i>`ˆ˜}Ê ˆÌiÀ>VÞ

advertisement
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞ
$ElNITIONOFTHEDOMAIN 4EXTFORMAT s#ONTINUOUSTEXTS s.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS #HARACTERISTICSOFTHEITEMS s&IVEPROCESSESASPECTS s)TEMTYPES s-ARKING 3ITUATIONS 2EPORTINGOFOUTCOMES s3CALINGTHEREADINGLITERACYTASKS s2EPORTING s"UILDINGANITEMMAP s,EVELSOFREADINGLITERACYPROlCIENCY ,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
$%&).)4)/./&4(%$/-!).
$ElNITIONSOFREADINGANDREADINGLITERACYHAVECHANGEDOVERTIMEINPARALLEL
WITH CHANGES IN SOCIETY THE ECONOMY AND CULTURE4HE CONCEPT OF LEARNING
ANDPARTICULARLYTHECONCEPTOFLIFELONGLEARNINGHASEXPANDEDPERCEPTIONSOF
READINGLITERACYANDTHEDEMANDSMADEONIT,ITERACYISNOLONGERCONSIDERED
AN ABILITY ONLY ACQUIRED IN CHILDHOOD DURING THE EARLY YEARS OF SCHOOLING
)NSTEAD IT IS VIEWED AS AN EXPANDING SET OF KNOWLEDGE SKILLS AND STRATEGIES
WHICH INDIVIDUALS BUILD ON THROUGHOUT LIFE IN VARIOUS SITUATIONSAND THROUGH
INTERACTION WITH THEIR PEERS AND WITH THE LARGER COMMUNITIES IN WHICH THEY
PARTICIPATE
4HROUGHACONSENSUSBUILDINGPROCESSINVOLVINGTHEREADINGEXPERTSSELECTEDBY
THEPARTICIPATINGCOUNTRIESANDTHE/%#$0)3!ADVISORYGROUPSTHEFOLLOWING
DElNITIONOFREADINGLITERACYWASADOPTEDFORTHESURVEY
h2EADINGLITERACYISUNDERSTANDINGUSINGANDREmECTINGONWRITTENTEXTSINORDERTO
ACHIEVE ONES GOALSTO DEVELOP ONES KNOWLEDGE AND POTENTIAL AND TO PARTICIPATE IN
SOCIETYv
4HIS DElNITION GOES BEYOND THE NOTION OF READING LITERACY AS DECODING AND
LITERALCOMPREHENSIONITIMPLIESTHATREADINGLITERACYINVOLVESUNDERSTANDING
USINGANDREmECTINGONWRITTENINFORMATIONFORAVARIETYOFPURPOSES)TTHUS
TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE ACTIVE AND INTERACTIVE ROLE OF THE READER IN GAINING
MEANINGFROMWRITTENTEXTS4HEDElNITIONALSORECOGNISESTHEFULLSCOPEOF
SITUATIONSINWHICHREADINGLITERACYPLAYSAROLEFORYOUNGADULTSFROMPRIVATE
TOPUBLICFROMSCHOOLTOWORKFROMACTIVECITIZENSHIPTOLIFELONGLEARNING)T
SPELLSOUTTHEIDEATHATLITERACYENABLESTHEFULlLMENTOFINDIVIDUALASPIRATIONS
n FROM DElNED ASPIRATIONS SUCH AS GAINING AN EDUCATIONAL QUALIlCATION OR
OBTAINING A JOB TO THOSE LESS IMMEDIATE GOALS WHICH ENRICH AND EXTEND
ONESPERSONALLIFE,ITERACYALSOPROVIDESTHEREADERWITHASETOFLINGUISTIC
TOOLS THAT ARE INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT FOR MEETING THE DEMANDS OF MODERN
SOCIETIESWITHTHEIRFORMALINSTITUTIONSLARGEBUREAUCRACIESANDCOMPLEXLEGAL
SYSTEMS
2EADERS RESPOND TO A GIVEN TEXT IN A VARIETY OF WAYS AS THEY SEEK TO USE AND
UNDERSTANDWHATTHEYAREREADING4HISDYNAMICPROCESSINVOLVESMANYFACTORS
SOME OF WHICH CAN BE MANIPULATED IN LARGESCALE ASSESSMENTS SUCH AS /%#$
0)3!4HESEINCLUDETHEREADINGSITUATIONTHESTRUCTUREOFTHETEXTITSELFANDTHE
CHARACTERISTICSOFTHEQUESTIONSTHATAREASKEDABOUTTHETEXTTHETESTRUBRIC!LL
OFTHESEFACTORSAREREGARDEDASIMPORTANTCOMPONENTSOFTHEREADINGPROCESSAND
WEREMANIPULATEDINTHECREATIONOFTHEITEMSUSEDINTHEASSESSMENT
)N ORDER TO USE TEXT FORMAT CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ITEMS AND SITUATIONS IN
CONSTRUCTINGTHEASSESSMENTTASKSANDLATERININTERPRETINGTHERESULTSTHERANGE
FOREACHOFTHESEFACTORSHADTOBESPECIlED4HISALLOWEDFORTHECATEGORISATION
OF EACH TASK SO THAT THE WEIGHTING OF EACH COMPONENT COULD BE TAKEN INTO
ACCOUNTINTHElNALASSEMBLYOFTHESURVEY
£än
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
4%84&/2-!4
!TTHEHEARTOFTHE/%#$0)3!ASSESSMENTISADISTINCTIONBETWEENCONTINUOUS
ANDNONCONTINUOUSTEXTS
s#ONTINUOUSTEXTSARETYPICALLYCOMPOSEDOFSENTENCESTHATAREINTURNORGANISED
INTO PARAGRAPHS4HESE MAY lT INTO EVEN LARGER STRUCTURES SUCH AS SECTIONS
CHAPTERS AND BOOKS4HE PRIMARY CLASSIlCATION OF CONTINUOUS TEXTS IS BY
RHETORICALPURPOSEORTEXTTYPE
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
s.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTSORDOCUMENTSASTHEYAREKNOWNINSOMEAPPROACHES
CANBECATEGORISEDINTWOWAYS/NEISTHEFORMALSTRUCTUREAPPROACHUSED
IN THE WORK OF +IRSCH AND -OSENTHAL 4HEIR WORK CLASSIlES
TEXTS BY THE WAY UNDERLYING LISTS ARE PUT TOGETHER TO CONSTRUCT THE VARIOUS
NONCONTINUOUS TEXT TYPES4HIS APPROACH IS USEFUL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE
SIMILARITIESANDDIFFERENCESBETWEENTYPESOFNONCONTINUOUSTEXTS4HEOTHER
METHODOFCLASSIlCATIONISBYEVERYDAYDESCRIPTIONSOFTHEFORMATSOFTHESE
TEXTS4HIS SECOND APPROACH IS USED IN CLASSIFYING NONCONTINUOUS TEXTS IN
/%#$0)3!
#ONTINUOUSTEXTS
4EXT TYPES ARE STANDARD WAYS OF ORGANISING CONTINUOUS TEXTS BY CONTENT AND
AUTHORSPURPOSE
s.ARRATIONISTHETYPEOFTEXTINWHICHTHEINFORMATIONREFERSTOPROPERTIESOF
OBJECTSINTIME.ARRATIVETEXTSTYPICALLYPROVIDEANSWERSTOhWHENvORhIN
WHATSEQUENCEvQUESTIONS
s%XPOSITION
IS THE TYPE OF TEXT IN WHICH THE INFORMATION IS PRESENTED AS
COMPOSITECONCEPTSORMENTALCONSTRUCTSORELEMENTSINTOWHICHCONCEPTSOR
MENTALCONSTRUCTSCANBEANALYSED4HETEXTPROVIDESANEXPLANATIONOFHOW
THECOMPONENTELEMENTSINTERRELATEINAMEANINGFULWHOLEANDOFTENANSWERS
hHOWvQUESTIONS
s$ESCRIPTIONISTHETYPEOFTEXTINWHICHTHEINFORMATIONREFERSTOPROPERTIES
OFOBJECTSINSPACE$ESCRIPTIVETEXTSTYPICALLYPROVIDEANANSWERTOhWHATv
QUESTIONS
s!RGUMENTATIONISTHETYPEOFTEXTTHATPRESENTSPROPOSITIONSASTOTHERELATIONSHIP
BETWEENCONCEPTSOROTHERPROPOSITIONS!RGUMENTATIVETEXTSOFTENANSWER
hWHYvQUESTIONS!NOTHERIMPORTANTSUBCLASSIlCATIONOFARGUMENTATIVETEXTS
ISPERSUASIVETEXTS
s)NSTRUCTION SOMETIMES CALLED INJUNCTION IS THE TYPE OF TEXT THAT PROVIDES
DIRECTIONS ON WHAT TO DO AND INCLUDES PROCEDURES RULES REGULATIONS AND
STATUTESSPECIFYINGCERTAINBEHAVIOURS
s! DOCUMENT OR RECORD IS A TEXT THAT IS DESIGNED TO STANDARDISE AND CONSERVE
INFORMATION )T CAN BE CHARACTERISED BY HIGHLY FORMALISED TEXTUAL AND
FORMATTINGFEATURES
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£ä™
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
s(YPERTEXTISASETOFTEXTSLOTSLINKEDTOGETHERINSUCHAWAYTHATTHEUNITSCANBE
READINDIFFERENTSEQUENCESALLOWINGREADERSTOFOLLOWVARIOUSROUTESTOTHE
INFORMATION
.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS
.ONCONTINUOUS TEXTS ARE ORGANISED DIFFERENTLY FROM CONTINUOUS TEXTS AND SO
REQUIREDIFFERENTKINDSOFREADINGAPPROACHES4HEREADERSHOULDREFERTOTHEWORK
OF+IRSCHAND-OSENTHALFORADISCUSSIONOFTHESTRUCTURALAPPROACH
!CCORDINGTOTHEIRWORKLISTSARETHEMOSTELEMENTARYNONCONTINUOUSTEXTS4HEY
CONSISTOFANUMBEROFENTRIESTHATSHARESOMEPROPERTYIES4HISSHAREDPROPERTY
MAYBEUSEDASALABELORTITLEFORTHELIST,ISTSMAYHAVETHEIRENTRIESORDEREDEG
THENAMESOFSTUDENTSINACLASSARRANGEDALPHABETICALLYORUNORDEREDEGALIST
OFSUPPLIESTOBEBOUGHTATASHOP
#LASSIFYING NONCONTINUOUS TEXTS BY THEIR FORMAT AS SHOWN BELOW PROVIDES
A FAMILIAR MEANS OF DISCUSSING WHAT TYPES OF NONCONTINUOUS TEXTS MAY BE
INCLUDEDINTHEASSESSMENT
s#HARTS AND GRAPHS ARE ICONIC REPRESENTATIONS OF DATA4HEY ARE USED FOR THE
PURPOSESOFSCIENTIlCARGUMENTATIONANDALSOINJOURNALSANDNEWSPAPERSTO
DISPLAYNUMERICALANDTABULARPUBLICINFORMATIONINAVISUALFORMAT
s4ABLES AND MATRICES4ABLES ARE ROW AND COLUMN MATRICES4YPICALLY ALL THE
ENTRIESINEACHCOLUMNANDEACHROWSHAREPROPERTIESANDTHUSTHECOLUMN
ANDROWLABELSAREPARTOFTHEINFORMATIONSTRUCTUREOFTHETEXT#OMMON
TABLESINCLUDESCHEDULESSPREADSHEETSORDERFORMSANDINDEXES
s$IAGRAMSOFTENACCOMPANYTECHNICALDESCRIPTIONSEGDEMONSTRATINGPARTSOF
AHOUSEHOLDAPPLIANCEEXPOSITORYTEXTSANDINSTRUCTIVETEXTSEGILLUSTRATING
HOW TO ASSEMBLE A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE )T IS OFTEN USEFUL TO DISTINGUISH
PROCEDURALHOWTOFROMPROCESSHOWSOMETHINGWORKSDIAGRAMS
s-APS ARE NONCONTINUOUS TEXTS THAT INDICATE THE GEOGRAPHICAL RELATIONSHIPS
BETWEEN PLACES4HERE IS A VARIETY OF TYPES OF MAPS2OAD MAPS MARK THE
