1.1 Evolution of Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship is from the French “entreprendre,” meaning “to undertake.” An entrepreneur is an innovator or developer who recognizes and seizes opportunities; converts those opportunities into workable/marketable ideas; adds value through time, effort, money, or skills; assumes the risks of the competitive marketplace to implement these ideas; and realizes the rewards from these efforts. Characteristics of entrepreneurs: Personal initiative The ability to consolidate resources Management skills A desire for autonomy Risk taking Aggressiveness Competitiveness Goal-oriented behavior Confidence Opportunistic behavior Intuitiveness Reality-based action The ability to learn from mistakes The ability to employ human relations skills Historical developments in entrepreneurship: No single definition of entrepreneur exists. Recognition of entrepreneurs dates back to eighteenthcentury France. Until 1950, the majority of definitions and references came from economists. Over the decade, writers have continued to modify the definition. Robert C. Ronstadt said, “Entrepreneurship is the dynamic process of creating incremental wealth.” In the twentieth century, the word entrepreneur became closely linked with free enterprise and capitalism. Entrepreneurs serve as agents for change, provide creative, innovative ideas for business enterprise and help businesses grow and become profitable. In the twenty-first century, entrepreneurs are considered heroes of free enterprise. Many people now regard entrepreneurship as “pioneership” on the frontier of business. An integrated definition of entrepreneurship recognizes entrepreneurship as a dynamic process of vision, change, and creation. 1.2 Myths of Entrepreneurship Avoiding Folklore: The Myths of Entrepreneurship Myth 1: Entrepreneurs Are Doers, Not Thinkers Entrepreneurs have a tendency toward action, but they are also thinkers. Myth 2: Entrepreneurs Are Born, Not Made Traits include aggressiveness, initiative, drive, a willingness to take risks, analytical ability, and skill in human relations. Entrepreneurship has models, processes, and case studies that allow traits to be acquired. Myth 3: Entrepreneurs Are Always Inventors This idea is a result of misunderstanding and tunnel vision. Many inventors or innovators are also entrepreneurs. Numerous entrepreneurs encompass all sorts of innovative activities. Myth 4: Entrepreneurs Are Academic and Social Misfits This myth results from people who have started successful enterprises after dropping out of school or quitting a job. Historically, education and social organizations have not recognized the entrepreneur. The entrepreneur, no longer a misfit, is now viewed as a professional. Myth 5: Entrepreneurs Must Fit the Profile Many books and articles have presented checklists of characteristics of the successful entrepreneur. The environment, the venture itself, and the entrepreneur have interactive effects, which result in many different types of profiles. Myth 6: All Entrepreneurs Need Is Money That a venture needs capital to survive is true. A large number of business failures occur because of lack of adequate financing. Failure due to lack of financing indicates other problems: Managerial incompetence Lack of financial understanding Poor investments Poor planning Myth 7: All Entrepreneurs Need Is Luck Being in the right place at the right time is always an advantage. “Luck” happens when preparation meets opportunity. What appears to be luck could really be several factors: Preparation Determination Desire Knowledge Innovativeness Myth 8: Entrepreneurship Is Unstructured and Chaotic Entrepreneurs sometimes thought of as gunslingers who are assumed to be disorganized and unstructured, leaving it to others to keep things on track. Heavily involved in all facets of their ventures, they tend to have a system to keep things straight and maintain priorities, which may seem strange to casual observers but works for them. Myth 9: Most Entrepreneurial Initiatives Fail Many entrepreneurs suffer a number of failures before they are successful. Failure can teach many lessons to those willing to learn and often leads to future success. The corridor principle states that with every venture launched, new and unintended opportunities often arise. The “high failure rate” is misleading, according to researcher Bruce Kirchoff. Myth 10: Entrepreneurs Are Extreme Risk Takers The concept of risk is a major element in the entrepreneurial process. The public’s perception of the risk most entrepreneurs assume is distorted. Appearance may be that an entrepreneur is “gambling” on a wild chance but entrepreneur is usually working on a moderate or “calculated” risk. 1.3 Approaches to Entrepreneurship 1. Schools-of-Thought Approaches to Entrepreneurship THE MACRO VIEW Presents a broad array of factors that relate to success or failure in contemporary entrepreneurial ventures. Exhibits a strong external locus of control point of view. THE MICRO VIEW Exhibits an internal locus of control point of view. 2. Process Approaches to Entrepreneurship management, the theories based on combinations can delve into some of the particular aspects of entrepreneurship with greater granularity. A sizeable body of research has developed that supports the individual frameworks through the schools of thought or through process models but the integration of previously disparate aspects of entrepreneurship may be particularly valuable to advancing the field of entrepreneurship. 