Chapt erEi ght St r at egyRevi ew, Eval uat i onandCont r ol 8. 1 TheNat ur eofSt r at egyEval uat i on Eval uat i on i st he syst emat i c det er mi nat i on ofmer i t ,wor t h,and si gni f i cance of somet hi ngorsomeone.Eval uat i onof t eni susedt ochar act er i zeandappr i sesubj ect s ofi nt er esti n a wi de r ange ofhuman ent er pr i ses,i ncl udi ng t he Ar t s,busi ness, comput ersci ence,cr i mi nalj ust i ce,educat i on,engi neer i ng,f oundat i onsandnonpr of i t or gani zat i ons, gover nment , heal t hcar e, andot herhumanser vi ces. “ St r at egyeval uat i onal er t smanagementt opot ent i aloract ualpr obl emsi nat i mel y f ashi on. ” I ti scompl exandsensi t i veunder t aki ng Over emphasi scanbecost l yandcount er pr oduct i ve Syst emat i cRevi ew, Eval uat i on&Cont r ol 1.St r at egi esbecomeobsol et e 2.I nt er nal envi r onment sar edynami c 3.Ext er nalenvi r onment sar edynami c Pur poseofst r at egyeval uat i on St r at egyeval uat i oni svi t al t ot heor gani zat i on’ swel l bei ng Al er tmanagementt opot ent i aloract ualpr obl emsi nat i mel yf ashi on Er r oneous st r at egi c deci si ons can have sever e negat i ve i mpact on or gani zat i ons Basi cAct i vi t i es– 1.Exami ni ngt heunder l yi ngbasesofaf i r ms’ st r at egy 2.Compar i ngexpect edt oact ual r esul t s 3.Cor r ect i veact i onst oensur eper f or manceconf or mst opl ans I nmanyor gani zat i ons, eval uat i oni sanappr ai salofper f or mance– Haveasset si ncr eased? I ncr easei npr of i t abi l i t y? I ncr easei nsal es? I ncr easei npr oduct i vi t y? Pr of i tmar gi ns, ROIandEPSr at i osi ncr eased FourCr i t er i a( Ri char dRummel t ) :Heexpl ai nsf ourcr i t er i af orst r at egyval uat i on.They ar e: 1.Consi st ency 1 St r at egyshoul dnotpr esenti nconsi st entgoal sandpol i ci es. •Conf l i ctandi nt er depar t ment albi cker i ngsympt omat i cofmanager i aldi sor derand st r at egi ci nconsi st ency 2.Consonance Needf orst r at egi est oexami neset soft r ends •Adapt i ver esponset oext er nalenvi r onment •Tr endsar er esul t sofi nt er act i onsamongot hert r ends 3.Feasi bi l i t y Nei t herovert axr esour cesnorcr eat esunsol vabl esubpr obl ems •Or gani zat i onsmustdemonst r at et heabi l i t i es,compet enci es,ski l l sandt al ent st o car r youtagi venst r at egy 4.Advant age Cr eat i onormai nt enanceofcompet i t i veadvant age •Super i or i t yi nr esour ces, ski l l s, orposi t i on Thepr ocessofeval uat i ngSt r at egi es 1.St r at egyeval uat i oni snecessar yf oral lsi zesandki ndsofor gani zat i on.St r at egy eval uat i onshoul di ni t i at emanager i alquest i oni ngofexpect at i onsandassumpt i ons shoul dt r i ggerar evi ew ofobj ect i vesandval uesandshoul dst i mul at ecr eat i vi t yi n gener at i ngal t er nat i veandf or mul at i ngcr i t er i aofeval uat i on 2.Eval uat i ngst r at egi esoncont i nuousr at hert hanaper i odi cbasi sal l owsbenchmar k ofpr ogr esst oest abl i shedando\ mor eef f ect i vel ymoni t or ed 3.Manager sandempl oyeesoft hef i r m shoul dbecont i nual l yawar eofpr ogr essbei ng madet owar dsachi evi ngt hef i r m’ sobj ect i ves.Asacr i t i calsuccessf act or schange, or gani zat i onmember sshoul dbei nvol vedi ndet er mi ni ngappr opr i at ecor r ect i veact i on. 8. 