Uploaded by gasymova.99bk.ru

Speaker credibility

advertisement
ACTION STEP 2
Speaker Credibility
rhetorical ques ons:
Credibility is the confidence that an audience places in the truthfulness of
what a speaker says. The impact of credibility on speaker success has been
a fundamental concept in public speaking since Aristotle described it as
ethos more than 2,000 years ago. Having been understood as a key concept
for so long, it is no wonder that several theories exist about how speakers
develop credibility. You can read a summary of these theories by going to
your CourseMate for Challenge to access Web Resource 5.2: Holistic Theory
of Speaker Credibility.
Some people are widely known as experts in a particular area and have
proven to be trustworthy and likable. When these people give a speech, they
don’t have to adapt their remarks to establish their credibility. For example,
in November 2008 Nancy Nielsen, president of the American Medical
Association, spoke to fellow physicians on the subject of standing up for
patients when health plans don’t—no one listening would have questioned
her credibility.
However, most of us, even if we are given a formal introduction that attempts
to acquaint the audience with our credentials and character, will still need to
adapt our remarks to build audience confidence in the truthfulness of what
we are saying. Three adaptation techniques can affect how credible we are
perceived to be: demonstrating knowledge and expertise, establishing trustworthiness, and displaying personableness.
ques ons phrased to
s mulate a mental
response rather than an
actual spoken response
from the audience
credibility: the
percep on that you
are knowledgeable,
trustworthy, and
personable
Demonstrate Knowledge and Exper se
When listeners perceive you to be a knowledgeable expert, they will perceive
you as credible. Their assessment of your knowledge and expertise depends
on how well you convince them that you are qualified to speak on this topic.
You can demonstrate your knowledge and expertise through direct and indirect
means.
You establish your expertise directly when you disclose your experiences
with your topic, including formal education, special study, demonstrated skill,
and your “track record.” For example, in a speech on DWP, J. J. explained:
knowledge and
exper se: how well you
convince your audience
that you are qualified to
speak on the topic
I became interested in the issue of driving while phoning (DWP) after being
involved personally in an accident caused by a driver who was talking on the
phone. Since then, I’ve done a great deal of research on the subject and am
involved in a grassroots organization devoted to passing legislation to ban driving while phoning in our state.
SPEECH SNIPPET
Of course, to make claims like this, you must have had experiences that give
you “standing” to speak on your topic. This is why it is critical for you to choose
a topic you know something about. When you can demonstrate your personal
involvement with your topic, your audience begins to trust that you understand
the material you are presenting.
Audience members will also assess your expertise through indirect means,
such as how well prepared you seem and how much you demonstrate firsthand
involvement by using personal examples and illustrations. Audiences have an
almost instinctive sense of when a speaker is “winging it,” and most audiences distrust a speaker who does not appear to have command of the material. Speakers
who are overly dependent on their notes or who hem and haw fumbling to find
ways to express their ideas undermine the confidence of the audience. On the
other hand, when your ideas are easy to follow and clearly expressed, audience
members perceive you to be more credible.
Similarly, when your ideas are developed through specific statistics, highquality examples, illustrations, and personal experiences, audience members
Chapter 5
Demonstra ng Direct
Exper se
Tiffany demonstrated
direct exper se with
her topic when she
declared, “About five
years ago, I made
a decision to stop
ea ng meat, which
has changed my life in
several ways. Living a
vegetarian lifestyle is an
important aspect of who
I am today.”
|
Adap ng to Audiences
|
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
81
SPEECH SNIPPET
Establishing
Trustworthiness
Tiffany established
trustworthiness in her
speech by framing it as
an explana on about
why she chose to live
a vegetarian lifestyle
rather than trying to
persuade her listeners
to make that same
choice: “In the next few
minutes, we’ll talk about
how I made this choice
to live meat-free, some
of the family issues I’ve
dealt with as a result of
this choice, and some
of the specific ways
this choice con nues to
affect my life today.”
trustworthiness: the
extent to which the
audience can believe that
what you say is accurate,
true, and in their best
interests
are more likely to view you as credible. Think about how impressed you are
with instructors who always seem to have two or three perfect examples and
illustrations and who are able to recall statistics without looking at their notes.
