Uploaded by johnthomaseagle

Article xx

advertisement
AJPH BOOK & MEDIA
Racism, a Root Cause of Health
Inequity, Must Be Tackled Head on
Racism: Science & Tools for the
Public Health Professional
By Chandra L. Ford, PhD, Derek M.
Griffith, PhD, Marino A. Bruce, PhD,
and Keon L. Gilbert, DrPH
Washington, DC: APHA Press; 2019
616 pages; $75.00
ISBN: 978-0-87553-303-2
1258
Book & Media
Jones
“Racism is a system of structuring opportunity and assigning
value based on the social interpretation of how one looks
(which is what we call ‘race’)
that unfairly disadvantages some
individuals and communities,
unfairly advantages other individuals and communities, and
saps the strength of the whole
society through the waste of
human resources.”1(p3) Public
health has a long-fraught relationship with racism through
policies and practices such as attributing stigmatized disease to
one’s nationality, ethnicity, or
race. Fortunately, the American
Public Health Association more
recently has been raising the
clarion call to address racism. One
might ask whether we still have a
need for a book explicitly titled
Racism. Just as Camara Phyllis
Jones, MD, PhD, MPH, president of American Public Health
Association from 2015 to 2016
noted, for those who are privileged by a system (e.g., those who
are successful in public health), “it
is part of your privilege not to
have to know.”1 But if we are to
shift practice enough to ensure
that a book like this becomes
obsolete, know we must! Even
more important, we must know
from those who have the firsthand, lived experience of racism
within public health.
Critical race theory provides
the reason that this book is so
essential. Those who experience
institutional racism within public
health are the very ones who
should challenge the traditional
paradigms and theories.2 Thus,
this book compiles the narratives
from leaders within the public
health profession to contextualize the praxis of racism within
public health. Also compiled is a
rich discussion of the key terms,
such as ethnicity, race, and racism, which is central for enabling
a meaningful discourse. Furthermore, the tactic taken goes
beyond presenting the historical
context and scientific underpinnings of the study of racism to
structuring the earned assets and
sources of strength as a toolkit to
address racism.
Segregation by race, poverty,
education, and other social factors accounts for more than a
third of total deaths in the United
States in a year.3 Racism imposes
a huge human, social, and economic burden, estimated as $1.24
trillion between 2003 and 2006
in health care or lost productivity
and premature death.4 Racism
affects health through racial
stratification in social structures
such as housing, the criminal
justice system, and the educational system. Several examples
of how racialization, the social
process of “othering” those not of
the dominant group, has health
effects include mechanisms such
as hypervigilance and high-stress
coping (e.g., John Henryism).
Racism is a public health issue,
and practitioners have tools that
can help achieve health equity
such as social change, community
organizing, policy advocacy, research, and scholarship. Public
health practitioners are positioned with research tools and
health system practices such that
they can raise awareness, identify
causal pathways, and organize
cultural and institutional change.
To address racism, research must
start with explicitly naming racism and investigating it directly.
This necessitates examining both
implicit and explicit racial biases
and assumptions in knowledge
production, conceptualization
and measurement, and action.
Furthermore, public health has a
rich history of partnering with
communities, which can be used
as an antiracism strategy when
sharing of power and privilege in
formal and informal ways is done
with respect, recognition, and
responsibility. Many innovations
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Nancy L. Jones is with the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities,
Bethesda, MD.
Correspondence should be sent to Nancy L. Jones, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator,
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health,
6707 Democracy Blvd, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: nancy.jones@nih.gov).
Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the “Reprints” link.
This book review was accepted June 3, 2020.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305823
Note. The final content is the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the
official views of the National Institutes of Health or the US government.
AJPH
September 2020, Vol 110, No. 9
AJPH BOOK & MEDIA
to address structural racism have
come from public health, such as
health literacy; cultural competence; and, more recently, cultural humility.
Race is a social construct with
racist underpinnings. Racial categorizations are reductive and
racist, rooted in Colonial origins
of the country when non-White
and native institutions were dismantled to achieve manifest destiny of the United States. Thus,
examining the categories can assist
in measuring the real effects of
racist consequences on nondominant groups. The racial/ethnic
minority and religious minority
populations share common
themes, but each has a unique
historical context that is needed to
understand the key issues these
populations confront today.
