How Real is Reality TV? Reality television programs are unconventional, but have become the most popular type of tv amongst viewers. This category of television programming is unscripted and casts real life people, instead of professional actors, and just follows these people and documents their lives. Reality television has become such a staple in our American lives today that it’s difficult to partition what we watch on television and what we do in our real lives. So exactly how “real” are these programs? Are there clear distinctions between what we watch on tv and how we carry on our daily lives? Or are these television programs becoming more”real” because we integrate what we see into how we live? If so, why is that? Why do people crave the lifestyles they see on tv? Society is strange, but sociology explains possible explanations as to why this may be. The final decision is up to the viewer and everyone interprets what they see differently. Sociologically speaking, reality television provides many concepts as to why we love these television programs so much that we’d want to integrate what we see into our actual lives. Symbolic interactionism is the the micro level theory of how shared meanings, orientation, and assumptions form basic motivation behind people’s actions. This concept is useful in understanding cultures, and how different actions portray different meanings in various places around the world. This concept allows viewers to evaluate their own behavior in comparison to others. Reality TV portrays this theory by allowing viewers to see that their real life actions are acceptable, because they see others doing the same thing on TV, and because the show is “reality” and not scripted. An example of this concept would be the “bromance”, a non-sexual but affectionate relationship of two male friends, between Pauly D and Vinny, on hit MTV reality show, J ersey Shore. The cast of the Jersey Shore include a group of 8 strangers who are of Italian descent and lead lifestyles of the modern day “guidos and guidettes”. Two of the four guys on the show formed a very special bond, they are best friends and refer to their relationship as a “bromance”. As their bromance grows, viewers see that the guys hug, kiss, and show very affectionate actions towards one another. This is an example of symbolic interactionism because many male friendships today have grown into “bromances”, and many guys have grown to accept the fact that it is okay to be affectionate with one another and not have to worry about being labeled as “gay” or “feminine”. Their “bromance” is an example of how people have modified their own actions and beliefs based on what is seen on TV, alongside other interactions amongst reality stars. Another popular product from Jersey Shore is the ever so popular, fist pump. The fist pump is a dance move and gesture where the arm is raised and hand is formed into a fist, as the arm is raised and lowered in a thrusting motion. This is a very popular dance move that was exposed in the club scene of the Jersey Shore. Depicted above is Jersey Shore cast member, P auly D, fist pumping in a club alongside a female companion. Before the show, fist pumping was not a commonly known dance move, but once Jersey Shore exposed the gesture to the world, it has become rare to walk into a club and not see “fist pumpers”. This is an example of how people have modified their daily lives because of what they have seen or been exposed to on reality television. Jersey Shore has created new social norms that are widely accepted because “normal” people are pictured doing them on national television. Symbolic Interactionism is also seen in hit MTV reality show, T he Hills. The Hills featured fashion student L auren Conrad and her friends as they embark on their new journeys in the hills of Los Angeles, California. Viewers quickly became obsessed and engulfed themselves into the drama of Lauren’s life, relationships, and conflicts with other cast members. Lauren lived the life of a normal girl in her early 20’s except the drama was magnified and exaggerated to a whole different level. Conrad, more popularly known as LC, faced the challenges of fake friends, betrayal, love triangles, heartache, but also chased her dream and climbed the fashion ladder and worked alongside world famous designers. Because LC is not a professional actress and just lives her life, viewers feel that they can relate to the events in her life and ultimately form a bond with her. Viewers are able to see her journey and can feel like they are living her dream with her. Many viewers root for her success and others watch the drama in her life to make up for the lack of drama in their own lives. Also, because LC was presented with many rare opportunities, viewers might get the sense that they are living vicariously through her. Another sociological concept seen on The Hills is social control. Social control is a set of mechanisms that create normative compliance between members of society, meaning there are unspoken rules and norms that are generally accepted, understood, and should not be broken. The informal social control present in the Hills is the unspoken rule of not dating a friend’s ex boyfriend or girlfriend. As seen in the clip above, Lauren is telling a mutual friend about how A udrina Patridge, Conrad’s friend and former roommate, has accused Lauren of hooking up with her on again off again boyfriend, Justin Bobby. Conrad of course understands the concept of informal social control and would never become involved with Justin Bobby, and Conrad doesn’t particularly understand why Patridge would even accuse her of such action because Justin Bobby is simply not Conrad’s type. This example of informal social control affects the lives of viewers because seeing that other people follow the rules of the “girlcode” make people more susceptible to following those rules in their own lives. Breaking the girl code can lead to very bad consequences, even breaking up friendships. Conflict theory is also a big theme in reality television, particularly apparent in shows such as The Bachelor and the R eal World Challenge. Conflict theory is defined by a social belief where many different outlets compete for the same resources. The idea that conflict between competing interests in society is obvious in in clip above of The Bachelor. The Bachelor is a television series where one man is trying to find the woman he wants to spend the rest of his life with, amongst a group of 25 women who are living in the same house and competing for time