Open in app
Get started
You have 2 free member-only stories left this month.
Sign up for Medium and get an extra one
Zaron Burnett III
Follow
Mar 22, 2017 · 24 min read
·
Listen
Save
Nikola Tesla and the Conspiracy Against
Water-Powered Cars
In 1899, Nikola Tesla takes notes in his laboratory, as high voltage electricity arcs from his “magnifying
transmitter”
W
hen water-powered car inventor Stanley Meyer sat down to lunch, he never
expected the unwelcome surprise of death But just like pregnancy or the IRS
W
expected the unwelcome surprise of death. But just like pregnancy or the IRS
tax man, death doesn’t care about your life plans. It was the third
Friday
March,
the
started
Open in
app in Get
year was 1998. John Travolta was on the cover of Time magazine, made-up to look like
Bill Clinton. The Big Lebowski and Wild Things were playing at the multiplex. Will
Smith’s track Gettin’ Jiggy Wit It was the #1 song in America. Which makes it very
possible that Will Smith’s radio-friendly voice was in the air, perhaps leaking out of the
open car windows of a passing sedan, when water-powered car inventor Stanley Meyer
exploded from the restaurant.
Meyer was dining with his two Belgian investors and his brother. Just after enjoying a
swallow of cranberry juice, he was seized by the grip of panic. He stood up and fled the
table. His brother chased him into the parking lot, where he found him on the ground.
Stanley Meyer’s life was reduced to dying words. With his last breath, Meyer accused
the Belgian investors of assassinating him: “They poisoned me…” And then, the waterpowered car inventor died.
The coroner for Franklin County performed an autopsy. The police from Grove City
opened an investigation. Once they were done, the state of Ohio ruled that Stanley
Meyer was dead from natural causes. The coroner determined the pioneering inventor
suffered from high blood pressure. The cause of death: a cerebral aneurysm.
Many diehard supporters of the water-powered car inventor believe his dying words to
be gospel truth. To them, clearly, Stanley Meyer was murdered. But why? Was it to
suppress the spread of his alternative technologies?
It should be pointed out: there is no known poison that can be used to induce a cerebral
aneurysm. But if one already has a developing aneurysm, a blood thinning agent like
Warafin (AKA rat poison) can cause a pre-existing aneurysm to bleed out and become
fatal. Of course, these sorts of speculations of assassinations and suppression of worldchanging technologies by powerful elite figures are built on the shaky sands of What
if… and this same question is a constant problem for water-powered cars and their
controversial inventors.
What if…?
A
water-powered car doesn’t burn water. That’s ridiculous. It also doesn’t run on
steam. The name is a misnomer. The water-powered cars we’ll focus on derive
Open in app
Get started
their locomotion from electrically splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen
gases — the resulting hydrogen gas is burned.
Studies published in scientific journals have shown an H2/gasoline mix increases fuel
efficiency in a conventional internal combustion engine. The more surprising part is
that you can also burn ionized hydrogen gas such as H2 in the cylinders of your car,
directly. All by itself. You can explode hydrogen the same as gasoline. Water-powered
car guys call this ionized hydrogen gas: HHO, or ortho-hydroxy.
What exactly is ortho-hydroxy? It’s a molecule of two bonded ionized atoms of
hydrogen.
Hydrogen gas split from a water molecule can be processed with pulsed electricity,
which ionizes it. One can continue to process/ionize the hydrogen gas until you create
an enriched version called deuterium. If you keep going, you can create tritium, which
is a radioactive hydrogen gas.
Now you see why water-powered car inventors are ruled suspicious by the feds. In
today’s fearful climate, you don’t want to be making radioactive gases in your garage.
They have labels for people who do that. But any water-powered car inventor will tell
you: they don’t need to create radioactive hydrogen gas to power their cars. They just
want to split water. Basic chemistry.