2 ASt r at egyEval uat i onFr amewor k St r at egyeval uat i onact i vi t i esi nt er msofkeyquest i onst hatshoul dbeaddr essed, al t er nat i veanswer st ot hosequest i ons,andappr opr i at eact i onsf oranor gani zat i ont o t ake.Not i cet hatcor r ect i veact i onsar eal mostal waysneededexceptwhen: ( 1)Ext er nalandi nt er nalf act or shavenotsi gni f i cant l ychangedand ( 2)Thef i r mi spr ogr essi ngsat i sf act or i l yt owar dachi evi ngst at edobj ect i ves. Revi ewi ngBasesofSt r at egy 2 Revi ewi ngt heunder l yi ngbasesofanor gani zat i on' sst r at egycoul dbeappr oachedby devel opi ngar evi sedEFEMat r i xandI FEMat r i x.Ar evi sedI FEMat r i xshoul df ocuson changes i n t he or gani zat i on' s management , mar ket i ng, f i nance/ account i ng, pr oduct i on/ oper at i ons,R&D,and comput er i nf or mat i on syst ems st r engt hs and weaknesses.A r evi sedEFEMat r i xshoul di ndi cat ehow ef f ect i veaf i r m' sst r at egi es hav ebeeni nr esponset okeyoppor t uni t i esandt hr eat s.Thi sanal ysi scoul dal so addr esssuchquest i onsast hef ol l owi ng: 1.Howhavecompet i t or sr eact edt oourst r at egi es? 2.Howhavecompet i t or s' st r at egi eschanged? 3.Havemaj orcompet i t or s' st r engt hsandweaknesseschanged? 4.Whyar ecompet i t or smaki ngcer t ai nst r at egi cchanges? 5.Whyar esomecompet i t or s' st r at egi esmor esuccessf ult hanot her s? 6.How sat i sf i ed ar e ourcompet i t or s wi t ht hei rpr esentmar ketposi t i ons and pr of i t abi l i t y? 7.Howf arcanourmaj orcompet i t or sbepushedbef or er et al i at i ng? 8.Howcoul dwemor eef f ect i vel ycooper at ewi t hourcompet i t or s? Measur i ngOr gani zat i onalPer f or mance Anot her i mpor t ant st r at egyeval uat i on act i vi t y i s measur i ng or gani zat i onal per f or mance.Thi sact i vi t yi ncl udescompar i ng expect ed r esul t st o act ualr esul t s, i nvest i gat i ngdevi at i onsf r om pl ans,eval uat i ngi ndi vi dualper f or mance,andexami ni ng pr ogr essbei ngmadet owar dmeet i ngst at edobj ect i ves.Bot hl ongt er m andannual obj ect i vesar ecommonl yusedi nt hi spr ocess.Cr i t er i af oreval uat i ngst r at egi esshoul d bemeasur abl eandeasi l yver i f i abl e.Cr i t er i at hatpr edi ctr esul t smaybemor ei mpor t ant t hant hoset hatr evealwhatal r eadyhashappened. Quant i t at i vecr i t er i acommonl yusedt oeval uat est r at egi esar ef i nanci alr at i os,whi ch st r at egi st suset omaket hr eecr i t i calcompar i sons: ( 1)Compar i ngt hef i r m' sper f or manceoverdi f f er entt i meper i ods, ( 2)Compar i ngt hef i r m' sper f or mancet ocompet i t or s' , and ( 3)Compar i ngt hef i r m' sper f or mancet oi ndust r yaver ages. Somekeyf i nanci alr at i ost hatar epar t i cul ar l yusef ulascr i t er i af orst r at egyeval uat i onar eas f ol l ows: 1.Ret ur noni nvest ment 2.Ret ur nonequi t y 3 3.Pr of i tmar gi n 4.Mar ketshar e 5.Debtt oequi t y 6.Ear ni ngspershar e 7.Sal esgr owt h 8.Assetgr owt h Apar tf r om quant i t at i vecr i t er i a,SeymourTi l l esi dent i f i edsi xqual i t at i vequest i onst hat ar eusef uli neval uat i ngst r at egi es: 1.I st hest r at egyi nt er nal l yconsi st ent ? 2.I st hest r at egyconsi st entwi t ht heenvi r onment ? 