INVERTER WITH MULTIPLE MPP TRACKERS: REQUIREMENTS AND
STATE OF THE ART SOLUTIONS
ABSTRACT: For most people inverters with multiple MPP Trackers (MPPT) seem to be more flexible
compared to inverters with a single MPPT. At first glance this assumption appears to be correct, however,
the devil is in the detail. The purpose of this project is to show that not every inverter with multiple MPPT’s is
automatically usable for each application. There are high requirements on such an inverter which must be
fulfilled to be as flexible as always assumed.
1
Introduction
Inverters with multiple MPP Trackers should be usable for different applications. Firstly, perfect system
configuration must be possible. That means each number of PV modules – which results from different system
sizes – must be configurable. Secondly, to minimize energy losses, further applications are: shaded PV
systems and PV systems with different module orientation. These are in principle the main applications for
inverters with multiple MPP Trackers and the crucial question is: “Are inverters with multiple MPP Trackers
suitable for all of these applications”?
2
Multistring
The requirements of an inverter with two MPP Trackers are explained in the following text. Figure 1 indicates a
simplified block diagram: each string has its own DC/DC converter with a separate MPPT for operating the
respective string or string bundle at its maximum power.
=
=
MPPT
=
=
~
MPPT
=
Figure 1: Block diagram of an inverter with two MPPT’s
The key factor for such an inverter to be useful for the mentioned applications in chapter 1 is the DC power
capability of each MPPT. As shown in Figure 2, the DC power capability on the main input (MPPT1) must be
100% over an appropriate MPP voltage range – the same as it is for a normal string inverter. If the maximum
DC power capability on MPPT1 would be lower than 100% then the installer could be forced to mix up PV
modules on the second input (MPPT2) which are not exposed to the same conditions. For example, a maximum
provided DC power capability of 70% on MPPT1 in a PV system in which 10% of PV modules are shaded would
result in energy losses. However, that should be originally minimized with an inverter with two MPP Trackers.
04/2013
1/7
DC power capability – MPPT1
Figure 2: Required DC power capability of MPPT1
As can be seen in Figure 3, for MPPT2 a maximum DC power capability of 50% is sufficient – also in that case
the MPP voltage range must be wide enough. 50% DC power capability is required, for example, in an
East/West orientated PV system with a 1:1 power separation - 50% DC power on the east roof and 50% DC
power on the west roof.
DC power capability – MPPT2
Figure 3: Required DC power capability of MPPT2
Additionally, for both MPP Trackers an extended MPP voltage range with decreasing DC power capability is
required to get more flexibility in system configuration and a better performance for shaded systems or systems
with different module orientation. With such a design the inverter would be useful for each application but has
the disadvantage of high costs due to oversizing.
3
State of the Art Solutions
First of all, there are some inverters with multiple MPPT’s available on the market, which closely meet the
requirements explained in the previous chapter. Those inverters have in principle no significant problems
concerning the applications mentioned in chapter 1. But there are also some inverters with multiple MPPT’s
currently available which do not fulfil the requirements.
An example of an inverter with two MPPT’s is shown in Figure 4. As can be seen, both MPP Trackers - MPPT1
and MPPT2 - have the same DC power capability of 58% over a certain MPP voltage range. This means that
the requirements on the inverters’ DC power capability aren’t fulfilled. 58% is in fact sufficient for MPPT2 but
insufficient for MPPT1. What consequences this has is explained later in chapter 4 and chapter 5. Moreover,
04/2013
2/7
the minimal MPP voltage (VMPP/MIN) is specified at a lower DC power capability than PMAX which can cause
misunderstanding or wrong VMPP calculations. Therefore VMPP/MIN should be specified at PMAX as the arrow
shows in Figure 4.
DC power capability – MPPT1, MPPT2
Figure 4: DC power capability of MPPT1 and MPPT2 of an inverter with two MPPT’s
In comparison, in Figure 5 the required DC power capability of MPPT1 (100%) over an appropriate input voltage
range is shown. As can be seen, the difference between the required DC power capability and the actual one is
significant.
