APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, July 2006, p. 4775–4781
0099-2240/06/$08.00⫹0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00356-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vol. 72, No. 7
Culture-Independent Characterization of the Digestive-Tract Microbiota
of the Medicinal Leech Reveals a Tripartite Symbiosis
Paul L. Worthen, Cindy J. Gode,† and Joerg Graf*
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
Received 13 February 2006/Accepted 6 May 2006
dominant microbe, an Aeromonas species which was consistently present in medicinal leeches, but disagreed in two aspects, i.e., the identity of the Aeromonas species and the presence of other microbes in the leech midgut (11, 12, 14, 29).
Case reports identified Aeromonas hydrophila infections associated with the clinical use of medicinal leeches, but these
studies often used commercial phenotypic tests that do not
accurately identify Aeromonas to the species level (1, 7, 29). A
second controversial point has been the complexity of the
midgut microbiota. A few studies implementing nonquantitative approaches reported the presence of additional bacterial
species in the midgut (11), while other studies reported only
Aeromonas spp. (14).
Recent studies of invertebrate midguts have utilized cultureindependent methods to detect diverse gut microbial communities in a wide range of hosts, such as earthworms (21), gypsy
moths (5), mosquitoes (28, 36), and termites (34, 42). These
studies reported more complex microbial communities than
culture-based studies, consistent with the proposal that well
over 95% of microbes in the environment cannot be cultured
in laboratory settings (3). The detection and phylogenetic analysis of these “unculturable” bacteria provide important information about the complexity of the microbial communities in
invertebrate midguts and have led to the discovery of novel
organisms. To our knowledge, culture-independent studies of
leeches have been limited to the mycetomes, which are digestive-tract-associated organs that house symbiotic bacteria (24,
25, 40); however, mycetomes have not been detected in medicinal leeches (Hirudo spp.).
The midgut of the medicinal leech consists of two major
components, the crop and the intestinum (Fig. 1). The crop is
a large compartment that stores blood meals after ingestion,
absorbs water and salts from the ingested blood, and is the
The digestive tracts of most animals are colonized by very
complex microbial communities which provide important functions to the host, including the synthesis of essential nutrients,
stimulation of the immune system, and resistance against the
colonization of pathogens (17, 30). In hematophagous, bloodfeeding invertebrates, these symbionts are thought to be critical
for host fitness because of the need for blood-scarce nutrients (15,
32). Investigators have resorted to examining naturally occurring, monospecific associations, for example, Vibrio fischeri and
the squid Euprymna scolopes, or simplified complex communities by using gnotobiotic animals, such as Bacteroidetes thetaiotaomicron and the mouse Mus muscus (18, 33). The use of such
model systems has revealed an amazing molecular interplay
between symbionts and hosts. However, these models are limited in their utility for investigating the interactions between
different symbiont species that are likely to play an important
role in most digestive-tract communities. In the characterization of the microbial communities associated with hematophagous animals, an additional interest is the potential risk these
animals pose to human health by serving as vectors for infectious diseases, which is exemplified by wound infections following leech therapy in patients with venous congestion who
do not receive preemptive antibiotics (9, 38).
The first detailed descriptions of the digestive-tract microbiota of medicinal leeches reported an unusual simplicity, as
only one bacterium was cultured from the leech digestive tract
(6, 19). Subsequent studies supported the presence of one
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular
and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 91 N. Eagleville Rd., Unit
3125, Storrs, CT 06269-3125. Phone: (860) 486-9284. Fax: (860) 4864331. E-mail: joerg.graf@uconn.edu.
† Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242.
4775
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
Culture-based studies of the microbial community within the gut of the medicinal leech have typically been
focused on various Aeromonas species, which were believed to be the sole symbiont of the leech digestive tract.
In this study, analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries confirmed the presence of Aeromonas veronii and
revealed a second symbiont, clone PW3, a novel member of the Rikenellaceae, within the crop, a large
compartment where ingested blood is stored prior to digestion. The diversity of the bacterial community in the
leech intestinum was determined, and additional symbionts were detected, including members of the ␣-, ␥-, and
␦-Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes. The relative abundances of the clones suggested
that A. veronii and the novel clone, PW3, also dominate the intestinum community, while other clones,
representing transient organisms, were typically present in low numbers. The identities of these transients
varied greatly between individual leeches. Neither time after feeding nor feeding on defibrinated blood caused
a change in identity of the dominant members of the microbial communities. Terminal restriction fragment
length polymorphism analysis was used to verify that the results from the clone libraries were representative
of a larger data set. The presence of a two-member bacterial community in the crop provides a unique
opportunity to investigate both symbiont-symbiont and symbiont-host interactions in a natural model of
digestive-tract associations.
