INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REPORT
Wawa Gold Project, Wawa, Ontario
Prepared for
Augustine Ventures Inc.
Prepared by
Elisabeth Ronacher, PhD, P.Geo. & Jenna McKenzie, P.Geo.
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience
and
Sébastien Bernier, P.Geo.
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
June 30, 2016
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 UNITS.......................................................................................................................................... 15 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ................................................................................................ 16 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .............................................................................. 16 4.1 OWNERSHIP .............................................................................................................................. 23 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES ................................................................................................ 25 4.3 PERMITS .................................................................................................................................... 25 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY,
CLIMATE,
LOCAL
RESOURCES,
INFRASTRUCTURE,
AND
PHYSIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................... 26 5.1 ACCESS...................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2 CLIMATE ..................................................................................................................................... 26 5.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION ...................................................................................... 27 5.4 INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOCAL RESOURCES ...................................................................... 27 6.0 HISTORY ........................................................................................................................................ 29 6.1 SURLUGA GOLD MINES LTD. – 1962–1975 ............................................................................ 40 6.2 COMINCO – 1963/64 .................................................................................................................. 40 6.1 PANGO GOLD MINES LTD. – 1969–1970, 1980-1984 ............................................................. 41 6.2 J.D.S BOHME PROPERTIES – 1970 ......................................................................................... 43 6.3 CONSOLIDATED MORRISON EXPLORATIONS LIMITED – 1974 .......................................... 43 6.4 PURSIDES GOLD MINE – 1974-1975 ....................................................................................... 43 6.5 CANBEC EXPLORATIONS LTD. – 1983 ................................................................................... 44 6.6 DUNRAINE MINES LTD. – 1980–1984 ...................................................................................... 44 6.7 NORTHERN HORIZON RESOURCES LTD. – 1981, 1983 ....................................................... 45 6.8 MONTE CHRISTO RESOURCES – 1984 .................................................................................. 45 6.9 CITADEL GOLD MINES INC. – 1982–2006 ............................................................................... 46 6.10 CAVIAR RESOURCES LTD. – 1986 .......................................................................................... 47 6.11 GOLDUN AGE RESOURCES INC. – 1986 ................................................................................ 47 Page | 2
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
6.12 MR. ROBERT HENDERSON – 1986.......................................................................................... 48 6.13 VAN OLLIE EXPLORATIONS LTD. – 1989–1991...................................................................... 48 6.14 ALLIED NORTHERN RESOURCES – 1988–1990 .................................................................... 51 6.15 PAN ORVANA RESOURCES INC. – 1990/91 ........................................................................... 51 6.16 TRANSGOLD EXPLORATIONS AND INVESTMENT INC. – 1994-1995, 1998 ........................ 52 6.17 LAWRENCE MELNICK – 1995-1996 ......................................................................................... 52 6.18 ELLIOT FEDER – 1996–1998..................................................................................................... 52 6.19 JOHN LEADBETTER – 2000 ...................................................................................................... 53 6.20 3814793 CANADA INC. – P.MOUSSEAU-L. – 2004.................................................................. 53 6.21 WAWA GP INC. – 2007 .............................................................................................................. 53 6.22 AUGUSTINE VENTURES INC. – 2011 ...................................................................................... 55 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION....................................................................... 59 7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY............................................................................................................... 59 7.2 LOCAL GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 60 7.3 PROPERTY GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 61 7.3.1 Structure ....................................................................................................................... 66 7.3.2 Alteration ...................................................................................................................... 67 7.4 MINERALIZATION ...................................................................................................................... 69 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES ............................................................................................................................ 71 9.0 EXPLORATION .............................................................................................................................. 72 9.1 GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEYING (DEC 2014 – JAN 2015) .................................................. 72 9.2 INDUCED POLARIZATION (DEC 2014) .................................................................................... 75 9.3 GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEYING (OCTOBER 2015) ........................................................... 78 9.4 GROUND HORIZONTAL LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEYING (OCTOBER 2015) ....... 81 9.5 HELICOPTER-BORNE GRADIENT MAGNETIC SURVEY (FEB 2015) .................................... 86 9.6 2014 ROCK SAMPLING ............................................................................................................. 93 9.7 2015 ROCK SAMPLING ............................................................................................................. 96 9.8 2015 CHANNEL SAMPLING ...................................................................................................... 98 10.0 DRILLING ..................................................................................................................................... 101 10.1 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................. 106 10.1.1 Surluga area ............................................................................................................... 109 10.1.2 Sunrise-Mickelson area .............................................................................................. 109 Page | 3
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
10.1.3 Hornblende Shear area .............................................................................................. 109 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .......................................................... 110 11.1 HISTORIC SAMPLES ............................................................................................................... 110 11.2 WAWA GP INC. 2007 SAMPLES ............................................................................................. 110 11.3 AUGUSTINE 2011 SAMPLES .................................................................................................. 110 11.4 2014 AND 2015 PROSPECTING AND CHANNEL SAMPLES ................................................ 111 11.5 RED PINE 2014/2015 SAMPLES ............................................................................................. 111 11.5.1 Analytical Procedures................................................................................................. 112 11.5.2 Physical Rock Property Measurements ..................................................................... 113 11.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMS ......................................... 115 11.6.1 SRK Comments .......................................................................................................... 116 11.7 GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY (DEC 2014 – JAN 2015) ...................................................... 116 11.8 IP/RES SURVEY (DEC 2014)................................................................................................... 117 11.9 GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY (OCT 2015) .......................................................................... 117 11.10 HLEM SURVEY (OCT 2015) .................................................................................................... 117 11.11 HELICOPTER-BORNE GRADIENT MAGNETIC SURVEY (FEB 2015) .................................. 118 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION .................................................................................................................. 119 12.1 DATA VERIFICATION BY RED PINE ...................................................................................... 119 12.2 DATA VERIFICATION BY SRK ................................................................................................ 119 12.2.1 Independent Verification Sampling ............................................................................ 119 12.2.2 Verification of Electronic Analytical Data.................................................................... 121 12.2.3 Verification of Analytical Quality Control Data ........................................................... 122 12.3 VERIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR THE
OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2015 DRILLING PROGRAM .......................................................................... 126 12.3.1 2016 Site Visit Check Samples .................................................................................. 129 12.4 SITE VISIT ................................................................................................................................ 129 12.5 GEOPHYSICS SURVEYS ........................................................................................................ 135 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ................................................... 136 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES ........................................................................................... 136 14.1 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY ........................................................ 137 14.1.1 Resource Database.................................................................................................... 138 14.1.2 Geological Modelling .................................................................................................. 139 Page | 4
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.1.3 Compositing and Capping .......................................................................................... 140 14.1.1 Specific Gravity Database .......................................................................................... 142 14.1.2 Variography and Block Interpolation .......................................................................... 146 14.1.3 Block Model Definition ................................................................................................ 147 14.1.4 Estimation Strategy .................................................................................................... 148 14.1.5 Block Model Validation ............................................................................................... 148 14.2 MINERAL RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................. 155 14.3 PREPARATION OF MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT ..................................................... 156 14.4 SENSITIVITY TO SELECTION OF REPORTING CUT-OFF GRADE ..................................... 157 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES .......................................................................................................... 158 15.1 ARGONAUT GOLD INC. .......................................................................................................... 158 15.2 RICHMONT MINES INC. .......................................................................................................... 160 15.3 WESDOME GOLD MINES LTD. ............................................................................................... 161 16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION ....................................................................... 161 17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 161 18.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................. 164 18.1 PHASE 1 ................................................................................................................................... 164 18.1.1 3D Compilation ........................................................................................................... 164 18.1.2 Structural Interpretation .............................................................................................. 164 18.1.3 Rock Property Survey ................................................................................................ 164 18.1.4 Quality Control ............................................................................................................ 165 18.2 PHASE 2 ................................................................................................................................... 166 19.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 167 20.0 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................................................. 175 FIGURES
Figure 4-1: Location of Red Pine’s Wawa Gold Project.............................................................................. 17 Figure 4-2: Map showing the patented and unpatented mining claims of Red Pine’s Wawa Gold project.20 Figure 4-3: Map showing the patented mining claims of the Wawa Gold project. ...................................... 21 Page | 5
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 4-4: Map showing the location and the extent of the geological wireframe used to calculate the
mineral resource (in yellow). ....................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 5-1: Map showing the access to property and the infrastructure in the area................................... 28 Figure 6-1: Locations of known diamond drill holes on the property. ......................................................... 31 Figure 6-2: Locations of the grab samples collected by Augustine in 2011. .............................................. 58 Figure 7-1: Map showing the Superior Province and its subprovinces. ...................................................... 60 Figure 7-2: Map of the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt. ............................................................................... 62 Figure 7-3: Property geology map. ............................................................................................................. 63 Figure 7-4: Typical diorite of the Jubilee Stock from drill hole SD-14-05 (7.4 m). ...................................... 64 Figure 7-5: Typical fine-grained mafic rock (gabbro) of the Jubilee Stock from drill hole SD-14-05 (36.5 m).
.................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Figure 7-6: Lamprophyre from drill hole SD-14-06 (308 m). ....................................................................... 66 Figure 7-7: Quartz-sericite altered diorite from SD-14-05, 172.7 m............................................................ 68 Figure 7-8: Quartz-sericite altered diorite from drill hole SD-14-04, 35 m. The quartz-sericite alteration is
overprinted by pink K-spar alteration. ......................................................................................................... 69 Figure 7-9: Late quartz-vein and breccia from drill hole SD-14-05, 167.3 m. ............................................. 71 Figure 9-1. Total Magnetic Intensity of Wawa Ground Magnetic Survey (Dec 2014 – Jan 2015).............. 74 Figure 9-2. Location of Spectral IP/Resistivity Survey lines. ...................................................................... 76 Figure 9-3. Results of the RES2DINV resistivity inversion on the Spectral IP dataset carried out by Abitibi
Geophysics Inc. Viewed from South. .......................................................................................................... 77 Figure 9-4. Results of the RES2DINV chargeability inversion on the Spectral IP dataset carried out by Abitibi
Geophysics Inc. Viewed from South. .......................................................................................................... 78 Figure 9-5. Total Magnetic Intensity of Wawa Ground Magnetic Survey (Oct 2015) ................................. 80 Figure 9-6. Max Min 50 m Tx-Rx separation. In-phase solid lines: 56 kHz (red), 28 kHz (pink), 14 kHz
(brown), 7 kHz (cyan). Quadrature dashed lines: 56 kHz (blue), 28 kHz (maroon), 14 kHz (orange), 7 kHz
(green). ........................................................................................................................................................ 82 Figure 9-7. Max Min 100 m Tx-Rx Separation. In-phase solid lines: 56 kHz (red), 28 kHz (pink), 14 kHz
(brown), 7 kHz (cyan). Quadrature dashed lines: 56 kHz (blue), 28 kHz (maroon), 14 kHz (orange), 7 kHz
(green). ........................................................................................................................................................ 83 Figure 9-8. Anomalies selected by ClearView Geophysics from 50 m Tx-Rx separation HLEM data. Total
magnetic intensity data (Oct 2015) underlain. ............................................................................................ 85 Figure 9-9. Overview of the Heli-GT system. The three orthogonal magnetic gradients are measured on 3
m baselines (from Munro, 2015). ................................................................................................................ 87 Figure 9-10. Final total magnetic field grid .................................................................................................. 89 Figure 9-11. Calculated Vertical Gradient of Reduced to Pole Magnetic Grid ........................................... 90 Page | 6
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-12. Digital Terrain Model .............................................................................................................. 91 Figure 9-13. Structures noted on CVG results. ........................................................................................... 92 Figure 9-14: Map showing the locations of the grab samples collected by Red Pine in 2014. .................. 94 Figure 9-15: Locations of the rock grab samples collected in 2015. .......................................................... 97 Figure 9-16: Location of the channel samples collected in 2015. ............................................................... 99 Figure 10-1: Drill plan map showing the collar locations and traces of the 2014 and 2015 drill holes. .... 104 Figure 10-2: Drill collar location for SD-14-01 and SD-14-02. .................................................................. 105 Figure 10-3: Red Pine's core logging facility in Wawa. ............................................................................. 106 Figure 11-1: Secure core storage area next to Red Pine’s core logging facility in Wawa, Ontario. ......... 112 Figure 11-2: SG measurement at Red Pine's core logging facility. .......................................................... 114 Figure 12-1: Time series plots for blank samples and certified reference materials assayed by Actlabs
between 2014 and 205 on the Surluga–Jubilee Gold Deposit.................................................................. 124 Figure 12-2: Bias charts and precision plots for field duplicates sampled by Red Pin and assayed by Actlabs
comparing the original assay to the quarter core duplicate. ..................................................................... 125 Figure 12-3: Performance of standard Oreas 12a. Black triangles represent standard results. .............. 127 Figure 12-4: Performance of standard Oreas 19a. Black triangles represent standard results. .............. 127 Figure 12-5: Performance of standard Oreas205. Black triangles represent standard results. ............... 128 Figure 12-6: Performance of standard Oreas 202. Black triangles represent standard results. .............. 128 Figure 12-7: Entrance to the property. ...................................................................................................... 131 Figure 12-8: Historic collar. ....................................................................................................................... 132 Figure 12-9: Visible gold in drill hole HS-15-31, 73.00–74.00 m. ............................................................. 134 Figure 12-10: Photo of the collar location for HS-15-29 as verified during the February 2015 site visit. . 135 Figure 14-1: Oblique section looking northwest. ....................................................................................... 140 Figure 14-2: Sampling Length by Domains............................................................................................... 141 Figure 14-3: Specific Gravity ..................................................................................................................... 142 Figure 14-4: Basic Statistics – Domain 1 .................................................................................................. 143 Figure 14-5: Basic Statistics – Alteration Zone ......................................................................................... 144 Figure 14-6: Basic Statistics – Shear Zone............................................................................................... 145 Figure 14-7: Gold Correlograms for Domain 1.......................................................................................... 147 Figure 14-8: Validation of the Block Estimates for Domain 1 ................................................................... 150 Figure 14-9: Validation of the Block Estimates for the Alternation Domain .............................................. 151 Figure 14-10: Validation of the Block Estimates for the Shear Domain .................................................... 152 Figure 14-11: Validation of the Block Estimates for all Resource Domains Combined ............................ 153 Figure 14-12: Block Estimates Comparing Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Estimation Results .. 154 Figure 15-1: Map showing the locations of adjacent mines and exploration projects. ............................. 160 Page | 7
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
TABLES
Table 1-1: Mineral Resource Statement*, Surluga-Jubilee Gold Deposit, Wawa Gold Project, Ontario,
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., May 26, 2015 ............................................................................................ 13 Table 2-1: List of Qualified Persons for this report. .................................................................................... 14 Table 4-1: List of claims that are part of the Wawa Gold Project property. ................................................ 18 Table 6-1: Historic production data (from Rupert, 1997) ............................................................................ 29 Table 6-2: Historic surface diamond drill holes completed in the Wawa Gold Project area. ...................... 29 Table 6-3: Historic underground diamond drill holes completed in the Wawa Gold Project area. ............. 30 Table 6-4. Historic exploration of the Wawa Gold Project .......................................................................... 32 Table 6-5: Diamond drill holes completed by Cominco in 1963 and 1964. ................................................ 41 Table 6-6: Assay highlights of the Cominco drill holes. .............................................................................. 41 Table 6-7: Overview of Dunraine's drilling. ................................................................................................. 44 Table 6-8: Details of diamond drill holes completed by Van Ollie from 1989 to 1991. ............................... 48 Table 6-9: Assay highlights of holes drilled by Van Ollie between 1998 and 1990. Only raw assays >10 g/t
Au are shown; weighted averages were not calculated.............................................................................. 50 Table 6-10: Collar locations and survey details of diamond drill holes completed by Wawa GP in 2007. . 54 Table 6-11: Selected assay highlights for Wawa GP's 2007 drilling program. ........................................... 54 Table 6-12: Collar locations and survey details of diamond drill holes completed by Augustine in 2011. . 55 Table 6-13: assay highlights for Augustine's 2011 drilling program. .......................................................... 56 Table 6-14: Assay highlights of the grab samples collected by Augustine in 2011. ................................... 59 Table 9-1. Features identified from Spectral IP/Res data by ClearView Geophysics Inc. Coordinates are
listed in NAD83, UTM Zone 16N. ................................................................................................................ 75 Table 9-2. Parameters of the Ground Magnetic Survey: October 2015 ..................................................... 78 Table 9-3. HLEM survey parameters. ......................................................................................................... 81 Table 9-4. Interpreted anomalies of 50 m Tx-Rx separation survey. Selected by ClearView Geophysics Inc.
.................................................................................................................................................................... 84 Table 9-5. Helicopter-borne gradient magnetic survey parameters ........................................................... 86 Table 9-6: List of samples collected by Red Pine in 2104. ......................................................................... 95 Table 9-7: Assay highlights of the 2015 grab samples. .............................................................................. 98 Table 9-8: Locations and orientations of the channels sampled in 2015.................................................. 100 Table 9-9: Assay highlights of the 2015 channel samples........................................................................ 101 Table 10-1: Details of Red Pine’s 2014 and early 2015 diamond drill holes. ........................................... 102 Page | 8
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 10-2: Details of Red Pine’s fall 2015 drilling program. .................................................................... 103 Table 10-3: Assay highlights for Red Pine's 2014 and spring 2015 drilling program. .............................. 107 Table 10-4: Assay highlights for Red Pine’s fall 2015 drilling program. ................................................... 108 Table 11-1: Standards used during the 2014 Red Pine drilling program.................................................. 113 Table 11-2: List of standards used during the fall 2015 drilling program. ................................................. 113 Table 11-3: Specifications of Control Samples Used By Red Pine (2014-2015)...................................... 116 Table 12-1: Assay Results for Verification Samples Collected by SRK on the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit
.................................................................................................................................................................. 120 Table 12-2: Summary of Analytical Quality Control Data Produced by Red Pine on the Surluga–Jubilee
Gold Deposit ............................................................................................................................................. 122 Table 12-3: Check samples collected during the February 2016 site visit. .............................................. 129 Table 12-4: Sections of drill holes reviewed during the February 2016 site visit. ..................................... 133 Table 14-1: Basic statistics – gold ............................................................................................................ 141 Table 14-2: Gold Variogram Parameters for the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit. ...................................... 147 Table 14-3: Surluga–Jubilee Deposit Block Model Specifications ............................................................ 148 Table 14-4: Summary of Estimation Parameters for all Resource Domains ............................................ 148 Table 14-5: Assumptions Considered for Reporting Cut-Off Grade Determination.................................. 156 Table 14-6: Mineral Resource Statement*, Surluga-Jubilee Gold Deposit, Wawa Gold Project, Ontario,
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., May 26, 2015 .......................................................................................... 157 Table 14-7: Quantities and Grade Estimates – Pit Material...................................................................... 158 Table 14-8: Quantities and Grade Estimates – Underground Material ..................................................... 158 Table 18-1: Cost estimate for the recommended exploration program. ................................................... 165 APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – Certificates of Qualified Persons
Appendix 2 – List of Patented Tenures
Appendix 3 – Independent Verification Samples Assay Certificates
Page | 9
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
1.0
SUMMARY
Augustine Ventures Inc. (“Augustine”) commissioned Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience (“Ronacher
McKenzie”) and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) to complete an NI43-101 compliant technical report
for Augustine’s Wawa Gold Project (“the property”) near Wawa, Ontario. Ronacher McKenzie and SRK had
previously completed a report on the Wawa property for Red Pine Exploration Inc. (“Red Pine”) in June
2015. That report was updated with the latest exploration data. The resource published in the June 2015
report is still current and included in the present report. The resource estimate is based on extensive drilling
in the area of the historic Surluga Mine (“Surluga”).
The property is located two km east of the Town of Wawa, Ontario, and ~650 km northwest of Toronto. It
consists of 205 patented tenures (fee simple absolutes and leases) totaling 2,198.74 ha and 34 unpatented
mineral claims covering 2,985.43 ha. Augustine entered into an Assignment and Assumption agreement
with Red Pine and Citabar Limited Partnership (“Citabar”) on December 10, 2014. Red Pine earned a 30%
interest in the property by incurring a total of $2.1 million in “eligible exploration expenses” (see Section 4.0
below) by June 30, 2015. Red Pine can earn up to an additional 15% interest in the property by incurring a
further $4 million in eligible exploration expenses by June 30, 2016 (see Section 4.0 for further details). On
December 17, 2015, Augustine announced that Augustine entered into a non-binding letter of intent to
merge with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Red Pine where Red Pine will acquire all of the outstanding
securities of Augustine (the “Transaction”).
The property is located in the Michipicoten greenstone belt of the Wawa Subprovince (Superior Province).
The Michipicoten greenstone belt consists of three cycles of mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks with
associated subvolcanic intrusions and metasedimentary rocks (Sage, 1994). The Jubilee Lake Stock, which
hosts the mineralization on the property, is the intrusive equivalent to the felsic portions of the two oldest
cycles. It is located along a regional structure, the Wawa–Hawk Lake–Manitowik Lake Fault. The Jubilee
Stock is fine- to medium-grained and locally porphyritic; it intruded into quartz-feldspar crystal tuff at 2.745
Ga. Intrusive breccia occurs at the margins of the stock. The Jubilee shear zone, which hosts the majority
of the mineralization at the historic Surluga Mine, consists of a number of parallel, ~300–900 m long enechelon segments. It strikes northeast (018-034°) and dips 25-55° to the southeast. Its width ranges from
9 m to 60 m.
Gold mineralization is spatially associated with the major shear zones on the property. It is finely
disseminated in quartz veins, lenses and pods within shear and breccia zones in various rock types.
Page | 10
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Recrystallized quartz and minor amounts of sulfides (pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite) are also
characteristic; strong silicification is typically associated with the mineralization.
Extensive historic exploration was completed on the property. Drilling in the Wawa Gold Project area
consisted of 561 surface diamond drill holes totaling 78,177.58 m and 1,522 underground diamond drill
holes totaling 51,680 m. Eight past-producing mines exist on the property.
A ground magnetic survey was conducted by Red Pine, the operator of the property, between 03 December
2014 and 26 January 2015. A total of 69.7 line-km were collected covering an area of 2.23 km². The ground
magnetic survey outlined the strike of the Jubilee shear zone, which was expressed as a magnetic low
striking approximately 015°. Areas of increased magnetization coincide with the Jubilee shear plane. Linear
features oriented east–west are observed in the magnetic data.
Red Pine contracted ClearView Geophysics Inc. (“ClearView”) to conduct Spectral Induced Polarization
and Resistivity (“Spectral IP/Res”) surveys on the Surluga Property between 12 December 2014 and 16
December 2014. The objective of the survey was to determine if the Spectral IP/Res results could be used
to enhance drill targeting for gold mineralization. The survey array geometry constituted a Pole-Dipole
“Combo” array, whereby the dipole spacing (“a”) for n = 1-6 was a = 50 m, and for n= 7-8, a = 100 m. A
total of four lines were surveyed covering 3.08 line-km. Three anomalous features were selected by
ClearView from the survey results. Red Pine furthered the interpretation of the Spectral IP/Res by
contracting Abitibi Geophysics Inc. (“Abitibi Geophysics”) to complete an inversion of the Spectral IP dataset
using the RES2DINV inversion code developed by Geotomo Software Sdn. Bhd. The purpose of the
inversion is to appropriately place the chargeability and apparent resistivity features at depth and relate
them to the known Jubilee shear plane. The inversion results of both resistivity and chargeability reflect the
easterly dip of the Jubilee shear zone, with higher resistivity values east and above the shear zone. A broad
chargeability contrast is also associated with the shear zone.
In October 2015, Red Pine contracted ClearView to complete a second ground magnetic survey at the
Sunrise area, as identified by the 2015 Rock Sampling. The purpose of this work was to locate magnetic
anomalies, as well as identify zones and trends to help guide gold exploration. A total of 12.3 line-km were
collected at 20 m line spacing, covering an area of 0.17 km². The survey delineates several subtle ENE
trending magnetic linear features, including one associated with the south-eastern arm of the Surluga grade
shell.
In October 2015, Red Pine also contracted ClearView to complete a ground horizontal loop electromagnetic
(“HLEM”) on the Wawa Gold Project. The survey was completed using an Apex MaxMin system and is
Page | 11
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
often referred to as a “MaxMin” survey (“MaxMin”). The purpose of this work was to locate electromagnetic
anomalies, as well as identifying zones and trends that help guide gold exploration. Two cable separations
were recorded: 50 m and 100 m, in horizontal-coplanar orientation. The 50 m transmitter (“Tx”) to receiver
(“Rx”) separation consisted of 6.3 line-km, covering 0.112 km² and the 100 m Tx-Rx separation consisted
of 4.2 line-km, covering 0.052 km². Eleven anomalies were selected from the 50 m Tx-Rx separation based
on the in-phase and quadrature responses.
Red Pine contracted Scott Hogg & associates Ltd. (“Scott Hogg”) to fly a helicopter-towed gradient magnetic
survey in February, 2015. A total of 928 line-km of data were collected, covering an area of 37 km2.
Significant structures such as the Hornblende Shear, the Jubilee Shear, the Parkhill fault and the Darwin
Shear could be identified from this survey data.
Red Pine completed a rock sampling program in 2014 and another rock sampling program and channel
sampling in 2015. Locally, several samples contained significant gold grades of up to 93 g/t Au.
Red Pine completed drilling programs in December 2014 and from February to April 2015. A total of 5,594.5
m were drilled in 26 diamond drill holes. A total of 2,489 samples were assayed. Another drilling program
was completed in October and November 2015. A total of 1,571.6 m were drilled in 13 diamond drill holes
and 1,102 drill core samples were collected and assayed.
SRK estimated a mineral resource based on information from 2,007 historical core boreholes
(126,067 metres) drilled between 1960 and 1990, core drilled by Wawa GP Inc. in 2007 and 2011, and
additional 26 core boreholes (5,594 metres) drilled by Red Pine in 2014 and 2015. SRK reported the
tonnage and grade estimates at two cut-off grades: 0.4 and 2.5 g/t gold for pit and underground mineral
resources, respectively (Table 1-1). This estimation was completed in conformity with CIM Mineral
Resource and Mineral Reserves Estimation Best Practices Guidelines (November 2003). The blocks were
classified according to CIM Standard Definition for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014)
guidelines. This estimation does not represent mineral reserves and has not demonstrated economic
viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted into mineral
reserves. The effective date of the tonnage and grade estimates is May 26, 2015.
Page | 12
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 1-1: Mineral Resource Statement*, Surluga-Jubilee Gold Deposit, Wawa Gold Project, Ontario,
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., May 26, 2015
Resource Category
Inferred**
Inside Pit
Outside Pit
Underground
Total
*
Cut-off
Gold (g/t)
Quantity
Grade
(‘000 t) Gold (g/t)
0.40
0.40
2.50
0.50
10,239
8,630
955
19,824
2.05
1.07
3.73
1.71
Contained Metal
Gold (‘000 oz)
676
298
114
1,088
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. All figures are
rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. Composites have been capped where appropriate.
** Pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t gold in relation with a conceptual pit shell
constructed by SRK. Underground mineral resources include classified modelled blocks below the
conceptual pit shell and above a cut-off grade of 2.50 g/t gold. Cut-off grades are based on a gold price of
US$1,250 per once and a gold recovery of 95 percent.
A personal inspection of the property was completed by Sébastien Bernier (SRK) and Elisabeth Ronacher
(Ronacher McKenzie) on January 19 and 20, 2015. Bernier and Ronacher reviewed the logging and QC
procedures, inspected current and historic diamond drill core and took 42 check samples from historic
surface and underground holes and from a current drill hole at Red Pine’s secure core logging facility in
Wawa. A second site visit was completed by Elisabeth Ronacher on February 17 and 18, 2016, to review
core drilled in the fall of 2015.
Based on the historic exploration and mining, the current exploration completed by Red Pine and Augustine
and the resource estimate by SRK, Ronacher McKenzie conclude that potential exists to find additional
gold mineralization on the property outside the Surluga–Jubilee area. Therefore, further exploration is
warranted outside of the Surluga–Jubilee area.
Ronacher McKenzie recommend expanding exploration from the Surluga–Jubilee area to the other areas
of the property. In particular, a 3D compilation of all existing data and an integration of geological and
geophysical data is recommended. In addition, a physical property survey of selected existing drill holes
should be completed. The survey results should be integrated with the geological information available for
the Surluga–Jubilee area and with the existing geophysical data available for the entire property. The
purpose of the 3D model and the physical property survey is for Red Pine to be able to determine targets
for ground truthing and further drilling. Additional drilling in the Hornblende Shear area is also recommended
to determine the extent of potential mineralization in this zone.
Page | 13
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
2.0
INTRODUCTION
Augustine Ventures Inc. (“Augustine”) commissioned Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience (“Ronacher
McKenzie”) and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) to update an NI 43-101 compliant technical report
for Augustine’s Wawa Gold Project (“the property”) near Wawa, Ontario. The current report is based on a
previous report issued to Red Pine Exploration Inc. (“Red Pine”) by the same authors and dated June 5,
2015 (Ronacher et al., 2015). SRK had completed a resource estimate based on extensive drilling in the
area of the historic Surluga Mine (“Surluga”) that is a part of the Wawa Gold Project, data verification and
a site visit for the original report. Ronacher McKenzie completed the technical report excluding sections 14
(Mineral Resource Estimates), sections 11.1 (Quality Control and Quality Assurance Program) and 12.1
(Data Verification by SRK).
The purpose of the current report is to satisfy Augustine’s requirement to provide a prospectus for
Augustine’s shareholders as part of the proposed merger of Red Pine and Augustine (Augustine News
Release, December 17, 2015).
The main source of information was Red Pine and Augustine; Red Pine provided a compilation of historic
data including drill hole information and reports; additional historic information and geological literature was
obtained from the public domain, dominantly the Ontario Geological Survey (“OGS”).
The property was visited by Sébastien Bernier (SRK) and Elisabeth Ronacher (Ronacher McKenzie) on
January 19 and 20, 2015. Bernier and Ronacher reviewed current and historic drill core, collected check
samples from current and historic core, visited historic and current drill collars and shaft locations and
discussed the project with Red Pine staff. In addition, Elisabeth Ronacher visited the property from February
16 to 18, 2016. During the second site visit, Ronacher reviewed drill core from the October/November 2015
drilling program.
Table 2-1 lists the Qualified Persons who completed this report and the sections of the report for which they
are responsible.
Table 2-1: List of Qualified Persons for this report.
Section Number Section Title
1.0
Summary
2.0
Introduction
3.0
Reliance on Other Experts
4.0
Property Description and Location
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure
5.0
and Physiography
6.0
History
Qualified Person(s)
Ronacher, McKenzie, Bernier
Ronacher, McKenzie, Bernier
Ronacher, McKenzie
Ronacher
Ronacher
Ronacher, McKenzie
Page | 14
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Section Number
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
2.1
Section Title
Geological Setting and Mineralization
Deposit Types
Exploration
Drilling
Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security
Data Verification
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
Mineral Resource Estimates
Adjacent Properties
Other Relevant Data and Information
Interpretation and Conclusions
Recommendations
References
Qualified Person(s)
Ronacher
Ronacher
McKenzie, Ronacher
Ronacher
Bernier, Ronacher, McKenzie
Bernier, Ronacher, McKenzie
na
Bernier
Ronacher
Ronacher, McKenzie
Ronacher, McKenzie, Bernier
Ronacher, McKenzie, Bernier
Ronacher, McKenzie, Bernier
Terminology
AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry
Asl: above sea level
Ga: billion years
Lidar: Light Detection and Ranging; laser-based technology for determining digital terrain models
MNDM: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
MNR: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
RTK GPS: Real Time Kinematic Global Positioning System; provides centimeter-level accuracy location
data.
Sedar: System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval; mandatory document filing and retrieving
system for companies trading on Canadian stock exchanges administered by the Canadian Securities
Administrators (www.sedar.com).
2.2
Units
The metric system of measurement is used in this report. Historic data are typically reported in imperial
units and were converted for this report using the following conversion factors:
Page | 15
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016

1 ounce per (short) ton = 34.2857 grams/tonne

1 foot = 0.3048 metres

1 mile = 1.609344 kilometres

1 gamma (unit of magnetic field intensity) = 1 x 10-9 Tesla = 1 nanoTesla
The following abbreviations are used in this report: m = metres, ft = foot, mi = mile, ha = hectare, nT =
nanoTesla, g/t = grams/tonne, oz/t = ounce/short ton.
Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates are provided in the datum of NAD83, Zone 16N.
3.0
RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS
Ronacher McKenzie relied on information provided by Augustine and Red Pine regarding land tenure,
property ownership and tax matters and did not conduct any independent investigations in these regards.
Ronacher McKenzie did not verify the legality of any underlying agreements that may exist in relation to the
Wawa Gold Project properties but have relied on Red Pine with regard to the information provided in Section
4.0 of this report. Red Pine and Augustine personnel communicated this information to Ronacher McKenzie
via e-mail during the preparation of this report.
Ronacher McKenzie relied on Augustine with regard to the closure plan of historic mines on the property
as discussed in Section 4.2 of this report. The information presented in Section 4.2 was conveyed to
Ronacher McKenzie by Dr. Robert Dodds, Augustine’s CEO, on March 21, 2016.
4.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The Wawa Gold Project is located two km east of the Town of Wawa, Ontario and ~650 km northwest of
Toronto (Figure 4-1), dominantly in McMurray Township but straddles Naveau and Rabazo townships in
the Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division (NTS 41/n14 and 42/C3). The property is centred on UTM NAD83
(Zone 16N) 669,800 m E and 5,315,000 m N. Legal access is available via Highway 101 from Wawa and
the Surluga Mine Road, a private road owned and maintained by Citabar Limited Partnership (“Citabar”).
Page | 16
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 4-1: Location of Red Pine’s Wawa Gold Project.
Page | 17
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The property consists of 205 patented tenures (fee simple absolutes and leases; listed in Appendix 2)
totaling 2,198.74 ha and 34 unpatented mineral claims consisting of 207 claim units covering 2,985.43 ha
(Table 4-1, Figure 4-2, Figure 4-3). Augustine does not hold the surface rights of the unpatented mining
claims. Surface rights holders of the dispositions are listed in Appendix 2.
Table 4-1: List of claims that are part of the Wawa Gold Project property.
Claim #
Title Holder
Expiry
Area (ha)
Township
4255705
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
07-Mar-17
61.98
McMurray
4255706
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
07-Mar-17
245.98
McMurray
4256983
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
28-Mar-17
179.44
Naveau
4256977
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
221.33
Naveau
4256971
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
32.37
McMurray
4256979
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
178.44
McMurray
4256980
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
227.49
McMurray
4256976
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
59.39
McMurray
4256972
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
98.68
McMurray
4256974
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
119.51
McMurray
4256975
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
57.1
McMurray
1
1110152
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
07-Jan-17
10.93
McMurray
4216050
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
14.16
McMurray
4216347
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
10.85
McMurray
4261061
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
138.96
McMurray
4261063
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
85.16
McMurray
4261060
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
57.26
McMurray
4261059
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
85.54
McMurray
4261062
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
20-Jan-17
187.77
McMurray
4258713
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
09-Feb-17
63.08
McMurray
4258711
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
09-Feb-17
217.22
McMurray
4258712
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
09-Feb-17
167.97
McMurray
4256981
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
13.98
Rabazo
4256973
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
28.53
McMurray
4256978
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Mar-17
11.53
McMurray
4278256
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
15-Sep-17
49.97
McMurray
4270193
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
10-Sep-17
8.16
McMurray
4270194
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
10-Sep-17
18.79
McMurray
4270192
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
25-Aug-17
53.12
McMurray
4278258
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
02-Oct-17
67.78
McMurray
Page | 18
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Claim #
Title Holder
Expiry
Area (ha)
Township
4278259
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
02-Oct-17
70.91
McMurray
4278257
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
02-Oct-17
50.07
McMurray
4271628
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Jun-17
90.75
McMurray
4271625
Wawa GP/Augustine/Red Pine*
29-Jun-17
1.23
McMurray
34
TOTAL
2985.43
Notes:
*Wawa GP Inc. (40%), Augustine Ventures Inc. (30%), Red Pine Exploration Inc. (30%)
Red Pine does not hold the surface rights for the unpatented mining claims. Surface rights are held by the Crown,
various Townships and Municipalities and private individuals.
Red Pine does not hold timber rights for unpatented mining claims.
In order to renew unpatented minerals claims in Ontario, a total of $400 has to be spent on each claim unit per year.
1 This claim is part of the closure plan
Page | 19
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 4-2: Map showing the patented and unpatented mining claims of Red Pine’s Wawa Gold project.
Page | 20
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 4-3: Map showing the patented mining claims of the Wawa Gold project.
Page | 21
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 4-4: Map showing the location and the extent of the geological wireframe used to calculate the mineral resource
(in yellow).
Page | 22
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
4.1
Ownership
On December 17, 2015, Augustine announced that it entered into a non-binding letter of intent to merge
with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Red Pine where Red Pine will acquire all of the outstanding securities of
Augustine (the “Transaction”). At the time of the completion of this report, Augustine and Red Pine each
held a 30% interest in the Wawa Gold Project. Upon completion of the Transaction, Augustine and Red
Pine will form a combined entity (“the Resulting Issuer”).
On December 11, 2014, Red Pine announced in a press release available on the company’s website and
under its profile on www.SEDAR.com that it had entered into an assignment and assumption agreement
(the “Assumption Agreement”) with Augustine Ventures Inc. (“Augustine”) and Citabar effective December
10, 2014.
Pursuant to the Assumption Agreement, Augustine and Citabar agreed to amend the existing Surluga
property option agreement, as amended (the “Option Agreement”), between Citadel and Delta Precious
Metals (Ontario) Inc. (“Delta”), among others, dated April 16, 2009 (Delta having assigned all of its rights
and obligations under the Option Agreement to Augustine effective September 10, 2010), to allow Red Pine
to earn up to a 45% interest in the Wawa Gold Project property. Under the Assumption Agreement, Red
Pine:

must incur a total of $2.1 million in “eligible exploration expenses” (within the meaning of such term
in the Assumption Agreement) by June 30, 2015, upon which Red Pine and Augustine will together
have incurred a total of $4 million in such expenses as Augustine has previously incurred $1.9
million in such expenses. Upon fulfilling this obligation, Red Pine and Augustine will have each
earned a 30% interest in the Wawa Gold Project with Citabar holding the remaining 40%;

has the right to earn half of an additional 15% interest (or, for greater clarity, an additional 7.5%
interest for a total of 37.5%) in the Wawa Gold Project if Red Pine and Augustine incur a further
$4.0 million in eligible exploration expenses by June 30, 2016, which could be increased up to the
entire 15% additional interest (for a total of a 45% interest) if all such additional $4.0 million in
eligible exploration expenses is incurred by Red Pine;

has the right to earn a 50% interest in Augustine’s existing interests in all mineral properties
acquired by Augustine, including any future acquisitions, within an area of influence of a 5 km radius
from the perimeter of the Wawa Gold Project. These “area of influence properties” are also subject
to the Assignment Agreement, with Citabar having the right to earn its pro rata interest therein;

upon earning a minimum 30% interest in the Wawa Gold Project, a joint venture among Red Pine,
Augustine and Citabar in the form included in the Option Agreement (as restated by the Assumption
Page | 23
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Agreement) will automatically come into effect (the “JV Agreement”) pursuant to which Red Pine
will be the Manager (within the meaning of such term in the JV Agreement) of the Wawa Gold
Project.
Red Pine incurred a total of $2.1 million in “eligible exploration expense” (within the meaning of such term
in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement”) upon which Red Pine and Augustine together incurred a
total of $4 million in such expenses as Augustine had previously incurred $1.9 million in such expenses.
Upon fulfilling of this obligation, Red Pine and Augustine each earned in a 30% interest in the Wawa Gold
Project with Citabar holding the remaining 40%, all in accordance with an Earn in Agreement signed by all
parties on August 7, 2015.
The Assignment Agreement and the Option Agreement and all amendments thereto are available under
Red Pine’s profile on www.SEDAR.com and the summary of these agreements herein is qualified in its
entirety by the full text of these agreements. The reader is encouraged to refer to the agreements for further
details.
Net smelter returns (“NSR”) are payable to the parties indicated in Appendix 2 and as set out in the Option
Agreement and the Assumption Agreement.
Red Pine has advised that the annual municipal tax for 2015 relating to the fee simple absolute surface
rights of the properties listed in Appendix 2 was approximately $106,000. Of this, there is a balance of
approximately $50,000 still owing to the Municipality of Wawa. The Municipal taxes for three of the leases
with surface rights are billed indirectly through the Ministry of Natural Resources (“MNR”) as Land Rents
for an additional amount of approximately $16,000 annually. Municipal taxes can also be subject to annual
increases of up to 3%. The actual 2016 municipal tax billing will not be issued until later in 2016. The total
annual rent payments, payable to the MNDM, for the 17 leased properties listed in Appendix 2 is
approximately $2,400 per year. All 17 accounts are in good standing with $0 owing. The annual taxes for
the 2016 mineral rights on the fee simple absolute properties listed in Appendix 2 are approximately $5,500
and are also payable to the MNDM. Any obligations to the MNDM typically do not change year over year
without a change in rights, area or the Mining Act. All obligations are currently in good standing with 0$
owing in arrears.
Red Pine holds timber rights for some areas as indicated in Appendix 2.
Ronacher McKenzie is not aware of any royalties, back-in rights, payments or other agreements and
encumbrances to which the property is subject other the ones mentioned above and in the Option
Agreement and the Assumption Agreement.
Page | 24
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
4.2
Environmental Liabilities
Citadel is in the process of completing a mine closure plan. All patented mining claims for which mining
rights are held are part of the closure plan. The closure plan is being conducted by “exp” consultants from
their Thunder Bay, Ontario, office. A large part of the closure plan has been completed. The following
summarizes the status of the closure plan work:
A Progressive Rehabilitation Report was submitted by “exp” to MNDM on March 31, 2016 confirming that
all the required closure plan work has been completed with the following exceptions:
i.
Backfilling of two small test pits on the south shore of Wawa Lake due to the mild, winter which
prevented access to the lake. This work will be completed in the summer of 2016 or the winter of
2016-2017;
ii.
Completion of a Crown Pillar Study. “exp” proposed to MNDM in a letter on March 31, 2016 to
conduct a geotechnical investigation of all available information and prepare a confirmation drilling
program for any missing information, if required, all subject to approval by MNDM as the final field
work.
A Sediment Toxicity Report for the Grace-Darwin Tailings was submitted by “exp” to MNDM on January 8,
2016; the report concludes that elevated mercury levels are a result of historical activities and are not
attributable to Citabar’s activities; however, “exp” recommends that the monitoring continue for another
three years at a reduced number of locations.
Financial Assurance of $315,000 in the form of a Letter of Credit from Sherfam Inc. on behalf of Citabar
LLC remains in effect.
4.3
Permits
In Ontario, permits are generally required for exploration on unpatented mineral claims or leases.
Exploration activities such as geophysical activities requiring a power generator, line cutting where the line
width is less than 1.5 m, mechanized drilling where the total weight of the rig is less than 150 kg,
mechanized surface stripping where the total stripped area is less than 100 m2, or pitting and trenching of
a volume of 1 to 3 m3 on unpatented mineral claims or leases require an exploration plan. Exploration
permits are required for line cutting where the line width exceeds 1.5 m, for drilling where the weight of the
drill exceeds 150 kg, mechanized stripping of an area greater than 100 m2 and for pitting and trenching
where the total volume of rock is more than 3 m3. Plan and permit applications are submitted to the Ministry
Page | 25
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
of Northern Development and Mines for review, posting on the Environmental Registry (30 days) and
circulation to First Nations communities who have areas of cultural significance. Plans are typically
approved within 30 days and permits within 60 days. Plans are valid for two years and permits are valid for
three years (www.mndm.gov.on.ca).
Generally, no exploration plans or permits are required for fee simple absolute patents or for areas that are
part of a closure plan. All surface rights holders must be notified of the application in advance of the
submission.
As of the effective date of this Report, exploration permit PR-15-10721 for mechanized drilling, mechanized
stripping, pitting and trenching of bedrock, and line cutting and exploration plan PL15-10485 for line cutting,
drilling, stripping and geophysics were obtained for 31 of the 34 unpatented mineral claims. The permit is
valid until August 27, 2018; the plan is valid until August 6, 2017. Exploration PR16-10809 for mechanized
drilling, mechanized stripping, and pitting and trenching of bedrock, and exploration plan PL16-10561 for
line cutting, drilling, stripping and geophysics were obtained for two additional claims (4271628, 4271625).
This permit is valid until April 7, 2019 and the plan is valid until March 19, 2018. The remaining claim
1110152 is part of the closure plan and no permit or plan are required.
Ronacher McKenzie is not aware of any other significant factors or risks that may affect the access, title or
the right or ability to perform work on the property.
5.0
ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND
PHYSIOGRAPHY
5.1
Access
The Town of Wawa is located on Highway 17 (Trans-Canada Highway), ~480 km east of Thunder Bay,
Ontario, ~225 km north of Sault St. Marie, Ontario, and ~650 km northwest of Toronto, Ontario. The property
can be accessed by driving 2 km on Highway 101 from Wawa and then turning south onto a gravel road
using a 2-wheel drive vehicle. During the winter months, the main access road to the property from Highway
101 is ploughed. Areas off the main road can be accessed by snowmobiles.
5.2
Climate
The vicinity to Lake Superior has a significant impact on the climate on the property. Environment Canada
has recorded weather details in Wawa since 1981 (http://climate.weather.gc.ca) and showed that the
Page | 26
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
warmest temperatures are recorded in July and August (daily average 15° C; daily maximum 20.8° C). The
coldest temperatures are typically recorded in January (daily average −14° C; daily minimum −20.2° C).
September and October are the months with the most rainfall (~122 and ~107 mm, respectively) and the
highest snowfall occurs in December (80 cm).
Exploration can be completed on the property year-round.
5.3
Physiography and Vegetation
The Town of Wawa is located at 289 m asl. The area of the property is hilly with a range of elevations from
300 m to 400 m asl. Steep ridges exist locally. The property is forested with spruce, pine, poplar and birch
being the dominant species.
5.4
Infrastructure and Local Resources
Skilled and unskilled labour is available in Wawa because of the long mining history of the area. Wawa has
a population of 2,634 persons (www.statcan.gc.ca).
A 230 kV power line crosses the southern part of the property and a second power line crosses the western
part of the property (Figure 5-1). An airport exists in Wawa but no commercial flights are operated from it.
Algoma Central Railway was acquired by Canadian National Railways and no longer operates freight
service between Sault Ste. Marie and Hearst.
Sufficient water is available from lakes and streams on the property. Surface rights for a large part of the
property are held by Augustine’s joint venture partners (see Appendix 2) and are sufficient for any potential
mining operation.
Tailings storage areas, potential waste disposal areas, heap leach pad areas and potential processing plant
sites are not relevant to the project at this stage.
Page | 27
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 5-1: Map showing the access to property and the infrastructure in the area.
Page | 28
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
6.0
HISTORY
The Wawa area has been explored for gold since the 1860s (Rupert, 1997) and gold was first discovered
by William Teddy in 1897 (Frey, 1987). A staking rush followed the change in claim staking adopted by the
Ontario Government to encourage staking in 1895 (MacMillan and Rupert, 1990). The staking rush resulted
in a number of discoveries and the first mine to start production was the Grace Mine (1901). In the 1930s,
several mines commenced production, including the Parkhill, Minto and Jubilee Mines (MacMillan and
Rupert, 1990). By the early 1940s, 15 mines produced gold in the Wawa area (Frey, 1987). The Surluga
Mine was developed in the late 1960s. Eight past-producing mines exist on the current Wawa Gold Project
property (Cooper, Minto, Jubilee, Surluga, Parkhill, Grace-Darwin, Mariposa and Van Sickle; Figure 6-1).
Rupert (1997) summarized the production from these mines based on historic records (Table 6-1) and also
provides a detailed overview of historic exploration.
Table 6-1: Historic production data (from Rupert, 1997)
Mine
Company
Mariposa
Grace-Darwin
Parkhill
Jubilee
Minto
Van Sickle
Cooper
Surluga
Mariposa Gold Mines Ltd.
5 companies
Park Hill Gold Mines Ltd.
Cooper Gold Mines Ltd., Minto Gold
Mines Ltd.
Minto Gold Mines Ltd
Canfield and Smith
Minto Gold Mines Ltd
Surluga Gold Mines Ltd., Citadel
Gold Mines Inc.
Years
1904
1902–1937
1929–1938
1929–1939
Tonnes
Milled
8
41,302
114,096
107,930
Gold
Grade (g/t)
72.99
13.27
14.81
4.29
Gold
Recovered (kg)
0.6
548.5
1,688.9
463.9
1930–1934
1935–1936
1938
1968–1991
57,335
8,372
4,435
86,082
12.56
6.34
11.42
3.12
661.4
53.2
50.6
268.3
419,560
9.04
3,735.4
Extensive historic exploration was completed on the property. Drilling in the Wawa Gold Project area
consisted of 561 surface diamond drill holes totaling 78,177.58 m and 1,522 underground diamond drill
holes totaling 51,680 m (Red Pine database, 2014; Table 6-2, Table 6-3, Figure 6-1).
Table 6-2: Historic surface diamond drill holes completed in the Wawa Gold Project area.
Company
Year Drilled No of DDH
Meterage (m)
Con Mine Smelt
1934
15
1,474.03
Surluga
1960
8
744.27
Surluga
1961
17
2,135.93
Surluga
1962
51
5,975.98
Surluga
1963
13
2,092.62
Cominco
1964
20
2,633.03
Surluga
1965
3
308.01
Page | 29
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Surluga
Surluga
Pango
Dunraine
Dunraine
Dunraine
Dunraine
Citadel
Citadel
Citadel
Van Ollie
Van Ollie
Van Ollie
Wawa GP Inc.
Augustine
Morrison
Surluga
TOTAL
Year Drilled
1968
1969
1969
1980
1981
1982
1983
1987
1988
1989
1989
1990
1991
2007
2011
?
?
No of DDH
16
13
43
35
19
8
11
100
30
51
31
34
6
14
18
3
2
561
Meterage (m)
1,673.31
2,874.61
6,811.11
3,268.83
1,462.88
410.57
1,626.12
18,089.94
4,879.91
6,812.36
1,445.88
1,447.22
195.76
8,410.20
2,944.00
306.63
154.38
78,177.58
Table 6-3: Historic underground diamond drill holes completed in the Wawa Gold Project area.
Company
Year
No of DDH
Meterage (m)
Surluga
1967
9
243.63
Surluga
1968
261
8,276.04
Surluga
1969
57
1,183.72
Pango
1969
309
10,654.07
Pango
1970
100
3,596.02
Pursides
1974
31
787.21
Pursides
1975
170
4,216.69
Surluga
1975
1
6.10
Citadel
1987
396
12,430.34
Citadel
1988
9
669.95
Citadel
1989
55
3,205.27
Log Missing ?
47
1,748.61
TOTAL
1,445
47,017.65
Iron ore deposits and past-producing mines exist in the Wawa area. Diamonds and diamond indicator
minerals were found in the area in 1993 (Sutherland, 1995). Since then, extensive exploration for diamonds
and diamond indicator minerals has occurred. A brief summary of relevant historic exploration is provided
in Table 6-4 and below. Only historic exploration for gold is summarized; exploration for diamonds and iron
ore was not reviewed for this report.
Page | 30
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 6-1: Locations of known diamond drill holes on the property.
Page | 31
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 6-4. Historic exploration of the Wawa Gold Project
Company
Year(s)
Exploration
Results
Stanley
1903
Sampling, geological
Several Au-bearing veins located;
Newton
assessment
conclusions "Michipicoten gold
Syndicate
district will become one of the
important gold camps of America"
Anglo
26 surface diamond
No results reported
1926–
Huronian Ltd.
drill holes and
1929
And Cooper
underground
Gold Mines
development at
Jubilee Mine
Parkhill Gold
1930–
Operated Parkhill
Bankruptcy in 1937
Mines
1937
mine
Mackay Point
Syndicate
1933/34
Minto Gold
Mines
Sandra Gold
Mines
1934–
1939
1944
Surluga Gold
Mines
1962
Cominco
1963
Surluga Gold
Mines
1967
Surluga Gold
Mines
1964–
1968
Metallurgical testing,
15 ddh
Up to 17 g/t Au over 0.3 m in core
Jubilee Mine operated
Took over Parkhill
Mine area from
Parkhill Gold Mines
Surluga Gold Mines
Incorporated; 100
surface ddh
Optioned property;
mapping; geophysics
(no specific method
mentioned); 20
diamond drill holes
Surluga mine brought
into production,
diamond drilling from
1960 to 1969
3 shafts sunk, levels
1, 2, 3 and 5
developed
Reference
Boss, 1903
(41N15NE0039)
Rupert, 1997
41N15NE0087
(Amalgamation of
several reports)
Mackey Point
Syndicate, 1933
(42C02SE0021)
Rupert, 1997
May, 1944
(41N15NE0087)
Mine construction started
Geophysics inconclusive; VG in
one drill hole
Kuryliw, 1970 &
1972
(41N15NE0036)
Morris, 1964
(42C02SE9043)
Mine operated from 1968 to 1969;
drilling intersected numerous goldrich zones
Surluga Gold Mines
Annual Report
(41N15NE0063)
Kuryliw, 1972
(41N15NE0036)
Kuryliw, 1969
(41N15NW0037)
Page | 32
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Pango Gold
Mines Ltd.
Year(s)
19691970
Exploration
JV with Surluga Gold
Mines: expansion of
underground
workings,
underground drilling;
detailed surface
mapping.
Ground mag survey 1
Ground mag survey 2
JDS Bohme
Property
1970
Ground mag survey
Pango Gold
Mines Ltd.
1971
Ground mag survey; 1
ddh on north shore of
Reed Lake into mag
anomaly
Surluga Gold
Mines (under
the name of
Pursides
1973
Mine reopened; new
drifting on the 6th
level, decline between
6th and 7th level;
Results
New drifts and adits; "good" grades
returned from ddh (no assay data
available)
Ground mag survey 1: Oct-Nov
1969. Line spacing 400 ft (=121.92
m), Tie spacing 2000 ft (=609.60
m). An inclined gabbro plug East of
Jubilee Lake containing
disseminated pentlanditechalcopyrite-pyrrhotite
mineralization was found to have
highly magnetic pyrrhotitepentlandite but the gabbroic rock
itself was found to have low
magnetics, notable lower than the
biotitic syenite intruded by the
gabbro. A 1000 gamma (=1000 nT)
anomaly was identified and noted to
be associated with disseminated
pentlandite-pyrrhotite mineralization
in the gabbro, east of Jubilee Lake.
The unmineralized gabbro was
noted to have a flat magnetic
response. Additional magnetic
anomalies are noted to be
associated with peridotite plugs,
and are considered to be part of the
Pango intrusive complex.
Ground mag survey 2: April-July
1970. 74.82 line-miles (=120.41
line-km) at 400 ft (=121.92 m) line
spacing, 3000 ft (=914.40 m) tie
lines, and 100 ft (=30.48 m) station
spacing. July 1970, 6.3 line-miles
(=10.14 line-km) of ground mag
completed at 100 ft (=30.48 m)
stations. Magnetic flat response,
indicating a uniform suite of rocks.
One 2000 gamma (=2000 nT)
anomaly was noted, adjacent to a
carbonatite plug
Survey completed at 400 ft
(=121.92 m) line spacing. Only
magnetic linear anomalies noted,
Interpreted to be gabbroic intrusive
dykes
Ground mag survey: 100 ft (=30.48
m) intervals. Anomaly found recommended for follow up Drilling:
ultramafic rock with magnetite,
minor sulfides, no gold
Resources delineated based on
drilling
Reference
Kuryliw, 1972
(41N15NE0036)
Kuryliw, 1969
(41N15NW0037)
Tindale, 1970a
(42C02SE0208)
Tindale, 1970b
(41N15NE0008)
Kuryliw, 1970
(41N15NE0516)
Kuryliw, 1971a
(41N15NE9035)Kur
yliw, 1971b
(41N15NE0088)
41N15NE0036
(Amalgamation of
reports. p. 79)
Page | 33
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Gold Mines
Ltd.)
Consolidated
Morrison
Explorations
Ltd
Pursides
Gold Mines
Golden
Goose Gold
Mines Ltd.
Dunraine
Mines Ltd.
Year(s)
Exploration
underground diamond
drilling
Results
Reference
1974
Airborne magnetic
and radiometric
survey (Aerodat)
Mag and radiometric anomaly
related to carbonatite
Boyko, 1974
(42C02SE1210)
19741975
VLF-EM survey
VLF-EM: Summer 1974, winter
1975. 8 anomalies detected, 1
recommended for follow-up
Crone, 1975
(41N15NE0082)
1978
Acquires Deep Lake
Mine
1980
Golden
Goose Gold
Mines Ltd.
1980
38 surface drill holes
(3385.1 m); sampling
of Parkhill tailings
(235 samples)
35 channel samples of
surface expression of
Deep Lake Mine
Ground mag survey
VLF-EM survey
Pango Gold
Mines Ltd.
1980
Ground mag survey
Dunraine
Mines Ltd.
1981
Northern
Horizon
Resources
Ltd.
Dunraine
Mines Ltd.
1981
20 surface drill holes
(4919.7 m);
dewatering of Parkhill
mine
Ground mag survey
Pango Gold
Mines Ltd.
1982
8 surface drill holes
(410.6 m); continued
dewatering of Parkhill
1982
VLF-EM survey 1
(April 19-21, 1982)
VLF-EM survey 2
(April-May 1982)
Rupert, 1990
(41N15NE9036)
Best intersection in D80-18: 46.22
g/t Au over 0.88 m; average grade
of Parkhill tailings 0.86 g/t
Harper, 1981a
(41N15NE0054)
Below detection limit to 0.91 g/t
(average: 0.31 g/t Au); Rupert
(1980a) concluded that no
economic potential exists at the
mine.
Ground mag and VLF-EM: no
significant anomalies noted
Two structural/lithologic features
identified: 1. east-west trend related
to metavolcanic rocks, 2. northwestsoutheast trend related to diabase
dyke. Two oval shaped anomalies
identified, mapped as gabbroicdiorite intrusives
Best intersection in D81-2: 34.97 g/t
Au over 0.15 m
Rupert, 1980a
(41N15NE9036)
Rupert, 1980b
(41N15NE0078)
300 ft (=91.44 m) line spacing. One
horseshoe-shaped magnetic
anomaly identified, interpreted as
possible folded structure
Best intersection in D82-4: 7.61 g/t
Au over 1.5 m
VLF-EM survey 1: 3 conductors
identified, two recommended for
drilling
VLF-EM survey 2: 10 conductive
anomalies identified, thought to be
caused by bedrock sources; IP
recommended as follow-up tool for
prioritization
Kuryliw, 1980
(41N15NE0077)
Piaza, 1984
(41N15NW0026)
Harper, 1981b
(41N15NE0061)
Kuryliw, 1981
(41N15NE0524)
Harper, 1982
(41N15NE0061)
Gignac, 1983
(41N15NE0055)
Kuryliw, 1982
(41N15NE0057)
Piaza, 1984
(41N15NW0026)
Page | 34
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Canbec
Explorations
Ltd.
Year(s)
1983
Exploration
Ground mag survey
(May 1983)
VLF-EM survey (MayJune 1983)
Dunraine
Mines Ltd.
1983
Mapping, drilling (6
ddh; 738.2 m): 83-1 to
-6; rock samplingVLFEM Survey
Northern
Horizon
Resources
Ltd.
1983
Dighem III FDEM
Pango Gold
Mines Ltd.
1984
Till sampling: 47
overburden holes
Results
Ground mag survey: 5.9 line miles
(=9.50 line-km) were run at 200 ft
(=60.96 m) and 400 ft (=121.92 m)
line spacing, with station spacing of
50 ft (=15.24 m) over 3 claims.
Results showed weak overall
magnetic signature, with anomalies
identified as diabase dykes and
felsic volcanic flow unit.
VLF-EM survey: 5.9 line miles
(=9.50 line-km) at 200 ft (=60.96 m)
and 400 ft (=121.92 m) line spacing
and 100 ft (=30.48 m) station
spacing. One anomaly noted,
trending north-south and in strike
with the Darwin Shear. Noise
related to the power line was noted.
Outlined shear-zone hosting Au;
proposed syngenetic genesis; 0.9–
1.8 m of 3.4 g/t in 3 ddh; geochem
survey indicated Au only near
Darwin shear VLF-EM survey:
Phase 1 covered the Darwin EW
grid extending from Moody Pit to the
Darwin Shear. Phase 2 covered
southern half of Darwin Shear. The
northern half of the Darwin Shear
was not able to be surveyed due to
remanence of the power and
telephone lines; 5 conductors were
found in the vicinity of the Darwin
Mine; The Darwin Shear was noted
to be a conductive structure, and
areas where east-west striking
conductors intersect the structure
were considered prospective.
Geochemical surveys were
recommended for follow-up
April 1-4, 1983, 298 line-km and
300 m line spacing, 30 m EM
sensor height, 45 m mag sensor
height. 20 anomalies identified as
moderate-high priority
Anomalous zones near faults and
shears identified but no economic
significance attributed to anomalies
Reference
Archibald, 1983a
(41N15NW0029)
Archibald, 1983b
(41N15NW0029)
Studemeister, 1983
(41N15NE0041)
Smith and Dvorak,
1983
(42C02SE0505)
Gillis, 1984
(41N15NW0027)
Page | 35
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Monte
Christo
Resources
Year(s)
1984
Exploration
Ground mag survey
VLF-EM Survey
Geologic mapping
EM-17 HLEM
3 ddh targeting
conductors (W-1, -2, 2A, -3)
Dunraine
Mines Ltd.
Goldun Age
Resources
Inc.
1984
5 surface drill holes
(887.9 m)
Ground mag and
gradiometer survey
Dewatering and
review of underground
workings
Caviar
Resources
1986
1986
Ground mag survey
VLF-EM survey
Mapping, prospecting,
sampling between
Reed Lake and Leroy
Lake
Results
Ground mag and VLF-EM survey:
Completed on 11 claims in Feb
1984 and April 1984. A total of 18.7
line-miles (=30.06 line-km) of mag
data and 16 line-miles (=25.75 linekm) of VLF-EM data were collected.
One large conductive anomaly was
found to be high priority and
recommended for drill testing with
three drill holes
Geologic mapping: shear zones
identified during mapping
EM-17 HLEM: July 1984. 6 linemiles (=9.66 line-km) collected at
300 ft (=91.44 m) coil separation, as
a follow-up survey on the
conductors identified by the VLF
survey. Weak HLEM conductors
were noted in the same trend,
interpreted as a possible shear
zone, and were recommended for
drilling
Drilling: one ddh intersected shear
zone with "consistent anomalous
gold values", two were abandoned
10.29 g/t Au over 0.3 m
Ground mag and gradiometer: May
30-June 12, 1986. 0.94 line-km on
one claim of ground magnetic data
and gradiometer (vertical total field
magnetic gradient). Gradiometer
sensor spacing is 1 m. 84 stations
surveyed. No significant results
interpreted due to small size of
survey, recommendation to
increase survey area
Dewatering and review:
investigation concluded that Au is
left in pillars, floors and backs of
stopes (in particular above first
level, little minable material left
below third level
Ground mag and VLF-EM: Jan-Feb,
1986. 24.12 line-miles (=38.82 linekm) of ground mag and VLF at 300
ft (=91.44 m) line spacing and 100 ft
(=30.48 m) station spacing. Infill
lines were at 100 ft (=30.48 m) line
spacing. Magnetic data was
collected at 50 ft (=15.24 m) station
spacing. 8 conductive anomalies
were identified as high-priority
targetsMapping, prospecting,
sampling: NW trending, Au-bearing
vein delineated (up to 16.80 g/t Au)
Reference
Kuryliw, 1984a
(41N15NE0048)
Kuryliw, 1984b
(41N15NE0064)
Studemeister, 1984
(41N15NE0046)
Gignac, 1986
(41N15NE0034)
Tilsley, 1986
(41N15NE9041)
Sears, 1986a
(41N15NE0035)
Sears, 1986b
(41N15NE0505)
Page | 36
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Citadel Gold
Mines
Year(s)
1986
Exploration
Surluga mine
dewatered;
underground
development; surface
and underground
drilling
Dighem III Survey
Terraquest airborne
mag
VLF-EM survey
Robert
Henderson
1986
Citadel Gold
Mines
1987
Mill refurbished;
mapping/sampling on
Henderson property
(SE McMurray Twp.)
Allied
Northern
Resources
Ltd.
1988
Mapping, rock
sampling
Ground mag VLF-EM
survey 1
Ground mag VLF-EM
survey 2
Ground mag VLF-EM
survey 3
Citadel Gold
Mines
Citadel Gold
Mines
1988
Ore recovery studies
1988
Structural studies
Results
Drilling: Intersected 20.42 m at 3.74
g/t Au
Dighem III: 454 line-km flown with
Dighem III FDEM in October 1986.
Several discrete bedrock
conductors identified and
recommended for follow-up work.
Terraquest fixed-wing airborne
magnetic and VLF-EM survey flown
July 22, 1986. 100 line-km at 200 m
line spacing and 100 m terrain
clearance. Several structural and
conductive anomalies were located
and recommended for follow-up
surveying
Mineralization independent of host
rock but structurally controlled
(140°–160°, 010°–060°)
Mapping, rock sampling: six rock
types observed and described;
various quartz veins observed (no
assay results available)
Ground mag, VLF-EM survey 1:
Aug 12-Sept 17, 1988. 19.25 linekm of ground mag and VLF-EM
collected. Ground mag station
spacing = 25 m. Magnetic results
highlight diabase dykes and
geologic contacts. VLF-EM results
identified 2 high-priority conductors
Ground mag, VLF-EM survey 2:
Aug 12-Dec 10, 1988. A total of
50.85 line-km of ground mag and
VLF-EM were conducted on 31
claims at 120 m line spacing. No
significant anomalies were
identified.
Ground mag, VLF-EM survey 3:
Aug 15-Nov 10, 1988. 11.75 line-km
collected at 120 m line spacing.
One conductor was recommended
for follow-up
Cyanidation recovered 90% of the
gold, floatation 86%
Gold-bearing quartz veins predate
shearing along Jubilee Zone
Reference
Rupert, 1997
Kilty, 1986
(42C02SE0504)
Barrie, 1986
(41N15NE0033)
Osmani, 1987
(41N15NW0028)
Sears and
Gasparetto, 1988
(41N15NE0027)
Sears, 1989
(41N15NW0021)
Sears and
Gasparetto, 1989
(41N15NW0022)
Lakefield Research,
1988
Helmstaedt, 1988
Page | 37
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Citadel Gold
Mines
Year(s)
1988
Exploration
Exploratory
underground
development;
sampling in Surluga
mine; trenching and
sampling; trenching
Ground mag survey 1
IP survey 1 Ground
mag survey 2 Ground
mag survey 3
Allied
Northern
Resources
Ltd.
Citadel Gold
Mines
1989
Mapping
1989
Surluga mine closed
due to inadequate
reserves
Mapping, soil and rock
sampling, 6 drill holes
(AN-90-1 to 6)
Allied
Northern
Resources
Ltd.
1990
Van Ollie
Exploration
Ltd.
1990
Mapping, soil
geochemistry, drilling
Ground mag and VLFEM survey
Pan-Orvana
(option
agreement
with Citadel)
Pan-Orvana
(option
1990
Soil sampling, review
of historical data;
sampling of
underground workings
Detailed data review
1991–
1992
Results
Two different shear zones identified
during drifting; Darwin and Root
veins found by strippingGround mag
survey 1: Summer 1988 on Block B
to establish base data for future
mapping. IP survey 1: JVX
contracted to complete test surveys
of pole-dipole and gradient array
methods in time-domain IP mode.
Results found the shear zone was
not distinguishable from background
Ground mag survey 2: June-July
1988. Targeted follow-up of
anomalies on Block C. Line spacing
400 ft (=121.92 m). Several
magnetic anomalies were identified.
Ground mag survey 3: Dec 1988 Mar 1989. Ground magnetic survey
conducted at 400 ft (=121.92 m) line
spacing to improve resolution of
airborne magnetic anomaly. The
anomaly was interpreted as iron
formation.
Mapping: four target areas
delineated
Reference
Rupert and Leroy,
1989
(42C02SE0220)
Rupert, 1989a
(41N15NE0023)
Rupert, 1989b
(41N15NE0021)
Sears, 1989
(41N15NW0021)
Rupert, 1997
3 vein systems located, several
weak soil anomalies; drilling
intersected the Villeneuve vein
Mapping, soil geochemistry, drilling:
more Au anomalies in soil over
intrusive rocks than volcanic rocks;
down dip of Mickelson vein system
confirmed
Mag, VLF-EM: Jan 11-Feb 4, 1990.
41.1 line-km of magnetic data and
38.1 line-km of VLF-EM data
collected. Several magnetic and
conductive anomalies were
identified from the respected
surveys and recommended for
follow-up work.
Au anomaly over the shear zone;
sampling revealed "considerable
variability" in gold content of the
shear zone
Sufficient low-grade resources
available but not suitable for open
Sears, 1990b
(41N15NE0014)
Sears, 1990c
(41N15NE0013)
Sears, 1990e
(41N15NE0025)
Sears, 1990a
(41N15NE0011)
Sears, 1990d
(41N15NE0016)
Reid, 1990
(41N15NE0011)
Bradshaw, 1991
(42C02SE0518)
Bradshaw, 1991
(42C02SE0518)
Page | 38
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
agreement
with Citadel)
Year(s)
Exploration
Results
pit mining because of the high strip
ratio
Reference
Citadel Gold
Mines
1990
Prospecting, mapping,
reinterpretation of
geophysical surveys,
trenching; mapping in
Deep Lake area
Rupert, 1990
(42C02SE0500)
Reed, 1990
(42C02SE0500, p.
27)
1991
6 ddh (195.76 m) on
Sunrise #1 vein (S-910 to -6)
6 ddh (789 m), ground
geophysics
Delineate areas for further
exploration, geophysics deemed of
"marginal utility" but soil sampling
effective; anomalous Au grades in
Deep Lake area but economic
questionable (best results 0.41 g/t
Au)
Best assays between 1.23 and 4.87
g/t Au but no intervals reported
Van Ollie
Exploration
Ltd.
Tri Origin
(option
agreement
with Citadel)
Transgold
Exploration
and
Investment
Inc.
Delisle, 1991
(41N15NE0069)
Best Au assay: 609 ppb over 1.3 m
Gow, 2004
No significant Au results in 1994;
weak B-horizon soil anomaly (57
ppb) All ground geophysics
conducted between July September, 1995, on a 100 m linespaced grid. VLF-EM: 25 m station
spacing, HLEM: 25 m station
spacing, Ground mag: 12.5 m
station spacing. Several anomalies
were identified from these surveys
and displayed on related maps.
VLF-EM: Oct 1995. Line spacing
100 m, station spacing 25 m. One
conductive anomaly was identified.
Ground mag survey: Oct 1996. Line
spacing 60 m, station spacing 30 m.
2 anomalies identified as highpriority for follow-up
VLF-EM: Oct 1996. 12.2 line-km
collected, 100 m line spacing, 25 m
station spacing. 3 anomalies
identified as possible shear zones,
recommended for follow-up
Ground mag survey: Oct 1996. 12.2
line-km. Anomalies identified related
to Firesand Carbonatite Complex
Till sampling: 1997-1998. goldbearing vein averaging 8.7 g/t Au
located in southern and northern
parts of McMurray Twp
IP test survey on weak VLF-EM
anomalies. Time domain IP survey.
Dipole-dipole array, a spacing = 25
m, N = 1-3. Three chargeable
features were identified and
recommended for follow-up
No conductors; best Au assay: 442
ppb
Drost, 1994
(41N15NE0004)
Drost, 1995
(41N15NE0029)
2000
1994/1995
Mapping, sampling
(1994); VLF-EM
surveyHLEM
surveyGround mag
surveyProspecting,
rock/soil sampling
(1995) in Leroy Lake
area
Lawrence
Melnick
19951996
VLF-EM survey
Ground mag survey
Elliot Feder
19961998
VLF-EM survey
Ground mag survey
Till sampling
Transgold
Exploration
and
Investment
Inc.
1998
IP survey
John
Leadbetter
1998–
2000
Beepmat survey
Prospecting and
Archibald, 1996b
(42C02SE0026)
Archibald, 1996a
(42C02SE0022)
Thomas, 1997a
(42C02SE2001)
Thomas, 1997b
(42C02SE2002)
Archibald, 1998
(42C02SE2003)
Anderson, 1998
(41N15NE2002)
Leadbetter, 1998
(41N15NE2003)
Page | 39
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Company
Year(s)
Exploration
sampling near Deep
Lake
Results
Reference
Leadbetter, 2000
(41N15NE1005)
3814793
Canada Inc. P.MousseauL.
2004
Ground mag survey
VLF-EM survey
Archibald, 2004
(42C02SE2014)
Augustine
Ventures Inc.
2007–
2012
Diamond drilling:
8,401 m in 2007;
2,944 m (18 ddh) in
2011; helicopter EM
Between Oct 15, 2003 and July 18,
2004:
Ground mag survey: 62.2 line-km.
25 m and 50 m line spacing, 15 m
station spacing. Ground magnetic
results have been used to further
delineate airborne anomalies and
outcrops.
VLF-EM survey: 24.5 line-km, 50 m
line spacing, 15 m station spacing.
Anomalies identified were
interpreted to be associated with
fault and shear systems.
Resource estimated based on
drilling (see text)
VTEM: Jan 2011. 412 line-km of
VTEM data, 100 m line spacing.
Magnetic-conductive features noted
in survey coincide with the Parkhill
fault. Six conductive anomalies
were identified as potential followup targets.
6.1
Duke, 2012 (WGM
NI43-101 compliant
report)
Surluga Gold Mines Ltd. – 1962–1975
Surluga Gold Mines was incorporated in 1962 (Kuryliw, 1972). Between 1964 and 1968, three shafts were
sunk to 290 m and Levels 1, 2, 3 and 5 were developed at 50 m, 88 m, 12.5 m and 204 m respectively.
Underground diamond drilling traced the ore zone for a length of 457 m (Kuryliw, 1972).The Surluga gold
mine was brought into production in 1967 and the mill construction started (Surluga Gold Mines Annual
Report 1997). In that year, underground development advanced by 2,465 m on seven levels. Between 1960
and 1969, Surluga Gold Mines drilled 120 diamond drill holes from the surface and 328 underground drill
holes. Production stopped in 1969. In 1973, Surluga Gold Mines, under the name of Pursides Gold Mines
Ltd., reopened the mine and operated it until 1975 (41N15NE0036, p. 79)
6.2
Cominco – 1963/64
Cominco optioned the property in 1963 (Morris, 1964) and completed a mapping and geophysical surveys.
The geophysical survey did not produce any meaningful results. Cominco also drilled 20 diamond drill holes
totaling 2633 m in 1963/64 (Table 6-5). Selected assay highlights are listed in Table 6-6.
Page | 40
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 6-5: Diamond drill holes completed by Cominco in 1963 and 1964.
Hole # Year Easting
Northing
Elevation (m) Azimuth
S090
1963
667753
5315781
346
S091
1964
667830
5315935
364
S092
1964
667907
5316059
367
S093
1964
667895
5316194
347
S094
1964
668082
5316345
371
S095
1964
667979
5316257
375
S096
1964
668134
5317530
330
S097
1964
667990
5317373
337
S098
1964
668527
5317742
319
S099
1964
668627
5317962
305
S100
1964
668706
5318177
330
S101
1964
668205
5317778
318
S102
1964
668335
5318131
311
S103
1964
668732
5318419
304
S104
1964
668998
5319129
287
S105
1964
669285
5319044
308
S106
1964
669005
5319442
287
S107
1964
669046
5319053
318
S108
1964
668895
5318739
337
S109
1964
668352
5316413
372
TOTAL 20
Table 6-6: Assay highlights of the Cominco drill holes.
Hole #
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)
S090
37.49
38.25
0.76
S090
35.05
35.51
0.46
S092
49.83
50.90
1.07
S094
62.64
63.55
0.91
S094
63.55
64.47
0.92
S094
74.68
75.29
0.61
S107
86.87
87.48
0.61
S109
191.11
191.72
0.61
S109
220.07
221.44
1.37
(°)
Dip (°)
Length (m)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
−90
64.31
73.76
85.95
92.97
102.11
93.57
128.02
117.96
103.33
120.09
178.31
132.59
114.3
97.84
207.27
66.14
396.24
95.86
117.04
245.37
2,633.03
Au (g/t)
6.17
5.14
12.69
16.49
4.80
4.80
16.46
19.89
7.54
6.1 Pango Gold Mines Ltd. – 1969–1970, 1980-1984
Pango Gold Mines (“Pango”) entered into a joint-venture agreement with Surluga Gold Mines in 1969 and
completed a successful exploration program from 1969 to 1970. Pango delineated “sizeable” tonnage of
“good grade” in the Jubilee zone by drilling on the 5th and 6th levels (Kuryliw, 1972). Geological mapping
Page | 41
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
was completed in 1969 (Kuryliw, 1969). Nevertheless, any additional work was suspended because further
financing could not be secured.
In June 1969, the Surluga mine closed down in spite of encouraging drill hole intersections on the 6th level.
A ground magnetic survey was conducted in August-September, 1969, by Kirkland Lake based contractor,
George Potter (Kuryliw, 1969). Grid lines were designed at 400 ft (=121.92 m) line-spacing and 2000 ft
(609.6 m) tie-spacing. An inclined gabbro plug East of Jubilee Lake containing disseminated pentlanditechalcopyrite-pyrrhotite mineralization was found to have highly magnetic pyrrhotite-pentlandite but the
gabbroic rock itself was found to have low magnetics, notable lower than the biotitic syenite intruded by the
gabbro. A 1000 gamma (=1000 nT) anomaly was identified and noted to be associated with disseminated
pentlandite-pyrrhotite mineralization in the gabbro, east of Jubilee Lake. The unmineralized gabbro was
noted to have a flat magnetic response. Additional magnetic anomalies are noted to be associated with
peridotite plugs, and are considered to be part of the Pango intrusive complex. (Kuryliw, 1969). In OctoberNovember, 1969, J. Cureatz conducted a ground magnetic survey on the Property under the supervision
of Kuryliw (Kuryliw, 1970 C). A magnetic-high anomaly was located and noted to be associated with
disseminated pentlandite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite mineralization in the gabbro east of Jubilee Lake. Several
other isolated magnetic anomalies were identified (Kuryliw, 1970 C). A strong magnetic response over the
Eastern portion of the Firesand carbonatite was noted (Kuryliw, 1970 C).
From April-June, 1970, 74.82 line-miles (=120.41 line-km) of ground magnetic data were collected at 100
ft (=30.48 m) intervals on a 400 ft (=121.92 m) line-spaced grid with 3000 ft (=914.40 m) tie line spacing.
The work was completed y behalf of Pango by Carl Huston (Tindale, 1970a). The magnetic response was
noted to be relatively quiet, and interpreted to be caused by uniform bedrock units. One 2000 gamma
(=2000 nT) anomaly was noted and was interpreted to be related to a nearby Firesand River carbonatite.
In July 1970, 6.3 line-miles (=10.14 line-km) of ground magnetics were completed at 100 ft (=30.48 m)
intervals on behalf of Pango by Carl Huston (Tindale, 1970b). The higher magnetic intensity features
identified on the survey were interpreted to be gabbro intrusive. A large portion of this reading is noted to
be adjacent to the Firesand carbonatite. Further geological mapping was recommended to determine the
cause of these magnetic anomalies (Tindale, 1970b).
In 1971, a ground magnetic survey was conducted at 100 ft intervals and high priority magnetic anomalies
were identified (Kuryliw, 1971a). Pango drilled one diamond drill hole (1971#1) on the north shore of Reed
Lake to test a magnetic anomaly. The anomaly was explained by magnetite-bearing peridotite with minor
sulfides and no gold (Kuryliw, 1971b).
Page | 42
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Pango conducted a ground magnetic survey in March-April 1980 (Kuryliw, 1980, Piaza, 1984). Two major
structural and lithologic trends were identified: the first being a series of east-west trends correlated to
metavolcanic rocks, with the more mafic portions being related to areas of high magnetization; and the
second identifying a major northwest-southeast trend, reflecting a linear diabase dykes. Two oval shaped
magnetic anomalies were identified and noted to be coincident with mapped gabbroic-diorite intrusive
(Piaza, 1984).
In April 19-21, 1982, Pango conducted an Electromagnetic Very Low Frequency (“VLF-EM”) survey on five
claims (Kuryliw, 1982). The survey was carried out on East-West picket lines at 100 ft (=30.48 m) station
intervals. Three conductors were located, two of which were recommended for drilling. Also in April-May
1982, Pango conducted an Electromagnetic Very Low Frequency (“VLF-EM”) survey 14 additional claims.
Ten conductive anomalies were identified for follow-up, with recommendation to conduct inducedpolarization to help prioritize targets (Piaza, 1984).
In 1984, Pango completed an overburden drilling program consisting of 47 holes on their Ward Lake
property between Ward Lake and Highway 17 in McMurray Township (Gillis, 1984). Although zones
anomalous in Au near faults and shear zones were delineated no economic significance was attributed to
these zones.
6.2
J.D.S Bohme Properties – 1970
A ground magnetic was completed in November 1969 on the J.D.S. Bohme property, at 400 ft (=121.92 m)
line-spacing (Kuryliw, 1970a). Only magnetic linear features were noted and were interpreted to be caused
by gabbroic basic intrusive dykes (Kuryliw, 1970a).
6.3
Consolidated Morrison Explorations Limited – 1974
In August 1974, Consolidated Morrison Explorations Ltd (“Consolidated Morrison”) flew an airborne
magnetic and radiometric survey with Aerodat Ltd (Boyko, 1974). The survey results are related to the
carbonatite complex and no new anomalies were identified.
6.4
Pursides Gold Mine – 1974-1975
In summer 1974 and winter 1975, a VLF-EM survey was carried out for Pursides Gold Mines (Crone, 1975).
Eight anomalies were identified, with one anomaly of interest and recommended for follow-up.
Page | 43
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
6.5
Canbec Explorations Ltd. – 1983
In May 1983, Canbec Exploration Ltd. (“Canbec”) completed 5.9 line-miles (=9.50 line-km) of ground
magnetic surveying at 200 ft (=60.96 m) and 400 ft (=121.92 m) line spacing, with station spacing of 50 ft
(=15.24 m) over 3 claims (Archibald, 1983 A). The purpose of the survey was to delineate geological
structure related to the north-south trending quartz rich shears. The results showed weak overall magnetic
signature, with anomalies identified as either diabase dykes or a felsic volcanic flow unit (Archibald, 1983a).
In May-June 1983, Canbec completed 5.9 line-miles (=9.50 line-km) of VLF-EM surveying at 200 ft (=60.96
m) and 400 ft (=121.92 m) line spacing, with station spacing of 100 ft (=30.48 m) over 3 claims (Archibald,
1983b). One conductive anomaly was noted, trending north-south and in strike with the Darwin Shear.
Noise was noted throughout the survey due to nearby power lines (Archibald, 1983b).
6.6
Dunraine Mines Ltd. – 1980–1984
Dunraine Mines Ltd. (“Dunraine”) acquired the Parkhill, Darwin (Grace) and Van Sickle mine areas between
1979 and 1980 (Harper, 1981).
Dunraine completed diamond drilling programs in five consecutive years (Table 6-7) (Studemeister, 1983,
1984).
Table 6-7: Overview of Dunraine's drilling.
Year
No of Holes
Total Metres
1980
38
3,385.10
1981
20
4,919.70
1982
8
410.60
1983
6
738.20
1984
5
887.90
TOTAL
77
10341.50
Best Intersection
46.22 g/t Au over 0.88 m
34.97 g/t Au over 0.15 m
7.61 g/t Au over 1. 5 m
5.96 g/t Au over 1.5 m
10.29 g/t Au over 0.3 m
During the 1980 drilling program, 15 drill holes intersected 21 gold-bearing quartz veins. The purpose of
the last two drilling programs was to test the continuity of the Grace horizon.
The 1982 drilling program focused on the extension of the Grace vein (Gignac, 1983); one hole was drilled
on the Darwin Shear zone to test the extension of the Surluga deposit. Gignac (1983) concluded that the
Darwin shear zone warrant further work.
Dunraine sampled the Parkhill tailings in 1980; a total of 235 samples were collected and an average gold
grade of the tailings of 0.86 g/t Au was determined (Harper, 1981a). Harper (1981a) states that the grade
of most samples ranges from 0.51 g/t Au to 1.20 g/t Au.
Page | 44
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
In 1981, Dunraine started dewatering the Parkhill mine and systematically mapping the underground
workings (Harper, 1981b). Underground drilling was also continued. Drilling continued until 1984.
In 1983, a VLF-EM survey was undertaken on the Dunraine claims in two phases (Studemeister, 1983).
The first phase was completed in the vicinity of the Darwin Mine, extending from the Moody Pit to the Darwin
Shear. The phase of surveying identified five anomalies for follow-up. The second phase covered the
southern half of the Darwin Shear. It was reported that the northern half of the Darwin shear was unable to
be surveyed due to remanence effects of local power and telephone lines (Studemeister, 1983). This phase
noted that the Darwin shear was a conductive structure, and that any east-west striking conductors
intersecting the Darwin shear were considered prospective. Anomalies were recommended for follow-up
geochemical surveying (Studemeister, 1983).
6.7
Northern Horizon Resources Ltd. – 1981, 1983
A ground magnetic survey was completed at 300 ft (=91.44 m) intervals for Northern Horizon Resources
Ltd. (“Northern Horizon”) (Kuryliw, 1981). One horseshoe-shaped anomaly was identified for follow-up as
a possible folded structure.
From April 1-4, 1983, Northern Horizon flew 298 line-km of Dighem III frequency-domain electromagnetic
data, which included magnetic data collection (Smith and Dvorak, 1983). The line spacing was 300 m, EM
sensor height was 30 m, and magnetic sensor height was 45 m. In total, twenty anomalies were identified
as moderate-high priority (Smith and Dvorak, 1983).
6.8
Monte Christo Resources – 1984
In February and April, 1984, Monte Christo Resources (“Monte Christo”) conducted a ground magnetic
survey and VLF-EM survey on 11 claims (Kuryliw, 1984). A total of 18.7 line-miles (=30.06 line-km) of
magnetic data was collected and 16 line-miles (=25.75 line-km) of VLF-EM data was collected. One large
conductive anomaly was identified and recommended for drill testing by three drill holes (Kuryliw, 1984).
Kuryliw (1984c) completed a mapping program on Monte Christo’s property in 1984 and identified several
silicified shear zones. He concluded that diamond drilling in the area of the shear zone is warranted.
Three diamond drill holes (W-1, -2 and -3) were completed on the property in 1984 and a quartz-carbonate
altered shear zone with anomalous gold intersected (Kuryliw, 1984d).
Page | 45
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
In July 1984, Monte Christo collected 6 line-miles (=9.66 line-km) of EM-17 horizontal loop electromagnetic
(“HLEM”) over the high priority targets identified by the VLF-EM survey (Kuryliw, 1984b). The results of the
HLEM survey were interpreted to be weak HLEM conductors coincident with the trend of the conductors
identified in the VLF-EM survey and were interpreted to be possible shear zones. These conductors were
recommended for drilling (Kuryliw, 1984b).
6.9
Citadel Gold Mines Inc. – 1982–2006
Between 1982 and 1986, Citadel Gold Mines Inc. (“Citadel”) consolidated various properties from previous
owners into one land package. In 1986, the Surluga mine was dewatered and a limited underground
program started (Rupert, 1997). Drilling discovered an intersection of 0.109 oz/t (3.74 g/t Au) over 67’ (20.42
m) near the junction of the Sunrise vein system and the Jubilee Shear Zone (Rupert, 1997). In October,
1986, 454 line-km of Dighem III FDEM data was flown on the Citadel property (Kilty, 1986). Several discrete
bedrock conductors were identified from the survey and recommended for follow-up work (Kilty, 1986).
In 1987, Citadel Gold Mines (“Citadel”) optioned the Henderson property east of Leroy Lake in the southeast
corner of McMurray Township and Osmani (1987) mapped the property and concluded that the
mineralization was independent of rock-type and structurally controlled. He recommended further
exploration including geophysical surveys, mapping and prospecting on the property.
In 1988, Citadel purchased the Parkhill and Grace Mine properties (MacMillan and Rupert, 1990). In the
same year, Citadel commissioned a study of the structural setting of the Surluga deposit (Helmstaedt,
1988). Helmstaedt (1988) concluded that the quartz-gold veins predate the ductile shear movement along
the Jubilee Shear Zone.
Also in 1988, Citadel completed exploratory underground drifting which identified two different shear zones
in the south part of the Surluga mine (Rupert and Leroy, 1989). Trenching and sampling delineated the
Darwin, Root and Fat veins. A ground magnetic survey was conducted in the summer of 1988 on Block B
to act as a base dataset for future mapping (Rupert and Leroy, 1989). Citadel contracted JVX to complete
a test IP survey in pole-dipole and gradient array time-domain methods. The survey results were unable to
distinguish the shear zone from the background data (Rupert and Leroy, 1989).
Citadel commissioned an ore recovery study including gravity concentration by various means, floatation
and cyanidation (Lakefield Research, 1988). Cyanidation recovered ~90% of the gold, sulfide flotation
~86%. Gravity concentration using the Knelson Concentrator was unsuccessful but upgrading gravity with
a Mozley Mineral Separator recovered +20% of contained gold.
Page | 46
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
In June-July 1988, Citadel conducted a ground magnetic survey to target follow-up anomalies located in
Block C (Rupert, 1989a). Line spacing was 400 ft (=121.92 m). Several magnetic anomalies were identified
(Rupert, 1989a).
Between December 1988 and March 1989, Citadel conducted a ground magnetic survey at 400 ft (=121.92
m) line spacing to improve the resolution of an airborne magnetic anomaly identified under Deep Lake
(Rupert, 1989b). The author interpreted the anomaly to be caused by iron formation (Rupert, 1989b).
The Surluga Mine was closed in 1989 but exploration continued until 1997 (Rupert, 1997). In 1990, Citadel
delineated soil anomalies in the Deep Lake area (Rupert, 1990). In 1996, Citadel drilled two diamond drill
holes totaling 294 m under Deep Lake (assessment report 41N15NE0037). Assay results were not
reported.
6.10
Caviar Resources Ltd. – 1986
In January-February, 1986, Caviar Resources Ltd. (“Caviar Resources”) conducted a ground magnetic and
VLF-EM survey covering 24.12 line-miles (=38.82 line-km). The main grid had a line spacing of 300 ft
(=91.44 m) and infill spacing of 100 ft (=30.48 m). The magnetic station spacing was 50 ft (=15.24 m) and
VLF-EM station spacing was 100 ft (=30.48 m). Eight conductive anomalies were identified as high-priority
targets and were recommended for follow-up work (Sears, 1986a).
6.11
Goldun Age Resources Inc. – 1986
Goldun Age Resources Inc. (“Goldun Age”) entered into an option agreement with Dunraine in 1986 and
continued the dewatering of the underground workings on the Parkhill property that Dunraine had started.
The underground workings were mapped, sampled and evaluated. Tilsley (1986) concluded that gold was
left in pillars, floors and backs of stopes, in particular above the 1st level but that little minable material was
left below the 3rd level. He reports that broken material and material washed from the stopes had grades
similar to the ones reported from the stopes with the exception of material from the Mill Vein on 3rd level
which had grades up to 3 ounces per ton (102.86 g/t Au; average grade 24 g/t Au; Tilsley, 1986). Tilsley
(1986) also concluded that the mined lenses would not extend up dip to the property boundary and that
there are no undiscovered lenses.
From May 30-June 12, 1986, Goldun Age completed a ground magnetic and vertical total field magnetic
gradiometer survey on one claim (Gignac, 1986). The survey consisted of 0.94 line-km. The gradiometer
Page | 47
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
vertical sensor spacing was 1 m. A total of 84 stations were surveyed. No significant results were noted
due to the small size of the survey, and the author recommended increasing the survey size (Gignac, 1986).
6.12
Mr. Robert Henderson – 1986
On July 22, 1986, Mr. Robert Henderson (“Mr. Henderson”) contracted Terraquest Ltd. (“Terraquest”) to fly
100 line-km of fixed-wing airborne magnetic and VLF- EM data (Barrie, 1986). The line spacing was 200 m
and mean terrain clearance was 100 m. Several structural and conductive anomalies were identified in the
survey data and recommended for follow-up surveying (Barrie, 1986).
6.13
Van Ollie Explorations Ltd. – 1989–1991
In 1990, Van Ollie Explorations Ltd. (“Van Ollie”) completed a geological (mapping, rock and soil sampling)
and geophysical (magnetic, VLF-EM) survey on their claims in McMurray Township immediately west of
Deep Lake (Sears, 1990a) (Reid, 1990). A total of 41.1 line-km of ground magnetic data was collected and
38.1 line-km of VLF-EM data was collected (Reid, 1990). Several magnetic and conductive anomalies were
identified from the respective surveys for follow-up exploration work.
Several veins, including the Van Sickle Vein, Captain Vein and Road Vein, were stripped. Mapping,
prospecting and rock sampling delineated several targets that correspond with zones of soil and
geophysical anomalies. The Van Sickle vein system was traced for 200 m and Sears (1990a) concluded it
was the extension of the Park Hill vein system.
Van Ollie drilled 31 diamond drilling programs totaling 1,445.88 m in 1989, 34 diamond drill holes totaling
1,447.22 m in 1990 and 6 diamond drill holes totaling 195.76 m in 1991 (Table 6-8, Table 6-9). The drilling
targeted the Van Sickle, Mickelson and Captain Veins.
In 1991, Van Ollie drilled six diamond drill holes totaling 195.76 m at the Sunrise No. 1 Vein (Delisle, 1991).
Best assay results ranged from 1.23 g/t Au to 4.87 g/t Au, however, the intervals for these grades were not
reported in Delisle (1991).
Table 6-8: Details of diamond drill holes completed by Van Ollie from 1989 to 1991.
Hole #
Year
Easting
Northing Elevation (m)
Depth (m)
VO-89-01
1989
669040 5314847
348
36.58
VO-89-02
1989
669040 5314842
347
38.71
VO-89-03
1989
669040 5314837
347
48.77
VO-89-04
1989
669040 5314817
348
55.17
VO-89-05
1989
669040 5314801
347
103.63
VO-89-06
1989
669040 5314780
346
81.99
Dip (°)
−88
−85
−85
−85
−85
−85
Azimuth (°)
360
360
360
360
360
360
Page | 48
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Hole #
VO-89-07
VO-89-08
VO-89-09
VO-89-10
VO-89-11
VO-89-12
VO-89-13
VO-89-14
VO-89-15
VO-89-16
VO-89-17
VO-89-18
VO-89-19
VO-89-20
VO-89-21
VO-89-22
VO-89-23
VO-89-24
VO-89-25
VO-89-26
VO-89-27
VO-89-28
VO-89-29
VO-89-30
VO-89-31
VO-90-32
VO-90-33
VO-90-34
VO-90-35
VO-90-36
VO-90-37
VO-90-38
VO-90-39
VO-90-40
VO-90-41
VO-90-42
VO-90-43
VO-90-44
VO-90-45
VO-90-46
VO-90-47
VO-90-48
VO-90-49
VO-90-50
VO-90-51
VO-90-52
VO-90-53
VO-90-54
Year
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
Easting
669040
669034
669034
668883
669070
668900
669070
669030
669030
668990
668951
668990
668931
668965
668930
668964
668931
668880
668880
668947
668947
668868
668945
668947
668980
668980
668978
668978
668868
668978
669010
668914
669010
669060
669060
669070
668914
669080
669080
669080
668914
669105
669105
669040
668900
668950
668951
668951
Northing
5314853
5314901
5314897
5315714
5314825
5315746
5314801
5314837
5314821
5314827
5315730
5314828
5315732
5314794
5315732
5314794
5315733
5315744
5315744
5314814
5314813
5315739
5314813
5314812
5314826
5314825
5314826
5314825
5315739
5314827
5314827
5315741
5314827
5314821
5314820
5314826
5315741
5314829
5314829
5314828
5315742
5314833
5314833
5314807
5315746
5315735
5315735
5315735
Elevation (m)
347
343
344
354
345
349
347
348
347
346
351
346
353
342
353
342
353
351
351
341
341
352
341
341
344
344
343
343
352
343
350
351
350
345
345
345
351
345
345
345
351
341
341
347
349
352
351
351
Depth (m)
36.88
60.96
65.29
48.16
42.67
91.44
48.46
17.68
36.88
44.65
60.35
35.05
42.67
56.39
36.88
57.91
46.03
42.67
70.41
30.48
24.08
30.48
21.34
24.08
9.14
21.79
18.29
24.69
48.01
43.59
28.96
45.87
22.25
24.69
27.74
24.38
58.37
21.34
21.34
27.74
65.53
24.38
27.74
45.11
45.42
49.68
49.38
52.43
Dip (°)
−85
−45
−75
−45
−85
−45
−85
−85
−85
−85
−45
−45
−45
−45
−45
−45
−70
−45
−70
−45
−65
−45
−45
−70
−45
−85
−45
−70
−75
−45
−60
−45
−85
−45
−85
−45
−60
−45
−60
−85
−75
−55
−85
−85
−62
−60
−47
−59
Azimuth (°)
360
360
360
360
360
180
360
360
360
360
180
360
180
360
210
320
210
180
150
360
360
180
315
315
360
360
360
360
180
240
360
180
360
360
360
360
180
360
360
360
180
360
360
360
180
180
152
152
Page | 49
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Hole #
VO-90-55
VO-90-56
VO-90-57
VO-90-58
VO-90-59
VO-90-60
VO-90-61
VO-90-62
VO-90-63
VO-90-64
VO-90-65
VO-S-91-1
VO-S-91-2
VO-S-91-3
VO-S-91-4
VO-S-91-5
VO-S-91-6
TOTAL
Year
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
Easting
668951
668854
668854
668837
668837
668811
668811
668791
668985
668985
669004
668962
668932
668814
668909
668909
668962
Northing
5315736
5315735
5315735
5315738
5315738
5315745
5315746
5315758
5315746
5315747
5315749
5315800
5315806
5315804
5315806
5315806
5315800
Elevation (m)
351
353
353
355
355
358
358
362
348
348
348
347
349
361
352
352
347
Depth (m)
67.67
76.81
43.89
28.04
49.07
44.20
77.42
46.63
64.31
65.23
65.23
36.00
21.70
34.13
29.26
25.66
49.01
3088.86
Dip (°)
−85
−45
−60
−60
−45
−45
−60
−45
−45
−60
−45
−45
−45
−70
−45
−75
−65
Azimuth (°)
152
180
180
195
195
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
Table 6-9: Assay highlights of holes drilled by Van Ollie between 1998 and 1990. Only raw assays >10 g/t Au are
shown; weighted averages were not calculated.
Hole #
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)
Au (g/t)
VO-89-01
1.83
2.19
0.36
142.42
VO-89-01
1.22
1.52
0.3
44.91
VO-89-01
2.49
2.8
0.31
17.55
VO-89-02
6.76
6.91
0.15
38.19
VO-89-04
27.74
27.91
0.17
34.9
VO-89-10
45.54
45.62
0.08
11.86
VO-89-12
28.65
28.93
0.28
10.08
VO-89-14
2.97
3.15
0.18
57.12
VO-89-14
5.31
5.54
0.23
32.57
VO-89-14
5.87
6.1
0.23
14.67
VO-89-23
31.55
31.85
0.3
75.43
VO-89-23
30.23
30.3
0.07
41.73
VO-89-24
16.74
17.22
0.48
81.63
VO-90-39
10.62
10.72
0.1
109.89
VO-90-43
34.31
34.44
0.13
28.77
VO-90-45
12.32
12.75
0.43
14.64
VO-90-50
32.74
32.92
0.18
20.95
VO-90-51
29.41
30.48
1.07
46.87
VO-90-51
28.19
29.41
1.22
29.01
VO-90-53
37.85
38
0.15
53.55
VO-90-63
13.01
13.14
0.13
23.55
VO-S-91-6
8.73
8.93
0.2
14.71
Page | 50
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The area explored by Van Ollie was traditionally called the “Van Sickle Claims” as they were held by the
Van Sickle Estate. Citadel consolidated the area of the Van Sickle Claims with its holdings in 1997 (Red
Pine Option Agreement, December 10, 2014 as filed on sedar.com under Red Pine Exploration Inc.).
6.14
Allied Northern Resources – 1988–1990
In 1988, Allied Northern Resources completed a geological (mapping and sampling) and geophysical
(magnetics and VLF-EM) survey (Sears and Gasparetto, 1988). Several quartz veins were found. Assay
data are not available.
From August 12 – September 17, 1988, Allied Northern Resources completed 19.25 line-km of ground
magnetic and VLF-EM surveying (Sears and Gasparetto, 1988). The ground magnetic results highlighted
diabase dykes and other interpreted geologic contacts. The VLF-EM results identified two high-priority
conductors, recommended for follow-up work (Sears and Gasparetto, 1988)
From August 12-December 10, 1988, a second magnetic and VLF- EM survey was completed by Allied
Northern Resources (Sears, 1989). A total of 50.85 line-km of data was collected covering 31 claims. No
significant anomalies were identified (Sears, 1989).
From August 15 – November 10, 1988, a third magnetic and VLF-EM survey was completed for Allied
Northern Resources (Sears and Gasparetto, 1989). A total of 11.75 line-km of data were collected at 120
m line spacing. One conductor was selected as high priority and recommended for follow-up work (Sears
and Gasparetto, 1989).
In 1990, Allied Northern Resources completed small exploration programs on their claims in the southern
part of McMurray Township at the boundary of McMurray Township with Rabazo and Naveau townships.
The program consisted of prospecting, stripping, rock and soil sampling and mapping (Sears, 1990b). Three
quartz-carbonate veins and several weak soil anomalies in the eastern part of the property were delineated.
One of the veins had low gold values. In addition, six diamond drill holes totaling 320.95 m were drilled
(Sears, 1990c). All six drill holes intersected the Villeneuve vein system (Sears, 1990e).
6.15
Pan Orvana Resources Inc. – 1990/91
Pan Orvana Resource Inc. (“Pan Orvana”) entered into an option agreement with Citadel to evaluate the
Jubilee property. In 1990, Pan Orvana reviewed historic information including drilling, completed a soil
sampling survey that delineated an Au anomaly over the main shear zone and sampled the underground
workings (Bradshaw, 1990). Bradshaw (1990) concluded based on the underground sampling that
Page | 51
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
“significant gold grades” were left in the margins of the old workings and that the grades and thicknesses
were sufficient to “consider” open pit mining.
6.16
Transgold Explorations and Investment Inc. – 1994-1995, 1998
Transgold Explorations and Investment Inc. (“Transgold”) completed a mapping and sampling program in
the Lyre Lake area in 1994. No anomalous gold values were observed (Drost, 1994). In 1995, Transgold
completed a geophysical and geological exploration program in the Leroy Lake area in 1995. A soil weak
B-horizon soil anomaly with gold values up to 57 ppm was delineated. The anomalous soil samples
correspond to a VLF-EM anomaly.
Between July and September 1995, ground magnetics, VLF-EM and HLEM were collected on the Transgold
property at 100 m line spacing and 12.5 m, 25 m, and 25 m station spacing respectively (Drost, 1995).
Several anomalies were identified from these surveys and were displayed in map format (Drost, 1995).
Based on the exploration results, a diamond drilling program in the area was recommended.
In 1998, a test IP survey was conducted on previously-identified VLF-EM anomalies (Anderson, 1998).
Time-domain IP data was collected in dipole-dipole array, with “a” spacing = 25 m, and N = 1-3. Three
chargeable features were identified and recommended for follow-up exploration (Anderson, 1998).
6.17
Lawrence Melnick – 1995-1996
In October 1995, a VLF-EM survey was conducted on the Lawrence Melnick claims at 100 m line spacing
and 25 m station spacing (Archibald, 1996b). One high priority conductor was identified. In October 1996,
Lawrence Melnick collected ground magnetic data at 60 m line spacing and 30 m station spacing. Two
magnetic anomalies were identified as high priority and were recommended for follow-up work (Archibald,
1996b).
6.18
Elliot Feder – 1996–1998
In October 1996, Elliott Feder collected ground VLF-EM and magnetic data covering 12.2 line-km
(Archibald, 1996). The line spacing was 100 m and station spacing 25 m. Three conductive anomalies were
identified from the VLF-EM survey as possible shear zones and were recommended for follow-up.
Anomalies were also identified from the magnetic survey and related to the Firesand Carbonatite Complex
(Archibald, 1996).
Four diamond drill holes were also completed in 1996 (Archibald, 1996). No positive results were reported.
Page | 52
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
A till sampling survey was completed on the claim group owned by Elliot Feder in McMurray Township in
1997 (Thomas, 1997a). Twelve gold grains were found in a sample from Feder’s claim 1174416 (Figure 1
in Thomas, 1997). It was concluded that further work was warranted in this area. The following year, a goldbearing vein assaying 8.7 g/t Au was found in the same location in the southern part of McMurray Township
(Archibald, 1998; location of the gold-bearing sample shown on Figure 1A in Archibald, 1998). Thirty-two
till samples were collected, 16 of which were analyzed for diamond indicator minerals. Several samples
contain flakes of visible gold and gold “indicator” minerals (e.g., arsenopyrite). Archibald (1998) described
the sample as “sheared meta-rhyolite with up to 16% pyrite and arsenopyrite” and gold occurring as
inclusions in the rims of pyrite.
Slightly anomalous gold values were also obtained from till samples collected from the northern part of
McMurray Township (Thomas, 1997b). The location of the claims where the samples were collected is
shown on Figure 1 in Thomas (1997b)
6.19
John Leadbetter – 2000
In 1998, John Leadbetter completed a beepmat survey on claims near Deep Lake. No conductors were
discovered (Leadbetter, 1998). In 2000, Leadbetter prospected and sampled the area near Deep Lake in
the central eastern part of Red Pine’s dispositions. He took 12 grab samples; the best gold assay results
was 442 ppb Au (Leadbetter, 2000).
6.20
3814793 Canada Inc. – P.Mousseau-L. – 2004
Between October 15, 2003 and July 18, 2004, 3814793 Canada Inc. - P.Mousseau-L. conducted ground
magnetic and VLF-EM surveying on their property (Archibald, 2004). The ground magnetic data consisted
of 62.2 line-km at 25 m and 50 m line spacing, and 15 m station spacing. The results were used to further
delineate airborne anomalies and trace outcropping areas. The VLF-EM survey consisted of 24.5 line-km
of data at 50 m line spacing and 15 m station spacing. Anomalies identified were interpreted to be
associated with fault and shear systems and were recommended for follow-up exploration (Archibald,
2004).
6.21
Wawa GP Inc. – 2007
In 2007, Wawa GP Inc. (“Wawa GP”) completed a diamond drilling program at their Jubilee–Surluga
property totaling 8,401 m (core diameter: NQ) (Gow, 2011). The purpose of this drilling program was to
target the down dip extension of the Jubilee shear zone.
Page | 53
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 6-10: Collar locations and survey details of diamond drill holes completed by Wawa GP in 2007.
Hole #
Easting
Northing
Elevation
Azimuth (°)
Dip (°)
Collar
Length
(m)
Depth (m)
(m)
07-383
668275
5315577
371
270
−85
538.0
07-384
668365
5315474
345
270
−85
618.0
07-385
668147
5315475
348
262
−85
510.2
668453
5315594
362
273
−85
645.0
273
−85
07-387
668361
531582
378
290
−85
534.0
07-388
668444
5315796
375
314
−85
531.0
07-389
668582
5315801
368
299
−86
750.0
07-390
668528
5315701
368
247
−83
711.0
07-391
668610
5315733
374
292
−82
696.0
07-392
668700
5315820
378
176
−82
849.0
668740
55315708
374
281
−82
771.0
181
−82
295
−80
07-386
07-386B
1
07-393
07-393A
1
07-393B1
07-394
688660
5315840
360
TOTAL
1wedged
489.5
124.7
398.7
10.3
393.0
352
770.0
8410.2
drill holes
Table 6-11: Selected assay highlights for Wawa GP's 2007 drilling program.
Hole No
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)
Au (g/t)
07-383
452.00
453.90
1.90
6.00
incl.
452.60
453.40
0.80
11.21
07-384
555.06
562.20
7.14
1.18
incl.
555.60
555.80
0.20
13.39
564.40
576.40
12.00
1.15
incl.
569.70
570.15
0.45
5.49
07-385
61.10
62.40
1.30
10.38
07-386B
586.00
590.00
4.00
2.06
incl.
586.00
587.20
1.20
6.22
07-387
476.10
485.50
9.40
1.78
incl.
480.70
481.70
1.00
3.37
incl.
483.50
484.50
1.00
4.61
07-388
48.25
49.18
0.93
4.28
51.10
52.10
1.00
8.68
507.35
508.20
0.85
1.35
7-389
559.60
562.60
3.00
7.24
7-391
600.90
604.30
3.40
11.44
7-392
844.10
844.60
0.50
5.12
7-393
680.50
680.90
0.40
4.50
691.10
692.80
1.70
10.67
734.20
735.70
1.50
5.73
07-393B
686.25
688.80
2.55
6.21
Page | 54
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Hole No
incl.
07-394
From (m)
686.25
716.80
558.10
To (m)
686.40
717.60
559.20
Interval (m)
0.15
0.80
1.10
Au (g/t)
93.70
10.95
7.92
Intervals listed here do not represent true thickness.
6.22
Augustine Ventures Inc. – 2011
In January 2011, Augustine contracted Geotech Ltd. to fly 412 line-km of helicopter-borne Versatile Time
Domain Electromagnetic data (“VTEM”) at 100 m line spacing (Duke, 2012). Several magnetic-conductive
features were noted within the survey to coincide with the Parkhill fault. Six conductive anomalies were
identified as potential follow-up targets (Duke, 2012).
In 2011, Augustine drilled 2,944 m in 18 diamond drill holes (core diameter: NQ). The purpose of the drilling
was to confirm historic drilling results (13 drill holes) and define the mineralization around the Jubilee mine
(5 drill holes; Duke, 2012). The holes were surveyed every 10 m using a Flex-IT down hole survey tool.
Twelve of the holes twinned historic holes. The twin holes did not reproduce the results of the historic
database. Duke (2012) concluded that the nugget effect cannot be used to explain the discrepancy between
the two data sets, which remained unexplained.
Table 6-12: Collar locations and survey details of diamond drill holes completed by Augustine in 2011.
Hole #
Easting
Northing
Elevation (m)
Azimuth (°)
Dip (°) Length (m)
AV-11-001
5317022
668300
361
0
−90
193
AV-11-002
5316929
668276
360
0
−90
151
AV-11-003
5316862
668290
360
0
−90
141
AV-11-004
5316784
668274
354
0
−90
146
AV-11-005
5316773
668370
356
0
−90
212
AV-11-006
5316677
668302
351
0
−90
178
AV-11-007
5316783
668217
349
0
−90
107
AV-11-008
5316560
668108
355
294
−45
72
AV-11-009
5316430
668084
354
294
−45
88
AV-11-010
5316521
668280
384
0
−90
205
AV-11-011
5316326
668036
372
294
−62
79
AV-11-012
5316251
668161
381
0
−90
229
AV-11-013
5316215
668053
380
0
−90
163
AV-11-014
5316160
668051
378
0
−90
170
AV-11-015
5316040
668118
375
0
−90
235
AV-11-016
5316028
668020
381
0
−90
200
AV-11-017
5315969
667918
372
0
−90
169
AV-11-018
5315830
667981
346
0
−90
206
TOTAL
2944
Page | 55
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 6-13: assay highlights for Augustine's 2011 drilling program.
Hole No
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)
Au (g/t)
AV-11-002
91.81
93.38
1.57
5.67
97.09
103.58
6.49
1.94
incl.
98.58
99.17
0.59
7.24
AV-11-05
171.17
173.66
2.49
2.87
incl.
171.56
172.05
0.49
5.85
AV-11-006
133.00
136.59
3.59
7.03
incl.
133.56
134.12
0.56
21.87
AV-11-007
35.19
37.70
2.51
2.83
incl.
35.92
36.17
0.25
17.32
AV-11-008
30.56
36.60
6.04
3.23
incl.
31.28
31.80
0.52
10.69
and
32.50
32.93
0.43
8.83
AV-11-009
45.23
53.17
7.94
5.33
incl.
46.15
46.46
0.31
43.77
and
51.30
51.74
0.44
8.82
AV-11-010
162.92
164.60
1.68
20.18
AV-11-011
48.17
51.77
3.60
3.76
AV-11-012
161.54
171.44
9.90
1.93
incl.
161.54
161.98
0.44
14.36
and
170.15
170.55
0.40
10.47
AV-11-14
126.85
135.75
8.90
3.09
incl.
133.30
133.70
0.40
23.14
and
134.16
134.62
0.46
11.19
144.68
145.42
0.74
22.77
AVI-11-15
190.74
219.65
28.91
2.57
AVI-11-16
155.92
161.39
5.47
3.06
AVI-11.18
147.55
156.84
9.29
2.60
Subsequently, Augustine commissioned Watts, Griffis and McOuat Consulting Geologists and Engineers
(“WGM”) to complete a resource estimate that included Augustine’s current and previous drill holes (Duke,
2012). WGM estimated the Surluga deposit contained 32.2 Mt grading 1.14 g/t Au (cutoff: 0.2 g/t Au)
The historic estimate is reliable but no longer relevant as it was superseded by the current estimate (Section
14: Mineral Resource Estimates), which upgraded the historic estimate. The historic estimate used the
categories set out in the “Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” by the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”; CIM, 2014). The estimate was completed
using ordinary kriging and validated using the inverse distance method. Red Pine is not treating the historic
Page | 56
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
estimate as current because the qualified person have not done sufficient work to classify the historic
estimate as current.
Augustine also collected 200 grab samples on the property in 2011 (Figure 6-2). Table 6-14 lists samples
with >1 g/t Au.
Augustine completed a Lidar survey in 2011.Eagle Mapping Limited used a Riegl VQ-480 laser scanner
and airborne GPS/IMU to obtain digital images of the Wawa Gold Project area. The survey collected 2 to 3
pulses per square meter with a ± 0.15 m vertical accuracy and a ±0.3 m horizontal accuracy. The survey
provided georeferenced digital files with 1 m contours, digital elevation model and orthophoto imagery with
a 20 cm resolution.
Page | 57
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 6-2: Locations of the grab samples collected by Augustine in 2011.
Page | 58
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 6-14: Assay highlights of the grab samples collected by Augustine in 2011.
Sample #
Easting
Northing Au (g/t)
Location
1003978
668180
5315784
14.03 Minto
1003953
668166
5315867
8.3 Minto
1003903
668382
5315387
5.64 Minto
1003920
668242
5315144
3.95 Minto
1003894
668397
5315385
2.96 Minto
1003963
668242
5315971
2.06 Minto
1003976
668170
5315779
1.88 Minto
1003873
668447
5315431
1.49 Minto
1003921
668243
5315145
1.27 Minto
7.0
GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION
7.1
Regional Geology
The property is located in the Michipicoten greenstone belt of the Wawa Subprovince (Superior Province).
The Superior Province is the world’s largest Archean craton; it formed by amalgamation of subprovinces of
various origins (plutonic, volcanic-plutonic, gneissic, sedimentary) (Polat and Kerrich, 2000). The
subprovinces range in age from 3.0 to 2.65 Ga. The Wawa Subprovince extends from Minnesota in the
west to the Kapuskasing structural zone in the east (Figure 7-1). The Quetico subprovince is located to the
north of the Wawa subprovince and the south-eastern boundary is represented by the Batchawana fault
zone. The southern boundary is located under Lake Superior.
Two areas of greenstone belts characterize the subprovince: one along its northern border and one in its
central parts. The latter area includes the Michipicoten greenstone belt.
Page | 59
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-1: Map showing the Superior Province and its subprovinces.
7.2
Local Geology
The Michipicoten greenstone belt consists of three cycles of mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks with
associated subvolcanic intrusions and metasedimentary (Sage, 1994). The ages of the three cycle are 2.9
Page | 60
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Ga, 2.75 Ga and 2.7 Ga. The two older cycles are capped by extensive iron formation. The composition of
the mafic volcanic rocks ranges from basaltic to komatiitic; the youngest mafic volcanic rocks are tholeiitic.
The Hawk Lake Granitic Complex and the Jubilee Lake Stock are the intrusive equivalents to the felsic
portions of the two oldest cycles and represent the centres of calderas (Sage, 1984). The granitic stocks
are located along a regional structure, the Wawa–Hawk Lake–Manitowik Lake Fault (Figure 7-2). Diabase
dikes cut the supracrustal rocks. The Firesand River Carbonatite intruded along the Wawa–Hawk Lake–
Manitowik Lake Fault indicating that the fault is deep-seated. The fault forms the boundary between an area
of extensive lamprophyres to the south and a lamprophyre-free zone to the north. Sage (1994) interpreted
the greenstone belt to have formed as an island arc in a convergent plate margin environment.
The Michipicoten greenstone belt was metamorphosed to greenschist facies whereas the surrounding
supracrustal rocks were metamorphosed to amphibolite facies. The greenstone belt is surrounded by Early
Precambrian granite and gneiss. It is covered by extensive glacial material.
The Wawa Gold Project is located along the southern boundary of Michipicoten greenstone belt (Sherman,
2005).
7.3
Property Geology
A large part of the property is underlain by the Jubilee Stock, a high-level subvolcanic intrusion of variable
composition (diorite to quartz diorite and granodiorite; Frey, 1987) (Figure 7-3). The Jubilee Stock is fineto medium-grained and locally porphyritic; it intruded into quartz-feldspar crystal tuff at 2.745 Ga. Intrusive
breccia occurs at the margins of the stock. MacMillan and Rupert (1990) observed that the more massive
and competent, central parts of the Jubilee Stock are associated with better gold grades, which they
attributed to a locally favorable stress field spatially associated with the competent blocks.
Page | 61
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-2: Map of the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt.
Page | 62
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-3: Property geology map.
Page | 63
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The main rock types encountered during Red Pine’s 2014 drilling program include:
1. Medium-grained diorite (Figure 7-4)
2. Fine-grained mafic rock (gabbro; Figure 7-5)
3. Late lamprophyre dikes (Figure 7-6)
Figure 7-4: Typical diorite of the Jubilee Stock from drill hole SD-14-05 (7.4 m).
Page | 64
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-5: Typical fine-grained mafic rock (gabbro) of the Jubilee Stock from drill hole SD-14-05 (36.5 m).
Page | 65
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-6: Lamprophyre from drill hole SD-14-06 (308 m).
7.3.1 Structure
The structural setting on the property is complex and characterized by numerous fractures and faults of
variable strikes and dips. The dominant directions of structural features, e.g., faults, joints, quartz-gold veins
and zones of weakness intruded by dikes, is northeast to east-northeast (shear veins and shear zones;
20°–45° and 45°–70°; Frohberg, 1937) and northwest (tensional veining; 320°–340°). Examples of
northeast striking faults are the prominent Jubilee shear zone, the Darwin break (previously called Darwin
Shear) and the Minto B fault (Figure 7-3). Some of the veins mined in the Cooper, Minto and Grace mines
are typical examples of the gold-bearing and WNW-oriented tensional vein sets.
Diabase dikes post-date gold mineralization. Lamprophyre dikes cut the diabase dikes.
Page | 66
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The Jubilee shear zone, which hosts the majority of the mineralization at the Surluga Mine, consists of a
number of parallel, ~300–900 m long en-echelon segments (Rupert, 1997). It strikes northeast (018-034°)
and dips (25-55°) to the southeast. Its width ranges from 9 m to 60 m. It extends from Wawa Lake to the
northwest-trending Parkhill Fault (3.2 km) (Rupert, 1997; MacMillan and Rupert, 1990). The extension of
the Jubilee shear zone south of the Parkhill Fault remains to be defined. The Jubilee Shear Zone was
interpreted to be an oblique thrust fault with the hanging wall moving up and north (Helmstaedt, 1988). It is
not exposed north of Wawa Lake and is assumed to be truncated by a NW trending fault under Wawa Lake
(Helmstaedt, 1988).
7.3.2 Alteration
Carbonatization, sericitization, chloritization and local silicification of the Jubilee Stock are characteristic of
the zones adjacent to mineralization. Locally, the Jubilee diorite is pervasively biotitized. Epidote, tourmaline
and K-feldspar were also observed.
In the Surluga deposit, current drill core reveals that quartz-sericite alteration of strongly sheared diorite is
intimately associated with gold mineralization (Figure 7-7). Pink K-feldspar alteration overprints the sericite
alteration (Figure 7-8). Outward from the mineralization, pre-mineralization sodic alteration is prevalent.
Biotite veins outside of the immediate mineralized zone and a broad halos of chlorite-carbonate alteration
also predate mineralization.
Page | 67
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-7: Quartz-sericite altered diorite from SD-14-05, 172.7 m.
Page | 68
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-8: Quartz-sericite altered diorite from drill hole SD-14-04, 35 m. The quartz-sericite alteration is overprinted by
pink K-spar alteration.
7.4
Mineralization
Historically, mineralization was found at various locations on the property as evidenced by the eight pastproducing mines. The mineralization is spatially associated with the major shear-zones on the property.
Gold mineralization is finely disseminated in quartz veins, lenses and pods within shear and breccia zones
in various rock types (Frey, 1987). This lack of preference of the gold mineralization for a particular rock
type is typical of the mineralization in the area. Recrystallized quartz and minor amounts of sulfides are also
characteristic. Frey (1987) interpreted the rock competency to have a major impact on the character and
location of the mineralization.
Page | 69
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
According to Frey (1987) gold occurs within the NE (020°) trending Jubilee shear zone and dips between
30° and 40° east. However, Sherman (2005) stressed that most historical deposits are hosted by quartz
lenses located east of the Jubilee shear zone in ENE-oriented shear systems. In addition, mineralization
also occurs in the hanging-wall of the Jubilee shear zone.
Rupert (1997) describes the high grade mineralized zones to consist of lenses of <2.5 cm to 6 m thickness,
4.5–15 m length and 3 to 12 m width. They occur in clusters and are arranged in en-enchelon manner.
Between 2 and 4% pyrite and minor arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite were also reported; strong silicification
is typically associated with the mineralization. The lenses consist of zones of recrystallized quartz that is
often folded and deformed. Different sets of tensional veins with variable gold content were also document
within the Surluga deposit and in the other historic mines. Helmstaedt (1988) suggested that the mineralized
zones appear to be lenses because the maximum elongation direction during ductile shearing was oblique
to the trend of the Jubilee zone.
Kuryliw (1970) reported the mineralization to be zoned from white quartz-tourmaline-gold to grey quartzpyrite-gold to blue-grey quartz-arsenopyrite-gold with increasing gold grades from quartz–tourmaline to
quartz–gold.
During the personal inspection of the property, two different types of mineralization were observed in core
(dominantly strongly altered diorite) from the Surluga deposit. One type is characterized by late quartz veins
that carry fine-grained visible gold and minor pyrite and carbonate. Another type is characterized by
auriferous arsenopyrite with minor quartz in strongly sheared and strongly sericite altered diorite. Pyrite,
pyrrhotite, minor chalcopyrite and magnetite were also observed in or peripheral to the high-grade zones.
Locally, the quartz veins are very thin or absent. Quartz-tourmaline-Au veins were not observed.
The continuity of the mineralization between the various historic mines on the property is uncertain due to
lack of drilling data but the systematic orientation of the tensional vein sets in each of the historical mines
indicate a coeval period of formation under a similar stress regime.
In the Surluga–Jubilee area the vast majority of the gold mineralization is constrained within the Surluga–
Jubilee shear zone and hanging wall and footwall secondary shear zones that remain poorly understood
and defined. The shear zone represents a continuous structure approximately 2.5 km long, striking north,
dipping 30–35° to the east and plunging to the south at 12°, with a true thickness up to 75 m locally. The
shear zone outcrops at the northern extremity. Current drilling information confirms that the shear zone can
be traced up to 800 m below surface. Details about possible mineralization in other areas outside the
Surluga–Jubilee area have not been confirmed.
Page | 70
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 7-9: Late quartz-vein and breccia from drill hole SD-14-05, 167.3 m.
8.0
DEPOSIT TYPES
The mineralization on the Wawa Gold Project property is interpreted to be of orogenic (shear-zone-hosted)
origin.
Epigenetic gold deposits in metamorphic terranes of Precambrian shields have yielded 23,000–25,000 t Au
(Goldfarb et al., 2005). These deposits typically formed during the late stages of orogeny and are therefore
called orogenic gold deposits (Goldfarb et al., 2005). Most of these deposits are located close to deepcrustal, compressional and transtensional fault zones with complex structural histories (Dubé and Gosselin,
2007). Mineralization is hosted by veins filling shears and faults; mineralization is concentrated at jogs or
changes in strike along the larger-scale fault zones. The timing of the mineralization is typically syn- to latedeformation. Stockworks, breccias, crack-seal veins, sigmoidal veins, and disseminations in deeper parts
Page | 71
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
are all common. Swarms of lamprophyre dikes and intermediate to felsic porphyritic intrusions are also
common in orogenic deposits.
The typical sulfide content of these deposits is 2–5% with arsenopyrite and pyrite being the dominant
sulfides. Pyrrhotite occurs in higher-temperature systems. Base-metals are rare but W-, B- and Te-bearing
phases can occur (Goldfarb et al., 2005). Visible gold and electrum are common. Typical gangue minerals
are quartz and carbonate. Carbonates, sericite/muscovite, chlorite, K-feldspar, biotite, tourmaline and albite
are typical alteration minerals.
Intermittent pressure changes in the shear zones and the resulting fluid unmixing and water–rock interaction
and associated desulfidation are considered the dominant precipitation mechanisms. Metamorphic fluids
are interpreted to be responsible for gold transport; however, gold may have been sequestered from rocks
predating the metamorphic event (Goldfarb et al., 2005).
Economically significant orogenic deposits tend to be between 2 and 10 km long, ~1 km wide and can be
mined to depths of 2–3 km. Examples of orogenic deposits/districts are Muruntau (Kazakhstan), Ashanti
(West Africa) and Golden Mile (West Australia). Canadian examples include McIntyre–Hollinger (Ontario),
Red Lake (Ontario) and Kirkland Lake (Ontario).
9.0 EXPLORATION
9.1
Ground Magnetic Surveying (Dec 2014 – Jan 2015)
Members of the Red Pine team conducted a ground magnetic survey of the Surluga Mine and surrounding
area between 03 December 2014 and 26 January 2015.
The survey data was collected using a GEM Systems GSMP-35 Magnetometer, an optically pumped
