Uploaded by Erica Pajarillo

Lesson 1 Understanding Rizal Law

advertisement
Republic of the Philippines
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
F. Pimentel Avenue, Brgy. 2, Daet, Camarines Norte – 4600, Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
GEC 9: THE LIFE AND WORKS OF RIZAL
Second Semester S.Y. 2021-2022
LEARNING ACTIVITY SHEET
LESSON 1: UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
Name:
Date:
Course &Yr:
Score:
Activity 1: The Debates about the Rizal Bill.
Read the following excerpts from the statements of the legislators who supported and opposed
the passage of the Rizal Law in 1956. Then, answer the questions that follow.
FOR:
“Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo must be read by all Filipinos. They must be taken to
heart, for in their pages we see ourselves as in a mirror, our defects as well as our strength, our
virtues as well as our vices. Only then would we become conscious as a people and so learn to
prepare ourselves for painful sacrifices that ultimately lead to self-reliance, self-respect and
freedom.”
-
Senator Jose P. Laurel
“Rizal did not pretend to teach religion when he wrote those books. He aimed at inculcating
civic consciousness in the Filipinos, national dignity, personal pride, and patriotism and if
references were made by him in the course of his narration to certain religious and behaviour of
orring ministers of the church, it was because he portrayed faithfully the general situation in the
Philippines as it then existed.”
-
Senator Claro M. Recto
AGAINST:
“A vast majority of our people are, at the same time, Catholic and Filipino citizens. As such, they
have two great loves: their country and their faith. These two loves are not conflicting loves.
They are harmonious affections, like the love for his father and for his mother.
This is the basis of my stand. Let us not create a conflict between nationalism and religion,
between the government and the church.”
-
Senator Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo
Guide Questions:
1. What was the major argument raised by Senator Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo against
the passage of the Rizal Bill?
2. What was the major argument raised by Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro M.
Recto in support of the passage of the Rizal Bill?
3. Are there points of convergence between the supporters and opposers of the
Rizal Bill based on these statements?
Page 1 of 2
Revision: 0
Republic of the Philippines
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
F. Pimentel Avenue, Brgy. 2, Daet, Camarines Norte – 4600, Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
Activity 2: STUDENT’S JOURNAL:
Reflect on the purpose of Rizal Law. Rizal Law was passed in the year 1956. After almost 66
years of being a law, does the purpose of instilling patriotism and love for country is seen in the
Filipinos especially the youth of today? Why or why not.
Rubrics for Grading:
FEATURES
SCORE
CAll relevant concepts are included and correct
oConnectivity of the topic to the issue/s of the country nowadays
R
n
e
QVery informative and well organized
ltu
Grammar
Virtually no
Usage
spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors (if captions are to be
eused) or (if viva voce), the clarity and formality are observable
a
tnl
Te
ti
do
t
nty
ea
slo
sf
M
a
k
i
n
g
35%
30%
20%
15%
100%
Prepared by:
John Rey R. Buan
Instructor
Page 2 of 2
Revision: 0
Download