4776
WORTHEN ET AL.
location of the Aeromonas symbionts detected in previous
studies (15b). The crop is further compartmentalized into 10
pairs of lateral caeca and 1 pair of elongated posterior caeca
(Fig. 1). Directly adjacent to the lateral caeca are pairs of
bladders that have been shown to house bacteria (6). From the
crop, the ingested blood, or intraluminal fluid (ILF), passes
into the intestinum, a short, tube-like structure, near the posterior caeca, where the blood meal is subsequently digested
and nutrients are absorbed (Fig. 1). Prior to this report, no
studies have specifically characterized the bacterial community
within the intestinum of the medicinal leech. The goal of this
study was to determine the composition of the bacterial community in the midgut of Hirudo verbana by using culture-independent methods, to compare the crop and intestinum microbiotas, to monitor the bacterial communities following feeding,
and to determine the effects of diet on the microbiotas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals. Medicinal leeches were obtained from Leeches USA (Westbury,
NY). The animals were maintained prior to feeding in leech mobile homes
(Leeches USA) containing local well water. The temperature was maintained at
25°C (⫾1°C) with a 14 h-10 h light-dark cycle. Leeches were identified morphologically as Hirudo verbana, which was verified by sequencing of multiple loci (M.
Siddall, personal communication).
Feeding. Leeches were divided into two groups. The first group was fed 5 ml
fresh blood (containing heparin [25 U/ml] [Sigma Chemical Co., Atlanta, GA])
obtained from sheep at the University of Connecticut’s School of Agriculture in
accordance with an approved IACUC protocol (Storrs, CT), and the second was
fed commercially available defibrinated whole sheep blood (Quad Five, Ryegate,
MT). The animals were fed as described previously (14).
Isolation of digestive-tract contents. The leeches were rinsed, dried, and then
disinfected by gently being washed with a 10% bleach solution. A 2- to 3-cm
longitudinal incision was made along the ventral surface of each leech, beginning
approximately 1 cm below the head. The skin and connective tissue were removed from the crop. The crop was then pierced, and the ILF of the crop was
collected using a positive-pressure pipette. Following extraction of the ILF, a 1-
to 2-cm longitudinal incision was made approximately 2 cm posterior to the first
incision, and the intestinum of the animal was removed intact and placed in
saline (0.85% [wt/vol] NaCl). The intestinum was rinsed three times with saline,
homogenized, and vortexed.
DNA extraction. DNAs were isolated from the homogenized intestinum and
from sheep blood by using a DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions for increased DNA yield from
gram-positive bacteria. Due to the presence of a PCR inhibitor, DNA extraction
from ILF was performed using a protocol for enhanced extraction of bacterial
DNA from blood samples (31), with the only modification being that the ILF was
diluted 1:1 with sterile saline before DNA extraction.
PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. 16S rRNA genes were amplified from DNA extracts by utilizing the primers 27F (5⬘-AGAGTTTGATCM
TGGCTCAG-3⬘) and 1492R (5⬘-TACGGYTACCTTGTTAGGACTT-3⬘) (26).
Amplification was conducted using a PTC-200 DNA engine (MJ Research,
Waltham, MA) and the following thermal profile: 95°C for 5 min followed by 20
cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 90 s, with a final step of 72°C
for 10 min. Positive amplification of 16S rRNA genes was verified by visualization
of a single 1.5-kb band. Negative controls were included in every set of reactions.
PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN).
No PCR products were detected from sheep blood extracts.
Construction of 16S rRNA gene clone library. 16S rRNA gene amplicons were
cloned into pCR2.1 and transformed into Escherichia coli TOP10 cells by using
a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The presence of one 1.5-kb insert in each clone was verified by
digesting purified plasmids with the restriction endonuclease EcoRI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Inserts were amplified using the 27F and 1492R
primers described above and 5 ng of plasmid DNA. Libraries from the ILF of the
crop and the intestinum were constructed from leeches 7 and 90 days after
feeding. In addition, ILF and intestinum libraries were constructed from a leech
7 days after it was fed defibrinated blood.
