Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Language & Communication journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/langcom Language practices and language ideologies in the popular music TV show The Voice Russia Evgeniya Aleshinskaya a, *, Elena Gritsenko b a b National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 31 Kashirskoye shosse, Moscow 115409, Russia Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod, 31a Minin St., Nizhny Novgorod 603155, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Available online 20 September 2016 This paper examines the diverse communicative practices of the popular TV show The Voice Russia and highlights the role and function of language ideologies in Russian popular music. We argue that language choice in songs is guided by two sets of ideasdthe ideologies of pop music professionals, who have a strong English bias, and the popular beliefs held by the audience, who support the integrity of the Russian language and culture. Analysis of multilingual songs which combine lyrics and music from different countries (and cultures) reveals the role of language alternation as a resource of meaning making and an instrument for constructing ethnic, local, and glocal (transnational-but-localized) identities. Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Language Ideology Popular music Discourse Global Local 1. Introduction Popular culture and popular music are areas of social life profoundly affected by globalization. Their impact is manifested, among other areas, in ‘the global diffusion of a similar range of programme types on TVdnews and current affairs programmes, soap operas, ‘reality TV’ shows’ (Fairclough, 2006, p. 87). The Voice (Golos) is a local version of a global musical TV show which enjoys great popularity in Russia. It is an important part of the Russian pop music landscape and a salient example of glocalization (Robertson, 1995)dthe creative appropriation of global cultural ﬂows involving reﬂection on and reafﬁrmation of local cultural forms and values. As a popular entertainment show, Golos covers not only the performance of musical product (songs) but also other related language practices, such as rehearsals, show hosting, and conversations between coaches and contestants. Different aspects of the show are discussed by TV viewers on the internet. This provides ample material for studying the discourse of the show as a ‘complex arena of practice’ (Fairclough, 1995b, p. 185) in which ‘social knowledge and social reality are produced, reproduced, and transformed through a variety of special genres’ (Androutsopoulos, 2009, p. 43). Language practices in popular music have become the object of academic inquiry as a result of ‘acceleration of the sociolinguistic interest in [.] the socially meaningful’ (Coupland, 2007, p. vi). A number of recent studies of language alternation in popular music, especially in rap lyrics, raise questions about identity construction, the politics of language, and simultaneous processes of globalization and localization (Alim et al., 2009; Davis and Bentahila, 2008; Terkouraﬁ, 2010). Several works have addressed the symbolic use of languages in popular music where the national (ethnic) language (e.g., an Asian language) can ‘convey a sense of “Eastern-ness”, “locality”, “conservatism”, “collectivism”, “us-ness” and so forth’, while English and/or other foreign languages ‘convey a sense of “Western-ness”, “globality”, “modernity”, “individuality”, “otherness” and so forth’ (Chan, 2009, p. 109). Mixing languages and language varieties in music also serves as a medium of social ideology and can express a political * Corresponding author. Fax: þ7 499 324 2111. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (E. Aleshinskaya), [email protected] (E. Gritsenko). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.08.005 0271-5309/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 46 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 stance; for example, switching between indigenous languages and (African) American English in rap expresses opposition to the dominant ‘English-as-ofﬁcial language’ policy in Nigeria (Omoniyi, 2009). In Russia, all these topics are fairly new. The prime focus of research, to date, has been on language hybridization and the functions of English in Russian popular music (Aleshinskaya and Gritsenko, 2014; Eddy, 2008; Gritsenko and Dunyasheva, 2013; Proshina, 2010). In this paper, we aim to explore the language practices of Golos through their links to language ideologies ‘as an interpretive ﬁlter of the relationships between language and society’ (Woolard and Shieffelin, 1994, p. 62). We address the pragmatics of language choice in the songs and highlight the conﬂict between professionals’ opinion and popular beliefs, which motivate such choices at various stages of the show. We analyze multilingual performances that combine lyrics and music from different countries (or cultures) and describe the role of language alternation as a meaning-making resource and an instrument for constructing local, national, and transnational identities. 2. Research setting The musical show Golos is part of the internationally syndicated show The Voice. The aim of the show is to ﬁnd, through a series of contests (or rounds), a new singing talentda versatile vocalist, who will be granted a contract with an international record company. Contestants are given professional advice by four expert coaches, who also act as the judging panel. All coaches are successful performing artists in various genres. The vocal contest is broadcast on the leading Russian television network Channel One across Russia and the entire postSoviet space. Videos from Season 1 (October 2012–December 2012), Season 2 (September 2013dDecember 2013), and Season 3 (September 2014dDecember 2014), as well as interviews with the contestants and coaches, are available on the Channel One ofﬁcial website (www.1tv.ru/voice). Golos is currently one of the ten highest rated shows on Russian television. The audience share of the Season 3 ﬁnale on 26 December 2014 was 47.3%, which is an outstanding result for a TV show of this kind. In 2014, it won a prestigious TEFI award from the Russian Academy of Television for the best entertainment program in the category ‘Evening Prime’. Contestants sing covers of famous songs from all over the world. Since the audience of Golos is multi-generational, the songs are selected to satisfy all ages: recent and old hits in various musical genres, folk songs, and popular songs from the Soviet era. In striving for the ‘best voice’ title, contestants go through four phases: a series of blind auditions, battle rounds, knockout rounds, and live shows (quarter-ﬁnals, semi-ﬁnals, and ﬁnals). In the ﬁrst three stages, it is up to the coaches to decide who will progress to the next round and who will have to leave the competition. In the live shows, the audience chooses four ﬁnalists and vote for the best voice in the country. Golos differs from other national versions of The Voice due to its international status. The Russian Federation is a multiethnic state, and some participants come from republics which have their own languages and cultures (e.g., Tatarstan, Chechnya, North Ossetia-Alania, etc.). The show also welcomes vocalists from different post-Soviet countries (Belarus, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kirgizstan, Latvia, and Estonia), even though most of these countries have their own national versions of The Voice. Finally, contestants from Europe, Africa, and America can also participate in Golos: for example, Season 2 (2013) featured vocalists from Italy, the Maldives, and the USA, and Season 3 (2014) had singers from Cameroon, Uruguay, France, and the UK. This diversity makes Golos a perfect setting to explore multilingual creativity in music (Gritsenko and Aleshinskaya, 2015). Since the show is broadcast in Russia and targets a mainly Russian-speaking audience, the Russian language serves as a local lingua franca: it is used by all participants and forms a common base for interaction between contestants from different countries, including those from Europe and Africa. Songs performed in Russian are warmly met by viewers, and foreign vocalists choose them to show respect to the host country and to win the approval of the audience. Still, ‘the dominance of English in the popular music scene’ (Crystal, 2003, p. 101) is manifested vividly and in various forms. English is the predominant language of musical compositions; it is employed by coaches and local contestants to talk to foreign singers; and English terms and hybrid English-Russian forms are routinely used by contestants and coaches in informal professional communication and casual talk. The show is not only multilingual and multicultural. It features different genres as well. With regard to the pop music domain, the term ‘genre’ can denote a type of music (musical genre) and a type of text (discursive genre). Musical genres, such as jazz, soul, funk, rock, pop, heavy metal, hip hop, and so forth, are characterized by speciﬁc techniques, instrumentation, context, subject matter, and social function. Discursive genres are linked to different types of domain-speciﬁc social activity: jam sessions, studio recordings, music CDs, music reviews, interviews, professional forums, academic publications, riders, contracts, etc. (Aleshinskaya, 2013, pp. 427–428). Golos provides an opportunity to explore different discursive genres. It includes an introduction of the contestants by the show host, contestants’ video presentations with fragments of rehearsals and key moments of the show, the actual performance of the song, and its discussion by the coaches. 