Uploaded by A

Review A New Biography Tells of Francis Bacon’s Turbulent Life The New Republic

The Turbulent Life of
Francis Bacon
Bacon’s contradictions make him the rare artist who warrants an
infatuated 900-page biography.
Jeremy Lybarger / April 7, 2021
The same day that Francis Bacon’s landmark retrospective opened at the Grand
Palais in Paris, in 1971, his longtime boyfriend and muse George Dyer died on the
toilet in their hotel. It was unclear whether the cause of death was an accidental
overdose of sleeping pills or suicide. The day before, Bacon had returned to the Hôtel
des Saints-Pères to find Dyer drunk in bed with a young man. The couple argued.
Bacon stormed out to spend the night in another room. Faced with the prospect of
Dyer’s death overshadowing his triumphal exhibition, Bacon asked the hotel
manager to postpone notifying the authorities—an amenity apparently available
only to the famous. The bathroom where Dyer’s body still slumped on the toilet was
discreetly locked, and Bacon went off to be feted by France’s cultural elite.
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
our issue-driven,
Revelations independent journalism and subscribe today.
by Mark Stevens and Annalyn Swan
Buy on Bookshop
Knopf, 880 pp., $60.00
This episode suggests ruthless careerism, but as the Pulitzer Prize–winning critics
Mark Stevens and Annalyn Swan write in their new biography, Francis Bacon:
Revelations, the reality turned out to be more haunting. Beginning in 1972, Bacon
regularly checked into the hotel room where Dyer died. He slept in the same bed
where Dyer had cheated on him; he sat on the toilet where Dyer took his last breath.
Bacon wasn’t spiritual, but these private rituals, which could last up to two weeks,
had the intimacy of a séance. It was the closest Bacon came to sentimentality.
There’s a dreamlike gravitas to Bacon’s art that matches his do-it-yourself ghost hunt.
He gave to the twentieth century a visual repertoire—screaming popes, deformed
heads, distended bodies, crucifixions—that symbolizes a universal if often
inscrutable anxiety, while still imparting the psychic drama of Bacon’s own selfcontradictions. “What I’ve always wanted to do is to make things that are very formal
yet coming to bits,” he once said, and the tension between control and breakdown is
the subtext of his life and paintings. The Bacon who emerges in Stevens and Swan’s
biography has the clammy decorum of a proper Englishman cut with the tragicomic
wit of the Irish. He erased or denied parts of his history he didn’t like; he destroyed
canvases that fell short of an impossible perfection; he couldn’t speak about himself
without getting drunk first. He was an S&M enthusiast who lived with his childhood
nanny. He painted disturbing vignettes but was an effervescent fixture at London
bars. His states of betweenness, of paradox, make him that rare artist who actually
rewards 900 infatuated pages.
Be the most
informed person you know:
3 months for $5
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Bacon was born in Ireland in 1909, descendant of an illustrious bloodline of military
adventurers and rich industrialists. His parents were recent arrivals from England.
“When I think of my childhood, I see something very heavy, very cold, like a block of
ice,” Bacon told an interviewer. There was much to detest in his early years: the
asthma that confined him to a sickroom and necessitated medicinal candles and
occasional hits of morphine; his father, an ex-soldier and horse trainer disappointed
by his weakling son; the outbreak of World War I, which drove the family back to
England (Stevens and Swan suggest that searchlights may have inspired the “ghostly
white” stripes that appear in some later paintings); and, after the war, the Irish
Republican Army, which terrorized aristocratic families like Bacon’s. “It was both
magical and unnerving—thrilling and dreadful—to go to bed knowing that
somewhere in the dark field beyond the window there might be strangers waiting
and watching, phantoms who lit flares and sang songs,” Stevens and Swan write,
noting that “watchers would appear decades later in many of Bacon’s pictures.”
(“Thrilling” and “magical” perhaps overstate the whimsy of partisans threatening to
torch the neighborhood.)
Francis Bacon erased or denied parts of his history he
didn’t like; he destroyed canvases that fell short of an
impossible perfection; he couldn’t speak about himself
without getting drunk first.
