STUDY SKILLS
MPU 2263
REFLECTION OF CASE STUDY SET A
10%
Group Number:
No
1
2
3
4
Name
Matric Number
1
Respond to a study situation.
Raisya’s courses this semester include Pengajian Malaysia, Cultural Diversity in Malaysia, Business
Management and Marketing Management. The Pengajian Malaysia course requirement include
several reading assignment from the books placed on reserve in the library and an essay final exam.
The Marketing management course content includes several textbook chapter and lectures explaining
how the marketing strategies effect the profitability of the business. The Cultural diversity in
Malaysia involves reading textbook, lectures and multiple choice exam. The business management
course focuses in part on the organization and structure of corporation; two multiple choice and
true/false exams will be given.
1. In which course(s) do you think Raisya will need to use outlines and explain why?
2. In which course(s) do you think Raisya will need to use summarizing and explain why?
3. Recommend a mapping strategy Raisya might use for each course. Explain why each
recommended approach is appropriate.
Answer Sheet:
2
3
Evaluation Criteria for Reflection of the Case Study
Criteria
Depth of
Reflection
(10M)
Required
Components
(10M)
Structure
(10M)
Evidence
and Practice
(10M)
Presentation
Structure
(10M)
Superior (8M-10M)
Response demonstrates an in-depth
reflection on, and personalization of, the
theories, concepts, and/or strategies
presented in the course materials to date.
Viewpoints and interpretations are
insightful and well supported. Clear,
detailed examples are provided, as
applicable.
Response includes all components and
meets or exceeds all requirements
indicated in the instructions. Each question
or part of the assignment is addressed
thoroughly. All attachments and/or
additional documents are included, as
required.
Writing is clear, concise, and well
organized with excellent
sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts
are expressed in a coherent and logical
manner. There are no more than three
spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per
page of writing.
Response shows strong evidence of
synthesis of ideas presented and insights
gained throughout the entire course. The
implications of these insights for the
respondent's overall teaching practice are
thoroughly detailed, as applicable.
Speaks clearly, correctly and precisely,
loud enough for audience to hear and
slowly enough for easy understanding.
Eye contact constant: minimal or no
reading of notes.
Sufficient (4M- 7M)
Response demonstrates a general
reflection on, and personalization of, the
theories, concepts, and/or strategies
presented in the course materials to date.
Viewpoints and interpretations are
supported. Appropriate examples are
provided, as applicable.
Response includes all components and
meets all requirements indicated in the
instructions. Each question or part of the
assignment is addressed. All attachments
and/or additional documents are
included, as required.
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well
organized with good sentence/paragraph
construction. Thoughts are expressed in a
coherent and logical manner. There are
no more than five spelling, grammar, or
syntax errors per page of writing.
Response shows evidence of synthesis of
ideas presented and insights gained
throughout the entire course. The
implications of these insights for the
respondent's overall teaching practice are
presented, as applicable.
Speaks clearly, pronounces most words
correctly, loud enough to be easily heard,
and slow enough to be understood. Eye
contact maintained except when
consulting notes, which is too often.
Minimal (1M-3M)
Response demonstrates a minimal reflection
on, and personalization of, the theories,
concepts, and/or strategies presented in the
course materials to date. Viewpoints and
interpretations are unsupported or supported
with flawed arguments. Examples, when
applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant
to the assignment.
Response is missing some components
and/or does not fully meet the requirements
indicated in the instructions. Some questions
or parts of the assignment are not addressed.
Some attachments and additional
documents, if required, are missing or
unsuitable for the assignment.
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized.
Thoughts are not expressed in a logical
manner. There are more than five spelling,
grammar, or syntax errors per page of
writing.
Unacceptable (0 points)
Response demonstrates a lack of reflection
on, or personalization of, the theories,
concepts, and/or strategies presented in the
course materials to date. Viewpoints and
interpretations are missing, inappropriate,
and/or unsupported. Examples, when
applicable, are not provided.
Response shows little evidence of synthesis
of ideas presented and insights gained
throughout the entire course. Few
implications of these insights for the
respondent's overall teaching practice are
presented, as applicable.
Speaks unclearly, mispronounces many
major terms, and speaks too softly or rapidly
to be easily understood. Some eye contact
but mostly reading from notes.
Response shows no evidence of synthesis
of ideas presented and insights gained
throughout the entire course. No
implications for the respondent's overall
teaching practice are presented, as
applicable.
Mumbles, mispronounces most important
terms, and speaks too softly or rapidly to
be understood at all. No eye contact, reads
from notes exclusively.
Evaluation of Reflection Case Study
Response excludes essential components
and/or does not address the requirements
indicated in the instructions. Many parts of
the assignment are addressed minimally,
inadequately, and/or not at all.
Writing is unclear and disorganized.
Thoughts ramble and make little sense.
There are numerous spelling, grammar, or
syntax errors throughout the response.
1.
NAME:
ID NUMBER:
Depth of Reflection
10M
2.
NAME:
ID NUMBER:
Depth of Reflection
10M
3.
NAME:
ID NUMBER:
Depth of Reflection
10M
4.
NAME:
ID NUMBER:
Depth of Reflection
10M
Required Components
Writing Structure
10M
10M
Required Components
Writing Structure
10M
10M
Required Components
Writing Structure
10M
10M
Required Components
Writing Structure
10M
10M
Evidence and
Practice
10M
Presentation
Structure
10M
TOTAL MARKS
TOTAL %
50M
10%
Evidence and
Practice
10M
Presentation
Structure
10M
TOTAL MARKS
TOTAL %
50M
10%
Evidence and
Practice
10M
Presentation
Structure
10M
TOTAL MARKS
TOTAL %
50M
10%
Evidence and
Practice
10M
Presentation
Structure
10M
TOTAL MARKS
TOTAL %
50M
10%
5.
NAME:
ID NUMBER:
Depth of Reflection
10M
Required Components
Writing Structure
10M
10M
Evidence and
Practice
10M
Presentation
Structure
10M
TOTAL MARKS
TOTAL %
50M
10%