Uploaded by Joko Bacal

Bacal EBM v2.0

advertisement
.EVIDENCE-BASED.
.MEDICINE.
A Critical Appraisal on Therapeutics
March 24, 2022
Clinical Clerk: Bacal, Jose Agerico II P.
Avatar: Dr. Krenz Yaba
.OBJECTIVES.
1. To present an appraisal of an article on therapeutics
using EBM protocol
2. To appraise and determine the relevance, validity and
applicability of an article
3. To give a conclusion and a resolution based on the
article appraised
.CLINICAL SCENARIO.
.CASE.
Patient JO, a 29 year old man male, Roman
Catholic, and a resident of Canito-an,
Cagayan de Oro City, came in
due to chest pain.
.HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS.
12 hours PTC, was working the night shift when he noted
onset of chest pain, burning, pain scale 5/10. This was
associated with a sour taste on his mouth. There was
also noted frequent burping. Patient’s symptoms were
temporarily relieved by siing down to rest.
Immediately after his shift, persistence of symptoms
prompted consult.
.PAST MEDICAL.
.HISTORY.
(-) Hypertension
(-) Diabetes Mellitus
(+) Bronchial Asthma (Childhood)
- Last aack: Unrecalled
(-) Malignancy/Cancer
(-) Known Allergies
(-) Kidney Disease
.FAMILY HISTORY.
(+) Hypertension - Paternal
(-) Diabetes Mellitus - Maternal
(-) Bronchial Asthma
(-) Malignancy
(-) Heart disease
(-) Liver/Kidney disease
.PERSONAL/SOCIAL.
.HISTORY.
Single
Convenience Store Cashier
(-) Smoking
(+) Alcoholic Beverage Drinker
- 500mL Beer 3-4x/week
(-) Drugs
.REVIEW OF SYSTEMS.
GENERAL
(-) loss of appetite
(-) weight loss
(-) fatigue
(-) fever
SKIN
(-) rashes
RESPIRATORY
(-) cough
(-) dyspnea
CARDIOVASCULAR
(-) palpitations
GIT
(-) diarrhea
(-) constipation
HEENT
(-) blurring of vision
(-) ear/nasal discharges
(-) swollen glands
GUT
(-) dysuria
(-) hematuria
(-) urinary frequency
(-) lower back pain
MUSCULOSKELETAL
(-) muscle weakness
(-) joint pains
(-) diiculty walking
NEUROLOGIC
(-) seizures
.PHYSICAL EXAM.
GENERAL: Awake, ambulatory, NIRD
VITAL SIGNS:
ANTHROPOMETRICS:
Height: 140 cm
BP: 130/80 mmHg
Weight: 50 kgs
HR: 98 bpm
BMI: 25.5 kg/m2 (Obese Class I)
RR: 20 cpm
Temp: 36.5 C
O2 sat: 99% at room air
.PHYSICAL EXAM.
SKIN: Brown skin, moist, good turgor
HEENT: Anicteric sclerae, Pink
palpebral conjunctiva, moist lips and
tongue, (-) lymphadenopathy
CHEST & LUNGS: Equal chest
expansion, Clear breath sounds, (-)
retractions
.PHYSICAL EXAM.
CVS: Adynamic precordium, DHS
normal rate, regular rhythm
ABDOMEN: Flabby, normoactive bowel
sounds, soft, nontender
GUT: Grossly male, (-) kidney punch test
EXTREMITIES: (-) Bipedal edema, full
pulses, CRT <2sec
.LABORATORY WORK-UP.
K Deficit = 155.56
.ASSESSMENT.
1. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
2. Hypokalemia, Mild
3. Malnutrition - Obese Class I
.PLAN.
HOME MEDICATIONS:
1. Omeprazole tab, 1 tab OD pre-breakfast x 2 weeks
2. Aluminum Hydroxide + Magnesium Hydroxide 200 mg +
200 mg/tab 1 tab TID x 5 days
3. KCl 10 mEq/tab 2 tabs BID x 3 days
.PLAN.
NON-PHARMACOLOGIC INTERVENTIONS:
1. Avoid acidic food and drinks such as soft drinks
and alcoholic beverages
2. Avoid strenuous physical activities
3. Avoid meals within 2-3 hours of bedtime
4. Eat 1 banana per meal
5. Advised
.DISCUSSION.
.WHAT IS GERD?.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2022
.WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS OF GERD?.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2022
.HOW DO YOU MANAGE GERD?.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2022
.ESOMEPRAZOLE.