There was also the matter of Bacon’s burgeoning homosexuality. Like many young
gay boys, Bacon was conflicted by an attraction to his own father. He also—
facetiously or not—claimed to be aroused by the smell of horse manure, which would
have been in rank abundance given his father’s profession. When he was 15, Bacon
was raped by a groom in his father’s stable, a story Stevens and Swan treat
skeptically. Many of Bacon’s claims buttressed a self-mythology designed to make
him seem more feral and less calculated than he actually was. He later said he didn’t
read serious books or take art classes, although each assertion was a lie. He alleged
that his father kicked him out of the house after he discovered Bacon wearing his
mother’s panties. Whether the anecdote is true or not, it’s the kind of tawdry
provocation Bacon relished. “What was certain,” Stevens and Swan write, “was that
some unstable sexual compound—father, groom, animal, discipline—gave Francis a
and subscribe
that helpedindependent
make him into
the painter
Francis Bacon.”
In his late teens, he drew inspiration from the “gilded squalor” he found in London,
Berlin, and Paris. A visit to Berlin in 1927 introduced him to Europe’s sexual and
artistic vanguard: prostitution, drag shows, sex clubs, and drugs. (The trip may have
also kindled his connoisseurship of seedy bars and lowlifes, a taste he shared with his
friend William S. Burroughs, another intermittent expat who rejected his family’s
bourgeois pieties.) Bacon may have first seen Battleship Potemkin in Berlin; his
fascination with mouths and screaming subjects can be traced to the film’s “indelible
image of the nurse caught in the massacre on the Odessa steps ... her pince-nez
bloodily shattering as she opens her mouth in a scream.”
It was in Paris, though, that Bacon the artist first emerged. His discovery of Picasso in
the late 1920s was an “epiphany.” Although Bacon sometimes downplayed Picasso’s
influence, the older artist’s biomorphic figures and scrambled anatomies are an
obvious precursor to Bacon’s figures. In a pattern that was consistent throughout his
life, Bacon also rebuffed other artists with whom he was certainly familiar and by
whom he was perhaps even inspired, including Otto Dix and Chaim Soutine. Dix’s
elongated bodies and harsh figuration and Soutine’s garish expressionism are natural
referents for Bacon. Equally important were the illustrated books Bacon bought from
dealers along the Seine—books about diseases of the mouth, big game animals,
supernatural emanations, and other esoteric subjects. (His library of oddities
eventually totaled more than 1,200 volumes.) Later, he was drawn to the motion
studies of Eadweard Muybridge and to Nazi propaganda.
In the early 1930s, Bacon found a creative outlet in rug and furniture design.
Encouraged by several women—including Madge Garland and Dorothy Todd, the
powerhouse lovers who led British Vogue—Bacon envisioned a career creating
modernist decor. His prospects were buoyed when he met Eric Allden, a bureaucrat
23 years his senior who became Bacon’s first male companion. (Peter Lacy and Dyer
were Bacon’s two other great loves; both died on the brink of major Bacon
exhibitions.) Allden spoiled the young artist with expensive haircuts and tailored
clothing, and with outings to the theater and museums. With Allden’s help, Bacon
opened a design showroom in London, with living quarters in the back for the two
men and Bacon’s nanny, who served as cook and housekeeper.
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Be the most
informed person you know:
3 months for $5
Despite his modest success as a designer, Bacon was determined to be a serious artist.
“A thing has to arrive at a stage of deformity before I can find it beautiful,” he told his
cousin Diana, and in his early canvases he not only depicted deformed subjects—the
crucifixion was an obsession—but also deformed the paint itself: “He added …
whatever amounts of oil, water, and probably dust he thought might awaken the
flesh or help generate a powerful image,” Stevens and Swan write. A crucifixion from
1933, showing a spindly ectoplasmic figure with raised arms against a black
background, remains one of Bacon’s eeriest works and is a thematic rehearsal for his
later notable triptych Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion.
