BMH IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1 Barclay Memorial Hospital Memorandum To: Dr. Larry Harvey, BMH Board Chairman From: Antonio Johnson, Interim CEO Subject: BMH Improvement Plan Date: 7/5/2020 Background Barclay Memorial Hospital (BMH), has provided services to the local community for more than 50 years. After reviewing the files on the history of BMH, it was determined that the facility experienced bad leadership that lead to bankruptcy. There was a time when BMH excelled in the aspects of financial stability, top level management and services. It is clear to see how fifty years of service has created overwhelming stress to continue providing excellent services. One major bad decision made by BMH management was the merger of Valley Physician Group (VPG) and Physician Hospital Organization (PHO). The merger caused a rift in communication and trust amongst staff and board members. BMH can no longer make effective decisions due to allowing outside sources intervene in business decisions. Listed below are key factors that contribute to workplace stress and the cause of leadership conflict. Primary issue The inefficiency of the board and governance to make decisions and implement strategic planning. High FTE Ratio Violation of bylaws Poor morale amongst staff Poor communication between board members and CEO Lack of consequences for actions that violated facilities rules and regulations Solution Plan First plan of action of be to elect new board members. BMH must elect new board members that are interested in enhancing the hospital and its services rather than selfinterest. All board members who are incompetent and lack interest in the organization must be fired. BMH must establish a strategic plan for short term, long term and process of improvement goals. The family needs to create tangible goals that will ensure the organization does not lose focus. This also requires all staff members to understand the goals and follow the designed strategic plan. By setting goals, BMH can decrease conflict of interest, increase communication between physician and board members, and increase community benefits. With the resignation of Gregory Schilling, BMH must elect a CEO that will help develop a positive relationship between physicians and the board members. The new CEO needs to have a strong authoritative background but also have the ability to make decisions that will satisfy stakeholder’s interest. BMH has experienced many issues with communication and decision making amongst its board members. In this case the board members at BMH were not qualified to hold the position nor did the members have the hospitals best interest in mind. Along with the wrong individuals being elected as board members, Dr. Harvey wasted valuable resources and time. Several board members were only focused on personal agendas that caused major conflicts during board meetings. If boards understand their roles and responsibilities, have a proper structure including well-chosen members, exhibit appropriate behaviors, and know what is expected of them, they can live up to the challenges of the future and keep health care organizations on track for the good of the community (Arnwine, 2002). In order for BMH to get back on track, the first solution is to bring in new members with fresh ideas that will work in the hospitals favor. In order for the facility to make a complete change, it must first start with board members since they play a critical role in the organization. V/r Antonio Johnson, Interim CEO Reference: Arnwine, D. (2002, January). Effective governance: The roles and responsibilities of board members. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1276331/