DISTANCE AND ROUTES BETWEEN IDENTIlED PLACES4HEMATIC MAPS INDICATE THE
RELATIONSHIPSBETWEENLOCATIONSANDSOCIALORPHYSICALFEATURES
s&ORMSARESTRUCTUREDANDFORMATTEDTEXTSWHICHREQUESTTHEREADERTORESPOND
TOSPECIlCQUESTIONSINSPECIlEDWAYS&ORMSAREUSEDBYMANYORGANISATIONS
TOCOLLECTDATA4HEYOFTENCONTAINSTRUCTUREDORPRECODEDANSWERFORMATS
4YPICALEXAMPLESARETAXFORMSIMMIGRATIONFORMSVISAFORMSAPPLICATION
FORMSSTATISTICALQUESTIONNAIRESETC
s)NFORMATIONSHEETSDIFFERFROMFORMSINTHATTHEYPROVIDERATHERTHANREQUEST
INFORMATION4HEY SUMMARISE INFORMATION IN A STRUCTURED WAY AND IN SUCH
A FORMAT THAT THE READER CAN EASILY AND QUICKLY LOCATE SPECIlC PIECES OF
INFORMATION )NFORMATION SHEETS MAY CONTAIN VARIOUS TEXT FORMS AS WELL
AS LISTS TABLES lGURES AND SOPHISTICATED TEXTBASED GRAPHICS HEADINGS
££ä
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
FONTSINDENTATIONBORDERSETC TO SUMMARISE AND HIGHLIGHT INFORMATION
4IMETABLESPRICELISTSCATALOGUESANDPROGRAMMESAREEXAMPLESOFTHISTYPE
OFNONCONTINUOUSTEXT
s#ALLS AND ADVERTISEMENTS ARE DOCUMENTS DESIGNED TO INVITE THE READER TO DO
SOMETHING EG TO BUY GOODS OR SERVICES ATTEND GATHERINGS OR MEETINGS
ELECTAPERSONTOAPUBLICOFlCEETC4HEPURPOSEOFTHESEDOCUMENTSISTO
PERSUADE THE READER4HEY OFFER SOMETHING AND REQUEST BOTH ATTENTION AND
ACTION!DVERTISEMENTS INVITATIONS SUMMONSES WARNINGS AND NOTICES ARE
EXAMPLESOFTHISDOCUMENTFORMAT
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
s6OUCHERSTESTIFYTHATTHEIROWNERISENTITLEDTOCERTAINSERVICES4HEINFORMATION
THATTHEYCONTAINMUSTBESUFlCIENTTOSHOWWHETHERTHEVOUCHERISVALIDOR
NOT4YPICALEXAMPLESARETICKETSINVOICESETC
s#ERTIlCATESAREWRITTENACKNOWLEDGEMENTSOFTHEVALIDITYOFANAGREEMENTORA
CONTRACT4HEYAREFORMALISEDINCONTENTRATHERTHANFORMAT4HEYREQUIRETHE
SIGNATUREOFONEORMOREPERSONSAUTHORISEDANDCOMPETENTTOBEARTESTIMONY
OFTHETRUTHOFTHEGIVENSTATEMENT7ARRANTIESSCHOOLCERTIlCATESDIPLOMAS
CONTRACTSETCAREDOCUMENTSTHATHAVETHESEPROPERTIES
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°£s$ISTRIBUTIONOFREADINGLITERACYTASKSBYTEXTFORMATANDTYPE
2EADINGASAMAJORDOMAIN0)3!
2EADINGASAMINORDOMAIN0)3!
4EXTFORMATANDTYPE
0ERCENTAGEOFTASKS
BYTEXTFORMAT
ANDTYPE
s#ONTINUOUS
.ARRATIVE
%XPOSITORY
$ESCRIPTIVE
!RGUMENTATIVEANDPERSUASIVE
)NJUNCTIVE
4/4!,
s.ON#ONTINUOUS
#HARTSANDGRAPHS
4ABLES
$IAGRAMS
-APS
&ORMS
!DVERTISEMENTS
4/4!,
0ERCENTAGEOFTASKSBY
TEXTFORMATANDTYPEBASED
ONTHEWHOLETEST
$ATAMAYNOTALWAYSADDUPTOTHETOTALSINDICATEDBECAUSEOFROUNDINGS
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£££
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
4HEDISTRIBUTIONANDVARIETYOFTEXTSTHATSTUDENTSAREASKEDTOREADFOR/%#$
0)3! ARE IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ASSESSMENT &IGURE SHOWS THE
DISTRIBUTIONS OF TASKS FOR CONTINUOUS AND NONCONTINUOUS TEXTS IN 0)3! READINGASMAJORDOMAINANDIN0)3!READINGASMINORDOMAIN)TCAN
BE READILY SEEN THAT IN BOTH AND CONTINUOUS TEXTS REPRESENT TWO
THIRDSOFTHETASKSORITEMSCONTAINEDINTHEASSESSMENT7ITHINTHISCATEGORYIN
BOTHCYCLESTHELARGESTPERCENTAGECOMESFROMEXPOSITORYTEXTS
#(!2!#4%2)34)#3/&4(%)4%-3
4HREESETSOFVARIABLESAREUSEDTODESCRIBETHECHARACTERISTICSOFTHEITEMSTHE
PROCESSESASPECTSWHICHSETOUTTHETASKFORTHEEXAMINEEITEMTYPESWHICH
SETOUTTHEWAYSINWHICHEXAMINEESAREASKEDTODEMONSTRATETHEIRPROlCIENCY
ATTHETASKANDRULESFORMARKINGWHICHSPECIFYHOWEXAMINEESANSWERSARETO
BEEVALUATED%ACHOFTHESEWILLBEDISCUSSEDINTURNTHOUGHTHElRSTREQUIRES
CONSIDERABLYMOREATTENTION
&IVEPROCESSESASPECTS
)NANEFFORTTOSIMULATEAUTHENTICREADINGSITUATIONSTHE/%#$0)3!READING
ASSESSMENT MEASURES THE FOLLOWING lVE PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH ACHIEVING A
FULLUNDERSTANDINGOFATEXTWHETHERTHETEXTISCONTINUOUSORNONCONTINUOUS
%XAMINEES ARE EXPECTED TO DEMONSTRATE THEIR PROlCIENCY IN ALL OF THESE
PROCESSES
sRETRIEVINGINFORMATION
sFORMINGABROADGENERALUNDERSTANDING
sDEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATION
sREmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHECONTENTOFATEXTAND
sREmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHEFORMOFATEXT
4HEFULLUNDERSTANDINGOFTEXTSINVOLVESALLOFTHESEPROCESSES)TISEXPECTEDTHAT
ALLREADERSIRRESPECTIVEOFTHEIROVERALLPROlCIENCYWILLBEABLETODEMONSTRATE
SOMELEVELOFCOMPETENCYINEACHOFTHEM,ANGER7HILETHEREISAN
INTERRELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHElVEASPECTSnEACHMAYREQUIREMANYOFTHESAME
UNDERLYING SKILLS n SUCCESSFULLY ACCOMPLISHING ONE MAY NOT ENSURE SUCCESSFUL
COMPLETIONOFANYOTHER3OMEVIEWTHEMASBEINGINTHEREPERTOIREOFEACH
READERATEVERYDEVELOPMENTALLEVELRATHERTHANFORMINGASEQUENTIALHIERARCHY
ORSETOFSKILLS
&IGURE IDENTIlES THE KEY DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE lVE
PROCESSESOFREADINGMEASUREDIN/%#$0)3!7HILETHISlGURENECESSARILY
OVERSIMPLIlES EACH PROCESSIT PROVIDES A USEFUL SCHEME FOR ORGANISING AND
REMEMBERINGTHERELATIONSHIPSBETWEENTHEM!SDEPICTEDINTHISlGURETHE
lVEPROCESSESCANBEDISTINGUISHEDINTERMSOFFOURCHARACTERISTICS4HElRST
DEALS WITH THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE READER IS EXPECTED TO USE INFORMATION
PRIMARILY FROM WITHIN THE TEXT OR TO DRAW ALSO UPON OUTSIDE KNOWLEDGE
££Ó
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°Ós#HARACTERISTICSDISTINGUISHINGTHElVEPROCESSESASPECTS
OFREADINGLITERACY
2EADING,ITERACY
5SEINFORMATIONPRIMARILY
FROMWITHINTHETEXT
&OCUSON
INDEPENDENT
PARTSOFTHETEXT
$RAWUPONOUTSIDE
KNOWLEDGE
&OCUSON
CONTENT
&OCUSON
RELATIONSHIPS
WITHINTHETEXT
7HOLETEXT
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
&OCUSON
STRUCTURE
2ELATIONSHIPS
AMONGPARTS
OFTEXT
2ETRIEVE &ORMABROAD $EVELOPAN
INFORMATION UNDERSTANDING INTERPRETATION
2EmECT
2EmECT
ONAND
ONAND
EVALUATE
EVALUATEFORM
CONTENTOFTEXT
OFTEXT
! SECOND CHARACTERISTIC INVOLVES THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE READER IS ASKED
TO FOCUS ON INDEPENDENT PARTS OF THE TEXT OR ON THE RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE TEXT3OMETIMES READERS ARE EXPECTED TO
RETRIEVEINDEPENDENTPIECESOFINFORMATIONWHILEATOTHERTIMESTHEYAREASKED
TODEMONSTRATETHEIRUNDERSTANDINGOFTHERELATIONSHIPSBETWEENPARTSOFTHE
TEXT&OCUSINGONEITHERTHEWHOLETEXTORONRELATIONSHIPSBETWEENPARTSOF
THE TEXT IS THE THIRD DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC4HE FOURTH CHARACTERISTIC
RELATESTOWHETHERTHEREADERISASKEDTODEALWITHTHECONTENTORSUBSTANCE
OFTHETEXTRATHERTHANITSFORMORSTRUCTURE4HElVEPROCESSESOFREADINGARE
REPRESENTEDINTHELASTLINEOF&IGUREATTHEENDSOFTHEVARIOUSBRANCHES
"Y STARTING AT THE TOP OF THE lGURE AND FOLLOWING EACH BRANCH ONE CAN SEE
WHICHCHARACTERISTICSAREASSOCIATEDWITHEACHPROCESS
4HEFOLLOWINGDISCUSSIONATTEMPTSTODElNEEACHPROCESSOPERATIONALLYANDTO
ASSOCIATEITWITHPARTICULARKINDSOFITEMS!LTHOUGHEACHPROCESSISDISCUSSED
INTERMSOFASINGLETEXTEACHCANALSOAPPLYTOMULTIPLETEXTSWHENTHESEARE
PRESENTEDTOGETHERASAUNITWITHINTHETEST4HEDESCRIPTIONOFEACHPROCESSHAS
TWOPARTS4HElRSTPROVIDESAGENERALOVERVIEWOFTHEPROCESSWHILETHESECOND
DESCRIBESPARTICULARWAYSINWHICHTHEPROCESSMIGHTBEASSESSED
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
££Î
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
2ETRIEVINGINFORMATION
)NTHECOURSEOFDAILYLIFEREADERSOFTENNEEDAPARTICULARPIECEOFINFORMATION
ATELEPHONENUMBERORTHEDEPARTURETIMEFORABUSORTRAIN4HEYMAYWANT
TO lND A PARTICULAR FACT TO SUPPORT OR REFUTE A CLAIM SOMEONE HAS MADE)N
SITUATIONSSUCHASTHESEREADERSAREINTERESTEDINRETRIEVINGISOLATEDPIECESOF
INFORMATION4ODOSOREADERSMUSTSCANSEARCHFORLOCATEANDSELECTRELEVANT
INFORMATION4HEPROCESSINGINVOLVEDISMOSTFREQUENTLYATTHESENTENCELEVEL
THOUGHINSOMECASESTHEINFORMATIONMAYBEINTWOORMORESENTENCESORIN
DIFFERENTPARAGRAPHS
