29%
7-24
21-27 11-19
13
7
9
15
281 W
75-59
^^Old Dominion
(7)
300
262
44% 26-59 31% 20-65 21%
4-19
20%
6-30
19-28 13-18
10
14
6
10
152 W
79-60
^^James Madison
(0)
105
253
47% 25-53 32% 20-62 36% 10-28 26%
7-27
19-23 13-19
7
10
11
8
90 W
94-81
^^Ark. St.
(0)
112
97
47% 28-60 41% 26-63 29%
39% 10-26 33-39 19-24
9
12
7
12
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
5-17
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
110.7
112th
103.5
206th
101.9
239th
107.1
177th
108.4
155th
Def-Efficiency
105.5
168th
97.5
38th
99.9
84th
101.7
88th
99.7
57th
WAB
-3.3
184th
-1.2
68th
-2.1
143rd
-2.8
111th
-1.3
92nd
FG% 50% or better
7-0
3PT% >= 35%
8-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
4-8
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
18-5
13-3
3PT% < 35%
10-7
Make >= 10 3PA
15-9
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
19-2
More FTA than Opp.
18-6
3-4
More OReb than Opp.
0-3
Make < 10 3PA
14-9
12-9
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
2-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
21-7
3PA / FGA < 35%
17-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
8-7
4-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
10-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
7-5
@ Matteise
Utah State
Tennessee
Wofford
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
UCLA
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
312
W, 85-50
Rider
38
L, 72-64
^^New Mexico
284
W, 71-40
Boston U.
287
W, 85-45
Lehigh
Record
22-10 (13-7)
224
W, 84-70
Idaho St.
Home
15-2
344
W, 80-47
CS. Fullerton
Road
300
W, 88-43
Southern Utah
109
W, 69-58
Washington
Non-Conf.
29
W, 73-71
*Oregon
Conf.
13
W, 57-54
^^Arizona
361
W, 111-75
Prairie View A&M
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^North Carolina
65.0
117.9
95.3
15.9
22.8
32.8
29.2
296th
27th
20th
90th
5th
90th
149th
36
L, 76-74
15
W, 65-62
^^Gonzaga
55
L, 66-58
*Nebraska
22
L, 94-75
Michigan
12
L, 79-61
*Maryland
77
L, 75-68
*Rutgers
64
W, 94-70
Iowa
#7 UCLA Bruins - Big 10
BPI: 27
BT: 25
EM: 26
KPI: 28
NET: 27
POM: 27
SOR: 28
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
74.8
65.7
1-25
2-1
2-1
0-3
7-8
Win
78.0
60.5
26-50
2-0
0-2
1-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.5
77.1
51-100
3-1
0-0
3-2
189.4
Home
80.4
60.6
101-200
1-0
0-0
1-0
51.5
Road
68.4
71.5
201+
7-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.3 (28th)
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 8-3
Opp. O-Reb%
53.0
70.3
53.1
35.2
32.9
36.0
80th
eFG%
248th
FT%
101st
2PT%
97th
3PT%
180th
FTA/FGA %
257th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
50.5
74.9
51.2
33.2
34.6
44.8
157th
312th
189th
130th
220th
337th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 85-83
Wisconsin
109
W, 65-60
*Washington
Win
71.4%
54.7%
49.1%
37.5%
29.2%
7.8
6.7
1.4
3.5
5.6
1.4
67
W, 82-76
*USC
Loss
68.2%
49.1%
56.0%
30.2%
41.5%
6.4
9.8
3.2
-2.1
2.0
-3.0
29
W, 78-52
Oregon
Home
69.9%
57.1%
47.2%
34.6%
31.1%
7.1
7.2
2.1
3.5
7.3
1.8
7
W, 63-61
Michigan St.
Road
70.9%
47.9%
55.4%
35.8%
35.5%
7.7
8.2
1.9
-0.3
1.3
-2.1
71
W, 78-54
Penn St.
25
L, 83-78
*Illinois
140
51
W, 72-68
*Indiana
125
125
88
L, 64-61
Minnesota
45
W, 69-61
Ohio St.
110
110
Off-Efficiency
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 39% 15
28
Fast Break 11%
L, 76-66
*Purdue
57
W, 73-69
*Northwestern
95
95
80
67
W, 90-63
USC
11
L, 86-70
^^Wisconsin
65
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
91
65
Game #
Game #
Loss
Road
Tyler Bilodeau
78
Fast Break 11%
Home
4-5 when TO% above 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
In Paint 38%
80
L vs. UNC, led 59-43, 13-22 FT
L vs. Minny, led 29-12, 9-19 FT
99
Off TO 25%
Eric Dailey Jr.
Defensive Pct.l
18
46
2nd Chance 14%
2nd Chance 14%
62
Off TO 17%
65
Sebastian Mack
Offensive Pct.l
11
Kobe Johnson
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 11.2
4.4
23-40
1-10
13.2
4.4
15-30
9-16
10.8
3.0
10-20
7-14
5.8
7.2
4-9
7-19
W 12.5
3.7
84-152
18-50
13.4
4.6
80-132
30-62
9.1
1.7
49-103
12-41
7.6
6.4
41-74
22-68
Opp eFG% above 50%: 8-9
L
15.9
6.2
42-85
17-37
7.2
2.7
20-43
4-23
12.1
3.1
29-60
10-27
9.2
5.0
17-28
14-32
E. Dailey Jr. DNP L @ Nebraska
H
13.5
4.1
74-128
16-37
13.5
4.6
66-107
20-54
10.6
2.0
44-81
8-33
7.6
6.0
37-64
11-47
R
13.7
5.1
52-109
19-50
9.3
3.4
34-68
14-31
9.4
2.3
34-82
14-35
8.7
5.9
21-38
25-53
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Andrews, T. Bilodeau, S. Clark, E. Dailey, K. Johnson (25 G: 17-8)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
34 Tyler Bilodeau
6'9"
Jr
1
26.2
13.6
4.5
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.4
53.2%
126-237
40.2%
35-87
73.0%
3
65-89
Eric Dailey Jr.
6'8"
So
1
23.8
11.6
4.1
1.4
1.0
1.3
0.2
57.1%
100-175
40.0%
34-85
70.7%
58-82
12 Sebastian Mack
6'3"
So
--
21.2
10.0
2.2
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.0
47.9%
78-163
32.4%
22-68
73.9%
99-134
0
6'6"
Sr
--
29.0
8.1
5.9
3.0
1.5
1.7
0.2
56.9%
58-102
36.0%
36-100
69.2%
36-52
55 Skyy Clark
6'3"
Jr
--
26.3
8.0
2.9
2.8
1.1
1.3
0.1
53.8%
49-91
37.7%
40-106
76.0%
38-50
2
6'2"
Jr
2
24.8
7.1
1.6
3.3
1.6
0.6
0.1
43.2%
51-118
32.3%
32-99
66.7%
14-21
15 Aday Mara
7'3"
So
1
12.6
6.3
3.9
0.9
0.8
0.2
1.5
60.0%
78-130
--
--
55.9%
38-68
10 Lazar Stefanovic
6'7"
Sr
--
16.5
4.7
1.8
0.8
0.6
0.5
--
50.8%
30-59
33.3%
23-69
95.5%
21-22
1
6'4"
Fr
2
11.4
3.8
1.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.1
39.6%
19-48
32.4%
11-34
85.7%
42-49
Kobe Johnson
Dylan Andrews
Trent Perry
#7 UCLA Bruins - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
256
326
52% 34-65 32% 20-63 35% 10-29 25%
5-20
7-12
5-13
13
16
9
11
64-72
^^New Mexico
(3)
87
18
36% 20-55 51% 25-49 22%
5-23
40%
6-15
19-27 16-23
13
6
21
22
284 W
71-40
Boston U.
(2)
317
278
40% 24-60 30% 14-46 23%
5-22
25%
6-24
18-21
6-9
11
6
15
27
287 W
85-45
Lehigh
(3)
296
276
55% 31-56 29% 15-51 23%
3-13
25%
6-24
20-26
9-15
10
4
8
11
224 W
84-70
Idaho St.
(4)
186
251
57% 27-47 44% 24-54 64%
9-14
33% 11-33
21-26
11-14
7
10
11
11
344 W
80-47
CS. Fullerton
(1)
362
284
50% 30-60 29% 15-52 33%
6-18
21%
5-24
14-23 12-13
9
11
7
19
300 W
88-43
Southern Utah
(3)
340
242
48% 38-80 35% 14-40 30%
6-20
25%
4-16
6-9
11-15
16
4
8
30
109 W
69-58
Washington
(6)
116
132
42% 25-60 39% 19-49 38%
8-21
19%
3-16
11-22
17-24
11
10
7
12
29 W
73-71
*Oregon
(4)
54
37
45% 28-62 47% 26-55 52% 12-23 43%
9-21
5-7
10-14
6
9
8
12
13 W
57-54
^^Arizona
(5)
10
30
45% 23-51 45% 19-42 19%
2-16
7-16
14-19
5
8
14
22
361 W
111-75
Prairie View A&M
(2)
339
353
59% 36-61 47% 24-51 48% 10-21 48% 10-21 29-37 17-24
12
5
10
16
74-76
^^North Carolina
(3)
21
65
49% 26-53 47% 22-47 50%
35%
8-23
13-22 24-35
7
6
12
18
L
15 W
4-21
9-18
Opp
Turnovers
--
36
For
Off. Reb
DBG
L
Opp
FT
Rider
38
For
3PT
85-50
312 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
13%
65-62
^^Gonzaga
(6)
12
29
36% 20-55 46% 25-55 50% 12-24 29%
7-24
13-18
5-8
11
8
11
15
55
L
58-66
*Nebraska
(6)
85
56
39% 22-57 33% 17-52 14%
4-28
28%
7-25
10-13 25-29
6
7
15
13
22
L
75-94
Michigan
(2)
53
15
42% 25-60 62% 32-52 10%
2-20
54% 15-28 23-34 15-21
9
4
6
16
12
L
61-79
*Maryland
(2)
28
6
42% 22-53 54% 27-50 33%
6-18
37%
7-19
11-14
14
7
20
15
77
L
18-21
68-75
*Rutgers
(2)
48
119
42% 25-59 46% 24-52 32%
6-19
30%
6-20
12-15 21-31
7
10
9
10
64 W
94-70
Iowa
(3)
18
178
62% 36-58 45% 21-47 35%
8-23
38%
9-24
14-20 19-25
10
9
7
14
11 W
85-83
Wisconsin
(3)
14
26
51% 29-57 51% 25-49 32%
6-19
50% 15-30 21-28 18-21
10
4
6
13
109 W
65-60
*Washington
(2)
116
132
41% 23-56 42% 22-53 53%
9-17
23%
10-14 11-15
9
8
11
14
67 W
82-76
*USC
(2)
35
104
55% 28-51 49% 27-55 38%
6-16
36% 11-31 20-25 11-19
7
9
8
10
29 W
78-52
Oregon
(2)
54
37
56% 30-54 41% 21-51 48% 11-23 17%
4-23
7-12
6-10
6
7
7
13
7
W
63-61
Michigan St.
(4)
37
5
35% 21-60 38% 20-53 25%
7-28
23%
5-22
14-19 16-19
6
12
3
15
71 W
78-54
Penn St.
(3)
63
79
47% 31-66 38% 19-50 26%
5-19
24%
5-21
11-15 11-12
11
7
3
17
78-83
*Illinois
(2)
15
44
48% 28-58 51% 27-53 52% 12-23 39% 11-28 10-15 18-20
4
9
7
14
72-68
*Indiana
(2)
74
39
47% 26-55 40% 25-62 45%
9-20
24%
7-29
11-14 11-14
8
9
11
7
61-64
Minnesota
(3)
106
86
45% 23-51 46% 22-48 40%
6-15
33%
8-24
9-19
12-13
10
7
9
12
69-61
Ohio St.
(4)
38
61
40% 23-57 32% 20-63 40%
8-20
22%
6-27
15-20 15-16
13
10
13
8
66-76
*Purdue
(4)
8
68
48% 24-50 52% 27-52 28%
5-18
50% 11-22 13-16 11-16
12
6
14
9
57 W
73-69
*Northwestern
(2)
66
41
47% 27-58 47% 25-53 30%
7-23
37%
7-19
12-16 12-14
13
4
12
8
67 W
90-63
USC
(4)
35
104
62% 37-60 43% 21-49 46% 10-22 32%
6-19
6-9
15-18
6
9
12
20
70-86
^^Wisconsin
(5)
14
26
32% 22-68 52% 30-58 30%
59% 19-32 17-26
7-13
19
7
5
9
25
L
51 W
88
L
45 W
18
11
L
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-30
Non-Conference Games
5-22
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
121.4
20th
112.8
64th
108.4
120th
119.8
22nd
119.7
26th
Def-Efficiency
93.1
14th
96.3
25th
87.7
4th
96.3
26th
96.8
29th
WAB
+1.7
20th
+1.6
34th
+0.7
33rd
+2.8
24th
+1.2
34th
FG% 50% or better
10-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
10-4
16-4
3PT% < 35%
6-6
Make >= 10 3PA
11-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
6-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
16-4
More FTA than Opp.
12-4
4-4
More OReb than Opp.
1-6
Make < 10 3PA
16-9
12-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
18-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-7
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
7-9
3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-7
More Turnovers than Opp.
3-3
9-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-3
@ Matteise
321
W, 101-46
Alcorn St.
268
W, 103-74
Charlotte
W, 117-53
Westminster (UT)
135
W, 95-83
Montana
Record
26-7 (15-5)
64
W, 77-69
^^Iowa
Home
15-2
94
W, 72-67
^^St. Bonaventure
Road
#10 Utah St. Aggies - MWC
BPI: 44
BT: 49
EM: 54
KPI: 34
NET: 37
POM: 51
SOR: 37
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
80.9
70.0
1-25
0-0
0-0
1-0
11-5
Win
84.2
67.2
26-50
2-2
0-1
1-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
68.6
80.3
51-100
3-0
4-0
1-2
72
W, 61-57
^^North Texas
200
W, 70-67
Wyoming
Non-Conf.
136.9
Home
88.4
68.9
101-200
4-0
0-0
2-0
324
W, 92-62
Utah Tech
Conf.
124.7
Road
72.9
71.1
201+
5-0
0-0
2-0
195
W, 88-67
South Florida
41
L, 75-73
UC San Diego
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Saint Mary's
67.6
122.6
105.2
16.0
20.2
34.6
30.3
153rd
13th
148th
95th
38th
43rd
211th
56.0
70.2
57.7
35.8
37.6
42.3
19th
eFG%
253rd
FT%
11th
2PT%
67th
3PT%
52nd
FTA/FGA %
93rd
3PA/FGA %
23
W, 75-68
50
W, 67-66
*San Diego St.
95
W, 69-64
*Nevada
274
W, 89-83
Fresno St.
179
W, 85-78
*San Jose St.
53
W, 81-79
Boise St.
97
L, 65-62
*UNLV
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.3 (34th)
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 8-3
Opp. O-Reb%
51.8
71.9
52.6
33.8
36.2
44.4
232nd
166th
250th
178th
264th
329th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
95
W, 90-69
Nevada
314
W, 87-58
*Air Force
Win
71.6%
60.1%
50.5%
38.5%
32.5%
9.3
7.9
1.3
5.2
3.1
3.4
97
W, 76-71
UNLV
Loss
65.2%
50.0%
55.8%
31.3%
37.2%
6.7
7.3
-0.3
-5.1
-0.1
-5.6
38
L, 82-63
New Mexico
Home
70.7%
60.4%
53.0%
39.2%
34.5%
10.2
8.4
1.8
3.2
5.6
4.5
200
W, 71-67
*Wyoming
Road
70.4%
55.8%
50.0%
34.4%
32.0%
7.3
7.1
0.0
2.8
-1.0
-1.8
274
W, 89-81
*Fresno St.
44
W, 93-85
Colorado St.
140
38
L, 82-79
*New Mexico
125
125
179
W, 105-57
San Jose St.
50
W, 79-71
San Diego St.
110
110
*Boise St.
44
L, 93-66
*Colorado St.
95
95
80
W, 87-47
Air Force
97
W, 70-58
^^UNLV
65
79
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
85
Home
57
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Ian Martinez
98
Fast Break 8%
65
Game #
^^Colorado St.
L @ UNLV, led 60-53, 5:07 left
L vs. New Mex, led 46-36 early 2H
60
2nd Chance 15%
In Paint 40%
314
L, 83-72
82
Fast Break 16%
80
44
71
In Paint 45%
69
Off TO 17%
Mason Falslev
Dexter Akanno
Defensive Pct.l
L, 82-65
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
53
Off-Efficiency
Deyton Albury
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 14.2
4.0
10-21
11-32
15.6
6.2
23-38
9-24
4.0
2.4
1-4
4-17
8.8
2.0
11-24
3-7
W 17.6
3.7
69-127
65-156 15.1
6.2 116-202
38-93
9.6
3.5
36-69
46-96
7.2
2.7
56-91
8-16
L
14.0
2.9
17-35
13-50
14.3
6.4
23-47
14-37
3.6
2.9
4-11
4-18
9.3
1.4
19-40
4-9
H
17.6
3.2
36-74
50-112
13.4
5.6
68-124
21-57
11.9
2.9
30-49
36-74
8.5
2.4
38-68
10-15
R
16.0
3.9
50-88
28-94
16.5
6.9
71-125
31-73
4.5
3.8
10-31
14-40
6.8
2.4
37-63
2-10
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Ian Martinez
6'3"
Sr
--
29.5
16.8
3.5
2.7
1.8
0.9
0.3
53.1%
86-162
37.9%
78-206
87.6%
149-170
12 Mason Falslev
6'3"
So
--
32.1
14.9
6.2
3.7
2.1
2.3
0.1
55.8%
139-249
40.0%
52-130
56.3%
58-103
7
Dexter Akanno
6'5"
Sr
--
25.3
8.3
3.3
1.0
0.7
0.7
--
50.0%
40-80
43.9%
50-114
76.3%
45-59
13 Deyton Albury
6'2"
Sr
--
18.5
7.7
2.4
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.1
57.3%
75-131
48.0%
12-25
68.4%
67-98
22 Karson Templin
6'8"
So
--
17.0
7.5
5.0
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.7
59.5%
78-131
31.7%
13-41
59.3%
51-86
8
Drake Allen
6'4"
Sr
2
21.1
7.2
1.9
3.9
1.5
1.2
0.4
58.4%
59-101
29.6%
21-71
62.3%
43-69
21 Aubin Gateretse
6'11"
Sr
1
17.8
6.5
4.3
0.5
1.1
0.3
0.7
77.3%
85-110
20.0%
1-5
57.4%
35-61
2
6'9"
So
--
16.8
5.9
1.9
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.3
57.7%
30-52
29.4%
37-126
82.8%
24-29
7'0"
Jr
4
8.8
3.7
1.7
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.2
56.1%
23-41
32.0%
16-50
72.2%
13-18
W vs. SMC, USU 71% 2PT FG
Ian Martinez 41% 3PT in MWC
--Nov-Dec: 28-87, 32%
M. Falslev top 50 steals rate
Starting Lineup Last G: (12 G: 0-1)
#
4
NAME
Tucker Anderson
20 Isaac Johnson
2PT
3PT
FT
#10 Utah St. Aggies - MWC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
321 W
101-46
Alcorn St.
--
331
267
51% 37-72 29% 16-55 39% 12-31 33%
7-21
15-18
7-11
15
9
9
17
268 W
103-74
Charlotte
(2)
215
293
58% 38-66 48% 25-52 32%
36%
8-22
20-27 16-22
15
8
7
17
7-22
Opp
Off. Reb
W
117-53
Westminster (UT)
(3)
--
--
64% 42-66 35% 21-60 55% 17-31 40%
6-15
16-22
5-8
10
12
9
21
135 W
95-83
Montana
(4)
82
236
50% 29-58 52% 32-62 45%
9-20
33%
8-24
28-36
11-20
10
12
12
18
64 W
77-69
^^Iowa
(3)
18
178
46% 30-65 44% 28-64 33%
7-21
19%
5-26
10-16
8-16
13
6
18
16
94 W
72-67
^^St. Bonaventure
(5)
165
57
34% 22-64 43% 26-61 21%
6-28
29%
6-21
22-28
9-15
16
10
8
10
72 W
61-57
^^North Texas
(0)
118
48
44% 20-46 36% 22-61 35%
6-17
23%
7-30
15-21
6-9
7
10
16
9
200 W
70-67
Wyoming
(4)
230
149
41% 23-56 50% 24-48 29%
5-17
46% 12-26 19-26
7-9
9
2
8
9
324 W
92-62
Utah Tech
(2)
260
316
49% 32-65 41% 25-61 28%
8-29
26%
8-31
20-26
4-11
11
8
13
14
88-67
South Florida
(6)
246
157
50% 32-64 46% 24-52 26%
6-23
37%
7-19
18-21 12-15
11
10
11
21
73-75
UC San Diego
(2)
64
35
40% 24-60 47% 22-47 29%
8-28
30%
8-27
17-24 23-27
8
3
13
15
23 W
75-68
*Saint Mary's
(4)
55
9
59% 30-51 44% 24-54 35%
6-17
40% 10-25
9-11
10-19
4
9
13
12
50 W
67-66
*San Diego St.
(5)
122
14
44% 22-50 39% 20-52 29%
8-28
25%
6-24
15-21 20-22
4
8
15
14
95 W
69-64
*Nevada
(2)
79
120
52% 24-46 42% 24-57 40%
8-20
30%
7-23
13-18
9-12
4
11
13
13
274 W
89-83
Fresno St.
(3)
275
216
48% 31-64 48% 29-60 35%
9-26
35%
7-20
18-27 18-26
10
8
10
14
179 W
85-78
*San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
52% 34-66 42% 25-60 38%
9-24
42% 14-33
8-16
17
10
8
10
81-79
Boise St.
(3)
52
54
61% 30-49 53% 27-51 52% 11-21 54% 14-26 10-22 11-17
3
9
6
7
62-65
*UNLV
(3)
162
55
42% 22-53 41% 24-59 39% 10-26 24%
6-25
8-15
11-17
10
13
12
5
95 W
90-69
Nevada
(6)
79
120
59% 33-56 53% 26-49 53% 16-30 43%
9-21
8-9
8-9
3
5
7
17
314 W
87-58
*Air Force
(2)
311
239
54% 30-56 38% 19-50 52% 16-31 25%
5-20
11-13 15-23
4
7
9
14
97 W
76-71
UNLV
(3)
162
55
48% 24-50 43% 24-56 36%
9-25
20%
4-20
19-31 19-23
7
5
11
11
195 W
41
L
53 W
97
L
38
L
14-17
63-82
New Mexico
(2)
87
18
38% 24-64 48% 28-58 16%
5-31
32%
7-22
10-23 19-27
4
8
9
15
200 W
71-67
*Wyoming
(2)
230
149
41% 22-54 45% 24-53 16%
3-19
26%
6-23
24-31 13-16
12
5
11
13
274 W
89-81
*Fresno St.
(2)
275
216
62% 37-60 47% 26-55 31%
5-16
39%
9-23
10-20 20-28
12
8
14
14
93-85
Colorado St.
(3)
34
46
59% 32-54 46% 25-55 52% 12-23 39% 13-33 17-30 22-27
7
6
6
11
79-82
*New Mexico
(4)
87
18
48% 28-59 46% 24-52 39% 10-26 35%
7-20
13-16 27-34
11
12
13
13
179 W
105-57
San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
58% 38-66 37% 21-57 52% 13-25 29%
9-31
16-21
6-9
12
6
6
14
50 W
79-71
San Diego St.
(2)
122
14
41% 21-51 44% 23-52 41% 11-27 33% 10-30 26-32 15-22
9
4
7
7
52
54
42% 22-52 48% 27-56 39%
7-18
41%
8
9
10
7
7-21
67% 14-21 13-16 15-16
44 W
38
L
53
L
65-82
*Boise St.
(3)
44
L
66-93
*Colorado St.
(2)
34
46
43% 23-54 58% 32-55 33%
9
7
8
9
87-47
Air Force
(6)
311
239
55% 31-56 42% 17-41 47% 15-32 23%
6-26
10-11
7-14
10
8
7
18
70-58
^^UNLV
(4)
162
55
46% 25-54 24% 13-55 32%
8-25
15%
3-20
12-17 29-37
13
19
13
6
72-83
^^Colorado St.
(1)
34
46
37% 23-63 60% 25-42 21%
7-33
56% 10-18 19-30 23-37
15
6
10
13
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
314 W
97 W
44
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
9-22
14-21 19-23
Off-Efficency
127.2
4th
116.8
34th
116.8
31st
124.4
13th
125.6
11th
Def-Efficiency
105.6
169th
103.6
112th
96.1
39th
108.1
197th
108.1
201st
WAB
+0.6
48th
+1.7
33rd
+1.4
20th
+1.1
39th
-0.7
74th
FG% 50% or better
15-0
3PT% >= 35%
15-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
11-3
More FTM than Opp.
15-0
FG% 45% or better
20-1
3PT% < 35%
11-3
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-3
More FTA than Opp.
17-0
FG% below 45%
6-5
Make >= 10 3PA
9-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
6-1
More OReb than Opp.
16-2
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-1
Make < 10 3PA
17-4
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
20-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
17-3
Opp. FG% 45% or better
10-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
16-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
270
W, 80-64
Gardner Webb
17
W, 77-55
*Louisville
135
W, 92-57
Montana
277
W, 103-68
Austin Peay
Record
27-7 (12-6)
103
W, 64-42
^^Virginia
Home
16-1
31
W, 77-62
^^Baylor
Road
299
W, 78-35
UT Martin
120
W, 96-70
Syracuse
210
W, 75-62
^^Miami (FL)
25
W, 66-64
*Illinois
338
W, 84-36
Western Carolina
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Middle Tenn.
63.8
119.3
91.1
16.0
17.8
35.4
30.1
336th
19th
3rd
95th
126th
28th
202nd
52.8
74.3
54.1
34.0
35.4
43.0
84th
eFG%
106th
FT%
66th
2PT%
164th
3PT%
110th
FTA/FGA %
82nd
3PA/FGA %
44.4
74.0
46.7
27.8
29.4
45.1
1st
278th
29th
1st
85th
340th
113
W, 82-64
#2 Tennessee Volunteers - SEC
BPI: 5
BT: 6
EM: 6
KPI: 4
NET: 5
W, 67-52
Norfolk St.
39
W, 76-52
Arkansas
4
L, 73-43
*Florida
45
W, 74-70
*Texas
35
W, 74-56
Georgia
47
L, 76-75
*Vanderbilt
SOR: 5
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
74.7
63.0
1-25
3-1
1-1
3-3
11-6
Win
77.1
60.1
26-50
4-0
2-0
2-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
65.6
74.1
51-100
1-0
0-0
1-0
Non-Conf.
133.8
Home
79.8
60.6
101-200
4-0
1-0
0-0
Conf.
31.1
Road
69.6
65.5
201+
4-0
1-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +9.3 (6th)
163
POM: 5
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-4
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 68-56
Miss St.
1
L, 53-51
*Auburn
Win
74.0%
55.3%
46.3%
36.1%
26.1%
8.5
7.0
2.5
8.4
1.4
3.0
14
L, 78-73
Kentucky
Loss
75.5%
48.7%
47.9%
27.1%
35.5%
7.4
7.9
-2.6
-4.0
0.0
0.7
4
W, 64-44
Florida
Home
73.7%
57.4%
45.5%
34.0%
28.2%
8.6
7.7
3.4
8.8
2.5
3.5
23
W, 85-81
Missouri
Road
74.9%
50.4%
47.7%
34.1%
27.3%
8.0
6.6
-0.5
2.9
-0.4
1.5
39
W, 70-52
*Oklahoma
14
L, 75-64
*Kentucky
140
47
W, 81-76
Vanderbilt
125
125
16
W, 77-69
*Texas A&M
83
W, 65-59
*LSU
110
110
W, 79-76
Alabama
26
L, 78-76
*Ole Miss
95
95
80
86
W, 75-65
South Carolina
45
W, 83-72
^^Texas
65
W, 70-65
^^Auburn
4
L, 86-77
^^Florida
In Paint 41%
31
Fast Break 11%
27
79
2nd Chance 17%
77
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
84
In Paint 40%
80
1
Def-Efficiency
140
Home
F. Okpara top 40 block shot rate, #2
in SEC play
Zeigler from 3 in L's excluding SEC
title G: 1-6, 0-2, 1-11, 0-6, 2-5, 1-6
W vs. Illinois: 30 of Ill's 64 via FT
2nd Chance 16% 11
Game #
Loss
Road
Chaz Lanier
74
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
Defensive Pct.l
6
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
33
59
Off TO 17%
Zakai Zeigler
Jordan Gainey
Igor Milicic Jr.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.8
2.8
22-34
11-32
14.2
3.4
11-15
7-24
15.0
3.0
12-19
8-30
9.0
3.6
9-18
7-18
W 19.0
3.8
89-183
14-51
13.6
3.0
55-109
9-43
11.6
3.4
66-122
12-40
9.8
7.4
69-114
13-30
L
12.6
3.7
16-36
96-224 14.4
3.6
22-42
48-133 10.7
3.0
10-32
31-105 10.9
5.1
11-21
24-83
H
18.2
3.7
53-105
57-145 13.4
3.1
31-67
33-92
11.6
3.5
51-85
16-66
11.0
8.6
46-70
18-56
R
17.2
3.8
52-114
53-130 14.1
3.1
46-84
24-84
11.2
3.2
25-69
27-79
9.1
5.3
34-65
19-57
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Lanier, J. Mashack, I. Milicic, F. Okpara, Z. Zeigler (33 G: 26-7)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
--
31.1
17.7
3.8
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.1
47.9%
105-219
40.0%
110-275
73.5%
61-83
2
Chaz Lanier
6'4"
Sr
5
2PT
3PT
FT
Zakai Zeigler
5'9"
Sr
1
33.9
13.8
3.1
7.3
3.0
1.9
0.3
51.0%
77-151
32.4%
57-176
80.1%
129-161
11 Jordan Gainey
6'4"
Sr
--
27.7
11.4
3.4
1.9
0.9
1.1
0.4
49.4%
76-154
29.7%
43-145
81.5%
106-130
7
6'10"
Sr
1
26.0
10.0
6.9
2.1
1.4
0.7
0.8
59.3%
80-135
32.7%
37-113
74.7%
59-79
34 Felix Okpara
6'11"
Jr
--
25.6
7.3
6.2
0.3
1.1
0.3
1.7
58.6%
102-174
100.0%
1-1
70.7%
41-58
15 Jahmai Mashack
6'4"
Sr
--
28.2
6.0
4.3
1.5
1.0
1.6
0.6
50.5%
49-97
36.2%
17-47
75.7%
56-74
12 Cade Phillips
6'9"
So
--
15.0
4.8
3.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.9
63.7%
65-102
0.0%
0-1
52.4%
33-63
43 Cameron Carr
6'5"
So
30
10.5
4.8
1.5
1.0
0.3
0.0
0.5
100.0%
3-3
40.0%
2-5
77.8%
7-9
13 J.P. Estrella
6'11"
So
31
10.3
4.7
2.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.7
66.7%
6-9
--
0-0
66.7%
2-3
Igor Milicic Jr.
#2 Tennessee Volunteers - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
270 W
80-64
Gardner Webb
--
245
264
51% 28-55 44% 24-55 35%
Opp
For
17 W
77-55
*Louisville
(4)
25
16
135 W
92-57
Montana
(3)
81
277 W
103-68
Austin Peay
(3)
249
103 W
64-42
^^Virginia
(3)
31 W
77-62
^^Baylor
(0)
299 W
78-35
UT Martin
120 W
96-70
210 W
75-62
8-23
FT
Opp
26%
6-23
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
For Opp For Opp
16-21 10-15
7
7
10
14
57% 30-53 27% 16-60 53% 10-19 26% 10-39
7-11
11
12
20
13
235
61% 31-51 35% 18-52 43%
9-21
28%
21-25 14-19
5
3
12
11
293
64% 37-58 36% 22-62 36%
5-14
30% 10-33 24-33 14-17
11
4
10
13
89
134
38% 25-66 29% 14-49 36%
9-25
30%
6-20
5-10
8-11
14
7
6
16
17
58
52% 24-46 42% 25-59 44% 12-27 27%
6-22
17-22
6-8
8
14
12
12
(4)
250
304
48% 30-63 23% 12-53 27% 10-37 19%
6-31
8-10
5-7
19
8
11
13
Syracuse
(5)
95
147
54% 35-65 49% 26-53 35% 10-29 32%
6-19
16-24 12-21
12
3
8
11
^^Miami (FL)
(6)
71
324
48% 25-52 39% 24-61 40% 10-25 24%
8-33
15-18
6-10
4
7
11
12
7-25
13-13
25 W
66-64
*Illinois
(3)
15
45
32% 20-62 29% 15-51 25%
6-24
17%
4-23
20-28 30-36
16
10
4
11
338 W
84-36
Western Carolina
(2)
342
297
46% 32-69 22% 14-64 30%
8-27
15%
6-39
12-14
2-4
13
13
10
20
113 W
82-64
Middle Tenn.
(5)
130
121
48% 27-56 41% 24-59 46% 10-22 30%
9-30
18-23
7-14
6
3
11
11
163 W
67-52
Norfolk St.
(7)
178
237
43% 23-54 37% 22-59 26%
15%
2-13
13-16
6-8
9
8
6
11
39 W
76-52
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
39% 27-69 38% 20-53 39% 10-26 21%
6-29
12-15
6-13
19
6
12
15
43-73
*Florida
(2)
3
13
21% 12-56 40% 27-68 14%
30%
6-20
15-25 13-17
9
16
11
11
74-70
*Texas
(3)
39
69
45% 25-56 42% 26-62 44% 10-23 28%
7-25
14-20
11-14
14
12
12
5
74-56
Georgia
(3)
46
23
42% 28-66 38% 20-53 30%
29%
6-21
10-10 10-12
18
7
9
17
75-76
*Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
48% 24-50 46% 26-56 48% 10-21 38%
8-21
17-21 16-19
7
8
9
9
68-56
Miss St.
(2)
26
50
42% 23-55 34% 19-56 36% 10-28 30% 10-33 12-13
10
8
10
10
4
L
45 W
35 W
47
L
33 W
8-31
4-29
8-27
8-12
1
L
51-53
*Auburn
(3)
1
12
32% 17-54 31% 18-59 18%
13-16 14-19
8
15
10
9
14
L
73-78
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
35% 25-72 50% 25-50 24% 11-45 50% 12-24 12-17 16-24
12
7
5
11
W
64-44
Florida
(3)
3
13
40% 24-60 25% 13-53 27%
10-15 14-19
9
5
7
12
23 W
85-81
Missouri
(3)
5
75
50% 27-54 42% 25-60 67% 10-15 40% 12-30 21-30 19-29
11
10
10
3
39 W
70-52
*Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
60% 29-48 32% 17-53 43%
9-21
26%
12-12
5
5
18
11
4
14
L
4-22
6-22
15%
15%
3-20
4-27
6-23
3-5
64-75
*Kentucky
(2)
11
49
43% 23-54 50% 26-52 17%
3-18
50% 12-24 15-19 11-14
7
3
9
8
47 W
81-76
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
56% 29-52 46% 27-59 43%
9-21
44% 12-27 14-22 10-14
2
6
5
5
16 W
77-69
*Texas A&M
(6)
49
11
43% 23-54 39% 23-59 48% 13-27 17%
5-30
18-20 18-20
8
11
7
11
83 W
65-59
*LSU
(2)
128
62
41% 23-56 41% 21-51 27%
6-22
26%
7-27
13-21 10-16
12
6
11
10
6
79-76
Alabama
(3)
4
28
43% 26-61 42% 25-60 38%
8-21
38%
9-24
19-26 17-26
5
10
11
10
W
26
76-78
*Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
46% 25-54 46% 31-68 39% 12-31 26%
5-19
14-17 11-14
6
11
7
5
86 W
75-65
South Carolina
(2)
109
59
55% 30-55 35% 20-57 29%
6-21
22%
8-36
9-21
17-22
7
9
6
9
45 W
83-72
^^Texas
(5)
39
69
50% 27-54 46% 25-54 25%
5-20
25%
4-16
24-35 18-21
13
9
7
11
1
70-65
^^Auburn
(0)
1
12
43% 20-47 42% 23-55 26%
5-19
29%
6-21
25-27 13-22
10
8
10
6
77-86
^^Florida
(0)
3
13
45% 22-49 43% 26-61 31%
8-26
33%
9-27
25-32 25-28
4
11
9
7
4
L
W
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
119.2
26th
118.5
24th
117.7
26th
117.4
41st
123.7
13th
Def-Efficiency
90.7
7th
90.1
4th
85.9
2nd
91.5
5th
94.7
16th
WAB
+4
1st
+5.3
6th
+3.1
4th
+4.9
10th
+5.2
3rd
FG% 50% or better
11-0
3PT% >= 35%
15-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
3-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
19-4
15-2
3PT% < 35%
12-5
Make >= 10 3PA
12-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
11-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
24-4
More FTA than Opp.
18-5
5-2
More OReb than Opp.
0-2
Make < 10 3PA
16-4
17-2
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-1
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
3-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
24-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
14-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
21-3
More Turnovers than Opp.
8-4
3-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-0
@ Matteise
W, 112-58
Erskine
98
L, 78-69
*Lipscomb
251
L, 71-68
*Presbyterian
3
L, 86-35
*Duke
Record
19-15 (10-8)
127
W, 81-73
^^St. Thomas
Home
7-6
141
L, 76-74
*Milwaukee
Road
210
L, 79-74
^^Portland St.
122
W, 74-54
North Alabama
Non-Conf.
270
W, 88-64
Gardner Webb
Conf.
