Early Recognition of Shock, Early intervention and Treatment of shock Dr Hardawani Mohd Hussain Emergency Physician Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah Definition of Shock: Shock is a clinical syndrome which occurs when there is an abnormality of the circulatory system that results in inadequate organ perfusion and tissue oxygenation. Imbalance between O2 demand and O2 supply Tissue hypoperfussion Anaerobic metabolism Lactic acid accumulation Metabolic acidosis Coagulopathy, high CO2 Types of shock 1. Hypovolaemic 2. Cardiogenic 3. Obstructive 4. Distributive – septic, anaphylactic,neurogenic *HAEMORRHAGE IS THE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF SHOCK IN THE INJURED PATIENT* Shock in a trauma patients classified as; -1-hemorrhagic -1. Hypovolaemic -2-non hemorrhagic 2. Cardiogenic -cardiogenic shock -tension pneumothorax3. Obstructive -neurogenic shock 4. Distributive – septic, anaphylactic,neurogenic -septic shock Pump – failure Volume – not enough Vessel - failure Type Pathophysiology Treatment Hypovolemic Volume depletion Volume replacement Cardiogenic Pump failure - Electrical problem (arrythmias) - Structure (LVF) Anti Arrythmia Defibrillation Inotropic Distributive Vessel – generalised vasodilatation Fluid Inotropes Obstructive Vessel – obstructed - Pulmonary embolism - Tension pneumothorax - Cardiac tamponade Release obstruction Determine whether patient really in shok or not? - tachyrcardic, tachypneic, pale, altered sensorium, hypotension and others. Determine the cause of shock - hypovolemic, cardiogenic, distributive or obstructive. Know the pathogenesis of shock - pump, volume or vessel. Treat accordingly - fluid, inotropes, release obstruction (chest tube, pericardiocentesis) MTLS HYPOVOLAEMIC SHOCK • Most common cause of shock in the trauma patient • Haemorrhage is defined as an acute loss of circulating blood volume • Normal blood volume in adult : 7% of body weight • Normal blood volume in paed.: 80mls/kg Note: Tachycardia is the first sign of shock INITIAL PATIENT ASSESSMENT 1. Recognition of shock - tachycardia is the first sign of shock 2. Assessment of blood loss - anatomical - physiological Recognition of shock Any injured patient who is cool & has tachycardia is considered to be in shock until proven otherwise Infant > 160/min Preschool-age child > 140/min School to puberty >120/min Adult >100/min Mini MTLS 2014 MTLS ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS CAUSED BY FRACTURES Pelvis 2.0 - 4.0 L (40 - 80% TBW) Femur 1.0 - 2.5 L (20 - 50% TBW) Tibia 0.5 - 1.5 L (10 - 30% TBW) Humerus 0.5 - 1.5 L (10 - 30% TBW) For an open fracture the loss is two or three times greater Life Threatening Injuries multiple trauma severe crush injury severe vascular injury amputation Pelvic injury Limb Threatening Injuries vascular injury compartment syndrome compound fracture major joint dislocation nerve injury MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHAGIC SHOCK A. Physical Examination ABCDE B. Vascular Access C. Initial Fluid Therapy D. Evaluation and Monitoring E. Definitive treatment A. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 1. Airway - establish a patent airway - administer oxygen - maintain SpO2 >95% 2. Breathing - ensure adequate ventilation - consider tension pneumothorax 3. Circulation - control obvious haemorrhage by direct pressure over bleeding site - obtain adequate intravenous access - assess tissue perfusion 4. Disability - neurologic examination 5. Exposure B. VASCULAR ACCESS • 2 large bore IV cannula 16 - 14 G - forearm or antecubital veins - central venous line using a short cannula - cutdown at the saphenous or arm veins • In paediatrics, intraosseous needle access in failure to get a peripheral line C. INITIAL FLUID THERAPY • Initial fluid bolus - paediatric - 20ml/kg - adults - 1 - 2 L balanced salt solution • Crystalloid - Ringer’s lactate (Hartmann’s solution) - Normal Saline (0.9% saline) - replace 3 ml of crystalloid for 1 ml of blood lost The patient’s response to initial fluid resuscitation is the key to determing subsequent therapy. There are three possible patterns of response to the initial fluid bolus: • rapid response, • transient response, and • minimal or no response. Rapid Response These patients respond rapidly and favorably to the initial fluid bolus with hemodynamic normalization •remain stable when IV fluids are decreased to maintenance •Usually these patients have lost less than 20% of their blood volume •don’t need addition fluid boluses or blood transfusion However, it is still critical to ensure that surgical consultation be obtained immediately as emergency surgery may become suddenly necessary. Transient Responders These patients respond to the initial fluid bolus with improvement in their vital signs and improvement in perfusion • But when the bolus infusion is slowed to maintenance their vitals and perfusion deteriorate •These patients either have continuing blood loss or they need more fluid and/or blood •Usually these patients have lost 20% to 40% of their blood volume They need blood and blood products and they need immediate surgical or angiographic control of internal hemorrage. Minimal or No Response These patients have minimal or no response to fluid bolus and blood administration • They need immediate surgical or angiographic control of internal or they will die •In patients with minimal or no response to fluid bolus, it is important to consider other causes of failure to respond to fluids and blood (namely pump failure caused by cardiac contusion, cardiac tamponade, and tension pneumothorax) but they are uncommon •By far the most common cause of minimal or no response to fluids and blood is exasanguinating hemorrhage. D. EVALUATION AND MONITORING 1. General - return of normal PR, BP, pulse pressure - improvement in central nervous system status - improvement in skin circulation 2. Urinary output • The renal response to restoration of perfusion is sensitive i.e. it can reflect organ perfusion • adult : 50ml/hr • paediatric : 1ml/kg/hr 3. Central Venous Pressure - reflects the intravascular volume 4. Acid - base balance - metabolic acidosis is due to prolonged shock and inadequate resuscitation - persistent acidosis should be treated with increased fluid and not IV NaHCO3 E. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT Fluid resuscitation does not replace early definitive intervention and surgery to control the haemorrhage. Definitive care should be instituted within the “GOLDEN HOUR”. THANK YOU