Introduction: Coke and CocaCoke has been in the wars for centuries now. It erupted 13 years after the birth of CocaCoke by pharmacist Caleb Bradham, when Coke was created. This made the twoCoke producers a direct competitor with one another. Over the decades after the creation of the twoCokes‟, CocaCoke continuously evolved its brand and expanded to Europe while Coke was struggling to keep track as it suffered from bankruptcy a couple of times due to the WWI. In the 50‟s, both companies were at their peak with advertising and expanding their business to other countries. They had strategies to stay in the business competitively, both companies embraced advertising platforms, celebrities endorsements, merging with other companies; as Coke merged with Frito Lay in the 60s which created CokeCo which hauled a great revenue for Coke until today (Bhasin, 2013). Firstly, to compare the branding strategies of these two household brands, it can be compared and discussed using the five levels of meaning for a product. The core benefit Coke and CocaCoke has the same core benefit for their products, which is to quench the thirst of their consumers as well as selling a non-alcoholic soft drink. Core benefit is the fundamental need or want that consumers satisfy by consuming the product or service (Kotler/Keller 2012) 1 The generic product A generic product is the basic version of the product containing only those attributes or characteristics absolutely necessary for it‟s functioning but with no distinguishing features (Keller, 2012). Thus generically, both Coke and CocaCoke are both soft drinks. The expected product The expected product is defined as a set of attributes or characteristics that buyers normally expect and agree to when they purchase a product. When consumers get a hold of a Coke product, they are expecting the sweet, citrusy flavor burst (Lubin, 2012) and when other consumers grab a CocaCoke product they await the raisiny – vanilla taste of the soft drink (Gladwell, 2012). The CocaCoke products are constantly produced in a red background with the iconic CocaCoke writing. Conversely, Coke products are packaged in a can with their blue writing. Augmented Product The CocaCoke products would also feature the label and nutritional facts of the product. It also provides the contact details of the manufacturer and place of manufacturing for after sales service purposes. Other additional information such as the website domain is given for product support. Coke on the other hand may have some similarities to the cocaCoke product. Coke has a great customer support as they offer easy accessibility and fast response as well as Coke‟s availability for contact if an issue occurs (Sheikh, 2002). 2 Potential product Potential product is including all the augmentations and transformations that product might ultimately undergo in the future (Keller, 2012). As for CocaCoke, they pledge to help their consumers be active and make informed nutritional choices (CocaCoke Company, 2012). CocaCoke is offering array of products that would be hydrating and fitting for their individual needs and lifestyle that offers low and no calorie beverages and regular calorie beverages packaged in smaller portions (CocaCoke Company, 2012). This solution was made to address the global problem of obesity as reported by World Health Organization statistics. CocaCoke believes that the impact of obesity on the health of the consumer affects the health of their business thus they became more concerned with the public health. A lot of researchers and health advocates blame the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages as the cause of obesity. Coke Co is also affected by the global issue of obesity and is taking an initiative to help curb the situation. Coke Co is looking at lowering their salt, sugar and saturated fats that is in their food and beverage products. The company will also increase whole grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts and low-fat dairy incorporated in their food products. They are also looking at being environmentally conscious, for example the fully compostable chip bag that will decompose entirely in 14 weeks (CokeCo). Brand knowledge Brand knowledge as explained as Kevin Keller, as the awareness of the brand name and belief about the brand image (Keller, 1993). Branding is a potent element for a product and between the two brands; Coke and CocaCoke; the latter is seen as a more valuable brand (Lubin, 2012). It can be deducted that brand knowledge is important for the health of the company. The CocaCoke brand is worth $79 billion in the year 2013 according to Interbrand in comparison of Coke brand, which is only $17 million worth. Adding on, according to an article written in Interbrand titled 3 “Best Global Brands”, the brand awareness disseminated by CocaCoke is a powerful spread as according to a survey by Research Now, the company scored 90% in brand awareness among the respondents from various countries such as Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, France and also Australia. The company scored big when they sold millions of beverages during Olympics London 2012, but they scored a bigger win with a high return of global viewership. The event also allowed CocaCoke to solidify a powerful association in the minds of billions of people around the globe. The company has used this event to also show their strong presence as a sponsor and also as a strong brand. A consumer from a different country can identify a CocaCoke product, even though it‟s in a foreign language and they may still recognize the product immediately (Lauren, 2012). As for Coke, their strategy to heighten their brand awareness was with multiple projects under the name “Coke Refresh Project” as well as bringing back the old Coke Challenge where a blind taste test is conducted against CocaCoke. The favorable outcome for Coke from these tests is that the testers would always prefer Coke to CocaCoke. On a different point, the availability of the two products worldwide could be a contributing factor to their differences in brand awareness. CocaCoke is much more widely available than Coke. 4 CocaCoke creates a sort of convenience for consumers for being widely available thus getting the loyalty of the consumers. There is a higher demand for CocaCoke than Coke thus the monopolization in restaurants are more favorable towards CocaCoke. For example, McDonalds, Subway, Nando‟s are all providing CocaCoke as a beverage in comparison to KFC as one of Coke‟s territory (Lin, 2012). According to an article by Design Council UK regarding „The Power of Branding‟, the brand association with CocaCoke and its product would be that the brand promises their consumers the great same taste; with the original recipe which is branded as The Real Thing, and also happiness, youthfulness, classic, energetic, and refreshing. In comparison, Coke also associates themselves with these keywords; fun, refreshing, youthfulness. Coke would appeal to the younger generation with the usage of celebrity endorsers. A great list of famous celebrities such as Michael Jackson, Britney Spears and most recently the singer Beyoncé as the brand‟s endorsers was used to gain vast attention from all ages of consumers (Johnson, 2011). The usage of celebrities as endorsers of the brand adds to the brand image (Erdogan, 1999). Apart from that, the visual for CocaCoke adds to the association of the product as the familiar red and white colors of the brand as well as the iconic CocaCoke writing complemented with the unique shape of the bottles represents the brand itself The brand image helped the associations of this brand in the minds of their consumer. Brand image is consumer‟s perception about a brand as reflected by the brand associations. As for CocaCoke, their logo is an iconic logo that has been consistent throughout the years (Emily, 2013). Thus, when a consumer sees the brand, they have the perception of devouring in a classic, great tasting soft drink that is refreshing. Equally, Coke bears in mind that CocaCoke tries to be “timeless” so Coke goes to be “timely” meaning they would be in the now, being a modern and edgyCoke brand (Colom, 2012). Therefore, consumers perceive the brand as the current and younger brand to consume. 5 Product Class Information Beverages Water Product Category Information Flavored NonAlcoholic Milk Juices Alcoholic Hot Beverages Wine Soft Drinks Pepsi Cola Distilled Spirits Product Type Information Beer Brand Information Coca Cola Product Category Hierarchy Above is the product category hierarchy for the two brands. Both brands have the same product class information which is both brands selling beverages. Categorically, both brands are focused to selling flavored drinks more than water, although Coca Cola has a mineral water branded as “Dasani”, CocaCoke‟s company reels in most of its revenue and market share with their soft drinks; CocaCoke and Diet Coke. Moving on to the third level, the product type information groups the two brands under the same category, which is non-alcoholic that reflects all of the products under the two 6 brands that offers non-alcoholic beverages. Finally, the lowest level is the level that is regarding the brand information, which describes what are the types of product under the brand. Brand Positioning Ideally brand positioning is the act of designing the company‟s offer and image so that it occupies a distinct and valued place in the target consumer‟s minds (Kotler and Keller, 2006). It is also a way to delicately position the brands in the minds of consumers so that they think of the brand in the right or desired manner, which will in the end, maximize potential benefit to the company. TheCoke wars between the two name brands has been started for centuries, they are well aware that they are in competition with one another and at multiple occasions have directly compared themselves publicly; The Coke Challenge. To distinguish themselves, they have targeted different audiences, as Coke has always had the younger generation in mind. Their advertising and marketing strategies are fixed to target teens aged 14 or even younger with a fun and most often interlaced with music. This is evident over the years as Coke had musical celebrities like Michael Jackson, Britney Spears and now Beyoncé (Vendredi, 2012). In contrast to CocaCoke, their target audience is wider but ensuring the products pleases the generation Y as well as the older generation. They achieve this by trying a fresher new image to reach the younger generation but maintaining the originality of the cans and bottles as well as taste for the older generation. Adding on, CocaCoke also targets diversifying their audience and taking geographical aspects in high consideration as they target the world filled with different cultures (Lyle, 2010). CocaCoke also positions themselves as a drink fit for the entire family while in contrast Coke aims to reach the teens (Vendredi, 2012). These brands position themselves also knowing their indirect and direct competitors. OtherCoke beverages in the market are their direct competitors and between the two they are the most competitive with each other. Indirect competitors are other produces of beverages such as juices, teas or coffee (Dixon, 2009). Coke and CocaCoke falls under the same product