Course Title: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Course code: ENV 401
Assignment Topic: EIA-Basic Concept
Submitted to
Prof. Dr. M. Zainal Abedin
Adjunct Faculty
Department of Environmental Science and Management
School of Environmental Science and Life Science (SELS)
Submitted by
Group No. Name of Group Members
01
ID
Rana Projjal Sarkar
2130634
Tasfia Tahsin
2110634
Humaira Ahmed
2120629
Section
01
Submission Date: 4th December 2023
1|P age
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 3
EIA Origins and Development........................................................................................................................... 4
Concept of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ..................................................................................... 5
Method for carrying out EIA ............................................................................................................................. 5
Steps in EIA process ........................................................................................................................................... 6
The Main Participants of EIA ........................................................................................................................... 7
Importance of EIA for Environmental Protection........................................................................................... 8
EIA with respect to Bangladesh......................................................................................................................... 9
What is assessed in Environmental Impact Assessment? .............................................................................. 10
The Environmental Components of EIA ........................................................................................................ 12
Advantages and Disadvantages of EIA ........................................................................................................... 14
Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................... 16
2|P age
Introduction
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a systematic procedure devised to identify, assess, and
mitigate the potential environmental, social, and economic consequences of proposed projects,
policies, or programs. It serves as a vital instrument for achieving sustainable development by
equipping decision-makers with extensive information to make well-informed choices regarding
the environmental implications of their actions.
Figure 1: Environmental Impact Assessment
The primary aim of EIA is to foster responsible and sustainable development by anticipating and
addressing the possible adverse effects of human activities on the environment. This process
entails a multidisciplinary approach, involving experts in the fields of environmental science,
engineering, social sciences, and economics to evaluate the complete spectrum of impacts that a
project may generate.
EIA has emerged as a global practice, with numerous countries enshrining it in their regulatory
frameworks to ensure sustainable development and safeguard the environment. As the world
confronts escalating environmental challenges, EIA continues to play a pivotal role in reconciling
developmental needs with environmental preservation, ultimately contributing to a more resilient
and harmonious coexistence between human activities and the ecosystems they influence.
3|P age
EIA Origins and Development
The origins of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) can be traced back to the 1960s,
originating in North America and Western Europe. This particular time period witnessed a surge
in awareness concerning the intricate relationship between the expanding industrial economy and
local environmental changes.
The developmental years (1960s - 1970s): The formal development of the EIA procedure took
place during the 1970s, driven by the necessity to predict and address the environmental impacts
of burgeoning developmental activities. The foundation for EIA was established during this era,
aiming to provide opportunities for mitigating negative impacts and enhancing positive ones.
A localized focus (Early 1970s): Initially, during the early 1970s, following the implementation
of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), efforts related to EIA were confined to the
local project area. The broader impacts of wider projects and their potential relationships were
overlooked during this nascent stage.
Organized development (Mid-1970s to Early 1980s): As the mid-1970s approached and
extended into the early 1980s, EIA efforts underwent a transformative phase. The focus shifted
from localized assessments to a more comprehensive and organized approach. This particular
period witnessed a significant rise in the technical sophistication of EIA processes.
Global expansion (Early 1980s to Mid-1990s): The early 1980s to the mid-1990s witnessed a
rapid global expansion of EIA, catalyzed by international events such as the 1987 World
Commission on Environment and Development, and the Earth Summits of 1992 and 1997. During
this epoch, the definition of the 'environment' broadened to include not only biophysical aspects
but also components of the social and economic environments.
A holistic perspective (1980s - 1990s): The expanding scope of EIA during the 1980s to the 1990s
marked a holistic approach that recognized the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and
economic factors. This comprehensive perspective represented a paradigm shift in environmental
assessment methodologies.
Introduction of "Environmental Health Impact Assessment" (1987): In a pivotal move in
1987, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the concept of "Environmental Health
Impact Assessment." This addition emphasized the importance of considering health-related
impacts within the broader framework of EIA.
