PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ADVANCE VARIANCE ANALYSIS Interpretation of material mix and yield variances Mix - a favourable total mix variance would suggest that a higher proportion of a cheaper material is being used hence reducing the overall average cost per unit. Yield - an adverse total yield variance would suggest that less output has been achieved for a given input, i.e. that the total input in volume is more than expected for the output achieved. • • • These variances may be interrelated. A favourable material mix variance may lead to an adverse material yield variance. This is due to differences in quality between the materials used. Any change in mix should be judged by the impact on the overall total materials variance. The operating statement would include a separate line for each variance example A company manufactures a chemical using two components, A and B. The standard information for one unit of the chemical are as follows: In a particular period, 160 units of the chemical were produced, using 1,000 kgs of material A and 1,460 kgs of material B. Required: Calculate the material usage, mix and yield variances for each material. PLANING AND OPERATIONAL VARIANCES When applying planning and operating principles to cost variances(material and labour), care must be taken over flexing the budgets. The accepted approach for use in the exam is to flex both the original and revised budgets to actual production levels: The standard cost per unit of raw material was estimated to be$5.20 per unit. However, due to subsequent improvements in technology, the general market price at the time of purchase was $5.00 per unit. The actual price paid was $5.18 per unit. 10,000 units of the raw materials were purchased during the period. Required: Calculate the planning and operational materials price variances. Comment on the results.