Identification of symbionts. Amplicons from individual clones were digested
separately with the restriction endonucleases HaeIII and Taq␣I (New England
Biolabs) to generate restriction profiles, which were visualized in a 2.0% Metaphor agarose gel (Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ) stained with ethidium bromide. Multiple clones for each representative restriction profile were sequenced
using the following primers: 27F, 1492R, 530F (5⬘-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG3⬘), 519R (5⬘-GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG-3⬘), 926F (5⬘-AAACTYAAAKG
AATTGACGG-3⬘), and 907R (5⬘-CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3⬘) (26).
Sequencing was carried out at the University of Connecticut Biotechnology
Center, using a CEQ protocol (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and at the
Yale University Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Sequencing Center, using a
Big Dye protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The DNA sequences
were aligned and assembled into contigs using ContigExpress in the Vector NTI
software package (Invitrogen) and were compared to the NCBI BLAST database
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) (2) and the Ribosomal Database Project
II (RDP; http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) (8). All sequences were checked for chimeras
using the Chimera_Check program at the RDP website. The predicted coverage
of clone libraries was determined using Good’s formula for coverage, a nonparametric measure (13).
T-RFLP analysis. 16S rRNA genes from up to five animals sacrificed 1, 3, 7,
and 30 days after being fed were PCR amplified using the forward primer 27F
labeled with the fluorescent label WellRED D4 (Proligo, Boulder, CO) and the
unlabeled reverse primer 1492R (16). Labeled products were digested with the
restriction endonuclease Tsp509I (New England Biolabs). Digested fragments
were purified by precipitation with ethanol and resuspended in CEQ sample
loading solution (Beckman Coulter). Terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs)
were separated and visualized at the University of Connecticut’s Bioservices
Center, using a CEQ2000XL capillary sequencer (Beckman Coulter) with an
internal size standard (size standard 600; Beckman Coulter). Data analysis of
terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) samples utilized a
binning range of 1 bp and a cutoff value of 0.5% of the total peak height to
identify peaks. The expected T-RF sizes were calculated based on sequence data
and restriction sites obtained from our 16S rRNA gene clone libraries.
Phylogenetic analysis. The newly detected leech symbiont 16S rRNA gene
sequences and published 16S rRNA gene sequences were used for phylogenetic
analysis. Sequences were aligned using a ClustalW interface, EMBOSS emma
(41). Maximum likelihood dendrograms were prepared using the PHYLIP software package (J. Felsenstein, PHYLIP, version 3.6, 2005), using the HKY⫹I⫹G
model of evolution. A Bayesian inference of phylogeny using the MrBayes
software package (v3.1) (20) was generated with the same alignment, using the
GTR⫹I⫹G model of evolution. The analysis was run in duplicate with four
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
FIG. 1. Drawing of the digestive tract and excretory organs of H.
verbana (Modified from reference 15a with kind permission of
Springer Science and Business Media.)
APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
VOL. 72, 2006
CHARACTERIZATION OF LEECH DIGESTIVE-TRACT MICROBIOTA
4777
TABLE 1. Bacterial phylotypes recovered from 16S rRNA gene clone libraries constructed from the digestive tract of
the medicinal leech, H. verbana
Source
Clone name
Bacterial division
Genus
a
Species
b
No. (%) of clones recovered
after indicated time (days)
of feeding
7
90
PW1
PW2
PW3
␥-Proteobacteria
␥-Proteobacteria
Bacteroidetes
Aeromonas
Morganella
A. veronii
M. morganii
11 (21.1)
0
41 (78.8)
29 (43.9)
2 (3.0)
35 (53.0)
Intestinum
PW1
PW2
PW3
PW4
PW5
PW6
PW7
PW8
PW9
PW10
PW11
PW12
PW13
␥-Proteobacteria
␥-Proteobacteria
Bacteroidetes
␣-Proteobacteria
␣-Proteobacteria
␥-Proteobacteria
␦-Proteobacteria
Bacteroidetes
Bacteroidetes
Fusobacteria
Firmicutes
Firmicutes
Firmicutes
Aeromonas
Morganella
A. veronii
M. morganii
15 (27.2)
3 (5.5)
27 (49.1)
2 (3.6)
1 (1.8)
1 (1.8)
0
0
1 (1.8)
3 (5.5)
0
0
2 (3.6)
21 (29.5)
12 (16.9)
21 (29.5)
0
0
0
2 (2.8)
5 (7.0)
0
0
8 (11.2)
2 (2.8)
0
a
b
Ochrobactrum
Sphingobacterium
Pseudomonas
Desulfovibrio
Chryseobacterium
Fusobacterium
Clostridium
Vagococcus
Enterococcus
C. meningosepticum
F. varium
V. carniphilus
E. malodoratus
ⱖ93% identity.