4|P age
Concept of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
According to the graph, in scenarios where projects undergo Environmental impact Assessment
(EIA), there is a systemic evaluation of the potential environmental consequences before the
project implementation. This allows for informed decision-making, identification of potential
risks, and the implementation of mitigation measures. As a result, the environmental impact is
reduced, leading to sustainable development. Conversely, in scenarios without EIA, projects
proceed without a Comprehensive assessment of their environmental impact m potentially leading
to unanticipated, negative consequences for the. environmental and surrounding communities.
Method for carrying out EIA
The process of conducting Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) involves several systematic
procedures. These include:
(1) Gathering baseline data from both primary and secondary sources.
(2) Making predictions about potential impacts based on historical knowledge and mathematical
models.
(3) Assessing the impacts and evaluating the net cost benefit, while simultaneously developing
environmental management plans to minimize the negative effects.
(4) Quantitatively estimating the financial cost of implementing monitoring plans and mitigation
measures.
(5) Preparing environmental management plans aimed at reducing the impacts to a minimum.
(6) The financial cost of the monitoring plan and the mitigation measures can be quantitatively
estimated.
5|P age
Steps in EIA process
The process of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a methodical and recurring approach
characterized by intricate interactions among its different stages. The essential steps in this process,
designed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of proposed projects, are as follows:
1. Screening: In this initial phase, the project plan undergoes a meticulous screening process.
Factors such as the magnitude of investment, geographical location, and the nature of development
are scrutinized to determine whether statutory clearance is necessary.
2. Scoping: The scoping stage involves a detailed examination of the potential impacts of the
project. This includes the identification of impact zones, exploration of possible mitigations, and
the establishment of monitoring requirements. Strict adherence to guidelines set by the Ministry
of Environment and Forest (MoEF) of the Government of India is essential for the EIA agency.
3. Collection of Baseline Data: A comprehensive understanding of the existing environmental
conditions in the study area is established through the meticulous collection of baseline data. This
data serves as an important reference point for subsequent assessments.
4. Impact Prediction: Anticipating positive and negative impacts, discerning reversible and
irreversible consequences, and evaluating temporary and permanent effects are integral
components of impact prediction. A nuanced understanding of the project by the assessment
agency is crucial for accurate predictions.
5. Mitigation Measures and EIA Report: The EIA report plays a pivotal role in this phase,
summarizing proposed actions and measures aimed at preventing, minimizing, or mitigating
identified impacts. Contingency plans, including strategies for compensating potential
environmental damage or loss, are carefully outlined.
6. Public Hearing: After the completion of the EIA report, transparency and inclusivity are
fostered through engaging the public and environmental groups living near the project site.
Consultation and information dissemination ensure that diverse perspectives are considered.
7. Decision Making: The final decision-making process involves the collaboration of the Impact
Assessment (IA) Authority and domain experts. Extensive consultations with the project manager
and consultants are undertaken to make informed decisions, considering both the EIA and the
Environment Management Plan (EMP).
8. Monitoring and Implementation of Environmental Management Plan: Rigorous
monitoring is established to oversee the phased implementation of the project. The Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) is systematically executed to ensure compliance with approved measures
and the effective management of environmental impacts.
9. Risk Assessment: An integral aspect of the EIA process involves a meticulous analysis of
inventories and the evaluation of hazard probability and indices. This comprehensive risk
assessment helps identify potential threats and vulnerabilities, contributing to informed decisionmaking.
6|P age
By emphasizing its cyclical nature, the EIA process integrates feedback loops, allowing ongoing
refinement and adaptation based on emerging information and insights. Stakeholder engagement
and adherence to regulatory frameworks enhance the effectiveness of this multifaceted assessment
procedure.
The Main Participants of EIA
Each participant plays a critical role in ensuring that the EIA process is comprehensive,
transparent, and considers all potential environmental impacts before a project moves forward.
1. Those who propose the project: This group comprises individuals, organizations, or entities
initiating or planning a project that could have environmental implications. They're responsible for
providing project details, funding, and initiating the EIA process.
