‐
UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION
‐
August 2002
DIN
22101
GERMAN STANDARD
Continuous conveyors
Belt conveyors for loose bulk materials
Basics for calculation and dimensioning
Supersedes
DIN 22101:1982‐02
ICS 53.040.10
Continuous conveyor – Belt conveyors for loose bulk materials
Basics for calculation and dimensioning
TAKRAF
Printouts from digital database of
TAKRAF GmbH
Reproduction in accordance with DIN Instruction Sheet No. 7.
For information only! Without amendment service!
Continued on
pages 2 to 51
Mining Standards Committee (FABERG) of DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.
Mechanical Engineering Standards Committee (NAM) of DIN
© Din Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Reproduction, even in parts, only
with the explicit permission of the DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.,
Berlin. Sole sale rights of German Standards (DIN‐Normen) are with Beuth
Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin
Ref. No. DIN 22101:2002‐08
Price group 17 Sales No. 0017
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Contents
Page
Preface
1
2
3
4
5
6
6.1
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.4
6.5
6.5.1
6.5.2
7
7.1
7.2
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4
7.2.5
7.3
7.3.1
7.3.2
8
8.1
8.2
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.3
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.4
8.5
8.5.1
8.5.2
8.5.3
2
Scope of application
Referenced standards
Concepts
Symbols and units
Volume flow and mass flow
Resistance to motion and required power for steady operating condition
General
Primary resistances
General
Determination of primary resistance
Determination of a hypothetical friction coefficient f
Secondary resistances
General
Determination of individual secondary resistances
All‐inclusive calculation of secondary resistances
Gradient resistance
Special resistance
General
Determination of individual special resistance
Design and layout of the drive system
General
Location of the drive units, size and number of drive motors
General
Horizontal and slightly inclined installations
Uphill conveying installations
Downhill conveying installations
Installations with downhill and uphill sections
Starting, stopping and holding
Starting
Stopping and holding
Belt tensions and take‐up forces
General
Required belt tensions
General
Minimum belt tensions required for the transmission of pulley peripheral forces
Minimum belt tensions required for the limitation of the belt sag and for correct
belt guiding
Local belt tension variations in top belt and return belt
General
Steady operating condition
Non‐steady operating conditions
Take‐up forces and take‐up distance
Local belt tensions in the upper and lower strand
General
Non‐steady operating conditions
Steady operating condition
4
4
4
5
5
10
12
12
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
17
17
17
17
18
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
21
21
21
22
22
23
23
23
24
25
25
25
25
26
28
28
28
28
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Page
9
9.1
9.2
9.2.1
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.3
9.3.1
9.3.2
10
10.1
10.2
10.3
11
12
12.1
12l2
12.2.1
12.2.2
12.2.3
12.3
12.3.1
12.3.2
12.3.3
13
Distribution of belt tensions across the belt width
General
Transition curves
General
Distribution of belt tensions for textile conveyor belts
Distribution of belt tension for steel cord conveyor belts
Curves
Horizontal curves
Vertical curves
Design and layout of the conveyor belt
General
Design and layout of the tension member
Design and layout of the cover layer
Minimum pulley diameter
Design and layout of transition curves and vertical curve radii
General
Determination of the minimum transition length
General
Conveyor belts with textile plies
Steel cord conveyor belts
Determination of the minimum radius of vertical curves
General
Convex curves
Concave curves
Dimensioning of turnovers
29
29
29
29
30
31
32
32
32
34
34
34
37
38
39
39
40
40
40
40
41
41
41
41
41
Appendix A (for information) Notes
43
Appendix B (for information) Explanations on international standards
48
References
50
3
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Preface
This standard has been prepared by a working group of the working committee “Conveyor Belts” of the
Mining Standards Committee (FABERG).
Appendices A and B are provided for information. Cited appendices are for informational purposes.
This standard relates to the standards ISO 5048:1989, ISO/DIS 3870:1996, ISO 5293:1981, ISO 3684:1990
issued by the International Organisation for Standardization(see appendix B).
Amendments
In comparison with DIN 22101:1982‐02, the following amendments have been incorporated:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
consideration of the resistance to motion and required power ;
altered approach on hypothetical friction coefficients;
introduction of the determination of width‐related distribution of belt tensions;
introduction of a restricted consideration of non‐steady operating conditions
recalculation of safety factors for the design and layout of conveyor belts;
complete revision of the contents of the standard document;
updated list of cited standards;
editorial revision of the standard document.
Previous editions
DIN BERG 2101 Part 1:1933‐07
DIN BERG 2101 Part 2:1933‐07
DIN BERG 2101 Part 3:1933‐07
Din 22101: 1942‐02, 1982‐02
1 Scope of application
This standard contains the fundamentals for the design and layout of belt conveyor installations for bulk
materials. Proceeding from this standard document, major requirements applicable to belt conveyor
components such as drives, brakes and take‐up devices may be specified for particular conveying
conditions. The standard also gives a description of the design and dimensioning of the conveyor belt.
2 Referenced standards
This standard includes dated and undated references to standard specifications from other publications.
References from the documents below are cited in the respective passages. Subsequent amendments or
revisions of published dated references shall be considered as belonging to this standard only if
incorporated by amendment or revision. Undated references shall be applicable in their latest published
version (including amendments).
DIN 15207‐1, Continuous conveyors – Carrying idlers for belt conveyors – Main dimensions for bulk
material idlers.
DIN 22102‐1, Conveyor belts with textile plies for bulk materials – Dimensions, requirements, identification.
DIN 22102‐3, Conveyor belts with textile plies for bulk materials – Permanent belt splices.
4
DIN 22101:2002‐08
DIN 22107, Continuous conveyors – Carrying idler configuration for bulk conveyors –Main dimensions.
DIN 22109‐1, Conveyor belts with textile plies for hard coal mining – Single ply PVG and PVC conveyor belts
for underground mining application – Main dimensions, requirements.
DIN 22109‐2, Conveyor belts with textile plies for hard coal mining – Double ply rubber or PVC belts for
underground mining applications – Main dimensions, requirements.
DIN 22109‐4, Conveyor belts with textile plies for hard coal mining – Double ply rubber belts for surface
mining applications – Dimensions, requirements.
DIN 22110‐3, Test procedure for conveyor belt splices – Determination of the endurance limit of conveyor
belt splices (fatigue test).
DIN 22112‐1, Belt conveyors for underground coal mining – Carrying idlers – Part 1: Dimensions.
DIN 22112‐2, Belt conveyors for underground coal mining – Carrying idlers – Part 2: Requirements.
DIN 22121, Conveyor belts with textile plies for hard coal mining – Permanent belt splices for single ply or
double ply conveyor belts – Dimensions, requirements, identification.
DIN 22129‐1, Steel cord belts for underground hard coal mining – Dimensions, requirements.
DIN 22129‐4, Steel cord belts for underground hard coal mining – Belt splices – Dimensions, requirements.
DIN 22131‐1, Steel cord belts for general handling technology – Dimensions, requirements.
ISO 3684 : 1990‐3, Conveyor belts – Determination of minimum pulley diameters.
3 Concepts
This standard shall be applicable within the definition of the following concept:
3.1
Belt conveyor
Continuous belt conveyors for bulk materials with circulating conveyor belts which feature tension
members of textile or steel cord ply and cover layers of rubber or plastic (e.g. in accordance with DIN
22101‐1, DIN 22109‐1, DIN 22109‐2, DIN 22109‐4, DIN 22129‐1 and DIN 22131‐1) supported on carrying
idlers (e.g. in accordance with DIN 15207‐1, DIN 22112‐1 and DIN 22112‐2) and driven or braked by
friction grip via pulleys and driving belts where appropriate (arrangement of the carrying idlers e.g. in
accordance with DIN 22107).
4
Symbols and units
Symbol
A
A1
A2
AGr
B
C
Table 1 – Symbols and units
Meaning
Cross section of fill
Partial cross section of slope above water fill
Partial cross section with β=0 (water fill)
Efficient contact area between belt cleaner and belt
Belt width
Coefficient for all‐inclusive consideration of secondary resistances
Unit
m²
m² (mm²)a)
m² (mm²) a)
mm²
mm²
‐
5
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Symbol
DTR
ELGk
Fa
FAuf
FE
FGa
FGb
FGr
FH
FN
FR
FRst
FS
FSch
FSchb
FSp
FSt
FT
FTm
FTm
FTr
FT1
FT2
FW
H
Im
Im,N
IV
IV,N
L
PW
PM
PM,N
Ra
Re
6
Table 1 (continued)
Meaning
Pulley diameter
Modulus of elasticity of all load‐carrying belt plies (belt core) related to the
width of the belt
Portion of belt tension caused by acceleration/deceleration
Inertia resistance and frictional resistance between material conveyed and
belt at the feeding point
Indentation rolling resistance
Resistance of material transfer devices arranged in the stretch of the
installation
Bending resistance of conveyor belt
Friction resistance resulting from belt cleaners
Total of primary resistances of upper strand and lower strand
Total of secondary resistances
Running resistance of carrying idlers
Camber resistance
Total of special resistances
Frictional resistance between material conveyed and lateral chutes outside
the acceleration zone of feeding points
Frictional resistance between material conveyed and lateral cutes in the
acceleration zone of a feeding point
Tension at the axis of the take‐up pulley
Total gradient resistance
Local belt tension (strand tension)
Mean belt tension of upper strand and lower strand
Difference between mean belt tension FTm and belt tension minimum
FT, min
Total of driving forces on pulley periphery
Maximum belt tension (strand tension) at drive pulley
Minimum belt tension (strand tension) at drive pulley
Total resistance to motion of upper and lower strand in steady operating
condition
Lift of the conveyor (H>0 for uphill conveying, H<0 for downhill conveying)
Mass flow
Nominal mass flow
Volume flow
Nominal volume flow
Axial distance
Total power required on the periphery of drive pulley(s) in steady
operating condition due to motional resistance
Total power of driving motors
Nominal drive motor capacity
Radius of concave vertical transition curve
Radius of convex vertical transition curve
Unit
mm
N/mm
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
kg/s
kg/s
m3/s
m3/s
m
kW
kW
kW
m (mm)a)
m (mm)a)
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Symbol
S0
S1
a
b
bS
bSch
cR
cRank
cRst
cSchb
cTr
cÜ
dAb
dGk
e
eK
eM
f
g
h
hrel
hK,0
hK,1
hTr
k
kK
kM
kN
kt
kt,rel
k
L
lb
Table 1 (continued)
Meaning
Belt safety factor taking into account the splicing conditions
Belt safety factor taking into account the expected service life and
operating loads
Acceleration or deceleration
Usable belt width
Belt portion on wing roller (applicable to 2‐part and 3‐part troughed idlers)
Clear width between chutes
Coefficient for the calculation of the masses of carrying idlers related to
their periphery
Rankine factor
Coefficient for the calculation of camber resistance
Coefficient for the taking into overall account of additional resistance
between material conveyed and lateral chutes in the feeding zones caused
by dynamic pressure of the mass flow fed in
Coefficient for the determination of the minimum pulley diameter
Coefficient for the determination of the transition length
Cleaner blade thickness
Thickness of longitudinal tensile member (without e.g. upper warp and
weft)
Base of natural logarithms (e = 2.71828…..)