Compare this with your experiences with instructors who seem tied to the
textbook and don’t appear to know much about the subject beyond their
prepared lecture. In which instance do you perceive the instructor to be more
knowledgeable?
Establish Trustworthiness
Your trustworthiness is the extent to which the audience can believe that what
you say is accurate, true, and in their best interests. The more your audience
sees you as trustworthy, the more credible you will be. People assess others’
trustworthiness by judging their character and their motives. So you can establish yourself as trustworthy by following ethical standards and by honestly
explaining what is motivating you to speak.
As you plan your speech, you need to consider how to demonstrate your
character—that you are honest, industrious, dependable, and a morally strong
person. For example, when you credit the source of your information as you
speak, you confirm that the information is true—that you are not making it
up—and you signal your honesty by not taking credit for someone else’s ideas.
Similarly, if you present the arguments evenly on both sides of an issue, instead
of just the side you favor, audience members will see you as fair-minded.
How trustworthy you appear to be will also depend on how the audience views
your motives. If people believe that what you are saying is self-serving rather than
in their interests, they will be suspicious and view you as less trustworthy. Early
in your speech, then, it is important to show how audience members will benefit
from what you are saying. For example, in his speech on toxic waste, Brandon
might describe how one community’s ignorance of toxic waste disposal allowed
a toxic waste dump to be located in their community, which led to serious health
issues. He can then share his motive by saying something like this: “My hope is
that this speech will give you the information you need to thoughtfully participate in decisions like these that may face your community.”
Display Personableness
From Wall Street Journal, permission Cartoon Features Syndicate.
We have more confidence in people that we like. Personableness is the extent
to which you project an agreeable or pleasing personality. The more your
listeners like you, the more likely they
are to believe what you tell them. We
quickly decide how much we like a new
person based on our first impressions.
This fact is actually based on a concept
we refer to in the communication field
as impression formation and management, which is rooted in the theory of
symbolic interactionism.2 These first
impressions are based on what we infer
about people from what we see, such as
how they dress, how physically attractive we find them, how well they speak,
whether they smile and appear friendly,
and even how they carry themselves.
Although first impressions are not
always correct, we still use them. That’s
why a successful business professional
82
|
Part 2
|
Principles
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
might wear an oversize graphic T-shirt, baggy
shorts, and a backward ball cap when hanging out with his friends; put on khakis and a
polo shirt to go to the office; and dress in a
formal blue suit to make a major presentation
at a professional conference. In each case, he
is adjusting his look to convey appropriate personableness in different settings. As a speaker
trying to build credibility with an audience, you
should look for ways to adapt your personal
style to one that will help the audience like you
and perceive you as credible.
Besides dressing appropriately for the audiEthical speakers are fair in that
ence and occasion, you can increase the chances
they present all sides of an issue,
that the audience will like you by smiling at
not just the one they favor. Would
individual audience members before beginning
you describe Stephen Colbert as
ethical in this regard?
your remarks and by looking at individuals as
you speak, acknowledging them with a quick
nod. You can also demonstrate personableness by using appropriate humor.
By appropriate humor, we mean humor that demonstrates respect for diverse
listeners by not potentially offending a particular group (e.g., sexist, ageist, racist) or the values held by them.
AP Photo/Jason DeCrow
ACTION STEP 2
personableness: the
extent to which you
project an agreeable or
pleasing personality
Informa on Comprehension and Reten on
Although audience analysis helps you select a topic that is appropriate for your
audience’s current knowledge level, you will still need to adapt the information
you present so that audience members can easily follow what you are saying and
remember it when you are through. Six guidelines that can aid you are (1) appealing to diverse learning styles, (2) orienting the audience with transitions, (3)
choosing specific and familiar language, (4) using vivid language and examples,
(5) personalizing information, and (6) comparing unfamiliar ideas with those
the audience recognizes.