You may be surprised, or skeptical, to learn you can pump hydrogen gas into your
Ford’s engine and it’ll work just the same as regular unleaded gasoline. Ready for the
weirder part? The engine exhaust is water vapor. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. A torch
fueled with ortho-hydroxy gas has a flame that burns hot enough to cut through a steel
plate like a lightsaber, but when that same flame cools on contact, unburned hydrogen
recombines with oxygen in the atmosphere and turns into water vapor. It’s crazy to see
a flame lick the air and then, like magic, become water droplets. Fire isn’t supposed to
turn into water.
This may be a water-powered car’s biggest selling point: it’s super clean tech. The
biggest drawback for water-powered cars is equally simple: “There’s no such thing as
free energy.”
You need an electrical current to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Where do
you get that? If you use a battery any environmentalist worth their vegan bacon will
you get that? If you use a battery, any environmentalist worth their vegan bacon will
Get started
Open in app
tell you: battery technology is not clean. This is the biggest problem
for electric
cars
being hailed as environmental saviors. Battery production is a very dirty industry. If
you use renewable resources like wind and solar to power the batteries used to split the
water, that’s about as clean as it gets. But think about it — that’s really not much
different from electric cars. So, then why do we need water-powered cars? Plus, isn’t it
a bad idea to turn water into the new oil?
The case for a water-powered car is about power, both electrical and socio-political.
Devotees of Nikola Tesla think our physics books need to be rewritten. Modern
accepted science and Tesla parted ways after Einstein’s Theory of Relativity re-shaped
how we imagine the universe that surrounds and exists inside of us. Gone was Tesla’s
idea of an ether of energy. Tesla described electricity as a feature of a pervasive field of
energy––all part of a vibrating universe, that manifested as a coordinated dance of
frequencies. To Tesla, the universe and everything in it could be understood as
vibrations.
In the post-Einstein world, Tesla’s alternative theory of energy is now considered
scientific heresy. Only the true believers still hold their faith in Tesla's view of the
universe. However, following his methods, these garage tinkerers and shade tree
physicists seem to work electrical miracles. And they claim this is the real reason why
the government won’t let them build water-powered cars. It’s all part of a century-long
fight that goes back to Tesla and his former boss, Thomas Edison. Genius versus
Industry. And now, a century later, these true believers and electrical outlaws argue
10.4K
85
that rather than follow the lead of the electric car company named for their hero, we
need to make everyone understand how a water-powered car works, and redesign our
modern industry according to Tesla’s alternative theory of energy. Imagine everything
you know about electricity is wrong. Now ask yourself: why would anyone want to
suppress this truth? Who benefits?
I
once wrote a story about people who drive slow in the fast lane; while researching
it I contacted the California Highway Patrol to get clarification on the law. The
officers were surprisingly open and helpful. Two officers sat with me and answered all
my questions. Curious about why water-powered cars are not allowed on California’s
roads, I sent an email to my contact at the CHP. He politely said he’d look into it and get
back to me. After waiting a month, I checked back with him. I still haven’t heard
anything.
Open in app
Get started
Since the CHP won’t talk, I checked the law books myself. According to the California
vehicle code, all vehicles must be deemed “road-worthy.” Which means you can’t just
build a car in your backyard and take it for a spin. There are certain regulations the car
must meet. For instance, it must have working headlights and taillights. There are lots
more regulations. You can read them all here. But there are no specific regulations
about what sort of engine your car must have under the hood — only about how much
the engine can pollute. This is why water-powered car inventors cry foul. It’s technically
not against the law. So what happens when you take your water-powered car to the
CHP to get it certified as “roadworthy?” I wish I could tell you.
The CHP had no official comment.
On blogs and forums, water-powered cars fans claim that inventors and supporters of
the technology have been harassed by FBI agents. They claim they’ve been investigated
and intimidated and threatened. Some claim that water-powered car inventor and
alternative energy genius, Bob Boyce, had cancer-causing agents secretly and forcibly
inserted into his body in a small chip. The surgery to remove it is documented here.
