as PDF

advertisement
New and Changing
Lighting Incentives for New York State
Presenters:
Place your chosen
image here. The four
corners must just cover
the arrow tips. For
covers, the three
pictures should be the
same size and in a
straight line.
Edward Bartholomew
Commercial Lighting | Program Manager
National Grid
Edward.Bartholomew@NationalGrid.com
Rebecca Firman
Marketing Manager
Ephesus Lighting
Rebecca.Firman@ephesustech.com
http://www.ephesustech.com
2015 Lighting Application Changes
 New Energy Code Mandates
 Transition to LED Technology through Incentive Amounts
 TLED’s (LED T8 Replacements with Integral Drivers)
 New Prescriptive Indoor LED Offerings
 New Prescriptive Outdoor LED Offerings
 Case Study –Syracuse War Memorial Ice Rink
Ephesus LED Retrofit Project
 Custom Lighting Parameters
 Lighting Controls
2
Lighting Industry Trends & Changes
 Energy Codes continue to reduce lighting power density and mandate
controls
 Energy Star transitioning to qualifying only residential lighting.
 DLC to create a simplified tiered structure. Premium tier based on
higher efficacy. Categories will be backwards compatible for utility
programs.
 New LED lighting with integrated controls and wireless networks.
Adaptive programming to match occupant use
 LEDs cost decrease, market penetration increases, quality improves
 Fluorescent and HID slowly being replaced and eliminated
3
IECC 2012 Energy Code Mandates
2014 New York State Supplemental Energy Code
 Lower Lighting Power Densities for Interior and Exterior
Lighting
 Mandated Occupancy Sensors with manual off or to
automatically turn lights on to 50% (except in exempt
spaces)
 Mandated Automated Daylight Zone Controls for lighting
located in daylight zones to reduce power to 35% or less
 Mandated photocell (dusk to dawn) control on all outdoor
lighting circuits and/or fixtures.
4
2013 & 2014 NYS
Lighting kWh Savings
4,132,235
FL
23,677,526
HID
LED
20,410,704
CONTROLS
1,277,875
49,498,340 kWh Saved
$6,107,983 Incentives
5
Cheap and Easy Energy Savings
vs. Long-term Comprehensive Savings
 Rewards long term kWh savings over simple kW savings
 Encourages comprehensive design through the interaction
with high-performance building systems.
 Supports long term energy savings, beyond 5 yrs
 Promotes cost-effective solutions that pays for themselves
within 3-7 years
 Supports long-term market transformation
 Supports high-performance buildings with best practices
and greater occupant acceptance & comfort
6
6
Advancement of LED’s
2015
200 lm/W
US DOE SSL Multi Year Program Plan 2012
7
ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL OF LED’S
Forecasted US Lighting Energy Consumption & Savings, 2010 – 2030
Energy Savings Potential of Solid State Lighting in General Illumination Applications -2012
8
Transition to LED Technology through
Incentive Amounts
LED Troffers
27W Saved
$$$
FL Troffers
27W Saved
$
9
Question #1
10
Solution
Per Fixture
Savings Est.
meh
TLED’s , CFLED’s
(T8 & CFL replacement lamps using existing
ballast and sockets –No Rewiring Required)
Good
LED Tube retrofit kits with drivers
(not using FL ballast or sockets)
10W-25W
Better
LED full retrofit kits with drivers and lens
20W-40W
Best
LED replacement fixtures
25W-55W
Excellent
LED Adaptable fixtures with embedded controls
Awesome
Redesign of space with reduced LPD, controls
and LED fixtures.
5W-15W
55W-75W
> 75W
11
New LED Measure Codes -81C, 81D, 81E
Indoor–TLED’s (LED T8 Tubes)
 Qualified products must be listed on the DLC site. The categories are: Four-Foot Linear
Replacement Lamps or Two-Foot Linear Replacement Lamps
 TLEDs must have an Integral driver and be FL ballast compatible
 To be eligible, lamp must state “internal driver” in the notes column (column L) on the DLC
QPL list.
