Specifications and Standard Activity by Kerry Heid, Magna Electric Corporation Canadian Standards Update: CSA Z462 and the NFPA 70E Currently there are two CSA standards being worked on that have ties to NETA. CSA Z462, Workplace Electrical Safety, is being reviewed, and a new standard, CSA Z320 Building Commissioning is being developed. CSA Z462 is harmonized with NFPA 70E, while CSA Z320 is a new standard. Meetings for CSA Z462 were held in Montreal on September 30 and October 1 as well as in Toronto on December 8 and 9. The primary reason for these meetings was to organize the committee to make submissions for change to NFPA 70E. The deadline for changes in 70E is January 5, 2010. Since CSA Z462 and NFPA 70E are technically harmonized, it is important for members of the Canadian standard committee to effect change of 70E so that this change can then be integrated into the next revision of Z462. www.netaworld.org Changes proposed that affect NETA are in regard to chapter 2, Safety-Related Maintenance Requirements, where proposals were approved to mandate maintenance requirements in two critical areas: switching devices and protective devices. Maintenance on switching devices is directly relevant to worker safety when establishing an electrically safe work condition. Maintenance on overcurrent protective devices is crucial in ensuring calculated incident energy values meet actual field values when operating times of equipment are considered. A new standard called Building Commission is under development. The electrical subcommittee has extensively used the NETA acceptance testing specifications for determining the protocol for electrical system commissioning. This standard applies to all commercial and institutional buildings built in Canada. Spring 2010 NETA WORLD 1 Specifications and Standard Activity NEC Code Making Panel Committee Report 2011 NFPA 70 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CODE PANEL 10 DESCRIPTION OF PANEL CMP-10 deals primarily with Article 240, Overcurrent Protection. MEETING DATE December, 7th and 8th, 2009 MEETING PURPOSE Report on Comments, 2011 Code ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING Roderic L. Hageman, Principle Scott Blizard, Alternate NETA NETA NUMBER OF COMMENTS 52 Accept Reject Accept in Principle 9 30 4 Accept in Part Accept in Principle in Part Hold 0 1 9 Definitions: Accept – The panel accepts the comment exactly as written. Only editorial changes may be made. Reject – The comment is rejected by the panel. Accept in Principle – Accept the comment with a change in wording. Accept in Part – If part of a comment is accepted without change and the remainder is rejected. The panel action must indicate what part was accepted and what part was rejected and the panel statement must indicate its reasons for rejecting that portion. Accept in Principle in Part – This is a combination of “Accept in Principle” and “Accept in Part” as shown above. Hold – A comment is held for consideration during the next Code cycle because it introduces new material not in the original proposal. 2 NETA WORLD Spring 2010 CMP-10 is a very well organized and knowledgeable panel, with representation from many organizations including IAIE, IEC, IEEE, IBEW, EEI, ACC, NETA, UL, NEMA, and NECA. This diverse group brings various points of view to the code-making process. Donald Cook is the chair of CMP-10. Donny is a member of the International Association of Electrical Inspectors, IAEI, and will help CMP-10 suggest enforceable code. Due to significant effort by members of the panel in preparing suggested panel statements and Donny’s work in organizing the comments in a logical order to be addressed by the panel, the panel was able to work through the 53 comments in just one and one-half days. There were a few comments that would be of particular interest to NETA members. Some of these were rejected unanimously by the panel and, therefore, will have no impact on NETA at this stage of the code-making process. CMP-10 received nine comments regarding Proposal 10-72. In the proposal stage, 10-72 proposed a new Article 240.35 that would require that enclosures, in other than dwelling occupancies, containing service or feeder circuit overcurrent protection devices be marked with 1) available short-circuit current, 2) the date the calculation was made, and 3) a warning that the value may change. The panel was more divided on this proposal than any other of the 84 proposals. After significant discussion, the panel voted to accept in principle and in part. They dropped the warning and added an exception for installations with written safety procedures, and where only qualified persons could service the equipment, as long as the short-circuit information was available to the AHJ. The final ballot was 7 to 4 in favor of the panel action. www.netaworld.org This same proposal was presented to CMP-1 at the ROP meeting and was accepted by them. CMP-10 created its own comment, 10-26a, log #CC1000 that effectively asks the Correlating Committee to