Evidence guidelines
Contents
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
Contents
1. About the National Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
6. Evidence sources
5
9. Assessing evidence
7
7. Recognising evidence from other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
8
National Regulatory Code Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Published by the National Regulatory System for Community
Housing Directorate.
Document Identification: 003-04-13/NRSD
Publication date: January 2014
Supported by the Commonwealth Government of Australia
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
This work is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part
for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an
acknowledgement of the source. It may not be reproduced for
commercial sale.
8
Performance outcome 2: Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3: Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4: Governance
26
Performance outcome 5: Probity
32
Performance outcome 6: Management
36
Performance outcome 7: Financial viability
38
Glossary
42
Contents
1. About the National Regulatory System
for Community Housing
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
Community housing providers are organisations that deliver
social or affordable housing and associated services to people
on very low, low or moderate incomes. These services are
covered by the social and affordable housing policies of
government housing (policy/funding) agencies1.
The key objectives of the NRSCH are to:
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
•
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
provide a consistent regulatory environment to support the
growth and development of the community housing sector
6
•
pave the way for future housing product development
9. Assessing evidence
7
•
reduce the regulatory burden on housing providers working
across jurisdictions
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
•
8
18
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
The National Regulatory System for Community
Housing (NRSCH) is a regulatory system designed
to contribute to a well governed and managed
community housing sector, and provide a platform
for the ongoing development and viability of the
community housing sector across Australia.
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
provide a level playing field for providers seeking to enter
new jurisdictions.
The governance arrangements are set out in an InterGovernment Agreement (IGA) for a National Regulatory System
for Community Housing and provide for the establishment
of the National Regulatory Council (NRC) as an independent
advisory committee.
A suite of Operational Guidelines guides the overall operation
of the NRSCH in accordance with the Community Housing
Providers National Law (the ‘National Law’).
The scope of a Registrar’s functions under the NRSCH is limited
to regulatory activities. State and territory housing agencies
will continue to have responsibility for policy, funding and
industry development decisions, which will depend on the
arrangements in each jurisdiction.
38
2. Purpose of this document
3. Principles
The National Regulatory Code sets out the
performance outcomes and requirements that
must be met by registered community housing
providers under the NRSCH.
The principles of good regulation that underpin
the National Regulatory Code are the performance
requirements which are:
Community housing providers must demonstrate their capacity
to comply with the Code on application and once registered,
must demonstrate ongoing compliance with the Code.
The Evidence Guidelines describe the performance indicators
and evidence sources for assessing providers against the
National Regulatory Code performance outcomes and
requirements for different types of providers (classified as Tier 1,
2 and 3 providers).
•
Proportionate – reflecting the scale and scope of regulated
activities
•
Accountable – able to justify regulatory assessments and be
subject to scrutiny
•
Consistent – based on standardised information
and methods
•
Transparent – clear and open processes and decisions
The Evidence Guidelines are proportionate to levels of risk,
and aim to minimise the reporting burden. All tiers have
minimum evidence sources so that a minimum level of
regulatory engagement can be maintained for providers
that are consistently well performing and/or have a simple
business model. The Evidence Guidelines are not intended to
be prescriptive, and allow for a provider to propose alternative
evidence sources.
•
Flexible – avoiding unnecessary rules about how housing
providers organise their business and demonstrate
compliance
•
Targeted – focused on the core purposes of improving
tenant outcomes and protecting vulnerable tenants,
protecting government funding and equity, and ensuring
investor and partner confidence.
These Guidelines are made jointly by the relevant ministers of
each participating jurisdiction and are published on the New
South Wales legislation website according to section 10 (2) of
the National Law.
In assessing a provider’s performance under the National
Regulatory Code, the Registrar in each jurisdiction is required
to apply these principles of good regulation. The Registrar must
undertake every assessment in the context of the provider’s
business and must consistently apply the guidelines.
These guidelines should be read in conjunction with:
•
the National Law
•
the National Regulatory Code (schedule 1 of the
National Law)
•
any other guidelines made under section 10(2) of the
National Law.
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
Policy and funding agencies are usually, but not always, the housing
agency in the particular jurisdiction. For the purposes of this document,
the term ‘housing agency’ will be used, but it is acknowledged that this will
include policy and funding agencies for those jurisdictions where relevant.
1
2 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
3
Contents
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
4. Tiers of registration
5. Risk and regulation
6. Evidence sources
The Evidence Guidelines set performance
indicators and evidence requirements in
accordance with three tiers of registration.
Performance and assessment data is used to
inform a risk-based assessment of all registered
providers to determine compliance with the
National Law and the National Regulatory
Code. This determines the nature of regulatory
engagement and, where necessary, action.
For the most part, the Evidence Guidelines rely
upon the business documentation and data that
community housing providers’ governing bodies
would require in order to be satisfied that their
community housing delivery is well governed, well
managed and financially viable.
The tier of registration is determined by an entity’s level of risk
arising from the scale and scope of its community housing
activities, which in turn determines the intensity of regulatory
engagement and oversight.
For example, organisations involved in activities that require
management of a higher level risk (e.g. property development
and leveraging assets) will be subject to a higher level of
regulatory requirements and engagement than organisations
managing lower level risks (e.g. small-scale tenancy
management). For example, Tier 1 providers might have an
annual compliance assessment, whereas Tier 3 providers might
have a compliance assessment every two years.
It is important to note that Registrar decisions about tiers are
different from their assessment of actual risks associated with
a provider’s compliance with the National Law. Within any tier,
Registrars may vary the amount of regulatory engagement
depending on actual risk presented at any given time.
Risk-based engagement recognises:
•
the impact of complex business structures, for instance with
multi-jurisdictional providers,
•
potential or actual problems from providers taking on risky
activities
•
potential or actual problems due to weaknesses in
management or governance.
A community housing provider can present evidence in its
existing form and is not expected to reconfigure its key business
documents. Providers can also present multiple evidence
sources in one document, such as:
•
its resident feedback findings and action plan (for
performance outcome 1), a list of partnership arrangements
(for performance outcome 2)
•
the local community profile and strategies for contributing
to the local community (for performance outcome 2)
•
its governance structure and expertise base and profiles of
each governing body member (for performance outcome 4).
For providers with a simple business model, engagement
will be minimal.
All providers will be informed of the expected level of
engagement. This engagement will be regularly reviewed
in light of changing business focus and complexity and
performance.
Regulation will be responsive, proportionate and
consistently applied.
In broad terms risk-based engagement allows registrars to:
•
38
maintain a minimum level of regulatory engagement for
consistently well-performing providers (for these providers
more reliance is placed on monitoring basic data and health
checks and on the provider advising the regulator of any
change of circumstances)
•
develop a new approach for multi-jurisdictional providers
where there is an increased level of risk arising from size or
the amount of money they receive for development
•
engage with providers more intensively where higher
levels of risk are identified, in ways that reflect their
particular circumstances.