3.I st hest r at egyappr opr i at ei nvi ewofavai l abl er esour ces? 4.Doest hest r at egyi nvol veanaccept abl edegr eeofr i sk? 5.Doest hest r at egyhaveanappr opr i at et i mef r amewor k? 6.I st hest r at egywor kabl e? Taki ngCor r ect i veAct i ons The f i nalst r at egyeval uat i on act i vi t y,t aki ng cor r ect i ve act i ons,r equi r es maki ng changest or eposi t i onaf i r m compet i t i vel yf ort hef ut ur e.Exampl esofchangest hat maybeneededar eal t er i nganor gani zat i on' sst r uct ur e,r epl aci ngoneormor ekey i ndi vi dual s,sel l i ngadi vi si on,orr evi si ngabusi nessmi ssi on.Ot herchangescoul d i ncl udeest abl i shi ngorr evi si ngobj ect i ves, devi si ngnewpol i ci es, i ssui ngst ockt or ai se capi t al ,addi ngaddi t i onalsal esper sons,al l ocat i ngr esour cesdi f f er ent l y,ordevel opi ng newper f or mancei ncent i ves.Taki ngcor r ect i veact i onsdoesnotnecessar i l ymeant hat exi st i ngst r at egi eswi l l beabandonedorevent hatnewst r at egi esmustbef or mul at ed. 8. 3 Publ i shedSour cesofSt r at egyEval uat i onI nf or mat i on A numberofpubl i cat i ons ar e hel pf uli n eval uat i ng a f i r m’ s st r at egi es.Al t hough publ i shedsour cesofst r at egyeval uat i oni nf or mat i onf ocuspr i mar i l yonl ar ge,publ i cl y hel dbusi nesses,t hecompar at i ver at i osandr el at edi nf or mat i onar ewi del yusedt o eval uat esmal lbusi nessesandpr i vat el yownedf i r msaswel l . 8. 4 Char act er i st i csofanEf f ect i veEval uat i onSyst em AGoodeval uat i onsyst em mustpossessvar i ousqual i t i es.Fi r st ,st r at egyeval uat i on act i vi t i esmustbeeconomi cal ;t oomuchi nf or mat i oncanbej ustasbadast ool i t t l e i nf or mat i on;andt oomanycont r ol scandomor ehar mt hangood.St r at egyeval uat i on act i vi t i es al so shoul d be meani ngf ul ;t hey shoul d speci f i cal l yr el at et oaf i r m' s 4 obj ect i ves.Theyshoul dpr ovi demanager swi t husef uli nf or mat i onaboutt asksover whi cht heyhavecont r olandi nf l uence.St r at egyeval uat i onact i vi t i esshoul dpr ovi de t i mel yi nf or mat i on;onoccasi onandi nsomear eas,manager smayneedi nf or mat i on dai l y.Forexampl e,whenaf i r m hasdi ver si f i edbyacqui r i nganot herf i r m,eval uat i ve i nf or mat i onmaybeneededf r equent l y.However ,i nanR&Ddepar t ment ,dai l yoreven weekl yeval uat i vei nf or mat i oncoul dbedysf unct i onal .Appr oxi mat ei nf or mat i ont hati s t i mel yi sgener al l ymor edesi r abl easabasi sf orst r at egyeval uat i ont hanaccur at e i nf or mat i on t hatdoes notdepi ctt he pr esent .Fr equentmeasur ementand r api d r epor t i ngmayf r ust r at econt r olr at hert hangi vebet t ercont r ol .Thet i medi mensi onof cont r olmustcoi nci dewi t ht het i mespanoft heeventbei ngmeasur ed. St r at egyeval uat i onshoul dbedesi gnedt opr ovi deat r uepi ct ur eofwhati shappeni ng. Forexampl e,i nasever eeconomi cdownt ur n,pr oduct i vi t yandpr of i t abi l i t yr at i osmay dr op al ar mi ngl y,al t hough empl oyees and manager s ar e act ual l ywor ki ng har der . St r at egyeval uat i onsshoul dpor t r ayt hi st ypeofsi t uat i onf ai r l y.I nf or mat i onder i ved f r om t hest r at egyeval uat i onpr ocessshoul df aci l i t at eact i onandshoul dbedi r ect edt o t hosei ndi vi dual si nt heor gani zat i onwhoneedt ot akeact i onbasedoni t .Manager s commonl yi gnor eeval uat i ver epor t st hatar epr ovi dedf ori nf or mat i onalpur posesonl y; notal lmanager sneedt or ecei veal lr epor t s.Cont r ol sneedt obeact i onor i ent edr at her t hani nf or mat i onor i ent ed. The st r at egyeval uat i on pr ocess shoul d notdomi nat e deci si ons;i tshoul df ost er mut ualunder st andi ng,t r ust ,and common sense!No depar t mentshoul df ai lt o cooper at ewi t hanot heri neval uat i ngst r at egi es.St r at egyeval uat i onsshoul dbesi mpl e, nott oocumber some,andnott oor est r i ct i ve.Compl exst r at