2. The environmental consultant who prepares EIA on behalf of the project proponent:
Environmental consultants or consulting firms are hired by the project proponents to conduct the
EIA. They assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and suggest
mitigation measures.
3. Pollution Control Board (State or National): Regulatory authorities like Pollution Control
Boards at the state or national level play a crucial role. They review the EIA report, ensure
compliance with environmental regulations, and issue necessary clearances or permits for the
project.
4. Public participation: The public has the right to express opinions and concerns regarding the
proposed project. Their feedback, often collected through public hearings or consultations, is
considered in the decision-making process.
5. Impact Assessment Agency: This agency, typically a government body, oversees the EIA
process, ensures its adherence to regulations, and sometimes coordinates with other stakeholders
involved in the assessment.
6. Regional center of the Ministry of Environment and Forest: These regional centers act as
intermediaries between the project proponents, Impact Assessment Agency, and other
stakeholders. They may facilitate the EIA process and ensure that it aligns with national or regional
environmental policies and guidelines.
7|P age
Importance of EIA for Environmental Protection
EIA serves as a crucial tool for assessing the potential environmental consequences of proposed
development activities before they are carried out. Here's how it addresses the issues you've
mentioned:
1. Anticipating Environmental Problems: EIA involves a systematic process of identifying,
predicting, and evaluating potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. By anticipating
these problems in advance, measures can be taken to mitigate or avoid them.
2. Holistic Decision-Making: EIA provides decision-makers with comprehensive information
about the environmental implications of a project. This information allows for a more balanced
evaluation of the costs and benefits, considering environmental, social, and economic factors.
3. Minimizing Resource Depletion and Waste Generation: Through EIA, strategies can be
developed to minimize the use of natural resources as raw materials and to reduce waste
generation. This includes exploring alternative designs, technologies, and locations that are more
environmentally friendly.
4. Protecting Air, Soil, and Water Quality: EIA helps in identifying potential sources of
pollution and their impacts on air, soil, and water. By doing so, appropriate measures can be
planned to prevent or mitigate contamination and degradation of these vital resources.
5. Global Environmental Concerns and Sustainability: EIA contributes to global efforts for
sustainability by ensuring that development activities align with environmental conservation goals.
It supports the principles of sustainable development by balancing progress with the protection of
natural resources and ecosystems.
6. Legal Compliance and Responsible Development: In many cases, EIA is a legal requirement
for projects. By conducting EIAs, project proponents adhere to environmental regulations and
demonstrate a commitment to responsible and environmentally conscious development.
Ultimately, EIA is an indispensable process that guides decision-makers, stakeholders, and the
public toward making informed choices that minimize environmental harm while allowing for
necessary development to take place.
8|P age
EIA with respect to Bangladesh
In Bangladesh, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) categories are often classified based on
the magnitude and significance of potential environmental impacts. These classifications typically
categorize projects into different color codes such as Green, Orange A, Orange B, and Red. Here's
a general understanding of these categories:
•
Green Category: Projects falling under the "Green" category are considered to have
minimal or negligible environmental impacts. These projects may include small-scale
developments like minor road expansions, some agricultural activities, or renovations that
are not expected to significantly affect the environment. They might be exempted from full
EIA requirements but may still require basic assessments like Initial Environmental
Examination (IEE).
•
Orange A Category: Projects falling under the "Orange A" category are moderate-sized
projects that could potentially have adverse environmental impacts but are manageable
with appropriate mitigation measures. These projects include certain industrial facilities,
small-scale hydropower plants, or infrastructure projects. They require a comprehensive
EIA report for approval.
•
Orange B Category: Projects categorized as "Orange B" are larger-scale developments
that pose significant environmental risks and impacts. These projects might include large
9|P age
industrial complexes, major infrastructure projects, or extensive urban development
initiatives. They necessitate an in-depth EIA study and meticulous mitigation strategies.
