Intel 266MHz 32-Bit Pentium II (Klamath) Processor

advertisement
Construction Analysis
Intel 266MHz 32-Bit
Pentium II (Klamath) Processor
a
e
lS
miconductor
In
d
us
try
Since 1964
n
Servi g the G
lo
b
Report Number: SCA 9706-542
®
15022 N. 75th Street
Scottsdale, AZ 85260-2476
Phone: 602-998-9780
Fax: 602-948-1925
e-mail: ice@primenet.com
Internet: http://www.ice-corp.com/ice
INDEX TO TEXT
TITLE
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
MAJOR FINDINGS
1
1
TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION
Assembly
Die Process
2
2-3
ANALYSIS RESULTS I
Assembly
4-5
ANALYSIS RESULTS II
Die Process and Design
6-9
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
10
TABLES
Overall Evaluation
Package Markings
Wirestrength Results
Die Material Analysis
Horizontal Dimensions
Vertical Dimensions
11
12
12
12
13
14
-i-
INTRODUCTION
This report describes a construction analysis of the Intel 266MHz Pentium II (Klamath)
Processor. Two samples were used for the analysis. The devices were received in 540-pin
BGA (Ball Grid Array) packages with a metal heatsink.
MAJOR FINDINGS
Questionable Items:1
• Quality of die manufacturing was good and we found no areas of quality concerns.
Special Features:
• Four metal, P-epi, CMOS process (not BiCMOS).
• All metal levels employed stacked tungsten via/contact plugs.
• Chemical-mechanical-planarization (CMP).
• Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation.
• Titanium silicided diffusion structures.
• Aggressive feature sizes (reported 0.28 micron, measured 0.25 micron gates).
• Beveled die edges at top of die.
1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns.
They should be discussed
with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.
-1-
TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION
Assembly:
• The devices were packaged in 540-pin BGA (Ball Grid Array) packages. A metal
heatsink was employed on the top of the package. The die was mounted cavity
down.
• Eight decoupling capacitors were present on top of the package.
• The BGA was constructed of fiberglass in which the package cavity was employed.
The package was covered with a green conformal coating. The cavity was filled
with black plastic material.
• Triple tier package lands plated with gold.
• Ultrasonic wedge wirebonding using gold wire. Wirebonds (to the die and package
lands) had double “footprints.”
• Sawn dicing (full depth). The edges of the die had been beveled at the surface.
• Silver-epoxy die attach. The backside of the die was plated with gold.
Die Process:
• Fabrication process: Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation, CMOS process
apparently employing twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate.
• Die coat: A thin patterned polyimide die coat was present over the entire die.
• Final passivation: A single layer of nitride.
-2-
TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION (continued)
• Metallization: Four levels of metal defined by dry-etch techniques. All consisted of
aluminum with titanium-nitride caps (except M4). Metal 4 employed a substantial
titanium adhesion layer. There appeared to be evidence of very thin titanium
adhesion layers under metals 1 - 3. Tungsten plugs were employed for all vertical
interconnect. Metals 2 - 4 employed tungsten plugs with “stubs” underneath, for
improved contact. The “stubs” penetrated into the metal below the tungsten plus.
This is a unique processing feature. All plugs were lined with titanium-nitride.
Stacked vias were employed at all levels.
• Interlevel dielectrics 1, 2 and 3: The interlevel dielectric between all metals consisted
of the same structure. A very thin glass was deposited first, followed by two thick
layers of glass. The second layer had rounded corners around metal sidewalls. The
third layer of glass was planarized by CMP.
• Pre-metal glass: A thick layer of glass followed by a thin layer of glass. This
dielectric was also planarized by CMP.
• Polysilicon: A single layer of dry-etched polycide (poly and titanium-silicide). This
layer was used to form all gates on the die. Nitride sidewall spacers were used to
provide the LDD spacing.
• Diffusions: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions formed the sources/drains of
transistors. Titanium was sintered into the diffusions (salicide process). No bipolar
devices appeared to be present.
• Isolation: Isolation consisted of oxide-filled shallow-trenches.
• Wells: Twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate.
• SRAM: On-chip Level 1 data and instruction Cache memory cell arrays (16KByte
each) were employed. The memory cells used a 6T CMOS SRAM cell design.
