Belliotti appears to be arguing that all that is required to satisfy the requirements of morality in a sexual exchange is that the participants consent to the exchange in question. Disagree with Belliotti. According to Bellioti, the only requirement for a sexual act's ethical legitimacy is consent. However, this is an excessively basic perspective. Beyond simple permission, sexual encounter morality takes into account the partners' well-being, relationship dynamics, and the effects of their interaction. A sexual encounter between two people who are not acquainted, for example, may not be seen as as ethical as one that takes place within a committed partnership. This is due to the fact that committed relationships frequently entail greater levels of mutual respect, trust, and communication. However, given the greater likelihood of exploitation, engaging in sexual behavior with a stranger may be seen as less moral. A sexual encounter's moral evaluation also heavily depends on its consequences. Given the increased chance of unwanted pregnancy and STDs, an interaction between people who do not use birth control may be seen as less moral than one in which it is used. To sum up, Belliotti's argument that the morality of a sexual encounter is determined solely by consent is not fully developed. In addition to these factors, the parties' wellbeing, the nature of their connection, and the possible consequences of their actions must all be taken into account while evaluating such exchanges ethically.