Uploaded by Alysza Caliel Lualhati

KAS 1, 1ST Act.

advertisement
Caliel Lualhati
KAS 1-U
Besides the idea that we already know how the Philippines and Indonesia are much more
similar in culture, and geography. They also seem to coincide in terms of Political dynasties
reigning over information distortion for years on end in their own respective countries, history
also shows how effective this system was with the Marcos and Prabowo administration in
deceiving people.
It is important for us to understand these similarities and differences since there is a unique
pattern between the two. Prabowo winning in the current elections is like showcasing what it
was like for Marcos to eventually win back in 2022. Stangio (2024) states that the two of them
individually have relations with a dictator, and another with an ex-son-in-law. Both were
degraded and exiled after the fall of Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and the fall of Suharto in
1998, wherein they also got to insert themselves back into power.
Indonesia had it way tougher than the Philippines under dictatorship, indicating 32 years under
Suharto vs only 14 years it was considered one of the most excruciatingly brutal controlling
experiences ever. This also showcases how the wealth of the people was thrown into useless
bargaining, resulting in economic inequalities. The relatives of the thirteen activists who
vanished in 1998, dressed in sky blue, assembled in front of Jakarta's Presidential Palace as
supporters. They displayed images of the generals they believed to be accountable for their
loved ones' disappearances, including one of Prabowo, according to The Associated Press. "Mr.
Paian Siahaan, 77, urged the news agency, "Prabo, if you are going to be president, please
resolve the enforced disappearance cases so that we, the victims' families, can have peace."
Which looks like the same blueprint for how the Martial Law was declared. According to Bicker
(2022), 70,000 people were imprisoned, 34,000 were tortured and over 3,200 people were killed
in the nine years after Mr Marcos imposed martial law, as told by Amnesty International. People
who were innocent were forced to admit that they were communists, hence not even knowing
the meaning of the word itself. Records of constantly being tortured were also taken into
account by many of our historians, so how did we let the same thing slip past us again this
time?
Some say it’s because how the current generation did not still exist during the period of the
Prabowo and Marcos administrations, hence our textbooks lacking substantial data regarding
their governing in those eras succeeded in implying that they were great leaders. Another would
have to be how Camaraderie works against two political parties. The idea that you are assured
a position in exchange for the people’s trust and of course table negotiations, evidently worked.
Although it is already proven a point that we have now become more proactive, participating in
various organizations and even self-educating ourselves, it is still very unfortunate that we are
on the receiving end of both of these families who just won because of their selfish needs and
hunger for power. Dulay (2023) states that there are 3 factors to be considered as to why
Marcos eventually won again: simply because of History, Duterte, and Home, which is why
suppression is nowhere to be found. As reported by Jamil Flores “Neither the Indonesians nor
the Filipinos have a long political memory,” a Filipino writer, Jakarta Globe columnist, and
foreign policy observer who has been working in Indonesia for 22 years.
In conclusion, Indonesia and the Philippines share and favor a collective memory with our
history being enclosed in political turmoil. As much as we wish for the country to improve, and
look back: we still also have a long way to go with proving that the people we elected are not the
people we should be tolerating.
References:
●
Bicker, Laura. “Philippines Martial Law: The Fight to Remember a Decade of Arrests and
Torture.” BBC News, 28 Sept. 2022, www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63056898.
●
Dulay, D., Hicken, A., Menon, A., & Holmes, R. (2023). Continuity, History, and Identity:
Why Bongbong Marcos Won the 2022 Philippine Presidential Election. Pacific Affairs,
96(1), 85-104.a
●
Macaraig, A. (2014, July 6). Marcos, Prabowo and a failure of memory? RAPPLER.
https://www.rappler.com/world/asia-pacific/62546-marcos-prabowo-history/
●
Strangio, S. (2024, February 16). Indonesia’s President Congratulates Successor-elect
Following
Decisive
Victory.
The
Diplomat.
https://thediplomat.com/2024/02/indonesias-president-congratulates-successor-elect-foll
owing-decisive-victory/
Download