ⱖ98% identity.
independent chains and for 100,000 generations, of which the initial 25,000 were
discarded as burn-in. Treeview (35) was used to generate image files.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The 16S rRNA gene sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database under accession numbers DQ355170 to DQ335182.
RESULTS
Bacterial community in the ILF. An analysis of 16S rRNA
gene clone libraries revealed the presence of a second bacterial
symbiont in the ILF, clone PW3 (Table 1). The 16S rRNA
gene sequences of clone PW3 most closely matched Rikenella
microfusus (89.7% identity), a member of the Bacteroidetes
(Fig. 2). In addition, clone PW1 corresponded to the Aeromonas symbiont, and its 16S rRNA sequence differed by only 1 bp
from that of Aeromonas veronii, further supporting the identity
of the symbiont as A. veronii. In the library from the animal
sacrificed 90 days after being fed, clone PW2 was detected only
twice, and it had ⬎99% sequence identity with the 16S rRNA
gene sequence from Morganella morganii, a widely distributed
opportunistic pathogen (23).
The relative abundances of these sequences in our clone
libraries suggested that Aeromonas and clone PW3 were the
dominant members of the ILF community 7 and 90 days after
leech feeding, together accounting for ⬎98% of the cloned
sequences. Good’s formula was used to determine the coverage of the 7- and 90-day libraries, which was ⬎97.8% and
⬎98.5%, respectively, indicating that all abundant sequences
were likely sampled in our libraries.
Bacterial community of the intestinum. In contrast to the
extremely simple community present in the ILF, the clone
libraries from the intestinum suggested the presence of a more
diverse community of bacteria (Table 1). The majority of plasmids (66.7%) from these libraries matched 16S rRNA genes
from A. veronii and clone PW3. The remaining plasmids contained 16S rRNA genes corresponding to members of the
␣-Proteobacteria (2.4%), ␥-Proteobacteria (12.7%), ␦-Proteobacteria (1.6%), Bacteroidetes (4.8%), Fusobacteria (2.4%),
and Firmicutes (9.5%). Many of the sequences detected
(53.8%) were distinct from sequences in the databases (⬍97%
match with any organism in the BLAST database). No more
than nine different clones were detected in a single clone library, and plasmids corresponding to only three organisms, A.
veronii, clone PW3, and M. morganii, were detected in intestinum clone libraries both 7 and 90 days after feeding. No
apparent changes to the dominant members, overall number of
species, or relative diversity of the community were detected
between the 7- and 90-day libraries. Coverage of the 7- and
90-day libraries was ⬎94.5% and ⬎98.7%, respectively.
T-RFLP analysis of the bacterial communities in multiple
leeches. T-RFLP analysis was used to determine whether the
clone libraries were representative of the symbionts detected in
leech populations. The median number of peaks detected in
ILF samples obtained between 7 and 30 days after leech feeding was 2 (n ⫽ 11). Peaks corresponding to A. veronii and clone
PW3 were detected in 45.5% and 100%, respectively, of TRFLP samples from the ILF. The median number of peaks
detected in intestinum samples from 1 to 30 days after leech
feeding was 10 (n ⫽ 16), with at most 17 distinct peaks detected in one intestinum sample. In the intestinum, 36.7% of
peaks matched the calculated peak locations for organisms
detected in our clone libraries, and these peaks corresponded
to 71.5% of the total peak height. This suggests that the peaks
corresponding to the clone libraries accounted for most of the
16S rRNA genes present in the intestinum. Peaks corresponding to the core symbionts, A. veronii and clone PW3, were
detected in 66% and 100%, respectively, of intestinum samples. The inability to detect Aeromonas in all samples could be
due to several factors. The animals used in our study were
maintained for medicinal use on humans and were starved for
at least 3 months prior to shipment to reduce the number of
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
ILF
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic tree of sequences detected in this study (shown in bold) and sequences from related organisms. The tree was constructed
using a maximum likelihood analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences with the HKY⫹I⫹G model of evolution. Support at nodes is shown with circles.