These are serious claims.
So, I phoned the FBI’s Los Angeles office.
I spoke with Laura Eimiller from Media Relations. I told her I was working on a story
about water-powered cars and asked if the FBI has any comment about the rumors of
harassment and intimidation, also if there are any ongoing investigations into waterpowered cars. She told me she’d look into it and get back to me.
I’m still waiting. Periodically, I call and leave her a voicemail.
On a blog dedicated to the proliferation of alternative energy ideas, I read a story of a
water-powered car inventor who gave a demonstration to a colonel from the
Department of Defense. They, apparently, drove from Tennessee to Washington
together, and then ran a battery of tests, this article claimed. So, I emailed the
Pentagon.
Knowing how bureaucracies are, I thought the Department of Defense might have some
record of this demonstration, some documentation on the testing of hydroxy as a fuel
source. The colonel I spoke with from media relations was very helpful. At first. He
phoned me and we chatted briefly He also told me our conversation was off the record
phoned me and we chatted briefly. He also told me our conversation was off the record.
Get startedhe
in app
The retired colonel explained that he was not in the military,Open
but as
a spokesperson
did have some big news he could share. The DoD was about to announce a new fleet of
all-electric vehicles. It was part of private-public partnership with GM. He said the
engineers at TARDEC (Tank Research) were geeked to talk to me about what they’d
been building. While it’s good to hear that DoD is switching over to electric vehicles, I
explained that I was only interested in water-powered cars and hydroxy fuels. In his
friendly way, he told me to write up all my questions and he’d submit them to his
supervisor for approval to speak on the record. I submitted my questions to him.
And I never heard from him again.
Perhaps, the alternative energy community was right? Maybe they are being
suppressed. One thing’s for sure: no one at any governmental agency will speak with
me on the record once they hear or read the words water-powered car.
In the water-powered car community online, you’ll read bitter claims that amateur
inventors can never get their designs and inventions patented because that’s another
way the US government denies the alternative energy theories and heretical science.
So, I contacted the United States Trademark and Patent Office.
The gentleman I spoke with was extremely friendly and helpful. I asked him why the
patent office would deny a patent. He explained that a patent has to demonstrate a
workable device or process. Simple enough. But in a circular logic that any conspiracy
theorist could make hay with — of course the government would claim the science
doesn’t work, that’s how they suppress it. I asked the gentleman from the USTPO, let’s
say the science does indeed work, would there be any way to appeal a ruling? He said
there is. He also recommended I search the patent database to see if perhaps a waterpowered engine had been approved. I asked if he could search from his end. He told me
the patent office’s search engine is slow and cumbersome. He confided with a chuckle
that’s it more efficient to use Google to search the federal patent database. (There are
your tax dollars at work.) So, I did. This is what I found:
There is a water-powered engine that was patented.
Which means nothing at all. Really. Except that it is federally-recognized as a
presumably working device. But taken together, what does this all mean for the claims
of government suppression? Is the US government denying the potential of waterpowered cars just to protect the moribund petrochemical industry? Why won’t anyone
powered cars just to protect the moribund petrochemical industry? Why won t anyone
Open in app
Get started
speak on the record? Why does everyone I question from the government dummy up
like a mob boss looking to avoid self-incrimination?
If the government won’t talk, the only way to get answers is to go check out these
electrical outlaws for myself. Go meet one of these alternative energy trailblazers and
see if the science works. Or not.
C
ayucos, California is a little beach town near San Luis Obispo; it sits at the end of
a spit of land. Only one way in and one way out. It’s like the world’s most
beautiful ghetto. It’s a sleepy little coastal town that pays its rent with tourist dollars.
It’s primarily home to artists and aging baby-boomers. It reminds me of the road trips I
took in California as a boy. Time moves slower here in Cayucos. And somewhere here a
man in his garage is trying to build the future.