 TLEDs must require no rewiring
12
TLED -Clarification
NYS
81
Not
Supported
Not
Supported
13
LED Full Retrofit Kits
−
−
−
−
LED full retrofit kits with drivers and lens
Immediate kW savings
Thermal issues reduced further
Works with controls
− Imprecise compatibility with
existing fixtures and structure
− Retains same location and
number of existing fixtures
14
New LED Measure Codes -87A, 87B, 87C
Indoor–Recessed Troffer
15
New LED Measure Codes -86A, 86B, 86C
Indoor–High Bay/Low Bay
16
New LED Measure Codes -83A, 83B
Outdoor–Canopy/Garage
17
New LED Measure Codes -85A, 85B
Outdoor–Wall Mount Area
18
New LED Measure Codes -87A, 87B, 87C
Outdoor–Pole Area/Roadway/Decorative
19
Minimum Eligibility Requirements for 2011
Custom Lighting
Lighting projects with combined labor and materials cost exceeding
$30,000 unless there are unique circumstances:
a) Unique facility lighting requirements
b) Unique hours of operation (typical hours average 4,000 and
those that vary from the standard hours for their facility type)
c) Unique labor or materials cost
d) Unique fixture type (obsolète existing fixture, antique replica,
etc.)
e) The project’s calculated incentive must be cost effective.
f) Use NYS Custom Lighting Tool


Update with LED lighting criteria based on review process and DLC
or Energy Star
De-emphasize references to CEE ballasts and lamps
20
Expert
Techs
Sales
LED Fixture Review Process
DLC or Energy Star
Listed and verified
LED Cutsheets
Reviewed
LM79
In-situ
LM80
LED Cutsheets
DLC or Energy Star
Non-listed but categorized
LM79
In-situ
LM80
DLC or Energy Star
Non-listed and non-categorized
Specialized application
21
Question #2
22
Case Study:
Syracuse War Memorial Ice Rink-2012
LED High Bay Lighting Retrofit
Rebecca Firman
Marketing Manager
23
LED Basics
• “Digital lighting:” not bulb based, no moving parts to wear out maintenance-free
• Can tolerate high heat, humidity, dirt and challenging
environments
• Instant on/off capability (remember Super Bowl 2013?)
• Energy costs are often reduced by 75%
• Fixtures can be used at different power/dimming levels &
integrated with various control systems
• Many installations have a payback period of 2-3 years
24
Highbay HID vs. LED
Legacy Lighting Drawbacks
LED Lighting Benefits
High Power Consumption
1650W – 2120W
Power Consumption reduced 40%+
1000W
High Cost of Ownership
Lumen depreciation – 20% Loss @ 2000
hrs
Bulbs require frequent replacement
Low Cost of Ownership
No lumen depreciation – constant light
No maintenance for the lifetime of the
fixture
Cold Start / Restrike Delay
5 – 15 min to reach full output
20 min restrike
Instant On/Off
Allows for dimming and advanced
controls
No warm-up time
Poor Color Consistency
CCT shift over time impacts color uniformity
Color Consistency
Maintains uniform color temperature over
time
Limited Control Options
Not “Green”
Contains mercury
Many Control Options
Environmentally Safe
No hazardous chemicals
ROHS compliant
25
Case study: Syracuse War Memorial
• First sports venue in North America to install LED lighting
• Ephesus’ first installation in September of 2012
• Home of AHL’s Syracuse Crunch (affiliate of Tampa Bay
Lightning) and multi-use facility
• 7000 seat arena
• Opened in 1951
26
Reasons for change
• Energy and maintenance costs were high
• Metal halide system would lose 40% of its light output over 18
months
• Experienced low lighting levels and uniformity as well as
shadows on the surface
27
Results & Savings
•
•
•
•
147 Arena 600 fixtures were installed
Foot candles increased from 105 to 217
Energy consumption reduced by 85%
Ice is more easily maintained
Savings
• In first year of operation, 230,000 kWh were saved, resulting in over
$40,000 of energy savings.
• Lights have been in use for thousands of hours with no maintenance.
• Now completing third full year of operation; a control system was installed
in 2013 to offer more operational flexibility.
28
29
Other New York State Projects
 ELG Utica Alloys: 66% energy savings
 Ft. Drum Airfield: 73% energy savings
 Ft. Drum Pool: 56% energy savings
 Nine Mile Nuclear Plant: 78% energy savings
 Auburn Armature: 28% energy savings
30
Lighting Controls
Potential Savings >50%
31
Source: Osram Sylvania – Enselium Controls
Lighting Controls –Barriers to Implementation
 Initial cost
 Overly complex (not fully
utilized)
 Lack of training for installers
 Lack of certification for specifiers
and installers
 Lack of education for facility
managers and occupants
 Lack of commissioning to
ensure performance
32
Lighting Controls Mandated By Code
IECC 2012 contain mandatory lighting provisions for the
following:
• Indoor automatic lighting shutoff
• Light reduction controls -must allow the occupants to select a lighting
level that is 30% and 70% of full power (Step or Dimming)
• Occupancy sensor or timer switch controls–within a open or closed
space
• Time Switch Controls
• Daylight control zones- with daylight sensors
• Display/Accent lighting control
• Outdoor lighting control
• Separate Task lighting control
33
33
Components , Systems & Strategies
 Lighting Control Components:
Occupancy sensors, daylight sensors, that control a fixture or
a lighting circuit.