Black circles indicate nodal support of ⬎90% bootstrap support and a Bayesian posterior probability of ⬎0.9; gray circles indicate ⬎70% bootstrap
support and a Bayesian posterior probability of ⬎0.7; and white circles indicate ⬎50% bootstrap support and a Bayesian posterior probability
of ⬎0.5.
4778
VOL. 72, 2006
CHARACTERIZATION OF LEECH DIGESTIVE-TRACT MICROBIOTA
DISCUSSION
Previous studies relied on culturing techniques to characterize the digestive-tract microbiota of the medicinal leech, and
several investigators (6, 19) as well as our previous report (22)
concluded that the ILF of the crop contains a monoculture of
Aeromonas. The culture-independent analysis described in this
report provides evidence of a second symbiont, clone PW3,
residing in the crop. Sequence analysis identified clone PW3 as
originating from an uncultured Bacteroidetes organism belonging to the Rikenellaceae, and T-RFLP analysis detected a peak
corresponding to this clone in all samples. These data indicate
that PW3 is a resident of the leech digestive tract and coexists
with A. veronii in the ILF of the crop.
Very few Rikenella sp. isolates have been cultured, possibly
due to their fastidious growth requirements and their low oxygen tolerance. It is also possible that culture-based studies of
leeches were unable to detect PW3 due to a growth disadvantage when grown with Aeromonas under lab conditions or that
PW3 requires the leech and/or Aeromonas for growth. It is
tempting to speculate that A. veronii, a facultative anaerobe,
lowers the local oxygen concentration, permitting PW3 to proliferate. We are currently employing anaerobic and microaerophilic culturing techniques to attempt to cultivate PW3 outside
the leech.
The 16S rRNA gene phylogeny of clone PW3 indicates that
it is clustered within a clade of organisms that is highly divergent from the other Bacteroidetes organisms (Fig. 2). The family Rikenellaceae consists of only a half-dozen described organisms, all of which were isolated from digestive systems or fecal
matter. Recent PCR-based studies amplified sequences be-
longing to this clade from a wide variety of gut environments,
including bacteria detected within the guts of termites (unpublished submissions to GenBank), the goat rumen (unpublished), the feces of swine (unpublished), mouse cecal samples
(27), and human gut and fecal samples (10, 37). These findings
strongly suggest an adaptation of these organisms to colonizing
digestive systems of a wide range of animals, from invertebrates to mammals, including humans. This could indicate that
organisms within this group are highly specialized for gut symbioses and that they may play an important role within the host
digestive tract. Evaluating the symbiotic role of these
Rikenella-like symbionts in digestive tracts in the crop of the
leech, where only one additional bacterial species is present,
may be feasible.
In contrast to the crop, the intestinum of the medicinal leech
supports a more diverse bacterial community consisting of three
core organisms, namely, A. veronii, PW3, and M. morganii, and
several transient organisms. The core organisms were defined
as present 7 days and 90 days after leech feeding, while transient organisms were detected at only one of these time points.
We cannot exclude the possibility that the transient organisms
are continuously present but below our detection level, which
does not exclude them from possibly performing important
functions. In addition, our study did not search for archaea,
which could also be present in the crop and intestinum. As in
the crop, A. veronii and PW3 were the dominant organisms,
with each accounting for at least 25% of the plasmids analyzed.
The abundance of these two organisms in the intestinum may
be due to the continual inflow of crop content during the
digestion of the blood meal.