accept the proposal as 240.35 if it does not accept CMP-1’s version in the final ballot on comments. During the proposal stage, proposal 10-82 proposed a new article, 240.87 to require either zone-selective interlocking, differential relaying, or an energy-reducing maintenance switch on circuit breakers without an instantaneous trip. This proposal was accepted in principle by the panel. The panel added “or an approved equivalent” to allow for future technology. This proposal sent a shock wave through the breaker manufacturing community. Eaton requested time to make a presentation to the panel encouraging the panel to reject the proposal, and there were 10 comments, nine of which requested major changes in the proposal or outright rejection. The panel, however, continued to support the original proposal with some language modification One other proposal that may be of interest to testing firms after 2016 is a proposal by our Panel Chair, Donny Cook that requires equipment required or permitted in Article 240 (overcurrent protective devices) to be “listed or field evaluated by a qualified testing laboratory or inspection agency concerned with product evaluation”. Donny’s suggested December 31, 2016 delayed enforcement gives the industry time to get devices listed. Following that date, devices not listed by an organization such as UL would have to be field evaluated for acceptability. I made the comment in discussion that some characteristics, such as interrupting capability, are not capable of being evaluated in the field. The comment was accepted by the panel, and it will be interesting to see the final results. www.netaworld.org Spring 2010 NETA WORLD 3 Specifications and Standard Activity Ron Widup, Shermco Industries The 2011 National Electrical Code: Report on Comments Meeting Update For each version of the NFPA 70, The National Electrical Code or NEC, there is a specific process for review and revision on the standard. Recently, one of the last significant steps in the process, the “Report on Comments” (ROC) meeting was just completed in California. This was for the current revision of standard (the 2011 Edition) and marks the last time the Code Making Panel participants get together as a group to discuss public proposals and comments. NETA is represented on three Code Making Panels, CMP-10 (Rod Hageman/Scott Blizard), CMP 11 (Ron Widup), and CMP-15 (Mike Velvikis). There was also activity from NETA on CMP-4 during the ROC meeting. The following information pertains to each panel activity. CMP-4 Code Making Panel 4 is responsible for Articles 225 and 230 One of the more important Articles is 230.95(C), which sets forth the performance testing requirements of Ground Fault Protection Systems (GFP). There were two proposals submitted for recommended changes to Article 230.95(C), one by Rod Hageman of PRIT Service and one by Ron Widup of Shermco Industries. The basic intent of the proposals was to add the words “by primary current injection” as a technical clarification to the existing performance testing requirements of 230.95(C). At the Report on Proposal (ROP) meeting, both proposals were rejected by CMP-4. As a follow-up to the committee action, comments were sent to NFPA in an attempt to clarify the position and technical merit of the proposals. Additionally, on December 9, 2009, at the Report on Comments meeting in California, Rod Hageman and Ron Widup presented an overview of testing of GFP systems by primary current injection. The intent was to educate the CMP-4 committee on the intent and technical merits of the proposals. 4 NETA WORLD Spring 2010 Unfortunately, the committee did not reverse their original action to reject. A new series of proposals will need to be authored for the next (2014) edition of the NEC. CMP-11 Code Making Panel 11 is responsible for Articles 409, 430, 440, 460, 470, Annex D, and Example D8. These articles primarily relate to motors and motor controls, as well as HVAC and refrigeration related code topics. While this Code cycle did not have very many controversial or “hot” topics for CMP-11, there were several important proposals and related discussion topics that were a part of the meeting and the 64 individual comments submitted to NFPA. Some of the meeting highlight points of discussion were: Valve Actuator (VAM) Assemblies There was much discussion about defining Small Valve Actuator (VAM) Assemblies. Valve Actuator (VAM) assemblies are covered in Article 430.2 and 430.81. Regarding original Proposal No. 11-25, ROC Item 115, Log 2852 and Proposal No. 11-25, ROC Item 11-35, Log 2173. The panel holds the proposals and comment in accordance with NFPA Regulation Governing Committee Projects Section 4.4.6.2.2(c) because the proposed changes could not be handled within the timeframe for processing the report. They will become an automatic proposal item at the next cycle. Article 430.28 Feeder Taps There was much discussion on feeder taps and the wording of proposal No. 11-55. Acceptance of the comment to this proposal would allow a tap