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
The Evidence Guidelines are not intended to be prescriptive or
exhaustive and the provider may look to alternative business
documentation or data. A single evidence source may be listed
and used for assessing multiple performance requirements.
4 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
Evidence sources are divided into two categories:
1. evidence sources to demonstrate the provider’s capacity to
meet the National Regulatory Code
2. evidence sources to demonstrate the provider’s ongoing
compliance with performance indicators.
In practical terms, the provider must demonstrate capacity to
comply with the National Law at the point of registration. When
an existing provider applies for registration, the Registrar will
take into account whether the entity has capacity in its current
operations to comply with the National Law requirements.
For instance, the Registrar will use the entity’s current financial
performance data and forecasts to judge its operating capacity
at registration, and use this to make an assessment as to
whether it can operate in a compliant manner in the future.
To determine whether an entity has the capacity to comply
with the National Law, Registrars will review evidence sources
that include a performance reporting dataset and a financial
performance report, in addition to documentation.
However, the community housing provider must indicate where
evidence relating to a performance requirement is located, to
ensure all relevant evidence is taken into account during the
assessment.
It is ultimately the decision of a Registrar as to whether an
evidence source is relevant and is used in an assessment.
A community housing provider may submit the required
evidence, but that evidence may be insufficient to demonstrate
performance, or that evidence may be in an alternative form
that results in the Registrar requiring additional evidence from
the provider. The types of additional evidence that may be
requested have been included in the performance outcomes
tables later in this document.
In practical terms, capacity
will be demonstrated at the
point of registration
5
Contents
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
8
18
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
7. Recognising evidence
from other assurance
systems
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
9. Assessing evidence
The Evidence Guidelines are not prescriptive
and enable evidence from other assurance
systems to be submitted for registration and
compliance assessment.
In order to make a compliance assessment on
registration and on an ongoing basis, a Registrar
will require, on occasion, information from sources
other than the provider.
Registrars will use the Evidence Guidelines
when undertaking registration and compliance
assessments and decision-making.
This approach aims to minimise the regulatory burden
on community housing providers by ensuring the NRSCH
effectively co-exists with other assurance systems regarding
data collection, reporting and information sharing.
National Community Housing Standards
Registrars will recognise accreditation under the National
Community Housing Standards and accreditation under other
relevant third-party accreditation systems as a valid source of
evidence for entities to demonstrate performance against the
National Regulatory Code.
The National Community Housing Standards were introduced
in 1998 with the aim of setting out good practice standards in
service delivery in the community housing sector throughout
Australia. The Standards cover the elements that constitute
a quality housing service for residents and tenants in
community housing.
Accreditation is designed to allow accredited providers to make
continuous quality improvements in delivering and managing
community housing. Accredited community housing providers
are well positioned for meeting the requirements of the
National Regulatory Code.
In order to demonstrate performance against the National
Regulatory Code, providers may use evidence used for
accreditation, or the accreditation report issued by the
accrediting authority. However, a provider that has obtained
accreditation will not automatically meet the regulatory
performance outcomes under the National Regulatory Code.
Those sources may include:
•
the National Register
•
the Registrar’s record of complaints and notifications
under the National Law
•
the relevant housing agency
•
When a Registrar assesses a provider’s compliance for the
purposes of registration or on an ongoing basis, the Registrar
will assess:
•
other government agencies (this might include information
about the provider’s funding terms or compliance with a
policy or contract, or housing-related service delivery)
whether the provider meets the relevant eligibility
requirements in the National Law and in the Tier Guidelines
•
whether the provider has the capacity to meet the National
Regulatory Code requirements
•
other regulatory authorities (this might include information
about regulatory engagement with the provider)
•
whether the provider complies with other requirements of
the National Law.
•
the public record (this might include information about the
provider’s body corporate status, court or tribunal decisions,
or media).
The Register will discuss with the provider the need for
this information.
A Registrar will obtain information from other sources only in
accordance with the exercise of its functions under the National
Law and in accordance with any relevant requirements relating
to confidentiality or otherwise.
Glossary42
The Registrar undertakes every assessment in the context of
the provider’s business, with an understanding of the provider’s
scale and scope, operating environment, business plan and
outcomes and history of delivering community housing.
The Evidence Guidelines include thresholds for some
requirements as an indicative guide to measuring performance
results against the National Regulatory Code outcomes and
requirements.
The thresholds in themselves do not determine capacity
or compliance. Rather, they provide a transparent level of
performance as a starting point against which the Registrar
can assess performance results. Performance results that are
below, or are trending below, a threshold or a combination of
thresholds, will raise a flag that there may be a performance
concern that the Registrar needs to address when assessing the
provider’s capacity or ongoing compliance.
Where a provider does not meet certain thresholds, the
Registrar will seek to understand whether the provider
is not complying with the performance requirement
or whether the level of performance relates to
particular circumstances.
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
Registrars use all relevant information to assess the provider’s
performance outcomes. A provider demonstrates its capacity or
ongoing compliance by meeting specified National Regulatory
Code performance outcomes and requirements.
6 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
In some cases, performance results below the threshold may
be acceptable in the context of a given provider’s operating
environment, business plan and outcomes, or once specific
factors affecting the performance results or data have been
taken into account. For instance, repairs performance may not
meet the relevant threshold because the provider does not
have full control over the actual process or funding. Similarly, a
provider with a standard type of housing may not survey each
individual dwelling but may rely on sample surveys.
In each case where a provider’s performance result is below a
relevant threshold, the Registrar will determine whether this
amounts to a lack of capacity or non-compliance by examining
the particular performance outcome and requirement, the
seriousness of the performance concern and the underlying
cause of the performance result. If no acceptable explanation
exists, providers will be required to remedy performance.
The Evidence Guidelines are part of a package of information
and Operational Guidelines under the NRSCH that guide
community housing providers in the process of achieving
registration and ongoing compliance. The Evidence Guidelines
should be read and used together with:
•
the National Law and National Regulatory Code
•
Tier Guidelines
•
Enforcement Guidelines
•
any other Operational Guidelines
•
any guidance notes.
The Evidence Guidelines are subject to the NRSCH evaluation
and continuous improvement framework.