)NASSESSMENTTASKSTHATCALLFORRETRIEVINGINFORMATIONEXAMINEESMUSTMATCH
INFORMATIONGIVENINTHEQUESTIONWITHEITHERIDENTICALLYWORDEDORSYNONYMOUS
INFORMATIONINTHETEXTANDUSETHISTOlNDTHENEWINFORMATIONCALLEDFOR)N
THESE TASKSRETRIEVING INFORMATION IS BASED ON THE TEXT ITSELF AND ON EXPLICIT
INFORMATION INCLUDED IN IT 2ETRIEVING TASKS REQUIRE THE EXAMINEE TO lND
INFORMATION BASED ON REQUIREMENTS OR FEATURES SPECIlED IN QUESTIONS4HE
EXAMINEEHASTODETECTORIDENTIFYONEORMOREESSENTIALELEMENTSOFAQUESTION
CHARACTERSPLACETIMESETTINGETCANDTHENTOSEARCHFORAMATCHTHATMAYBE
LITERALORSYNONYMOUS
2ETRIEVING TASKS CAN INVOLVE VARIOUS DEGREES OF AMBIGUITY&OR EXAMPLETHE
EXAMINEEMAYBEREQUIREDTOSELECTEXPLICITINFORMATIONSUCHASANINDICATION
OFTIMEORPLACEINATEXTORTABLE!MOREDIFlCULTVERSIONOFTHISSAMETYPE
OFTASKMIGHTINVOLVElNDINGSYNONYMOUSINFORMATION4HISSOMETIMESINVOLVES
CATEGORISATIONSKILLSORITMAYREQUIREDISCRIMINATINGBETWEENTWOSIMILARPIECES
OFINFORMATION4HEDIFFERENTLEVELSOFPROlCIENCYASSOCIATEDWITHTHISPROCESS
OFCOMPREHENSIONCANBEMEASUREDBYSYSTEMATICALLYVARYINGTHEELEMENTSTHAT
CONTRIBUTETOTHEDIFlCULTYOFTHETASK
&ORMINGABROADGENERALUNDERSTANDING
4O FORM A BROAD GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAS BEEN READ A READER
MUST CONSIDER THE TEXT AS A WHOLE OR IN A BROAD PERSPECTIVE4HERE ARE
VARIOUS ASSESSMENT TASKS IN WHICH READERS ARE ASKED TO FORM A BROAD GENERAL
UNDERSTANDING%XAMINEESMAYDEMONSTRATEINITIALUNDERSTANDINGBYIDENTIFYING
THEMAINTOPICORMESSAGEORBYIDENTIFYINGTHEGENERALPURPOSEORUSEOFTHE
TEXT%XAMPLESINCLUDETASKSTHATREQUIRETHEREADERTOSELECTORCREATEATITLE
ORTHESISFORTHETEXTTOEXPLAINTHEORDEROFSIMPLEINSTRUCTIONSORTOIDENTIFY
THEMAINDIMENSIONSOFAGRAPHORATABLE/THERSINCLUDETASKSTHATREQUIRETHE
EXAMINEETODESCRIBETHEMAINCHARACTERSETTINGORMILIEUOFASTORYTOIDENTIFY
ATHEMEORMESSAGEOFALITERARYTEXTORTOEXPLAINTHEPURPOSEORUSEOFAMAP
ORAlGURE
7ITHINTHISPROCESSSOMETASKSMIGHTREQUIRETHEEXAMINEETOMATCHAPARTICULAR
PIECEOFTEXTTOTHEQUESTION&OREXAMPLETHISWOULDHAPPENWHENATHEMEOR
MAINIDEAISEXPLICITLYSTATEDINTHETEXT/THERTASKSMAYREQUIRETHEEXAMINEE
TOFOCUSONMORETHANONESPECIlCREFERENCEINTHETEXTnFORINSTANCEIFTHE
READER HAD TO DEDUCE THE THEME FROM THE REPETITION OF A PARTICULAR CATEGORY
££{
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
OFINFORMATION3ELECTINGTHEMAINIDEAIMPLIESESTABLISHINGAHIERARCHYAMONG
IDEAS AND CHOOSING THE MOST GENERAL AND OVERARCHING 3UCH A TASK INDICATES
WHETHERTHEEXAMINEECANDISTINGUISHBETWEENKEYIDEASANDMINORDETAILSOR
CANRECOGNISETHESUMMARYOFTHEMAINTHEMEINASENTENCEORTITLE
$EVELOPINGANINTERPRETATION
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
$EVELOPINGANINTERPRETATIONREQUIRESREADERSTOEXTENDTHEIRINITIALIMPRESSIONS
SOTHATTHEYDEVELOPAMORESPECIlCORCOMPLETEUNDERSTANDINGOFWHATTHEYHAVE
READ4ASKSINTHISCATEGORYCALLFORLOGICALUNDERSTANDINGREADERSMUSTPROCESSTHE
ORGANISATIONOFINFORMATIONINTHETEXT4ODOSOREADERSMUSTDEMONSTRATETHEIR
UNDERSTANDINGOFCOHESIONEVENIFTHEYCANNOTEXPLICITLYSTATEWHATCOHESIONIS)N
SOMEINSTANCESDEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATIONMAYREQUIRETHEREADERTOPROCESS
A SEQUENCE OF JUST TWO SENTENCES RELYING ON LOCAL COHESIONWHICH MIGHT EVEN
BE FACILITATED BY THE PRESENCE OF COHESIVE MARKERS SUCH AS THE USE OF hlRSTv
ANDhSECONDvTOINDICATEASEQUENCE)NMOREDIFlCULTINSTANCESEGTOINDICATE
RELATIONSOFCAUSEANDEFFECTTHEREMIGHTNOTBEANYEXPLICITMARKINGS
%XAMPLESOFTASKSTHATMIGHTBEUSEDTOASSESSTHISPROCESSINCLUDECOMPARING
AND CONTRASTING INFORMATION DRAWING INFERENCES AND IDENTIFYING AND LISTING
SUPPORTING EVIDENCEh#OMPARE AND CONTRASTv TASKS REQUIRE THE EXAMINEE TO
DRAWTOGETHERTWOORMOREPIECESOFINFORMATIONFROMTHETEXT)NORDERTO
PROCESS EITHER EXPLICIT OR IMPLICIT INFORMATION FROM ONE OR MORE SOURCES IN
SUCHTASKSTHEREADERMUSTOFTENINFERANINTENDEDRELATIONSHIPORCATEGORY4HIS
PROCESSOFCOMPREHENSIONISALSOASSESSEDINTASKSTHATREQUIRETHEEXAMINEETO
MAKEINFERENCESABOUTTHEAUTHORSINTENTIONANDTOIDENTIFYTHEEVIDENCEUSED
TOINFERTHATINTENTION
2EmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHECONTENTOFATEXT
2EmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHECONTENTOFATEXTREQUIRESTHEREADERTOCONNECT
INFORMATIONINATEXTTOKNOWLEDGEFROMOTHERSOURCES2EADERSMUSTALSOASSESS
THECLAIMSMADEINTHETEXTAGAINSTTHEIROWNKNOWLEDGEOFTHEWORLD/FTEN
READERSAREASKEDTOARTICULATEANDDEFENDTHEIROWNPOINTSOFVIEW4ODOSO
READERSMUSTBEABLETODEVELOPANUNDERSTANDINGOFWHATISSAIDANDINTENDED
INATEXT4HEYMUSTTHENTESTTHATMENTALREPRESENTATIONAGAINSTWHATTHEYKNOW
ANDBELIEVEONTHEBASISOFEITHERPRIORINFORMATIONORINFORMATIONFOUNDIN
OTHERTEXTS2EADERSMUSTCALLONSUPPORTINGEVIDENCEFROMWITHINTHETEXTAND
CONTRASTTHATWITHOTHERSOURCESOFINFORMATIONUSINGBOTHGENERALANDSPECIlC
KNOWLEDGEASWELLASTHEABILITYTOREASONABSTRACTLY
!SSESSMENTTASKSREPRESENTATIVEOFTHISCATEGORYOFPROCESSINGINCLUDEPROVIDING
EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENTS FROM OUTSIDE THE TEXT ASSESSING THE RELEVANCE OF
PARTICULAR PIECES OF INFORMATION OR EVIDENCE OR DRAWING COMPARISONS WITH
MORAL OR AESTHETIC RULES STANDARDS4HE EXAMINEE MIGHT BE ASKED TO OFFER
ORIDENTIFYALTERNATIVEPIECESOFINFORMATIONTHATMIGHTSTRENGTHENANAUTHORS
ARGUMENTORTOEVALUATETHESUFlCIENCYOFTHEEVIDENCEORINFORMATIONPROVIDED
INTHETEXT
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
££x
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
4HEOUTSIDEKNOWLEDGETOWHICHTEXTUALINFORMATIONISTOBECONNECTEDMAY
COMEFROMTHEEXAMINEESOWNKNOWLEDGEFROMOTHERTEXTSPROVIDEDINTHE
ASSESSMENTORFROMIDEASEXPLICITLYPROVIDEDINTHEQUESTION
2EmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHEFORMOFATEXT
4ASKS IN THIS CATEGORY REQUIRE READERS TO STAND APART FROM THE TEXTCONSIDER
ITOBJECTIVELYANDEVALUATEITSQUALITYANDAPPROPRIATENESS+NOWLEDGEOFSUCH
THINGS AS TEXT STRUCTURE GENRE AND REGISTER PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THESE
TASKS4HESEFEATURESWHICHFORMTHEBASISOFANAUTHORSCRAFTlGURESTRONGLY
IN UNDERSTANDING STANDARDS INHERENT IN TASKS OF THIS NATURE %VALUATING HOW
SUCCESSFULANAUTHORISINPORTRAYINGSOMECHARACTERISTICORPERSUADINGAREADER
DEPENDS NOT ONLY ON SUBSTANTIVE KNOWLEDGE BUT ALSO ON THE ABILITY TO DETECT
NUANCES IN LANGUAGE n FOR EXAMPLE UNDERSTANDING WHEN THE CHOICE OF AN
ADJECTIVEMIGHTCOLOURINTERPRETATION
3OMEEXAMPLESOFASSESSMENTTASKSCHARACTERISTICOFREmECTINGONTHEFORMOFA
TEXTINCLUDEDETERMININGTHEUTILITYOFAPARTICULARTEXTFORASPECIlEDPURPOSE
ANDEVALUATINGANAUTHORSUSEOFPARTICULARTEXTUALFEATURESINACCOMPLISHINGA
PARTICULARGOAL4HEEXAMINEEMAYALSOBECALLEDUPONTODESCRIBEORCOMMENT
ONTHEAUTHORSUSEOFSTYLEANDTOIDENTIFYTHEAUTHORSPURPOSEANDATTITUDE
&IGURESHOWSTHEDISTRIBUTIONOFREADINGLITERACYTASKSBYEACHOFTHETHREE
SUBSCALESGENERATEDFROMTHElVEREADINGPROCESSESASPECTSDElNEDABOVE4HE
LARGESTCATEGORYOFTASKSWHICHACCOUNTSFORAPPROXIMATELYPERCENTOFTHE
TESTISREPRESENTEDBYTHETWOBRANCHESOF&IGURETHATASKSTUDENTSTOFOCUS
ON RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN A TEXT4HESE TASKS REQUIRE STUDENTS EITHER TO FORM A
BROADUNDERSTANDINGORTODEVELOPANINTERPRETATION4HEYHAVEBEENGROUPED
TOGETHERFORREPORTINGPURPOSESINTOASINGLEPROCESSCALLEDINTERPRETINGTEXTS)N
0)3!ANDTHENEXTLARGESTCATEGORYWASMADEUPOFTHEPERCENT
OFTHETASKSTHATREQUIRESTUDENTSTODEMONSTRATETHEIRSKILLATRETRIEVINGISOLATED
PIECESOFINFORMATION%ACHOFTHESEPROCESSESnFORMINGABROADUNDERSTANDING
RETRIEVINGINFORMATIONANDDEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATIONnFOCUSESONTHEDEGREE
TOWHICHTHEREADERCANUNDERSTANDANDUSEINFORMATIONCONTAINEDPRIMARILY
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°Îs$ISTRIBUTIONOFREADINGLITERACYTASKSBYREADINGPROCESSASPECT
2EADINGASAMAJORDOMAIN0)3!