Short‑Term Symptomatic Relief in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Comparative Study of Esomeprazole and Vonoprazan
.VONOPRAZAN.
Short‑Term Symptomatic Relief in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Comparative Study of Esomeprazole and Vonoprazan
.EBM STEP 1:.
.ASK.
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
In adult patients with GERD, will
Vonoprazan, compared to Esomeprazole
provide beer symptom relief in a
randomized controlled trial?
.CLINICAL DILEMMA.
P Adult patients diagnosed with GERD
I Vonoprazan
C Esomeprazole
O Beer relief of symptoms
M Randomized Controlled Trial
.EBM STEP 2:.
.ACQUIRE.
.SEARCHING THE LITERATURE.
.EBM STEP 3:.
.APPRAISE.
.R. .ELEVANCE.
Is the objective of the article
comparing therapeutic interventions
to the clinical dilemma?
.R. .ELEVANCE.
.CLINICAL SCENARIO.
.JOURNAL SCENARIO.
Adult patients
diagnosed with GERD
Adult Patients
diagnosed with GERD
Vonoprazan
Vonoprazan 20 mg/day
administered over 4 weeks
C
Esomeprazole
Esomeprazole 20 mg/day
administered over 4 weeks
O
Beer relief of symptoms
Significantly beer GerdQ, FSSG,
and GOS scores
M
Randomized Controlled Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
P
I
.R. .ELEVANCE.
Is the objective of the article
comparing therapeutic interventions
to the clinical dilemma?
YES
.V. .ALIDITY.
Was the assignment of patients
to treatment groups randomized?
.V. .ALIDITY.
.V. .ALIDITY.
Was the assignment of patients
to treatment groups randomized?
YES
.V. .ALIDITY.
Was follow-up rate adequate?
.V. .ALIDITY.
.V. .ALIDITY.
Was follow-up rate adequate?
YES
.V. .ALIDITY.
Were baseline characteristics
similar at the start of the trial?
.V. .ALIDITY.
.V. .ALIDITY.
Were baseline characteristics
similar at the start of the trial?
YES
.V. .ALIDITY.
Were patients blinded to treatment assignment?
Were clinicians “blind” to treatment?
Was the study personnel “blind” to treatment?
.V. .ALIDITY.
.V. .ALIDITY.
Were patients blinded to treatment assignment?
Were clinicians “blind” to treatment?
Was the study personnel “blind” to treatment?
NO
.V. .ALIDITY.
Aside from the experimental intervention,
were the groups treated equally?
.V. .ALIDITY.
.V. .ALIDITY.
Aside from the experimental intervention,
were the groups treated equally?
YES
.V. .ALIDITY.
Overall, is the study valid?
.V. .ALIDITY.
Overall, is the study valid?
YES
.R. .ESULTS.
How large was the treatment eect?
.R. .ESULTS.
.R. .ESULTS.
.CONTROL.
.INTERVENTION.
Esomeprazole
20 mg/tab OD
n = 25
88.0% * 25 = 22 treated
25 - 22 = 3 not treated
Rc = 3/25 = 0.12
Vonoprazan
20 mg/tab OD
n = 22
81.8% * 22 = 18 treated
22 - 18 = 4 not treated
Rt = 4/22 = 0.18
.R. .ESULTS.
.CONTROL.
.INTERVENTION.
Esomeprazole
20 mg/tab OD
Vonoprazan
20 mg/tab OD
Rc = 3/25 = 0.12
Rt = 4/22 = 0.18
RR
ARR
RRR
NNT
Rt/Rc = 0.18/0.12
Rc - Rt = 0.12 - 0.18 = -0.06
1 - RR = 1 - 1.5 = -0.5
1/ARR = 100/-6%
= 1.5
= -6%
= -50%
= -16.67
.R. .ESULTS.
How large was the treatment eect?
HARMFUL
.EBM STEP 4:.
.APPLY.
.A. .PPLICABILITY.
Can the results be applied to my patient care?
YES
.A. .PPLICABILITY.
Were all clinically important
outcomes considered?
YES
.A. .PPLICABILITY.
Is the likely treatment worth
the potential harm and costs?
NO
.EBM STEP 5:.
.ASSESS.
.RESOLUTION.
In adult patients with GERD, Vonoprazan,
compared to Esomeprazole, in providing
beer symptom relief, will be harmful.
Download