206
L, 79-56
*Elon
124
L, 77-67
*Charleston
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Saint Louis
63.9
111.5
109.7
16.9
14.9
35.5
26.2
335th
91st
248th
159th
319th
26th
32nd
105
W, 74-71
#15 Wofford Terriers - SoCon
BPI: 139
BT: 145
EM: 115
KPI: 133
NET: 131
Ky. Christian
144
L, 68-66
UNC Greensboro
157
W, 81-78
*ETSU
338
W, 77-69
Western Carolina
118
W, 81-62
*Furman
106
!L, 83-81
*Chattanooga
SOR:
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
75.3
69.8
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
12-9
Win
82.2
64.2
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.6
76.9
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-1
165.4
Home
77.9
66.5
101-200
1-5
3-0
4-4
226.4
Road
73.7
71.9
201+
4-1
1-1
4-2
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -9.7 (193rd)
W, 100-55
POM: 120
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 3-7
Opp. O-Reb%
53.3
66.8
54.6
34.5
31.1
47.7
73rd
eFG%
333rd
FT%
52nd
2PT%
138th
3PT%
235th
FTA/FGA %
22nd
3PA/FGA %
51.8
69.2
51.8
34.5
36.2
45.8
232nd
33rd
216th
223rd
264th
344th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
267
W, 69-49
Mercer
360
W, 79-68
The Citadel
Win
64.9%
59.1%
49.5%
36.8%
29.0%
10.3
7.8
4.8
11.7
1.2
0.2
112
L, 77-61
*Samford
Loss
68.0%
50.8%
54.4%
30.7%
40.8%
8.9
9.7
2.9
1.1
-1.9
-3.3
305
L, 74-67
VMI
Home
65.8%
58.8%
50.3%
33.2%
30.4%
9.8
7.8
5.9
12.7
-0.9
-2.1
144
W, 74-62
*UNC Greensboro
Road
66.3%
53.7%
52.7%
34.6%
36.0%
9.6
9.1
2.8
3.6
0.3
-0.9
106
L, 79-70
Chattanooga
267
W, 77-66
*Mercer
140
360
!W, 74-71
*The Citadel
125
125
112
L, 76-68
Samford
305
W, 82-43
*VMI
110
110
157
L, 73-68
ETSU
95
95
338
W, 90-67
*Western Carolina
80
Furman
157
W, 72-60
^^ETSU
65
305
W, 85-65
^^VMI
118
W, 92-85
^^Furman
79
2nd Chance 16%
Off TO 16% 16
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 38%
91
Fast Break 9%
95
87
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Corey Tripp
26
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
44
In Paint 42%
60
Off TO 17%
Kyler Filewich
Dillon Bailey
Defensive Pct.l
L, 78-75
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
118
80
Off-Efficiency
Justin Bailey
L vs. Duke 5-33 3PT, D. Bailey: 1-11
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
K. Filewich top 25 off-reb rate, top
75 def-reb rate; top 75 both last year.
L5 14.4
5.0
14-25
9-26
13.6
9.2
31-46
0-0
12.0
3.2
5-13
9-28
12.6
3.8
7-11
11-26
W 14.4
4.8
64-111
30-83
12.6
9.6 109-178
0-1
12.2
2.8
26-50
39-104 10.3
3.6
27-45
32-64
J. Sivills season-high 20 pts (4-7
3PT) in SoCon Tittle G, 13 PPG final
6 games
L 14.1
3.1
43-100
30-86
11.1
9.1
73-133
0-4
10.2
2.1
22-37
26-87
8.7
3.5
15-33
23-58
H
14.5
4.3
39-81
22-64
12.3 10.2 72-113
0-1
10.9
2.9
16-30
24-73
10.7
2.9
17-30
25-50
R
14.1
3.8
68-130
38-105
11.7
0-4
11.5
2.2
32-57
41-118
9.0
3.9
25-48
30-72
8.8 110-198
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Bailey, J. Bailey, K. Filewich, J. Sivills, C. Tripp (22 G: 13-9)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
10 Corey Tripp
6'2"
Sr
1
28.3
14.3
4.0
3.2
2.2
0.9
0.3
50.7%
107-211
14 Kyler Filewich
6'9"
Sr
--
27.1
11.9
9.4
3.1
1.6
0.7
0.6
58.5%
182-311
2
Dillon Bailey
6'2"
Sr
--
28.4
11.3
2.5
1.5
1.4
0.8
0.0
55.2%
48-87
5
Justin Bailey
6'3"
Jr
1
27.2
9.6
3.6
1.7
0.9
1.2
0.0
53.8%
42-78
0
Jackson Sivills
6'6"
Sr
2
21.6
9.3
3.8
1.1
1.0
0.3
0.4
65.7%
32 Jeremy Lorenz
6'8"
So
--
22.0
7.9
3.8
1.7
1.3
0.7
0.7
59.6%
4
35.5%
FT
60-169
81.1%
77-95
0.0%
0-5
31.8%
42-132
34.0%
65-191
82.3%
93-113
45.1%
55-122
78.8%
67-85
44-67
34.7%
60-173
77.8%
28-36
81-136
29.4%
20-68
71.9%
46-64
Luke Flynn
6'1"
Fr
1
19.9
4.2
2.9
1.2
0.5
0.4
0.1
42.9%
9-21
36.1%
35-97
70.0%
14-20
11 Kahmare Holmes
6'3"
Fr
7
14.4
4.2
2.0
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.2
65.3%
32-49
20.5%
9-44
61.8%
21-34
30 Anthony Arrington
6'2"
Jr
5
15.6
4.0
2.3
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.1
43.5%
20-46
26.7%
23-86
66.7%
8-12
#15 Wofford Terriers - SoCon
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
112-58
Erskine
--
--
--
48% 44-92 36% 20-56 29% 15-51 24%
8-33
9-17
10-16
25
3
11
23
11
11
10
6
98
L
69-78
*Lipscomb
(4)
97
125
45% 26-58 48% 28-58 39% 12-31 33%
7-21
5-10
15-18
251
L
68-71
*Presbyterian
(3)
231
261
46% 26-57 48% 25-52 32%
9-28
50%
9-18
7-9
12-21
9
6
11
9
3
L
35-86
*Duke
(2)
2
4
25% 14-57 48% 30-62 15%
5-33
42% 16-38
2-3
10-11
10
14
15
10
127 W
81-73
^^St. Thomas
(5)
58
230
55% 30-55 42% 22-53 46% 10-22 32% 10-31
11-19
19-28
8
7
13
10
141
L
74-76
*Milwaukee
(0)
183
174
49% 30-61 46% 26-57 25%
29%
5-17
8-15
19-33
9
12
7
7
210
L
74-79
^^Portland St.
(0)
274
100
44% 22-50 48% 30-63 50% 13-26 31%
8-26
17-21
11-16
8
10
15
10
122 W
74-54
North Alabama
(6)
81
180
48% 30-63 35% 19-54 30%
22%
4-18
7-11
12-18
15
5
13
10
270 W
88-64
Gardner Webb
(2)
245
264
59% 34-58 44% 21-48 50% 12-24 21%
4-19
8-10
18-28
9
10
12
17
6-24
7-23
206
L
56-79
*Elon
(2)
182
277
29% 21-73 60% 28-47 23%
9-39
50% 11-22
5-8
12-16
17
6
8
16
124
L
67-77
*Charleston
(8)
198
151
33% 23-69 46% 27-59 22%
8-37
50% 12-24 13-18
11-13
15
7
9
9
74-71
*Saint Louis
(1)
123
110
50% 29-58 47% 21-45 29%
6-21
38%
9-24
10-17 20-35
7
4
4
7
100-55
Ky. Christian
(9)
--
--
49% 37-76 39% 22-57 29% 10-35 27%
8-30
16-27
3-4
21
6
7
16
66-68
UNC Greensboro
(3)
196
171
44% 24-54 39% 22-57 39%
9-23
38%
9-24
9-14
15-20
8
8
9
3
157 W
81-78
*ETSU
(2)
205
154
62% 29-47 54% 25-46 45%
9-20
43%
9-21
14-29 19-28
8
6
14
12
338 W
77-69
Western Carolina
(3)
342
297
44% 28-63 36% 23-64 39% 10-26 26% 10-39
11-18
13-15
9
5
8
4
81-62
*Furman
(4)
117
194
47% 32-68 33% 23-69 41% 13-32 24%
4-7
8-13
19
15
10
4
81-83 #
*Chattanooga
(1)
59
270
46% 26-56 53% 29-55 38% 11-29 49% 16-33 18-22
9-14
8
3
10
11
69-49
Mercer
(2)
316
197
43% 23-54 30% 17-57 31% 10-32 18%
13-21 11-18
7
7
7
8
105 W
W
144
L
118 W
106
L
267 W
360 W
8-34
4-22
79-68
The Citadel
(3)
356
352
56% 27-48 36% 21-58 36%
9-25
35% 13-37 16-20 13-16
6
5
11
3
112
L
61-77
*Samford
(2)
101
209
44% 22-50 53% 28-53 30%
6-20
50% 11-22 11-19 10-13
6
6
9
12
305
L
67-74
VMI
(3)
314
275
43% 25-58 46% 23-50 33% 10-30 42% 11-26
7-18
17-23
15
4
13
9
74-62
*UNC Greensboro (2)
196
171
43% 23-54 39% 23-59 63% 12-19 30%
7-23
16-20
9-16
7
15
6
12
70-79
Chattanooga
(3)
59
270
41% 23-56 54% 29-54 35%
24%
5-21
16-20 16-21
8
4
13
4
267 W
77-66
*Mercer
(2)
316
197
40% 26-65 40% 27-68 35% 12-34 23%
5-22
13-21
7-11
12
11
12
11
360 W
74-71 #
*The Citadel
(3)
356
352
41% 27-66 48% 29-60 21%
6-28
32%
8-25
14-19
5-8
20
6
8
8
68-76
Samford
(2)
101
209
43% 22-51 46% 27-59 24%
6-25
33%
9-27
18-25 13-18
7
9
12
10
82-43
*VMI
(3)
314
275
56% 32-57 26% 14-54 39% 10-26 23%
7-31
8-16
8-16
10
5
13
17
68-73
ETSU
(2)
205
154
40% 21-53 52% 22-42 37% 13-35 50%
7-14
13-18 22-38
8
6
8
10
90-67
*Western Carolina
(3)
342
297
47% 33-70 40% 22-55 26%
8-31
30%
8-27
16-20 15-19
15
9
6
12
75-78
Furman
(2)
117
194
44% 26-59 45% 23-51 27%
8-30
40% 10-25 15-21 22-28
14
3
13
8
157 W
72-60
^^ETSU
(6)
205
154
45% 21-47 41% 20-49 41% 11-27 32%
7-22
19-30 13-22
11
4
9
5
305 W
85-65
^^VMI
(0)
314
275
48% 30-62 46% 20-44 41% 12-29 30%
6-20
13-21 19-23
12
7
2
13
118 W
92-85
^^Furman
(0)
117
194
54% 26-48 48% 27-56 50% 14-28 39% 13-33 26-33 18-20
6
6
10
7
144 W
106
L
112
L
305 W
157
L
338 W
118
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-23
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
107.5
169th
113.1
62nd
107.5
133rd
110.6
102nd
114.3
69th
Def-Efficiency
109.6
243rd
109.7
245th
109.0
241st
109.1
219th
109.1
215th
WAB
-5.3
276th
-4.4
136th
-4.1
237th
-5.9
196th
-2.8
157th
FG% 50% or better
7-0
3PT% >= 35%
12-5
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
4-10
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
9-5
13-3
3PT% < 35%
6-12
Make >= 10 3PA
7-10
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
13-5
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-5
More FTA than Opp.
12-5
4-7
More OReb than Opp.
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-5
Make < 10 3PA
6-10
15-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
15-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
9-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
5-14
3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
16-14
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-10
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-9
0-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
2-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
0-2
@ Matteise
West Region
1.15
NCAA
Average
PPP & PPPA
1.06
ADJUSTED PPP ALLOWED
1.10
Norfolk St.
Nebraska Omaha
UNC Wilmington
1.05
Connecticut
Oklahoma
1.00
Grand Canyon
Memphis
Drake
Missouri
Colorado St.
Texas Tech
0.95
Arkansas
Kansas
0.85
Maryland
St. John's
0.90
0.85
0.90
0.95
Raleigh
1
Florida
Fri
16
Norfolk St.
3:50
8
UConn
Fri
9
Oklahoma
6:25
1.00
1.05
1.10
Florida
1.15
1.20
1.25
ADJUSTED PPP
Seattle
5
Memphis
Fri
12
Colorado St.
11:00
4
Maryland
Fri
13
Grand Canyon
1:35
Wichita
6
Missouri
Tur
11
Drake
4:35
3
Texas Tech
Thu
14
UNC Wilm
7:30
San Francisco
Thursday / Saturday
Providence
7
Kansas
Thu
10
Arkansas
4:10
2
St. John's
Thu
15
Omaha
6:45
Game Times Are PT
1.30
Norfolk State
Connecticut
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Florida
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
Oklahoma
195
W, 98-83
^^South Florida
180
W, 81-60
Jacksonville
329
W, 86-62
Grambling St.
91
W, 87-74
*Florida St.
Record
30-4 (14-4)
296
W, 84-60
Florida A&M
Home
15-1
197
W, 93-68
Southern Ill.
Road
#1 Florida Gators - SEC
BPI: 4
BT: 4
EM: 3
KPI: 3
NET: 4
POM: 2
SOR: 3
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
85.4
69.2
1-25
2-1
3-0
2-2
15-3
Win
86.5
67.1
26-50
5-0
1-0
2-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
77.3
85.3
51-100
1-0
2-0
3-0
61
W, 75-58
^^Wake Forest
134
W, 88-51
^^Wichita St.
103
W, 87-69
Virginia
78
W, 83-66
^^Arizona St.
36
W, 90-84
^^North Carolina
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
North Florida
69.5
127.7
94.0
15.0
17.0
38.1
28.8
64th
3rd
13th
36th
184th
8th
126th
55.0
71.8
56.4
35.5
32.6
43.6
37th
eFG%
199th
FT%
27th
2PT%
83rd
3PT%
188th
FTA/FGA %
73rd
3PA/FGA %
45.3
70.7
45.9
29.6
33.0
37.3
6th
112th
14th
7th
176th
120th
263
W, 99-45
353
W, 85-45
Stetson
14
L, 106-100
*Kentucky
5
W, 73-43
Tennessee
39
W, 71-63
*Arkansas
23
L, 83-82
Missouri
45
W, 84-60
Texas
Non-Conf.
148.1
Home
86.3
62.5
101-200
3-0
2-0
0-0
Conf.
33.9
Road
84.6
75.2
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +11.1 (3rd)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 70-69
*South Carolina
35
W, 89-59
Georgia
Win
72.9%
56.6%
44.9%
36.2%
27.8%
10.0
6.2
2.8
9.5
1.5
0.7
5
L, 64-44
*Tennessee
Loss
65.8%
54.3%
54.0%
30.8%
41.8%
9.0
10.3
2.0
2.0
-1.3
1.8
47
W, 86-75
Vanderbilt
Home
70.1%
56.5%
41.9%
37.9%
27.2%
10.3
5.7
2.6
9.1
3.0
0.5
1
W, 90-81
*Auburn
Road
73.2%
56.3%
49.5%
33.5%
31.5%
9.6
7.6
2.7
8.2
-0.4
1.1
33
W, 81-68
*Miss St.
86
W, 88-67
South Carolina
140
39
W, 85-63
Oklahoma
125
125
83
W, 79-65
*LSU
35
L, 88-83
*Georgia
110
110
W, 89-70
Texas A&M
6
W, 99-94
*Alabama
Def-Efficiency
140
61
In Paint 44%
99
Fast Break 19%
95
95
80
92
2nd Chance 18%
47
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
38
In Paint 44%
26
W, 90-71
Ole Miss
80
23
W, 95-81
^^Missouri
65
6
W, 104-82
^^Alabama
5
W, 86-77
^^Tennessee
L vs. Mizzou: Trailed 42-23 1H
L vs. UGA: Trailed 39-13, 13 min in
Since 2/4 (Next G after scoring 44 vs.
Vols), Torvik OE: 134.1, 3PT 38.7%
Haugh PPG Nov-Jan: 7.6, since: 12.1
Home
30
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Walter Clayton Jr.
66
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
88
Off TO 16%
Alijah Martin
Defensive Pct.l
16
Off-Efficiency
Will Richard
Offensive Pct.l
86
Alex Condon
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 21.4
4.2
17-34
20-45
13.2
3.8
18-22
6-22
13.6
3.0
12-17
9-33
14.8
9.2
21-38
5-13
W 16.9
3.8
90-167
14-37
14.6
4.7
88-146
12-33
13.6
4.5
84-125
8-20
11.9
8.2
97-174
0-6
L
22.3
3.8
12-24
83-220 13.5
3.5
5-13
57-164 13.3
4.8
12-15
62-175
7.0
6.0
7-16
16-43
H
14.9
3.3
47-77
36-95
15.2
4.8
47-78
38-96
13.6
4.3
41-64
39-96
12.4
8.4
59-96
6-20
R
19.7
4.1
55-114
61-162 13.8
4.4
46-81
31-101 13.6
4.7
55-76
31-99
10.2
7.5
45-94
10-29
Starting Lineup Last G: R. Chinyelu, W. Clayton, A. Condon, A. Martin, W. Richard (26 G: 23-3)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
1
Walter Clayton Jr.
6'3"
Sr
1
32.4
17.5
3.8
4.3
2.3
1.3
0.5
53.4%
102-191
37.7%
97-257
85.7%
84-98
15 Alijah Martin
6'2"
Sr
2
30.0
14.5
4.6
2.3
1.5
1.6
0.2
58.5%
93-159
35.0%
69-197
73.7%
70-95
5
Will Richard
6'5"
Sr
--
31.5
13.6
4.5
1.8
1.4
1.7
0.3
68.6%
96-140
35.9%
70-195
83.3%
60-72
21 Alex Condon
6'11"
So
3
25.2
11.2
7.9
2.2
1.2
0.8
1.4
54.7%
104-190
32.7%
16-49
61.3%
92-150
10 Thomas Haugh
6'9"
So
--
24.0
9.4
6.0
2.1
1.1
0.8
0.7
58.8%
67-114
36.3%
29-80
81.2%
99-122
11 Denzel Aberdeen
6'5"
Jr
1
20.1
8.0
1.7
1.6
0.9
0.5
0.0
45.3%
62-137
34.4%
32-93
71.4%
45-63
9
Rueben Chinyelu
6'11"
So
--
19.2
6.1
6.5
0.7
1.0
0.5
0.9
60.4%
90-149
--
0-0
57.8%
26-45
4
Sam Alexis
6'9"
Jr
11
12.4
4.9
3.6
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.7
53.1%
43-81
20.0%
4-20
53.8%
14-26
7
Urban Klavzar
6'1"
Fr
11
10.5
3.6
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.0
41.4%
12-29
35.4%
17-48
66.7%
8-12
#1 Florida Gators - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
^^South Florida
--
246
157
52% 33-63 44% 28-63 19%
5-26
48% 13-27 27-33 14-17
11
10
8
15
180 W
81-60
Jacksonville
(2)
266
111
53% 30-57 38% 25-66 29%
7-24
29%
7-24
14-25
3-3
12
15
10
17
329 W
86-62
Grambling St.
(3)
346
228
45% 29-64 43% 23-54 30%
7-23
17%
2-12
21-26 14-17
17
3
12
15
91 W
87-74
*Florida St.
(3)
141
72
53% 32-61 39% 27-70 36% 10-28 35%
7-20
13-17 13-21
13
14
19
8
296 W
84-60
Florida A&M
(3)
255
344
41% 28-68 35% 19-55 29% 10-34 24%
5-21
18-26 17-24
18
9
7
15
197 W
93-68
Southern Ill.
(2)
180
203
47% 35-75 35% 25-72 41% 16-39 33%
5-15
7-14
13-18
13
19
6
12
61 W
75-58
^^Wake Forest
(5)
137
36
40% 23-58 38% 21-56 30%
15%
3-20
21-27 13-15
11
8
11
11
134 W
88-51
^^Wichita St.
(0)
188
117
45% 35-78 30% 17-57 42% 14-33 23%
5-22
4-5
12-19
17
4
8
9
103 W
87-69
Virginia
(4)
89
134
52% 31-60 46% 26-57 40% 10-25 38%
8-21
15-21
9-10
11
13
6
12
78 W
83-66
^^Arizona St.
(9)
67
76
48% 32-67 37% 23-62 33% 10-30 28%
7-25
9-10
13-19
10
5
14
11
36 W
90-84
^^North Carolina
(2)
21
65
46% 30-65 46% 33-72 34% 11-32 18%
5-28
19-27 13-19
14
8
17
10
263 W
99-45
North Florida
(3)
136
349
45% 34-76 23% 13-56 45%
9-20
24%
8-34
22-27
11-18
25
5
11
17
85-45
Stetson
(7)
302
358
51% 35-69 27% 18-68 36%
9-25
13%
3-24
6-9
6-8
10
10
13
15
100-106
*Kentucky
(5)
11
49
55% 33-60 58% 37-64 36% 12-33 48% 14-29 22-35 18-24
12
8
8
5
W
73-43
Tennessee
(2)
19
3
40% 27-68 21% 12-56 30%
6-20
14%
4-29
13-17 15-25
16
9
11
11
39 W
71-63
*Arkansas
(3)
83
22
39% 25-64 30% 18-60 29%
8-28
19%
3-16
13-20 24-35
16
13
9
8
5
23
L
8-27
Opp
For
Opp
Turnovers
98-83
L
For
Off. Reb
Result
14
Opp
FT
195 W
353 W
For
3PT
For Opp For Opp
82-83
Missouri
(2)
5
75
48% 26-54 44% 27-61 36%
9-25
38% 11-29 21-31 18-29
11
13
13
8
45 W
84-60
Texas
(3)
39
69
49% 33-67 36% 20-55 40%
8-20
25%
4-16
10-15 16-19
11
8
8
14
86 W
70-69
*South Carolina
(3)
109
59
42% 28-66 49% 28-57 33%
8-24
35%
9-26
6-9
4-8
14
11
10
16
89-59
Georgia
(2)
46
23
53% 34-64 36% 21-59 35%
9-26
24%
5-21
12-15 12-15
14
13
14
17
44-64
*Tennessee
(6)
19
3
25% 13-53 40% 24-60 15%
4-27
27%
6-22
14-19 10-15
5
9
12
7
47 W
86-75
Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
57% 31-54 51% 31-61 48% 10-21 32%
6-19
14-23
7-12
9
7
10
9
1
W
90-81
*Auburn
(3)
1
12
48% 31-64 43% 30-70 39% 13-33 32%
7-22
15-18 14-23
9
15
11
8
33 W
81-68
*Miss St.
(2)
26
50
46% 28-61 41% 24-58 39% 14-36 26%
7-27
11-17 13-19
6
10
8
15
86 W
88-67
South Carolina
(3)
109
59
60% 32-53 44% 22-50 50% 14-28 33%
4-12
10-12 19-23
2
5
10
13
39 W
85-63
Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
45% 28-62 39% 19-49 38% 12-32 35%
7-20
17-23 18-27
9
5
6
12
79-65
*LSU
(3)
128
62
44% 31-70 38% 24-63 32%
9-31
10-14
8-12
17
9
5
7
83-88
*Georgia
(2)
46
23
41% 27-66 54% 28-52 34% 11-32 56% 10-18 18-29 22-27
14
4
9
17
16 W
89-70
Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
48% 32-67 39% 23-59 42% 14-33 29%
5-17
11-16 19-28
10
15
10
13
6
35 W
5
L
83 W
35
L
7-22
W
99-94
*Alabama
(3)
4
28
49% 35-72 47% 34-72 30%
36%
9-25
21-29 17-25
14
9
9
6
26 W
90-71
Ole Miss
(2)
31
34
49% 31-63 33% 22-66 37% 14-38 33%
7-21
14-21 20-25
15
12
14
9
23 W
95-81
^^Missouri
(5)
5
75
62% 34-55 44% 30-68 38%
4-16
18-23 17-28
7
14
15
8
6
W
104-82
^^Alabama
(0)
4
28
51% 37-72 42% 28-67 44% 12-27 31% 11-35 18-28 15-23
13
10
7
10
5
W
86-77
^^Tennessee
(0)
19
3
43% 26-61 45% 22-49 33%
11
4
7
9
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-27
29%
9-24
9-27
25%
31%
Non-Conference Games
8-26
25-28 25-32
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
127.0
6th
127.0
5th
121.7
10th
127.2
5th
130.9
3rd
Def-Efficiency
91.0
8th
96.2
24th
93.4
23rd
94.2
14th
95.0
20th
WAB
+3.3
4th
+7.8
2nd
+2.4
7th
+6.5
4th
+6.8
2nd
FG% 50% or better
10-1
3PT% >= 35%
16-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
15-3
21-2
3PT% < 35%
9-2
Make >= 10 3PA
14-2
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
25-1
More FTA than Opp.
14-4
2-3
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
15-2
20-2
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
28-1
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
19-1
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
5-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
25-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
20-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
10-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-3
4-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
12-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
W, 96-41
Pa St.-Wilkes Barre
W, 104-60
Virginia-Lynchburg
152
W, 83-69
James Madison
226
L, 84-73
*William & Mary
Record
24-10 (11-3)
215
W, 67-58
*Hampton
Home
11-1
80
L, 70-63
*Stanford
Road
#16 Norfolk St. Spartans - MEAC
BPI: 171
BT: 195
EM: 161
KPI: 167
NET: 183
POM: 180
SOR: 122
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.3
69.0
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
13-9
Win
80.0
63.7
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.8
81.7
51-100
0-0
0-0
1-2
82
L, 91-73
*Grand Canyon
242
W, 76-55
*UC Davis
Non-Conf.
199.4
Home
86.1
65.2
101-200
2-0
1-0
0-1
333
W, 77-66
*Stony Brook
Conf.
311.3
Road
72.5
71.0
201+
6-1
4-0
7-4
231
L, 80-67
Hofstra
31
L, 94-69
*Baylor
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Northern Kent.
66.3
106.2
109.0
18.3
18.6
32.8
33.8
226th
178th
237th
254th
90th
90th
335th
52.4
75.3
54.5
31.3
39.0
27.7
98th
eFG%
72nd
FT%
57th
2PT%
299th
3PT%
34th
FTA/FGA %
360th
3PA/FGA %
49.7
71.0
48.9
33.9
34.9
42.7
119th
122nd
97th
187th
228th
299th
222
L, 71-62
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -5.3 (114th)
264
W, 71-54
^^Alabama St.
329
W, 76-70
^^Grambling St.
76
W, 77-74
*High Point
5
L, 67-52
*Tennessee
357
W, 81-59
MD Eastern Shore
294
W, 73-64
*Delaware St.
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 92-69
Coppin St.
330
L, 78-74
*Morgan St.
Win
76.1%
57.3%
42.3%
33.7%
31.7%
5.5
7.1
-1.6
4.3
2.0
5.2
W, 105-42
Wash. Adventist
Loss
74.0%
50.7%
60.2%
31.6%
37.3%
5.0
10.1
-2.5
-5.8
-1.6
-3.2
304
W, 92-75
Howard
Home
79.6%
59.5%
44.3%
36.3%
32.8%
6.8
6.7
-0.3
6.2
2.2
6.8
193
!W, 67-65
S. Carolina St.
Road
73.3%
53.0%
48.7%
30.9%
33.9%
4.6
8.7
-2.7
-1.3
0.3
0.6
319
W, 81-78
NC Central
357
W, 75-63
*MD Eastern Shore
140
294
W, 96-84
Delaware St.
125
125
359
W, 79-63
*Coppin St.
330
W, 69-60
Morgan St.
110
110
L, 91-88
*S. Carolina St.
319
!L, 91-87
*NC Central
95
95
80
304
W, 81-69
*Howard
357
W, 77-70
^^MD East Shore
65
W, 58-55
^^Morgan St.
193
W, 66-65
^^S. Carolina St.
L vs. Baylor, trailed by 6 at HT
L vs. Tenn, trailed by 7 at HT
Ings & Moore vs. Baylor: 23, 8-16
FG, vs. Tenn: 37, 16-31 FG
J. Myers 6-24 3PT in MEAC
MEAC R64: '23 L vs. KU 96-68, '22
85-49 Baylor, '21 98-55 Gonzaga
In Paint 50%
96
Fast Break 19%
98
39
2nd Chance 14%
71
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
94
In Paint 37%
80
330
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 15% 21
65
Game #
Home
2nd Chance 17% 6
Game #
Loss
Road
Brian Moore Jr.
Defensive Pct.l
193
Off-Efficiency
42
Off TO 19%
Christian Ings
Jalen Myers
Offensive Pct.l
359
Chris Fields Jr.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.8
4.0
28-53
1-10
12.6
4.2
16-33
6-15
11.4
4.6
15-26
2-6
10.0
4.8
19-31
2-6
W 18.4
3.9 140-231
19-45
11.7
2.4
57-116
26-53
11.2
6.0
66-106
11-37
9.1
4.6
49-97
4-10
L
18.5
3.5
59-115
9-25
12.5
1.7
40-80
8-18
9.5
4.2
25-45
8-22
6.0
3.7
17-38
0-5
H
19.2
2.8
69-108
13-23
12.3
2.1
30-61
15-34
11.4
6.4
30-48
7-22
9.7
4.4
23-48
2-2
R
18.0
4.3 130-238
15-47
11.8
2.2
67-135
19-37
10.2
5.0
61-103
12-37
7.5
4.3
43-87
2-13
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Darden, C. Ings, K. Mading, B. Moore, J. Myers (14 G: 12-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
5
Brian Moore Jr.
6'1"
Jr
--
31.6
18.4
3.8
3.1
1.6
1.3
0.3
57.5%
199-346
40.0%
28-70
81.5%
145-178
0
Christian Ings
6'2"
Sr
2
27.4
11.9
2.2
3.2
2.3
0.8
0.1
49.5%
97-196
47.9%
34-71
73.5%
86-117
9
Jalen Myers
6'8"
Sr
4
25.2
10.6
5.4
1.0
1.3
0.8
0.4
60.3%
91-151
32.2%
19-59
85.9%
79-92
24 Chris Fields Jr.
6'7"
So
11
17.5
8.2
4.3
1.3
1.6
1.0
0.5
48.9%
66-135
26.7%
4-15
62.9%
44-70
7
Kuluel Mading
6'9"
Sr
--
22.3
7.4
4.2
0.6
1.3
0.1
1.3
62.4%
93-149
34.5%
10-29
53.0%
35-66
11 Jaylani Darden
6'5"
Sr
2
24.4
6.3
4.7
2.4
1.5
1.4
0.2
51.7%
60-116
27.8%
15-54
77.6%
38-49
2
Terrance Jones
6'3"
Sr
1
19.1
6.3
2.9
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.1
54.8%
46-84
26.1%
23-88
88.5%
46-52
13 Sin'Cere McMahon
6'1"
Sr
1
17.4
5.5
0.9
1.2
0.8
0.5
--
47.2%
17-36
30.1%
34-113
85.2%
46-54
8
6'10"
Sr
4
17.3
4.4
3.4
0.5
1.1
0.2
0.4
55.6%
55-99
--
--
51.2%
21-41
Tyrel Bladen
#16 Norfolk St. Spartans - MEAC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
P. St.-Wilkes Barre
--
--
--
56% 35-63 31% 17-55 33%
24%
4-17
19-21
3-5
7
4
9
19
W
104-60
Virginia-Lynchburg
(1)
--
--
55% 35-64 37% 19-52 54% 15-28 36%
5-14
19-23 17-25
8
5
10
15
83-69
James Madison
(2)
105
253
60% 27-45 37% 23-62 47%
7-15
31% 13-42 22-29 10-18
0
16
12
14
73-84
*William & Mary
(2)
167
272
45% 27-60 45% 30-67
7%
1-14
35% 16-46 18-23
8-13
9
15
12
14
215 W
7-21
Opp
Turnovers
96-41
L
For
Off. Reb
Result
226
Opp
FT
W
152 W
For
3PT
67-58
*Hampton
(3)
228
190
45% 22-49 30% 20-67 39%
7-18
26%
8-31
16-22 10-14
7
19
9
12
80
L
63-70
*Stanford
(3)
75
88
44% 24-54 34% 19-56 31%
5-16
24%
8-34
10-11
24-37
4
18
12
6
82
L
73-91
*Grand Canyon
(1)
126
60
47% 29-62 61% 33-54 29%
4-14
58% 14-24
11-14
11-14
8
4
11
12
242 W
76-55
*UC Davis
(2)
328
108
47% 27-58 36% 14-39 33%
7-21
30%
7-23
15-18 20-29
9
5
13
23
333 W
77-66
*Stony Brook
(5)
263
351
52% 28-54 36% 20-56 28%
5-18
27%
9-33
16-20 17-20
7
6
8
6
5-15
50% 11-22
231
L
67-80
Hofstra
(7)
322
96
39% 19-49 60% 27-45 33%
24-26 15-20
2
6
10
14
31
L
69-94
*Baylor
(1)
17
58
49% 23-47 55% 36-65 56% 10-18 35%
9-26
13-21 13-19
5
11
20
8
222
L
62-71
*Northern Kent.
(3)
241
243
38% 22-58 47% 23-49 27%
4-15
32%
7-22
14-21 18-24
11
10
12
13
264 W
71-54
^^Alabama St.
(3)
282
246
46% 23-50 31% 18-58 30%
3-10
12%
3-26
22-28 15-22
9
10
13
11
329 W
76-70
^^Grambling St.
(0)
346
228
49% 25-51 45% 25-56 40%
6-15
24%
5-21
20-27 15-17
6
9
6
9
77-74
*High Point
(8)
29
213
54% 28-52 35% 19-55 33%
5-15
42% 15-36 16-23 21-33
52-67
*Tennessee
(1)
19
3
37% 22-59 43% 23-54 15%
2-13
26%
8-31
357 W
81-59
MD Eastern Shore
(3)
348
356
58% 33-57 35% 23-65 40%
6-15
27%
294 W
73-64
*Delaware St.
(1)
272
320
46% 26-56 37% 21-57 29%
4-14
25%
359 W
92-69
Coppin St.
(4)
363
299
62% 34-55 49% 26-53 38%
8-21
(1)
285
350
40% 28-70 52% 29-56 26%
7-27
--
--
76 W
5
L
330
L
5
20
8
10
6-8
13-16
8
9
11
6
6-22
9-16
7-12
8
13
10
12
3-12
17-23 19-21
6
11
13
15
35%
7-20
16-21 10-13
5
6
14
19
47%
8-17
11-21 12-15
22
6
13
13
59% 38-64 20% 12-60 46% 11-24 26%
6-23
18-27 12-21
8
6
15
20
74-78
*Morgan St.
W
105-42
Wash Adventist
304 W
92-75
Howard
(4)
233
337
51% 33-65 49% 28-57 24%
5-21
28%
5-18
21-21 14-18
14
7
12
12
193 W
67-65 #
S. Carolina St.
(6)
242
131
38% 21-55 34% 22-64 13%
2-16
26%
6-23
23-28 15-25
11
16
17
17
319 W
81-78
NC Central
(1)
243
347
56% 28-50 53% 32-61 35%
6-17
40%
6-15
19-24
8-13
10
11
12
8
357 W
75-63
*MD East Shore
(11)
348
356
50% 24-48 45% 22-49 33%
3-9
50% 11-22 24-34
8-16
5
6
8
14
294 W
96-84
Delaware St.
(1)
272
320
54% 37-68 49% 34-69 33%
5-15
44%
7-16
17-23
9-14
8
6
15
14
359 W
79-63
*Coppin St.
(4)
363
299
47% 25-53 38% 18-47 36%
5-14
37%
7-19
24-33 20-26
7
7
10
13
330 W
69-60
Morgan St.
(1)
285
350
39% 28-72 34% 21-61 28%
5-18
33%
4-12
8-11
14-18
22
11
11
9
7
13
14
11
193
L
88-91
*S. Carolina St.
(4)
242
131
59% 34-58 47% 25-53 54%
7-13
52% 11-21 13-20 30-38
319
L
87-91 #
*NC Central
(1)
243
347
58% 34-59 49% 30-61 39%
5-13
32%
14-16 22-34
4
13
8
10
304 W
81-69
*Howard
(2)
233
337
48% 29-60 41% 24-58 20%
2-10
38% 11-29 21-25 10-14
12
11
12
17
357 W
77-70
^^MD East Shore
(1)
348
356
40% 23-57 35% 20-57 25%
3-12
14%
9-13
13-15
10
10
13
11
330 W
58-55
^^Morgan St.
(0)
285
350
42% 20-48 37% 23-62 33%
3-9
37% 10-27 23-34
9-12
10
13
15
15
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
9-28
2-14
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
106.7
187th
106.6
148th
108.6
118th
107.4
167th
104.7
212th
Def-Efficiency
111.7
277th
107.6
193rd
107.5
216th
111.7
273rd
110.1
237th
WAB
-0.7
80th
-4.6
143rd
-3.1
192nd
-2.3
99th
-1.3
96th
FG% 50% or better
13-2
3PT% >= 35%
9-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
10-4
More FTM than Opp.
18-2
19-5
3PT% < 35%
5-5
Make >= 10 3PA
15-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
2-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-6
More FTA than Opp.
18-4
6-4
More OReb than Opp.
1-4
Make < 10 3PA
22-9
9-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
18-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
14-5
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-7
Opp. FG% below 45%
20-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
1-0
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-8
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-4
18-8
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
9-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-1
@ Matteise
262
W, 92-56
Sacred Heart
354
W, 92-53
New Hampshire
349
W, 90-49
Le Moyne
342
W, 81-46
East Texas A&M
Record
23-10 (14-6)
37
!L, 99-97
^^Memphis
Home
14-2
84
L, 73-72
^^Colorado
Road
#8 UConn Huskies - Big East
BPI: 16
BT: 35
EM: 21
KPI: 46
NET: 32
POM: 35
SOR: 31
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
77.4
68.0
1-25
0-1
1-0
0-1
9-8
Win
80.4
64.3
26-50
3-1
0-2
3-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.4
76.6
51-100
3-0
1-2
2-1
63
L, 85-67
^^Dayton
357
W, 99-45
MD Eastern Shore
31
W, 76-72
Baylor
45
W, 76-65
*Texas
15
W, 77-71
^^Gonzaga
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Xavier
63.8
121.6
102.0
17.1
15.5
35.6
27.4
340th
16th
92nd
174th
288th
23rd
62nd
55.5
79.1
57.3
35.4
30.6
42.6
27th
eFG%
10th
FT%
16th
2PT%
87th
3PT%
256th
FTA/FGA %
90th
3PA/FGA %
48.3
73.0
46.0
35.1
40.0
34.2
59th
233rd
16th
257th
332nd
35th
42
!W, 94-89
Non-Conf.
156.4
Home
81.3
63.9
101-200
2-0
0-0
2-0
Conf.
