Uploaded by Media HABT

CMCE10001 Assignment 2 Rubric

advertisement
CMCE10001 Assignment 2 Rubric
Weighting
10%
10%
30%
30%
Criteria
Appropriate article selected
Introduction and conclusion
Summary of article
Integration with existing understanding of
sustainable commerce
10%
Written style is appropriate for an academic
audience.
10%
Referencing using APA 7th edition referencing
style.
Highy proficient
Article selected is:
- Relevant to sustainable commerce
- From a reputable source
- Less than 10 years old or is a seminal work
Proficient
Article selected is:
- Not directly relevant to sustainable commerce
- From a reputable source
- Less than 10 years old or is a seminal work
Competent
Article selected is:
- Not directly relevant to sustainable commerce
and/or
- From a reputable source, and/or
- More than 10 years old
Development Required
Criteria Unfulfilled
Article selected is:
A new article was not provided
- Not directly relevant to sustainable commerce
and/or
- Not from a reputable source, and/or
- More than 10 years old
Provides a concise and complete introduction
and conclusion that explains the purpose of the
report, outlines the format of the report, and
summarises the key ideas in the report linking
back to the assignment task.
Provides a complete introduction and conclusion Provides an introduction and conclusion that
Provides an introduction and conclusion that
that explains the purpose and format of the
explains some of the purpose and format of the does not adequately explain the purpose and
assignment.
assignment.
format of the assignment.
Could be improved by being more concise.
Could be improved by being more concise and
more complete.
Could be improved by being more concise and
more complete.
Provides a complete response to the assignment
question including:
- Explanation of the thesis statement
- The key findings
- Supporting argument(s)
- The analytical methods used
Provides a strong answer that may not fully
explore the key areas of:
- Explanation of the thesis statement
- The key findings
- Supporting argument(s)
- The analytical methods used
Provides a basic answer that only partially
explores the key areas of:
- Explanation of the thesis statement
- The key findings
- Supporting argument(s)
- The analytical methods used
Provides an answer that needs more
A summary of the article was not provided.
development to meet the required standard for
university work. Key areas may not be discussed,
or may be discussed in a simplistic way.
Demonstrates a strong understanding of the
article.
Could be improved by having a more balanced
discussion of all aspects of the article.
May not answer all key areas, or may lack
appropriate depth of analysis and discussion.
Could be improved by deeper understanding of
the article.
Knowledge from the article has been integrated
with your understanding of sustainable
commerce. Synthesises the article with the
three required readings in this subject and
knowledge from the lectures and tutorials.
Knowledge from the article has been integrated
with your understanding of sustainable
commerce. Provides some synthesises with the
required readings and subject materials.
Knowledge from the article has been integrated
with your understanding of sustainable
commerce. May not provide an adequate
synthesises with the required readings or subject
materials.
Knowledge from the article has not been
integrated with your understanding of
sustainable commerce. May provide a
description of the various sources. May not
provide an adequate synthesises with the
required readings or subject materials.
Uses an appropriate writing style for university,
including excellent spelling, grammar, and
structure.
Uses a mostly appropriate writing style for
university, including excellent spelling, grammar,
and structure. May containg minor areas for
grammatical and/or structural improvement.
Only contains very minor spelling errors.
Uses a writing style that is acceptable for
university writing but needs significant
improvement. May contain areas for
grammatical and/or structural improvement.
May contain spelling errors.
Written style is not yet at a standard that is
Written style is completely unacceptable for
acceptable for university writing. Writing may
university work.
contain significant spelling, grammatical, and/or
structural problems.
All sources have been referenced appropriately
both in-text and in the reference list using APA
7th edition referencing style.
All sources have been referenced appropriately
both in-text and in the reference list using APA
7th edition referencing style. May contain minor
errors in referencing style.
All sources have been referenced appropriately
both in-text and in the reference list using APA
7th edition referencing style. May contain errors
in referencing style
All sources have NOT been referenced
appropriately both in-text and in the reference
list. And/or, APA 7th edition referencing style is
not used. And/or care has not been taken to
reference appropriately.
An introduction and/or conclusion was not
provided.
The answer may be descriptive only and not
provide appropriate depth of analysis.
No attempt was made to integrate knowledge
from the article with your understanding of
sustainable commerce.
No attempt has been made to reference any
sources.
Download