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Three Studies of Lucian Freud, 1969
Bacon’s career through the ’30s followed a jerky trajectory of acclaim and failure. He
made an uneasy companion to the other stalwarts of British art at the time: Henry
Moore, John Piper, and, especially, Graham Sutherland. Bacon and Sutherland had a
competitive influence on each other, although Sutherland was fundamentally more
provincial than Bacon and championed the English tradition—and Englishness as a
virtue—in a way Bacon never did. (Bacon and Lucian Freud had a similarly fraught
relationship.) As Stevens and Swan write, Bacon’s art was torn between opposite
impulses: “Explosive or restrained; bestial or civilized; naked or revealed; raw or
cooked.” He wasn’t a surrealist, although his desolate geometric architecture and
nightmarish creatures recall that movement’s dreamlike juxtapositions. Nor was he a
cubist, despite his discordant faces. He didn’t seem to belong to any school or ism of
contemporary art. Stevens and Swan invoke a lineage of old masters such as
Rembrandt, Titian, and Velázquez, and Bacon himself aspired to such grandeur.
Yet he also understood the essentially moral, Manichean universe of the old masters
as a farce. Bacon isolates and aestheticizes the human condition—a phrase he would
have mocked—as a series of elemental traumas. Head I, from 1948, presents a
necrotic head disintegrating into yolky runoff, the exposed teeth reminiscent of
certain deep-sea predator fish. “Human control, vested in settled human features, is
an old-master illusion,” Stevens and Swan write of the painting. The same can be said
of one of Bacon’s most iconic works, Study After Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent
X, from 1953, which remakes Velázquez’s original as an eruption of luminous distress.
Velázquez’s pope is regal and indomitable; Bacon’s looks as if he’s mid-sizzle in an
electric chair. Head VI, from 1949, also reworks the Velázquez, this time framing the
pope’s screaming head behind both a phantasmal cube and a gauze of oxidized
drapery. The artist Lawrence Gowing wrote that “the paradoxical appearance at once
of pastiche and iconoclasm was indeed one of Bacon’s most original strokes.”
Stevens and Swan extend that idea to the literal presentation of Bacon’s art. By
putting his canvases in heavy gold frames, Bacon employed a “kind of satirical
costume—the old masters in drag.” Bacon was a deadly serious artist, but not
humorless. There’s a whiff of camp in his bombast and even in his public persona—
the suit and glossy leather jacket that gave the impression of a gentleman fetishist.
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
The notion of a gay, irreligious man painting flamboyant popes and crucifixions, and
then framing them in a way that self-consciously evokes the canon, is more amusing
than most critics acknowledge. (John Berger initially and unfavorably compared
Bacon to Walt Disney.) For Bacon, the sober traditions of Christian iconography and
Western art were suitable subjects for art but never for veneration.
Stevens and Swan’s biography is also the story of interwar and midcentury gay
British culture: discretion and code-speak, confirmed bachelors rooming together,
followed gradually by the sordid vivacity of Soho nightlife. The book paints a vivid
portrait of the Colony Room, the bar in London where Bacon (and Dylan Thomas)
spent many obliterated hours. The place was presided over by Muriel Belcher, a
mordant lesbian who lingered “like a musk” amid her regular gay clientele:
The freedom inside the bilious green room, while naughty, funny, and
subversive, also included the darker liberties. You could wound and be
wounded. You could choose to drink yourself to death. Veneers were
stripped; masks were picked up in pieces. Sloppy drunks often fell down
the narrow staircase. By the next day the performances were forgiven or
forgotten—or perhaps not.
Queer life was still scandalous in that era. In the 1950s, police routinely cracked down
on gay offenses: In 1952, the code-breaker Alan Turing was convicted of gross
indecency and opted for chemical castration instead of prison. (He committed
suicide two years later.) The 1954 trial and imprisonment of conservative politician
Edward Montagu, landowner Michael Pitt-Rivers, and journalist Peter Wildeblood
became a cause célèbre. Homosexual acts remained officially illegal in Britain until
1967. In this environment, circumspection was the rule, although Bacon pushed both
his romantic life and his art to the edge.
“Until late in his life Bacon was attracted to beautiful but suppressed men in whom
there lay—somewhere between weakness and power—a seductive but dangerous line
that he could test,” Stevens and Swan write. In Peter Lacy, a former fighter pilot,
Bacon found the perfect collaborator. Lacy beat and raped Bacon, and once
threatened to chain him up in a corner, where Bacon would have to sleep and shit on
a bed of straw. During one particularly violent exchange, Lacy threw Bacon through a
window.our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
This hard-knock eroticism pervaded some of Bacon’s paintings, as well. Two Figures,
from 1953, depicts two naked men grappling on a disheveled bed. The men’s skin has
the mottled plum undertones of a bruise, while their faces are mostly blurred, almost
rinsed out, aside from one man’s bared teeth. It’s an ambiguous image that suggests
both rapture and violence. (Lucian Freud hung the painting over his bed and refused
to ever lend it to museums.) Bacon explored similar themes in Two Figures in the
Grass, from 1954, and The Wrestlers After Muybridge, from 1980.