category, which is beverage, they however have some similarities; points of parity and differences; point of differences. The potent 7 differences are the taste, ingredients as well as the branding between these two brands. As mentioned before in this study, Coke has a taste of citrust in the drink while CocaCoke has a more raisin and vanilla in their product. The ingredients of these products also can be differentiated as Coke has slightly more sugar, caffeine and calories while CocaCoke has slightly more sodium (Lubin, 2012). CocaCoke is a much fizzier drink due to its high percentage of carbonation in comparison to Coke. Other than that, according to an article written on Soft Drink Face Off website, on the surface the product looks different with CocaCoke using the familiar red label with the iconic CocaCoke writing and Coke with the blue, white and red stripes as the background with a Coke writing (2013). Both brands also have different bottling packaging, which each company has patented. For example CocaCoke‟s iconic contour shaped bottle that was patented in 1915. Not to mention the company of Coke does not only focus on beverages but has reaping in revenue from their flagship food, mainly chips products. Despite the differences, vast consumers lean towards CocaCoke more than Coke which can be concluded that CocaCoke‟s branding is much more valuable (Lubin, 2012). On another note, the similarities of these two brands are that they have a wide variety of soft drinks beverages that enter the market and of course the basic of the products being soft drinks. Other more straightforward similarities are that they are both soft drinks and non-alcoholic that was created by southern pharmacists. Other than that, both brands offer a product that has the same core value that is to quench the thirsts of consumers with aCoke carbonated drink. Aligning the company’s workforce to new priorities The company’s structural changes will result in the reallocation of some people and resources, which will include voluntary and involuntary reductions in employees. The company is working on this next stage of design and will share more information in the future. In order to minimize the impact from these structural changes, the company today announced a voluntary separation program that will give employees the option of taking a separation package, if eligible. The program will provide enhanced benefits and will first be offered to approximately 4,000 employees in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico who have a mostrecent hire date on or before Sept. 1, 2017. A similar program will be offered in many 8 countries internationally. The voluntary program is expected to reduce the number of involuntary separations. The company’s overall global severance programs are expected to incur expenses ranging from approximately $350 million to $550 million. Brand elements Brand elements are implemented to distinguish one brand from its competitors. It consists of the brand names; what does it mean and why it was named that, its logos and symbols, the URL it may use to help consumers get to the website of the brand, the slogans the brands use to describe their product, packaging of its products, characters that goes along with it as well as jingles. Starting with the CocaCoke brand, it evokes images of the red CocaCoke logo with a red and white themed advertising and packaging. The logo itself is distinctive enough to help consumers identify the brand (CocaCoke UK). The name came about by the creator, Dr John Stith Pemberton who decided that two c‟s would be great on a label thus created the brand name. In comparison to the typical look of the cans, the packaging of the products can be better distinguished by their iconic contoured bottles. They also introduced the six packs carriers to encourage people to bring their drinks home, which was a huge success (CocaCoke UK). According to their website, CocaCoke have used slogans as a part of their advertising or marketing purposes thus it has changed over the years from 1886 to 2006. Their famous ones are from the year 2001 which Life Tastes Good, 1963; Things go better with Coke, 1969; it‟s the Real Thing and the recent one “The Coke Side of Life” (2012). A part of their advertising efforts, a jingle was created to accompany most of their commercials and it became synonymous with the brand as written on Wordlab website (2005). Adding on to their brand elements, the URL for the company is easy enough to be retrieved by memory as its just the brand name; www.cocacola.com. Other than that, it is evident in their advertising that the polar bears are the characters they use in those advertisements or billboard posters. The creator of the character, Ken Stewart wanted to depict a character that is cute and innocent, fun and also reflects human attributes (2012). Conversely, Coke brings an image of the predominantly blue colored Coke logo with its red, white and blue background that was a patriotic approach by the company 9 (Bhasin, 2013). Its brand name on the other hand, was a brainchild of the creator Caleb Bradham, whom at first regarded the drink as “Brad‟s drink”, he then named the product something that had to do with the ingredient of the product; which was Coken andCoke. Overtime the product was branded as Coke as reported by the website Coke Store. An article from Timetoast that was written regarding Coke‟s packaging and logo stated that, its logo has been the writing of Coke which underwent drastic facelifts over the years however today the logo are represented only by the three colors of the brands which are the iconic blue, red and white (2013). Adding on to the