Distance from the centre line of belt plies at the edge of the belt to the
neutral axis of the belt
Distance from the centre line of belt plies at the centre of the belt to the
neutral axis of the belt
Hypothetical friction coefficient
Acceleration due to gravity (g = 9.81 m/s2)
Height difference of a part section
Maximum belt sag, related to the distance between carrying idler centres
Distance from the belt edge to the deepest level of the trough
Distance from the belt edge to the pulley surface level
Lift of the pulley in the transition zone above the deepest level of the
trough
Belt tension related to belt width
Belt tension related to belt width at the belt edge
Belt tension related to belt width in the middle of the conveyor belt
Nominal rupture force of the belt related to belt width
Reference endurance strength of the belt splice
Relative endurance strength of the belt splice
Difference between width‐related belt tension at the edges and in the
middle of the conveyor belt
Length of a part section
Length of the acceleration path in the feeding zone
Unit
‐
‐
m/s2
mm
m
m
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
mm
mm
‐
mm
mm
m/s2
M
‐
Mm
Mm
Mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
N/mm
‐
N/mm
m
m
7
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Symbol
lk
lM
lSch
l
lR
lü
LÜ,c
lW
Σm
n
pGr
pA
pA,0
pB
pB,0
q
sB
sSp
tB
v
v0
zL
zM
zR
zR, st
α
β
βdyn
8
Table 1 (continued)
Meaning
Length of the belt edge in the transition zone
Length of the shell of the central idler in a 3‐part carrying idler
arrangement
Length of lateral chutes
Elongation of belt in the part section of length l
Distance between carrying idler centres
Length of transition zone
Reference length of the transition zone for steel cord conveyor belts
Length of belt turnover
Total of translatorially moving masses, non‐driven and non‐braked rotating
masses related to their periphery
Line load resulting from the conveyor belt
Line load resulting from the material conveyed assuming a uniform load
distribution across the entire conveying path
Line load resulting from nominal load
Line load resulting from rotating idler parts
Number of part sections of one conveyor
Pressure between belt cleaner and belt
Start up factor related to the drive pulley: ratio of the peripheral force
occurring at the pulley FTr,A, max in the start up phase and the force FW,max
decisive for the dimensioning of the conveyor
Start up factor related to the drive: ratio of the drive torque resulting from
the effective drive characteristic during the start up phase of the conveyor
and the nominal motor torque corresponding to the installed motor power
PM, inst
Braking factor related to the brake drum: ratio of the peripheral force
occurring at the brake drum FTr,B and the force FW,max decisive for the
dimensioning of the conveyor
Brake related deceleration factor: ratio of brake the torque resulting from
the brake characteristic and nominal motor torque corresponding to the
installed motor power PM, inst
Coefficient for the determination of primary resistance
Braking distance
Take‐up pulley travel
Braking time
Conveying speed
Feeding (advance) speed in the direction of conveying
Number of belt plies
Number of motors installed
Number of carrying idlers in one part section (upper strand or lower
strand)
Number of carrying idlers of one part section (upper or lower strand) set at
a tilt
Angle of pulley belt wrap
Equivalent angle of slope for the calculation of partial cross‐section A1th
Actual dynamic angle of slope of the material conveyed
Unit
m
mm (m)a)
m
m
m
m
m
m
kg
kg/m
kg/m
kg/m
kg/m
‐
N/mm2
‐
‐
‐
‐
m
m
s
m/s
m/s
‐
‐
‐
‐
° or rad
°
°
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Table 1 (continued)
Symbol
Meaning
δ
Conveyor slope angle (δ>0 for uphill conveying, δ<0 for downhill
conveying)y
ε
Angle of tilt of the carrying idlers
ΔεK
Additional elongation (pos. or neg.) at the edge of the belt on concave or
convex transition curves
ΔεKoo
Limiting value of ΔεK at the centre of very long transition curves
ΔεM
Additional elongation (pos. or neg.) at the centre of the belt on concave or
convex transition curves
ΔεM
Limiting value of ΔεM at the centre of very long transition curves
ΔεMoo
Difference of elongation at the belt edge and at the centre of very long
transition curves
ηges
Overall efficiency of all transmission members between motor shaft and
pulley shaft
λ
Trough angle of the conveyor belt in the upper strand or lower strand
μ
Friction coefficient between belt and pulley
μ1
Friction coefficient between belt and material conveyed
μ2
Friction coefficient between material conveyed and lateral chutes
μ3
Friction coefficient between belt and carrying idler
μ4
Friction coefficient between belt and belt cleaner
ρ
Bulk density of material conveyed
φ
Effective filling ratio
φ Betr
Filling ratio corresponding to the operating conditions of the conveyor
φ St
Reduction factor of filling ratio for the theoretical total cross section Ath in
case of inclined installations
φ St,1
Reduction factor of filling ratio for the theoretical partial cross‐section Atth
in the case of inclined installations
a)
In some formulas these variables are used with the unit mentioned in brackets.
Subscript
A
B
A
eff
erf
i
j
inst
max
min
o
red
th
u
*
Unit
°
°
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
°
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
kg/m3
‐
‐
‐
‐
Table 2 – Subscript
Meaning
during starting
during stopping
non‐steady operating condition (acceleration, deceleration)
effective
required
running subscript of the belt strand sections
running subscript of the belt deflection points
installed
maximum
minimum
upper strand
reduced
theoretical
lower strand
running subscript for the identification of operating conditions
9
DIN 22101:2002‐08
5 Volume flow and mass flow
The maximum volume flow and mass flow of a belt conveyor installation shall be determined by the
potential cross section of fill, and the latter is dependent on the dynamic angle of slope of the material
conveyed and on the feeding conditions, amongst other factors.
For the calculation of the maximum volume flow and mass flow, a simple equivalent geometrical cross
section needs to be found. This theoretical cross section Ath is calculated from the shape of the conveyor
belt on the carrying idlers and from the shape of the slope formed by the material conveyed. Figure 1
shows the cross section of a belt supported by a troughed 3‐part carrying idler arrangement.
Picture 1 – Theoretical cross section of fill in the case of horizontal conveying
and 3‐part carrying idler arrangement
The theoretical cross section of fill is dependent on the length of the carrying idlers and on their
arrangement (through angle), useful belt width b and equivalent slope angle β describing a cross section
of exactly the same surface area as the actual one. In this case, the useful belt width b shall be calculated
as follows dependent on the belt width B :
B ≤ 2000mm
B > 2000mm
b = 0.9 x B – 50 mm
B = B – 250 mm
(1)
(2)
The useful belt width of belt conveyors with horizontal curves and inclined idlers installed to stabilize the
belt may appear to be smaller.
With 1‐part, 2‐part and 3‐part carrying idler arrangements of horizontal belt conveyors the equivalent
theoretical cross section of fill Ath of the real cross section of fill can be established proceeding from angle
β as the sum of partial cross sections A1,th and A2,th (see [1], figure 1 and appendix A):
(3)
10
DIN 22101:2002‐08
(4)
The selection of an equivalent slope angle depends on the material to be conveyed as well as on the
length of the conveying distance. In case of lacking experience in selecting an adequate slope angle, the
following standard values can be applied:
The value will be β = 20° for materials with normal flow properties. Values β = 20° and smaller values
down to β = 0° will be characteristic for almost liquid materials. Equivalent slope angles of more than 20°
can be applied only in case of materials with high internal friction.
1‐part and 2‐part carrying idler arrangements shall be calculated applying a central roller length of lM = 0 .
The following parameters can be calculated proceeding from the theoretical cross section fill:
theoretical volume flow
(5)
proceeding from the effective filling ratio
nominal volume flow
(6)
nominal mass flow
(7)
line load resulting from nominal load
(8)
The filling level φBetr depends on:
‐‐ properties of material conveyed
‐‐ lumpy condition;
‐‐ max. edge length;
‐‐ dynamic angle of slope β dyn (characterizing the actual dynamic property of the slope);
‐‐ operating conditions of the conveyor
‐‐ uniform material feeding;
‐‐ rectilinear belt travel;
‐‐ available reserve capacity
The theoretical cross section fill can be utilized almost thoroughly (φ = φBetr = 1), if uniform feeding of
material and straightforward belt movement is ensured.
The reduction factor φSt takes into consideration that the partial cross section A1,th is reduced under
downhill conveying conditions:
(9)
A properly aligned belt loaded with less lumpy material and δmax ≤ βdyn can be calculated as follows:
11
DIN 22101:2002‐08
(10)
Applying the above equations (9) and (10) it must be noted that the angle of slope for downhill conveying
cannot be higher than the actual dynamic angle of slope angle βdyn (see also appendix A), and that only
partial cross section A2,th is available for conveying.
6 Resistance to motion and required power for steady operating condition
6.1 General
The method described below for the determination of motional resistance and required power and the
local belt tensions yields fairly realistic results for state‐of‐the‐art technology, even complex conveyor
installations and any imaginable operating conditions.
Experienced design engineers may simplify the calculation method for ordinary belt conveyors with
manageable operating conditions not requiring a high degree of accuracy, provided that safety aspects
will be met.
Prior to calculating the resistance to motion, individual base values must be estimated. These values shall
be checked and corrected, if necessary, after completing the calculation. The calculation shall be repeated
as many times as necessary to match the results with the input values.
In the steady operating conditions, forces resisting belt movement (resistance to motion) FW are
calculated by the summation of friction, weight and mass forces. Required power for the conveyor PW is
calculated as a product of both the so determined resistance to motion and the conveying speed.
P W = FW . v
For the calculation of motional resistances, the following distinction is indispensable
‐‐ primary resistance FH
‐‐ secondary resistance FN
‐‐ gradient resistance FSt,
‐‐ special resistance FS
The sum of the above types of resistance to motion FW is equal to the pulley peripheral force FTr to be
transmitted to the belt:
(12)
The above resistance shall be established for individual sections. Each part section is characterized by
constant parameters , e.g. conveyor inclination δ , hypothetical friction coefficient f and line load due to
material to be conveyed mL, and rotating parts for both the upper and lower strand. Hence it is advisable
– particularly with regard to computer calculations – to assign a running subscript i to the start points and
end points of all part sections of the conveyor installation, starting from the tail station towards the head
station.
12
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Upper strand values shall be identified by subscript o, lower strand values by subscript u (see figure 2). In
order to maintain the assigned descriptions, belt deflection points and their parameters shall be identified
by subscript j (see figures 2 and 5).
6.2 Primary resistances
6.2.1 General
Primary resistance occurs across the entire length of the conveyor stretch. The parameters of primary
resistance shall be established for individual sections.
Head
Station
Direction of conveying ‐‐‐‐‐
Tail
Station
Figure 2 – Part sections and calculation of motional resistances
for individual sections
6.2.2 Determination of primary resistance
Primary resistances FH,i of all part sections are to be established separately for the upper and lower
strand of each individual part section, in a simplified manner assuming a linear relation between
resistance and moved load:
(13)
The primary resistances of the upper strand part sections FH,o,i and lower strand part sections FH,u,i are
indispensable for the determination of belt tensions (see 8.3).
The primary resistance of the conveyor can be calculated as follows:
(14)
Primary resistances shall be calculated for the nominal loading range (filling ratio ϕ for range 0.7 to 1.1) of
belt conveyors with downhill and uphill sections, and for extreme loads (non‐uniform load, partial load or
idling) as the cumulative resistance determined under these conditions may significantly exceed the
resistance arising under nominal conditions.
6.2.3 Determination of a hypothetical friction coefficient f
The selection of a hypothetical friction coefficient f is of major importance as regards the magnitudes of
primary resistance. This is the more important for conveyors with small gradient resistance. Attempts to
be on the safe side with the calculation, inaccurate descriptions of the operating features and a large
range of values characterizing the friction coefficient f as indicated in table 4 inevitably leads to
considerable overdimensioning, in certain cases. In order to avoid disproportional dimensioning, friction
coefficients f should be established as precisely as possible for the individual part sections.
13
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The friction coefficient f is defined mainly by the rolling resistance of the carrying idlers and the
indentation rolling resistance. Also the flexing resistance may have a large share, if the sag of the conveyor
belt is relatively deep.
For a more precise determination of the friction coefficient f the idler rolling resistance and the
indentation rolling resistance can be measured under given marginal conditions, and all other resistances
may be estimated (see [2], [3], [4] and [5]). With a normal magnitude of flexing resistance the above
mentioned two measurable values of the loaded strand (usually of the upper strand) range between 50%
and 85%, on average 70% of the friction resistances. They amount to approx. 90% of the friction resistance
values of the unloaded strand (usually of the lower strand). This approach means:
upper strand
(15)
lower strand
(16)
with 0.5 ≤ qo ≤ 0.85, on average qo = 0.7
and qu = 0.9.
The guiding principle for the estimate of coefficient qo can be seen from table 3.
Table 3 – Standard values for coefficient q0
Criterion
Relative sag hrel
Internal friction of material conveyed
Running resistance of carrying idlers
Indentation rolling resistance
Coefficient q0
medium
medium
medium
medium
standard value ≈
0.7
Classification
heavy, but ≤ 0.01
little
high
low
low
high
low
high
means
decreasing
increasing
coefficient q0
down to / up to
0.5
0.85
If there are neither measured values nor experience you can rely on, standard values of f may be selected
from table 4 depending on the operating conditions and design features (confer also appendix A) (see
[6]). These standard values are based on numerous combined upper and lower strand measurements and
for the following limiting conditions:
‐‐ 3‐part rigid upper strand carrying idlers;
‐‐ carrying idlers with antifriction bearings and labyrinth seals;
‐‐ values of relative belt slag hrel ≤ 0.01;
‐‐ filling ratios ϕ in the range from 0.7 to 1.1 .
14
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Table 4 – Standard values for coefficient f of belt conveyor installations
with filling ratios φ in the rage from 0.7 to 1.1
Criterion
Internal friction of material to be
conveyed
Belt conveyor alignment
Belt tension
Operating conditions (dusty, sticky)
Idler diameter
Spacing of upper strand idlers in m
Spacing of lower strand idlers in m
Belt speed in m/s
Trough angle in °
Ambient temperature in °C
Friction coefficient f
medium
medium
medium
Medium
108 to 159
1.0 to 1.5
2.5 to 3.5
4 to 6
25 to 35
15 to 25
standard value
≈ 0.020
Classification
low
good
high
good
>159
<1.0
<2.5
<4
<25
>25
high
bad
low
bad
<108
>1.5
>3.5
>6
>35
<15
means
decreasing
increasing
friction coefficient f
down to / up to
0.010
0.040
The application of the above friction coefficients f in the calculation of primary resistance according to
equation (13) is acceptable only if there are no strict requirements concerning high accuracy of the
calculation.
When the drives function as dynamos, an assumed smaller friction coefficient f means higher safety
with regard to the dimensioning; whereas for drives functioning as motors this effect will be achieved by
assuming a larger friction coefficient f .
6.3 Secondary resistances
6.3.1 General
Secondary resistances include friction resistances and steady‐state resistances arising only in some places
on the conveyor. Secondary resistances FN are calculated from several individual resistances:
6.3.2 Determination of individual secondary resistances
Steady‐state resistance of material conveyed and friction resistance between material conveyed and
the belt in the feeding zone
FAuf = lm . (v ‐ v0)
(17)
Friction resistance between conveyor belt and lateral chutes in the acceleration zone of a feeding point.
15
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Figure 3 – Chute configuration
The following applies to feeding points with 3‐part idler arrangements and bSch > lM (see [6]):
(18)
for 0 ≤ v0 ≤ v
(19)
with
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
(20)
lM = bSch shall be applied for bSch ≤ lM ;
lM = 0 shall be applied for 2‐part carrying idler arrangements;
lM = bSch shall be applied for 1‐part carrying idler arrangements;
The following approach applies to other carrying idler arrangements (e.g. 5‐part carrying idlers):
‐‐ a) determination of the height of material pressing against lateral chute walls proceeding from
the volume flow and average conveying speed in the feeding zone (v + vo)/2 ;
‐‐ b) determination of wall pressure as potentially caused by a fluid pressing against the side walls of
the chute.
If applicable, multiply with cSchb and cRank;
‐‐ c) determination of friction resistance from average wall pressure, friction coefficient and size of wall
areas.
The following applies to belt conveyors of customary design:
cSchb . cRank = 1 (see appendix A)
As a general rule, friction coefficient μ1 and µ2 are in the range from 0.5 to 0.7.
Friction resistance caused by belt cleaners
In case the belt is cleaned with scraper bars, friction resistance can be determined as follows:
FGr = µ4 . ρGr . AGr
(21)
As a general rule, the contact pressure ρGr is in the range from 0.03 N/mm2 to 0.1 N/mm2, whereas the
friction coefficient µ4 ranges between 0.6 and 0.7, roughly.
16
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The relationship below applies to the calculation of the total of secondary resistance
FN = FAuf + FSchb + FGr
(22)
Further secondary resistances are the bending resistance of the conveyor belt where it runs over a pulley
and the resistance of the bearings of non‐driven pulleys. These secondary resistances are insignificant and
can be neglected in almost all cases compared with the above mentioned resistances. If necessary,
calculation formulas can be taken from the referenced documents (e.g. [1]).
6.3.3 All‐inclusive calculation of secondary resistances
If the portion of secondary resistances in the total resistance is small, e.g. with conveyor lengths
L > 80 m and conveyors with just one feeding point, an all‐inclusive calculation of secondary resistances
from the primary resistances is permissible. The total secondary resistance can be taken into account by
applying coefficient C (see [1]):
FN = (C – 1) . FH
(23)
Coefficient C can be selected from table 5:
Table 5 – Standard values of coefficient C for belt conveyor installations
with filling ratios φ in the range from 0.7 to 1.1
L in m
C
80
1.92
100
1.78
150
1.58
200
1.45
300
1.31
400
1.25
500
1.20
600
1.17
700
1.14
800
1.12
900
1.10
1000
1.09
1500
1.06
≥2000
1.05
6.4 Gradient resistance
The gradient resistance of the conveyor belt and material conveyed can be calculated as follows for each
part section:
(24)
FSt,i = hi . g . (mG + mL,i)
whereas the total gradient resistance is calculated as follows
(25)
applying hi = li . sin δi
(26)
(for uphill belt travel: hi > 0; δi > 0 ; for downhill belt travel: hi < 0; δi < 0)
6.5 Special resistance
6.5.1 General
Special resistances FS are resistances that do not occur with all belt conveyors. These resistances are
calculated proceeding from several individual resistances (see appendix A).
The special resistances of a part section i are composed of:
FS,i = FRst,i + FSch.i + FGa,i
(27)
17
DIN 22101:2002‐08
and the values of upper strand and lower strand part sections are to be determined and cumulated in
order to determine the total value for the entire conveyor:
(28)
6.5.2 Determination of individual special resistance
Camber resistance
The camber resistance which arises at an individual side carrying idler will depend on its normal force, on
the friction coefficient µ3 between the belt and the carrying idler, and also on the angle of tilt ε . The
camber resistance FRst,i in part section i of the conveyor is then obtained from the total of individual
camber resistances, and taking the angle of inclination δi of the installation into consideration:
(29)
As a general rule, the friction coefficient µ3 is in the range from approx. 0.5 to 0.7.
In the above relationship, the parameters cRst,i are dependent on the on the carrying idler arrangement
and, in the case of the upper strand, the parameter is dependent in addition on the geometry of the bulk
material. In the case of 3‐part carrying idler arrangements with idlers of equal length in the upper strand,
and with filling ratios ϕ in the range from 0.7 to 1.1 (see [7]):
cRst,o = 0.4 for λ = 30°
cRst,o = 0.5 for λ= 45°
The following applies to 2‐part troughed carrying idlers in the (unloaded) lower strand:
cRst,u = cos λ
Friction resistance between the conveyor belt and the lateral chutes outside the feeding points
The relationship below applies to 3‐part carrying idler arrangements (see figure 3) and
bSch > lM:
(30)
As a general rule, the friction coefficient µ2 is in the range from 0.5 to 0.7 .
lM = bSch shall be applied for bSch < lM ;
lM = 0 shall be applied for 2‐part carrying idler arrangements;
lM = bSch shall be applied for 1‐part carrying idler arrangements;
Resistance FGa of material transfer devices arranged along the stretch of the installation
If, in special cases, material is discharged laterally along the conveying path, e.g. through belt cleaners, the
forces occurring in these locations shall be taken into account as special resistance.
18
DIN 22101:2002‐08
7 Design and layout of the drive system
7.1 General
The design and layout of the drive system comprises:
‐‐ the selection of the location and number of drives;
‐‐ decisions relating to starting aids;
‐‐ the sizing of the driving motors (rated output);
‐‐ the determination of the required braking forces (stopping and holding).
7.2 Location of the drive units, size and number of drive motors
7.2.1 General
The subdivision of the drives onto several driving pulleys situated at the head and at the rear of the
installation, and in certain cases also onto intermediate drives, will be determined on the basis of
minimum belt tensions on the belt conveyor installation, inasmuch as no other consideration stand in the
way.
Other aspects may be e.g.:
‐‐ spatial conditions;
‐‐ availability of energy;
‐‐ driving and braking options.
In order to ensure minimum belt tensions, the type and arrangement of drives must be suitably selected
to ensure favourable magnitudes and local distribution of motional resistance Fw,o for the upper strand
and Fw,u for the lower strand in the steady operating condition . Relevant variations of belt tensions
occurring in the direction of belt travel can be calculated by the summation of the resistance portions
form the part sections i of the conveyor in accordance with equation (12).
Here we have:
(31)
In the case of extreme loading (non‐uniform loading, partial load or idling) of a belt conveyor installation
with downhill and uphill grade stretches, the force Fw determined for the nominal loading range may be
exceeded to a considerable degree (see subclause 6.2.2):
|FW,max| = |FW,o + FW,u|max ≥ |FW|
(32)
|PW,max| ≥ |PW|
(33)
Motors shall be selected proceeding from the a.m. extreme power requirement, however in due
consideration of the thermal rating of the motors.
7.2.2 Horizontal and slightly inclined installations
FW,o > 0 , FW,u > 0 ( for uniformly loaded upper strand)
In the case of belt conveyor installations with drives at the installation head and rear, but without
intermediate drives, the belt tensions will be minimum if the drive power is appropriately subdivided
between head, i.e. by proportional distribution of the motional resistance occurring in the
19
DIN 22101:2002‐08
upper and lower strand. The required total power of the driving motors can be calculated with the aid of
the following equation:
(34)
The rated motor power actually installed is, as a general rule, greater than the required power:
PM,inst ≥ PM, erf.
7.2.3
(35)
Uphill conveying installations
FW, o > 0 , FW, u ≤ 0 (for uniformly loaded upper strand)
In such installations, the belt tensions will be minimum if all the drives are arranged at the head of the
installation, assuming that no intermediate drives are installed.
PM, erf. and PM, inst. can be calculated applying the equations (34) and (35).
7.2.4
Downhill conveying installations
FW, o ≤ 0 , FW, u > 0 (for uniformly loaded upper strand)
In these installations, it is essential to install the drives at the rear end of the installation in order to obtain
minimum belt tensions. For the purpose of determining to total power of the drives, the required power
of the driving motors at the motor shafts shall be calculated as follows depending on whether the drives
operate as motors (PW, max > 0) or dynamos (PW, max < 0) :
PM,erf = PW, max . ηges
for PW, max > 0
(36)
for PW, max < 0
(37)
The above calculations do not yield exact information on the efficiency of the drives. For reasons of safety,
the efficiency ηges applied within the range of the estimate to the drives operating as dynamos should be
higher than that for drives operating as motors.
The rated power of the motors actually installed is, as a general rule, greater than the amount of required
power:
PM, inst ≥|PM, erf|
7.2.5
(38)
Installations with downhill and uphill sections
An appropriate arrangement of the drives for belt conveyor installations with downhill and uphill sections
ensuring minimum belt tensions can be suggested only if all actual conditions are taken into account.
20
DIN 22101:2002‐08
7.3 Starting, stopping and holding
7.3.1
Starting
In order to achieve minimum belt tensions, it is necessary to limit the total pulley peripheral force on stat
up FTr,A generated at the drive end, during run‐up to full speed of the belt conveyor installation. However
the force FTr A must not be allowed to decrease below a given minimum value in order to safeguard the
positive control of the initial breakaway and start‐up process:
‐‐ The maximum pulley peripheral force on stat‐up FTr, A, max. should not exceed 1.7 times the force
FW, max. in accordance with equation (32) used for the determination of the installation design. This means:
acceleration factor ρA ≤ 1.7.
‐‐ In order to accelerate the masses in the upper and lower strand there should, however, be a force
available under the most unfavourable start‐up conditions (loading condition, distribution of load) which
amounts to 20% at least of the primary, secondary and special resistance to be taken into account in order
to ensure the starting of the conveyor within the maximum time period allowed in accordance with the
thermal rating of the drives (see [8]).