3. Theoretical framework and study material Research on language ideologies, understood as ‘particular views and beliefs about languages and their links to social, political, moral and aesthetic values’ (Johnson et al., 2010, p. 241), has gained considerable momentum in recent years. Ideology has become the crucial concept in the study of popular music, where different aspects of language are ‘ideologized’ (Androutsopoulos, 2010a) in multimodal performances foregrounding local diversity in the complex process of globalization. E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 47 Back in 1934, the Russian (Soviet) linguist Abayev (2006, p. 5) suggested differentiation between ‘the ideology expressed in language (as an ideological system)’ and ‘the ideology expressed with the help of language (as a communicative system)’. Fairclough expressed it from a different perspective: ‘Language is a material form of ideology, and language is invested by ideology’ (Fairclough, 1995a, p. 73). Our paper takes into account both dimensions. We explore ideology as a ‘systematic body of ideas articulated by a particular group of people’ (Storey, 2009, p. 2), speciﬁcally, the ideas which inform the practices of professional musicians and TV viewers, and address the ‘unconscious meanings that texts and practices (for instance, song lyrics) carry or can be made to carry’ (Storey, 2009, p.4). We also tackle competing ideological representations of the way the world is or should be, keeping in mind that texts (television, pop songs, etc.) always present a particular image of the world. Our general research approach has a performative focus. It is shaped by Fairclough’s deﬁnition of discourse as language use and a form of social practice (Fairclough, 2006, p. 27). Following Fairclough, we assume that language use is simultaneously constitutive of social identities, social relations, and systems of knowledge and beliefs (Fairclough, 1993, p. 134), and we address the ‘relationships of causality and determination between discursive practices, events, and texts, and wider social and cultural structures, relations and processes’ (Fairclough, 1993, p.132). To reveal the ideologies underlying the use of language(s) in Golos, we address three relevant discoursesdthe discourse of pop music professionals (coaches and contestants), the discourse of the audience (TV viewers, forum participants), and the discourse TV ofﬁcials (the administration of Channel One), as well as four genresdperformances, rehearsals, interviews, and discussions. Analysis is structured in accordance with Fairclough’s (1995a) three-dimensional framework, which includes descriptiondthe study of formal elements of the text (e.g., language alternation in song lyrics), interpretationdanalysis of how the text is produced and received (e.g., who performs the song, and who the target audience is), and explanation, which takes into account the broader social currents affecting the text (e.g., the professional socialization of Russian pop musicians as the reason for language bias). The data were drawn from 95 h of video recordings of Golos on the ofﬁcial website of Channel One (www.1tv.ru/voice) and http://www.youtube.com/, as well as the forums on these websites. Following Fiske (1987) and Androutsopoulos (2009), we divided all available texts into three groups: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary texts are the songs performed by the contestants. Secondary texts include professional discourse on language use on Golos, performance discussions by the judging panel, selected fragments of rehearsals, and interviews. Tertiary texts occur at the level of the audience and represent public responses to the show. This three-tier structure helps to link three different ‘arenas’ of popular music and show how ‘the tension between globalness and localness is negotiated within each of these arenas’ (Androutsopoulos, 2009, p. 59). At the level of primary texts, we examined 556 songs performed by the contestants. Our primary focus was on language choice in the song lyrics. Most of the songs were monolingualdusually English or Russian, but there were also songs in Italian, French, Spanish, German, Ukrainian, Hebrew, and a few other languages. Our goal was to ﬁnd out what motivates the choice of language at various stages of the show and to describe the language ideologies underlying such choices. As some of the songs were multilingual, we explored the symbolic meanings conveyed by different languages. Our assumption was that language choice and language alternation in popular music are ‘indexical of multiple cultural afﬁliations and identiﬁcations’ (Alim et al., 2009, p.7), for instance, being professional and cosmopolitan or being part of the local (ethnic, national) and global (transnational) musical cultures. To conﬁrm this assumption, we interviewed professional musicians and analyzed relevant samples of metalinguistic professional discourse. At the level of secondary texts, we examined samples of professional talk at rehearsals, the coaches’ discussions of language use in songs, and interviews with participants, coaches, and show organizers posted on the Channel One website (www.1tv.ru/voice) and taken from other internet sources (see web references). To validate the ﬁndings obtained through ‘interpretation’ and ‘explanation’, we conducted ﬁve quasi-ethnographic interviews with professional Russian musicians from Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Nizhny Novgorod who perform in different musical genres. Four online interviews with rock and hip hop artists (Alexei, drummer in a post-rock band, 31 years old; Ivan, rock guitar player, 20 years old; Alexander, rapper, 25 years old; Mikhail, rapper, 23 years old) addressed the use of English in professional conversations and the role of language in identity making. The ﬁfth interviewee was a jazz, pop, and folk singer and one of the ﬁnalists of Golos (Tina, 33 years old). The focus of this interview was on multilingual songs, and her views related to language use in pop music in general. All interviews were conducted in Russian and translated into English.1 At the level of tertiary texts, we explored the contents of the Golos web forums on Channel One’s ofﬁcial website (www.1tv. ru/voice) and YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/) and some other web forums where the audience discussed the show (http://otzovik.com/; http://encycl.m-rnagiev.ru). We selected comments on language choice in the songs. We believe that these public metalinguistic pronouncements manifest deeper social concerns about language and popular culture and shed light on language ideologies circulating in contemporary Russia. 4. Language choices in songs Songs are the centerpieces around which the show is built: they are rehearsed by the contestants before each round, performed in front of the audience and coaches during the broadcast, discussed by the coaches after the performance, and, ﬁnally, evaluated and voted on by the viewers. Unlike many other national versions of The Voice, Golos is very diverse in terms 1 Quotes from these interviews are used in Sections 4.3 and 5.1. 48 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 of music and language. It presents songs from different countries and cultures and in a wide range of genres (from mainstream jazz, pop, and rock songs to Italian opera and folk music). In this section, we address the issue of language choice in songs and highlight the factors which inﬂuence it at different stages of the show. We analyze professional opinions on language choice in songs, compare them with the views of the audience, and observe the language ideologies that shape the position of each social group. 