When I phone my contact to tell him I’m close, he instructs me where to park, and then
walks out to meet me. I have no idea what to expect. Will he be a squinty-eyed
suspicious conspiracy theorist crackpot? Or is he more like the flinty, industrious men
who first built planes and barn-stormed a century ago?
Andrew Batty is a tall white guy, a baby-boomer, a man of immense decency, and a
kindness that’s as obvious as the fragrance of a well-tended garden. In short, he’s a very
nice and honest man. He attributes this to his faith in Jesus. He also credits his obvious
decency as the reason why the alternative energy genius Bob Boyce trusted him in the
first place. Bob Boyce is the inventor of the best, most efficient, high-powered catalytic
hydrogen fuel cells you can find online. He’s a verifiable electrical genius. As a
mechanical engineer, he’s exacting. He’s the leading mind in the field of home-built
water-powered cars. Although, he would never use that term. He would say he works
with electricity and hydroxy power. He’s also the one who leased his designs to Andrew
to sell online. And he’s allegedly guided Andrew to a higher understanding of electricity
than even Einstein had. (That is, if you believe he’s correct.)
As one of the very few licensees of Bob Boyce designs, Andrew owns and operates
Hydrogen Garage. His workshop is, literally, in his garage. That’s where he builds the
hydroxy kits he sells online. Mostly, truckers buy his water-splitting machines and use
them to increase the fuel efficiency of their diesel trucks. The CHP runs a program in
t e
to
c ease t e ue e c e cy o t e d ese t uc s.
eC
u s a p og a
conjunction with CARB (Clear Air Resources Board) to regulate
the
emissions
of diesel
Get started
Open
in app
trucks in California. The regulations make it illegal for a truck driver to run pure
hydroxy. But they can add the hydroxy gas to their engine air intake as a supplement.
Andrew tells me truckers can get upwards to 30% more efficiency. Which means, in real
terms, they save three dollars for every ten dollars they would’ve spent. That’s huge
savings to a cash-strapped trucker.
Although the electrical theory may be alternative, the chemistry employed is actually
rather simple. Hydrogen has a negative charge. Oxygen has a positive charge. This
mean the gases can easily be separated by their polarity. When Andrew splits out the
hydrogen gas, he ionizes it with bursts of electricity. If he does this again and again, he
could create deuterium, and he could continue to enrich until he reached tritium.
Andrew tells me that would get him in trouble with the government. So, they just
ionize the gas to create ortho-hydrogen. To do that, he uses different amperages of
electricity. The idea is that certain frequencies of electricity make the hydrogen behave
differently. Andrew picks up a fuel cell to explain how it works. He tells me that they’ve
discovered that “five amps makes the highest quality ortho.” Andrew and his partner
Jerome build their own fuel cells. I do not meet Jerome, but Andrew tells me about how
the two of them went into business after they met Bob Boyce in a hotel in Los Angeles, a
decade ago.
“It was in a motel in LA in 19… It was 2007. He just wanted to show him, ‘Hey, I made this
cell. Do you want to look at it? It’s your seven-plate.’ And he approved it. Right then. And he
was just really cool and he goes, ‘Yeah, you can make that. I want ten dollars a sale’ That’s
our royalty fee. ‘You guys can have a license. You guys can sell my stuff.’ He said what’s your
guys’ PWM like?’
I have to interrupt Andrew. He casually uses terms like “seven plate” and acronyms like
PWM like he’s saying NATO or NFL. But I have no idea what PWM is and I’ve been
reading up on this stuff for weeks.
“Pulse width modulator. All it is is a circuit that pulses. The modulator is a switch that gets
hot and it just switches the electrical current on and off. It’s part of training the molecules.”
What all that means is: to condition the hydrogen gas that’s separated from the water,
they use an electrical current that pulses like a strobe light. This causes a differential in
the hydrogen gas, causing atoms of hydrogen to pair together into ionized molecules
like ortho-hydrogen H+, deuterium, H2, or tritium, H3.