Every assessment is
undertaken in the context
of the provider’s business
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Contents
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
6
6
The provider makes information about
its tenancy management policies and
procedures available in a variety
of formats
•
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
a. Determining and managing
eligibility, allocation and
termination of housing assistance
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenancy management policies and procedures (including
the process to determine eligibility, allocation, rent, charges,
complaints, appeals and termination of tenancy)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenancy management policies and procedures where
there has been a significant change
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
The community housing provider is fair, transparent and responsive in delivering housing
assistance to tenants, residents and other clients
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
The policies and procedures are
applied so there are no significant and
ongoing or repeated failure to treat
applicants and residents/tenants fairly
and transparently
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Documents, such as brochures, booklets or information
kits, that are provided to applicants, tenants/residents and
other stakeholders
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
May be requested
• Standard letters and forms to applicants and tenants/
residents used in tenancy management
•
The provider manages housing
assistance in accordance with its
policies and the legal and policy
requirements relevant to its jurisdiction
•
•
38
Glossary42
The policies and procedures are
applied so there are no significant
and ongoing or repeated failures
to manage housing assistance in
accordance with policy and legal
requirements
Tenancy management policies and
procedures reference legal and
jurisdictional policy requirements
where appropriate
•
Evidence that significant changes in policies and
procedures have been communicated to tenants/residents
(e.g. letters to tenants/residents, brochures, posters)
•
Record of feedback from residents/tenants and response
or action
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis undertaken at
least every two years, addressing the information provided
to tenants/residents.
•
8 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
Website
Outsourcing agreement (if applicable)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenancy management policies and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenancy management policies and procedures where
there has been a significant change
Tier 2
• System and processes for monitoring compliance with its
own policies and the legal and policy requirements relevant
to its jurisdiction
•
Tenancy data
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring compliance
with its own policies and the legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
May be requested
• Records that confirm the provider complies with its own
tenancy management policies and procedures and other
legal and policy requirements relevant to its jurisdiction
May be requested
• Sample tenancy/residency agreement
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
•
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
•
Tier 1
• Information about the range of housing services delivered
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
All applicants/tenants/residents receive
information to enable the applicant/
tenant/resident to make informed
decisions and to understand decisions
made by the provider
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
9
Contents
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
The community housing provider is fair, transparent and responsive in delivering housing
assistance to tenants, residents and other clients
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
b. Determining and managing rents
The provider makes information about
its policies and procedures to determine
and manage rents available in a variety
of formats
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Rent policies and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Rent policies and procedures where there has been
a significant change
•
All applicants/tenants/residents receive
information to enable the applicant/
tenant/resident make informed
decisions and to understand options
The policies and procedures are
applied so there are no significant and
ongoing or repeated failures to treat
applicants and residents/tenants fairly
and transparently
•
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
Tier 1
• Information about the range of housing services delivered
May be requested
• Standard letters and forms to applicants and tenants/
residents used in tenancy management
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
The provider manages rent in
accordance with the specific legal and
policy requirements of each jurisdiction
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
•
Tenancy management policies and
procedures reference legal and
jurisdictional policy requirements
where appropriate
•
All tenants/residents are charged rent
in accordance with jurisdictional policy
requirements
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Documents, such as brochures, booklets or information
kits, that are provided to applicants, tenants/residents and
other stakeholders
•
Evidence that significant changes in policies and
procedures have been communicated to tenants/residents
•
Record of feedback from residents/tenants and response
or action
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis addressing the
adequacy of information provided to tenants/residents
•
Outsourcing agreement (if applicable)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Rent policies and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Rent policies and procedures where there has been a
significant change
Tier 2
• Systems and processes for monitoring compliance with its
own policies and the legal and policy requirements relevant
to its jurisdiction
•
Tenancy data
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring compliance
with its own policies and the legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
May be requested
• Records that confirm the provider complies with its own
rent management policies and procedures and other legal
and policy requirements relevant to its jurisdiction
May be requested
• Sample tenancy/residency agreement
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
•
c. Setting and meeting relevant
housing service standards
The provider communicates and
monitors what tenants and residents
can expect from the service
•
Standards address operating hours,
response times, privacy, conduct and
communication
•
Standards address access across
geographical location (tiers 1 and 2)
Website
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Service charter or relevant policies and procedures
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Service charter or relevant policies and procedures
where there has been a significant change
•
Complaints data
May be requested
• Records that demonstrate the provider monitors the
implementation and effectiveness of the service charter or
relevant policies and procedures
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
10 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
11
Contents
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
The community housing provider is fair, transparent and responsive in delivering housing
assistance to tenants, residents and other clients
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
d. Supporting tenant and resident
engagement
The provider involves tenants and
residents in the planning and delivery
of housing services in a variety of
accessible ways
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenant/resident engagement policies and procedures
or strategy
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Annual report
The provider promotes appropriate
opportunities for tenants and residents
to be involved in their community
All tenants/residents are provided
appropriate opportunities to be
involved in planning and delivering
housing services
•
Formal tenant/resident engagement
mechanisms such as governing body
position(s), representative forum,
surveys, tenant advocate position (tiers
1 and 2)
•
Tenant/resident survey is conducted
at least every two years with positive
outcomes for tenant and resident
involvement (tiers 1 and 2)
•
All tenants/residents are made aware
of appropriate opportunities to be
involved in their community
•
Tenant/resident engagement policies and procedures or
strategy where there has been a significant change
•
Records of tenant/resident engagement (e.g. tenant/
resident meetings, consultations) and actions taken as
a result
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis addresses
the involvement of tenants/residents in planning and
delivering housing services
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenant/resident engagement plans/strategy and/or policies
and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Annual report
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Tiers 1 and 2
• Plans or programs of opportunities for tenants to be
involved in their community
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Tier 1
• Communications to residents/tenants of opportunities
to be involved in community (such as newsletters)
The provider obtains feedback from
tenants and residents on its services,
and consults with them on proposals
that will affect them
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Tenant/resident engagement plans/strategy and/or
policies and procedures where there has been a
significant change
•
All tenants/residents are provided
appropriate opportunities to provide
feedback and to be consulted
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenant/resident engagement plans/strategy and/or policies
and procedures
•
Formal mechanisms such as governing
body position(s), representative forum,
surveys, tenant advocate position
(tiers 1 and 2)
•
•
38
Tenant/resident survey is conducted
at least every two years with
positive outcomes for feedback and
consultation opportunities (tiers 1
and 2)
Feedback mechanisms (e.g. written surveys, suggestion box,
verbal feedback sought during tenant/resident contact)
Tiers 1 and 2
• Methodology for collecting tenant/resident feedback
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Annual report
•
Tenant/resident engagement policies and procedures or
strategy where there has been a significant change
•
Records of tenant/resident engagement (e.g. tenant/
resident meetings, consultations)
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
12 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
13
Contents
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
The community housing provider is fair, transparent and responsive in delivering housing
assistance to tenants, residents and other clients
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
e. Facilitating access to support for
social housing applicants and
tenants with complex needs
The provider establishes and maintains
arrangements that are adequate to
ensure tenants and residents with
support needs receive appropriate
support, if relevant and where available,
to maintain their tenancies
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Tenant/resident support facilitation policies and
procedures where there has been a significant change
•
•
Tenant/resident support facilitation policies and procedures
including responding to changing resident/tenant needs
List of current or proposed partnership arrangements
through which support is facilitated for residents and tenants
in need
Tiers 1 and 2
• List of current or proposed formal partnership arrangements
through which support is facilitated for residents and tenants
in need
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
f. Managing and addressing
complaints and appeals relating
to providing housing services
Information is readily available and
promoted to tenants on complaints
and appeals
•
All applicants, tenants/residents receive
information to enable the applicant,
tenant/resident to make informed
decisions about managing complaints
and appeals
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaint and appeal policies and procedures
•
Documents, such as brochures, booklets or information
kits, that are provided to applicants, tenants/residents and
other stakeholders
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
•
Support data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Sample of formal support partnership agreements and
minutes of meetings with support partners
Tenant/resident survey results and analysis undertaken at
least every two years, addressing access to support
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaint and appeal policies and procedures where there
has been significant change
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
•
The provider manages complaints and
appeals promptly and fairly
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
•
May be requested
• Records relating to the systems in place for monitoring and
maintaining arrangements (tiers 1 and 2)
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Annual report
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
•
•
•
38
Complaints and appeals are managed
so that there are no significant and
ongoing or repeated failures in
promptness or fairness
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaint and appeal policies and procedures
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to complaints and
appeals are dealt promptly and fairly.