This force FTr, A shall be suitably selected to ensure friction grip between the material conveyed and the
conveyor belt tor the corresponding start‐up acceleration aA.
aA ≤ (µ l cos δ i, max ‐ sin δ i, max ) . g
(39)
(for uphill belt travel: δi > 0 ; for downhill belt travel: δi < 0 )
The force FTr, A shall be introduced into the belt slowly enough to ensure that the installation runs up to
full operating speed under quasi steady conditions, and consequently with the smallest possible additional
dynamic forces (see [8] and [9]).
The starting factor ρA, 0 related to the nominal torque of all drive motors shall be applied for the
determination of the starting factor pA in accordance with the relationship below applicable in the case of
relatively small mass inertia torques of the rotating components of drives operating as motors in the
steady operating condition, i.e. for horizontal and uphill conveying installations:
(40)
7.3.2 Stopping and holding
The operation of belt conveyor installations requires the provision of braking equipment, as a general rule,
for the purpose of stopping the moving masses and/or the provision of holding devices for the purpose of
holding inclined installations under load.
The following considerations apply to the design and dimensioning of the braking equipment:
‐‐ total required braking force FTr, B on the braked pulleys
(Braking factor
);
(41)
‐‐ number and arrangement of brakes;
‐‐ braking frequency and braking time or braking distance;
‐‐ energy of the rotating drive components to be absorbed by braking.
21
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The required braking force FTr, B must be determined for the most unfavourable braking conditions
governed by the filling ratio φ and by the distribution of the load in downhill and uphill stretches of the
installation; in this connection, either the braking distance sB or braking time tB must be specified. This
will turn determine the braking retardation aB , which must be such that the friction grip between the
material conveyed and the belt is retained intact. In case of fine‐grained bulk material, we have the
following relationship:
|aB|≤|µ1 . cos δi, max + sin δi, max | . g
(42)
The braking factor ρB0 related to the nominal torque of all drive motors shall be applied for the
determination of the braking factor ρB in the case of relatively mass inertia torques of the rotating
components of drives operating as motors in the steady operating condition, i.e. for horizontal and uphill
conveyors:
(43)
It may be necessary to limit the total braking force to a given value FTr, B, max , and consequently the
braking retardation to a limiting value aB, max , in order to reduce the belt stresses to the lowest possible
figure, and also reduce the stresses on other parts of the installation, and in order to retain intact friction
grip on the braked pulleys (see subclause 8.2.2).
As regards the design and dimensioning of holding devices, the maximum gradient resistance FSt max
liable to arise under maximum permissible loading conditions and most unfavourable load distribution,
shall be used as the base value, minus the main resistance arising under these conditions; for safety
reasons, only the minimum primary resistance anticipated must be entered in the calculation. If a number
of mechanical holdback devices are used, each individual device must be sized for the maximum holding
force likely to arise, if uniform load take‐up is not ensured.
8 Belt tensions and take‐up forces
8.1 General
The belt traction force in a belt conveyor installation is a quantity which varies along the stretch of the
installation, and which is governed by the following influences (see figure 5):
‐‐ length and local course of the installation;
‐‐ number and arrangement of drives;
‐‐ characteristics of the driving and braking equipment;
‐‐ type and arrangement of the belt take‐up device;
‐‐ operating condition (loading and movement conditions).
Belt tensions should be kept down to the lowest possible value in view of the stressing and layout of the
belt and of other parts of the installation.
22
DIN 22101:2002‐08
8.2 Required belt tensions
8.2.1 General
The operation of belt conveyor installations requires minimum belt tensions in order to enable the
transmission of forces to the belt by friction grip on the driving pulleys, and also to limit the belt sag and
to enable the belt o guided correctly.
8.2.2 Minimum belt tensions required for the transmission of pulley peripheral forces
The transmission of the total pulley peripheral forces which arise during starting, braking, or in the steady
operating condition by friction grip on the individual driven or braked pulleys requires certain given
minimum belt tensions at the ascent onto the pulley and at the descent from the pulley. In the case
illustrated in figure 4, with the forces FT1 and FT2 and the associated maximum pulley peripheral force
FTr, max > 0 we have:
Figure 4 – Minimum belt tensions at the belt run‐on point and run‐off point on the drive pulley
required to ensure transmission of the pulley peripheral force FTr, max
FT1 – FT2 = FTr, max
(44)
(45)
Wherein α must be entered in “radian” units.
It follows that:
(46)
FT1 = FT2 + FTr, max
(47)
In the case of more than one driven or brake pulley, it must e verified for each individual pulley and for all
operating conditions whether the friction grip is ensured in accordance with equations (45) and (46). IN
this connection it must be borne in mind that the total pulley peripheral forces FTr, FTr, A or FTr, B are
distributed onto the individual pulleys in the proportion of the torques induced in said pulleys by the
driving or braking equipment.
Recommended friction coefficients µ between belts with rubber cover layer and pulley surfaces of
different finish can be obtained for the steady operating condition from table 6.
23
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Table 6 – Recommended friction coefficients µ between belts with rubber cover layera and pulley
surfaces of different finish (see [10]) applicable to the design and layout of belt conveyor installations
for the steady operating condition
Operating conditions
Metal surface
(plain steel
pulley)
0.35 to 0.4
Friction coefficient
µ
for pulley surface
Polyurethane
Rubber lagging
lagging
(arrow pattern)
(arrow pattern)
0.35 to 0.4
0.4 to 0.45
Ceramic lagging
with pores
(arrow pattern)
0.4 to 0.45
Dry
Wet
(clear water)
0.1
0.35
0.35
0.35 to 0.4
Wet
(with mud and clay)
0.05 to 0.1
0.2
0.25 to 0.3
0.35
a
For conveyor belts with PVC cover layer approx. 10 % less friction coefficients shall be assumed.
8.2.3 Minimum belt tensions required for the limitation of the belt sag and for correct belt guiding
For the purpose of technical optimization of the belt conveyor installation, the calculated maximum
relative belt sag related to the distance between carrying idler centres, must be limited to values less than
0.01 in the steady operating condition; a greater belt sag is tolerated in the non‐steady operating
conditions. The greater the conveying speed and the lumpier the material conveyed, the smaller shall the
sag be. The following minimum belt tensions are required for a given maximum belt sag and a given
distance between carrying idler centres:
upper strand (with load):
(48)
lower strand:
(49)
If a given maximum value of hrel is specified, different distances between carrying idler centres can be
allocated to the belt tension reigning along the path of an installation. When these distances between
centres are finally selected, the load‐carrying capacity of the carrying idlers and the natural oscillations of
the conveyor belt must be taken into account (see [11]).
In order to ensure the trouble‐free operation of belt conveyor installations, it may be necessary to arrange
for the application of higher minimum belt tensions in certain cases, viz:
‐‐ belts with turnover in the lower strand (see [12};
‐‐ belts with a low degree of transverse rigidity;
‐‐ inclined belt conveyor installations at the lower pulley;
‐‐ belts with locally non‐uniform force distribution across the belt width (see clause 9).
24
DIN 22101:2002‐08
8.3 Local belt tension variations in top belt and return belt
8.3.1 General
From the point of view of the correct sizing of the belt and of other parts of the installation, the proper
appreciation of the course or pattern of the belt tension along the length of the installation, and in
particular the ascertainment of the magnitude of the extreme values of the force, are very important
factors. Local belt tensions FT, i can be determined by summation of the motional resistance values FW, i
(see clause 6) and superimposition of the take‐up force (see subclause 8.4) and, if applicable, the
acceleration force Fa, i (see subclause 8.3.3).
Direction of belt travel
Figure 5 – Pulley peripheral forces, resistance to motion and belt tensions
illustrated for a conveyor installation with i = 2 part sections and j = 4 pulleys
8.3.2 Steady operating condition
A calculation of motional resistances FW, i for the individual part sections of a belt conveyor installation in
the stationary operating condition is provided in clause 6.
8.3.3 Non‐steady operating conditions
During the starting and stopping process, the magnitude and pattern of the forces generated by the
driving and braking equipment on the one hand, and the breakaway resistance and motional resistances
of a belt conveyor installation on the other hand result in additional dynamic belt tensions. These
additional tensions are a function of the following factors, if we assume a belt acceleration independent of
local conditions and , hence, quasi steady operating conditions of the conveyor (see also appendix A):
‐‐ the total of pulley peripheral forces FTr, A during starting or FTr, B during stopping;
‐‐ the total of acting motional resistances ( a p p r o x i m a t e l y equal to the motional resistance
occurring under steady operating conditions FW );
‐‐ the non‐driven or non‐braked masses Σm moving either in a straight line or with a rotary motion.
25
DIN 22101:2002‐08
For the frequently occurring case of the secondary resistance representing only a small proportion of the
total resistance, the dynamic belt tension variations Fa, i resulting from acceleration or deceleration can
be determined as follows for an individual part section i with the aid of the belt acceleration a :
starting:
(50)
stopping:
(51)
Fa,i = a . (cR,i . mR,i + mG + mL,i) . li
(52)
Value cR, i depends on the design of the carrying idler. The standard value can be assumed as cR,i = 0.9 .
8.4 Take‐up forces and take‐up distance
Take‐up devices are required for the generation of the necessary take‐up forces (see subclause 8.2) and
for the compensation of the elastic elongations. They must enable the compensation of elastic, plastic,
and thermal length variations of the belt, on one hand, and take‐up excess lengths originating from the
installation process and reserve lengths. The calculation of the take‐up distance provided below takes
into consideration only the portion due to elastic elongation of the conveyor belt.
The magnitude of the take‐up forces will depend on the type and local arrangement of the take‐up device,
and on the installation which requires take‐up adjustments. In view of the design and construction
expenses and complications involved. Preferably, take‐up devices are installed for preference in those
positions where the minimum belt tensions in the steady operating condition are anticipated.
Other aspects to be taken into consideration:
‐‐ availability of energy;
‐‐ local conditions;
‐‐ pre‐tensioning force to be ensured under non‐steady operating conditions;
In principle, a distinction is made between take‐up devices with a fixed take‐up pulley and take‐up devices
with a flying take‐up pulley. Irrespectively of the type of take‐up device the relationship below exists
between the quantities which characterize any g i v e n o p e r a t i n g c o n d i t i o n
(identified by an asterisk *):
‐‐ local belt tensions
(x) and force variations
(x) ;
of belt tension distribution
(x) in accordance with figure 6;
‐‐ mean belt tension
.
‐‐ take‐up pulley take‐up distance
26
DIN 22101:2002‐08
(53)
The most unfavourable operating condition must be selected for the calculation used for sizing take‐up
and take‐up and pulley path
) on the basis of equation (53).
devices (take‐up force
Figure 6 – Belt tensions in the upper strand and lower strand of a belt conveyor installation
with i = 3 part sections and j = 2 pulleys
If the take‐up device is installed at the spot where the minimum belt tensile force
take‐up force
reigns, the
at the take up pulley will be:
=2.
(54)
In cases which deviate from the above, one must additionally take into consideration the force difference
between the force at the sport where the take‐up pulley is actually installed and the force at the spot
where
reigns.
In the case of tensioning devices with a f i x e d t a k e – u p p u l l e y (see also appendix A) the mean
is a constant parameter, independent of the operating condition
belt tension
FTm = const
(55)
This will result in the belt being operated with greater belt tensions than those required according to
subclause 8.2 under operating conditions which deviate from the most unfavourable operating condition.
On the other hand, in the case of take‐up devices with a f l y i n g t a k e u p p u l l e y (see also
appendix A) will either remain the same under all operating conditions (e.g. for gravity take‐up devices)
27
DIN 22101:2002‐08
or will be adjusted to the varying operating conditions by means of “adapted tensioning devices” (e.g. by
will result for
adjustable take‐up winches). In both above cases, suitably altered take‐up pulley paths
the compensation of the e l a s t i c e l o n g a t i o n :
(56)
Take‐up devices shall be suitably designed to prevent the belt from sliding and slipping on the drive pulley
under non‐steady operating conditions, as far as possible (see appendix A).
8.5 Local belt tensions in the upper and lower strand
8.5.1 General
The belt tensions in the steady and in the non‐steady operating conditions of a belt conveyor installation
are decisive amongst other factors for the design and layout of:
‐‐ the conveyor belt;
‐‐ the driving pulleys and return pulleys;
‐‐ the transition curves in the case of concave or convex belt conduction;
‐‐ the transition lengths at the start and finish of the conveyor belt troughings;
‐‐ the belt turnovers;
‐‐ the design of other parts of the belt conveyor installation;
The maximum local belt tension, which must be taken into consideration for the dimensioning of the
conveyor belt, shall be determined taking into consideration of all loading and operating conditions.
