Uploaded by arimnahs

psych response paper 3

advertisement
Mira Shan
Professor Noah J. Sasson
PSY 2301.0W1
02 April 2023
Psychology Response Paper
One social psychology process that I have witnessed recently occured in my dormitory,
which I have recognized as the bystander effect. There is a student on my floor who is autistic
and greatly struggles with social interactions and communication. He does not understand
personal boundaries or social cues and thus has become the target for bullying. Many student
friend groups will regularly subject this student to teasing and humiliation in public study rooms.
But as I have noticed, other students will simply walk past when the autistic student is getting
bullied, not willing to speak up for this student. The bystander effect is very apparent in this
situation, as the other students most likely are not interviewing due to the fact that no one else is.
There is a large student body in our dormitory, so the diffusion of responsibility among the
bystanders is larger. Many may hesitate to speak up in fear of social repercussions, or simply
assume that someone else will step in to defend him. These bystanders do not believe that they
should be the one to stand up for the autistic student because it is not their responsibility and
other students are not saying anything, so it is socially acceptable.
Another social psychology process I see a lot around me is deindividuation, especially on
social media. I have noticed that individuals on many differing social media platforms such as
Instagram are more likely to leave cruel, negative, or vulgar comments on posts or uploads.
Many of these comments seem very unlikely to ever be said to someone’s face, but are typed
without hesitation on social media. I believe there are many factors that are recognized in the
theory of deindividuation that can be seen in social media. One such aspect is the option of
anonymity, where individuals can hide behind fake usernames and devices. Anonymity allows
hateful commenters to say anything with little direct consequence or confrontation. These
negative comments only further encourage other commenters to express hateful sentiments for
no other purpose other than the sake of being rude, as they likely cannot be recognized outside of
the platform. These commenters may think these negative thoughts when interacting with others
in person, but do not openly say them in fear of social repercussions. Another aspect is the way
that social media dehumanizes individuals. Many platforms are used for people to express their
interests and opinions, but this in turn superficially groups individuals into categories. When
someone is given a label, such as a certain political leaning, those in opposition feel more
compelled to be hurtful or blunt, as they no longer recognize the user as a person, but rather the
‘category’ they are representing.
Download