lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Learning Unit 2 Payment Chpt 6 Methods of Payment Law (Varsity College) Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Learning Unit 1: Banks and banking law Theme 1: Introduction to banking law Define all relevant terminology in terms of the Banks Act: Banks play an important part in the functioning of the economy by performing various roles, including that of payment and loan intermediary, as well as provider of payment settlement facilities. 4 Principal methods of payment: Money: physical money including cash Payment cards: debit and credit cards Funds transfer: customers instruction to the bank to transfer funds from one account to another Negotiable instruments: cheques and letters of credit Discuss all the exclusions from the Act: The Banks Act does not apply to the following: The South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The Land Bank The Development Bank of Southern Africa The Corporation for Public Deposits The Public Investment Commissioners Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA): FICA residential address The provision and verification of a residential address: The obligation to provide an address and the need for such to be verified appears to have been the chosen safeguard against identity fraud. The value of providing a residential address for purposes of identifying a customer has been questioned. De Koker argues that the negative impact of residential address verification increases as a result of the high level of internal migration. In South Africa, the verification of a client’s address has presented certain difficulties, particularly with low-income individuals. The drafters of the FICA and its regulations were aware of the fact that individuals who lived in informal settlements and rural areas could face problems in verifying their residential address. Compare the different tiers of banks available in South Africa: First Tier banks: Commercial bank: is a financial institution that provides banking services for their customers, including businesses, organisations and individuals. Banking services include the offering of current, deposit and savings accounts, as well as providing loans to their customers. Investment bank: is a financial institution that assists individuals, companies and governments in raising capital by underwriting and/or acting as the client’s agent in the issuance of securities. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Second-tier banks: Mutual bank: is defined as a juristic person registered as a mutual bank, and whose members qualify as such by virtue of being shareholders and being entitled to participate in exercising control in a general meeting of the bank The Postbank of South Africa: Is a savings financial institution that operates as a division of the South African Post Office. Third-tier banks: Village banks: The objectives of village banks are to provide appropriate financial services at a local level and to provide a link to a first-tier bank. Stokvels: Generic name for a wide range of credit and savings associations which one encounters in disadvantaged communities. They provide banking-type services including savings and credit services. Mobile banking services: A number of cellular companies have developed software for their clients to use their cellphones as paying devices. Payments which take place through cellphones are generally referred to as mobile payments. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Theme 2: Banking law and its sources Analyse the impact of various phenomena on South African banking law: We have seen an expansion of the pool of modern SA banking-law principles which are as a result of the following 5 fundamental phenomena: 1. Banking law as part of the law of obligations 2. Bank-customer relationship is a multi-faceted one 3. Government policy of legislating to replace the common law 4. Globalisation 5. Major practical changes in banking sector Discuss the sources of banking law in South Africa: Primary sources include: Legislation – Constitution Other legislation may include: National Payment Systems Act National Prosecuting Authority Act Debt Collectors Act Judicial precedent Custom or Trade Usage Code of Banking Practice Roman law Roman-Dutch law Indigenous law -Stokvels Secondary sources include: International law The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: supra-national banking body. Aim: to foster co-operation between banking regulators & establish agreed minimum standards for supervision of international banking groups. South African Reserve Bank rigidly follows standards laid down by Basel Committee. Sa incorporates them by way of Regulation and they became part of our municipal law Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Theme 3: The South African banking system Discuss the function of the South African Reserve Bank: SARB plays a pivotal role in the regulation of Banks in South Africa. Primary role: To protect the value of the SA currency in the interests of balance & sustainable growth. Mandate of SARB is derived from Constitution. SARB plays multiple roles: Lead regulator in SA –responsible for bank regulation & supervision Issues banking licences to banking institutions & monitoring their activities in terms of either Banks Actor Mutual Banks Act . Section 10 (1) (c) (i) of SARB Act –SARB may ‘perform such functions, implement such rules & procedures and, in general, take such steps as may be necessary to establish, conduct, monitor, regulate & supervise payment, clearing or settlement systems. ‘ National Payment System Act enables SARB to perform these functions Authority to perform these functions vests in National Payment System Department of SARB S 10 of SARB ACT –SARB may exercise various powers relating to the financial market. Theme 4: The bank-customer relationship #General elements of the Bank-Customer Relationship: Loan: It is generally accepted that the basic relationship between a bank and its customer in respect of a current account is one of debtor and creditor. If the account reflects a credit balance, the customer is the creditor and the bank, the debtor. Money deposited by the customer to the credit of the account is essentially a loan given by him to the bank. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Where the account is overdrawn, the roles of the parties are reversed: the bank is the creditor and the customer, the debtor Formation of the Bank-Customer relationship: The bank-customer relationship is formed when a bank agrees to open an account on behalf of a person and accept him as its customer. The contract is normally concluded by way of offer and acceptance. The prospective customer makes an offer by completing and submitting an application form to open an account and the bank may either accept or reject this offer. If the bank decides to accept the offer, the contract comes into existence when the bank communicates its acceptance to the customer. Duties of the bank: Keeping and accounting customers account with the bank. Repaying and collecting payments on behalf of the customer. Furnishing customer with statements of account. Duties of the customer: To pay overdrawing’s, interest and bank charges. To exercise reasonable care in drawing payment instructions To reimburse and indemnify the bank. Circumstances in which the bank-customer relationship terminates: Agreement: Parties tacitly agree Notice of termination: Customer summarily terminates his contract with the bank. Death or dissolution of the customer: if natural person Sequestration of the customer: restricts banks’ ability to perform mandate with customer. Consequences of termination: The whole of the balance standing to the credit of the customers account becomes immediately repayable by the bank. Also ends certain duties that the bank owes to its customer Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 In essence, the bank-customer relationship is a multi-faceted one that exhibits elements of different types of contract, most notably those of loan for consumption (mutuum) and mandate (mandatum). Pinto v First National Bank of Namibia 2012 (A98/2001) NAHCMD 43: explains how the naturalia of the contract of mandate does not exclude the imposition of statute. Statute thus overrides the common law contractual terms between the banker and the customer in the interests of justice. This is important when considering our unjust and unfair terms contained in section 48 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) the broad “interests of justice” yardstick. Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers 2001 (1) SA 256 (C): contractual terms are often entered into between individuals and often between poor and vulnerable people on one hand, and powerful, well-resourced companies on the other. This may very well assist in developing fair and relevant rules for this ever-changing contractual landscape between bank and customer. Relationship between principal and agent & mandator and mandatory: The relationship of the mandator and mandatory is governed by our common law naturalia principles and the bank owes a duty of reasonable care to the mandator in carrying out its instructions. Should the bank fail to carry out the instructions in a reasonable manner, then the Bank will be liable for breach of mandate (contract). This principle of fiduciary care is extended to an agent acting on behalf of a principal; in that the agent must act in the best interests of the principal and not in her/ his own interests. The mandator also has a duty to act with reasonable care when making payment instructions. Learning Unit 2: Payment Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Theme 1: Nature of payment What is payment? Payment is the rendering of what is owed under a monetary obligation by a person competent to render it to a person competent to accept it. It discharges the obligation and any obligation accessory to it. What is solutio? Discharge of an obligation by performance. How is the rendering of what is owed achieved? If the creditor refuses the debtors tender of payment, no payment takes place, even if the tender is a valid one. What does it mean that payment is a bilateral act? Requires the agreement or co-operation of both parties. What is the general rule for payment to have taken place? The debtor must, as a rule, give the creditor an unfettered right to immediate use of the funds in question. Theme 2: Various concepts relating to money Explain concepts relating to payment and their legal effect: Def money: Money in the sense of the currency has been judicially defined as ‘that which passes freely from hand to hand throughout the community in final discharge of debts. Does it include e-money & foreign currency? E-money and Foreign currency is not money for legal purposes. What is generally accepted to constitute money for commercial purposes? Notes and coins. Medium, amount, and time and place of payment What is legal tender? That is, in banknotes and coins that the creditor is obliged to accept in redemption of the debt. What constitutes as legal tender? Section 17 of the SARB Act Banknotes – any amount Gold coins – any amount Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Other coins – any amount, per transaction, not exceeding: R50, where coins of denomination of R1, R2 or R5 are tendered. R5, where coins of denomination of 10, 20, 50 cents are tendered. 