77.3
Road
73.8
71.9
201+
6-0
0-0
0-1
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.2 (36th)
86
W, 78-74
*Butler
116
W, 81-68
*DePaul
110
W, 87-84
Providence
56
L, 68-66
*Villanova
89
W, 68-60
*Georgetown
32
L, 68-63
Creighton
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-6
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
86
!W, 80-78
Butler
42
L, 76-72
*Xavier
Win
80.8%
58.9%
44.2%
36.5%
32.6%
8.6
6.0
3.0
9.8
0.2
0.0
116
W, 72-61
DePaul
Loss
74.0%
53.4%
50.0%
33.3%
40.6%
8.7
7.6
1.9
2.0
-1.8
-6.5
27
W, 77-69
*Marquette
Home
81.4%
59.9%
46.4%
33.7%
30.2%
8.1
5.8
4.1
11.0
0.8
2.9
9
L, 68-62
St. John's
Road
76.2%
54.6%
45.6%
37.1%
40.0%
9.2
7.2
1.3
4.1
-1.5
-6.5
32
W, 70-66
*Creighton
220
!L, 69-68
*Seton Hall
140
56
W, 66-59
Villanova
125
125
9
L, 89-75
*St. John's
89
W, 93-79
Georgetown
110
110
82
In Paint 46%
34
27
W, 72-66
Marquette
95
95
80
80
2nd Chance 17%
25
Off TO 16%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
66
In Paint 42%
220
W, 81-50
Seton Hall
80
56
W, 73-56
^^Villanova
65
^^Creighton
Home
L's....Led Memphis by 4, 2 min left
OT, Colorado by 5 w/ 3:03
McNeeley DNP: vs. Prov - @ Marq
83
2nd Chance 13%
Game #
Loss
Road
Solo Ball
75
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
64
Off TO 17%
Liam McNeeley
Defensive Pct.l
*Providence
Offensive Pct.l
W, 75-63
L, 71-62
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 11%
110
32
Off-Efficiency
Alex Karaban
Tarris Reed Jr.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 13.0
3.6
10-18
11-30
10.8
4.6
14-38
6-24
15.2
6.4
13-29
12-24
9.4
8.8
21-27
0-0
W 14.8
3.5
47-95
64-149 15.3
6.2
50-100
34-92
15.5
5.8
62-110
48-122 10.6
7.7
97-145
0-0
Karaban: 31.6% 3PT BE, 43% LY
L
14.3
3.7
18-40
31-76
12.3
6.0
17-52
9-37
11.9
4.0
24-52
17-60
7.7
6.3
31-44
0-0
Opp finishes w/ eFG% of 50% or
better, UConn is 6-8
H
15.1
3.2
38-70
43-101 14.3
6.2
30-64
20-66
13.6
4.9
39-69
26-74
11.4
8.6
71-104
0-0
R
14.2
3.9
27-65
52-124 14.7
6.1
37-88
23-63
15.0
5.5
47-93
39-108
8.1
6.0
57-85
0-0
Starting Lineup Last G: S. Ball, H. Diarra, S. Johnson, A. Karaban, L. McNeeley (14 G: 10-4)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
Solo Ball
6'3"
So
--
31.8
14.6
3.6
1.6
0.9
0.7
0.4
48.1%
65-135
42.2%
95-225
84.0%
68-81
30 Liam McNeeley
6'7"
Fr
8
32.0
14.5
6.1
2.3
2.0
0.5
0.2
44.1%
67-152
33.3%
43-129
86.1%
99-115
11 Alex Karaban
6'8"
Jr
2
35.8
14.4
5.2
2.9
1.3
0.5
1.6
53.1%
86-162
35.7%
65-182
83.9%
78-93
5
Tarris Reed Jr.
6'10"
Jr
--
20.0
9.7
7.3
1.0
1.2
0.7
1.7
67.7%
128-189
--
--
65.3%
64-98
10 Hassan Diarra
6'2"
Sr
--
27.7
7.9
3.6
5.8
2.2
1.5
0.3
51.2%
65-127
28.9%
22-76
83.3%
65-78
35 Samson Johnson
6'10"
Sr
1
19.2
7.4
3.3
1.0
1.1
0.7
1.5
77.1%
101-131
--
--
75.6%
34-45
3
1
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
Jaylin Stewart
6'7"
So
--
17.9
5.4
2.5
1.0
0.8
0.1
0.3
72.3%
47-65
35.5%
22-62
70.8%
17-24
20 Aidan Mahaney
6'3"
Jr
1
12.5
4.5
0.8
1.3
0.6
0.2
--
40.6%
28-69
35.5%
22-62
76.7%
23-30
23 Jayden Ross
6'7"
So
1
11.7
2.4
1.5
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
64.7%
22-34
22.2%
10-45
66.7%
4-6
#8 UConn Huskies - Big East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
DBG
Off
Def
92-56
Sacred Heart
--
202
286
52% 32-62 34% 19-56 42% 13-31 40%
6-15
15-23 12-18
12
3
12
14
354 W
92-53
New Hampshire
(2)
355
332
51% 32-63 35% 17-48 32%
23%
3-13
19-25 16-20
14
3
10
16
349 W
90-49
Le Moyne
(3)
239
362
56% 35-63 35% 19-54 36% 12-33 29%
6-21
8-11
5-8
11
3
7
11
342 W
81-46
East Texas A&M
(5)
337
273
54% 32-59 25% 15-59 29%
3-17
10-14 13-22
10
11
19
17
7-24
18%
For
Opp
Turnovers
262 W
9-28
Opp
Off. Reb
For Opp For Opp
37
L
97-99 #
^^Memphis
(5)
88
47
49% 32-65 55% 29-53 47% 14-30 55% 12-22 19-24 29-40
14
9
9
12
84
L
72-73
^^Colorado
(0)
129
51
48% 25-52 51% 23-45 39% 12-31 56%
9-16
10-13 18-28
5
7
9
11
63
L
67-85
^^Dayton
(1)
57
129
42% 26-62 50% 25-50 28%
47%
8-17
7-11
27-30
7
7
5
10
357 W
99-45
MD Eastern Shore
(1)
348
356
54% 32-59 30% 15-50 37% 10-27 14%
2-14
25-27 13-25
10
6
9
11
31 W
76-72
Baylor
(3)
17
58
46% 21-46 49% 27-55 32%
8-25
35%
6-17
26-33 12-19
8
11
7
8
45 W
76-65
*Texas
(3)
39
69
52% 28-54 42% 21-50 45%
9-20
47%
8-17
11-16
15-24
11
6
12
9
15 W
77-71
^^Gonzaga
(5)
12
29
46% 27-59 44% 25-57 21%
5-24
38%
6-16
18-21 15-19
7
6
7
10
42 W
94-89 #
Xavier
(3)
41
38
48% 33-69 50% 29-58 33%
8-24
54% 13-24 20-21 18-21
12
3
7
9
86 W
78-74
*Butler
(2)
44
150
45% 27-60 43% 23-54 46% 11-24 33%
5-15
13-16 23-28
6
6
8
7
116 W
81-68
*DePaul
(10)
115
126
48% 30-62 40% 21-53 48% 14-29 25%
3-12
7-10
23-28
12
8
13
9
87-84
Providence
(3)
92
143
56% 27-48 50% 30-60 46%
31%
4-13
27-32 20-23
5
12
7
9
66-68
*Villanova
(2)
23
95
54% 27-50 44% 24-55 37% 10-27 40%
8-20
2-4
12-13
5
7
11
5
68-60
*Georgetown
(2)
157
67
46% 26-56 39% 19-49 35%
9-26
47%
7-15
7-10
15-23
7
9
11
14
63-68
Creighton
(6)
32
42
45% 26-58 48% 23-48 32%
6-19
35%
8-23
5-5
14-15
6
7
6
9
80-78 #
Butler
(2)
44
150
48% 32-67 46% 27-59 35%
7-20
26%
5-19
9-14
19-28
12
10
8
10
72-76
*Xavier
(3)
41
38
47% 26-55 47% 26-55 27%
7-26
41%
7-17
13-17 17-24
9
5
12
9
72-61
DePaul
(3)
115
126
44% 24-55 42% 21-50 32%
7-22
29%
6-21
17-21 13-18
8
4
6
12
77-69
*Marquette
(2)
40
31
60% 25-42 40% 25-63 63% 12-19 32%
7-22
15-19 12-22
6
13
21
8
62-68
St. John's
(5)
71
2
39% 20-51 40% 26-65 28%
8-29
19%
4-21
14-22 12-16
12
7
18
6
70-66
*Creighton
(3)
32
42
39% 26-66 40% 19-47 23%
6-26
29%
7-24
12-15 21-30
11
5
6
10
68-69 #
*Seton Hall
(3)
325
89
37% 22-59 39% 25-64 31%
8-26
40%
6-15
16-21 13-16
13
12
13
9
66-59
Villanova
(2)
23
95
45% 23-51 35% 19-54 21%
4-19
36%
8-22
16-18 13-16
9
5
8
8
8-19
110 W
56
L
89 W
32
L
86 W
42
L
116 W
27 W
9
L
32 W
220
L
56 W
9
L
8-29
6-13
75-89
*St. John's
(4)
71
2
39% 23-59 47% 30-64 26%
6-23
42%
23-29 21-27
17
15
17
11
89 W
93-79
Georgetown
(2)
157
67
56% 33-59 52% 29-56 38%
9-24
41% 11-27 18-20 10-14
12
4
7
9
110 W
75-63
*Providence
(2)
92
143
54% 28-52 40% 20-50 45%
9-20
40%
8-20
10-15 15-23
8
6
11
7
27 W
72-66
Marquette
(3)
40
31
40% 26-65 44% 25-57 35%
7-20
14%
3-22
13-14 13-16
14
7
8
5
220 W
81-50
Seton Hall
(2)
325
89
52% 28-54 35% 18-51 32%
8-25
25%
4-16
17-18 10-17
13
6
16
13
73-56
^^Villanova
(4)
23
95
58% 26-45 32% 15-47 40%
8-20
33%
7-21
13-15 19-25
3
5
9
7
62-71
^^Creighton
(0)
32
42
43% 26-61 52% 26-50 38%
8-21
35%
6-17
2-4
11
4
3
3
56 W
32
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
13-18
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
121.9
17th
122.5
13th
124.0
4th
121.8
16th
121.6
21st
Def-Efficiency
102.5
117th
102.2
88th
102.4
108th
102.2
94th
101.2
76th
WAB
+1.4
30th
+0.8
48th
-0
56th
+2.2
28th
+1.4
31st
FG% 50% or better
12-1
3PT% >= 35%
13-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-8
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
20-4
3PT% < 35%
3-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
3-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
10-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
14-2
More FTA than Opp.
11-3
6-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
2-1
More OReb than Opp.
16-6
Make < 10 3PA
17-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
21-9
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-4
5-7
3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
7-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
9-5
18-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
4-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
14-6
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-2
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
13-3
326
W, 93-60
Lindenwood
246
W, 73-57
N'Western St.
353
W, 85-64
Stetson
342
W, 84-56
East Texas A&M
Record
20-13 (6-12)
110
W, 79-77
^^Providence
Home
12-5
13
W, 82-77
^^Arizona
Road
17
W, 69-64
^^Louisville
99
W, 76-61
Georgia Tech
Non-Conf.
321
W, 94-78
Alcorn St.
Conf.
91
W, 80-65
^^Oklahoma St.
22
W, 87-86
^^Michigan
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Central Ark.
68.4
117.7
100.9
17.3
18.1
26.5
31.7
109th
30th
77th
185th
111th
273rd
275th
54.9
79.4
54.6
37.0
39.6
41.9
38th
eFG%
9th
FT%
52nd
2PT%
34th
3PT%
29th
FTA/FGA %
106th
3PA/FGA %
340
W, 89-66
#9 Oklahoma Sooners - SEC
BPI: 43
BT: 46
EM: 47
KPI: 42
NET: 43
W, 89-67
Prairie View A&M
6
L, 107-79
*Alabama
16
L, 80-78
Texas A&M
35
L, 72-62
*Georgia
45
L, 77-73
Texas
86
W, 82-62
South Carolina
SOR: 36
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.8
74.8
1-25
1-3
3-1
0-5
8-8
Win
83.5
69.4
26-50
2-1
1-0
2-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
71.7
83.3
51-100
2-1
1-0
0-0
176.2
Home
83.2
70.6
101-200
0-0
1-0
0-0
30.1
Road
74.2
79.3
201+
7-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.1 (37th)
361
POM: 38
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-6
Opp. O-Reb%
51.1
72.9
54.9
30.5
35.8
41.9
189th
230th
322nd
20th
253rd
284th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 65-62
*Arkansas
16
L, 75-68
*Texas A&M
Win
0.801
57.7%
51.6%
38.6%
29.3%
9.4
7.4
-2.4
0.8
2.5
6.0
47
W, 97-67
Vanderbilt
Loss
78.2%
49.9%
60.0%
34.3%
32.5%
7.5
7.6
-2.3
-5.3
-1.9
-3.2
1
L, 98-70
*Auburn
Home
80.9%
59.9%
54.1%
37.0%
31.5%
8.9
7.6
-0.4
3.5
2.2
6.1
5
L, 70-52
Tennessee
Road
77.9%
48.9%
55.7%
36.9%
29.4%
8.4
7.3
-4.4
-7.0
-0.7
-1.6
23
L, 82-58
*Missouri
83
L, 82-79
LSU
140
In Paint 41%
26
4
L, 85-63
*Florida
125
125
33
W, 93-87
Miss St.
14
L, 83-82
Kentucky
110
110
L, 87-84
*Ole Miss
23
W, 96-84
Missouri
95
95
80
2nd Chance 13% 20
83
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
W, 76-72
*Texas
35
W, 81-75
^^Georgia
65
^^Kentucky
Home
39
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
Jeremiah Fears
79
Fast Break 11%
65
Game #
48
Off TO 18%
Jalon Moore
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
40
In Paint 44%
45
L, 85-84
81
Fast Break 15%
80
14
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
26
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
39
Duke Miles
Brycen Goodine
J. Fears 23% 3PT in SEC
---Since 2/1: 28%
---Draws 6.2 fouls per 40 minutes
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 22.8
4.2
26-52
7-27
9.8
6.0
9-30
7-14
7.6
3.4
6-11
5-10
7.0
3.2
6-9
7-22
S. Goodwin top 25 off-reb rate
W 19.4
4.2
94-161
24-75
16.9
6.1
84-158
26-68
10.5
2.5
43-71
29-63
7.1
2.2
9-17
30-75
L 13.3
4.1
45-109
12-56
14.7
5.4
47-97
17-42
8.2
2.8
23-42
11-28
9.4
2.8
8-22
29-61
B. Goodine 47% 3PT SEC #2, led
MAAC in 3PT% LY
H
17.7
4.5
87-140
14-62
17.9
6.3
77-126
24-65
10.2
2.5
36-59
23-50
10.0
2.2
11-24
33-72
Since 2/1: 2PT FG defense 57.3%
R
16.3
3.7
52-130
22-69
13.9
5.3
54-129
19-45
8.9
2.7
30-54
17-41
6.4
2.8
6-15
26-64
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Fears, B. Goodine, D. Miles, J. Moore, M. Wague (3 G: 2-1)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
6'4"
Fr
--
30.0
17.0
4.1
4.1
3.5
1.6
0.1
51.5%
139-270
27.5%
36-131
84.5%
175-207
14 Jalon Moore
6'7"
Sr
--
30.3
16.0
5.8
0.6
1.6
0.5
0.5
51.4%
131-255
39.1%
43-110
83.5%
137-164
15 Duke Miles
6'2"
Sr
--
24.9
9.6
2.6
2.1
1.2
1.5
0.1
58.4%
66-113
44.0%
40-91
84.0%
63-75
2
Brycen Goodine
6'4"
Sr
3
22.4
8.1
2.5
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.3
43.6%
17-39
43.4%
59-136
76.2%
32-42
1
Kobe Elvis
6'1"
Sr
--
23.8
7.9
1.8
2.9
1.5
0.7
--
55.8%
48-86
35.3%
48-136
72.4%
21-29
10 Sam Godwin
6'10"
Sr
3
19.1
6.5
5.2
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.6
59.3%
80-135
--
--
56.3%
36-64
35 Glenn Taylor Jr.
6'6"
Sr
--
19.4
4.6
2.6
1.0
0.6
0.7
0.2
52.5%
32-61
29.2%
19-65
75.0%
30-40
7
Dayton Forsythe
6'2"
Fr
3
11.9
4.4
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.4
--
46.9%
15-32
46.7%
21-45
90.5%
38-42
5
Mohamed Wague
6'10"
Sr
1
11.0
3.7
2.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.3
73.3%
44-60
--
--
67.4%
31-46
0
NAME
Jeremiah Fears
2PT
3PT
FT
#9 Oklahoma Sooners - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
326 W
93-60
Lindenwood
--
352
201
52% 34-65 35% 23-65 41% 14-34 17%
4-24
11-17
10-14
11
11
11
12
246 W
73-57
N'Western St.
(6)
251
189
43% 25-58 46% 23-50 29%
6-21
24%
4-17
17-22
7-11
9
6
9
19
353 W
85-64
Stetson
(4)
302
357
49% 34-69 48% 24-50 38%
9-24
38%
9-24
8-10
7-9
14
7
11
23
342 W
84-56
East Texas A&M
(4)
337
273
48% 28-59 38% 20-53 31% 10-32 22%
7-32
18-22
9-17
8
8
10
15
110 W
79-77
^^Providence
(5)
92
143
51% 25-49 43% 24-56 37%
4
8
13
16
13 W
82-77
^^Arizona
(0)
10
30
43% 25-58 43% 28-65 41% 12-29 26%
5-19
20-21 16-19
13
14
15
9
17 W
69-64
^^Louisville
(0)
25
16
48% 21-44 38% 24-63 47%
22%
7-32
19-25
9-16
3
20
10
14
5-19
26-30 12-18
7-19
8-17
Opp
Off. Reb
36% 12-33 22-29 17-23
99 W
76-61
Georgia Tech
(3)
151
66
39% 20-52 42% 22-53 36% 10-28 26%
321 W
94-78
Alcorn St.
(3)
331
267
55% 35-64 53% 30-57 32% 12-37 50% 10-20 12-14
91 W
80-65
^^Oklahoma St.
(6)
140
63
49% 30-61 39% 22-56 35%
28%
22 W
87-86
^^Michigan
(3)
53
15
47% 27-57 47% 30-64 48% 12-25 14%
340 W
89-66
Central Ark.
(3)
326
346
361 W
7
7
7
10
8-12
9
8
12
18
5-18
12-19 16-25
8
8
12
14
4-28
21-24 22-26
9
14
11
10
49% 33-68 38% 24-64 35% 10-29 28%
9-32
13-14
9-11
8
9
9
12
8-23
89-67
Prairie View A&M
(6)
339
353
61% 26-43 48% 29-61 29%
5-17
25%
4-16
32-35
5-7
4
4
9
10
6
L
79-107
*Alabama
(5)
4
28
48% 32-67 50% 38-76 26%
5-19
31%
9-29
10-16 22-30
7
20
11
8
16
L
78-80
Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
54% 25-46 44% 27-61 58% 14-24 39%
9-23
14-17 17-22
8
15
18
7
35
L
62-72
*Georgia
(2)
46
23
38% 24-63 43% 21-49 26%
7-27
18%
3-17
7-9
27-37
8
11
11
13
45
L
73-77
Texas
(3)
39
69
51% 25-49 48% 28-58 31%
5-16
32%
7-22
18-26 14-18
6
4
18
14
86 W
82-62
South Carolina
(2)
110
59
56% 28-50 41% 21-51 47%
8-17
38%
9-24
18-21 11-21
4
9
11
15
39 W
65-62
*Arkansas
(6)
83
22
41% 21-51 37% 20-54 33%
7-21
33%
9-27
16-20 13-16
6
5
13
9
68-75
*Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
48% 21-44 38% 21-56 46% 10-22 17%
4-24
16-22 29-35
2
20
10
13
97-67
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
63% 36-57 39% 24-62 55% 11-20 27%
7-26
14-22 12-14
7
7
16
14
16
L
47 W
1
L
70-98
*Auburn
(2)
1
12
33% 18-54 53% 32-61 30%
7-23
31%
8-26
27-29 26-33
6
7
13
7
5
L
52-70
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
32% 17-53 60% 29-48 26%
6-23
43%
9-21
12-12
3-5
5
5
11
18
23
L
58-82
*Missouri
(3)
5
75
31% 18-58 54% 26-48 23%
5-22
33%
4-12
17-24 26-35
11
2
15
12
83
L
79-82
LSU
(2)
128
62
42% 25-60 48% 27-56 17%
3-18
39% 11-28 26-32 17-30
12
3
9
9
4
L
63-85
*Florida
(2)
3
13
39% 19-49 45% 28-62 35%
7-20
38% 12-32 18-27 17-23
5
9
12
6
33 W
93-87
Miss St.
(3)
26
50
53% 29-55 40% 29-73 42% 11-26 32% 10-31 24-34 19-22
7
19
9
12
14
L
82-83
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
53% 30-57 50% 29-58 40% 10-25 30%
7-23
12-17 18-24
7
7
15
13
26
L
84-87
*Ole Miss
(2)
31
34
53% 27-51 51% 28-55 46% 10-22 33%
8-24
20-22 23-31
3
6
12
9
23 W
96-84
Missouri
(3)
5
75
57% 32-56 47% 28-60 41%
7-17
29%
9-31
25-26 19-24
7
11
9
10
45 W
76-72
*Texas
(2)
39
69
40% 23-58 39% 23-59 33%
8-24
38%
8-21
22-28 18-23
7
11
5
11
81-75
^^Georgia
(3)
46
23
48% 26-54 44% 28-63 48% 12-25 36% 10-28 17-25
9-16
7
14
12
11
84-85
^^Kentucky
(0)
11
49
48% 30-62 52% 31-60 36%
15-18 15-22
4
5
8
10
35 W
14
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
9-25
33%
Non-Conference Games
8-24
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
117.6
40th
118.3
28th
119.1
21st
116.7
46th
117.4
44th
Def-Efficiency
102.5
116th
99.9
62nd
101.4
96th
101.0
79th
100.7
70th
WAB
-0.8
85th
+2.9
21st
+2.9
6th
-1.1
70th
+0.1
55th
FG% 50% or better
8-4
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
15-7
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
5-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-7
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-10
Opp. FG% below 45%
14-3
12-6
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-4
More FTM than Opp.
18-5
8-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-4
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
14-9
More FTA than Opp.
17-4
4-2
More OReb than Opp.
10-9
4-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-11
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
11-9
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
12-7
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-8
3-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
4-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-4
@ Matteise
Colorado State
Maryland
Grand Canyon
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Memphis
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
23
W, 83-75
Missouri
97
W, 80-74
*UNLV
181
W, 94-70
Ohio
60
W, 68-64
*San Francisco
Record
29-5 (16-2)
30
!W, 99-97
^^UConn
Home
13-2
7
W, 71-63
^^Michigan St.
Road
#5 Memphis Tigers - AAC
BPI: 46
BT: 61
EM: 40
KPI: 14
NET: 50
POM: 52
SOR: 14
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
80.1
73.2
1-25
1-0
1-1
1-0
16-3
Win
81.1
71.2
26-50
1-1
1-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
74.8
85.2
51-100
1-1
0-0
2-0
1
L, 90-76
^^Auburn
130
W, 81-71
La. Tech
Non-Conf.
73.9
Home
80.7
71.5
101-200
8-0
3-0
5-2
90
L, 85-72
Ark. St.
Conf.
158.3
Road
79.7
74.6
201+
2-0
0-0
3-0
18
!W, 87-82
*Clemson
103
W, 64-62
*Virginia
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Miss St.
70.6
111.7
98.7
19.2
19.1
35.1
32.3
30th
88th
47th
304th
67th
37th
302nd
33
L, 79-66
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.9 (19th)
26
W, 87-70
Ole Miss
119
W, 90-62
*Florida Atlantic
72
W, 68-64
North Texas
171
W, 74-70
ECU
168
L, 88-81
*Temple
268
W, 77-68
*Charlotte
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 10-1
Opp. O-Reb%
53.6
70.5
52.0
38.0
39.4
33.1
63rd
eFG%
241st
FT%
140th
2PT%
17th
3PT%
30th
FTA/FGA %
322nd
3PA/FGA %
48.5
71.0
48.6
32.2
33.6
40.7
68th
123rd
87th
83rd
198th
246th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 61-53
Wichita St.
102
W, 100-77
UAB
Win
70.0%
53.6%
48.0%
38.5%
32.1%
7.5
7.8
1.5
5.7
-0.5
2.0
147
W, 68-56
*Tulane
Loss
71.5%
42.9%
51.4%
35.2%
33.1%
7.4
8.6
-4.6
-9.4
-1.4
2.0
204
W, 86-83
*Rice
Home
71.0%
54.1%
47.8%
37.3%
34.3%
7.3
8.0
1.1
3.1
0.5
3.9
249
W, 83-71
Tulsa
Road
69.6%
50.4%
49.2%
38.5%
30.7%
7.6
7.9
0.1
3.7
-1.4
0.5
168
W, 90-82
Temple
195
W, 80-65
*South Florida
140
134
!L, 84-79
*Wichita St.
125
125
119
W, 84-65
Florida Atlantic
204
W, 84-72
Rice
110
110
W, 88-81
*UAB
209
W, 75-70
*UTSA
95
95
80
195
W, 84-68
South Florida
134
W, 83-80
^^Wichita St.
65
W, 78-77
^^Tulane
102
W, 84-72
^^UAB
69
In Paint 45%
94
Fast Break 18%
84
2nd Chance 17%
94
Off TO 23%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Home
2nd Chance 16% 21
Game #
Loss
Road
PJ Haggerty
41
Fast Break 13%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
64
In Paint 42%
80
147
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
102
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 22% 4
Dain Dainja
Tyrese Hunter
Offensive Pct.l
134
Colby Rogers
T. Hunter hurt in AAC SF, DNP Final
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
PJ Haggerty draws 6.2 fouls per 40
min, top 60 in country. 10+ FTA 13x
L5 24.2
7.8
32-69
2-11
20.4
8.4
46-69
0-1
10.0
3.8
12-26
6-19
7.8
1.4
8-20
7-28
W 21.6
D. Dainja last 15G: 18.3 PPG
--Nov-Dec: 11 PPG
W vs. Mich St: T. Hunter 23 pts
W vs. Clemson: Hunter 23 (7 3PM)
5.8 174-337
7-17
14.9
7.4 182-284
0-0
13.4
3.8
63-139
14-34
10.9
2.1
46-113
10-29
L
23.2
5.6
29-62
31-82
11.0
6.4
19-42
0-1
14.8
4.2
10-31
59-148
8.0
1.0
2-17
65-176
H
22.9
5.1
90-166
25-47
14.1
7.1
84-127
0-1
12.4
3.7
31-76
26-75
9.9
1.7
21-58
31-85
R
20.9
6.3 113-233
13-52
14.6
7.3 117-199
0-0
14.6
3.9
42-94
47-107 10.8
2.2
27-72
44-120
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Dainja, P. Haggerty, N. Jourdain, B. Okojie, C. Rogers (1 G: 1-0)
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
PJ Haggerty
6'3"
So
--
36.6
21.8
5.8
3.8
3.3
1.8
0.1
50.9%
203-399
42 Dain Dainja
6'9"
Sr
--
26.8
14.4
7.2
1.7
2.8
0.9
1.3
61.7%
201-326
11 Tyrese Hunter
6'0"
Sr
2
34.0
13.7
3.8
3.6
2.3
1.5
0.2
42.9%
73-170
3
Colby Rogers
6'5"
Sr
--
30.1
10.4
2.0
1.4
1.4
0.9
0.3
36.9%
48-130
2
Nick Jourdain
6'8"
Sr
--
26.2
6.4
5.6
1.9
1.1
0.7
1.1
60.7%
32 Moussa Cisse
6'10"
Sr
--
18.2
5.8
6.4
0.5
1.0
0.7
1.6
7
PJ Carter
6'5"
Sr
--
14.2
5.4
1.5
0.4
0.5
0.3
5
Dante Harris
6'0"
Sr
18
11.8
2.4
1.6
1.1
0.8
1.1
6
Baraka Okojie
6'3"
So
4
11.0
1.5
1.2
1.1
0.6
0.4
4
NAME
2PT
3PT
38.4%
FT
38-99
81.9%
221-270
0.0%
0-1
58.5%
86-147
40.1%
73-182
77.4%
72-93
36.6%
75-205
79.1%
34-43
68-112
26.1%
12-46
70.8%
46-65
54.4%
68-125
--
0-0
48.8%
60-123
0.0
42.9%
12-28
39.8%
45-113
92.3%
24-26
0.0
44.4%
12-27
50.0%
3-6
62.5%
5-8
0.1
41.7%
10-24
46.2%
6-13
41.2%
7-17
#5 Memphis Tigers - AAC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
--
5
75
46% 26-57 46% 26-57 40%
8-20
29%
7-24
23-30 16-25
11
8
16
14
97 W
80-74
*UNLV
(4)
162
55
52% 29-56 40% 23-58 35%
6-17
36%
9-25
16-22 19-26
8
9
13
10
181 W
94-70
Ohio
(5)
168
218
56% 32-57 37% 24-65 72% 13-18 39% 12-31 17-22
10-11
4
9
14
16
60 W
68-64
*San Francisco
(5)
94
40
37% 19-52 33% 20-61 37%
23-31 18-27
8
14
15
15
30 W
99-97 #
^^UConn
(3)
16
92
55% 29-53 49% 32-65 55% 12-22 47% 14-30 29-40 19-24
9
14
12
9
7
71-63
^^Michigan St.
(0)
37
5
47% 26-55 42% 22-52 35%
8-23
35%
7-20
11-14
12-19
6
8
8
13
76-90
^^Auburn
(0)
1
12
50% 28-56 57% 34-60 67%
6-9
33%
8-24
14-19 14-17
8
11
11
9
81-71
La. Tech
(6)
146
142
43% 26-60 51% 25-49 35%
6-17
57% 13-23 23-33
8-12
18
6
13
19
72-85
Ark. St.
(3)
112
96
36% 21-59 37% 26-71 32%
7-22
33% 12-36 23-34 21-27
15
14
20
14
18 W
87-82 #
*Clemson
(5)
24
17
52% 31-60 45% 30-67 48% 12-25 32% 10-31 13-17 12-15
10
10
14
13
103 W
64-62
*Virginia
(3)
89
134
38% 21-56 40% 21-53 22%
5-23
32%
14
7
12
8
66-79
Miss St.
(2)
26
50
36% 19-53 44% 31-70 30%
8-27
37% 10-27 20-26
10
18
18
14
7-19
90
L
33
L
7-19
Opp
21%
6-28
6-19
For
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
130 W
For
Off. Reb
Missouri
L
Opp
FT
83-75
1
For
3PT
23 W
W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
17-21 14-18
7-10
For Opp For Opp
26 W
87-70
Ole Miss
(6)
31
34
48% 29-61 36% 24-66 37%
25%
7-28
22-31 15-21
11
9
13
9
119 W
90-62
*Florida Atlantic
(4)
77
185
56% 33-59 32% 22-68 56% 10-18 16%
5-31
14-19 13-21
12
16
19
12
72 W
68-64
North Texas
(2)
118
48
55% 24-44 43% 22-51 39%
5-13
22%
4-18
15-21 16-21
4
11
15
13
171 W
74-70
ECU
(5)
176
216
41% 25-61 39% 24-61 26%
6-23
25%
5-20
18-23 17-23
12
13
16
18
6-21
168
81-88
*Temple
(4)
100
259
45% 27-60 47% 29-62 29%
41%
9-22
21-31 21-34
8
18
9
15
268 W
L
77-68
*Charlotte
(2)
215
294
49% 28-57 39% 22-57 40% 10-25 32%
9-28
11-18 15-20
8
4
14
11
134 W
61-53
Wichita St.
(3)
188
117
44% 23-52 40% 21-52 32%
6-19
19%
3-16
9-15
8-13
11
9
19
21
102 W
100-77
UAB
(2)
33
255
62% 38-61 39% 25-65 53%
9-17
38%
8-21
15-25 19-25
6
9
13
16
147 W
68-56
*Tulane
(3)
131
169
45% 26-58 36% 21-58 39%
9-23
17%
4-24
7-10
10-17
7
11
10
12
204 W
86-83
*Rice
(2)
171
208
55% 33-60 45% 28-62 52% 11-21 40% 10-25
9-15
17-22
11
11
16
11
249 W
83-71
Tulsa
(2)
254
206
57% 34-60 54% 30-56 43%
9-21
42%
6-12
3-6
10
9
8
13
168 W
90-82
Temple
(3)
100
259
56% 32-57 50% 27-54 42%
8-19
50% 11-22 18-25 17-19
9
6
12
16
80-65
*South Florida
(3)
246
157
40% 27-67 38% 23-60 36%
9-25
24%
7-29
17-30 12-15
13
3
12
14
79-84 #
*Wichita St.
(2)
188
117
36% 27-75 40% 30-75 39% 10-26 19%
4-21
15-20 20-26
12
15
9
8
119 W
84-65
Florida Atlantic
(6)
77
185
47% 33-70 43% 26-61 26%
5-19
40%
8-20
13-15
5-18
16
10
9
11
204 W
84-72
Rice
(2)
171
208
49% 32-65 41% 24-58 15%
2-13
24%
5-21
18-23 19-24
14
5
8
12
102 W
88-81
*UAB
(3)
33
255
53% 36-68 46% 30-65 29%
5-17
35%
7-20
11-16 14-20
12
10
13
10
209 W
75-70
*UTSA
(1)
159
233
46% 25-54 39% 24-62 42%
5-12
29%
9-31
20-27 13-18
12
7
21
8
195 W
84-68
South Florida
(2)
246
157
53% 31-59 43% 24-56 40% 10-25 29%
7-24
12-20 13-23
9
7
14
9
134 W
83-80
^^Wichita St.
(6)
188
117
45% 29-64 42% 23-55 20%
3-15
42% 10-24 22-30 24-31
11
7
14
17
147 W
78-77
^^Tulane
(0)
131
169
39% 25-65 45% 27-60 22%
5-23
31%
9-29
23-38 14-21
20
5
13
12
102 W
84-72
^^UAB
(0)
33
255
47% 32-68 35% 24-69 46%
6-13
26%
7-27
14-23 17-23
12
19
12
13
195 W
134
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
8-19
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
110.3
118th
113.8
55th
115.8
38th
110.5
105th
112.4
95th
Def-Efficiency
98.9
67th
98.3
44th
98.9
71st
98.3
41st
102.0
86th
WAB
+0.7
41st
+4.1
14th
+3.1
5th
+1.2
36th
+1.2
33rd
FG% 50% or better
12-1
3PT% >= 35%
20-2
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
12-2
More FTM than Opp.
17-2
21-2
3PT% < 35%
8-3
Make >= 10 3PA
9-3
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
7-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-3
More FTA than Opp.
14-3
7-2
More OReb than Opp.
3-1
Make < 10 3PA
22-4
16-1
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-3
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
14-1
Opp. FG% 45% or better
8-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
21-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
6-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
14-4
14-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
6-1
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
8-2
@ Matteise
273
W, 82-56
North Dakota
254
!W, 87-79
Tenn. St.
308
W, 74-65
Denver
26
L, 84-69
^^Ole Miss
Record
25-9 (16-4)
137
!L, 77-75
UC Riverside
Home
14-2
109
L, 73-67
^^Washington
Road
#12 Colorado St. Rams - MWC
BPI: 53
BT: 38
EM: 39
KPI: 44
NET: 47
POM: 42
SOR: 49
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
75.2
67.1
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
11-7
Win
77.8
62.7
26-50
2-1
1-2
0-3
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
68.0
79.2
51-100
3-0
3-0
3-1
75
!W, 76-72
^^TCU
159
W, 83-54
LMU
84
L, 72-55
*Colorado
34
L, 76-68
^^VCU
159
W, 78-68
Radford
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Nevada
66.0
116.9
98.6
17.4
16.7
26.4
25.3
245th
34th
46th
193rd
200th
278th
16th
55.8
77.5
56.5
36.6
31.8
42.8
23rd
eFG%
28th
FT%
25th
2PT%
47th
3PT%
207th
FTA/FGA %
86th
3PA/FGA %
48.5
68.1
47.7
33.1
33.6
37.9
68th
11th
55th
127th
198th
142nd
95
W, 66-64
Non-Conf.
122.4
Home
80.4
65.0
101-200
4-1
0-1
2-0
Conf.
125.8
Road
70.6
68.9
201+
5-0
0-0
2-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +0.9 (47th)
38
L, 76-68
New Mexico
179
W, 72-50
*San Jose St.
274
W, 91-64
Fresno St.
97
W, 84-62
UNLV
50
L, 75-60
*San Diego St.
200
W, 79-63
*Wyoming
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-1
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
53
W, 75-72
Boise St.
274
W, 69-64
*Fresno St.
Win
76.6%
58.4%
46.4%
38.9%
29.1%
8.9
6.1
-0.8
4.3
0.4
1.4
314
W, 79-58
Air Force
Loss
80.4%
50.9%
51.2%
30.7%
43.9%
7.9
9.6
-0.7
-1.3
-3.7
-1.1
38
L, 87-65
*New Mexico
Home
75.6%
58.5%
45.8%
39.3%
33.5%
9.6
6.6
0.1
4.4
1.4
2.1
50
W, 68-63
San Diego St.
Road
79.2%
54.6%
49.7%
34.0%
32.8%
7.8
7.4
-1.6
1.4
-2.5
-0.4
43
L, 93-85
*Utah St.
200
W, 88-53
Wyoming
140
95
W, 79-71
Nevada
125
125
97
W, 61-53
*UNLV
314
W, 77-55
*Air Force
110
110
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 40% 22
Offensive Pct.l
Off-Efficiency
Fast Break 10% 21
W, 93-66
Utah St.
179
W, 83-56
San Jose St.
95
95
80
53
W, 83-73
*Boise St.
95
W, 67-59
^^Nevada
65
W, 83-72
^^Utah St.
53
W, 69-56
^^Boise St.
