The India Way: Lessons for the U.S. Most prominent that brought down companies – Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia, and Global Crossing. Not quite bad enough – Xerox, Sunbeam, Waste Management, Tyco, Health South, etc. The calamity was caused by “failure in leadership” in both financial services and government. (3) There are now alternative business models that can lay claim more successful. “Stakeholder” Model o o Dominant model in the US in the early 1980s Asserts that business has many groups with an interest or stake in its operations, and that the interest of these different stakeholders have to be balanced o Pushed aside by theoretical arguments emanating from the field of finance, which then played out in the sphere of public policy beginning in the 1980s. Contemporary US Model o Asserts that maximizing shareholder value is the primary goal of business – the only goal of contemporary business o Elements that are different from other practices elsewhere: (1) Business strategy – focuses attention outside the firm in the search for opportunities and, to a lesser extent, in a related search for competencies through mergers and acquisitions and joint ventures. (2) Restructuring – when markets or strategies change, companies lay-off employees to cut costs and hire new ones to redirect the business toward new markets or to meet new skills. Ability to restructure – key to competitiveness (3) Efforts to harness the motivation and abilities of employees – focuses mainly at the top, with financial incentives (via equity) offered to executives and top managers – in turn, they figure out how to motivate the rest of the workforce, with threat of job loss typically an important part of the mix (factor). o Recent and Important Challenges: (1) It has not worked well for employees Because employees are no longer seen as explicit stakeholders whose interests have to be balanced against those of shareholders. Compared to previous decades, jobs are much less secure, wage growth is markedly lower, and at least by some measures, employee attitudes toward their jobs and their employers are worse. (2) Corporate governance has been plagued in recent years by a sharp increase in malfeasance. An unending stream of corporate financial scandals that began in the mid-1990s – executives manipulating finances to improve share prices and pad their own pockets. Country with the second-fastest growth rates in the world over the past decades. GDP has risen 9% per year – several times that of the US and nearly that of China. Became one of the most favored destinations for direct investment – behind China but ahead of US. Infrastructures are less developed than in most Western nations – but value of exports has increased by 2.5 times from 2004 – 2008 Indian companies have become international acquirers – able to compete with the best enterprises and operating well beyond the boundaries of India. Shares great many traits with the US: o Democratic principles o Associated arrangements of civil society (free press, a strong and independent judiciary, a highly diverse population, open capital and labor markets) 1. 2. 3. 4. Indian companies see their most important goal as serving a social mission. Indian companies take the management of human capital. The persistence of engaged employees contributes to a uniquely Indian approach to problem solving – Jugaad. Business strategy is eternal and rests on innovations in the companies’ value chains – less interested in acquiring competencies through mergers and acquisition. Maximizing shareholder value was placed fourth – Indian business unlike the US Indian Business Leader Priorities 1) Chief input for business strategy 2) Keeper of organizational culture 3) Guide or teacher for employees 4) Representative of owner and investor interests 5) Representative of other stakeholders (e.g., employees and the community) 6) Civic leadership within the business community 7) Civic leadership outside the business community Corporate Governance o Distinctive feature – the determination to balance the interest of the firm’s diverse stakeholders, all the groups that have a claim on what the company does. o Emphasis on the interest of the broader community, which extended from the immediate vicinity of the business out to encompass the entire nation. o Problem/special concern – the rights of the minority shareholders o Tunneling – concentrated majority ownership and holding company structures create incentives to shift assets inappropriately across companies o “The Tata Group is less rules-based and more values-based. We have always believed you really cannot frame rules for corporate governance” – Tata Steel o Nonexecutive directors – take more of a strategic partnership role with company executives, and less of a shareholder monitoring or rules-based role. o Protecting shareholder value is not ignored – but Indian directors incorporate the concerns of a range of constituencies in reaching board decisions in partnership with management. Mission-driven o Sense of mission Central to the distinctiveness of the Indian model A social goal for the business that goes beyond making money and helps employees wee a purpose in their work. Social mission – the purpose of the business, not a separate act of charity – extends to helping India and its citizens. o “fortune at the bottom of the pyramid” Emphasizes busines opportunities among the poor; but making money is never presented as the primary objective o They put their money where their mouth is with respect to mission. The Motivation for Mission o Driver for the sense of mission – the priority and value placed in India on service to others and the widely held belief that one’s goal in life should extend beyond oneself, especially beyond one’s material needs o Vanaprastha ashrama – third of the four stages of Hindu life; focuses on the search for meaning, helping others, and a gradual withdrawal from the competitive business world – neatly coincides with the typical age (over 50) of senior business leaders. o Desiring leaders – humane, compassionate, and generous – the preference that fit nicely with the aspect of national culture manifesting service to others as a source of motivation. o Mission fits the altruistic norm – “Corporate social responsibility and good governance are related to the state of the development of the country” (Srinivasan, director of Tractors and Farm equipment) o Driven by necessity – The rapid growth of the Indian market and the inadequate scale of health and education systems have forced companies to develop healthcare and classes for their own talent. o Social investments pays off as well “Our history in corporate social responsibility has enhanced the group brand” – Tata Steel; was proved invaluable for recruiting and retaining employees The perception of a company’s social responsibility is one of the main factors in retaining talent. Acting responsibly may also pay off especially in dealing with regulator – obtaining industrial licenses and environmental clearance in India can depend on being known for public responsibility. o Mission as a business goal affects relationship with customers. Individuals have long memories – doing good things for people when they have no money and are not customers can redound to a company’s advantage when those individuals do have money and are in the market for your products. o Social mission is a powerful way to motivate employees. the connection individuals see between the tasks they perform and the overall product or outcome of the organization is an important source of positive employee outcomes the effects of task significance on job performance are much more powerful when they contribute to helping others, and social impact more generally can lead to performance outcomes that are orders of magnitude greater Social Mission vs the US Model o US Model – disadvantage difficult for most people to see making money for shareholders as a goal that is personally meaningful led executives to concentrate on the interests of their own enterprise and devote less attention to the welfare of the community or society o Focus of mission may relater to differences in leadership style o Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) – most widely used assessment of leadership in US o Transformational Style – Indian business leaders rank highest in practices that fall under this style o (inspirational motivation, idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, and individual consideration) Transactional side – Indian leaders are quick to use contingent rewards (rewards based on performance), but less prone to manage by exception or look for mistakes. (American leaders more likely to use this) Indian companies – built employee commitment by creating a sense of reciprocity with the workforce, looking after their interests and those of their families and implicitly asking employees to look after the firm’s interest in return. To translate commitment into action, the business leaders went to extraordinary lengths to empower employees in a way that often conflicted with historical and cultural norms, giving them the freedom to plunge into problems they encountered and create their own solutions. Business leaders directed their attention to building organizational culture, their number-two priority, which shows employees how to behave, and to demonstrating the connection between employee competencies and business strategies. Training o They invest heavily in their employees, especially their new hires. o Design management – trains people to use both sides of the brain (visual and aesthetic side, and the logicalrational) (Pantaloon – leading retailer) Employee Appreciation o Measure of priority on the employees – comes from what they tell shareholders and the broader community about the employees’ operation o Common mention of human resource issue: (1) Most common – thanking employees of their contribution (2) to highlight individual employees – typically for their special contributions or sometime for their life experiences (3) mentions of employee capabilities and efforts to train and develop employees (4) to discuss contributions employees were making to the broader community They see employees as key to building the organizational capabilities that drive competitiveness – the reason they invest in their employees To Americans – the purpose of employee learning was to better execute existing strategies o “Learning” seemed more like training, designed to improve performance on existing tasks. They take pains to protect those investments in employees (like Japanese companies) o (Mahindra Group) contemplated and decided not to lay off workers because they knew there were five family members who would suffer alongside – put these employees in the company gardens and claim that the company now has some of the finest gardens in India Employee Empowerment and Transparency o Having motivated and skilled employees might not matter if they were not given the opportunity to use those skills. o Mind-Tree’s innovative methods to give feedback to employees: Snapshots – monthly updates that describe the competitive environment and the state of the company All Minds Meet – a regular open house with the company’s leadership where all questions are tackled on the spot People Net intranet – grievances are addressed Petals - a blogging site Integrity Policy (Mind-Tree) – (transparency and rolemodeling) posts on its Web site accounts of ethical failures and violations of company policies, and the lessons the firm has learned from each The idea is that by acknowledging mistakes, especially those made by leaders, the company encourages others to admit theirs and to follow its lead in making changes. “Single-status” policy (Sasken Corporation) – highwater mark for a culture of openness and flat hierarchy; means that all employees, from entry-level to Mody himself, are treated identically—same offices, same travel policies (coach class), same criteria for compensation (no separate executive compensation policies) Jugaad o ability to improvise and find a way around problems, often using trial and error method. o The unique cultural context of learning to work in a tough, resource-constrained country where the ability to make do and improvise with what little was available o In modern corporations, this phenomenon plays out through motivated and committed employees hammering away at tough problems, persistent until they find creative solutions and workarounds. o Having a sense of mission and social goal – helps employees see a purpose in their work that goes beyond their immediate self-interest, beyond the achievements of the firms and its owners. o Creative adaptation, not weary resignation – central to the Indian approach to management. o Adjust – also spoken in various local accents in India; used in a wide range of situations, usually with a plaintive smile; Doing More with Less, Strategically o Tata Nano – the pint-sized car built by Ratan Tata of Tata Motors, India’s largest maker of automobiles and trucks o Conventional market strategy - – staying away from low end of the market, where Japanese quality and prices dominated. o Price point – 100,000 rupees per car of $2500 – achieved through jugaad concept Deep frugality, a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, and a single-minded determination by Tata’s top managers to work through the many constraints and challenges of operating in the Indian environment. o Open distribution innovation – (termed by Business Week) the method could create not only the world’s least expensive automobile but also its largest selling one Kits of components are to be sold en masse for assembly and distribution by local entrepreneurs providing the tools for local mechanics to assemble the car in existing auto shops or new garages created to cater to rural customers “creating entrepreneurs across the country that would produce the car …, my idea of dispersing wealth” o Narayana Hrudayalaya – hospital group; founded by Devi Shetty; to help the thousands of Indian children who need cardiac surgery and cannot afford it o ICICI Bank – similar for rural banking by K.V. Kamath; alternative, far less costly avenues for reaching the poor, ranging from nonprofit microfinance groups to using local fertilizer distributors as agents Strategy from Within – fourth the source of comparative advantage as coming from deep inside the company, from motivated employees, new and better ideas, and superior execution Strategy in these companies comes from internal capabilities. The source of the distinctiveness of the India Way and the ability to focus the business on solving hard problems rests heavily on the management of people: o They invest in them, o use social mission to create motivation, o empower them, and o tap into the cultural aspect of jugaad to hammer away at hard problems until they break through. “Chief input into the strategy process” - most important task; the CEOs monitor and maintain the infrastructure of their organizations, the firms’ architecture and culture and systems for investing in and engaging their employees Strategy o a staff-function in US but number-one priority for the Indian CEOs or the CEOs involvement o viewed as a set of enduring principles, an approach to business that they can encode into the firms’ responses to market opportunities o allows for improvisation and flexibility in unit-level practices while incorporating interventions and inputs from the CEOs into the strategies of various businesses. The India Way companies are more likely to stick with their traditional customers and take on the long-term, persistent challenges those customers face. Customer relationships were the area of largest net decline for U.S. CEOs, and their increased focus was all on factors outside the firm Indian leaders report the biggest declines in their time in the area of day-to-day management, giving more autonomy to lower management “Speed, flexibility, and adaptability to change” o (US) below “consistent execution of strategy” o (India) the heart of strategy and the greater priority Key Elements of Strategy: o Adaptability o Improvisation (jugaad) o Doing more with less The process of driving strategy through core principles, especially social mission, also helps these companies find opportunities where no one else was looking. The India Way model created responded to the remarkably different environment for business offered up by the economic reforms and more open markets after 1990. The India Way is unique, but the set of practices that comprise it are not necessarily dependent on the Indian context. The India Way should serve as a model for other countries in part because it addresses the intense pressures for greater social responsibility but most importantly because it is succeeding in the competitive environment with a competitive advantage that appears to be sustainable in the long run. Not all Indian business leaders are saints, not all Indian companies pursue the practices we describe here, and that even for these leading companies, we may be describing their best attributes. The India Way offers a compelling example of a model that succeeds financially while succeeding socially. Strategic Human Resource Management as Ethical Stewardship (Ulrich & Beatty) Critical contribution made by human Ethical Stewardship – a model of governance that honors obligations due to many stakeholders and that maximizes long-term organizational wealth creation Ethical issues in HRM – key factors in aligning and guiding organizational success Strategic focus of HRS – more effective when aligned with an organization’s mission, purposes, values, and structure Most effective HRPs o add value to their organization’s effectiveness by linking people, strategy, values, and performance o (linking) critical to the maximization of performance outcomes in a world that is increasingly dependent upon the initiative, creativity, and commitment of employees to succeed. Goals of effective organizations: o Not simply instrumental or outcome oriented o Also normative, or value-based o achieve their greatness because of their commitment to values and principles which guide employees and which create strong and effective employee cultures. 3 Key Functions (Becker & Huselid, 1999): (1) A management culture aligned with the corporate strategy (2) Operational and professional excellence in conducting key tasks (3) A human resource structure focusing on human resource managers as business partners to other departments o are interrelated o Organizational cultures can enrich human lives as well as increase profitability o Integrating key human resource functions to reframe an organization’s internal environment results in significantly higher organizational outcomes and financial performance that is superior to what firms can attain by implementing individual human resource program elements piecemeal. “High involvement, high performance, or high commitment management practices” – enormous economic returns can be obtained through the implementation of these Execution – the key to effective organizational change HR Architecture o the systems, practices, competencies, and employee performance behaviors of SHRM o a key element to “building sustainable competitive advantage and creating above-average financial performance” resources in accomplishing strategic goals – required that they fill the roles of coach, architect, facilitator, conscience, and contributing leader—rising from the status of subservient “partners” to substantial “players” 3 Key Change Factors for the Successful Transformation of HR function: (1) Focus on cost-effectiveness Reframing the human resource function to deliver services at a reduced cost made the HRM function more financially accountable (2) Merger of the HRM function with the strategic role Aligning core processes—the key tasks performed by organizations—so that when systems mesh rather than conflict the entire organization is able to utilize people efficiently and effectively. (3) Development of new knowledge organizational culture, financial performance, and goal achievement were interdependent elements of successful organizations—and that valuing people and treating them well improved the bottom line. Successful HRM – “involves designing and implementing a set of internally consistent policies and practices that ensure that employees’ collective knowledge, skills, and abilities contribute to the achievement of its business objectives” The “decision science” of HR – how to measure the added value of employee contributions. HRPs acknowledge that they can earn a place at their organization’s strategic policy making table only if they understand the “decision science” of HR and help create organizational programs and systems that reinforce desired employee behaviors Leaders as stewards – who owed a complex set of duties to stakeholders; these duties achieve long-term wealth creation which ultimately benefits all stakeholders and honors the obligations owed by business to society. “Covenantal” – the nature of duties of organizational leaders; suggesting that the relationship that organizations owed to employees as akin both a contact and a sacred obligation. Ethical Stewardship o The honoring of duties owed to employees, stakeholder, and society in the pursuit of long-term wealth creation” o A theory of organizational governance in which leaders seek the best interests of stakeholders by creating high trust cultures that honor a broad range of duties owed by organizations to followers. o Stewardship role – value-based, principle-centered, and committed to the welfare of all stakeholders. o “Win-win or No Deal” – the duty of leaders is to optimize outcomes, rather than setting compromise position that overlooks opportunities. Ethical obligations of organizations – neither idealistic nor soft. Responsibility of organizations – fully disclose critical information and to clearly identify threats facing an organization as well as the accompanying implications of those threats upon employees. Treating employees as “owners and partners” in the governance process and emphasized that in the highly competitive global that relationship encompassed sharing honest and extensive communication (Block) “(t)he first task of the leader is to define reality”—a reality that included an obligation to tell all of the truth to employees, rather than withholding key information that might treat the employees as mere hirelings. or the means by which the firm achieved its goals. Moral position of ethical stewardship – organizational leaders have the obligation to pursue long-term wealth creation by implementing systems that strengthen the organizational commitment of each stakeholder. Ethical stewards in HRM: o Demonstrate the insights of great organizations that transform their companies into human and humane communities which emphasize inclusion, shared partnership, empowerment, and leader trustworthiness. o Transforming culture occurs when followers believe that systems will enable employees to achieve desired outcomes and that social contacts will be honored o Also achieved by treating employees as “yous” or as valued individuals and organizational partners rather than as “its” or mere organizational commodity with a human form. If the HRP is to function as an ethical steward in the modern organization: o she/he must combine a profound knowledge of the operations of the firm o an understanding about how to implement systems by which organizations can maximize human performance o an understanding of the empirical value and cost/benefit contribution of high-performance systems o the ability to communicate effectively to top management and Boards of Directors in a convincing manner so that those policy makers will adopt policies and systems essential for creating integrated and effective HRM systems that support organizational goals Transformational Leadership o “Transformative leaders” – HRPs should be; who honor a broad set of ethical duties in their role as ethical stewards. o Demonstrate this principle when they combine a commitment to helping both individuals and organizations to achieve unprecedented excellence. o had a positive impact on followers’ development and performance and the accomplishment of organizational priorities. o “elevate the desires of followers for achievement and self-development while also promoting the development of groups and organizations” o Jim Schwappach – a leader who was effective at listening deeply to others and involving others in developing solutions that empower employees while greatly increasing the effectiveness of an organization in accomplishing organizational goals. o Empowering employees maximizes commitment and enables employees to become a source of strategic competitive advantage that competitors rarely can duplicate. o Empowering employees maximizes commitment and enables employees to become a source of strategic competitive advantage that competitors rarely can duplicate o The ability of transformational leadership to simultaneously pursue both individual needs and organizational goals has long been considered a critical element of organizational success and is widely regarded as an important characteristic of high-performance organizations. Charismatic Leadership o “Charismatic leaders” – ethical stewards to the degree that they personally inspire other to achieve worthy goals. o “an attribution based on follower perceptions of their leader’s behavior”, and reflects the followers’ “perception of their leader’s extraordinary character” o Characterized by high emotional expressiveness, selfconfidence, self-determination, freedom from internal conflict, and a conviction of the correctness of the leader’s own beliefs. o Inspiring leaders appeal to common ideals and animate an organization’s vision in a way that resonates deeply within the hearts of others. o They recognize that it is in resonating with people at the emotional level that creates the greatest personal commitment. o Elmar Toime – implemented high trust practices based upon close relationship with individual employees; transformed New Zealand Post “from a typical government bureaucracy to a profitable stateowned enterprise and the most efficient post office in the world” o Honors the duties of ethical stewardship by encouraging the hearts of employees. o That ability to create high commitment and high trust is at the heart of high performing organizations and is a key responsibility of effective leadership. Principle-centered Leadership o Incorporates foundations of ethical stewardship to the degree that it seeks to integrate the instrumental and normative objectives of an organization while being congruent with universal principles demonstrated by effective leaders o Leadership – the most successful when it adheres to a patterned set of well-accepted principles of effectiveness and respected moral values. o practiced “from the inside out” at the personal, interpersonal, managerial, and organizational levels. o They earn trust based upon their character and competence o Great leaders sustain their credibility based upon their consistency in modeling correct principles and in honoring values that demonstrate personal integrity. o They recognize the virtuous outcomes supersede adherence to rules and that moral purposes complement best practices in achieving stewardship goals. o They model organizational values and recognize that effective leadership is ultimately the integration of both ends and means. o Proctor and Gamble – created a strong principlebased culture based on core values and a core ideology. o Principle-centered leaders and ethical stewards – develop a knowledge of guiding principles that characterize great organizations, and help organizations to create aligned organizational cultures that match actual behaviors with espoused values – a key element in establishing and implementing human resource systems that earn employee commitment and trust Servant Leadership o Build trust and inspire the confidence of others. o at the heart of ethical stewardship and exemplifies its depth of commitment to serving the individual. o Depree – one of the most highly regarded advocates of servant leadership – organizational leaders had the ethical responsibility to be “a servant and a debtor” to employees by establishing policies that demonstrate the organization’s commitment to the welfare of each employee. o “Valuing individuals and developing people, building community, practicing authenticity, and providing leadership that focuses on the good of those who are being led and those whom the organization serves” o Great leader is a servant first because the commitment to serving others is his identity “deep down inside” o Honors each individual as a valued end, rather than simply as a means to organizational outcomes o They put the needs, desires, interests, and welfare of others above his or her self-interest while also honoring duties owed to the organization. o Herb Kelleher & Sam Walton – known for valuing employees as critical to the success of their organizations and for adopting a leadership philosophy incorporating principles of servant leadership – balanced a consideration for employees’ welfare with a recognition that treating employees well increases their commitment in return. o Servant leaders and ethical stewards - demonstrate a commitment to the “welfare, growth, and wholeness” of stakeholders – makes leaders credible and trustworthy Level 5 Leaders o They demonstrate their fierce commitment to the success of the organization while creating systems that recognize employee contributions and give credit to employees for achieving an organization’s success o demonstrate a leadership insight that willingly shares both power and the credit for accomplishments while accepting personal responsibility for organizational failures o leaders of the organizations that evolved “from good to great” were typified by high commitment coupled with great personal humility. o They avoided the counterfeit leadership qualities of egoistic self-interest that typified high profile leaders in many organizations. o They were not “I-centered” leaders who pursued self-serving goals or who viewed themselves as the upfront personification of their organization’s success o They tended to be described by those who worked with or wrote about them as “quiet, humble, modest, reserved, shy, gracious, mild-mannered, selfeffacing, understated, did not believe his own clippings; and so forth” o Possessed a “ferocious resolve, an almost stoic determination to do whatever needs to be done” to serve the organization and to make it great o Most successful women leaders who “seem to care more about the sustained success of their organization than their own legacy”. o They are transformative in demonstrating humility about their own accomplishments, giving credit to others in their organization for success while accepting full responsibility for the errors made by an organization and working unceasingly to address those errors. o Level 5 leaders and ethical stewards – create human resource systems and processes that are fully aligned with the normative and instrumental goals of the organization while giving employees credit for their role in the accomplishment of those goal – balance the needs of the organization with a commitment to the best interests of its stakeholders and create reward systems that also reward employees for contributing to organizational success. Covenantal Leadership o they help organizations create new knowledge which enables firms to create and maintain competitive advantage and constantly improve o integrates the roles of the leader as a servant, role model, a source of inspiration and as a creator of new insight and meaning o encompasses the pursuit of a noble purpose, often described as rising to the level of a contractual or even a sacred duty o They seek not only to enhance the skills and abilities of those with whom they associate, but also to “unleash the great human potential which is often dormant and silent” in organizations o Striving to serve both individuals and the organization, sharing knowledge, inspiring by personal example, and learning with others, covenantal leadership is attuned to the importance of continuous learning. o Incorporates ethical stewardship’s commitment to creating new solutions to problems, creating new wealth and value, and working for the welfare of stakeholders. o Possess the ability to help people to discover new truths and achieve the best within themselves at both the individual and organizational levels, enabling organizations to optimize wealth creation and honor their role as covenantal leaders and ethical stewards o Bob Branchi – taught a delivery driver that his value as an individual and his role in the organization were also important in the organization’s success - thereby helping that individual not only to share in the organization’s accomplishments but also to redefine himself. o Vital role of knowledge creation in firms – important element of the human resource architecture and have advocated the importance of adopting a learning organization culture to create a sustainable competitive advantage. o They focus on individuals, empower them to increase their level of commitment to themselves and to the organization, and create opportunities for creating new knowledge and insight that benefits both the organization and the individual. o As ethical stewards – they help their organizations add value to the lives of individuals and organizations o Leaders who demonstrate high commitment to others and to their organizations “authentic” and praise the trustworthiness and integrity of those who lead unselfishly and effectively. o Described their accomplishments as balancing “value and virtue” in creating cultures where employees feel empowered to take risks and achieve unprecedented results. “Good” is not good enough and is, in fact “the enemy of the great” Challenge for today’s leaders – to move from “effectiveness” to “greatness” – to optimize the potential of the modern organization. Stereotype Threat at Work Diversity o a fact of organizational life; increasing percentages of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians in the American workforce, an aging population, expanding female labor force participation o first identified in the mid-1980s o were heralded as an opportunity for organizations to become more creative, to reach previously untapped markets, and in general to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage. Employee diversity o Does not necessarily boost creativity, market share, or competitive advantage o If left unmanaged – more likely to damage morale, increase turnover, and cause significant communication problems and conflict within the organization “Managing diversity” o Has become the sought-after managerial skill o Concerns about effective diversity management – spawned an industry of diversity training programs, diversity videos, and diversity consultants. o Most attention has focused on the organizational decision marker – the manager who is prejudiced against certain groups who allows these prejudices to influence how he or she treats employees o Individual-level prejudices – become institutionalized or embodied in organizational policies and practices that systematically disadvantage some employees. o Efforts to reduce discrimination: Hiring nonprejudiced managers Redesigning biased selection, appraisal, and promotion Generally eradicating stereotypes from managerial decision making o Eliminate stereotypes in decision making = create an organization where all employees can flourish and advance. o Stereotypes still exist in the broader society – resulting in stereotype threat. The fear of being judged and treated according to a negative stereotype about members of your group Have a negative effect on employee feelings and behavior, making it difficult for employee to perform to his/her true potential. Can result in employees working harder, but not better – performance declines places certain demands on the manager of diverse employees — demands to create conditions that minimize the occurrence of stereotype threat, so that all employees can perform effectively Stereotype threat in educational arenas – an issue for high stakes testing; hang on scores from: o Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) o Graduate Record Examination (6RE) o Graduate Management Achievement Test (GMAT) Without the “right” scores, a student won’t be able to get into the best college for his or her chosen field Being evaluated can raise anxiety for everyone. Apprehension in these kinds of situation is a common phenomenon – little anxiety can even boost performance Anxieties can be heightened for those employees who are members of a negatively stereotyped group. Stereotype Threat o the fear of being seen and judged according to a negative stereotype about their group, and the concern that they might do something that would inadvertently confirm the negative stereotype o describes the psychological experience of a person who – while engaged in a task, is aware of a stereotype about his or her identity group, suggesting that he or she will not perform well on that task o can have a disruptive effect on performance – resulting in the individual confirming the very stereotype he or she wanted to disconfirm o places an additional burden on members of the stereotyped group o “In the spotlight” Feeling (of stereotyped group) where their failure would reflect negatively not only on themselves as individuals, but on the larger group to which they belong “It’s like you have something to prove, and you don’t want to mess it up and be a negative reflection (on black women)” (Beyonce) Research shows that the negatively stereotyped group underperforms when the stereotype is seen as relevant to the task. Stigma conscious o Members of racial and ethnic minorities, members of lower socio-economic classes, women, older people, gay and bisexual men, and people with disabilities o Members of these groups can be very aware of the social stereotypes other people associate with their group o This phenomenon does not apply only to people in the disadvantaged group – even members of high-status groups can experience stereotype threat Stereotype threat can affect all of us – each of us is a member of at least one group about which stereotypes exist “Mediating” explanations o Several different answers to the unresolved question “why does stereotype threat have this negative impact – on short-term performance” o Dominant explanation – anxiety Anxiety increases a person’s motivation and effort – stereotype threatened participants are very motivated to perform well, and sometimes they try too hard or are too cautious in performing Anxiety decreases a person’s motivation and effort – stereotype threatened participants lose confidence that they can perform well, and in a self-fulfilling way this undermines performance .2 Conditions needed for Stereotype Threat to emerge: o Task difficulty o Personal task investment Stereotype Relevance of the Task: What does it take to perform well? o ST is situation specific – felt in situations where one can be “judged by, treated and seen in terms of, or self-fulfill a negative stereotype about one’s group” o occur when doing well on the task requires an ability on which, according to the stereotype, the person performing the task has a deficit o the stereotype relevance of the task has often been created by telling participants that the task is a direct “test” of the stereotyped ability o Beliefs about the traits necessary for jobs can also be organization specific. o The potential for stereotype threat exists any time employees’ beliefs about the particular traits needed for good job performance are linked to stereotypes about groups. Task Difficulty: Why is this so hard? o ST is most likely to influence performance on very difficult tasks – those that are at the limits of a person’s abilities. o Easier tasks – doesn’t have much negative effect o Experiencing frustration with task accomplishment is an important trigger for stereotype threat. o Simple tasks – little frustration – the person is doing well and knows it. o Difficult tasks – progress is not so smooth – think how others will explain their difficulty. o Member of the stereotyped group – stereotype is also likely to come to mind as a potential explanation that others might use. o A negative dynamic operates between task difficulty and stereotype threat. Difficult task – evokes concern over performance – concern has a greater impact on the performance of difficult task. Difficult jobs – require concentration and focus; all of one’s cognitive/mental resources must be directed toward accomplishing the work. Performance detriments occur when resources are diverted toward worrying about one’s skills and how one will be viewed by others Difficult tasks trigger stereotype threat and are most affected by it. o Difficult, complex, and challenging tasks ST most likely to occur Creates a dilemma for managers o Task Difficulty Not just a fact in many (especially professional) jobs, it is a desired condition Good way to develop employees – giving demanding assignments to new hires Early demanding experiences predict later career success. a trigger for stereotype threat because people try to explain their difficulty to themselves: on a stereotype relevant task, where the context reinforces the stereotype, they are more likely to think of the stereotype as a potential explanation resulting anxiety and distress then disrupts performance o “Stretch” assignments Assignments for which an employee is not yet fully qualified, “stretching” the employee’s skills and abilities Used as developmental tools throughout a person’s tenure Needed for skill development, but managers must be aware of the extra potential for stereotype threat these assignments must involve for stereotyped employees, and counteract this risk o New and unfamiliar tasks – may be more at risk for stereotype threat than routine, familiar ones. Personal Task Investment: How important is this to who I am? o Personal task investment Refers to how important doing well on the task is to the individual’s self-esteem and identity. Skill is a part of how they define themselves – such invested people, doing well in that task domain is important for their self-esteem and for feeling good about themselves o People who are personally invested in the task Most likely to be most influenced by stereotype threat – they are the ones who really care about their performance. more negatively affected by stereotype threat than those without such personal task investment they are invested in the task they are good at. “the most capable members of stereotyped groups tend to be the most adversely affected in their performance by stereotype threat” o Important reminder for managers: The employees who care about their work and really want to do well are generally the ones that a manager is least likely to worry about since they are the ones he or she thinks will succeed on their own, and thus don’t need coaxing, coaching, or extra attention. o Stereotype relevance o The most important condition for ST o ST only occurs when the stereotype seems relevant to performing the task. o Created by the way the researchers described the tasks in a laboratory setting. o In work settings, can be signaled and reinforced by the diversity (or lack thereof) of people who are currently performing the job. Token o Termed used Rosabeth Moss Kanter o Describe individuals who are different from others on a salient demographic dimension – race, sex, or age o feel very “visible”—that they stand out from the rest of the group o view tokens in terms of their distinguishing characteristic: as the woman or the Asian o numerical differences reinforce the relevance of the stereotype for performance in the setting – or being the “only one” suggests that the stereotype is true, and therefore it is relevant to job performance These conditions make stereotype threat more likely for members of negatively stereotyped groups: o The employee is invested in doing well, on: o A difficult, stereotype relevant task, where: o The context reinforces the stereotype Positive