•
Red Category: The "Red" category encompasses projects with severe and potentially
irreversible environmental impacts. These projects, such as large-scale mining operations,
heavy industries, or major dam constructions, are likely to cause substantial harm to the
environment. They demand the highest level of scrutiny through a comprehensive EIA
process, stringent mitigation measures, and often face strict regulatory controls.
These color-coded categories help regulatory bodies in Bangladesh to assess the magnitude of
potential environmental impacts associated with proposed projects. They guide the level of
scrutiny, the depth of assessment required, and the stringency of mitigation measures needed to
address environmental concerns.
What is assessed in Environmental Impact Assessment?
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) involves a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of
various aspects related to a proposed project, activity, or policy. The assessment covers multiple
dimensions to understand and mitigate potential environmental impacts. The key elements asses
Project Description: Comprehensive information about the nature, scope, and purpose of the
project.
1. Project Alternatives: Evaluation of alternative project options and their potential
environmental impacts.
2. Baseline Environmental Conditions: Analysis of the existing environmental conditions in
the project area.
3. Environmental Components: Examination of specific environmental aspects such as air
quality, water resources, soil, biodiversity, noise, and others.
4. Direct and Indirect Impacts: Identification and assessment of both direct and indirect
impacts that the project may have on the environment.
5. Cumulative Impacts: Evaluation of the combined effects of the proposed project along with
other existing and planned activities in the area.
6. Mitigation Measures: Development of measures to mitigate or minimize adverse
environmental impacts.
7. Social and Economic Impacts: Assessment of social and economic consequences on local
communities, including employment, housing, and community well-being.
8. Human Health and Safety: Evaluation of potential effects on human health and safety,
including exposure to pollutants or hazardous materials.
9. Public Participation: Involvement of the public and stakeholders in the decision-making
process, ensuring their concerns are considered.
10. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Verification of compliance with environmental laws,
regulations, and standards.
11. Monitoring and Follow-up: Development of monitoring programs to track the project's
environmental performance after implementation.
10 | P a g e
12. Environmental Management Plan: Establishment of a plan detailing how the project will
be managed to minimize environmental impacts during its lifecycle.
13. Emergency Response Plan: Preparation of plans to address potential emergencies and
unforeseen environmental incidents.
14. Financial and Economic Analysis: Economic evaluation of the project, including costs and
benefits.
15. Decision-Making and Approval: Presentation of findings and recommendations for
decision-makers to consider during the approval.
EIA is a systematic tool that aims to integrate environmental considerations into the decisionmaking process, promoting sustainable development and the protection of ecosystems. The
thorough assessment of these aspects allows for informed decision-making, ensuring that
environmental considerations are central to the planning and execution of projects.
The following are necessary to conduct an environmental impact assessment:
(i) evaluation of the current state of the environment.
(ii) evaluation of the ecosystem's constituent elements (air, water, land, biological).
(iii) an examination of the project's potential negative environmental effects before it is
implemented.
(iv) the effect on the local populace.
11 | P a g e
The Environmental Components of EIA
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) involves the detailed examination of various
environmental components to assess the potential impacts of a proposed project. EIA seeks to give
decision-makers a thorough understanding of the possible effects of a project and to advise them
on how to mitigate or minimize negative effects by carefully examining these environmental
components.
The key environmental components considered in EIA include:
1. Air Quality:
•
•
Emissions of pollutants and their potential effects on air quality.
Impact on ambient air quality and potential health hazards.
2. Water Resources:
•
•
Potential contamination of surface and groundwater.
Alteration of watercourses, rivers, or wetlands.
3. Changes in water quality and quantity.
•
•
•
Soil and Geology:
Soil erosion and degradation.
Geological impacts, such as subsidence or seismic activity.
4. Biodiversity and Ecosystems:
•
•
•
Assessment of flora and fauna in the project area.
Identification of critical habitats and endangered species.
Evaluation of potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.
5. Land Use and Agriculture:
•
•
Changes in land use patterns.
Impact on agricultural activities and productivity.
6. Noise and Vibration:
•
•
Evaluation of potential noise and vibration emissions.
