OT 505 Quiz One Study Guide HIssong, Lape & Bailey Chpts. 1, 2,3, 4,10,11 Chpt. 1- Compare/ contrast inductive and deducting reasoning Inductive reasoning: starts with specific observation that eventually forms general theory o “bottom-up” approach o Start with interesting observation, looks for pattern of similar observations, develop hypothesis from pattern, and form base of general theory o Accepts or believes finding about a situation and then applies belief to all similar individuals, assuming finding will be true for all Deductive reasoning: starts with a general theory and ends with a specific conclusion o “top-down” approach o Start with general theory, form hypothesis based on theory, test hypothesis, assess results, and form conclusion Chpt. 3- Literature Review- thorough review of written material on the proposed topis of study; essential to design a relevant, original, and timely research study What is CINAHL? The cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature More than 3,000 journals on topics: OT, PT, and speech and 12 other rehab disciplines Includes books, book chapters, conference proceedings, audiovisuals, and educational software PubMed? More than 21 million citations to biomedical research from 1948 and includes worldwide coverage OT Search? Comprehensive database of literature and audiovisual material related to occupational therapy along with information directly related to literature in rehabilitation, education, psychiatry, psychology, healthcare delivery, and administration Psych info? Produced by American psychological association Content classification scheme that divides field of psychology into 16 major categories and 64 subcategories More than 3.3 million citations, primarily to peer-reviewed journal articles and books pertaining to behavioral sciences and mental health Chpt. 4 What is the problem? The heart of the study from which all other elements flow The reason for doing the study The problem or question that caught your interest in the first place The issue you want to solve in your clinical practice What is significance of a study? Purpose Should tell the reader what you hope to accomplish regarding the problem by carrying out your study Study is appropriate for the research problem and hat some important beliefs will occur if you do it What is importance of the study? What your study will do to affect the problem and why your study is important Tells what makes your purpose worth pursuing Chpt. 10- Evidence Based Practice and PP on the topic What is EBP? The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients The integration of best research evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s unique values and circumstances What are the three components? Best evidence: the current applicable research available on the efficacy of treatments for particular diagnoses or conditions Practitioner expertise: knowledge, skills, and past experiences Client goals, values, and circumstances: client’s context can encompass his or her cultural background, personal demographics, virtual communication, stage of life, and physical and social environments What are critically appraised papers? Short analyses of individual studies Highlight the purpose, the setting, the participants or sample used, the study design or methodology, the level of evidence, the main outcomes and findings, any limitations, and how and why the article was deemed applicable to the question at hand What are critically appraised topics? Summaries of multiple studies on a single topic or practice concern Similar to systematic reviews- include synthesis of numerous studies, but generally less rigorous, more concise, and more limited in focus, with the emphasis on practical application of research What is a systematic review? A summary of all of the literature on a particular topic; summarize existing clinical research on a topic What is a meta analysis? Combines the data of multiple studies to find common results and to identify overall trends Quatitative, formal, epidemilogical study design used to systematically assess the results of previous research to derive conclusions about that body of research Draw the pyramid of EBP- see text book pg. 135 What is the 5 step EBP Process? 1. Identifying a need and an evidence-based practice question: consider practice setting and identify practice question 2. Searching the evidence: literature review 3. Appraising and synthesizing the evidence: determine value and relevancy of literature 4. Applying the evidence: 5. Evaluating the project: closely examine outcomes of project to draw conclusions about treatment and decide if you will continue How do you conduct a literature review? Consider search terms you might use, which databases might be helpful, and time period Research log Chpt. 11-Before Implementing your plan and Informed Consent PP What is IRB? Institutional review board Human participants committee Responsible for safeguarding the rights of individuals or groups you will be studying Why do we need informed consent? Agree to the study Understand benefits and risks Withdraw at any time What key information needs to be on the informed consent? Easy to understand language Benefits and risks Can withdraw at anytime confidentiality What does benefits outweigh the risks mean? What can be gained is much more significant than what might be lost or risked What is readability? How easy and what grade level the document is Particpants must be able to understand the informed consent to sign it What is child assent and when do we need it? Informed consent for minors Child signs the document after you have explained the consent process to their level of understanding PICO – what is it and how do we use it? P: populations- who are you wanting to study I: intervention- what interventions are you looking at C: comparison/correlation- what other interventions or techniques have evidence and should be considered O: outcomes- what has been measured to show changes, what are the changes? Finer research problems are: F: feasible I: interesting N: novel E: ethical R: realistic 3 types of research- define each of these Quantitative: numbers, facts, statistical analysis, structured procedures, big pictures Designed to collect cold, hard facts Sample of at least 30 Qualitative: describe more than mesaure