4.1. Pragmatic underpinnings of language choice in songs Table 1 summarizes the data on the language of the songs performed in different seasons and stages of the show. All in all, four types of songs were performed in the show: (1) monolingual songs in Russian, (2) monolingual songs in English, (3) monolingual songs in a language other than Russian or English, and (4) multilingual songs. The ﬁgures in each column indicate the number of songs in different languages that were performed at a particular stage of the show (blind auditions, battles, knockouts, quarter-ﬁnals, and semi-ﬁnals). In brackets, we provide the percentage of songs in each language. The column ‘Total’ shows how many songs in each language were performed in the given season. Apparently, there are certain regularities in the distribution of songs in different languages throughout the stages of the show. The competing languages are English and Russian. In the ﬁrst two seasons, the total number of songs in English (46.6%) exceeded the number of Russian songs (41.6%). The gap between the two languages expanded in Season 2, when the percentage of Russian songs dropped by 5% (36.6%) and the percentage of songs in English showed an increase of 3% (49.7%). The situation changed again in Season 3, when Russian became the dominant language (46% vs 43%). Compared to the number of Russian and English songs, the percentage of monolingual songs in other languages was low and decreased from Season 1 to Season 3. In contrast, the number of multilingual songs rose in Season 2, and it remained stable in Season 3. Although the gap between English and Russian songs is not great, it is signiﬁcant enough to suggest that the ﬂuctuations in the number of songs throughout the show are not random. Apparently, the preference for English or Russian correlates with the stage of the show. In the ﬁrst two rounds of the competition (‘blind auditions’ and ‘battles’), the percentage of songs in English exceeds the percentage of songs in Russian. However, in ‘live shows’ and especially in the ﬁnale, the situation is reversed: the number of Russian songs exceeds the number of songs in English. This tendency is observed throughout all seasons of the show and is especially obvious in Season 3, when the percentage of Russian songs rises from 40.47% in blind auditions to 71.43% in the ﬁnale, and the percentage of English songs decreases from 46.42% in blind auditions to 28.57% in the ﬁnale. We connect this tendency to the social agents who select the songs and evaluate their performance. In blind auditions, it is usually the contestants who decide what songs will better demonstrate their vocal abilities. In battles and knockouts, the choice is made by the coaches, who help the contestants to select the songs and decide who will proceed to the next round of the competition. In quarter-ﬁnals and semi-ﬁnals, the TV viewers together with the coaches vote for the contestants and decide whether they should stay in the show. As for the ﬁnale, the choice is made entirely by the viewers, who vote via phone (by text messaging) and select the best performer and the best voice of the country. The collected data suggest that the audience and the coaches have different preferences concerning the language of musical compositions: professionals (the vocalists and the coaches) favor English, while TV viewers want to hear more Russian songs and vote for the contestants who sing in Russian in the ‘live shows’. The language preferences of the coaches were apparent in many episodes of the show. In the beginning of each season, the coaches sing a song together which serves as a symbolic introduction to the show. In all three seasons, they selected English songs for this opening performance: Season 1d‘Let It Be’; Season 2d‘Blue Suede Shoes’; and Season 3d‘Come Together’. The voting results for the blind auditions are also quite telling. During this stage of the contest, the coaches listen to the songs with their backs to the contestants and turn around only if they like the performance and want the participant to proceed to the next round. The results of the blind Table 1 Language choices on Golos. Season Language(s) Stage of the show Blind auditions Battles Knock-outs Quarter-ﬁnals Semi-ﬁnals Finale Total 1 (2012) Russian English Another language Two (or three) languages Total Russian English Another language Two (or three) languages Total Russian English Another language Two (or three) languages Total 30 (41.67%) 32 (44.45%) 10 (13.88%) 0 72 25 (29.76%) 50 (59.52%) 9 (10.71%) 0 84 34 (40.48%) 39 (46.42%) 9 (10.72%) 2 (2.38%) 84 8 (33.33%) 12 (50%) 4 (16.67%) 0 24 8 (28.57%) 17 (60.72%) 0 3 (10.71%) 28 12 (42.85%) 14 (50%) 2 (7.15%) 0 41 28 9 (37.5%) 14 (58.34%) 1 (4.16%) 0 24 15 (41.67%) 14 (38.88%) 6 (16.66%) 1 (2.78%) 36 18 (50%) 11 (30.55%) 4 (11.11%) 3 (8.34%) 36 6 (37.5%) 9 (56.25%) 1 (6.25%) 0 16 12 (50%) 9 (37.5%) 3 (12.5%) 0 24 12 (50%) 12 (50%) 0 0 24 7 (58.34%) 5 (41.66%) 0 0 12 7 (58.34%) 4 (33.33%) 1 (8.33%) 0 12 6 (50%) 5 (41.67%) 1 (8.33%) 0 12 7 (53.85%) 3 (23.08%) 2 (15.38%) 1 (7.69%) 13 5 (38.46%) 4 (30.78%) 2 (15.38%) 2 (15.38%) 13 10 (71.43%) 4 (28.57%) 0 0 14 67 (41.6%) 75 (46.6%) 18 (11.2%) 1 (0.6%) 161 72 (36.6%) 98 (49.7%) 21 (10.7%) 6 (3%) 197 92 (46%) 85 (43%) 16 (8.08%) 5 (2.52%) 198 2 (2013) 3 (2014) E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 49 auditions indicate that the coaches vote for English songs far more often than for Russian songs. Table 2 shows the languages of performances that were approved unanimously, i.e. the songs which all four coaches turned around for in blind auditions. Only one Russian song was selected unanimously in Season 1 (compared to three songs in English), and none in Season 2 (compared to nine English songs). The ﬁgures for Season 3 turned out to be in response to the recommendation of the producers who wanted to see more Russian songs in the show. Nonetheless, only three Russian songs were voted for, compared to ﬁve songs in English. The TV viewers, on the other hand, tend to vote in favor of the contestants who sing in Russian, and their vote often contradicts the coaches’ opinion (see Table 3). Interestingly, in several cases in Season 1 and Season 2, the votes of the audience ‘saved’ the contestants with Russian songs who were given low grades by their coaches in the quarter- and semi-ﬁnals. For instance, in the Season 2 semi-ﬁnal (2013), Sharip Umkhanov from Chechnya performed ‘Miserere’ in Italian and was highly praised by his coach Alexander Gradsky, yet he did not proceed to the ﬁnale. Meanwhile, Sergey Volchkov from Belarus was ‘saved’ by the audience when he performed the old-time hit ‘Sinyaya vechnost’ (‘Blue eternity’) in Russian. On Dima Bilan’s team, Andrey Tsvetkov could not make it to the ﬁnale with Michael Jackson’s ‘Heal the World’ in English, while Gela Guralia from Georgia qualiﬁed for the ﬁnale due to the TV viewers’ support of his version of the Russian rock ballad ‘Put’ (‘The way’). Analyses of the secondary and tertiary textsdprofessional musicians’ opinions and TV viewers’ web forum commentsdreveal the ideological underpinning behind each type of vote. 4.2. Professional discourse on language choice in songs: the English bias The language of the songs performed by the contestants has been subject to debate throughout the show. Although the producers recommend maintaining a balance between the songs in English and Russian, English is consistently ahead. In an online interview, one of the coaches explains this as the inﬂuence of the Anglo-American tradition on the professional socialization of Russian pop musicians: We are facing a very challenging task. We should make half of the repertoire Russian. We almost ﬁt d we are trying. Now we do about 45%. It is not easy . A lot of singers [.] grew up on American jazz and pop music and are used to the English language (Leonid Agutin, coach (Agutin, 2014)) The coaches believe that English songs are better suited for demonstrating contestants’ vocal abilities than Russian songs. It should be noted that comments of this kind are usually referred to ‘modern’ songs (i.e. songs composed in the post-Soviet years): We have a lot of beautiful songs in Russia, but very few modern songs are good in terms of the vocal since our broadcast format has greatly simpliﬁed the musical tastes of the public (Leonid Agutin, coach (Agutin, 2014)) Unfortunately, we do not have enough competitive modern songs in Russian d songs that would allow the contestants to demonstrate all their vocal abilities. And in such a contest they are absolutely essential (Alexander Gradsky, coach (Gradsky, 2012)) Musicians emphasize the high prestige of English and the Anglo-American tradition in Russian popular music. For local musicians, hits in the English language have become a paragon of vocal skill: English is an international language [.] it is no secret that the dominant culture in singing is that of the English language . (Tina Kuznetsova, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview) Yet, the prestige of English is not the only reason for language bias in the pop music domain. Russian vocalists explain their preference for English by referring to the phonetic and prosodic peculiarities of both languages. They insist that singing in English is ‘easier’ because it is ‘phonetically more convenient and more musical’ (Tina Kuznetsova, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview). Sergey Mikhailin, one of the quarterﬁnalists in Season 3, says that it is difﬁcult to sing in Russian because of the consonant clusters (like rtch) and complicated word endings: Singing in Russian is tough. You should pronounce all words correctly, sing through the endings, and put the right stress . (Sergey Mikhailin, Golos quarterﬁnalist (Kondratyev, 2015)) From a linguistic point of view, these views are hardly justiﬁed. Both languages are stress-timed, and there are no considerable differences in their syllabic structure (Arakin, 1989, pp. 65–89). The preference for English may be connected with Russian being less customary for vocalists who have been trained in the Anglo-American tradition and use English in their everyday professional communication. Table 2 Unanimous vote in blind auditions. Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Russian English Another language 1 0 3 3 9 5 2 1 0 50 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 Table 3 Discrepancies in evaluation results (Season 2 semi-ﬁnal). Coaching team: Gradsky Contestant Volchkov (Russian song) Contestant Umkhanov (Italian song) Points given by the coach Support of the audience 40% 62.3% 60% 37.7% Coaching team: Bilan Contestant Tsvetkov (English song) Contestant Guralia (Russian song) Points given by the coach Support of the audience 60% 37% 40% 63% 4.3. English in professional communication: rehearsals Rehearsals are never shown to the public in full because of their highly professional (technical) and sometimes intimate character, but even short fragments posted on the web reveal the immense prestige of English and its role in professional communication in the pop music domain. During rehearsals, contestants and their coaches select and practice songs that will be later performed on stage and creatively modify them to demonstrate their voice capabilities and to appeal to the audience. They discuss the subtleties of music and music making and use a lot of borrowed professional vocabulary. Terms of Italian origin are used to refer to vocal features (falsetto, soprano, tenor, etc.) and music-playing techniques (legato, staccato, crescendo, etc.). However, most of the terms come from Anglo-American musical genres (jazz, soul, funk, rock, hip hop), and English is used to refer to structural elements of composition (sample, riff, bridge, intro, outro), instruments, and singing techniques (scat, growl, beatbox, etc.). Professional musicians explain the abundant use of English terminology as the need to bridge lexical gaps: English terms characterize musical techniques more precisely. And for most of them, it is impossible to ﬁnd a counterpart in Russian. (Alexei, drummer in a post-rock band, personal interview) Even if Russian counterparts do exist, English terms are preferred in professional talk, as they convey specialized musical meanings. One of our respondents explained the difference between the Russian word zvuk and its English counterpart sound in the following way: ‘Sound’ [saund] is a more capacious term which implies not so much the sound [zvuk] but an individual quality, a personal sound [zvuk]. Such as the sound of Sting, the sound of Jackson, the sound of U2.2 (Tina, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview) As a result of the shared knowledge of musical details and the informal character of communication, contestants and coaches use a hybrid type of talk where English serves as a lexiﬁer language and Russian as a recipient language providing the phonological, morphological, and syntactic foundation (Gritsenko and Laletina, 2012), e.g.,: svingovat’d‘to swing’, djazit’d‘to jazz’, sketit’d‘to scat’, bitboksit’d‘to beatbox’, bandad‘band’, batlid‘battles’, batlitsad‘to battle’, draivovyid‘driving’, rokeshnikd‘rock’, etc. The examples below represent fragments of informal talk between the coaches and the contestants3: the coach’s recommendation on how to better perform jazz (1), and encouragement to sing a rock piece (2): (1) Yeyo It [F.ACC.SG] ‘It (the song) must be swung’ (IMP ¼ impersonal) (2) Iz From ‘Can you (do) something in rock?’ nado must-IMP pro-sving-ovat’ PFV-swing-INF rok-eshnik-a rock-M.GEN.SG chto-nibud’ something-INDF.ACC mozh-esh? can-PRS.2SG This type of talk facilitates communication and serves as a marker of professional identity for Russian vocalists and musicians. Remarkably, when we asked them what language (English or Russian) the hybrid terms represent, they mentioned their foreign origin and local professional status: I would rather refer it to professional musical sphere (Ivan, guitar player, personal interview) Hm, good question . Well, I’d say, the terms are English, of course, but [.] we adapt them for the Russian mentality d this way it is easier and more convenient to communicate (Alexander, rapper, personal interview) Well . may be English, but Russianized. We alter English terms in our own way . This pattern is quite common now d not only in rap. Everyone understands this kind of talk (Mikhail, rapper, personal interview) 2 The original quote in Russian is as follows: “Saunddeto bolee emkoe ponyatie, kotoroe opredelyaet dazhe ne stolko zvuk, skolko individualnoe kachestvo, personalnyj zvuk. Est’ saund Stinga, est’ saund Dzheksona, est’ saund U2, saund Radiohead.” 3 The abbreviations for the grammatical terms used in the examples follow the Leipzig Glossing Rules. E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 51 These quotes indicate that in the Russian pop music domain, English has become a resource for Russian-based professional communication. It is no longer regarded as the ‘Other’ but has become a part of the ‘Self’. 4.4. The public discourse on language choice in songs: Russian as a symbol of national culture and identity In this section, we analyze comments from the web forums where TV viewers discuss monolingual and multilingual performances on Golos (Otzovik, 2016; Nagiev, 2014). They address the issues of language choice in songs, the mission of popular songs (to entertain or give food for thought), and public beliefs concerning the Soviet vs post-Soviet dichotomy in popular music. The comments also shed light on how the audience understands the role of language in society and their perception of patriotism, nationalism, and (popular) culture. Practically all forum participants believe that there should be more Russian songs in the show and disapprove of the growing number of English songs. Contrary to the stereotype of popular music as thoughtless and primitive (Storey, 2009), they emphasize the need to ‘understand’ the song and the importance of an empathic experience: I would like to hear more Russian songs. English songs do not touch your heart (tatiana21092014 (Otzovik, 2016)) I wish there were more Russian songs in the show rather than the foreign songs which we don’t understand (Irin-Ka (Otzovik, 2016)) The viewers disagree with professionals’ opinion that Russian songs do not allow one to demonstrate one’s vocal abilities. At the same time, they admit that Russian songs are more difﬁcult to performdnot because of the phonetic peculiarities of the Russian language (or its being less ‘musical’) but because the vocalists need to convey convincingly the meanings and emotions embedded in Russian songs. Behind this view, there is a popular belief that a good song needs to be ‘deep’ in meaningdi.e. it should not only entertain but also give food for thought. Interestingly, professional musicians and the audience agree that songs composed during Soviet times were more meaningful and more professional than post-Soviet songs, which are considered shallow: There are a lot of beautiful Russian songs which can reveal the strength, depth and beauty of one’s voice. But these are all Soviet-era songs [.] Russian songs are more difﬁcult to perform because they are deep and need to be sung accordingly (E. Plankina (Nagiev, 2014)) Forum participants are critical of the English bias of the show and interpret it as the lack of respect for the Russian language and culture. The emotional tone of such comments is rendered by rhetorical questions and exclamation marks. The opposition of we (our) vs they (them, there) foregrounds wider social and political tensions connected to globalization: . It is very disappointing that contestants prefer foreign songs. Is it really true that there are no more good songs in Russia!!! Is it really true that in our country there are no more good poets and composers!!! The coaches did not turn d not once! d to the songs performed in Russian. Have we indeed got so stuck in all these foreignisms that are ready to forget the music in our native language? I do not deny that they have good songs there, but the contest is held in Russia. I am sure that at a similar show in America, they won’t perform songs in Russian. [.] It is just that we no longer respect our native language and ourselves. Even the signboards in the streets are now in foreign languages (1igrok13 (Otzovik, 2016)) Even the viewers who appreciate multiculturalism and diversity in popular music are critical of the Western bias of the show and object to stigmatizing the Russian language. I do not think that there should be no other cultures on the stage. We do need cultural diversity. But nowadays the emulation of Western culture and Western values is too obvious and growing . The Russian language is being replaced. Our native tongue is seen as improper. This is not normal . (Irina T. (Nagiev, 2014)) Many comments link language choices in songs to national integrity and patriotism: It would be great to hear all songs in Russian. It is not nationalism, just the respect for the audience . (Muzhchina (Otzovik, 2016)) . the beginning (of the show) was good but now it has turned into the English language festival. We should be more patriotic. It’s very unlikely that in the US they would sing Russian songs at a similar festival (erzia253 (Otzovik, 2016)) This is practically an English-speaking contest. It is terrible! Are we facing the crisis of the national culture? (Anonym207469 (Otzovik, 2016)) Forum participants resist the imposition of foreign values (Americanization) and insist that the television and other gatekeepers should do more to support Russian culture: They intend to Americanize the Russian people altogether. The National Channel One should promote Russian culture to the mass audience (k2_2000 (Nagiev, 2014)) When it comes to language choice in monolingual songs, the ideologies of pop music professionals and TV viewers are in conﬂict. Musicians favor English, which they consider more prestigious, more musical, and better suited for demonstrating 52 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 vocal abilities. The audience expresses pro-Russian views. They (re)produce the ideology of language as part of national culture and identity and criticize the dominance of English in Russian popular music. 