potassium magnetometer. The data was collected at 1 Hz and the system is reported to have an accuracy
of ±0.05 nT (GEM Systems Inc., 2013). The magnetic diurnal was observed using a stationary GSM-19
magnetometer, and was collected at 0.2 Hz. The corrected total magnetic field was calculated during nightly
processing of the data.
The majority of survey lines were collected in an east-west orientation, perpendicular to the strike of the
Jubilee shear zone. The survey line spacing was 50 m. An additional four lines were surveyed over the cut
line path of the IP lines discussed in Section 9.2 - Induced Polarization. Additional lines oblique to the main
east-west orientation were collected and included in the final database.
Page | 72
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The corrected total magnetic intensity was examined in profile format and found to be of sufficient quality,
and delineates the western edge of the presently-defined extent of the Surluga Mine. A few east-west
trending magnetic lineaments, extending eastward from the Surluga Mine, are under-sampled with the
present east-west ground magnetic line orientation and are therefore not as well delineated in the magnetic
image. Since the delineation of these units was not the primary focus of this survey, this sampling is
considered satisfactory.
The ground magnetic survey defined the strike of the Jubilee shear zone and is expressed as a magnetic
low striking approximately 015°. There are areas of increased magnetization within the Jubilee shear plane
require further investigation in 3D through constrained inversion, as they may be related to the shear zone.
Linear features oriented east-west are also observed in the magnetic data.
The gridded results of the total magnetic intensity are displayed in Figure 9-1. A total of 69.7 line-km were
collected in GPS mode. This represents a total area surveyed of 2.23 km².
Page | 73
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-1. Total Magnetic Intensity of Wawa Ground Magnetic Survey (Dec 2014 – Jan 2015).
Page | 74
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
9.2
Induced Polarization (Dec 2014)
Red Pine contracted ClearView Geophysics Inc. (“ClearView”) to conduct Spectral Induced Polarization
and Resistivity (“Spectral IP/Res”) surveys on the Surluga Property. The work was completed December
12–16, 2014. The objective of the survey was to determine if the Spectral IP/Res results could be used to
enhance drill targeting for gold mineralization (Mihelcic, 2014).
The survey array geometry was a Pole-Dipole “Combo” array, whereby the dipole spacing (“a”) for n = 1-6
was a = 50 m, and for n= 7-8, a = 100 m. Voltage drops were measured for each dipole, and the transmitter
operator measured the contact resistance and electric current passing through the current electrodes during
each reading. This information was relayed to the receiver operator and entered into the receiver instrument
for to help calculate apparent resistivity (Mihelcic, 2014).
A total of four lines were surveyed covering 3.08 line-km, with each line ranging from 600–950 m. Lines 1
– 3 were surveyed orthogonal to the Jubilee shear zone, and Line 4 was surveyed parallel to the strike of
the Jubilee shear zone, approximately 430 m southeast of the top surface. Line 4 is considered the Base
Line. A map outlining the line locations in plan-view is located in Figure 9-2.
A final database was provided to the client containing Spectral IP/Res parameters calculated during the
survey: chargeability, DC resistivity and spectral tau calculated from Cole-Cole decay fitting. The data was
collected using a Scintrex IPR-12 Multi-channel IP-Receiver, and the original dump files were provided to
Ronacher McKenzie for review in Geosoft Oasis Montaj. Over a period of two seconds of on-off time, eleven
samples were taken to map the chargeability decay per sample point. The decay curves were examined
visually for each line and no abnormalities were noted. The samples are considered representative and no
factors are thought to have resulted in sample bias.
Three features were identified by ClearView in the Spectral IP/Res and are listed in Table 9-1. A location
of the survey lines is found in Figure 9-2.
Table 9-1. Features identified from Spectral IP/Res data by ClearView Geophysics Inc. Coordinates are listed in
NAD83, UTM Zone 16N.
Feature
Elevation
Easting (m)
Northing (m)
Description
ID
(m)
Gold mineralization noted at this point; There is a
contact of low resistivity to the west and high
A
668,415
5,317,121
128.5
resistivity to the east at this point; Spectral Tau is
relatively short compared to adjacent areas on line
B
668,449
5,316,382
177.8
Gold mineralization noted at this point; Broad
chargeability response of 12mV/V at 100 m depth;
Spectral Tau is relatively short
Page | 75
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Feature
ID
C
Easting (m)
668,129
Northing (m)
5,316,091
Elevation
(m)
174.8
Description
Gold mineralization noted at this point;
Chargeability response is broad 14mV/V and
located between low resistivity zones; Spectral Tau
is relatively short
Figure 9-2. Location of Spectral IP/Resistivity Survey lines.
Page | 76
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
On April 20th, 2015, Red Pine contracted Abitibi Geophysics (“Abitibi Geophysics”) to complete an inversion
of the Spectral IP dataset using the RES2DINV inversion code developed by Geotomo Software Sdn. Bhd.
The purpose of the inversion is to appropriately place the chargeability and apparent resistivity features at
depth and relate them to the known Surluga Mine.
Red Pine constructed an XYZ file of GPS coordinates recorded during the survey. The results were
provided to Red Pine in .DAT, .INV AND .XYZ containing the input dataset, the output RES2DINV format
and the final output of chargeability and resistivity features at depth.
3D images of the resistivity and chargeability inversions are found in Figure 9-3 and Figure 9-4. The results
reflect the easterly dip of the Jubilee shear zone, with higher resistivity associated values in the west and
above the shear zone. A broad chargeability contrast is associated with the shear zone.
Figure 9-3. Results of the RES2DINV resistivity inversion on the Spectral IP dataset carried out by Abitibi Geophysics
Inc. Viewed from South.
Page | 77
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-4. Results of the RES2DINV chargeability inversion on the Spectral IP dataset carried out by Abitibi
Geophysics Inc. Viewed from South.
9.3
Ground Magnetic Surveying (October 2015)
Red Pine contracted ClearView Geophysics Inc. (“ClearView”) to complete a ground magnetic survey on
the Wawa Gold Project, in the Sunrise area (See Figure 7-3). The purpose of this work was to locate
magnetic anomalies, as well as identify zones and trends to help guide gold exploration. The survey was
completed in October 2015 (Mihelcic, 2015). Survey parameters are found in Table 9-2.
Table 9-2. Parameters of the Ground Magnetic Survey: October 2015
Survey Parameter
Value
Survey dates
October 18-19, 2015
Line-km
12.3 km
Line direction
170°
Line spacing
20 m
Terrain clearance
2m
Page | 78
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Survey Parameter
Value
Magnetic sensor
Scintrex ENVI Cesium magnetometer
Magnetic sensor resolution
0.01 nT
Magnetic sensor sampling rate
10 Hz
Magnetic base station sensor
GSM-19 v7.0 Overhauser magnetometer
Magnetic base station sensor resolution
0.01 nT
Magnetic base station
1 Hz
Magnetic base station location (Long, Lat)
84.7378W, 47.9714N
The corrected total magnetic intensity was examined in profile format and found to be of sufficient quality
and representative of the magnetite distribution of the subsurface. No factors are noted to cause sample
biases. The gridded results of the total magnetic intensity are displayed in Figure 9-5. A total of 12.3 linekm were collected in GPS mode. This represents a total area surveyed of 0.17 km².
This survey represents a higher-resolution magnetic survey over the Sunrise area. The survey delineates
several subtle ENE trending magnetic linear features, including one associated with the south-eastern arm
of the Surluga grade shell.
Page | 79
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-5. Total Magnetic Intensity of Wawa Ground Magnetic Survey (Oct 2015)
Page | 80
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
9.4
Ground Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic Surveying (October 2015)
Red Pine contracted ClearView Geophysics Inc. (“ClearView”) to complete a ground horizontal loop
electromagnetic (“HLEM”) on the Wawa Gold Project. The survey was completed using an Apex MaxMin
system and is often referred to as a “MaxMin” survey (“MaxMin”). The purpose of this work was to locate
electromagnetic anomalies, as well as identifying zones and trends that help guide gold exploration. The
survey was completed in October 2015 (Mihelcic, 2015).
Two cable separations were recorded: 50 m and 100 m. The coils were kept horizontal-parallel to each
other. The receiver (“Rx”) led the transmitter (“Tx”) along survey lines and the slope difference between the
Rx and Tx was adjusted using an inclinometer. The 110 Hz setting was used to ‘null’ the in-phase response
of small adjustments to the Tx-Rx coil separation. Readings were recorded as the secondary field
percentage of the primary transmitter field (Mihelcic, 2015). Survey specifications can be found in Table
9-3. Profile responses for the 50 m Tx-Rx separation and 100 m Tx-Rx separation are found in Figure 9-6
and Figure 9-7 respectively.
Table 9-3. HLEM survey parameters.
Survey Parameter
Survey dates
Cable lengths
Line-km
Area covered
Line direction
Line spacing
Station spacing - 50 m cable separation
Station spacing - 100 m cable separation
Coil orientation
Slope calculation
Rx, Tx configuration
System
Frequencies recorded (Hz) - 50 m cable
separation
Frequencies recorded (Hz) - 100 m cable
separation
Parameters measured
Value
October 9-18, 2015
50 m and 100 m
50 m: 6.3 line-km, 100 m: 4.2 line-km
50 m: 0.112 km², 100 m: 0.052 km²
170°
20 m
5m
12.5 m
Horizontal-parallel to each other
Inclinometer
Rx in front, Tx trailing
Apex MaxMin I-10 EM System
L1460E, L1400E, north of 130N on L1380N: 110, 220,
880, 1760, 3520, 7040, 14080, 28160, 56320
All other lines: 110, 7040, 14080, 28160, 56320
All lines: 110, 220, 880, 1760, 3520, 7040, 14080, 28160,
56320
In-phase and quadrature components of secondary
magnetic field, in % of primary field
Page | 81
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-6. Max Min 50 m Tx-Rx separation. In-phase solid lines: 56 kHz (red), 28 kHz (pink), 14 kHz (brown), 7 kHz
(cyan). Quadrature dashed lines: 56 kHz (blue), 28 kHz (maroon), 14 kHz (orange), 7 kHz (green).
Page | 82
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-7. Max Min 100 m Tx-Rx Separation. In-phase solid lines: 56 kHz (red), 28 kHz (pink), 14 kHz (brown), 7
kHz (cyan). Quadrature dashed lines: 56 kHz (blue), 28 kHz (maroon), 14 kHz (orange), 7 kHz (green).
Page | 83
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The highest quadrature response profiles for the 100 m Tx-Rx separation were noted on the southern parts
of lines L1480E – L1600E. The in-phase responses were noted to be relatively weak and highly variable in
the south part of L1540E - L1600E (Mihelcic, 2015).
Eleven anomalies were selected by ClearView Geophysics from the 50 m Tx-Rx separation based on the
in-phase and quadrature response, and are listed in Table 9-4. They are displayed graphically in Figure
9-8.
Table 9-4. Interpreted anomalies of 50 m Tx-Rx separation survey. Selected by ClearView Geophysics Inc.
Anomaly ID Comment
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Strong in-phase and quadrature responses, especially on L1180E and L1200E. Width of anomaly
is less than 25 m suggesting a near or at surface source.
Centre of 25 m wide quadrature and alternating in-phase response. Anomaly extends to outcrops
where samples were taken.
Centre of 25 m wide quadrature and alternating in-phase response. Anomaly extends to outcrops
where samples were taken.
Located in northeast corner of grid, best defined on 14 kHz data. Response is less than 15 m wide
indicating weak near or at surface source.
Located in northeast corner of grid, best defined on 14 kHz data. Response is less than 15 m wide
indicating weak near or at surface source.
Located in northeast corner of grid, best defined on 14 kHz data. Response is less than 15 m wide
indicating weak near or at surface source.
Anomaly noted to coincide with elevated gold assays. Consist of very weak (less than 3%) 56 kHz
quadrature anomalies over a width of approximately 50 m. Anomaly likely the result of subtle
variations from the bedrock.
Anomaly noted to coincide with elevated gold assays. Consist of very weak (less than 3%) 56 kHz
quadrature anomalies over a width of approximately 50 m. Anomaly likely the result of subtle
variations from the bedrock.
Similar, and immediately south to anomalies G and H.
Located at south-east corner of grid. One of the highest amplitude anomalies detected. Marks the
boundary between positive and negative quadrature response. This boundary does not correlate
with the edge of the swamp. Posited to be a bedrock source.
Located at south-east corner of grid. One of the highest amplitude anomalies detected. Although
the anomaly axis is located in a flat overburden-filled area, the source could result from a bedrock
fault zone.
Page | 84
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-8. Anomalies selected by ClearView Geophysics from 50 m Tx-Rx separation HLEM data. Total magnetic
intensity data (Oct 2015) underlain.
Page | 85
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
9.5
Helicopter-borne Gradient Magnetic Survey (Feb 2015)
Red Pine contracted Scott Hogg & associates Ltd. (“Scott Hogg”) to conduct a helicopter-towed gradient
magnetic survey on the Wawa Gold Project. The survey was completed from February 12th – 17th, 2015. A
total of 928 line-km of data were collected (Munro, 2015). The survey covered an area of 37 km2. The
survey parameters are presented in Table 9-5.
Table 9-5. Helicopter-borne gradient magnetic survey parameters
Survey Parameter
Value
Survey dates
Feb 12-17, 2015
Line-km
928 line-km
Area
37 km²
Line direction
090°
Line spacing
50 m
Tie line direction
000°
Tie line spacing
500 m
Terrain clearance
30 m
Heli-GT (contains 4 Scintrex CS3 cesium
sensors in an orthogonal array)
3 m within the array
Magnetic sensor
Magnetic sensor separation
Magnetic sensor resolution
0.005 nT
Magnetic sensor sampling rate
10 Hz
Fluxgate magnetometer
Billingsley TFM100G2 3-axis
Fluxgate magnetometer sampling rate
10 Hz
Radar altimeter
Terra TRA 3500 / TR 140
Radar altimeter sampling rate
10 Hz
Additional data recorded
VLF, GPS
Magnetic base station
GEM SSM19TW proton magnetometer
Alternate diurnal recording
Natural Resources Canada - Ottawa
It was noted that there were times throughout surveying that magnetic base station operated by Scott Hogg
was unable to record due to cold weather conditions. During this time, diurnal magnetic data recorded by
Natural Resources Canada in Ottawa was reviewed for determination of magnetic storms during surveying
(Munro, 2015). Scott Hogg confirmed that the base station channels were used to monitor diurnal activity
but the diurnal correction occurs during the tie-line levelling phase. It is industry-practice to employ at least
one base magnetometer at a survey site to monitor diurnal activity. The diurnal activity recorded by Natural
Resources Canada does not suggest any abnormal solar storm occurring, but the lack of this on-site base
Page | 86
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
station magnetometer could introduce bias in the sampling of the magnetic data. Red Pine was made aware
of the base magnetometer failure and elected to continue with surveying.
The Scott Hogg Heli-GT system consists of a towed bird that contains all of the geophysical sensors as
well as altimeter and GPS antennae (Munro, 2015). The system contains four magnetometers and allows
for calculation of three magnetic gradients G1, G2 and G3, measured from the nose sensor to each of the
radial sensors (Munro, 2015). The sensor in the bird’s nose (“Mag4”) is used as the principal total field
profile. A minor lag is applied to the Mag4 sensor to align the data with the GPS antennae array (Munro,
2015). A visual depiction of the system can be found in Figure 9-9.
Figure 9-9. Overview of the Heli-GT system. The three orthogonal magnetic gradients are measured on 3 m
baselines (from Munro, 2015).
The pitch, roll and yaw of the bird are recorded by Scott Hogg and mathematically used to rotate the
measured gradients to G-north, G-east and G-down, representing the XYZ orthogonal components of the
magnetic field. The GPS altitude data was applied to the lagged magnetic data to produce an altitude
correction. This altitude-corrected data underwent tie-line levelling and final micro-levelling (Munro, 2015).
Page | 87
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Scott Hogg used proprietary gradient tensor software program GT-Grid to produce a total magnetic field
grid from the recorded total magnetic field sensor (Mag4) and the recorded gradients. The total magnetic
field grid is displayed in Figure 9-10. The data was also pole-reduced for the Wawa Gold Project using a
Fast Fourier Transform (“FFT”) filter. An FFT filter was also applied to the data to produce a first vertical
derivative grid (“CVG”), calculated from the pole-reduced total field grid, as can be seen in Figure 9-11. A
half-cosine roll-off filter was included with the vertical derivative operator to reduce short-wavelength noise.
The full wavelength of the noise filter was 30 m (Munro, 2015). A digital terrain model (“DTM”) was
calculated by subtracting the radar altimeter data from the GPS altitude, and was corrected by microlevelling (Munro, 2015). The DTM is displayed in Figure 9-12.
The magnetic survey covers the extents of the Wawa Gold Project. Significant structures such as the
Hornblende Shear, the Jubilee Shear, the Parkhill fault and the Darwin Shear could be identified from this
survey data and can be viewed on Figure 9-13. This information was used to guide gold exploration on the
property.
Page | 88
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-10. Final total magnetic field grid
Page | 89
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-11. Calculated Vertical Gradient of Reduced to Pole Magnetic Grid
Page | 90
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-12. Digital Terrain Model
Page | 91
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-13. Structures noted on CVG results.
Page | 92
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
9.6
2014 Rock Sampling
Red Pine completed a short field program from September 29 to October 3, 2014. The field work was
executed by Brad Leonard, P.Geo., a consultant to Red Pine. The purpose of the program was to collect
structural data and samples from the property (Leonard, 2014). Fifty-nine rock samples were collected
(Figure 9-14). The samples are representative of the outcrop from which they were collected. The assay
results are listed in Table 9-6.
Based on the field observations and sampling, Leonard (2014) concluded that intense alteration was
restricted to the shear zones and the immediate vicinity of the shear zones. He observed three main
structural trends: NNE (e.g., Jubilee shear zone), NNW (e.g., Parkhill shear zone) and EW (e.g., Parkhill
fault).
Page | 93
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-14: Map showing the locations of the grab samples collected by Red Pine in 2014.
Page | 94
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 9-6: List of samples collected by Red Pine in 2104.
Sample #
Area
Easting Northing
22306
Surluga
668230 5317911
22307
Surluga
668251 5317928
22308
Surluga
668251 5317928
22309
Wawa Goldfield
669592 5319119
22310
Wawa Goldfield
669592 5319119
22311
Wawa Goldfield
669587 5319123
22312
Wawa Goldfield
669587 5319123
22313
Mackay
668762 5318441
22314
Mackay
668791 5318470
22315
Surluga Mine
667960 5316853
22316
Cora Shaft
667930 5316220
22317
Cora Shaft
667930 5316220
22318
Cora Shaft
667930 5316220
22319
Cora Shaft
667930 5316220
22320
Cora Shaft
668311 5316955
22321
Jubilee Shaft
668002 5316479
22322
Jubilee Shaft
667997 5316478
22323
Jubilee Shaft
667997 5316478
22324
Jubilee Shaft
667997 5316478
22325
Jubilee Shaft
667973 5316473
22326
Minto Zone B
668161 5315781
22327
Minto Zone B
668190 5315789
22328
Minto Zone B
668190 5315789
22329
Minto Zone B
668165 5315787
22330
Minto Zone B
668141 5315834
22331
Minto Zone A
667976 5315864
22332
Minto Zone A
667976 5315864
22333
Minto Zone A
667976 5315864
22334
Sunrise
668942 5315761
22335
Sunrise
668942 5315761
22336
Sunrise
668942 5315754
22336a
Sunrise
668942 5315754
22337
Sunrise
668942 5315754
22338
Sunrise
668932 5315689
22339
Sunrise
668926 5315679
22340
Sunrise
668724 5315745
22341
Sunrise
668724 5315745
22342
Sunrise
668724 5315745
22343
Mickelson
668718 5315826
22344
Mickelson
668702 5315822
22345
Mickelson
668687 5315822
22346
Mickelson
668712 5315809
22347
Parkhill
668555 5314701
22348
Parkhill
668555 5314701
22349
Parkhill
668555 5314701
22350
Parkhill
668544 5314670
22201
Mariposa Shaft
668794 5314282
Au (ppb)
19
9
7
28
<5
20
77
> 5000
> 5000
<5
2300
18
177
112
<5
22
37
<5
16
<5
638
> 5000
> 5000
12
62
11
14
<5
> 5000
8
> 5000
36
10
> 5000
15
> 5000
13
<5
238
16
971
9
25
25
<5
280
> 5000
Au (g/t)
5.63
14.70
17.00
5.51
9.25
31.90
27.00
15.00
11.00
Page | 95
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Sample #
22202
22203
22204
22205
22206
22207
22208
22209
22210
22211
22212
22213
22214
22215
9.7
Area
Mariposa Shaft
Mariposa Shaft
Mariposa Shaft
EM Conductor
EM Conductor
Nyman
Van Sickle Shaft
Van Sickle Shaft
Van Sickle Shaft
Van Sickle Shaft
Van Sickle Shaft
Parkhill Shear Zone
Parkhill Shear Zone
Parkhill Shear Zone
Easting
668804
668810
668843
668029
668029
668470
668991
668991
668991
668991
668991
668781
668781
668781
Northing
5314280
5314255
5314225
5313446
5313446
5313571
5314866
5314866
5314866
5314866
5314866
5314180
5314180
5314180
Au (ppb)
241
10
163
> 5000
<5
68
3480
<5
7
<5
<5
137
364
16
Au (g/t)
13.50
2015 Rock Sampling
Red Pine collected 277 rock grab samples on the property from July 3 to 31, 2015. The purpose of the
sampling was to characterize historic gold showings in the hanging wall and footwall and the Surluga
deposit and elsewhere on the property (Figure 9-15). Another purpose was to test structures interpreted
from airborne magnetic data (see Section 9.5).
Samples were collected from outcrops and placed in a plastic sample bag together with a pre-labeled
sample tag. Individual samples were placed in rice bags and delivered to the laboratory by Red Pine
personnel. The samples are representative of the outcrop from which they were collected.
Assay highlights are listed in Table 9-7.
Samples from the Sunrise, Parkhill and Jubilee (near the Cora shaft) areas returned gold values of >50 g/t
(Figure 9-15). Samples from the Cooper area and from the Hornblende Shear area north of Surluga (Figure
7-3) returned gold values between 20 and 50 g/t Au. The sample results confirmed that significant gold
grades exist in the historic showings. Channel sampling was completed in some of the areas where rock
samples returned high gold grades (see Section 9.8 2015 Channel Sampling).
Page | 96
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-15: Locations of the rock grab samples collected in 2015.
Prospecting samples represented by white dots are from Augustine’s 2011 program (see Figure 6-2).
Page | 97
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 9-7: Assay highlights of the 2015 grab samples.
Sample #
Field ID
UTM_E
11728 15WG-AC-101
668884
11619 15WG-AC-025
668764
1473023 15WG-BM-025
667930
11701 15WG-AC-080
668944
1473051 15WG-JFM-126
669518
1473059 15WG-JFM-130
669653
11465 grab
668966
11663 15WG-AC-048
668077
11743 15WG-AC-111
668025
11532 15WG-JFM-029
668756
11626 15WG-AC-025
668746
11597 Adam_Gord_Prospecting
668463
11725 15WG-AC-099
668723
11703 15WG-AC-081
668790
1099323 15WG-JFM-073
668399
1473052 15WG-JFM-126
669518
1473087 15WG-JFM-098
668042
11644 15WG-AC-033
668907
1473084 15WG-JFM-099
668079
11618 15WG-AC-024
668958
9.8
UTM_N
5315692
5314700
5316243
5315749
5317996
5317918
5315680
5317498
5313447
5318442
5314695
5315777
5315749
5315707
5315384
5317996
5317460
5315695
5317534
5314842
Au (g/t)
93.0
54.1
50.8
36.3
34.1
25.4
24.9
24.4
18.4
16.6
12.9
10.5
6.9
6.9
3.7
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.7
2015 Channel Sampling
Red Pine collected 144 channel samples from 41 locations from July 3 to 31, 2015 (Figure 9-16, Table 9-8).
The purpose of the channel sampling was to verify historic showings. Channel samples were cut using a
channel saw. The starting point of the channel was recorded in terms of UTM easting and northing; the
elevation was also recorded. In addition, the azimuth of the channel was documented. Samples were
collected in approximately one meter intervals (intervals range from 0.1 to 1.5 m); assay highlights of the
channel samples are listed in Table 9-9. The channel samples are representative of the outcrop from which
they were collected.
The areas investigated with the channel samples were the area around the historic Sunrise shaft, the area
between the historic Van Sickle and Parkhill mines, the area north of the historic Minto mine and an area
north of Highway 101 on dispositions SSM61967 and SSM61972. The best results were obtained from the
Sunrise area with several samples returning gold grades >50 g/t. As a result of the positive prospecting and
channel sample results, this area was selected for follow-up drilling.
Page | 98
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 9-16: Location of the channel samples collected in 2015.
Page | 99
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 9-8: Locations and orientations of the channels sampled in 2015.
Trench ID
Claim
UTM_E UTM_N
Elevation (m)
15WG-AC-009
696679 668159 5315862
348
15WG-AC-010
696679 668154 5315864
349
15WG-AC-011
696679 668215 5315948
349
15WG-AC-012
696679 668251 5315988
352
15WG-AC-014
696679 668226 5315952
349
15WG-AC-018
635653 669020 5314854
347
15WG-AC-019
635653 669033 5314876
346
15WG-AC-020
635653 669035 5314877
346
15WG-AC-021
635653 669046 5314879
345
15WG-AC-022
635653 669054 5314880
343
15WG-AC-023A
635653 669086 5314882
341
15WG-AC-023B
635653 669086 5314882
341
15WG-AC-023C
635653 669086 5314882
341
15WG-AC-025
698917 668764 5314700
339
15WG-AC-026
614798 668943 5315696
352
15WG-AC-031
614798 668904 5315687
353
15WG-AC-032
614798 668903 5315695
354
15WG-AC-034A
614798 668896 5315692
354
15WG-AC-034B
614798 668896 5315692
354
15WG-AC-035
614798 668913 5315683
352
15WG-AC-121
710019 668796 5315832
367
15WG-AC-122
710019 668787 5315834
367
15WG-AC-123
710019 668756 5315817
367
15WG-AC-124
710019 668753 5315821
367
15WG-AC-125A
606820 668721 5315745
371
15WG-AC-125B
606820 668721 5315745
371
15WG-JFM-017
629611 668758 5318439
301
15WG-AC-001
664637 668803 5318479
297
15WG-AC-001A
664637 668803 5318479
297
15WG-AC-004
629611 668766 5318449
300
15WG-AC-006
626116 668212 5315821
350
15WG-AC-008
626116 668163 5315777
348
Mariposa1
661858 668799 5314286
358
Mariposa2
661858 668806 5314278
357
Mickelson1
614798 668931 5315680
350
Mickelson2
614798 668930 5315683
350
Mickelson3
614798 668885 5315690
354
Mickelson4
614798 668884 5315690
354
Mickelson5
614798 668883 5315690
354
Mickelson6
614798 668882 5315691
355
Mickelson7
614798 668881 5315692
353
Length (m)
6.00
4.00
10.00
11.50
1.55
1.70
3.00
0.60
1.00
3.00
0.25
0.35
0.45
4.00
1.50
2.25
2.35
0.35
0.20
2.75
8.00
2.00
5.75
3.00
3.15
0.75
0.95
4.40
3.50
1.50
4.82
6.00
4.00
3.00
4.50
0.35
2.75
0.55
1.60
1.20
0.85
Dip (°)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Azimuth (°)
326
309
315
312
350
338
347
347
43
358
333
333
333
162
17
332
337
20
20
359
326
314
321
229
329
329
329
150
240
148
332
326
180
360
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
Page | 100
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 9-9: Assay highlights of the 2015 channel samples.
Channel #
From (m)
To (m)
15WG-AC-001
0
2
15WG-AC-001A
0
3.5
incl.
2.5
2.88
15WG-AC-008
2
6
incl.
5
6
15WG-AC-025
2
3
15WG-AC-026
0
1.5
incl.
1
1.1
15WG-AC-035
0
2.75
incl.
0
0.7
15WG-AC-125A
0.5
3.15
incl.
1.5
2.25
15WG-JFM-017
0
0.95
Mickelson1
2.1
3.45
Mickelson5
0
1.6
Mickelson7
0
1.2
Interval (m)
2
3.5
0.38
4
1
1
1.5
0.1
2.75
0.7
2.65
0.75
0.95
1.35
1.6
1.2
Weighted Average Au (g/t)
4.16
8.03
53.7
2.64
5.16
9.21
8.22
88.1
28.04
69.5
17.2
54.2
8.55
8.85
18.76
24.23
10.0 DRILLING
Red Pine completed a drilling program consisting of six diamond drill holes totaling 1,573.7 m from
December 3 to 18, 2014 (Figure 10-1). The purpose of the program was to confirm the existence of
historically reported high-grade zones and the geological setting and the character of the mineralization. A
second drilling program was completed from February 13, 2015 to April 15, 2015. The purpose of this
program was to expand the size of the mineralized body and to drill infill holes gaps in the historic drilling
existed. The spring 2015 program consisted of 20 diamond drill holes totaling 4020.77 m.
Another drilling program was completed between October 4 and November 15, 2015. It consisted of 13
diamond drill holes totaling 1571.6 m (Table 10-2). The purpose of the drilling program was to drill test
structures adjacent to the Surluga deposit where gold mineralization was found in surface samples. This
area north of Surluga is called “Hornblende Shear” (see locations of drill holes labeled “HS“ in Figure 10-1).
In addition, another gold-bearing vein systems in the area of the Mickelson-Sunrise Deformation zone was
drilled. Prospecting and channel samples collected in this area returned high gold grades of >50 g/t.
Collar locations were determined using an RTK GPS. Drilling was completed by Norex Drilling of Timmins,
Ontario, in 2014, by Forage Drilling of Sherbrooke, Quebec, in the spring of 2015, and Forage Rouiller of
Page | 101
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Amos, QC, in the fall of 2015. The drill core was oriented using a Reflex ACT II RD core orientation
instrument during all drilling programs; a Reflex TN14 Gyrocomopass was used to orient the drill rig during
the two 2015 programs. The drill core diameter was NQ (47.6 mm) for the first two programs and HQ (63.5
mm) for the fall 2015 program. A Reflex EZ-Shot downhole deviation survey tool was used to determine
the deviation of the drill hole from the planned azimuth and dip. The first deviation reading was taken at a
depth of 10–15 m, subsequent readings were taken every 50 m and at the end of each hole. Core recovery
was >95%.
Table 10-1: Details of Red Pine’s 2014 and early 2015 diamond drill holes.
Hole ID
Easting
Northing
Elevation (m)
Azimuth (°)
SD-14-01
668306
5316785
320
317
SD-14-02
668306
5316786
362
328
SD-14-03
668442
5316567
386
340
SD-14-04
668449
5316300
373
340
SD-14-05
668365
5317013
366
234
SD-14-06
668205
5315775
348
345
SD-15-07
668241
5315919
348
305
SD-15-08
668546
5316251
375
324
SD-15-09
668315
5316460
378
302
SD-15-10
668343
5316352
374
338
SD-15-11
668272
5316498
384
300
SD-15-12
668271
5316497
384
320
SD-15-13
668322
5316532
386
318
SD-15-14
668341
5316090
361
323
SD-15-15
668219
5316237
372
323
SD-15-16
668256
5316336
371
321
SD-15-17
668289
5316374
370
337
SD-15-18
668172
5316367
371
325
SD-15-19
668141
5316463
364
326
SD-15-20
668219
5316593
370
326
SD-15-21
668163
5316660
353
320
SD-15-22
668248
5316729
353
320
SD-15-23
668186
5316802
351
320
SD-15-24
668166
5316869
353
314
SD-15-25
668455
5317006
369
225
SD-15-26
668498
5316263
383
325
TOTAL
Dip (°)
−65
−65
−62
−65
−47
−45
−56
−60
−57
−57
−57
−60
−65
−56
−55
−55
−62
−60
−59
−59
−50
−60
−50
−56
−55
−67
Length (m)
127.7
231.0
309.0
330.0
234.0
342.0
279.0
363.8
240.0
255.0
228.0
163.1
213.0
291.0
195.0
180.0
210.0
115.8
135.0
123.0
75.0
99.0
99.0
171.0
240.0
345.1
5,594.5
Page | 102
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 10-2: Details of Red Pine’s fall 2015 drilling program.
Hole ID
UTM_E
UTM_N
Elevation (m)
Azimuth (°)
Dip (°)
Depth (m)
HS-15-27
668091
5317471
340.7
345
-65
130
HS-15-28
668057
5317403
340.8
342
-65
82.8
HS-15-29
668122
5317297
344.3
350
-70
211
HS-15-30
668094
5317233
348.7
350
-70
208
HS-15-31
668253
5316810
357.6
310
-56
385
SM-15-32
668918
5315678
351.0
325
-47
53.8
SM-15-33
668939
5315706
352.5
215
-47
82
SM-15-34
668962
5315707
352.4
215
-47
82
SM-15-35
668964
5315707
352.4
145
-45
100
SM-15-36
668951
5315772
348.2
210
-50
52
SM-15-37
668897
5315675
351.9
325
-47
58
SM-15-38
668720
5315742
371.1
25
-47
75
SM-15-39
668724
5315758
369.8
190
-50
52
1571.6
Page | 103
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 10-1: Drill plan map showing the collar locations and traces of the 2014 and 2015 drill holes.
The area containing HS- drill holes is known as the “Hornblende Shear” area.
Page | 104
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The core was transported from the drill rig to Red Pines secure core logging facility in Wawa by the drilling
company (Figure 10-3). At the logging facility, the core was measured and photographed (wet and dry).
Red Pine personnel logged the core in detail using a custom-made, Microsoft Access-based logging
database. Magnetic susceptibility and structural information, including fractures, veins etc., were also
recorded. Overburden thickness ranged from 0.16 m to 6.52 m and averaged 1.83 m. Core recovery
exceeded 95%.
Figure 10-2: Drill collar location for SD-14-01 and SD-14-02.
Page | 105
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 10-3: Red Pine's core logging facility in Wawa.
10.1
Results
Red Pine analyzed 597 drill core samples from the 2014 drill core, 1,901 samples from the core drilled in
the spring of 2015 and 1,102 samples from the core drilled in the fall of 2015. Typical sample intervals were
one metre in the mineralized zone and two metres outside the mineralized zone. During the fall 2015
program, the maximum sample length was decreased to 1.5 m to keep to keep the sample weight
reasonable because the core diameter had been increased from NQ to HQ. Assay highlights are shown in
Table 10-3 and Table 10-4. The current sampling length of approximately 1m to 2 m allows an adequate
characterization of the gold grade variation within the shear zone.
Page | 106
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 10-3: Assay highlights for Red Pine's 2014 and spring 2015 drilling program.
Hole #
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)*
Au (g/t)**
SD-14-01
75.50
78.10
2.60
2.61
incl.
77.00
78.10
1.10
4.72
SD-14-01
107.07
109.60
2.53
3.15
SD-14-02
80.5
82.5
2.00
3.85
SD-14-02
119.50
128.38
8.88
3.58
incl.
119.50
120.50
1.00
8.28
and
121.50
122.42
0.92
6.06
and
125.50
126.50
1.00
11.30
SD-14-03
255.00
260.00
5.00
3.22
incl.
257.00
258.00
1.00
8.17
SD-14-03
264.10
271.80
7.70
8.89
incl.
265.10
266.20
1.10
20.50
and
266.53
267.30
0.77
15.00
and
268.50
270.70
2.20
14.23
SD-14-04
253.18
288.50
35.32
5.72
incl.
263
264
1.00
11.60
and
267
267.77
0.77
11.60
and
275.6
276.6
1.00
11.80
and
281.5
282.5
1.00
11.40
SD-14-05
148.25
162.25
14.00
7.25
incl.
155.00
161.00
6.00
15.33
SD-14-06
10.61
18.00
7.39
1.71
incl.
10.61
12.45
1.84
6.05
SD-14-06
292.33
322.50
30.17
2.64
incl.
302.2
303.3
1.10
11.90
and
320.46
321.5
1.04
42.30
SD-15-07
66.00
68.00
2.00
13.65
SD-15-07
237.00
252.00
15.00
2.19
incl.
247.00
248.00
1.00
9.25
SD-15-08
328.35
329.35
1.00
11.50
SD-15-10
228.39
229.40
1.01
16.20
SD-15-11
195.50
196.50
1.00
53.20
SD-15-11
216.00
217.00
1.00
51.70
SD-15-12
151.10
152.10
1.00
5.00
incl.
254.11
255.00
0.89
8.49
SD-15-14
253.00
257.00
4.00
2.17
SD-15-14
266.00
273.18
7.18
2.57
incl.
268.80
269.80
1.00
9.99
and
273.00
273.18
0.18
5.00
SD-15-14
281.00
285.48
4.48
3.16
incl.
282.00
283.00
1.00
11.20
SD-15-15
166.00
174.00
8.00
1.04
SD-15-19
72.00
79.60
7.60
1.67
incl.
74.48
76.50
2.02
4.88
SD-15-19
84.60
85.60
1.00
5.11
SD-15-22
54.70
57.00
2.30
2.48
incl.
56.04
57.00
0.96
5.67
Page | 107
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Hole #
SD-15-22
SD-15-23
SD-15-24
SD-15-25
SD-15-25
SD-15-26
incl.
SD-15-26
From (m)
72.00
30.60
161.00
198.75
231.70
275.00
287.10
298.13
To (m)
75.00
31.60
162.00
205.75
232.70
288.10
288.10
299.13
Interval (m)*
3.00
1.00
1.00
7.00
1.00
13.10
1.00
1.00
Au (g/t)**
1.88
3.86
2.88
2.19
2.35
3.60
17.89
11.20
*Intervals are sample lengths and do not represent the true thicknesses of the mineralization
** weighted average gold grades
Table 10-4: Assay highlights for Red Pine’s fall 2015 drilling program.
Hole #
From (m)
To (m)
Interval (m)*
Weighted Average Au (g/t)**
HS-15-27
25.00
33.10
8.10
2.96
incl.
26.00
27.40
1.40
9.70
and
28.40
29.73
1.33
3.28
HS-15-28
25.95
41.30
15.35
1.25
HS-15-29
147.00
150.00
3.00
1.58
incl.
148.00
149.00
1.00
3.05
HS-15-29
165.00
171.00
6.00
0.84
HS-15-30
1.50
14.00
12.50
1.78
incl.
10.00
11.40
1.40
3.82
and
12.84
14.00
1.16
5.22
HS-15-30
153.50
164.83
11.33
1.33
incl.
155.97
157.52
1.55
3.21
HS-15-31
57.50
84.00
26.50
2.92
incl.
65.00
66.00
1.00
3.06
and
76.00
77.00
1.00
3.91
and
80.00
81.00
1.00
3.45
HS-15-31
178.50
200.50
22.00
1.01
HS-15-31
347.50
356.00
8.50
5.37
incl.
350.50
351.50
1.00
25.30
and
352.50
353.40
0.90
15.70
SM-15-32
21.40
22.00
0.60
6.65
SM-15-35
41.00
41.75
0.75
28.06
SM-15-37
6.10
7.00
0.90
1.04
*Intervals are sample lengths and do not represent the true thicknesses of the mineralization
** weighted average gold grades
Page | 108
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
10.1.1 Surluga area
In the Surluga area, the mineralization forms zones in a tabular body striking north and dipping 30–35° to
the east and plunging to the south at 12°, with a true thickness up to 75 m locally. The drill holes in this
area were included in the resource estimated.
10.1.2 Sunrise-Mickelson area
This area was drilled because of the results from the prospecting and channel samples. SM-15-32, 35 and
-37 intersected possible extensions of the veins found on surface at 21 m, 41 m and 6 m, however,
insufficient drilling was completed in this area to provide full understanding of the vein extent. The
relationship between the sample lengths and the true thickness of the mineralization and the orientation of
the mineralization are not known at this stage.
10.1.3 Hornblende Shear area
Limited modern exploration had been completed west of the historic Surluga mine in the “Hornblende
Shear” area (Figure 7-3), located approximately 300 m west of the Jubilee Shear zone. A historic shaft may
have occurred in this area but little evidence remains. Red Pine collected rock samples from the area in
2015 and one sample returned 24.4 g/t Au. Five holes were drilled in the Hornblende Shear area in 2015.
The Hornblende Shear strikes northeast and dips ~25-35° to the southeast. It is interpreted to be subparallel
to the Jubilee shear zone. Several drill holes intersected gold mineralization. Drill hole HS-15-31 was drilled
to the northwest (310°). It intersected mineralization that is part of the Jubilee shear zone between ~60 and
80 m and mineralization that is interpreted to be part of the Hornblende Shear at 350 m. The relationship
between the sample lengths and the true thickness of the mineralization is not known at this stage. Based
on limited drilling, the orientation of the mineralization is interpreted to coincide with the orientation of the
Hornblende Shear.
Ronacher McKenzie did not determine any drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that could materially
impact the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Page | 109
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY
11.1
Historic Samples
No information is available about the sample preparation, analyses and security of historic drill core.
However, Duke (2012) assumed that core from surface drill holes was split using a core splitter and that
core from underground drill holes were either assayed as whole core or also split by a core splitter. Duke
(2012) also indicated that samples may have been analyzed by an assay laboratory on site initially. In the
1980s and 1990s, the samples were likely sent to Wawa Assay Laboratory, an unaccredited laboratory in
Wawa. Duke (2012) assumed the assay method to have been fire assay with a gravimetric finish. No
information about quality control measures and sample security is available.
11.2
Wawa GP Inc. 2007 Samples
Details about the sample preparation, analyses and security of core samples from Wawa GP’s 2007 drilling
program were described by Duke (2012). The core was cut in half using a core saw; one half was returned
to the core box, the other half was put in a sample bag and sent to Accurassay Laboratories (“Accurassay”)
in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Accurassay is accredited for gold under the ISO/IEC 17025 guideline. At
Accurassay, the samples were dried, crushed, split and pulverized. A 30 g aliquot was used for fire assay
analysis with an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. Accurassay is independent of Augustine (Duke
2012).
Wawa GP inserted 12 blanks and three standards into the sample stream. In addition, Accurassay repeated
one analysis for every 10 samples (Duke, 2012).
Sample security was described by Dow (2011): core was moved from the drill rig to the logging area by the
drillers. Samples were transported to Accurassay by a bonded carrier.
11.3
Augustine 2011 Samples
Duke (2012) described the sampling procedure for the drill core from Augustine’s 2011 drilling program.
The core was transported from the drill rig to Augustine’s secure logging and storage facility in Wawa. The
core was cut in half using a core saw. One half was returned to the core box, the other half was put in a
sample bag with a pre-numbered sample tag. Multiple sample bags were collected in rice bags; the rice
bags were sealed, placed in pails and shipped to Accurassay by Greyhound. Accurassay is accredited for
gold under the ISO/IEC 17025 guideline. Accurassay is independent of Augustine.
Page | 110
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Accurassay dried and crushed the sample to −8 mesh (2.38 mm). A subsample was pulverized and 30 g
of the pulverized material was analyzed by fire assay with an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. Duke
(2012) concluded that the sample collection, preparation and security for the 2011 drilling program were
adequate.
11.4
2014 and 2015 Prospecting and Channel Samples
The 2014 and 2015 prospecting and channel samples were collected by Red Pine personnel and put in