2EADINGASAMINORDOMAIN0)3!AND
2EADINGPROCESSASPECT
2ETRIEVINGINFORMATION
)NTERPRETINGTEXTS
2EmECTIONANDEVALUATION
4/4!,
££È
0ERCENTAGEOFTASKS
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
WITHINTHETEXT4HEREMAININGOFTHETASKSAPPROXIMATELYPERCENTREQUIRED
STUDENTSTOREmECTONEITHERTHECONTENTORINFORMATIONPROVIDEDINTHETEXTOR
ONTHESTRUCTUREANDFORMOFTHETEXTITSELF
)TEMTYPES
&IGURE INDICATES THAT IN 0)3! AND AROUND PER CENT OF THE
READINGLITERACYTASKSINTHE/%#$0)3!ASSESSMENTWEREOPENCONSTRUCTED
RESPONSE ITEMS WHICH REQUIRED JUDGEMENT ON THE PART OF THE MARKER4HE
REMAININGTASKSCONSISTOFCLOSEDCONSTRUCTEDRESPONSEITEMSTHATREQUIRELITTLE
JUDGEMENTONTHEPARTOFTHEMARKERASWELLASSIMPLEMULTIPLECHOICEITEMS
FOR WHICH STUDENTS CHOOSE ONE OF SEVERAL ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS AND COMPLEX
MULTIPLECHOICEITEMSFORWHICHSTUDENTSCHOOSEMORETHANONERESPONSE
4HISTABLEALSOREVEALSTHATWHILEMULTIPLECHOICEANDOPENCONSTRUCTEDRESPONSE
ITEMSAREREPRESENTEDACROSSTHEPROCESSESTHEYARENOTDISTRIBUTEDEVENLY!
LARGERPERCENTAGEOFMULTIPLECHOICEITEMSAREASSOCIATEDWITHTHETWOPROCESSES
DEALINGWITHINTERPRETINGRELATIONSHIPSWITHINATEXT4HISISSHOWNINTHESECOND
ROW OF &IGURE )N CONTRASTWHILE REmECTION AND EVALUATION TASKS ACCOUNT
FORAROUNDPERCENTIN0)3!ANDONLYPERCENTINARE
MULTIPLECHOICE/FTHEREmECTIONANDEVALUATIONTASKSAROUNDPERCENTARE
OPEN CONSTRUCTEDRESPONSE ITEMS THAT REQUIRE JUDGEMENT ON THE PART OF THE
MARKER
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°{s$ISTRIBUTIONOFREADINGLITERACYTASKS
BYREADINGPROCESSASPECTANDITEMTYPE
2EADINGASAMAJORDOMAIN0)3!
2EADINGASAMINORDOMAIN0)3!
)TEMTYPES
0ROCESS
ASPECT
0ERCENTAGE
OFMULTIPLE
CHOICEITEMS
0ERCENTAGE
OFCOMPLEX
MULTIPLE
CHOICEITEMS
0ERCENTAGE
0ERCENTAGE
OFCLOSED
OFOPEN
CONSTRUCTED
CONSTRUCTED
RESPONSEITEMS RESPONSEITEMS
4/4!,
2ETRIEVING
INFORMATION
)NTERPRETING TEXTS
2EmECTION
ANDEVALUATION
4/4!,
4HISCATEGORYINCLUDESSHORTRESPONSEITEMS
$ATAMAYNOTALWAYSADDUPTOTHETOTALSINDICATEDBECAUSEOFROUNDING
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
££Ç
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
-ARKING
-ARKINGISRELATIVELYSIMPLEWITHDICHOTOMOUSLYSCOREDMULTIPLECHOICEITEMS
THE EXAMINEE HAS EITHER CHOSEN THE DESIGNATED ANSWER OR NOT0ARTIALCREDIT
MODELSALLOWFORMORECOMPLEXMARKINGOFITEMS(EREBECAUSESOMEWRONG
ANSWERS ARE MORE COMPLETE THAN OTHERSEXAMINEES WHO PROVIDE ANhALMOST
RIGHTvANSWERRECEIVEPARTIALCREDIT0SYCHOMETRICMODELSFORSUCHPOLYTOMOUS
SCORINGAREWELLESTABLISHEDANDINSOMEWAYSAREPREFERABLETODICHOTOMOUS
SCORINGASTHEYUTILISEMOREOFTHEINFORMATIONINTHERESPONSES)NTERPRETATION
OF POLYTOMOUS MARKING IS MORE COMPLEX HOWEVER AS EACH TASK HAS SEVERAL
LOCATIONSONTHEDIFlCULTYSCALEONEFORTHEFULLCREDITANSWERANDOTHERSFOR
EACHOFTHEPARTIALCREDITANSWERS0ARTIALCREDITMARKINGISUSEDFORSOMEOFTHE
MORECOMPLEXCONSTRUCTEDRESPONSEITEMSIN/%#$0)3!
3)45!4)/.3
4HE MANNER IN WHICH SITUATION WAS DElNED WAS BORROWED FROM THE #OUNCIL
OF%UROPESWORKONLANGUAGE&OURSITUATIONVARIABLESWEREIDENTIlED
READINGFORPRIVATEUSEREADINGFORPUBLICUSEREADINGFORWORKANDREADINGFOR
EDUCATION7HILETHEINTENTIONOFTHE/%#$0)3!READINGLITERACYASSESSMENT
WASTOMEASURETHEKINDSOFREADINGTHATOCCURBOTHWITHINANDOUTSIDECLASSROOMS
THEMANNERINWHICHSITUATIONWASDElNEDCOULDNOTBEBASEDSIMPLYONWHERE
THEREADINGACTIVITYISCARRIEDOUT&OREXAMPLETEXTBOOKSAREREADBOTHINSCHOOLS
ANDINHOMESANDTHEPROCESSANDPURPOSEOFREADINGTHESETEXTSDIFFERLITTLEFROM
ONESETTINGTOANOTHER-OREOVERREADINGALSOINVOLVESTHEAUTHORSINTENDEDUSE
DIFFERENTTYPESOFCONTENTANDTHEFACTTHATOTHERSEGTEACHERSANDEMPLOYERS
SOMETIMESDECIDEWHATSHOULDBEREADANDFORWHATPURPOSE
4HUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ASSESSMENT SITUATION CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AS A
GENERAL CATEGORISATION OF TEXTS BASED ON THE AUTHORS INTENDED USE ON THE
RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERPERSONSIMPLICITLYOREXPLICITLYASSOCIATEDWITHTHETEXT
AND ON THE GENERAL CONTENT4HE SAMPLE TEXTS WERE DRAWN FROM A VARIETY OF
SITUATIONSTOMAXIMISETHEDIVERSITYOFCONTENTINCLUDEDINTHEREADINGLITERACY
SURVEY#LOSEATTENTIONWASALSOPAIDTOTHEORIGINOFTEXTSSELECTEDFORINCLUSION
INTHISSURVEY4HEGOALWASTOREACHABALANCEBETWEENTHEBROADDElNITIONOF
READINGLITERACYUSEDIN/%#$0)3!ANDTHELINGUISTICANDCULTURALDIVERSITYOF
PARTICIPATINGCOUNTRIES4HISDIVERSITYHELPEDTOENSURETHATNOONEGROUPWOULD
BEEITHERADVANTAGEDORDISADVANTAGEDBYTHEASSESSMENTCONTENT
4HEFOURSITUATIONVARIABLESTAKENFROMTHEWORKOFTHE#OUNCILOF%UROPECAN
BEDESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS
s2EADING FOR PRIVATE USE PERSONAL4HIS TYPE OF READING IS CARRIED OUT TO SATISFY
AN INDIVIDUALS OWN INTERESTSBOTH PRACTICAL AND INTELLECTUAL)T ALSO INCLUDES
READINGTOMAINTAINORDEVELOPPERSONALCONNECTIONSTOOTHERPEOPLE#ONTENTS
TYPICALLY INCLUDE PERSONAL LETTERS lCTION BIOGRAPHY AND INFORMATIONAL TEXTS
READFORCURIOSITYASAPARTOFLEISUREORRECREATIONALACTIVITIES
s2EADINGFORPUBLICUSE4HISTYPEOFREADINGISCARRIEDOUTTOPARTICIPATEINTHE
ACTIVITIESOFTHEWIDERSOCIETY)TINCLUDESTHEUSEOFOFlCIALDOCUMENTSASWELL
££n
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ASINFORMATIONABOUTPUBLICEVENTS)NGENERALTHESETASKSAREASSOCIATEDWITH
MOREORLESSANONYMOUSCONTACTWITHOTHERS
s2EADINGFORWORKOCCUPATIONAL7HILENOTALLYEAROLDSWILLACTUALLYHAVETO
READATWORKITISIMPORTANTTOASSESSTHEIRREADINESSTOMOVEINTOTHEWORLD
OFWORKSINCEINMOSTCOUNTRIESOVEROFTHEMWILLBEINTHELABOURFORCE
WITHINONETOTWOYEARS4HEPROTOTYPICALTASKSOFTHISTYPEAREOFTENREFERRED
TOAShREADINGTODOv3TICHT3TIGGINSINTHATTHEYARETIEDTOTHE
ACCOMPLISHMENTOFSOMEIMMEDIATETASK
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
s2EADINGFOREDUCATION4HISTYPEOFREADINGISNORMALLYINVOLVEDWITHACQUIRING
INFORMATION AS PART OF A LARGER LEARNING TASK4HE MATERIALS ARE OFTEN NOT
CHOSENBYTHEREADERBUTASSIGNEDBYATEACHER4HECONTENTISUSUALLYDESIGNED
SPECIlCALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTRUCTION4HE PROTOTYPICAL TASKS ARE THOSE
USUALLYIDENTIlEDAShREADINGTOLEARNv3TICHT3TIGGINS
&IGURE SHOWS THE DISTRIBUTION OF READING LITERACY TASKS IN THE ASSESSMENT
ACROSSALLFOURSITUATIONSFORTWOSCENARIOSWHENREADINGWASAMAJORDOMAIN
0)3!ANDWHENITISAMINORDOMAIN0)3!!MOREEVENDISTRIBUTION
OFTASKSACROSSSITUATIONSISACHIEVEDIN
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°xs$ISTRIBUTIONOFREADINGLITERACYTASKSBYSITUATION
2EADINGASAMAJORDOMAIN0)3!