• No redundancy fuses were found.
-3-
ANALYSIS RESULTS I
Assembly :
Figures 1 - 8
Questionable Items:1 None.
Special Features:
• Beveled die edges.
• Unique double “footprint” wirebonding technique.
• Extremely tight bond pitch (80 microns).
General items:
• The devices were packaged in 540-pin BGAs. A metal heatsink was employed on
top of the packages. The die was mounted cavity down. They were constructed of
fiberglass and were covered with a green conformal coating. The cavity was filled
with black plastic material. Eight decoupling capacitors were employed on top of
the packages.
• Overall package quality: Good. No defects were found on the external or internal
portions of the packages. Solder ball placement was good. No voids were noted in
the plastic cavity fill.
• Wirebonding: Ultrasonic wedge bond method using 0.9 mil gold wire. All
wirebonds had a double “footprint” which is the first time we’ve seen this type of
bonding used on these types of devices. A three tier package land structure was
used. Wire spacing and placement was good. Bond pitch was very close (80
microns); however, no problems were noted.
1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns.
They should be discussed
with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.
-4-
ANALYSIS RESULTS I (continued)
• Die attach: Silver-epoxy die attach of good quality. No voids were noted in the die
attach. The backside of the die was plated with gold.
• Die dicing: Die separation was by full depth sawing and showed normal quality
workmanship. No large chips or cracks were present at the die edges. The top
edges of the die had been beveled (see Figures 7 and 8). This is highly unusual and
it is not apparent why it is done.
-5-
ANALYSIS RESULTS II
Die Process and Design:
Figures 9 - 49
Questionable Items:1
• No items of concern were found in the area of die fabrication.
Special Features:
• Four metal, twin-well, P-epi, CMOS process.
• All vertical interconnect employed tungsten via/contact plugs.
• Chemical-mechanical-planarization (CMP).
• Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation.
• Titanium salicided diffusion structures.
• Aggressive feature sizes (0.25 micron gates).
General Items:
• Fabrication process: Oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation, CMOS process
apparently employing twin-wells in a P-epi on a P substrate. No problems were
found in the process.
• Design implementation: Die layout was clean and efficient. Alignment was good at
all levels.
• Design features: Slotted bus lines were employed to relieve stress. Anti-dishing
patterns were employed for planarization purposes. Numerous unconnected metal 4
vias (which appear to be used for probing purposes) were present.
• Surface defects: No toolmarks, masking defects, or contamination areas were
found.
-6-
ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
• Die coat: A patterned polyimide die coat was present over the entire die surface.
• Final passivation: A single layer of nitride. Coverage was good. Edge seal was also
good as the passivation extended to the scribe lane to seal the metallization.
• Metallization: Four levels of metallization. All consisted of aluminum with
titanium-nitride caps (except M4). Metal 4 employed a fairly thick titanium
adhesion layer. The other levels probably used a titanium layer too thin to detect.
Tungsten plugs were employed under all metals. Holes (voids) were noted in the
center of some tungsten plugs (mainly metals 3 and 4). Although this indicates
incomplete fill of the via holes no problems are foreseen. All plugs were lined with
titanium-nitride underneath and the presumed titanium layer over top.
• Metal patterning: All metal levels were defined by a dry etch of good quality. Metal
lines were widened (where needed), where vias made contact to them from above.
• Metal defects: None. No voiding, notching or cracking of the metal layers was
found. No silicon nodules were found following removal of the metal layers.
• Metal step coverage: No metal (aluminum) thinning was present at the connections
to the tungsten via plugs. The absence of thinning is due to the good control of plug
height and the planarization technique employed.
• Vias and contacts: All via and contact cuts were defined by a dry etch of good
quality. Again, alignment of the metals and plugs was good. Metals 2 - 4 employed
tungsten “stubs” at the bottom of the tungsten plugs. These unique features
consisted of stubs of tungsten metallization that penetrate into the underlying
aluminum. The profiles of the “stubs” varied quite a lot indicating inconsistency in
the processing. Vias and contacts were placed directly over one another (stacked
vias). No problems were noted.
