Uploaded by abuhaimednoura

2021 DOFS L2 Location

advertisement
BUSI4494
Design of Operations Facilities and
Systems
Lecture 2
Location
Lin Wu
8 Feb 2022
Recap
• Getting to know each other
• Introduction to module
• Introduction to Facilities Planning
Recap
Facilities Planning
(Tompkins et al.)
Structure of today’s session
1. Factors in location
selection
2. Location selection
methodology
Facility location
• The facility location decision is a
strategic decision concerning the
geographical positioning of a
production or service location (Chen
et al., 2014).
• When is a facility location decision
required?
✓ New businesses
✓ Existing business relocation
✓ Existing business expansion
Plant location and design
• All businesses are faced with the problem of where
to locate their premises, and how to layout all the
facilities necessary to production within those
premises.
• The decisions which are made regarding location and
layout will affect the efficiency with which a
business can operate and influence operating costs.
Location strategy
 One of the most important decisions a firm makes
 Increasingly global in nature (???)
 Long term impact and decisions are difficult to change
 The objective is to maximize the benefit of location to the
firm
https://mdxipe.wordpress.com/2018/12/14/are-we-approaching-a-wave-of-deglobalisation/
Factors in location
selection
BUSI4494 DOFS
Location Strategy
Location decisions principles (Ketokivi et al., 2018):
1. Decisions about the geography of economic activity are guided by
locational factors, such as proximity to markets, access to knowledge,
and the relative cost of production inputs.
2. Decisions about the geography of economic activity are guided by
organizational factors, such as plant roles in the firm’s network and
inter-functional interdependencies.
3. Decisions about the geography of economic activity are guided by
temporal considerations.
In groups
• Factors that may affect location decisions
• Categories of factors
Location Decisions
Country Decision
Critical Success Factors
1. Political risks, government
rules, attitudes, incentives
2. Cultural and economic issues
3. Location of markets
4. Labour availability, attitudes,
productivity, costs
5. Availability of supplies,
communications, energy
6. Exchange rates and currency
risks
Factors affecting location
• The following slides list, very briefly, some of the
factors which must be taken into account when
choosing a location.
• Their relative importance will depend upon the
particular enterprise and its current operating
situation, the company’s products/services, and the
business and operating strategy.
Market
• It may be advisable to locate
plant close to markets.
• When?
Raw materials
• Close to raw materials
• When?
Raw materials (cont.)
• Sustainable production
Availability of labour
• Cost of labour = wage?
• Other factors?
Labour productivity
 Labor productivity
➢ Wage rates are not the only cost
➢ Lower productivity may increase total cost
Labor cost per day
= cost per unit
Productivity (units per day)
Example: labour cost per day is $70 in the US and $25 in Mexico. 60 units can be
produced in the US per day, and 20 units in Mexico per day.
Which country has a lower cost per unit?
Labour productivity
USA
$70
= $1.17 per unit
60 units
Mexico
$25
= $1.25 per unit
20 units
Transportation
• Is the available transportation adequate?
• Is it the most appropriate:
• water (slow but economical)
• railways (suitable for large bulk)
• roads (very flexible)
• airlines (fast but expensive)
• pipe lines (high capital cost, low unit
transport cost - but inflexible).
• Is it integrated?
• Logistics providers
Services (utilities)
• Are the available utilities adequate, and
at what cost:
• Electricity
• Gas
• Water
• Waste disposal
Land requirements
• Availability
• for present needs
• for future expansion
• Cost
• acquisition
• site development
• annual costs
• Appreciation/depreciation
in value
https://www.mmtimes.com/special-features/150-investment-myanmar/2822-land-prices-hold-back-property-investment.html
Sub-contractors
• Availability of sub-contract services and manufacturers.
• Quality, reliability and cost of subcontractors.
Climate
• Are any climatic factors important to production?
• How does climate affect costs associated with location decisions?
• How does climate affect efficiency associated with location
decisions?
Government restrictions and incentives
• All governments rely upon
successful business enterprises to
underpin their economy, and
depending upon their current
economic strength, may offer
Vietnam
substantial inducements to
attract businesses.
Cayman Islands
• A business will have to consider
whether such inducements will
overcome any longer term
disadvantages of locating in that
country.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/uk-news/tesco-uses-offshorehavens-avoid-ps1-billion-tax-2512505
Government restrictions and incentives (cont.)
• Will location in a particular country give
preferential access to particular markets
(e.g. access to government contracts, or
avoidance of import
restrictions/tariffs)?
• Some governments will put up barriers
and restrictions against particular
industries which do not fit in with
government policy.
Local authority incentives and restrictions
• Just as with governments, local authorities may offer
inducements to businesses to locate in their area, to improve
the wealth of their local community.
• Local authorities vary in their restrictions on noise, smells, fire
risks, traffic restrictions, etc. which may affect planning
permissions.
Community services
• Education, training facilities
• Social amenities
• Availability of housing
• Policing
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1608006444/shrewsburyacth/j4gyrijvosxmjlwxj4lu/20201
215DirectorofBusinessServicesV1.pdf
Defense and internal security
• Not all regions/countries of the world enjoy stability.