Open in app
Get started
“If you have non-magnetic stainless (steel) which is 304 or 316, you can set the polarity.
Now, nickel is non-magnetic, so the more nickel you have in it, the better.”
To keep up with what he’s describing, a person needs a good working knowledge of
physics, chemistry, electrical engineering, magnetic metals, nature of polarity, and flow
dynamics. Only because I’ve long been a fan of Nikola Tesla does this busy intersection
of scientific disciplines make any sense to me. Since Andrew Batty’s guru, the
alternative energy genius Bob Boyce, is a recluse living on a mountaintop in Tennessee,
I can’t ask Boyce any questions. Instead, I must ask Andrew if Bob ever told him about
building a car that works entirely on a water fuel system. Andrew explains it as best he
can.
“The first time was in 1990, he had it on jack stands in his driveway, a Duster engine, or a
Dodge engine. He had that running at 60 mph. He had the wheels spinning — he was
revving the engine — but it was on jack stands. It never got off the driveway. They told him
he was driving on the road. Someone came into his place and threw his toroids across the
room and broke ’em and stuff.”
He digs around in his garage to find an example. After a minute of looking, he finds one
in a drawer, he lifts it out like an excited boy who’s found his old toy. Andrew shows me
a toroid. It’s possibly the most important component they build that’s based on Bob
Boyce’s designs. It’s iron core wrapped in coils of solid 16-gauge silver-coated copper
wire, and it looks like a giant donut that’s been encased in melted candle wax. Looking
at the toroid, for a moment, it feels like we stepped out of time. You don’t think
anything with this much wax could be high tech. But it is, it very much is, if it works
like he says it does.
“It’s a three-phase circuit. It’s a radiant energy device. He says with this thing you could run
your whole house. If you had a rack of batteries — when you hook it up to a circuit, it
brings longitudinal energy into the center of the toroid — he said it can change the weather
and stuff. It could become a weapon. So he didn’t want to put it out there.”
As if he can see me grow skeptical when he claims the toroid could be a longitudinal
energy weapon, he brings our conversation back to why I visited his garage. With a
slight twinkle in his eye, Andrew asks me if I want to see how hydroxy power works. He
sets the toroid aside and we walk back over to his workbench.
Andrew connects leads from a marine battery. The deep cycle of a marine battery is a
Open in app
Get started
good source for steady power. He sets the rate of the current at 5 amps. The water starts
to bubble. Gases indeed separate in the clear cylinders. He connects a small grade
rubber hose, and with a flick of a flame he lights the stream of gas on fire like an
acetylene torch.
A tiny flame spits from the metal nozzle at the end of the rubber hose. He focuses the
flame on a plate of metal and slices through it like a jedi. Andrew explains that
hydrogen flame behaves differently than other gases like propane or butane. For
instance the jet nozzle is cool to the touch. Andrew lets me hold the nozzle and even
though I can see the blue flame less than an inch from my fingers, the metal is cool
enough to hold.
I ask Andrew how dangerous it would be if his hydrogen-splitting machine becomes
unstable. Like, could it explode? Would his whole garage burn up like the Hindenburg?
Andrew laughs at my question. And then explains that although the doomed zeppelin
used hydrogen gas, the Hindenburg was working with a very different set of
circumstances. Andrew assures me that if there is a problem his system just sort of pops
from back pressure. A hose will disconnect, or a tube might rupture its seal. But it never
explodes. It won’t catch fire like the famous fireball airship. He connects the torch to a
set of welded metal tubes that separate the warmed air into shafts, aimed in different
directions, Andrew says he uses this as a homemade area heater to warm his garage in
the winter. Within minutes you can feel the warmth surround us.