-7-
ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
• Interlevel dielectrics: The interlevel dielectric between metal levels consisted of the
same oxide structure. A very thin glass was deposited first, followed by two thick
layers of glass. The third layer of glass was subjected to CMP which left the surface
very planar. The appearance of the second glass layer on ILD 1 was somewhat
unusual; however, it does not appear to present a problem. No problems were
found with any of these layers.
• Pre-metal glass (under metal 1): A thick layer of silicon-dioxide followed by a thin
layer of glass. This layer also appeared to have been planarized by chemicalmechanical-planarization. No problems were found.
• Polysilicon: A single level of polycide (poly and titanium-silicide) was used. It
formed all gates and word lines in the array. Definition was by dry etch of good
quality. Nitride sidewall spacers were used throughout and left in place. No
problems were found.
• Isolation: The device used oxide-filled shallow-trench isolation. The step at the
oxide transition was somewhat larger than normally seen.
• Diffusions: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions were used for sources and drains.
Titanium was sintered into the diffusions (salicide process) to reduce series
resistance. An LDD process was used employing nitride sidewall spacers. No
problems were found. No bipolar devices were found on these parts which makes
them the first non BiCMOS Pentium parts we’ve seen.
• Wells: Apparent twin-wells were used in a P-epi on a P substrate. Definition was
normal.
• Buried contacts: Not used.
-8-
ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
• SRAM: On-chip Level 1 data and instruction Cache memory cell arrays (16KByte
each) were employed. The memory cells used a 6T CMOS SRAM cell design.
Metal 4 distributed GND and Vcc to Metal 3. Metal 3 distributed GND and Vcc
(via metals 1 and 2) and formed “piggyback” word lines. Metal 2 formed bit lines
and metal 1 provided cell interconnect and provided GND and Vcc throughout the
cells. Polycide formed the N-channel select and storage transistors and the Pchannel pull-up transistors. Cell pitch was 4.1 x 4.8 microns (19 microns2).
• No redundancy fuses were noted.
-9-
PROCEDURE
The devices were subjected to the following analysis procedures:
External inspection
X-ray
Inspect assembly features
Die optical inspection
Wirepull test
Delayer to metal 4 and inspect
Aluminum removal (metal 4) and inspect tungsten plugs
Delayer to metal 3 and inspect
Aluminum removal (metal 3) and inspect tungsten plugs
Delayer to metal 2 and inspect
Aluminum removal (metal 2) and inspect tungsten plugs
Delayer to metal 1 and inspect
Aluminum removal (metal 1) and inspect tungsten plugs
Delayer to polycide/substrate and inspect
Die sectioning (90° for SEM)*
Measure horizontal dimensions
Measure vertical dimensions
Die material analysis
*Delineation of cross-sections is by silicon etch unless otherwise indicated.
- 10 -
OVERALL QUALITY EVALUATION: Overall Rating: Normal
DETAIL OF EVALUATION
Package integrity
G
Package markings
N
Die placement
G
Wirebond placement
G (tight wirebond pitch)
Wirebond quality
G (double footprints)
Dicing quality
G (beveled edges)
Die attach quality
G
Die attach method
Silver-epoxy
Dicing method
Sawn
Wirebond method
Ultrasonic wedge bonds using 0.9 mil gold wire.
Die surface integrity:
Toolmarks (absence)
G
Particles (absence)
G
Contamination (absence)
G
Process defects (absence)
N
General workmanship
N
Passivation integrity
G
Metal definition
N
Metal integrity
G
Metal registration
N
Contact coverage
N
Via/contact registration
N
Etch control (depth)
N
G = Good, P = Poor, N = Normal, NP = Normal/Poor
- 11 -
PACKAGE MARKINGS
TOP (heatsink)
Sample 1
C70609
14-0257
(plus coded markings)
Sample 2
(only coded markings)
WIREBOND STRENGTH
# of wires pulled:
90 (30 each tier)
Bond lifts:
0
Force to break - high:
10g
- low:
5g
- avg.:
6.7g
- std. dev.:
0.9
DIE MATERIAL ANALYSIS
Overlay passivation:
Single layer of nitride.
Metallization 4:
Aluminum with a titanium adhesion layer.
Interlevel dielectrics 1, 2 and 3:
A thin layer of glass followed by two thick layers of
glass.
Metallization 1 - 3:
a
Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and probably
very thin titanium adhesion layer.
Via/contact plugs (M1 - M4)
Tungsten (lined with titanium-nitride).
Pre-metal dielectric:
Thick layer of silicon-dioxide followed by a thin
glass. (No reflow glass).
Polycide:
Titanium-silicide on polysilicon.
Salicide on diffusions:
Titanium-silicide.
- 12 -
HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS
Die size:
13.3 x 14.6 mm (525 x 575 mils)
Die area:
195 mm2 (301,875 mils2)
Min pad size:
0.07 x 0.15 mm (3 x 5.9 mils)
Min pad window:
0.06 x 0.14 mm (2.4 x 5.3 mils)
Min pad space:
4 microns
Min metal 4 width:
1.6 micron
Min metal 4 space:
1.1 micron
Min metal 3 width:
0.6 micron
Min metal 3 space:
0.55 micron
Min metal 2 width:
0.55 micron
Min metal 2 space:
0.5 micron
Min metal 1 width:
0.4 micron
Min metal 1 space:
0.55 micron
Min via (M4-to-M3):
0.6 micron
Min via (M3-to-M2):
0.6 micron
Min via (M2-to-M1):
0.5 micron
Min contact:
0.5 micron
Min diffusion space:
0.4 micron
Min polycide width:
0.25 micron
Min polycide space:
0.5 micron
Min gate length* - (N-channel):
0.25 micron
- (P-channel):
0.25 micron
Min gate-to-contact space:
0.3 micron
SRAM cell size:
19.7 microns2
SRAM cell pitch:
4.1 x 4.8 microns
*Physical gate length
- 13 -
VERTICAL DIMENSIONS
Die thickness:
0.5 mm (20 mils)
Layers:
Passivation:
Metal 4 - aluminum:
- barrier:
- plugs:
Interlevel dielectric 3 - glass 3:
- glass 2:
- glass 1:
Metal 3 - cap:
- aluminum:
- plugs:
Interlevel dielectric 2 - glass 3:
- glass 2:
- glass 1:
Metal 2 - cap:
- aluminum:
- plugs:
Interlevel dielectric 1 - glass 3:
- glass 2:
- glass 1:
Metal 1 - cap:
- aluminum:
- plugs:
Pre-metal glass - glass 2:
- glass 1:
Polycide - silicide:
- poly:
Trench oxide:
N+ S/D:
P+ S/D:
N-well:
P-epi:
0.7 micron
1.7 micron
0.1 micron
0.9 micron (not including “stub”)
0.45 - 1.4 micron
0.4 micron
0.1 micron
0.05 micron (approximate)
0.75 micron
0.7 micron (not including “stub”)
0.4 - 1.3 micron
0.35 micron
0.1 micron
0.05 micron (approximate)
0.8 micron
0.6 micron (not including “stub”)
0.2 - 0.9 micron
0.25 micron
0.1 micron
0.05 micron (approximate)
0.55 micron
0.55 - 0.85 micron
0.13 micron
0.3 - 0.7 micron
0.07 micron (approximate)
0.27 micron
0.4 micron
0.2 micron
0.25 micron
0.8 micron (approximate)
1.6 micron
- 14 -
INDEX TO FIGURES
ASSEMBLY
Figures 1 - 8
DIE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION
Figures 9 - 11
PHYSICAL DIE STRUCTURES
Figures 12 - 40
COLOR DRAWING OF DIE STRUCTURE
Figure 41
MEMORY CELL
Figures 42 - 48
GENERAL CIRCUITRY
Figure 49
- ii -
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 1.3x
Mag. 1.3x
Mag. 1.2x
Figure 1. Package photographs and x-ray view of the Intel Pentium II Processor.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 1.25x
Mag. 3x
Figure 2. Cavity views of the package.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 30x
BONDING TIERS
GOLD PLATED LAND
Mag. 260x
GOLD WIRES
GOLD PLATED LAND
DOUBLE FOOTPRINT
Mag. 1000x
GOLD WIRE
Figure 3. SEM views of typical wirebonding. 60°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
ALUMINUM
BOND PAD
Mag. 410x
GOLD
WIRE
Mag. 500x, 60°
DIE COAT
DOUBLE FOOTPRINT
Mag. 1000x, 60°
PAD PUSHOUT
DIE COAT
Figure 4. Optical and SEM views illustrating bond pad pitch and typical bonds.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
BOND
PASSIVATION
Mag. 3500x
METAL 4 (BOND PAD)
METAL 4 (FROM PAD)
METAL 3
Mag. 9000x
METAL 2 (TO CIRCUITRY)
METAL 1
POLY GATE
PAD WINDOW CUTOUT
PASSIVATION
Mag. 10,000x
METAL 4 (BOND PAD)
Figure 5. SEM section views of the pad structure.