Effects of Stereotype Threat: o Being able to channel those feelings – a strong motivation to disprove a negative stereotype about your group can increase persistence and determination to succeed o a desire to prove one’s ability can be a powerful form of motivation, most effective in improving performance and persistence on simple tasks that are familiar to the performer o If you know how to perform a task, this kind of motivation can help you to perform better (it can either help you or work against you) Repeated exposure to stereotype threat - may have serious, and primarily negative, side effects. o Accompanied by physiological reactions (increase in blood pressure, contribute to chronic health problems such as hypertension) o Associated with lower job satisfaction o May lead a person to disengage (or “disidentify”) with the performance domain could be one cause of turnover for women and racial/ethnic minorities in professional and managerial jobs “Ways to eliminate stereotype threat – changing the conditions that produce the effect Only solution under the individual’s control (the worst) o By disidentifying with the affected task domain – acting opposite to it o costly for both the individual who gives up a valued part of the self, and for the organization that loses an engaged and motivated employee Strategies for reducing Stereotype Threat: (1) Provide a successful task strategy Effort alone couldn’t boost performance Teach affected employees behavioral strategies for improving performance and counteracting negative stereotypes – addresses task difficulty When using stretch assignments, managers should set goals, and help employees develop strategies toward attaining them “sink or swim” attitude – common; detrimental for stereotyped threatened individuals (2) Reduce the stereotype relevance of the task Personally invested employee faces a difficult task By refuting or diminishing the stereotype relevance of the task being told explicitly that there were no gender differences would reduce the relevance of the stereotype to the task, and hence reduce stereotype threat emphasizing characteristics shared by both groups – highlight characteristics important for performance – stressing common characteristics of employees that are relevant for performing the task (3) Provide an alternative explanation for task difficulty Search for explanation of difficulty “Warm up” – allows a better assessment of their true ability level on the actual test Managers certainly shouldn’t lie to their employees to give them an excuse for task difficulty and poor performance. Remind employees about real-life factors that might be constraining their performance (e.g., a difficult client, limited resources, or a tight deadline) Telling employees that you know stereotype threat can happen, and that they should be aware of it, gives them a different attribution for their difficulty and anxiety (it’s not the stereotype, it’s the stereotype threat). (4) Change the context change the context by removing people from token situations. presenting a role model who contradicts the stereotype – by boosting the salience and visibility of role models If context does not reinforce stereotype, therefor stereotype does not come to mind Employee performs task without stereotype threat disruption 2 major Objectives of Diversity Management Programs: o To change managers’ attitudes – to reduce negative attitudes, stereotypes, and prejudice against members of different groups o To change managers’ behaviors – how they select, appraise, and develop employees These Objectives Ignore 2 Realities: o Changing attitudes and reducing stereotypes is a longterm endeavor o While increasing the objectivity of the measurement and decision is necessary, the presence of stereotype threat means that performance itself may convey biased information about a person’s true ability. 2 Principles that are currently downplayed in most diversity management efforts: (1) Acknowledge stereotypes and address them directly. (2) Shift the focus from the manager to the environment. The Ethics of Human Resource Management Employees – most important [most valuable, greatest] asset Old Romans Days tools of production: o “dumb tools” – uses of plows, shovels o “semi-speaking tools” – used of animals o “speaking tools” – used of slaves HR Managers who wish to be ethical - must manage humans not as resources but as autonomous individuals with legitimate rights and interests. Kantian Ethics o HR managers are faced with the Kantian ethical question of how to ensure that their treatment of employees, applicants, and former employees respects their autonomy. Stakeholder Ethics o HR managers are required to consider the interests of employees, applicants, and former employees o Stakeholder (Clarkson) – are persons or groups that have or claim ownership, rights, or interests in a corporation and its activities, past, present, or future Fairness and Justice o Managers who judge ethics by fairness or justice must apply these principles to all stakeholders, ensuring that the least well-off are not disadvantaged and have a voice in decision-making processes. Utilitarian Ethics o Utilitarian HR managers need to consider the outcomes of their decisions on everyone, including employees, applicants, and former employees. Virtue Ethics o Recommend developing habits that contribute to the flourishing of individuals and the community. HR managers should consider the claims these ethical theories make on their behavior when striving to be ethical in their roles. Terms like “fairness”, “stakeholder”, and “duty” – are used in the context of invoking ethical principles derived from various theories discussed elsewhere in the volume. (1) Discernment: The HR manager must determine the right course of action in complex situations. (2) Conflict with Professional Judgment: A conflict between the HR manager's professional judgment of what is right and their responsibility to fulfill employer requests. (3) Conflict of Interest: - or appearance of conflict of interest – Situations where the HR manager's personal interests conflict with their role as an agent of the employer. Recognition of ethical issues – the common challenge with all three problems “Ethical” situations - involve virtue or moral courage— the HR manager simply has to refuse to do that which is not right and choose to do what is Finding ways to increase their abilities to recognize moral issues – one challenge of HR managers o by setting aside time for reflection, discussing issues with other managers, reading ethics-related material, and listening to employee concerns. o Resource Allocation: Allocating time and resources to ethical reflection becomes an ethical issue itself, as HR managers must balance this with their other duties. o increase their abilities to discover hidden motives and activities. “Right action” – discerned by the HR manager, is sometimes translated into policy and procedure, to provide guidance to other managers and information to employees Policies and procedures o help HR managers ensure fairness by making the decision-making process more consistent and transparent o can also detract from HR managers’ recognizing some ethical issues, because policy may be applied without regard for changes over time or for individual situations o Employee Involvement: One approach to address the dilemma of policy application is to involve employees in reviewing HR policies and practices regularly. Professional Associations o Where HR managers can turn for guidance o Codes of ethics established by professional associations of human resource managers require certain levels of integrity, obedience to the letter and spirit of the law, contribution to the organization and the profession, loyalty, and confidentiality Legal Obligations – it is assumed that HR managers have an obligation to obey the law unless the law itself is immoral. It also acknowledges ethical challenges when laws are violated or when laws and morality do not align. 