7) According to law of consideration, the consideration is the price for which the promise of the other is
bought and thus given for value is enforceable.
In this case of coal mine, company promised to pay the amount and this was the consideration in this
case. Therefore the company is bound to pay its liabilities. Police was bound to perform their duty but it
was optional for them hence promised for paying the payment should be performed.
8) According to the laws of capacities of parties, “minor and reimbursement” a minor cannot be
compelled to return the money received by him under an agreement. But where a minor enters into an
agreement showing the attained the majority, the court may order to return the money.
In this case, since minor fraudulently showed the false age and entered in the agreement. Therefore, he
had no right to claim the money received by him. Since he falsely showed the fake age so court should
handover the car to R. But R cannot sue the minor because it was a void agreement.
9) According to law of section 11. Disqualified persons diplomatic staff and representatives of foreign
staff can enter into contact. And when they act by the order of government they cannot be sued.
In this scnerio, E is from foreign embassy and representing foreign government hence M cannot suit a
file against him for the rent.
10) According to act of breach of contract, when a party fails to perform his obligations under a contract
then compensation awarded by the court to aggrieved party for the losses faced by him due do breach
of contract.
In this case, defendants, refused to pay the amount. Plaintiff is suffering the losses so compensation
should be awarded to the aggrieved party.
11) According to agreement in restraint of trade, every person has right to operate the lawful trade. Any
agreement that restraint a person from doing any business or duty is void agreement.
In this case, A cannot sue B. Because any agreement which restrain any person to perform any lawful
trade is void agreement. Hence A cannot recover his amount of 10000.
12) According to privity of contract, a contract is not enforceable by the stranger, but it’s only
enforceable to the parties of contract.
In the matter of Municipal board, B is not responsible to pay the money because B was stranger in this
contract and also board refused to recognize his name as tenet. Hence, B is not liable.
13) Doctrine of frustration means that the contract is brought to be at end by the law due to some
disaster and there is no fault of anyone.
In this case, lessees are not liable for the rent because restrictions were imposed by the law due to 1939
war hence there is no fault of lessees.