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
87
Fast Break 10%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
73
In Paint 41%
80
43
53
Off TO 18%
Home
Road
Nique Clifford
75
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
46
Off TO 18%
Jalen Lake
Defensive Pct.l
43
2nd Chance 12% 12
Kyan Evans
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson
Since 2/15: 10-0, 62.5% eFG #1,
47.4% 3PT #1 among teams min. 5G,
top 10 WAB
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 25.2
8.2
28-45
13-26
9.0
2.2
10-22
7-21
11.0
3.0
5-17
13-22
6.8
3.2
6-11
4-11
R. Mbemba DNP L Ole Miss or UCR
W 20.8 10.0 129-214
54-116
10.8
3.0
51-98
46-130 10.6
2.8
33-68
47-104
8.8
4.0
53-90
26-65
L vs. UW, Nique Clifford fouled out
in 27 minutes, 2nd lowest MP
L
14.1
8.9
33-70
12-50
12.1
2.3
22-43
17-54
9.2
3.2
15-25
15-40
9.7
5.1
19-35
8-22
H
18.9
9.6
75-122
36-76
11.4
3.1
37-63
29-86
10.5
3.0
19-41
31-63
10.4
4.5
38-64
22-48
K. Evans 45% 3PT in MWC
R
19.1
9.8
87-162
30-90
10.9
2.6
36-78
34-98
10.0
2.8
29-52
31-81
7.8
4.1
34-61
12-39
Starting Lineup Last G: N. Clifford, J. Crocker-Johnson, K. Evans, J. Lake, R. Mbemba (24 G: 19-5)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
10 Nique Clifford
6'6"
Sr
--
35.3
19.0
9.7
4.4
2.6
1.2
0.6
57.0%
162-284
39.8%
66-166
77.0%
124-161
15 Jalen Lake
6'4"
Sr
--
31.0
11.2
2.8
2.0
1.2
0.5
0.3
51.8%
73-141
34.2%
63-184
88.0%
44-50
0
Kyan Evans
6'2"
So
--
27.8
10.2
2.9
3.1
2.0
0.8
0.1
51.6%
48-93
43.1%
62-144
86.8%
66-76
8
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson
6'8"
So
--
21.0
9.0
4.3
0.8
1.0
0.2
0.7
57.6%
72-125
39.1%
34-87
75.0%
60-80
21 Rashaan Mbemba
6'7"
So
4
19.3
7.2
3.6
0.9
1.4
0.5
0.4
62.5%
75-120
22.2%
2-9
71.1%
59-83
11 Keshawn Williams
6'3"
Sr
--
14.1
5.3
1.6
0.7
0.7
0.2
0.0
57.1%
52-91
38.0%
19-50
67.9%
19-28
13 Bowen Born
5'11"
Jr
--
14.9
4.9
1.3
1.5
0.7
0.5
--
45.1%
23-51
33.7%
31-92
93.1%
27-29
35 Kyle Jorgensen
6'9"
Fr
2
13.5
4.2
2.0
0.9
0.7
0.3
0.3
51.5%
34-66
29.5%
13-44
84.4%
27-32
25 Ethan Morton
6'6"
Sr
1
23.8
3.8
3.2
2.3
0.7
0.9
0.3
60.5%
46-76
13.3%
2-15
58.7%
27-46
#12 Colorado St. Rams - MWC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
Opp
FT
For
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
273 W
82-56
North Dakota
--
138
321
58% 35-60 35% 17-48 24%
4-17
31%
5-16
8-19
17-23
5
3
10
20
254 W
87-79 #
Tenn. St.
(3)
238
214
43% 27-63 47% 31-66 33%
8-24
32%
7-22
25-35 10-19
9
12
11
19
308 W
For
3PT
74-65
Denver
(3)
293
220
46% 27-59 39% 24-61 25%
7-28
33%
8-24
13-15
9-11
10
13
12
16
26
L
69-84
^^Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
48% 24-50 51% 28-55 35%
9-26
47%
9-19
10-11
19-26
5
6
14
4
137
L
75-77 #
UC Riverside
(5)
107
235
40% 25-62 42% 27-65 30% 10-33 42% 10-24 15-25 13-18
5
10
9
15
109
L
67-73
^^Washington
(5)
116
132
41% 25-61 45% 25-56 30%
7-23
46% 10-22 10-12 13-24
10
6
14
10
76-72 #
^^TCU
(0)
173
27
43% 29-67 34% 21-62 30%
8-27
36%
9-25
10-12 21-30
8
8
16
13
75 W
159 W
83-54
LMU
(4)
214
107
45% 30-67 34% 19-56 39% 14-36 19%
4-21
9-10
12-16
10
5
8
10
84
L
55-72
*Colorado
(2)
129
51
31% 20-64 50% 28-56 26%
7-27
38%
9-24
8-8
7-12
8
8
11
16
34
L
68-76
^^VCU
(6)
42
25
51% 26-51 44% 25-57 33%
5-15
37% 11-30
11-13
15-25
5
12
14
8
159 W
78-68
Radford
(2)
109
240
56% 29-52 41% 24-58 29%
6-21
33%
6-18
14-17 14-19
8
8
9
7
95 W
66-64
*Nevada
(3)
79
120
47% 22-47 41% 23-56 30%
6-20
38%
6-16
16-19 12-20
2
10
8
9
38
68-76
New Mexico
(6)
87
18
45% 27-60 49% 31-63 26%
6-23
47%
7-15
8-8
7-9
12
9
17
12
179 W
L
72-50
*San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
50% 29-58 30% 18-61 27%
7-26
9%
2-23
7-9
12-16
8
5
16
7
274 W
91-64
Fresno St.
(6)
275
216
50% 29-58 38% 19-50 43% 13-30 50%
7-14
20-23 19-33
7
8
12
16
97 W
84-62
UNLV
(3)
162
55
57% 30-53 42% 25-60 50% 12-24 29%
5-17
12-15
7-11
5
9
12
10
50
60-75
*San Diego St.
(2)
122
14
43% 20-47 45% 25-56 32%
9-28
36%
9-25
11-15 16-26
6
9
19
9
200 W
L
79-63
*Wyoming
(3)
230
149
52% 28-54 40% 25-63 33%
8-24
23%
5-22
15-17
8-10
4
7
9
5
53 W
75-72
Boise St.
(3)
52
54
46% 26-56 52% 27-52 46% 11-24 33%
6-18
12-15 12-15
6
3
7
7
274 W
69-64
*Fresno St.
(2)
275
216
47% 25-53 44% 21-48 31%
8-26
35%
8-23
11-16 14-18
7
4
10
9
314 W
79-58
Air Force
(2)
311
239
52% 29-56 35% 20-57 28%
5-18
29%
7-24
16-19 11-13
5
7
5
10
65-87
*New Mexico
(7)
87
18
35% 20-58 54% 30-56 22%
5-23
64%
9-14
20-24 18-24
12
8
11
7
68-63
San Diego St.
(2)
122
14
42% 22-53 38% 22-58 37%
7-19
35%
8-23
17-24 11-21
15
11
11
7
85-93
*Utah St.
(2)
13
148
46% 25-55 59% 32-54 39% 13-33 52% 12-23 22-27 17-30
6
7
11
6
200 W
88-53
Wyoming
(3)
230
149
61% 34-56 38% 20-53 58% 14-24 35%
6-17
6-10
7-11
6
7
8
11
95 W
79-71
Nevada
(2)
79
120
55% 24-44 50% 27-54 52% 11-21 33%
4-12
20-27 13-17
7
3
16
7
97 W
61-53
*UNLV
(3)
162
55
42% 22-52 42% 21-50 26%
5-19
36%
4-11
12-14
7-17
5
5
10
9
314 W
77-55
*Air Force
(2)
311
239
51% 28-55 42% 19-45 40%
8-20
24%
4-17
13-18 13-17
8
6
12
19
43 W
93-66
Utah St.
(3)
13
148
58% 32-55 43% 23-54 67% 14-21 33%
7-21
15-16 13-16
7
9
9
8
179 W
83-56
San Jose St.
(2)
161
168
57% 34-60 40% 21-52 42% 11-26 30%
8-27
4-5
6-9
6
4
11
14
53 W
83-73
*Boise St.
(2)
52
54
57% 27-47 42% 23-55 47%
8-17
24%
7-29
21-22 20-23
3
12
8
9
95 W
67-59
^^Nevada
(5)
79
120
45% 23-51 36% 20-55 32%
6-19
19%
5-26
15-20 14-17
4
6
9
5
43 W
83-72
^^Utah St.
(1)
13
148
60% 25-42 37% 23-63 56% 10-18 21%
7-33
23-37 19-30
6
15
13
10
53 W
69-56
^^Boise St.
-(1)
52
54
43% 22-51 39% 19-49 50% 12-24 30%
8-27
13-19 10-14
5
7
8
13
38
L
50 W
43
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
118.6
30th
112.4
67th
105.5
172nd
119.8
25th
123.4
15th
Def-Efficiency
98.0
55th
99.4
53rd
99.9
85th
99.8
62nd
97.4
39th
WAB
+0.4
53rd
+0.5
51st
-2.4
154th
+2
29th
+2.7
15th
FG% 50% or better
14-1
3PT% >= 35%
13-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-9
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
19-4
3PT% < 35%
6-5
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
2-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
15-5
12-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
20-0
More FTA than Opp.
11-1
0-4
More OReb than Opp.
Make < 10 3PA
15-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
9-3
25-5
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
12-2
3-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
16-5
22-4
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
8-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
12-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-2
@ Matteise
248
W, 79-49
Manhattan
223
W, 86-52
Mt. St. Mary's
296
W, 84-53
Florida A&M
27
L, 78-74
Marquette
Record
25-8 (14-6)
358
W, 108-37
Canisius
Home
17-2
56
W, 76-75
^^Villanova
Road
219
W, 91-67
Bucknell
321
W, 96-58
Alcorn St.
Non-Conf.
45
W, 83-59
Ohio St.
Conf.
18
L, 83-78
*Purdue
297
W, 111-57
St. Francis (PA)
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
^^Syracuse
69.8
117.9
92.1
14.5
20.2
31.0
27.2
54th
28th
6th
23rd
38th
146th
55th
53.8
75.5
52.7
37.2
32.9
35.5
57th
eFG%
67th
FT%
114th
2PT%
28th
3PT%
180th
FTA/FGA %
270th
3PA/FGA %
47.0
73.9
47.6
30.7
25.9
35.8
25th
275th
53rd
25th
26th
81st
120
W, 87-60
#4 Maryland Terrapins - Big 10
BPI: 13
BT: 10
EM: 12
KPI: 17
NET: 10
W, 81-66
MD Eastern Shore
109
L, 75-69
*Washington
29
L, 83-79
*Oregon
28
W, 79-61
UCLA
88
W, 77-71
Minnesota
57
!L, 76-74
*Northwestern
SOR: 18
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
81.7
67.0
1-25
1-1
1-1
2-1
8-6
Win
84.6
64.2
26-50
2-1
0-0
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
72.4
75.9
51-100
6-0
1-0
3-1
202.9
Home
84.3
62.5
101-200
0-0
1-0
0-1
49.2
Road
78.1
73.1
201+
8-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.6 (22nd)
357
POM: 13
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-7
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
55
W, 69-66
Nebraska
25
W, 91-70
*Illinois
Win
75.2%
53.9%
45.9%
38.5%
30.1%
8.8
6.4
1.7
5.6
4.6
4.6
51
W, 79-78
*Indiana
Loss
76.4%
48.9%
52.5%
32.2%
32.5%
6.1
6.9
-2.8
-4.0
-0.5
2.3
11
W, 76-68
Wisconsin
Home
75.4%
55.8%
44.3%
36.9%
29.4%
8.6
6.0
1.4
6.7
3.7
5.3
45
L, 73-70
*Ohio St.
Road
75.8%
48.9%
52.0%
37.6%
32.4%
7.5
7.2
-0.4
-1.4
2.9
2.3
77
W, 90-81
Rutgers
55
W, 83-75
*Nebraska
140
64
W, 101-75
Iowa
125
125
67
W, 88-71
USC
7
L, 58-55
Michigan St.
110
110
*Penn St.
22
W, 71-65
*Michigan
95
95
80
60
2nd Chance 15%
92
Off TO 22%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
W, 74-61
Northwestern
25
W, 88-65
^^Illinois
65
^^Michigan
Home
L vs. UW: Queen + Gillespie 5 pts,
1-13 FG, Maryland 2-11 3PT
S. Miguel 43.6% 3PT in B10, in
Maryland L's: 7-26, 26.9%
54
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Derik Queen
88
Fast Break 10%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
25
In Paint 45%
57
L, 81-80
84
Fast Break 16%
80
22
56
In Paint 44%
69
Off TO 17%
Ja'Kobi Gillespie
Defensive Pct.l
W, 68-64
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
71
Off-Efficiency
Rodney Rice
Julian Reese
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 20.0
8.2
31-62
2-4
13.2
3.4
9-24
12-28
13.8
1.6
9-22
14-37
10.4
8.0
15-41
0-0
W 16.2
9.5 145-251
0-13
15.2
3.0
66-120
65-148 14.2
2.1
62-111
57-154 13.4
9.4 126-221
0-1
Queen 5.9 fouls drawn per 40/min
FTA in L @ Purdue (2), UW (5), NW
(1)
L
16.8
7.5
42-82
4-15
13.0
2.3
21-51
15-46
13.0
2.4
19-39
17-43
12.4
7.8
33-66
0-0
H
15.3
9.4 100-176
0-14
15.9
2.8
51-85
50-116
13.8
2.1
46-74
40-109 12.5
8.7
87-146
0-1
R
17.7
8.4
4-14
12.9
2.8
36-86
30-78
14.1
2.2
35-76
34-88
9.4
72-141
0-0
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
25 Derik Queen
6'10"
Fr
--
30.1
16.3
9.0
1.9
2.3
1.1
1.1
56.2%
187-333
14.3%
4-28
76.8%
152-198
0
Ja'Kobi Gillespie
6'1"
Jr
--
31.4
14.7
2.8
5.0
1.9
1.8
0.1
50.9%
87-171
41.2%
80-194
86.4%
70-81
1
Rodney Rice
6'4"
So
--
30.7
13.9
2.2
2.1
1.0
0.7
0.1
54.0%
81-150
37.6%
74-197
80.0%
76-95
10 Julian Reese
6'9"
Sr
--
28.2
13.1
9.0
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.6
55.4%
159-287
0.0%
0-1
74.2%
115-155
9
Selton Miguel
6'4"
Jr
--
28.3
12.0
1.9
1.9
1.0
1.0
0.2
46.0%
75-163
41.6%
69-166
77.6%
38-49
6
Tafara Gapare
6'9"
Jr
3
10.8
3.6
2.0
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.8
54.2%
26-48
38.2%
13-34
62.1%
18-29
22 Jordan Geronimo
6'6"
Sr
6
9.5
2.6
2.3
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.7
58.8%
30-51
28.6%
2-7
50.0%
3-6
4
Braden Pierce
7'0"
So
28
7.2
2.4
2.4
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.4
62.5%
5-8
0.0%
0-1
50.0%
2-4
5
DeShawn Harris-Smith
6'5"
So
--
15.3
2.3
2.5
1.1
0.7
0.4
--
45.1%
23-51
17.9%
5-28
53.6%
15-28
87-157
14.0
Starting Lineup Last G: J. Gillespie, S. Miguel, D. Queen, J. Reese, R. Rice (29 G: 22-7)
NAME
2PT
3PT
FT
#4 Maryland Terrapins - Big 10
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
--
153
333
44% 31-70 27% 16-59 22%
5-23
19%
5-27
12-17 12-15
16
6
9
11
223 W
86-52
Mt. St. Mary's
(3)
298
199
43% 28-65 41% 17-42 39%
9-23
46%
6-13
21-30 12-20
12
5
6
25
84-53
Florida A&M
(2)
255
344
48% 31-64 39% 20-51 28%
8-29
29%
6-21
14-21
7-17
8
9
6
20
74-78
Marquette
(3)
40
31
53% 29-55 45% 26-58 37%
7-19
35%
8-23
9-14
18-24
7
9
12
6
358 W
108-37
Canisius
(3)
303
360
54% 39-72 26% 14-55 29%
9-31
20%
5-25
21-25
4-6
15
3
9
18
56 W
76-75
^^Villanova
(4)
23
95
50% 28-56 47% 29-62 32%
6-19
31%
9-29
14-19
8-9
14
13
13
8
219 W
91-67
Bucknell
(2)
226
202
50% 33-66 43% 23-53 39% 12-31 38%
9-24
13-20 12-19
6
6
7
19
321 W
96-58
Alcorn St.
(3)
331
267
57% 32-56 31% 21-67 48% 11-23 25%
5-20
21-24
11-17
8
11
12
13
45 W
83-59
Ohio St.
(2)
38
61
47% 29-62 38% 22-58 28%
21%
4-19
18-24
11-18
6
7
10
15
L
7-25
Opp
For
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
18
For
Off. Reb
Manhattan
L
Opp
FT
79-49
27
For
3PT
248 W
296 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For Opp For Opp
78-83
*Purdue
(3)
8
68
46% 30-66 49% 32-66 42% 11-26 35%
9-26
7-9
10-13
10
9
10
8
297 W
111-57
St. Francis (PA)
(8)
294
289
62% 42-68 41% 24-59 58% 15-26 30%
7-23
12-17
2-3
11
2
5
13
120 W
87-60
^^Syracuse
(3)
95
147
48% 35-73 43% 25-58 44% 12-27 50%
8-16
5-6
2-2
13
6
12
20
357 W
81-66
MD Eastern Shore
(6)
348
356
48% 30-63 44% 27-61 28%
5-18
25%
4-16
16-22
8-12
13
12
12
11
109
L
69-75
*Washington
(4)
116
132
45% 26-58 46% 26-57 18%
2-11
21%
5-24
15-22 18-23
5
10
11
12
29
L
79-83
*Oregon
(2)
54
37
48% 28-59 52% 29-56 43%
9-21
43% 12-28 14-19 13-15
9
6
10
8
79-61
UCLA
(4)
27
20
54% 27-50 42% 22-53 37%
7-19
33%
6-18
18-21
11-14
7
14
15
20
77-71
Minnesota
(2)
106
86
47% 26-55 42% 22-53 32%
6-19
47%
8-17
19-24 19-23
6
7
10
15
74-76 #
*Northwestern
(2)
66
41
38% 24-63 48% 29-60 30%
6-20
32%
6-19
20-22 12-19
8
7
14
13
55 W
69-66
Nebraska
(2)
85
56
45% 26-58 47% 27-58 40% 10-25 38%
6-16
7-12
6-11
8
5
11
13
25 W
91-70
*Illinois
(3)
15
44
50% 36-72 38% 23-61 25%
21%
6-28
16-23 18-24
11
8
7
16
51 W
79-78
*Indiana
(2)
74
39
49% 30-61 48% 31-64 50% 12-24 41%
7-17
7-9
9-15
8
12
10
7
76-68
Wisconsin
(2)
14
26
40% 24-60 37% 22-59 50% 12-24 33%
9-27
16-21 15-21
9
9
7
9
70-73
*Ohio St.
(7)
38
61
42% 23-55 46% 27-59 21%
25%
4-16
21-30 15-18
7
7
11
8
77 W
90-81
Rutgers
(2)
48
119
45% 29-65 41% 26-63 37% 10-27 19%
3-16
22-34 26-31
11
14
9
13
55 W
83-75
*Nebraska
(3)
85
56
59% 31-53 43% 25-58 47%
36%
9-25
14-18 16-17
9
8
11
9
64 W
101-75
Iowa
(2)
18
178
58% 39-67 43% 31-72 46% 12-26 30%
8-27
11-13
5-6
9
9
14
11
88-71
USC
(3)
35
104
49% 31-63 46% 29-63 40%
8-20
32%
7-22
18-21
6-8
8
2
9
9
55-58
Michigan St.
(5)
37
5
31% 15-48 34% 22-65 20%
4-20
27%
4-15
21-26 10-12
3
12
11
10
71 W
68-64
*Penn St.
(2)
63
79
39% 25-65 40% 23-57 33%
7-21
32%
6-19
11-13 12-16
8
7
8
16
22 W
71-65
*Michigan
(3)
53
15
38% 24-63 44% 27-62 36%
9-25
35%
7-20
14-19
4-7
9
9
8
16
57 W
74-61
Northwestern
(2)
66
41
42% 22-52 36% 20-55 44%
7-16
21%
4-19
23-28 17-20
12
6
17
11
88-65
^^Illinois
(5)
15
44
42% 30-71 37% 23-63 48% 11-23 22%
6-27
17-24 13-18
9
13
3
17
80-81
^^Michigan
(0)
53
15
44% 27-61 47% 31-66 33%
7-18
19-23 12-13
3
14
6
16
28 W
88 W
57
L
11 W
45
L
67 W
7
L
25 W
22
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
3-12
3-14
7-15
7-21
39%
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
115.1
55th
121.1
14th
116.7
32nd
117.4
40th
117.0
47th
Def-Efficiency
89.8
5th
95.0
16th
92.7
18th
92.5
9th
90.0
1st
WAB
+2.3
15th
+2.3
26th
+0.4
43rd
+3.9
16th
+2.5
16th
FG% 50% or better
9-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
16-3
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
9-5
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
0-1
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
21-2
16-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-2
More FTM than Opp.
18-5
9-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
10-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
17-6
More FTA than Opp.
21-5
0-1
More OReb than Opp.
15-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
13-3
25-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
18-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
8-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
6-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
14-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-0
@ Matteise
344
W, 89-79
CS. Fullerton
166
W, 74-72
Western Ky.
78
L, 87-76
^^Arizona St.
242
L, 75-68
UC Davis
Record
26-7 (13-3)
163
W, 91-73
Norfolk St.
Home
16-1
80
W, 78-71
^^Stanford
Road
220
#13 Grand Canyon Antelopes - WAC
BPI: 87
BT: 83
EM: 65
KPI: 94
NET: 92
POM: 93
SOR: 78
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.2
69.1
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
10-6
Win
81.5
66.7
26-50
0-0
0-1
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.6
78.3
51-100
0-0
1-1
0-0
W, 78-72
Hawaii
W, 100-52
LIFE Pacific
Non-Conf.
181.6
Home
83.3
67.0
101-200
7-0
2-0
1-3
35
L, 73-68
^^Georgia
Conf.
219
Road
74.8
71.4
201+
8-1
2-0
4-1
130
L, 74-66
*La. Tech
362
W, 74-51
Chicago St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Saint Louis
71.4
108.6
99.5
18.4
20.6
32.5
28.6
15th
127th
60th
264th
27th
97th
113th
51.2
73.5
53.2
31.6
43.9
33.6
147th
eFG%
128th
FT%
95th
2PT%
285th
3PT%
7th
FTA/FGA %
310th
3PA/FGA %
47.0
73.1
46.4
32.1
32.2
34.4
25th
242nd
24th
78th
158th
41st
105
W, 73-72
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -2.5 (70th)
323
W, 68-55
^^San Diego
143
W, 112-66
Bryant
300
W, 82-71
Southern Utah
104
L, 72-64
*Utah Valley
228
W, 88-58
Ab. Christian
289
W, 88-64
Tarleton St.
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
300
W, 74-59
*Southern Utah
324
W, 79-66
*Utah Tech
Win
74.9%
54.6%
44.6%
32.9%
30.4%
6.4
6.6
0.8
5.9
2.5
7.4
173
W, 83-74
Seattle
Loss
66.2%
49.5%
50.3%
26.7%
37.5%
5.7
6.4
1.6
-2.1
0.7
-2.7
104
W, 75-57
Utah Valley
Home
72.6%
54.2%
44.9%
33.2%
31.7%
7.2
6.9
2.7
7.3
3.7
7.4
176
L, 85-71
*Cal Baptist
Road
74.1%
52.8%
46.9%
29.4%
31.6%
5.3
6.2
-0.9
0.8
0.4
2.9
289
W, 64-60
*Tarleton St.
237
W, 82-75
*UT Arlington
140
176
W, 66-64
Cal Baptist
125
125
237
W, 85-71
UT Arlington
173
W, 63-60
*Seattle
110
110
Utah Tech
228
!L, 82-81
*Ab. Christian
95
95
80
237
W, 98-75
^^UT Arlington
176
W, 75-66
^^Cal Baptist
65
W, 89-82
80
Off TO 20%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 46% 20
28
Fast Break 14%
Home
45
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
JaKobe Coles
80
2nd Chance 17%
65
Game #
^^Utah Valley
Grant-Foster DNP L @ ACU
---3PT in WAC: 35.3%
---vs. KenPom A+B: 2-24; 17-55 LY
57
Fast Break 13%
80
104
66
In Paint 45%
Defensive Pct.l
W, 90-68
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
324
Off-Efficiency
Off TO 21% 9
Tyon Grant-Foster
Ray Harrison
Duke Brennan
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 19.0
4.0
30-48
4-12
14.8
1.4
24-37
1-12
15.8
4.8
22-33
4-16
10.8
8.0
20-28
0-0
W 14.9
6.0 124-216
7-23
11.7
2.7
67-140
10-32
14.5
5.8
70-138
4-29
11.0
9.5 100-156
0-0
L
14.1
4.6
32-46
20-66
11.4
2.9
16-45
29-85
14.7
6.5
23-53
16-63
9.4
7.8
21-28
0-1
D. Brennan top 100 off & def reb rate
H
14.3
5.6
79-135
13-50
11.8
2.7
40-88
23-61
15.6
6.6
44-94
13-46
10.6
9.6
57-92
0-1
LY top 75 OE
R
15.3
5.7
77-127
14-39
11.4
2.8
43-97
16-56
13.5
5.4
49-97
7-46
10.8
8.9
64-92
0-0
J. Coles 10 PPG LY @ TCU
---Fouled out in ASU + UGA L's
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Brennan, J. Coles, T. Grant-Foster, R. Harrison, C. Moore (11 G: 8-3)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
21 JaKobe Coles
6'8"
Sr
--
28.3
14.8
5.7
2.2
1.6
1.2
0.9
59.5%
156-262
30.3%
7
Tyon Grant-Foster
6'7"
Sr
8
27.2
14.5
6.0
2.0
2.6
1.8
1.6
48.7%
93-191
0
Ray Harrison
6'4"
Sr
--
31.5
11.6
2.7
2.9
1.7
1.1
0.2
44.9%
83-185
24 Duke Brennan
6'10"
Jr
4
26.7
10.7
9.2
0.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
65.8%
2
Makaih Williams
6'1"
So
--
24.4
8.3
2.4
2.5
2.2
1.2
0.2
5
Lok Wur
6'8"
Sr
--
21.7
8.1
3.8
0.8
1.0
1.1
8
FT
27-89
77.0%
94-122
21.7%
20-92
68.4%
117-171
33.3%
39-117
87.8%
101-115
121-184
0.0%
0-1
65.4%
68-104
44.8%
56-125
25.8%
23-89
77.5%
93-120
1.2
52.2%
59-113
36.5%
35-96
74.1%
43-58
Collin Moore
6'4"
Sr
1
25.8
7.8
3.5
2.1
1.4
1.8
0.9
50.5%
46-91
36.3%
33-91
71.3%
57-80
11 Caleb Shaw
6'6"
Jr
2
17.1
6.3
2.5
0.9
1.0
0.5
0.1
51.3%
40-78
43.3%
26-60
67.9%
36-53
23 Sammie Yeanay
6'8"
Fr
28
5.5
2.6
1.4
--
0.6
0.2
0.2
62.5%
5-8
50.0%
1-2
0.0%
0-2
#13 Grand Canyon Antelopes - WAC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
344 W
89-79
CS. Fullerton
--
362
284
48% 28-59 48% 24-50 32% 10-31 41%
7-17
23-32 24-30
16
8
17
17
166 W
74-72
Western Ky.
(4)
232
106
40% 24-60 46% 28-61 24%
4-17
38%
8-21
22-29
9
6
11
14
8-13
For Opp For Opp
78
L
76-87
^^Arizona St.
(4)
67
76
44% 26-59 54% 29-54 41%
7-17
44% 11-25
17-25 18-21
11
5
14
15
242
L
68-75
UC Davis
(5)
328
108
37% 22-59 46% 26-57 16%
4-25
47%
7-15
20-28 16-18
15
10
17
18
163 W
91-73
Norfolk St.
(1)
178
237
61% 33-54 47% 29-62 58% 14-24 29%
4-14
11-14
11-14
4
8
12
11
80 W
78-71
^^Stanford
(3)
75
88
46% 25-54 38% 24-63 42%
5-12
18%
4-22
23-29 19-24
5
10
10
12
220 W
78-72
Hawaii
(6)
248
195
44% 25-57 46% 26-56 25%
4-16
32%
8-25
24-32 12-20
6
7
8
19
100-52
LIFE Pacific
(3)
--
--
50% 34-68 26% 18-69 29%
8-28
24%
8-33
24-35
8-9
14
10
5
17
35
W
L
68-73
^^Georgia
(6)
46
23
37% 23-63 51% 27-53 26%
7-27
33%
5-15
15-17 14-17
12
7
13
18
130
L
66-74
*La. Tech
(1)
146
142
40% 25-62 52% 28-54 22%
6-27
35%
7-20
10-17
11-14
12
7
11
13
362 W
74-51
Chicago St.
(2)
361
343
51% 28-55 37% 20-54 24%
4-17
30%
6-20
14-25
5-10
6
2
18
23
105 W
73-72
Saint Louis
(2)
123
110
42% 27-65 44% 25-57 35%
8-23
38% 12-32
11-19
10-17
10
5
9
7
323 W
68-55
^^San Diego
(5)
290
269
28% 15-54 31% 22-70 17%
2-12
16%
4-25
36-42
7-11
10
12
13
14
143 W
112-66
Bryant
(1)
190
152
41% 34-83 34% 23-67 32%
9-28
14%
4-28
35-44 16-27
19
11
7
22
82-71
Southern Utah
(4)
340
242
40% 27-68 45% 29-65 55% 11-20 33%
6-18
17-22
7-8
17
8
13
14
64-72
*Utah Valley
(4)
160
91
44% 24-55 37% 23-63 29%
5-17
32%
6-19
11-18
20-27
6
16
14
11
228 W
88-58
Ab. Christian
(6)
319
81
54% 30-56 32% 18-57 50%
8-16
43%
6-14
20-30 16-20
10
8
11
19
289 W
88-64
Tarleton St.
(1)
358
98
49% 23-47 41% 22-54 39%
9-23
27%
3-11
33-39 17-22
6
9
12
12
300 W
74-59
*Southern Utah
(4)
340
242
45% 28-62 37% 22-59 37%
7-19
18%
3-17
11-17 12-17
11
9
11
10
324 W
79-66
*Utah Tech
(1)
260
316
58% 28-48 37% 24-65 31%
4-13
26%
6-23
19-22 12-17
5
10
13
12
173 W
83-74
Seattle
(4)
235
80
49% 26-53 40% 26-65 18%
4-22
29%
6-21
27-38 16-19
7
8
11
12
75-57
Utah Valley
(1)
160
91
48% 30-63 33% 21-64 24%
4-17
22%
4-18
11-13 11-15
11
9
12
12
71-85
*Cal Baptist
(6)
204
135
42% 26-62 45% 29-65 29%
7-24
27%
4-15
12-23 23-28
12
14
20
14
289 W
64-60
*Tarleton St.
(4)
358
98
49% 20-41 41% 24-58 17%
2-12
27%
4-15
22-28
9
9
21
12
237 W
82-75
*UT Arlington
(1)
171
301
51% 29-57 49% 27-55 40% 10-25 32%
7-22
14-17 14-21
6
8
11
15
176 W
66-64
Cal Baptist
(6)
204
135
42% 24-57 43% 23-53 35%
9-23
12-19
9-10
10
5
17
15
237 W
85-71
UT Arlington
(4)
171
301
48% 34-71 41% 25-61 37% 10-27 33% 11-33
7-8
10-17
12
12
9
17
173 W
63-60
*Seattle
(1)
235
80
45% 22-49 25% 15-59 20%
3-15
26%
6-23
16-25 24-32
9
10
13
8
324 W
90-68
Utah Tech
(4)
260
316
59% 31-53 38% 23-61 29%
5-17
31%
9-29
23-33 13-17
9
10
11
13
5-11
300 W
104
L
104 W
176
L
228
L
6-17
39%
8-15
81-82 #
*Ab. Christian
(1)
319
81
46% 30-65 45% 29-64 31%
4-13
46%
17-26 19-20
12
10
19
24
237 W
98-75
^^UT Arlington
(3)
171
301
54% 35-65 47% 26-55 24%
5-21
46% 11-24 23-32 12-25
8
9
7
14
176 W
75-66
^^Cal Baptist
(1)
204
135
48% 26-54 40% 23-58 27%
4-15
39%
7-18
19-23 13-16
4
5
11
13
104 W
89-82
^^Utah Valley
(0)
160
91
52% 28-54 47% 27-58 35%
6-17
47%
9-19
27-33 19-28
6
11
8
11
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
109.9
126th
106.6
150th
104.9
177th
107.6
159th
109.2
145th
Def-Efficiency
99.1
72nd
99.9
60th
98.4
63rd
98.8
49th
100.0
62nd
WAB
-0
64th
-2.5
87th
-1.8
130th
-1.1
72nd
-0.3
67th
FG% 50% or better
9-0
3PT% >= 35%
10-1
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-4
18-1
3PT% < 35%
8-6
Make >= 10 3PA
0-3
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-2
More FTM than Opp.
19-2
16-6
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
18-3
More FTA than Opp.
20-4
3-1
More OReb than Opp.
21-7
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
11-5
23-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
16-5
3PA / FGA >= 40%
6-3
3PA / FGA < 35%
18-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
13-5
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-3
@ Matteise
Drake
Texas Tech
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Missouri
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
UNC Wilmington
37
L, 83-75
*Memphis
304
W, 77-62
Howard
302
W, 84-77
Eastern Wash.
364
W, 111-39
Miss Valley St.
Record
22-11 (10-8)
298
W, 91-56
Pacific
Home
18-2
363
W, 112-63
Ark. PB
Road
326
W, 81-61
Lindenwood
125
W, 98-93
California
Non-Conf.
20
W, 76-67
Kansas
Conf.
288
W, 88-61
LIU Brooklyn
131
W, 83-72
J'Ville St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
^^Illinois
68.1
127.0
100.8
15.2
20.0
33.7
32.2
124th
5th
75th
44th
43rd
66th
296th
56.2
72.5
56.7
37.0
46.8
41.5
18th
eFG%
168th
FT%
20th
2PT%
34th
3PT%
2nd
FTA/FGA %
117th
3PA/FGA %
25
L, 80-77
#6 Missouri Tigers - SEC
264
W, 82-65
Alabama St.
1
L, 84-68
*Auburn
83
W, 83-67
LSU
47
W, 75-66
Vanderbilt
4
W, 83-82
*Florida
39
W, 83-65
Arkansas
BPI: 31
BT: 16
EM: 25
KPI: 29
NET: 16
POM: 15
SOR: 29
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
84.5
73.8
1-25
2-2
0-2
1-2
4-9
Win
88.3
68.5
26-50
4-0
1-0
2-5
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
76.7
84.6
51-100
2-0
0-0
0-0
190.2
Home
87.4
68.7
101-200
2-0
0-0
0-0
34.3
Road
80.0
81.8
201+
8-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +3.0 (30th)
Offense
Defense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 2-4
Opp. O-Reb%
50.7
76.2
51.1
33.4
35.3
38.2
170th
350th
186th
154th
238th
155th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
L, 61-53
*Texas
26
W, 83-75
Ole Miss
Win
72.6%
60.1%
48.3%
39.9%
31.3%
9.5
7.1
-0.1
4.6
3.8
7.6
33
W, 88-61
*Miss St.
Loss
72.3%
50.3%
56.8%
31.2%
38.1%
7.5
7.8
0.9
-4.3
2.0
-2.7
5
L, 85-81
*Tennessee
Home
72.6%
59.3%
47.5%
39.7%
32.7%
9.1
7.2
-0.1
3.7
3.9
7.9
16
L, 67-64
Texas A&M
Road
72.3%
52.9%
56.9%
33.2%
34.4%
8.5
7.5
0.7
-1.5
2.2
-1.6
39
W, 82-58
Oklahoma
35
W, 87-74
*Georgia
140
In Paint 40%
25
6
W, 110-98
Alabama
125
125
39
L, 92-85
*Arkansas
86
W, 101-71
South Carolina
110
110
71
*Vanderbilt
39
L, 96-84
*Oklahoma
95
95
80
49
2nd Chance 15%
87
Off TO 21%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
46
In Paint 44%
14
L, 91-83
Kentucky
80
33
W, 85-73
^^Miss St.
65
^^Florida
Home
M. Mitchell DNP SEC Tourney L precautionary reasons on knee
C. Grill DNP vs. Cal - vs. Illinois
A. Robinson top 20 steals rate, 17
games w/ 2+ steals
W vs. Kansas, KU 22 turnovers
2nd Chance 16% 10
Game #
Loss
Road
Mark Mitchell
85
Fast Break 10%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
!L, 97-93
L, 95-81
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 15%
47
4
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
45
58
Off TO 17%
Caleb Grill
Tamar Bates
Anthony Robinson II
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 16.0
3.6
25-45
2-2
13.6
3.0
9-15
12-43
14.4
2.4
21-36
6-19
7.8
2.8
9-17
3-8
W 14.5
4.5
99-167
10-35
15.7
3.6
29-44
61-124 13.6
2.8
67-104
36-79
11.0
3.7
52-91
16-34
L
13.2
4.8
38-76
3-15
10.1
3.5
15-21
16-66
12.9
2.5
34-67
16-51
5.8
2.0
13-31
4-15
H
15.5
4.5
97-163
10-33
14.6
3.8
25-37
48-96
13.1
2.7
60-100
29-70
10.4
3.8
42-75
13-33
R
11.8
4.7
40-80
3-17
12.6
3.3
19-28
29-94
13.8
2.7
41-71
23-60
7.5
2.1
23-47
7-16
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Bates, J. Gray, T. Perkins, T. Pierce, A. Robinson (1 G: 0-1)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
25 Mark Mitchell
6'9"
Jr
1
27.5
14.1
4.6
1.9
1.6
1.0
0.8
56.4%
31 Caleb Grill
6'3"
Sr
5
25.9
13.7
3.6
1.2
1.0
1.6
0.1
2
Tamar Bates
6'5"
Sr
--
25.9
13.4
2.7
1.0
1.3
1.3
0.2
0
Anthony Robinson II
6'3"
So
1
22.9
9.2
3.1
3.5
1.7
2.0
12 Tony Perkins
6'4"
Sr
2
23.5
8.7
2.6
2.6
1.5
11 Trent Pierce
6'10"
So
1
17.2
6.8
3.3
1.0
1
Marques Warrick
2PT
3PT
FT
137-243
26.0%
13-50
66.7%
138-207
67.7%
44-65
40.5%
77-190
85.5%
65-76
59.1%
101-171
40.0%
52-130
94.3%
83-88
0.2
53.3%
65-122
40.8%
20-49
77.6%
104-134
1.1
0.2
55.3%
73-132
29.6%
16-54
75.2%
76-101
0.7
0.7
0.2
68.3%
43-63
33.0%
32-97
58.1%
36-62
6'3"
Sr
1
13.5
6.8
0.9
1.3
0.3
0.4
0.0
52.0%
39-75
46.1%
35-76
80.5%
33-41
35 Jacob Crews
6'8"
Sr
1
12.9
5.7
2.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
48.1%
25-52
33.6%
39-116
73.7%
14-19
33 Josh Gray
7'0"
Sr
1
15.8
3.3
5.3
0.6
0.9
0.3
0.4
54.1%
33-61
33.3%
1-3
55.6%
35-63
#6 Missouri Tigers - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
For
FT
DBG
Off
Def
*Memphis
--
88
47
46% 26-57 46% 26-57 29%
7-24
40%
304 W
77-62
Howard
(3)
233
337
47% 24-51 40% 22-55 14%
3-22
53% 10-19 26-31
302 W
84-77
Eastern Wash.