plastic sample bags with pre-labeled tags; several samples were collected in rice bags and transported to
the laboratory by Red Pine personnel. No quality control samples were added. Sample preparation and
analytical procedures were the same as for the 2014 and 2015 drill core samples (Section 11.5).
11.5
Red Pine 2014/2015 Samples
Drill core was transported from the drill rig to the core logging facility by the drill contractor. The core
collected by Red Pine during the 2014–2015 drilling program was sampled in regular intervals of ~1 m
within the mineralized zone and ~2 m outside the immediate mineralized zone observing lithological
contacts. Maximum sample lengths for HQ core (fall 2015 program) was 1.5 m. The core was cut using a
core saw. A total of 1901 samples were collected during the 2014 and spring 2015 programs and 1102
samples during the fall 2015 program. Standards and blanks were inserted in the samples stream every 20
samples and 25 samples, respectively. The standards used are listed in Table 11-1 and Table 11-2. Silica
sand was used as blank. During the 2014 and spring 2015 programs, 138 standards and 112 blanks were
inserted. Six core duplicates were inserted. During the 2015 program, 52 blanks and 55 standards were
inserted. No core duplicates were submitted for assaying. The assay laboratory inserted preparation and
pulp duplicates.
Core samples were put into a plastic bag together with a pre-numbered sample tag. Individual bags were
put into rice bags and transported to Activation Laboratories Ltd. (“Actlabs”) in Ancaster or Timmins,
Ontario, by Red Pine personnel. Each rice bag also has a pre-numbered tag. Actlabs is an ISO/IEC 17025
certified laboratory and fire assay analysis is within the scope of this accreditation at Actlabs Timmins,
Sudbury and Ancaster laboratories, the three locations where assays were performed. There is no
relationship between Augustine and Actlabs.
The remaining drill core is stored in Red Pine’s secure drill core logging and outdoor storage facility (Figure
11-1).
Page | 111
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 11-1: Secure core storage area next to Red Pine’s core logging facility in Wawa, Ontario.
11.5.1 Analytical Procedures
Two analytical packages were selected by Red Pine: (1) Fire-assay with an AAS finish and (2) Screen
metallics on 1000 g of samples.
For the fire-assay analysis, the entire sample is crushed to −10 mesh (1.7 mm), mechanically split and an
aliquot of 250 g is pulverized to at least 95% −150 mesh (105 μm). For the fall 2015 samples, an aliquot of
500 g was pulverized to at least 95% −150 mesh (105 μm). Thirty grams of the pulverized sample were
used for the fire assay procedure for the 2014 and the spring 2015 samples. Fifty grams of the pulverized
sample were used for the fire assay procedure for the fall 2015 samples. Gold analysis was completed by
AAS.
Page | 112
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
For the metallic screen analysis, typically a 1000 g split (up to 2000 g) is sieved at 100 mesh (149 μm).
Assays are performed on the entire +100 mesh and on two splits of the −100 mesh fraction. The final assay
is calculated using the weight and gold analysis of each fraction.
Table 11-1: Standards used during the 2014 Red Pine drilling program.
Standard Name* Certified Standard Method
Matrix
Au (g/t)
Deviation
Oreas 205
1.244 0.053
FA-AAS
tholeiitic basalt and sulfide-bearing (pyrite,
arsenopyrite) gold ore in quartz-sericite-carbonate
schist assemblage
Oreas 206
2.197 0.081
FA-AAS
same
Oreas 904
0.045 0.0043
FA-INAA oxide Cu ore hosted by carbonaceous sandstone and
siltstone
*All standards are produced by Ore Research & Exploration Pty.
Table 11-2: List of standards used during the fall 2015 drilling program.
Standard
Certified Standard
Method
Matrix
Name*
Au g/t
Deviation
Oreas 12a
11.79
0.24 FA-AAS
sulfide-bearing (pyrite, arsenopyrite) gold ore in quartzsericite-carbonate schist assemblage
Oreas 19a
5.49
0.10 FA-AAS
alkali olivine basalt and sulfide-bearing (pyrite,
arsenopyrite) gold ore in quartz-sericite-carbonate
schist assemblage
Oreas 205
0.75
0.03 FA-AAS
tholeiitic basalt and sulfide-bearing (pyrite,
arsenopyrite) gold ore in quartz-sericite-carbonate
schist assemblage
Oreas 202
1.24
0.05 FA-AAS
tholeiitic basalt and sulfide-bearing (pyrite,
arsenopyrite) gold ore in quartz-sericite-carbonate
schist assemblage
*All standards are produced by Ore Research & Exploration Pty.
The Qualified Person concludes that the sample preparation, security and analytical procedures are
adequate for the purpose of this report. For future quality assurance programs, Ronacher McKenzie
recommends the inclusion of core duplicates in regular intervals.
11.5.2 Physical Rock Property Measurements
Magnetic susceptibility and specific gravity (“SG”) on the drill core were recorded by Red Pine. SG was
determined by weighing a piece of core in air and in water and by calculating SG using the formula:
Page | 113
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
SG
Figure 11-2: SG measurement at Red Pine's core logging facility.
Page | 114
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
11.6
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programs
Quality control measures are typically set in place to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of exploration
data. These measures include written field procedures and independent verifications of aspects such as
drilling, surveying, sampling and assaying, data management, and database integrity. Appropriate
documentation of quality control measures and regular analysis of quality control data are important as a
safeguard for project data and form the basis for the quality assurance program implemented during
exploration.
Analytical control measures typically involve internal and external laboratory control measures implemented
to monitor the precision and accuracy of the sampling, preparation, and assaying. They are also important
to prevent sample mix-up and to monitor the voluntary or inadvertent contamination of samples. Assaying
protocols typically involve regularly duplicating and replicating assays and inserting quality control samples
to monitor the reliability of assaying results delivered by the assaying laboratories. Check assaying is
normally performed as an additional test of the reliability of assaying results. This generally involves reassaying a set number of sample rejects and pulps at a secondary umpire laboratory.
This technical report concerns the exploration work completed by Red Pine between 2014 and 2015. The
review focuses on the analytical results for the new drilling completed by Red Pine and informing the mineral
resources. Analytical quality control data from Augustine drilling in 2011 are summarized in the previous
technical report by WGM (Duke, 2012). The authors concluded that the exploration data of Augustine were
acquired using generally accepted industry best practices. SRK also reviewed the available Augustine data
and found it sufficiently reliable. SRK is not aware of any analytical quality control data produced by earlier
project operators.
Red Pine relied partly on the internal analytical quality control measures implemented by Activation
Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs). In addition, Red Pine implemented external analytical control measures
consisting of the use of control samples (blanks, certified reference materials and duplicate samples)
inserted in all sample batches submitted for assaying. Umpire check assaying was not performed.
Five certified gold reference materials sourced from commercial suppliers were used (Table 11-3). Silica
sand provided by Actlabs was used as a field blank. Only six field duplicate samples were collected early
in the 2014 program. The duplicate sample was collected by splitting the remaining half core in two and
taking one quarter of the remaining core as sample material.
Page | 115
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 11-3: Specifications of Control Samples Used By Red Pine (2014-2015)
Reference
Material
OREAS 205
OREAS 206
OREAS 904
OREAS 12a
OREAS 19a
Source
Ore Research
Ore Research
Ore Research
Ore Research
Ore Research
Au
(g/t)
1.244
2.197
0.045
11.79
5.49
Standard
Deviation
0.0530
0.0810
0.0043
0.2400
0.1000
Sample
Count
48
12
10
34
34
11.6.1 SRK Comments
In the opinion of SRK, the sampling preparation, security, and analytical procedures used by Red Pine to
collect samples from the Surluga gold deposit are consistent with generally accepted industry best practices
and are, therefore, adequate. The sampling preparation, security, and analytical procedures used by
Augustine are well documented and appear to be adequate. Historical sampling preparation, security, and
analytical procedures are unknown and as such SRK cannot comment on its adequacy.
The analysis of the available analytical quality control data is presented in the following section.
11.7
Ground Magnetic Survey (Dec 2014 – Jan 2015)
The diurnal variation of the ground magnetic survey was examined for any deviations that exceeded 3 nT
peak-to-peak over a 1 minute chord. When noted, these artifacts were removed from the database so that
they were not introduced into the final data when the diurnal values are subtracted from the recorded
airborne data. The integrity of the survey magnetometer data was also viewed graphically in profile form to
ensure that no gaps exist and that the noise specifications are met. A fourth difference with normalized
tolerance of 20 nT was applied to the raw ground magnetic data to locate and correct any small steps and/or
spikes in the data. The only significant area identified in the fourth difference filter coincided with an area
of known culture, as communicated by the client. This data was removed from the final database. It is
expected, given the nature of a ground magnetic survey, for the results to be slightly noisier than those
presented by an airborne survey.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report judges these QA/QC criteria to be acceptable
thresholds for the collection of ground magnetic survey data.
Page | 116
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
11.8
IP/Res Survey (Dec 2014)
The original, raw time-domain IP files were provided to Red Pine for review in Geosoft Oasis Montaj. The
IP decays and resistivity values were reviewed in the IP QC utility visually. The final cole-cole Spectral IP
data was also provided and gridded for review against the final products provided by ClearView.
An *.inv file was provided for each line detailing the inversion parameters and convergence limits. Each file
was set with convergence limit of 1 with one cell per station spacing. Each inversion converged.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report judges this quality control method to be acceptable
for the collection of IP/Res survey data and corresponding inversions.
11.9
Ground Magnetic Survey (Oct 2015)
The diurnal variation of the ground magnetic survey was examined for any deviations that exceeded 3 nT
peak-to-peak over a 1 minute chord. No instances were noted. The integrity of the survey magnetometer
data was viewed graphically in profile form to ensure no gaps exist and that noise specifications were met.
A fourth difference of 20 nT was applied to the raw ground magnetic data to locate any spikes in the data.
This corresponded to the ‘Noise’ channel provided by ClearView. All data flagged in the Noise channel was
removed by ClearView in the final database. Given the walk-mode of the survey and close location to the
ground, it is expected for the results to be slightly noisier than those presented by an airborne survey.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report judges these QA/QC criteria to be acceptable
thresholds for the collection of ground magnetic survey data.
11.10 HLEM Survey (Oct 2015)
ClearView employed the quality control procedures outlined in the MaxMin instrumentation manual (Apex
Parametrics, 1998). The transmitter and receiver were held symmetrically during measurements. The tilt
test monitor was reviewed continuously, allowing for manual correction of the transmitter and receiver
planes. The battery was also monitored, as sufficient voltage is required to drive the prescribed current
through the transmitter coil for each recorded frequency.
Page | 117
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
To account for minor variations in the coil separation, the 110 Hz in-phase response was subtracted from
the higher frequencies to remove the incorrectly calculated primary field. This is considered industry
standard and is acceptable as there were no major conductors noted in the area.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report judges these QA/QC criteria to be acceptable
thresholds for the collection of ground magnetic survey data.
11.11 Helicopter-borne Gradient Magnetic Survey (Feb 2015)
The radar altimeter was tested for a 30 m tolerance ± 10 m over a distance of 100 m. The areas found to
be out of specification were valleys between topographic highs and tree covered low-land areas. The
average altimeter reading in these areas was approximately 40 m.
The flight-line separation was tested for a nominal separation of 50 m, maximum separation of 75 m, and
a line separation greater than 65 m over a distance greater than 50 m. The majority of the survey area was
within specification, but several areas were noted to have line separation of 75 m to 80 m. The sample
separation was tested and all samples are 4 m apart or less.
The integrity of the survey magnetometer data was also viewed graphically in profile form to ensure that no
gaps exist and that the noise specifications are met. A fourth difference with normalized tolerance of 1 nT
was applied to each of the raw magnetic channels to locate and correct any small steps and/or spikes in
the data. No significant areas were noted.
Due to the failure of the base magnetometer at the survey site, the quality of the diurnal activity could not
be verified. Given the ability to resolve major structures from this dataset, as was the intention of this survey,
this data is considered to be adequate for the purposes of this technical report.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report judges these QA/QC criteria provided adequate
confidence in the data collection and processing of the airborne gradient magnetic survey data.
Page | 118
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
12.0 DATA VERIFICATION
12.1
Data Verification by Red Pine
The exploration work completed by Red Pine was conducted using documented procedures and involved
extensive verifications and validation of exploration data. During drilling, experienced Red Pine geologists
implement industry standard measures designed to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the
exploration data.
Red Pine monitored the analytical quality control data on a real-time basis. Failures of quality control
samples were investigated and appropriate actions taken, including potentially requesting re-assaying of
certain batches of samples.
Following the acquisition of the project, Red Pine initiated a review of the electronic exploration data in
relation to the original paper reports, drill logs, sections and plans. Red Pine fixed various discrepancies in
the digitization of the project database, including re-locating 27 underground boreholes.
12.2
Data Verification by SRK
SRK completed a series of verifications to ensure that the geological information and the electronic data
provided by Red Pine are reliable for modelling the geology and the mineral resources of the Wawa Gold
Project. The verifications include a site inspection, independent verification sampling, verification of the
electronic data, and a review of the analytical data with emphasis on analysis of analytical quality control
data produced by Red Pine in 2014. The following sections summarizes the verifications completed by
SRK.
12.2.1 Independent Verification Sampling
As part of the verification procedures, SRK collected a total of forty-two verification samples. Fourteen
samples were collected from core drilled by Red Pine, eleven samples were collected from core drilled by
Augustine in 2011, four samples were collected from core drilled by Citadel Gold Mines in 1988, and
fourteen samples were collected from historical underground drilling by Surluga Gold Mines in 1968. The
verification samples were collected by splitting the remaining half core to replicate historical sample
intervals where possible. Verification samples were submitted to the ALS Minerals Laboratory
(ALS Minerals) in Sudbury, Ontario for preparation along with one blank and one certified reference material
control sample. Final analyses were completed at ALS Minerals in North Vancouver, BC.
Page | 119
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The ALS Minerals laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia, and the preparation laboratory in
Sudbury, Ontario are accredited under ISO/IEC 17025:2005 certification by the Standards Council of
Canada (accreditation numbers 579 and 689) for various testing procedures including the procedures used
to assay the samples submitted by SRK. SRK samples were assayed for gold using a standard fire assay
procedure with atomic absorption finish on thirty gram sub-samples or by metallic screen. Assay certificates
for the SRK samples are presented in Appendix 3.
Such a small sample size cannot be considered representative to verify the gold grades obtained by Red
Pine, Augustine, Citadel Gold Mines, and Surluga Gold Mines. The purpose of the verification sampling
was only to confirm that there is gold mineralization in the core from the Wawa Gold Project sampled by
SRK. Assay results for the verification samples confirm the presence of gold in the core sampled by SRK
(Table 12-1). The analytical results show that the SRK verification samples generally reproduce the Red
Pine and Augustine sampling results reasonable well. There are, however, larger discrepancies between
the SRK data and the historical results from Citadel and Surluga.
Table 12-1: Assay Results for Verification Samples Collected by SRK on the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit
Borehole
Operator
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
SD14-03
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
AV-11-015
S307
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Red Pine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Augustine
Citadel
From
(m)
246.68
247.80
248.80
249.80
251.00
251.98
253.00
254.00
255.00
256.00
257.00
258.00
259.00
260.00
212.32
212.95
213.29
213.77
214.20
214.90
218.80
219.20
219.65
220.04
220.41
303.28
To
(m)
247.80
248.80
249.80
251.00
251.98
253.00
254.00
255.00
256.00
257.00
258.00
259.00
260.00
261.00
212.95
213.29
213.77
214.20
214.90
215.80
219.20
219.65
220.04
220.41
221.26
304.80
Length
(m)
1.12
1.00
1.00
1.20
0.98
1.02
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.63
0.34
0.48
0.43
0.70
0.90
0.40
0.45
0.39
0.37
0.85
1.52
Original
(g/t Au)
0.07
1.96
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.28
0.39
3.47
1.72
8.17
0.07
2.65
0.77
3.84
2.86
0.89
0.22
0.60
3.00
11.72
7.89
0.14
0.03
0.01
5.97
ALS Minerals
(g/t Au)
0.05
3.37
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.09
0.12
0.45
2.72
1.64
9.45
0.05
4.00
1.21
5.72
2.93
0.51
0.84
3.69
2.05
17.20
6.99
0.38
0.03
0.01
0.39
Page | 120
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Borehole
Operator
S307
S307
S307
U0335L5
U0335L5
U0335L5
U0335L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
U1660L5
Citadel
Citadel
Citadel
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
Surluga
From
(m)
304.80
306.48
307.24
13.70
14.48
15.24
16.03
16.15
17.07
18.44
19.96
20.88
22.25
22.86
17.89
26.67
To
(m)
306.48
307.24
308.15
14.48
15.24
16.03
16.76
17.07
17.98
19.96
20.88
22.25
22.86
23.77
18.44
27.06
Length
(m)
1.68
0.76
0.91
0.78
0.76
0.79
0.73
0.92
0.91
1.52
0.92
1.37
0.61
0.91
0.55
0.39
Original
(g/t Au)
0.75
8.71
22.59
11.00
0.69
11.31
1.71
0.27
3.57
2.67
0.55
5.01
2.19
0.21
-
ALS Minerals
(g/t Au)
0.27
0.99
2.39
0.19
0.01
0.24
0.08
0.34
6.77
0.37
2.21
2.98
1.36
6.87
11.55
0.12
12.2.2 Verification of Electronic Analytical Data
Red Pine provided assay certificates for all batches of samples analyzed at Actlabs in 2014 and 2015, in
addition to the assay certificates from Accurassay Laboratories, from Thunder Bay, Ontario, for the
Augustine drilling in 2011. SRK verified the sample numbers and gold values recorded in the digital data
against electronic assay certificates (pdf format). SRK checked approximately 5 percent of the analytical
database entries for the drilling completed by Red Pine and Augustine.
No input errors were detected. SRK concludes that the digital analytical results reflect the analytical results
delivered by Actlabs for the 2014-2015 drilling program completed by Red Pine, and by Accurassay
Laboratories for the 2011 drilling program completed by Augustine.
SRK noticed that in the digital database, Augustine analytical results for gold were rounded to the second
decimal place, while the assay certificates delivered by Accurassay report gold assays to three decimal
places. No rounding errors were detected.
To the extent possible, SRK also verified other electronic data (surveying and logging tables) contained in
the Wawa Gold Project exploration database. The location of historical underground boreholes were
checked against scanned mine plan maps and for consistency in relation to adjoining boreholes. No major
issues were detected.
Page | 121
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
12.2.3 Verification of Analytical Quality Control Data
Red Pine provided to SRK assay results for the external analytical quality control samples for the period
2014 to spring 2015. The data was provided by Red Pine in the form of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets.
External quality control samples comprise field blanks, certified reference materials and field duplicated.
SRK aggregated the assay results of the external analytical control samples for further analysis. Sample
blank and certified reference material data were summarized on time series plots to highlight the
performance of the control samples. Field duplicates were analyzed using bias charts, quantile-quantile,
and relative precision plots.
The analytical quality control data produced by Red Pine between 2014 and 2015 are summarized in Table
12-2 and presented in graphical format in Figure 12-1 and Figure 12-2. The external quality control data
produced represents 10 percent of the Red Pine produced analytical data (2,525 samples).
Table 12-2: Summary of Analytical Quality Control Data Produced by Red Pine on the Surluga–Jubilee Gold Deposit
Sample Count
Blanks
QC samples
OREAS 205
OREAS 206
OREAS 904
OREAS 12a
OREAS 19a
Field Duplicates
Total QC Samples
Core
2,525
112
138
48
12
10
34
34
6
256
(%) Comment
4.44%
5.47%
Ore Research (1.244 g/t)
Ore Research (2.197 g/t)
Ore Research (0.045 g/t)
Ore Research (11.79 g/t)
Ore Research (5.49 g/t)
0.24%
10.14%
In general, the performance of the control samples is acceptable. Blanks consistently yielded values at or
below the detection limit with no sample above ten times the detection limit of 0.005 g/t gold. The highest
blank sample (1472053) assayed in 2015 graded 0.039 g/t gold. This sample was not inserted with higher
grade samples thus eliminating sample contamination as a possible cause. Overall the sample blanks
performed very well.
The certified reference material samples are generally within expected limits of two standard deviations
with a few failures. An initial review revealed a number of outliers indicating mislabelled control samples.
These errors were subsequently corrected by Red Pine. Globally, the results show that Actlabs is able to
return analytical results within expected limits for the control samples tested.
Page | 122
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Only six field duplicates were collected. Such a small sample group cannot be considered representative
so as to verify if a sampling bias was introduced.
Based on the review of the analytical quality control data, SRK concludes that the analytical results
delivered by Actlabs are sufficiently reliable to inform mineral resource estimation. In the opinion of SRK,
the analytical data acquired by Red Pine for the Wawa Gold Project does not present evidence of bias.
WGM reviewed the analytical data acquired by Augustine in 2011 and concluded that the data were
sufficiently trustworthy to inform mineral resources (Duke, 2012). SRK also reviewed the Augustine
analytical quality control data from 2007 and 2011 and found no evidence of bias.
In 2011, Augustine drilled 12 vertical boreholes to validate the data contained in the historical database
from Citadel Gold Mines. Borehole casings were found at 9 of the 12 twin borehole sites. Their location
corresponds to the location in the digital database. WGM noted a significant difference between the gold
assays in the historical database and the assays from the 12 twin boreholes. WGM’s comparison showed
that, using grade composites with historically unsampled intervals given a value of zero, there is 24 percent
less gold in the boreholes drilled by Augustine in 2011. WGM concluded that despite not being able to
explain the differences in the twin boreholes that the historical database, excluding the underground drilling,
was sufficiently reliable to be considered for mineral resource evaluation.
On the basis of the review of the Red Pine and Augustine data, SRK concludes that despite the lack of
extensive analytical quality control data for a significant portion of the exploration database, the analytical
data are generally sufficiently reliable to support geology and mineral resource modelling. The lack of
analytical quality control data for the historical data cast some uncertainty in the reliability of the historical
analytical data. This is compounded by the poor results of the 2011 twin drilling program. These risks should
be taken into consideration in the classification of any mineral resources informed from the historical data.
SRK recommends that Augustine conduct additional verification of the historical sampling data with a focus
on validating the historical assay results. In light of the results of the 2011 twin borehole program, the
verifications should include re-sampling of selected sections of archived core for check assaying and
additional verification and validation drilling. SRK also recommends that Augustine submit a portion of pulp
rejects from newly acquired drilling data to an umpire laboratory for check assaying.
Page | 123
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
0.8
Time Series for Silica Field Blank
(Actlabs; 2014-2015 Core Samples)
N = 112
Time Series for Reference Material OREAS 205
(Actlabs; 2014-2015 Core Samples)
Blank
0.7
1.7
10x Detection Limit
0.6
1.5
Gold Assay (g/t)
Gold Assay (g/t)
OREAS 205
Expected Value
+2StdDev
-2StdDev
N = 48
0.5
0.4
0.3
1.3
1.1
0.2
0.9
0.1
0.0
1471025 1471277 1472025 1471975 1472323 10172
10473
10737
11027
0.7
1471082 1471293 1472030 1471896 1472250 1472430 10400
11327
Time Series for Reference Material OREAS 206
(Actlabs; 2014 Core Samples)
2.8
0.10
N = 12
OREAS 206
Expected Value
+2StdDev
-2StdDev
2.6
2.4
0.09
11000
11240
2.2
2.0
Time Series for Reference Material OREAS 904
(Actlabs; 2014 Core Samples)
OREAS 904
Expected Value
+2StdDev
-2StdDev
N = 10
0.08
Gold Assay (g/t)
Gold Assay (g/t)
10700
Samples (Time Series)
Samples (Time Series)
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
1.8
0.01
1.6
1471020
1471517
1471154
1471273
1471597
0.00
1471058 1471134 1471194 1471255 1471313 1471577 1471637 1471373 1471433 1472010
1471451
Samples (Time Series)
Samples (Time Series)
Time Series for Reference Material OREAS 12a
(Actlabs; 2015 Core Samples)
15
N = 34
Time Series for Reference Material OREAS 19a
(Actlabs; 2015 Core Samples)
6.5
OREAS 12a
Expected Value
+2StdDev
-2StdDev
14
Gold Assay (g/t)
Gold Assay (g/t)
11
10
OREAS 19a
Expected Value
+2StdDev
-2StdDev
6.0
13
12
N = 34
5.5
5.0
9
8
1471780 1471980 1472270 1472390
10300
10540
Samples (Time Series)
10780
11020
11320
4.5
1471740 1472110 1472350
10140
10380
10620
10860
11100
11340
Samples (Time Series)
Figure 12-1: Time series plots for blank samples and certified reference materials assayed by Actlabs between 2014
and 205 on the Surluga–Jubilee Gold Deposit.
Page | 124
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Bias Chart Field Duplicate Assay Pairs (0-0.1 gpt Au)
(Actlabs; Core Samples)
0.10
100%
90%
0.08
N = 6 pairs
Au assay
80%
y = 0.9991x
R² = 0.997
70%
0.06
HARD (%)
Field Duplicate Assays (Au g/t)
N = 6 pairs
Ranked Half Absolute Relative Deviation Plot
(Actlabs; Core Samples)
Only pair analysed by
Metallic Screen. Both are
below detection limit.
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
50%
40%
30%
2014 Field Duplicates
0.02
60%
+10%
20%
-10%
10%
0.06
0.08
83.3%
0%
0.10
0%
10%
20%
30%
Original Assays (Au g/t)
100%
N = 6 pairs
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Mean versus Half Relative Deviation Plot
(Actlabs; Core Samples)
N = 6 pairs
80%
Au assay
0% Line
60%
1
40%
HRD (%)
Field Duplicate Assays (Au g/t)
50%
Rank
Q-Q Plot Field Duplicate Assay Pairs
(Actlabs; Core Samples)
10
40%
0.1
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
0.01
-60%
-80%
0.001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
-100%
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Individual Mean (Au g/t)
Original Assays (Au g/t)
Mean versus Half Absolute Relative Deviation Plot
(Actlabs; Core Samples)
100%
HARD (%)
10%
1%
N = 6 pairs
0%
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Individual Mean (Au g/t)
Figure 12-2: Bias charts and precision plots for field duplicates sampled by Red Pin and assayed by Actlabs
comparing the original assay to the quarter core duplicate.
Page | 125
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
12.3
Verification of Analytical Quality Control Data for the October/November
2015 Drilling Program
The verification of the analytical quality control data for the fall 2015 drilling program was completed by
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience. The fall 2015 drilling was not included in the resource estimate.
Red Pine inserted blanks and standards into the sample stream. Duplicates were not inserted because of
the strong nugget effect observed in the previous drilling programs.
A total of 52 blanks were inserted in regular intervals: every 25th sample was silica sand. All blanks returned
gold values below the detection limit.
Four different standards were inserted, including a low-, medium- and high-grade gold standard (Table
11-2).
Generally, the standards inserted performed well (Figure 12-3 to Figure 12-6). Only one standard failed
(Oreas 205, sample 12950, drill hole SM-15-37). Standards Oreas 202 and 205 appeared to have a high
failure rate based on the database provided by Red Pine, however, it was clear from a review of the results
that these standards were mislabeled. Although all standards passed, standards Oreas 12a, 19a and 205
show a distinct bias low (Figure 12-3, Figure 12-4, Figure 12-5).
Page | 126
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-3: Performance of standard Oreas 12a. Black triangles represent standard results.
Figure 12-4: Performance of standard Oreas 19a. Black triangles represent standard results.
Page | 127
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-5: Performance of standard Oreas205. Black triangles represent standard results.
1.35
1 standard deviation
Au (g/t)
1.3
1.25
certified value
1.2
1 standard deviation
1.15
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
Oreas 202
Figure 12-6: Performance of standard Oreas 202. Black triangles represent standard results.
Page | 128
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The data obtained from the fall 2015 drilling program are adequate for the purpose of this report.
12.3.1 2016 Site Visit Check Samples
During the site visit in February 2016, Ronacher McKenzie collected seven samples from drill core that was
reviewed on site (Table 12-3). The purpose of the check sampling was to confirm that gold is present in the
drill core. Exact correlation was not expected because of the strong nugget effect demonstrated previously.
The samples were submitted to ALS Minerals in Sudbury, Ontario. The samples were prepared at ALS
Minerals’ Sudbury laboratory and analyzed by fire assay with an AAS finish in ALS Minerals’ Val d’Or,
Quebec, laboratory. The ALS Minerals laboratory Val d’Or, QC, is accredited under ISO/IEC 17025:2005
certification by the Standards Council of Canada (accreditation number 689) for various testing procedures
including the procedures used to assay the samples submitted by Ronacher McKenzie. A blank and a
standard were included in the sample submission and both performed well.
The check sample results corroborate previous conclusions that the gold mineralization displays a strong
nugget effect. For example, visible gold was observed during logging in sample 1473309 by Ronacher
McKenzie (Figure 12-9), however, the assay result is 0.23 g/t Au. Although this result indicates that gold is
present, it is not proportional to the amount observed visually, which is attributed to the nugget effect.
Table 12-3: Check samples collected during the February 2016 site visit.
Hole ID From (m) To Interval Check Original Check Comment (m) (m) Sample Tag Au (g/t) Au (g/t) HS‐15‐27 25.00 26.00 1.00 1473303 0.57 0.02 HS‐15‐27 26.00 27.40 1.40 1473304 9.70 0.10 HS‐15‐27 27.40 28.40 1.00 1473305 0.46 0.04 HS‐15‐30 12.84 14.00 1.16 1473306 5.22 0.07 Blank 1473307 <0.005 HS‐15‐30 14.00 15.20 1.20 1473308 0.01 0.01 HS‐15‐31 73.00 74.00 1.00 1473309 1.00 0.23 Visible gold observed in core Standard Oreas 202 1473310 0.75 0.74 HS‐15‐31 74.00 75.00 1.00 1473311 0.90 0.01 Lamprophyre dike 12.4
Site Visit
Sébastien Bernier, P.Geo., of SRK visited the Wawa Gold Project on January 19 and 20, 2015
accompanied by Elisabeth Ronacher, P.Geo., of Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience, in addition to Craig
Scherba’ and the field personal representing Red Pine. The site visit took place shortly after the first drilling
program had been completed. The purpose of the site visit was to ascertain the geological setting of the
Page | 129
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
project, witness the extent of exploration work carried out on the property and assess logistical aspects,
including access to the property (Figure 12-7), and other constraints relating to conducting exploration work
in this area.
All aspects that could materially impact the integrity of the resource database (like core logging, sampling
and database management) were reviewed with Red Pine staff. SRK and Ronacher McKenzie were given
full access to all relevant project data. SRK and Ronacher McKenzie were able to interview exploration staff
to ascertain exploration procedures and protocols.
The location of several borehole collars, drilled by Red Pine and historical, was verified in the field by SRK
and Ronacher McKenzie (Figure 12-8). For the holes drilled by Red Pine, the collars are clearly marked
and the borehole casing is capped and marked with the drill hole number. For the historical holes, the
borehole identification tag is often missing but the casing remains intact. No discrepancies were found
between the location, numbering or orientation of the holes verified in the field, on plans and the database
examined by SRK.
SRK examined core from several boreholes and found that the logging information accurately reflects actual
drill core. The lithology contacts checked by SRK match the information reported in the drill logs.
Page | 130
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-7: Entrance to the property.
Page | 131
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-8: Historic collar.
Page | 132
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Another site visit was completed by Elisabeth Ronacher, P.Geo., on February 17 and 18, 2016, to review
core drilled in the fall of 2015. Dr. Ronacher reviewed sections of the following drill holes listed in Table
12-4 with the help of Red Pine personnel. Visible gold was observed in drill hole HS-15-31 (72.00–74.00
m). A total of seven drill core check samples were collected and submitted to ALS Canada, a laboratory not
used by Augustine, for verification of the assay results.
Table 12-4: Sections of drill holes reviewed during the February 2016 site visit.
Hole ID
From (m)
To (m)
HS-15-27
24.00
38.80
HS-15-28
23.00
43.00
HS-15-29
162.00
178.92
HS-15-29
202.00
214.00
HS-15-30
0.00
17.60
HS-15-30
149.00
168.80
HS-15-31
51.00
89.00
HS-15-31
177.00
207.00
In addition, Dr. Ronacher visited the property and verified the locations of drill holes HS-15-29 and HS-1530 (Figure 12-10). The core storage area that Red Pine had created in 2015 was also visited; historic core
that had been stored off site until 2015 was transferred to this location and is currently stored there together
with recent drill core.
Page | 133
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-9: Visible gold in drill hole HS-15-31, 73.00–74.00 m.
Page | 134
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 12-10: Photo of the collar location for HS-15-29 as verified during the February 2015 site visit.
12.5
Geophysics Surveys
The original ground magnetic survey data (Dec 2014 – Jan 2015) was loaded into geophysical processing
software program Geosoft Oasis montaj (“Oasis montaj”), gridded and reviewed. The location of the data
was confirmed, and the base-corrected magnetic data was gridded and confirmed against the files provided
by Red Pine.
Both data instrument files and final databases pertaining to the Spectral IP/Res survey were provided to
Ronacher McKenzie and reviewed in Oasis montaj. The location of the data was confirmed, and
pseudosections were generated in Oasis Montaj for verification against those provided by ClearView. The
raw instrument data was also reviewed in Oasis Montaj and decays and resistivity/chargeability values were
verified.
Page | 135
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The raw and processed ground magnetic data (Oct 2015) was provided by Red Pine to Ronacher McKenzie
for review in Oasis montaj. The location of the data was confirmed, and the base corrected magnetic data
was gridded and confirmed against the files provided by Red Pine.
The ground magnetic survey data (Oct 2015) was loaded into geophysical processing software program
Geosoft Oasis montaj (“Oasis montaj”), gridded and reviewed. The location of the data was confirmed, and
the base-corrected magnetic data was gridded and confirmed against the files provided by ClearView
Geophysics.
The ground HLEM survey data (Oct 2015) was loaded into geophysical processing software program
Geosoft Oasis montaj (“Oasis montaj”) and reviewed in profile format. The profiles were exported and
compared graphically in ArcMap to the interpretation maps provided by ClearView Geophysics.
The helicopter-borne gradient magnetic survey data (Feb 2015) was provided by Red Pine to Ronacher
McKenzie for review in Oasis montaj. An analytic signal grid was calculated from the three measured
gradients and compared to that derived from the total field grid using an FFT filter. Both grids were found
to show similar features.
Ms. Jenna McKenzie, a Qualified Person of this Report considers the ground magnetic survey (December
2014 – Jan 2015, the Spectral IP/Res survey (Dec 2014) and corresponding inversion results, the ground
magnetic survey (Oct 2015), the HLEM survey (Oct 2015) and the helicopter-borne gradient magnetic
survey (Feb 2015) to be adequate for the purposes used in this technical report.
13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
Red Pine has not completed any mineral processing and metallurgical testing.
14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES
The Wawa project includes gold mineralization in the Surluga-Jubilee gold deposit, a Precambrian-age
structurally complex gold deposit hosted in the Michipicoten greenstone belt. The gold mineralization occurs
in quartz veins and silica-altered fractures associated with shear zones, with the Jubilee shear zone
representing the primary structure. From the early 1900s until 1991, numerous small underground mines
have extracted approximately 500,000 tonnes of gold mineralization at an average grade of 8.9 grams of
gold per tonne (g/t gold).
Page | 136
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
A recent technical report (Watts, Griffis and McQuat, October 15, 2012) describes the geology and
exploration work supporting a Mineral Resource Statement prepared for Augustine Ventures Inc., the
previous project owner. Recent exploration work completed by Red Pine warrants the preparation of a new
mineral resource evaluation that considers a bulk pit extraction scenario.
This section describes the resource estimation methodology and summarizes the assumptions considered
by SRK in the preparation of a geology and mineral resource model for the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit.
The Mineral Resource Statement presented herein has been prepared for public disclosure.
This is the second mineral resource valuation prepared for the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit pursuant to
National Instrument 43-101. The mineral resources were estimated in conformity with CIM Mineral
Resource and Mineral Reserves Estimation Best Practices Guidelines (November 2003) and are classified
according to the CIM Standard Definition for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014). Mineral
resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty
that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. SRK is unaware of any
environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant issues
that may materially affect the mineral resources. The effective date of the tonnage and grade estimates is
May 26, 2015.
14.1
Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology
The mineral resources reported herein have been estimated using a geostatistical block modelling
approach informed from core borehole data and constrained by geological and gold mineralization domains.
Geological and gold mineralization domains were defined using a traditional wireframe interpretation
constructed from explicit modelling and sectional interpretation of the drilling data.
The evaluation of the mineral resources involved the following procedures:

Database compilation and verification

Construction of three-dimensional wireframe models and their verification

Data extraction and processing (compositing and capping), statistical analysis, and variography

Selection of estimation strategy and estimation parameters

Block modelling and grade estimation

Validation, classification, and tabulation

Assessment of “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction,” and selection of the
reporting assumptions
Page | 137
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016

Preparation of the Mineral Resource Statement
14.1.1 Resource Database
The Wawa exploration database up to January 19, 2015 comprises 2,007 historical core boreholes
(126,067 metres) drilled between early 1900s and 2007. During 2014 and 2015, Red Pine drilled an
additional 26 core boreholes (5,594 metres) designed to verify and validate parts of the historical data and
the position of underground excavations. SRK received the borehole sampling data as a Microsoft Access
database and subsequently converted the data into a series of CSV files for import into Leapfrog and
Datamine Studio 3 software. SRK performed the following validation steps:

Checked minimum and maximum values for each quality value field and confirmed/edited those
outside of expected ranges

Checked for gaps, overlaps and out of sequence intervals assays tables
No errors were found and SRK is satisfied with the database received from Red Pine.
Unsampled intervals are assumed to be barren and were assigned a value of 0.0 g/t gold for estimation.
Some of the historical core is still available. Preliminary validation work completed by Red Pine, as well as
by SRK and Ronacher McKenzie, confirms that the historical information in the database matches the
historical paper logs. The original assay certificates are not available for the historical data but sporadic
check samples and geochemistry validation using a portable XRF spectrometer confirms that the historical
sample intervals contain gold mineralization and that the analytical data are reasonable.
SRK audited approximately 5 percent of the electronic assay table against original assay certificates for the
boreholes drilled by Red Pine. No discrepancies were found.
Considering the early stage of the exploration project and the amount of work required to fully understand
the controls on the distribution of the gold mineralization, SRK concludes that the current database,
including the historical data, is sufficiently reliable for the purpose mineral resource estimation. The bulk of
the exploration data is, however, historical in nature, casting uncertainty in the location of the samples and
the analytical results. These concerns have been taken into account for the classification of the block model.
Page | 138
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.1.2 Geological Modelling
The gold mineralization at the Wawa project is associated with very fine sulfide (mainly pyrite) and small
quartz veining in strongly altered rock, the protolith from which is very difficult to identify but most likely was
of diorite composition. The vast majority of the gold mineralization is constrained within the Surluga-Jubilee
shear zone, and hanging wall and footwall secondary shear zones that remain poorly understood and
defined.
In collaboration with Red Pine, SRK developed a series of wireframes to constrain the mineral resource
estimation. Domain 1 represents a grade shell defined using a threshold of 0.80 g/t gold that was generated
to constrain the higher grade mineralization, located mainly within the Surluga-Jubilee shear zone, around
the historical underground development and drilling. This domain is surrounded by an alteration wireframe
generated essentially from the lithological information. The same strategy was applied to build a more
general wireframe for the Surluga-Jubilee shear zone (Figure 14-1). In total three domains were modelled
and considered as domains to constrain gold estimation.
Late lamprophyre dikes have been regularly identified in the Surluga-Jubilee shear zone. They crosscut the
gold mineralization and are barren. Overall, the lamprophyre intersections, typically about one metre in
length, represent between 3 and 4 percent of the length weighted lithology intervals in the borehole
database. For this study, the dikes were not modelled.
Page | 139
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-1: Oblique section looking northwest.
Showing the geology/resource domains modelled for the Surluga-Jubilee gold deposit of the Wawa project.
14.1.3 Compositing and Capping
Borehole assay data were extracted for each of the three resource domains (Domain 1, alteration and shear
zone wireframes) and examined for determining an appropriate composite length. Block model cell
dimensions and anticipated mining methods were also considered in the selection of the composite length.
A modal composite length of 2.0 metres was applied to all data (Figure 14-2).
The impact of outliers was examined on composite data in all three domains individually using log
probability plots and cumulative statistics. A three-dimensional visual validation of the selected capping
levels was also performed to assess the three-dimensional distribution of the higher grade values.
Basic statistics for assays, composites, and capped composites are summarized in Table 14-1. Basic
statistics, histograms, and cumulative probability plots examined for each domain are provided in Figure
14-4 to Figure 14-6.
Page | 140
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-2: Sampling Length by Domains
Table 14-1: Basic statistics – gold
Source
Units
Sample
Count
Domain 1
Alteration
Shear
g/t
g/t
g/t
17,118
14,415
10,351
Domain 1
Alteration
Shear
g/t
g/t
g/t
8,011
8,935
8,871
Domain 1
Alteration
Shear
g/t
g/t
g/t
8,011
8,935
8,871
Capped
Count
Minimum Maximum
Original Data
0.00
467.31
0.00
130.47
0.00
44.85
Composite Data
0.00
132.23
0.00
49.40
0.00
13.39
Capped Composite Data
3
0.00
75.00
8
0.00
21.00
5
0.00
10.00
Mean
Standard
Deviation
Coefficient
of Variation
2.77
0.36
0.11
7.65
2.19
0.79
2.77
6.06
7.34
2.77
0.36
0.11
5.21
1.45
0.52
1.88
3.99
4.82
2.75
0.35
0.11
4.85
1.21
0.50
1.76
3.41
4.67
Page | 141
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.1.1
Specific Gravity Database
Red Pine measured specific gravity on a small number of representative core samples from selected assay
intervals using a water displacement technique. A total of 859 specific gravity measurements were taken
(Figure 14-3). The average specific gravity was applied to each domain (2.76, 2.71 and 2.72 for Domain 1,
Alteration Zone and Shear Zone respectively).
Figure 14-3: Specific Gravity
Page | 142
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-4: Basic Statistics – Domain 1
Page | 143
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-5: Basic Statistics – Alteration Zone
Page | 144
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-6: Basic Statistics – Shear Zone
Page | 145
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.1.2 Variography and Block Interpolation
SRK evaluated the spatial distribution of gold using variograms and correlograms its normal score transform
in Domain 1. This domain contains the most continuous gold mineralization. A total of four spatial metrics
were considered to infer the correlation structure.
Continuity directions were assessed based on the orientation of the resource domains, composites, and
their spatial distribution. Further, variogram calculation considered sensitivities on orientation angles prior
to finalizing the correlation orientation.
All variogram analysis and modelling was performed using Datamine Studio 3 and the Geostatistical
Software Library (GSLib). The variogram modelling was based on the combination of the four metrics of
the capped composites and the correlogram. The use of original data yielded reasonably clear long range
structures allowing fitting variogram models. The variogram developed for Domain 1 was applied to the
Alteration and Shear domains.
These models are oriented in the plane of the gold mineralization, representing the direction of maximum
continuity. Consequently in Figure 14-7, the horizontal red model corresponds to the long axis of the
variogram orientated almost directly south and plunging at approximately 30 degrees towards the east,
while the blue horizontal model is the perpendicular to this direction. The vertical model represents the short
axis and is orientated perpendicular to the horizontal plane. Considering that the borehole orientation is
generally at a high angle to the zone, the vertical model can be considered as a proxy to a down-hole
variogram. The variogram parameters are summarized in Table 14-2.
Page | 146
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-7: Gold Correlograms for Domain 1
Note: The correlogram is inverted for the purposes of variogram modelling. The solid lines correspond to the fitted
model, while the dashed lines correspond to the experimental variogram in those same directions.
Table 14-2: Gold Variogram Parameters for the Surluga–Jubilee gold deposit.
Domain Structure Contribution Model
1
1
C0
C1
C2
C3
C4
0.15
0.55
0.20
0.05
0.05
Nugget
Spherical
Spherical
Spherical
Spherical
R1x R1y R1z Angle1 Angle1 Angle1 Axis Axis Axis
(m) (m) (m)
1
2
3
1
2
3
107
38
-28
3
1
3
11
4
1
107
38
-28
3
1
3
12
8 13
107
38
-28
3
1
3
28 18 14
107
38
-28
3
1
3
30 20 15
107
38
-28
3
1
3
The rotation angles are shown in Datamine Studio 3 convention
14.1.3 Block Model Definition
The criteria used in the selection of the block size included the borehole spacing, geometry of the modelled
gold mineralization, and anticipated mining techniques. In collaboration with Red Pine, SRK chose a block
size of 5 by 5 by 5 metres for all resource domains.
Subcells were used with 5 splits in all directions, allowing a resolution of 1 metre and honouring the
geometry of the modelled mineralization. Subcells were assigned the same grade as the parent cell. The
model is not rotated. The characteristics of the final block model are summarized in Table 14-3.
Page | 147
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 14-3: Surluga–Jubilee Deposit Block Model Specifications
Block Size (m)
Origin*
Parent Subcell
X
5
1.0
667,500
Y
5
1.0 5,315,200
Z
5
1.0
-500
Domain Axis
All
*
Number Rotation Rotation
of Cells
Angles
Axis
650
540
180
-
UTM NAD 83, Zone 16
14.1.4 Estimation Strategy
The estimation parameters developed for the Wawa project are summarized in Table 14-4. In all cases,
grade estimation considered ordinary kriging and five passes informed by capped composites. The first
pass was the most restrictive in terms of search radii and number of boreholes required to code a block.
Successive passes usually populated areas with less dense drilling, using relaxed parameters with
generally larger search radii and less data requirements. SRK assessed the sensitivity of the gold block
estimates to changes in minimum and maximum number of data, use of octant search and the number of
informing boreholes. Results from these studies show that the model is relatively insensitive to the selection
of the estimation parameters and data restrictions. A hard boundary was used between the resource
domains.
Table 14-4: Summary of Estimation Parameters for all Resource Domains
Parameter
1st Pass 2nd Pass 3rd Pass 4th Pass 5th Pass
Interpolation method
OK*
OK
OK
OK
OK
Search range X (relative to variogram range)
1x
1x
2x
2x
10x
Search range Y (relative to variogram range)
1x
1x
2x
2x
10x
Search range Z (relative to variogram range)
1x
1x
2x
2x
10x
Minimum number of composites
7
7
7
4
2
Maximum number of composites
12
12
16
16
16
Octant search
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Minimum number of octant
5
3
3
Minimum number of composites per octant
1
1
1
Maximum number of composites per octant
12
12
12
Maximum number of composites per borehole
3
3
3
3
3
*
OK = Ordinary Kriging
14.1.5 Block Model Validation
The block model estimates were validated through:
Page | 148
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016

Comparison of the basic statistics of ordinary kriging estimates with nearest neighbour
estimates, change-of-support correction and with the original source data (Figure 14-8 to
Figure 14-11)

Comparison of ordinary kriging estimates against an inverse distance (power of two) estimates
to assess potential impact of negative kriging weights (Figure 14-12)

