Uploaded by Lyka Joy Estrañero Gereña

Case Study (Gerena)

advertisement
ICCT Colleges Foundation Inc.
V.V Soliven Ave. II, Cainta, Rizal
College of Business and Accountancy
Submitted to:
Mrs. Sherryl Guanlao
Instructor
Submitted by:
Lyka Joy E. Gereña
MGMT205/Add70
COMPANY NAME: Creative Food Technology Corporation
POINT OF VIEW: Alex, a BS Food Technology graduate and MBA degree holder
TIME CONTEXT: Creative Food Technology Corporation, established in 2007
SHORT HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:
Creative Food Technology Corporation (CFTC), is the brainchild of Alex, a BS
Food Technology graduate and MBA degree holder who has substantial experience
working in the area of research and product development. In 2007, Alex quit his job and
founded CFTC. He launched Wake Up! Extreme, a line of hard candy marketed as “the
first energy candy in the Philippines.” This would be the start of what could only be
described as an entrepreneurial streak.
In 2008, Alex also established a water-refilling business, PureDrops, which catered
to households. In 2009, Alex took over the management of their family business of
reconditioning and trading secondhand offset printing equipment. In the same year, he
also established Offset Offsite, an offset printing business that provided all-around
printing services.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
Having embarked on different businesses in the span of only a few years, Alex
faced several problems: non-remittance of revenues, non-payment of consigned
products, and pilferage. Another major issue was that although Wake Up! Extreme was
different from other candies as it was probably the only energy candy available,
consumers could not differentiate it from other candies and already had a set price in
mind. Thus, they could easily switch to other brands when the price of the energy candy
was increased. This perception became a constraint on the margins of the product line.
Demand for the energy candy has yet to pick up as it was still virtually unknown to their
target market.
AREAS OF CONSIDERATION (SWOT ANALYSIS):
STRENGTHS
1.
2.
3.
4.
Uniqueness of product
Reputation for innovation
Low cost of products
Product differentiation
WEAKNESS
1. Lack of demand
2. Weak internal control
3. Unpopularity of the product among consumers
OPPURTUNITIES
1. New market trends
THREAT
1. Possibility of “taste fatigue”
2. Market competition
ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION:
1. Offer free taste of product on large quantity of new market.
PROS - Will introduce product on new market with an immediate feedback.
CONS - May take time since new product is not known for the new market yet.
2. Innovate a different flavors of candy.
PROS – Will introduce variety of flavored energy candies to the consumers
CONS – Old market may not brace the innovated product.
3. Advertisements of product among Filipino community.
PROS – Filipinos may do a word-of-mouth advertising
CONS – May not embrace with the new market yet since it is a new taste with them
CONCLUSION:
I recommend ACA 2 followed by ACA 1 and ACA 3. The company must create
different flavors of energy candies for customers have different taste preferences. They
must use advertisements through TV and social media and offer free taste of their
products in malls, schools and any public areas. Identify the appropriate target market
and introduce the product to them.
Download