Uploaded by dummy acc

04 Task Performance 1 14 .docx

advertisement
TASK PERFORMANCE
I.
CONTRACT RECOGNITION TASK
For the following scenarios, determine the status of the contract entered into. Write the
letter of the correct answer on the space provided before each number. (20 items x 2
points)
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Perfectly Valid
Rescissible
Voidable
Unenforceable
Null and void
Rescissible
Voidable
Unenforceable
Void
Contracts
validlyDefect is caused by Those that do notDefect is caused by
agreed upon but, by vices of consent.
comply
with
thelack of essential
reason of lesion or
Statute of Frauds.
elements or illegality.
economic
prejudice One
of
the
may be rescinded in contracting parties is Both
parties
are
cases established by incapacitated.
incapacitated.
law.
Those entered into in
Defect is caused by
the name of another
injury/ damage either
by one without or
to one of the parties
acting in excess of
of to a 3rd person
authority.
Comparative Table of Defective Contracts
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
D. A, minor, sold in writing his ball pen for P1,000 to B, a capacitated person.
The book value of the ball pen is P1,500 so A suffered lesion by more than ¼ the
value of the thing which is the object thereof.
C. G, guardian of minor M, sold in writing the house and lot of Mat a selling
price of P7,000,000 when its book value is P10,000,000. The sale is without prior
approval of guardianship court.
D. On January 1, A, the guardian of X, orally sold a phone of X in X’s name to J,
a minor, at a selling price of P749 when its book value is P1,000. The payment is to
be made on February 2 while delivery is to be made on March 1.
A. S orally sold a piece of land to B in the amount of P200,000 payable in four
(4) installments. B already paid a consideration of P50,000 representing the first
installment.
C. A, agent of P, orally sold the land of P in P’s name to B. The authority of A is
not in writing and B has already paid the whole purchase price to A.
D. A, a minor, orally sold the cell phone of his brother at a selling price of
P500. The buyer, an insane person, already paid P100 of the selling price to A.
A.
A orally entered a contract for a piece of work of cake at a price of P500.
The performance and payment of price shall be done after five (5) months.
A.
S orally entered into a contract of barter with B involving a cell phone and
a laptop. The values of the cell phone and laptop are P5,000 and P15,000,
respectively. The exchange will happen after six (6) months.
This study source was downloaded by 100000832543528 from CourseHero.com on 03-21-2022 12:29:16 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/95785017/04-Task-Performance-114docx/
9.
E. A mother sold two (2) fishponds to her daughter and the latter, in turn,
resold the same fishponds to her stepfather.
10.
A.
A Filipino leased a parcel of land to a foreigner for 99 years with an option
to buy the property within 50 years provided that the latter shall become a Filipino.
11.
A. A written contract for a transfer of a piece of land at an amount of P500,000
with a fair market value of P550,000. Delivery and payment have not yet been
made.
12.
C. The wife orally sold a land which is a community property to a third person
without the consent of the husband at a price of P60,000 when the book value is
P100,000.
13.
E. Oral contract of sale of a cell phone at a price of P400 but delivery and
payment will be made after 15 months.
14.
E. Oral contract of sale of a piece of land with a price of P499 but delivery and
payment will be made after one (1) month.
15.
D. A written contract of sale of a piece of land at a price of P499 between a
demented and an insane person.
16.
. G, the guardian of M, a minor, orally sold M’s cell phone for P500 to I, an
insane person. Delivery and payment have not yet been made.
17.
D. M, an insane person, orally sold prohibited drugs at a price of P1,000 when
its book value is P1,500, to I, an insane person also. Delivery and payment have not
yet been made.
18.
E.
An oral contract of sale of a cell phone at a price of P5,000 between
husband and wife who are covered by absolute community or conjugal property
regime. Delivery and payment will happen after two (2) months.
19.
E.
A written contract of sale of car at a price of P70,000 between husband
and wife who are covered by regime of absolute or complete separation of property.
The husband pointed a gun to the wife to sign the contract. Delivery and payment
have not yet been made.
20.
E.
An oral contract of sale of forest land or national park at a selling price of
P100,000,000 with partial payment of P20,000,000.
II.
CASE ANALYSIS
Analyze the following cases and answer the questions that follow. (4 items x 10
points)
Case 1. Supposed sale was evidenced by a receipt acknowledging receipt of P1,000.
Facts: B bought on a partial payment of P1,000.00, evidenced by a receipt, a portion of a
subdivision from S, administrator of the testate estate of his deceased spouse.