Intel Pentium II Processor
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
METAL 4 (FROM PAD)
METAL 3
METAL 2
POLY GATE
METAL 1
SHALLOW TRENCH OXIDE
Figure 6. SEM section views of an I/O structure. Mag. 6000x.
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
N+ S/D
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 80x
DIE ATTACH
BEVEL
Mag. 160x
DIE ATTACH
DIE SURFACE
BEVELED EDGE
Mag. 350x
Figure 7. SEM views of a die corner illustrating dicing and die attach. 60°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
DIE SURFACE
Mag. 800x
BEVELED EDGE
DIE SURFACE
Mag. 1600x
BEVEL
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
METAL 3
METAL2
METAL 1
N+
Figure 8. SEM section views of the edge seal structure.
Mag. 6500x
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Figure 9. Whole die photograph of the Intel Pentium II Processor. Mag 14x.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Figure 10. Die identification markings. Mag. 100x.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Figure 11. Optical views of die corners. Mag. 225x.
Intel Pentium II Processor
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
METAL 2
M3 PLUG
METAL 3
M2 PLUG
M1 PLUG
POLY GATES
METAL 1
Figure 12. SEM section view illustrating general device structure. Mag. 6500x.
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
N+ S/D
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
M4 PLUG
METAL 3
Mag. 8000x
METAL 2
METAL 1
M1 PLUG
N+
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
M4 PLUG
METAL 3
Mag. 8400x
METAL 2
POLY GATE
METAL 1
M1 PLUG
N+ S/D
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
METAL 3
M3 PLUG
M2 PLUG
Mag. 9000x
METAL 2
M1 PLUGS
TRENCH OXIDE
METAL 1
N+
Figure 12a. SEM section views illustrating general device structure.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 4
ILD 3
ILD 2
METAL 3
METAL 2
ILD 1
METAL 1
POLY GATE
M1 PLUGS
METAL 4
METAL 3
ILD 3
DELINEATION ARTIFACTS
METAL 2
M3 PLUGS
M2 PLUG
METAL 1
METAL 4
METAL 3
ILD 3
M3 PLUG
ILD 2
M2 PLUG
ILD 1
METAL 1
POLY
TRENCH OXIDE
Figure 13. Glass etch section views illustrating general structure. Mag. 9000x.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 2800x
Mag. 5700x
Figure 14. SEM views of general passivation coverage. 60°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
Mag. 10,000x
METAL 3
METAL 2
PASSIVATION
Mag. 13,000x
METAL 4
ILD 3
PASSIVATION
Mag. 26,000x
ALUMINUM 4
Ti BARRIER
Figure 15. SEM section views of metal 4 line profiles.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Figure 16. Topological SEM view of metal 4 patterning. Mag. 3700x, 0°.
Mag. 3700x
Mag. 7400x
Figure 17. SEM views of general metal 4 coverage. 50°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
Mag. 20,000x
M4 PLUG
ILD 3
METAL 3
“STUB”
PASSIVATION
METAL 4
M4 PLUGS
Mag. 15,000x
METAL 3
ALUMINUM 4
Ti BARRIER
W PLUG
VOIDS
“STUB”
METAL 3
Figure 18. SEM section views of metal 4-to-metal 3 vias.