DC power capability – MPPT1
Figure 5: Required DC power capability of MPPT1 with the appropriate MPP voltage range compared to the
provided DC power capability
Additional to that example, Table I shows some more inverters with two MPP Trackers that are available on the
market. As can be seen, all four inverters have the same DC power capability on both inputs. The minimum
requirement of 50% DC power capability on MPPT2 is fulfilled by every inverter. However, MPPT1 is always
undersized which have consequences regarding the mentioned applications: perfect system configuration,
shaded or different orientated PV system respectively. Furthermore, MPPT2 is mainly oversized with the
exception of inverter D.
04/2013
3/7
Table I: Examples of inverters with two MPPT’s - Percentage of the maximum DC power capability of each
MPPT
Inverter
A
B
C
D
4
M PPT1
62%
58%
55%
50%
M PPT2
62%
58%
55%
50%
Perfect System Configuration
For perfect system configuration a maximal DC power capability of 67% on the main input (MPPT1) and 50%
on the second input (MPPT2) is at least necessary. These are the minimum requirements for the installation of
even and uneven strings to the inverter. 67% on MPPT1 is demanded for the installation of three strings – two
strings on MPPT1 and one string on MPPT2. In the case of even strings the maximum DC power capability
necessary on MPPT2 is 50%. Moreover, parallel operation of MPPT1 and MPPT2 must be possible for the
installation of 1-string PV systems.
As shown in Table I, the required 67% DC power capability cannot be achieved by any inverter which results in
restrictions concerning the system configuration. First of all, there are restrictions with standard crystalline PV
modules – that means that modules with common 5- and 6-inch solar cells are partly not configurable. And
secondly, the system design with three strings is mainly not possible – as mentioned above, for three strings a
maximal DC power capability of 67% on any input is required. A comparison between an inverter with two
MPPT’s (inverter B – see chapter 3, Table I) and an inverter with a single MPPT is shown in Table II.
In that example the system configurations were carried out with a standard crystalline PV module with an MPP
current of 7.48A at STC conditions. Both inverters had the same nominal AC power of 10kW and since the
installation of the PV modules shall be flexible a system dimensioning from -5% to +20% with regard to PDC/MAX
(PDC/MAX = PAC/Efficiency of the inverter) was also considered – from the system dimensioning, results the
different number of PV modules.
As can be seen, the number of possible system configurations using the inverter with two MPPT’s does not
meet the expectations. For both inverter types five different number of PV modules can be installed. Hence,
there is no advantage for the inverter with two MPPT’s regarding system configuration compared to the inverter
with a single MPPT. At that point it should also be noted that the inverter with two MPPT’s is just partly
applicable for the other applications, in fact in three cases only. This will be handled in greater detail in the next
chapter.
Table II: Comparison between the inverter with two MPPT’s – that maximum DC power capability is 58% for
each MPP Tracker - and the inverter with a single MPPT regarding system configuration. Five numbers of PV
modules can be installed with each inverter. Separated strings can be installed to the inverter with two MPPT’s
with just three numbers of PV modules. The number of strings is higher at the inverter with a single MPPT due
to higher open circuit voltage.
04/2013
4/7
System dimensioning
(# PV modules)
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
System dimensioning
(# PV modules)
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Inverter B with two MPPT's
2x23 // 1x23 + 1x23 // 1x24 + 1x22
1x24 + 1x23
2x24 // 3x16 // 1x24 + 1x24
3x17
3x18
Inverter with a single MPPT
4x12
5x10
4x13
5x11
4x14
In summary it can be concluded, that an inverter with a single MPP Tracker and with a well suited MPP voltage
range has no disadvantages compared to an inverter with two MPPT’s which DC power capabilities do not meet
the explained requirements.