(2)
258
274
54% 26-48 52% 29-56 56% 10-18 36%
9-25
364 W
111-39
Miss Valley St.
(2)
364
364
57% 37-65 27% 13-48 48% 15-31 10%
1-10
298 W
91-56
Pacific
(7)
278
257
49% 30-61 37% 22-59 47% 14-30 21%
363 W
112-63
Ark. PB
(1)
347
361
52% 37-71 36% 22-62 28%
9-32
32%
326 W
81-61
Lindenwood
(2)
352
201
50% 27-54 36% 21-59 23%
5-22
15%
125 W
98-93
California
(5)
104
162
66% 35-53 50% 31-62 33%
20 W
76-67
Kansas
(4)
43
10
44% 23-52 40% 25-63 31%
288 W
88-61
LIU Brooklyn
(5)
349
131 W
83-72
J'Ville St.
(2)
135
77-80
^^Illinois
(4)
82-65
Alabama St.
68-84
*Auburn
83 W
83-67
47 W
75-66
4
W
39 W
L
For
3PT
75-83
37
Opponent
Opp Eff.
Opp
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
11
14
16
7
6
12
16
22-31 10-12
7
6
12
14
22-35 12-15
14
8
4
22
6-29
17-23
6-8
12
8
6
14
9-28
29-41 10-14
17
9
8
18
3-20
22-29 16-21
14
9
19
12
3-9
42% 10-24 25-38 21-25
4
13
11
14
4-13
35%
8-23
26-31
9-11
5
13
11
22
122
56% 31-55 38% 24-64 50% 14-28 33%
8-24
12-19
5-6
8
12
13
14
145
50% 28-56 45% 27-60 48% 12-25 41%
9-22
15-22
9-13
8
14
3
12
15
44
40% 23-58 44% 25-57 23%
3-13
31%
8-26
28-37 22-23
9
11
8
16
(7)
282
246
50% 29-58 39% 25-65 31%
9-29
40%
8-20
15-18
7-10
8
9
12
12
(4)
1
12
38% 21-55 57% 28-49 30%
7-23
48% 10-21 19-26 18-24
10
6
16
16
LSU
(2)
128
62
46% 25-54 43% 23-54 48% 12-25 40%
8-20
21-27 13-19
9
6
11
13
Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
49% 24-49 40% 21-52 42% 10-24 44%
8-18
17-25 16-20
9
9
14
11
83-82
*Florida
(2)
3
13
44% 27-61 48% 26-54 38% 11-29 36%
9-25
18-29 21-31
13
11
8
13
83-65
Arkansas
(3)
83
22
46% 29-63 44% 28-63 48% 11-23 22%
5-23
14-19
4-8
9
10
9
13
53-61
*Texas
(2)
39
69
31% 15-48 34% 17-50 18%
20%
4-20
19-27 23-30
7
13
10
9
26 W
83-75
Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
45% 22-49 48% 28-58 44% 11-25 30%
6-20
28-39 13-18
11
3
16
13
33 W
88-61
*Miss St.
(6)
26
50
55% 33-60 36% 20-55 47% 15-32 31%
8-26
7-10
13-20
8
10
11
11
L
264 W
1
L
45
L
4-22
16-25 23-30
Turnovers
8
25
8-20
Off. Reb
8-10
5
L
81-85
*Tennessee
(3)
19
3
42% 25-60 50% 27-54 40% 12-30 67% 10-15 19-29 21-30
10
11
3
10
16
L
64-67
Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
40% 21-53 45% 24-53 24%
5-21
26%
5-19
17-20 14-23
10
9
12
13
39 W
82-58
Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
54% 26-48 31% 18-58 33%
4-12
23%
5-22
26-35 17-24
2
11
12
15
35 W
87-74
*Georgia
(2)
46
23
47% 33-70 53% 31-59 31%
9-29
29%
5-17
12-14
7-10
16
10
1
9
6
110-98
Alabama
(3)
4
28
60% 35-58 54% 35-65 39%
9-23
42% 13-31 31-47 15-21
8
9
8
14
85-92
*Arkansas
(2)
83
22
44% 30-68 55% 29-53 33% 12-36 33%
6-18
13-17 28-37
17
7
18
16
101-71
South Carolina
(2)
110
59
64% 40-63 44% 24-55 58% 11-19
9%
2-23
10-12 21-25
7
10
6
15
9
17
13
14
W
39
L
86 W
47
L
93-97 #
*Vanderbilt
(3)
22
84
49% 28-57 50% 34-68 41%
9-22
31%
8-26
28-35 21-24
39
L
84-96
*Oklahoma
(3)
30
77
47% 28-60 57% 32-56 29%
9-31
41%
7-17
19-24 25-26
11
7
10
9
14
L
83-91
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
44% 29-66 48% 27-56 39% 11-28 55% 11-20 14-21 26-33
12
8
9
9
85-73
^^Miss St.
(4)
26
50
49% 27-55 36% 24-66 33%
8-24
20%
6-30
23-28 19-27
7
9
14
8
81-95
^^Florida
(0)
3
13
44% 30-68 62% 34-55 25%
4-16
38%
9-24
17-28 18-23
14
7
8
15
33 W
4
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
124.9
10th
127.2
4th
118.9
22nd
129.6
3rd
132.9
2nd
Def-Efficiency
99.6
74th
102.5
91st
104.0
152nd
99.3
56th
103.3
104th
WAB
+2.7
9th
+0.4
54th
+0.2
48th
+2.5
27th
+1
39th
FG% 50% or better
12-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
19-3
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
3-8
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-6
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
7-9
Opp. FG% below 45%
15-2
13-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-6
More FTM than Opp.
19-4
9-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
12-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
13-5
More FTA than Opp.
19-4
3-3
More OReb than Opp.
10-8
10-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
19-8
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
16-6
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
15-7
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
8-4
More Turnovers than Opp.
4-3
4-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-3
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-2
@ Matteise
W, 93-41
York (NE)
276
W, 66-51
Stephen F. Austin
177
W, 63-61
FGCU
210
W, 80-69
^^Miami (FL)
Record
30-3 (17-3)
119
W, 75-63
^^Florida Atlantic
Home
14-2
47
W, 81-70
^^Vanderbilt
Road
243
W, 61-47
Ga. Southern
225
W, 66-60
*Valparaiso
Non-Conf.
W, 90-35
St. Ambrose
Conf.
68
!W, 73-70
*Kansas St.
343
W, 72-62
Green Bay
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Belmont
58.6
112.6
98.5
18.6
22.1
36.0
25.8
364th
70th
44th
277th
10th
17th
22nd
125
W, 65-46
#11 Drake Bulldogs - MVC
BPI: 73
BT: 58
EM: 49
KPI: 33
NET: 56
L, 74-70
*UIC
158
L, 66-59
Murray St.
81
W, 64-57
*Bradley
260
W, 63-40
Evansville
136
W, 66-62
Illinois St.
208
W, 71-53
*Indiana St.
SOR: 32
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
70.1
58.4
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
16-1
Win
70.8
57.6
26-50
0-0
1-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
62.7
67.0
51-100
0-1
1-0
2-0
166.7
Home
70.7
55.8
101-200
5-1
3-0
4-1
174.5
Road
69.5
60.9
201+
7-0
1-0
4-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +2.3 (35th)
165
POM: 58
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-2
Opp. O-Reb%
53.8
70.7
54.6
35.0
43.0
36.8
57th
eFG%
237th
FT%
52nd
2PT%
107th
3PT%
11th
FTA/FGA %
235th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
51.7
72.1
54.3
31.8
35.8
39.1
227th
183rd
303rd
64th
253rd
189th
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 81-71
Valparaiso
264
!W, 69-62
*Missouri St.
Win
70.7%
55.8%
51.8%
35.8%
29.8%
6.7
5.5
3.4
7.2
3.6
3.9
108
W, 66-52
Northern Iowa
Loss
68.6%
53.1%
61.7%
32.1%
44.9%
5.7
7.3
4.0
4.3
2.7
0.0
197
W, 75-65
*Southern Ill.
Home
67.9%
56.2%
49.4%
36.9%
32.2%
7.4
5.4
3.7
7.5
4.4
4.1
158
W, 55-45
*Murray St.
Road
73.0%
55.0%
56.1%
34.0%
30.0%
5.9
5.9
3.3
6.4
2.7
2.9
208
!W, 85-81
Indiana St.
136
W, 84-77
*Illinois St.
140
81
L, 61-59
Bradley
125
125
165
W, 74-57
UIC
108
!W, 64-58
*Northern Iowa
110
110
74
In Paint 45%
*Evansville
264
!W, 68-60
Missouri St.
95
95
80
197
W, 70-53
^^Southern Ill.
80
125
W, 57-50
^^Belmont
65
^^Bradley
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 47% 14
Home
Game #
Loss
Road
Bennett Stirtz
94
Off TO 23%
65
Game #
59
2nd Chance 15%
Fast Break 9%
97
2nd Chance 11%
99
50
Off TO 18%
Daniel Abreu
Tavion Banks
Defensive Pct.l
W, 65-61
W, 63-48
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 8% 6
260
81
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
225
Mitch Mascari
C. Manyawu led MWC in steals rate,
top 20 nationally in Off-Reb rate -commits 5.8 fouls per 40 minutes.
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 20.0
4.8
21-37
11-30
7.6
4.0
8-15
5-18
11.6
7.4
18-33
1-1
3.8
2.4
1-8
4-24
M. Mascari last 7G 3PT: 6-34 17.6%
W 19.3
B. Stirtz vs. Vandy: 16 P, 11 A, 5 R
3PT Nov-Dec: 14-49, 28.6%
3PT Jan-March: 45-104, 43.3%
4.3 144-262 53-137 10.4
3.4
48-86
47-126 10.3
5.1
99-167
2-20
9.9
2.3
9-31
78-187
L
17.0
5.3
13-23
6-16
10.3
2.3
7-12
2-10
5.3
3.7
6-15
0-2
9.3
1.0
2-2
8-23
H
17.3
4.3
68-125
26-67
12.8
3.6
29-48
35-81
7.9
4.7
39-72
1-10
9.3
1.8
4-11
42-106
R
20.8
4.5
89-160
33-86
8.2
3.1
26-50
14-55
11.6
5.2
66-110
1-12
10.3
2.6
7-22
44-104
Starting Lineup Last G: D. Abreu, I. Jackson, C. Manyawu, M. Mascari, B. Stirtz (32 G: 30-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
14 Bennett Stirtz
6'4"
Jr
--
39.3
19.1
4.4
5.7
2.0
2.2
0.3
55.1%
54 Daniel Abreu
6'6"
Sr
--
33.6
10.4
3.3
1.0
0.9
1.0
0.7
6
Tavion Banks
6'7"
Jr
1
19.9
9.9
4.9
1.0
1.4
0.7
0.3
22 Mitch Mascari
6'5"
Sr
--
38.5
9.8
2.2
1.3
1.1
1.4
3
6'9"
So
--
18.8
7.2
5.4
0.9
1.2
23 Isaia Howard
6'5"
Fr
5
15.4
4.6
2.6
0.9
4
Cam Manyawu
Isaiah Jackson
2PT
3PT
FT
157-285
38.6%
59-153
79.5%
140-176
56.1%
55-98
36.0%
49-136
79.8%
87-109
57.7%
105-182
9.1%
2-22
71.4%
100-140
0.0
33.3%
11-33
41.0%
86-210
86.3%
44-51
1.3
0.7
57.7%
97-168
0.0%
0-1
50.0%
44-88
0.6
1.1
0.3
51.4%
38-74
30.2%
13-43
44.8%
13-29
6'3"
Sr
1
20.5
3.9
3.4
1.9
1.2
1.0
0.1
50.0%
37-74
20.0%
6-30
63.5%
33-52
11 Kael Combs
6'4"
So
4
12.3
3.5
1.8
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.1
59.4%
38-64
14.3%
2-14
76.9%
20-26
24 Nate Ferguson
6'8"
Sr
2
9.4
3.0
1.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
--
66.1%
39-59
--
--
50.0%
15-30
#11 Drake Bulldogs - MVC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
W
93-41
York (NE)
--
--
--
53% 31-59 30% 16-54 43% 13-30 13%
2-16
18-27
7-9
9
5
6
17
276 W
66-51
Stephen F. Austin
(5)
345
146
49% 21-43 39% 19-49 46% 10-22 33%
5-15
14-25
8-15
8
13
15
16
177 W
63-61
FGCU
(5)
150
211
44% 20-45 53% 26-49 29%
6-21
25%
3-12
17-25
6-8
8
4
14
15
210 W
80-69
^^Miami (FL)
(4)
72
324
46% 26-56 41% 18-44 21%
4-19
38%
8-21
24-28 25-29
13
5
6
9
119 W
75-63
^^Florida Atlantic
(0)
77
186
46% 23-50 47% 20-43 40% 10-25 31%
5-16
19-25 18-25
9
4
13
15
47 W
81-70
^^Vanderbilt
(1)
22
84
54% 29-54 44% 24-54 33%
5-15
19%
4-21
18-20 18-24
10
6
17
15
243 W
61-47
Ga. Southern
(5)
237
245
39% 20-51 38% 17-45 29%
6-21
13%
2-15
15-22
11-16
10
6
11
17
225 W
66-60
*Valparaiso
(4)
201
250
55% 23-42 41% 19-46 29%
4-14
37% 10-27 16-26 12-18
6
2
8
10
W
90-35
St. Ambrose
(6)
--
--
63% 36-57 24% 12-51 37%
7-19
25%
6-24
11-16
5-7
8
4
11
19
68 W
73-70 #
*Kansas St.
(4)
108
24
49% 24-49 50% 26-52 56%
9-16
33%
7-21
16-22
11-20
8
6
13
12
343 W
72-62
Green Bay
(3)
287
341
50% 28-56 49% 20-41 16%
3-19
31%
4-13
13-22 18-19
11
3
4
13
125 W
65-46
Belmont
(7)
84
224
47% 24-51 38% 15-40 32%
6-19
39%
5-13
11-15
11-16
7
6
8
16
165
L
70-74
*UIC
(2)
193
207
49% 28-57 57% 27-47 32%
6-19
47%
8-17
8-11
12-17
12
4
9
7
158
L
59-66
Murray St.
(3)
207
140
41% 21-51 55% 22-40 29%
4-14
47%
7-15
13-18 15-20
9
6
7
15
81 W
64-57
*Bradley
(2)
93
128
45% 21-47 44% 20-45 25%
4-16
25%
5-20
18-28 12-15
9
6
10
16
260 W
63-40
Evansville
(2)
318
159
40% 22-55 37% 16-43 27%
6-22
27%
4-15
13-22
4-9
19
5
7
15
136 W
66-62
Illinois St.
(3)
80
232
52% 23-44 50% 24-48 48% 11-23 29%
6-21
9-11
8-11
6
3
8
4
208 W
71-53
*Indiana St.
(2)
133
290
53% 27-51 36% 18-50 39%
7-18
17%
4-23
10-15 13-16
8
9
15
18
225 W
81-71
Valparaiso
(3)
201
250
55% 26-47 49% 23-47 56%
9-16
36%
4-11
20-24 21-25
5
5
8
10
264 W
69-62 #
*Missouri St.
(2)
261
161
43% 22-51 50% 24-48 38%
6-16
40%
8-20
19-24
6-12
8
9
7
15
108 W
66-52
Northern Iowa
(3)
125
117
50% 22-44 45% 21-47 63% 10-16 44%
7-16
12-21
3-7
9
8
11
14
197 W
75-65
*Southern Ill.
(2)
180
203
54% 25-46 51% 23-45 40%
6-15
33%
4-12
19-28 15-19
8
8
11
15
158 W
55-45
*Murray St.
(2)
207
140
51% 22-43 42% 17-41 25%
2-8
20%
3-15
9-11
8-10
7
4
5
6
208 W
85-81 #
Indiana St.
(3)
133
290
51% 28-55 51% 28-55 40%
8-20
27%
6-22
21-30 19-23
8
4
14
11
84-77
*Illinois St.
(3)
80
232
60% 29-48 58% 26-45 50%
9-18
38%
8-21
17-21 17-26
3
4
10
13
59-61
Bradley
(3)
93
128
46% 19-41 54% 23-43 35%
7-20
41%
7-17
14-22
8-12
6
5
11
13
165 W
74-57
UIC
(2)
193
207
48% 26-54 45% 19-42 35%
6-17
35%
8-23
16-22 11-16
13
5
6
15
108 W
64-58 #
*Northern Iowa
(3)
125
117
40% 23-58 37% 19-52 32%
6-19
18%
3-17
12-19 17-22
16
6
13
10
260 W
65-61
*Evansville
(2)
318
159
41% 22-54 47% 22-47 27%
6-22
33%
6-18
15-18 11-14
8
4
8
12
264 W
68-60 #
Missouri St.
(3)
261
161
45% 24-53 41% 20-49 29%
6-21
53% 10-19 14-18 10-14
11
6
9
11
197 W
70-53
^^Southern Ill.
(4)
180
203
44% 25-57 42% 19-45 30%
7-23
28%
5-18
13-22 10-16
13
10
4
14
125 W
57-50
^^Belmont
(0)
84
224
39% 17-44 40% 20-50 21%
4-19
27%
7-26
19-25
3-6
6
9
10
13
81 W
63-48
^^Bradley
(0)
93
128
46% 21-46 42% 17-41 40%
6-15
25%
5-20
15-23
9-13
10
2
6
10
136 W
81
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
110.8
109th
113.5
57th
110.7
92nd
113.9
65th
113.1
84th
Def-Efficiency
100.0
80th
97.3
35th
97.1
49th
100.5
72nd
98.6
50th
WAB
-1
89th
+3.3
17th
+1.6
18th
+0.1
55th
+1.1
37th
FG% 50% or better
13-0
3PT% >= 35%
15-1
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-3
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
More FTM than Opp.
22-1
21-2
3PT% < 35%
9-1
Make >= 10 3PA
15-2
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
22-0
More FTA than Opp.
21-1
2-0
More OReb than Opp.
Opp. FG% 50% or better
7-3
Make < 10 3PA
25-3
23-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
28-3
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
25-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
12-3
3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-0
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
14-0
More Turnovers than Opp.
5-1
14-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
278
W, 94-61
Beth-Cook
246
W, 86-65
N'Western St.
200
W, 96-49
Wyoming
363
W, 98-64
Ark. PB
Record
25-8 (15-5)
79
L, 78-77
^^Saint Joseph's
Home
15-3
120
W, 79-74
^^Syracuse
Road
117
W, 89-64
Northern Col.
116
W, 76-62
DePaul
16
L, 72-67
^^Texas A&M
328
W, 86-50
Oral Roberts
175
W, 101-57
Lamar
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
UCF
65.5
126.0
96.7
14.8
17.4
34.3
28.5
273rd
6th
32nd
30th
155th
51st
108th
55.5
76.4
54.3
37.9
29.7
44.6
27th
eFG%
44th
FT%
63rd
2PT%
19th
3PT%
280th
FTA/FGA %
59th
3PA/FGA %
48.0
69.5
48.2
31.7
33.5
34.1
53rd
38th
69th
61st
196th
29th
69
L, 87-83
74
W, 93-65
*Utah
21
W, 72-67
*BYU
10
!L, 85-84
Iowa St.
68
W, 61-57
*Kansas St.
13
W, 70-54
Arizona
54
W, 81-71
*Cincinnati
#3 Texas Tech Red Raiders - Big 12
BPI: 8
BT: 7
EM: 10
KPI: 21
NET: 7
POM: 7
SOR: 10
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
80.9
67.6
1-25
1-2
0-2
3-1
10-5
Win
83.2
64.1
26-50
2-0
1-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
73.9
78.5
51-100
4-1
0-1
5-1
Non-Conf.
155.8
Home
83.7
64.9
101-200
4-0
1-0
0-0
Conf.
44.7
Road
77.5
70.7
201+
4-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +5.8 (11th)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 7-5
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
91
W, 64-54
Oklahoma St.
75
W, 71-57
TCU
Win
76.5%
56.3%
47.9%
39.8%
28.6%
11.0
5.6
0.9
5.0
2.4
1.7
1
!W, 82-81
*Houston
Loss
76.4%
48.8%
49.0%
31.5%
42.4%
8.0
7.6
2.4
0.1
0.1
-3.0
31
W, 73-59
Baylor
Home
77.2%
55.9%
46.6%
38.4%
31.9%
9.7
6.3
2.4
6.8
2.7
3.0
13
L, 82-73
*Arizona
Road
75.5%
52.2%
50.1%
37.4%
31.4%
10.9
5.9
-0.1
0.3
0.9
-2.4
!W, 111-106 Arizona St.
91
W, 93-55
*Oklahoma St.
140
75
L, 69-66
*TCU
125
125
48
W, 73-51
West Virginia
1
L, 69-61
Houston
110
110
W, 78-73
*Kansas
84
W, 91-75
Colorado
95
95
80
78
W, 85-57
*Arizona St.
31
W, 76-74
^^Baylor
65
L, 86-80
In Paint 39% 12
Fast Break 13%
55
2nd Chance 15%
52
32
Off TO 17%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
^^Arizona
Home
Toppin top 40 off & def reb%,
91
Off TO 15%
Chance McMillian
Christian Anderson
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 22.6
9.2
37-67
6-16
9.8
5.8
8-26
8-20
10.4
3.0
10-14
10-25
14.6
2.6
6-13
16-36
W 18.1
8.6 145-237
L vs. St. Joe's, TT 4-20 3PT, SJ 12-22
DNP's...Toppin DePaul-Lamar, D.
Williams L vs. Houston + B12
Tourney L, C. McMillian L vs.
Houston + B12T L -- McMillan +
Williams: ??
Darrion Williams
44
2nd Chance 15%
Game #
Loss
Road
JT Toppin
71
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
38
In Paint 44%
80
13
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
20
Off-Efficiency
Offensive Pct.l
78
14-37
14.0
5.5
88-173
30-84
13.7
4.0
57-88
54-124
11.2
2.7
27-48
55-130
L
18.0 11.0
49-96
2-13
15.5
4.3
23-59
12-31
16.2
4.5
19-29
15-35
9.5
3.6
13-30
11-32
H
19.7 10.5 110-178
9-26
14.8
5.4
62-135
20-56
15.6
4.0
46-72
40-83
10.8
2.9
24-47
33-80
R
16.4
7-24
13.7
5.1
49-97
22-59
12.6
4.1
30-45
29-76
10.8
3.0
16-31
33-82
7.7
84-155
Starting Lineup Last G: C. Anderson, F. Federiko, E. Hawkins, J. Toppin, K. Walton (2 G: 0-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
15 JT Toppin
6'9"
So
4
26.4
18.1
9.2
1.2
1.6
0.9
1.3
58.3%
194-333
32.0%
5
Darrion Williams
6'6"
Jr
3
29.8
14.3
5.2
3.7
2.0
1.2
0.4
47.8%
111-232
0
Chance McMillian
6'2"
Sr
3
33.0
14.2
4.1
1.9
1.0
0.7
0.1
65.0%
76-117
4
Christian Anderson
6'2"
Fr
2
29.6
10.8
3.0
2.2
1.1
1.3
0.1
51.3%
3
Elijah Hawkins
5'11"
Sr
2
30.9
9.1
3.3
6.4
2.0
1.6
0.2
1
Kevin Overton
6'5"
So
1
22.3
8.2
3.8
1.0
0.9
0.5
24 Kerwin Walton
6'5"
Sr
--
18.0
5.8
1.2
0.5
0.4
35 Devan Cambridge
6'6"
Sr
27
17.6
5.5
3.5
0.3
1.0
33 Federiko Federiko
6'11"
Sr
2
19.8
5.2
4.6
0.8
0.7
FT
16-50
70.1%
89-127
36.5%
42-115
84.2%
80-95
43.4%
69-159
88.2%
67-76
40-78
40.7%
66-162
78.9%
56-71
34.0%
35-103
33.3%
49-147
86.5%
64-74
0.2
53.7%
51-95
32.4%
36-111
78.5%
51-65
0.2
0.2
34.6%
9-26
40.2%
53-132
76.5%
13-17
0.3
--
60.0%
9-15
57.1%
4-7
75.0%
3-4
0.4
0.8
73.6%
67-91
--
--
48.2%
27-56
#3 Texas Tech Red Raiders - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Opp
For
FT
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
Beth-Cook
--
329
223
57% 36-63 42% 25-60 53% 16-30 38%
6-16
6-10
5-10
10
3
11
9
246 W
86-65
N'Western St.
(2)
251
189
51% 29-57 37% 22-59 32%
44%
8-18
22-29 13-22
10
14
9
12
200 W
96-49
Wyoming
(4)
230
149
64% 39-61 34% 18-53 56% 10-18 21%
3-14
8-11
10-18
11
15
13
24
363 W
98-64
Ark. PB
(4)
347
361
60% 37-62 52% 25-48 40% 14-35 38%
6-16
10-12
8-13
8
3
15
22
6-19
Opp
Off. Reb
94-61
L
For
3PT
278 W
79
Opponent
Opp Eff.
77-78
^^Saint Joseph's
(2)
98
83
42% 28-66 46% 23-50 20%
4-20
55% 12-22 17-20 20-29
16
4
11
13
120 W
79-74
^^Syracuse
(0)
95
147
43% 27-63 42% 22-53 33%
8-24
29%
6-21
17-21 24-28
9
8
3
12
117 W
89-64
Northern Col.
(6)
86
187
46% 26-56 39% 24-61 57% 13-23 26%
6-23
24-26 10-16
13
8
15
11
76-62
DePaul
(4)
115
126
50% 29-58 42% 24-57 29%
13-17
3-6
8
5
6
14
67-72
^^Texas A&M
(3)
49
11
45% 23-51 37% 25-67 39% 12-31 38%
9-24
9-12
13-18
6
14
17
9
328 W
86-50
Oral Roberts
(7)
220
339
53% 34-64 34% 18-53 35% 10-29 28%
7-25
8-13
7-12
12
7
10
14
175 W
101-57
Lamar
(4)
269
94
55% 36-65 33% 23-70 45% 13-29 30%
6-20
16-18
5-9
10
16
6
12
83-87
UCF
(9)
51
113
46% 33-72 52% 29-56 19%
44% 10-23 14-18 19-22
11
7
10
14
74 W
93-65
*Utah
(3)
73
71
59% 34-58 42% 22-52 46% 12-26 26%
6-23
13-18 15-26
8
13
4
9
21 W
72-67
*BYU
(2)
7
53
45% 26-58 44% 25-57 36% 10-28 22%
5-23
10-16 12-21
10
11
9
8
116 W
16
L
69
L
10
L
5-17
3-16
31% 11-35
84-85 #
Iowa St.
(3)
20
8
42% 28-66 53% 31-59 45%
9-20
35%
6-17
19-24 17-24
14
8
14
14
68 W
61-57
*Kansas St.
(2)
108
24
50% 26-52 37% 19-52 39%
5-13
30%
9-30
4-7
10-12
6
6
13
9
13 W
70-54
Arizona
(3)
10
30
36% 24-66 31% 18-58 26%
6-23
17%
3-18
16-18 15-19
13
8
8
7
54 W
81-71
*Cincinnati
(2)
90
21
45% 27-60 52% 27-52 39% 12-31 21%
3-14
15-18 14-19
9
2
8
8
91 W
64-54
Oklahoma St.
(4)
140
63
44% 22-50 45% 19-42 31%
23%
3-13
12-21 13-18
6
6
13
20
75 W
71-57
TCU
(2)
173
27
47% 23-49 35% 20-57 32% 10-31 28%
5-18
15-21 12-22
7
10
8
6
1
82-81 #
*Houston
(2)
9
1
43% 23-54 45% 29-64 40% 12-30 36%
5-14
24-34 18-27
9
14
12
11
73-59
Baylor
(2)
17
58
40% 27-68 34% 19-56 38% 11-29 28%
5-18
8-10
16-20
14
10
7
12
73-82
*Arizona
(3)
10
30
37% 26-70 52% 30-58 36% 12-33 31%
4-13
9-10
18-23
11
9
9
14
111-106 # Arizona St.
(3)
67
76
57% 39-68 56% 40-72 39% 10-26 48% 13-27 23-32 13-16
11
5
14
12
93-55
*Oklahoma St.
(2)
140
63
48% 30-62 37% 19-51 43% 16-37 35%
6-17
17-19 11-21
7
6
8
13
66-69
*TCU
(2)
173
27
49% 26-53 41% 24-58 36%
9-25
35%
6-17
5-8
15-22
7
14
13
9
73-51
West Virginia
(3)
103
7
46% 26-56 33% 19-58 41%
9-22
22%
6-27
12-15
7-11
8
8
8
7
61-69
Houston
(1)
9
1
30% 17-57 45% 22-49 20%
6-30
50%
6-12
21-26 19-23
15
5
9
9
20 W
78-73
*Kansas
(4)
43
10
45% 28-62 48% 29-60 35% 15-43 22%
4-18
7-8
11-16
5
11
8
10
84 W
91-75
Colorado
(3)
129
51
48% 31-64 53% 29-55 49% 16-33 21%
3-14
13-16 14-21
8
7
5
10
78 W
85-57
*Arizona St.
(2)
67
76
45% 28-62 37% 19-51 36% 12-33 13%
2-15
17-20 17-23
5
3
2
6
76-74
^^Baylor
(4)
17
58
39% 25-64 45% 27-60 44% 15-34 25%
4-16
11-16 16-19
16
11
7
4
80-86
^^Arizona
(0)
10
30
43% 26-61 51% 31-61 32%
8-16
19-30 16-21
12
12
7
9
W
31 W
13
L
78 W
91 W
75
L
48 W
1
L
31 W
13
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
8-26
9-28
50%
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
122.8
15th
128.7
3rd
122.5
9th
126.2
9th
129.5
6th
Def-Efficiency
94.3
25th
99.5
56th
96.7
44th
96.0
24th
98.3
47th
WAB
+1.6
27th
+4.2
11th
-0.3
67th
+5.7
8th
+3.6
10th
FG% 50% or better
10-0
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
18-3
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-5
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
4-4
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
8-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
17-3
17-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-7
8-4
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
19-1
More FTA than Opp.
9-2
18-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
2-2
More OReb than Opp.
14-5
7-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
23-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
14-4
3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
6-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
10-2
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
16-5
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
2-1
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
14-3
W, 143-91
Mount Olive
243
W, 92-84
Ga. Southern
346
W, 89-85
*USC Upstate
20
L, 84-66
*Kansas
Record
27-7 (14-4)
258
L, 72-59
Colgate
Home
15-3
191
W, 69-60
Sam Houston St.
Road
171
W, 76-61
App. St.
171
W, 67-53
*ECU
Non-Conf.
170
W, 78-69
Marshall
Conf.
304
L, 88-83
*Howard
177
W, 79-66
FGCU
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
UNC Asheville
65.1
112.3
106.8
16.0
17.4
35.4
28.1
291st
76th
184th
95th
155th
28th
88th
178
W, 85-74
#14 UNC Wilmington Seahawks - CAA
BPI: 111
BT: 109
EM: 96
KPI: 88
NET: 102
Spartanburg Meth.
138
!L, 65-61
Towson
236
W, 77-69
Campbell
261
W, 64-55
*Monmouth
231
L, 66-63
*Hofstra
199
W, 80-72
N'Eastern
SOR: 84
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
79.4
69.9
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
12-4
Win
82.5
68.1
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.4
77.0
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-0
202.8
Home
82.8
68.9
101-200
7-1
1-0
3-0
223.3
Road
75.6
71.0
201+
6-2
2-0
6-3
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -3.3 (80th)
W, 99-47
POM: 105
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 5-3
52.2
75.3
53.8
33.0
37.8
36.2
105th
eFG%
73rd
FT%
78th
2PT%
212th
3PT%
47th
FTA/FGA %
251st
3PA/FGA %
50.9
68.1
50.4
34.4
30.3
42.6
178th
12th
154th
214th
110th
298th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
226
W, 85-74
William & Mary
124
W, 85-83
*Charleston
Win
75.6%
56.8%
49.1%
35.1%
30.4%
7.4
7.4
2.7
10.6
0.4
5.5
215
W, 83-62
Hampton
Loss
71.0%
46.9%
52.6%
29.4%
44.7%
6.9
11.4
3.3
-0.3
1.3
1.6
335
W, 83-59
*NC A&T
Home
73.3%
56.6%
50.8%
34.8%
30.3%
8.1
7.3
2.7
9.4
1.4
5.4
333
W, 80-70
Stony Brook
Road
76.7%
52.8%
48.6%
32.7%
36.9%
6.4
9.2
2.9
7.2
-0.3
3.8
229
W, 77-67
*Delaware
187
!W, 81-79
*Drexel
140
124
W, 86-66
Charleston
125
125
206
L, 81-70
Elon
215
L, 83-70
*Hampton
110
110
*William & Mary
236
W, 79-60
*Campbell
95
95
80
65
In Paint 44%
48
Fast Break 12%
90
2nd Chance 18%
48
Off TO 18%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
71
In Paint 41%
229
W, 88-58
Delaware
80
215
W, 79-65
^^Hampton
65
124
W, 68-67
^^Charleston
229
W, 76-72
^^Delaware
Home
L vs. Kansas trailed 43-38 at HT
-Newby for G: 2-of-9 FG, 1 A, 3 TO
S. Moore 2PT FG% in conf: 62%
69
2nd Chance 14%
Game #
Loss
Road
Donovan Newby
25
Fast Break 14%
65
Game #
76
Off TO 17%
Khamari McGriff
Defensive Pct.l
W, 79-70
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
226
Off-Efficiency
Harlan Obioha
Bo Montgomery
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 15.4
2.2
11-22
11-32
12.0
3.8
24-36
0-0
10.8
5.8
20-29
0-0
13.2
4.2
15-27
9-22
W 15.2
2.6
57-118
58-158
11.5
4.3 126-195
1-1
9.8
6.1 100-142
0-2
10.7
4.2
71-133
34-91
H. Obina top 100 OReb% & Blik%
L
12.3
3.1
9-33
17-52
11.9
3.0
32-44
1-2
7.3
5.4
15-33
0-2
3.1
2.3
4-19
4-14
4 of 6 L's allowed 1.2+ PPP
H
15.2
2.2
34-67
40-114
9.9
3.8
70-105
1-1
10.2
6.9
68-95
0-2
10.2
4.1
41-84
25-60
R
13.9
3.3
32-84
35-96
13.4
4.3
88-134
1-2
8.3
4.8
47-80
0-2
7.9
3.6
34-68
13-45
Starting Lineup Last G: B. Montgomery, S. Moore, D. Newby, H. Obioha, J. Williams (15 G: 13-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
1
Donovan Newby
6'1"
Sr
--
32.0
14.6
2.7
3.5
1.5
1.2
0.1
43.7%
66-151
35.7%
75-210
89.1%
21 Khamari McGriff
6'8"
Sr
1
19.4
11.6
4.0
0.7
1.0
0.4
1.2
66.1%
158-239
66.7%
2-3
69.3%
61-88
55 Harlan Obioha
7'0"
Jr
--
20.0
9.3
5.9
0.9
1.5
0.6
1.2
65.7%
115-175
0.0%
0-4
61.6%
85-138
0
Bo Montgomery
6'5"
Sr
--
22.5
9.1
3.8
2.1
1.0
0.8
0.3
49.3%
75-152
36.2%
38-105
79.3%
46-58
2
Elijah Jamison
6'3"
Jr
30
14.9
9.0
1.0
1.8
1.5
0.3
0.3
36.4%
8-22
50.0%
3-6
61.1%
11-18
3
Sean Moore
6'5"
Sr
--
24.0
8.8
6.5
1.3
1.6
1.5
0.4
54.8%
80-146
29.7%
35-118
64.7%
33-51
5
Noah Ross
6'7"
Jr
4
23.8
8.1
5.1
1.5
1.0
0.6
0.1
57.2%
79-138
25.5%
12-47
74.6%
50-67
8
Jake Murphy
6'4"
Jr
32
10.7
7.5
1.5
--
1.0
--
--
75.0%
3-4
50.0%
3-6
--
--
4
Nolan Hodge
6'7"
Jr
1
23.2
7.3
3.8
1.2
1.1
0.5
0.1
49.5%
51-103
38.0%
30-79
79.0%
49-62
139-156
#14 UNC Wilmington Seahawks - CAA
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
W
143-91
Mount Olive
--
--
--
69% 53-77 44% 35-80 54% 15-28 19%
5-27
22-31 16-23
14
11
15
12
243 W
92-84
Ga. Southern
(3)
237
245
42% 21-50 49% 29-59 20%
5-25
36%
8-22
45-59 18-28
12
7
12
14
346 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
For Opp For Opp
89-85
*USC Upstate
(6)
305
329
46% 28-61 46% 30-65 26%
5-19
33%
9-27
28-37 16-23
5
8
10
11
20
L
66-84
*Kansas
(3)
43
10
38% 21-56 55% 34-62 32%
6-19
24%
6-25
18-24 10-16
9
5
12
10
258
L
7-24
39% 11-28
59-72
Colgate
(7)
217
307
34% 21-61 50% 27-54 29%
10-15
7-9
15
9
10
12
191 W
69-60
Sam Houston St.
(1)
102
252
44% 24-54 30% 17-56 37% 10-27 35%
8-23
11-17
18-25
10
16
13
15
171 W
76-61
App. St.