Bacon understood life as a zero-sum proposition: There
are no winners except death; we are all meat; in a world
without meaning, you might as well do what you want.
Bacon’s Men in Suits series may be his most cohesive rejoinder to the stifled sexuality
of British culture. In 1954, Bacon lodged at the Imperial Hotel in Henley-on-Thames,
about an hour west of London. It was a faded pit stop for businessmen and
commuters, some of whom were there to drink their lunch and some to have hurried
trysts, and some of whom agreed to model for Bacon. The resulting series is a
monochromatic blue-and-black frieze of solitary men seemingly trapped inside
spectral cages. Stevens and Swan argue that the figures are stand-ins for “the
tormented everyman of postwar corporate culture.” The figures also represent a
performance of masculinity—broad-shouldered, hefty, on a payroll—alienated from
itself. The unanimous darkness of the backdrops evokes the darkness of the closet.
The paintings suggest how isolating queerness can be, and also how banal its selfdeception is, symbolized here by conformist wardrobes and dreary routine.
Performance is the flip side of homosexuality, and for Bacon, that meant playing the
roles both of bitchy bon vivant—heir to the tradition of his fellow Irishman Oscar
Wilde—and of dissipated artist. Neither role was a perfect fit. “It was Bacon’s secret
that he was not just a radical master of the twentieth-century stage who exulted in
the dark arts,” Stevens and Swan write. “He was simultaneously an Englishman
suffused with longing for the ordinary patterns of joy and solace denied him as a
child and young man.” Bacon was a conservative at heart—when drunk, he’d
sometimes lambaste poor people for their supposed weakness—but his art, as
channeled through his queerness, cast a critical, if oblique, eye on the prevailing
culture. Bacon understood life as a zero-sum proposition: There are no winners
except death; we are all meat; in a world without meaning, you might as well do what
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
you want. He once observed about the Nazi imagery that riveted him, “Amid the
clatter of Hitlerism you saw shadows in the process of becoming substantial.” The
opposite is true of Bacon’s art; there you see once substantial figures in the process of
becoming shadows.
Jeremy Lybarger @jeremylybarger
Jeremy Lybarger is the features editor at the Poetry Foundation. His work has appeared in The New
Yorker, Art in America, The Nation, The New York Review of Books, and more.
Want more on art, books, and culture?
Sign up for TNR’s Critical Mass weekly newsletter.
Read More: Critical Mass, Books, Culture, Art, Francis Bacon
Editor’s Picks
One of the Biggest Villains in the Local News Crisis Might Finally Lose
Alex Shephard
Alex Shephard
One of the Biggest Villains in the Local News Crisis Might Finally Lose
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Kick the Fracking Industry Out of Indian Country
Nick Martin
Nick Martin
Kick the Fracking Industry Out of Indian Country
The Labor-Rights Legislation That Could Make Medicare for All a Reality
Natalie Shure
Natalie Shure
The Labor-Rights Legislation That Could Make Medicare for All a Reality
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Delta and Coca-Cola Won’t Save Voting Rights in Georgia
Jacob Silverman
Jacob Silverman
Delta and Coca-Cola Won’t Save Voting Rights in Georgia
Latest From Critical Mass
The Mysteries of Stephen Hawking’s Universe
our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
Samanth Subramanian
The Mysteries of Stephen Hawking’s Universe
Last Judgment
Jo Livingstone
Jo Livingstone
Last Judgment
The Nail-Biting Story of Obamacare
Jake Bittle
Jake Bittle
The Nail-Biting Story of Obamacare
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.
The Haunted Imagination of Alfred Hitchcock
John Banville
John Banville
The Haunted Imagination of Alfred Hitchcock
Support our issue-driven, independent journalism and subscribe today.