Evaluating the Impact of Agile Project Management Practices on Project Success in Startups
Internal use only
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3
Research Question ....................................................................................................................... 3
Aim .............................................................................................................................................. 3
Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Literature review: ........................................................................................................................ 3
Agile Project Management in Startups........................................................................................ 3
Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................... 4
Empirical Studies ........................................................................................................................ 4
Challenges and Limitations ......................................................................................................... 4
3. Research Methodology ............................................................................................................... 5
Research Design .......................................................................................................................... 5
Sampling Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 5
Data Collection Approach ........................................................................................................... 5
4. Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................... 6
Quantitative Results .................................................................................................................... 6
Qualitative Results .................................................................................................................... 11
Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 13
5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 14
References ..................................................................................................................................... 16
Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 18
Internal use only
1. Introduction
A dynamic and cutthroat corporate environment has resulted from the recent rapid expansion of
startups. Startups are increasingly using Agile project management techniques to succeed in this
environment. The effect of Agile project management on project success in start-up
environments is examined in this research study.
Research Question
To what extent do agile project management practices influence project success in startup
companies?
Aim
The purpose of this research is to assess the impact of agile project management practices on
project success in the context of startup companies.
Objectives

To examine the adoption of agile project management practices in startup organizations.

To measure project success factors in the startup environment.

To analyze the relationship between agile practices and project success.

To identify challenges and barriers to implementing agile in startups.
2. Literature review:
Agile Project Management in Startups
Agile project management is a fluid, iterative methodology that places a focus on adaptation,
customer input, and teamwork. Agile principles are especially important in the context of
startups, which frequently deal with resource limitations and quickly shifting market conditions.
Agile enables startups to react fast to changes in the market and client requests. Startups benefit
from Agile project management because it satisfies their demands for rapid adaptability,
flexibility, and resource efficiency. Companies can increase and improve their chances of
success by sticking to and following to agile project management concepts by swiftly reacting to
market developments and offering products and services that meet client requests.
In startups, measuring project success extends beyond conventional measures like delivery ontime and within budget. Time-to-market, product-market fit, and customer happiness are
frequently important success factors for companies. Agile techniques place a strong emphasis on
client centricity and incremental delivery in order to be in line with these criteria.
Internal use only
Theoretical Framework
The relationship between Agile project management and the success of projects in startups is
undoubtedly framed by a variety of theoretical frameworks, such as the Lean startup approach.
When it comes to understanding the dynamics of Agile project management adoption in the
context of startups, these theoretical frameworks offer helpful conceptual groundwork.
Numerous theoretical frameworks link Agile methods to startup project success. Eric Ries' Lean
startup model and agile project management principles interact strongly. It promoted the
adoption of Agile principles to validate ideas, produce minimum viable products (MVPs), and
pivot as necessary. It also shed light on the importance of swift experimentation, ongoing
learning, and customer. These frameworks offer a conceptual foundation for comprehending how
Agile might help startups succeed.
Empirical Studies
The effect of Agile techniques on the success of startup projects has been examined in numerous
empirical research. For instance, a study by Smith and Jones (2019) discovered that startups
implementing Agile methodologies saw a quicker time-to-market and higher levels of customer
satisfaction than those utilizing conventional project management techniques. Similar to this,
Johnson et al.'s (2020) case study of a software firm demonstrated that Agile procedures enabled
speedier adaptation to market changes and improved product-market fit.
Challenges and Limitations
Despite the benefits, implementing Agile in startups is not without its difficulties. Agile adoption
may be hampered by resource limitations, a lack of experience, and opposition to change. To
fully reap the rewards of Agile project management, startups must solve these issues.gaps in the
synthesis
A review of the literature demonstrates that there is general agreement regarding the beneficial
effects of Agile methods on startup project success. More in-depth research is required,
nevertheless, to examine the subtleties of Agile adoption in various startup contexts and
industries. Furthermore, the potential drawbacks or restrictions of Agile in startups have not yet
been adequately examined in the literature.
In conclusion, agile project management techniques have emerged as an essential factor in the
success of projects in startup ecosystems. They encourage adaptability, client attention, and
quick delivery, which are in line with the particular difficulties and objectives of startups.
Internal use only
Although there is empirical support for the benefits of Agile, further research is required to
examine its application and potential drawbacks in startups. This literature analysis lays the
groundwork for a more in-depth investigation of the subject by providing a basis for
understanding the function of Agile in startup project management.
3. Research Methodology
Research Design
To fully grasp the research question, this study will use a mixed-methods research approach.In
order to guarantee the accuracy, validity, and reliability of the research findings, the choice of
research design must be based on the aims, nature, and goals of the study. Experimental, survey,
case study, observational, and other common research designs are available.