5. Multilingual performances Multilingual songs are not very numerous (see Table 4), but they are, no doubt, the highlights of the show. These songs are very warmly met by the audience and highly scored by the judging panel. Some of them have one melodyda single musical base with lyrics in two or more languages (e.g., the original text in French and its Russian translation in ‘Le temps des cathedrals’). Other performances combine fragments from different songs and alternate both language and music (e.g., a folk song in Russian combined with an English language hitd‘Storonoyu dozhd vs Try’). 5.1. Language alternation as a resource of meaning making Unlike medleys, compiled from parts of several hits which are played one after another and are not connected in terms of music or meaning, multilingual performances in Golos combine songs from different genres and different countries (cultures), match the pieces in terms of rhythm, harmony, and meaning and mold them into a single whole. For instance, in the Season 1 ﬁnale (2012), Elmira Kalimullina (an ethnic Tatar) and her coach Pelageya (a famous ethno-rock singer) performed a popular Portuguese fado called ‘Canção do Mar’ (‘Song of the sea’). The song has a ﬁxed accompaniment pattern during interludes, which consists of a repeated melodic motif created by stringed instruments. The repeated use of this motif in the end (coda) of the song serves as the rhythmic and harmonic base for incorporating fragments of folk songs in Tatar and Russian. (3) Elmira Kalimullina and Pelageya, ‘Canção do Mar’: Verse 2 (in Portuguese): Vem saber ão se o mar tera raz Vem ca ver bailar meu coração Se eu bailar no meu batel Não vou ao mar cruel E nem lhe digo aonde eu fui cantar Sorrir, bailar, viver, sonhar contigo Coda Elmira (in Tatar): Bakchanyn ber pochmagynda Min utyrdym uiladym Uiladym da yashlegemne Yashlegemne uinadym Yashlegemne uinadym Sin sazyn ny uinadyn Pelageya (in Russian): Golubushka golubushka Rodimaya matushka Ne davai ti batyushke Chashu zelena vina I want to know if the sea will be right Come see my heart dancing If I dance in my boat I’m not going to the cruel sea And don’t tell you where I was singing Smiling, dancing, living, dreaming about you In a corner of the garden I was sitting and thinking I was thinking about my youth About my youth I was playing About my youth I was playing You were playing your saz [stringed musical instrument] My dear, sweetheart My dear mother Don’t you give to my father A cup of acid wine Table 4 Combining languages in multilingual performances. Multilingual performance Languages Number of languages ‘Canção do mar’ ‘Tuda’ ‘Une vie d’amour’ ‘Le temps des cathedrales’ ‘Apologize/Uleteli listya’ ‘Now we are free’ ‘Storonoyu dozhd vs Try’ ‘Soldat’ ‘Get lucky vs Topitsya banya’ ‘La valse à mille temps’ ‘All around the world/Sari Gəlin’ ‘Ederlezi’ Portuguese, Tatar, Russian Russian, Georgian French, Russian Russian, French English, Russian Russian, invented language Russian, English Tatar, Russian, English English, Russian Russian, French English, Azerbaijani Romani, Russian, English, Latin 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 4 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 Ai ne davai ti batyushke Zelena vina ispit’ Zaprodast on dochen’ku Na dal’nyuyu storonushku 53 Oh don’t let father Drink the acid wine He will sell his daughter Somewhere far away Language alternation can occur in any part of the songdfrom the introduction to within a verse/chorus or the ﬁnal lines of the lyrics. For instance, beginning of the song is convenient for making a statement and/or expressing a certain point of viewdit sets the atmosphere, stirs listeners’ interest, and ‘tunes’ them to the right mood to get the message of the song. A ‘new’ language at the end helps to create the climax and/or emphasize symbolic meanings embedded in the song. Irrespective of its structural position, language alternation is always meaningful, and the additional meanings thus created are linked to language ideologies. A good example of language switching in the introduction is Jacques Brel’s ‘La valse à mille temps’ (‘The waltz of a thousand times’), performed in the knockout round of Season 3 by Alexandra Vorobyeva, who later became the winner of the competition. In that season, contestants and coaches were recommended by the organizers to include more Russian songs in the show. Alexandra began her performance with a ‘prologue’ in Russian written by her coach (Alexander Gradsky). In it, she ‘explained’ why they selected a foreign song. This jocular ‘introduction’ took the heat off the vocally complex performance, expressed resistance to producers’ recommendations, and conveyed a professional opinion on the issue of language(s) in popular music, speciﬁcally that a song should be performed in its original language. (4) Aleksandra Vorobyeva, ‘La valse à mille temps’: Introduction (in Russian): Govoryat mne, ‘Poi po-russki’ Deskat’ nashinskiy narod Po-angliyski, po-frantsuzski Ni bel’mesa ne poimyot [.] Nu a esli v ihnei pesne Est’ polyot i est’ dusha I motivchik interesniy Nas otsenyat ne spesha Nash narod umom ne uzkiy Nash narod ne lykom shyt I ya znyayu po-frantsuzski Pet’ konechno razreshit Etot val’sik Jaka Brelya Val’sik tysyachi vremyon Budet vsem ponyaten veryu I kem nado utverzhdyon They tell me, ‘Sing in Russian’ Because our people English or French Will not understand But if their song Is sincere and heartfelt And the melody is nice It will be appreciated Our people are not narrow-minded Our people are no common trash And I know that in French They will allow us to sing This little waltz by Jacque Brel The Waltz of a Thousand Times Will be understood by all people And will be approved by those authorized The format of popular songs is linear and goal-oriented, and their melodies (and/or harmonies) are directed ‘toward an expressive climax which usually occurs shortly before the end of the song’ (Manuel, 1985, p. 166). The closing lines of a song constitute a coda that may contain improvisations, including vocal ornamentations to the main melody. In this respect, the coda serves as an ideal place for creating new meaningsdas it was done in the song performed by Georgy Melikishvili and Nodar Revia (both ethnic Georgians living in Moscow) in the ﬁrst battle round of Season 2. They performed a popular Russian song ‘Tuda’ (‘Somewhere’) extending it with a piece of traditional Georgian polyphony from the folk song ‘Imeruli mgzavruli’. (5) Georgy Melikishvili and Nodar Revia, ‘Tuda’: Coda (in Russian): Tuda gde lyubili Tuda gde zabili Tuda gde ne zhdali Coda (in Georgian): Haralo hov dilo dela Abadelia hov dela Delia vrani nani na Delia vrani nani na Somewhere where we were loved Somewhere where we were forgotten Somewhere where nobody waited for us In this musical composition, the singers resort to a language that is unfamiliar to most of the audience. The use of Georgian is symbolic. Its contribution to the content of the song is less relevant than its indexical function as an ethnic identity marker. 54 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 In fact, the words in Georgian have no denotation; they are ‘ﬁller particles’ (Bailey, 1995), part of a famous ethnic (folk) tune (Ninoshvili, 2009). The Georgian ending to a Russian pop song allows the contestants to demonstrate their vocal abilities and ‘make ethnolinguistic otherness visible, without impeding the communicative value of lyrics to majority audiences’ (Androutsopoulos, 2010b, p. 39). Multilingual performances provide examples of innovative and unconventional uses of language which can be linked to the idea of language as a creative resource, an instrument of pop music aesthetics (like melody and/or rhythm). In the blind auditions for Season 3 (2014), Dilyara Vagapova (an ethnic Tartar) performed a famous song by the group 50 NIZZA ‘Soldat’ (‘Soldier’) combining three languagesdTatar, Russian and English. The original version by 50 NIZZA has verses and choruses in Russian and a coda in English. Dilyara started her performance with a verse and a chorus in Tatar (a wordfor-word translation of the original). The Tatar lyrics have Russian insertionsdthe words (in bold type) which have no Tatar equivalents. Some of them (e.g., patron, vagon, million) serve as the rhyming points of the verse (Sarkar and Winer, 2006). (6) Dilyara Vagapova, ‘Soldat’: Verse 1 (in Tatar): Min soldat Ükenech Vakytta kalganda ber genə patron Yaki ul yaki min In artky vagon bez bit kup Min dəülət million Min soldat Atyrga min tiesh Bu mina tanysh esh Pulya doshman tənenə eləgergə tiesh Shushy raga sina əniem Sugysh kaichan tuktar Chorus 1 (in Tatar): Min soldat Sugyshnyn tashlangan balasy Min soldat əni yaralarny tazart Min soldat Nik bezne onnytyn sin Hodai Min geroi əitegez nindi romannan Verse 2 (in Russian): Ya soldat Mne obidno Kogda ostayotsya odin patron Tol’ko ya ili on Posledniy vagon samogona Nas takih million Ya soldat I ya znayu svoyo delo Moyo delo strelyat’ Chtoby pulya popala v telo vraga Eto radost’ dlya tebya Mama voina teper’ ti dovol’na Chorus 2 (in Russian): Ya soldat Nedonoshenniy rebyonok