Impressions, opinions, viewpoints, human voice Less structured Delve deep into the topic at hand to gain information about people’s motivations, thinking, and attitudes More indepth, patient perspective, going native Mixed Methods Combination of qualitative and quantitative Information can complement each other Have numbers- not sure why Qualitative may provide some insight Sampling Consensus: the entire population Population : an exhaustive group of objects/individuals having one or more common characteristics, target population of interest to the researcher Sample: any portion of the population less than the total Non probability sampling: o o No random selection Selected based on other criteria Location Availability Convenience Uses subjects that are available Decreases generalization Convenience Sampling: any subjects eadily available and willing, opportunistic sampling Purposive Sampling: subjects deliberated selected for the study based on predefined criteria, selecting information- rich subjects Snowball Sampling: informants/participants provide names of others who meet study criteria Quota Sampling: individuals who are unlikely to be represented are included Probability sampling: sampling that ensures all members of the population have equal change of bein selected o Parameters of population known Simple random sampling: table of random numbers is used to randomly select sample Systematic random sampling: sampling interval width is determined and individuals are selected, every nth person is selected Stratified random sampling: dividing population into hmohenous subgroups and then reandomly selecting from each subgroup o Proportional: the percentage of participants from each group is the same as the population o Nonproportional: the percentage of particpants from each group in different than the population Cluster Sampling: successive random sampling of units is used to obtain sample, divide population into smaller clusters Research Ethics Confidentiality: protect confidential communications, such as papers or grants submitted for publication, presonnel records, trade or military secrets, or patient records Describe how privacy and confidentiality concerns will be handled Be sensitive to protect information frm unauthorized observation How particpants will be notfied of any unforseen findings Equipose: If a new intervention is being tested against the currently acceted treatment, the investigator should be genuinely uncertain which approach is superior A true null hypothesis should exist at the onset regarding the outcome of the trial Autonomy The investigator’s obligation to respect each participant as a person capable of making an informed decision regarding participation in the research study Each particpant has received a full disclosure of the nature of the study, the risks, benefits and laternatives, with an extended opportunity to ask questions Finds expression in the informed consent document Beneficence The investigator’s obligation to attempt to maximize benefits for the individual participant and/or society o Minimizing risk of harm to the individual An honest and thorough risk/benefit calculation must be performed Justice Demands equitable selection of participants avoiding participant populations that may be unfairly coerced into participating, such as prisoners and institutionalized children Equality in distribution of benefits and burdens among the population group(s) likely to benefit from the research Disclosure Particpants informed fully of the nature and purpose of the research, procedures to be used, the expected benefits, the potiential of reasonably foreseeable risks, stresses, and discomforts, alternatives to participating in the research Description of procedures for confidentiality/anonymity. Availability of compensation and medical treatment whom to contact with questions about the research study research subjects’ rights Competence The participant must be competent to give consent If the participant is not competent due to mental status, disease, or emergency, a designated surrogate may provide consent if it is in the participant’s best interest to participate In certain emergency cases, consent may be waived due to lack of a competent particpant and a surrogate What types of data are protected by HIPPA? Names, geographical identifiers, telephone numbers, fax numbers, email, SSN, medical records, health plans, account numbers, certificate/license numbers, vehicle identifiers, device identifiers, IP address, biometric identifiers, full face photography Designing Questionnaires What does a funnel structure mean? Place easy, non-challenging question first Key filter questions should go in early Use a funnel structure Go from basic to more in depth General questions before specific questions Go from the least sensitive to the most sensitive questions But—try and put important questions in before the end What are demographic questions? What is important to know about your sample that makes them similar or different from the population Age, gender, education, years of experience, income, geographical information, etc. Descriptive Research questionnaire Purpose is to generate a profile of the characteristics of the sample Answers questions such as what they frequently do, what they think, and their characteristics Predictive and Analytical questionnaires Purpose is to understand any relationships between variables Look for patterns, using correlation techniques, to investigate the relationship between these two variables Once research has established relationships between variables it may be possible to offer some predictions as to future events or patterns of behavior Measurement Scale Questionnaires Purpose is to generate a measurement scale to measure a complex variable Comprised of a number of statements that can be used to measure the variable Typically, based on previous research, and then test and refine the scale using data collected from appropriate respondents, with the aid of analytical methods such as exploratory, principal components or confirmatory factor analysis What is a Likert scale? Strongly agree, agree, neither, disagree, strongly disagree Visual Analog scale? Select the picture that represents your current pain level Rating Scale? On a scale of 1-7 with 1 being very poor and 7 being excellent Depends on question and context