Analogous to the situation in mammalian guts, a greater
number of different organisms were detected further down the
digestive tract. The intestinum contained a more diverse microbiota than the crop, despite the fact that the inhabitants of
the intestinum presumably had to pass through the crop before
reaching the intestinum. We hypothesize that the presence of
multiple antimicrobial factors in the crop contributes to this
simplicity. One antimicrobial factor is the complement system
of the ingested vertebrate blood, which remains active for
some time inside the leech and can kill sensitive bacteria (4,
22). A previous study suggested another complement-independent mechanism that inhibited the proliferation of some bacteria in the crop yet allowed them to remain viable (22). This
is consistent with the ability of some organisms to pass through
the crop and into the less restrictive intestinum. If the source
of these bacteria is water, rock, sediment, or the skin of a prey
animal, the arbitrary encounter of species that can survive the
passage through the crop could result in the appearance of the
transient organisms in the intestinum. An alternative but not
exclusive explanation is that at different time points of the
feeding cycle, some species increase in number while others
decrease below the limit of detection. The overall composition
of the bacterial community in the leech digestive system was
stable during the host’s feeding cycle. Wild leeches feed approximately every 2 to 8 weeks (39), and our data suggest that
the digestive-tract microbiota remains stable throughout this
entire feeding cycle. We can only draw limited conclusions
about the relative abundances of the different symbionts because the copy numbers of the ribosomal operons vary and
T-RFLP is not quantitative.
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
Aeromonas organisms present. Alternatively, A. veronii was
present at levels below the limit of detection or was not present
in all members of the population investigated.
Effect of blood meal on bacterial diversity. Some commercial
leech farms feed leeches defibrinated blood (M. Roth, personal communication), which may have reduced antimicrobial
activity after storage compared to that of fresh blood. The
bacterial communities in leeches who were fed defibrinated
blood were characterized by constructing clone libraries and
performing T-RFLP analysis. As expected, clone sequences
corresponding to A. veronii and clone PW3 were abundant in
both the ILF and intestina of leeches fed defibrinated blood.
M. morganii was also detected at a lower level in both clone
libraries. In addition, two novel organisms were detected
within these libraries. Surprisingly, one of these, clone PWD1,
accounted for 52.6% of the plasmids from the ILF library and
24.1% of plasmids from the intestinum clone library. However,
T-RFLP analysis of five additional leeches fed defibrinated
blood failed to detect a peak corresponding to clone PWD1,
indicating that this organism is not a common resident. This
suggests that an infirmity allowed clone PWD1 to proliferate
within this leech, leading to an inaccurate clone library, or that
the defibrinated blood allowed PWD1 to proliferate. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that clone PWD1 is closely related to
the genus Clostridium. The second novel sequence, clone
PWD2, was detected in small numbers and confined solely to
the intestinum library. Clone PWD2 clustered within the genus
Desulfovibrio.
4779
4780
WORTHEN ET AL.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Mark Siddall from the Natural History Museum of New
York for identifying the medicinal leeches used in our study, Virge
Kask for drawing Fig. 1, Jon Hill and Yen Lemire for preliminary
work, and Rita Rio, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, and Natasha Rabinowitz for
helpful comments.
The work performed was supported by NSF grant MCB-0334267
and career award MCB-0448052 to J.G.
REFERENCES
1. Abbott, S. L., W. K. Cheung, and J. M. Janda. 2003. The genus Aeromonas:
biochemical characteristics, atypical reactions, and phenotypic identification
schemes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2348–2357.
2. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990.
Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.
3. Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.
Microbiol. Rev. 59:143–169.
4. Braschler, T. R., S. Merino, J. M. Tomas, and J. Graf. 2003. Complement
resistance is essential for colonization of the digestive tract of Hirudo medicinalis by Aeromonas strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4268–4271.
5. Broderick, N. A., K. F. Raffa, R. M. Goodman, and J. Handelsman. 2004.
Census of the bacterial community of the gypsy moth larval midgut by using
culturing and culture-independent methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:
293–300.
6. Büsing, K.-H., W. Döll, and K. Freytag. 1953. Die Bakterienflora der medizinischen Blutegel. Arch. Mikrobiol. 19:52–86.
7. Carnahan, A. M., S. W. Joseph, and J. M. Janda. 1989. Species identification
of Aeromonas strains based on carbon substrate oxidation profiles. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 27:2128–2129.
8. Cole, J. R., B. Chai, R. J. Farris, Q. Wang, S. A. Kulam, D. M. McGarrell,
G. M. Garrity, and J. M. Tiedje. 2005. The Ribosomal Database Project
(RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic
Acids Res. 33:D294–D296.
9. de Chalain, T. M. 1996. Exploring the use of the medicinal leech: a clinical
risk-benefit analysis. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 12:165–172.