8.5.2 Non‐steady operating conditions
For the purpose of determining the local belt tensions in the no‐steady operating conditions, the
minimum belt tensions in accordance with subclause 8.2, the local belt tension variations in accordance
with subclause 6.2 and the additional dynamic belt tensions due to acceleration and deceleration in
accordance with subclause 8.3.3 must be taken into consideration.
As regards the local minimum belt tension FT, min, A or FT, min, B , respectively, which arise during starting and
stopping, respectively, the force FT,min A is, as a general rule, the determining one for the calculation of
belt tensions and for the quantity FT, min under steady operating conditions.
8.5.3 Steady operating condition
The belt tensions in the steady operating condition are determined by the required local minimum belt
tensions in accordance with subclause 8.2 under the most unfavourable loading conditions, as well as by
the local belt tension variations in accordance with subclause 8.3, and they have minimum FT, min .
However there is, as a general rule, a greater minimum FT, min , dependent on the mimima FT, A, min or
FT, B, min which occur during the non‐steady conditions, and dependent also on the type of take‐up device
uses. This consequently results in higher belt tensions than those required under the steady operating
conditions in accordance with subclause 8.2. The so established maximum belt tension FT,max is, as a
general rule, the determining one for the calculation of the conveyor belt. In the case of unfavourable
transitions or curves, even local belt tensions smaller than FT, max may cause extremely high stress across
the belt cross section (see clause 9).
28
DIN 22101:2002‐08
9 Distribution of belt tensions across the belt width
9.1 General
The mean belt tension ki related to the belt width can be calculated in accordance with the relationship
below
(57)
Most of all conveyor belts are designed as troughed belts in order to enable larger cross section fills. For
this purpose, the belts are reshaped from a flat belt into a troughed belt or vice versa (transition zone). In
the transition zones, the belt edges will travel a longer distance than the central zone of the conveyor belt.
Consequently, the rated belt tensions are non‐uniformly distributed across the cross section of the belt;
and the edges must bear a higher portion of the belt tensions than the central zone of the conveyor belt.
The same effect also appears where troughed conveyors belts are routed through convex, vertical curves
of belt conveyor installations. If troughed belts are routed through concave, vertical curves, the central
zone of the belt will be subject to higher tensions, whereas the belt tensions arising at the edges will be
less. In horizontal curves, one side of the belt will be subject to higher tensions than the other one.
The geometry of the transition zone must be suitable designed in for the given belt tensions at the
respective spots so as to avoid impermissible high stress and compression across the entire cross section
of the conveyor belt.
The belt tensions are dependent on the geometry of the curve or transition zone (transition length, curve
radius, through angle, position of pulley surface relative to the deepest level of the trough). That is why
geometrical considerations are of vital importance with regard to the design and layout of the conveyor
belt.
The stresses in the conveyor belt also dependent on the elastic characteristics of the belt and the belt
tensions arising in the a.m. positions. Having carried out the initial calculations required for the design
and layout of the conveyor belt, the geometry of the transitions and curves of the belt conveyor
installation and the characteristics of the conveyor belt can be modified for further optimization (see
clause 12).
9.2 Transition curves
9.2.1 General
If there are no particular requirements, the standard value of minimum transition length shall be
determined as follows:
(58)
lü, min = c0 . hK, 1
With
cü = 8.5 for belts with EP textile plies
cü = 14 for steel cord belts
In this connection, hk, 1 = hK, 0 – hTr is the distance of the belt edge from the pulley surface (see figure 7).
If the pulley is arranged at a higher position, shorter transition lengths or smaller belt tensions can be
achieved. The standard value of maximum pulley lift is hTr, max :
(59)
29
DIN 22101:2002‐08
If the belt pulley is positioned at a lower position longer transitions will be the consequence or,
respectively, higher belt tensions at the edges and lower tensions in the central zone of the conveyors
belt.
Figure 7 – Transition curves
9.2.2 Distribution of belt tensions for textile conveyor belts
Forced length variations of textile conveyor belts are almost completely compensated in the transition
zone. Hence the determination of the elongations and tensions is easier than it is for steel cord belts.
Provided that the belt travels through the transition zone centrally, the following relationship will be
applicable to 2‐part and 3‐part troughed idler sets:
The difference Δk of the width‐related belt tension at the belt edge and in the central zone of the belt
can be rated with the aid of the equation below (see [13)):
(60)
In the above equation lk (see Figure 7) means the belt edge length in the transition zone
(61)
The width‐related belt tension Δk as illustrated in figure 8 can be calculated for
central zone of the belt
(62)
applying
(63)
30
DIN 22101:2002‐08
belt edge
kK = kM + Δk
To avoid compression of the conveyor belt: apply km ≥ 0
(64)
(65)
Legend
a) uniform distribution along the conveyor stretch outside the transitions zones
b) non‐uniform distribution in the transition zone
c) idealized distribution according to the above approach in accordance with relationship (62)
and (64)
Figure 8 – Distribution of belt tensions across the belt width in transition zones
9.2.3 Distribution of belt tension for steel cord conveyor belts
Due to the relatively small elastic elongation of the steel cords of steel‐cord conveyor belts, the effects of
transition zones and convex curves are particularly aggravating as regard the stresses caused to the
conveyor belt and other parts of the belt conveyor installation.
In contrast to the characteristics of textile conveyor belts, forced length variations will be compensated
not only in the zone where they occur, but also along considerably long portions of the adjacent belt.
The stresses occurring with steel‐cord conveyor belts can be calculated very precisely thanks to the results
of pertinent research work (see [12) and [14]). The stress calculation method for steel‐cord conveyor belts
is not only based on the geometry of the transition zone and the modulus of elasticity, but also on the belt
design and modulus of shear of the rubber between the steel cords. This calculation is complex and
therefore requires electronic means. If the approach for the calculation of textile conveyor belts is applied
to steel‐cord belts, the so established belt tensions in the transition zones will be differ from the actual
forces to a considerable extent.
31
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The rough calculation below can be applied to 2‐part and 3‐part troughed idler sets. The following
conditions are assumed for this purpose:
‐‐ The belt design is in accordance with DIN 22129‐1 or DIN 22131‐1 or following these standards.
‐‐ The elastic properties of the belts correspond to latest technical development.
‐‐ The selected length of the transition zone is not smaller than the standard value determined in
accordance with equation (58).
In the calculation of the elongation of the conveyor belt, the elongation of the edge shall not be referred
to a related to the transition length lÜ, but to the length lü, c :
(66)
This, however, is based on the condition that there must be at least a piece of belt with a length lÜ, eff – lÜ
for the compensation of length variations. This condition is not fulfilled, if there is a convex curve adjacent
to the transition zone.
Analogously to equation (60), the difference Δk of width related belt tension k between the belt edge
and central belt zone is calculated as follows:
(67)
and hence, the width‐related belt tension in the central zone kM, ib in accordance with equation (62)
and at the belt edge analogously to equation (64)
kK,i = 1.25 . (kM,i + Δk)
To avoid compression of the conveyor belt:
(68)
apply kM,i ≥ 0.
9.3 Curves
9.3.1 Horizontal curves
In the horizontal plane, changes of direction are only capable of being accommodated to a limited extent,
and they require a relatively cumbersome calculation (see [15]).
9.3.2 Vertical curves
In the case of c o n v e x belt conductance of troughed belts (see figure 9), there will arise additional
elongations of the edge of the belt and contractions of the belt centre, which superimpose themselves on
the elongations causes by the belt tension in the form of positive and negative elongations ΔεK and ΔεM .
On the other hand, in the case of c o n c a v e belt conductance (see figure 9), however, there will arise
additional elongations of the belt centre and contractions of the edge of the belt with magnitudes that will
amount to the same magnitudes as the additional elongations which arise in the case of convex belt
conductance on condition that the belt does not lift off the carrying idlers.
32
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Conveying direction
Figure 9 – Conveyor installation with concave and convex transition curve
The additional elongations resulting from convex and concave transition curves are only capable of being
calculated with a relatively great deal of complexity in the case of short and medium curve lengths with
(see [16]); as far as their magnitude is concerned they are however always smaller than the limiting values
Δ εKoo and Δ εMoo in the middle zone of very long curves, and which are independent of the construction
of the belt, and can be calculated with the aid of table 7 and figure 10 below.
Table 7 – Definition of the limiting values Δ εKoo and Δ εMoo
Limiting values
Transition curve
Convex
Concyve
Δ εKoo
Δ εMoo
Neutral plane
of belt plies
Picture 10 – Aid to the calculation of the limiting values of elongation Δ εKoo and Δ εMoo
at the centre of long convex and concave transition curves
33
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The distances eK and eM of the centre lines of the belt plies from their neutral plane are illustrated in
figure 10. The position of the neural plane can be assumed in this case to pass through the centre of
gravity of the belt plies.
The following approximation formula can be set up for the calculation of the difference of elongations
between the belt edge and the centre of long transition curves for 2‐part and 3‐part troughed carrying
idlers with bS calculated in accordance with equation (63):
Convex curve
(69)
Concave curve
(70)
In this equation, Re – eM or Ra + eM is the curve radius indicated in the design drawings.
Δk = |Δεoo| . ELGk
(71)
Introducing this value Δk in equation (62) and equation (64), the width‐related belt tensions in the
central zone of the belt and at the belt edge can be calculated for textile and steel ‐cord conveyor belts
passing through the curve.
Δk for short and medium curve lengths will be slightly smaller than the result of the above calculation.
The additional elongation of steel cord belts can be determined with sufficient accuracy also for small and
medium curves applying the method in accordance with [16]).
No excessive stresses will arise the in the conveyor belt in concave curves with small radii as the belt will
lift of the idlers (see subclause 12.3.3).
10 Design and layout of the conveyor belt
10.1 General
The tension members and cover layers of a conveyor belt must be selected according to the operating
conditions. Their specification will be governed to a considerable extent by the characteristics of the bulk
material conveyed (physical and chemical characteristics, grain structure) and by the application
conditions of the belt (environmental influences, scheduled service life, mechanical stresses, e.g. at the
feeding points).
10.2 Design and layout of the tension member
The dynamic strength of the conveyor belt verified for vulcanized splices on a test stand according to
DIN 22110‐3 shall form the basis for the selection of conveyor belts and splices. The design and layout
shall be based on the reference endurance strength kt of the splice as defined in the a.m. test procedure
(see [5], [17], [18] and [19]).
34
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The values of the relative endurance strength have been established for splices made and tested under
ideal conditions. Deviations from these conditions, either related to the situation or due to the operating
conditions, shall be taken into account by applying a safety factor s0 which shall be established in
accordance with table 8. Chemical and physical stresses, influences, natural aging and the frequency of
high tensions and bending stresses are represented by factor S1 from table 9.
At this stage, the design and layout shall be based on the highest belt tensions calculated for a belt cross
section in steady operating condition.
High belt tensions, which may arise temporarily when conveyor belts with partial loads are passing
through uphill and downhill stretches of the installation, shall be taken into account. For this purpose a
check must be carried out in accordance with equation (75).
Table 8 – Determination of the safety factor S0 based on the classification of belt splice characteristics
Characteristics of the belt splice
Atmosphere
Protection against sun radiation
Air temperature
Workplace
Labour qualification
Quality of splicing material
Quality of vulcanizing device
S a f e t y f a c t o r S0
normal
normal
moderate
normal
normal
normal
normal
1.1
Classification
dust‐free
dusty
very good
moderate
≥18°C and ≤ 22°C
<10°C and >30°C
roomy
narrow
very good
moderate
fresh
nearly expired shelf life
very good
moderate
means
decreasing
increasing
safety factor down to / up to
1.0
1.2
Table 9 – Safety factor S1 based on the classification of operating conditions
Relevant characteristics
for the dynamic strength of belt and
belt splices
Expected service life
Consequential damage due to failure
Chemical/physical stresses
Starting / stopping procedures
Circulation frequency
S a f e t y f a c t o r S1
Classification
normal
normal
normal
>3/day <30/day
> 2/hour
< 1/minute
1.7
short
small
low
≤3/day
≤ 2/hour
long
large
high
≥30/day
≥ 1/minute
means
decreasing
Increasing
of the safety factor down to / up to
1.5
1.9
Hence the minimum reference endurance stength kt,min of the belt and belt splice can be calculated as
follows:
kt,min = kK,max . S0 . S1
(72)
35
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The relative reference endurance strength of a belt describes the portion of its nominal rupture force kN1)
(73)
The relative reference endurance strength is characteristic for a certain belt type and its splices. It must
therefore be incorporated in the product standards as minimum requirement, in the future.