Amateur alternative energy inventors like Bob Boyce and Andrew Batty, and it could
certainly be said of Nikola Tesla, tend to suffer from the same fate. Few people
understand them. This makes it easy for mainstream science to dismiss them. As a
counterpoint, when thinking about amateur inventors it helps to remember that two
years before the Wright brothers first flew at Kitty Hawk, Rear Admiral George W
Melville wrote a book, “The Engineer and the Problem of Aerial Navigation,” and he
lampooned the kooky dream of flying machines:
“…there is no basis for the ardent hopes and positive statements made as to the safety
and successful use of the dirigible balloon or flying machine, or both, for commercial
transportation or as weapons of war, and that, therefore, it would be a wrong, whether
willful or unknowing, to lead the people and perhaps governments at this time to
believe the contrary…”
Occasionally, accepted science and respected members of the US government can be
wrong.
T
Open in app
Get started
he man who gave us our electrical grid never intended for our world to be
choked with wires. To Nikola Tesla, electricity wasn’t something that flows like
water in pipes to your home. To imagine it that way may confuse you and hides the true
nature of electricity. Electricity doesn’t flow to your house as a stream of electrons. It’s
atu e o e ect c ty.
ect c ty does t o to you
ouse as a st ea
o e ect o s. t s
more like waves in the ocean. Only, in this case, the ocean is high
power
lines.
Get started
Open tension
in app
The electrical waves pass a charge through the field of electrons in the wires. To Tesla,
everything is electrical. Bound together by a pervasive field of energy. We call that
vibrating field: the Universe.
Tesla saw energy in the air, in the stars, and in the soil. Tesla called it etheric energy.
Like the Force in Star Wars, it surrounds and penetrates everything, binding everything
together. And scientifically, etheric energy can be expressed as oscillations in polarity
that we call electricity and/or magnetism. To Tesla’s way of thinking everything is
vibrating energy expressed at different frequencies. The Universe is like an electric
symphony. And this cosmic opus we call our Universe works best when frequencies
meet in harmonic convergences, at intersections of frictionless existences. Presently, we
only play with half of Tesla’s electric symphony.
You may have heard that our modern digital world is pretty much built upon Tesla’s
understanding of electricity and energy. Yet, our accepted scientific community balks at
some of Tesla’s far-out ideas, things like zero point energy and scalar longitudinal
electromagnetic fields that emanate from black holes. But if Tesla was right about
lasers and radio, could he also be right about etheric energy?
Other than cold fusion, if you want to kill an otherwise promising career in physics,
start to earnestly use the term “zero point energy.” In the physics community, it’s
practically a slur. It’s how you dismiss a theory as ridiculous. Only rubes, fools, and
crackpots believe in such things. All good and true working scientists point to Newton
and Einstein and warn anyone, “There’s no such thing as a free lunch! You can’t make a
perpetual motion machine!”
Meanwhile, Tesla’s scientific adherents, like desert hermits, secret themselves away,
tinkering in garages across the country, and they rely on their “crackpot” theories and
equations to make machines that seemingly manipulate longitudinal energy.
Of the alternative energy proponents out there today, there is one man, in particular,
who stands out. His name is Eric Dollard. Imagine that Santa Claus had a very skinny
little brother who became a mad scientist and you’re pretty close. Dollard is a bearded,
charmingly honest, fussily short-tempered scientific genius. He doesn’t care if you think
what he says works or not. He knows it works. He understands the math and mechanics
and polarity that prove to him it works. And to explain how it works, he’s reached back
to mathematicians before Einstein, electricians who helped found our modern world,
Open in app
Get started
and he borrowed their work to invent new math to explain his theories of alternative
energy.
You can find his PowerPoint presentations online. He speaks extemporaneously, at
length, about the most arcane minutiae of the history of our understanding of
electricity. He gives whiteboard talks that can last for hours. His YouTube videos aren’t
for the casual observer. He’s no salesman for alternative energy. He’s also no prophet.
