Uploaded by copleyjr21

Torts Final Review

advertisement
TORTS
DTS Final Review

Understanding Torts on Amazon

Previous Exam Questions

Quimbee Exams
Negligence
Negligence is distinguished from Intent

Intent-

Negligence-
2 Essential Elements of Negligence.
1. A
2. B
Duty of Reasonable Care

Duty Based on Relationsihip

Limited Duty of Landholder—Trespassers
Breach of Duty

Only have to modify your behavior to foreseeable risks

When you are warned of the risk, it reduces their responsibility to you (almost to zero)

Generally, you don’t breach a duty if you expose them to a BLATANT risk

You get in trouble if it is an unknown risk, that other can’t see (ex. At night)

Risk of harm is unreasonable when a reasonable and prudent person would foresee that
harm might result AND would avoid conduct that creates the risk
Origins of Strict Liabilty

Rylands v. Fletcher
o P sued after mine flooded
Negligence: Reasonable Person

Fictional, hypothetical character used for judging conduct

Ordinary knowledge and intelligence
o Exception is usually made if D is mentally handicapped
o No exception for insanity (
Negligence: Court and Jury

In a negligence case, the plaintiff bears the burden of two distinct factors:
Negligence: Hand Text and Custom
Negligence: Per Se

Gorris v. Scott
o D
Negligence: Res Ipsa Loquitor

“The thing speaks for itself”—The occurrence of an accident implies negligence

Factors to look at when trying to prove Res Ipsa Loquitor
Contributory Negligence
1. In Common Law jurisdictions,
2. In some jurisdictions,
Assumption of Risk

Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Inc.
Comparative Negligence

Statutory in nature—will be stated as a fact on the exam
Joint and Several Liablility
Who pays what?

P can enforce claim against either tortfeasor
Cause in Fact
Reynolds v Texas – woman tripped on stairwell with no light while rushing for the train
New York Central R.R. v. Grimstad –
Cause in Fact: Multiple Causes
Summers v. Tice
Cause in Fact: Mass Torts
Alternative liability
Coincidental liability
Enterprise liability
Market Share liability
Proximate Cause

P must prove in a negligence case that her harm fell within the scope of D’s liability.

D only liable:
o For types of injuries forseeably
Proximate Cause: Causal Link
Proximate Cause: Foreseeability
Is it foreseeable or not?
Affirmative Duties and Special Relationships

Landlords have duty to take steps to protect tenants from foreseeable
Duties of Landowners

Trespassers

Trespassing Children

Licensee

Invitee
Strict Liability

Gehrts v. Batteen

Spano v. Perini Corp
Intentional Torts

Battery

Assault

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Fraud and Misrepresentation

Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Manufacturing Co.
Product Liability Origins

If no duty to person, then no product liability
Product Liability: Duty to Warn

Often duty to warn even when danger is clear
Download