egyeval uat i onsyst ems of t enconf usepeopl eandaccompl i shl i t t l e.Thet estofanef f ect i veeval uat i onsyst em i si t susef ul ness, noti t scompl exi t y. Lar geor gani zat i onsr equi r eamor eel abor at eanddet ai l edst r at egyeval uat i onsyst em because i ti s mor e di f f i cul tt o coor di nat e ef f or t s among di f f er entdi vi si ons and f unct i onalar eas.Manager si nsmal lcompani esof t encommuni cat ewi t heachot her andt hei rempl oyeesdai l yanddonotneedext ensi veeval uat i ver epor t i ngsyst ems. Fami l i ar i t y wi t h l ocal envi r onment s usual l y makes gat her i ng and eval uat i ng i nf or mat i onmucheasi erf orsmal lor gani zat i onst hanf orl ar gebusi nesses.Butt hekey t oanef f ect i vest r at egyeval uat i onsyst em maybet heabi l i t yt oconvi ncepar t i ci pant s t hatf ai l ur et oaccompl i shcer t ai nobj ect i veswi t hi napr escr i bedt i mei snotnecessar i l y ar ef l ect i onoft hei rper f or mance. Ther ei snoonei dealst r at egyeval uat i onsyst em.Theuni quechar act er i st i csofan or gani zat i on,i ncl udi ngi t ssi ze,managementst yl e,pur pose,pr obl ems,andst r engt hs, can det er mi ne a st r at egyeval uat i on and cont r olsyst em' sf i naldesi gn.Rober t Wat er manof f er edt hef ol l owi ngobser vat i onaboutsuccessf ulor gani zat i ons' st r at egyeval uat i onandcont r ol syst ems: 5 Successf ulcompani es t r eatf act s as f r i ends and cont r ol s as l i ber at i ng.Mor gan Guar ant yandWel l sFar gonotonl ysur vi vebutt hr i vei nt het r oubl edwat er sofbank der egul at i on,becauset hei rst r at egyeval uat i onandcont r olsyst emsar esound,t hei r r i ski scont ai ned,andt heyknow t hemsel vesandt hecompet i t i vesi t uat i onsowel l . Successf ulcompani eshaveavor aci oushungerf orf act s.Theyseei nf or mat i onwher e ot her sseeonl ydat a.Theyl ovecompar i sons, r anki ngs, anyt hi ngt hatr emovesdeci si on maki ng f r om t he r eal m ofmer e opi ni on.Successf ulcompani es mai nt ai nt i ght , accur at ef i nanci alcont r ol s.Thei rpeopl edon' tr egar dcont r ol sasani mposi t i onof aut ocr acy,butast hebeni gnchecksandbal ancest hatal l owt hem t obecr eat i v eand f r ee. 8. 5 Thecont i ngencyModel Abasi cpr emi seofgoodst r at egi cmanagementi st hatf i r mspl anwayst odealwi t h unf avor abl eandf avor abl eevent sbef or et heyoccur .Toomanyor gani zat i onspr epar e cont i ngency pl ans j ustf orunf avor abl e event s;t hi si s a mi st ake,because bot h mi ni mi zi ngt hr eat sandcapi t al i zi ngonoppor t uni t i escani mpr oveaf i r m' scompet i t i ve posi t i on. Regar dl essofhow car ef ul l yst r at egi esar ef or mul at ed,i mpl ement ed,andeval uat ed, unf or eseen event s such as st r i kes,boycot t s,nat ur aldi sast er s,ar r i valoff or ei gn compet i t or s,andgover nmentact i onscanmakeast r at egyobsol et e.Tomi ni mi zet he i mpactofpot ent i alt hr eat s, or gani zat i onsshoul ddevel opcont i ngencypl ansaspar tof t hest r at egy eval uat i onpr ocess.Cont i ngencypl anscanbedef i nedasal t er nat i vepl ans t hatcanbeputi nt oef f ecti fcer t ai nkeyevent sdonotoccurasexpect ed.Onl yhi ghpr i or i t yar easr equi r et hei nsur anceofcont i ngencypl ans.St r at egi st scannotand shoul dnott r yt ocoveral lbasesbypl anni ngf oral lpossi bl econt i ngenci es.Buti nany case, cont i ngencypl ansshoul dbeassi mpl easpossi bl e. Audi t i ng Af r equent l yusedt ooli nst r at egyeval uat i oni st heaudi t .Audi t i ngi sdef i nedbyt