2EADINGASAMINORDOMAIN0)3!
3ITUATION
0ERCENTAGEOFTASKS
0ERSONAL
0UBLIC
/CCUPATIONAL
%DUCATIONAL
4/4!,
2%0/24).'/54#/-%3
3CALINGTHEREADINGLITERACYTASKS
4HE READING LITERACY TASKS ARE CONSTRUCTED AND ADMINISTERED TO NATIONALLY
REPRESENTATIVESAMPLESOFYEAROLDSINPARTICIPATINGCOUNTRIESTOENSURETHAT
THE ASSESSMENT PROVIDES THE BROADEST POSSIBLE COVERAGE OF READING LITERACY AS
DElNED HERE(OWEVERNO INDIVIDUAL STUDENT CAN BE EXPECTED TO RESPOND TO
THEENTIRESETOFTASKS!CCORDINGLYTHESURVEYISDESIGNEDTOGIVEEACHSTUDENT
PARTICIPATINGINTHESTUDYASUBSETOFTHETOTALPOOLOFTASKSWHILEATTHESAME
TIMEENSURINGTHATEACHOFTHETASKSISADMINISTEREDTONATIONALLYREPRESENTATIVE
SAMPLESOFSTUDENTS3UMMARISINGTHEPERFORMANCEOFSTUDENTSACROSSTHISENTIRE
POOLOFTASKSTHUSPOSESACHALLENGE
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
££™
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
/NE MAY IMAGINE THE READING LITERACY TASKS ARRANGED ALONG A CONTINUUM IN
TERMSOFDIFlCULTYFORSTUDENTSANDTHELEVELOFSKILLREQUIREDTOANSWEREACH
ITEMCORRECTLY4HEPROCEDUREUSEDIN/%#$0)3!TOCAPTURETHISCONTINUUM
OFDIFlCULTYANDABILITYIS)TEM2ESPONSE4HEORY)24)24ISAMATHEMATICAL
MODELUSEDFORESTIMATINGTHEPROBABILITYTHATAPARTICULARPERSONWILLRESPOND
CORRECTLY TO A GIVEN TASK FROM A SPECIlED POOL OF TASKS4HIS PROBABILITY IS
MODELLEDALONGACONTINUUMWHICHSUMMARISESBOTHTHEPROlCIENCYOFAPERSON
IN TERMS OF HIS OR HER ABILITY AND THE COMPLEXITY OF AN ITEM IN TERMS OF ITS
DIFlCULTY4HISCONTINUUMOFDIFlCULTYANDPROlCIENCYISREFERREDTOASAhSCALEv
2EPORTING
0)3!WILLFOLLOWTHEREPORTINGSCHEMEUSEDIN0)3!WHICHREPORTED
OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF A PROlCIENCY SCALE BASED ON THEORY AND INTERPRETABLE
IN POLICY TERMS4HE RESULTS OF THE READING LITERACY ASSESSMENT WERE lRST
SUMMARISED ON A SINGLE COMPOSITE READING LITERACY SCALE HAVING A MEAN OF
AND A STANDARD DEVIATION OF )N ADDITION STUDENT PERFORMANCE WAS
ALSOREPRESENTEDONlVESUBSCALESTHREEPROCESSASPECTSUBSCALESRETRIEVING
INFORMATIONINTERPRETINGTEXTSANDREmECTIONANDEVALUATION/%#$A
ANDTWOTEXTFORMATSUBSCALESCONTINUOUSANDNONCONTINUOUSTEXT/%#$
B4HESE lVE SUBSCALES MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO COMPARE MEAN SCORES AND
DISTRIBUTIONS AMONG SUBGROUPS AND COUNTRIES BY VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF THE
READINGLITERACYCONSTRUCT!LTHOUGHTHEREISAHIGHCORRELATIONBETWEENTHESE
SUBSCALESREPORTINGRESULTSONEACHSUBSCALEMAYREVEALINTERESTINGINTERACTIONS
AMONG THE PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES7HERE SUCH FEATURES OCCUR THEY CAN BE
EXAMINED AND LINKED TO THE CURRICULUM AND TEACHING METHODOLOGY USED )N
SOME COUNTRIES THE IMPORTANT QUESTION MAY BE HOW TO TEACH THE CURRENT
CURRICULUMBETTER)NOTHERSTHEQUESTIONMAYNOTONLYBEHOWTOTEACHBUTALSO
WHATTOTEACH
4HEREADINGPROCESSASPECTSUBSCALES
&IGURESUMMARISESTHEREADINGLITERACYTASKSINTERMSOFTHREEPROCESSES
4HEREARETWOREASONSFORREDUCINGTHENUMBEROFPROCESSSUBSCALESFROMlVETO
THREEFORREPORTINGPURPOSES4HElRSTISPRAGMATIC)NANDREADING
AS A MINOR DOMAINWILL BE RESTRICTED TO ABOUT ITEMS INSTEAD OF THE THAT WERE USED IN WHEN READING WAS A MAJOR DOMAIN4HE AMOUNT OF
INFORMATIONTHEREFOREWILLBEINSUFlCIENTTOREPORTTRENDSOVERlVEPROCESS
SUBSCALES4HESECONDREASONISCONCEPTUAL4HETHREEPROCESSSUBSCALESAREBASED
ONTHESETOFlVEPROCESSESSHOWNIN&IGURE&ORMINGABROADUNDERSTANDING
ANDDEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATIONHAVEBEENGROUPEDTOGETHERINANhINTERPRETING
TEXTSvSUBSCALEBECAUSEINBOTHTHEREADERPROCESSESINFORMATIONINTHETEXT
INTHECASEOFFORMINGABROADUNDERSTANDINGTHEWHOLETEXTANDINTHECASEOF
DEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATIONONEPARTOFTHETEXTINRELATIONTOANOTHER2EmECTING
ONANDEVALUATINGTHECONTENTOFATEXTANDREmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGTHEFORMOFATEXT
HAVEBEENCOLLAPSEDINTOASINGLEhREmECTIONANDEVALUATIONvSUBSCALEBECAUSETHE
DISTINCTIONBETWEENREmECTINGONANDEVALUATINGCONTENTANDREmECTINGONAND
EVALUATINGFORMINPRACTICEWASFOUNDTOBESOMEWHATARBITRARY
£Óä
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°Ès2ELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHEREADINGLITERACYFRAMEWORKANDTHE
PROCESSASPECTSUBSCALES
2EADING,ITERACY
5SEINFORMATIONPRIMARILY
FROMWITHINTHETEXT
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
$RAWUPONOUTSIDE
KNOWLEDGE
2ETRIEVING
INFORMATION
)NTERPRETING
TEXTS
2ETRIEVE
INFORMATION
&ORMABROAD $EVELOPAN
UNDERSTANDING INTERPRETATION
2EmECTIONAND
EVALUATION
2EmECT
2EmECT
ONAND
ONAND
EVALUATE
EVALUATEFORM
CONTENTOFTEXT
OFTEXT
4HETEXTFORMATSUBSCALES
0)3! WILL ALSO OFFER THE POSSIBILITY OF PROVIDING RESULTS BASED ON TEXT
FORMATSUBSCALESASREPORTEDIN2EADINGFORCHANGE0ERFORMANCEANDENGAGEMENT
ACROSSCOUNTRIES/%#$B&IGURESUMMARISESTHEVARIOUSTEXTFORMATS
AND THE ASSOCIATED TASKS ALONG THE TWO TEXT FORMAT SUBSCALES/RGANISING THE
DATAINTHISWAYPROVIDESTHEOPPORTUNITYTOEXAMINETOWHATEXTENTCOUNTRIES
DIFFERWITHRESPECTTOABILITYTODEALWITHTEXTSINDIFFERENTFORMATS)NREPORTING
RESULTSFORTWOTHIRDSOFTHETASKSWEREUSEDTOCREATETHECONTINUOUSTEXT
SUBSCALEWHILETHEREMAININGONETHIRDOFTHETASKSWEREUSEDTOCREATETHENON
CONTINUOUSTEXTSUBSCALE4HEREISASIMILARDISTRIBUTIONOFTASKSBETWEENTHETWO
TEXTFORMATSIN
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°Çs2ELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHEREADINGLITERACYFRAMEWORK
ANDTHETEXTFORMATSUBSCALES
2EADING,ITERACY
#ONTINUOUSTEXTSs
s.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS
.ARRATIVE
%XPOSITORY
$ESCRIPTIVE
!RGUMENTATIVE
ANDPERSUASIVE
)NJUNCTIVE
#HARTSANDGRAPHS
4ABLES
$IAGRAMS
-APS
&ORMS
!DVERTISEMENTS
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£Ó£
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
4HE SCORES ON THE COMPOSITE SCALE AS WELL AS ON EACH OF THE lVE SUBSCALES
REPRESENTVARYINGDEGREESOFPROlCIENCY!LOWSCOREINDICATESTHATASTUDENT
HASVERYLIMITEDKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLSWHILEAHIGHSCOREINDICATESTHATASTUDENT
HASQUITEADVANCEDKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLS5SEOF)TEM2ESPONSE4HEORYMAKESIT
POSSIBLENOTONLYTOSUMMARISERESULTSFORVARIOUSSUBPOPULATIONSOFSTUDENTS
BUTALSOTODETERMINETHERELATIVEDIFlCULTYOFTHEREADINGLITERACYTASKSINCLUDED
INTHESURVEY)NOTHERWORDSJUSTASINDIVIDUALSRECEIVEASPECIlCVALUEONA
SCALEACCORDINGTOTHEIRPERFORMANCEINTHEASSESSMENTTASKSEACHTASKRECEIVES
A SPECIlC VALUE ON A SCALE ACCORDING TO ITS DIFlCULTY AS DETERMINED BY THE
PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS ACROSS THE VARIOUS COUNTRIES THAT PARTICIPATE IN THE
ASSESSMENT
"UILDINGANITEMMAP
4HE COMPLETE SET OF READING LITERACY TASKS USED IN /%#$0)3! VARIES
WIDELY IN TEXT FORMATSITUATION AND TASK REQUIREMENTSAND HENCE ALSO IN
DIFFICULTY4HIS RANGE IS CAPTURED THROUGH WHAT IS KNOWN AS AN ITEM MAP
4HEITEMMAPPROVIDESAVISUALREPRESENTATIONOFTHEREADINGLITERACYSKILLS
DEMONSTRATEDBYSTUDENTSALONGTHESCALES4HEMAPSHOULDCONTAINABRIEF
DESCRIPTION OF A SELECTED NUMBER OF RELEASED ASSESSMENT TASKS ALONG WITH
THEIR SCALE VALUES4HESE DESCRIPTIONS TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE SPECIFIC
SKILLS THE ITEM IS DESIGNED TO ASSESS ANDIN THE CASE OF OPENENDED TASKS
THE CRITERIA USED FOR JUDGING THE ITEM CORRECT !N EXAMINATION OF THE
DESCRIPTIONSPROVIDESSOMEINSIGHTINTOTHERANGEOFPROCESSESREQUIREDOF
STUDENTSANDTHEPROFICIENCIESTHEYNEEDTODEMONSTRATEATVARIOUSPOINTS
ALONGTHEREADINGLITERACYSCALES
&IGURESHOWSANEXAMPLEOFANITEMMAPFROM0)3!!NEXPLANATION
OFHOWTOINTERPRETITMAYBEUSEFUL4HESCOREASSIGNEDTOEACHITEMISBASED
ONTHETHEORYTHATSOMEONEATAGIVENPOINTONTHESCALEISEQUALLYPROlCIENT
IN ALL TASKS AT THAT POINT ON THE SCALE)T WAS DECIDED THATFOR THE PURPOSES
OF/%#$0)3!hPROlCIENCYvSHOULDMEANTHATSTUDENTSATAPARTICULARPOINT
ONTHEREADINGLITERACYSCALEWOULDHAVEAPERCENTCHANCEOFRESPONDING
CORRECTLY TO ITEMS AT THAT POINT&OR EXAMPLEIN &IGURE AN ITEM APPEARS
AT ON THE COMPOSITE SCALE4HIS MEANS THAT STUDENTS SCORING ON THE
COMPOSITE READING LITERACY SCALE WILL HAVE A PER CENT CHANCE OF CORRECTLY
ANSWERING ITEMS GRADED ON THE SCALE4HIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT STUDENTS
RECEIVING SCORES BELOW WILL ALWAYS ANSWER INCORRECTLY 2ATHER STUDENTS
SCORINGBELOWWILLBEEXPECTEDTOANSWERCORRECTLYANITEMOFTHATLEVELOF
DIFlCULTYLESSTHANPERCENTOFTHETIME#ONVERSELYSTUDENTSHAVINGSCORES
ABOVEWILLHAVEAGREATERTHANPERCENTCHANCEOFRESPONDINGCORRECTLY
)T SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE ITEM WILL ALSO APPEAR ON A PROCESS SUBSCALE AND
ONAFORMATSUBSCALEASWELLASONTHECOMBINEDREADINGLITERACYSCALE)NTHIS
EXAMPLETHEITEMATONTHECOMPOSITESCALEREQUIRESSTUDENTSTOIDENTIFY
THEPURPOSETHATTWOSHORTTEXTSHAVEINCOMMONBYCOMPARINGTHEMAINIDEAS
INEACHOFTHEM)TISANINTERPRETATIONITEMANDTHUSAPPEARSONTHEINTERPRETING
TEXTSSCALEASWELLASONTHECONTINUOUSTEXTSSCALE
£ÓÓ
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°ns!NEXAMPLEOFA0)3!ITEMMAP
4YPESOF0ROCESS
h5hh 4YPESOF0ROCESS!SPECT
!SPECT
2ETRieVING
)NFORMATION
)NTERPRETING
2EmECTINGAND
EVALUATING
#ONTINUOUS
.ONCONTINUOUS
s4EXT&ORMAT
4EXT
&ORMAT
(90/4(%3)3%ABOUTANUNEXPECTEDPHENOMENONBY
5
s
!.!,93%SEVERALDESCRIBEDCASESAND-!4#(TO
CATEGORIESGIVENINA42%%$)!'2!-WHERESOMEOFTHE
5
s
(90/4(%3)3%ABOUTANUNEXPECTEDPHENOMENON
BYTAKINGACCOUNTOFOUTSIDEKNOWLEDGEALONGWITHSOME
RELEVANTINFORMATIONINA#/-0,%84!",%ONARELATIVELY
UNFAMILIARTOPICSCORE
5
s
%6!,5!4%THEENDINGOFA,/.'.!22!4)6%INRELATION
TOITSIMPLICITTHEMEORMOODSCORE
5
s
2%,!4%.5!.#%3/&,!.'5!'%INA,/.'.!22!4)6%
5
s
5
#/.3425%THEMEANINGOFASENTENCEBYRELATINGITTO
BROADCONTEXTINA,/.'.!22!4)6%
5
s
(90/4(%3)3%ABOUTANAUTHORIALDECISIONBYRELATING
EVIDENCEINAGRAPHTOTHEINFERREDMAINTHEMEOF
-5,4)0,%'2!0()#$)30,!93
5
s
#/-0!2%!.$%6!,5!4%THESTYLEOFTWOOPEN,%44%23
5
s
s
5
s
5
5
s
SITUATIONSCORE
#/..%#4EVIDENCEFROMA,/.'.!22!4)6%TOPERSONAL
CONCEPTSINORDERTOJUSTIFYOPPOSINGPOINTSOFVIEWSCORE
5
s
#OMPOSITEITEMMAP
TAKINGACCOUNTOFOUTSIDEKNOWLEDGEALONGWITHALLRELEVANT
INFORMATIONINA#/-0,%84!",%ONARELATIVELYUNFAMILIAR
TOPICSCORE
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
RELEVANTINFORMATIONISINFOOTNOTESSCORE
TOTHEMAINTHEMEINTHEPRESENCEOFCONmICTINGIDEASSCORE
,/#!4%INFORMATIONINA42%%$)!'2!-USING
INFORMATIONINAFOOTNOTESCORE
%6!,5!4%THEENDINGOFA,/.'.!22!4)6%INRELATION
TOTHEPLOTSCORE
).&%2!.!.!,/')#!,2%,!4)/.3()0BETWEENTWO
PHENOMENADISCUSSEDINANOPEN,%44%2
)$%.4)&9THEIMPLIEDSTARTINGDATEOFA'2!0(
#/.3425%4(%-%!.).'OFSHORTQUOTATIONSFROM
A,/.'.!22!4)6%INRELATIONTOATMOSPHEREORIMMEDIATE
5
s
s
x
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£ÓÎ
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°nÊ­Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi`®s!NEXAMPLEOFA0)3!ITEMMAP
!SPECT
4EXT
&ORMAT
#ONTINUOUS
%80,!).ACHARACTERSMOTIVATIONBYLINKINGEVENTS
INA,/.'.!22!4)6%
5
s
).&%24(%2%,!4)/.3()0BETWEEN
47/'2!0()#$)30,!93WITHDIFFERENTCONVENTIONS
5
s
%6!,5!4%THESUITABILITYOFA42%%$)!'2!-
FORPARTICULARPURPOSES
5
s
5
s
5
s
5
s
5
s
-!4#(CATEGORIESGIVENINA42%%$)!'2!-TODESCRIBEDCASES WHENSOMEOFTHERELEVANTINFORMATIONISINFOOTNOTESSCORE
5
s
).4%202%4INFORMATIONINASINGLEPARAGRAPHTO
UNDERSTANDTHESETTINGOFA.!22!4)6%
5
s
$ISTINGUISHBETWEENVARIABLESAND
3425#452!,&%!452%3OFA42%%$)!'2!-
5
)$%.4)&9THECOMMON0520/3%OF47/3(/244%843
5
s
5
s
5
,/#!4%ALITERALPIECEOFINFORMATIONINA4%84WITH
CLEARTEXTSTRUCTURE
5
s
,/#!4%EXPLICITINFORMATIONINASHORTSPECIlED
SECTIONOFA.!22!4)6%
5
s
,/#!4%ANEXPLICITLYSTATEDPIECEOFINFORMATIONIN
A4%84WITHHEADINGS
5
s
5
s
,/#!4%NUMERICALINFORMATIONINA42%%$)!'2!-SCORE
#/..%#4EVIDENCEFROMA,/.'.!22!4)6%TOPERSONAL
CONCEPTSINORDERTOJUSTIFYASINGLEPOINTOFVIEWSCORE
,/#!4%!.$#/-").%INFORMATIONINA,).%'2!0(
ANDITSINTRODUCTIONTOINFERAMISSINGVALUE
5.$%234!.$THESTRUCTUREOFA42%%$)!'2!-
,/#!4%PIECESOFEXPLICITINFORMATIONINA4%84
CONTAININGSTRONGORGANIZERS
)NFERTHE-!).)$%!OFASIMPLE"!2'2!0(FROMITSTITLE
2%#/'.)3%4(%-%OFANARTICLEHAVINGACLEAR
SUBHEADINGANDCONSIDERABLEREDUNDANCY
)NTERPRETING
2EmECTINGAND
EVALUATING
s4EXT&ORMAT
#OMPOSITEITEMMAP
£Ó{
4YPESOF0ROCESS
.ONCONTINUOUS
h5hh 4YPESOF0ROCESS!SPECT
2ETRieVING
)NFORMATION
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
s
s
,EVELSOFREADINGLITERACYPROlCIENCY
*USTASSTUDENTSWITHINEACHCOUNTRYARESAMPLEDTOREPRESENTTHENATIONALPOPULATION
OFYEAROLDSTUDENTSEACHREADINGLITERACYTASKREPRESENTSACLASSOFTASKSFROM
THEREADINGLITERACYDOMAIN(ENCEITREPRESENTSPROlCIENCYINATYPEOFPROCESSING
ANDINDEALINGWITHATYPEOFTEXTTHATYEAROLDSTUDENTSSHOULDHAVEACQUIRED
/NEOBVIOUSQUESTIONISWHATDISTINGUISHESTASKSATTHELOWERENDOFTHESCALEFROM
THOSEINTHEMIDDLEANDUPPERRANGESOFTHESCALE!LSODOTASKSTHATFALLAROUND
THESAMEPLACEONTHESCALESHARESOMECHARACTERISTICSTHATRESULTINTHEIRHAVING
SIMILARLEVELSOFDIFlCULTY%VENACURSORYREVIEWOFTHEITEMMAPREVEALSTHATTASKS
ATTHELOWERENDOFEACHSCALEDIFFERFROMTHOSEATTHEHIGHEREND!MORECAREFUL
ANALYSISOFTHERANGEOFTASKSALONGEACHSCALEPROVIDESINDICATIONSOFANORDERED
SETOFINFORMATIONPROCESSINGSKILLSANDSTRATEGIES-EMBERSOFTHEREADINGEXPERT
GROUPEXAMINEDEACHTASKTOIDENTIFYASETOFVARIABLESTHATSEEMEDTOINmUENCEITS