to be made to a tap which is specifically prohibited by Article 240.21. It was also noted that CMP-10 actions on proposal ROP 10-56 of the 1999 edition of the NEC specifically prohibited tapping a tap. The panel intends that tap conductors be terminated into a single overcurrent device. www.netaworld.org Adjustable Speed Drive Systems Article 430.123, Branch Circuit Short-Circuit and Ground Fault Protection As it relates to adjustable-speed drive systems, the panel provided comment and additional revisions for clarity. Article 440.9 Equipment Grounding This proposal added new text that states “Any wiring method employed shall contain an equipment grounding conductor in accordance with 250.118(1).” This adds a very important safety requirement for a grounding conductor on outdoor air conditioning and refrigeration equipment, as wiring methods installed outdoors are more susceptible to being damaged and/or compromised. Overall there were 64 comments and two committee proposals. The recommended committee actions were: Code Making Panel 11 Summary of Actions at ROC Meeting 30 7 1 5 19 2 2 The (somewhat abbreviated) 2011 NEC timeline is as follows: • NEC CMP ballots by staff liaison 1/12/10 • Date for NEC TCC meeting 2/22 - 2/26/10 • NEC TCC ballots 3/3/10 • Final copy (w/ ballot statements) to Secretary, Standards Council 3/5/10 • Posting of NEC Certified NITMAM 5/21/10 • Association Meeting for Documents with NITMAM 6/6-10/10 • Appeal closing date 6/29/10 • Council issuance for Documents with or without NITMAM 7/30/10 In July 2010 the 2011 Edition of the National Electrical Code should become official. Accept Accept in Principle Accept in Part Accept in Principle and Part Reject Hold Committee Action 2011 Edition of the NEC: The Home Stretch The next step in the process is for the committee members to vote on the recommended meeting actions, the NFPA Technical Correlating Committee to review the results, anyone with issues that wants to make a motion on the issues present at the NFPA Association Meeting, and finally for the NFPA council to issue the document. www.netaworld.org Spring 2010 NETA WORLD 5 Specifications and Standard Activity Standards Update ANSI/NETA ETT-2010 ANSI/NETA ATS-2009 The ANSI/NETA Standard for Certification of Electrical Testing Technicians was approved as an American National Standard on January 8, 2010. The document was originally approved as an ANSI standard in 2000. This standard establishes minimum requirements for qualification, certification, training, and exStandard for perience requirements of the Certification electrical testing technician. It of also provides criteria for docuElectrical menting qualifications and Testing certification, and details the Technicians minimum qualifications for an independent and impartial certifying body to certify electrical testing technicians. The ANSI/NETA Standard for Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and System is scheduled to be published as a revised document in 2013. Standard for These specifications cover Acceptance the suggested field tests and Testing inspections that are available Specifications to assess the suitability for for Electrical Power initial energization of elecEquipment and Systems trical power equipment and systems. The purpose of these specifications is to assure that tested electrical equipment and systems are operational, are within applicable standards and manufacturer’s tolerances, and are installed in accordance with design specifications. Work on this document will officially begin in 2011. Once completed, this standard will carry the designation of ANSI/NETA ATS-2013. ANSI/NETA ETT-2010 InterNational Electrical Testing Association American National Standard ANSI/NETA MTS-2007 The ANSI/NETA Standard for Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and Systems will be reviewed and is scheduled to be published as Standard for a revised American National Maintenance Standard in 2011. These specTesting ifications cover the suggested Specifications field tests and inspections that for Electrical Power Distribution are available to assess the suitEquipment and Systems ability for continued service InterNational Electrical and reliability of electrical Testing Association power distribution equipment and systems. The purpose of these specifications is to assure that tested electrical equipment and systems are operational, are within applicable standards and manufacturer’s tolerances, and are suitable for continued service. The revision is expected to be completed in the fall of 2010 and will carry the designation of ANSI/ NETA MTS-2011. ANSI/NETA MTS-2007 ANSI/NETA ATS-2009 Participation Comments and suggestions are always welcome on any of the standards and should be directed to the NETA office at neta@netaworld.org or 888-300-6382. To learn more about the NETA standards process, purchase these standards, or to get involved, please visit www.netaworld. org or call 888-300-6382. American National Standard 2007 6 NETA WORLD Spring 2010 www.netaworld.org