5
PV-Systems and PV-Systems with different Module Orientation
Further applications for inverters with multiple MPPT’s are shaded PV systems and PV systems with differing
module orientation. The requirements to be useful for these applications are even higher compared to those
explained in the previous chapter. The DC power capability on MPPT1 must be 100% - on MPPT2 50% DC
power capability is adequate.
All four inverters shown in Table I (see chapter 3) do not fulfil the requirements. Therefore these inverters can
be used only to a limited extent for shaded PV systems or systems with differing orientations. An example with
inverter C is shown in Table III.
The following factors were considered to calculate possible system configurations: IMPP/STC of the PV module =
8.5A; AC power of the inverter = 10kW; system dimensioning from -5% to +15% with regard to PDC/MAX (PDC/MAX
= PAC/Efficiency of the inverter).
As can be seen, four different numbers of PV modules can be installed. Since MPPT1 is undersized, the
following restrictions are obvious concerning shaded PV systems and different orientated PV systems: Firstly,
the usage of the inverter in a shaded PV system or PV systems with different module orientation is only
possible in just two cases - with 46 PV modules and with 48 PV modules. Secondly, the inverter with two
MPPT’s is not as flexible as expected because a 3:1, 3:2 or 4:1 string separation is not possible. Moreover, with
the shown system design for 46 PV modules and 48 PV modules mismatching losses can occur if just one
string or a few PV modules are shaded or of differing orientation.
04/2013
5/7
Table III: Possible system configurations using inverter C with two MPPT’s
System dimensioning
(# PV modules)
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
Inverter C with two MPPT's
2x12 + 2x11
4x12 // 2x12 + 2x12
5x10
5x11
Consequently, the last two chapters have shown that not every inverter with two MPP Trackers is automatically
useful for every application as is always assumed.
In comparison, in Table IV the possible system configurations with a 10kW AC inverter with a single MPPT are
shown – the factors used for the system configurations were similar to those before. As can be seen, the
numbers of PV modules which can be installed are similar compared to the inverter with two MPPT’s. Of course,
a string separation is not possible but this is not always necessary. The installation of inverters with single MPP
Tracker in east-west orientated PV systems is a good option and can provide an attractive alternative compared
to inverters with multiple MPPT’s [1][2].
Table IV: Possible system configurations with an inverter with single MPPT
System dimensioning
(# PV modules)
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
6
Inverter with a single MPPT
4x12
5x10
4x13
5x11
Conclusion
The findings of several analyses of inverters with multiple MPP Trackers are briefly summarized in the following
paragraphs.
Investigated state of the art solutions have shown that inverters with multiple MPP Trackers have restrictions
regarding:
/ Perfect system configuration
/ Shaded PV systems
/ PV systems with different module orientations
04/2013
6/7
Inverters with a single MPPT have often no disadvantages regarding system configuration compared to
inverters with multiple MPPT’s.
Inverters with multiple MPP Trackers must fulfil high requirements.
Misleading datasheet information could lead to poor system configurations.
In conclusion, many inverters with multiple MPPT’s do not keep their promises regarding system configuration,
shaded PV systems and PV systems with different module orientations.
7
Reference
/ [1] Efficient East-West orientated PV Systems with one MPP-Tracker, 25th European Photovoltaic Solar
Energy Conference, Spain, 2010
/ [2] Auslegung von PV-Anlagen im Polystring-Betrieb –Eigenverbrauchsoptimierung vs. Mismatch-Verlust, 27.
Symposium Photovoltaische Solarenergie, Bad Staffelstein, 2012
Characters (no spaces): 9,894
Words: 1,930
Enquiries:
Editor: Dietmar Staudacher, +43 (664) 8502427, staudacher.dietmar@fronius.com, Froniusplatz 1, 4600 Wels,
Austria.
Trade press: Andrea Schartner, +43 (664) 88536765, schartner.andrea@fronius.com, Froniusplatz 1, 4600
Wels, Austria.
04/2013
7/7