50c where coins of denomination of 1c,2c or 5c are tendered. What is the difference between “money of account” and “money of payment”? Money of account is the currency in which a debt is expressed or liability to pay damages is calculated. Money of payment is the currency in which such debt or liability is to be discharged. Which rate of exchange prevails when currency other than ZAR is converted into ZAR? If the debt is expressed in a foreign currency then, unless agreed otherwise, the debtor has the choice of paying in that currency or paying in South African currency converted at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of payment. When is the tender of payment of valid? For a tender of payment to be valid it must be for the full amount owing. The creditor may insist on the exact sum being paid – he cannot be made to give change – and unless agreed otherwise, he is not compelled to accept payment in instalments. The amount owing and payable is generally that specified in the contract. What about currency fluctuations? South African law applies the principle of currency nominalism, in terms of which the debtor must pay the sum stipulated as being due, irrespective of any interim fluctuations in the purchasing power of the currency. When must payment be made? Payment must be made at the time or within the period expressly or tacitly agreed upon (if any). How are time periods computed? To determine precisely when an agreed period of days, weeks, months or years expires, the court must ascertain, if possible, what the parties themselves intended, by examining the wording of the contract in the light of any admissible evidence. If, through this process, the court can arrive at the common intention of the parties, it must give effect to that intention. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Where must payment be made? The debtor must make payment at the place expressly or tacitly agreed upon. What is the effect Reg 3(1)(c) of the Exchange Control Regulations? (1) Subject to any exemption which may be granted by the Treasury or a person authorised by the Treasury, no person shall, without permission granted by the Treasury or a person authorised by the Treasury and in accordance with such conditions as the Treasury or such authorised person may impose: (c) make any payment to, or in favour, or on behalf of a person resident outside the Republic, or place any sum to the credit of such person; or Critically discuss the common law and statutory law in respect of payment of monetary debts At common law, a party who owes a monetary debt may pay it before the date stipulated for payment, provided the time clause was inserted in the contract purely for his benefit. If the time clause was inserted solely for the benefit of the creditor, or for the benefit of both parties, the creditor is not obliged to accept early payment. Critically evaluate the guarantee of payment Payment guarantees are typically used in sales of land to ensure that payment takes place. In a sale of land for cash, the buyer is obliged, in principle, to pay the price against (pari passu with) registration of transfer of the land in the Deeds Registry. In practice, it is not possible to determine precisely when registration will take place and so it is accepted that the buyer need not pay at the exact moment of transfer, it being sufficient if he pays when the fact of transfer may be registered without the buyer making payment at all The following should be noted regarding the required payment guarantee: There is no prescribed from for the guarantee. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Unless agreed otherwise, the guarantee need not be a bank guarantee and it not be irrevocable. The buyer is bound to furnish the guarantee only once the seller indicates that he is willing and able to lodge the transfer documents. If the buyer sues to enforce transfer, he may tender the required guarantee in his summons. #Payment by post For payment to discharge monetary debt debtor must place money or payment instrument at creditor’s disposal. If debtor chooses to post cheque postal order or other payment instrument to creditor & it does not reach him debt is not paid &debt is not discharged. But courts have made exception to rule & hold that mere act of posting discharges debt if following requirements are satisfied: Creditor requests or authorises debtor to send his payment by post In case of cheque debtor complies with any agreed terms regarding manner in which cheque is to be drawn. Debtor posts instrument in correctly addressed & stamped envelope. Instrument is lost or stolen in transit & in case of cheque paid by bank in circumstances entitling it to debit account of drawer of instrument. Above exception does not apply if parties have agreed that any payment made by debtor must be received by creditor in order to be effective. Payment by & to a 3rd person Payment of monetary debt may be made by: Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Debtor’s agent surety for debtor independent 3rd person –3rd person may make payment without debtor’s knowledge or consent & even against his will. Creditor may not refuse tender of payment on basis that it comes from someone other than debtor or person appointed by debtor. For 3rd person to discharge obligation he must make it clear to creditor that he is paying for or in name of debtor &he must make payment unconditionally. Obligation is not discharged if: 3rd person fails to indicate for whom he is paying, or He tenders payment subject to condition that creditor is not obliged to accept, or He pays what is owed not to discharge debt but to purchase & obtain cession of creditor’s claim against debtor Having made payment on behalf of debtor - 3rd person has right of recovery against him in certain circumstances. Parties to contractual debt may agree that payment of debt will be made by an independent 3rd person –someone who is not party to their contract. In such a case payment by 3rd person discharges debtor's obligation. Such 3rd person not being party to contract cannot be compelled to render payment, but debtor may be held liable for breach of contract if 3rd party fails to pay. Receipt for payment A party who pays debt is entitled to receipt & may withhold payment until he is given one. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 A bank that pays out on cheque to party purporting to be payee may demand that he indorse instrument as form of receipt. Apportionment of payment If parties have agreed in advance how money is to be applied : e.g. they have stipulated that creditor must apply money to particular debt or that he may allocate money to whichever debt or debts he sees fit court must give effect to that agreement. If parties have not concluded any prior agreement on how payment is to be apportioned among debts, then question depends on whether either debtor or creditor has allocated payment to any particular debt or debts. Debtor who owes two or more monetary debts to one creditor may make payment to creditor which is insufficient to discharge all debts. In such case it is necessary to determine HOW payment is to be appropriated between debts Debtor may before or at time of making payment indicate to which debt (or debts) payment is to be applied. If he does payment must be appropriated accordingly. He need not give an express indication if his intention is clear in circumstances Debtor’s intention will generally be clear for example where: He has consistently agreed to creditor appropriating his payments in manner adopted Amount of payment corresponds with one particular debt He admits one debt & disputes others Creditor has demanded payment of one of debts & debtor without any explanation has forwarded amount demanded If debtor has not expressly indicated appropriation & circumstances do not suggest one creditor may choose debt(s) to which to apply payment. For creditor’s appropriation to be effective he must make his intention known to debtor before or at time of payment so as to give debtor an opportunity of stipulating otherwise. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Creditor is required to act fairly in making his choice & he cannot appropriate payment to debt which is disputed or not yet due or not legally enforceable. Payment in full settlement: A debtor who denies owing full amount claimed by creditor may tender payment of lesser amount &accompany tender with words ‘in full settlement’. May creditor keep payment & sue for balance? Answer depends on whether parties have concluded a compromise. In this regard following should be noted: Compromise is essentially agreement between parties to disputed obligation or to lawsuit, settling matter in dispute each party receding from his previous position & conceding something. Typical reasons for a party agreeing to compromise are that he is: Uncertain as to merits of his side of dispute or Unsure whether he will be able to prove his version of events in court or Not prepared to incur inconvenience (trauma) or expense of litigation Compromise is usually classified as form of novation because it is intended to replace & has effect of replacing any obligation which exists between parties. But it differs from novation in three respects: It must be concluded to settle dispute between parties Each party must depart from his prior position & concede something either by diminishing his claim or increasing his liability; & Agreement does not require valid existing obligation as prerequisite for its formation. Parties often conclude compromise precisely because they are uncertain as to whether there is any obligation between them. If claim in respect of which they agree to compromise is invalid validity of compromise is not affected. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 Set-off Set-off or compensation (compensatio) is method by which mutually owed debts (contractual or otherwise) are extinguished. Set-off has same extinguishing effect as payment & is regarded as its legal equivalent. It promotes economic efficiency in that it allows reciprocal debts to be discharged without expense & inconvenience of duplication of performance. Requirements for set-off to operate: Parties to set-off must be separate legal entities Parties must be mutually indebted to each other (each must be both creditor & debtor of other) & each must owe & be owed in same capacity. Debts must be of same kind (eiusdemgeneris). Debts must be due and enforceable. Debts must be liquidated Effect of set-off Set-off operates automatically (ex lege) as soon as requirements set out above are met It need not be specifically invoked In this respect it differs from payment which involves voluntary act on part of debtor Set-off must be pleaded & proved for court to be able to take cognisance of it. Set-off discharges both of debts wholly or in part. It has same effect as full or partial payment of each debt. If debts are for same amount both are completely extinguished. If debts are for different sums greater is reduced by amount of smaller which is extinguished. When set-off is excluded? Parties may by agreement exclude applicability of set-off to their reciprocal debts e.g. either of debts will be paid ‘without deduction or set off. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|21955909 In some instances, set-off is excluded by statute or by common law. Granting of sequestration or liquidation order creates a concursus creditorum which prevents set-off from taking place. Proof of payment If debtor alleges that he has paid his debt onus is on him to prove it. If he fails to establish his allegation on balance of probabilities, judgment must go against him (there is no question of court granting absolution from instance). Receipt is prima facie proof of payment of a money debt Party who makes payment of debt is entitled to receipt &may withhold payment until he receives one. Prescription What does it mean when debt has “prescribed”? Prescription refers to the termination of a debt or obligation through the effluxion of time. The Prescription Act 68 of 1969 sets out the periods of prescription for different types of debt with the prescription period for a basic debt being three years. Once prescription period has passed debt is no longer legally enforceable & creditor may not bring claim against debtor. Downloaded by Genevieve Asem (Genevieveacademics@gmail.com)