10. Eckburg, P. B., E. M. Bik, C. N. Bernstein, E. Purdom, L. Dethlefsen, M.
Sargent, S. R. Gill, K. E. Nelson, and D. A. Relman. 2005. Diversity of the
human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308:1635–1638.
11. Eroglu, C., M. Hokelek, E. Guneren, S. Esen, A. Pekbay, and O. A. Uysal.
2001. Bacterial flora of Hirudo medicinalis and their antibiotic sensitivities in
the middle Black Sea region, Turkey. Ann. Plast. Surg. 47:70–73.
12. Fenollar, F., P. E. Fournier, and R. Legre. 1999. Unusual case of Aeromonas
sobria cellulitis associated with the use of leeches. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol.
Infect. Dis. 18:72–73.
13. Good, I. J. 1953. The population frequencies of species and estimation of
population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264.
14. Graf, J. 1999. Symbiosis of Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria and Hirudo
medicinalis, the medicinal leech: a novel model for digestive tract associations. Infect. Immun. 67:1–7.
15. Graf, J. 2002. The effect of the symbionts on the physiology of Hirudo
medicinalis, the medicinal leech. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 41:269–275.
15a.Graf, J. 2006. Molecular requirements for the colonisation of Hirudo medicinals by Aeromonas veronii, p. 291–303. In J. Overmann (ed.), Molecular
basis of symbiosis, vol. 41. Springer, New York, N.Y.
15b.Graf, J., Y. Kikuchi, and R. M. V. Rio. Leeches and their microbiota:
naturally simple symbiosis models. Trends Microbiol., in press.
16. Grüntzig, V., B. Stres, H. L. Ayala del Rı́o, and J. M. Tiedje. July 2002,
posting date. Improved protocol for T-RFLP by capillary electrophoresis.
[Online.] http://rdp8.cme.msu.edu/html/t-rflp_jul02.html.
17. Hamann, L., V. El-Samalouti, A. J. Ulmer, H. D. Flad, and E. T. Rietschel.
1998. Components of gut bacteria as immunomodulators. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41:141–154.
18. Hooper, L. V., T. Midtvedt, and J. I. Gordon. 2002. How host-microbial
interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine.
Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22:283–307.
19. Hornborstel, H. 1942. Ueber die bakteriologischen Eigenschaften des Darmsymbionten beim medizinischen Blutegel (Hirudo officinalis) nebst Bemerkungen zur Symbiosefrage. Zbl. Bakteriol. 148:36–47.
20. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference
of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
21. Ihssen, J., M. A. Horn, C. Matthies, A. Gossner, A. Schramm, and H. L.
Drake. 2003. N2O-producing microorganisms in the gut of the earthworm
Aporrectodea caliginosa are indicative of ingested soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1655–1661.
22. Indergand, S., and J. Graf. 2000. Ingested blood contributes to the specificity
of the symbiosis of Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria and Hirudo medicinalis,
the medicinal leech. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4735–4741.
23. Janda, J. M., and S. L. Abbott. 1998. The enterobacteria. Lippincott-Raven,
Philadelphia, Pa.
24. Kikuchi, Y., and T. Fukatsu. 2002. Endosymbiotic bacteria in the esophageal
organ of glossiphoniid leeches. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4637–4641.
25. Kikuchi, Y., S. Sameshima, O. Kitade, J. Kojima, and T. Fukatsu. 2002.
Novel clade of Rickettsia spp. from leeches. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:
999–1004.
26. Lane, D. J. 1990. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115–147. In E. Stackebrandt
and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics.
John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.
27. Ley, R. E., F. Backhed, P. Turnbaugh, C. A. Lozupone, R. D. Knight, and J. I.
Gordon. 2005. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 102:11070–11075.
28. Lindh, J. M., O. Terenius, and I. Faye. 2005. 16S rRNA gene-based identification of midgut bacteria from field-caught Anopheles gambiae sensu lato
and A. funestus mosquitoes reveals new species related to known insect
symbionts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:7217–7223.
29. Mackay, D. R., E. K. Manders, G. C. Saggers, D. R. Banducci, J. Prinsloo,
and K. Klugman. 1999. Aeromonas species isolated from medicinal leeches.
Ann. Plast. Surg. 42:275–279.
