RESTRICTED BOOK REVIEW Ian F. W. Beckett Modern Insurgencies and Counter Insurgencies Guerrillas and their Opponents since 17502 Park Square, Milton Park Abingdon, Oxon, OX 14RN, 2001 Rs….. 1. The genre of this book is warfare and history where much of details available on Insurgencies and counter- insurgencies are included. The author Ian F.W. Beckett is a well-qualified professor in the field of military history in the USA to write this book. He has written many books including The Great War (1914-1918), A Nation in Arms: A Social Study of the British Army in the first world. The overall goal of the author of this book is to survey of asymmetrical military operation since 1750. The book contains nine chapters including root causes for insurgencies and counter-insurgencies referring to the many examples in history. 2. United State former president John F. Kennedy himself identified communistinspired insurgency as a ‘major form of politico-military conflict equal in importance to conventional warfare’ in between 1960 and 1963. As Ian Beckett correctly pointed out, there are many causes for insurgencies. Such as religiously motivated, socio-economic discrepancies, lack of political recognition, slavery, and invasion of smaller countries on political objectives. 3. The author describes the military and ideological aspect by referring to the few key characters in the history. These revolutionary leaders are Mao Zedong, Amilcar Cabral, Vo Nguyen Giap and Che Guevara. In fact, three individual guerrilla leaders are also mentioned as a thoroughly modern understanding of the political and socioeconomic potential of an insurgency, namely Nestor Makhno, Augusto Sandino and Tomas Edward Lawrence. Among them, one of the influential theorists of the twentieth century is Lawrence emphasis that military aspect of guerrilla warfare, believed victory would result from the key factors of mobility, security, time and doctrine. Therefore, it is believed that with the beginning of the Second World War some theorists and practitioners had recognised the possibility of using guerrilla techniques in the pursuit of overtly political ends 3. The book emphasises the tactics used by the insurgencies. Such as tactics used in open area and mountains area. Moreover ‘Hit and Run’ tactics used by the insurgencies also explain in details in this book. Nevertheless, he also emphasises that with the change of environment tactics also changed. For an example, Ian Beckett bringing out ‘Internet’ and ‘economic’ as a new mode of an operand. Almost all the tactics are known to Guerrilla warfare has been employed somewhere by someone else to prevent irregular operations: systematic terror, burning villages etc. 4. This book contains Guerrilla warfare and counter-insurgencies throughout the British, French, German, Dutch and Portuguese empires, the efforts of the Soviet Union to co-operate guerrilla operation everywhere for communist empires. Most of the details abstract from the American civil war, Napoleonic war. Meantime Ian Beckett provides details on a failure of Guerrilla war due to various factor. For example Lack of organization, betrayal and government support. This evidence that guerrilla operation exists with the help of political support. 5. . 6. Ian Beckett argues that urban guerrillas create more challenges to the opponents. Because modern tactics of guerrilla based on urbanization. Meantime they gain lots of support from the villages. Such as intelligence etc. Therefore, it is highly vulnerable to RESTRICTED RESTRICTED attack urban insurgencies. When it come to the modern world most of the conflict one way or another related to the political and natural resources. Their goal varies. They may act according to the political decision. In this aspect, Ian Beckett failed to provide sufficient details. Lack of information will create the vacuum of the book. Meantime he repeatedly applies his own adaptation of the counter-insurgency tactics extracted by Robert Thompson who is British success against the communist insurgency in Malaya as a principle for resolving the conflict. He emphasis that winning the heart and minds campaign as a precondition for military victory over the insurgency. 7. Ian Beckett felt that sometime over confidence by when analyse the situation given. Because, some mass killing, genocide done by the well-known government force are reluctant to have a legal procedure. Nevertheless, insurgents awarded death. Therefore, this is more bias to western who broke the law. Even he never mentions the root causes of the conflicts in details. Modern insurgency is more sophisticated. They have more connection beyond the territory. They are well organized. Therefore to resolve the conflict like this need more reconciliation, more rehabilitation more connection among citizen. RESTRICTED