Subsequently, S was authorized by the court to sell the subdivision. In the meantime, PT
Co. became the new administrator. It sold the lot to another which sale was judicially
approved. B files a complaint which seeks, among other things, for the quieting of title
over the lot in question (Leabres vs. Court of Appeals, 146 SCRA 158 [1986]).
Issue: Was there a valid and enforceable sale to B?
Held: An examination of the receipt reveals that the same can neither be regarded as a
contract of sale or a promise to sell. There was merely an acknowledgment of the sum of
One Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00). There was no agreement as to the total purchase price
of the land nor to the monthly installment to be paid by the petitioner. The requisites of a
valid Contract of Sale namely 1) consent or meeting of the minds of the parties; 2)
determinate subject matter; 3) price certain in money or its equivalent-are lacking in said
This study source was downloaded by 100000832543528 from CourseHero.com on 03-21-2022 12:29:16 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/95785017/04-Task-Performance-114docx/
receipt and therefore the “sale” is not valid nor enforceable. Furthermore, it is a fact that
his spouse was died. Her estate was thereafter under custodia legis of the Probate Court
which appointed S as Administrator. S entered into said sale in his own personal-capacity
and without court approval, consequently, said sale cannot bind the estate of wife.
Petitioner should have submitted the receipt of alleged sale to the Probate Court for its
approval of the transactions. Anent his possession of the land, petitioner cannot be
deemed a possessor in good faith in view of the registration of the ownership of the land.
To consider petitioner in good faith would be to put a premium on his own gross
negligence. The Court resolved to DENY the petition for lack of merit and to AFFIRM the
assailed judgment.
Case 2. Vendor “sells, transfers, and conveys” a land to the vendee who may sell or
assign the land prior to full payment of all installments.
Facts: The dispositive part of a deed entitled “Deed of Sale of Real Property” states: “for
and in consideration of the sum of P140,000, payable under the terms and conditions
stated in the foregoing premises, the VENDOR sells, transfers and conveys unto the
VENDEE x x x” the property in question as of December 22, 19XX, the date of said
document.”
It is provided that “should the VENDEE prior to the full payment of all the amounts
aforementioned, decide to sell or to assign part or all of the aforementioned parcel of land,
the VENDOR shall be informed in writing and shall have the option to repurchase the
property x x x. Should the VENDOR herein decide to repurchase, and the property is sold
or transferred to a third person, the balance of the consideration herein still due to the
VENDOR shall constitute automatically a prior lien on the consideration to be paid by the
third person to herein VENDEE.”
Issue: Is the above instrument a contract to sell?
Held: it is an instrument of a contract to sell by Recto Law it’s a occurs when the vendor
reserves the right to repurchase the thing sold and this is applicable in the contract of
pacto de retro sale or sale with a right to repurchase. And vendor has the rights to
repurchase and sold or to third person unless vendee are: 1. Fail to pay, regardless of the
number of installments defaulted; 2. Cancel the sale, should vendee’s failure to pay cover
two (2) or more installments. The vendor shall return to the vendee the sums received
minus reasonable rent; 3. Foreclose the chattel mortgage on the thing sold, if one has
been constituted, should the vendee’s failure to pay cover two (2) or more installments.
Case 3. Some of the goods contracted to be sold were missing through fault of carrier.
Facts: S, a domestic corporation, alleges that B, a general partnership, refused to pay the
price of various automotive products, with the latter claiming that it had not received the
merchandise. It appears that upon receipt of the Bill of Lading, B initiated, but did not
pursue, steps to take delivery as it was advised by NN Company, owner of the vessel on
which the spare parts were loaded by S’s forwarding agent, that because some parts were
missing, they would just be informed as soon as the missing parts were located. It was
only four (4) years later when a warehouseman of NN found in its bodega, parts of the
shipment in question, but already deteriorated and valueless.
Issue: Under the circumstances, can B be faulted for not accepting or refusing to accept
the shipment from NN four (4) years after shipment?
This study source was downloaded by 100000832543528 from CourseHero.com on 03-21-2022 12:29:16 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/95785017/04-Task-Performance-114docx/
Case 4. Machine purchased was in accordance with specifications in contract but did not
give the result expected by the buyer.
Facts: Under a contract of sale, S delivered and installed in B’s establishment a
refrigerating machine. The machine was in perfect accord with the description made in the
contract, but it did not give the result expected by B. S brought action to recover the
balance of the purchase price.
Issue: Is B’s action in refusing to pay such balance justifiable considering that he could
not use the machine satisfactorily in his establishment?
This study source was downloaded by 100000832543528 from CourseHero.com on 03-21-2022 12:29:16 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/95785017/04-Task-Performance-114docx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Download