Mag. 35,000x
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
VOIDS
M4 PLUGS
METAL 3
Mag. 25,000x
VOID
W PLUG
METAL 3
Mag. 35,000x
Figure 19. SEM section views of metal 4 plugs. 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
ILD 3
METAL 3
ILD 2
METAL 2
Mag. 20,000x
ILD 3
TiN CAP
DELINEATION ARTIFACT
ALUMINUM 3
Mag. 26,000x
Figure 20. SEM section views of metal 3 line profiles.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 3
VIAS (M3-M2)
Mag. 6000x
METAL 3
VIAS (M3-M2)
Mag. 8000x
Figure 21. Topological SEM views of metal 3 patterning. 0°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 9000x
METAL 3
Mag. 30,000x
W PLUG
METAL 2
TiN CAP
ALUMINUM 3
Mag. 34,000x
W PLUG
METAL 2
Figure 22. SEM views of metal 3 coverage. 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
VOIDS
METAL 2
M3 PLUGS
Mag. 27,000x
VOID
W PLUG
METAL 2
Mag. 35,000x
Figure 23. SEM views of metal 3 plugs. 50°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
VOID
VOID
METAL 3
Mag. 20,000x
M3 PLUGS
METAL 2
TiN CAP
ALUMINUM 3
VOID
Mag. 40,000x
W PLUG
METAL 2
“STUB”
METAL 3
Mag 30,000x
M3 PLUG
ILD 2
METAL 2
Figure 24. SEM section views of metal 3-to-metal 2 vias.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 3
ILD 2
METAL 2
Mag. 20,000x
ILD 2
TiN CAP
DELINEATION ARTIFACT
ALUMINUM 2
ILD 1
Mag. 26,000x
Figure 25. SEM section views of metal 2 line profiles.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 2
PLUG (M3-M2)
Mag. 7000x
METAL 2
VIA (M2-M1)
Mag. 8000x
Figure 26. Topological SEM views of metal 2 patterning. 0°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 12,500x
METAL 2
Mag. 26,000x
M2 PLUGS
METAL 1
TiN CAP
ALUMINUM 2
Mag. 35,000x
W PLUG
METAL 1
Figure 27. SEM views of general metal 2 coverage. 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 3
M3 PLUG
“STUB”
METAL 2
M2 PLUG
“STUB”
METAL 1
Mag. 22,000x
METAL 2
ILD 1
“STUB”
METAL 1
Mag. 35,000x
Figure 28. SEM section views of metal 2-to-metal 1 vias.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 1
ILD 1
PRE-METAL
DIELECTRIC
Mag. 26,000x
TiN CAP
ILD 1
ALUMINUM 1
Mag. 52,000x
Figure 29. SEM section views of metal 1 line profiles.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 1
PLUGS (M2-M1)
PLUG (M2-M1)
METAL 1
CONTACTS
Figure 30. Topological SEM views of metal 1 patterning. Mag. 7000x, 0°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 1
Mag. 9000x
Mag. 13,500x
Figure 31. SEM views of general metal 1 coverage. 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
M1
PLUG
POLY
M1
PLUG
Mag. 25,000x
W PLUG
POLY
W PLUG
DIFFUSION
Mag. 40,000x
Figure 32. SEM views of metal 1 plugs. 50°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
M3 PLUG
M2 PLUG
Mag. 13,000x
METAL 1
M1 PLUG
N+
POLY
M2 PLUG
METAL 1
Mag. 30,000x
M1 PLUG
POLY
TRENCH OXIDE
N+
ILD 1
METAL 1
Mag. 30,000x
PRE-METAL
DIELECTRIC
M1 PLUG
POLY
TRENCH OXIDE
N+
Figure 33. SEM section views of metal 1 contacts.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
POLY GATES
P+
Mag. 5000x
N+
POLY GATES
Mag. 6500x
N+
P+
Mag. 7000x
POLY
Figure 34. Topological SEM view of poly patterning. 0°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
POLY
Mag. 8400x
TRENCH
OXIDE
DIFFUSION
Mag. 10,000x
POLY
POLY GATE
Mag. 32,000x
POLY GATE
DIFFUSION
Figure 35. Perspective SEM views of poly coverage. 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 2
ILD 1
METAL 1
POLY GATES
M1 PLUG
Mag. 13,000x
N+ S/D
METAL 1
M1 PLUG
PRE-METAL
DIELECTRIC
Mag. 26,000x
POLY GATE
N+ S/D
POLY GATE
M1 PLUG
Mag. 52,000x
N+ S/D
GATE OXIDE
Figure 36. SEM section views of N-channel transistors.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
POLY GATE
P+ S/D
GATE OXIDE
Ti SILICIDE
NITRIDE
SIDEWALL
SPACER
POLY
Ti SALICIDE
glass etch
Figure 37. SEM section views of P-channel transistors. Mag. 52,000x.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 2
M1 PLUG
METAL 1
Mag. 13,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
N+ S/D
METAL 1
Mag. 26,000x
M1
PLUG
POLY
TRENCH OXIDE
N+ S/D
M1 PLUG
POLY
Mag. 52,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
N+ S/D
GATE OXIDE
Figure 38. SEM section view of unique transistor structure.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
SUBSTRATE
(DIFFUSION)
TRENCH
OXIDE
Mag. 10,000x, 55°
Mag. 15,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
DIFFUSIONS
Mag. 30,000x
N+ DIFFUSION
TRENCH OXIDE
Figure 39. SEM views illustrating anti-dishing patterns.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
POLY
Mag. 50,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
GATE OXIDE
POLY
Mag. 50,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
GATE OXIDE
Mag. 800x
P-EPI
N-WELL
P SUBSTRATE
Figure 40. Section views illustrating trench oxide and well structure.
INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 1
PRE-METAL GLASS
INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 3
METAL 4
PASSIVATION
PLUG
4
Intel Pentium II Processor
INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC 2
METAL 3
PLUG
3
METAL 2
PLUG
2
METAL 1
,,,,,,,,
N-WELL
P-WELL
PLUG 1
SILICIDE
N+ S/D
P+ S/D
SILICIDE
P SUBSTRATE
Orange = Nitride, Blue = Metal, Yellow = Oxide, Green = Poly,
Red = Diffusion, and Gray = Substrate
Figure 41. Color cross section drawing illustrating device structure.
P-EPI
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
TRENCH OXIDE
POLY
“PIGGYBACK” CONNECTION
VCC
GND
VCC
GND
Intel Pentium II Processor
“PIGGYBACK” WORD LINE
BIT LINE
BIT LINE
metal 3
metal 2
VCC
“PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES
metal 1
POLY
WORD
LINES
poly
Figure 42. Topological SEM views of Cache SRAM cells illustrating “piggyback” word line
connections. Mag. 6000x, 0°.
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
BIT LINE
CONTACTS
GND
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
GND
VCC
metal 1
P-WELL
N-WELL
P-WELL
123 123 123
poly
Figure 43. Topological SEM views of the Cache SRAM array. Mag. 5000x, 0°.
“PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES
GND
BIT LINE
Intel Pentium II Processor
GND
BIT LINE
VCC
metal 3
metal 2
POLY WORD LINES
VCC
metal 1
poly
Figure 44. Perspective SEM views of the Cache SRAM array. Mag. 7400x, 55°.
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
GND
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
BIT
CONTACTS
GND
VCC
metal 1
POLY WORD LINE
N-CHANNEL
DEVICES
P-CHANNEL
DEVICES
delayered
Figure 45. Detail SEM views of Cache SRAM cells. Mag. 14,000x, 55°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
BIT
metal 1
VCC
GND
BIT
BIT
1
3
5
6
BIT
delayered
VCC
GND
GND
4
2
WORD
3
BIT
4
2
1
5
BIT
6
Figure 46. Topological SEM views and schematic of a Cache SRAM cell. Mag. 15,000x, 0°.
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 4
METAL 3
Mag. 9000x
POLY WORD LINES
METAL 1
N+ S/D
BIT LINE CONTACT
Mag. 13,000x
METAL 1
P+
N+ S/D
POLY SELECT GATE
M1 PLUG
Mag. 52,000x
N+ S/D
N+ S/D
GATE OXIDE
Figure 47. SEM section views of a Cache SRAM cell (perpendicular to word lines).
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
METAL 4
METAL 3
Mag. 9000x
METAL 2
POLY
WORD
LINES
POLY
METAL 2
Mag. 15,000x
POLY WORD LINES
POLY
TRENCH OXIDE
TRENCH OXIDE
METAL 1
POLY WORD
LINE
Mag. 26,000x
TRENCH OXIDE
N-CHANNEL
DEVICES
P-CHANNEL
DEVICES
Figure 48. SEM section views of a Cache SRAM cell (parallel to storage and pull-up
transistors).
Intel Pentium II Processor
Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
Mag. 410x
NON-CONNECTED
VIAS
Mag. 1015x
Figure 49. Optical views of general circuit layout.
Download