Discussion Questions
The Stranger by Albert Camus.
Directions:
Get into groups of (3­5) and discuss your responses to these questions. Based on these discussions,
write your own detailed responses to these questions in paragraph form based for Guided Response
homework (due Thursday 03­27­14).
1. Compare and contrast the relationship between Salamano and his dog with the
relationship between Meursault and his mother. What are the similarities? Which is
more loving?
2. Is Meursault really a threat to his society? Does he deserve the death penalty? Is he
more or less dangerous than a criminal who commits a crime with clear motive?
3. We see characters in the novel solely through Meursault’s eyes, but Meursault typically
tells us very little. Using the information that Meursault provides, analyze the
characters Marie and Raymond. Discuss how Meursault’s observations reveal his
attitude and his judgment of others. What level of insight (deep? shallow? etc.) does
Meursault provide into these characters’ personalities?
4. In his jail cell, Meursault finds an old newspaper article about a Czechoslovakian man
who is murdered by his mother and sister. How does this article relate to Meursault’s
own trial for murder? How does this article expand the themes in The Stranger? How
does it support Camus’s philosophy of the absurd?
5. Trace the development of Meursault’s ideology in the novel. Examine what you believe
his principles or values to be which form a “system of ideas” that he lives his life by—
(known as an ideology). How does he come to open himself to “the gentle indifference
of the world”? What causes this epiphany to happen? How do earlier events in the novel
prepare us to expect it?
6. Discuss the style of The Stranger. Examine Camus’ use of language through diction,
syntax, figurative language and the tone he creates.
a. Camus presents the novel through the narrator. So, how does Meursault’s
language correspond to the subjects he describes? Hint‐‐discuss his perceptions
of the physical world as opposed to how he describes the motives or
psychologies of the individuals we encounter through him.
b. Does Camus’ style evolve or change as the novel goes on? Hint‐‐does the
stripped‐down prose: the short, simple sentences of the novel’s first half limit its
expressive power or enhance it?
c. Carefully examine Camus’ sentences. Describe the flow of these sentences and
the connections that exist (or do not) between them.
d. How can the style of the writing itself be said to embody the Existential
philosophy that Camus structures the novel around?
7. Analyze the passages describing Meursault’s walk down the beach before he kills the
Arab. How does Camus build tension in the passage? How is it different from the
passages preceding it? Meursault says at his trial that he killed the Arab because of the
sun. Is this explanation at all valid? (Hint: if you want a way to discuss a valid
explanation then apply Freud’s “psychic apparatus” involving “primary and secondary
processes” for how the ego is presented with impulses and images to Meursualt).