1.4 Schools of Entrepreneurial Thought THE MACRO VIEW Presents a broad array of factors that relate to success or failure in contemporary entrepreneurial ventures. Exhibits a strong external locus of control point of view. Three schools of entrepreneurial thought take the macro view. The Environmental School of Thought Deals with the external factors that affect a potential entrepreneur’s lifestyle. Focuses on institutions, values, and morals. Recognizes that friends and family can influence the desire to become an entrepreneur. The Financial/Capital School of Thought Deals with the search for seed capital and growth capital. Views the entire entrepreneurial venture from a financial management standpoint. The Displacement School of Thought Holds that the group hinders a person from advancing or eliminates certain factors needed to advance; consequently, the individual is projected into entrepreneurship in order to succeed. Frustrated individuals propelled into entrepreneurial pursuits. AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH Focuses on and includes three factors: inputs, outputs, and entrepreneurial intensity. Built around the concepts of inputs to the entrepreneurial process and outcomes from the entrepreneurial process. Inputs include environmental opportunities, the individual entrepreneur, the business concept, the organizational context, and financial and nonfinancial resources. Outputs include ventures, value creation, new products and processes, new technologies, profit, jobs, and economic growth. Three major types of displacement include: DYNAMIC STATES APPROACH Network of relationships (the dynamic state) convert opportunity tension into value, generating new resources that maintain the dynamic state. Exhibits an internal locus of control point of view. A FRAMEWORK OF FRAMEWORKS APPROACH Theories or frameworks based on combinations offer a more dynamic view of the phenomenon of entrepreneurship. Similar to the “multiple lens” approach that characterizes general Political displacement: Deals with government’s policies and regulations Cultural displacement: Deals with social groups precluded from professional fields Economic displacement: Deals with economic variations of recession and depression THE MICRO VIEW Three schools of entrepreneurial thought take the micro view. The Entrepreneurial Trait School of Thought Studies successful entrepreneurs who tend to exhibit similar characteristics. Four factors usually exhibited by successful entrepreneurs include: Achievement Creativity Determination Technological knowledge The Venture Opportunity School of Thought Emphasizes the search for sources of ideas, the development of concepts, and the implementation of venture opportunities. Views creativity and market awareness as essentials. Deals with the ability to recognize new ideas and opportunities and to implement the necessary steps of action. Preparation meeting opportunity equals “luck.” The Strategic Formulation School of Thought Emphasizes the planning process in successful venture development. Four major factors in considering the strategic formulation include: Unique markets Unique people Unique products Unique resources The United States is a leader in entrepreneurship education at both undergraduate and graduate levels. The United States is home to a high percentage of individuals with professional, technological, or business degrees, a group that registers at the highest entrepreneurial activity rate. 1.6 Entrepreneurial Cognition Cognition is used to refer to the mental functions, mental processes (thoughts), and mental states of intelligent humans. Entrepreneurial cognition is about understanding how entrepreneurs use simplifying mental models to piece together previously unconnected information that helps them to identify and invent new products or services, and to assemble the necessary resources to start and grow businesses. Metacognitive Perspective Metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mind-set integrates the combined effects of entrepreneurial motivation and context, toward the development of metacognitive strategies applied to information processing within an entrepreneurial environment. 1.5 Entrepreneurial Revolution Who Are Entrepreneurs? The Entrepreneurial Revolution: A Global Phenomenon Starting a new business requires more than just an idea; it requires a special person, an entrepreneur, who combines sound judgment and planning with risk taking to ensure the success of his or her own business. According to GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) data: 110 million people between 18 and 64 years old were actively engaged in starting a business. 140 million were running new businesses they started less than 3½ years earlier. 250 million people were involved in early-stage entrepreneurial activity. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Ventures in the United States During the last ten years, over 400,000 new business incorporations per year One of every 150 adults participates in the founding of a new firm each year. One in 12 adults is involved in trying to launch a new firm. The annual birthrate of new firms is 14 to 16 per 100 existing establishments. During this “Great Recession” (as some have called our lengthy recessionary period), more Americans have become entrepreneurs than at any time in the past 20 years. The United States has a culture that supports risk taking and seeking opportunities. Americans are relatively alert to unexploited economic opportunity and have a relatively low fear of failure. Characteristics Associated with Entrepreneurial Mind-Set DETERMINATION AND PERSEVERANCE—More than any other factor, total dedication to success as an entrepreneur can overcome obstacles and setbacks. It can also compensate for personal shortcomings. DRIVE TO ACHIEVE—Entrepreneurs are self-starters who appear to others to be internally driven by a strong desire to compete, to excel against self-imposed standards, and to pursue and attain challenging goals. OPPORTUNITY ORIENTATION—One clear pattern among successful growth-minded entrepreneurs is their focus on opportunity rather than on resources, structure, or strategy. PERSISTENT PROBLEM SOLVING—Entrepreneurs are not intimidated by difficult situations. Simple problems bore them, unsolvable ones do not warrant their time. SEEKING FEEDBACK—Effective entrepreneurs are often described as quick learners. INTERNAL LOCUS OF CONTROL—Successful entrepreneurs believe in themselves. They believe that their accomplishments and setbacks are within their own control and influence and that they can affect the outcome of their actions. A “loss orientation” towards grief recovery, which focuses on the failure, can sometimes exacerbate negative emotional reactions to failure. TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITY Successful entrepreneurs thrive on the fluidity and excitement of such an ambiguous existence. A “restoration orientation,” alternatively, enables entrepreneurs to distract themselves from thinking about the failure. However, avoiding negative emotions is unlikely to be successful in the long-run CALCULATED RISK TAKING—Successful entrepreneurs are not gamblers. When they decide to participate in a venture, they do so in a very calculated, carefully thought-out manner. HIGH ENERGY LEVEL—Many entrepreneurs fine tune their energy levels by carefully monitoring what they eat and drink, establishing exercise routines, and knowing when to get away for relaxation. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATIVENESS—An expanding school of thought thinks that creativity can be learned. VISION—Not all entrepreneurs have predetermined vision for their firm. In many cases this vision develops over time as the individual begins to learn what the firm is and what it can become. PASSION—A fundamental emotional experience for entrepreneurs characterized by a discrete emotion that is quite intense. TEAM BUILDING—The desire for independence and autonomy does not preclude the entrepreneur’s desire to build a strong entrepreneurial team. Most successful entrepreneurs have highly qualified, well-motivated teams that help handle the growth and development of the venture. 1.7 Dealing with Failures Entrepreneurs use failure as a learning experience. They have a tolerance for failure. The most effective entrepreneurs are realistic enough to expect difficulties and failures. Research indicates that entrepreneurs may recover more quickly from a failure if they oscillate between a loss and a restoration orientation. 1.9 Dark Side of Entrepreneurs Certain negative factors may envelop entrepreneurs and dominate their behavior. Although each of these factors has a positive aspect, it is important for entrepreneurs to understand their potential destructive side as well. The Entrepreneur’s Confrontation with Risk Starting or buying a new business involves risk. A typology of entrepreneurial styles helps describe the risk-taking activity of entrepreneurs. In this model, financial risk is measured against the level of profit motive (the desire for monetary gain or return from the venture). FINANCIAL RISK—In most new ventures the individual puts a significant portion of his savings or other resources at stake. Career risk—A question frequently raised by would-be entrepreneurs is whether they will be able to find a job or go back to their old jobs if their venture should fail. Family and social risk—Entrepreneurs expose their families to the risk of an incomplete family experience and the possibility of permanent scars. psychic risk—The greatest risk may be to the well-being of the entrepreneur. Stress and the Entrepreneur If entrepreneurs deal effectively with grief that emanates from failure then they will not become disappointed, discouraged, or depressed. In adverse and difficult times, they will continue to look for opportunity. To achieve their goals, entrepreneurs are willing to tolerate the effects of stress: back problems, indigestion, insomnia, or headaches. The Grief Recovery Process WHAT IS ENTREPRENEURIAL STRESS? Grief is a negative emotional response to the loss of something important triggering behavioral, psychological, and physiological symptoms. In general, stress can be viewed as a function of discrepancies between a person’s expectations and ability to meet demands. The emotions generated by failure (i.e., grief) can interfere with the learning process. Lacking the depth of resources, entrepreneurs must bear the cost of their mistakes while playing a multitude of roles, such as salesperson, recruiter, spokesperson, and negotiator. Simultaneous demands can lead to role overload. Entrepreneurs often work alone or with a small number of employees and therefore lack the support from colleagues. A basic personality structure, common to entrepreneurs and referred to as type A personality structure, describes people who are impatient, demanding, and overstrung. SOURCES OF STRESS Researchers Boyd and Gumpert identify four causes of entrepreneurial stress. Loneliness—Entrepreneurs