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
•
Service charter or relevant policies and procedures
Communications to residents/tenants (such as newsletters)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaint and appeal policies and procedures where there
has been significant change
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
Glossary42
•
Record of complaints and notifi-cations under the
National Law
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
14 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
15
Contents
Performance outcome 1: Tenant and housing services
The community housing provider is fair, transparent and responsive in delivering housing
assistance to tenants, residents and other clients
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
f. Managing and addressing
complaints and appeals relating
to providing housing services
The provider regularly monitors the
effectiveness of the complaints and
appeals system
The type, number and outcome of
complaints and appeals are reviewed
regularly to inform the fair, transparent and
responsive delivery of the complaints and
appeals system
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaint and appeal policies and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Systems and processes for monitoring compliance with its
own policies and the legal and policy requirements relevant
to its jurisdiction
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring compliance
with its own policies and the legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
•
Complaint and appeal policies and procedures where there
has been significant changes
Tiers 1 and 2
• Records of the Risk and Audit Committee
May be requested
• Records that confirm the provider complies with its own
complaint and appeals policies and procedures and other
legal and policy requirements relevant to its jurisdiction
(tiers 1 and 2)
•
g. Maintaining satisfaction
with the overall quality of
housing assistance
8
The provider maintains a satisfactory
level of tenant and resident satisfaction
•
18
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Housing assistance is delivered so
there is no significant and ongoing
or repeated dissatisfaction with the
overall quality of services provided
•
Satisfaction rate with the overall quality
of services ≥ 75%
•
Tenant/resident survey is conducted at
least every two years (tiers 1 and 2)
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
•
Outsourcing agreement: This evidence is relevant where transactional activities are outsourced to another agency, for example,
a real estate agent. The agreement (e.g. contract) may include conditions for service delivery related to quality and the rights of
residents/tenants, and will be subject to review to monitor compliance with the requirements of the formal agreement.
•
The provider makes its tenancy management policies and procedures available in a variety of formats: Information
about eligibility, allocation and ongoing tenancy/residency management processes should be made available to applicants and
residents/tenants to ensure the processes are transparent and readily understood. Similarly, information about internal complaints
and appeals processes should be accessible to applicants and residents/tenants. This information can be communicated through a
range of media such as (but not limited to) brochures, booklets, information kit, posters, audio and online.
•
Complaint and appeal data: This evidence is reviewed to ensure there is no significant and ongoing or repeated failure to treat
applicants and residents fairly.
Glossary42
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
Tiers 1 and 2
• Methodology for collecting tenant/resident
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
Annual report
•
Records of tenant/resident feedback (e.g. tenant/resident
meetings, consultations) and actions taken as a result
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Examples and notes
38
Print friendly version
Download now
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Feedback mechanisms
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis addresses
satisfaction with the overall quality of housing services
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Annual report
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
•
16 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
17
Contents
Performance outcome 2: Housing assets
The community housing provider manages its community housing assets in a manner that ensures
suitable properties are available now and in the future
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
a. Determining changing housing
needs and planning asset
acquisitions, disposals and
reconfiguration to respond
(strategic asset management)
The provider plans for how it will
manage its housing assets to optimise
outcomes on financial investment,
service delivery and meeting
housing needs.
b. Setting and meeting relevant
property condition standards
The provider manages community
housing assets in accordance with
the specific legal and policy property
condition requirements relevant to
its jurisdiction
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
•
Annual report
•
NRS financial performance report
Asset management policies and procedures
Tiers 1 and 2
• Strategic asset management plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Strategic asset management plan
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Thresholds
•
≥70% of all community housing assets
managed by the provider meet state
housing authority’s property condition
standards, or other property condition
standards adopted by the provider that
exceed the state housing authority’s
standards against which the properties
were inspected
•
Improving property condition
standards (e.g. star ratings) over time
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to meet property
condition standards
Record of current and future housing needs analysis
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies
and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies and procedures where there
has been a significant change
•
Asset maintenance plan
•
Reports against the asset maintenance plan
•
Property condition standards
•
Maintenance data
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Strategic asset management plan
•
System and processes for monitoring compliance with its
own policies and the legal and policy requirements relevant
to its jurisdiction
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring compliance
with its own policies and the legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
Tiers 1 and 2
• Reports against the strategic asset management plan
May be requested
• Records that confirm the provider complies with its own
asset management policies and procedures and other legal
and policy requirements relevant to its jurisdiction (tiers 1
and 2)
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
•
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
18 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
19
Contents
Performance outcome 2: Housing assets
The community housing provider manages its community housing assets in a manner that ensures
suitable properties are available now and in the future
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
c. Planning and undertaking
responsive, cyclical and lifecycle maintenance to maintain
property conditions (asset
maintenance)
The provider ensures (commensurate
with its responsibilities):
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies
and procedures
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies and procedures where there
has been significant change
•
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Maintenance data
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
-
properties are well maintained
-
maintenance is undertaken in
a timely manner
-
maintenance work is undertaken
by suitably qualified staff/
contractors/consultants
The condition of each property is
inspected at least every three years by
a party with appropriate qualifications
and/or experience in the building/
construction/maintenance fields or
ability to identify issues and escalate
within an appropriate system (tiers 1
and 2)
•
Cyclical and life-cycle maintenance is
scoped and budget allocated
6
•
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
Maintenance timeframes are set
and met in accordance with legal
requirements relevant to its jurisdiction
6
•
9. Assessing evidence
7
Asset maintenance plan is for a
minimum 10-year rolling period with
budget forecasts (tiers 1 and 2)
Asset maintenance plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Strategic asset management plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Reports against the strategic asset management plan
May be requested
• Reports against the asset maintenance plan
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Tenants are provided with easy-to-use
information on repairs and maintenance
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
All tenants/residents receive information
to enable the tenant/resident to make
informed decisions about repairs
and maintenance
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies and procedures
•
Documents, such as brochures, booklets or information
kits, that are provided to applicants, tenants/residents and
other stakeholders
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
38
•
Certification to the specific legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
•
Maintenance procurement processes and contracts
•
Example of an inspection report by a party with
appropriate qualifications
•
Qualifications and experience requirements in relevant
employment contracts
•
Qualifications and experience requirements in relevant
maintenance procurement processes and contracts
•
Records that confirm the provider complies with its own
asset maintenance policies and procedures and other legal
and policy requirements relevant to its jurisdiction (Tiers 1
and 2)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Asset management policies and procedures where there
has been a significant change
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
•
Communications to residents/tenants (such as newsletters)
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
Glossary42
•
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
20 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
21
Contents
Performance outcome 2: Housing assets
The community housing provider manages its community housing assets in a manner that ensures
suitable properties are available now and in the future
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
c. Planning and undertaking
responsive, cyclical and lifecycle maintenance to maintain
property conditions (asset
maintenance)
The provider maintains a satisfactory
level of tenant and resident satisfaction
with maintenance and housing amenity
• • Tenant/resident survey is conducted at
least every two years (tiers 1 and 2)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Feedback mechanisms
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
• • ≥ 75 per cent of tenants/residents
are satisfied with the condition of
the property
Tiers 1 and 2
• Methodology for collecting tenant/resident feedback
• • ≥ 75 per cent of tenants/residents
are satisfied with the maintenance of
the property
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
• • Records of complaints and appeals
do not indicate ongoing and repeated
instances of resident dissatisfaction
with maintenance and/or housing
amenity
•
Records of tenant/resident feedback (e.g. tenant/resident
meetings, consultations) and actions taken as a result
•
Complaints data
•
Appeals data
May be requested
• Records of monitoring and review of maintenance
procurement and contracting (tiers 1 and 2)
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
•
8
18
d. Planning and delivering its
housing development program
(asset development)
The provider plans, monitors and
reviews its development program to
ensure effective and efficient delivery of
new housing
Development program and projects
are managed to minimise variation to
timeframe and/or budget
Tiers 1 and 2
• Business plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Business plan
•
Expertise capable of ensuring
development projects are delivered
effectively and efficiently
•
Strategic asset management plan
•
Strategic asset management plan
•
Financial planning and forecasting
•
Financial planning and forecasting
•
Risk management plan
•
•
Project management methodology
Risk management plan
and register
•
Industry partnerships
•
•
Corporate structure
Industry partnership engagements, contracts and
agreements
•
Project progress reports and closure reports
•
Development data
•
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Risks are identified and mitigated
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/
growth plan
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
•
38
Glossary42
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
•
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Annual report
Tiers 1 and 2
• Tenant/resident survey results and analysis addressing
satisfaction with the overall quality of housing services
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
•
Debt financing arrangements and covenants
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/growth plan
•
Scenario planning or stress testing
•
Debt financing arrangements and covenants
•
Capital structure
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
22 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
23
Contents
Performance outcome 3: Community engagement
The community housing provider works in partnership with relevant organisations to promote
community housing and to contribute to socially inclusive communities
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
a. Promoting community housing to
local organisations that work with
potential residents, tenants
or clients
The provider engages with relevant
organisations using appropriate
communication tools to promote
community housing and benefits
of partnership
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
•
Business plan
•
Business plan
•
List of proposed engagements or documents
•
Annual report
•
Records that demonstrate the provider engages with
relevant organisations
b. Contributing to place renewal
and social inclusion partnerships
and planning relevant to
the provider’s community
housing activities
The provider works with others to
maximise positive economic and
social outcomes for tenants and the
community through place renewal
(tier 1 only)
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Organisations are provided with
information about community housing
and its benefits
Tiers 1 and 2
•
Community engagement policies and procedures or strategy
•
Website
Tiers 1 and 2
•
Community engagement policies and procedures where there
has been a significant change
•
Website
Tier 1
Tier 1
•
Business plan
•
Business plan
•
Community engagement policies and procedures or strategy
•
Annual report
•
List of current or proposed formal partnership arrangements
through which the provider contributes to place renewal
•
Website
•
Website
May be requested
•
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
The provider works with others to
maximise positive economic and
social outcomes for tenants and the
community through social inclusion
Tiers 1 and 2
Tiers 1 and 2
•
Business plan
•
Business plan
•
Community engagement policies and procedures or strategy
•
Annual report
•
List of current or proposed formal partnership arrangements
through which the provider contributes to social inclusion
•
Website
•
Website
May be requested
•
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Sample of formal partnership arrangements and minutes of
meetings with partners
Sample of formal partnership arrangements and minutes of
meetings with partners
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