4 Basic Functions: o To recruit o To train o To motivate o To retain o Terminating - usually after failing somehow at one of the other four functions Compensation - used to recruit applicants and to motivate and retain employees Labor Relations - affect recruiting, training, motivating, retaining, and terminating employees (1) Recruitment – looking for someone who can do the job well and, in some cases, for someone who shows promise for being promoted. HR managers are expected to outline minimum qualifications, set an entry salary range, advertise the position, refer applicants to hiring managers, and review selection decisions in a way that balances the organization’s resources with the likelihood of finding a well-qualified person. Ethical challenge: to balance individuals’ expectations of (and rights to) equal opportunities with the organization’s obligation of resource stewardship. (a) Minimum Qualifications: needs a clear idea of qualifications needed to perform job duties; establishes the minimum knowledge, skills, and abilities a person must have to be considered for the position o Setting minimum qualifications – an ethical decision, often approached as merely a strategic one. o Too high - result in applicants unwilling to accept either the position or the salary offered o Too low - will result, at best, in applications from so many people that extensive secondary screening procedures will be required and, at worst, in signaling to the most desirable applicants that they need not apply because they will be judged over-qualified o Special request – ensuring that the qualifications don’t exclude the hiring manager’s preselected favorite candidate—that further complicate the process of determining what qualifications to require (b) Entry Salary Range o Practical consideration – what the current labor market demands o Ethical Consideration: whether to take steps to increase the salaries of the existing employees or change the job classifications of the new employees o “Comparable worth” An HR manager with limited resources is unlikely to conduct studies assessing the “worth” of jobs, but failing to do so because one wants to avoid legal liability would be, in Kantian term, not produced by a “good will.” o Advertising omitting a salary or salary range may simply be an effort to save on advertising costs A position can be advertised very narrowly, such as by handing a vacancy announcement to one person, or very broadly, by putting a sign in the window, a link on a web page, an ad in the paper, or a commercial on television Promise keeping – adhering to the organization’s stated values Important Considerations: Intentionality of bias (Kant’s notion of good will) – important consideration in determining when the inevitable bias caused by the choice of advertisements is significant enough to render the process unfair Potential effect of the choice of advertisement on society o Outsourcing An issue currently in the forefront or business ethics HR manager must clearly understand the anticipated outcomes regarding all of the stakeholders: employees, potential employees, local communities, external communities, and stockholders (c) Selection – final step in the recruitment process; to select among the applicants for a position. o Important, and sometimes listed as a separate function of HR Managers o Often performed by hiring managers after the HR department has collected applications o and eliminated the people who clearly don’t qualify o Screening – can be performed by HR staff; they may add a set of preferred qualifications that are more stringent than the minimum qualifications posted in the advertisement; may use written or performance tests. o “as a favor” - having a CEO or other senior staff member send people to be interviewed o A common complaint from applicants is that they submitted applications and “never heard back” from the employer – perception of unfairness o “At will” contracts – not morally permissible o Conflict of Interest – not fraught with large conflicts of interest for HR managers – there is usually a separation between functions of the HR and the hiring managers. (2) Training and Development – divided into 2 types: (a) General Training – they see themselves as paying for training that an employee can then take to a competitor and use against them (b) Safety Training – they are obliged to ensure that all employees are aware of any safety hazards associated with their jobs or their work environments o Special case – protection against potentially contagious diseases, such as AIDS and hepatitis o should be designed to prevent or reduce transmission of disease, whether or not the infection status of a person is known. o Second special case - balancing an employee’s right to make decisions about undertaking risk and the employer’s responsibility to protect others from harm (c) Values Training - they see it as an attempt to indoctrinate them into a particular religion or to brainwash them o should also recognize that new employees may intend to be ethical but may be less sophisticated than experienced employees in evaluating the implications of various behaviors o Religious beliefs – fuel corporate profits, employers have sought to select employees with some set of religious or quasireligious beliefs or to create it in them o “rules for all” – some values, such as participative management, tolerance, and diversity, create internal inconsistencies when organizations attempt to require them (d) Career Development – use mentoring programs to foster career development, pairing new (or at least junior) employees one-on-one with employees with significant experience o includes succession planning, in which the organization identifies employees who are prepared (or have the potential to be prepared) to step into vacancies as key staff retire, are promoted, or otherwise leave their positions. o to prepare the designated employees for eventual vacancies and does not provide such training to those deemed not promotable (3) Motivation – seek to align employees’ goals with those of the organization “work off the clock” – skip their breaks (a) Compensation – to align the interests of employee and employer, they can also create conflicts of interest (b) Performance Appraisal System (c) Employee Monitoring – to measure productivity, to prevent theft, or to protect others – through videotaping, capturing keystrokes, reviewing e-mail, tapping telephones, collecting specimens for drug testing, or tracking locations (d) Climate and Culture (e) Charitable Contribution Campaigns (f) Job Design (g) Terms and Quality Circles (h) Progressive Discipline (4) Retention (a) Benefits (b) Balance (c) Compensations Systems (d) Employee Complaint Mechanisms (5) Termination (a) Dismissal (b) Layoffs (c) Resignation (d) Death