(0)
281
78
41% 25-61 40% 21-53 31%
8-26
12%
2-17
18-22 17-21
13
9
4
9
171 W
67-53
*ECU
(2)
176
215
40% 23-58 36% 19-53 32%
7-22
21%
4-19
14-15
11-15
11
8
13
16
170 W
78-69
Marshall
(3)
192
179
47% 26-55 41% 26-64 24%
4-17
23%
7-30
22-27 10-24
7
14
13
13
5-24
65% 13-20 20-27 21-26
304
83-88
*Howard
(6)
233
337
46% 29-63 53% 27-51 21%
9
5
8
12
177 W
L
79-66
FGCU
(3)
150
211
49% 28-57 47% 25-53 31% 10-32 26%
5-19
13-21
11-19
8
6
4
9
178 W
85-74
UNC Asheville
(2)
156
295
48% 28-58 47% 28-60 38%
26%
7-27
21-28
11-16
12
13
7
10
99-47
Spartanburg Meth.
(6)
--
--
47% 37-79 24% 16-67 34% 12-35 23%
6-26
13-20
9-11
23
3
15
10
61-65 #
Towson
(4)
181
183
34% 20-59 35% 25-71 33%
8-24
29%
8-28
13-20
7-11
9
14
6
5
236 W
77-69
Campbell
(1)
266
167
43% 23-53 48% 25-52 21%
4-19
29%
5-17
27-33 14-20
16
5
11
8
261 W
64-55
*Monmouth
(4)
219
282
46% 24-52 34% 20-59 43%
9-21
33%
8-24
7-12
7-11
13
10
21
14
63-66
*Hofstra
(1)
322
96
38% 22-58 45% 23-51 33% 10-30 43% 12-28
9-18
8-14
11
8
9
12
199 W
80-72
N'Eastern
(4)
218
188
48% 31-65 54% 29-54 40%
8-20
38%
10-14
6-9
14
7
11
16
226 W
85-74
William & Mary
(3)
167
272
50% 28-56 40% 24-60 25%
4-16
39% 13-33 25-32 13-20
12
7
11
13
124 W
85-83
*Charleston
(2)
198
151
53% 31-59 44% 25-57 38%
6-16
37% 11-30 17-19 22-24
7
6
9
11
215 W
83-62
Hampton
(1)
228
190
57% 29-51 42% 25-60 64%
7-11
17%
3-18
18-26
9-18
8
12
10
11
335 W
83-59
*NC A&T
(4)
335
303
52% 33-63 44% 20-46 45%
9-20
30%
7-23
8-8
12-18
11
1
9
12
333 W
80-70
Stony Brook
(1)
263
351
57% 25-44 42% 24-57 52% 11-21 36%
9-25
19-27 13-20
3
7
12
9
229 W
77-67
*Delaware
(4)
121
325
48% 31-65 44% 26-59 44%
8-18
38%
9-24
7-11
6-9
15
7
13
12
187 W
81-79 #
*Drexel
(1)
222
158
48% 31-64 43% 31-72 41%
7-17
42% 10-24 12-25
124 W
86-66
Charleston
(4)
198
151
52% 34-66 42% 24-57 32%
7-22
25%
W
138
L
231
L
8-21
8-21
6-24
7-12
11
9
12
14
11-16 12-21
14
7
8
7
4-4
206
L
70-81
Elon
(1)
182
277
46% 29-63 56% 27-48 32%
8-25
56% 15-27
12-14
13
9
7
13
215
L
70-83
*Hampton
(6)
228
190
44% 26-59 53% 28-53 24%
4-17
65% 15-23 14-16 12-16
14
7
13
10
226 W
79-70
*William & Mary
(1)
167
272
49% 29-59 43% 26-60 28%
5-18
36% 11-31 16-20
7-9
14
7
10
7
236 W
79-60
*Campbell
(2)
266
167
58% 29-50 44% 22-50 43%
6-14
21%
4-19
15-17 12-19
6
5
14
11
229 W
88-58
Delaware
(1)
121
325
54% 35-65 40% 21-52 38%
9-24
26%
6-23
9-12
10-13
8
6
8
16
215 W
79-65
^^Hampton
(7)
228
190
49% 23-47 36% 24-67 33%
4-12
25%
7-28
29-34 10-17
7
12
11
5
124 W
68-67
^^Charleston
(0)
198
151
40% 24-60 36% 20-55 31%
8-26
45% 14-31 12-14 13-20
9
10
8
12
229 W
76-72
^^Delaware
(0)
121
325
43% 24-56 42% 25-59 18%
4-22
32%
10
7
6
5
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
7-22
24-29 15-17
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
113.1
78th
110.7
95th
110.4
96th
112.6
81st
113.3
81st
Def-Efficiency
108.1
210th
105.7
155th
107.3
212th
107.3
183rd
107.0
179th
WAB
-2.1
129th
-1.2
67th
-1.4
108th
-2.1
89th
-0.7
72nd
FG% 50% or better
9-0
3PT% >= 35%
13-0
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-5
More FTM than Opp.
20-5
20-2
3PT% < 35%
7-5
Make >= 10 3PA
14-7
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
18-2
More FTA than Opp.
19-5
5-5
More OReb than Opp.
1-5
Make < 10 3PA
22-6
19-6
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
22-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
15-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
21-1
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
8-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
15-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
11-3
13-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-0
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-0
@ Matteise
Arkansas
St. John's
Omaha
DEFENSE
OFFENSE
Kansas
Bad Offense / Good Defense
@ Matteise
Good Offense / Bad Defense
Shot Charts via CBB Analytics (cbbanalytics.com), Play Type via Synergy Sports
304
W, 87-57
Howard
36
W, 92-89
North Carolina
7
W, 77-69
^^Michigan St.
192
W, 78-57
Oakland
Record
21-12 (11-9)
96
W, 84-66
UNC Wilmington
Home
14-3
3
W, 75-72
^^Duke
Road
118
W, 86-51
Furman
32
L, 76-63
*Creighton
Non-Conf.
23
L, 76-67
*Missouri
Conf.
132
W, 75-60
N.C. State
185
W, 87-53
Brown
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
West Virginia
68.3
116.1
93.1
16.7
15.6
30.4
27.5
115th
43rd
10th
149th
283rd
166th
68th
53.1
71.1
53.4
35.2
24.3
34.3
78th
eFG%
222nd
FT%
89th
2PT%
97th
3PT%
355th
FTA/FGA %
297th
3PA/FGA %
46.2
72.7
46.1
30.9
28.0
40.7
14th
222nd
18th
33rd
53rd
246th
48
L, 62-61
#7 Kansas Jayhawks - Big 12
BPI: 14
BT: 20
EM: 15
KPI: 24
NET: 20
W, 99-48
*UCF
78
W, 74-55
Arizona St.
54
W, 54-40
*Cincinnati
10
L, 74-57
*Iowa St.
68
W, 84-74
Kansas St.
75
W, 74-61
*TCU
SOR: 26
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.2
69.3
1-25
2-2
2-1
0-4
7-9
Win
81.2
64.2
26-50
1-1
0-0
0-2
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
67.5
78.2
51-100
6-0
1-0
4-2
95.4
Home
81.0
66.6
101-200
4-0
0-0
0-0
43.1
Road
71.1
72.1
201+
1-0
0-0
0-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +4.1 (25th)
69
POM: 21
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-2
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
1
!L, 92-86
Houston
69
W, 91-87
UCF
Win
73.2%
56.3%
43.7%
36.2%
27.6%
7.5
6.9
0.6
6.6
0.3
-1.0
31
L, 81-70
*Baylor
Loss
67.6%
47.4%
50.2%
33.3%
36.9%
7.3
9.2
-0.8
-3.1
-3.6
-3.4
10
W, 69-52
Iowa St.
Home
73.0%
58.1%
46.0%
36.1%
29.2%
7.6
7.4
0.4
6.6
-0.4
-0.1
68
L, 81-73
*Kansas St.
Road
68.9%
48.5%
46.1%
34.1%
32.8%
7.2
8.1
-0.3
-0.6
-1.9
-3.8
84
W, 71-59
Colorado
74
L, 74-67
*Utah
140
21
L, 91-57
*BYU
125
125
91
W, 96-64
Oklahoma St.
84
W, 71-64
*Colorado
110
110
8
L, 78-73
Texas Tech
95
95
1
L, 65-59
*Houston
80
93
In Paint 49%
Fast Break 13%
58
2nd Chance 15%
58
Off TO 16% 23
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
81
Arizona
69
!W, 98-94
^^UCF
65
65
Game #
^^Arizona
Home
Road
Hunter Dickinson
W vs. Mich St: Sparty 3-24 3PT
W vs. Duke: Knueppel 0-8 3PT
P
HD FGA last 5G: 18, 8, 23, 13, 13
Game #
Loss
Fast Break 12%
62
2nd Chance 14%
62
69
Off TO 17%
Zeke Mayo
Defensive Pct.l
W, 83-76
Offensive Pct.l
13
L, 88-77
Def-Efficiency
140
In Paint 40%
80
13
Off-Efficiency
KJ Adams
Dajuan Harris Jr.
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 22.0 11.2
38-71
6-14
15.2
4.4
5-13
16-34
14.0
8.0
26-44
0-0
7.8
3.8
11-27
5-8
W 19.2 10.1 162-270
8-27
15.5
5.3
51-106
62-132
9.8
4.9
78-138
0-0
9.2
3.1
59-108
13-45
Mayo last 3G: 15-26 3PT
L
14.8
9.8
61-123
7-27
12.7
3.8
27-56
23-74
8.3
5.2
33-69
0-0
9.3
2.9
29-70
14-37
Storrs 3PT in B12: 19.5%, 8-41
H
17.5
9.9 118-201
3-19
17.6
5.2
44-88
56-123
9.9
5.2
65-104
0-0
9.6
2.9
48-88
13-33
R
17.7 10.2 105-192
12-35
11.1
4.3
34-74
29-83
8.5
4.9
46-103
0-0
8.8
3.1
40-90
14-49
Starting Lineup Last G: K. Adams, H. Dickinson, R. Griffen, D. Harris, Z. Mayo (16 G: 11-5)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
1
Hunter Dickinson
7'2"
Sr
--
30.2
17.6
10.0
2.0
2.1
1.0
1.3
56.7%
5
3PT
FT
223-393
27.8%
15-54
74.4%
90-121
Zeke Mayo
6'4"
Sr
--
31.6
14.5
4.8
3.0
2.5
0.7
0.1
48.1%
78-162
41.3%
85-206
82.5%
66-80
24 KJ Adams
6'7"
Sr
3
30.0
9.2
5.0
2.5
1.0
0.9
0.8
53.6%
111-207
--
--
72.4%
55-76
3
Dajuan Harris Jr.
6'2"
Sr
1
32.5
9.2
3.0
5.7
1.8
1.4
0.4
49.4%
88-178
32.9%
27-82
72.5%
37-51
6
Rylan Griffen
6'6"
Jr
1
20.4
6.4
2.1
1.4
0.9
0.3
0.3
44.6%
29-65
33.6%
40-119
67.5%
27-40
40 Flory Bidunga
6'9"
Fr
--
16.3
5.9
5.4
0.3
0.8
0.6
1.6
71.1%
86-121
--
--
53.3%
24-45
2
AJ Storr
6'7"
Jr
--
15.3
5.8
1.6
0.7
0.9
0.3
0.1
44.3%
51-115
27.6%
21-76
65.9%
27-41
8
David Coit
5'11"
Sr
--
15.6
5.2
1.5
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.0
36.1%
13-36
38.7%
46-119
75.0%
9-12
0
Shakeel Moore
6'1"
Sr
14
14.5
3.8
1.7
1.4
0.9
0.6
0.2
57.1%
20-35
33.3%
7-21
64.7%
11-17
#7 Kansas Jayhawks - Big 12
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
Opponent
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
Off. Reb
Turnovers
DBG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
304 W
87-57
Howard
--
233
337
60% 32-53 38% 22-58 50% 11-22 36%
8-22
12-16
5-12
5
8
14
15
36 W
92-89
North Carolina
(3)
21
65
49% 37-76 43% 27-63 29%
6-21
30%
7-23
12-17 28-31
9
9
4
9
7
W
77-69
^^Michigan St.
(3)
37
5
41% 28-69 35% 24-69 29%
5-17
13%
3-24
16-22 18-21
9
10
10
10
192 W
78-57
Oakland
(3)
177
234
57% 32-56 44% 24-55 40%
8-20
27%
6-22
6-11
3-12
6
9
8
11
96 W
84-66
UNC Wilmington
(2)
76
184
55% 34-62 38% 21-56 24%
6-25
32%
6-19
10-16 18-24
5
9
10
12
3
W
75-72
^^Duke
(6)
2
4
49% 28-57 50% 24-48 47%
8-17
42% 11-26
11-12
13-18
7
3
15
16
118 W
86-51
Furman
(3)
117
194
61% 39-64 30% 17-57 24%
4-17
24%
4-6
8-13
8
8
7
10
9-38
32
L
63-76
*Creighton
(3)
32
42
36% 25-70 47% 25-53 35%
8-23
41% 12-29
5-8
14-17
9
6
4
14
23
L
67-76
*Missouri
(3)
5
75
40% 25-63 44% 23-52 35%
8-23
31%
4-13
9-11
26-31
13
5
22
11
132 W
75-60
N.C. State
(5)
145
102
57% 30-53 37% 21-57 42% 10-24 40%
6-15
5-7
12-18
8
9
12
8
185 W
87-53
Brown
(7)
244
160
50% 34-68 27% 20-75 36%
8-22
24%
8-33
11-15
5-8
9
14
6
8
61-62
West Virginia
(8)
103
7
39% 19-49 43% 26-60 25%
4-16
30%
6-20
19-21
4-6
7
7
8
6
69 W
99-48
*UCF
(4)
51
113
51% 42-83 21% 14-68 39%
9-23
23%
7-30
6-10
13-18
17
5
10
13
78 W
74-55
Arizona St.
(2)
67
76
44% 27-62 36% 19-53 30%
7-23
25%
6-24
13-13
11-12
11
7
12
17
54-40
*Cincinnati
(2)
90
21
35% 24-68 31% 18-59 10%
2-21
14%
3-22
4-5
1-2
14
11
7
10
57-74
*Iowa St.
(3)
20
8
41% 24-59 41% 24-59 31%
5-16
62%
8-13
4-11
18-25
8
9
17
13
68 W
84-74
Kansas St.
(2)
108
24
55% 31-56 46% 27-59 38%
6-16
23%
6-26
16-21 14-19
11
7
9
3
75 W
74-61
*TCU
(3)
173
27
56% 30-54 38% 25-66 35%
6-17
21%
5-24
8-10
6-12
8
14
17
10
86-92 #
Houston
(2)
9
1
46% 30-66 48% 35-73 36%
9-25
32%
8-25
17-30 14-25
10
11
10
5
91-87
UCF
(2)
51
113
44% 28-64 39% 29-75 48% 10-21 39% 14-36 25-29 15-17
14
12
12
7
70-81
*Baylor
(3)
17
58
46% 26-57 43% 25-58 27%
6-22
30%
6-20
12-19 25-28
5
10
14
15
69-52
Iowa St.
(1)
20
8
47% 26-55 31% 19-62 50%
9-18
14%
3-21
8-11
11-20
9
14
12
5
73-81
*Kansas St.
(4)
108
24
50% 30-60 50% 33-66 32%
6-19
41% 11-27
7-12
4-6
5
4
14
9
71-59
Colorado
(2)
129
51
47% 27-58 39% 22-57 29%
6-21
17%
11-16 11-16
8
7
7
8
48
L
54 W
10
L
1
L
69 W
31
L
10 W
68
L
84 W
4-23
74
L
67-74
*Utah
(3)
73
71
40% 22-55 37% 23-63 38%
9-24
32% 11-34 14-20 17-28
21
L
57-91
*BYU
(2)
7
53
37% 23-63 52% 34-66 28%
9-32
39% 14-36
91 W
96-64
Oklahoma St.
(3)
140
63
52% 38-73 37% 22-60 47% 14-30 32%
84 W
71-64
*Colorado
(1)
129
51
49% 26-53 38% 26-68 23%
3-13
21%
6
32
48% 29-60 45% 28-62 22%
4
14
10
7
2-5
9-12
6
9
15
10
8-25
6-8
12-19
15
8
18
17
5-24
16-28
7-10
4
11
8
14
4-18
35% 15-43 11-16
7-8
11
5
10
8
8
L
73-78
Texas Tech
(4)
1
L
59-65
*Houston
(1)
9
1
45% 19-42 35% 24-68 42%
5-12
35%
7-20
16-19 10-14
4
15
20
6
83-76
Arizona
(4)
10
30
49% 33-67 47% 26-55 38%
8-21
38%
6-16
9-14
18-21
11
6
4
8
98-94 #
^^UCF
(3)
51
113
45% 34-76 46% 31-68 44% 12-27 42% 14-33 18-23 18-24
14
8
16
14
77-88
^^Arizona
(0)
10
30
42% 27-64 53% 31-58 45% 14-31 44%
10
7
13
10
13 W
69 W
13
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
8-18
9-13
18-21
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
123.1
12th
109.0
117th
115.8
37th
115.7
54th
116.0
58th
Def-Efficiency
94.2
23rd
90.8
5th
90.3
6th
92.4
8th
95.0
19th
WAB
+2.3
16th
+1.8
31st
+2.1
11th
+1.9
31st
+0.5
46th
FG% 50% or better
10-1
3PT% >= 35%
13-4
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
6-6
16-5
3PT% < 35%
5-7
Make >= 10 3PA
1-3
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-6
Opp. FG% below 45%
17-6
8-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-6
More FTA than Opp.
8-5
5-1
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
3-5
More OReb than Opp.
10-5
16-11
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
18-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
4-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
11-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-10
3PA / FGA < 35%
13-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
5-7
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-4
@ Matteise
More FTM than Opp.
9-5
98
W, 76-60
Lipscomb
31
L, 72-67
^^Baylor
101
W, 65-49
Troy
298
W, 91-72
Pacific
Record
20-13 (8-10)
244
W, 79-67
Little Rock
Home
13-4
357
W, 109-35
MD Eastern Shore
Road
#10 Arkansas Razorbacks - SEC
BPI: 42
BT: 43
EM: 38
KPI: 43
NET: 40
POM: 40
SOR: 45
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
76.6
71.2
1-25
1-2
1-1
1-4
7-9
Win
83.4
68.2
26-50
3-2
0-2
2-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
66.2
75.7
51-100
2-0
1-0
0-2
25
L, 90-77
^^Illinois
210
W, 76-73
*Miami (FL)
209
W, 75-60
UTSA
22
W, 89-87
^^Michigan
340
W, 82-57
^^Central Ark.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
NC A&T
69.2
111.9
95.5
16.5
17.5
27.6
28.3
67th
83rd
22nd
132nd
152nd
246th
96th
52.7
73.4
54.4
33.3
35.5
36.7
88th
eFG%
132nd
FT%
61st
2PT%
199th
3PT%
107th
FTA/FGA %
240th
3PA/FGA %
48.3
72.5
48.5
31.9
29.4
39.5
59th
209th
81st
70th
85th
203rd
335
W, 95-67
192
W, 92-62
Oakland
5
L, 76-52
*Tennessee
26
L, 73-66
Ole Miss
4
L, 71-63
Florida
83
L, 78-74
*LSU
23
L, 83-65
*Missouri
Non-Conf.
168.4
Home
80.2
67.5
101-200
2-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
33.7
Road
72.8
75.1
201+
5-0
1-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +1.2 (43rd)
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-5
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
35
W, 68-65
Georgia
39
L, 65-62
Oklahoma
Win
75.8%
58.3%
46.8%
37.7%
30.3%
8.1
7.4
-1.8
3.7
1.3
4.4
14
W, 89-79
*Kentucky
Loss
69.5%
48.2%
51.3%
26.5%
34.4%
5.7
7.9
-0.5
-4.2
-1.2
-0.9
45
W, 78-70
*Texas
Home
76.1%
56.1%
47.6%
34.3%
28.7%
7.2
7.0
-1.3
3.1
1.2
5.2
6
L, 85-81
Alabama
Road
69.7%
52.2%
49.6%
32.1%
35.9%
7.0
8.3
-1.3
-2.5
-0.7
-1.1
83
W, 70-58
LSU
16
L, 69-61
*Texas A&M
140
1
L, 67-60
*Auburn
125
125
23
W, 92-85
Missouri
45
!W, 86-81
Texas
110
110
*South Carolina
47
W, 90-77
*Vanderbilt
95
95
80
34
2nd Chance 0.14
62
Off TO 0.19
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
W, 93-92
Miss St.
86
W, 72-68
^^South Carolina
65
^^Ole Miss
Home
A. Thiero DNP final 6G -- ???
B. Fland last G @ Missouri - will be
available for NCAAT
36
2nd Chance 0.15
Game #
Loss
Road
Adou Thiero
63
Fast Break 0.12
65
Game #
75
Off TO 0.17
Boogie Fland
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
42
In Paint 0.44
33
L, 83-80
90
Fast Break 0.17
80
26
75
In Paint 0.45
Defensive Pct.l
L, 72-53
Def-Efficiency
140
Offensive Pct.l
86
Off-Efficiency
Johnell Davis
D.J. Wagner
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 13.0
5.0
19-42
3-8
12.8
3.4
14-49
8-29
13.4
2.2
15-36
7-21
13.6
2.0
14-26
8-26
W 15.5
6.2
75-113
5-23
16.5
3.3
39-73
24-59
13.0
3.8
43-95
35-90
12.3
3.0
55-120
33-78
Ivisic 3PT last 10 G: 11-of-41, 27%
L
15.7
5.7
52-97
6-19
12.7
3.7
18-66
11-37
8.6
2.7
23-52
14-62
9.4
2.4
39-80
6-47
J. Davis PPG first Nov-Dec: 9.2 PPG
H
16.3
6.3
78-122
5-20
15.7
3.6
39-80
21-54
11.6
3.6
31-70
29-86
11.1
3.1
43-101
24-68
R
14.7
5.5
49-88
6-22
14.0
3.1
18-59
14-42
10.7
3.1
35-77
20-66
11.2
2.3
51-99
15-57
Starting Lineup Last G: T. Brazile, J. Davis, Z. Ivisic, K. Knox, D. Wagner (6 G: 4-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
3
Adou Thiero
6'6"
Jr
7
28.4
15.6
6.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
0.8
60.5%
127-210
26.2%
2
Boogie Fland
6'2"
Fr
15
34.1
15.1
3.4
5.7
1.6
1.5
0.1
41.0%
57-139
1
Johnell Davis
6'3"
Sr
2
31.6
11.2
3.3
1.6
1.5
1.5
0.1
44.9%
66-147
21 D.J. Wagner
6'3"
So
--
34.3
11.1
2.7
3.5
2.3
0.9
0.1
47.0%
44 Zvonimir Ivisic
7'2"
So
1
20.1
9.3
4.6
0.8
1.5
0.7
2.0
11 Karter Knox
6'6"
Fr
--
23.7
7.9
3.2
1.1
1.0
0.6
4
Trevon Brazile
6'10"
Jr
2
19.9
6.5
5.1
0.8
1.1
9
Jonas Aidoo
6'11"
Sr
3
17.6
6.4
4.8
0.8
0.8
24 Billy Richmond III
6'5"
Fr
--
17.2
5.6
2.8
1.4
1.2
FT
11-42
68.8%
119-173
36.5%
35-96
83.9%
52-62
32.2%
49-152
83.8%
67-80
94-200
31.2%
39-125
80.5%
62-77
59.4%
57-96
37.9%
47-124
72.4%
42-58
0.4
55.1%
54-98
33.0%
31-94
80.6%
58-72
0.8
1.1
79.2%
57-72
41.2%
21-51
54.5%
24-44
0.6
1.1
60.5%
75-124
0.0%
0-7
60.0%
42-70
0.6
0.5
58.1%
72-124
15.4%
2-13
74.5%
35-47
#10 Arkansas Razorbacks - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
97
125
54% 34-63 38% 22-58 21%
4-19
33%
9-27
4-7
7-9
6
4
12
18
67-72
^^Baylor
(2)
17
58
41% 24-58 47% 27-58 25%
5-20
29%
7-24
14-17
11-17
10
9
11
8
101 W
65-49
Troy
(3)
163
73
43% 24-56 38% 21-55 44% 10-23 16%
3-19
7-14
4-7
8
10
14
24
298 W
91-72
Pacific
(4)
278
257
60% 31-52 40% 24-60 43%
9-21
34% 12-35 20-25 12-13
3
8
15
16
244 W
79-67
Little Rock
(3)
320
139
47% 25-53 37% 22-59 29%
7-24
27%
6-22
22-27 17-23
5
11
19
17
357 W
109-35
MD Eastern Shore
(2)
348
356
56% 40-72 23% 14-61 44% 15-34 15%
4-26
14-17
3-8
8
6
4
17
77-90
^^Illinois
(2)
15
44
48% 28-58 53% 30-57 29%
48% 15-31 16-27 15-22
8
5
11
10
210 W
76-73
*Miami (FL)
(4)
72
324
48% 30-62 48% 29-60 48% 11-23 31%
9-29
5-9
6-8
6
8
10
11
209 W
75-60
UTSA
(3)
159
233
53% 28-53 41% 24-59 33%
5-15
29%
7-24
14-19
5-5
7
4
14
8
L
5-17
Opp
Turnovers
--
25
For
Off. Reb
DBG
L
Opp
FT
Lipscomb
31
For
3PT
76-60
98 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
22 W
89-87
^^Michigan
(2)
53
15
50% 33-66 58% 34-59 39%
9-23
44%
8-18
14-22
11-18
8
5
13
17
340 W
82-57
^^Central Ark.
(3)
326
346
60% 33-55 33% 18-54 45%
9-20
25%
7-28
7-9
14-18
7
3
12
8
335 W
95-67
NC A&T
(6)
335
303
50% 37-74 36% 27-75 25%
6-24
18%
4-22
15-19
9-17
13
16
6
8
2-17
192 W
92-62
Oakland
(8)
177
234
60% 35-58 40% 24-60 46% 10-22 12%
12-14 12-18
5
8
13
12
5
L
52-76
*Tennessee
(4)
19
3
38% 20-53 39% 27-69 21%
6-29
39% 10-26
6-13
6
19
15
12
26
L
66-73
Ole Miss
(3)
31
34
37% 22-59 46% 23-50 22%
5-23
39%
9-23
17-24 18-28
8
6
6
4
4
L
63-71
Florida
(2)
3
13
30% 18-60 39% 25-64 19%
3-16
29%
8-28
24-35 13-20
13
16
8
9
83
L
74-78
*LSU
(2)
128
62
39% 27-69 40% 22-55 45%
9-20
36%
8-22
11-13 26-28
14
11
12
12
23
L
65-83
*Missouri
(3)
5
75
44% 28-63 46% 29-63 22%
5-23
48% 11-23
4-8
14-19
10
9
13
9
68-65
Georgia
(3)
46
23
31% 18-58 44% 20-46 13%
3-23
36%
5-14
29-34 20-29
14
7
10
13
62-65
Oklahoma
(2)
30
77
37% 20-54 41% 21-51 33%
9-27
33%
7-21
13-16 16-20
5
6
9
13
89-79
*Kentucky
(6)
11
49
55% 32-58 48% 30-62 52% 13-25 44% 10-23 12-16
3
8
7
13
78-70
*Texas
(3)
39
69
44% 22-50 34% 22-64 41%
7-17
27%
6-22
27-35 20-27
3
10
9
10
81-85
Alabama
(2)
4
28
43% 28-65 55% 34-62 35%
7-20
26%
5-19
18-21 12-18
12
9
10
14
70-58
LSU
(3)
128
62
52% 28-54 39% 25-64 33%
4-12
25%
5-20
10-17
3-6
4
9
8
9
35 W
39
L
14 W
45 W
6
L
83 W
12-15
9-18
16
L
61-69
*Texas A&M
(2)
49
11
42% 20-48 42% 24-57 33%
7-21
30%
6-20
14-19 15-21
7
8
16
9
1
L
60-67
*Auburn
(3)
1
12
46% 25-55 40% 25-62 16%
3-19
17%
4-24
7-14
13-17
3
11
10
12
23 W
92-85
Missouri
(2)
5
75
55% 29-53 44% 30-68 33%
6-18
33% 12-36 28-37 13-17
7
17
16
18
45 W
86-81 #
Texas
(3)
39
69
47% 27-58 42% 30-71 53%
9-17
35%
9-26
23-31 12-13
4
10
12
10
53-72
*South Carolina
(2)
110
59
29% 15-52 47% 25-53 14%
3-22
36%
5-14
20-27 17-21
8
4
12
11
47 W
90-77
*Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
51% 33-65 38% 23-60 33%
8-24
40% 10-25 16-22 21-27
10
6
15
14
33 W
93-92
Miss St.
(3)
26
50
55% 31-56 44% 32-73 43%
9-21
38% 12-32 22-27 16-21
8
10
10
2
72-68
^^South Carolina
(3)
110
59
45% 25-56 39% 23-59 32%
7-22
35%
8-23
15-16 14-18
5
10
11
11
80-83
^^Ole Miss
(0)
31
34
46% 26-56 47% 30-64 32%
7-22
33%
8-24
21-32 15-20
11
8
15
10
86
L
86 W
26
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
111.9
92nd
111.0
86th
110.0
105th
111.7
91st
115.9
59th
Def-Efficiency
94.0
19th
97.3
34th
95.2
31st
95.6
22nd
95.2
22nd
WAB
+0.8
39th
+0.5
52nd
+0.6
35th
+0.7
49th
+2.5
17th
FG% 50% or better
13-0
3PT% >= 35%
11-2
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
5-6
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
15-6
16-3
3PT% < 35%
4-10
Make >= 10 3PA
9-11
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
5-0
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
15-7
More FTA than Opp.
14-5
5-3
More OReb than Opp.
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
15-13
7-8
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
15-10
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
12-4
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
3-7
3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-4
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
9-6
More Turnovers than Opp.
7-8
8-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
7-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
4-3
@ Matteise
233
W, 92-60
Fordham
190
W, 96-73
Quinnipiac
334
W, 66-45
Wagner
38
W, 85-71
New Mexico
Record
30-4 (18-2)
31
!L, 99-98
^^Baylor
Home
18-0
103
W, 80-55
^^Virginia
Road
#2 St. John's Red Storm - Big East
BPI: 12
BT: 15
EM: 7
KPI: 10
NET: 13
POM: 12
SOR: 7
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.7
65.9
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-0
12-4
Win
79.6
64.8
26-50
5-0
2-2
3-1
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
72.0
73.8
51-100
4-0
1-0
2-1
35
L, 66-63
^^Georgia
235
W, 77-64
Harvard
Non-Conf.
127.4
Home
81.0
66.4
101-200
4-0
1-0
2-0
68
W, 88-71
Kansas St.
Conf.
79.3
Road
76.1
65.3
201+
5-0
0-0
1-0
143
W, 99-77
Bryant
116
W, 89-61
DePaul
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
*Providence
70.1
112.6
89.1
15.6
21.9
37.3
28.9
50th
71st
2nd
66th
12th
9th
131st
110
W, 72-70
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +7.9 (7th)
229
W, 97-76
Delaware
32
L, 57-56
*Creighton
86
W, 70-62
Butler
42
W, 82-72
*Xavier
56
W, 80-68
Villanova
89
W, 63-58
Georgetown
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-4
Opp. O-Reb%
49.7
68.9
51.5
30.4
30.2
30.3
238th
eFG%
295th
FT%
154th
2PT%
337th
3PT%
269th
FTA/FGA %
346th
3PA/FGA %
46.6
67.0
45.8
31.8
30.4
40.8
19th
4th
11th
64th
112th
250th
Defense
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
W, 79-51
*Seton Hall
42
!W, 79-71
Xavier
Win
69.0%
52.1%
45.6%
30.0%
30.3%
5.9
7.2
3.9
6.9
4.2
1.8
89
W, 66-41
*Georgetown
Loss
68.1%
46.6%
46.9%
32.6%
44.0%
7.3
10.0
0.3
-2.8
3.0
2.0
110
W, 68-66
Providence
Home
69.2%
52.2%
45.8%
30.0%
32.2%
5.9
7.3
4.4
8.3
3.4
4.4
27
W, 70-64
Marquette
Road
68.5%
50.7%
45.7%
30.8%
31.4%
6.1
7.8
2.5
2.8
4.8
-1.2
30
W, 68-62
*UConn
56
L, 73-71
*Villanova
140
32
W, 79-73
Creighton
125
125
116
W, 82-58
*DePaul
30
W, 89-75
UConn
110
110
W, 76-70
*Butler
220
W, 71-61
Seton Hall
95
95
80
27
!W, 86-84
*Marquette
80
86
W, 78-57
^^Butler
65
27
W, 79-63
^^Marquette
32
W, 82-66
^^Creighton
L Georgia, St. John's 2-19 3PT
In Paint 48%
91
Fast Break 17%
91
99
2nd Chance 20%
94
Off TO 23%
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
65
Game #
Home
Zuby Ejiofor
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 43%
55
Fast Break 12%
56
2nd Chance 16% 18
Game #
Loss
Road
RJ Luis Jr.
L Baylor, led 97-93, 22 seconds left,
St. John's 16-28 FT
Def-Efficiency
140
Defensive Pct.l
86
Off-Efficiency
91
Off TO 15%
Kadary Richmond
Offensive Pct.l
220
Deivon Smith
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 22.2
8.2
30-66
10-20
18.2
8.2
29-45
2-8
11.6 10.2
27-54
0-4
6.0
3.4
8-24
2-12
W 19.2
7.4 160-324 37-113
14.4
8.1 142-228
8-35
13.0
6.6 162-301
6-35
9.4
4.8
59-151
28-74
D. Smith DNP L @ Villanova
L
12.3
5.5
17-41
4-13
15.5
7.5
18-25
2-6
10.8
4.8
15-36
1-3
8.0
4.3
9-23
1-5
Z. Ejiofor top 50 off-rebound rate
H
18.7
7.5
93-191
20-68
13.9
8.0
80-128
5-21
13.3
6.3
97-187
5-23
10.4
5.4
39-91
18-46
Richmond last 10G: 64 AST, 14 TO
R
18.0
6.7
84-174
21-58
15.3
8.0
80-125
5-20
12.1
6.5
80-150
2-15
7.8
4.1
29-83
11-33
#
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
12 RJ Luis Jr.
6'6"
Jr
1
31.9
18.4
7.2
2.1
2.2
1.4
0.6
48.5%
177-365
32.5%
41-126
75.0%
129-172
24 Zuby Ejiofor
6'9"
Jr
--
31.7
14.6
8.0
1.6
1.8
0.9
1.4
63.2%
160-253
24.4%
10-41
69.4%
145-209
1
Kadary Richmond
6'6"
Sr
--
33.0
12.7
6.4
5.4
2.0
2.1
0.9
52.5%
177-337
18.4%
7-38
54.7%
58-106
5
Deivon Smith
6'1"
Sr
6
26.9
9.2
4.8
4.0
1.6
1.5
0.4
39.1%
68-174
36.7%
29-79
64.8%
35-54
0
Aaron Scott
6'7"
Jr
--
27.2
8.5
4.1
0.9
0.7
1.5
0.5
57.4%
58-101
29.6%
48-162
83.3%
30-36
7
Simeon Wilcher
6'4"
So
--
25.7
8.1
1.9
1.4
1.4
1.1
0.4
48.1%
78-162
28.8%
30-104
73.7%
28-38
44 Brady Dunlap
6'7"
So
24
16.5
5.7
2.2
0.7
0.3
0.4
--
72.7%
8-11
37.5%
12-32
83.3%
5-6
8
7'1"
Jr
2
7.2
2.7
1.8
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.5
56.1%
37-66
0.0%
0-2
70.6%
12-17
6'5"
Fr
12
6.4
2.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.1
36.8%
7-19
33.3%
10-30
57.1%
4-7
Starting Lineup Last G: Z. Ejiofor, R. Luis, K. Richmond, A. Scott, S. Wilcher (15 G: 14-1)
NAME
Vincent Iwuchukwu
11 Jaiden Glover
2PT
3PT
FT
#2 St. John's Red Storm - Big East
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
172
268
55% 36-66 36% 20-55 35%
35%
8-23
11-15
12-20
7
8
11
19
190 W
96-73
Quinnipiac
(4)
257
166
45% 32-71 39% 25-65 39% 10-26 27%
8-30
22-26 15-21
12
8
11
14
334 W
66-45
Wagner
(3)
359
238
50% 21-42 29% 16-55 35%
6-17
21%
5-24
18-30
8-9
5
10
15
14
38 W
85-71
New Mexico
(3)
87
18
50% 34-68 44% 28-64 22%
4-18
44%
8-18
13-20
7-18
19
13
15
11
98-99 #
^^Baylor
(3)
17
58
55% 34-62 42% 35-83 58% 14-24 52% 15-29 16-28 14-23
5
13
18
15
80-55
^^Virginia
(0)
89
134
53% 32-61 40% 18-45 42% 10-24 32%
9-28
6-10
10-18
11
6
6
15
63-66
^^Georgia
(1)
46
23
31% 19-61 49% 24-49 11%
2-19
42%
5-12
23-28 13-16
17
12
14
23
235 W
77-64
Harvard
(5)
253
205
44% 31-70 36% 22-61 22%
6-27
28%
8-29
9-13
12-16
16
7
8
9
68 W
88-71
Kansas St.