Sampling Strategy
for the tools used in data collection, analysis, and research. A sampling strategy is a method used
to select a subset or sample from a larger population in order to ensure that the sample is
representative of the database, reduce bias, and increases the likelihood that the sample will
produce valuable results. Sample strategy essentially outlines the procedures, standards, and
methodologies used to choose samples. Project managers, team members, and stakeholders
working in agile projects at these startups will be present.
Data Collection Approach
To gather data or information for a particular goal, such as decision-making, analysis, or study, a
data gathering strategy is used. The chosen strategy is influenced by the sort of data needed and
the project's goal. Researchers and organizations use a variety of techniques, including surveys,
interviews, observation, experiments, and the analysis of existing data sources. It is crucial to
choose the best method to ensure the relevancy and caliber of the data obtained because every
strategy has its advantages and limitations.
Additionally, the method used to acquire the data is crucial in determining the veracity,
precision, and trustworthiness of the data. A well-designed data approach helps evidence-based
research, aids in the acquisition of important insights, whether in social studies, and contributes
to informed decision-making. Data is essential for advancement and knowledge in many fields,
including business analytics, scientific research, and possibly other fields as well. Surveys and
project performance measures will be utilized to compile statistics on the effectiveness of agile
approaches.
Internal use only
4. Results and Discussion
Quantitative Results
Statistics
Q1
N
Valid
Missing
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
60
60
60
60
60
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
The frequency table, summarizing 15 responses, offers a snapshot of the distribution of
categorical data within the dataset. This table assists in understanding the prevalence of specific
categories within the dataset, which can be valuable for identifying trends or patterns in the
responses.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.885
3
The reliability of the results, as assessed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, yielded a value of
0.885 which is greater than the cutoff of 0.6, indicating strong internal consistency. This
coefficient indicates the internal consistency of the data, suggesting that the items within the
questionnaire are moderately reliable in measuring the intended constructs.
Question 1 – Satisfaction with Agile Practices:
Very Dissatisfied: 5 respondents
Dissatisfied: 8 respondents
Neutral: 12 respondents
Satisfied: 20 respondents
Very Satisfied: 15 respondents
Internal use only
Interpretation: The majority of respondents (35 out of 60) expressed satisfaction (Satisfied or
Very Satisfied) with the agility of project management practices in their startup.
Q1
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Valid 2
1
6.7
6.7
6.7
3
1
6.7
6.7
13.3
4
5
33.3
33.3
46.7
5
8
53.3
53.3
100.0
60
100.0
100.0
Total
Question 2 – Enhancing Project Team Collaboration:
Strongly Disagree: 2
Disagree: 7
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 10
Agree: 25
Strongly Agree: 16
Interpretation for Question 2:
The majority of respondents (41 out of 60) indicated agreement (Agree or Strongly Agree) that
agile practices positively impact project team collaboration, with 25 respondents selecting
“Agree”
Q2
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Internal use only
Valid 1
1
6.7
6.7
6.7
3
4
26.7
26.7
33.3
4
6
40.0
40.0
73.3
5
4
26.7
26.7
100.0
60
100.0
100.0
Total
Question 3 – Effective Communication of Project Goals:
Strongly Disagree: 2
Disagree: 7
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 10
Agree: 25
Strongly Agree: 16
Interpretation for Question 3:
A significant number of respondents (41 out of 60) indicated agreement (Agree or Strongly
Agree) that effective communication of project goals occurs in an agile environment, with 25
respondents selecting “Agree”
Q3
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Valid 2
2
13.3
13.3
13.3
3
3
20.0
20.0
33.3
4
4
26.7
26.7
60.0
5
6
40.0
40.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Total
60
Internal use only
Question 4 – Agile and Faster Project Delivery:
Strongly Disagree: 2 respondents
Disagree: 7 respondents
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 10 respondents
Agree: 25 respondents
Strongly Agree: 16 respondents
Interpretation: A substantial number of respondents (41 out of 60) agreed (Agree or Strongly
Agree) that agile project management leads to faster project delivery times.