brand elements of Coke, the company also generates their slogans that would give a younger feel and targets the younger generation. Their slogan “The Coke Generation” and the year 2000 slogan, “For those who feel young” clearly depicts their brand that attempts to attract more younger audiences (Mary, 2012). Other than that, as reported by Giant Bomb, the mascot for Coke is the Cokeman, a well-known character in Japan that was created in 1990s. Another part to the brand element of Coke would be its URL. The company uses www.Coke.com as its main website which a simple method of connecting the consumers to the brand. The same as CocaCoke, both brands continue to create their own packaging. Over the years Coke has patented their bottles, this goes for CocaCoke as well, and it has become their distinguished differences that helps consumers identify the brands involved. Adding on, Coke recently has created a bottle that could secure favorable aromas as when the bottle or can is opened, it releases these favorable aromas to enhance the drinking experience (Wagner, 2013). The positioning and brand management strategy of the Coca-Cola The positioning strategy used by Coca-Cola has allowed them to paint a suitable image of themselves in the mind of their customers as the only “Real One”. They have designed their positioning strategy so as to draw an effective picture of their products offered for their customer. Once they had decided the market segment they wanted to target and compete in, they clearly developed a picture of that targeted market segment and properly defined their products as part of their positioning strategy. Through their positions strategy they emphasized on their distinct and unique characteristics with relation to their competitive brands stressing on their 10 individuality. They associated their product with the customer’s values and knowledge highlighting their benefits. Their positioning strategy also included comparison of Coca-Cola’s products with those of their rivals, like Coke, so that drive their customers to believe that Coca-Cola’s products had higher quality and standard. The Coca-Cola brand has turned out to be one of the most recognizable and a popular brand of all times and their beverage company is among the world’s largest beverage companies. They have become a successful brand since they have used a number of different brand management strategies depending on the market situation and target market. The strategies include hybrid, manufacturer, individual, private, family and generic brand management strategies. However, the most utilized brand management strategy she used is the individual brand management strategy since all of their major products have individual brand names, like Sprite and Fanta. Coca-Cola’s world-wide recognition comes from the fact that they have spent billions of dollars to promote and develop their trademark and brand name. Due to this today more than 95% of our global population recognizes Coca-Cola along with their special writing and their prominent red and white color. As a matter of fact, Coca-Cola Company came into being in 1986 and within the past 2 decades, it has been able to establish itself as one of the leading beverage companies in the world. At the beginning, Coca-Cola has used modern marketing techniques and she is even viewed as the “founding father of our present day marketing model”. The brand used a number of modern marketing techniques which has immensely benefited the business. This includes aiming their marketing concept totally towards their customers and allowing the focus of their customers to percolate trough almost every department whether human resource, production or finance. Another beneficial modern marketing technique includes taking of all of their important decisions with relevance to the existing market considerations, position and segmentation. Apart from placing importance on market implications, there are 3 techniques of modern marketing which the company can highly benefit from – focusing on customers, coordination and profit orientation. The company’s focus should always be on the consumer’s viewpoint so that they can totally understand which product or service the buyer needs. Since the marketing mix is an interconnected system, the entire marketing program needs to be considered and designed as a whole. 11 In addition, the marketing techniques used by Coca-Cola allow them to listen to the needs and demands of the people all over the world who want beverages that extend over a wide variety of occasions and tastes. Their marketing strategy has allowed them to produce great beverages which contribute towards each and every community of our world. Their marketing techniques display their commitment towards diversity, health, education and wellness, thus establishing them as one of the most successful and powerful brands of all time. Coca-Cola’s marketing techniques consists of an extremely efficient marketing mix strategy combining product, price, promotion and place. They not only provide the customers with their products, soft drinks, but also several services, like movies and holidays, allowing the consumers to be completely satisfied. Their main pricing strategy includes penetration pricing which has allowed them to grab a footing in their target market by winning a major part of the market share. After establishing customer loyalty, Coca-Cola then slowly raised their product prices. Coca-Cola has always been among the fore-runners in gimmicks and advertising styles and techniques which fall under promotion of marketing techniques. They have effectively use their promotional strategies for persuading their