Assessment of their effects on human health and wildlife.
12 | P a g e
7. Human Health and Safety:
•
•
Assessment of potential impacts on the health and safety of nearby communities.
Identification of potential hazards and risks.
8. Socio-Economic Aspects:
•
•
Evaluation of socio-economic impacts on local communities.
Assessment of employment opportunities and social infrastructure.
9. Cultural Heritage and Archaeology:
•
•
Identification and preservation of cultural heritage sites.
Assessment of impacts on archaeological resources.
10. Climate and Meteorology:
•
•
Evaluation of the project's contribution to climate change.
Assessment of meteorological impacts, such as microclimates.
11. Waste Generation and Management:
•
•
Identification of types and volumes of waste generated.
Assessment of waste disposal methods and potential impacts.
12. Energy Consumption:
•
•
Assessment of energy requirements for the project.
Consideration of energy efficiency measures.
13. Visual Impact and Aesthetics:
•
•
Evaluation of changes in landscape and visual aesthetics.
Identification of potential visual impacts on the surroundings.
14. Transportation and Traffic:
•
•
Assessment of transportation infrastructure and traffic impacts.
Identification of potential congestion and safety issues.
15. Cumulative Impacts:
•
•
Evaluation of combined effects when multiple projects are present in the area.
Consideration of long-term and cumulative impacts on the environment.
13 | P a g e
Advantages and Disadvantages of EIA
1.1 Advantages of Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) offers several advantages that contribute to sustainable
development and informed decision-making. EIA serves as a valuable tool for achieving
environmentally sustainable development by providing a systematic framework for assessing and
managing the environmental impacts of proposed projects. Some of the advantages of EIA are:
❖ Early Identification of Environmental Impacts: An early identification and evaluation of
possible environmental effects connected to a proposed project is made possible by EIA.
This makes it possible to plan ahead and include mitigating measures in the project design
phase.
❖ Informed Decision-Making: Decision-makers are provided with thorough information
about possible environmental effects, which enables them to make well-informed decisions
that strike a balance between environmental conservation and development.
❖ Public Participation and Transparency: Through the inclusion of stakeholders and local
communities in the decision-making process, EIA encourages public participation. The
public's knowledge, confidence, and comprehension of the project's environmental
ramifications are increased by this transparency.
❖ Mitigation and Enhancement Measures: The development of mitigation strategies to reduce
negative environmental effects and enhancement strategies to encourage favorable results
is made easier by EIA. As a result, the project is more ecologically sustainable.
❖ Optimization of Project Design: EIA aids in optimizing project design to reduce
environmental impacts by identifying alternative project options. This may result in more
environmentally friendly and resource-efficient solutions.
❖ Cumulative Impact Assessment: Cumulative impacts are taken into account by EIA, which
addresses the combined effects of several projects in a region. Using a comprehensive
approach guarantees a deeper comprehension of the environment as a whole.
❖ Compliance with Regulations: EIA ensures that projects comply with environmental laws,
regulations, and standards. This legal framework helps prevent environmentally harmful
activities and promotes responsible development.
❖ Enhanced Environmental Management: Through the creation of Environmental
Management Plans (EMPs) through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), projects are
guided in their ongoing management, encouraging ongoing monitoring and adaptive
management to address emerging environmental issues.
❖ Economic and Social Considerations: EIA assesses the social and economic impacts of a
project, providing a comprehensive view of its consequences on local communities,
employment, and quality of life.
❖ Prevention of Irreversible Damage: By identifying potential environmental risks and
impacts, EIA helps prevent irreversible damage to ecosystems and natural resources.
❖ Enhanced Project Acceptance: Public involvement and transparency in the EIA process
contribute to increased project acceptance and reduced opposition from local communities
and stakeholders.
❖ Global Best Practices: EIA often incorporates global best practices and standards, ensuring
that projects adhere to internationally recognized environmental norms.