are isolated from persons in whom they can confide. They tend not to participate in social activities unless there is some business benefit. Immersion in Business—Most entrepreneurs are married to their business. They work long hours, leaving them with little or no time for civic recreation. People Problems—Most entrepreneurs experience frustration, disappointment, and aggravation in their experience with people. Need to Achieve—Achievement brings satisfaction. However, many entrepreneurs are never satisfied with their work no matter how well it is done. DEALING WITH STRESS If stress can be kept within constructive bounds, it can increase a person’s efficiency and improve performance. Networking—One way to relieve the loneliness of running a business is to share experiences by networking with other business owners. The Entrepreneurial Ego Certain characteristics that usually propel entrepreneurs into success also, if exhibited in the extreme have destructive implications for entrepreneurs. Overbearing need for control—Entrepreneurs are driven by a strong desire to control both their venture and their destiny. SENSE OF DISTRUST Because entrepreneurs are continually scanning the environment, it could cause them to lose sight of reality, distort reasoning and logic, and take destructive action. Overriding desire for success This can be dangerous because there exists the chance that the individual will become more important than the venture itself. Unrealistic optimism—When external optimism is taken to its extreme, it could lead to a fantasy approach to the business. 1.10 Ethical Dilemmas Ethics provides the basic rules or parameters for conducting any activity in an “acceptable” manner. Ethics represents a set of principles prescribing a behavioral code that explains what is good and right or bad and wrong. Ethics may outline moral duty and obligations. Legality provides societal standards but not definitive answers to ethical questions. Because deciding what is good or right or bad and wrong is situational, instead of relying on a set of fixed ethical principles, entrepreneurs should an ethical process for making decisions. Ethical Rationalizations Getting Away from It All—The best antidote could be a wellplanned vacation. Decision makers use one of four rationalizations to justify questionable conduct: Communicating with Employees—Entrepreneurs are in close contact with employees and can readily assess the concerns of their staff. Finding Satisfaction Outside the Company—Entrepreneurs need to get away from the business occasionally and become more passionate about life itself; they need to gain some new perspectives. Delegating—Entrepreneurs find delegation difficult because they think they have to be at the business all the time and be involved in all aspects of the operation. Exercising Rigorously—Research demonstrates the value of exercise regimens on relieving the stress associated with entrepreneurs. that the activity is not “really” illegal or immoral that it is in the individual’s or the corporation’s best interest that it will never be found out that, because it helps the company, the company will condone it Morally questionable acts can be classified as: nonrole, role failure, role distortion, and role assertion. The Matter of Morality Requirements of law may overlap at times but do not duplicate the moral standards of society. Some laws have no moral content whatsoever. Some laws are morally unjust. Some moral standards have no legal basis. Legal requirements tend to be negative; morality tends to be positive. Legal requirements usually lag behind the acceptable moral standards of society Complexity of Decisions Corporate entrepreneurship as strategic entrepreneurship—transformation of organizations via large-scale or otherwise highly consequential innovations adopted in the firm’s pursuit of competitive advantage Strategic Renewal Sustained Regeneration Domain Redefinition Organizational Rejuvenation Business Model Reconstruction Business decisions, in the context of entrepreneurial ethics are complex. Why? The Need for Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation A company must always be ready and willing to accept innovations or it will quickly become obsolete. The modern corporation must develop in-house entrepreneurship or face stagnation, loss of personnel, and decline. Ethical decisions have extended consequences. Ethical questions have multiple alternatives—the choices are not always “do” or “don’t do.” Ethical business decisions often have mixed outcomes. Most business decisions have uncertain ethical consequences. Most ethical business decisions have personal implications. This need for corporate entrepreneurship has arisen in response to a number of pressing problems: Online Ethical Dilemmas in E-Commerce Slow demise of face-to-face interactions cause entrepreneurs to find ways to build trust. Entrepreneurs recognize that online consumer reviews are used to inform purchasing decisions and are posted to reputation management systems (Amazon and Yelp). Entrepreneurs find it far greater to exhibit strong ethical responsibility in their actions. 