Non-Fiction​ ​Prose​ ​Analysis​ ​-​ ​NBE3U
Criteria
Level​ ​0
<50%
Level​ ​1
50-60%
Level​ ​2
60-70%
Level​ ​3
70-80%
Level​ ​4
80-100%
Knowledge
-​ ​inadequate
understanding​ ​of
main​ ​points​ ​of
article
-​ ​no​ ​examination
of​ ​devices,
techniques
-​ ​limited​ ​grasp​ ​of
main​ ​pts​ ​in​ ​text
​ ​-​ ​minimal
explanation​ ​of
devices,
techniques
-understands
some​ ​of​ ​the​ ​points
in​ ​text
-​ ​a​ ​few​ ​techniques,
devices​ ​are
explained
-​ ​demonstrates
understanding​ ​of
main​ ​points​ ​in​ ​text
-​ ​some​ ​rhetorical
devices​ ​and
techniques​ ​are
explained
-demonstrates​ ​full
understanding​ ​of
text’s​ ​complexities
-​ ​advanced​ ​grasp
of​ ​writer’s
rhetorical​ ​and
stylistic​ ​techniques
-​ ​TS​ ​does​ ​not
summarize​ ​points
discussed
-​ ​no​ ​connection
between​ ​text​ ​and
devices
-​ ​no​ ​clear
organization​ ​or
development​ ​of
ideas
-​ ​TS​ ​attempts​ ​to
summarize​ ​main
pts​ ​of​ ​analysis
-​ ​minimal
connection
between​ ​text​ ​and
writer’s​ ​techniques
-​ ​weak
organization,​ ​idea
development
-TS​ ​summarizes
some​ ​main​ ​points
-​ ​some​ ​connection
between​ ​text​ ​and
technique/devices
-​ ​adequate
organization,​ ​idea
development
-TS​ ​summarizes
most​ ​main​ ​pts
-​ ​connection​ ​btwn
text​ ​and​ ​writer’s
devices​ ​and
rhetorical
technique
-​ ​most​ ​points​ ​are
clear,
well-organized​ ​&
developed
-topic​ ​sentence​ ​=
clear,​ ​complete
summary​ ​of​ ​main
points​ ​in​ ​analysis
-​ ​clear,detailed
connection
between​ ​text​ ​and
techniques
-​ ​all​ ​points​ ​=​ ​clear,
well-organized​ ​&
developed
-technical​ ​errors
interrupt​ ​flow,
making​ ​it​ ​difficult
to​ ​understand​ ​pts
-​ ​inadequate​ ​grasp
of​ ​language
conventions​ ​for
NBE3U
-​ ​major​ ​errors​ ​in
diction,syntax
-serious​ ​tech
errors
-​ ​limited​ ​grasp​ ​of
language
conventions
-​ ​errors​ ​in​ ​diction,
syntax​ ​interrupt
flow,​ ​limit​ ​reader
comprehension
-Tech​ ​errors
interrupt​ ​but
meaning​ ​is​ ​evident
-​ ​grasp​ ​of
language
conventions​ ​=
adequate
-​ ​diction,​ ​syntax
have​ ​some​ ​errors
-few​ ​technical
errors
-​ ​good​ ​grasp​ ​of
language
conventions
-​ ​clear​ ​diction,
syntax​ ​add​ ​to
good​ ​flow​ ​of​ ​ideas
-​ ​flow​ ​enhances,
develops​ ​TS/ideas
-​ ​writing​ ​is​ ​free​ ​of
technical​ ​errors,
no​ ​interruptions
-clear​ ​grasp​ ​of
language
conventions,
-​ ​sophisticated
diction,​ ​syntax
-no​ ​use​ ​of
Soapstone
categories
-​ ​no​ ​evidence​ ​of
PPA
-no​ ​reference​ ​to
text
-no​ ​connection​ ​of
ideas​ ​to​ ​TS
-limited​ ​use​ ​of
Soapstone​ ​chart
-minimal​ ​evidence
of​ ​PPA
-​ ​minimal
reference​ ​to​ ​text
-minimal
connection​ ​to​ ​TS
-​ ​poor​ ​use​ ​of
quotations
-some​ ​use​ ​of
Soapstone
categories
-some​ ​evidence​ ​of
PPA
-some​ ​reference​ ​to
text,​ ​connection​ ​to
TS
-some​ ​use​ ​of
quotations
-good​ ​use​ ​of
Soapstone​ ​chart
-PPA​ ​evident,
good​ ​explanation
and​ ​reference​ ​to
specifics
-good​ ​use​ ​of
quotations
-creative​ ​use​ ​of
soapstone
categories
-​ ​PPA​ ​=​ ​clear,​ ​all
points​ ​are
explained​​ ​and
connected​ ​to
specifics​​ ​in
text/TS
-excellent​ ​use​ ​of
quotations
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​/10
Thinking/
Inquiry
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​/10
Communication
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​/10
Application
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​/10
Comments:
Mark: