Uploaded by Ayush Agarwal

Event 2 - 9 11 Memorial Museum Tour - FINAL

advertisement
Participant Name: Ayush Agarwal
Congressional Award Level: Gold Medal
Activity/Activities: 9/11 Memorial Museum Tour
Location(s): Virtual
History of some of your favorite pieces and how each influenced the history and culture of
your chosen country:
Three artifacts fascinated me the most. The first was the 20-foot-long object which was 5% of
the antennae from the top of the North tower. This influenced the history of the United States
as, during the time that the tragic event of 9/11 occurred, broadcast engineers were working on
this antennae at the top of the building. When the planes crashed into the building, they were
all trapped under this part of the antennae. Another artifact was the elevator motor that helped
move the elevators in the twin towers at speeds of 1600 ft per minute, meaning that someone
could get from the top of the building to the lobby in less than a minute. However, during 9/11,
an elevator shaft was blown off, resulting in the cables getting exposed and protruding all over
the shaft. The final artifact was the big red fire truck. This represented the history of the United
States because of how many of our first responders (police, firefighters, and EMS) have died
throughout the decades to protect the citizens. In particular, 343 firefighters died during 9/11.
1) I think the most significant thing that interests me about 9/11 is how the US influence in the
Middle East economically and culturally before 2001 resulted in the creation of Al Qaeda. I am
fascinated by the US-Saudi Arabia relationship that has been a stronghold on our Middle East
foreign policy for almost a century. I am interested in US involvement in Kuwait, Iraq, the Gulf
War, and the Iranian Revolution, all of which were a buildup to jihadism and the formation of Al
Qaeda. Another exciting thing about this topic is the US response to the 9/11 attacks, mainly
the endless wars on terror that began under the Bush administration. I like analyzing the
incentive structures of the players involved in getting the US into Iraq and Afghanistan and how
those wars have continued to impact communities in those countries decades into the future. I
do not have a personal connection to New York or the Middle East, but I think that New York is a
place I want to travel to simply because it is a beacon of the American economy for the entire
world.
2) I chose the specific activity of a museum visit because I wanted the ability to, despite doing
this virtually, actually talk to someone and ask them questions. If I had just watched a
documentary or movie about 9/11, while many of my questions would be answered, those
would only spur new questions without allowing me to ask those questions to anyone and
engage in discussions about them. Having a tour guide who is knowledgeable about the subject
will enable me to not only ask them questions but engage in debates and talks about the topic,
which I think is much more productive.
3) I started by researching if there were any tours of the 9/11 Memorial Museum, and it turns
out they were doing virtual tours. I booked one for Monday, Feb 15, at 12PST and just joined the
zoom link to complete the activity.
4) I think the main question that this activity raised for me about the topic is to what degree the
US is responsible for the attacks on 9/11. Another question is if the US response to 9/11
regarding the war on terror was justified, particularly the invasion of Iraq. I would not have done
anything differently, as I thought I did a good job asking questions and discussing with the tour
guide. I did not miss any crucial details in my original plan, and if someone followed them, I
think they would be fully immersed in the topic.
5) If I were traveling to learn about the topic in person, my experience would have been
different because I would have seen many artifacts and historical figures shown on the camera
in person. This would have been different compared to learning it from home because there is a
lot more engagement and walking around necessary, so it overall makes it easier to pay
attention the entire time as online, there were some seconds where I lacked the motivation to
pay attention. I would not face a significant language barrier, as even when the tour guide was
talking into a microphone, I could understand and hear them perfectly. I did not learn more
about a part of the world that is hazardous and hard to reach because New York has plenty of
modes of transportation, so it is easy to get to. Traveling in person would have changed the kind
of immersion I was willing to take on because I probably could have done some simulations in
person about what it felt like to be in the building on 9/11 and overall more interactive
activities.
6) My activities did open a topic I would like to explore more in the future and it is how much
should the US get involved militarily in regions such as the Middle East, as we saw the
consequences of anti-american sentiment play out with 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq which created ISIS. I feel motivated to engage with this topic in person in the future by
maybe talking with soldiers who served in these conflicts and seeing what their perspective
was. Were they proud to serve the US despite not believing in what they were fighting for? Did
they believe in what they were fighting for? What did they think they were fighting for in the
first place? These are all questions I would ask soldiers who served in these wars on Terror.
7) One interesting fact I learned during the tour was about how the raid was conducted in May
of 2011 against Osama bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda and organizer of the 9/11 attacks. I
learned about how the seal 6 agents saw a pacer figure that represented bin Laden in many
ways, so even though they did not know 100% that it was him, they went and did the raid
anyway. After autopsies and genetics testing, it was confirmed the killed man was indeed
Osama Bin Laden. Another interesting fact I learned during the tour was about the slurry wall
technique. Essentially, since these trade towers were built next to the Hudson River, the
construction company had to be careful not to take away so much land that the river would
flood the whole city. Thus, they decided to create a giant wall of concrete to retain water, called
the slurry wall technique. This ensured that water wouldn’t get in while building the Twin
towers, and the destruction actually damaged part of this wall on 9/11. Thankfully, responders
could patch it back together to prevent flooding quickly. Another thing I learned was that the
events of 9/11 were foreshadowed. Apparently, in 1993, a group of terrorists drove up to the
twin towers with a truck full of explosives and detonated it, which killed 6 people and left over
1000 injured. Those six people were put on a fountain memorial, but then on 9/11, that
memorial was destroyed so their names got added to the 9/11 memorial. Another thing I
learned was about the destruction of an elevator shaft on 9/11, where the cables became
exposed and protruded because the elevator motor was blown off. These elevators at the Twin
towers were incredibly fast, moving at 1600 ft per minute. This meant one could get from top to
bottom in less than a minute. I also learned about a 3-year investigation that happened about
9/11 after the attack done by a subagency under the Department of Commerce. This agency
analyzed how these plane attacks could destroy and collapse entire buildings, and there were a
couple of reasons why. The first was the sheer plane speed, as they traveled at speeds of 400
mph. This destroyed not only external columns but columns at the core of the building, which
ended up dislodging fireproofing. This left the building vulnerable to the second event, where
fires ignited by the jet fuel in the plane burned down the twin towers. In the south tower, the
plane hit the building at more of an angle and at a lower part, which is why even though it was
the 2nd one hit, it was the first to fall.
Download