he Amer i can Account i ng Associ at i on ( AAA)as " a syst emat i c pr ocess ofobj ect i vel y obt ai ni ngandeval uat i ngevi dencer egar di ngasser t i onsabouteconomi cact i onsand event st o ascer t ai nt hedegr eeofcor r espondencebet ween t hoseasser t i onsand est abl i shedcr i t er i a,andcommuni cat i ngt her esul t st oi nt er est eduser s. "Peopl ewho per f or m audi t scanbedi vi dedi nt ot hr eegr oups:i ndependentaudi t or s,gover nment audi t or s,and i nt er nalaudi t or s.I ndependentaudi t or sbasi cal l yar ecer t i f i ed publ i c account ant s( CPAs)whopr ovi det hei rser vi cest oor gani zat i onsf oraf ee;t heyexami ne t hef i nanci alst at ement sofanor gani zat i ont odet er mi newhet hert heyhavebeen pr epar edaccor di ngt ogener al l yaccept edaccount i ngpr i nci pl es( GAAP)andwhet her t heyf ai r l yr epr esentt heact i vi t i esoft hef i r m.I ndependentaudi t or suseasetof st andar dscal l edgener al l yaccept edaudi t i ngst andar ds( GAAS) .Publ i caccount i ng 6 f i r msof t enhaveaconsul t i ngar mt hatpr ovi desst r at egyeval uat i onser vi ces. Two gover nmentagenci es—t heGener alAccount i ng Of f i ce( GAO)and t heI nt er nal RevenueSer vi ce( I RS) —empl oygover nmentaudi t or sr esponsi bl ef ormaki ngsur et hat or gani zat i onscompl ywi t hf eder all aws,st at ut es,andpol i ci es.GAOandI RSaudi t or s canaudi tanypubl i corpr i vat eor gani zat i on.Thet hi r dgr oupofaudi t or si sempl oyees wi t hi nanor gani zat i onwhoar er esponsi bl ef orsaf eguar di ngcompanyasset s,f or assessi ng t he ef f i ci encyofcompanyoper at i ons,and f orensur i ng t hatgener al l y accept edbusi nesspr ocedur esar epr act i ced. TheEnvi r onment alAudi t Forani ncr easi ngnumberoff i r ms,over seei ngenvi r onment alaf f ai r si snol ongera t echni calf unct i on per f or med by speci al i st s;i tr at herhas become an i mpor t ant st r at egi cmanagement concer n. Pr oduct desi gn, manuf act ur i ng, t r anspor t at i on, cust omeruse,packagi ng,pr oductdi sposal ,and cor por at er ewar dsand sanct i ons shoul d r ef l ect envi r onment al consi der at i ons. Fi r ms t hat ef f ect i vel y manage envi r onment alaf f ai r s ar e benef i t i ng f r om const r uct i ve r el at i ons wi t h empl oyees, consumer s, suppl i er s, anddi st r i but or s. I nst i t ut i nganenvi r onment alaudi tcani ncl udemovi ngenvi r onment alaf f ai r sf r om t he st af fsi de oft he or gani zat i on t ot he l i ne si de.Some f i r ms ar e al so i nt r oduci ng envi r onment alcr i t er i aandobj ect i vesi nt hei rper f or manceappr ai sali nst r ument sand syst ems.Conoco,f orexampl e,t i es compensat i on ofal li t st op manager st o envi r onment al act i on pl ans. Occi dent al Chemi cal i ncl udes envi r onment al r esponsi bi l i t i esi nal li t sj obdescr i pt i onsf orposi t i ons. Usi ngComput er st oEval uat eSt r at egi es Whenpr oper l ydesi gned,i nst al l ed,andoper at ed,acomput ernet wor kcanef f i ci ent l y acqui r ei nf or mat i onpr ompt l yandaccur at el y.Net wor kscanal l ow di ver sest r at egyeval uat i onr epor t st obegener at edf or —andr espondedt oby—di f f er entl evel sandt ypes ofmanager s. 8. 6 St r at egi cCont r ol :Cont r olPr ocess Thepr ocessofeval uat i onbasi cal l ydeal swi t hf ourst eps: 1.Set t i ngst andar dsofper f or mance 2.Measur ementofper f or mance 3.Anal yzi ngvar i ance 4.Taki ngcor r ect i veact i on END! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ? 7