Uploaded by Colin Isard

Zimbardo procedure (step by step)

advertisement


























Began in Stanford on the West coast of America on a summer’s day in 1971
Premise:
o An attempt to see what happens when you put really good people in a
bad place with institutional power – the whole institution that
empowers the guards, who are the representatives of this institution
called prison, to do whatever is necessary to prevent prisoners from
escaping, maintain law and order
Examine what happens when you take away their individuality
(deindividuation), namely the prisoners
Group bonding: Guards (yes in Zimbardo), Prisoners (no in R&H as guards
uncomfortable with their role in a higher status position - SIT
Zimbardo - IV = guard or prisoner
Zimbardo - DV = (1) transactions between/within subjects – guard and
prisoners
Zimbardo - DV = (2) individual reactions on questionnaires, personality
test, daily guard shift reports, post-experiment interviews
Zimbardo was superintendent as well
Advert in ‘Palo Alto City newspaper’
Offered $15 a day, now $90 or £65
75 volunteers – battery of psychological tests
Volunteers were students who had remained on campus – mostly middle-class
and white
12 prisoners - 2 prisoners on standby – not called - this left 10 prisoners
12 guards (one on standby and 1 withdrew) – this left 10 guards
Randomly assigned to prisoner or guard
Guards came down a day before experiment to choose their military style
uniform from an army surplus store and help put together the prison (so it felt
there prison)
On the day, ‘prisoners’ arrested by real police - handcuffed, searched, and read
their rights - and taken in real police car to basement of police station
Blindfolded and then driven (in car owned by experimenters) to experimental
prison
Degradation ritual – stripped, deloused, shaved, given number, uniform
Amount of abuse increased each day
Each day the level of abuse, aggression and violence against prisoners became
more extreme – guards become more dominant –
Day 1 – prisoner rights redefined as privileges earnt by good behaviour
although day passed without incident
Day 2 – prisoners remove caps, rip off numbers, barricade in cells with beds
against doors
Guards retaliate using fire extinguishers
Rebellious prisoners moved to solitary confinement after guards break down
doors, prisoners stripped naked, dragged out, some feet tied up, placed in a
dark closet and told everything a privilege…problems escalated
The ringleaders of the prisoner rebellion were placed into solitary confinement.
After this the guards generally began to harass and intimidate the prisoners.











One of the three cells was designated as a "privilege cell." The three prisoners
least involved in the rebellion were given special privileges. The guards gave
them back their uniforms and beds and allowed them to wash their hair and
brush their teeth. Privileged prisoners also got to eat special food in the
presence of the other prisoners who had temporarily lost the privilege of eating.
The effect was to break the solidarity among prisoners (compare to Reicher
and Haslam where solidarity of prisoners broke guards)
At this point, first prisoner released after 36 hours (early stages of
depression)
next few days – 3 others leave (emotional disorder)
fifth released owing to psychosomatic rash which covered portions of his
body
New rules…we will treat you as dangerous
Guards empowered to do whatever is necessary to prevent escape
Get prisoners to clean toilet bowls out with their hands
Guards take prisoners’ blankets and put them in dirt and nettles, take hours to
clean before they could sleep on them
Create a totally, arbitrary environment
Guards change to become more dominant, all about
Zimbardo aborted the experiment early when Christina Maslach, a graduate
student in psychology whom he was dating (and later married), objected to the
conditions of the prison after she was introduced to the experiment to conduct
interviews. Zimbardo noted that, of more than 50 people who had observed the
experiment, Maslach was the only one who questioned its morality. After only
six days of a planned two weeks' duration, the experiment was discontinued.
Download