• The decision whether to locate in a particular country
may be influenced by:
• the international situation affecting the country
• the internal stability of the country
• current international relations between the country and your
own country
Tradition
Proximity to competitors
• Called clustering
• Often driven by resources such as natural, information,
capital, talent
• Found in both manufacturing and service industries
Clustering of Companies
Industry
Locations
Reason for clustering
Wine makers
Napa Valley (US)
Bordeaux region
(France)
Natural resources of
land and climate
Software firms
Silicon Valley (US),
Zhongguancun
(China), Bangalore
(India)
Talent resources of
bright graduates in
scientific/technical
areas, venture
capitalists nearby
Partner Selection & Location
• Competencies, skills, reliability, costs, political and
strategic alliances, etc.
• Advantages/constraints of location
Choosing between alternatives
• There are invariably alternative solutions to any location
problems. In making a choice it is necessary to consider
all the relative revenues and costs, over a projected
time-scale.
• In addition, there are likely to be a large number of
intangible factors which may not be amenable to
economic analysis, but which are nevertheless essential
to operating efficiency.
Choosing between alternatives (cont.)
• Thus, although a comparative cost analysis of various
alternative solutions may point towards the selection of a
particular one, an appraisal of intangible factors may
be the basis of a decision to select another.
Multi-plant strategies
Where a company operates a number of manufacturing
plants or service operations, its location decisions may be
influenced by specific strategic considerations, e.g.
• product plant strategy
• market area plant strategy
• product-market plant strategy
• process plant strategy
• general purpose plant strategy
(The following slides refer to manufacturing plants but the same
considerations can apply to services)
Product plant strategy
• Each plant manufactures distinct products or
product lines, serving the entire (or a significant
section of) domestic or international market.
• Has the advantage of allowing specialisation in
manufacturing processes, design and management
expertise, organisation, etc. appropriate to the
particular products.
Product plant strategy
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/228315#:~:text=T
he%20company%20signs%20all%20its,%2C%20China%2
C%20Korea%20and%20Taiwan.
Market area plant strategy
• Plants manufacture all (or most) of a company’s products, and
serve a particular market area
• Allows close contact with markets
• May be important where transportation costs are high
https://www.cocacolacompany.com/company/cocacola-system
Product-market plant strategy
• Specialization of product plant + close proximity to market
https://www.pg.co.uk/structure-and-governance/corporate-structure/
Process plant strategy
• Where a process is particularly complex or specialized, often
involving high capital investment, a company may set up a
dedicated plant.
• This may produce a range of products all requiring the particular
process.
General purpose plant strategy
• Some companies do not have their own product range, but exist
to provide make-to-order services within a particular broad set of
technologies.
• Flexibility!!
Location strategies – service VS. manufacturing
Service/Retail/Professional Location Goods-Producing Location
maximize the profit
Revenue Focus
Cost Focus
minimize the cost
Volume/revenue
• Catchment; purchasing power
• Competition; advertising/pricing
Physical quality
• Parking/access; security/lighting;
appearance/image
Cost determinants
• Rent
• Management caliber
• Operations policies (hours, wage
rates)
Tangible costs
• Transportation cost of raw
material
• Shipment cost of finished goods
• Energy and utility cost; labor; raw
material; taxes, and so on
Intangible and future costs
• Attitude toward union
• Quality of life
• Education expenditures
• Quality of local government
Fast food
restaurant
Electronics
manufacturer
Revenue
Revenue
Costs
Costs
Location A
Location B
Location of operation
(a)
Location A
Location of operation
(b)
(a) Location concerned with profit maximisation
(b) Location concerned with cost minimisation
Resources and markets
Required
service level
Resource
costs
Land and
facilities
investment
Suitability
of site
OPERATIONS
RESOURCES
Resource
availability
Location of
sites
MARKET
REQUIREMENTS
Image of
location
Community
factors
Telemarketing/Internet industries
o Require neither face-to-face
contact nor movement of
materials
o Have very broad location
options
o Traditional variables are no
longer relevant
o Cost and availability of labor
may drive location decisions
Location selection
methodology
BUSI4494 DOFS
Location Selection
Methods of evaluating location alternatives:
• The Factor-Rating Method
• Locational Break-Even Analysis
• Center-of-Gravity Method
Factor-Rating Method
 Popular because a wide variety of factors can be included in
the analysis
 Six steps in the method
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Develop a list of relevant factors called critical success factors
Assign a weight to each factor
Develop a scale for each factor
Score each location for each factor
Multiply score by weights for each factor for each location
Recommend the location with the highest point score
Factor-rating method
New Tech Ltd is an organization that specializes in simulation modelling consultancy.
It has identified three sites on the west coast of the USA that have approximately
equal initial and operating costs. The sites have been evaluated on a score of 1 to 10
(10 being best) against the following criteria and weighting assigned by
management. Rank the three cities in order of their total weighted points score.
City
Weight
LA
Portland
Seattle
Pool of skilled
system modellers
.5
6
4
5
University research
in modelling
.3
3
5
3
Recreational and
cultural activities
.2
5
3
4
Factor-rating method
Solution
• LA = (6*.5) + (3*.3) + (5*.2) = 4.9
• Seattle = (5*.5) + (3*.3) + (4*.2) = 4.2
• Portland = (4*.5) + (5*.3) + (3*.2) = 4.1
Factor-rating example 1
The following table lists the weightings representing the relative
importance of factors for the location of the third overseas
campus of our university. Four potential sites have been given a
score out of 10 for each factor. Identify the most suitable
location for the University based on the results of weighted
scoring.
A.Tokyo
B.Chongqing
C.Toulouse
D.Mexico City
Factor-rating example 1
Factor
Weight
Site
Tokyo
Chongqing
Toulouse
Mexico City
Number of potential
students
40%
6
6
5
4
Attractiveness to
top scholars
25%
7
5
8
6
Operating cost
20%
4
6
5
7
Openness
15%
7
7
6
6
Factor-rating example 2
A British company is opening a new branch in Europe and the following
table lists the weightings representing the relative importance of factors
for the location of this company. Four potential sites have been given a
score out of 10 for each factor. Identify the most suitable location for the
branch based on the results of weighted scoring.
A.France
B.Italy
C.Netherlands
D.Spain
Factor-rating example 2
Factor
WEIGHT
France
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
Labour availability
0.25
6
7
5
8
Labour relations
0.21
6
5
8
7
Purchasing power
0.35
7
6
8
5
Growth potential
0.19
6
5
7
8
Locational break-even analysis
 Locational cost-volume analysis
 Three steps in the method
1. Determine fixed and variable costs for each location
2. Plot the cost for each location
3. Select location with lowest total cost at the expected
production volume level
Locational break-even analysis example
Three locations:
Fixed Variable Total
City
Cost
Cost
Cost
Akron
$30,000
$75
$180,000
Bowling Green
$60,000
$45
$150,000
Chicago
$110,000
$25
$160,000
Expected volume = ?? units
Total Cost = Fixed Cost + Variable Cost x Volume
180,000 = 30,000 + 75 x Volume
Volume = 2,000
Locational break-even analysis example
$180,000
$160,000
$150,000
Annual cost
$130,000
$110,000
$80,000
$60,000
$30,000
$10,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Akron
lowest
cost
Chicago
lowest cost
Bowling Green
lowest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Volume
Locational break-even analysis example
Location
A
B
C
D
Fixed cost/year
250,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
Variable
cost/year/unit
11
30
20
35
What is the location with the lowest total cost when expected volume is
4,000, 12,000 and 20,000 respectively?
Locational break-even analysis example
4,000
12,000
20,000
A
B
C
D
294,000
382,000
470,000
220,000
460,000
700,000
230,000
390,000
550,000
340,000
620,000
900,000
Center-of-Gravity Method
▪ Finds location of distribution center that minimizes
distribution costs
▪ Considers
▪ Location of markets
▪ Volume of goods shipped to those markets
▪ Shipping cost (or distance)
Center-of-Gravity Method
➢ Place existing locations on a coordinate grid
➢ Grid origin and scale is arbitrary
➢ Calculate X and Y coordinates for ‘center of gravity’
➢ Assumes cost is directly proportional to distance and
volume shipped
Center-of-Gravity Method
X coordinate of center of gravity =
Y coordinate of center of gravity =
where
∑dixQi
∑Qi
∑diyQi
∑Qi
dix = x-coordinate of location i
diy = y-coordinate of location i
Qi = Quantity of goods to be moved to location i
Center-of-Gravity method example
North-South
New York (130, 130)
Chicago (30, 120)
120 –
Pittsburgh (90, 110)
90 –
60 –
30 –
|
–
Atlanta (60, 40)
|
30
Arbitrary
origin
|
|
|
|
60
90
120
150
East-West
Center-of-Gravity method example
Number of Containers
Store Location
Shipped per Month
Chicago (30, 120)
2,000
Pittsburgh (90, 110)
1,000
New York (130, 130)
1,000
Atlanta (60, 40)
2,000
Center-of-Gravity method example
(30)(2000) + (90)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (60)(2000)
x-coordinate =
2000 + 1000 + 1000 + 2000
= 66.7
(120)(2000) + (110)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (40)(2000)
y-coordinate =
2000 + 1000 + 1000 + 2000
= 93.3
Center-of-Gravity Method
North-South
New York (130, 130)
Chicago (30, 120)
120 –
Pittsburgh (90, 110)
+
90 –
Center of gravity (66.7, 93.3)
60 –
30 –
|
–
Atlanta (60, 40)
|
30
Arbitrar
y origin
|
|
|
|
60
90
120
150
East-West
Shortcomings
• Only considers the distances traveled. It does not consider
other factors such as the availability of roads on the selected
location.
• Assumes distribution costs change in a linear fashion with the
distance and the quantity transported.
• Also assumes quantity transported is fixed for the duration of
the journey.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
 New tool to help in location analysis
 Enables more complex demographic
analysis
 Connects data with geography
Learning outcomes
• Factors to consider when locating a facility
• Different methodologies that may be used to gain insights into
facility location selection
Thank you!
Download