Table 10 contains the relative values of reference endurance strength for several belt types. The following
aspects must be taken into consideration for the determination for their application:
‐‐ The values for steel‐cord conveyor belts have been verified by numerous tests and can be considered as
as minimum requirements which must be complied with, including evidence of compliance.
‐‐ The values for conveyor belts with textile plies are standard values based on practical experience. Most
probably, these values must be corrected, if a larger number of test results will be available.
The actual reference endurance strength kt proven for a certain belt type and a certain types of splices
can always be applied in the calculation of the minimum force causing belt rupture.
Table 10 – Relative reference endurance strength kt,rel
Belt type
Textile belts with one
single ply
Textile belts with two
plies and thick
intermediate layer
Textile belts with more
than two plies
Textile belts with one
single ply
Textile belts with two
plies
Steel cord belts
Belt design acc. to
DIN 22102‐1
Minimum
rupture force
kN
N/mm
630 to 3150
DIN 22102‐1
200 to 2000
DIN 22102‐1
315 to 3150
DIN 22109‐1
800 to 3150
DIN 22109‐2
800 to 1600
Splicing acc. to
Relative reference
endurance
strength kt,rel
DIN 22102‐3
finger splice
DIN 22102‐3, with
intermediate tension
member
DIN 22102‐3, with
reset splice
DIN 22121
0.35
DIN 22121 with
intermediate tension
member (B)
DIN 22129‐4
0.30
0.35
0.30
0.35
DIN 22129‐1
1000 to 5400
0.45
DIN 22131‐1
Steel cord belts
following
<1000
following
0.45
DIN 22129‐1
>5400
DIN 22129‐4
DIN 22131‐1
a
Please note that the standard values cannot be achieved with aged belts or used belts.
_________________________
1)
The term “Nominal rupture force” cited in this context corresponds to the term “Minimum rupture
force” as applied in the standard documents issued for conveyor belts employed in the hard coal mining
industry and the regulations issued by the Mining authority.
36
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The minimum rupture force characteristic of the belt is calculated as follows applying the highest value kK
in accordance with equation (72) or equation (73) under steady operating conditions:
(74)
In order to avoid extreme stresses in the non‐steady operating condition and under those conditions that
may arise if belts with a partial load are passing through uphill and downhill stretches of the conveyor
installation, it shall be checked that the following limiting conditions are met:
kt,min ≥1.1 . kK,a,max
(75)
If this is not the case, the dimensioning of the endurance member must be corrected applying a higher
value kt = 1.1 – kK,a,max.
According to this method, the tension members of the conveyor belts must be dimensioned proceeding
exclusively from tensile loads. It must be checked whether they will provide a sufficient resistance against
additional stresses and whether their transversal rigidity will be sufficient for supporting the conveyor
belt. They must therefore be designed with higher strength, if necessary.
10.3 Design and layout of the cover layer
The thickness of cover layers shall be suitably selected dependent on the material so as to ensure its
protective function, even with progressing wear during the scheduled service life of the conveyor belt; the
surface structures of the tension member must remain adequately covered (see also appendix A).
If DIN standards and other normative regulations do not provide further details, the standard values for
the minimum thickness of cover layers indicated in table 11 and corresponding additions for the carrying
side of the belt as provided in table 12 may be applied. Certain minimum thickness values are required if a
belt protection (transverse reinforcement) is incorporated in the conveyor layers. In order to avoid
impermissible buckling of the belt, the ratio of the cover layer on the carrying side relative to the cover
layer on the running side should not exceed 3:1.
Table 11 – Standard values for minimum thickness of cover layers
on the carrying side and running side of the belt
Material of longitudinal
tension member
B (cotton)
P (polyamide)
E (polyester)
St (steel cords)
Minimum thickness of cover layer
(standard values)
1 mm to 2 mm depending on the textile structure
0.7 . dGk , at least 4 mm with transverse
reinforcement, possibly more than 4 mm
37
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Table 12 – Determination of the standard values for additions on the minimum thickness
of carrying side cover layers in accordance with table 11
Characteristics and their evaluation
Loading
Loading
frequency
Grain size
Density
Abrasiveness
favourable
average
unfavourable
favourable
average
unfavourable
favourable
average
unfavourable
favourable
average
unfavourable
favourable
average
unfavourable
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Cumulative
evaluation
figures
Additions on minimum
thickness, mm
(standard values)
5 to 6
0 to 1
7 to 8
1 to 3
9 to 11
3 to 6
12 to 13
6 to 10
14 to 15
> 10
11 Minimum pulley diameter
The method described for determining the minimum pulley diameters follows ISO 3684:1990. The idea
behind the determination of minimum pulley diameters is directly linked with the expectations regarding
the service life of the conveyor belt and its splices. The minimum pulley diameters to be determined in
accordance with the method described in this clause allows the assumption that the endurance strength
of splices will be at least equal to the expected service life of the conveyor belt; provided that the splices
are properly executed. Smaller pulley diameters as those determined in accordance with the method
described in this document will lead to premature failure; they also facilitate wear and tear of pulley
surfaces or laggings.
The minimum pulley diameters of a belt conveyor installation will be determined by the design and layout,
stresses and splicing method (see also appendix A). A distinction is made between the following groups of
pulleys when determining the minimum diameters:
‐‐ Group A: driving pulleys and all other pulleys in the zone of high belt tensions;
‐‐ Group B: return pulleys in the zone of low belt tensions;
‐‐ Group C: deflection pulleys (change of direction of bet travel ≤ 30°) .
In so far as no relevant data are contained in DIN standards or other specifications in this connection, the
minimum diameters of pulleys of group A, B and C, and for the four different groups of pulley load factors
provided in table 14, can be determined as follows:
DTr = cTr . dGk
(76)
The factor cTr is a parameter dependent on the material of the tension member according to table 13
below.
38
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Table 13 – Parameter cTr for the determination of the minimum pulley diameter DTr
Material of longitudinal tension member
cTr
B (cotton)
P (polyamide)
E (polyester)
St (steel cords)
80
90
108
145
Each pulley diameter determined in accordance with the above description shall be rounded up to the
next standard value indicated in table 14.
Table 14 – Minimum diameters of pulleys of groups A, B, C in function of the rate of utilization of the
maximum pulley load factors in the steady operating condition
Minimum diameter in mm (without lagging)
DTr
as per
equat.
(76)
in %
Pulley load factor =
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1000
1250
1400
1600
1800
2000
over 100%
Pulley group
A
B
C
125
100
160
125
100
200
160
125
250
200
160
315
250
200
400
315
250
500
400
315
630
500
400
800
630
500
1000 800
630
1250 1000 800
1400 1250 1000
1600 1400 1000
1800 1600 1250
2000 1800 1250
2200 2000 1400
over 60% up to 100%
Pulley group
A
B
C
100
125
100
160
125
100
200
160
125
250
200
160
315
250
200
400
315
250
500
400
315
630
500
400
800
630
500
1000 800
630
1250 1000 800
1400 1250 1000
1600 1250 1000
1800 1400 1250
2000 1600 1250
over 30% up to 60%
Pulley group
A
B
C
A
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1000
1250
1250
1600
1600
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1000
1000
1250
1250
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1000
1000
1250
1250
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
800
1000
1000
up to 30%
Pulley group
B
C
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1000
1000
1250
1250
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
800
1000
1000
12 Design and layout of transition curves and vertical curve radii
12.1 General
Clause 9 deals with the calculation of belt tensions distributed across the belt width proceeding from the
s p e c I f I e d d e s I g n of transition curves or convex curves for the subsequent design and layout of
the conveyor belt. This clause deals with the calculation of suitable transitions and vertical curves suitable
for a s p e c I f I e d b e l t t y p e .
39
DIN 22101:2002‐08
12.2 Determination of the minimum transition length
12.2.1 General
The following applies to 2‐part and 3‐part carrying idlers in accordance with the approach illustrated in
figure 8 and relationship (74):
(77)
(78)
and
Δk = kK,zul ‐kM
12.2.2
(79)
Conveyor belts with textile plies
(80)
(81)
The transition lengths calculated with sufficient accuracy in accordance with the above relationships are
applicable to t e x t I l e c o n v e y o r b e l t s.
12.2.3 Steel cord conveyor belts
Meeting the conditions mentioned in subclause 9.2.3, in particular equation (68), the minimum transition
lengths can be determined in a rough calculation as detailed below:
(82)
Δk is calculated in accordance with equation (79) applying equation (78) and equation (82) .
Applying the definition of lÜ, c in accordance with equation (66) we have:
(83)
(84
40
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Equation (83) and equation (84) may be applied only if there is a piece of belt of sufficient length provided
in front of or behind the belt pulley for the compensation of length variations. If there is e.g. a convex
curve right after a transition, the above condition will be considered as not met. In this case lU, c shall be
replaced by lÜ.
It is recommendable to apply the calculation methods detailed in [14] and [16].
If transitions are arranged in curved zones, elongations resulting from superimposition shall be taken into
consideration.
12.3 Determination of the minimum radius of vertical curves
12.3.1 General
Additional elongations due to convex and concave curves can be determined for small and medium curve
lengths with relatively large efforts only (see [16); however their magnitudes will always be smaller than
the elongations arising in the middle of long curves. These elongations form the basis of the calculations
below.
12.3.2 Convex curves
Proceeding from the assumption that the belt tension in the central zone of the conveyor belt is equal
to 0, the minimum radius of a convex curve can be determined as follows applying the equations (69),
(71), (74):
(85)
12.3.3 Concave curves
In the case of c o n c a v e belt conductance there will arise additional elongations of the belt centre and
contractions of the edge of the belt with magnitudes that will amount to the same magnitudes as the
additional elongations which arise in the case of convex belt conductance on condition that the belt does
not lift off the carrying idlers. Off‐lifting can be avoided if the following minimum radius will be met under
all operating conditions.
(86)
13 Dimensioning of turnovers
Belt turnovers are helpful as they reduce the soiling and wear of the conveyor belt and to improve belt
travel in the lower strand.
The length and type of the belt turnovers are dependent on the following parameters:
‐‐ belt width;
‐‐ belt weight;
‐‐ transverse rigidity;
‐‐ elastic characteristics;
‐‐ conveying speed .
41
DIN 22101:2002‐08
A distinction is made between the types of turnovers of the conveyor belt with different supporting
principles as illustrated in figure 11:
‐‐ free turnover;
‐‐ guided turnover;
‐‐ supported turnover
Free turnover
Guided turnover
Supported turnover
Figure 11 – Design variants for turnovers
Table 15 – Standard values for the dimensioning of turnover lengths lW
Type of belt turnover
Free turnover
Guided turnover
Supported turnover
Max. belt
width
1200
1600
2400
Minimum turnover length
lw
for conveyor belts with
cotton plies
EP plies
steel cord plies
8.B
10 . B
10 . B
12.5 . B
22 . B
‐
10 . B
15 . B
The standard values provided in table 15 will be sufficient if the return strand is subject to low belt
tensions. If this is not the case, a more precise calculation must be carried out (see [12]).
42
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Appendix A
(for information)
Notes
General
The working group assigned to revise the standard DIN 22101:1982‐02 was required to give a simple description of
relationships, wherever possible. This task appeared to be unrealistic. In fact, the current descriptions are even more
complex than those given in the 1982 edition because of new knowledge which needed to be incorporated. The
working group, however, came to the conclusion that comprehensive computerized calculations, which are widely
practicable, should be preferred in order to find improved technical and economical solutions.
Nevertheless, simplified calculation methods are referred to wherever feasible (i.e. in cases not requiring high
accuracy).
Re clause 5
Theoretical cross section fill Ath and equivalent angle of slope ß
The bulk material cross section, in the case of a troughed belt, comprises the “water cross section” and the slope
cross section lying above it. The shape of the slope will depend amongst other factors on the properties of the bulk
material conveyed (e.g. its lumpiness, internal friction, friction coefficient between the conveyor belt and the
material conveyed) and also on the operating conditions of the belt conveyor installation (e.g. type of belt feed,
rectilinear running of the belt, frequency and duration of vibrations (jarring) of the bulk material conveyed). The
slope cross section which actually takes shape is markedly smaller than the cross section given by the static angle of
slope. A calculation of this actual cross section can therefore, as a general rule, only be undertaken under
i d e a l i z i n g a s s u m p t i o n s . In the case of belt conveyor installations with a horizontal layout, the slope cross
section in the German technical literature is nearly always idealized in the form of a triangular cross section, whilst in
International Standard ISO 5048:1989 it is idealized in the form of a segment of a circle.
The working group considered the adoption of the above approach according to ISO 5048 and its incorporation in
this revision, but finally refrained from this intention for the following reasons:
‐‐ The latest editions of international and German normative standards take a triangular cross section as basis for
similar examinations (see ISO 7189 or DIN 22200).
‐‐ ISO 3435 proceeds from “angle of repose” instead of referring to the “surcharge angle” (as mentioned in ISO
5048).
‐‐ Hence it can be assumed that the next revision of ISO 5048 will be converted to an idealized triangular cross
section.
Reduction factor φst
When using the determination equation (10), it must be borne in mind that the equivalent angle β = 15° used in a
large number of calculations of the cross section of fill, represents a precautionary value. In order not to be placed in
the position of assessing far too low cross sections of fill by using this value in the case of inclined installations, it will
be necessary to calculate the factor φst which is dependent on the inclination, with an angle of slope βdyn can come
close to the static angle of slope (the angle of internal static friction). If accurate values are required in borderline
cases, such values must be determined by tests under conditions which approximate the true application conditions
as closely as possible. .
Re subclause 6.2
For the calculation of resistances, even complex determination equations are not excluded since computerized
calculations of this type are widely practicable.
Unlike in DIN 22101:1982‐02, preference
i n d i v i d u a l s e c t i o n s of a conveyor belt.
is
given
to
the
determination
of
resistances
for
43
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The simplest conceivable layout of a belt conveyor installation consists of two sections only: upper strand and lower
strand. The simplifying a belt conveyor installation with uphill and downhill part sections as an installation with only
two part sections may yield extremely wrong results. (This issue has already been addressed in the edition DIN
22101:1982‐02, subclause 8.1, however without suggesting a method for the correct determination of primary
resistance in each section.)
Re subclause 6.2.2
In order to enable a high degree of accuracy of design and layout, the hypothetical friction coefficient f should be
determined more precisely by measuring two major friction portions, i.e.
‐‐ the indentation rolling resistance of the conveyor belt,
‐‐ the idler running resistance
and by giving an estimate of the remaining portions (see [5]).
The standard values provided in table 4 can be used for a rough determination of the resistances arising in the
individual sections.
Figure A.1 shows an example of the portions of different types of resistance for long belt conveyor installations
‐‐ Right column: belt conveyor installation with approx. 5% inclination; Fa
‐‐ Left column: belt conveyor installation of horizontal layout
Gradient resistance
Special resistance
Portions of resistance
Secondary resistance
Vibration bending resistance
Flexing resistance of material
Idler running resistance
Indentation rolling resistance
Horizontal
Gradient = 5%
Figure A.1 – Comparison of the portions of resistance of two long belt conveyor installations
of identical design, however with different inclination
44
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Re subclause 6.2.3
Preferably, secondary resistances should be calculated individually, instead of determining an all‐inclusive portion of
the primary resistance.
Determining the friction resistance between conveyor belt and lateral chutes in the acceleration zone of a feeding
point, not only the Rankine factor
which has an effect on the pressure exerted on
the chute walls by the material in the chute zone shall be taken into consideration, but also the coefficient cSchb
(magnitudes of βdyn : can be seen from the explanations on on the reduction factor φSt ). This factor characterizes
the increase of the resistance due to additional pressure on the chute walls caused by the dynamic pressure of the
material flow of feed material. Consequently, the magnitude of the coefficient cSchb will be equal to 1 for the
transfer height 0; it then increases with rising conveying speeds and dropping heights. For the design and layout of
customary belt conveyor installations, the product will be cSchb . cRank = 1, whilst the coefficient will be applied as
cSchb = 1 for hopper discharge conveyors with high loading heights.
Re subclause 6.5
The distinction between special resistances arising along the entire stretch of the installation and those occurring in
individual sections only, as introduced by ISO 5048, will no longer be applicable. The calculation approach detailed in
this standard requires the calculation of resistance values for individual sections which particularly implies the
consideration of special resistances.
Detailed information on the magnitudes of the dynamic slope angle βdyn in the Rankine factor cRank applied in the
calculation of the resistance arising at the material guide bars can be seen from the above comments on the
reduction factor φst ..
Re subclause 8.3.3
A belt conveyor installation on which the rate of increase of the pulley peripheral forces is limited during the starting
or stopping procedure, and on which the belt is in motion in the entire installation, exhibits a belt acceleration which
is i n d e p e n d e n t o f l o c a t i o n ; it behaves in a quasi steady‐state fashion, and enables the dynamic
additional forces to be determined as mass forces. If one intends to calculate the non‐quasi steady operating
condition of belt conveyor installation, e.g. the breakaway process, it becomes necessary to determine the dynamic
additional forces which arise in this connection with the aid of very complex calculation methods (see [9]).
Re subclause 8.4
As regards the calculation, a distinction must be made between a tensioning device with a fixed take‐up pulley and a
tensioning device with a flying take‐up pulley.
Take‐up devices with a f i x e d p u l l e y are devices on which the position of the driven and no‐driven pulleys
remains unaltered for every operating condition of the conveyor. The desired adjustment of the tensile force is
effected for example by means of spindles (screws) or jacks. Depending on the prevailing operating condition, a fixed
take‐pulley will result in varying forces at the tensioning location. Conversely the total of the local belt elongations in
the upper strand and the lower strand will remain constant; it is equal to twice the take‐up pulley travel during the
).
take‐up process (take‐up pulley path
(A.1)
Take‐up devices with a f l y i n g t a k e – u p pulley are devices which generate tensile forces which are either
independent of the operating conditions, or which are practically constant, or which are suitably matched to the
prevailing operating conditions. This is achieved for example with the aid of take‐up weights, pneumatic or
45
DIN 22101:2002‐08
hydraulic devices and force‐controlled jacks in the case of take‐up pulleys with an adequate travel facility. Their
mode of operation is, therefore, characterized by the fact that the total of the local belt elongations in the upper
strand and the lower strand and consequently the take‐up pulley travel vary in magnitude:
(A.2)
A linear relationship between the elastic elongations and the belt tensions k related to the belt width is assumed as
simplification for the calculation of Δli , as a general rule, and this expressed by means of a mean modulus of
elasticity for all the load‐bearing belt plies ELGk .
Take‐up forces that can be adjusted by suitable means must be adjusted with an adequate speed in order to avoid
sliding and slipping on the drive pulleys. In this context, it may be helpful to adjust the take‐up force to a magnitude
higher than the calculated one in order to ensure an adequate belt tension at any time.
Re clause 9
The determination of belt tensions in accordance with DIN 22101:1982‐02 solely focussed on mean belt tensions.
Non‐uniform distribution of tensions over the width of a troughed belt as arising in transitions or curves was
accounted for by a deduction r1 introduced for this particular purpose. This, however, does not represent the state
of the art in respect of the design and layout of heavy‐duty conveyor belts.
For the consideration and determination of additional elongations of the conveyor belt, a distinction must be made
between belts with textile pliers and steel‐cord belts because of their extremely different elastic characteristics.
Elongations of belt edges in the transition zones shall be calculated proceeding from the geometrical approach
suggested by Laier (see [13]). Applying this approach, length variations and – for conveyor belts with textile plies –
elongations and additional loads can be determined with sufficient accuracy. Length compensations of steel‐cord
belts involve considerably large belt portions adjacent to the transition zone. That is why higher belt tensions than
actually arising will be the result, if the approach recommended for conveyor belts with textile plies is applied to
steel‐cord belts. In the referenced documents (see [12) and [14]) provide descriptions of safe methods for the
precise calculation of steel‐cord conveyor belts, which can be applied without problems, provided that the
mechanical characteristics of these belts are available.
If no mechanical characteristics of the belt are available, empirical relationships are provided for conveyors belts in
accordance with DIN 22129‐1 or DIN 22131‐1 and steel‐cord belts of similar design. These relationships will enable a
sufficiently precise prediction of the stresses arising in conveyor belts installed on 2‐part idlers and –most frequently
employed‐ 3‐part idlers, in many cases. However, the relationships can be referred to as correct only if the elastic
characteristics of the belt currently ensured according to common practice, but not specified by the applicable
standards, are maintained, except for insignificant modifications.
Re subclause 9.2
The belt pulley should not be arranged at a level which is lower than the deepest trough level as this requires greater
transition lengths or may aggravate the non‐uniform distribution of belt tensions across the cross section of the belt.
This also enhances the load on idlers and bearings. There is also an increasing risk of damage to the belt as the belt
may run into the gap between the rollers of the carrying idlers.
Re subclause 10.2
Deviating from DIN 22101:1982‐02, the belt tensions arising in the non‐steady operating conditions are not directly
taken into consideration for the design and layout of the conveyor belt. Instead, one single limiting condition has
been specified which will be applicable only to extremely high stresses in the non‐steady operating conditions. Safety
factors are to be selected (table 8 of the previous revision of the standard) in order to take the frequency of non‐
steady operating conditions into consideration. That is why no all‐inclusive deduction r2 is required for the
consideration of these stresses.
46
DIN 22101:2002‐08
The load‐bearing capacity of a conveyor belt is primarily dependent on the dynamic strength of the conveyor belt
and belt splices. DIN 22101 : 1982‐02 accounts for this aspect applying an all‐inclusive factor ro . Testing the belt in
accordance with DIN 221 10‐3 the reference endurance strength of the conveyor belt and the belt splices can be
determined. The characteristics of the belt splices are represented by the safety factors S0 provided in table 8. The
magnitude of stresses is expressed by the safety factor S1 to be selected from table 9. The values in table 8 and 9
have been verified by comparison with the values obtained from existing heavy‐duty conveyor installations.
Re subclause 10.3
Because the relevant DIN standards contain no data regarding the selection of the cover layer thickness,
recommendations in this respect have been incorporated in this standard.
The cover layer thickness on the running side of the conveyor belt is determined to a great extent by the tension
member, whilst the cover layer thickness on the carrying side of the belt is determined mainly by the stressing of the
belt by the material conveyed, and consequently by the following influencing quantities:
‐‐ nature of material conveyed: particle size and particle shape, density, abrasiveness
‐‐ loading conditions:
drop height, resilience of the belt support, difference in speed between conveyor
load and belt
‐‐ loading frequency:
frequency of belt circulation and scheduled service life of the conveyor belt,
number of feeding points
The thickness on the carrying side must be at least equal to the thickness on the running side of the belt. In view of
the resistance to motion of a belt conveyor installation, the cover plate thickness on the running side of the belt
should be kept as low as possible.
Re clause 11
The principle and general contents of the calculation of minimum pulley diameters is identical with the calculation
described in ISO 3684:1990. The design and layout according to the ISO standard is based on the percentage of
utilized RMBT (recommended maximum belt tension), which has been defined in DIN 22101:1982‐02 as
. This standard defines this variable as
. As the applicable rule does no longer
refer to the mean belt tension k related to the belt width, but to the highest local value kmax the reference value is to
(pulley loading factor). This reference value may have magnitudes higher
be calculated as
than 100%. That is why a fourth category has been introduced for pulleys loads exceeding the permissible
magnitudes defined in DIN 22101:1982‐02 and ISO 3684:1990.
Re clause 13
This standard contains empirical minimum turnover lengths for different belt types and turnover principles
47
DIN 22101:2002‐08
Appendix B
(for information)
Explanations on international standards
The following ISO standards have been taken into consideration for the revision of this standard:
ISO 5048:1989 “Continuous mechanical handling equipment – Belt conveyors with carrying idlers – Calculation of
operating power and tensile forces“
The recommendations contained in the above document for the determination of:
‐‐ the material flow and the troughing cross section
‐‐ the resistance to motion, driving force and the power requirement
‐‐ the belt tensions
Are in accordance with the contents of this standard.
In the ISO document, the cross section of fill of a troughed belt is composed of an equal sided trapezium or isosceles
triangle surmounted by a segment of circle. In this standard (see clause 5), the upper portion of the cross section of
fill is idealized in the form of an isosceles triangle, in accordance with the German technical literature. This approach
has been maintained as it can be assumed that the standard ISO 5048:1989 – like other ISO standards – will be
revised and converted to a triangular cross section (see appendix A, explanations on clause 5).
According to the recommendations contained in the ISO document for the calculation of the secondary and special
resistances, the resistances due to the belt cleaners are deemed to be special resistance. However, as belt cleaners
form part of the standard equipment of belt conveyor installations for bulk materials, the associated resistances
have been allotted to the secondary resistances in this standard (see clause 6).
The ISO document takes the maximum belt tension calculated as mean value across the belt width as basis for the
design and layout of the conveyor belt. It explicitly refers to simple, but frequent cases. This standard accounts for
non‐uniform belt tensions distributed across the cross section of troughed conveyor belts taking into consideration
the endurance strength of the conveyor belt and belt splices subject to dynamic loads.
ISO/DIS 3870:1996 “Conveyor belts for loose bulk material conveyors – Adjustment of take‐up devices“
In the above standard, recommendations are given in respect of different types of take‐up devices. It defines the
standard values of elongation and other influencing variables for the calculation of the take‐up distances applicable
to tension members of different materials. ISO/DIS 3870:1996, appendix A provides an option for the determination
of adequate take‐up distances dependent on the belt tensions determined for a belt conveyor installation. Applying
the relationships provided in this standard (see subclause 8.4) elongations of the conveyor belt and the
corresponding take‐up pulley path can be determined with a relatively high degree of accuracy proceeding from the
distribution of belt tensions and the characteristics of the conveyor belt.
ISO 5293:1981 “Conveyor belts – Formula for transition distance on three equal length idler rollers”
The above standard gives detailed recommendations for the determination of transition lengths. It is based on the
same simplified assumptions which were first made by Laier (see [13]. This standard does not give priority to the
retroactive calculation of an adequate transition length, but takes the maximum belt tensions resulting from a given
transition length (or curve layout) as basis for the design and layout of the conveyor belt.
48
DIN 22101:2002‐08
ISO 3684: 1990 “Conveyor belts – Determination of minimum pulley diameter“
The recommendations contained in the above standard for the determination of minimum pulley diameters for belt
conveyor installations have been incorporated in this standard in more concise form adapted to their field of
application (see clause 11). Since this standard does not contain any variable corresponding to the term
“recommended maximum belt tension” (RMBT), which had been introduced in ISO 3684, this variable had to be
.
newly defined as
The pulley loading factor has been introduced as
. 8 . 100 in % .
49
DIN 22101:2002‐08
References
DIN EN 20340, Schwerentflammbare Fördergurte – Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren (ISO 340: 1982);
German version EN 20340:1993. (Non‐readily flammable conveyor belts; requirements, test procedure)
DIN EN 20284, Fördergurte – Elektrische Leitfähigkeit – Spezifikation und Prüfverfahren (ISO 284:1982);
German version EN 20284:1993. (Conveyor belts; electric conductivity; specification, test procedure)
DIN 22103, Schwerentflammbare Stahlseil‐Fördergurte – Anforderungen, Prüfung. (Non‐readily flammable steel cord
conveyor belts; requirements, testing.)
DIN 22109‐5, Textil‐Fördergurte für den Steinkohlentagebau – Kennzeichnung. (Conveyor belts with textile plies for
the hard coal mining industry, opencast applications; identification)
DIN 22109‐6, Textil‐Fördergurte für den Steinhohlentagebau – Prüfung. (Conveyor belts with textile plies for the hard
coal mining industry, opencast applications; testing)
DIN 22110‐1, Prüfverfahren für Fördergurtverbindungen – Ermittlung der Bruchkraft von Gurtverbindungen an Textil‐
Fördergurten. (Test procedures for conveyor belt splices; determination of the rupture force for textile belt splices)
DIN 22110‐2, Prüfverfahren für Fördergurtverbindungen – Teil: Dauerlaufversuch, Ermittlung der Laufzeit von
Gurtverbindungen an Textil‐Fördergurten. (Test procedure for conveyor belt splices; part: continuous test run,
determination of the service life of textile belt splices)
DIN 22111, Gurtförderer für den Kohlenbergbau unter Tage – Leichtes Traggerüst. (Belt conveyors for coal mining,
uderground applications; lightweight supporting structure).
DIN 22112‐3, Gurtförderer für den Kohlenbergbau unter Tage – Tragrollen – Teil 3: Prüfungen. (Belt conveyors for
coal mining, underground applications; idlers: part 3: testing)
DIN 22114, Gurtförderer für den Kohlenbergbau unter Tage – Schweres Traggerüst. (Belt conveyors for coal mining
applications, underground applications; heavyweight supporting structure)
DIN 22118, Textil‐Fördergurte für den Steinkohlenbergbau – Brandtechnische Prüfung. (Conveyor belts with textile
plies for hard coal mining; fire prevention test)
DIN 22120, Abstreifleisten aus Elastomeren für Gurtförderanlagen im Steinkohlentragebau (Scraper bars made of
elastomers for belt conveyor system in the hard coal mining industry, opencast applications)
DIN 22200, Stetigförderer – Gliederbandförderer – Berechnungsgrundsätze. (Continuous conveyors; link belt
conveyors; calculation principles)
ISO 1537:1975, Mechanische Stetigförderer für Schüttgut ‐ Gemuldete Gurtförderer (außer tragbaren Förderern) –
Tragrollen. (Continuous mechanical conveyors for bulk materials; troughed belt conveyors (except portable
conveyors); carrying idlers)
ISO 3435:1977, Continuous mechanical handling equipment – classification and symbolization of bulk materials.
ISO 5048:1989, Stetigförderer – Gurtförderer mit TRagrollen – Berechnung der Antriebsleistung und der
Gurtzugkräfte. (Continuous conveyors; belt conveyors with idlers; calculation of driving power and belt tensions)
ISO 5293:1981, Fördergurte – Formel für den Übergangsabstand auf drei gleichlange Tragrollen. (Conveyor belts –
Formula for the transitions distance on three idlers of equal length)
SO 7189:1983, Mechanische Stetigförderer – Gliederbandförderer – Berechnungsregeln. (Continuous mechanical
conveyors; link belt conveyors; calulation principles)
[1] Vierling, A.: Zum Stand der Berechnungsgrundlagen für Gurtförderanlagen.
Braunkohle. Wärme und Energie 19 (1967) No. 9, pages 309‐315. (Fundamentals for the calculation of belt conveyor
systems)
[2] Schwarz, F: Zum Endrückrollwiderstand zwischen Fördergurt und Tragrolle.
Fördern und heben 17 (1967) No. 12, pages 712‐719. (Indentation rolling resistance between conveyor belt and
carrying idler)
[3] Behrens, U.: Untersuchungen zum Walkwiderstand schwerer Förderbandanlagen.
Braunkohle, Wärme und Energie 20 (1968) No. 7, pages 222‐231. (Examinations of the flexing resistance of
heavyweight belt conveyor systems)
[4] Hager, M. and A. Hintz: The Energy‐Saving Design of belts for Long Conveyor Systems.
Bulk Solids Handling 13 (1993) No. 4 Page 749‐758.
[5] Hager, M. and H. Simonsen: Berechnung und Auslegung von Gurtförderern für Schüttgut.
Braunkohle/Surface Mining 52 (2000) No. 3, p. 245‐259. (Calculation and dimensioning of belt conveyors for loose
bulk materials)
[6] Grimmer, K.‐J. and D. Thormann: Zur Problematik der Kraft‐ und Bewegungsverhältnisse des Schüttgures an
Aufgabestellen von Förderbandanlagen, Fördern und heben 17 (1967) No. 6, pages 345‐351. (Forces and motions
related to the bulk material at the feeding points of belt conveyor system)
50
DIN 22101:2002‐08
[7] Grimmer, K.‐J.: Zwei ausgewählte Probleme der Bandfördertechnik.
Fortschrittsberichte VDI‐Zeitschrift Reihe 13, No. 10, September 1968. (Two selected problems of belt conveyor
technology)
[8] Funke, H.: Zur Auslegung von Anlaufhilfen für Gurtförderanlagen nach Entwurf DIN 22101.
Braunkohle 31 (1979) No. 6, pages 188‐194. (Desing and layout of starting aids for belt conveyor system in
accordance with the draft of DIN 22101)
[9] Funke, H. and F. K. Könnecker: Experimental Investigations and Theory for the Design of Long‐Distance Belt
Conveyor System.
Bulk Solids Handling 8 (1988) No. 5, pages 567‐579.
.[10] Grimmer, K.‐J.: Der Einfluss von Trommelbelägen und Feuchtigkeit auf den Reibungsbeiwert zwischen
Fördergurt und Antriebstrommel.
Braunkohle, Wärme und Energie 18 (1966) No. 9, pages 325‐332. (The influence of pulley laggings and moisture of
friction factor between conveyor belt and drive pulley)
[11] VDI‐Richtlinie 2341, Gurtförderer für Schüttgut – Tragrollen und Tragrollenabstände. (Belt conveyors for loose
bulk material; idlers and idler spacing)
[12] Oehmen, K.H.: Berechnung der Dehnungsverteilung in Fördergurten infolge Muldungsübergang, Gurtwendung
und Seilunterbrechung.
Braunkohle 31 (1979) No. 12. pages 394‐402. (Determination of the distribution of elongations in conveyor belts
resulting from transition, turnover and discontinuity of cords)
[13] Laier, D.: Ein Versuch zur rechnerischen Erfassung der zusätzlichen Dehnung in der Muldungsstrecke von
Fördergurten.
Braunkohle. Wärme und Energie 18 (1966) No. 1. pages 14‐19. (Attempt of mathematical determination of additional
elongations in troughed sections of conveyor belts)
[14] Hager, M. and S. Tappeiner: Additional Strain in Conveyor Belts Caused by Curves and Transition Geometry.
Bulk Solids Handling 13 (1993) No. 4, pages 695‐703.
[15] Grimmer, K.‐J. and F. Kessler: Spezielle Betrachtungen zur Gurtführung bei Gurtförderern mit Horizontalkurven.
Teil 1: Anmerkungen und Teil 2: Verbesserungen zu herkömmlichen Berechnungsverfahren.
Berg‐ und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte 132 (1987), No. 2, pages 27‐32 and No. 6, pages 206‐211. (Special
considerations regarding belt routing on belt conveyors with horizontal curves. Part 1: Comments and Part 2:
Improvements of traditional calculation methods.
.[16] Oehmen, K. H.: Einfluss vertikaler und horizontaler Kurven auf die Dehnungsverteilung in Fördergurten –
Theorie und ANwendung.
Braunkohle 31 (1979) No. 12, pages 340‐348. (Influence of vertical and horizontal curves on the distribution of
elongations in conveyor belts; theory and application)
[17] Hager, M.: Stand der Entwicklung von Verbindungen hochfester Stahlseilgurte.
Braunkohle 39 (1987) No. 7, pages 251‐253. (State of development of high‐tension splices of steel‐cord conveyor
belts)
[18] Flebbe, H.: Dynamic Splice Strength‐Design Criterion for Conveyor Belts.
Bulk Solids Handling 8 (1988) No. 5. Page 581‐586.
[19] Hager M. and H. v .d. Wroge: Design of Steel Cord Conveyor Belt Splices.
Bulk Solids Handling 11 (1991) No. 4, pages 849‐860.
51