2.1 Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation The major thrust of corporate innovation is to develop the entrepreneurial spirit within organizational boundaries, thus allowing an atmosphere of innovation to prosper. rapid growth in the number of new and sophisticated competitors a sense of distrust in the traditional methods of corporate management an exodus of some of the best and brightest people from corporations to become small-business entrepreneurs (being an entrepreneur is becoming more of a status symbol; many companies are losing their best people, who are going out on their own; venture capital is becoming more widely available for those who wish to go out on their own, thus making entrepreneurship more attractive) international competition downsizing of major corporations an overall desire to improve efficiency and productivity. Obstacles to Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation Defining the Concept of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation The obstacles to corporate entrepreneurship are usually due to ineffective traditional management techniques. Definitions of corporate entrepreneurship have evolved over 30 years. Examples include: The adverse effects of traditional management principles applied to new venture development must be considered and corrected. Corporate entrepreneurship as centering on reenergizing and enhancing the firm’s ability to acquire innovative skills and capabilities. Corporate entrepreneurship as formal or informal activities that create new businesses in established companies through product and process innovations and market developments. Corporate entrepreneurship as corporate venturing— adding new business to the corporation Internal Corporate Venturing Cooperative Corporate Venturing External Corporate Venturing The following factors exist in large corporations that have exhibited successful innovations: Atmosphere and vision Orientation to the market Small, flat organizations Multiple approaches Interactive learning Skunk Works 2.2 Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy Structuring the Work Environment A corporate entrepreneurship (CE) strategy is manifested through the presence of an entrepreneurial strategic vision, a pro-entrepreneurship organizational architecture, and entrepreneurial processes and behavior exhibited across the organizational hierarchy. CE strategy is about creating self-renewing organizations through the unleashing and focusing of entrepreneurial potential that exists throughout those organizations. Employee perception of an innovative environment is critical for stressing management’s commitment to innovative projects. Melding individual attitudes, values, and behavioral orientations with the organizational factors of structure and reward is important. The five critical steps of a corporate entrepreneurship strategy are: Developing the vision Encouraging innovation Structuring for an entrepreneurial climate Preparing individual managers for corporate innovation Developing venture teams Developing the Vision The first step in planning a strategy of corporate entrepreneurship is sharing the vision of innovation that corporate leaders wish to achieve. The vision must be clearly articulated by the organization’s leaders; however, specific objectives are developed by managers and employees. Encouraging Innovation Two distinct types of innovation exist: Radical innovation—This type of innovation takes experimentation and determined vision, which are not necessarily managed. Incremental innovation—This type of innovation refers to the systematic evolution of a product or service into newer markets. Both types of innovation require vision and support. There needs to be a champion who has the ability to develop and share a vision as well as top management support of the innovative activities. 3M follows a set of innovation rules that encourages employees to foster ideas, which are as follows: Don’t kill a project. Tolerate failure. Keep divisions small. Motivate the champions. Stay close to the customer. Share the wealth. Five factors critical to the internal environment of an organization seeking to have its managers pursue innovative activity: 1. MANAGEMENT SUPPORT—the extent to which the management structure itself encourages employees to believe that innovation is, in fact, part of the role set for all organization members 2. AUTONOMY/WORK DISCRETION—the extent to which workers are able to make decisions about performing their own work in the way they believe is most effective 3. REWARDS/REINFORCEMENT—the extent to which rewards are contingent on performance, providing challenges, increasing responsibilities, and making the ideas of innovative people known to others in the organizational hierarchy 4. TIME AVAILABILITY—the extent to which individuals have time to incubate ideas 5. ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES—the extent to which people are encouraged to look at the organization from a broad perspective Control versus Autonomy The encouragement of corporate entrepreneurship can and often does result in counterproductive, rogue behavior. Deliberate design and development of organizational systems reflecting the organizational dimensions for an environment conducive to corporate innovation is critical. Preparation for Failure “Learning from failure” is an axiom in the corporate entrepreneurial community. Failure in a project may cause grief; the organization should have social support mechanisms in place to help with coping with failure. Better coping skills build self-efficacy in corporate entrepreneurs and promote continued corporate entrepreneurial behavior in the future Preparing Management Key decision makers must find ways to explain the purpose of using a corporate innovation process to those from whom entrepreneurial behaviors are expected. CE training programs can induce the changes