(6)
108
24
43% 32-75 35% 25-71 30%
8-27
32%
8-25
16-17 13-20
13
10
8
8
143 W
99-77
Bryant
(3)
190
152
50% 39-78 49% 28-57 31%
8-26
35%
6-17
13-19 15-24
20
9
11
19
116 W
89-61
DePaul
(5)
115
126
55% 37-67 39% 20-51 30%
3-10
30%
6-20
12-21 15-21
15
9
9
19
110 W
72-70
*Providence
(2)
92
143
40% 29-73 48% 25-52 17%
3-18
37%
7-19
11-26
13-17
14
5
5
16
97-76
Delaware
(7)
121
325
61% 39-64 49% 31-63 67%
8-12
42% 10-24
11-17
4-6
6
3
12
13
56-57
*Creighton
(2)
32
42
37% 25-68 42% 22-53 22%
2-9
35%
9-26
4-6
4-7
10
9
9
17
86 W
70-62
Butler
(3)
44
150
37% 26-71 39% 23-59
5%
1-21
35%
7-20
17-23
9-20
7
9
10
20
42 W
82-72
*Xavier
(2)
41
38
42% 34-81 37% 22-60 13%
2-16
22%
4-18
12-13 24-25
18
6
7
11
56 W
80-68
Villanova
(3)
23
95
40% 22-55 39% 22-56 29%
7-24
39% 10-26 29-39 14-17
13
7
9
9
89 W
63-58
Georgetown
(2)
157
67
35% 23-66 41% 24-58 33%
8-24
21%
3-14
9-14
7-10
11
9
10
17
220 W
79-51
*Seton Hall
(3)
325
89
47% 28-60 26% 15-57 39%
7-18
25%
4-16
16-20 17-29
13
15
15
17
42 W
79-71 #
Xavier
(3)
41
38
47% 28-60 40% 24-60
8%
1-12
40%
8-20
22-27 15-18
9
6
13
13
89 W
66-41
*Georgetown
(5)
157
67
48% 28-58 25% 14-57 29%
6-21
23%
6-26
4-9
7-16
6
10
13
15
110 W
68-66
Providence
(3)
92
143
38% 26-68 43% 24-56 33%
7-21
43% 12-28
9-14
6-9
10
8
9
17
27 W
70-64
Marquette
(2)
40
31
42% 25-60 41% 22-54 19%
3-16
32%
8-25
17-31 12-18
18
2
13
10
30 W
68-62
*UConn
(2)
16
92
40% 26-65 39% 20-51 19%
4-21
28%
8-29
12-16 14-22
7
12
6
18
L
229 W
32
L
56
L
9-26
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
35
For
Off. Reb
Fordham
L
Opp
FT
92-60
31
For
3PT
233 W
103 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
71-73
*Villanova
(4)
23
95
44% 27-61 53% 26-49 30% 11-37 46% 11-24
6-10
10-13
9
6
13
11
32 W
79-73
Creighton
(3)
32
42
38% 28-73 42% 27-65 33%
6-18
27%
17-29 11-15
18
9
5
14
116 W
82-58
*DePaul
(2)
115
126
46% 32-69 33% 18-55 43%
9-21
33% 10-30
9-11
12-12
15
6
10
15
30 W
89-75
UConn
(3)
16
92
47% 30-64 39% 23-59 42%
8-19
26%
6-23
21-27 23-29
15
17
11
17
86 W
76-70
*Butler
(2)
44
150
49% 29-59 39% 24-61 27%
4-15
22%
6-27
14-19 16-18
11
11
9
12
220 W
71-61
Seton Hall
(2)
325
89
43% 23-53 52% 25-48 31%
4-13
18%
2-11
21-33
9-21
12
3
14
12
27 W
86-84 #
*Marquette
(6)
40
31
45% 33-74 44% 31-71 22%
5-23
35% 10-29 15-21 12-22
17
12
11
12
86 W
78-57
^^Butler
(4)
44
150
47% 34-72 35% 19-55 35%
7-20
30%
9-30
3-4
10-16
14
7
9
13
27 W
79-63
^^Marquette
(0)
40
31
42% 28-67 39% 23-59 28%
5-18
21%
6-29
18-25 11-18
10
6
10
17
32 W
82-66
^^Creighton
(0)
32
42
52% 34-65 43% 26-60 50%
7-14
23%
6-26
7-11
10
11
9
13
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
8-30
8-16
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
112.2
89th
113.4
58th
117.5
27th
110.5
104th
113.3
80th
Def-Efficiency
93.5
17th
85.7
1st
95.4
33rd
88.0
1st
90.0
2nd
WAB
+3.7
3rd
+4.1
12th
+0.5
39th
+5.9
6th
+4.8
5th
FG% 50% or better
8-1
3PT% >= 35%
9-1
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
8-3
More FTM than Opp.
15-2
16-1
3PT% < 35%
14-3
Make >= 10 3PA
21-3
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
2-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
22-1
More FTA than Opp.
15-2
5-2
More OReb than Opp.
1-1
Make < 10 3PA
28-2
21-3
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
25-2
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
23-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
4-2
Opp. FG% below 45%
26-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
3PA / FGA < 35%
2-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-2
More Turnovers than Opp.
4-2
21-2
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
8-2
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
3-1
@ Matteise
W, 85-69
Mid-Amer. Christ.
353
W, 79-76
*Stetson
88
L, 68-64
*Minnesota
97
L, 80-69
*UNLV
Record
22-12 (13-3)
300
L, 79-73
*Southern Utah
Home
11-2
264
L, 85-67
^^Alabama St.
Road
#15 Omaha Mavericks - Summit
BPI: 211
BT: 126
EM: 157
KPI: 156
NET: 160
POM: 156
SOR: 149
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
78.1
75.0
1-25
0-0
0-0
0-1
11-10
Win
82.4
70.7
26-50
0-0
0-0
0-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
70.2
83.0
51-100
0-0
0-0
0-3
85
L, 92-84
*Akron
175
W, 65-59
^^Lamar
228
L, 71-55
Ab. Christian
196
L, 76-65
Montana St.
344
W, 70-60
*Sacramento St.
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Opp. O-Reb%
*Northern Iowa
67.7
112.2
108.4
15.7
14.9
29.2
25.4
148th
78th
221st
75th
319th
204th
18th
108
L, 78-58
Non-Conf.
188.7
Home
80.1
71.3
101-200
4-1
2-0
1-3
Conf.
204.9
Road
76.8
77.3
201+
5-1
2-1
6-2
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): -6.5 (132nd)
10
L, 83-51
*Iowa St.
188
W, 86-82
Cal Poly
W, 81-51
Mt. Marty
273
W, 95-85
*North Dakota
140
W, 85-80
*North Dakota St.
240
W, 77-58
UMKC
Offense
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 4-2
53.5
73.3
52.5
36.7
36.4
38.6
68th
eFG%
140th
FT%
122nd
2PT%
43rd
3PT%
74th
FTA/FGA %
176th
3PA/FGA %
Defense
53.1
71.9
53.5
35.1
37.7
44.5
283rd
164th
283rd
257th
296th
333rd
2PT %
3PT %
3PM / G
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
139
W, 87-80
South Dakota St.
308
W, 80-62
*Denver
Win
72.6%
53.8%
49.9%
39.5%
33.0%
9.1
8.7
2.1
5.6
1.3
2.8
127
W, 89-78
St. Thomas
Loss
72.1%
51.3%
57.5%
31.2%
38.0%
6.9
8.7
1.3
0.6
-3.9
-4.3
328
W, 84-76
*Oral Roberts
Home
70.7%
56.0%
53.0%
35.2%
33.0%
8.1
8.0
3.5
6.5
0.5
4.2
233
L, 91-87
*South Dakota
Road
73.7%
51.1%
52.6%
37.6%
35.6%
8.5
9.1
0.8
2.2
-1.2
-2.1
308
W, 78-69
Denver
273
W, 80-77
North Dakota
140
140
W, 85-74
North Dakota St.
125
125
139
L, 98-85
*South Dakota St.
127
L, 95-84
*St. Thomas
110
110
240
W, 78-66
*UMKC
95
95
233
W, 93-85
South Dakota
80
Oral Roberts
240
W, 70-61
^^UMKC
65
127
W, 85-75
^^St. Thomas
PPP allowed vs. Minnesota (1.03),
UNLV (1.09), Iowa St (1.2)
Best off-eff in Summit Lg play since
'22 SDST
JJ White 3PT in conf play: 48%
T. Osburn DNP @ UNLV
46
2nd Chance 12% 18
Off TO 15% 10
65
Game #
Home
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
In Paint 39%
88
Fast Break 10%
91
98
2nd Chance 12%
Game #
Loss
Road
Marquel Sutton
P
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
85
Off TO 16%
JJ White
Tony Osburn
Defensive Pct.l
W, 80-57
^^South Dakota
35
In Paint 42%
Offensive Pct.l
328
W, 100-75
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 12%
80
233
Off-Efficiency
Lance Waddles
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 25.0 11.6
45-70
1-12
19.4
3.2
18-29
14-29
13.6
5.0
4-15
17-34
8.2
5.0
6-18
7-18
W 20.5
8.3 139-257
20-60
16.2
2.6
64-108
52-104 12.8
3.9
26-62
57-128
9.0
3.9
35-80
30-83
L
16.8
7.4
63-122
8-36
9.2
2.6
25-54
13-44
11.0
2.3
29-43
15-50
9.2
4.0
26-58
14-51
H
19.9
7.4
78-129
9-34
14.3
3.1
35-62
27-61
13.3
3.4
23-43
30-74
9.1
4.0
24-52
15-41
R
18.7
8.3 124-250
19-62
13.3
2.3
54-100
38-87
11.5
3.4
32-62
42-104
9.0
3.9
37-86
29-93
Starting Lineup Last G: I. Ondekane, T. Osburn, M. Sutton, K. Thomas, J. White (20 G: 18-2)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
10 Marquel Sutton
6'7"
Sr
--
32.2
19.2
8.0
1.2
1.8
0.9
0.3
53.3%
202-379
29.2%
28-96
74.4%
163-219
1
JJ White
6'2"
Sr
--
27.1
13.7
2.6
4.0
1.8
0.8
--
54.9%
89-162
43.9%
65-148
78.8%
93-118
32 Tony Osburn
6'2"
Jr
1
27.1
12.2
3.4
1.4
0.8
1.0
0.0
52.4%
55-105
40.4%
72-178
86.4%
76-88
7
Lance Waddles
6'4"
Jr
--
21.0
9.1
3.9
1.9
1.1
0.5
0.1
44.2%
61-138
32.8%
44-134
70.1%
54-77
5
Ja'Sean Glover
6'4"
Jr
--
22.9
7.9
2.8
1.8
1.4
0.9
0.4
53.4%
63-118
36.5%
31-85
77.4%
48-62
22 Kamryn Thomas
6'8"
Jr
--
24.3
6.4
3.8
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.5
51.2%
43-84
37.8%
34-90
73.2%
30-41
24 Isaac Ondekane
6'8"
Sr
--
16.4
5.2
3.6
0.4
1.3
0.4
0.4
58.3%
70-120
--
--
54.3%
38-70
23 Joshua Streit
6'9"
Jr
--
19.2
2.2
3.5
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.5
59.3%
35-59
--
--
26.1%
6-23
25 Khamani Cooper
6'4"
So
17
6.8
1.7
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
40.0%
2-5
26.1%
6-23
66.7%
6-9
#15 Omaha Mavericks - Summit
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Opp Eff.
FG
For
3PT
Opp
For
FT
Opp
For
Off. Reb
Opp
Turnovers
Result
Opponent
DBG
Off
Def
W
85-69
Mid-Amer. Chris.
--
--
--
58% 30-52 41% 24-59 46% 11-24 36%
9-25
14-20 12-20
For Opp For Opp
5
8
16
11
353 W
79-76
*Stetson
(2)
302
357
41% 29-71 48% 29-61 39% 10-26 33%
9-27
11-13
9-18
9
6
5
7
88
L
64-68
*Minnesota
(1)
106
86
41% 21-51 46% 25-55 30%
18%
3-17
16-23 15-26
9
7
16
11
97
L
69-80
*UNLV
(4)
162
55
43% 23-54 46% 26-57 36% 10-28 22%
4-18
13-18 24-25
7
7
19
11
300
L
73-79
*Southern Utah
(1)
340
242
48% 29-61 44% 27-61 46%
6-13
37% 11-30
14-24
5
9
8
9
264
L
67-85
^^Alabama St.
(5)
282
246
35% 22-63 47% 26-55 22%
6-27
40% 12-30 17-26 21-29
12
6
10
9
85
L
84-92
*Akron
(0)
62
185
52% 29-56 53% 35-66 32%
6-19
46% 18-39 20-22
4-9
11
10
12
8
175 W
6-20
9-16
65-59
^^Lamar
(0)
269
94
36% 20-56 38% 20-53 52% 12-23 46% 11-24
13-18
8-11
10
5
12
14
228
L
55-71
Ab. Christian
(5)
319
81
36% 16-44 48% 26-54 31%
5-16
31%
4-13
18-24 15-19
5
4
16
10
196
L
65-76
Montana St.
(3)
209
182
44% 24-54 54% 27-50 11%
2-19
43%
9-21
15-20 13-16
6
3
10
7
70-60
*Sacramento St.
(2)
343
315
45% 27-60 36% 16-45 35%
8-23
31%
8-26
8-8
20-26
7
9
10
17
125
117
37% 21-57 48% 22-46 38% 12-32 43%
6-14
4-10
28-35
8
5
11
7
6-20
5-9
344 W
108
L
58-78
*Northern Iowa
(5)
10
L
51-83
*Iowa St.
(1)
20
8
36% 20-56 53% 32-60 26%
6-23
30%
13-18
7
10
18
12
188 W
86-82
Cal Poly
(5)
120
260
45% 31-69 46% 26-56 28%
8-29
40% 12-30 16-24 18-19
16
5
9
15
8-29
W
81-51
Mt. Marty
(6)
--
--
43% 29-67 33% 20-60 28%
11%
2-18
15-28
9-13
15
8
8
15
273 W
95-85
*North Dakota
(4)
138
321
57% 32-56 44% 27-61 50% 10-20 28%
9-32
21-27 22-30
9
13
12
12
140 W
85-80
*North Dakota St.
(1)
50
271
44% 31-71 42% 23-55 43% 12-28 38% 13-34 11-16 21-30
13
8
4
10
240 W
77-58
UMKC
(3)
284
155
52% 28-54 35% 18-51 36%
19%
4-21
13-18 18-23
5
3
8
11
139 W
87-80
South Dakota St.
(2)
111
175
48% 27-56 50% 29-58 44% 11-25 32%
8-25
22-33 14-21
5
6
7
10
308 W
80-62
*Denver
(3)
293
220
53% 26-49 43% 23-54 56% 10-18 35%
7-20
18-22
9-16
8
9
13
10
127 W
89-78
St. Thomas
(7)
58
230
54% 30-56 49% 29-59 44%
7-16
31%
9-29
22-34 11-17
11
4
11
10
84-76
*Oral Roberts
(1)
220
339
48% 25-52 47% 26-55 43%
9-21
27%
7-26
25-32 17-25
6
4
8
6
87-91
*South Dakota
(3)
132
319
50% 33-66 50% 32-64 33%
7-21
35%
8-23
14-20 19-31
11
7
15
8
308 W
78-69
Denver
(2)
293
220
49% 23-47 45% 28-62 22%
4-18
29%
7-24
28-34
6-10
7
7
12
6
273 W
80-77
North Dakota
(4)
138
321
48% 28-59 54% 26-48 42%
8-19
56%
9-16
16-21 16-20
140 W
85-74
North Dakota St.
(1)
50
271
52% 29-56 46% 28-61 54% 15-28 42% 14-33 12-15
328 W
233
L
8-22
8
3
7
11
4-8
7
8
8
9
139
L
85-98
*South Dakota St.
(4)
111
175
46% 30-65 55% 32-58 33%
9-27
50% 10-20 16-20 24-29
8
7
7
10
127
L
84-95
*St. Thomas
(1)
58
230
52% 29-56 51% 28-55 38%
8-21
45% 13-29 18-21 26-31
6
4
13
6
240 W
78-66
*UMKC
(3)
284
155
49% 29-59 46% 25-55 38%
8-21
42%
8-19
12-17
8-12
7
8
7
12
233 W
93-85
South Dakota
(2)
132
319
49% 32-65 42% 27-64 30%
6-20
28%
8-29
23-33 23-28
13
7
10
9
328 W
80-57
Oral Roberts
(6)
220
339
44% 30-69 36% 20-56 36% 12-33 29%
9-31
8-10
8-11
13
4
5
9
240 W
70-61
^^UMKC
(4)
284
155
46% 25-54 33% 20-61 31%
5-16
36%
9-25
15-22 12-17
9
11
8
9
233 W
100-75
^^South Dakota
(1)
132
319
59% 37-63 35% 23-66 38%
9-24
31% 10-32 17-24 19-29
6
9
11
10
127 W
85-75
^^St. Thomas
(0)
58
230
49% 28-57 40% 25-62 39%
9-23
29% 10-35 20-27 15-24
8
6
12
8
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
Non-Conference Games
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
110.6
114th
111.3
82nd
102.6
227th
117.1
43rd
115.9
60th
Def-Efficiency
109.1
230th
108.7
225th
110.9
282nd
110.0
232nd
107.4
188th
WAB
-1.2
97th
-5.3
162nd
-6.1
322nd
-0.9
67th
-0.5
70th
FG% 50% or better
7-3
3PT% >= 35%
16-4
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
9-7
FG% 45% or better
FG% below 45%
Opp. FG% 50% or better
More FTM than Opp.
13-4
16-5
3PT% < 35%
6-7
Make >= 10 3PA
6-8
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
9-2
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
13-5
More FTA than Opp.
14-3
6-5
More OReb than Opp.
2-6
Make < 10 3PA
13-10
12-9
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
16-7
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
13-2
Opp. FG% 45% or better
Opp. FG% below 45%
9-11
3PA / FGA >= 40%
13-1
3PA / FGA < 35%
10-5
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
17-5
More Turnovers than Opp.
8-10
4-3
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
3-6
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
1-5
@ Matteise
178
W, 110-54
UNC Asheville
90
W, 88-79
Ark. St.
59
W, 72-64
McNeese St.
18
L, 87-78
*Purdue
Record
25-8 (13-5)
25
W, 100-87
^^Illinois
Home
12-3
1
!W, 85-80
^^Houston
Road
77
W, 95-90
^^Rutgers
29
L, 83-81
^^Oregon
36
W, 94-79
*North Carolina
32
W, 83-75
Creighton
273
W, 97-90
*North Dakota
Poss.
Adj Off-Eff.
Adj Def-Eff.
Turnover%
Force TO%
Off-Reb%
Kent St.
74.6
127.7
96.4
16.7
13.5
34.7
29.2
1st
4th
28th
149th
348th
39th
149th
56.3
71.6
59.7
35.0
40.1
46.2
14th
eFG%
210th
FT%
4th
2PT%
107th
3PT%
25th
FTA/FGA %
41st
3PA/FGA %
47.9
70.4
48.8
30.8
33.9
35.1
50th
89th
92nd
29th
206th
56th
123
W, 81-54
#2 Alabama Crimson Tide - SEC
BPI: 6
BT: 5
EM: 5
KPI: 2
NET: 6
W, 105-82
South Dakota St.
39
W, 107-79
Oklahoma
86
W, 88-68
*South Carolina
16
W, 94-88
*Texas A&M
26
L, 74-64
Ole Miss
14
W, 102-97
*Kentucky
SOR: 6
PPG
PPG-OPP
vs. Opp.
Home
Neutral
Road
Season
91.1
81.4
1-25
1-2
3-1
3-3
13-5
Win
94.0
78.3
26-50
5-1
0-1
4-0
Avg. Opp. Torvik #
Loss
82.3
91.3
51-100
3-0
1-0
1-0
Non-Conf.
74.6
Home
91.3
75.9
101-200
3-0
0-0
0-0
Conf.
30.5
Road
91.0
86.0
201+
0-0
0-0
1-0
Wins Against Bubble (WAB): +9.8 (4th)
139
POM: 6
Offense
Defense
2PT %
Record In G Decided By 5 Points or Less: 6-3
3PT %
3PM / G
Opp. O-Reb%
Game +/- Margin [+ Good]
FT%
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
OFF
DEF
O-Reb
Reb
TO
FTM
47
W, 103-87
Vanderbilt
83
W, 80-73
LSU
Win
71.6%
61.5%
47.6%
35.9%
28.7%
10.8
7.0
0.8
8.4
-1.4
4.0
33
W, 88-84
*Miss St.
Loss
71.7%
53.9%
52.5%
32.0%
37.9%
9.1
8.6
0.1
0.3
-4.1
-3.0
35
W, 90-69
Georgia
Home
71.5%
61.6%
46.9%
32.4%
27.2%
9.7
6.9
0.5
8.2
-1.5
6.1
39
W, 85-81
*Arkansas
Road
71.7%
58.1%
50.3%
37.1%
34.2%
11.0
7.7
0.7
4.9
-2.6
-0.9
45
W, 103-80
*Texas
1
L, 94-85
Auburn
140
23
L, 110-98
*Missouri
125
125
14
W, 96-83
Kentucky
33
W, 111-73
Miss St.
110
110
5
L, 79-76
*Tennessee
95
95
4
L, 99-94
Florida
80
79
55
2nd Chance 15%
Off TO 14% 3
Fewest/Worst
Most/Worst
% Of Total Pts:
*Auburn
14
W, 99-70
^^Kentucky
65
49
^^Florida
Home
C. Youngblood DNP 9G, became
starter game vs. LSU
Wrightsell last G: vs. Oregon - OUT
2nd Chance 16% 21
Game #
Loss
Road
Mark Sears
65
Fast Break 12%
65
Game #
Most/Best
Fewest/Best
Defensive Pct.l
!W, 93-91
Offensive Pct.l
51
In Paint 43%
In Paint 43%
1
L, 104-82
Def-Efficiency
140
Fast Break 15%
80
4
Off-Efficiency
92
Off TO 15%
Grant Nelson
Aden Holloway
Labaron Philon
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
P
R
2PT
3PT
L5 17.0
3.2
20-41
8-35
11.2
6.4
15-29
5-14
8.2
1.6
4-12
10-25
14.2
3.6
19-37
7-21
W 18.5
3.0
69-150
62-165 12.7
7.7
91-137
21-72
12.0
2.0
41-72
62-143 10.7
3.1
77-134
22-87
Nelson injured in SEC Tourney L - ??
L
19.1
3.3
30-58
16-66
9.3
7.5
27-46
2-12
9.6
1.9
11-20
16-44
11.6
3.8
23-46
12-26
Sears 36% 3PT in SEC
H
19.3
3.4
43-91
35-101 10.5
7.6
50-79
8-26
12.2
2.3
24-40
37-93
10.5
2.9
44-77
12-52
R
18.1
2.7
56-117
43-130 12.9
7.7
68-104
15-58
10.8
1.7
28-52
41-94
11.3
3.6
56-103
22-61
Starting Lineup Last G: G. Nelson, C. Omoruyi, L. Philon, M. Sears, C. Youngblood (8 G: 4-4)
#
NAME
Ht
YR
DNP
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
TOV
SPG
BPG
2PT
3PT
FT
--
32.5
18.7
3.0
4.9
2.6
0.9
0.1
47.6%
99-208
33.8%
78-231
84.8%
184-217
1
Mark Sears
6'1"
Sr
4
Grant Nelson
6'11"
Sr
--
25.7
11.9
7.6
1.6
1.8
0.5
1.2
64.5%
118-183
27.4%
23-84
66.7%
86-129
3
Latrell Wrightsell Jr.
6'3"
Sr
25
25.7
11.5
1.8
2.0
1.3
0.5
0.1
81.8%
9-11
42.2%
19-45
85.0%
17-20
2
Aden Holloway
6'1"
So
--
21.1
11.4
2.0
1.9
1.2
0.6
0.0
56.5%
52-92
41.7%
78-187
78.0%
39-50
0
Labaron Philon
6'4"
Fr
--
24.5
10.9
3.3
3.6
1.8
1.3
0.3
55.6%
100-180
30.1%
34-113
75.6%
59-78
8
Chris Youngblood
6'4"
Sr
9
25.0
10.0
2.2
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.3
56.4%
31-55
38.6%
49-127
76.9%
30-39
11 Clifford Omoruyi
6'11"
Sr
--
19.0
7.6
6.6
0.8
0.8
0.2
1.0
74.0%
97-131
0.0%
0-1
70.4%
57-81
10 Mouhamed Dioubate
6'7"
So
--
15.9
7.1
5.9
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.7
65.0%
78-120
38.1%
8-21
60.9%
53-87
35 Derrion Reid
6'8"
Fr
13
15.1
6.4
3.0
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.3
52.2%
35-67
25.7%
9-35
56.6%
30-53
#2 Alabama Crimson Tide - SEC
! OT , * Road G, ^^ Neutral G
#
Result
FG
Off
Def
For
Opp
For Opp For Opp
--
156
295
63% 38-60 27% 20-73 44%
8-18
23%
6-26
26-37
8-14
14
13
10
8
90 W
88-79
Arkansas St.
(3)
112
97
41% 27-66 40% 25-62 19%
6-31
21%
6-28
28-44 23-36
12
6
10
10
72-64
McNeese St.
(2)
65
74
44% 22-50 39% 24-61 32% 11-34 29%
7-24
17-24
9-11
9
8
13
12
78-87
Purdue
(3)
8
68
44% 28-63 49% 31-63 31%
9-16
13-15 16-25
10
10
8
3
25 W
100-87
Illinois
(4)
15
44
52% 39-75 45% 32-71 32% 11-34 33% 10-30
11-13
13-24
5
13
7
12
1
85-80 #
Houston
(5)
9
1
37% 22-60 37% 24-65 37% 11-30 32%
6-19
30-41 26-33
17
9
14
12
95-90
Rutgers
(0)
48
119
52% 30-58 45% 29-65 40% 10-25 15%
2-13
25-36 30-35
13
7
19
9
77 W
29
L
9-29
Opp
Turnovers
DBG
W
For
Off. Reb
UNC Asheville
L
Opp
FT
110-54
18
For
3PT
178 W
59 W
Opponent
Opp Eff.
56%
81-83
Oregon
(2)
54
37
42% 27-64 44% 29-66 32% 12-38 29%
5-17
15-20 20-25
12
9
15
8
36 W
94-79
North Carolina
(3)
21
65
49% 35-71 41% 32-78 36% 12-33 18%
5-28
12-13 10-16
8
10
13
13
8-27
17-22 13-16
32 W
83-75
Creighton
(9)
32
42
43% 30-70 45% 27-60 20%
273 W
97-90
North Dakota
(3)
138
321
52% 33-63 43% 33-76 32% 11-34 42% 17-41 20-30
123 W
81-54
Kent St.
(3)
195
93
45% 27-60 28% 21-75 26%
139 W
105-82
South Dakota St.
(6)
111
175
39 W
107-79
Oklahoma
(5)
30
77
86 W
88-68
South Carolina
(3)
110
16 W
94-88
Texas A&M
(2)
49
26
L
6-30
30%
15
4
10
13
7-8
14
14
14
11
18-35 10-13
17
15
17
11
47% 37-78 42% 30-71 35% 19-55 42% 11-26
12-16
11-13
14
11
6
14
50% 38-76 48% 32-67 31%
9-29
26%
5-19
22-30 10-16
20
7
8
11
59
55% 35-64 43% 23-54 42%
8-19
21%
3-14
10-20 19-25
9
6
11
15
11
40% 27-68 39% 28-72 35% 13-37 22%
4-18
27-40 28-48
18
19
12
8
6-21
9-35
5-20
7%
64-74
Mississippi
(2)
31
34
43% 20-47 39% 27-70 25%
19-26 14-16
4
8
21
7
14 W
102-97
Kentucky
(3)
11
49
45% 30-67 48% 35-73 38% 13-34 41% 11-27 29-34 16-20
11
11
9
8
47 W
103-87
Vanderbilt
(2)
22
84
56% 36-64 39% 31-80 36%
8-22
42% 11-26 23-34 14-18
8
14
11
10
83 W
80-73
LSU
(3)
128
62
44% 27-61 39% 28-71 30%
7-23
13%
3-23
19-24 14-19
8
14
14
14
33 W
88-84
Mississippi St.
(3)
26
50
49% 31-63 50% 33-66 48% 15-31 32%
8-25
11-20 10-16
17
11
14
9
35 W
90-69
Georgia
(2)
46
23
53% 30-57 36% 27-76 42% 11-26 17%
4-23
19-23 11-23
8
13
19
6
39 W
85-81
Arkansas
(6)
83
22
55% 34-62 43% 28-65 26%
35%
7-20
12-18 18-21
9
12
14
10
45 W
103-80
Texas
(2)
39
69
62% 34-55 42% 29-69 59% 17-29 36%
8-22
18-20 14-19
8
12
16
8
40% 12-30 26-35 22-32
10
6
6
4
9
8
14
8
5-19
29%
2-27
1
L
85-94
Auburn
(3)
1
12
39% 27-70 46% 30-65 19%
23
L
98-110
Missouri
(3)
5
75
54% 35-65 60% 35-58 42% 13-31 39%
9-23
15-21 31-47
14 W
96-83
Kentucky
(2)
11
49
53% 32-61 43% 29-68 36% 11-31 35%
9-26
21-25 16-22
7
10
15
12
33 W
111-73
Mississippi St.
(2)
26
50
52% 37-71 38% 28-73 49% 22-45 20%
6-30
15-18 11-15
12
16
11
14
L
76-79
Tennessee
(3)
19
3
42% 25-60 43% 26-61 38%
9-24
38%
8-21
17-26 19-26
10
5
10
11
L
94-99
Florida
(3)
3
13
47% 34-72 49% 35-72 36%
9-25
30%
8-27
17-25 21-29
9
14
6
9
93-91 #
Auburn
(2)
1
12
52% 35-67 48% 35-73 32%
7-22
39% 10-26 16-24 11-17
8
8
13
9
99-70
Kentucky
(5)
11
49
51% 36-71 38% 21-56 38% 11-29 26%
16-21 23-35
7
5
10
16
82-104
Florida
(0)
3
13
42% 28-67 51% 37-72 31% 11-35 44% 12-27 15-23 18-28
10
13
10
7
5
4
1
W
14 W
4
L
via Torvik
Home Games
Road & Neutral Games
5-26
Non-Conference Games
5-19
Conference Games
Since Feb. 1 Games
Off-Efficency
122.8
14th
130.5
2nd
122.7
6th
130.5
2nd
130.8
4th
Def-Efficiency
92.3
12th
99.5
55th
95.4
32nd
97.4
34th
96.6
28th
WAB
+2.5
12th
+7.3
4th
+3.2
2nd
+6
5th
+3.4
11th
FG% 50% or better
14-1
3PT% >= 35%
FG% 45% or better
18-2
3PT% < 35%
FG% below 45%
7-6
Make >= 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 50% or better
1-2
Make < 10 3PA
Opp. FG% 45% or better
6-5
Opp. FG% below 45%
19-3
14-3
Opp. 3PT% >= 35%
7-5
More FTM than Opp.
19-2
11-5
Opp. 3PT% < 35%
15-3
Opp. makes >= 10 3PA
18-3
More FTA than Opp.
18-2
6-2
More OReb than Opp.
10-5
Opp. makes < 10 3PA
12-4
19-6
Fewer Turnovers than Opp.
7-2
3PA / FGA >= 40%
18-6
3PA / FGA < 35%
5-1
Opp. 3PA / FGA >= 40%
5-1
More Turnovers than Opp.
15-6
Opp. 3PA / FGA < 35%
11-4
Commit >= 15 Turnovers
5-2
@ Matteise
Statistics and Trends
• 2024-2025 Conference Standings
• NCAA Tournament History
2024-2025 CONFERENCE STANDINGS
CONFERENCE RANKINGS FROM AVERAGE NET
RK
CONF
NET
Adj Net
RK
CONF
NET
Adj Net
RK
CONF
NET
Adj Net
1
SEC
31.6
27.8
12
Big West
185.5
169.3
23
MAC
234.1
223.2
2
Big Ten
47.1
42.9
13
Ivy League
201.8
187.1
24
ASUN
239.4
229.1
3
Big 12
47.4
44.3
14
SoCon
203.8
186.2
25
America East
266.1
255.0
4
Big East
73.6
59.9
15
WAC
211.4
199.3
26
MAAC
266.8
259.3
5
ACC
96.4
88.9
16
Summit League
214.1
199.1
27
Patriot
273.5
269.4
6
Mountain West
124.7
104.9
17
CAA
215.3
205.7
28
OVC
280.6
275.0
7
Atlantic 10
136.8
128.5
18
Big South
217.2
201.0
29
MEAC
296.4
287.1
8
CUSA
144.8
132.0
19
Horizon
219.8
208.0
30
NEC
304.8
298.1
9
WCC
149.4
131.9
20
Sun Belt
223.4
213.8
31
SWAC
311.9
307.2
10
MVC
157.3
148.2
21
Big Sky
228.3
215.4
11
The American
160.2
150.9
22
Southland
228.5
217.8
Adj.: Excludes Worst Team's NET Ranking From Conference Average
America East Conference (AE)
American Athletic Conference (AAC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Bryant*
23-11
14-2
141
153
149
Memphis*
29-5
16-2
50
61
52
Vermont
21-12
13-3
232
234
243
North Texas
24-8
14-4
65
73
72
Maine
20-14
10-6
203
233
218
UAB
22-12
13-5
104
99
102
Albany
17-16
8-8
263
276
270
Tulane
19-14
12-6
145
138
138
Binghamton
15-17
7-9
311
316
318
East Carolina
19-14
10-8
176
182
176
UMass Lowell
17-15
6-10
242
264
244
Florida Atlantic
18-15
10-8
111
110
115
New Hampshire
8-24
6-10
355
356
355
Temple
17-15
9-9
164
157
171
UMBC
13-19
5-11
296
318
298
Wichita St.
19-14
8-10
134
140
135
NJIT
6-25
3-13
352
353
353
South Florida
13-19
6-12
189
202
195
Tulsa
13-20
6-12
271
240
268
UTSA
12-19
6-12
201
181
191
Rice
13-19
4-14
204
179
189
Charlotte
11-22
3-15
267
262
257
Atlantic 10 Conference (A10)
Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
VCU*
28-6
15-3
31
29
30
Duke*
31-3
19-1
1
2
1
George Mason
26-8
15-3
68
70
78
Clemson*
27-6
18-2
22
21
18
Dayton
22-10
12-6
67
78
73
Louisville*
27-7
18-2
23
19
23
Loyola Chicago
22-11
12-6
107
98
109
SMU
23-10
13-7
46
47
47
Saint Joseph's
22-12
11-7
76
82
79
Wake Forest
21-11
13-7
69
71
71
Saint Louis
19-14
11-7
101
108
106
North Carolina*
22-13
13-7
36
36
33
St. Bonaventure
22-11
9-9
97
92
103
Stanford
20-13
11-9
81
75
82
GW
21-12
9-9
124
116
113
Georgia Tech
17-16
10-10
109
90
94
Duquesne
13-19
8-10
149
123
132
Pittsburgh
17-15
8-12
61
72
61
Rhode Island
18-13
7-11
152
161
150
Florida St.
17-15
8-12
90
93
90
UMass
12-20
7-11
221
211
214
Virginia
15-17
8-12
110
96
104
Davidson
17-16
6-12
153
141
148
Notre Dame
15-18
8-12
103
97
96
La Salle
14-19
5-13
214
209
222
Virginia Tech
13-19
8-12
167
144
161
Richmond
10-22
5-13
253
224
238
Syracuse
14-19
7-13
133
107
117
Fordham
12-21
3-15
239
216
229
California
14-19
6-14
125
121
112
N.C. State
12-19
5-15
132
115
125
B.C.
12-19
4-16
202
172
184
Miami (FL)
7-24
3-17
225
185
192
Atlantic Sun Conference (ASUN)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Lipscomb*
25-9
14-4
84
102
83
North Alabama
24-10
14-4
113
112
111
FGCU
18-14
13-5
173
165
172
Jacksonville
19-13
12-6
182
191
179
Eastern Kent.
18-14
12-6
187
177
182
Queens
19-14
11-7
199
192
203
North Florida
15-17
8-10
262
267
259
Austin Peay
14-19
8-10
282
283
274
Stetson
8-24
6-12
353
352
352
Central Ark.
9-24
4-14
343
351
346
West Ga.
6-25
4-14
345
343
348
Bellarmine
5-26
2-16
351
338
341
Big 12 Conference (B12)
Big Sky Conference (BSky)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Houston*
30-4
19-1
3
1
3
Northern Colo.
25-9
15-3
114
119
122
Texas Tech*
25-8
15-5
7
7
7
Montana*
25-9
15-3
143
133
157
BYU*
24-9
14-6
24
14
24
Portland St.
19-13
11-7
200
183
207
Arizona*
22-12
14-6
12
9
14
Idaho St.
15-15
10-8
194
205
210
Iowa St.*
24-9
13-7
9
8
10
Montana St.
15-18
9-9
186
187
186
Kansas*
21-12
11-9
20
20
21
Northern Ariz.
18-15
8-10
248
246
247
West Virginia
19-13
10-10
51
34
53
Idaho
14-19
8-10
269
252
276
Baylor*
19-14
10-10
30
27
29
Eastern Wash.
10-22
6-12
284
278
294
TCU
16-16
9-11
78
74
87
Weber St.
12-22
5-13
301
291
300
Kansas St.
16-17
9-11
75
57
67
Sacramento St.
7-25
3-15
344
348
343
Utah
16-16
8-12
73
67
76
Cincinnati
18-15
7-13
49
45
55
UCF
17-16
7-13
71
69
68
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Oklahoma St.
15-17
7-13
96
87
100
High Point*
29-5
14-2
82
85
84
Arizona St.
13-19
4-16
74
65
70
Winthrop
23-11
11-5
163
170
163
Colorado
14-20
3-17
86
81
81
UNC Asheville
21-11
11-5
192
225
198
Radford
20-13
9-7
161
154
152
Longwood
18-14
7-9
210
230
211
Big East Conference (BE)
Big South Conference (BSth)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Presbyterian
14-18
7-9
240
256
231
St. John's*
30-4
18-2
13
15
12
Charleston So.
10-22
6-10
294
308
302
Creighton*
24-10
15-5
38
33
37
Gardner Webb
11-20
5-11
266
268
264
UConn*
23-10
14-6
32
35
35
USC Upstate
6-26
2-14
347
334
339
Marquette*
23-10
13-7
26
31
28
Xavier*
21-11
13-7
45
37
43
Villanova
19-14
11-9
55
52
56
Georgetown
17-15
8-12
88
94
86
Butler
14-19
6-14
83
77
77
Providence
12-20
6-14
100
104
97
DePaul
14-19
4-16
120
113
118
Seton Hall
7-25
2-18
211
217
206
Coastal Athletic Association (CAA)
Big Ten Conference (B10)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Michigan St.*
27-6
17-3
11
13
8
Towson
22-11
16-2
151
168
154
Maryland*
25-8
14-6
10
10
13
UNC Wilmington* 27-7
14-4
102
109
105
Michigan*
25-9
14-6
25
26
26
24-9
13-5
150
160
153
Wisconsin*
26-9
13-7
14
12
11
William & Mary 17-15
11-7
217
221
230
UCLA*
22-10
13-7
27
25
27
Campbell
15-17
10-8
222
223
221
Purdue*
22-11
13-7
19
18
19
Monmouth
13-20
10-8
258
260
267
Oregon*
24-9
12-8
29
39
31
Drexel
18-15
9-9
185
186
187
Illinois*
21-12
12-8
17
23
20
Northeastern
17-15
9-9
207
196
209
Indiana
19-13
10-10
54
55
48
Elon
17-15
8-10
184
228
197
Ohio St.