30. Marshall, J. C. 1999. Gastrointestinal flora and its alterations in critical
illness. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2:405–411.
31. Millar, B. C., X. Jiru, J. E. Moore, and J. A. Earle. 2000. A simple and
sensitive method to extract bacterial, yeast and fungal DNA from blood
culture material. J. Microbiol. Methods 42:139–147.
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest
One of the proposed functions of the symbionts is the production of antimicrobial compounds that enforce the simplicity
of the crop microbiota (6). The presence of both Aeromonas
and clone PW3 in the intestinum, where the bacterial community is more complex, suggests that these symbionts are not
responsible for creating antimicrobial activity in the leech digestive tract because one would expect to see a similar set of
organisms present in both the crop and intestinum. This evidence is indirect, and the observation could also be explained
by down-regulation of the antimicrobial activity in the intestinum. It seems likely that the antimicrobial activity is a result of
the leech and the ingested blood and that either becomes
inactive after a certain time or is inactivated in the intestinum.
The core microbial symbionts are more likely to play a role in
digestion and the formation of essential nutrients absent in the
single food source, blood.
T-RFLP analysis indicated that feeding leeches defibrinated
blood did not affect the composition of the digestive-tract
microbiota. An interesting exception was the sudden appearance and dominance of organism PWD1 in our clone library.
However, clone PWD1 was only isolated from the leech from
which our clone library was created and was not detected by
T-RFLP in other leeches. Thus, it is likely the result of an
irregularity within that individual leech rather than an effect of
the blood meal and shows the importance of using a second
technique to increase the sample size.
To our knowledge, this study represents the first time the
digestive-tract microbiota of the medicinal leech has been analyzed using PCR-based methods. Previous studies have suggested a monospecific digestive-tract symbiosis between Aeromonas bacteria and the leech. However, our results show that
the crop has a bacterial community consisting of two dominant
core symbionts and that the intestinum has a more complex
community consisting of the core symbionts and several transient organisms. We are currently pursuing the exact location
of the symbionts and confirmation of their presence by using a
PCR-independent approach. The simplicity of this tripartite
association may allow us to determine the contributions of the
individual partners and investigate interactions between the
two symbionts as a model system for the study of complex
digestive-tract symbioses between bacteria and their hosts.
APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
VOL. 72, 2006
CHARACTERIZATION OF LEECH DIGESTIVE-TRACT MICROBIOTA
32. Nogge, G. 1976. Sterility in tsetse flies (Glossina morsitans Westwood) caused
by loss of symbionts. Experientia 32:995–996.
33. Nyholm, S. V., and M. J. McFall-Ngai. 2004. The winnowing: establishing the
squid-vibrio symbiosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:632–642.
34. Ohkuma, M., S. Noda, Y. Hongoh, and T. Kudo. 2002. Diverse bacteria related
to the Bacteroides subgroup of the CFB phylum within the gut symbiotic communities of various termites. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 66:78–84.
35. Page, R. D. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on
personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12:357–358.
36. Pidiyar, V. J., K. Jangid, M. S. Patole, and Y. S. Shouche. 2004. Studies on
cultured and uncultured microbiota of wild Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito
midgut based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
70:597–603.
37. Rautio, M., H. Saxen, A. Siitonen, R. Nikku, and H. Jousimies-Somer. 2000.
Bacteriology of histopathologically defined appendicitis in children. Pediatr.
Infect. Dis. J. 19:1078–1083.
4781
38. Sartor, C., F. Limouzin-Perotti, R. Legre, D. Casanova, M. C. Bongrand, R.
Sambuc, and M. Drancourt. 2002. Nosocomial infections with Aeromonas
hydrophila from leeches. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:E1–E5.
39. Sawyer, R. T. 1986. Leech biology and behavior. Clarendon Press, Oxford,
United Kingdom.
40. Siddall, M. E., S. L. Perkins, and S. S. Desser. 2004. Leech mycetome
endosymbionts are a new lineage of alphaproteobacteria related to the
Rhizobiaceae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30:178–186.
41. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W:
improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through
sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680.
42. Yang, H., D. Schmitt-Wagner, U. Stingl, and A. Brune. 2005. Niche heterogeneity determines bacterial community structure in the termite gut (Reticulitermes santonensis). Environ. Microbiol. 7:916–932.
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on March 6, 2019 by guest