needed in the work atmosphere to develop more entrepreneurial activity. The Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument (CEAI) provides an instrument for measuring five key elements of an organization’s entrepreneurial climate: of businesses—but questions concerning the extent to which corporations should be involved in social obligations to society is open to debate. Developing I-Teams Sustainable entrepreneurship includes: Innovation teams and the potential they hold for producing innovative results are recognized as a twenty-first century productivity breakthrough. An I-Team is composed of two or more people who formally create and share the ownership of a new organization. The unit has a budget plus a leader who has the authority to make decisions within broad guidelines. If the unit proves successful, it is later integrated into the larger organization. Sustainable Entrepreneurship 2.3 Social Entrepreneurship Social Entrepreneurship that exhibits characteristics of nonprofits, government, and businesses—including applying to social problem solving traditional, private-sector entrepreneurship’s focus on innovation, risk-taking, and large scale transformation. Defining the Social Entrepreneur Social entrepreneurs are sometimes referred to as “public entrepreneurs,” “civic entrepreneurs,” or “social innovators.” Social entrepreneurs are change agents; they create largescale change using pattern-breaking ideas, they address the root causes of social problems, and they possess the ambition to create systemic change by introducing a new idea and persuading others to adopt. These types of transformative changes can be national or global. They also can be highly localized—but no less powerful—in their impact. Defining the Social Enterprise There are challenges to the boundaries of what is and what isn’t a social enterprise. It is generally agreed that social entrepreneurs and their ventures are driven by social goals; that is, the desire to benefit society in some way. But because the social mission of social entrepreneurs is the most important criterion, not wealth creation, arguments are made any social enterprise should be in the world of not-forprofit organizations. 2.4 Social Enterprise and Sustainability The basic challenge of social enterprise—addressing the obligations of a business to society—is the same for all types Ecopreneurship, which refers to environmental entrepreneurship with entrepreneurial actions contributing to preserving the natural environment including the Earth, biodiversity, and ecosystem. Social entrepreneurship, which encompasses the activities and processes undertaken to discover, define, and exploit opportunities in order to enhance social wealth. Corporate social responsibility, which refers to actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm. Ecopreneurship The environment stands out as one of the major challenges of social enterprise. Entrepreneurs have an enormous challenge to build socially responsible organizations for the future. Ecovision—attention to employees, the organization, and the environment—is a possible leadership style for accomplishing this. A plan to create a sustainable future through a practical, clearly stated strategy, as defined by Hawken and McDonough: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Eliminate the concept of waste. Restore accountability. Make prices reflect costs. Promote diversity. Make conservation profitable. Insist on accountability of nations. 2.5 Shared Value and the Triple Bottom Line The triple bottom line (sometimes referred to as TBL) is an accounting framework that goes beyond the traditional measures of profit, return on investment, and shareholder value to include environmental and social dimensions. "Shared value” is an approach to creating economic value that also creates value for society by addressing its needs and challenges. Bottom-Line Measures of Economic Performance Personal income Cost of underemployment Establishment sizes Job growth Employment distribution by sector Percentage of firms in each sector Revenue by sector contributing to gross state product Diaspora Networks Bottom-Line Measures of Environmental Performance Hazardous chemical concentrations Selected priority pollutants Electricity consumption Fossil fuel consumption Solid waste management Hazardous waste management Change in land use/land cover Bottom-Line Measures of Social Performance Unemployment rate Median household income Relative poverty Percentage of population with a post-secondary degree or certificate Average commute time Violent crimes per capita Health-adjusted life expectancy 2.6 Global Market Place Diaspora networks are relationships among ethnic groups that share cultural and social norms. They represent powerful advantages to global entrepreneurs because they speed the flow of information across borders; they create bonds of trust; and they create connections that help entrepreneurs collaborate within a country and across ethnicities. Easy communications technology (Internet and Skype) and social media (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.), make the linking together of diaspora networks stronger than ever. Global Organizations and Agreements They contribute to significant international vehicles that have developed. THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION The WTO is the umbrella organization governing the international trading system. Its job is to oversee international trade arrangements. THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT Like capitalism, entrepreneurship has expanded its reach across the globe and is now an engine for economic growth not only in America but elsewhere in the world. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an international agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States that eliminates trade barriers among the three nations. It created the world’s largest free trade area, with strong protection for patents, copyrights, industrial design rights, trade secret rights, and other forms of intellectual property Global Entrepreneurs THE EUROPEAN UNION The EU is an economic and political union of 27 member states which are located primarily in Europe. Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. Global entrepreneurs rely on global networks for resources, design, and distribution. They rise above nationalistic differences to see the big picture of global competition without abdicating their own nationalities. They confront the learning difficulties of language barriers head-on, recognizing the barriers such ignorance can generate. Global Thinking Today’s consumers can select products, ideas, and services from many nations and cultures. One of the most exciting and promising avenues for entrepreneurs to expand their businesses is by participating in the global market. Two of the primary reasons for the opportunity of global markets are the decline in trade barriers and the emergence of major trading blocs. Venturing Abroad As global opportunities expand, entrepreneurs are becoming more open-minded about internationalizing. GRADUAL INTERNATIONALIZATION Internationalization can be viewed as the outcome of a sequential process of incremental adjustments to changing conditions of the firm and its environment. This process progresses step-by-step as risk and commitment increase and entrepreneurs acquire more knowledge through experience. The traditional expectation regarding internationalization is that a business must enter the international arena incrementally, becoming global only as it grows older and wiser. Each country has something that others need, thus forming the basis of an interdependent international trade system: resource-rich countries have access to extractive assets and labor; market-rich countries have purchasing power. Use the resources of the other firms involved in the venture. Strategic fit. Disadvantages of Joint Ventures INTERNATIONAL AT INCEPTION Some entrepreneurial businesses are born global. Successful global start ups have seven characteristics: (1) global vision from inception; (2) internationally experienced management; (3) a strong international business network; (4) preemptive technology or marketing; (5) a unique intangible asset; (6) a linked product or service; and (7) tight organizational coordination worldwide. DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT Methods of Going International Methods of going international are importing, exporting, international alliances and joint ventures, direct foreign investment, and licensing IMPORTING Importing is buying and shipping foreign-produced goods for domestic consumption. EXPORTING Exporting is the shipping of a domestically produced good to a foreign destination for consumption. INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCES AND JOINT VENTURES Three main types of international alliances: informal international cooperative alliances; formal international cooperative alliances (ICAs); and international joint ventures. Informal alliances are not legally binding and are limited in scope and time. Formal alliances usually require a formal contract with specifics about what each company contributes and involve a greater commitment by each company and a transfer of proprietary information. Joint ventures occur when firms analyze the benefits of creating a relationship, pool their resources, and create a new venture. Joint ventures imply the sharing of assets, profits, risks, and venture ownership. Advantages of Joint Ventures Combine the strengths of the partners involved and thereby increase competitive position. Intimate knowledge of the local conditions and government where the facility is located. Fragmented control. A direct foreign investment is a domestically controlled foreign production facility. Does not imply that the firm owns a majority of the operation; can be achieved by acquiring an interest in an ongoing foreign operation, by obtaining a majority interest in a foreign company, by purchasing part of the assets of a foreign firm, or by building a facility in a foreign country. LICENSING Licensing is a business arrangement in which the manufacturer of a product (or a firm with proprietary rights over a certain trademark or technology) grants permission to some other group or individual to manufacture that product in return for specified royalties or other payments. Three basic types of licensing arrangements revolve around patents, trademarks, and technical know-how. Researching Foreign Markets Important parameters to identify and research include: Government regulations Political climate Infrastructure Distribution channels Competition Market size Local customs and culture INTERNATIONAL THREATS AND RISKS Dangers of foreign markets include political, economic, and financial risks, including: Ignorance Uncertainty Lack of information Restrictions imposed by the host country Unstable governments Changes in tax laws Rapid rises in costs and raw materials Fluctuating exchange rates Repatriation of profits and capital