voiny Ya soldat Mama zalechi moi rany Ya soldat Soldat zabytiy bogom strany Ya geroi Skazhite mne kakogo romana I’m a soldat [Russian: soldier] It hurts me When I have only one patron [‘bullet’] left Only it or me In the last vagon [‘wagon’] There are a million like us I’m a soldat [‘soldier’] And I know my business My business is to shoot So that the pulya [‘bullet’] hits the enemy It’s a joy for you Mother war, are you happy now I’m a soldat [‘soldier’] A premature baby of war I’m a soldat [‘soldier’] Mother, heal my wounds I’m a soldat [‘soldier’] A soldier of a godforsaken country I’m a geroi [‘hero’] Tell me, of what roman [‘novel’] I’m a soldier It hurts me When I have only one bullet left Only me or it The last wagon of a train There are a million like us I’m a soldier And I know my business My business is to shoot So that the bullet hits the enemy It’s a joy for you Mother war, are you happy now I’m a soldier A premature baby of war I’m a soldier Mother, heal my wounds I’m a soldier A soldier of a godforsaken country I’m a hero Tell me, of what novel E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 55 Coda (in English): I’m a soldier I’m a soldier The judging panel and the audience praised this song very highly, speciﬁcally pointing out the rhythmicity of the Tatar language. However, later in an interview, Dilyara admitted that she had shifted the stress and syllable boundaries of Tatar words to ﬁt them into the rhythmic pattern of the original song in Russian. She wanted to reinforce the sharp syncopated rhythm of the original song with the sound of the Tartar lyrics. Interestingly, being an ethnic Tatar from Kazan (the capital of Tatarstan), Dilyara does not speak the Tatar language. In this performance, she used it as an attention-getter and a means to articulate her ethnic identity. The languages most frequently used in multilingual performances are Russian (11 songs) and English (6 songs). They are used to ‘tell the story’ and/or convey symbolic meanings (connotations). The symbolism of English is based on language ideologies connecting it to globalization and modern trends. For instance, in the ﬁnal ‘live’ show of Season 2 (2013) Tina Kuznetsova combined the Russian folk song ‘Storonoyu dozhd’ (the verse) with the English-language pop hit ‘Try’ (the chorus). The chorus is often used as ‘a ‘hook’ to catch the ear of the listener’ (Nunes et al., 2015, p. 188). In Tina’s performance, it entails a pragmatic contrast with the Russian-language verse in terms of rhythm, melody, lyrics, and harmony; it is characterized by a more intensive instrumentation and is performed in a different language (English). (7) Tina Kuznetsova, ‘Storonoyu dozhd vs Try’: Verse 2 (in Russian): Golova bolit My head is aching Ai, chto bolit golovushka Aw, my poor head is aching Ne mogu tut bit’ I can’t be here Ai ne mogu tut bit’ Aw, can’t be here Oi pro druzhka lyubeznogo Oh, my boyfriend Ne mogu zabit’ I can’t forget Ne mogu zabit’ I can’t forget A moi razlyubezniy And my boyfriend Oi zabil pro menya Oh he forgot me Chorus (in English): Where there is desire there is gonna be a ﬂame Where there is a ﬂame someone’s bound to get burned But just because it burns doesn’t mean you’re gonna die You’ve gotta get up and try, try, try As we see, the Russian folk song tells the main story: a girl is crying in the rain because of her broken heart. The videos in the background reﬂect her inner turmoil and pain by showing large blue drops of either water or tears. The instrumentation during the Russian verse is minimal; the musical accompaniment and the sound of rain in the background maintain the feeling of sadness and suspense. The English chorus brings about a shift in narrative perspective, urging the girl not to give up and continue her life despite her difﬁculties. This content shift is enforced by a shift in beat and background instrumentation, which becomes more intensive and heavy. As the song reaches its climax in the ﬁnal chorus from ‘Try’, the background videos turn red and show bright electric-like ﬂames and hearts, supporting the contrast with the Russian verses. The vocalist’s appearance (short haircut, jeans, and high heels) calls for a modern interpretation of the old Russian folk song. When we asked Tina about the reason for mixing such different musical pieces, she explained that she wanted to make Russian folklore appealing to young people: I wanted [.] to present folk art in a modern language. I believe it is a hot topic, and we should by no means give up on our musical roots that inspired all Russian composers, poets and artists. [.] A folk song in a traditional form would be [.] too exotic for a modern listener [.]. So, to add freshness and originality to the song, I inserted the English fragment (Tina Kuznetsova, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview) She also stressed the importance of semantic compatibility in combined musical pieces: I was looking for semantically suitable refrains. And the song ‘Try’ seemed a good match. [.] It even extended the storyline of the song in terms of meaning (Tina Kuznetsova, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview) This ‘extension of storyline’ turned the Old Russian lamentation song (a ‘lost love’ story) into a life-afﬁrming appeal to resist grief and sadness. The performance brought together two different languages and two different musical forms and musical culturesdRussian folklore and modern American pop music. The vocalist positions herself as part of both cultures and employs modern musical arrangement and visual means to increase the appeal of the old Russian song. The use of English reframes the performance, making it up-to-date and adding a global touch. 56 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 In multilingual songs, Russian is usually used as a ‘base’ language (Androutsopoulos, 2010b, pp. 23–24) but has indexical potential as well. Its symbolic function is illustrated by the song ‘Ederlezi’, performed by Busha Goman (an ethnic Roma) in Season 3 knockouts (2014). ‘Ederlezi’ is a popular folk song among the Romani minority in the Balkans. It got its name from the festival which marks the beginning of spring and takes place on the same day as the Feast of Saint George in Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Serbia. The song became internationally famous in Goran Bregovi c’s version, which was used in the ﬁlm Time of the Gypsies by Emir Kusturica. The song is performed in Romani and tells the story of a little boy who is watching how the others are celebrating the holiday, eating lamb, and dancing. His own family is poor and he has nothing to eatdbut in the end they are given meat, too, and join the celebration. The vocalist begins his song in Romani, inserts the second verse in Russian, and sings the coda with elements of Romani, English, and Latin. (8) Busha Goman, ‘Ederlezi’: Verse 2 (in Russian): Blagoslovi Gospod’ Rossiyu Lord, bless Russia Matushku rodnuyu Our dear mother Matushku svyatuyu Our saint mother Hranimuyu toboi Saved by you Chorus (in Romani): O daje Oh mother Sa o Roma babo babo All the Roma, dad, dad Sa o Roma o daje All the Roma, oh, mother Sa o Roma babo babo hey All the Roma, dad, dad, hey Ederlezi, Ederlezi Ederlezi, Ederlezi Sa o Roma daje All the Roma, mother Coda (in English, Romani, Latin): See Lord See Lord Bless e gloria Bless gloria [Latin: ‘glory’] Hallelujah Hallelujah See Lord See Lord Bless e gloria Bless gloria [Latin: ‘glory’] E saint e Rusiya Saint Rusiya [Romani: ‘Russia’] Contrary to the traditional motive of Roma music’s ‘transnational homelessness’ (Imre, 2008), this version of ‘Ederlezi’ conveys a strong patriotic sentiment: a Russian Roma blesses Russia as their home country. The second verse in Russian has the form of a prayer: it foregrounds the idea of local belonging and indexes Russian Orthodoxy as part of Russian culture. The Latin insertions in the coda (gloria) impart a sacred meaning to the text, while English words (see Lord, bless, saint) create associations with gospel music. Language alternation and the mixing of different musical genres enables the vocalist to make a memorable and meaningful performance that was highly praised by the audience and the judging panel. 