BPI vs Posadas
BPI vs. Posadas
GR No. 34583, October 22, 1931
FACTS:
BPI, as administrator of the estate of deceased Adolphe Schuetze, appealed to CFI Manila absolving
defendant, Collector of Internal Revenue, from the complaint filed against him in recovering the
inheritance tax amounting to P1209 paid by the plaintiff, Rosario Gelano Vda de Schuetze, under protest,
and sum of P20,150 representing the proceeds of the insurance policy of the deceased.
Rosario and Adolphe were married in January 1914. The wife was actually residing and living in Germany
when Adolphe died in December 1927. The latter while in Germany, executed a will in March 1926,
pursuant with its law wherein plaintiff was named his universal heir. The deceased possessed not only
real property situated in the Philippines but also personal property consisting of shares of stocks in 19
domestic corporations. Included in the personal property is a life insurance policy issued at Manila on
January 1913 for the sum of $10,000 by the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Manila Branch. In
the insurance policy, the estate of the deceased was named the beneficiary without any qualification.
Rosario is the sole and only heir of the deceased. BPI, as administrator of the decedent’s estate and
attorney in fact of the plaintiff, having been demanded by Posadas to pay the inheritance tax, paid under
protest. Notwithstanding various demands made by plaintiff, Posadas refused to refund such amount.
ISSUE: WON the plaintiff is entitled to the proceeds of the insurance.
HELD:
SC ruled that(1)the proceeds of a life-insurance policy payable to the insured's estate, on which the
premiums were paid by the conjugal partnership, constitute community property, and belong one-half to
the husband and the other half to the wife, exclusively; (2)if the premiums were paid partly with
paraphernal and partly conjugal funds, the proceeds are likewise in like proportion paraphernal in part
and conjugal in part; and (3)the proceeds of a life-insurance policy payable to the insured's estate as the
beneficiary, if delivered to the testamentary administrator of the former as part of the assets of said estate
under probate administration, are subject to the inheritance tax according to the law on the matter, if
they belong to the assured exclusively, and it is immaterial that the insured was domiciled in these Islands
or outside.
Hence, the defendant was ordered to return to the plaintiff one-half of the tax collected upon the amount
of P20,150, being the proceeds of the insurance policy on the life of the late Adolphe Oscar Schuetze,
after deducting the proportional part corresponding to the first premium.