24 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
25
Contents
Performance outcome 4: Governance
The community housing provider is well governed to support the aims and intended outcomes
of its business
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
5. Risk and regulation
6. Evidence sources
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
9. Assessing evidence
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
a. Ensuring coherent and robust
strategic, operational, financial
and risk planning
The governing body sets and
implements its strategic directions and
scrutinises performance using:
•
The governing body meets regularly (at
least six times a year) in quorum with
the treasurer and/or other financial
expertise and/or consistent with the
constitution
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Constitution, charter or equivalent
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
Affiliated entity arrangements, and service agreements
and contracts
•
Annual report
•
The governing body has an
appropriate subcommittee structure
in place including an Audit and Risk
Management Committee (or similar),
with the Risk Management Committee
meeting at least four times a year (tier 1
and 2)
•
Documented governance structure and governance policies
and procedures
Affiliated entity arrangements where there has been
a significant change
•
•
Business plan
Governance structure and governance policies and
procedures where there has been significant change
•
Annual general meeting minutes and reports
•
Certification or accreditation of the provider relating to
recognised standards, where relevant
•
NRS financial performance report
-
business planning
-
financial planning
4
-
risk management planning
5
-
business continuity planning
6
The governing body provides effective
control of affiliated entity arrangements
(e.g. through a group structure
agreement, service-level agreement,
partnership agreement or contract)
4
6
7
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
•
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
•
•
Risk management plan and risk register
•
Business continuity plan
•
System for monitoring performance against its business plan
Affiliated entity arrangements
arrangements appropriately address:
•
Subcommittee structure and associated terms of reference
•
Risk management plan and risk register
-
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring performance
against its business plan
•
Business continuity plan where there has been
significant change
•
Tier 1
• Financial planning and scenario testing
The risk management system
is consistent with AUS/NZ ISO
31000:2009 (tier 1 and 2)
-
-
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
26 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
actual or perceived conflicts of
interest and conflicts of duty
in the board’s decision making
where there are shared directors or
executives
protocols for managing directors’
duties and the sharing of
information in accordance with
relevant corporations law
the independence of the
chairperson (non-employee of the
provider or affiliated entities)
-
appropriate balance between
independent directors and
executive directors
-
clear and transparent policies and/
or agreements on affiliated entity
arrangements where contracting or
sharing services that are relevant to
achieving performance outcomes
under the National Regulatory Code
-
corporations law requirements (particularly
in relation to shadow directors, insolvent
trading scheme, and consolidated financial
reporting)
-
risks in relation to reputation, governance,
corporate entity and financial
38
Glossary42
relevant corporations law in relation
to directors’ duties and exposure to
liabilities in relation to non-wholly
owned subsidiaries
-
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Tiers 1 and 2
• Financial plan
Financial plan and scenario testing
May be requested
• Certification or accreditation of the provider relating to
recognised standards, where relevant
Tiers 1 and 2
• Financial plan
May be requested
• Sample governing body meeting minutes including
agendas, reports on progress against plans (strategic,
operational, financial and risk) and action items
•
Records that confirm the provider is performing against its
business plan (tiers 1 and 2)
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
•
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
27
Contents
Performance outcome 4: Governance
The community housing provider is well governed to support the aims and intended outcomes
of its business
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
b. Ensuring effective, transparent
and accountable arrangements
and controls are in place for
decision making to give effect to
strategic, operational, financial
and risk plans
The provider operates in accordance
with a code of governance, consistent
with the ASX Corporate Governance
Principles, including in relation to:
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Constitution, charter or equivalent
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
•
Annual report
-
the roles and responsibilities of the
governing body and subcommittees
•
Documented governance structure and governance policies
and procedures
•
•
Business plan
Governance code, structures, policies and procedures
where there has been a significant change
-
decision-making processes
•
Schedule of delegations
•
-
managing conflicts of interest
•
Code of governance
Schedule of delegations where there has been
a significant change
-
internal business compliance
•
Conflict of interests policies and procedures
•
Conflict of interest register or record
-
selection and performance of
the CEO
•
Standing financial instructions and key financial
reporting requirements
•
Sample governing body meeting minutes including
agendas, reports on progress against the business plan
and action items
Tiers 1 and 2
• Risk management plan and register
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to achieve the
performance outcomes defined in the
regulatory code
Independent chairperson
(non-employee of the provider or
affiliated entities)
Tiers 1 and 2
• Subcommittee structure and associated terms of reference
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
8
18
c. Complying with legal
requirements and relevant
government policies
The provider has a system in place to
ensure compliance with all applicable
legal requirements and relevant
government policies
24
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to meet legal
requirements and relevant
government policies
•
Any instance of noncompliance is dealt
with in a prompt and effective manner
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Systems or processes for monitoring compliance with legal
requirements and relevant government policies
•
Policies and procedures or processes for ensuring staff
understand and comply with legal requirements and relevant
government policies (such as training)
Tiers 1 and 2
• Risk management system
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for monitoring compliance
with its own policies and the legal and policy requirements
relevant to its jurisdiction
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
38
Records of compliance reporting to the governing body
May be requested
• Sample governing body meeting minutes including
agendas, reports on progress against plans (strategic,
operational, financial and risk) and action items
•
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
•
Records that confirm the provider is performing against its
code of governance (tiers 1 and 2)
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Records that confirm the provider is complying with legal
requirements and relevant government policies (such as a
report of compliance to the governing body)
•
Annual report
Tiers 1 and 2
• Risk management plan and register
•
Audit and risk committee agendas, minutes and reports
Tier 1
• Debt financing arrangements and covenants
Other sources
• Decisions of appeals/reviews in relevant tribunals or bodies
•
Decisions of other regulatory authorities
•
Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
28 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
29
Contents
Performance outcome 4: Governance
The community housing provider is well governed to support the aims and intended outcomes
of its business
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
9. Assessing evidence
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
d. Ensuring that the governing body
has members with appropriate
expertise or that such expertise
is available to the governing body
The provider has fair and transparent
processes in place to ensure the
governing body has members with,
or access to, an appropriate range of
skills and knowledge to deliver on its
business plan and manage the risks
in its business, including in relation to,
where undertaken:
•
The business plan includes maintaining
an appropriate governance structure,
skills and knowledge
Tier 1, 2 and 3
• Constitution, charter or equivalent
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
There is a clear process for identifying
and acquiring the skills and knowledge
needed for effective governance in the
context of its business plan
•
Business plan
•
Annual report
•
Documented governance structure and governance policies
and procedures
•
Board member profiles/CVs
•
Annual general meeting minutes and reports
•
•
NRS financial performance report
The governing body accesses external
advice, independent of the provider’s
management, where appropriate
Profiles of current governing body members identifying their
skills and expertise
•
Governing body induction and training plan
The governing body undertakes a
governance review at least threeyearly, or after a significant change,
with external input (tiers 1 and 2)
May be requested
• Recruitment, induction, professional development,
succession, remuneration and/or performance assessment
policies and procedures
Tiers 1 and 2
• Methodology and outcome of governance reviews where
they have been undertaken
6
6
7
-
recruitment and selection
-
induction
-
professional development
-
succession
-
engaging external expertise
-
remuneration
-
performance assessment of the
governing body
•
•
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
•
Website
May be requested
• Recruitment, induction, professional development,
succession, remuneration and/or performance
assessment records
Examples and notes
8
•
Reports to the governing body: Reports in the key operational areas assist the governing body to make informed decisions. A
review of reports considered by the governing body assists to ascertain whether the provider receives appropriate information for
the size and scope of its operation. Reports may be from internal or external sources.
•
Schedule of delegations: The provider should have policies and procedures that have been approved by the governing body
relating to governance, which details the responsibilities of the governing body for decision-making. Delegations should be in
place that authorise decision making for the governing body, management and operational staff.