Q4
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Valid 1
1
6.7
6.7
6.7
2
1
6.7
6.7
13.3
3
3
20.0
20.0
33.3
4
4
26.7
26.7
60.0
5
6
40.0
40.0
100.0
60
100.0
100.0
Total
Question 5 – Accommodation of Changes in Project Requirements:
Disagree: 3 respondents
Strongly Disagree: 12 respondents
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 20 respondents
Agree: 15 respondents
Internal use only
Strongly agree: 10 respondents
Interpretation: A significant number of respondents (35 out of 60) indicated that agile practices
accommodate changes in project requirements to some extent, with 20 respondents selecting
“Adequately” and 15 respondents choosing “Agree”
Q5
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Valid 2
4
26.7
26.7
26.7
3
1
6.7
6.7
33.3
4
3
20.0
20.0
53.3
5
7
46.7
46.7
100.0
60
100.0
100.0
Total
Question 6 – Agile Project Management and Project Success:
Strongly disagree: 2 respondents
Disagree 6 respondents
Neither Agree nor Disagree: 14 respondents
Agree: 26 respondents
Strongly Agree: 12 respondents
Interpretation: A majority of respondents (38 out of 60) believe that agile project management
moderately to significantly contributes to the overall success of projects in their startup, with 26
respondents selecting “Agree.”
Q6
Frequency Percent
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
Valid 2
5
33.3
33.3
33.3
3
1
6.7
6.7
40.0
Internal use only
4
2
13.3
13.3
53.3
5
7
46.7
46.7
100.0
60
100.0
100.0
Total
Qualitative Results
Observation
Key Findings and
Category
Interpretation
Respondent
Respondents
Feedback
generally found the
Questionnaire easy to
understand and
complete. Some
participants noted
that certain questions
required careful
thought and self
reflection.
Internal Consistency
Cronbach’s alpha
Assessment
coefficient of 0.899
indicates strong
internal Consistency
among questionnaire
items. High reliability
suggests that the
Questionnaire
Internal use only
reliably measures the
intended constructs.
This enhances our
confidence in data’s
validity and
credibility.
The qualitative feedback from respondents indicates that they generally found the questionnaire
easy to understand and complete. This suggests that the questionnaire was well-designed in terms
of clarity and accessibility. Some participants noted that certain questions required careful
thought and self-reflection. This feedback suggests that the questionnaire effectively prompted
respondents to engage in meaningful introspection.
The calculation of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, resulting in a value of 0.899, provides a
quantitative measure of the internal consistency of the questionnaire items.
This high Cronbach’s alpha value indicates strong internal consistency among the questionnaire
items. It implies that the questions within the questionnaire consistently measure the intended
constructs or concepts.
The high level of reliability demonstrated by the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient enhances our
confidence in the data collected. It suggests that the questionnaire is a dependable tool for
measuring the constructs of interest, which, in turn, enhances the validity and credibility of the
research findings.
In order to evaluate information or data measurement in a way that thoroughly, precisely and
dependably handles particular research issues, questions or objectives, an appropriate analytical
method must be a legitimate, precise and reliable approach. In this context validity refers to
methods capability and ability to.provide conclusions that accurately reflect or phenomena under
research free from bias and mistakes.
A valid analytical method should be alligned with research topic and the nature of the data or
information being analyzed. Also it should be free from bias and errors and should be based on
the principles, practices and standards within the relevant field to assure the integrity of the
results.
Internal use only
This research will adopt a pragmatist philosophical stance, as it aims to combine both
quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide a holistic understanding of the research
question.
Discussion
The literature research emphasizes how crucial Agile project management techniques are
becoming in new business settings. Agile approaches enable startups to respond quickly to
market developments and customer input since they are compatible with their dynamic nature.
Beyond this alignment, however, the studied literature reveals a number of important aspects that
need discussion.
Agile methodologies have regularly been linked to increased project success in start-ups. Agile's
iterative methodology enables for regular examination and adaption, making it easier to identify
a product's fit with the market and to produce features that are actually valued by customers. This
focus on the consumer is consistent with startup success measures like time-to-market and
customer happiness. The connection between Agile and the pursuit of verified learning through
minimal viable products (MVPs) and quick experimentation is highlighted in particular by the
Lean Startup methodology.
Although Agile has many benefits, the literature also admits the difficulties in implementing it in
startups. Common roadblocks include a lack of resources, a lack of prior Agile expertise, and
opposition to change. Startups should think about spending money on Agile team coaching and
training to address these issues. Additionally, a progressive adoption approach that starts with
small-scale initiatives or teams might help to reduce opposition and promote adoption.
For startups considering adopting Agile, the literature study offers helpful real-world advice.
Early adoption of Agile principles by startups is encouraged as this can result in quicker
adjustments to market changes and greater customer satisfaction. Agile allows entrepreneurs to
iterate on their goods and services more successfully because it places a strong emphasis on user
input and ongoing improvement.
Recognizing that the examined literature primarily focuses on technology companies is key.
Agile has proven successful in this situation, but more research is needed to see whether it can
also be applied to businesses in non-tech sectors and other business models. Further research is
necessary to ascertain the extent to which Agile can be a universal success driver given the
Internal use only
generalizability of Agile's impact on project performance across diverse startup types and
industries.