Contemporary scientists often
ask, “Why the history lesson?
The past is already in the past.”
Unfortunately, “racial hierarchy
is not just a problem attributable
to millions of individual Americans but is also deeply embedded
in American systems, structures,
and institutions.”5(p469) Historical
trauma, a type of institutional
racism, transfers through multiple
generations via philosophies, institutions, organizations, and policies,
with violence, depression, and
substance use. Many common
themes between groups include
using historical and current laws and
policies to illegitimize, criminalize,
and dehumanize groups within the
racial hierarchy of the United States.
Another thread is who has the
privilege of characterizing the
group. Part of racism is that the
dominant group assigns the value
and meaning to nondominant
groups. Those who self-identify
as American Indian and Alaska
Native are not minority populations; they are people from
diverse nations with selfdetermination and sovereignty.
Asian Americans come from
September 2020, Vol 110, No. 9
AJPH
many different nations but have
been grouped together with
other nations that experienced
historical atrocities in times of
war. Latina and Latino individuals
are cast as perpetual foreigners,
criminalized and dehumanized,
with a low social rank within the
racial hierarchy of the United
States. Even explanations appealing to cultural differences can
“easily devolve into victimblaming explanations instead of
pointing to the inequities that
place communities and individuals at increased risk.”6(p416) Most
insidious are when threats to one’s
cultural identity are internalized,
and the person believes his or her
group is truly inferior.
Thus, community-based research, community partners, and
community scientists need to be
central in helping recast the realm
of data and knowledge systems to
serve their own groups. “Structural competency calls on health
care providers and students to
recognize how institutions,
markets, or health care delivery
systems shape symptom presentations and to mobilize for correction of health and wealth
inequities in society.”7(p190)
Racism, a root cause of health
inequity, must be tackled head
on. What better place to begin
than learning from the wealth of
seminar papers, narratives from
key warriors, and the historical
context of the fight against racism
in public health. It behooves all of
us who are privileged to work
within public health to take the
time to learn about racism from
fellow practitioners who have
generously shared their earned assets and sources of strength.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author has no conflicts of interest to
disclose.
REFERENCES
1. Jones C. Launching an APHA presidential initiative on racism and health.
Nation’s Health. Am J Public Health. 2016;
45(10):3.
2. Flores A, Gaxiola Serrano T, Solrzano
D. Critical race theory, racial stratification
in education and public health. In: Ford
CL, Griffith DM, Bruce MA, Gilbert KL,
eds. Racism: Science & Tools for the Public
Health Professional. Washington, DC:
American Public Health Association;
2019:151.
3. Galea S, Tracy M, Hoggatt KJ,
Dimaggio C, Karpati A. Estimated deaths
attributable to social factors in the United
States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):
1456–1465.
4. LaVeist TA, Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The
Economic Burden of Health Inequalities in the
United States. Washington, DC: Joint
Center for Political and Economic Studies; 2009.
5. Smedley B. Towards a comprehensive
understanding of racism and health inequities: a multilevel approach. In: Ford
CL, Griffith DM, Bruce MA, Gilbert KL,
eds. Racism: Science & Tools for the Public
Health Professional. Washington, DC:
American Public Health Association;
2019:469.
6. LeBrón A, Viruell-Fuentes E. Racism
and the health of Latina/Latino communities. In: Ford CL, Griffith DM, Bruce
MA, Gilbert KL, eds. Racism: Science &
Tools for the Public Health Professional.
Washington, DC: American Public
Health Association; 2019:416.
7. Metzl JM, Petty J, Olowojoba OV.
Using a structural competency framework
to teach structural racism in pre-health
education. Soc Sci Med. 2018;199:189–
201.
Nancy L. Jones, PhD
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Nathaniel Stinson Jr, MD, PhD,
MPH, National Institute on Minority
Health and Health Disparities, for providing substantive review.
Jones
Book & Media
1259
Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health
Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.
Download