Visual comparison of block estimates to original borehole data on plans and sections
Validation checks confirm that block estimates for all resource domains are a reasonable representation
of the informing data considering the current level of geological and geostatistical understanding of the
deposit.
Page | 149
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-8: Validation of the Block Estimates for Domain 1
Page | 150
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-9: Validation of the Block Estimates for the Alternation Domain
Page | 151
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-10: Validation of the Block Estimates for the Shear Domain
Page | 152
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-11: Validation of the Block Estimates for all Resource Domains Combined
Page | 153
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 14-12: Block Estimates Comparing Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Estimation Results
Page | 154
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.2
Mineral Resource Classification
Block model quantities and grade estimates were classified by Sébastien Bernier, P.Geo. (APGO#1847)
according to the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014).
Mineral resource classification is typically a subjective concept, and industry best practices suggest that
resource classification should consider the confidence in the geological continuity of the mineralized
structures, the quality and quantity of exploration data supporting the estimates, the geostatistical
confidence in the tonnage and grade estimates, and the continuity at the reporting cut-off grade. Appropriate
classification criteria should aim at integrating these concepts to delineate regular areas at a similar
classification.
SRK is satisfied that the geological model constructed for the Wawa project honours the current geological
information and knowledge. Over 99 percent of the exploration data informing the geology and mineral
resource model is historical, with limited geological information. A review of available documentation of the
historical information suggests that the location of the samples and the analytical results are generally
sufficiently reliable to support resource evaluation. Their historical nature and the lack of geological
information cast some uncertainty in the reliability of the historical data and thus present a risk that should
be taken into consideration for classification. The mineral resource model is informed from core boreholes
with pierce points density varying from a few metres to a few hundred metres in some deeper portion of the
deposit. The sampling information is sufficiently dense to infer a reasonable continuity of the gold
mineralization between sample points.
Considering that the mineral resources are mostly informed from historical drilling information, with a lack
of information on the sample preparation and analytical methods used, no analytical quality control data,
and poor reproducibility in the 2011 twin drilling program, SRK considers that all modelled blocks should
be classified in the Inferred category within the meaning of the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral
Resources and Mineral Reserves. SRK believes that the confidence in the estimates is insufficient to allow
for the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters or to enable an evaluation of economic
viability worthy of public disclosure. This Inferred classification is consistent with the classification of the
2012 mineral resource model.
Page | 155
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
14.3
Preparation of Mineral Resource Statement
CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014) defines a mineral
resource as:
“[A] concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the
Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects
for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and
other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted
from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.”
The “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” requirement generally implies that the
quantity and grade estimates meet certain economic thresholds and that the mineral resources are reported
at an appropriate cut-off grade that takes into account extraction scenarios and processing recoveries. SRK
considers that the gold mineralization at the Wawa project is amenable to pit and underground extraction.
In order to determine the quantities of material offering “reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction” by a pit, SRK used a pit optimizer and reasonable mining assumptions to evaluate the
proportions of the block model that could be “reasonably expected” to be mined from a pit.
It should be noted that the pit optimization results are used solely for the purpose of testing the “reasonable
prospects for economic extraction” by a pit and do not represent an attempt to define mineral reserves.
There are no mineral reserves on the Wawa project.
The assumptions considered to assist with the preparation of the mineral resource statement are
summarized in Table 14-5. SRK considers that it is appropriate to report the mineral resources for the Wawa
project at two cut-off grades: 0.40 g/t gold for pit mineral resources and 2.50 g/t gold for underground
mineral resources.
Table 14-5: Assumptions Considered for Reporting Cut-Off Grade Determination
Parameter
Production rate (tonnes per day)
Mining cost (C$/tonne)
General and administration (C$/tonne)
Process cost (C$/tonne of ore)
Gold recovery (%)
Mining recovery / mining dilution (%)
Gold price (US$/ounce)
Exchange Rate US$:C$
Revenue factor
Pit slope angle
Pit
12,250
$2.05
$2.00
$13.00
95%
95 / 5
$1,250
0.95
1.00
45
Underground
2,000
$75.00
$5.00
$13.00
95%
95 / 10
$1,250
0.95
n/a
n/a
Page | 156
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The gold mineralization delineated by drilling is not completely closed off by drilling, especially in the center
of the deposit, near surface. Further, there is gold mineralization in the hanging wall and footwall secondary
structures, but its geometry remains poorly constrained. SRK considers that additional drilling is required
near surface to define better the near surface gold mineralization. In this context, the conceptual pit
optimization results should be reviewed with caution. Review of the pit optimization results suggests that
the bulk of the modelled gold mineralization is amenable for pit extraction to a depth of approximately 300
metres. SRK considers that the gold mineralization located outside of the conceptual pit shell, but above
the bottom of the pit shell may eventually be shown to be amenable for pit extraction with additional drilling.
As a result, SRK considers that it is appropriate to report as pit mineral resource those blocks above cutoff and to the maximum depth about 300 metres (maximum depth of the conceptual pit shell). Furthermore,
SRK considers that it is appropriate to report those blocks located below that depth above a cut-off grade
of 2.50 g/t gold as underground mineral resource.
The global quantity and grade estimates for the Wawa project is presented in Table 14-6.
Table 14-6: Mineral Resource Statement*, Surluga-Jubilee Gold Deposit, Wawa Gold Project, Ontario,
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., May 26, 2015
Resource Category
Inferred**
Inside Pit
Outside Pit
Underground
Total
*
Cut-off
Gold (g/t)
0.40
0.40
2.50
0.50
Quantity
Grade
(‘000 t) Gold (g/t)
10,239
8,630
955
19,824
Contained Metal
Gold (‘000 oz)
2.05
1.07
3.73
1.71
676
298
114
1,088
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. All figures are
rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. Composites have been capped where
appropriate.
** Pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t gold in relation with a conceptual pit shell
constructed by SRK. Underground mineral resources include classified modelled blocks below the
conceptual pit shell and above a cut-off grade of 2.50 g/t gold. Cut-off grades are based on a gold price
of US$1,250 per once and a gold recovery of 95 percent
14.4
Sensitivity to Selection of Reporting Cut-off Grade
The quantity and grade estimates are fairly sensitive to the selection of a reporting cut-off grade. To illustrate
this sensitivity, block model quantities and grade estimates are presented at different cut-off grades in Table
14-7 for the pit material and Table 14-8 for the underground material. The reader is cautioned that the
figures presented in the tables should not be misconstrued with Mineral Resource Statements.
Page | 157
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Table 14-7: Quantities and Grade Estimates – Pit Material
Cut-Off Grade
g/t gold
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
*
Quantity
‘000s tonnes
30,717
23,028
18,869
16,029
14,011
12,448
11,021
Grade
g/t gold
1.09
1.38
1.61
1.81
1.99
2.16
2.34
Contained Gold
‘000 oz
1,080
1,020
974
933
897
865
831
The reader is cautioned that the figures presented in this table should not be
misconstrued as a Mineral Resource Statement. The reported quantities and
grades are only presented as a sensitivity of the deposit model to the selection
of cut-off grade.
Table 14-8: Quantities and Grade Estimates – Underground Material
Cut-Off Grade
g/t gold
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
5.0
*
Quantity
‘000s tonne
2,111
1,658
955
475
255
201
128
Grade
g/t gold
2.81
3.11
3.73
4.72
6.05
6.67
8.00
Contained Gold
‘000 oz
191
166
114
72
50
43
33
The reader is cautioned that the figures presented in this table should not be
misconstrued as a Mineral Resource Statement. The reported quantities and
grades are only presented as a sensitivity of the deposit model to the selection
of cut-off grade.
15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES
There are no claims immediately adjacent to the Wawa Gold Property, however, there are mines in the
general vicinity that may have similar mineralization styles. These are described below.
15.1
Argonaut Gold Inc.
Argonaut Gold Inc.’s (“Argonaut”) Magino gold project (“Magino”) is located ~40 km NE of Red Pine’s Wawa
Gold Project property in Finan Township (Figure 15-1). Magino is a historic underground mine that Argonaut
Page | 158
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
is planning on reopening as open pit operation and has completed a Preliminary Feasibility Study in January
2014 (Doerksen et al., 2014). At Magino, gold is hosted by carbonate-quartz-tourmaline veins that occur in
an ENE striking, felsic intrusions, the Webb Lake and Lovell Lake Stocks. The stock hosts about 5–10%
veins. High-grade gold-bearing veins are enclosed in a strongly silica-flooded envelope of low-grade,
quartz-sericitie-pyrite±gold mineralization. Doerksen et al. (2014) report a strong, structural control on the
veins with 70°-striking shear zones being common. Individual quartz-veins are hosted by secondary, brittleductile fracture sets.
The Qualified Person has been unable to verify the information presented in section 15.1 and the
information is not indicative of mineralization on the Wawa Gold Project property that is the subject of this
report. The information presented here is from the public domain. This report clearly distinguishes between
the information from adjacent properties, such as the Magino gold project, and the information from the
Wawa Gold Project property that is the subject of this report.
Page | 159
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Figure 15-1: Map showing the locations of adjacent mines and exploration projects.
15.2
Richmont Mines Inc.
Richmont Mines Inc.’s (“Richmont”) Island Gold Mine is located 83 km NE of Wawa and has been a gold
producer from underground operations since 2007 (Adam and Vachon, 2014). The underground operations
are accessed via a ramp and reach depths of 574 m. Between 2007 and the end of 2013, the mine produced
>256,000 ounces of gold. Gold mineralization is hosted by the Goudreau Lake deformation zone and
associated with strong sericitification and silicification. Narrow quartz-veins contain 2%–5% pyrite and gold.
Richmont completed nearly 100,000 m of underground drilling in 2013 and estimated 251,572 t of proven
resources at a grade of 5.95 g/t Au and 481,775 tonnes of probably resources at a grade of 6.16 g/t Au.
Page | 160
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
The Qualified Person has been unable to verify the information presented in section 15.2 and the
information is not indicative of mineralization on the Wawa Gold Project property that tis the subject of this
report. The information presented here is from the public domain. This report clearly distinguishes between
the information from adjacent properties, such as the Island Gold Mine, and the information from the Wawa
Gold Project property that is the subject of this report.
15.3
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (“Wesdome”) operates the Eagle River and Mishi Mines, 50 km west of Wawa.
The deposits are “Archean greenstone belt-hosted vein deposits along a regional deformation zone…”
(Heather, 1986). At the Eagle River Mine, gold is hosted dominantly by east striking, sub-vertical quartz
veins in a diorite stock. The average vein thickness is 2.5 m (range: 1–15 m). The quartz veins are sheared
and spatially associated with sericite-chlorite alteration. Sulfides are also present, including pyrite,
pyrrhotite, galena, sphalerite and chalcopyrite. The deposit is mined underground (sublevel long-hole
stoping) and accessed by a ramp system and a 580 m deep shaft.
The Eagle River Mine has been operated by Westdome since 1996 and has produced 961,936 ounces (as
of December 31, 2013; www.wesdome.com).
The Qualified Person has been unable to verify the information presented in section 15.2 and the
information is not indicative of mineralization on the Wawa Gold Project property that tis the subject of this
report. The information presented here is from the public domain. This report clearly distinguishes between
the information from adjacent properties, such as the Island Gold Mine, and the information from the Wawa
Gold Project property that is the subject of this report.
16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
The Qualified Persons are not aware of any other relevant data, information or explanation that would make
this report understandable or not misleading.
17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
The Wawa Gold Project is located two km east of the Town of Wawa and consists of a land position of
5,184 ha. Eight past-producing mines exist on the property.
Page | 161
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Gold mineralization is characterized by fine-grained visible gold in quartz veins in strongly sheared and
strongly sericite altered diorite. Pyrite, pyrrhotite and minor chalcopyrite also occur in or peripheral to the
high-grade zones.
The structural setting on the property is complex and characterized by numerous fractures and faults of
variable strikes and dips with the dominant directions being northeast to east-northeast and northwest. The
Jubilee shear zone, which is the most prominent structure on the property and hosts the majority of the
mineralization at the Surluga Mine, consists of a number of parallel, ~300–900 m long en-echelon
segments. It strikes northeast (018–034°), dips 25–55° to the southeast and is between 9 m and 60 m wide.
Red Pine completed 69.7 line-km of ground magnetic surveying over an area of 2.23 km² in February 2015
over the Surluga Mine area and 12.3 line-km over an area of 0.17 km² in October 2015 at the Sunrise area.
The Surluga ground magnetic survey defined the strike of the Jubilee shear zone. Areas of increased
magnetization within the Jubilee shear plane require further investigation in 3D. Linear features oriented
east-west are observed in the magnetic data. The Sunrise survey delineated several subtle ENE trending
magnetic linear features, including one associated with the south-eastern arm of the Surluga grade shell.
Red Pine completed 3.08 line-km of Spectral Induced Polarization and Resistivity survey. The IP/Res
inversion results indicate a resistive zone coincident with the silicification noted above the Jubilee shear
zone. Both the resistivity and chargeability inversion results show a contrast at the Jubilee shear plane.
Red Pine completed 6.3 line-km of 50 m Tx-Rx separated HLEM data and 4.2 line-km of 100 m Tx-Rx
HLEM data at the Sunrise area. Eleven anomalies were identified from the 50 m Tx-Rx in-phase and
quadrature profiles.
In February 2015, a helicopter-towed gradient magnetic survey was completed on the Wawa Gold Project,
consisting of 928 line-km and covering an area of 37 km2. During the survey operation, the magnetic base
station was unable to operate at the survey site due to cold weather conditions. Diurnal magnetic data
recorded by Natural Resources Canada in Ottawa suggests that no solar storms occurred during survey
operations. Despite this failure, significant structures were still identified from this survey data and were
used to guide gold exploration on the property.
Red Pine drilled a total of 5,594.5 m in 26 diamond drill holes in 2014 and the spring of 2015. The drilling
results indicate that gold mineralization is spatially associated with the Jubilee Shear plane; the mineralized
body strikes north, dips 30–35° to the east and plunges to the south at 12°. Isolated pockets of
Page | 162
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
mineralization also occur in the hanging wall of the shear. Quartz-sericite alteration of strongly sheared
diorite is intimately associated with gold mineralization. Pink K-feldspar alteration overprints the sericite
alteration. Outward from the mineralization, pre-mineralization sodic alteration is prevalent. Biotite veins
outside of the immediate mineralized zone and broad halos of chlorite-carbonate alteration also predate
mineralization. Another drilling program in October/November 2015 focused on the Sunrise and Hornblende
Shear areas. The drilling at Sunrise was insufficient to fully test the anticipated depth extensions of the
veins sampled on surface. In the Hornblende Shear area mineralization subparallel to the Jubilee shear
zone was drilled. The limited drilling in this area did not fully delineate the extent of the mineralization.
SRK estimated a resource for the Surluga–Jubilee zone. SRK is satisfied that the geological model
constructed for the Surluga–Jubilee area honours the current geological information and knowledge. Over
99% of the exploration data informing the geology and mineral resource model is historical, with limited
geological information. A review of available documentation of the historical information suggests that the
location of the samples and the analytical results are generally sufficiently reliable to support resource
evaluation. The lack of information on analytical methods and procedures for the historical drilling data,
including the absence of analytical quality control data, compounded with poor results of the 2011 twin
drilling program, shows some uncertainty in the reliability of the historical analytical data. Poor
reproducibility of historical results casts doubt on the reliability of the data and thus presents a risk that the
quantities and grade presented in the Mineral Resource Statement are overestimated.
Ronacher McKenzie and SRK did not determine any significant risks or uncertainties that could reasonably
be expected to affect the reliability or confidence in the exploration information or mineral resource other
than the uncertainties associated with the historic drilling, which were taken into account when SRK
classified the resource.
Based on the historic exploration and mining, the current exploration completed by Red Pine and the
resource estimate by SRK Ronacher McKenzie conclude that significant potential exists to find additional
gold mineralization on the property outside the Surluga–Jubilee area, including in the area of the
Hornblende Shear. Further exploration is therefore warranted on the property outside the Surluga–Jubilee
area.
Page | 163
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
18.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
A large amount of drilling exists on the property. Only one area, the Surluga–Jubilee area, was modeled
for the current resource estimation. The recommendations to advance the property focus on the parts of
the property outside the Surluga–Jubilee area where additional exploration is warranted.
A large amount of drilling exists in the area of the historic Surluga and Jubilee mines. The mineralization
appears to be structurally controlled with the Jubilee shear zone hosting most of the mineralization in the
Surluga–Jubilee area. However, prominent structures exist in other parts of the property, e.g. Parkhill
Shear, Parkhill Fault and Darwin Shear.
The following staged exploration program is recommended for the property.
18.1
Phase 1
18.1.1 3D Compilation
Ronacher McKenzie recommend a property-wide compilation of all geological (including structural and
alteration) data, assay information and geophysical data in 3D. The various datasets should be integrated
in 3D and interpreted together. In particular, geophysical features should be related to geological
observations through constrained inversion and analysis. An integrated approach to data interpretation will
provide a model for subsequent exploration.
In particular, a 3D model of the Sunrise Mickelson area will help understand a potential downward extension
of the gold-bearing veins sampled at surface.
18.1.2 Structural Interpretation
As part of the 3D compilation, a detailed, property-wide structural analysis of magnetic data in a geological
context should be completed. This will help determine the structural controls on mineralization; in particular,
it will help understand the importance of structures intersecting the dominant shear zones.
18.1.3 Rock Property Survey
The 3D model will provide a geological baseline for the entire property with excellent geological control in
the Surluga–Jubilee area. In order to obtain a better understanding of other areas on the property, Ronacher
McKenzie recommend determining the physical rock properties (e.g. chargeability, resistivity, magnetic
Page | 164
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
susceptibility, etc.) using downhole probes on existing drill holes. The rock properties should be correlated
with drill core information, including rock type, alteration, mineralization and structural data, and interpreted
in this geological context. Furthermore, the rock property data should be combined with the existing ground
and airborne geophysical data to assist in characterizing the properties of host and mineralized rock. Based
on the integration of geological and geophysical downhole and surface data, the geology, mineralization
and structural setting could characterized in areas where there is no drilling but only surface geophysics by
extrapolating the findings from the zones where the physical rock properties were collected to adjacent
unexplored areas.
A more detailed analysis could be completed on the Spectral IP/Res dataset, relating the tau results with
gold mineralization and determining if this is a predictive tool in locating zones of gold mineralization.
Pending on the results, further IP/Res surveying on the surface and/or downhole would be warranted.
Table 18-1: Cost estimate for the recommended exploration program.
Item
Unit
No of Units
3D compilation
hour
80
Structural interpretation
hour
80
Physical rock property downhole survey
on 20 drill holes
day
25
Rock property analysis (incl. cluster
analysis)
hour
40
Targeting
hour
20
Cost/Unit
$135
$200
Total Cost
$10,800
$16,000
$3,000
$75,000
$150
$135
$6,000
$2,700
$110,500
18.1.4 Quality Control
Red Pine used an acceptable quality control program during the 2014 and 2015 drilling programs. It
included blanks and various standards. The quality control analysis of several standards used during the
fall 2015 program indicated a systematic low bias of the analysis. It is recommended that a QC analysis be
completed during the drilling program so that the assay laboratory can be made aware of the bias and
correct the issue.
SRK recommends that Augustine submit a portion of pulp rejects from newly acquired drilling data to an
umpire laboratory for check assaying.
SRK also recommends that Augustine conduct additional verification of the historical sampling data with a
focus on validating the historical assay results. This is especially important considering the impact of the
historical data on the Mineral Resource Statement presented herein. Over 99% of the analytical data
Page | 165
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
informing the mineral resource model is historical and represents an important risk for this deposit. The
2011 twin drilling program showed poor reproducibility. The verifications should include a comprehensive
re-sampling program of selected sections of archived core for check assaying.
18.2
Phase 2
Five holes were drilled in the Hornblende Shear area; the results from theses holes warrant follow-up drilling
to determine the extent of the mineralization in the Hornblende Shear zone. This drilling program is
recommended after completion of the 3D modeling of the property recommended in Phase 1 and is
contingent on the positive outcome of the 3D model. The 3D model results will determine the most
favourable locations and directions of the drill holes. It will also help determine the amount of drilling required
for an initial characterization of the extent of the mineralization in the Hornblende Shear area.
Page | 166
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
19.0 REFERENCES
Adam, D. and Vachon, D., 2014, Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimate as of
December 31, 2013, for the Island Gold Mine, Dubreuilville, Ontario, Canada, 249 p. (available on
sedar.com)
Anderson, S.D., 1998, Geophysical Report Induced Polarization Survey on the McMurray-Lastheels
Townships Property, Wawa Area, Sault Ste Marie Mining Division, Ont.: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE2002, 26 p.
Apex Parametrics Ltd, 1998, MaxMin I+ EM Systems Operations Manual: Apex Parametrics Ltd, Uxbridge,
Ontario. 30 p.
Archibald, F., 1983a, Canbec Explorations Ltd. Proton Magnetometer Survey – Rabazo-McMurray
Townships, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NW0029, p. 10-16.
Archibald, F., 1983b, V.L.F. Electromagnetic Survey, Canbec Explorations Ltd. – Rabazo-McMurray
Townships, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NW0029, p. 1-9.
Archibald, F., 1996a, Summary Report, Elliot Feder Property, Northeast Part of McMurray Township &
Northwest Part of Lastheels Township, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE0022, 51 p.
Archibald, F., 1996b, Lawrence Melnick Property, McMurray & Chabane Townships, District of Algoma,
Northern Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
42C02SE0026, 37 p.
Archibald, F.T., 1998, Preliminary Summary Report, Firesand Carbonatite Diamondiferous Study,
Geological, Magnetics, Electromagnetics, Backhoe Bulk Testing, Lastheels & McMurray
Townships, Northern Ontario, NTS-42C/2: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 42C02SE2003, 95 p.
Archibald, F.T., 2004, Summary Report #4 VLF Electromagnetics-Magnetometer-Geology-Bulk SamplingDiamond Drilling for 3814793 Canada Inc. – P.Mousseau-L. Chanbanel McMurray Lastheels
Lendrum Township Groups. Wawa Area, District of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE2014, 137 p.
Barrie, C.Q., 1986, Report on an Airborne Magnetic and VLF-EM Survey McMurray Township Sault Ste.
Marie Mining Division, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment
Report No. 41N15NE0033, 21 p.
Barry, J.M., 1994, Report of a 1993 work program on the Golden Reed prospect, McMurray Township,
Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0022, 29 p.
Boniwell, J.B., 2002, Evaluation of a Circular Aeromagnetic Anomaly in McMurray Township, Sault St. Marie
M.D. for Artisan Gold Mines. Excalibur International Consultants. Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE2007, 16 p
Page | 167
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Boss, C.M., Frances Group: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0039, 21 p
Boyko, W.P., 1974, Airborne Geophysical Surveys, Sault Ste. Marie – Sudbury Region, Ontario for
Consolidated Morrison Explorations Ltd. Aerodat Ltd., 61 p
Bradshaw, P.M.D., 1991, Jubilee Property, Wawa, Ontario, NTS 91 N/15, 1990 Work Program, Summary
Report: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
42C02SE0518, 54 p.
CIM, 2003, Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines: CIM
Estimation Best Practice Committee, November 23, 2003.
CIM, 2014, CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserve: CIM Standing
Committee on Reserve Definitions, May 10, 2014.
Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 1996, Diamond Drill Record: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0037, 14 p.
Crone, D., 1975, Report for Mining Claims SSM 321878 321879 321880 covering a VLF Electromagnetic
Survey in McMurray Township, Wawa Area, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0082, 10 p.
Delisle, P.-C., 1991, Summary of Drill Program, Sunrise No. 1 Vein for Van Ollie Exploration Ltd.: Ontario
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0069, p. 9–51.
Doerksen, G., Pilotto, D., Boehnke, R., Bender, M., Aref, K., Kirkham, G., Hutchison, I. and Buter, L., 2014,
Preliminary Feasibility Study Technical Report for the Magino Project, Wawa, Ontario, Canada:
Independent Technical Report for Argonaut Gold Inc., 513 p. (available on sedar.com)
Drost, A., 1994, A report on the geology of mining claims SSM 1174761 and SSM 1174880, McMurray
Township, Wawa area, Sault Ste. Marie Mining District: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0004, 23 p.
Drost, A., 1995, A summary of phase 1 exploration on the McMurray-Lastheels Township property of
Transgold Explorations and Investment Inc., Wawa area, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0029, 102 p.
Duke, C.J., 2012, Amended technical review and mineral resource estimate for the Jubilee-Surluga
property, near Wawa, Ontario, Canada: Independent Technical Report for Augustine Ventures Inc.,
October 15, 2012.
Dubé, B., and Gosselin, P., 2007, Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits: Geological
Association of Canada, Special Publication No. 5, p. 49–73.
Frey, E.D., 1987, Geology of Wawa area gold mineralization: Institute of Lake Superior Geology Field Trip
Guidebook, v. 33, Part 2, 31 p.
Frohberg, M.H., 1935, The Ore Deposits of the Michipicoten Area: 44th Annual Report of the Ontario
Department of Mines, Vol. 44, Part 3, p. 39–83.
Page | 168
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
GEM
Systems Inc., 2013, Potassium GSMP-35 (Magnetometer).
content/uploads/2014/05/GSMP-35-Ground.pdf. 2 p.
http://www.gemsys.ca/wp-
Gignac, D.J., 1983, Report on 1982 Diamond Drill Program for Dunraine Mines Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00055, 76 p.
Gignac, D.J., 1986, Report on Magnetometer and Gradiometer Surveys on Claim SSM 481686, McMurray
Township for Goldun Age – Dunraine Joint Venture, Wawa, Ontario. Precambrian Exploration and
Mining Services Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0034, 15 p.
Gillis, D.J., 1984, Basal Till Survey for Pango Gold Mines Limited of the Ward Lake Property, McMurray
Township, District of Algoma, Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry
of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00027, 24 p.
Goldfarb, R.J., Baker, T., Dubé, B., Groves, D.I., Hart, C.J.R. and Gosselin, P., 2005, Distribution,
Character, and Genesis of Gold Deposits in Metamorphic Terranes: Economic Geology 100th
Anniversary Volume, p. 407–450.
Gow, N.N., 2004, Valuation and Technical Report on the Surluga Property, Wawa, Ontario: Report prepared
for Citadel Gold Mines Inc. by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., 96 p.
Gow, N.N., 2011, Technical report on the Surluga property, Wawa, Ontario, Canada: Independent
Technical Report prepared by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. for Augustine Ventures
Inc., February 14, 2011, 71 p.
Harper, H.G., 1981a, Dunraine Mines Ltd., Wawa Area Gold Property, McMurray Township, Ontario:
Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00054, 167
p.
Harper, H.G., 1981b, Dunraine Mines Ltd., Wawa Area Gold Property, McMurray Township, Ontario,
Progress Report: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE00061, p. 1–22.
Harper, H.G., 1982, Dunraine Mines Ltd., Parkhill Mine Project, Wawa, Ontario, 1982 Program: Ontario
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00061, p. 23–122.
Heather, K.B., 1986, Mineralization of the Mishibishu Greenstone Belt: Ontario Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Paper 132, p. 283–291.
Helmstaedt, H., 1988, Structural observations in the Surluga and Jubilee mines, Citadel Gold Mines Inc.,
Wawa, Ontario: Report for Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 29 p.
Kilty, S.J., 1986, Dighem III Survey of the Wawa Area, Ontario for Citadel Gold Mines Inc. by Dighem
Surveys and Processing Inc.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment
Report No. 42C02SE0504, 72 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1969, Report on Geological Survey of the Property of Pango Gold Mines Limited, Township
29, Range 23, Wawa, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and
Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00037, 24 p.
Page | 169
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Kuryliw, C.J., 1970a, Progress report on Surluga Gold Mines Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00036, 13–19 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1970b, Report on a Magnetic Survey of J.D.S. Bohme Properties: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0516, 12 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1970c, Report on a Magnetic Survey of the Property of Pango Gold Mines Limited, Township
29, Range 23, Wawa, District of Algoma, ON: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 42C02SE0219, 12 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1971b, Diamond Drilling (hole 1971#1) for Pango Gold Mines: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00088, 21p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1972, A report on Surluga Gold Mines Ltd. gold property, Wawa, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00036, 52–73 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1980, Pango Gold Mines Ltd, McMurray Township, Wawa Area, Northern Ontario, Report on
a Magnetic Survey: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0077, 13 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1981, Northern Horizon Resources Ltd – Report on Magnetic Survey: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0524, 14 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1982, Report on a (sic) Electromagnetic Survey. Pango Gold Mines Ltd McMurray Township
Wawa, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0057, 37 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1983, The Monte Christo Resources Properties, McMurray Township (Wawa, Ontario) Also
Known as TWP. 29, Range 23, District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE00064, 106 p. (includes various
reports).
Kuryliw, C.J., 1984a, Report on a VLF Electromagnetic Survey, The Monte Christo Resources Properties,
McMurray Township (Wawa, Ontario) Also Known as TWP. 29, Range 23, District of Algoma,
Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0048, 47 p.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1984b, Report on Geologic Mapping, The Monte Christo Resources South Property,
McMurray Township (Wawa, Ontario) District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0064, p. 20–56.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1984c, Report on an EM-17 Electromagnetic Survey, The Monte Christo Resources South
Property, McMurray Township (Wawa, Ontario) District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0064, p. 77-106.
Kuryliw, C.J., 1984d, Report on Diamond Drilling, The Monte Christo Resources South Property, McMurray
Township (Wawa, Ontario) District of Algoma, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0064, p. 77-106.
Lakefield Research, 1988, An Investigation of the Recovery of Gold from samples of Surluga ore submitted
by Citadel Gold Mines Inc., Progress Report No. 1: Report for Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 92 p.
Page | 170
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Leadbetter, J., 1998, Prospecting Report on Eight Claims in the Deep Lake Area, McMurray Township,
Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE2003, 20 p.
Leadbetter, J., 2000, 2000 Prospecting Report – Deep Lake Area Property, McMurray Township, Ontario:
Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE1005, 20
p.
Leonard, B., 2014, Surluga Property Report: Internal Report for Red Pine Exploration Inc., 109 p.
Mackey Point Syndicate, 1933, Compilation of Several Reports: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE0021, 88 p.
MacMillan, D. and Rupert, R.J., 1990, Exploration Report -- Geological Mapping in the Vicinity of the GraceDarwin, Parkhill and Minto Mines: Report for Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 61 p.
May, W.T, 1944, Report on Sandra Gold Mines Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0087, p. 46–56.
Mihelcic, J., 2014, Report on Test IP Surveys at the Surluga Project, Wawa, Ontario. Clearview Geophysics
Inc., 21 p.
Mihelcic, J., 2015, Report on Geophysical Surveys at the Sunrise and Mickelson Veins Property, Wawa
Project, Wawa, Ontario. Clearview Geophysics Inc., 27 p.
Morris, H.G., 1964, The Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of Canada, Exploration Report No. 4,
Final Exploration, Surluga Gold Mines Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 42C02SE9043, p. 1132–1144.
Munro, S., 2015, Red Pine Exploration Inc. Heli-GT, 3 Axis Magnetic Gradient Survey Wawa Project
Northern Ontario Operations and Processing Report. Scott Hogg and Associates Ltd., 12 p.
Piaza, P.E., 1984, Report on the Magnetic and VLF Interpretation for Pango Gold Mines Ltd. On the
McMurray Township Claims, Wawa Area, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and
Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NW0026, p. 12-15.
Polat, A. and Kerrich, R., 2000, Archean greenstone belt magmatism and the continental growth-mantle
evolution connection: constraints from Th-U-Nb-LREE systematics of the 2.7 Ga Wawa
subprovince, Superior Province, Canada: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 175, p. 41-54.
Osmani, I.A., 1987, Henderson Property, McMurray Township, Wawa, Ontario, Geological Report for
Citadel Gold Mines Incorporated: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment
Report No. 41N15NE0028, 59 p.
Reid, R., 1990, Report on Geophysical Surveys on the Van Sickle Property of Van Ollie Explorations Ltd.:
Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0011, p.
114-128.
Ronacher, E., McKenzie, J. and Bernier, S., 2015, Wawa Gold Project, Ontario: Independent Technical
Report for Red Pine Resources, June 5, 2015, 138 p.
Page | 171
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Rupert, R.J., 1980a, Geological & sampling report to the directors of Golden Goose Gold Mines Ltd. on the
Deep Lake mining property, Wawa, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE9036, 24 p.
Rupert, R.J., 1980b, Magnetic and VLF EM Survey, Claim No. SSM 504488, McMurray Tp, Ontario: Ontario
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0078, 15 p.
Rupert, R.J., 1989a, Citadel Gold Mines Inc. Report on Magnetometer Survey Block B West of Firesand
River, McMurray Township, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0023, 20 p.
Rupert, R.J., 1989b, Citadel Gold Mines Inc. Report on Magnetometer Survey South Part of Block A at
Deep Lake: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0021, 14 p.
Rupert, R.J., 1997, Exploration report on the Wawa area properties of Citadel Gold Mines Inc., Report for
Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 51.
Rupert, R.J. and Leroy, A., 1989, Citadel Gold Mines Inc., Technical Reports OMEP Project No. OM88-7C-254: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
42C02SE0220, 465 p.
Sage, R.P., 1994, Geology of the Michipicoten greenstone belt: Ontario Geological Survey Open File
Report 5888, 592 p.
Sears, S., 1986a, Report on Magnetometer and VLF-EM Surveys over the Reed Lake Claim Group, Wawa
Area, Northern Ontario for Caviar Resources Limited: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0035, 30 p.
Sears, S., 1986b, Report on a geological mapping and prospecting program over the Reed Lake claim
group, Wawa area, northern Ontario, for Caviar Resources Limited: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0505, 45 p.
Sears, S., 1989, Report of a work program on thirty one (31) claims of the Fickle property for Allied Northern
Resources Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NW0021, 37 p.
Sears, S., 1990a, Summary report and evaluation of the 1989 work programs on the Van Sickle property
of Van Ollie Exploration Limited, Volume I: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0011, 1027 p.
Sears, S., 1990b, Report of a 1990 exploration program on the Fickle claim group, McMurray Township,
Ontario, for Allied Northern Resources Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0014, 28 p.
Sears, S., 1990c, Progress report on a 1990 drill program on the Fickle claims of Allied Northern Resources
Ltd.: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0013,
23 p.
Page | 172
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Sears, S., 1990d, Summary report on the 1990 work program (an addendum to the 1989 report) on the Van
Sickle property, of Van Ollie Explorations Ltd., Part 1: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0016, 196 p.
Sears, S., 1990e, Report on a 1990 Drill Program on the Fickle Claims of Allied Northern Resources Ltd.:
Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0025, 30
p.
Sears, S. and Gasparetto, A., 1988, Report of a work program on the Fickle property of Allied Northern
Resources Ltd., Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0027, 39 p.
Sears, S. and Gasparetto, A., 1989, Report of a Work Program on Eight Claims of the Fickle Property for
Allied Northern Resources Ltd., Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment
Report No. 41N15NW0022, 33 p.
Sherman, B., 2005, Illustrated Information to Accompany an Independent Assessment of the Mineral
Exploration Potential of the Surluga Property of Citadel Gold Mines Inc., at Wawa, Ontario: Report
for Citadel Gold Mines Inc., 48 p.
Smith, P.A. and Dvorak, Z., 1983, Dighem III Survey of the Wawa Area, Ontario for Northern Horizon
Resource Corporation: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report
No. 42C02SE0505, 83 p.
Studemeister, P.A., 1983, Dunraine Property, Dunraine Mines Ltd., Wawa, Ontario, Progress Report,
(various reports): Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No.
41N15NE0041, 209 p.
Studemeister, P.A., 1984, Report on the 1984 Diamond Drilling Program, Dunraine Mines Ltd.: Ontario
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0046, 52 p.
Surluga Gold Mines, Annual Report 1967, Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 41N15NE0063, 11 p.
Sutherland, W.D., 1995, Wawa Creek Geophysical Survey: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and
Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NW0017, 102 p.
Thomas, R.D., 1997a, Report on Heavy Mineral Sampling, Feder Claim Group, Chabanel, McMurray and
Lastheels Townships, Wawa, Ontario, NTS 42C/2, 41N/15: Ontario Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE2001, 63 p.
Thomas, R.D., 1997b, Report on geochemical analyses of till samples, Feder North claim group, Chabanel
and McMurray Townships, Wawa, Ontario, NTS 42C/2: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development
and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE2002, 36 p.
Tilsley, J.E., Goldun Age Resources Inc., 1986 Exploration Program, Parkhill Property, McMurray
Township, Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and
Mines Assessment Report No. 41N15NE9041, 98 p.
Page | 173
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Tindale, J.L., 1970a, Report on Magnetometer Survey on Property of Pango Mines Ltd., Twsp 28 & 29, Rge
23, Wawa, District of Algoma, ON. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Assessment Report No. 42C02SE0208, 18 p.
Tindale, J.L., 1970b, Report on Magnetometer Survey on Property of Pango Mines Ltd., Twsp 38, Rge 23,
District of Algoma, ON. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report
No. 41N15NE0008, 11 p.
Trusler, J.R., 1970, Report on a Geologic Survey of the Property of Pango Gold Mines Ltd. Ontario Ministry
of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report No. 42C02SE0110, 37 p.
Page | 174
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
20.0 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
This report, titled “Independent Technical Report – Wawa Gold Project, Wawa, Ontario”, dated June 30,
2016 and prepared for Augustine Ventures Inc., was completed and signed by the following authors:
“signed and sealed”
__________________________
Elisabeth Ronacher, PhD, P.Geo.
June 30, 2016
Sudbury, ON
“signed and sealed”
__________________________
Jenna McKenzie, P.Geo.
June 30, 2016
Toronto, ON
“signed and sealed”
__________________________
Sébastien Bernier
June 30, 2016
Sudbury, ON
Page | 175
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Appendix 1 – Certificates of Qualified Persons
Page | 176
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON
Elisabeth Ronacher
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience
Sudbury, ON, Canada
Elisabeth.Ronacher@RMGeoscience.com
 705-419-1508
I, Elisabeth Ronacher, do hereby certify that:
1. I am the Principal Geologist at Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience.
2. I am responsible for sections 3–5, 7, 8, 9.3, 10 and 15 and jointly responsible for sections 1, 2, 6,
11 and 12, and 15–20 of the report titled “Independent Technical Report – Wawa Gold Project,
Wawa, Ontario” dated June 30, 2016, and prepared for Augustine Ventures Inc.
3. I hold the following academic qualifications: M.Sc. Geology (1997), University of Vienna, Vienna,
Austria; Ph.D. Geology (2002), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
4. I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Geologists of Ontario (APGO,
member # 1476), the Society of Economic Geologists (SEG) and the Society for Geology Applied
to Mineral Deposits (SGA).
5. I have worked on exploration projects worldwide (including Canada, Mongolia, China, Austria) and
on a variety of commodities including Au, Cu, base-metal, Cu-Ni PGE and U and deposit types
since 1997.
6. I have read the definition of “Qualified Person” set out in the National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as
defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements to be a “Qualified
Person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.
7. I visited the property on January 19 and 20, 2015, and on February 17 and 18, 2016.
8. I am independent of the issuer as described in section 1.5 of the National Instrument 43-101.
9. I have no prior involvement with the property that is subject of this report other than having
completed a Technical Report for Red Pine Exploration Inc. on the same property in June 2015.
10. I have read the National Instrument 43-101 and this report has been prepared in compliance with
this Instrument.
11. As of the date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the
technical report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to
make the technical report not misleading.
Dated this 30th Day of June, 2016
“Signed and Sealed”
___________________________
Elisabeth Ronacher, Ph.D., P.Geo.
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON
Jenna McKenzie
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience
Toronto, ON, Canada
Jenna.McKenzie@RMGeoscience.com
 647-378-2648
I, Jenna McKenzie, do hereby certify that:
1. I am the Principal Geophysicist at Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience.
2. I am responsible for sections 9.1, 9.2, 11.4, 11.5, 12.4 and jointly responsible for sections 1, 2, 6
and 17-20 of the report titled “Independent Technical Report – Wawa Gold Project, Wawa, Ontario”
dated June 30, 2016, and prepared for Augustine Ventures Inc.
3. I hold the following academic qualifications: Hons.B.Sc. Applied Physics – Geophysics (2002),
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
4. I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Geologists of Ontario (APGO,
member # 1653), the Canadian Exploration Geophysical Society (KEGS) and the Society of
Exploration Geophysicists (SEG)
5. I have worked on exploration projects worldwide (including Canada, USA, Mexico, Dominican
Republic, Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, Republic of South Africa, Russia,
Turkey and Indonesia). I have worked on a variety of commodities including porphyry-copper, gold,
diamond, Ni-Cu-PGE and potash since 2001.
6. I have read the definition of “Qualified Person” set out in the National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as
defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements to be a “Qualified
Person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.
7. I have not visited the property.
8. I am independent of the issuer as described in section 1.5 of the National Instrument 43-101.
9. I have no prior involvement with the property that is subject of this report other than having
completed a Technical Report for Red Pine Exploration Inc. on the same property in June 2015.
10. I have read the National Instrument 43-101 this report has been prepared in compliance with this
Instrument.
11. That, as of the date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief,
the technical report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed
to make the technical report not misleading.
Dated this 30th Day of June, 2016
“Signed and Sealed”
___________________________
Jenna McKenzie, P.Geo.
Ronacher McKenzie Geoscience
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON
To accompany the technical report entitled Independent Technical Report Wawa Gold Project, Wawa,
Ontario and dated June 30, 2016.
I, Sébastien B. Bernier, do hereby certify that:
1) I am a Principal Consultant (Resource Geology) with the firm of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (SRK) with
an office at Suite 101, Regent Street South, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada;
2) I am a graduate of the University of Ottawa in 2001 with BSc (Honours) Geology and I obtained a MSc
degree in Geology from Laurentian University in 2003. I have practiced my profession continuously since
2002. I worked in exploration and commercial production of base and precious metals mainly in Canada. I
have been focussing my career on geostatistical studies, geological modelling and resource modelling of
base and precious metals since 2004;
3) I am a Professional Geoscientist registered with the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario
(APGO#1847) and with the Ordre des Géologues du Québec (OGQ# 1034) ;
4) I have personally visited the project area between January 19 and 20, 2015;
5) I have read the definition of qualified person set out in National Instrument 43-101 and certify that by virtue
of my education, affiliation to a professional association, and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the
requirements to be a qualified person for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 and this technical
report has been prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1;
6) I am independent of the issuer as defined in Section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101;
7) I have co-authored parts of sections 1, 2, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19 and 20 and Appendix 3;
8) I have had prior involvement with the subject property. I have completed and co-signed a Technical Report
dated June 5, 2015 for Red Pine Exploration Inc on the subject property. The Mineral Resource Statement
dated May 26, 2015 remains current as no new information acquired since would affect the Mineral
Resource Statement;
9) I have read National Instrument 43-101 and confirm that this technical report has been prepared in
compliance therewith;
10) SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. was retained by Augustine Ventures Inc, to restate the Mineral Resource
Statement of the Wawa Gold Project and contribute to a Technical Report prepared by Ronacher Mckenzie
Geoscience, as part of the property acquisition requirement.
11) I have not received, nor do I expect to receive, any interest, directly or indirectly, in the Wawa project or
securities of Augustine Ventures Inc;
12) That, as of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this technical
report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical
report not misleading.
“signed and sealed”
Sudbury, Ontario
Sébastien B. Bernier, PGeo (APGO#1847)
June 30, 2016
Principal Consultant (Resource Geology)
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Appendix 2 – List of Patented Tenures
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
DJ7
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0255
Absolute
NA
Yes
DJ7
31169-0255
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
DJ7
311690255
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
5% NSR, Weiss
Estate
NA
DJ8
Part of 31169Fee
0255
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
DJ8
31169-0255
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
DJ8
311690255
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
Yes
R738
31169-0221
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
R738
311690642
Wawa GP Inc.
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
R738
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0221
SSM138
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM138
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM138
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM138
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM138
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM138
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM139
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM139
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM139
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM139
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM139
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM139
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM140
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM140
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM140
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM140
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM140
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM140
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM141
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM141
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM141
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM141
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM141
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM141
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM176
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM176
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM176
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM176
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM176
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM176
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM177*
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM177
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM177
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM177
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM177
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM177
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM178
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0278
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM178
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM178
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM182
Part of 31169Fee
0277
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM182
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM182
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM182
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM182
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM182
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM183
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM183
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM183
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM183
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM183
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM183
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM191
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM191
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM191
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM191
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM191
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM191
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM194
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM194
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM194
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM194
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM194
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM194
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM195
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM195
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM195
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM195
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM195
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM195
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM201
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM201
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM201
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM201
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM201
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM201
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM212
Part of 31196Fee
Simple
0279
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM212
31196-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM212
311960695
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM212
Part of 31196Fee
0695
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM212
31169-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM212
311960695
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
SSM218
Part of 31169Fee
0278
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM218
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM218
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM219
Part of 31169Fee
0278
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM219
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM219
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM220
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0278
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM220
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM220
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM221
Part of 31169Fee
0278
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM221
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM221
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM223
Part of 31169Fee
0278
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM223
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM223
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM224
Part of 31169Fee
0277
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM224
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM224
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM224
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM224
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM224
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM2401
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0280
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM2401
31169-0280
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM2401
311690280
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR Dunraine;
Citadel/Gibson 1/2
interest
NA
SSM2402
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0280
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM2402
31169-0280
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM2402
311690280
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR Dunraine;
Citadel/Gibson 1/2
interest
NA
SSM2403
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0280
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM2403
31169-0280
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM2402
311690280
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR Dunraine;
Citadel/Gibson 1/2
interest
NA
SSM241
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM241
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM241
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM241
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM241
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM241
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM242
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM242
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM242
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM242
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM242
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM242
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM243
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM243
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM243
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM243
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM243
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM243
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM244
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM244
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM244
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM244
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM244
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM244
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM245
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM245
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM245
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM245
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM245
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM245
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM246
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM246
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM246
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM246
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM246
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM246
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM247
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM247
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM247
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM247
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM247
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM247
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM248
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM248
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM248
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM248
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM248
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM248
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM250
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM250
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM250
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM250
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM250
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM250
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM252
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM252
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM252
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM252
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM252
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM252
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM257
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0278
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM257
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM257
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM258
Part of 31169Fee
0277
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM258
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM258
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM258
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM258
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM258
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
SSM2583
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0549
NA
Yes
SSM2583
31169-0549
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM2583
311690549
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1% NSR, Davey
NA
SSM259
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0277
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM259
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM259
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM259
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM259
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM259
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
SSM261
Part of 31196Fee
Simple
0279
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM261
31196-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM261
311690695
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM261
Part of 31196Fee
0695
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM261
31169-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM261
311690695
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
SSM262
Part of 31196Fee
0279
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM262
31169-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM262
311690695
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM262
Part of 31196Fee
0695
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM262
31169-0279
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM262
311690695
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
SSM3047
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3047
31169-0281 The Estate of
Lloyd A. Van
Sickle
Yes
SSM3047
311690281
The Estate of
Lloyd A. Van
Sickle
No
SSM3089
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3089
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3089
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3090
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3090
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3090
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3104
Part of 31169Fee
0289
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM60184
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3104
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3106
Part of 31169Fee
0289
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM60185
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3106
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3107
Part of 31169Fee
0289
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM60363
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3107
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
31169-0281
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
NA
5% NSR, Weiss
Estate
NA
NA
2.5% Diamonds, 1%
other
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
SSM3108
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0289
Absolute
SSM3109
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM60362
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3108
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Yes
SSM3109
31169-0286
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3109
311690286
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
SSM3124
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0284
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3124
31169-0284
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3124
311690284
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
SSM3129
Part of 31169Fee
0284
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3129
31169-0284
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3129
311690284
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
SSM3130
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3130
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3130
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3131
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3131
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3131
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3132
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3132
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3132
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3133
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3133
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3133
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3134
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3134
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3134
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3135
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3135
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3135
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3136
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3136
31169-0283 The Estate of
Lloyd A. Van
Sickle
Yes
SSM3136
311690283
The Estate of
Lloyd A. Van
Sickle
No
SSM3191
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3191
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3191
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3192
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3192
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3192
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
31169-0286
31169-0283
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
NA
2.5% Diamonds, 1%
other
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM3193
SSM3194
SSM321118
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3193
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3193
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3194
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3194
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Olie Van Sickle
and the Estate
of Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle and
The Corporation
of the
Municipality of
Wawa
No
Lease
PIN
31169-0202 107487
Yes
SSM321118 31169-0202
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Partial
SSM321118 31169Olie Van
0202 and
Sickle and (excepting and Y308
31169the Estate of PT 3 on 1R0265
Lloyd Allen
4860
Van Sickle
(Y308)
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
2.5% diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
Expiry
31-Jan-25
SSM3231
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3231
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3231
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3232
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3232
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3232
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3256
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3256
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3256
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3301
Part of 31169Fee
0295
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3301
31169-0295
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3301
311690295
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM3306
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM430232 33169-0213
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3306
311690307
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3307
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0308
Absolute
NA
No
SSM430235 33169-0214
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3307
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3378
Part of 31169Fee
0308
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM430234 33169-0214
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3378
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3379
Part of 31169Fee
0308
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM430233 33169-0214
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3379
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
31169-0307
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
SSM64595
Lease
Part of 311690205
NA
Yes
SSM64595
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3399
311690291
John A. McPhail,
John A. Hussey,
and Lanthrop
Henry Peters
No
31-May-26
SSM3400
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0649
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3400
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3400
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3401
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3401
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3401
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3406
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3406
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3406
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3407
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3407
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3407
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3408
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3408
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3408
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3455
Part of 31169Fee
0649
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3455
31169-0649
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3455
311690649
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3470
Part of 31169Fee
0295
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3470
31169-0295
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3470
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM3470
Part of 31169Fee
0872
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
SSM3470
31169-0295
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3470
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM3471
Part of 31169Fee
0295
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3471
31169-0295
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3471
311690295
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
SSM3493
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3493
31169-0285
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3493
311690285
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
SSM3531
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3531
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3531
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3538
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3538
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3538
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
31169-0285
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
Expiry
NA
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM3555
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3555
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3555
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3556
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3556
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3556
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3557
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3557
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3557
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3558
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3558
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3558
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM3565
Part of 31169Fee
0297
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3565
31169-0297
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM3565
311690297
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
SSM3566
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0297
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM3566
31169-0297
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM3566
311690297
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
SSM3678
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0304
NA
Yes
SSM3678
31169-0304
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3678
311690304
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1% NSR, Davey; 1%
Caicco
NA
ES170
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0268
NA
Yes
ES170
31169-0268
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
ES170
311690268
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
NA
Yes
SSM4020
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4020
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM407822
311690201
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
31-Jan-25
SSM4020
SSM407822
PIN
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0648
Absolute
Lease
31169-0201 107487
Yes
SSM407822 31169-0201
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Y330 but
recorded as
SSM4141
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0306
NA
Yes
Y330
31169-0306
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
Y330
311690306
Y331 but
recorded as
SSM4142
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0305
NA
Yes
Y331
31169-0305
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
Y331
ES171 but
recorded as
SSM4192
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0309
NA
Yes
ES171
31169-0309
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM430232
Lease
311690213(LT)
Part of
108850
Yes
SSM430232 31169-0213
Wawa GP
Inc.
SSM430233
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0214
108850
Yes
SSM430233 31169-0214
SSM430234
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0214
108850
Yes
SSM430258
Lease
31169-0216
Part of
109445
Yes
SSM4316
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0318
NA
Yes
SSM4316
SSM4317
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM4318
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
SSM433
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA
31169-0270
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
311690305
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
ES171
311690309
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
No
SSM3306
311690307
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-Aug-32
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3379
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-Aug-32
SSM430234 31169-0214
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3378
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-Aug-32
SSM430258 31169-0216
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM430258
311690216
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-33
31169-0318
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4316
311690318
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM4317
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4317
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Yes
SSM4318
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4318
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Yes
SSM433
31169-0270
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM433
311690270
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
SSM4390
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0316
NA
Yes
SSM4390
31169-0316
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4390
311690316
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1% NSR, Davey
NA
SSM4391
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0317
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM4391
31169-0317
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4391
311690317
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1% NSR, Davey
NA
SSM4392
Part of 31169Fee
0317
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM4392
31169-0317
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4392
311690317
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1% NSR, Davey
NA
SSM4507
Part of 31169Fee
0648
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM4507
31169-0648
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM4507
311690648
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM469255
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0217
109446
Yes
SSM469255 31169-0217
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-33
SSM469256
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0217
109446
Yes
SSM469256 31169-0217
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-33
SSM469257
Lease
31169-0215
Part of
109445
Yes
SSM469257 31169-0215
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM469257
311690215
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-33
SSM542856
Lease
31169-0200 107417
Yes
SSM542856 31169-0200
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
JD3
311690287
The Corporation
of the Township
of Michipicoten
No
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
31-Jul-23
SSM58
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0276
Yes
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM58
311690276
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
SSM581686
Lease
No
None
None
Crown
No
1/4% NSR Dunraine
31-Jan-31
SSM59662
Fee
Simple
Absolute
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
311691824
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM59663
Lease
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
SSM59664
Lease
311690203
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
NA
SSM58
31169-0276
31169-0210 108502
Yes
SSM581686 31169-0210
31169-1824
Yes
SSM59662
31169-1824
Yes
SSM59663
31169-0203
Yes
SSM59664
31169-0205
NA
PIN 31169- 107760
0203
Part of 31169- 107761
0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes except SSM59662
SR over
transmissio
n lines
Yes
SSM59663
No
None
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
SSM60
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0274
NA
Yes
SSM60
31169-0274
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM60
311690274
Estate of Lloyd
Allen Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie Van
Sickle)
No
2.0% NSR Diamonds,
1% NSR Van Sickle
Claims held under
option
NA
SSM60183
Lease
Yes
SSM60183
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3105
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM60184
Lease
31169-0205
Part of
107761
Yes
SSM60184
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3104
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
SSM60185
Lease
31169-0205
Part of
107761
Yes
SSM60185
31169-0205
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3106
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
SSM60942
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-1809
NA
Yes
SSM60942
31169-1809
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM60942
311691809
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
SSM61530
Lease
31169-0212 108852
Yes
SSM61530
31169-0212
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM61530
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-Jul-32
SSM61531
Lease
Yes
SSM61531
31169-0204
SSM61532
Lease
Part of PIN 107760
31169-0204
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61532
31169-0206
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM61533
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Yes
SSM61533
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM61954
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Yes
SSM61954
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM61955
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Yes
SSM61955
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM61956
Lease
Part of PIN Part of
31169-0206 107761
Yes
SSM61956
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM61957
Lease
31169-0211 108852
Yes
SSM61957
31169-0211
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-Jul-32
Lease
Part of PIN 107760
31169-0204
Yes
SSM61958
31169-0204
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
SSM61958
Yes
SSM61958
311690204
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Part of 31169- Part of
0205
107761
Yes
No
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
311690212
SSM61531 PIN 311690204
None
None
31-May-26
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM61959
Lease
SSM61960
Lease
SSM61961
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Part of PIN 107760
31169-0204
Part of PIN Part of
31169-0206 107761
Yes
SSM61959
31169-0204
Yes
SSM61959
Yes
SSM61960
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
Lease
Part of PIN Part of
31169-0206 107761
Yes
SSM61961
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
SSM61962
Lease
Part of PIN Part of
31169-0206 107761
Yes
SSM61962
31169-0206
SSM61963
Lease
Yes
SSM61963
31169-0204
SSM61964
Lease
Part of PIN 107760
31169-0204
Part of PIN Part of
31169-0206 107761
Yes
SSM61964
31169-0206
SSM61965
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61965
31169-0204
SSM61966
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61966
31169-0204
SSM61967
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61967
31169-0204
SSM61968
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61968
31169-0204
SSM61969
Lease
107761
Yes
SSM61969
31169-0206
SSM61970
Lease
107761
Yes
SSM61970
31169-0206
SSM61971
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61971
31169-0204
SSM61972
Lease
107760
Yes
SSM61972
31169-0204
SSM6247 in
PIN,
SSM64702 in
lease
Lease
Part of PIN
31169-0204
Part of PIN
31169-0204
Part of PIN
31169-0204
Part of PIN
31169-0204
Part of PIN
31169-0206
Part of PIN
31169-0206
Part of PIN
31169-0204
Part of PIN
31169-0204
31169-0207
107761
Yes
SSM6247
31169-0207
SSM64700
Lease
31169-0196 108913
Yes
SSM64700
31169-0196
SSM64701
Lease
31169-0197 108912
Yes
SSM64701
31169-0197
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
None
311690204
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM61963
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
No
None
311690204
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM61965
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61966
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61967
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61968
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
No
None
311690204
311690204
311690204
311690204
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61971
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
Yes
SSM61972
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
No
SSM6247
311690204
311690204
311690330
The Corporation
of the Township
of Michipicoten
No
31-May-26
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
30-Nov-32
No
None
None
Crown
No
30-Nov-32
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM64703
Lease
SSM64704
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
31169-0195 108914
Yes
SSM64703
31169-0195
No
None
None
Crown
No
30-Nov-32
Lease
31169-0194 108916
Yes
SSM64704
31169-0194
No
None
None
Crown
No
30-Nov-32
SSM64705
Lease
31169-0193 108915
Yes
SSM64705
31169-0193
No
None
None
Crown
No
30-Nov-32
SSM64706
Lease
31169-0198 108943
Yes
SSM64706
31169-0198
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-Jan-33
SSM64934
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Yes
SSM64934
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
SSM64955
Lease
Part of 31169- Part of
0206
107761
Yes
SSM64955
31169-0206
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
None
None
Crown
No
31-May-26
JD16
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0273
NA
Yes
JD16
31169-0273
Olie Van
Sickle and
the Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
Yes
JD16
311690273
Olie Van Sickle
and the Estate
of Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
SSM7389
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0338
NA
Yes
SSM7389
31169-0338
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM7389
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
1/4% NSR Dunraine
NA
SSM7389
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0872
Absolute
NA
No
SSM7389
31169-0338
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM7389
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31169-0199 107320
Yes
SSM76721
31169-0199
Olie Van
Sickle and
the Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
Yes
SSM76721
311690199
Olie Van Sickle
and the Estate
of Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
30-Apr-21
NA
SSM76721
Lease
SSM7921
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0341
NA
Yes
SSM7921
31169-0341
Estate of
Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
(Exec: Ollie
Van Sickle)
Yes
SSM7921
311690341
Olie Van Sickle
and the Estate
of Lloyd Allen
Van Sickle
No
2.5% Diamonds + 1%
other, Van Sickle
NA
SSM886
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0272
NA
Yes
SSM886
31169-0272
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM886
311690272
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
1/4%, NSR Dunraine
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
PIN
Lease
ID
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
1/4% NSR, Dunraine
NA
Y461
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0260
Absolute
NA
Yes
Y461
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
Y461
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
Y461
Part of 31169Fee
0872
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
Y461
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
Y461
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
Y462
Part of 31169Fee
0260
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
Y462
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
Y462
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
Y462
Part of 31169Fee
0872
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
Y462
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
Y462
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
Y463
Part of 31169Fee
0260
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
Y463
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
Y463
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
No
Y463
Part of 31169Fee
0872
Simple
Absolute
NA
No
Y463
31169-0260
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
Y463
311690872
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
SSM222
Part of 31169Fee
0278
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM222
31169-0278
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM222
311690696
Kurt Echle and
Stephan Echle
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM249
Part of 31169Fee
0277
Simple
Absolute
NA
Yes
SSM249
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM249
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
5% NSR, Weiss
NA
SSM249
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0643
Absolute
NA
No
SSM249
31169-0277
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM249
311690643
Wawa GP Inc.
and Citabar
Limited
Partnership
No
NA
NA
No
R738
31169-0221
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
R738
311690642
Wawa GP Inc.
Yes
NA
NA
No
SSM60183 lease 107761
Wawa GP
Inc.
Yes
SSM3105
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Part of
108850
Yes
SSM430235 31169-0214
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3307
311690308
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-Aug-32
Part of 31160- Part of
0205
107761
Yes
SSM60362
Wawa GP
Inc.
No
SSM3108
311690289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
R738
SSM3105
Fee
Simple
Absolute
31169-0642
Part of 31169Fee
Simple
0289
Absolute
SSM430235
Lease
SSM60362
Lease
31169-0214
31169-0205
NA
1/4% NSR Dunraine
NA
NA
1/4% NSR Dunraine
NA
NA
Wawa Gold Project, Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Patented
Mining
Claim ID
Type of
Title
SSM60363
Lease
SSM4678
Fee
Simple
Absolute
NA: Not applicable
PIN
Lease
ID
Part of 31169- Part of
0205
107761
31169-0315
NA
Mineral
Rights
Mineral
Rights
Claim ID
Yes
SSM60363
Yes
SSM4678
Mineral
Rights PIN
Mineral
Rights Title
Holder
Surface
Rights
Surface
Rights
Claim ID
31169-0205 Wawa GP Inc
No
SSM3107
311600289
Wawa GP Inc.
No
31-May-26
31169-0315
Yes
SSM4678
311690315
Wawa GP Inc.
No
NA
Wawa GP
Inc.
Surface Surface Rights
Rights PIN Title Holder
Timber
Rights
Agreement
Obligations,
Recipient(s)
Expiry
Wawa Gold Project
Ontario, Canada
June 30, 2016
Appendix 3 – Independent Verification Samples Assay Certificates