Appeal to Diverse Learning Styles
learning style: a person’s
A learning style is a person’s preferred way of receiving information. Because
people differ in how they prefer to learn, you should present your ideas in
ways that make it easy for all audience members to understand and remember what you are saying. Models for understanding learning styles have been
developed by a number of scholars across many disciplines.3 One prominent
model, called Kolb’s cycle of learning, conceptualizes these preferences along
four dimensions: feeling, thinking, watching, and doing.4 Kolb’s model is actually rooted in John Dewey’s experiential learning theory.5 Exhibit 5.1 illustrates
the cycle.
Some people prefer to learn by “watching” and easily understand and
remember things they see and hear. People who prefer to learn by watching
relate to well-designed visual aids and vivid examples that they can picture.
Others prefer to learn by “doing.” For these people, hands-on activities aid their
comprehension and memory. People who prefer to learn by doing relate well
when speakers provide real-life applications and clearly state how the speech
topic is relevant to their personal or professional lives.
Some people find it difficult to understand and remember factual material
and learn better if their feelings are engaged. These people learn well from
stories and other supporting material that appeals to their emotions or senses.
Other people learn well by absorbing and considering factual material. People
Chapter 5
preferred way of receiving
informa on
|
Adap ng to Audiences
|
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
83
Exhibit 5.1 Kolb’s cycle of learning
who prefer to learn by thinking connect
well when your ideas are supported with
detailed definitions, explanations, facts,
and statistics.
Exhibit 5.1 depicts how the watching–
doing and feeling–thinking dimensions of
the cycle of learning theory result in four
types of learners. Although each of us has
a favored learning style, research reveals
that all people learn most effectively when
ideas are presented in ways that “round”
the entire cycle of learning.6 So as you consider what information you will provide,
adapt to diverse learning styles by presenting new information in ways that appeal
to watching and feeling and doing and
thinking.
For example, suppose you are trying to
make the point that, for the large numbers
of Americans who are functionally illiterate, understanding simple directions can
be a problem. Here’s an illustration that
develops this idea:
SPEECH SNIPPET
For instance, a person who is functionally
illiterate might not be able to read or understand a label that says, “Take three
times a day after eating.”
Rounding the Cycle of
Learning
Now look at how much richer this illustration becomes when we develop the
statement by using supportive material that appeals to different learning styles:
In her speech about
hurricanes, Megan
appealed to both
feeling and watching by
showing photos of her
own hometown a er
it was ravaged by a
hurricane She appealed
to both watching and
thinking by explaining
hurricane categories
with the help of a scale
chart visual aid. And
she appealed to doing
by having the audience
look through a box of
hurricane tossed ar cles
to search for a baby ring.
transi on: a sentence or
two that summarizes one
main point and introduces
the next one
84
|
Part 2
|
A significant number of Americans are functionally illiterate. That is, about
35 million people, 20 percent of the adult population, have serious difficulties
with common reading tasks (thinking). That means that one of every five
people you see today may struggle with basic reading tasks. They cannot read
well enough to understand how to bake a frozen pizza, how to assemble their children’s bicycle from the printed instructions, or which bus to catch from the signs
at the stop (feeling). Many functionally illiterate people don’t read well enough
to follow the directions on this bottle [show an enlarged image of the label on a
medicine bottle that reads, “Take three times a day after eating”] (watching).
So the directions on a prescription bottle like this [show visual aid of enlarged
prescription bottle with directions written in garbled nonsense words] are basically
meaningless (doing).
Orient the Audience with Transi ons
When listeners become confused or forget basic information, they lose interest in what is being said. If your speech is more than a couple of minutes long,
you can use transitions to orient your audience. A transition is a sentence or
two that summarizes one main point and introduces the next one. Suppose
your goal is to explain the three phases of clinical trial a cancer drug must
pass through to earn FDA approval. After explaining the goals of the first
phase, you might use a transition like this: “So the goal of the first phase is to
see whether a drug that is safe in animals is also safe in humans. Phase I trials
are not designed to determine whether or not the drug works; that is actually
the goal in Phase II trials.”
Principles
Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Download