He doesn’t want to make you believe. He wants to show the whole world exactly how
and why his Tesla-based understanding of longitudinal energy works. The harder
Dollard tries to explain it all, the more he looks like a nutty old kook. To understand
what Dollard says in his lectures, it helps if you throw out your textbook understanding
of electricity.
Here, let’s have Dollard explain:
“You build Tesla’s devices as he describes in his writings and you will get all these effects. I’ve
duplicated just about every Tesla experiment. In fact, actually, I’m very famous for being
possibly the only person that has ever duplicated Tesla in an experiment. And it’s not
because I’m smart or I talk to space aliens. What it is is I don’t make any improvements on
the historic study. It’s that simple. I just do exactly as instructed. And it all works exactly as
described.”
Open in app
Get started
He’s being humble. He’s very smart. Even if he sees it as due diligence, that he’s just
following a path set forth by a genius before him, there are few people who can
understand Tesla’s work. And fewer still who are willing to risk their career to follow his
path. But Dollard has no career to throw away. He’s an autodidact. He’s a garage
tinkerer. Just like Tesla.
To summarize the science down to the essential difference that separates Tesla and
Dollard from our modern accepted understanding of physics/chemistry, Tesla found a
way to escape the law of Newtonian physics that states every action has an equal and
opposite reaction. As Dollard puts it, “Tesla found a way to give a push without having
to lean against anything.”
That’s revolutionary. That’s also why mainstream science rejects it. You can’t just
escape Newtonian physics. But Dollard says Tesla did. And that he did it both electromagnetically, and mechanically. The secret is the use of frequencies.
“Tesla’s aim was to produce a worldwide power system that was based on this principle and
the power system would be tuned to the natural resonant frequency of the Earth. And you
could just simply disconnect all the generating stations, cause the solar system would run
the electrical plant. It would be one with the electrical system of the Earth.”
That sounds like free energy nonsense to anyone in the accepted scientific community.
But Tesla claimed to have performed an experiment wherein he conducted electricity
through the center of the planet as oscillating frequencies.
“As wireless (radio) progressed, Tesla established the system where he could transmit
longitudinally through the earth electrical power at a velocity of 291,000 miles/sec.
That’s Pi over two, times the velocity of light,” Eric Dollard lectures.
Wait, did Dollard just claim Tesla got an electrical signal to propagate faster than the
speed of light? “Impossible! That can’t be true,” screams the accepted scientific
community. That violates all of modern physics. Newtonian and Einsteinian physics.
Tesla must be wrong if he argues with Einstein and Newton. But what if they’re all
correct? What if it’s all slightly stranger than we think?
Dollard and Tesla describe fields of electricity that move backwards and forwards in
time. That’s very different than what we imagine in high tension lines stretched high
above us Tesla and his disciple Dollard propose that there are eight forms of electricity
above us. Tesla and his disciple Dollard propose that there are eight forms of electricity.
Open in app
Get started
Together, these eight forms operate as a unit, one bound by the duality of polarity.
Confused? Welcome to the realm of longitudinal energy.
According to Dollard, and Tesla, we presently use only one half of the electrical
magnetic frequencies available to us. We use the ones that are choppy, scratchy, and
inefficient but very easy to detect because of friction. Evidence of this antagonistic
energy is measured in the resistance found in our transmission wires. In physical terms,
think of resistance as the friction in the flow of our electrical grid, and if we design a
system with electrical resonance in mind, where friction is reduced to zero, just think of
all the energy that wouldn’t be lost in transmission. Thus, it also wouldn’t need to be
generated, or stored in a battery. In monetary and environmental terms, the savings
would be colossal.
To understand how harmonic convergences in frequencies work, think of how music
resonates and shatters a wine glass. That’s the sort of sudden increase in power that
occurs when one reaches resonance and one matches frequencies — things can
explode. That’s how Dollard and Tesla treat electromagnetic fields, they manipulate
frequencies. To believers in alternative energy, we’ve just begun to use electricity to its
fullest potential. As they say, everything that’s old is new again. Perhaps, working with
electrical energy will soon be more futuristic than nuclear energy.
