lOMoAR cPSD| 9205026 Readings in Philippine History | Lesson 1 HISTORY AND HISTORICAL SOURCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. History Study of the past The chronological record of events (as affecting a nation or people) based on a critical examination of source materials and usually presenting an explanation of their causes. May include accounts coming from oral traditions in forms of epics, songs, artifacts, architecture, and memory. Historiography History of history The writing of history based on the critical examination of sources, the selection of particular details from the authentic materials in those sources, and the synthesis of those details into a narrative that stands the test of critical examination. The Importance of History Helps understand people and societies Helps understand change For personal aesthetic and humanistic goals Provides identity Historical Source Anything that provides information regarding a historical topic. May be: a. written (more valid, less prone to biases) b. non-written (good when recordings, writings, etc. are not yet possible) Kinds of Source Primary sources: made during the time of the events. Primary sources don’t always have to be during the time of event, it can also be closer to the time of the event, or after but the time duration must not be too long. Secondary sources: made after the time of the events. Examples: resources found in the library Primary Sources The historical documents used by historians as evidence. Provide a first-hand account of an event or time period. Considered to be authoritative. Examples: Letters, diaries. Secondary Sources Works that interpret or analyze a historical event or phenomenon. At least one step removed from the event is often based on primary sources. Often attempt to describe or explain primary sources. Weak sources Examples: Interpretations/narrative of a primary source, essays, reaction papers, documentaries, “History of the Philippines” by Barrows Examples Primary Secondary diaries, correspondence, journal articles that ships' logs comment on or analyze research original documents e.g. textbooks birth certificates, trial transcripts dictionaries and encyclopedias biographies, autobiographies, books that interpret, manuscripts analyze interviews, speeches, political commentary oral histories biographies case law, legislation, dissertations regulations, newspaper constitutions editorial/opinion government documents, pieces statistical data, research criticism of literature, reports art works or music a journal article reporting NEW research or findings creative art works, literature newspaper advertisements and reportage and editorial/opinion pieces Source Criticism A healthy skepticism about the reasons a source was made and the validity of the nature of historical sources. 1. 2. 3. 4. Kinds of Criticism External criticism is a process by which historians determine whether a source is authentic by checking the validity of the source. Internal criticism looks at the reliability of an authenticated source after it has been subjected to external criticism. In determining the validity of the source, check: Accuracy: verify, double check, and look for disclaimers Authority: know the source; trustworthy, lacks bias, objective Currency: check how time may affect the information presented Coverage: make sure the content is comprehensive and relevant 1