DIFlCULTY4HEYFOUNDTHATDIFlCULTYISINPARTDETERMINEDBYTHELENGTHSTRUCTURE
ANDCOMPLEXITYOFTHETEXTITSELF(OWEVERTHEYALSONOTEDTHATINMOSTREADING
UNITSAUNITBEINGATEXTANDASETOFQUESTIONSTHEQUESTIONSRANGEACROSSTHE
READINGLITERACYSCALE4HISMEANSTHATWHILETHESTRUCTUREOFATEXTCONTRIBUTESTO
THEDIFlCULTYOFANITEMWHATTHEREADERHASTODOWITHTHATTEXTASDElNEDBYTHE
QUESTIONORDIRECTIVEINTERACTSWITHTHETEXTANDAFFECTSTHEOVERALLDIFlCULTY
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
4HEMEMBERSOFTHEREADINGEXPERTGROUPANDTESTDEVELOPERSIDENTIlEDANUMBER
OFVARIABLESTHATCANINmUENCETHEDIFlCULTYOFANYREADINGLITERACYTASK/NESALIENT
FACTORISTHEPROCESSINVOLVEDINRETRIEVINGINFORMATIONDEVELOPINGANINTERPRETATION
ORREmECTINGONWHATHASBEENREAD0ROCESSESRANGEINCOMPLEXITYANDSOPHISTICATION
FROM MAKING SIMPLE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PIECES OF INFORMATIONTO CATEGORISING
IDEASACCORDINGTOGIVENCRITERIAANDTOCRITICALLYEVALUATINGANDHYPOTHESISINGABOUT
ASECTIONOFTEXT)NADDITIONTOTHEPROCESSCALLEDFORTHEDIFlCULTYOFRETRIEVING
INFORMATIONTASKSVARIESWITHTHENUMBEROFPIECESOFINFORMATIONTOBEINCLUDEDIN
THERESPONSETHENUMBEROFCRITERIAWHICHTHEINFORMATIONMUSTSATISFYANDWHETHER
ORNOTWHATISRETRIEVEDNEEDSTOBESEQUENCEDINAPARTICULARWAY)NTHECASEOF
INTERPRETATIVEANDREmECTIVETASKSTHEAMOUNTOFATEXTTHATNEEDSTOBEASSIMILATED
IS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR AFFECTING DIFlCULTY)N ITEMS THAT REQUIRE REmECTION ON THE
READERSPARTDIFlCULTYISALSOCONDITIONEDBYTHEFAMILIARITYORSPECIlCITYOFTHE
KNOWLEDGETHATMUSTBEDRAWNONFROMOUTSIDETHETEXT)NALLPROCESSESOFREADING
THEDIFlCULTYOFTHETASKDEPENDSONHOWPROMINENTTHEREQUIREDINFORMATIONISHOW
MUCHCOMPETINGINFORMATIONISPRESENTANDWHETHERORNOTTHEREADERISEXPLICITLY
DIRECTEDTOTHEIDEASORINFORMATIONREQUIREDTOCOMPLETETHETASK
)NANATTEMPTTOCAPTURETHISPROGRESSIONOFCOMPLEXITYANDDIFlCULTYIN0)3!
THECOMPOSITEREADINGLITERACYSCALEANDEACHOFTHESUBSCALESWEREDIVIDEDINTO
lVELEVELS
,EVEL
3COREPOINTSONTHE0)3!SCALE
TO
TO
TO
TO
-ORETHAN
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£Óx
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
%XPERTPANELSJUDGEDTHATTHETASKSWITHINEACHLEVELOFREADINGLITERACYSHARED
MANY OF THE SAME TASK FEATURES AND REQUIREMENTSAND DIFFERED IN SYSTEMATIC
WAYS FROM TASKS AT HIGHER OR LOWER LEVELS!S A RESULTTHESE LEVELS APPEAR TO
BEAUSEFULWAYTOEXPLORETHEPROGRESSIONOFREADINGLITERACYDEMANDSWITHIN
EACHSCALE4HISPROGRESSIONISSUMMARISEDIN&IGURE4HISPROCESSWILLBE
REPEATEDFORTHEMAJORDOMAINSFOREACHCYCLE
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°™s2EADINGLITERACYLEVELSMAP
2ETRIEVINGINFORMATION
)NTERPRETINGTEXTS
2EmECTINGANDEVALUATING
,OCATEANDPOSSIBLYSEQUENCE
ORCOMBINEMULTIPLEPIECESOF
DEEPLYEMBEDDEDINFORMATION
SOMEOFWHICHMAYBEOUTSIDE
THEMAINBODYOFTHETEXT)NFER
WHICHINFORMATIONINTHETEXTIS
RELEVANTTOTHETASK$EALWITH
HIGHLYPLAUSIBLEANDOREXTENSIVE
COMPETINGINFORMATION
%ITHERCONSTRUETHEMEANINGOF
NUANCEDLANGUAGEORDEMONSTRATE
AFULLANDDETAILEDUNDERSTANDING
OFATEXT
#RITICALLYEVALUATEOR
HYPOTHESISEDRAWINGON
SPECIALISEDKNOWLEDGE$EAL
WITHCONCEPTSTHATARECONTRARY
TOEXPECTATIONSANDDRAWONA
DEEPUNDERSTANDINGOFLONGOR
COMPLEXTEXTS
#ONTINUOUSTEXTS.EGOTIATETEXTSWHOSEDISCOURSESTRUCTUREISNOTOBVIOUSORCLEARLYMARKEDINORDER
TODISCERNTHERELATIONSHIPOFSPECIlCPARTSOFTHETEXTTOITSIMPLICITTHEMEORINTENTION
.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS )DENTIFYPATTERNSAMONGMANYPIECESOFINFORMATIONPRESENTEDINADISPLAY
WHICHMAYBELONGANDDETAILEDSOMETIMESBYREFERRINGTOINFORMATIONEXTERNALTOTHEDISPLAY4HE
READER MAY NEED TO REALISE INDEPENDENTLY THAT A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF THE SECTION OF TEXT REQUIRES
REFERENCETOASEPARATEPARTOFTHESAMEDOCUMENTSUCHASAFOOTNOTE
,OCATEANDPOSSIBLYSEQUENCEOR
COMBINEMULTIPLEPIECESOF
EMBEDDEDINFORMATIONEACHOF
WHICHMAYNEEDTOMEETMULTIPLE
CRITERIAINATEXTWITHFAMILIAR
CONTEXTORFORM)NFERWHICH
INFORMATIONINTHETEXTISRELEVANT
TOTHETASK
5SEAHIGHLEVELOFTEXTBASED
INFERENCETOUNDERSTANDANDAPPLY
CATEGORIESINANUNFAMILIAR
CONTEXTANDTOCONSTRUETHE
MEANINGOFASECTIONOFTEXTBY
TAKINGINTOACCOUNTTHETEXTAS
AWHOLE$EALWITHAMBIGUITIES
IDEASTHATARECONTRARYTO
EXPECTATIONANDIDEASTHATARE
NEGATIVELYWORDED
5SEFORMALORPUBLICKNOWLEDGE
TOHYPOTHESISEABOUTORCRITICALLY
EVALUATEATEXT3HOWACCURATE
UNDERSTANDINGOFLONGOR
COMPLEXTEXTS
#ONTINUOUSTEXTS&OLLOWLINGUISTICORTHEMATICLINKSOVERSEVERALPARAGRAPHSOFTENINTHEABSENCEOF
CLEARDISCOURSEMARKERSINORDERTOLOCATEINTERPRETOREVALUATEEMBEDDEDINFORMATIONORTOINFER
PSYCHOLOGICALORMETAPHYSICALMEANING
.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS 3CANALONGDETAILEDTEXTINORDERTOlNDRELEVANTINFORMATIONOFTENWITH
LITTLEORNOASSISTANCEFROMORGANISERSSUCHASLABELSORSPECIALFORMATTINGTOLOCATESEVERALPIECESOF
INFORMATIONTOBECOMPAREDORCOMBINED
£ÓÈ
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°™Ê­Vœ˜Ìˆ˜Õi`®s2EADINGLITERACYLEVELSMAP
2ETRIEVINGINFORMATION
,OCATEANDINSOMECASESRECOGNISE
THERELATIONSHIPBETWEENPIECESOF
INFORMATIONEACHOFWHICHMAY
NEEDTOMEETMULTIPLECRITERIA
$EALWITHPROMINENTCOMPETING
INFORMATION
)NTERPRETINGTEXTS
2EmECTINGANDEVALUATING
)NTEGRATESEVERALPARTSOFATEXT
INORDERTOIDENTIFYAMAIN
IDEAUNDERSTANDARELATIONSHIPOR
CONSTRUETHEMEANINGOFAWORD
ORPHRASE#OMPARECONTRASTOR
CATEGORISETAKINGMANYCRITERIA
INTOACCOUNT$EALWITHCOMPETING
INFORMATION
-AKECONNECTIONSOR
COMPARISONSGIVEEXPLANATIONS
OREVALUATEAFEATUREOFTEXT
$EMONSTRATEADETAILED
UNDERSTANDINGOFTHETEXTIN
RELATIONTOFAMILIAREVERYDAY
KNOWLEDGEORDRAWONLESS
COMMONKNOWLEDGE
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
#ONTINUOUSTEXTS5SECONVENTIONSOFTEXTORGANISATIONWHEREPRESENTANDFOLLOWIMPLICITOREXPLICIT
LOGICALLINKSSUCHASCAUSEANDEFFECTRELATIONSHIPSACROSSSENTENCESORPARAGRAPHSINORDERTOLOCATE
INTERPRETOREVALUATEINFORMATION
.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS#ONSIDERONEDISPLAYINTHELIGHTOFASECONDSEPARATEDOCUMENTORDISPLAY
POSSIBLYINADIFFERENTFORMATORCOMBINESEVERALPIECESOFSPATIALVERBALANDNUMERICINFORMATIONIN
AGRAPHORMAPTODRAWCONCLUSIONSABOUTTHEINFORMATIONREPRESENTED
,OCATEONEORMOREPIECESOF
INFORMATIONEACHOFWHICHMAYBE
REQUIREDTOMEETMULTIPLECRITERIA
$EALWITHCOMPETINGINFORMATION
)DENTIFYTHEMAINIDEAINATEXT
UNDERSTANDRELATIONSHIPSFORMOR
APPLYSIMPLECATEGORIESOR
CONSTRUEMEANINGWITHINALIMITED
PARTOFTHETEXTWHENTHE
INFORMATIONISNOTPROMINENTAND
LOWLEVELINFERENCESAREREQUIRED
-AKEACOMPARISONOR
CONNECTIONSBETWEENTHETEXT
ANDOUTSIDEKNOWLEDGEOR
EXPLAINAFEATUREOFTHETEXTBY
DRAWINGONPERSONALEXPERIENCE