 Localized Lighting Controls:
Space confined network of sensors and lighting to a local
relay controlled by a keypad.
 Adapted Lighting :
Lighting fixtures with integral sensors that are networkable,
addressable and programmable
 Networked Lighting Controls:
Programmable, addressable, lighting, sensors and controls
that is controlled and networked to a central server.
 Integrated Lighting Controls:
Network lighting controls system that is integrated with the
whole building automation system.
34
Components , Systems & Strategies
 Lighting Control Components:
Occupancy
sensors,
daylight
MANDATED
BY IECC
2012sensors, that control a fixture
or a lighting circuit.
 Localized Lighting Controls:
Space confined network of sensors and lighting to a local
relay controlled by a keypad.
 Intelligent (Smart) Lighting:
Lighting fixtures with integral sensors that are networkable,
addressable and programmable
 Networked Lighting Controls:
Programmable, addressable, lighting, sensors and controls
that is controlled and networked to a central server.
 Integrated Lighting Controls:
Network lighting controls system that is integrated with the
whole building automation system.
35
Components , Systems & Strategies
 Multi-scene programmable dimming
 Multi-scene programmable time scheduling
 Multi-scene programmable occupancy sensors
 Task or direct lighting programmable dimming control with occupancy
sensor –separate from the ambient light
 Automatic continuous daylight dimming control of primary perimeter
lighting when effective aperture is 0.15 and area is less than 250 ft2
 Automatic continuous daylight dimming control of secondary perimeter
lighting when effective aperture is 0.30
 Automatic continuous daylight dimming control under skylights when
the area is greater than 900 ft2 and the effective aperture is greater
than 0.01
36
Potential Savings >50%
37
Source: Osram Sylvania – Enselium Controls
Savings Potential for Lighting Controls
Lighting has the largest
Current Controls Saturation
estimated technical
(NCI 2012)
potential for energy
Timer
savings of any U.S.
building end-use.
EMS
A significant fraction of Motion Detector
that potential is believed
to lie in lighting system Light Sensor
controls.
Dimmer
None
0%
27% Energy Savings over no-controls
19% Energy Savings beyond ASHRAE 2010
20%
40%
60%
80%
38
2012 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
Lighting Controls Energy Savings
Assumptions
Control Type
NYS DSF
LBNL
Occupancy sensor
30%
24%
Programmable control
15%
Daylight dimming control
30%
Daylight stepped control
20%
28%
Personal Tuning
31%
Task Tuning
36%
Multiple Strategies
38%
Adaptive LED Lighting
New
54%
All controls savings assumptions should be space dependent. Controls
achieve different energy savings in an warehouse than an office.
39
Lighting Controls Training -Partnerships
 National Grid is willing to partner with Controls
Mfgs to provide hands-on training on their
controls systems:
 Improves installation and performance of
controls
 More accurate bidding based on better
knowledge of installation (labor & material
costs)
 Understand the capabilities of controls systems
in order to provide the right system for the
project.
40
Summary
 New IECC 2012 code moves retrofit projects into
major retrofit opportunities with LED’s and controls.
 Replacement of existing FL to LED is more effective with the entire
fixture and added controls.
 Higher efficacy LED’s can improve lighting quality by redirecting
lumens for glare control and visual comfort
 Lighting controls offers the next best opportunities for energy
savings.
 LED’s integrated with controls offers substantial energy savings with
less hassle
 Comprehensive efficiency programs offer more incentives and
provide better quality than one-for-one lighting replacement
programs.
41
Thank you for attending this webinar
Presenters:
Place your chosen
image here. The four
corners must just cover
the arrow tips. For
covers, the three
pictures should be the
same size and in a
straight line.
Edward Bartholomew
Commercial Lighting | Program Manager
National Grid
Edward.Bartholomew@NationalGrid.com
Rebecca Firman
Marketing Manager
Ephesus Lighting
Rebecca.Firman@ephesustech.com
http://www.ephesustech.com
42
Question #3 & #4
43
Download