with the bachelor. As you can see, things get very intense and tension runs high when competition and jealousy starts to grow between women. The male bachelor is the obvious scarce resource that these women are fighting over. This concept carries over into the lives of viewers because it instills a sense of competition in our own lives where we want to emerge victorious. Also, many viewers crave the drama that they see in these television programs to fill the void in their own lives. Many female viewers can also live vicariously through the show and imagine themselves in place of the girl featured on each date. The Real World Challenge is a television show where multiple groups of individuals compete in series of events for a grand prize that takes place in the final episode. Eliminations are at the end of every round and the worst team gets automatically placed in them. While the winning group not only advances to the next round, an individual competes for power over the whole group thus giving the individual winner of the round more say so. That individual gets to choose a team to face the worst team in the elimination round. There is a form of social inequality due to race and or age. Contestants always want to eliminate the less social, or even the youngest ones. This is for power, and it is not divided equally. The conflict paradigm focuses on divisions of society, this television series gives us a perspective of society having social order and control through dominance. Due to scarce resources, competition is inevitable and we can see examples of social dominance in the Real World Challenge. Most reality television shows use a form of the conflict paradigm by having conflict over resources, such as money, goods, or power. This theme keeps TV ratings soaring due to the fabricated struggles relating to some of the viewer’s lives by the social inequality that society faces. To be able to look at reality TV through a sociological imagination, one can get additional perspectives of it. Macrosociology, meaning to look and analyze the social systems on a large scale, is important. Reality TV has another sociological perception, and that is functionalism. This theory is a macro-level paradigm, which argues that the social structure is continuously attempting to maintain social equilibrium (balance) among all of the components of society. This paradigm is interested in the structure of society and how it impacts people’s lives. While the economy is looking to stabilize itself, reality television gives it the opportunity to go through the structure of functionalism. Reality television shows its viewers these reality stars that wear brand clothing to refresh their minds when it comes the latest fashion trend. In “Jersey Shore” reality television star M ichael Sorrentino, known, as “The Situation” happens to wear A bercrombie & Fitch brand clothing. This is a form of product placement that gets the attention of consumers by allowing them to be in place with our society’s fashion and puts money in the pockets of those that are displayed. The economical structure stabilizes without much effort and unintentionally helps boost up sales on certain lines of clothing. As reality television star Kim Kardashian goes through her normal daily routine on her show, she flashes designer brand clothing such as L ouis Vuitton, or Burberry. Kardashian and the rest of her clan are shown in the biggest designer brands, and their lavish lifestyle is not subtle, by any means. Though it may apparent that these are expensive articles of clothing, it still encourages society to stick to the latest fashion and companies get promoted without them having to rely only on advertisements. A functionalist paradigm can maintain and restore equilibrium in its social system with shared values. This phenomenon has the individuals in society conversing with one another about a show they like to watch, or in which they can both relate to. Having shared values helps prevent conflicts among the structure, which makes functionalism completely opposite of the conflict theory. Society interacts naturally within each other. Due to the lack of drama in most people’s lives, the reality television shows have controversial arguments throughout the series that may be suitable to talk about with people who have seen the same show. This brings a commonality among people. For instance, people will ask each other about the debate among reality television stars or what they think on a TV star’s latest haircut. These reality TV stars have set trends or social norms in a way that forms a social structure throughout America. If one would “fist pump” at a club, people who’ve seen “Jersey Shore” can familiarize and relate with each other all with a simple gesture. To understand reality TV’s true effect on the general population, we must consider the social concepts of manifest and latent functions. A manifest function of reality TV would be the purpose of its conception – entertainment. Unlike the news, reality television is to humor the public with unlikely scenarios of drinking, sex, and of course the signature dramatic fights that make a reality series popular. Whether you want to know who the K ardashians are dating or how Snooki gets her “hair-poof”, you are intentionally giving into reality TV’s manifest function. However, what makes these programs controversial, at times, would be the latent function – the unexpected outcome of reality television. The latent function could be anything from you not exercising enough because you’re watching the show on a couch, to you not getting out and socializing with friends due to your obsession about different series. These outcomes of both manifest and latent functions tend to lead to dysfunctions. Manifest and latent dysfunctions are intended and unintended negative effects on society. Purposely watching reality TV allows one to share the common phrase “oh, let me see how stupid this show is.” Often viewers want to sit down and criticize the many people of the reality programs, thus the manifest dysfunction. As for the latent dysfunction, an unexpected and negative outcome of reality series could be your unconscious decisions and attitudes. When Jersey Shore first aired, those who were unfamiliar with “guido” and “guidette” culture instantly began to attribute an unconscious belief that Italians from New Jersey were all obnoxious and troublesome. As a conclusion, people are unaware that reality TV had shaped their basic ideas of different cultures and peoples and the way they perceived the world.