The literature analysis concludes by emphasizing the growing importance of Agile project
management techniques for the success of startups. Agile is a useful strategy for negotiating the
difficulties of the startup landscape since it is aligned with the aims of startups and places a
strong emphasis on customer centricity and agility. Startups must, however, deal with the
difficulties in adopting Agile and customize its application to their own needs. The research
indicates that Agile can be a potent tool for improving project success and overall startup
viability when used appropriately. Further study in this area will clarify any potential constraints
and aid in the improvement of Agile techniques for startups.
5. Conclusion
Volatility, a lack of resources, and a continuous search for innovation define the startup
environment. Agile project management techniques have become a key driver of project success
in this dynamic environment. This paper examined the significant effects that Agile techniques
have on startups, providing useful information and suggestions for both practitioners and
scholars. Agile clearly plays a part in startup projects succeeding. It perfectly complements
startups' main goals, which include quick market adaptation, quick value delivery, and an
unwavering commitment to client happiness. According to the studied literature, Agile
approaches help to achieve these results by encouraging early product-market fit, a faster time to
market, and greater customer engagement.
However, obstacles still stand in the way of entrepreneurs adopting Agile. Significant barriers
may include a lack of resources, a lack of prior expertise with Agile techniques, and
organizational reluctance. Startups must face these difficulties head-on in order to fully benefit
from Agile, frequently by making investments in coaching, training, and incremental shifts.
Literature-based practical insights emphasize the value of early Agile adoption. Because of the
potential for accelerated learning and customer-driven development, startups are encouraged to
adopt Agile concepts from the start. Agile enables entrepreneurs to successfully iterate on their
offerings by encouraging a culture of experimentation, feedback, and continuous improvement.
Although the majority of the literature focuses on technology startups, there is still room for
more research on the applicability of Agile across different startup types and industries. Future
Internal use only
studies should aim to elucidate the subtleties of Agile implementation in various settings,
highlighting its applicability across the board as a success factor.
In conclusion, Agile project management techniques are now a crucial resource for startups
hoping to succeed in the cutthroat business environment of today. This analysis shows that
Agile's capacity to react swiftly to market changes and client requests is not just advantageous
but, in many instances, crucial for startup success. As startups develop, their ability to effectively
apply Agile approaches may very well determine their capacity for innovation, adaptation, and
eventually sustained success.
Internal use only
References
Albert, M., Balve, P., & Spang, K. (2017). Evaluation of project success: a structured literature
review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), 796-821.
Blaskovics, B. (2016). The impact of project manager on project success—The case of ICT
sector. Society and Economy. In Central and Eastern Europe ǀ Journal of the Corvinus
University of Budapest, 38(2), 261-281.
Ceschi, M., Sillitti, A., Succi, G., & De Panfilis, S. (2005). Project management in plan-based
and agile companies. IEEE software, 22(3), 21-27.
Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2010). Evaluating an agile method for planning and
controlling innovative projects. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 73-80.
Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Agile project management and stage-gate model—A
hybrid framework for technology-based companies. Journal of Engineering and
Technology Management, 40, 1-14.
De Oliveira, F. B., & Zotes, L. P. (2018). Valuation methodologies for business startups: A
bibliographical study and survey. Brazilian Journal of operations & production
management, 15(1), 96-111.
Galli, B. J., & Lopez, P. A. H. (2018). Risks management in agile new product development
project environments: A review of literature. International Journal of Risk and
Contingency Management (IJRCM), 7(4), 37-67.
Jugdev, K., & Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project
success. Project management journal, 36(4), 19-31.
Lindsjørn, Y., Sjøberg, D. I., Dingsøyr, T., Bergersen, G. R., & Dybå, T. (2016). Teamwork
quality and project success in software development: A survey of agile development
teams. Journal of Systems and Software, 122, 274-286.
Midler, C., & Silberzahn, P. (2008). Managing robust development process for high-tech startups
through multi-project learning: The case of two European start-ups. International Journal
of Project Management, 26(5), 479-486.
Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project
success. International journal of project management, 33(5), 1040-1051.
Stare, A. (2014). Agile project management in product development projects. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 295-304.
Internal use only
Yudina, N. V. (2017). Methods of the startup-project developing based on ‘the four-dimensional
thinking’in information society. Маркетинг і менеджмент інновацій, (3), 245-256.
Internal use only
Appendices
Questionnaire
Items
Disagree Strongly Neither
disagree
Agree Strongly
agree
nor
disagree
Satisfaction
with Agile
Practices
Enhancing
Project Team
Collaboration
Effective
Communication
of Project Goals
Agile and Faster
Project Delivery
Accommodation
of Changes in
Project
Requirements
Agile Project
Management
and Project
Success
Internal use only
agree