+ Using the PLC Structure to Better Understand how to Investigate the Iowa Core in Math: Part III Christine Quisley, Sandy Ubben AEA 267 Math/PLC Consultants + Today’s Focus How implementing the Standards of Mathematical Practice build students mathematical understanding. + Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) 8 practices, IC pages 8-10. Not new, but based in best practice in mathematics education over past 20-25 years - Based on NCTM process standards (1989 and 2000) and National Research Council’s Report Adding It Up (2001). Practices describe how students engage in learning mathematics. SMP are the key to improving mathematics teaching and learning. + What does mathematical understanding look like? • To show mathematical understanding what should see and hear from teachers and students. + Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) SMP are the key to improving mathematics teaching and learning. What The are the look fors in a classroom teacher will… + Innovation Configuration Map Shirley Hord: "What it does is to explicitly spell out what the new practice will look like when it is in operation in the classroom." + Poll: Where am I? Where is my PLC Team? + Sample Problems 28 + 44 = Fosnot, C. T. & Dolk, M. (2001), Young Mathematicians at Work: Constructing Number Sense, Addition, and Subtraction, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, pp. 136-137. + What do we know about the student’s mathematical understanding? 1 28 +44 72 + 28 + 44 Samples of Student Work Fosnot, C. T. & Dolk, M. (2001), Young Mathematicians at Work: Constructing Number Sense, Addition, and Subtraction, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, pp. 136-137. + Innovation Configuration Map Shirley Hord: "What it does is to explicitly spell out what the new practice will look like when it is in operation in the classroom." + Team Planning Questions SMP 6 (Kanold & Larson) What is the essential student vocabulary for this unit, and how will our team assess it? What are the expectations for precision in student solution pathways, explanations, and labels during this unit? How will students be expected to accurately describe the procedures they used to solve tasks and problems in class? Will student work as it relates to in-and out-of-class problems and tasks require students to perform calculations carefully and appropriately? Will students’ team and whole-class discussions reveal an accurate use of mathematics? + Team Planning Questions SMP 2 (Kanold & Larson) What are the expectations for student reasoning and mathematical explanations for this problem or math task? How will students be expected to connect the problem’s solutions and the limits on those solutions based on the context of the problem? What are questions teachers can ask if students get stuck in the problem? How can teachers scaffold the problem if necessary? What are the nuances to the problem that can be extended to student teams that demonstrate adequate solutions to the original task? What are the prompts (scaffolding questions) teachers can use to help students teach, learn, and reason with one another during their work together on this problem or task? + Team Planning Questions SMP 3 (Kanold & Larson) How will students provide explanations and justifications as part of their solution processes during class activities? How will students attempt to make sense of their classmates’ solutions by asking questions for clarification of their peers? How will students communicate disagreements when they don’t understand or don’t agree with solutions presented by others, spurring discussion between and among students? How will the lesson design allow and encourage students to make conjectures about new information and test the validity of those conjectures? + Thank you! Christine Quisley AEA 267 School Improvement Consultant Math and PLCs cquisley@aea267.k12.ia.us 641-390-0865