•
Expertise: The knowledge and skills of governing body members, or those available to the governing body, may include financial
management, asset management, risk management, human resource management and housing management.
18
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
30 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
31
Contents
Performance outcome 5: Probity
The community housing provider maintains high standards of probity relating to the business
of the provider
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
a. Establishing and administering a
code of conduct
The provider has a code of conduct
designed (or is supported by additional
policies and procedures) to ensure it
maintains high standards of probity,
including in relation to:
•
All board members, staff members and
volunteers have provided a written
undertaking that they understand and
will comply with the code of conduct
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Code of governance
•
Code of conduct
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Code of governance and code of conduct where there has
been a significant change
•
The provider regularly promotes the
code of conduct
•
Probity policies and procedures (such as whistle blowing,
conflict of interest, gifts and hospitality, and procurement)
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to abide by the
code of conduct
-
whistle-blowing
-
conflict of interest
-
gifts and hospitality
-
procurement
•
Probity policies and procedures where there has been
significant change
•
Conflict of interests register or records
•
Gift register or records
•
Records of governing body and staff training (such as a
plan or calendar)
Annual report
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
•
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
Tiers 1 and 2
• Website
9. Assessing evidence
7
May be requested
• Sample of de-identified signed agreements to abide by the
code of conduct
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
•
8
24
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
18
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
38
Records that demonstrate the provider complies with its
code of conduct (tiers 1 and 2)
b. Establishing and administering
a system of employment and
appointment checks
The provider conducts checks for
governing body members, employees,
volunteers and agents commensurate
with the requirements of the position,
including in relation to:
-
referees and previous employment
-
criminal record
-
bankruptcy
-
working with children
-
working with aged
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated failures to conduct
appropriate employment and
appointment checks
•
Media reports
•
Court decisions
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• System or processes to undertake employment and
appointment checks
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Annual report
May be requested
• Employment checks policies and procedures
May be requested
• Employment checks policies and procedures
•
Audit management letters (where they have been issued)
•
Sample employment and appointment check forms (e.g.
police clearance, references, working with children)
•
Employment checks policies and procedures
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
32 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
33
Contents
Performance outcome 5: Probity
The community housing provider maintains high standards of probity relating to the business
of the provider
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
c. Establishing and administering a
system for preventing, detecting,
reporting on and responding to
instances of fraud, corruption and
criminal conduct
The provider’s system is consistent
with good practice established by
relevant anti-fraud, anti-corruption
and anti-crime agencies and
professional standards bodies in the
relevant jurisdiction
•
There are no significant and ongoing or
repeated instances of fraud, corruption
or criminal conduct
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Systems and processes for detecting and responding to
fraud, corruption and criminal conduct
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Audit management letters (where they have been issued)
•
Any instance of fraud, corruption or
criminal conduct is dealt with in a
prompt and effective manner
Tiers 1 and 2
• Fraud, corruption and criminal conduct prevention plan,
policies and procedures
Tiers 1 and 2
• Risk register
May be requested
• Records that demonstrate the provider’s system for
preventing, detecting, reporting on and responding
to instances of fraud, corruption and criminal conduct
are effective
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
•
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
Tier 1
• Integrated system and processes for detecting and
responding to fraud, corruption and criminal conduct
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Risk management system and risk register
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
8
d. Maintaining the reputation of the
community housing sector
18
24
The provider notifies the primary
Registrar of any incident related to
its operations (and its response)
that damages or has the potential
to damage the reputation of the
community housing sector
•
•
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
•
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Annual report
•
Procurement and contracting controls
•
Financial controls
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated instances of incidents
that damage or may damage the
reputation of the community
housing sector
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Notification policies and procedures
•
Media reports
•
Court decisions
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Complaints data
•
Appeals data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Audit and Risk Committee meeting minutes
Any incident that damages or may
damage the reputation of the
community housing sector is dealt
with in a prompt and effective manner
•
Risk register
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
Notifications are made consistent with
the NRS notification guidelines and
National Law
38
•
Decisions of appeals/reviews/matters in relevant tribunals,
bodies or courts
•
Decisions of other regulatory authorities
•
Media reports
•
Court decisions
Glossary42
Examples and notes
•
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
Probity refers to integrity and honesty in the agency’s operations and in the conduct of its governing body, volunteers and
standards. The performance standards require the agency to establish or adopt a code of conduct incorporating measures such as
mechanisms to manage conflicts of interest and to make policy and business decisions within an ethical framework.
34 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
•
The code of conduct describes the behaviour and responsibilities an organisation requires of its people. The code of conduct
will include requirements for ethical and appropriate conduct. A provider’s code of conduct and a signed undertaking that a staff,
governing body and volunteer member has read, understood and will abide by the code of conduct demonstrates a provider’s
commitment to guiding staff in ethical conduct. It is recommended that training and induction of staff, governing body and
volunteer members should include training in the code of conduct.