17-15
9-11
41
41
39
Hampton
17-16
8-10
212
204
215
Rutgers
15-17
8-12
77
68
75
Hofstra
15-18
6-12
218
226
220
Nebraska
17-14
7-13
59
62
54
Delaware
16-20
5-13
235
235
232
Iowa
17-16
7-13
63
66
64
Stony Brook
8-24
4-14
340
331
332
Northwestern
17-16
7-13
53
53
45
N.C. A&T
7-25
3-15
333
339
335
USC
16-17
7-13
70
59
63
Minnesota
15-17
7-13
95
86
89
Penn St.
16-15
6-14
66
64
60
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Washington
13-18
4-16
117
118
108
Liberty*
28-6
13-5
60
56
62
Middle Tenn.
22-11
12-6
106
120
119
J'Ville St.
22-12
12-6
122
132
123
Big West Conference (BW)
Charleston
Conference USA (CUSA)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Kennesaw St.
19-14
10-8
137
124
130
UC San Diego*
30-4
18-2
35
44
36
New Mexico St.
17-15
10-8
144
105
131
UC Irvine
28-6
17-3
62
80
66
La. Tech
20-12
9-9
126
134
126
CSUN
22-10
14-6
105
128
107
Western Ky.
17-15
8-10
159
159
159
UC Riverside
21-12
14-6
142
151
145
UTEP
18-15
7-11
157
143
158
UC Santa Barbara 21-13
11-9
140
147
147
Sam Houston St. 13-19
6-12
178
156
175
3-15
260
265
254
UC Davis
15-17
9-11
237
243
246
Cal Poly
16-19
8-12
180
178
181
CS Bakersfield
14-19
8-12
244
255
239
Hawaii
15-16
7-13
223
231
224
Long Beach St.
7-25
3-17
326
309
303
CS Fullerton
6-26
1-19
348
354
351
FIU
10-23
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference (MAAC)
Horizon League (Horz)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Robert Morris*
26-8
15-5
139
150
139
Quinnipiac
20-13
15-5
191
210
213
Milwaukee
21-11
14-6
135
163
144
Merrimack
18-15
14-6
181
198
188
Cleveland St.
21-12
14-6
174
173
168
Marist
20-10
13-7
246
284
271
Youngstown St.
21-13
13-7
190
213
202
Mount St. Mary's* 22-12
12-8
236
263
250
Purdue Fort Wayne 19-13
12-8
156
175
164
Manhattan
17-13
12-8
243
259
236
Northern Ky.
17-16
11-9
229
250
234
Iona
17-17
12-8
252
242
258
Oakland
16-18
11-9
193
193
177
Sacred Heart
15-18
10-10
254
248
263
Wright St.
15-18
8-12
220
220
223
Siena
14-18
9-11
259
269
253
IU Indy
10-22
6-14
315
314
314
Rider
14-19
9-11
314
307
313
Detroit Mercy
8-24
4-16
329
346
337
Fairfield
12-20
8-12
327
337
333
Green Bay
4-28
2-18
338
330
334
Saint Peter's
12-16
7-13
286
295
299
Niagara
11-20
6-14
322
327
321
Canisius
3-28
3-17
357
355
359
Ivy League (IVY)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Yale*
22-7
13-1
72
79
74
Cornell
18-11
9-5
119
125
128
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Princeton
19-11
8-6
166
206
178
Akron*
28-6
17-1
91
101
99
Dartmouth
14-14
8-6
209
176
205
Miami (OH)
25-9
14-4
147
146
151
Harvard
12-15
7-7
256
238
256
Kent St.
22-11
11-7
128
127
136
Brown
14-13
6-8
215
201
208
Toledo
18-15
10-8
238
253
240
Penn
8-19
4-10
303
303
292
Ohio
16-16
10-8
179
184
200
Columbia
12-15
1-13
272
299
279
Eastern Mich.
16-16
9-9
268
271
281
Western Mich.
12-20
9-9
279
281
293
Bowling Green
14-18
8-10
289
275
290
Central Mich.
14-17
7-11
219
222
199
Ball St.
14-17
7-11
276
273
275
Buffalo
9-22
4-14
341
345
340
Northern Illinois
6-25
2-16
354
349
345
Mid-American Conference (MAC)
Mountain West Conference (MWC)
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (MEAC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Norfolk St.*
24-10
11-3
183
195
180
New Mexico*
26-7
17-3
42
40
41
S. Carolina St.
20-13
11-3
196
188
190
Colorado St.*
25-9
16-4
47
38
42
Delaware St.
16-14
8-6
305
313
307
Utah St.*
26-7
15-5
37
49
51
Morgan St.
14-18
7-7
332
336
331
Boise St.
24-10
14-6
44
50
50
Howard
12-20
7-7
316
302
312
San Diego St.*
21-9
14-6
52
54
46
N.C. Central
14-19
6-8
319
319
323
UNLV
18-15
11-9
98
89
92
Coppin St.
6-24
4-10
359
362
361
Nevada
17-16
8-12
79
88
80
UMES
6-25
2-12
361
359
358
San Jose St.
15-19
7-13
175
152
165
Wyoming
12-20
5-15
197
189
185
Fresno St.
6-26
2-18
278
258
255
Air Force
4-28
1-19
323
289
310
Missouri Valley Conference (MVC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Drake*
30-3
17-3
56
58
58
Bradley
26-8
15-5
80
100
95
Northern Iowa
20-12
14-6
93
117
101
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Belmont
22-11
13-7
129
130
129
Central Conn.
25-7
14-2
168
194
183
Illinois St.
19-14
10-10
121
131
140
LIU
17-16
12-4
280
280
285
Illinois Chicago
18-14
10-10
154
190
174
Mercyhurst
15-16
9-7
336
333
342
Murray St.
16-17
9-11
146
162
142
Saint Francis*
16-17
8-8
297
301
311
Indiana St.
14-18
8-12
205
203
201
FDU
13-20
8-8
304
304
308
Southern Illinois 14-19
8-12
195
180
193
Stonehill
15-17
7-9
312
328
322
Northeast Conference (NEC)
Evansville
11-21
8-12
257
261
262
Wagner
14-16
6-10
339
340
344
Valparaiso
15-19
6-14
206
219
212
Le Moyne
9-23
4-12
350
347
354
Missouri St.
9-23
2-18
245
207
245
Chicago St.
4-28
4-12
358
361
362
Southeastern Conference (SEC)
Ohio Valley Conference (OVC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SE Mo. St.
21-12
15-5
188
197
204
Auburn*
28-5
15-3
2
3
4
SIUE*
22-11
13-7
216
218
217
Florida*
30-4
14-4
4
4
2
Little Rock
19-14
12-8
234
254
227
Alabama*
25-8
13-5
6
5
6
Tenn. St.
17-16
12-8
250
232
252
Tennessee*
27-7
12-6
5
6
5
Lindenwood
16-17
10-10
313
320
326
Texas A&M*
22-10
11-7
18
22
17
Tenn. Tech
15-17
10-10
292
290
304
Kentucky*
22-11
10-8
15
17
16
Morehead St.
15-17
10-10
317
321
327
Missouri*
22-11
10-8
16
16
15
UT Martin
14-19
9-11
291
288
291
Mississippi*
22-11
10-8
28
28
25
Eastern Ill.
12-19
8-12
318
315
315
Mississippi St.*
21-12
8-10
34
32
32
Western Ill.
12-19
6-14
337
342
347
Vanderbilt*
20-12
8-10
48
42
49
Southern Indiana 10-20
5-15
331
335
336
Georgia*
20-12
8-10
33
30
34
Arkansas*
20-13
8-10
40
43
40
Oklahoma*
20-13
6-12
43
46
38
Patriot League (PL)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Texas*
19-15
6-12
39
48
44
American*
22-12
13-5
226
244
237
LSU
14-18
3-15
89
84
88
Bucknell
18-15
13-5
213
214
225
South Carolina
12-20
2-16
87
76
69
Army
16-15
10-8
307
312
324
Boston U.
16-16
10-8
290
317
305
Navy
15-19
10-8
270
287
272
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Colgate
14-19
10-8
247
272
260
Chattanooga
24-9
15-3
115
135
110
Lafayette
13-20
7-11
283
294
289
UNC Greensboro 20-12
13-5
138
169
143
Loyola MD
12-19
6-12
308
310
306
Samford
22-10
12-6
116
137
116
Lehigh
11-19
6-12
281
300
282
ETSU
19-13
12-6
148
166
141
Holy Cross
13-19
5-13
310
329
320
Furman
25-9
11-7
127
142
137
Wofford*
19-15
10-8
131
145
120
VMI
15-19
7-11
298
311
287
Mercer
14-19
6-12
261
277
261
Western Caro.
8-22
4-14
342
341
338
The Citadel
5-25
0-18
362
360
356
Southern Conference (SC)
Summit League (Sum)
Southland Conference (Slnd)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
McNeese*
27-6
19-1
58
63
59
Omaha*
22-12
13-3
160
126
156
Lamar
20-13
14-6
169
174
166
St. Thomas
24-10
12-4
118
114
127
Nicholls
20-13
13-7
171
167
173
South Dakota St. 20-12
11-5
130
129
134
Texas A&M CC
20-14
12-8
165
149
160
North Dakota St. 21-11
10-6
136
122
133
Southeastern La. 18-14
12-8
208
208
194
South Dakota
19-14
9-7
233
237
241
Northwestern St. 16-16
12-8
230
227
228
North Dakota
12-21
5-11
275
241
265
Incarnate Word
17-16
9-11
249
245
248
Denver
11-21
5-11
300
270
309
Hou. Christian
12-20
9-11
287
266
278
UMKC
13-20
4-12
241
229
235
UTRGV
16-15
8-12
251
236
242
Oral Roberts
7-23
3-13
334
297
328
SFA
14-17
7-13
273
286
277
E. Texas A&M
5-26
3-17
335
332
330
New Orleans
4-27
2-18
346
350
349
Southwestern Athletic Conference (SWAC)
Sun Belt Conference (SB)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Arkansas St.
24-10
13-5
94
95
91
Troy*
23-10
13-5
99
103
98
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
South Alabama
21-11
13-5
123
136
121
Southern
20-12
15-3
224
215
233
James Madison
20-12
13-5
158
158
162
Jackson St.
16-18
14-4
264
257
249
Marshall
20-13
12-6
177
171
169
Beth. Cookman
17-16
13-5
277
296
288
App St.
17-14
10-8
170
164
170
Alabama St.*
19-15
12-6
274
274
273
Texas St.
16-16
9-9
198
212
196
Texas Southern
15-17
12-6
285
282
280
Ga. Southern
17-16
8-10
255
249
251
Alcorn St.
11-21
11-7
330
322
325
Old Dominion
15-20
8-10
293
293
284
Florida A&M
14-17
10-8
321
326
317
Georgia St.
14-19
8-10
265
247
266
Grambling St.
12-22
7-11
325
323
319
Louisiana
12-21
8-10
320
305
316
Alabama A&M
10-22
6-12
360
358
360
Southern Miss
11-22
5-13
299
306
297
Prairie View
5-27
4-14
356
357
357
Coastal Carolina 10-22
3-15
328
324
329
Ark Pine Bluff
6-25
3-15
363
363
363
Louisiana Monroe 7-25
3-15
349
344
350
Mississippi Val.
3-28
1-17
364
364
364
West Coast Conference (WCC)
Western Athletic Conference (WAC)
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
SCHOOL
REC
CONF
NET
BT
KP
Utah Valley
25-8
15-1
108
111
114
Saint Mary's*
28-5
17-1
21
24
22
Grand Canyon*
26-7
13-3
92
83
93
Gonzaga*
25-8
14-4
8
11
9
Cal Baptist
17-15
9-7
172
155
167
San Francisco
24-9
13-5
64
60
65
Abilene Christian 16-16
8-8
228
200
219
Santa Clara
20-12
12-6
57
51
57
Seattle
14-18
8-8
155
139
146
Oregon St.
20-12
10-8
85
91
85
Tarleton St.
12-20
7-9
302
285
286
Washington St.
19-14
8-10
112
106
124
UT Arlington
13-18
6-10
231
239
226
LMU
17-15
8-10
162
148
155
Southern Utah
12-19
4-12
306
325
295
Portland
12-20
7-11
288
251
269
Utah Tech
7-26
2-14
309
298
301
Pepperdine
13-22
4-14
227
199
216
Pacific
9-24
4-14
295
279
283
San Diego
6-27
2-16
324
292
296
First Round
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Ab. Christian
2021
2022
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
15
20
L 35
14
8.5
W1
Akron
Alabama
9
2.5
W3
Arizona
4
-9
L 21
Arizona State
2
11
Arkansas
7
2
L 17
Auburn
4
-9.5
W4
6
-17
W 13
3
-6
W1
Baylor
9
2
W9
Belmont
11
3.5
L2
1
-8.5
-25.5
W 17
W 24
Boise St.
Bucknell
14
14.5
L4
Buffalo
13
9
W 21
Butler
10
-2
W 17
15
18
L 11
6
-6
W 17
BYU
6
-3.5
Spread
Result
13
13
L4
6
-4.5
L 14
1
-24.5
1
-21
W 17
2
2
-14
W 15
Clemson
5
-3.5
W 11
7
-4
15
13
9.5
17.5
L7
7
2.5
L4
15
20.5
L 31
14
8.5
L 17
5
-6
Spread
Result
14
11.5
L 17
W 21
4
-8.5
W 13
-14.5
L4
2
-19.5
W 20
11
4.5
L2
W4
8
-2.5
W 10
2
-14.5
W 19
9
-1.5
W8
4
-13.5
L2
1
-20.5
W 36
3
-10.5
W 18
3
-14.5
W 25
8
3.5
W 11
10
1.5
L8
6
-8.5
L4
6
1.5
W 21
8
L1
14
8
L7
15
13.5
L 20
14
14.5
L 25
12
5.5
L6
13
8.5
L 13
10
-1.5
W2
10
2.5
L 12
W 23
Colorado St.
Connecticut
Seed
-5
L4
Colorado
Result
L7
Cleveland St.
Colgate
Spread
4
13
Cincinnati
Seed
2024
L 11
Chattanooga
C of Charleston
Seed
L 17
5
Bradley
2023
6
2
L 12
7
-4
L9
5
-6.5
L7
4
-9.5
W 24
1
-27.5
W 39
5
-7.5
W1
9
2
W3
6
-5.5
W9
3
-11.5
W 17
7
1.5
W3
10
-1.5
L5
Creighton
8
-2.5
L 10
CS Fullerton
15
20.5
L 26
15
18.5
L 17
Davidson
12
4.5
L5
10
-1
L1
Dayton
Delaware
Drake
@ Matteise
15
11
8
L 16
15.5
L 20
12
2.5
L7
First Round
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Drexel
Duke
2
-21
W 22
1
-27.5
2022
Seed
Spread
Result
16
22.5
L 29
W 23
2023
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
2
-18.5
W 17
5
-5.5
W 23
4
-12.5
W 17
11
8.5
W4
7
1.5
L2
8
-3.5
L 12
5
-6.5
W 21
166
26.5
L 28
Duquesne
Eastern Wash.
14
F. Dickinson
Florida
6
-6
W 15
16
28.5
L 38
10
3
W9
10.5
L9
16
7
1.5
9
-1
W 13
4
-9
W7
4
-11
16
22
9
1.5
W1
13
5.5
W1
3
-15.5
W 12
W 10
Furman
Gardner Webb
W5
W5
Flo. Atlantic
Florida State
23.5
L 15
Georgetown
12
6
L 23
Georgia Tech
9
6
L 11
Georgia State
15
14
L 15
14
12.5
L 29
Gonzaga
4
-12.5
W4
1
-28.5
W 38
1
-33
W 43
16
22.5
L 21
1
-22.5
W 21
Grambling
Grand Canyon
15
13.4
L 12
Hartford
16
25.5
L 24
2
-20.5
W 31
Houston
6
-4
W2
3
-12.5
W 29
5
-8.5
W 14
Howard
Illinois
1
-22.5
W 29
Indiana
Iona
15
21
L 22
16
24.5
L 15
15
17
L 13
Iowa
10
4
W7
2
-13.4
W 12
Iowa State
6
-5
L3
Jacksonville St.
14
15.5
L 12
12
5.5
W9
1
-19.5
W 11
1
-24.5
W 40
16
21.5
L 28
3
-10.5
W 16
2
-15.5
W 17
12
4.5
W 11
4
-7.5
W4
4
-8
W1
9
2.5
L 10
12
2.5
L 29
4
-3.5
W 11
13
9.5
L 24
5
-9.5
L4
8
1.5
L8
11
4
W5
6
-4.5
L 18
15
14.5
L 19
James Madison
Kansas
1
-13.5
W 16
4
-7
W 34
Kansas State
9
2.5
W 10
4
-4
L6
3
-10.5
W9
1
-22
W 27
1
-21.5
W 28
3
-7.5
W 12
Kennesaw St.
14
11.5
L5
Kent State
13
3.5
L 11
2018
2019
2021
First Round
2018-2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Kentucky
5
-4.5
W5
2
-20
W 35
12
7
W4
Liberty
Lipscomb
15
22
Seed
13
Spread
7
2022
Result
2023
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
2
-17.5
L6
6
-4.5
W8
3
-13.5
L4
15
19.5
L 20
16
24.5
L 40
2
-14.5
W 18
12
6.5
L 21
9
-1.5
W 18
8
1.5
L 18
14
10.5
L 16
8
1.5
L 15
10
-1.5
L3
11
-1.5
L 21
L9
L 18
Long Beach St.
Longwood
14
18.5
L 32
Louisiana
Louisville
Loyola-Chicago
7
11
1.5
-4.5
W2
3
-7
W5
Marquette
5
-3
L 19
6
-3.5
W2
13
13.5
11.5
L3
2
-10.5
W 17
8
2.5
W2
L 10
LSU
Marshall
13
8
-6
W 11
10
0
L 13
8
-2
W 15
6
-4
L5
9
3.5
L 32
W6
Maryland
10
4
W9
McNeese
Memphis
Miami (FL)
6
-1.5
L2
Michigan
3
-10
W 14
2
-15
W 19
Michigan State
3
-14.5
W4
2
-18
W 11
Minnesota
10
4.5
W 10
Mississippi
8
-1
L 23
Mississippi St.
5
-7
L4
Missouri
8
1
L 13
Montana
14
10
L 14
1
9
15
15
-25
-1.5
W 16
-3.5
L 11
8
-1.5
L1
10
2
W2
5
-2.5
W7
11
-2
W 12
7
1
W1
7
-2.5
W 10
L4
14
Morehead St.
14
12
10
L 17
12
3
13
15
L 35
L 17
W 19
7
-2
7
PK
W4
7
-3
L9
New Mexico
New Mexico St.
Norfolk St.
@ Matteise
12
-3.5
L 11
12
6
1.5
W 11
14
7.5
L 12
W5
Nebraska
Nevada
7
L 19
Montana St.
Murray State
9
L1
16
33
L 43
12
6.5
W7
16
20.5
L 36
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
First Round
2018-2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
North Carolina
2
-22
W 18
1
-24.5
W 15
8
-2
L 23
8
-3.5
W 32
N.C. State
9
3.5
L 11
No. Dakota St.
16
27.5
Seed
Spread
2024
Result
11
5.5
L9
16
19.5
L 11
7
-1.5
W8
13
Northeastern
13
7
L 34
Northern Kent.
14
13
L 15
7.5
Notre Dame
11
4.5
Ohio
13
7
W4
Ohio State
5
-8
W8
11
5
W3
2
-15.5
L3
Oklahoma
10
1.5
L5
9
1
W 23
8
1.5
W4
4
-7
W9
15
15.5
W3
7
-
W DQ
12
8.5
W 14
Oklahoma State
12
2
W 18
Oregon State
Penn
16
-13.5
7
0
W 28
11
4.5
W 13
9
3.5
W 12
14
13.5
W4
11
-2.5
W 14
W 13
12
5.5
L 23
L 16
Penn St.
10
2.5
W 17
Pittsburgh
11
4.5
W 18
Princeton
15
14.5
W4
Providence
10
2.5
L4
Purdue
2
-20.5
W 26
Radford
16
22.5
L 26
Rhode Island
7
-1.5
W5
3
-12.5
W 12
4
-7.5
L9
Richmond
Rutgers
10
Saint Louis
13
10
L 14
Saint Mary's
11
3.5
L4
Saint Peter's
-24.5
L 12
Oral Roberts
Oregon
1
W 14
Oakland
12.5
Result
W9
Northwestern
14
Spread
L 23
North Texas
Old Dominion
Seed
-2.5
4
-2
W9
11
4.5
L8
3
-16.5
W 22
1
-23.5
L5
1
-26.5
W 28
12
9.5
W4
5
-2.5
W 29
5
-4.5
W 12
5
-5.5
L9
15
17.5
W6
15
21.5
L 34
W4
First Round
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Seed
Spread
2023
Result
Seed
Spread
2024
Result
Samford
San Diego State
11
4
L2
6
-3
L 16
San Francisco
Seton Hall
8
-3.5
W 11
10
3
L 16
8
-2
L3
10
2
L5
8
0
L 27
5
-5.5
W6
South Carolina
South Dakota St
12
8
L8
St. Bonaventure
11
6
L 15
Stephen F. Aus.
14
11
L 10
13
9
2
2
L9
11
4.5
W5
TCU
6
-4.5
L5
Tennessee
3
-11.5
W 26
Texas
10
PK
L4
Texas A&M
7
-2.5
W4
8
2
-2
-17.5
L9
W7
11
3
16
19.5
L 19
Texas Tech
3
-11
W 10
3
-13
W 15
13
4
9
-1.5
16
21
13
12.5
L4
Utah State
8
-3.5
L 17
VCU
8
1.5
L 15
Vermont
13
9
L7
6
-3.5
W4
@ Matteise
1
-22.5
-6.5
W4
6
2.5
L 14
15
15.5
L 17
16
27.5
L 39
0
W 27
6
-4.5
W2
9
-3.5
L 16
-8.5
L 14
3
-18.5
W 32
4
-11.5
W3
2
-21.5
W 34
3
-8.5
L1
6
-1.5
W8
2
-13.5
W 20
7
-2.5
W 12
7
-2.5
L 17
9
-1.5
W 15
16
-24.5
L 21
16
25
L 16
16
22
L 27
6
-4
W 12
3
-15
W 35
6
-4.5
L 13
12
8.5
L 14
12
6.5
L4
8
3.5
W 16
13
12.5
L 17
12
7.5
L1
11
3.5
W 11
14
10.5
L 18
4
-13
W4
2
-17.5
W 33
15
17.5
L 33
10
2.5
L 10
10
-1.5
L 11
12
4.5
L 12
15
10.5
L 17
W 20
USC
Villanova
5
9
UNC Asheville
UNC Greensboro
L4
W 15
UCLA
UMBC
7.5
W6
UCSB
UCF
13
5
UAB
UC Irvine
Result
W 16
Texas A&M CC
Texas Southern
Spread
L 15
Stetson
Syracuse
Seed
W 26
13
11
L 10
6
-8
W 16
11
4
L 12
5
-6
W 10
7
-2
L2
13
5
L4
2
-15.5
W 20
2018
2019
2021
2022
First Round
2018-2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Virginia
1
-21
L 20
1
-22
W 15
4
-7
L4
Virginia Tech
8
-2.5
L3
4
-10
W 14
10
-1.5
L5
Seed
11
Spread
1.5
2023
Result
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
4
-5.5
L1
9
3.5
5
-10
W 17
3
-13
W 17
9
-2.5
4
-13.5
Wisconsin
5
14
11.5
7
1
-19.5
2018
Spread
-3
9
11.5
9
2
W 23
3
-8
W7
16
21
L 17
7
L5
14
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
L 23
Seed
Spread
16.5
Arkansas
-1.5
L 31
Baylor
Butler
10
4
L3
Cincinnati
2
-9
L2
Clemson
5
1.5
W 31
5
-2.5
W 14
9
14
L 12
Colorado
Spread
Result
14
14
5.5
L 20
2
2
-6
W 19
1
5
3
-2.5
W 14
14
L 12
1
1
1.5
-6.5
W2
W 13
Creighton
5
-9.5
15
14.5
L 18
5
-4.5
L 11
13
13.5
W2
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
1
-8.5
W 22
4
-5.5
W 11
2
-8.5
W 10
3
-4.5
L8
6
4.5
W8
10
4.5
L4
-5.5
8
3.5
W1
9
5.5
L 17
3
1.5
L9
W 14
9
12.5
L7
4
-3.5
W 15
1
-13.5
W 17
6
-1.5
W9
3
-3.5
W 13
7
8.5
L 10
4
-6.5
W 38
Dayton
2
W5
2024
L 18
Connecticut
Duke
1.5
2023
Seed
3
4
7
W5
L 22
2022
Result
-11.5
Arizona
Auburn
L 28
W 16
Ab. Christian
Alabama
L 10
3
14
Seed
L 18
6
W 19
Yale
Second Round
2018-2024
-2
12
L 26
Wofford
Xavier
24.5
L6
Winthrop
Wright St.
16
L2
Western Kent.
Wichita State
Result
W 17
Washington St.
West Virginia
Spread
L8
Wagner
Washington
Seed
W 25
1
-13
W1
2
-6.5
W9
5
-2.5
L 13
Second Round
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Seed
Spread
2023
Result
Seed
Spread
2024
Result
Duquesne
FDU
Florida
6
1.5
L3
10
6
L 15
7
-9
9
5.5
W5
4
-4
W 28
4
-1
4
-4
W6
1
-14
W 12
1
-15.5
L8
9
-15.5
W8
13
4.5
L 23
3
-4.5
W3
W 16
1
-9.5
W4
Grand Canyon
Houston
3
-6.5
W 15
Illinois
2
-7.5
W3
5
-3.5
W 15
1
-7
L 13
4
3.5
L 15
Indiana
1
4
Iowa
10
8
L6
2
-4.5
11
-5.5
-1.5
W 17
-4.5
W4
Kansas St.
9
-10
W7
Kentucky
5
-5.5
W 20
Liberty
Loyola-Chicago
11
4.5
13
L 14
2
-5
W6
12
9.5
L9
3
13
2.5
W1
LSU
Marshall
4
-3
W 28
3
1.5
4
W5
L 34
8
7
W 13
8
4.5
L8
1
-12.5
W7
Maryland
6
3
L2
10
6
L 19
Memphis
9
9.5
L4
Miami (FL)
10
6.5
W 18
11
6.5
W8
7
6.5
L9
Michigan
3
-3.5
W1
2
-6
W 15
Michigan State
3
-10
L2
2
-10.5
W 20
10
10.5
L 20
1
-4.5
W8
Missouri
Murray State
L 26
5
-3.5
W 21
12
5.5
L 11
1
-8.5
W5
3
-9.5
W 26
2
-6.5
W 11
12
6.5
L 38
1
-3.5
L1
4
3.5
L 21
3
3.5
W6
6
-3.5
L6
2
-2.5
L9
2
-4.5
W4
8
8.5
L 22
5
1.5
W 16
7
2.5
W9
9
3.5
L 16
7
-6.5
L 15
L 23
Marquette
Minnesota
9.5
L 16
James Madison
1
11
L 15
Iowa State
Kansas
Result
W 18
Furman
Gonzaga
15.5
Spread
L3
Fl. Atlantic
Florida State
16
Seed
12
4
L 28
7
-8
L 10
2018
2019
Second Round
2018-2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Nevada
7
9
W2
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
New Mexico St.
North Carolina
2
-7
L 21
1
-11
W 22
2023
Seed
Spread
Result
12
6.5
L5
8
5.5
W7
Seed
Spread
2024
Result
N.C. State
North Texas
13
6
7
Notre Dame
11
7.5
7.5
L5
Ohio State
5
4
L6
Oklahoma
11
6.5
L 15
9
10.5
L 12
5.5
7
15.5
L 16
Oklahoma St.
4
-6
L 10
Oral Roberts
15
9
W3
7
4.5
W 15
12
6
W 10
12
-4.5
W 19
Oregon St.
5
10
4.5
L5
Pittsburgh
11
4.5
L 11
Princeton
15
6.5
W 15
Providence
4
-3.5
W 28
3
-3.5
W 10
12
3.5
L 28
Saint Mary's
5
3
L 16
Saint Peter's
15
8
W 10
2
-4
W3
Rhode Island
7
9.5
L 25
3
-3
W 26
Richmond
Rutgers
10
7.5
8
4.5
L4
Syracuse
5
1.5
W2
11
TCU
Tennessee
@ Matteise
3
-4.5
L1
2
-8
W6
4
W 16
11
-6.5
W6
9
13.5
L 17
14
6.5
L6
11
3.5
L 13
1
-11.5
W 39
5
-5.5
W 28
2
-6.5
W4
L3
San Diego St.
Seton Hall
-3.5
L 10
Penn St.
Purdue
1
L 14
8
Oregon
Result
L6
Oakland
13
Spread
L 23
Northwestern
Ohio
Seed
5
3.5
L 15
5
-4.5
W 23
W3
9
10
L5
6
4.5
L3
3
-6.5
L8
4
2.5
W 13
Second Round
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Texas
Texas A&M
7
7
W 21
Texas Tech
3
-1.5
W3
3
-4
W 20
UC Irvine
13
4.5
L 19
UCF
9
13
L1
UCLA
UMBC
16
10
2023
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
6
3.5
L 10
2
-4.5
W5
7
6.5
L4
9
8.5
L5
8
11.5
L 39
7
6.5
L 11
13
5.5
L 28
6
-1.5
L2
3
-7.5
W6
11
-5.5
W 20
4
-3
W 16
6
-1.5
W 34
2
-7.5
W5
L7
USC
Utah St.
Villanova
1
-11.5
W 23
6
3
L 26
Virginia
1
-10.5
W 12
Virginia Tech
4
-9.5
W9
Washington
9
11
L 22
5
-6
W 23
2
-5
W 10
Washington St.
West Virginia
5
-13
W 23
Wisconsin
Wofford
Xavier
7
1
-5.5
5
3
-4
L3
9
6.5
L 13
3
-4
L5
L6
L5
3
-4.5
W 11
Yale
Sweet 16
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Alabama
2022
Seed
Spread
Result
2
-7
L 10
Arizona
Arkansas
Auburn
5
5.5
3
-11.5
W2
1
-8.5
W 11
Seed
Spread
2023
Result
1
-2
L 12
4
10
W6
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
1
-6.5
L7
4
4.5
W2
2
-7.5
L5
6
7.5
W5
8
3.5
L 23
W 17
Baylor
Clemson
Connecticut
Creighton
Duke
5
2
-11
W4
1
-7
W2
12.5
L 18
2
1
W5
4
-3.5
W 23
1
-11.5
W 30
6
-10.5
W 11
3
3.5
L7
4
4.5
W 30
Sweet 16
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Seed
Spread
2023
Result
Fl. Atlantic
2024
Seed
Spread
Result
9
4.5
W7
Seed
Spread
Result
Florida St.
9
6
W 15
4
7.5
L 14
4
2
L 18
Gonzaga
4
-6
L 15
1
-7.5
W 14
1
-12.5
W 18
1
-10
L6
3
1.5
W3
5
4.5
L 12
3
2
L4
2
-6.5
W 16
5
2
W 12
1
-7.5
L 14
1
-4.5
L3
Illinois
3
1.5
W 30
Iowa St.
2
-1.5
L3
2
-7.5
L9
1
-4.5
L2
11
7.5
W9
1
-4.5
W 12
Houston
Kansas
1
-5
W4
Kansas St.
9
5.5
L3
Kentucky
5
-5.5
L3
Loyola Chicago
11
1
W1
LSU
1
-7
W5
3
2
-2
W5
W4
8
3
-1.5
-7
L7
6 L 17
Marquette
Miami (FL)
Michigan
3
-2.5
W 27
Michigan State
Nevada
7
-1
2
-2
L 19
2
-6
W 17
1
-5.5
L 17
1
-2
W 18
11
5
5
7.5
W 14
7
1.5
L5
L8
L1
North Carolina
8
2.5
W7
N.C. State
Oral Roberts
Oregon
12
8.5
L4
Oregon St.
15
11.5
L2
7
2
L 14
12
7
W7
Princeton
15
Providence
Purdue
2
-2
L 13
3
1.5
W5
Saint Peter's
4
7
L5
3
-13
L3
15
13
W3
San Diego St.
Syracuse
11
11
L4
Tennessee
Texas A&M
7
2.5
L 27
Texas Tech
3
2
W 13
@ Matteise
11
2
-1.5
L5
3
2
W 19
6.5
10.5
L 11
5
6.5
W7
5
11.5
L 30
4
-4.5
L7
2
-3.5
W7
L 16
3
-1
L5
Sweet 16
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
Result
2023
2024
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
UCLA
11
7
W 10
4
-2.5
L7
2
-1.5
L3
USC
6
-2
W 14
2
-5
W8
3
4.5
L 12
-5.5
Result
2022
Spread
1
Spread
2021
Seed
Villanova
Seed
2019
W 12
Virginia
1
-8.5
W4
Virginia Tech
4
7
L2
West Virginia
5
5.5
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Seed
Spread
2023
Arkansas
Auburn
5
4.5
Result
Seed
Spread
Result
3
-8
L9
1
-8
W9
4
4
Connecticut
4
-2.5
W 28
Creighton
6
2.5
L1
L4
1
-2.5
L1
2
-4
W9
Fl. Atlantic
Florida State
9
4.5
1
-5
L6
Houston
9
1.5
W3
1
-8.5
W 19
3
2.5
L 28
2
-8
W6
5
-3
Kansas
1
-3
W4
Kansas St.
9
-1
L 16
Kentucky
1
2
1
-4.5
Michigan State
North Carolina
3
-4.5
-6
W 26
3
-1.5
L3
5
3.5
W7
L6
W 16
Miami (FL)
Michigan
4
-3.5
W7
6
3.5
L7
1
-8.5
W 25
4
-7.5
L 12
3
8.5
L 25
L6
Illinois
11
Result
L4
Gonzaga
Loyola Chicago
Spread
L9
Clemson
3
Seed
W6
Baylor
2
Result
2024
Alabama
Duke
Spread
L 12
Xavier
Elite Eight
2018-2024
Seed
W4
1
2
2.5
-6.5
10
6
L 26
8
-8
W 20
L2
W1
Elite Eight
2018-2024
2018
Seed
Spread
2019
Result
Seed
Spread
2021
Result
Seed
Spread
2022
Result
Seed
Spread
2023
Result
Seed
Spread
2024
Result
N.C. State
Oregon St.
12
Purdue
3
4.5
12
8
L5
5
Saint Peter's
15
8
-2.5
2
L 12
3
5
W6
UCLA
11
6.5
W2
USC
6
8.5
L 19
Villanova
Virginia
@ Matteise
1
-6
W 12
2
1
-4.5
W5
11
7.5
W 12
1
-3.5
W6
2
3.5
L6
L 20
Texas
6
Result
W1
Tennessee
3
Spread
L6
San Diego St.
Texas Tech
Seed
3
W6
-3.5
L7
National Championship Game
National Semifinal
2013
Louisville (-10) vs. Wichita State
Louisville (72-68)
2004
Connecticut (-5) vs. Georgia Tech
Connecticut (82-73)
2013
Michigan (-1.5) vs. Syracuse
Michigan (61-56)
2005
North Carolina (-2) vs. Illinois
North Carolina (75-70)
2014
Florida (-7) vs. Connecticut
Connecticut (63-53)
2006
Florida (-1) vs. UCLA
Florida (73-57)
2014
Kentucky (0) vs. Wisconsin
Kentucky (74-73)
2007
Florida (-4.5) vs. Ohio State
Florida (84-75)
2015
Kentucky (-5) vs. Wisconsin
Wisconsin (71-64)
2008
Memphis (-2) vs. Kansas
Kansas (75-68) [OT]
2015
Duke (-5) vs. Michigan State
Duke (81-61)
2009
North Carolina (-7.5) vs. Michigan St.
North Carolina (89-72)
2016
Villanova (-2.5) vs. Oklahoma
Villanova (95-51)
2010
Duke (-7) vs. Butler
Duke (61-59)
2016
North Carolina (-10) vs. Syracuse
North Carolina (83-66)
2011
Connecticut (-3) vs. Butler
Connecticut (53-41)
2017
Gonzaga (-7) vs. South Carolina
Gonzaga (77-73)
2012
Kentucky (-6) vs. Kansas
Kentucky (67-59)
2017
North Carolina (-4.5) vs. Oregon
North Carolina (77-76)
2013
Louisville (-4) vs. Michigan
Louisville (82-76)
2018
Michigan (-5.5) vs. Loyola-Chicago
Michigan (69-57)
2014
Kentucky (-2.5) vs. Connecticut
Connecticut (60-54)
2018
Villanova (-5) vs. Kansas
Villanova (95-79)
2015
Wisconsin (-1) vs. Duke
Duke (68-63)
2019
Michigan State (-2) vs. Texas Tech
Texas Tech (61-51)
2016
North Carolina (-2) vs. Villanova
Villanova (77-74)
2019
Virginia (-6) vs. Auburn
Virginia (63-62)
2017
North Carolina (-1) vs. Gonzaga
North Carolina (71-65)
2021
Baylor (-5) vs. Houston
Baylor (78-59)
2018
Villanova (-7) vs. Michigan
Villanova (79-62)
2021
Gonzaga (-14.5) vs. UCLA
Gonzaga (93-90) {OT}
2019
Virginia (-2) vs. Texas Tech
Virginia (85-77) [OT}
2022
Kansas (-4) vs. Villanova
Kansas (81-65)
2021
Gonzaga (-4.5) vs. Baylor
Baylor (86-70)
2022
Duke (-4.5) vs. North Carolina
North Carolina (81-77)
2022
Kansas (-4.5) vs. North Carolina
Kansas (72-69)
2023
SDSU (-2.5) vs. Florida Atlantic
San Diego State (72-71)
2023
Connecticut (-6.5) vs. SDSU
Connecticut (76-59)
2023
Connecticut (-5.5) vs. Miami
Connecticut (72-59)
2024
Connecticut (-6.5) vs. Purdue
Connecticut (75-60)
2024
Connecticut (-10.5) vs. Alabama
Connecticut (86-72)
2024
Purdue (-9.5) vs. N.C. State
Purdue (63-50)