customers into buying their original products and trying the new ones. They have used a combination of public relations, advertising, personal selling and sales promotion as a part of their marketing techniques. Coca-Cola have also carefully chosen the place or distribution techniques for their company. Their techniques include direct, selective, intensive and exclusive distribution. It is completely apparent from their widespread popularity and reputation that these marketing strategies used by Coca-Cola has helped them establish themselves as among the most powerful and successful brand of modern times, one which will fortunately be a complex yet vital part of our modern world culture. In a highly competitive world such as ours effective branding and positioning strategies are extremely essential since it plays as a major force for the company and allows it to retain its stronghold all over the world. The branding strategies of a company accurately define the individuality of the company, its products and services. Every company, whether small or large, consider their branding strategies to be an important part of the entire business. Through their branding strategies they establish themselves as a brand name which represents quality and standard to their 12 customers. A brand name helps the differentiation among customers based on their unique qualities from other similar products. Additionally, the positioning strategy of a company helps it to establish the profitability of their various products and services. In order for a company to be successful simply having a quality product is not enough in our capitalistic world economy. The products and services must have a distinct and clear image and should be offered to the target customers at competitive prices. This is what a positioning strategy creates. Therefore, positioning strategies helps companies create a useful and desired image of the product for the customers, producing a direct contact between them and the company. Recommendations This report also provides a number of recommendations for Coca-Cola, which may help the company, come out of the economic recession. It strongly advices the management to adopt a broader perspective and develop a long-term strategy instead of focusing on short term plans. The declining nature of sales curves, profit margins and decreased rate of growth can be attributed to the recession and may be consider being quite natural in the present instable economic conditions. However, this should not be a reason to panic and make hasty decisions, which may bring about adverse effects and outcomes and may ruin the company. On the contrary, it should be seen as an opportunity to strengthen and stabilize the company right from its roots. Indeed, recession can be considered an opportunity to innovate, utilize, and take advantages of the openings created by the economic slump. (Dobrev 2008) Investing in emerging markets like India and China, which demonstrate significant growth opportunities, is surely a viable option for the company. It increases the customer reach and enhances the brand diversity. Capitalizing on the openings, which these emerging markets offer, can be a boost to the company, particularly when domestic markets in the United States are not performing so well. As a result, the company must pay more importance to its brand position and brand management and redeem the low revenue due to the recession from these emerging markets. 13 Conclusion The argument that the brands or brand names along with its brand position and brand management of a business like Coca-Cola, under which its goods or services are marketed, embodies as much an asset as their tangible counterparts, is increasingly gaining momentum. Realizing the requirement of implicating the value of brands in the accounts, some large corporations in the UK have initiated the capitalization of the value of their brands in their documented financial declarations. The issue logically crops up with regards to whether the implication of this entity as an asset in the financial documents serves any real significant function or is merely another effort by the brand accountants to create more opportunities for themselves. References: 1. UKEssays. (November 2018). Positioning and Brand Management of CocaCola. 2. Chang, S. and Podolny, J., (2001). “Coca cola’’ Semiconductor Division (A),” Stanford Graduate School of Business Case. 3. Hyun, S., Han, M., and Yeh, J., (2004) “Anycall: Building a Powerful Brand,” Korea Marketing Journal Vol. 5(4). 4. Joo, T., (2003). “ Coca cola Co., LTD.: Digital Convergence in the U.S. Mobile Phone Market”, Darden Graduate School of Business Case. 5. Kim, JW. et al., (2003). “Digital Revolution and Advances of Korean Companies,” SERI CEO Information. 6. Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (2019). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts Global Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited. 7. Evans, V. (2013). Key Strategy Tools: The 80+ Tools for Every Manager to Build a Winning Strategy. London: Pearson UK. 8. Gander, J. (2017). Strategic Analysis: A Creative and Cultural Industries Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis. 9. Hambrick , D., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? Academy of Management Executive, 4(15), 48–59. 10. Hartline, M., & Ferrell, O. (2006). Marketing Strategy. Boston:MA: Cengage Learning. 11. Išoraitė, M. (2009). Theoretical aspects of marketing strategy. Ekonomika ir vadyba: aktualijos ir perspektyvos: mokslo darbai, 1, 114-125. 14 12. Knott, P. (2015). Does VRIO help managers evaluate a firm’s resources? Management Decision. 13. 15