35
Contents
Performance outcome 6: Management
The community housing provider manages its resources in a cost-effective manner
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
a. Demonstrating it utilises its
assets and funding to meet
business goals
The business planning process includes
an assessment of costs and returns
on assets and funding to meet its
business goals
•
Costs are controlled and, where
possible, are minimised
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
Returns (financial and/or social)
are sustained and, where possible,
maximised
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/growth plan
•
Annual report
•
Annual audited financial reports
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Asset data
•
Financial data
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
Tiers 1 and 2
• Development data
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/growth plan
9. Assessing evidence
7
•
•
The provider generates and utilises
surplus to achieve its business goals
(tiers 1 and 2 only)
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
Where cost-effective opportunities
for improving financial and/or social
returns are identified, they are achieved
Operating expense composition
Tiers 1 and 2
• Business plan
Tiers 1 and 2
• Business plan
Equity and reserve composition
•
•
Annual report
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Asset data
•
Financial data
•
Return on assets
•
•
8
Strategic asset management plan
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/growth plan
18
Tier 1
• Strategic/development/growth plan
24
•
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
b. Implementing appropriate
management structures, systems,
policies and procedures to ensure
the operational needs of its
business can be met (including
having people with the right skills
and experience and the systems
and resources to achieve the
intended outcomes of
its business)
The provider’s management structure,
systems, policies and procedures are
fit-for-purpose
•
The provider’s management structure,
systems, policies and procedures
are subject to regular review and
enhancement, and when there has
been significant change to the scale
and scope of its business
Scenario planning or stress testing
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
•
Annual report
•
Audit management letters (where issued)
Corporate structure and systems
Tiers 1 and 2
• Audit and Risk Committee meeting minutes
•
Risk register
May be requested
• Methodology and outcome of management structure,
systems, policies and procedures review where they have
been undertaken
Glossary42
•
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
Scenario planning or stress testing
Quality management systems manual/policy or, if relevant,
accreditation (tier 1 only)
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
36 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
37
Contents
Performance outcome 7: Financial viability
The community housing provider is financially viable at all times
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
a. Ensuring a viable capital structure
The provider monitors and manages
its capital structure to achieve its
business goals
•
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
Audited financial report
•
Annual report
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Annual audited financial reports
•
Financial viability measures data
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Audit management letter for the most recent financial year
(where they have been issued)
•
Financial viability measures data
Tiers 1 and 2
• Debt financing arrangements and covenants
Tiers 1 and 2
• Debt financing arrangements and covenants
May be requested
• Sample governing body minutes with relevant operational
and financial reports
b. Maintaining appropriate financial
performance
The provider monitors and manages
its financial performance to achieve its
business goals
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
•
Financial performance is monitored
and managed for short-, medium- and
long-term viability
•
There are no significant and ongoing
or repeated instances of incidents of
inappropriate financial performance
and/or failure to achieve business
goals due to inappropriate financial
performance
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Annual report
•
Financial viability measures data
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Audit management letter for the most recent financial year
(where they have been issued)
•
Financial viability measures data
Tier 1 and 2
• Financial planning and scenario testing
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
•
Debt financing arrangements and covenants
May be requested
• Sample governing body minutes with relevant operational
and financial reports
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
Capital adequacy – the provider has
sufficient capital resources to be able
to absorb unexpected losses and to
manage adverse shocks so that it can
meet its commitments to investors
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
38 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
39
Contents
Performance outcome 7: Financial viability
The community housing provider is financially viable at all times
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
Performance requirements
Performance indicators
Thresholds
Evidence sources to
demonstrate capacity
Evidence sources to
demonstrate compliance
c. Managing financial risk exposure
The provider monitors and manages
its financial risk exposure to protect its
financial interests and the interests
of investors
•
Opportunities for financial risks to
crystallise are minimised
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
Tiers 1, 2 and 3
• Business plan
•
There are no significant and ongoing or
repeated instances of risks crystallising
•
NRS financial performance report
•
Annual report
•
Any crystallising risks are dealt with in
a prompt and effective manner
•
Financial management policies and procedures
•
NRS financial performance report
Tiers 1 and 2
• Financial planning and scenario testing
•
Risk management plan
•
•
Risk register
Debt financing arrangements and covenants
May be requested
• Sample governing body minutes with relevant risk
management reports
•
Governing body consideration and approval of significant
financial events and risk management (sample)
Other sources
• Record of complaints and notifications under the
National Law
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
Tiers 1 and 2
• Documented risk management system
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
40 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
41
Contents
Glossary
1. About the National
Regulatory System for
Community Housing
2
2. Purpose of this document
3
3. Principles
3
4. Tiers of registration
4
5. Risk and regulation
4
6. Evidence sources
5
7. Recognising evidence from
other assurance systems
6
8. Obtaining evidence from
other sources
6
9. Assessing evidence
7
National Regulatory Code
Evidence Guidelines
Performance outcome 1:
Tenant and housing services
8
Performance outcome 2:
Housing assets
18
Performance outcome 3:
Community engagement
24
Performance outcome 4:
Governance26
Community housing
Housing for people on a very low, low or moderate income
or for people with additional needs that is delivered by nongovernment organisations.
Community housing asset
a) land vested in the provider by or under the community
housing legislation of a participating jurisdiction, or
b) land acquired by the provider wholly or partly with funding
provided by a Housing Agency of a participating jurisdiction,
or
c) land vested in the provider on which a housing agency of a
participating jurisdiction has constructed housing or made
other improvements, or
d) funds provided to the provider by a housing agency of a
participating jurisdiction for the purposes of community
housing, or
e) any other asset of the provider that is of a class of assets
declared by the community housing legislation of a
participating jurisdiction as community housing assets for
the purposes of the National Law.
Community housing legislation
The National Law as applied in or adopted by a jurisdiction,
together with any other legislation declared to be community
housing legislation by the law of that jurisdiction.
Community housing provider
An organisation that provides community housing.
Enforcement Guidelines
Guidelines setting out the enforcement actions available to
Registrars under the National Law if they reasonably believe
that a provider is not complying with the community housing
legislation of a participating jurisdiction.
Housing agency
A Commonwealth, state or territory government department
or agency with responsibility for policy and funding decisions
relating to community and other housing
Inter-Government Agreement (IGA)
A joint ministerial agreement, signed by relevant ministers
which commits governments to proceeding with the National
Regulatory System for Community Housing and outlines the
basis for its establishment and operation.
National Law
The state and territory based legislation through which the
NRSCH is being introduced. The National Law is enacted in
the host jurisdiction, New South Wales, and either applied or
adopted by participating jurisdictions.
National Register
A single national database with the details of all registered
community housing providers that is made publicly available.
National Regulatory Code
The performance requirements that registered housing
providers must meet and comply with in providing
community housing.
National Regulatory Council (NRC)
An independent advisory committee to be appointed by
housing ministers as an independent advisory committee to
oversee the operation of the NRSCH with Secretariat support.
National Regulatory System for Community Housing
(NRSCH)
A national system of registration, monitoring and regulation of
community housing providers to encourage the development,
viability and quality of community housing to promote
confidence in the good governance of registered community
housing providers so as to:
•
facilitate greater investment in the sector
•
make it easier for community housing providers to operate
in more than one participating jurisdiction, and
•
identify appropriate entities to which government funding
for community housing might be provided under other
legislation or policies of a jurisdiction.
Operational Guidelines
The suite of guidelines that governs the operation of the
NRSCH, including the Evidence Guidelines, Tier Guidelines and
Enforcement Guidelines.
Participating jurisdictions
Commonwealth, states and territories whose governments
have agreed to participate in the NRSCH, e.g. a jurisdiction that
applies or adopts the National Law.
Primary Registrar
The Registrar for the primary jurisdiction in which the
community housing provider operates: generally the Registrar
in the state or territory in which the provider undertakes the
majority of its community housing activity.
Tier Guidelines
Guidelines for the application of the three-tiered registration
system based on risk, whereby different levels of regulatory
oversight apply to providers based on the scale and scope of
their community housing activities.
Please note:
Some common terms may have slightly different definitions in
different jurisdictions that reflect variations in their legislation
and/or existing terminology.
Performance outcome 5:
Probity32
Performance outcome 6:
Management36
Performance outcome 7:
Financial viability
38
Glossary42
Print friendly version
Download now
Please note that this interactive pdf
has been created for online viewing
only. To print any of the pages, please
click here to download the print
friendly version of this document.
42 l National Regulatory System for Community Housing - Evidence Guidelines Version 1.0
43