5.2. Professional and public discourses on multilingual songs: from language bias to language creativity In the case of multilingual songs, the views of the public and professionals’ opinions do not reveal any controversy or bias. The discourse of language ‘inequality’di.e. positioning languages as more or less ‘musical’ and language choice as more or less ‘patriotic’ddisappears from the discussions. The focus moves from socio-political to creative aspects, and languages come to be used as elements of pop music aesthetics. As we have shown above, language alternation in multilingual songs is always meaningful. It can be used to make a folk song appealing to young audiences, emphasize one’s ethnicity, express warm feelings toward one’s home country, make an important statement, or reinforce the rhythm of the song. The vocalists create these meanings by experimenting with linguistic and musical forms, and the results are highly rated: We decided that in this song (‘Tuda’) there will be an ethnic fragment – a Georgian musical story (Pelageya, coach, discussion in Season 2, Episode 7) It is one of those experiments which I highly appreciate (Alexander Grandsky, coach, the song ‘Ederlezi’, discussion in Season 3, Episode 12) Both mainstream and minority languages are considered equally effective in terms of expressive potential: I even felt sorry that Tatar is not a language that is accepted as a major one for singing here. It is so rhythmic d just stunning! It made my mouth water (Leonid Agutin, coach, the song ‘Soldat’, discussion in Season 3, Episode 6) Unlike in the case of monolingual songs, the TV viewers warmly welcome not only Russian but also other languages and cultures: E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 57 A wonderful idea to mix different genres and a stunning performance! I love her creative stance d Russian folk with a modern sound (Nastasya Filippovna, the song ‘Storonoyu dozhd vs Try’ (Golos/The Voice Russia, 2013)) Georgian speech on the Russian stage! Remember, my friends, music has no limits and art has no borders (Tural Hasanov, the song ‘Tuda’ (CityAngel1408)) Bravo Romale! Russia is not Russia without the Gypsy! (Michael Sapronov, the song ‘Ederlezi’ (Golos/The Voice Russia, 2014a)) Some comments mention the ethnic tensions of the 1990s and 2000s in the post-Soviet space and bring up the Soviet-era concept of ‘the friendship of peoples’. In Tartar, this song sounds fantastic . such ‘friendship of peoples’ in music is always interesting (Catherine S., the song ‘Soldat’ (Golos/The Voice Russia, 2014b)) Tatars and Russians stopped ﬁghting; they now sing together . the result is not so bad, isn’t it? (Bruno OMER, the song ‘Canção do Mar’ (Good extraterrestrial, 2014)) If they read these comments in Georgia (I mean if they still speak Russian there), respect to you for such wonderful voices! [.] I even remembered my happy Soviet childhood with ‘chitto-dritto’4 . Shall we be friends or what? (AlexVon AlexVon, the song ‘Tuda’ (CityAngel1408, 2013)) Two language ideologies emerge from the analyses of multilingual songs and their positioning by professional musicians and the publicdlanguage as an index of ethnicity and national culture and language as a creative resource, an instrument of pop music aesthetics. 6. Discussion Research ﬁndings indicate that the use of language(s) on Golos is determined by ideological and pragmatic reasons. Pragmatically, language choice in songs is an ‘outcome of strategic styling within speciﬁc social and historical contexts’ (Androutsopoulos, 2010b, p. 20). As a cultural and commercial product, popular songs ‘are likely to be adapted to the requirements of the public(s) they target’, and the language of lyrics ‘can be expected to play an important role in determining their appeal to relevant audiences’ (Davis and Bentahila, 2008, p. 247). On Golos, language choice becomes a ‘marketing strategy’ which takes into account the language ideologies of those who name the winners at each stage of the contest. Since the coaches/judges prefer the English language songs, the percentage of Russian songs at blind auditions and battles is rather low. In the ﬁnal stages of the contest, when the opinion of the TV viewers becomes critical, the choice is more often made in favor of Russian songs. The language ideologies of Russian pop musicians are shaped by the transnational expansion of the Anglo-American musical tradition and the role of English as a lingua franca in modern popular music. In this community of practice, English can index professionalism, convenient melodic and rhythmic structure, and an opportunity to demonstrate one’s vocal range. It is also a symbol of being modern, novel, and a part of the global pop music community. Because of its crucial role in communication of Russian pop musicians, English becomes part of their professional identitydi.e. part of the ‘Self’. The TV viewers, on the other hand, position English as the ‘Other’; they associate it with the expansion of Western (American) values and consider the language bias in popular music to be a threat to national culture. Although this ideology may not be shared by the entire pop music audience, it characterizes the online community of Golos and represents the view of a certain part of Russian society. The link between Russian and national culture and identity is articulated by the audience and the vocalists who work in the folk/ethno rock and world music genres. These musicians believe that ‘Russia has a great past in the history of global music’ and see their mission as preserving the Russian folk tradition through creative musical forms (Tina, Golos ﬁnalist, personal interview). The viewers also highlight the beauty of Old Russian songs and take pride in Russia’s cultural heritage: It would be great to revive these Old Russian lamentation songs! Shivers down the spine! And the voice so wellmatched! Feel proud of Russia . where they had such wonderful songs back then!!!! (Ruslan Putilin, the song ‘Storonoyu dozhd vs Try’ (Golos/The Voice Russia, 2013)) Both the coaches and the audience are critical of the songs (lyrics and music) composed during the post-Soviet years; they consider the Soviet-era songs more meaningful and more professional. Indeed, most of the Russian songs performed on the show are famous old hits. The Soviet vs post-Soviet dichotomy reﬂects not only the idealization of ‘good old times’ but the opposition of two different sets of valuesdprofessionalism (associated with Soviet popular song tradition) and consumerism (associated with post-Soviet pop music market). The Soviet Union was not a consumer society, and material well-being was considered less important than satisfying intellectual needs. In the Soviet pop music industry, there were many talented poets and composers whose songs have now become iconic. It is generally recognized that nowadays in Russian popular music there are no ﬁgures of equal status or talent: 4 A line of a Georgian song from a famous Soviet movie. 58 E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 Almost all great composers have either died or are no longer making music d except for the brilliant Alexandra Pakhmutova [.]. And I see no song writers matching the level of Derbenev, Shaferan, or Dobronravov (Alexander Gradsky, coach (Gradsky, 2014)) Thus, in the pop music domain, contrasting Soviet and post-Soviet songs may index high standards of pop music-making as opposed to catering to ‘low taste’. Another interesting dichotomy concerns the issue of understanding popular music. According to Frith (1996), the Western tradition associates fun with the body and seriousness with the mind. Machin (2010, p. 19) connects ‘the difference between listening with the mind and listening with the body’ with ‘the Romantic dichotomy between nature and culture and their corresponding associations with feelings and reason. Feelings are associated with the body as opposed to the intellect. For this reason pop music is often seen as simplistic and not requiring intellect. It is not listened to intellectually but physically’. The public discourse on language use in Golos indexes a different philosophy. The strive for ‘understanding’ and the belief that songs should be ‘deep’ suggest ‘listening intellectually’ or listening ‘with the mind’. Yet, when the language of the song is unfamiliar, the TV viewers speak of listening ‘with the heart’ and bring up ‘feeling’ as a mode of understanding. Still, the comprehension of popular music is represented as an intellectual endeavor (rather than a pleasant experience). I do not understand Elmira’s language but I hear with my heart the love and kindness . what else do we need? (101batia, the song ‘Canção do Mar’ (Rudoi, 2013)) I do not know what it was about but I did feel the power of friendship and unity (Marat Kaipov, the song ‘Ederlezi’ (Golos/The Voice Russia, 2014a)) Globalization has evoked an interest in ethnicity as a cultural reference. In popular music, ethnic motives have become more prominent. Alternating ethnic melodies and lyrics is akin to metroethnicity as cultural crossingdplaying with ethnicity for aesthetic effect (Maher, 2010, p. 587). Metroethnicity as a cultural performance is usually linked to metropolitan urban space, yet it is as widespread in the space of popular music. In multilingual songs, the vocalists appropriate different languages and different ethnic melodies and ‘play’ with them as if they were their ‘own’, yet at the same time stress their ‘otherness’. The symbolism of language alternation develops an aesthetic dimension: I like the idea of pouring the colors of Tatar and Russian folk into the Portuguese song. Very original! BRILLIANT!!! Bravo to those who thought of it (animaentera, the song ‘Canção do Mar’ (Rudoi, 2013)) 7. Conclusion Language choice and language alternation on Golos are always meaningful, and the symbolic meanings thus created are shaped by language ideologies circulating in contemporary Russia. These meanings are context-bound. The same linguistic form (discursive move) may be interpreted in different ways. For instance, choosing a Russian song can be a marketing strategy (to get more votes from the public) or a patriotic move (to indicate attachment to national values and/or show local belonging); singing in English can be resisted (as an imposition on national culture) or welcomed (as a creative step to make an old song sound modern). In this complex process of meaning making, languages can blur and build boundaries (e.g., between professionals