ANDATTITUDES
#ONTINUOUSTEXTS&OLLOWLOGICALANDLINGUISTICCONNECTIONSWITHINAPARAGRAPHINORDERTOLOCATEOR
INTERPRETINFORMATIONORSYNTHESISEINFORMATIONACROSSTEXTSORPARTSOFATEXTINORDERTOINFERTHE
AUTHORSPURPOSE
.ONCONTINUOUSTEXTS$EMONSTRATEAGRASPOFTHEUNDERLYINGSTRUCTUREOFAVISUALDISPLAYSUCHASA
SIMPLETREEDIAGRAMORTABLEORCOMBINETWOPIECESOFINFORMATIONFROMAGRAPHORTABLE
,OCATEONEORMOREINDEPENDENT
PIECESOFEXPLICITLYSTATED
INFORMATIONTYPICALLYMEETINGA
SINGLECRITERIONWITHLITTLEORNO
COMPETINGINFORMATIONINTHETEXT
2ECOGNISETHEMAINTHEMEOR
AUTHORSPURPOSEINATEXTABOUTA
FAMILIARTOPICWHENTHEREQUIRED
INFORMATIONINTHETEXTISNOT
PROMINENT
-AKEASIMPLECONNECTION
BETWEENINFORMATIONINTHETEXT
ANDCOMMONEVERYDAY
KNOWLEDGE
#ONTINUOUS TEXTS 5SE REDUNDANCYPARAGRAPH HEADINGS OR COMMON PRINT CONVENTIONS TO FORM AN
IMPRESSIONOFTHEMAINIDEAOFTHETEXTORTOLOCATEINFORMATIONSTATEDEXPLICITLYWITHINASHORTSECTION
OFTEXT
.ONCONTINUOUS TEXTS &OCUSONDISCRETEPIECESOFINFORMATIONUSUALLYWITHINASINGLEDISPLAYSUCH
AS A SIMPLE MAPA LINE GRAPH OR A BAR GRAPH THAT PRESENTS ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF INFORMATION IN A
STRAIGHTFORWARD WAYAND IN WHICH MOST OF THE VERBAL TEXT IS LIMITED TO A SMALL NUMBER OF WORDS OR
PHRASES
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£ÓÇ
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
)NTERPRETINGTHEREADINGLITERACYLEVELS
.OTONLYDOESEACHLEVELREPRESENTARANGEOFTASKSANDASSOCIATEDKNOWLEDGE
ANDSKILLSITALSOREPRESENTSARANGEOFPROlCIENCIESDEMONSTRATEDBYSTUDENTS
!S MENTIONED PREVIOUSLYTHE READING LITERACY LEVELS WERE INITIALLY SET BY THE
MEMBERSOFTHEREADINGEXPERTGROUPTOREPRESENTASETOFTASKSWITHSHARED
CHARACTERISTICS4HESELEVELSALSOHAVESHAREDSTATISTICALPROPERTIES4HEAVERAGE
STUDENTWITHINEACHLEVELCANBEEXPECTEDTOSUCCESSFULLYPERFORMTHEAVERAGE
TASKWITHINTHATLEVELPERCENTOFTHETIME)NADDITIONTHEWIDTHOFEACHLEVEL
ISINPARTDETERMINEDBYTHEEXPECTATIONTHATASTUDENTATTHELOWERENDOFANY
LEVELWILLSCOREPERCENTONANYHYPOTHETICALTESTMADEUPOFITEMSRANDOMLY
SELECTEDFROMTHATLEVEL
3INCEEACHREADINGLITERACYSCALEREPRESENTSAPROGRESSIONOFKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLS
STUDENTS AT A PARTICULAR LEVEL NOT ONLY DEMONSTRATE THE KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS
ASSOCIATEDWITHTHATPARTICULARLEVELBUTTHEPROlCIENCIESASSOCIATEDWITHTHELOWER
LEVELSASWELL4HUSTHEKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLSASSUMEDATEACHLEVELBUILDONAND
ENCOMPASSTHEPROlCIENCIESLAIDDOWNINTHENEXTLOWERLEVEL4HISMEANSTHATA
STUDENTWHOISJUDGEDTOBEAT,EVELONAREADINGLITERACYSCALEISPROlCIENTNOT
ONLYIN,EVELTASKSBUTALSOIN,EVELANDTASKS4HISALSOMEANSTHATSTUDENTS
WHOAREAT,EVELSANDWILLBEEXPECTEDTOGETTHEAVERAGE,EVELITEMCORRECT
LESSTHANPERCENTOFTHETIME0UTANOTHERWAYTHEYWILLBEEXPECTEDTOSCORE
LESSTHANPERCENTONATESTMADEUPOFITEMSDRAWNFROM,EVEL
&IGURESHOWSTHEPROBABILITYTHATINDIVIDUALSPERFORMINGATSELECTEDPOINTS
ALONGTHECOMBINEDREADINGLITERACYSCALEWILLGIVEACORRECTRESPONSETOTASKSOF
VARYINGDIFlCULTY/NEISA,EVELTASKONEISA,EVELTASKANDTHETHIRDTASK
RECEIVESTWOSCOREPOINTSONEAT,EVELANDTHEOTHERAT,EVEL)TISREADILY
SEENHERETHATASTUDENTWITHASCOREOFWHOISESTIMATEDTOBEBELOW,EVEL
HASONLYAPERCENTCHANCEOFRESPONDINGCORRECTLYTOTHE,EVELTASKTHAT
ISATONTHEREADINGLITERACYSCALE4HISPERSONHASONLYAPERCENTCHANCE
OFRESPONDINGTOTHEITEMFROM,EVELANDALMOSTNOCHANCEOFRESPONDING
CORRECTLYTOTHEITEMFROM,EVEL3OMEONEWITHAPROlCIENCYOFINTHE
MIDDLEOF,EVELHASAPERCENTCHANCEOFRESPONDINGTOTHEITEMAT
BUTONLYSLIGHTLYMORETHANONECHANCEINFOUROFRESPONDINGCORRECTLYTOTHE
TASKATANDONLYASEVENPERCENTCHANCEOFRESPONDINGCORRECTLYTOTHETASK
SELECTEDFROM,EVEL)NCONTRASTSOMEONEAT,EVELWOULDBEEXPECTEDTO
RESPONDCORRECTLYPERCENTOFTHETIMETOTASKSATONTHEREADINGLITERACY
SCALEAND PER CENT OF THE TIME TO TASKS AT NEAR THE MIDDLE OF ,EVEL
(OWEVERHEORSHEWOULDONLYHAVEJUSTOVERONECHANCEINFOURPER
CENTOFCORRECTLYRESPONDINGTOITEMSFROMTHEMIDDLEOF,EVEL&INALLYA
STUDENTAT,EVELISEXPECTEDTORESPONDCORRECTLYMOSTOFTHETIMETOMOST
OFTHETASKS!SSHOWNIN&IGUREASTUDENTHAVINGASCOREOFONTHE
COMBINEDREADINGLITERACYSCALEHASAPERCENTCHANCEOFANSWERINGTHETASK
ATCORRECTLYAPERCENTCHANCEOFANSWERINGTHEITEMAT,EVEL
CORRECTLYANDAPERCENTOFRESPONDINGCORRECTLYTOTHETASKSELECTEDFROM
NEARTHECENTREOF,EVEL
£Ón
4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS©/%#$
ˆ}ÕÀiÊÓ°£äs0ROBABILITYASAPERCENTAGEOFRESPONDINGCORRECTLYTOSELECTEDTASKS
OFVARYINGDIFlCULTYFORSTUDENTSWITHVARYINGLEVELSOFPROlCIENCY
,EVELITEM ,EVELITEM ,EVELITEM ,EVELITEM
ATPOINTS ATPOINTS ATPOINTS ATPOINTS
"ELOW,EVEL
,EVEL
,EVEL
,EVEL
,EVEL
,EVEL
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
0ROlCIENCYOFPOINTS
,i>`ˆ˜}ʈÌiÀ>VÞÊ
&IGURE ALSO IMPLICITLY RAISES QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST
DESIGNATEDLEVELS%VENTHOUGHTHETOPOFTHEREADINGLITERACYSCALEISUNBOUNDED
ITCANBESTATEDWITHSOMECERTAINTYTHATSTUDENTSOFEXTREMELYHIGHPROlCIENCYARE
CAPABLEOFPERFORMINGTASKSCHARACTERISEDBYTHEHIGHESTLEVELOFPROlCIENCY4HERE
ISMOREOFANISSUEFORSTUDENTSWHOAREATTHEBOTTOMENDOFTHEREADINGLITERACY
SCALE,EVELBEGINSATYETACERTAINPERCENTAGEOFSTUDENTSINEACHCOUNTRYIS
ESTIMATEDTOBEBELOWTHISPOINTONTHESCALE7HILETHEREARENOREADINGLITERACY
TASKSWITHASCALEVALUEBELOWITISNOTCORRECTTOSAYTHATTHESESTUDENTSARE
WITHOUTANYREADINGLITERACYSKILLSORAREhTOTALLYILLITERATEv(OWEVERONTHEBASIS
OF THEIR PERFORMANCE IN THE SET OF TASKS USED IN THIS ASSESSMENTTHEY WOULD BE
EXPECTEDTOSCORELESSTHANPERCENTONASETOFTASKSSELECTEDFROM,EVEL4HEY
ARECLASSIlEDTHEREFOREASPERFORMINGBELOW,EVEL
3INCECOMPARATIVELYFEWYOUNGADULTSINOURSOCIETIESHAVENOLITERACYSKILLSTHE
FRAMEWORKDOESNOTCALLFORAMEASUREOFWHETHERORNOTYEAROLDSTUDENTS
CANREADINATECHNICALSENSE4HATIS/%#$0)3!DOESNOTMEASURETHEEXTENT
TOWHICHYEAROLDSTUDENTSAREmUENTREADERSORHOWCOMPETENTTHEYAREAT
WORDRECOGNITIONTASKSORSPELLING)TDOESHOWEVERREmECTTHECONTEMPORARY
VIEWTHATSTUDENTSSHOULDUPONCOMPLETINGCOMPULSORYEDUCATIONBEABLETO
CONSTRUCTEXTENDANDREmECTONTHEMEANINGOFWHATTHEYHAVEREADACROSSA
WIDERANGEOFCONTINUOUSANDNONCONTINUOUSTEXTSCOMMONLYASSOCIATEDWITHA
VARIETYOFSITUATIONSBOTHWITHINANDOUTSIDESCHOOL7HILEITWASNOTPOSSIBLETO
SAYWHATKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLSSTUDENTSPERFORMINGBELOW,EVELMAYPOSSESS
WITH REGARD TO READING LITERACYTHEIR LEVEL OF PROlCIENCY INDICATES THAT THESE
STUDENTSAREUNLIKELYTOBEABLETOUSEREADINGINDEPENDENTLYASATOOLTOASSIST
THEMINACQUIRINGKNOWLEDGEANDSKILLSINOTHERAREASn\
©/%#$4HE0)3!!SSESSMENT&RAMEWORKn-ATHEMATICS2EADING3CIENCEAND0ROBLEM3OLVING+NOWLEDGEAND3KILLS
£Ó™
Download