Tesla even said as much in his book My Inventions (pg. 26):
I am unwilling to accord to some small-minded and jealous individuals the satisfaction of
having thwarted my efforts. These men are to me nothing more than microbes of a nasty
disease. My project was retarded by laws of nature. The world was not prepared for it. It
was too far ahead of time. But the same laws will prevail in the end and make it a
triumphal success.
O
ut there in the Silicon Valley, tucked away in cozy Palo Alto, somewhere in a
building on the Stanford campus, there’s a professor who’s working with these
very same ideas. Only, Dr. Hongjie Dai isn’t researching longitudinal energy. He would
likely shake his head at such alternative energy terms. Instead, he’s applied
nanoparticles onto graphene and onto nickel plates to create cheap efficient hydroxy
gas.
gas.
Open in app
Get started
As you now know, you must introduce electricity to split the water and derive oxygen
and hydrogen gases. This is the most impressive part: Dr. Dai’s latest research into
electrolysis created a water-splitter that can be powered by a single AAA battery. That’s
huge. That means you could convert renewable resources into electricity, store it in tiny
batteries, and then use those batteries to split the water. Dr. Dai envisions his process
being used to create cheap hydrogen for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, and not as a source
to create HHO/hydroxy gas for water-powered cars.
In recent years, there have been a few water-powered cars to make it into mainstream
news cycle. In 2002, a company called Genesis World Energy/United Fuel Cell Technology
announced they patented a process that split water into HHO gas, and then mixed it
together again to create a fuel. Four years later, in 2006, after raising nearly three
million dollars from investors, the owner of the company, Patrick Kelly, was convicted
in New Jersey of theft.
There’s also Genepax, a Japanese company that announced in 2008 they created a car
that runs on water. But the company and its technology was roundly savaged by
Popular Mechanics magazine. Eight years later, the company is still around, and was
recently touting its new world-changing water-powered car that runs on two cans of
soda. Their claims remain doubtful.
There was also Filipino inventor, Daniel Dingel, who claimed to have created a waterpowered car. He even filed a patent application with the USTPO. In 2000, he convinced
Formosa Plastics Group to partner with him. And a mere short eight years later, in
2008, they were suing him for fraud. Formosa Plastics Group won. Dingel was
imprisoned for twenty years. Sadly, he passed away in 2011.
Most recently, in 2015, a Swiss-French company, nanoFlowcell AG, unveiled its waterpowered car line. And, unlike the others to come before it, they’ve stayed open for
business and aren’t being sued for fraud or theft. Despite initial criticism and skepticism
from journalists who assured the Tesla car company they had nothing to fear from this
French-Swiss water-powered upstart, this year, the company offered multiple models of
their water-powered fuel cell vehicle. They don’t burn HHO gas, instead, it’s a flow
system that runs on electrolysis to power a fuel cell. It’s still essentially, a waterpowered electric car.
Open in app
Get started
Is this the beginning of a tech revolution? One that dark forces have attempted to
suppress and were willing to kill inventors in order to keep their inventions from seeing
the light of day? Who knows? These sorts of questions are rarely truly answered until
everyone involved is dead.
The more important questions to answer: Are alternative energy geniuses like Eric
Dollard and Bob Boyce right? Does Tesla still have a lot more to teach us if we follow his
understanding of electricity? Can Tesla’s ideas of oscillating electrical fields and
dielectric effects mix with Dr. Dai’s nanoparticles to create new materials?
Perhaps a water-powered car is a foolish dream.
But it’s equally clear: we don’t yet fully understand electricity. Yes, Elon Musk is a
genius. No doubt. But there is a big difference between his Tesla motor company and
Tesla the man. This distinction may be key to the path humanity takes. Or drives.
About
Help
Terms
Privacy
bout
ep
e
s
acy
Open in app
Get the Medium app
Get started