and the public, between old and new, national and transnational); they can be ‘rivals’ (in monolingual songs) or ‘partners’ (in multilingual performances). Analyses of the discursive base of musical semiotics on Golos help to advance knowledge of the role and functioning of language ideologies in Russian pop music and get a better understanding of Russian society at large. Acknowledgements We are indebted to the vocalists and musicians, especially Tina Kuznetsova, who shared their views and expertise with us in interviews, as well as Natalia Aristova, Teona Namchevadze, and participants of cigane.clan.su/forum, who provided insights into the Tatar, Georgian and Romani languages. We are also grateful to Eeva Sippola, Britta Schneider, Carsten Levisen, and two anonymous reviewers for their important suggestions and comments on the earlier drafts of this paper. References Abayev, V.I., 2006. Statji po teorii i istorii jazykoznanija [Selected Works on the Theory and History of Linguistics in the Russian language]. Nauka, Moscow. Aleshinskaya, E., 2013. Key components of musical discourse analysis. Res. Lang. 11 (4), 423–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rela-2013-0007. Aleshinskaya, E.V., Gritsenko, E.S., 2014. Anglijskij jazyk kak sredstvo konstruirovanija globalnoj i lokalnoj identichnosti v rossijskoj populjarnoj muzyke [English as a means of constructing global and local identity in Russian popular music in the Russian language]. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod 6, 189–193. Alim, H.S., Ibrahim, A., Pennycook, A., 2009. Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. Routledge, New York, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203892787. Androutsopoulos, J., 2009. Language and the three spheres of hip hop. In: Alim, H.S., Ibrahim, A., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. Routledge, New York, London, pp. 43–62. Androutsopoulos, J., 2010a. Ideologizing ethnolectal German. In: Johnson, S., Milani, T.M. (Eds.), Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Policies. Continuum, London, pp. 182–202. E. Aleshinskaya, E. Gritsenko / Language & Communication 52 (2017) 45–59 59 Androutsopoulos, J., 2010b. Multilingualism, ethnicity, and genre: the case of German hip-hop. In: Terkouraﬁ, M. (Ed.), Languages of Global Hip Hop. Continuum, London, pp. 19–44. Arakin, V.D., 1989. Sravnitelnaja tipologija anglijskogo i russkogo jazykov [Comparative Typology of English and Russian Languages in the Russian language]. Prosveshchenije, Moscow. Bailey, J., 1995. Metrics Today I: on analyzing the verbal rhythm of a Russian lyric folk song. Poet. Today 16 (3), 471–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1773175. Chan, B.H.-S., 2009. English in Hong Kong Cantopop: language choice, code-switching and genre. World Englishes 28 (1), 107–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-971x.2008.01572.x. Coupland, N., 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511755064. Crystal, D., 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486999. Davis, E.E., Bentahila, A., 2008. Translation and code switching in the lyrics of bilingual popular songs. The Translator 14 (2), 247–272. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/13556509.2008.10799258. Eddy, A.A., 2008. English in the current musical subculture: current trends and attitudes. In: Proshina, Z. (Ed.), Cultural and Language Contacts. Far Eastern University Publishers, Vladivostok, pp. 20–27. Fairclough, N., 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse & Soc. 4 (2), 133–168. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0957926593004002002. Fairclough, N., 1995a. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. Longman, London, New York. Fairclough, N., 1995b. Media Discourse. Edward Arnold, London. Fairclough, N., 2006. Language and Globalization. Routledge, London, New York. Fiske, J., 1987. Television Culture: Popular Pleasures and Politics. Routledge, New York. Frith, S., 1996. Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Gritsenko, E.S., Aleshinskaya, E.V., 2015. Translanguaging in music: conceptualizing modes of interaction in global contact zones. Voprosi kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Issues in Cognitive Linguistics] 4 (45), 73–80. Gritsenko, E.S., Dunyasheva, L.G., 2013. Yazikovije osobennosti repa v aspekte globalizatsii [Language peculiarities of rap in the context of globalization in the Russian language]. Polit. Linguist. 2 (44), 141–147. Gritsenko, E.S., Laletina, A.O., 2012. Mnogojazychije v professionalnoj kommunikatsiji [Multilingualism in professional communication in the Russian language]. J. Psycholinguist. 1 (14), 46–55. Imre, A., 2008. Roma music and transnational homelessness. Third Text. 22 (3), 325–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09528820802204664. Johnson, S., Milani, T.M., Upton, C., 2010. Language ideological debates on the BBC Voices website: hypermodality in theory and practice. In: Johnson, S., Milani, T.M. (Eds.), Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Policies. Continuum, London, pp. 223–251. Machin, D., 2010. Analysing Popular Music: Image, Sound, Text. Sage, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280027. Maher, J.C., 2010. Metroethnicities and metrolanguages. In: Coupland, N. (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 575–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch26. Manuel, P., 1985. Formal structure of popular music as a reﬂection of socio-economic change. Int. Rev. Aesthet. Sociol. Music 16 (2), 163–180. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/836775. Ninoshvili, L., 2009. The poetics of pop polyphony: translating Georgian song for the world. Popular Music Soc. 32 (3), 407–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03007760902985858. Nunes, J.C., Ordanini, A., Valselia, F., 2015. The power of repetition: repetitive lyrics in a song increase processing ﬂuency and drive market success. J. Consumer Psychol. 25 (2), 187–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.004. Omoniyi, T., 2009. “So I choose to do am Naija style”: hip hop, language, and postcolonial identities. In: Alim, H.S., Ibrahim, A., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. Routledge, New York, London, pp. 113–135. Proshina, Z., 2010. Slavic Englishes: education or culture? In: Kirkpatrick, A. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 299–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203849323. Robertson, R., 1995. Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: Featherstone, M., Lash, S., Robertson, R. (Eds.), Global Modernities. Sage, London, pp. 25–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n2. Sarkar, M., Winer, L., 2006. Multilingual code-switching in Quebec rap: poetry, pragmatics and performativity. Int. J. Multiling. 3 (3), 173–192. http://dx.doi. org/10.2167/ijm030.0. Storey, J., 2009. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: an Introduction. Pearson Longman, Harlow. Terkouraﬁ, M., 2010. Languages of Global Hip Hop. Continuum, London. Woolard, K., Shieffelin, B.B., 1994. Language ideology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 23, 55–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415. Web references Agutin, L., 2014. New Update: Leonid Agutin on ‘Golos’. Interview by Alexei Mazhayev. http://agutin.com/index.php?page¼183 (accessed on 01.11.2015). CityAngel1408, 2013. Georgy Melikishvili d Nodar Reviya “Tuda”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼Nx-h9A-tq8Y (accessed on 15.02.2016). Golos/The Voice Russia, 2013. Tina Kuznetsova d “Try” vs “Storonoyu dozhd” d Golos d Finale d Season 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼0V_ gJGukW1k (accessed on 15.02.2016). Golos/The Voice Russia, 2014a. Busha Goman “Ederlezi” d Knockouts d Golos d Season 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼vssWn8RqM2c (accessed on 15.02.2016). Golos/The Voice Russia, 2014b. Dilyara Vagapova “Soldat” d Blind auditions d Golos d Season 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼vssWn8RqM2c (accessed on 15.02.2016). Good extraterrestrial, 2014. Golos. Elmira Kalimullina and Pelageya. 29.12.2012 d “Cancao do mar”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼v6otNkCDngE (accessed on 15.02.2016). Gradsky, A., 2012. ‘Golos’ on Channel One. Alexander Gradsky on the Project ‘Golos’ on Channel One. http://www.gradsky.com/publication/s12_13.shtml (accessed on 01.11.2015). Gradsky, A., 2014. MassoLit. Alexander Gradsky on the Project ‘Golos’. http://subscribe.ru/group/massolit/5856001/ (accessed on 01.11.2015). Kondratyev, Y., 2015. Show ‘Golos’: Welcome to Hell. Interview for Pravda.Ru by Elena Timoshkina. http://www.pravda.ru/culture/music/modern/30-012015/1246383-mihajlin-0/ (accessed on 01.11.2015). Nagiev, D., 2014. Reviews by viewers. Series 2. http://encycl.m-rnagiev.ru/%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%B2%D1%8B_%D0%B7%D1%80%D0%B8%D1% 82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BD (accessed on 15.02. 2016). Otzovik, 2016. TV Program ‘Golos’ (Channel One) d reviews. http://otzovik.com/reviews/teleprogramma_golos_perviy_kanal/ (accessed on 15.02.2016). Rudoi, I., 2013. Elmira Kalimullina and Pelageya d Canção do Mar (Elle tu l’aimes). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v¼pFDQpgQN3lU (accessed on 15.02. 2016).