14 | P a g e
❖ Sustainable Development Integration: EIA integrates environmental considerations into
the overall development process, promoting the concept of sustainable development where
economic growth coexists with environmental protection.
1.2 Disadvantages of Environmental Impact Assessment
While Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) provides valuable insights into potential
environmental impacts, there are also some disadvantages associated with the process:
❖ Complex and Time-Consuming: EIA processes can be complex and time-consuming,
requiring significant resources, expertise, and time. This can result in delays in project
implementation and increased costs.
❖ High Costs: The costs associated with conducting a thorough EIA, including data
collection, analysis, and public consultation, can be substantial. This may pose
challenges, particularly for smaller projects or organizations with limited financial
resources.
❖ Subjectivity and Interpretation: The interpretation of environmental data and the
assessment of impacts involve some degree of subjectivity. This subjectivity can lead
to differences in opinions and disputes among stakeholders.
❖ Limited Predictive Accuracy: Despite thorough assessments, predicting the exact
magnitude and nature of environmental impacts can be challenging. Unforeseen
circumstances or changes in project conditions may result in different outcomes.
❖ Potential for Manipulation: In some cases, there may be a risk of manipulating the EIA
process to downplay or overlook certain environmental impacts. This can occur due to
conflicts of interest, inadequate oversight, or lack of transparency.
❖ Limited Scope: EIA may not always consider all potential impacts, especially those
related to long-term or cumulative effects. This limitation could result in incomplete
assessments of a project's overall environmental footprint.
❖ Influence of Political and Economic Factors: Political and economic factors may
influence the decision-making process, sometimes leading to the approval of projects
despite identified environmental concerns. This can compromise the effectiveness of
the EIA process.
❖ Overemphasis on Formality: Some critics argue that EIA processes can become overly
formalistic, with a focus on meeting regulatory requirements rather than genuinely
addressing environmental concerns. This may lead to a box-ticking approach without
achieving meaningful environmental protection.
❖ Inadequate Public Engagement: Despite efforts to involve the public, participation in
the EIA process may be limited or ineffective. Communities might not have the
necessary resources or information to engage meaningfully, leading to potential
misunderstandings or dissatisfaction.
❖ Limited Integration with Planning: EIA is often conducted as a separate process from
project planning, limiting its ability to influence project design at an early stage. This
separation can result in missed opportunities for optimizing projects for environmental
sustainability.
15 | P a g e
❖ Difficulty in Addressing Uncertainty: Addressing uncertainties in environmental
predictions and impacts can be challenging. This may lead to cautious decision-making
or underestimation of risks.
❖ Inconsistent Application: The application of EIA may vary across regions and
jurisdictions, resulting in inconsistencies in the assessment process and the level of
environmental protection.
While EIA has its challenges, ongoing efforts to address these disadvantages and improve the
effectiveness of the process are essential to ensure that environmental considerations are
appropriately integrated into decision-making processes.
Conclusion
In summary, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) encapsulates essential principles pivotal
to sustainable development. Its core lies in a meticulous process evaluating potential
environmental ramifications of proposed projects. By systematically identifying, predicting,
and addressing impacts, EIA ensures informed decision-making, mitigating adverse
consequences on ecosystems, communities, and economies. Integral to this process is
stakeholder engagement, fostering collaboration among diverse interests to incorporate
concerns and insights into project planning.
EIA's significance extends beyond regulatory compliance; it epitomizes a proactive approach,
emphasizing foresight and precaution. By integrating scientific analysis, socio-economic
considerations, and public feedback, it cultivates a framework that harmonizes human
activities with environmental preservation.
Moreover, EIA champions the concept of mitigation, advocating for strategies that reduce,
offset, or eliminate adverse effects, emphasizing the precautionary principle to prevent
irreversible harm.
As we navigate increasingly complex developmental landscapes, embracing and applying
these fundamental EIA principles becomes paramount. They serve as guiding beacons, shaping
responsible and sustainable pathways for progress while preserving and protecting the
invaluable ecosystems upon which our well-being ultimately depends.
16 | P a g e