Uploaded by anc23

An Cheng - Asch (St Out.)

advertisement
An Cheng
Grade 11
3/05/2022
Study outline
Study ID: Asch (1956)
The aim of the study
Asch wanted to test the power of normative social influence
on one's likelihood to conform in an unambiguous task.
-
Procedure
IV → Unanimous incorrect
response.
DV → Level of conformity
(agreeing with incorrect).
Sample → Male students in the USA
They were told that they were taking part in a ‘vision test’. He
presented participants with an unambiguous stimulus.
-
Card 1: a single line.
The participants asked to choose the line on card 2
which was the same length as the 1st card.
6 confederates instructed to give wrong answers on certain
trials + a naive participant who always answered next to last.
There were 18 trials (times when they were asked to compare
the lines) 12 answered incorrectly by the confederates.
-
Control condition → Participant answered all 18 trials
without the confederates present and with only the
experimenter in the room.
After experiment, interviews with participants were carried out.
Results and
Implications
-
12 critical trials, 75% of participants conformed at least
once, and 25% of participant never conformed.
Control condition → Less than 1% wrong response.
Asch interviewed some participants and found that the
reason for why they conformed:
An Cheng
Grade 11
3/05/2022
1. They really thought that they were wrong.
2. They were unsure of their answer.
3. They did not want to be ridiculed by group, so went
along with wrong answer, although knowing incorrect.
Evaluation
-
Lacks mundane realism → Task does not have
personal meaning to them (low ecological validity).
-
Control group → Ensure task was not ambiguous.
-
Ethical concern → Deception.
-
Some psychologists have criticized the interpretation
of the study as exaggerating the role of group
pressure on conformity.
-
Although use of interviews → No way to actually know
what they were thinking and how they made their
decisions during the actual experiment. The only way is
from the participants thinking back and recalling
(retrospective in nature, memory bias).
-
The paradigm has been used repeatedly to test
different factors that may influence conformity.
-
Sampling bias in the original study, but the paradigm
has been used with different cultures and genders.
Download